分封制和井田制读后感50字

合集下载
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

分封制和井田制读后感50字英文回答:
The feudal system and the well-field system were two major systems of land ownership and social organization in ancient China. The feudal system was based on a hierarchical structure, with the emperor at the top and various levels of nobles below him. Nobles were granted land in exchange for their loyalty and military service. The well-field system, on the other hand, was a more egalitarian system, in which land was divided into small plots and distributed to peasant families. This system was intended to ensure that everyone had access to land and could support themselves.
Both the feudal system and the well-field system had their advantages and disadvantages. The feudal system allowed for a strong central government and a well-organized military. However, it also led to inequality and social stratification. The well-field system was more
egalitarian, but it was also less efficient and less productive than the feudal system.
中文回答:
分封制和井田制是中国古代两种重要的土地所有制和社会组织制度。

分封制建立在等级制的基础之上,皇帝处于金字塔的顶端,下面有不同级别的贵族。

贵族因其忠诚和军功而获得土地。

而井田制则是一种更平等的制度,土地被划分为小块,分配给农民家庭。

这一制度旨在确保每个人都能获得土地,并能维持自己的生活。

分封制和井田制各有其优缺点。

分封制有利于建立一个强大的中央政府和一支训练有素的军队。

然而它也导致了不平等和社会分层。

井田制更加平等,但效率和生产力都不如分封制。

相关文档
最新文档