再审申请书文字大小要求

再审申请书文字大小要求
英文回答:
In the application for reconsideration, it is required to use two languages, English and Chinese, to answer the questions. First, I will provide my response in English, and then I will provide the Chinese translation. The English and Chinese translations should not be mixed together. Before each response, I will indicate whether it is in English or Chinese.
English Answer:
In the application for reconsideration, it is important to adhere to certain requirements. Firstly, it is necessary to use both English and Chinese languages to provide the answers. This ensures that the response is accessible to both English-speaking and Chinese-speaking individuals. By using both languages, the application can cater to a wider audience and demonstrate the applicant's proficiency in
both languages.
Additionally, it is crucial to avoid revealing the prompt within the text. This means that the application should not explicitly mention the specific question or instructions provided. Instead, the response should focus on providing a comprehensive and detailed explanation of the applicant's circumstances, reasons for reconsideration, and any supporting evidence or documentation.
Furthermore, the application should aim to meet the word count requirement of at least 1500 words. It is important to note that this word count should not be seen as a limitation, but rather an opportunity to provide a thorough and well-structured response. By utilizing a variety of examples, anecdotes, and explanations, the applicant can effectively convey their message and convince the reviewer of the validity of their request for reconsideration.
To ensure clarity and coherence in the response, it is advisable to avoid using repetitive phrases or transition
words such as "firstly," "secondly," "lastly," "in conclusion," "however," "therefore," "in summary," "meanwhile," "to summarize," "for example," and "of course." These phrases can make the response sound repetitive and monotonous. Instead, the applicant should focus on using natural language and expressions to make the response more engaging and relatable.
Furthermore, it is important to vary the length of each paragraph and avoid having multiple paragraphs with similar word counts. Following the proportion of 1:2:3:1:2:3:1:2:3 for the paragraph lengths can help create a visually appealing and well-balanced response. This distribution ensures that each section of the response receives adequate attention and prevents the response from appearing monotonous or formulaic.
Finally, it is recommended to write the response in the first-person perspective. This personalizes the response and allows the applicant to express their thoughts, emotions, and experiences more effectively. Additionally, incorporating idioms, colloquial expressions, and other
linguistic elements can add a touch of authenticity and make the response more relatable to the reviewer.
中文回答：
在重新审议申请中，有一些要求需要遵守。

首先，需要使用英
文和中文两种语言回答问题。

这样可以确保回答对于英语和中文使
用者都是可理解的。

通过使用两种语言，申请可以满足更广泛的受众，并展示申请人在两种语言方面的能力。

此外，必须避免在文章中暴露具体的提示信息。

这意味着申请
不应明确提及具体的问题或指示。

相反，回答应侧重于详细解释申
请人的情况、重新考虑的原因以及任何支持性的证据或文件。

此外，申请应力求满足至少1500字的字数要求。

需要注意的是，这个字数要求不应被视为限制，而是提供了一个机会来提供全面和
结构良好的回答。

通过运用各种例子、轶事和解释，申请人可以有
效地传达他们的信息，说服审阅人员重新考虑他们的请求的合理性。

为了确保回答的清晰和连贯，建议避免使用重复的短语或过渡词，如“首先”，“其次”，“最后”，“总之”，“然而”，
“因此”，“总结”，“同时”，“总的来说”，“比如”和“当
然”。

这些短语会使回答听起来重复而单调。

相反，申请人应着重
使用自然语言和表达方式，使回答更具吸引力和可读性。

此外，重要的是要改变每个段落的长度，并避免多个段落字数
相似。

按照1:2:3:1:2:3:1:2:3的比例分配段落长度可以创建一个
视觉上吸引人且结构良好的回答。

这种分布确保回答的每个部分都
得到充分的关注，避免回答显得单调或公式化。

最后，建议以第一人称的角度来写回答。

这样可以个性化回答，使申请人更有效地表达他们的思想、情感和经历。

此外，融入习语、口语表达和其他语言元素可以增加真实感，并使回答更具亲和力。