GREissue11
GRE_issue万能例子
GRE Analytical Writing 新鲜例子(1)Sarah Brightman 莎拉.布莱曼(就是音乐剧《猫》里唱MEOMORY那个)这个可以写determination什么的She was a workaholic from an early age, never waste a minute of time.Straight from school, she went to ballet lessons. When she got home at eight, she went to bed. She got up at four in the morning to do her homework and then began the schedule all over again.When she was a teenager, she decided to try her hand, or her vocals, at singing. (2)Prisoner Abuse 虐囚事件(伊拉克战争的那个丑闻)可以写媒体的题材Since the “60 Minutes II”broadcast, pictures of abuse have been posted on the Internet and shown on television stations worldwide.一些有用的词汇:Watergate (这个都知道)Zipper gate(这是说克林顿的)Enron gate(这是说小布什)Muckraker 专门报道丑闻的记者the Forth Estate 第四阶级,在美国媒体被称为第四权力或第四阶级(3)A Message to Garcia 致加西亚的信(前两年很火的书)It is not book-learning young men need, nor instruction about this and that, but a stiffening of the vertebrae which will cause them to loyal to a trust, to act promptly, concentrate their energies: do the thing.(4)Nictzche尼采这厮有句名言:“One has to pay dearly for immortality. One has to die several times while one is still alive.”可以用在写毅力什么个人品质的~(5)William Hung 孔庆祥(这人前两年可是火得不行~)American Idol 美国偶像(超女就是中国版的美国偶像)Lovable loser 可爱的失败者He didn’t survive the first cut. His performance was interrupted by Simon Cowell (评委), You can’t dance. You can’t sing. So what do you want me to say?Hung earnestly and humbly replied: I already gave my best, and I have no regret at all.这个可以用在尝试,失败之类的题目上。
GRE英语作文分类题库—ISSUE
GRE英语作文分类题库—ISSUE简介在GRE考试中,Issue是指议题写作,与Argument类似都是GRE Analytical Writing的一部分,需要候选人对给出的话题进行阐述和分析。
Issue是更具有主观性的考试内容,需要候选人充分表达自己的观点,谈及丰富的经验和事例支持论证,并且要注意措辞合理、思路清晰、结构紧凑。
在本文档中,我们将提供一些Issue题库,这些议题涵盖了社会科学、艺术、哲学等多个领域,通过研究这些经典话题,准备GRE写作中的Issue将变得更加得心应手。
Issue题库社会科学Politic and Government1. A government should invest funds in the arts to ensure that it canflourish and be available to all people.2.Some people claim that political decision-making process indemocracies is too slow to response to climate changes. Do you agree ordisagree?3.The government should provide healthcare to all citizens regardlessof their ability to pay for it.Education4.The purpose of college or university education is to help students tosucceed in future career. Do you agree or disagree?5.The function of education is to teach one to think intensively andcritically. Do you agree or disagree?6.Some people believe that the most important goal of education is tohelp people to learn to be happy on their own. Do you agree or disagree?Culture7.The most important way to preserve ancient historical sites is to makethem available to the public, to have them constantly used and thus alive.8.Museums and art galleries should focus on the works of art that arerepresentative of the cultural history of their own country rather than theworks of art that are from different parts of the world.9.It is important for people to celebrate the ceremonies and festivals oftheir own culture rather than those of other cultures.艺术Music and Film10.Artistic disciplines, such as music, theater, and film, are valuable onlywhen they contribute to the larger society.11.The purpose of music is to make us feel good. Do you agree ordisagree?12.The best way to appreciate music is simply to listen to it.Literature and Writing13. A person should never make an important decision alone.14.The best way to learn about life is through personal experience.15.Argue for and/or against the use of digital devices in literary analysis.哲学Morality and Ethics16.Morality depends on the individual.17.The ultimate goal of human beings is not happiness, but knowledge.18.To be an ethical person, one must take into consideration the contextof the situation.Knowledge and Reasoning19.Innovation should always be welcomed, even if it is leading towardsunethical practices.cation is more than simply acquiring knowledge; it is aboutlearning to think for oneself.21.The ultimate goal of philosophical inquiry is not knowledge, but action.总结以上便是我们为大家提供的GRE英语写作的Issue题库,这些话题涵盖了众多领域,如政治、文化、教育、艺术和哲学等。
gre写作issue模板
gre写作issue模板当涉及GRE写作issue模板时,以下是一个常用的模板:1.引言:简要描述讨论的主题,并提出针对该主题的争议或问题。
2.背景信息:提供相关的背景资料,以便读者能够更好地理解讨论的上下文。
3.观点一:阐述第一个观点,包括其优势和劣势,并提供支持该观点的理由和例证。
4.观点二:阐述第二个观点,同样包括其优势和劣势,并提供支持该观点的理由和例证。
5.反驳观点:回应可能存在的反对意见或观点,并提供进一步的解释和例证。
6.结论:总结以上的讨论,强调自己的立场,并提供一些概括性的陈述。
下面是一个示例模板:1.引言:近年来,越来越多的人开始关注环境保护这一全球性的问题。
然而,有人认为采取环境友好型的生活方式对个人来说过于困难和不切实际。
2.背景信息:在当今世界,人类活动对环境造成了严重的负面影响,例如气候变化、空气污染、资源枯竭等。
因此,环境保护已经成为一个迫切的问题。
3.观点一:采取环境友好型的生活方式对个人来说是有困难和不切实际的。
例如,购买环保产品通常比传统产品更昂贵,限制开车或飞行会给人们的生活和工作带来不便等。
4.观点二:然而,采取环境友好型的生活方式对于保护地球和未来世代的生存至关重要。
例如,选择可再生能源、减少能源消耗、鼓励循环利用等措施都可以减少环境污染并延缓资源枯竭。
5.反驳观点:尽管采取环境友好型的生活方式可能面临一些困难和不便,但这些牺牲是值得的。
我们应该更加关注长远利益,而不仅仅追求短期的个人舒适和方便。
6.结论:在面对环境保护这一全球性的挑战时,每个人都应该为了未来世代的生存而采取环境友好型的生活方式。
尽管这可能会带来一些困难和不便,但这是我们应尽的责任和义务。
请注意,这只是一个示例模板,实际写作时可以根据具体题目和观点进行灵活调整。
在GRE写作中,重要的不仅是表达清晰,还需要有逻辑性和充分的支持材料。
GRE写作提纲Issue完整版整合word版
英语学习无论对于学生还是职场人士来说都是非常重要的,很多要出国留学的学生需要准备对应的托福、雅思、SAT、GRE、GMAT等留学考试,获得较高的分数才能申请相对较好的国外大学。
国内大学生经常要备考的是四六级考试,能在四六级考试中获得较高的分数,在今后的职场工作总也会有一定的优势。
英语的学习词汇是基础,各个不同等级的考试对于词汇量的要求也不同,一般要求的词汇量在3000-20000不等。
学好英语在掌握足够词汇量的基础上还要对语法有一定的了解,生活中多练习口语,掌握一些口语交流技能。
为大家整理汇总了下述英语学习材料,方便大家学习查看。
今天我们一起来看看GRE写作提纲Issue完整版吧,下面就和大家,来欣一下吧。
GRE写作提纲Issue完整版A nation should require all of 表态+论述观点:中立偏否定1、在接受高等教育(tertiaryeducation)之前,学习统一的课程有许多优点:a、由于全国学习同样课程,有利于保证教育公平,避免不同教育水平地区差距拉大(widen thedisparity between);b、维护统一,利于开展一致的国民教育,普遍地提高国民素质;c、避免各个地区重复开发课程,极大降低财政负担2、然而,这样也有很大的弊端(seriousdrawbacks):a、从个体差异来看,不同学生有不同特长,要求全国统一课程显然谋杀了学生的个性,不利于个人发展;b、不同地区有独特文化,尤其在许多文化多样(diverseculture)的国家,不同地区学生接受同样课程可能造成地区文化的流失(gradually fade away)3、事实上,这个问题不可一概而论(We should not make sweepinggeneralizations):a、对于文化差异不大的国家,可以在要求全国统一部分compulsorycurriculums,同时根据不同学生的需求开设electivecourses,与大学课程设置制度类似,但必修部分较多,选修较少;b、对于文化差异大的国家,则不宜要求统一课程,可设置教学大纲(minimum syllabus),由各个地区按照大纲设置符合地区文化和发展需求的课程。
新gre作文题库:issue的提问规律讲解
新gre作文题库:issue的提问规律讲解(经典版)编制人:__________________审核人:__________________审批人:__________________编制单位:__________________编制时间:____年____月____日序言下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文,如演讲稿、总结报告、合同协议、方案大全、工作计划、学习计划、条据书信、致辞讲话、教学资料、作文大全、其他范文等等,想了解不同范文格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as speech drafts, summary reports, contract agreements, project plans, work plans, study plans, letter letters, speeches, teaching materials, essays, other sample essays, etc. Want to know the format and writing of different sample essays, so stay tuned!新gre作文题库:issue的提问规律讲解gre写作考察考生的逻辑分析能力,写作部分是我们国人的一个薄弱环节,改革后的新gre考试题目要求更加具体,考察考生完成题目过程中是否融合批判性思维。
GRE作文Issue部分要求考生写什么
GRE作文Issue部分要求考生写什么GRE作文Issue部分要求考生写什么在GRE作文issue写作要求是什么,就是我们需要备考GRE作文issue写作的方向。
新GRE作文issue写作要求考生根据所给的题目,完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。
这就考察考生们的知识量和缜密的逻辑思维能力,如何把观点表达清楚是最重要的。
下面和小编一起来看看吧:新GRE作文Issue题库涉及社会、文化、科技、历史、政治、艺术等诸多方面。
不同类型的题目有较大差别,但在同一类型的题目中却包含了许多命题方向非常接近的题目。
新GRE作文issue写作要求大量的素材储备:新GRE作文Issue写作对于论据的要求是非常高的,因此你的名人事例的储备,相关知识量的'积累是非常重要的。
这一环节也正是GRE考生最为头疼的一部分,举不出支持自己的观点的例子,因此让自己的文章显得只有苍白的论证,缺乏说服力。
因此要多读历史,积累例子,尤其关注那些重要的哲学家、科学家、艺术家、政治领袖等人的生平事迹、主要贡献。
例如Issue里的这样一道真题:“Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists are always out of step with their time and their society。
”(真正影响深远的思想家和具有高度创造力的艺术家总是与他们的时代和社会步伐不一致)。
这个题目如果没有必备的那些思想家和艺术家的例子,文章必然缺乏说服力。
因此读历史积累写作素材,具体说就是论据素材是拿高分的一个重要环节。
新GRE作文issue写作要求完整的逻辑思路:另外,写提纲对于新GRE作文Issue部分的备考是至关重要的,也是最占用时间、最核心的一个环节。
每一个题目的提纲力求详细,不用去写开头段和结尾段,就写正文各段你的各个分支观点,也就是正文部分的论证过程。
除了论证以外,写完后想想可以用些什么论据,把支持论证的论据也写上。
GRE issue例子总结
我在准备 issue 过程中用到的查到的一些词及词组, 我发现在引用例子的时候很多时候是知 道用中文怎么说却常常被一个词的英文说法而难住了, 所以我就一个个都查了出来, 可能不 能满足大家所有的要求,也希望对大家有点帮助吧,祝大家杀 G 成功:1) The flight of Ap olio 11; lunarian di ng missio n,阿波罗11号的登月计划另外,Ap olio 13号的登月很惊险,大家可能都知道吧看过电影“阿波罗13”的人都知道 这段历史吧不知道的兄弟姐妹上百度搜一下就知道啦! ,还有,“挑战者号” Challenger ; 哥伦比亚号 Columbia 2) 杨氏双缝实验(大学物理讲过的,呵呵) :You ng ' double-slit exp erime nt ,严格来说,这个实验是用 classical theory cannot explain,这里面涉及到 quantum theory ,即量子理论, 我不是学物理的, 但是据我查的资料上说, 其实人类对量子理论并没有完全地 明白,也没法用它解释一切, 这个观点我觉得可能用来说明人类的认识过程是由不知到知的 认识过程,要用发展的眼光来看问题。
3) 火星登月计划: Mars Explorationfor the assembly, test and launch to the film Titanic and Pearl Harbor 球车的意思,同理 Mars rover .4) Man hattan P roject ,曼哈顿计划,就是当年Ei nstein 和Oppen heimer (奥本海默,这小子狠, 被称为原子弹之父, 一定要记住, 这小子在听说美国在对 Hiroshima ,即日本广 岛投原子弹之后, 曾感叹自己当初不应该研制原子弹 which 给人类带来了灾难, 科技与人性 的题目能用到)5) 多利 Dolly 转基因技术:double-helix克里克 ,Wastonand Crick6) 二战纳粹德国在活人上做实验, 用大量的犹太妇女人活体实验为的是研制避孕药contraceptive )7) 关于丑闻:Billscandal ;兴奋剂: n. molestation ;8) 垃圾邮件:不要再说junk mail 啦,老土!有个更 native 的词:spam,记住哟!9) 环境问题:氟利昂: freon ,臭氧层: ozonosphere/ ozone layer ,臭氧空洞: ozone hole ;赤潮: red tide 10) 关于美国总统:刺杀总统;岂今为止,美国一共有四位总统被刺杀,第一位是 Abraham Lincoln, 最后一位是 John F. Kennedy ,还有许多刺杀未遂的,比如刺杀 Roosevelt , Truman 等等,这可以被 用来例子表明领导者不可能让每一个人都满意.另外, 罗斯福是个残疾人, 大家知道吧脊髓灰质炎导致坐在轮椅上, 的病,挺奇怪, 小儿麻痹并不是像我们想象的那样只能小时候得谈到杜鲁门, 当年美国的曼哈顿计划是罗斯福批的, 知道美国要研究原子弹的人并不多, 加研制的科学家都不知道自己在从事什么研究工作, 保密工作做的相当严密, 福下台,杜鲁门上台的时候都不知道美国已经研制出了原子弹. 11) 北美最大范围的停电:blackout (or power failure )in eastern US and CanadaRover Mission which costs $425 million every year process which is just the same amount as it costs ,哇,够狠,老美有钱!另外, moon rover 是月,不用说了, 我想顺着这只名羊提一提关于基因工程 ( genetic engineering ) , transgenics ,人体胚胎: human embryo ,DNA 分子双螺旋结构:thestructure of DNA,还有两个牛人,就是发现DNA 分子双螺旋结构的沃森和oralClinton ' s sexual scandal with Monica Lewinsky ;Nixon ' s Watergate stimulant ;猥亵 (针对那个把自己黑皮染白的那个小子的) :v. molest; Kobe Bryant Rape case;不过他并不是小时候得 我得多说一句, 甚至许多后来参 以致后来罗斯人类对科技依赖的例证. 12) 巨牛的深蓝电脑,就是下棋的那个 Deep Blue ,是IBM 的电脑,有2 5 6个processor , 另外IBM 还有个别称Big Blue 13) 直线加速器 lin ear accelerator ,回旋加速器 cyclotro n accelerator 14) 永动机 perp etual moti on mach ine 15) 名人 Albeit Einstein : photo electronic effect (光电效应);question classical mechanics, qua ntum theory,不要墨守成规 stick to conven tio ns, 头脑要灵活,不能太固执 adama nt/ obsti nate/ stubbor n/ headstr ong ,质能方程: mass-e nergy equati on Galileo : did exp erime nt on Lea ning Tower of P isa to discover law of uniform accelerati on of falli ng bodies; discovered that moon shines with reflected light; denoun ced for advocati ng Copern ica n system ;was later tried by Inq uisiti on ( 法庭)and forced to recant (改变信仰); 哥白尼 Copernicus ,日心说: sun-centered system 地心说: earth-centered system 布鲁诺 Bruno ,火刑 be burned at stake Isaac Newt on :经典力学 classical mecha nics, inspired by the falli ng apple; 宗教 Hegel 黑格尔:1770 — 1831 German philosopher; oppo sites in flue need Existe ntialists, Marx, etc. Karl Marx 的辩证唯物主义来自于黑格尔的辩证法 物论 Vincent van Gogh :梵高,作品 sun flower Monet 莫奈 作品 sun rise Steven Hawking: British theoretical physicist 万有弓丨力 uni versal gravitati on sta nd on the shoulders of gia ntshis dialectic process dialectic 和费尔巴哈 ,be for reconciling Feuerbach 的唯 no ted for his research of the uni verse. His work in flue need the deve lopment of the 炸理论)and black hole (黑洞)theory Mandela (曼德拉),(struggle against segregation in South Africa ) the South African black p olitical leader and former p reside nt, was awarded 1993 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to an tiracism and an tia partheid . Nels on Man dela is one of the great moral and p olitical leaders of our time: an intern ati onal hero whose lifelo ng dedication to the fight against racial oppression in South Africa won him the Nobel Peace Prize and the presidency of his country. Since his triumphant release in 1990 from more tha n a quarter-ce ntury of imprisonment, Man dela has bee n at the cen tre of the most comp ell ing and inspiring p olitical drama in the world. He is revered everywhere as a vital force in the fight for huma n rights and racial equality. Beethoven , the German Composer, began to lose his hearing in 1801 and was entirely deaf by 1819. However, this obstacle could not kee p him from beco ming one of the most famous and prolific composers in art history. His music, including 9 symphonies, 5 piano concertos, several senates and so on, forms a transition from classical to roma ntic compo siti on. In dividual, Compani es, Leadersh ip and Internal con trol into the origin big ba ng (宇宙大爆 Discrim in at ing services ______may cause misun dersta nding and unpl easa nt best exa mple is [Toshiba |, one of the largest Japanese companies. In 2000, the Companyannounced that among no tebook compu ters it p roduced, one model had serious defect. Users inNorth America could choose either rep laceme nts with an up graded model or full refund. However, no such offer for users in China. Chin ese users were outraged at the company's discrim in atio n and refused to use any of Toshiba's no tebook compu ters.What the company lost is not only the temporary reve nue but also the con sumer's con fide nee, which con tribute to the Ion g-term success of the company.Roosevelt : the 32nd p reside nt and the only p reside nt elected for 4th terms (1933-45); developed reforms and projectsknown as the NewDeal. Under his sagacious leadership,America successfully walked out the shadow of Recession and conquered the notorious fascism in the Second World War. And accord ing to a p oil con ducted at Harvard in 1950, Roosevelt is highly renowned as one of the greatest p reside nt of America n, ranking only after Wash ington and Lincoln.Washin gton : 1st p reside nt of the U.S. (1789-1797); established many p recede nts thatp erma nen tly sha ped the character of the office of p reside nt; uni versally regarded as father of his cou ntry. Abraham Li ncol n: 16th p reside nt of the . (1861-65);successfully preserved the Union during the American Civil War; issued Emancipation Proclamation freeing all slaves in rebelling states; made famous address dedicating cemetery at Gettysburg; assass in ated five days after end of Civil War.Jefferson : chief author of Declarati on of Independence (1776); 3d p reside nt of the .(1801*09); pu rchased Louisia na from France, sent Lewis and Clark to explore it; prohibited importation of slaves; instrumentalin founding U. of Virginia.From him we can see the importance initially laid upon education. He required to carve such epitaph on his tombstone as ‘ chief author of Independence; author of the Freedom Law of Religi on in Virginia; Father of the Virginia Uni. ' Without mentioning of his presidency. It reflected viv status of educati on in Jeffers on ‘ s heart and this status was in herited by his successors. It is why American ‘ s being super power of the world today.Wright Brothers( 怀特兄弟 ):Itlasted only 12 sec on ds, but those 12 seco ndschanged history.On December 17, 1903, two brothersnamedOrville and Wilbur Wrightmade the first airpla ne flight哥俩的飞机就在天上呆了12秒.Marie Curie : p robed the mysteries of radioactivity and X rays. In 1903, she and her husba nd won the Nobel Prize in p hysics, one of the most important awardsinscienee. In 1911, Marie Curie won a second Nobel Prize, this time inchemistry.Sheis one of very few people in history to win two Nobel p rizes. Martin Luther King, Jr. I have a dream that my four littlechildren willoneday live in a n ati on where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today!”Captain James Cook : sailed around the world twice. He was the first European to reach Hawaii and New Zeala nd Osama bin Laden Confucius 孑L 子,Mencius 孟子his progenies Declaratio n ofidly what a注:下面的表格是我转贴的,并非原创,但是我也加工了一些,特别是对于一些词的英文说法,也算是站在巨人的肩膀上吧嘿嘿幸福的和谐。
GRE作文分类题库—ISSUE
GRE作文分类题库—ISSUE前言GRE作文是美国研究生入学考试中重要的组成部分,由于GRE作文在评分中占比较大的比重,因此考生需要在备考之前提前了解GRE作文的题目类型和考察方向,这样才可以有充分的准备和信心面对考试。
本文将为大家介绍GRE作文ISSUE题型,向大家展示常见的考察方向、题目模式以及一些备考建议。
什么是ISSUE题型?ISSUE题型是GRE作文中的一种常见题型,其主要考察考生对于某一主题的立场和看法,并要求考生在文章中提供足够的证据来支撑自己的观点,展示自己的逻辑和论述能力。
ISSUE题型通常包括以下三个要素:•题目陈述:题目会给出一个主观性较强的表述,要求考生就该表述发表自己的看法。
•分析要求:题目会就某一主题提出一系列问题,要求考生就这些问题进行分析。
•思考范围:题目会给出一个主题,要求考生就这一主题从多方面进行思考,并论述自己的观点。
在ISSUE题型中,考生需要将自己的观点和证据清晰表达出来,并表明自己对于该主题的态度和看法,同时,考生需要思考问题全面、立论充分、逻辑合理,并且给出具体和可行的实例。
常见的ISSUE题目类型ISSUE题目的主题比较广泛,测试考生在各种主题下进行思考和立论的能力。
以下列举一些常见的ISSUE题目类型,考生可以在此进行参考和备考,更好地为GRE作文ISSUE题型做好准备。
社会类1.人类生活是否需要个人道德的引导?2.社会上的贫富差距是否应得到重视?3.政府是否应该彻底取消福利制度?4.生育权是否应该在各国间得到保护?5.义务教育是否应该废除?政治类1.民主政治是否是当前的最佳选项?2.政府是否应该介入企业的内部管理?3.政府是否应该对教育进行干预?4.美国还需要维持其全球霸权地位吗?伦理类1.人类是否应该保护和维护环境?2.科技的发展是否应该因为道德原则受到限制?3.是否应该禁止人类克隆?教育类1.各国学生在智力和文化方面是否存在差异?2.在校学生是否应该得到免费的教育?3.考试和考试成绩是否是唯一的衡量学生能力的标准?4.在大学期间能否同时考虑工作和学业?上述问题不仅覆盖了政治、伦理、教育、社会等多个领域,而且这里展示的只是其中的部分,考生在掌握以上基本类型的基础上,需要进一步深入探究题目的推广方向,了解更多的考试内容。
GREIssue高分范文
GREIssue高分范文想要更好的备考GRE写作考试,需要多看一些范文哦,小编整理了一些范文,下面小编就和大家分享,来欣赏一下吧。
GRE Issue高分范文"Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little."The speaker makes a threshold claim that students who learn only facts learn very little, then condudes that students should always learn about concepts, ideas, and trends before they memorize facts. While I wholeheartedly agree with the threshold claim, the condusion unfairly generalizes about the learning process. In fact, following the speaker's advice would actually impede the learning of concepts and ideas, as well as impeding the development of insightful and useful new ones. Turning first to the speaker's threshold daim, I strongly agree that ifwe learn only facts we learn very little. Consider the task of memorizing the periodic table of dements, which any student can memorize without any knowledge of chemistry, or that the table relates to chemistry. Rote memorization of the table amounts to a bit of mental exercise-an opportunity to practice memorization techniques and perhaps learn some new ones. Otherwise, the student has learned very little about chemical dements, or about anything for that matter.As for the speaker's ultimate claim, I concede that postponing the memorization of facts until after one leams ideas and concepts holds certain advantages. With a conceptual framework already in place a student is better able to understand the meaning of a fact, and to appreciate its significance. As a result, the student is more likely to memorize the fact to begin with, and less likely to forget it as time passes. Moreover, in my observation students whose first goal is to memorize facts tend to stop there--for whatever reason. It seems that by focusing on facts first students risk equating the learning process with the assimilation of trivia; in turn, students risk learning nothing of much use in solving real world problems.Conceding that students must learn ideas and concepts, as well as facts relating to them, in order to learning anything meaningful, I nevertheless disagree that the former should always precede the latter--for three reasons. In the first place, I seeknow reason why memorizing a fact cannot precede learning about its meaning and significance--as long as the student does not stop at rote memorization. Consider once again our hypothetical chemistry student. The speaker might advise this student to first learn about the historical trends leading to the discovery of the elements, or to learn about the concepts of altering chemical compounds to achieve certain reactions--before studying the periodic table. Having no familiarity with the basic vocabulary of chemistry, which includes the informarion in the periodic table, this student would come away from the first two lessons bewildered and confused in other words, having learned little.In the second place, the speaker misunderstands the process by which we learn ideas and concepts, and by which we develop new ones. Consider, for example, how economics students learn about the relationship between supply and demand, and the resulting concept of market equilibrium, and of surplus and shortage. Learning about the dynamics of supply and demand involves (1) entertaining a theory, and perhaps even formulating a new one, (2) testing hypothetical scenarios against the theory, and (3) examining real-world facts for the purpose of confirming, refuting, modifying, or qualifying the theory. But which step should come first? The speaker would have us follow steps 1 through 3 in that order. Yet, theories, concepts, and ideas rarely materialize out of thin air; they generally emerge from empirical observations--i.e., facts. Thus the speaker's notion about how we should learn concepts and ideas gets the learning process backwards.In the third place, strict adherence to the speaker's advice would surely lead to illconceived ideas, concepts, and theories. Why? An idea or concept conjured up without the benefit of data amounts to little more than the conjurer's hopes and desires. Accordingly, conjurers will tend to seek out facts that support their prejudices and opinions, and overlook or avoid facts that refute them. One telling example involves theories about the center of the universe.Understandably, we ego-driven humans would prefer that the universe revolve around us.Early theories presumed so for this reason, and facts that ran contrary to this ego-driven theory were ignored, while observers of these facts were scorned and even vilified. In short, students who strictly follow the speaker's prescription are unlikely to contribute significantly to the advancement of knowledge.To sum up, in a vacuum facts are meaningless, and only by filling that vacuum with ideas and concepts can students learn, by gaining useful perspectives and insights about facts. Yet,since facts are the very stuff from which ideas, concepts, and trends spring, without some facts students cannot learn much of anything. In the final analysis, then, students should learn facts right along with concepts, ideas, and trends.GRE Issue高分范文The speaker asserts that rather than merely highlighting certain sensational events the media should provide complete coverage of more important events .While the speaker's assertion has merit from a normative standpoint,in the final analysis i find this assertion indefensible.Upon first impression the speaker's claim seems quite compelling ,for two reasons.First ,without the benefit of a complete, unfiltered, and balanced account of a current evnets ,it is impossible to develop an informed and intelligent opinion about important social and political issue and , in turn, to contribute meaningfully to our democratic society ,which relies on broad participation in an ongoing debate about such issues to steer a proper course.the end result of our being a largely uninformed people is that we relegate the most important decisions to a handful of legislators,jurists ,and executives who may not know what is best for us.Second,by focusing on the "sensational"-by which i take the speaker to mean comparatively shocking, entertaining , and titillating events which easily catch one's attention-from trashy talk shows and local news broadcasts to The National Enquixer and People Magazine.This trend dearly serves to undermine a society's collective sensibilities and renders a society's members more vulnerable to demagoguery; thus we should all abhor and resist the trend.However,for serveral reasons i find the media's current trend toward highlights and the sensational to be justifiable.First ,the world is becoming an increasingly eventful place;thus with each passing year it becomes a more onerous task for the media to attempt full news coverage.Second ,we are becoming an increasingly busy society.The average U.S.worker spends nearly 60 hours per week at work now;and in most families both spouses work. Compare this startlingly busy pace to the pace a generation ago,when one bread-winner worked just over 40 hours per week.We have far less time today for news, so highlights must suffice .third,the media does infact provide full coverage of important events;anyone can find such coverage beyond their newspaper's front page,on daily PBS news programs, and on the Internet.I would wholeheartedly agree with the speaker if the sensational highlights were all the media were willing or permited to provide;this scenario would be tantamount to thought control on a mass scale and would serve to undermine our free society.However , i am aware of no evidence of any trend in this direction.To the contrary,in my observation the media are informing us more fully than ever before;we just need to seek out that information.On balance,then, the speaker's claim is not behave-regardless of its merits from a normative standpoint begs the question.GRE Issue高分范文Long black coat, large sunglasses, face buried deeply down in the turned-up collar and hurried steps denying any attempt to stop them---no, don't be alarmed; this is not a criminal at large, but only a public figure escaping the voyeuristic eyes and cameras of omnipresent tabloid reporters.Yet it is only one side of the coin. When you come back home, what greets you in newspapers, on TV or on the Internet, are a sargasso sea of so-called exclusive news telling tales about privacies of public figures. Not only tabloids are selling what they find by voyeurism, public figures, especially singers, movie stars and such alike in show businesses, are also themselves brandishing their underwear, so as to attract the eyes and attention of the public and to remain in the spotlight.It is a human nature to have the propensity to pry into other people's lives, especially the private lives of famous public figures, for their public lives are all so shining, so different from those of ours, that we cannot help but want to know what they are really like in real daily life and if they too have such sorrows and happiness as those common to us. By peeping into the private lives of public figures, our curiosity is satisfied, our distance from those "shining guys shortened", and our self-assurance secured by knowing that those "shining guys", too, are no more than ordinary humans.Whereas those "shining guys", on the one hand, detest to be mixed up with ordinary human beings for they are naturally arrogant and supercilious--the inevitable by-products of fame and fortune--and strive to sustain their status and mystery, on the other hand, they have to please the public, for they know quite clearly that attentionof the public is the very basis of their fame and fortune, whatever the causes of that attention. Thus, having a private life or not having a private life should not be a big bother to singers and movie stars. Actually, they sometimes are themselves selling their privacies in exchange for fame and fortune.Yet for politicians, it is a different and a little bit complicated story. As leaders of our government, surely they have more significant responsibilities to shoulder and their behaviors matter more to the society and to every one of us. Considering the onerous tasks of politicians, should we, the public, and the mass media leave them alone and let them concentrate on their job, or thinking of the interests of the public, should the mass media act as a supervisor to those politicians and let the public be informed of their misdeeds?As officials elected by the public and paid for by the public, politicians should undoubtedly under the supervision of the public and answer for the public. And the public, surely enough, have the right to ask for honest dealings of all kinds of issues of the government. When a politician's private affairs, such as using what power he has to secure a higher position and a higher salary for his girl friend as the Director of the World Bank did, undermine the interests of the public, the public have the right to know such scandals and reconsider their faith been laid on the politician.But what complicates the problem is that mass media, a commercial institution, is not always so just and serves only the interests of the public and the society--its shareholders' interests have the first and foremost priority. As a result, reporters all too often pry into the private lives of politicians, trying to dig out something provocative that could serve to stimulate the public's appetite and skyrocket the sales of the newspaper.Private life of a politician is also a vital card in the hands of his opponents. During the presidential election, private lives of presidential candidates have been snooped, exposed, exaggerated, distorted, fabricated and attacked. President Clinton's affair with L. Monica almost costs him his presidency, while helps start his wife, Hilary Clinton's political career.All these cause pressure on politicians. Concededly, moderate pressure can help politicians remain high-spirited, discreet and prudent with their behaviors, too much pressure surely strains their nerves too much and thus undermines their energy and spirit, and therefore their working efficiency.However, a politician also takes advantage of his own private life to establish a wanted image of himself, to win him the critical vote, or to convey a particular political gesture. For instance, the former president of Argentina, Peron married 26-year old Evita, an actress who came from the lower rung of the social ladder, to indicate his determination to stand by the poor and fight for their rights, and this private affair won Peron hearts and faith of millions of peasants and, consequently, the presidency of Argentina.Thus, private lives of public figures are a two-edged sword--proper use of it could bring magnificent benefits for them, while abuse of it could leave them cut and injured, even fatally.GRE Issue高分范文"The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time."The speaker contends that technology's primary goal should be to increase our efficiency for the purpose of affording us more leisure time. I concede that technology has enhanced our efficiency as we go about our everyday lives. Productivity software helps us plan and coordinate projects; intranets, the Internet, and satellite technology make us more efficient messengers; and technology even helps us prepare our food and access entertainment more efficiently. Beyond this concession, however, I find the speaker's contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint.The chief reason for my disagreement lies in the empirical proof: with technological advancement comes diminished leisure time. In 1960 the average U.S. family included only one breadwinner, who worked just over 40 hours per week. Since then the average work week has increased steadily to nearly 60 hours today; and in most families there are now two breadwinners. What explains this decline in leisure despite increasing efficiency that new technologies have brought about? I contend that technology itself is the culprit behind the decline. We use the additional free time that technology affords us not for leisure but rather for work. As computer technology enables greater and greater office productivity it also raises our employers' expectations--or demands--for production. Further technological advances breed still greater efficiency and, in turn, expectations. Our spiraling work load is only exacerbated by the competitive business environment in which nearly allof us work today. Moreover, every technological advance demands our time and attention in order to learn how to use the new technology. Time devoted to keeping pace with technology depletes time for leisure activities.I disagree with the speaker for another reason as well: the suggestion that technology's chief goal should be to facilitate leisure is simply wrongheaded. There are far more vital concerns that technology can and should address. Advances in bio-technology can help cure and prevent diseases; advances in medical technology can allow for safer, less invasire diagnosis and treatment; advances in genetics can help prevent birth defects; advances in engineering and chemistry can improve the structural integrity of our buildings, roads, bridges and vehicles; information technology enables education while communication technology facilitates global participation in the democratic process. In short, health, safety, education, and freedom--and not leisure--are the proper final objectives of technology. Admittedly, advances in these areas sometimes involve improved efficiency; yet efficiency is merely a means to these more important ends.In sum, I find indefensible the speaker's suggestion that technology's value lies chiefly in the efficiency and resulting leisure time it can afford us. The suggestion runs contrary to the overwhelming evidence that technology diminishes leisure time, and it wrongly places leisure ahead of goals such as health, safety, education, and freedom as technology's ultimate aims.。
GRE考试Issue写作范文详解
GRE考试Issue写作范文详解(1~19)(1):Issue"The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."观点陈述型作文/[题目]"被置于媒体审视下的任何人,其名誉终将受毁损。
"Sample EssayThe intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. Intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject has turned even minor media events into so-called "media frenzies". Reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person's past, increasing the possibility that the subject's reputation may be harmed.[范文正文]当今媒体报道的力度,由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未有的数量和种类,从而被极大地增强。
GREIssue作文模板整理
GREIssue作文模板整理(经典版)编制人:__________________审核人:__________________审批人:__________________编制单位:__________________编制时间:____年____月____日序言下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文,如演讲稿、总结报告、合同协议、方案大全、工作计划、学习计划、条据书信、致辞讲话、教学资料、作文大全、其他范文等等,想了解不同范文格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as speech drafts, summary reports, contract agreements, project plans, work plans, study plans, letter letters, speeches, teaching materials, essays, other sample essays, etc. Want to know the format and writing of different sample essays, so stay tuned!GREIssue作文模板整理GRE作文最让广大同学头疼的难题之一就是时间不够用,如果能有一个好的写作模板,将为广大考生在考场上省下构思的时间,就有更多的时间来进行论证段的写作。
GRE写作—ISSUE高频提纲整理
ISSUE高频话题:传统文化与现代化
传统文化与现代化之间存在着复杂的互动关系。现代化进程必然 会对传统文化产生影响,但同时也需要保留和传承传统文化的精 髓。如何平衡传统文化与现代化的关系,既能促进社会发展,又 能保持文化传承,是当代社会面临的重要课题。
在探讨传统文化与现代化的关系时,需要关注文化的多样性与包 容性。现代化并非要完全摒弃传统,而是要在传承中创新,在借 鉴中发展。
ISSUE高频话题:环境保护与经济发展
可持续发展
环境保护与经济发展并非相互矛盾,两者 可以相互促进。
生态保护
保护自然环境是可持续经济发展的基石, 我们要重视生态保护的长期效益。
绿色科技
发展绿色科技,可以有效减少环境污染, 促进经济绿色转型。
ISSUE高频话题:平等机会与 社会公正
平等机会和社会公正一直是人类社会关注的重要议题。GRE写作中经常出现探 讨这两者的关系。本节将探讨平等机会与社会公正的内涵,分析两者之间的 关系,并举例说明如何运用相关论证进行写作。
稳定的重要性
社会稳定是改革成功的基础,为改革创造 良好的外部环境。
改革与稳定的平衡
在改革过程中,要注重改革的力度和节奏 ,确保社会稳定,避免剧烈动荡。
总结与展望
GRE写作备考
通过对ISSUE写作高频话题的梳理,希望能帮助考生更有效率地备考,提高写作水平。
持续学习
写作能力的提升是一个持续积累的过程,建议考生定期阅读写作材料,练习写作。
用事实、数据、例子等佐证你的观点。
解释逻辑 3
解释你的论据如何支持你的观点。
每个论点都应该清晰地表达你的观点,并用充足的论据和逻辑解释来支撑。
如何引用例子论证
选择相关例子 1
GREIssue高分范文
GREIssue高分范文想要更好的备考GRE写作考试,需要多看一些范文哦,我整理了一些范文,下面我就和大家共享,来观赏一下吧。
GRE Issue高分范文Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little.The speaker makes a threshold claim that students who learn only facts learn very little, then condudes that students should always learn about concepts, ideas, and trends before they memorize facts. While I wholeheartedly agree with the threshold claim, the condusion unfairly generalizes about the learning process. In fact, following the speakers advice would actually impede the learning of concepts and ideas, as well as impeding the development of insightful and useful new ones.Turning first to the speakers threshold daim, I strongly agree that ifwe learn only facts we learn very little. Consider the task of memorizing the periodic table of dements, which any student can memorize without any knowledge of chemistry, or that the table relates to chemistry. Rote memorization of the table amounts to a bit of mental exercise-an opportunity to practice memorization techniques and perhaps learn some new ones. Otherwise, the student has learned very little aboutchemical dements, or about anything for that matter.As for the speakers ultimate claim, I concede that postponing the memorization of facts until after one leams ideas and concepts holds certain advantages. With a conceptual framework already in place a student is better able to understand the meaning of a fact, and to appreciate its significance. As a result, the student is more likely to memorize the fact to begin with, and less likely to forget it as time passes. Moreover, in my observation students whose first goal is to memorize facts tend to stop there--for whatever reason. It seems that by focusing on facts first students risk equating the learning process with the assimilation of trivia; in turn, students risk learning nothing of much use in solving real world problems.Conceding that students must learn ideas and concepts, as well as facts relating to them, in order to learning anything meaningful, I nevertheless disagree that the former should always precede the latter--for three reasons. In the first place, I see know reason why memorizing a fact cannot precede learning about its meaning and significance--as long as the student does not stop at rote memorization. Consider once again our hypothetical chemistry student. The speaker might advise this student to first learn about the historical trends leading to the discovery of the elements, or to learn about the concepts of altering chemical compounds to achieve certain reactions--beforestudying the periodic table. Having no familiarity with the basic vocabulary of chemistry, which includes the informarion in the periodic table, this student would come away from the first two lessons bewildered and confused in other words, having learned little.In the second place, the speaker misunderstands the process by which we learn ideas and concepts, and by which we develop new ones. Consider, for example, how economics students learn about the relationship between supply and demand, and the resulting concept of market equilibrium, and of surplus and shortage. Learning about the dynamics of supply and demand involves (1) entertaining a theory, and perhaps even formulating a new one, (2) testing hypothetical scenarios against the theory, and (3) examining real-world facts for the purpose of confirming, refuting, modifying, or qualifying the theory. But which step should come first? The speaker would have us follow steps 1 through 3 in that order. Yet, theories, concepts, and ideas rarely materialize out of thin air; they generally emerge from empirical observations--i.e., facts. Thus the speakers notion about how we should learn concepts and ideas gets the learning process backwards.In the third place, strict adherence to the speakers advice would surely lead to illconceived ideas, concepts, and theories. Why? An idea or concept conjured up without the benefit of data amounts to little more than the conjurers hopes and desires. Accordingly, conjurers willtend to seek out facts that support their prejudices and opinions, and overlook or avoid facts that refute them. One telling example involves theories about the center of the universe.Understandably, we ego-driven humans would prefer that the universe revolve around us.Early theories presumed so for this reason, and facts that ran contrary to this ego-driven theory were ignored, while observers of these facts were scorned and even vilified. In short, students who strictly follow the speakers prescription are unlikely to contribute significantly to the advancement of knowledge.To sum up, in a vacuum facts are meaningless, and only by filling that vacuum with ideas and concepts can students learn, by gaining useful perspectives and insights about facts. Yet,since facts are the very stuff from which ideas, concepts, and trends spring, without some facts students cannot learn much of anything. In the final analysis, then, students should learn facts right along with concepts, ideas, and trends.GRE Issue高分范文The speaker asserts that rather than merely highlighting certain sensational events the media should provide complete coverage of more important events .While the speakers assertion has merit from a normative standpoint,in the final analysis i find this assertion indefensible.Upon first impression the speakers claim seems quite compelling ,for two reasons.First ,without the benefit of a complete, unfiltered, and balanced account of a current evnets ,it is impossible to develop an informed and intelligent opinion about important social and political issue and , in turn, to contribute meaningfully to our democratic society ,which relies on broad participation in an ongoing debate about such issues to steer a proper course.the end result of our being a largely uninformed people is that we relegate the most important decisions to a handful of legislators,jurists ,and executives who may not know what is best for us.Second,by focusing on the sensational-by which i take the speaker to mean comparatively shocking, entertaining , and titillating events which easily catch ones attention-from trashy talk shows and local news broadcasts to The National Enquixer and People Magazine.This trend dearly serves to undermine a societys collective sensibilities and renders a societys members more vulnerable to demagoguery; thus we should all abhor and resist the trend.However,for serveral reasons i find the medias current trend toward highlights and the sensational to be justifiable.First ,the world is becoming an increasingly eventful place;thus with each passing year it becomes a more onerous task for the media to attempt full news coverage.Second ,we are becoming an increasingly busy society.Theaverage U.S.worker spends nearly 60 hours per week at work now;and in most families both spouses work. Compare this startlingly busy pace to the pace a generation ago,when one bread-winner worked just over 40 hours per week.We have far less time today for news, so highlights must suffice .third,the media does in fact provide full coverage of important events;anyone can find such coverage beyond their newspapers front page,on daily PBS news programs, and on the Internet.I would wholeheartedly agree with the speaker if the sensational highlights were all the media were willing or permited to provide;this scenario would be tantamount to thought control on a mass scale and would serve to undermine our free society.However , i am aware of no evidence of any trend in this direction.To the contrary,in my observation the media are informing us more fully than ever before;we just need to seek out that information.On balance,then, the speakers claim is not behave-regardless of its merits from a normative standpoint begs the question.GRE Issue高分范文Long black coat, large sunglasses, face buried deeply down in the turned-up collar and hurried steps denying any attempt to stop them---no, dont be alarmed; this is not a criminal at large, but only a public figure escaping the voyeuristic eyes and cameras of omnipresent tabloid reporters.Yet it is only one side of the coin. When you come back home, what greets you in newspapers, on TV or on the Internet, are a sargasso sea of so-called exclusive news telling tales about privacies of public figures. Not only tabloids are selling what they find by voyeurism, public figures, especially singers, movie stars and such alike in show businesses, are also themselves brandishing their underwear, so as to attract the eyes and attention of the public and to remain in the spotlight.It is a human nature to have the propensity to pry into other peoples lives, especially the private lives of famous public figures, for their public lives are all so shining, so different from those of ours, that we cannot help but want to know what they are really like in real daily life and if they too have such sorrows and happiness as those common to us. By peeping into the private lives of public figures, our curiosity is satisfied, our distance from those shining guys shortened, and our self-assurance secured by knowing that those shining guys, too, are no more than ordinary humans.Whereas those shining guys, on the one hand, detest to be mixed up with ordinary human beings for they are naturally arrogant and supercilious--the inevitable by-products of fame and fortune--and strive to sustain their status and mystery, on the other hand, they have to please the public, for they know quite clearly that attention of the public is the very basis of their fame and fortune, whatever the causes of thatattention. Thus, having a private life or not having a private life should not be a big bother to singers and movie stars. Actually, they sometimes are themselves selling their privacies in exchange for fame and fortune.Yet for politicians, it is a different and a little bit complicated story. As leaders of our government, surely they have more significant responsibilities to shoulder and their behaviors matter more to the society and to every one of us. Considering the onerous tasks of politicians, should we, the public, and the mass media leave them alone and let them concentrate on their job, or thinking of the interests of the public, should the mass media act as a supervisor to those politicians and let the public be informed of their misdeeds?As officials elected by the public and paid for by the public, politicians should undoubtedly under the supervision of the public and answer for the public. And the public, surely enough, have the right to ask for honest dealings of all kinds of issues of the government. When a politicians private affairs, such as using what power he has to secure a higher position and a higher salary for his girl friend as the Director of the World Bank did, undermine the interests of the public, the public have the right to know such scandals and reconsider their faith been laid on the politician.But what complicates the problem is that mass media, a commercial institution, is not always so just and serves only the interests of thepublic and the society--its shareholders interests have the first and foremost priority. As a result, reporters all too often pry into the private lives of politicians, trying to dig out something provocative that could serve to stimulate the publics appetite and skyrocket the sales of the newspaper.Private life of a politician is also a vital card in the hands of his opponents. During the presidential election, private lives of presidential candidates have been snooped, exposed, exaggerated, distorted, fabricated and attacked. President Clintons affair with L. Monica almost costs him his presidency, while helps start his wife, Hilary Clintons political career.All these cause pressure on politicians. Concededly, moderate pressure can help politicians remain high-spirited, discreet and prudent with their behaviors, too much pressure surely strains their nerves too much and thus undermines their energy and spirit, and therefore their working efficiency.However, a politician also takes advantage of his own private life to establish a wanted image of himself, to win him the critical vote, or to convey a particular political gesture. For instance, the former president of Argentina, Peron married 26-year old Evita, an actress who came from the lower rung of the social ladder, to indicate his determination to stand by the poor and fight for their rights, and this private affair won Peronhearts and faith of millions of peasants and, consequently, the presidency of Argentina.Thus, private lives of public figures are a two-edged sword--proper use of it could bring magnificent benefits for them, while abuse of it could leave them cut and injured, even fatally.GRE Issue高分范文The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase peoples efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time.The speaker contends that technologys primary goal should be to increase our efficiency for the purpose of affording us more leisure time.I concede that technology has enhanced our efficiency as we go about our everyday lives. Productivity software helps us plan and coordinate projects; intranets, the Internet, and satellite technology make us more efficient messengers; and technology even helps us prepare our food and access entertainment more efficiently. Beyond this concession, however, I find the speakers contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint.The chief reason for my disagreement lies in the empirical proof: with technological advancement comes diminished leisure time. In 1960 the average U.S. family included only one breadwinner, who worked just over 40 hours per week. Since then the average work week has increased steadily to nearly 60 hours today; and in most families there are now twobreadwinners. What explains this decline in leisure despite increasing efficiency that new technologies have brought about? I contend that technology itself is the culprit behind the decline. We use the additional free time that technology affords us not for leisure but rather for work. As computer technology enables greater and greater office productivity it also raises our employers expectations--or demands--for production. Further technological advances breed still greater efficiency and, in turn, expectations. Our spiraling work load is only exacerbated by the competitive business environment in which nearly all of us work today. Moreover, every technological advance demands our time and attention in order to learn how to use the new technology. Time devoted to keeping pace with technology depletes time for leisure activities.I disagree with the speaker for another reason as well: the suggestion that technologys chief goal should be to facilitate leisure is simply wrongheaded. There are far more vital concerns that technology can and should address. Advances in bio-technology can help cure and prevent diseases; advances in medical technology can allow for safer, less invasire diagnosis and treatment; advances in genetics can help prevent birth defects; advances in engineering and chemistry can improve the structural integrity of our buildings, roads, bridges and vehicles; information technology enables education while communication technology facilitates global participation in thedemocratic process. In short, health, safety, education, and freedom--and not leisure--are the proper final objectives of technology. Admittedly, advances in these areas sometimes involve improved efficiency; yet efficiency is merely a means to these more important ends.In sum, I find indefensible the speakers suggestion that technologys value lies chiefly in the efficiency and resulting leisure time it can afford us. The suggestion runs contrary to the overwhelming evidence that technology diminishes leisure time, and it wrongly places leisure ahead of goals such as health, safety, education, and freedom as technologys ultimate aims.GRE Issue高分范文。
【小站教育】GRE考试Issue全部题目的翻译
Issue全部题目的翻译Issue Topics说明:1.我的分类是对在网上流行的分类题库做了一些小修改。
1)尽可能把相近的题目放在一起,所以题号不一样按顺序排列。
2)另外,我删除多次重复的题号。
3)国际类(International)的两道题,我做了移动。
NO.11 大学题,移至Education --> Education & SocietyNO.13 语言题,移至Politics --> Others2.标黑体的题目是孙远推荐的练习题。
3.高频题根据寄托天下最新机经(2006.3.2)整理,包括2005年及2006年3月的题目:2005年频率在20次以上(含20次)或2006年1月至3月频率在3次以上(含3次)。
频率标注分为两部分,前一部分指2005年2月-9月的频率,后一部分表示2006年1-3月的频率。
非高频的孙远题后面也列出频率统计。
4.欢迎指正。
Redhobor 2006/3/5No.1 StudyStudy Methods (2)28 "Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little."学生们只有在学习了有助于理解事实的思想、趋势和概念后才可能记住这些事实。
孤立学习事实是学不到东西的。
42 "Because learning is not a solitary activity but one that requires collaboration among people, students of all ages will benefit academically if they work frequently in groups."学习不是个人行为,而是需要人们的合作,所以各个年级的学生如果经常在一个群体里工作,他们将会在学业上获益非浅。
gre issue评分标准
GRE Issue的评分标准主要包括以下几个方面:
1. 文章结构:文章应该有清晰的结构,包括引言、主体和结论。
引言应该明确提出文章的主题,主体部分应该对主题进行深入的分析和讨论,结论部分应该总结文章的主要观点并给出明确的结论。
2. 语言表达:文章的语言表达应该清晰、准确、流畅。
评分员会注意拼写错误、语法错误、词汇选择等方面。
3. 逻辑推理:文章应该有逻辑推理的支持,论点应该有充分的证据和推理来支持。
评分员会注意论点的连贯性和一致性。
4. 观点阐述:文章的观点应该明确、有深度,并且能够支持文章的主题。
评分员会注意观点的独特性和深度。
5. 论证方式:文章应该采用适当的论证方式,如因果论证、比较论证等。
评分员会注意论证方式的合理性和有效性。
在评分过程中,每篇GRE Issue都会先由一名人类评分员根据GRE 写作评分标准给出整数分数(0到6之间的任意整数,包括0分、1分、2分、3分、4分、5分、6分)。
然后,ETS的e-rater(ETS基于自然语言分析研发的阅卷程序)会给出0到6之间的实数分数(0~6之间的任意实数值,可能是小数,也可能是整数)。
最终的分数将取两者的平均值。
以上信息仅供参考,建议查阅ETS官方网站获取更准确的信息。
202X年新GRE写作Issue题库中英文对照及分类整理完全版
千里之行,始于足下。
202X年新GRE写作Issue题库中英文对比及分类整理完全版以下是202X年新GRE写作Issue题库中英文对比及分类整理:1. Education- Issue 1: The best way to teach is to praise positive actionsand ignore negative ones.中文:最好的教学方式是赞扬乐观行为,忽视消极行为。
- Issue 2: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside their major field of study.中文:高校应要求每个同学修读多种专业以外的课程。
- Issue 3: The primary purpose of education should be to teach critical thinking skills.中文:教育的主要目的应当是教授批判性思维力量。
- Issue 4: Government funding for education should prioritize STEM fields over humanities and social sciences.中文:政府对教育的资助应将重点放在STEM领域,而不是人文社科领域上。
2. Technology- Issue 5: Technology is making people less creative.中文:科技正在减弱人们的制造力。
- Issue 6: Technology is necessary for the future of education.中文:科技对于教育的将来是必不行少的。
- Issue 7: The government should regulate the use of personal technology devices in public places.第1页/共3页锲而不舍,金石可镂。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
People's bad behaiviour is determined largely by the environment too. Many researchers have reported the bad influence of violent TV shows and computer games on children. If there are many such things, our next generation might degenerate. Children who have watched such TV programmes tend to behave more violently than those who don't. So if a child lives in a country where there are many violent shows, he has more chance to be violent.
ISSUE11
People's behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
The speaker claimed that people's behaviour is largely determined by the society. But sometimes people's behavious is determined by their personalities as well.
What's more, the assertion might cause bad effects. It might grow to a dangerous determinism. People believe their behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making. Excellent people will no longer work hard, believing that success will be on the way because they will do the right things automaticaly; People won't have the responsibility too, thinking that their behaviour is not determined by their own will. So it is dangerous if everyone agrees with the speakers assertion.
However, people's behaviour sometimes is not only determined by the environment, but their own personality as well. If people's behaviour is only determined by forces not of their own making, it might be amazing to note that people should behave so differently in one environment. When seeing a people starving to death, some people offered him food; others went away quietly, pretending not seeing him; still others cursed him, saying that he deserves it. It forces us to believe that there should be much distinction in each person's charactor. Some people are born hospitable; Others are born hostile; Still others are born unsympathetic. This made peoples behaviour such different in the same environment.
So, on the whole, people's behaviour is determined by forces not of their own making to some extent. But people should also be aware of the fact that people's behaviour is determined by their own free will as well. Only in this way, people can no longer be decadent and can be responsible and diligent.
On the whole the speaker's claim is true because the environment does exert great influence on people's behaviour. We all have such embarrassment when our behaivior was too different from others. For example, if everyone brings a gift to a party but I don't. I would have a strong sense of embarrassment. So the next time I am invited to a pห้องสมุดไป่ตู้rty, I would bring a gift with me. This aptly illustrate how great the environment has influenced my behaviour.
485words
The influence can be either good or bad, but it can be a great influence. There is a Chinese saying: The company you keep really does matter. Mencius's mother moved three times simply to find his child a good neighbour. With such good neighbour, Mencius began to learn manner and finaly became one of the most imfluential thinker in the Chinese history. There is another example. One psychology group once conducted an experiment. The experiment went like this. People are asked to go past a donation box. The researchers found amazingly that people are more tend to donate when there are other people who donate. So people's behaviour largely depends on the environment.