政治演讲★

政治演讲★
第一篇：政治演讲
演讲稿的种类：
演讲按不同的分类标准，可以分成很多种类型，譬如领导人演讲、竞赛性演讲、论辨性演讲、竞选演讲、就职演说等。

我们从内容性质的不同，把演讲稿分为以下几种类型：
1、政治鼓动类。

是指政治家或代表某一权力机构的要员阐述政治主张和见解的演讲稿。

各级领导的施政演说，新当选的领导人的就职演说，政治家的竞选演说等等，都属于这一类型。

著名的范例有《林肯在葛底斯堡的演讲》、《丘吉尔在美国圣诞节的即兴演讲》以及马丁．路德．金的《我有一个梦》等。

◆政治类演讲稿有三大特点：
一是话题的政治性。

这类演讲涉及的往往是重大的政治问题，关系到国家、政党、民族以及改革、和平与进步等。

演讲者要表明自己的政治倾向，宣传自己的政治观点，力求正确把握历史的发展方向。

二是内容的鼓动性。

这类演讲是为一定的政治目的服务的，通过演讲，让听众了解自己的施政纲领或政治观点，从而获得理解和支持，这是最基本的演讲目的。

因此这类演讲，都要具备强烈的鼓动性、感召力和说服力。

三是严谨的逻辑性。

政治鼓动类的演讲稿，在提出问题、分析问题、解决问题的过程中，要显示出无懈可击的逻辑力量，只有这样才能使听众口服心服，才能赢得听众的理解和支持。

Ⅰ摘要体裁学家夏尔·巴依认为“说话事实会让人联想起它最常用的和用得最自然的阶级和场所，即它会发生一种联想下场”，“仿佛任何表达事实城市带上必然的场所和阶级特有的气息。

”是以说话是一种“社会象征事实”。

巴依所说的说话的“联想下场”就是说话的
语体色彩。

也就是说，每个阶级所使用的说话都被打上了该阶级的烙印。

反过来说，应用中的说话能使我们联想到该种说话使用者的社会阶级、职业特征以及措辞的对象和场所。

本文首要研究政治演说体的语体色彩，为声名这一问题将拔取戴高乐的两篇经典的演说作为样本。

关头词：目的性；传染力
一政治演说体的特征：
政治演说体是一种非凡的说话，它需要演说者口头表达，但并不属于白话体，而是更倾向于讲究语体。

尽管政治演说有多种功用，但仍是存在一些配合特征，体味了这些特征将有助于我们剖析其语体色彩。

第一，政治演说有着特定的历史布景。

因为政治演说者凡是都是国家的翘楚人物，掌管国家年夜权，凡是揭晓演说的时刻与某种重年夜的历史事务相联系，剖析一篇演说词，首先要弄清楚它揭晓的时代布景以及相关的历史事务。

本文所选择的两篇文章都出自于戴高乐，但时代布景截然分歧。

其中一篇揭晓于1940年二战时代。

那时的法国面临着亡国的危险，法国年夜陆已经被纳粹德国所占领，戴高乐和一些抵当派逃亡到英国向法国人平易近揭晓演说，号召人们团结起来配合匹敌德国纳粹。

此外一篇写于1969年，法国对戴高乐提出的全国地域化和更始参议院的方案进行全平易近公决，此次表决现实上是磨练法国人平易近在1968年蒲月风暴之后是否对他信赖的试金石。

功效未获经由过程，他于次日辞去总统职务。

本篇讲话揭晓于国平易近投票前夜。

第二，政治演说有明晰的政治目的，演说者等候着引起普遍的撑持。

在国家求助紧急时刻，戴高乐的使命是唤起公众，给人平易近以必胜的但愿和战斗的勇气。

而第二篇演说揭晓的时代布景完全分歧，关系到国家由谁率领，关系到戴高乐是否还享有人平易近的信赖，演说的目的是唤起人平易近对他的尊敬，指出国平易近的选择将关系到法国的命运。

第三，政治演说具有强烈的传染力。

为了达到演说者的目的，演
说词应具有相当的文采以此打悦耳众并获得认可和撑持。

二政治演说体的语体色彩：
一般说来，政治演说体具有以下一些语体特征：
第一，出色的开篇。

为了从一路头就给听众留下深刻的印象，演讲词尤其要讲究“凤头”。

可以使用的体例
多种多样，如疑问句式引起读者乐趣，类比手法层层推进，活跃描画再现事务等等。

本文所选两篇均采用直接贴题法，第一篇开首就指出，抵当政府已经成立，救国有望，起到振奋人心的浸染。

第二篇开篇就提到公众的抉择美乎法国的命运，使空气马上严厉起来，让每一个听众都自觉责任重年夜，不成轻率。

开宗明义的体例有助于听众直接进入主题介入思虑，从始至终都随从追随着作者的思绪。

出格是在重年夜的历史时刻，听众急于知道抉择妄想者的立场，或者是危机的场所，演说者需要直接剖明立场。

但不管哪一种体例，开篇都要出色。

第二，词汇的选择。

为了增强演说的下场，以达到传染听众获取撑持的目的，政治演说体出格正视词汇的选择。

演说体分歧于白话，在词汇的选择上，多使用书面语，以及具有激情色彩的词语。

例如，第一篇中“submerg e s”“e craser”“foudroy e s”这些词语切确而形象的默示了作者的立场和激情，使文章显得有文采，而且增强了传染力。

也就是说，听众不会知足于毫无文采的演说，演说者不能干巴巴的剖明自己的不雅概念，而是操作有限的篇幅传染人，只有恰如其分地选择词语才能尽可能切确的表达出作者的设法。

第三，丰硕的旬式。

为了达到引起共识的下场，政治演说还要在句式上做文章。

凡是一篇演说会用到良多若干好多种句式。

一再；在演说中最简单有用的体例就是经由过程一再达到强调的目的。

举例来看：(1)“Ce sont les chars，les avlons．la tacbque des Allemands...Ce sont les chars，les avions，la tactique des Allemands…”(2)“Car la France n’est pas seulel Elle n’ est pas seule!Elle n’est pas seule!”以上两例是具有典型意义的两种一再。

第一例是头语一再，经由过程个体字词的改动使语义递增，层层递进；
第二例是完全一再，同样的内容一再三次，以增强语气，使人印象深女4。

这种用法普遍用于演说体。

排比旬：可以说这是最适合于演说体的一种句式。

既搜罗真正意义上的句子的排用，也搜罗句子的一部门如名词、形容词、动词的排用。

凡是，排比句加倍振奋人心，更使人热血沸腾。

有默示力的短句与头头是道的长句：在演说词中长短句的选摘要按照演说的目的和通篇的意境来抉择。

有时辰可以使用一个短句增强默示力，有时辰甚至是一个词。

例如第一篇中，在对思疑者的疑问进行否按时，作者只用了一个词“Non”这里一个词的默示力胜过千言万语，精练有力。

这篇演说作者年夜部门使用短句，原因是那时的情形紧迫，人平易近巴望听到强有力的声音，这时使用短句轻易造成一种气焰，鼓舞人心。

第二篇中作者普遍使用长句，原因是重在说理，言之有理才能获得公众的撑持，而且长句轻易形成一种严厉的空气，合适作者的目的，即引起国平易近的正视和思虑。

第四，时态的使用。

演说体因为是以口头表达听众听懂为目的，是以不会用到简单曩昔时和虚拟式未完成曩昔时，分袂用复合曩昔时和虚拟式曩昔时来庖代。

第五，注重音韵。

演说现实上就是说，所以演说词要琅琅上口，为达到这样的目的就必需注重音韵。

如第二篇中有一系列的半谐音：“mandat，S e nat；cr e ation．r e gion，revolution…”；三节奏，如“cette transformati on sociale，morale，humaine”音韵使得整篇演说节奏光鲜，语调铿锵，富有鼓舞性。

第六，条理清楚。

政治演说体要考虑到谋篇结构的问题，要做到结构整洁条理清楚。

严谨的结构，分明的条理是政治演说至关主要的一条尺度。

第七，结尾有力。

政治演说体要求结尾有力，如同交响乐的最后一章，要给人留下深刻的震撼力，或使人动情，或发人深思，或剖明心迹。

第一篇作者的结尾短短一句话剖清楚明了他将要继续战斗的决心，对听众而言耳边似乎响起了战斗的军号，具有强烈的传染力。

第二篇中作者先是带着听众重温了历史，从头唤起了人们对英雄的回忆，
之后又一次强调了作者一再声明的：“人平易近的抉择关系到整个法兰西的命运”并要求人们稳重。

演说体的结尾凡是斗劲简短，原因是简短的句子轻易记忆，听众会在心里不竭回响，达到“绕梁三日”的最佳下场，以实现演说者的目的。

三结语：
政治演说是一种非凡的应用语体，把握了其体裁色彩才能真正理解这类文章，而且对翻译也年夜有裨益。

其非凡性默示在：演说一方面要具有白话的某些特点，如公共化，不要过于“咬文嚼字”让听众“如坠云雾”，另一方面，又要求表达要有文采，演说者要有雄辩之才。

恰是在这一要求之下，才发生了它怪异的语体色彩。

第二篇：政治演讲文体
Stylistic features of political speech
Abstract:
Different literary forms have different stylistic features.As a special style, the political speech is widely used in various fields of the society with its
special features.Next, I am going to talk about its stylistic features at lexical level, syntactical level and figures of speech by giving examples of Gettysburg Address delivered by Abraham Lincoln.Key words:
stylistic features
political speech
Political speech is a very important form of public speech.It refers to a kind of speech that is used to clarify the speaker’s position, viewpoint and some policies in both domestic and foreign affairs in order to realize some certain political objectives.Owing to its magnificent importance in political life, it is extensively used in different fields of the society.And it has formed its special stylistic features.For example, the language is formal and solemn.With the use of different figures of speech,
the whole speech is vivid and lively.So it is essential to know something about the stylistic features of political speeches.Stylistic features at lexical level
Word is a unit of language that represents a concept which can be expressively communicated with meaning.It is smaller than a sentence and also the basic cell to form a speech.Political speech is used to achieve some political objectives, so the words used in it are always complicated, accurate, and formal.In Gettysburg Address, there are “consecrate”, “hallow”, “detract” “perish” etc, which make the speech formal and serious.Besides, political speech is always inspiring and persuasive.Thus, the words used must have such powers.In Gettysburg Address, President Lincoln does not use second-person pronouns.Instead, he uses many first-person pronouns which are in their plural forms, such as “our fathers”, “we are engaged in…” “We are met…” “It is for us the living…” “It is rather for us…” The uses of “WE” and “US” here show that the speaker seems to stand with the audiences on the same side.It will narrow down the gap between them and make the speech more intimate and more acceptable.What is more, the uses of modal verbs are also noticeable.A modal verb is a type of auxiliary verb that is used to indicate modality—that is likelihood, ability, permission, and obligation.In Gettysburg Address, six modal verbs are used—can, might, should, cannot, will and shall.In the sentence “it is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this”, “should” indicate people’s obligation to finish the work the mart yrs have left.In the sentence “but, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate—we cannot not consecrate—we cannot hallow—this ground”, three “cannot” are used.It stresses the martyrs’ contribution to the country is too great to
be surpassed.And in the last sent ence “…shall not perish from …” “shall” here shows Lincoln’s great determination to build a better country and will not let the soldiers die in vain.In a word, modal verbs play an important role in emphasizing.Stylistic features at syntactical level
From the perspective of sentence structure, political speeches are inclined to use long sentences to express complicated relations.In return, it can make the speech more serious and formal.However, short sentences are also necessary.Only when long and short sentences are combined properly, can a speech play a biggest role.In Gettysburg Address, we can see variation of structure and length.The longest sentence has 83 words while the shortest only has 10 words.By doing this, President Lincoln gives prominence to the key points and makes the speech more vivid.Political speeches are very formal.So compound sentences are frequently used, which can make the speech much more informative and more functional.Take a sentence in Gettysburg Address as example: “It is for us t he living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.” “which they who fought…” functions as an attributive clause.It makes information clear and the speech more complicated.Political speeches are made to realize different political purposes.So, different sentence types, like declarative sentence, question, exclamatory sentence, imperative sentence, are used.Declarative sentence expresses an objective idea.It gives people an impression of formality and can make the text more believable.Question is undoubtedly a good choice when the speaker wants to emphasis his point.Imperative sentences are the most persuasive and inspiring one.President Lincoln just uses
declarative sentence to show seriousness in his speech.Figures of speech
A figure of speech is the use of a word or a phrase, which transcends its literal interpretation.It often provides emphasis, freshness of expression, or clarity.As I have mentioned before, the object of a political speech is to illustrate, convince and persuade the audience that what the speaker is saying and representing so that the audience can support them.So, to realize this object effectively, speakers always use proper figures of speech in their political speeches.Next I am going to talk about major figures of speech from three aspects used in political speeches: 1: Phonetic Stylistic Devices
It can be divided into onomatopoeia, alliteration and assonance, among which the major used one is alliteration.Alliteration can enhance the sense of rhythm and improve the efficiency of expression.By using this, the audience will have a deep impression on the speech.In Gettysburg Address, President Lincoln uses much alliteration, such as “four score and seven years” “a new nation” “our poor power”.2: Semantic Rhetoric Semantic rhetoric can be divided into simile, metaphor, personification, metonymy, synecdoche, transferred epithet, hyperbole, pun etc.Metaphor is frequently used in political speeches.A metaphor describes a subject by asserting that it is, on some point of comparison, the same as another otherwise unrelated object.It can change abstract things into specific ones and make the language more vivid and easy to understand.In Gettysburg Address, President Lincoln uses “conceived” to compare a country to a child.The establishment of the country is just the birth of a child.3: Syntactical Stylistic Devices It includes parallelism, antithesis, rhetorical question, irony, climax and
parody.Parallelism refers to a structural arrangement of words, clause, sentence, paragraphs and even parts of the text.It can emphasis the mood, highlight the stressed content, and enhance the sense of language.Antithesis is used when two opposites are introduced in the same sentence, for contrasting effect.In political speeches, speakers use this rhetorical device combined with others to show strong persuasion, expression and appeal.In Gettysburg Address, there are examples, like “living and dead” “add or detract” “the world will little note nor long remember what we said here, but it can never forget what we did here.” Rhetorical question is also used in political speeches.It is a figure of speech in the form of a question that is asked in order to make a point.The question, a rhetorical device, is posed not to elicit a specific answer, but rather to encourage the listener to consider a message or ed in a political speech, it can impel the audience to have a deep thought and give them a lasting impression.From the analysis above, we can draw a conclusion of the stylistic features of political speeches.At lexical level, the words used are always formal and serious.Pronouns and modal verbs are also made full advantage of.At syntactical level, long and short sentences are both used in different degrees.Besides, compound sentences and various sentence types, like declarative sentence, question, are also applied in political speeches to make it more inspiring and motivating.Then, as to figures of speech, various types are adopted to make the speech more vivid and lively so that the audience can accept it easily.Political speeches play a great part of our life.So it is necessary for us to know about its stylistic features.In the future, if we are going to give a political speech, we will know exactly what we are going to say and how to say it effectively.
第三篇：政治演讲概念隐喻
成都信息工程学院银杏酒店管理学院本科毕业论文
An Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors in Obama’s Political Speeches
Abstract: This article focuses on the application of Conceptual Metaphors in Obama’s Polit ical Speeches.Pointing out the significant role Conceptual Metaphors played in Obama’s Political Speeches.The aims of this paper are 1)to introduce the relationship between Conceptual Metaphors and Political Speeches;2)elaborate the definition and classification of Conceptual Metaphors on the basis of Lakoff and Johnson’s great work Metaphors We Live By;3)Take Obama’s Political Speeches as background information, analyze the Conceptual Metaphors used and relevant functions in his Political Speeches.this research aims to study the metaphors in political speeches systematically and reveal how metaphors work in the political world.At the same time, through the analysis of metaphors, this research can help people know the American politics and understand its culture.Key words: Political Speeches;Conceptual Metaphors;Application
奥巴马政治演讲的概念隐喻分析
摘要:本文着重研究了概念隐喻在奥巴马政治演讲中的使用,指出概念隐喻在奥巴马的政治演讲中发挥的重要角色,本文旨在:1)简要介绍概念隐喻与政治演讲之间的关系;2)根据莱考夫和约翰逊合著的《我们赖以生存的隐喻》,来阐述概念隐喻的定义、分类;3)以奥巴马的政治演讲作为背景材料,分析其中所使用的概念隐喻,以及这些隐喻对其演讲的辅助作用.本文试图对所选语料中的隐喻进行系统研究,揭示隐喻在政治演讲语篇中的特殊作用,并且通过分析隐喻,帮助人们了解美国的政治和文化.关键词:政治演讲；概念隐喻；应用
成都信息工程学院银杏酒店管理学院本科毕业论文
Contents
成都信息工程学院银杏酒店管理学院本科毕业论文
1.Introduction Metaphor has always been the hot topic which gets much attention from linguists, it has been studied as long as 2000 years.In traditional metaphor theories, metaphor was only regarded as a kind of rhetorical devices, but with the springing of cognitive linguistics, a growing number of scholars begin to study this linguistic phenomenon.from the point of keoff and Johnson put forward the theory of conceptual metaphor theory the first time, they think A metaphor(or figurative comparison)in which one idea(or conceptual domain)is understood in terms of another, and metaphor is the cognitive tool.The domestic scholar 束定芳 had done some researches on the psychology and language caused by metaphor, and proposed the goal of building modern science of metaphor, she also elaborate the study objectives and ways of modern science of metaphor.The purposes of this paper are to analyze the conceptual metaphors used in political speeches, and reveal the significant functions of conceptual metaphors in political speeches..The conceptual metaphor theory
2.1.The Definition of conceptual metaphor theory In cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor, or cognitive metaphor, refers to the understanding of one idea, or conceptual domain, in terms of another “In cognitive linguistics, the conceptual domain from which we draw metaphorical expressions to understand another conceptual domain is known as the source domain.The conceptual domain that is understood in this way is the target domain.Thus the source domain of the journey is commonly used to explain the target domain of life”.(Lakeoff and Johnson,1980,p.1).2.2 The Classification of conceptual metaphor
By studying , it can be found that conceptual metaphors occupy a high frequency in political speeches.Generally speaking, in order to gain support and understanding from public, and fulfill their political goals, the statesmen will instill their political views into the listeners and make them more acceptable and understandable with the help of conceptual keoff divided conceptual metaphors into three categories: orientational metaphor;成都信息工程学院银杏酒店管理学院本科毕业论文
ontological metaphor;and structural metaphor.The following paragraphs will analyze these three types of conceptual metaphors.2.2.1 Orientational metaphor Orientatinal metaphor refers to “a metaphor that most of them have to do with spatial orientation like up and down, in and out, front and back, on and off, deep and shallow”.(Lakeoff and Johnson, 1980, p.140).“They organize a whole system of concepts with respect to one another.”(Lakoff and Johnson, 1980, p.15).The most important thing in this regard is “our direct physical experiences of living on Earth”(Brown 38).And this experience develops into part of ways that we conceive and conceptualize the physical world.For examples:(1)She is feeling up today.(2)Keep your voice down, please.2.2.2 Ontological metaphor
Ontological me taphor is “a type of metaphor in which something concrete is projected onto something abstract”(Lakeoff and Johnson,1980,p.20).Structural metaphor is the metaphor between abstract and concrete concepts;Ontological metaphor is the metaphor between abstract things and entities or substances.The abstract things include behaviors, ideas, feelings and so on.Most of the ontological metaphors are formulated on the basis of experience
of physical objects, especially our own bodies.Naturally, part of the human body becomes the source to describe a target object.Once we can identify our experiences as entities or substances or even our own body, we can refer to them, categorize them, group them, and quantify them and, by this means, reason about them.The sub-categories of the ontological metaphor consist of the human being metaphor and the liquid metaphor, Here are some examples:(1)The economy are very sick now.(2)For as much as government can do and can not do……….In above examples, the abstract things “economy” and “government” are all used metaphorically as person, because they can feel sick and do the things.2.2.3 Structural metaphor Structural metaphors grounded in systematic correlations within our experiences.(Lakeoff and Johnson,1980,p.61).Structural metaphor mea ns “a metaphorical system in which one 成都信息工程学院银杏酒店管理学院本科毕业论文
complex concept(typically abstract)is presented in terms of some other(usually more concrete)concept”(Lakeoff and Johnson,1980,p.38).The words can be used to describe the abstract concepts are also available for the complex ones.For example, in the sentences “time is money”, all the words suitable to represent “money” are also can be apply to “time”.People get to know the abstract concept “time” through the concrete concept “money”.Moreover, it d erives a number expressions of daily languages, such as “you’re wasting my time”;“I have no time to spare”.3.The application of conceptual metaphor in Obama’s political speeches Barack, Obama is the first African-American president in American history, his distinguished speaking skills has been recognized by the world.Conceptual metaphors are also widely
used in his political speeches , the following part will discuss the application of conceptual metaphors and the significant roles these metaphors played in his political sppeches.3.1 The application of orientational metaphor The orientational metaphors in Obama’s political speeches are concluded as following:(1)……I stand here today humbled by the task before us……(2)……and roll back the specter of warming planet……
Orientatinal metaphors are utilized in the two examples, the former uses “before”
to inspire the public’s hope to the future;the later uses “back” to show his determination to deal with the difficulties.(3)……rising tides of prosperity……
(4)……we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off(5)(6)In these two sentences, “rising” signify the past strong and prosperous, “up” signify the citizens must bestir themselves to fight the risk and revitalize the America economy.3.2 The application of ontological metaphor 3.3 The application of structual metaphor In Obama’s first inaugural address in 2009, he applied structural metaphor in several places, for example 成都信息工程学院银杏酒店管理学院本科毕业论文
(1)Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less.It has not been the path for the faint-hearted.(2)we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back, nor did we falter;and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God’s grace upon us…
In above two examples, he metaphorize America’s development as a “journey”.During the journey, the Americans hold together and constantly strive to the end of the journey.The example one also become the basic structural frame of the whole paragraph, this part of speech is around the key metaphor , and
the key metaphor keeps the whole paragraph coherent.4.Conclusion It can be seen that conceptual metaphor 成都信息工程学院银杏酒店管理学院本科毕业论文
References
Black, Charteris.Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor.New York:Palgrave Macmillan, koff, George & Johnson, Mark.Metaphors We Live by.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, koff, George.Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, koff, George.The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Wilson, J.Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language.Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.陈勇,刘肇云.隐喻政治与政治隐喻: 论美国政治家的政治隐喻.外语教学, 2009, 1: 25-28.束定芳.隐喻学研究.上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2000.孙厌舒.论隐喻在政治语篇中的功用.聊城大学学报,2004,(3):111-112.赵艳芳.认知语言学概论.上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2001.
第四篇：家长会政治历史演讲
尊敬的各位家长: 大家好!首先，感谢你们抽出时间来到学校参加我们的家长会,你们的到来是对我们学校教育工作的最大支持与理解。

我担任咱们班的政治教学工作。

今天,我准备从两个方面与各位家长交流思想：一是关于教育教学工作;二是对我们孩子教育的一点建议。

教学工作: 我的教育理念就是让咱们的孩子能够快乐学习。

我们一直认为学习是件痛苦的事情，其实不是这样的。

我们都知道只有拥有良好的心态才会享受生活，才能做一个幸福的人。

幸福不是拥有的多，而是在乎的少。

快乐是一种人生态度，一个快乐的孩子会发现每天的阳光都是灿烂的，生活总是美好的，学习总是快乐的。

我是一个快乐的人，我的课堂也总是充满笑声，我一直想试图影响着每一个孩子，让他们能够真正快乐学习，在学习中体会快乐。

一、重视习惯的培养。

有人说习惯决定命运。

其实是习惯形成品
质,品质决定命运。

学习习惯的培养是一个漫长的过程,一旦形成良好的学习习惯将终生受益。

我总是要求学生养成良好的学习习惯，比如课前应准备好教材、笔、本子等,这有利于孩子提前进入学习状态，课上认真记笔记，课后做到有效复习，作业本上的错误要认真纠正等。

这些看起来很简单的事情，在孩子们真正实施起来时却不简单，坚持一天很容易，坚持三年却不容易。

二、教给方法。

知识是学不完的。

只有掌握了正确的方法才能拥有更多的知识。

比如我的政治教学,我平时比较注重让孩子们知道如何发现生活中的知识，政治课本上的东西都是来源于生活，从生活中学习的一门课。

如何学习政治，我给孩子们讲了很多。

谈到政治的时候，好多家长甚至好多老师都会有这样一种感觉，政治那么枯燥，有什么意思呢？其实家长朋友们，如今的政治跟咱们小时候学的政治已经不一样了，如今的政治更多地是从思想道德层面来对学生进行升华教育，教孩子们如何做一个有思想的人，做一个理性的人。

如果现在的我们都还是认为政治那么枯燥无味的话，那我们就真的out了。

如今这个社会，我们需要知道的太多了。

如何把我们所知道的理论真正的转化为行动，需要用我们哲学的方法去解决，关于哲学在高二的政治课我们的孩子会真正接触到。

三、重视思维的养成。

思维的层次性反映着一个人的知识积淀，而积淀的多少又决定一个人的文化素养。

政治课的学习主要靠思维的养成，尤其是政治思维的养成，这种思维重在培养学生的多角度看问题，多层面找问题，遇事也要想着多方面去解决。

因此我平时特别注重引导学生开动脑筋，多想为什么，遇到问题多想怎么办。

课堂上我喜欢抛出一个问题，让孩子们自己去想为什么，使每个学生都能真正动起来。

希望他们从小就能养成一个良好的思维习惯，避免以后遇事一根筋，不动脑筋，不想办法。

而我们又深刻地明白，这种思维习惯不是简单几节政治课就可以养成的，更多地需要我们在平时的学习与生活中逐步完成，而思想政治课的学习是对这种思维习惯的养成具有最直接的指导意义。

好的思维思维习惯将会影响人的一生。

四、培养兴趣。

兴趣是最好的老师。

一个好老师就是要让孩子喜
欢读书,喜欢他这个老师。

有句话是这样说的:亲其师,信其道。

只有当学生喜欢这个老师了,他才会更喜欢他所教的学科。

如果孩子对老师所教的学科不喜欢,不管他考试成绩多好,那都是失败的教育。

为什么?因为那强制下所学到的东西,一旦失去别人的监督,他就不会再去学习了。

如果孩子对学习有了兴趣,学习就会成为他们的自觉行动,何愁孩子的学习成绩不好呢?为了激发学生的学习兴趣,我总是更多地开发教学资源，采用不同的方式进行教学。

那节辩论赛课是我印象最深刻的一节课，也是孩子们比较喜欢的一节课，在这节课中，所有的学生都动起来了，都在想问题，我由此觉得特欣慰。

老师是孩子圆梦的人,我们就是要他们体验成功的幸福,而不是失败的难堪。

有人说，失败是成功之母，但我们更认为成功是成功之母。

成功会让他们看到自己的长处,会信心百倍地战胜学习中的困难。

只有这样,让他们感觉到老师是关心他们的,是他们真正的贴心人，他们才会大胆发表自己的见解,提出自己的疑问。

孩子一旦出现错误,就有了及时纠正的机会。

教学就是要采取疏通学生的思想,疏通学生的错识,而不是堵塞他们的错识。

我国著名教育家刘良华说:教师是一种高危的职业,她可以成全一个孩子的一生,也很容易损害一个孩子的一生。

我总是这样想:作为教师,我不能改变孩子人生的起点,但我可以改变他们发展的起点和轨迹,以及人生的终点。

我们不能改变他们生命的长度,但我们可以拓展他们生命的宽度。

作为政治教师,我不但要让他们学会学习,更重要的是要让他们能够热爱生活，快乐生活，让孩子感受到学习是一件幸福的事。

在此我只对我们家长朋友提一条建议:尊重教育规律，不要让我们的孩子提前进入文理分科状态。

我曾跟很多孩子交流过，咱们很多家长希望孩子学理科，希望从现在开始不用学习文科科目，或者希望孩子学文科，现在开始不学理科课程，这对于孩子的全面发展是不利的。

高一年级设立了九门课程，其宗旨就是让学生能够全面学习，在学习这九门课的过程中，真正地发现自己的兴趣所在，为高二的文理分科奠定基础。

有的家长认为由于课程过多，怕孩子学起来费劲，殊不知，在这种复杂的课程学习中，正好锻炼了孩子的协调能力，合理安排时间的能力，这些能力高。