经鼻间歇正压通气和持续气道正压通气在早期早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中应用的比较

经鼻间歇正压通气和持续气道正压通气在早期早产儿呼吸窘迫
综合征中应用的比较
兰朝阳;林新祝;郑直
【期刊名称】《中国医药指南》
【年(卷),期】2013(11)23
【摘要】目的对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产儿早期使用经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)和经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)模式在有创呼吸支持率、疗效及并发症方面进行比较分析。

方法随机对照试验，将胎龄28~34周患有RDS的新生儿分
为早期使用NIPPV组和早期使用NCPAP组。

观察患儿生后72h内的插管有创呼吸支持率、支气管肺发育不良(BPD)发生率及使用无创呼吸支持后1、12、24h二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、氧分压(PaO2)及氧合指数(OI)。

结果①NIPPV组生后72h
内有创呼吸支持明显低于NCPAP组；NIPPV组OI在无创呼吸支持后1、12、
24h均高于NCPAP组；NIPPV组无创呼吸支持后1、12、24hPaCO2明显低于NCPAP组；NIPPV组PaO2在无创呼吸支持后1、12、24h明显高于NCPAP组；(P＜0.05)。

②两组患儿氧疗总时间NIPPV组低于NCPAP组，(P<0.05)。

结论早期使用NIPPV与NCPAP相比，可明显降低RDS患儿气管插管有创呼吸支持率，增加潮气量及通气量，改善氧合，值得临床推广。

%Objective To neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) of premature infants early use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) model with a respiratory support, curative effect and complications of comparative analysis. Method randomized controlled trial, gestational age 28-34 weeks, babies born with
RDS within 6h after divided into the early use of NIPPV group and early use of NCPAP. Observing children born within 72h after intubation and respiratory support, incidence of bronchial pulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and the use of noninvasive respiratory support 1, 12, 24h after carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and oxygenation index (OI). Result ①NIPPV group within 72h after birth of invasive respiratory support was signiifcantly lower than that in NCPAP
group;NIPPV group OI in noninvasive respiratory support after 1, 12, 24h were higher than that in group NCPAP;group NIPPV noninvasive respiratory support after 1, 12, 24hPaCO2 were signiifcantly lower than those in group NCPAP;group NIPPV PaO2 in noninvasive respiratory support 1, 12, 24h were signiifcantly higher than that of NCPAP group (P<0.05).②two groups of children with oxygen therapy time of NIPPV group was lower than that of NCPAP group (P<0.05). Conclusion Early use of NIPPV compared with NCPAP, can obviously reduce the RDS with endotracheal intubation and respiratory support, increase in tidal volume and the ventilation, improve oxygenation, worth clinical promotion.
【总页数】2页(P409-410)
【作者】兰朝阳;林新祝;郑直
【作者单位】厦门市妇幼保健院新生儿科，福建厦门361000;厦门市妇幼保健院新生儿科，福建厦门361000;厦门市妇幼保健院新生儿科，福建厦门361000【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】R722.6
【相关文献】
1.经鼻间歇正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的早期应用与临床疗效分析 [J], 周秀英;王继萍
2.经鼻无创高频振荡通气和持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征撤机后的应用比较 [J], 娄五斌;张卫星
3.双水平正压通气和经鼻持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征INSURE治疗方式中应用的比较 [J], 孔令凯;封志纯;孔祥永;李丽华;董建英;商明霞;池婧涵;郑杨;马俊娥;马倩
4.经鼻间歇正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的早期应用与临床疗效分析 [J], 周秀英;王继萍
5.经鼻间歇正压通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较 [J], 王六超
因版权原因，仅展示原文概要，查看原文内容请购买。