口腔科手机使用减压沸腾清洗机清洗消毒的效果观察
合集下载
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
【Key words】Stomatology mobile phone;Decompression boiling cleaning machine;75% alcohol;Cleaning effect;Work efficiency
口腔科手机是用来清洁牙石，研磨龋齿坏牙的器械， 使用时直接与口腔疾病患者的唾液、血液、碎屑等异物接 触，手机运转停止时产生负压，吸入这些异物，若不彻底 清洗消毒灭菌将成为交叉感染的重要媒介；又由于口腔科 手机种类繁多，结构复杂、管腔细窄、不宜超声波清洗等 特殊原因，限制了其彻底清洗消毒[1-2]。因此口腔科手机的 清洗消毒一直是一个棘手的令人头疼的问题。2019年08月 底，我院消毒供应中心引进了减压沸腾清洗机，用于口腔 科手机的清洗消毒。现将回收的口腔科手机随机分为两 组，一组采用常规的手工清洗，一组采用减压沸腾清洗机 清洗消毒，并进行清洗效果观察及工作效率对比，作报告 如下。
Pang Jing-cai (Disinfection supply center, people's Hospital of Ganyu District,Jiangsu Lianyungang 222100,China)
【Abstract】Objective Observe the effect of cleaning and disinfecting the stomatology mobile phone using a vacuum boiling washing machine.Methods 186 dental stomatology machines recovered from September 1,2019 to November 1, 2019 were randomly divided into two groups,A and B,with 93 in each group. Group A was cleaned by conventional manual cleaning,and group B was cleaned by manual pretreatment combined with boiling decompression washing machine.The cleaning quality was measured by visual inspection and 75% alcohol gauze wiping and ATP bioluminescence detection,and the difference in cleaning time between the two cleaning methods was compared.Results Visual inspection and 75% alcohol gauze wiping test,the combined rate of group A and B were 94.6% and 100%,respectively,ATP bio-fluorescence detection, group A and B group rate were 90.32% and 100%,respectively, cleaning time difference: group A The time spent by the property workers was 46 minutes,and the time spent by the Group B property workers was only 17 minutes.The difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion The effect of using a vacuum boiling cleaning machine to clean the oral mobile phone is obviously superior to the conventional manual cleaning method,which not only has a good cleaning effect,but also reduces the labor intensity of the worker and improves the work efficiency,and is a cleaning method worthy of promotion.
我院消毒供应中心集中回收口腔科手机以来非常重视手机的清洗选取自身素质高的物业工人固定人员加强口腔科手机清洗流程培训因此每天在口腔科手机的清洗中投入了大量的时间由于口腔科手机表面可能沾染上了病人的血液唾液脓液等甚至渗入到手机表面缝隙处皮圈连接处手工清洗很难处理清洗质量检测中75酒精擦拭消毒会有黑色污渍又由于口腔科手机管腔细窄仅凭高压水枪短时间加压冲洗管腔内很难清洗到位而且高压水枪高压气枪运行过程中产生了大量的噪音污染了环境危害了工作人员的身心健康10
效果好，还减轻了工人的劳动强度，提高了工作效率，是一种值得推广的清洗方法。
【关键词】口腔科手机；减压沸腾式清洗机；75%酒精；清ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ效果；工作效率
【中图分类号】R780.1
【文献标识码】A
【文章编号】ISSN.2095-7882.2020.02.1.03
Observation on the effect of cleaning and disinfecting of stomatology mobile phone using decompression boiling washing machine
【摘要】目的 观察口腔科手机使用减压沸腾清洗机清洗消毒后的效果。方法 将
2019年09月01日～2019年11月01日回收的口腔科手机186只随机分为A、B两组，每组93只。A组采用常规手
工清洗方法，B组采用手工预处理联合沸腾减压清洗机清洗。使用目测法及75%酒精纱布擦拭消毒和ATP生
物荧光检测法检测清洗质量，并比较两种清洗方法的清洗时间差异。结果 目测法及75%酒精纱布擦拭检
测，A组和B组合格率分别为94.6% 和100%，ATP生物荧光检测，A组和B组合格率分别90.32% 和100%，
清洗时间差异：A组物业工人所用时间46 min，B组物业工人所用时间仅为17 min，差异有统计学意义
（P＜0.05）。结论 使用减压沸腾式清洗机清洗口腔手机的效果明显优于常规的手工清洗方法，不仅清洗
2020 年1月 第7卷/第2期
全科口腔医学电子杂志
Vol.7, No.2 Jan. 2020
Electronic Journal Of General Stomatology
1
·论 著·
口腔科手机使用减压沸腾清洗机清洗消毒的效果观察
庞敬彩 （连云港市赣榆区人民医院消毒供应中心，江苏 连云港 222100）
口腔科手机是用来清洁牙石，研磨龋齿坏牙的器械， 使用时直接与口腔疾病患者的唾液、血液、碎屑等异物接 触，手机运转停止时产生负压，吸入这些异物，若不彻底 清洗消毒灭菌将成为交叉感染的重要媒介；又由于口腔科 手机种类繁多，结构复杂、管腔细窄、不宜超声波清洗等 特殊原因，限制了其彻底清洗消毒[1-2]。因此口腔科手机的 清洗消毒一直是一个棘手的令人头疼的问题。2019年08月 底，我院消毒供应中心引进了减压沸腾清洗机，用于口腔 科手机的清洗消毒。现将回收的口腔科手机随机分为两 组，一组采用常规的手工清洗，一组采用减压沸腾清洗机 清洗消毒，并进行清洗效果观察及工作效率对比，作报告 如下。
Pang Jing-cai (Disinfection supply center, people's Hospital of Ganyu District,Jiangsu Lianyungang 222100,China)
【Abstract】Objective Observe the effect of cleaning and disinfecting the stomatology mobile phone using a vacuum boiling washing machine.Methods 186 dental stomatology machines recovered from September 1,2019 to November 1, 2019 were randomly divided into two groups,A and B,with 93 in each group. Group A was cleaned by conventional manual cleaning,and group B was cleaned by manual pretreatment combined with boiling decompression washing machine.The cleaning quality was measured by visual inspection and 75% alcohol gauze wiping and ATP bioluminescence detection,and the difference in cleaning time between the two cleaning methods was compared.Results Visual inspection and 75% alcohol gauze wiping test,the combined rate of group A and B were 94.6% and 100%,respectively,ATP bio-fluorescence detection, group A and B group rate were 90.32% and 100%,respectively, cleaning time difference: group A The time spent by the property workers was 46 minutes,and the time spent by the Group B property workers was only 17 minutes.The difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion The effect of using a vacuum boiling cleaning machine to clean the oral mobile phone is obviously superior to the conventional manual cleaning method,which not only has a good cleaning effect,but also reduces the labor intensity of the worker and improves the work efficiency,and is a cleaning method worthy of promotion.
我院消毒供应中心集中回收口腔科手机以来非常重视手机的清洗选取自身素质高的物业工人固定人员加强口腔科手机清洗流程培训因此每天在口腔科手机的清洗中投入了大量的时间由于口腔科手机表面可能沾染上了病人的血液唾液脓液等甚至渗入到手机表面缝隙处皮圈连接处手工清洗很难处理清洗质量检测中75酒精擦拭消毒会有黑色污渍又由于口腔科手机管腔细窄仅凭高压水枪短时间加压冲洗管腔内很难清洗到位而且高压水枪高压气枪运行过程中产生了大量的噪音污染了环境危害了工作人员的身心健康10
效果好，还减轻了工人的劳动强度，提高了工作效率，是一种值得推广的清洗方法。
【关键词】口腔科手机；减压沸腾式清洗机；75%酒精；清ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ效果；工作效率
【中图分类号】R780.1
【文献标识码】A
【文章编号】ISSN.2095-7882.2020.02.1.03
Observation on the effect of cleaning and disinfecting of stomatology mobile phone using decompression boiling washing machine
【摘要】目的 观察口腔科手机使用减压沸腾清洗机清洗消毒后的效果。方法 将
2019年09月01日～2019年11月01日回收的口腔科手机186只随机分为A、B两组，每组93只。A组采用常规手
工清洗方法，B组采用手工预处理联合沸腾减压清洗机清洗。使用目测法及75%酒精纱布擦拭消毒和ATP生
物荧光检测法检测清洗质量，并比较两种清洗方法的清洗时间差异。结果 目测法及75%酒精纱布擦拭检
测，A组和B组合格率分别为94.6% 和100%，ATP生物荧光检测，A组和B组合格率分别90.32% 和100%，
清洗时间差异：A组物业工人所用时间46 min，B组物业工人所用时间仅为17 min，差异有统计学意义
（P＜0.05）。结论 使用减压沸腾式清洗机清洗口腔手机的效果明显优于常规的手工清洗方法，不仅清洗
2020 年1月 第7卷/第2期
全科口腔医学电子杂志
Vol.7, No.2 Jan. 2020
Electronic Journal Of General Stomatology
1
·论 著·
口腔科手机使用减压沸腾清洗机清洗消毒的效果观察
庞敬彩 （连云港市赣榆区人民医院消毒供应中心，江苏 连云港 222100）