Effective evaluation
绩效评估的英文作文
绩效评估的英文作文英文:Performance evaluation is an important aspect of any organization. It helps to assess the effectiveness of an employee or a team in achieving the set goals and objectives. In my experience, performance evaluations are usually conducted annually or bi-annually and involve a review of the employee's performance over a specific period.During the evaluation process, the employee is assessed based on various factors, including their productivity, quality of work, communication skills, teamwork, andability to meet deadlines. The evaluation also involves setting goals and objectives for the next period and identifying areas where the employee needs to improve.One of the challenges of performance evaluation is ensuring that it is fair and objective. To address this, some organizations use a 360-degree feedback system, whichinvolves gathering feedback from colleagues, managers, and subordinates. This approach helps to provide a more comprehensive view of the employee's performance and reduces the risk of bias.Another challenge is ensuring that the evaluation process is constructive and focuses on development rather than punishment. This can be achieved by providing feedback in a supportive and constructive manner, highlighting the employee's strengths, and providing suggestions for improvement.Overall, performance evaluation is an essential toolfor organizations to assess the effectiveness of their employees and identify areas for improvement. It is crucial to ensure that the process is fair, objective, and constructive to achieve the desired outcomes.中文:绩效评估是任何组织的重要方面。
评估报告 英文
评估报告英文Evaluation ReportAn evaluation report is a document that outlines the results of an assessment or analysis. Typically, evaluation reports are generated in response to a specific question or set of questions. They can be used to measure the effectiveness of a program, process, or activity, as well as identify areas for improvement.There are several key components of an evaluation report, including objectives, methodologies, findings, and recommendations. The objectives of the evaluation should be clearly stated at the beginning of the report. They should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. The methodologies used to conduct the evaluation should also be described, including any data collection techniques, sampling methods, and analysis tools.The findings section of the report should provide a detailed overview of the results of the evaluation. This may include statistical analysis, qualitative data, and other key insights. It is important to present the findings in a clear and concise manner and to reference any sources or data sets used.Finally, the recommendations section of the report should outline any suggested actions or changes based on the evaluation findings. These recommendations should be specific and actionable, and should address any issues or areas for improvement identified during the evaluation process.Evaluation reports are commonly used across a variety of industries and sectors, including education, healthcare, government, and business. They can be used to evaluate everything from educational programs to new product launches. Regardless of the specific application, all evaluation reports should be objective, data-driven, and focused on continuous improvement.In conclusion, evaluation reports play a critical role in measuring the effectiveness of programs, processes, and activities. By providing objective insights and actionable recommendations, these reports help organizations identify areas for improvement and drive continuous growth and development. To be effective, evaluation reports must be well-structured, data-driven, and focused on delivering practical recommendations for improvement.。
performance evaluation 履职评价
performance evaluation 履职评价随着社会的发展,履职评价越来越成为企业、政府机构和非营利组织的重要部分。
履职评价是评估人员工作业绩的一项重要工作。
同时,它也是对人员业绩表现的正式记录,对人员晋升和奖励的参考依据。
以下是关于履职评价的几点讨论。
一、履职评价的目的履职评价旨在评估员工工作表现并对其作出反馈,以指导员工自我提高和组织优化。
在评估和反馈的基础上,组织可以确定员工的发展方向,确保组织的目标和员工的目标保持一致。
同时,履职评价也对员工晋升、奖励和股权分配等方面有着重要的影响。
二、履职评价的指标履职评价的指标包括员工的工作表现、工作贡献、雇主价值和行为表现。
这些指标可以通过员工自我评估、同事评估、上级领导评估等方式收集。
收集到的数据可以根据不同的工作职责、目标和期望进行段位划分,以确定员工的绩效水平。
三、履职评价的实施履职评价应该是一项系统化的过程,需要结合组织的目标和员工的期望进行设计。
评价的过程需要包括对员工绩效的收集、评估和反馈,以及对公司组织的策略和目标的反思。
正式的履职评价应该是由一个经验丰富的评估小组协调完成的,评估小组负责评估员工,并为其提供反馈和薪资调整等措施。
四、履职评价的困境尽管履职评价是组织优化的一项重要工作,但也存在许多困境。
首先,评价结果可能不准确,因为评估没有很好的捕捉到员工工作的真实情况。
其次,评价结果可能刻意或无意地歧视一些员工,如女性、残疾人等。
另外,评价过程可能会产生压力和焦虑感,并可能导致员工离职。
综上所述,履职评价是企业管理的核心内容之一。
它不仅是对员工业绩表现的评价,更是一项长期的反馈和引导工作。
只有建立科学、合理的评价机制,才能保障企业和员工更好的发展。
精细化的评估 英语
精细化的评估英语Precision-based Evaluation: A Comprehensive ApproachEvaluating performance is a critical aspect of any organization, regardless of its size or industry. In today's competitive landscape, the ability to accurately assess and measure the effectiveness of various processes, strategies, and initiatives is essential for driving continuous improvement and achieving sustainable success. One approach that has gained widespread recognition is precision-based evaluation, a comprehensive methodology that focuses on meticulous data analysis and targeted refinement.At the heart of precision-based evaluation lies the recognition that traditional evaluation methods often fall short in capturing the nuances and complexities inherent in modern business environments. Relying solely on broad metrics or generalized benchmarks can overlook crucial details and fail to provide the insights necessary for making informed decisions. Precision-based evaluation, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of granular data collection and rigorous analysis to uncover the underlying factors that contribute to performance outcomes.One of the key advantages of this approach is its ability to identify and address specific areas for improvement. By delving deep into the data, precision-based evaluation enables organizations to pinpoint the root causes of problems, whether they are related to operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, or financial performance. This level of detail allows for the development of targeted interventions and the implementation of tailored solutions, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach.Moreover, precision-based evaluation fosters a culture of continuous learning and improvement. By regularly monitoring and analyzing performance data, organizations can quickly adapt to changing market conditions, respond to emerging trends, and make data-driven decisions that drive sustainable growth. This agility and responsiveness are particularly crucial in today's rapidly evolving business landscape, where the ability to anticipate and adapt to change can be the difference between success and failure.Another key aspect of precision-based evaluation is its emphasis on stakeholder engagement. By involving key stakeholders, such as employees, customers, and partners, in the evaluation process, organizations can gain a deeper understanding of their needs, preferences, and pain points. This collaborative approach not only enhances the relevance and accuracy of the evaluation but also fosters a sense of ownership and commitment among stakeholders,ultimately leading to more effective implementation of improvement initiatives.Furthermore, precision-based evaluation is not limited to a specific industry or organizational size. It can be applied across a wide range of sectors, from manufacturing and healthcare to technology and finance. By tailoring the evaluation framework to the unique characteristics and requirements of each organization, precision-based evaluation can deliver tangible and measurable benefits, regardless of the size or complexity of the business.One example of the successful implementation of precision-based evaluation can be found in the manufacturing industry. A leading automotive manufacturer, faced with increasing global competition and the need to optimize its production processes, adopted a precision-based approach to evaluate its operations. By collecting and analyzing granular data on production efficiency, quality control, and supply chain management, the organization was able to identify specific areas for improvement, such as optimizing the layout of the assembly line, enhancing quality control measures, and streamlining supplier relationships.Through this comprehensive and data-driven approach, the manufacturer was able to achieve significant improvements in overall production efficiency, reduce waste and defects, and enhancecustomer satisfaction. Moreover, the insights gained from the precision-based evaluation enabled the organization to make more informed strategic decisions, such as investing in new technologies, optimizing resource allocation, and aligning its operations with evolving market demands.Another example can be found in the healthcare sector, where precision-based evaluation has played a crucial role in improving patient outcomes and enhancing the overall quality of care. By meticulously collecting and analyzing data on patient demographics, medical histories, treatment protocols, and clinical outcomes, healthcare organizations have been able to identify best practices, optimize care pathways, and develop personalized treatment plans that cater to the unique needs of individual patients.This level of precision has not only led to improved patient satisfaction and better health outcomes but has also enabled healthcare providers to optimize resource utilization, reduce costs, and enhance the overall efficiency of their operations. Furthermore, the insights gained from precision-based evaluation have informed the development of innovative healthcare solutions, such as predictive analytics tools and personalized medicine approaches, which have the potential to transform the industry and improve the lives of patients.In conclusion, precision-based evaluation is a powerful and comprehensive approach that can deliver significant benefits to organizations across various industries. By emphasizing meticulous data collection, rigorous analysis, and targeted interventions, this methodology enables organizations to identify and address specific areas for improvement, foster a culture of continuous learning and adaptation, and make more informed strategic decisions. As businesses continue to navigate the complexities of the modern business landscape, the adoption of precision-based evaluation will become increasingly crucial for driving sustainable growth, enhancing operational efficiency, and delivering exceptional value to stakeholders.。
PICS发布变更管理过程中质量体系有效性评估指南!
PICS发布变更管理过程中质量体系有效性评估指南!近日,PIC/S发布了PI 054-1《如何评估和证实基于风险的变更管理药品质量体系的有效性》指南,指南阐述了药品变更管理过程中的质量体系有效性评估的各个方面,适用于药品GMP检查和药企用于提升其变更管理体系。
指南也提出,变更应将产品质量风险和/或患者安全危害降低到可接受的水平。
至少,变更应保持或改善产品质量和/或患者安全,不应增加工艺可变性。
全文翻译如下:How to Evaluate andDemonstrate the Effectiveness of a Pharmaceutical Quality System in relation toRisk-based Change Management如何评估和证实基于风险的变更管理药品质量体系的有效性1. Document History文件历史Adoption by Committee ofPI 054-1 30June 2021Entry into force of PI 054-1 15July 20212. Introduction介绍2.1. This documentprovides practical guidance for GMP inspectors when seeking to evaluate theeffectiveness of a company’s pharmaceutical quality system (PQS) in relation torisk-based change management. It covers all relevant steps in the changemanagement process –change proposal, change assessment, change planning andimplementation, change review and effectiveness checks. It indicates withineach step the aspects that render the PQS to be effective in that area.本文件为GMP检查员评估公司基于风险的变更管理中药品质量体系(PQS)的有效性提供了实用指南。
关于教师素质评估的英语作文
关于教师素质评估的英语作文Here is an English essay on the topic of teacher quality evaluation, with the content exceeding 1000 words as requested. There are no additional title or unnecessary punctuation marks in the main text.The evaluation of teacher quality is a crucial aspect of ensuring the effectiveness and continuous improvement of the education system. As the primary facilitators of learning, teachers play a pivotal role in shaping the academic and personal development of students. Therefore, it is essential to have a robust and comprehensive system in place to assess the competencies and performance of teachers. This essay will explore the importance of teacher quality evaluation, the key components of such assessments, and the challenges and considerations involved in implementing an effective evaluation framework.The primary rationale for teacher quality evaluation lies in the direct correlation between teacher effectiveness and student outcomes. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the quality of teaching is the single most important in-school factor influencing student achievement and overall academic success. Highly effective teachers not only impart knowledge and skills but also inspire a love oflearning, foster critical thinking, and nurture the holistic development of their students. Conversely, ineffective or underperforming teachers can have a detrimental impact on student learning, engagement, and motivation.By implementing a robust teacher quality evaluation system, educational institutions and policymakers can identify areas of strength and weakness among their teaching staff. This information can then be used to provide targeted professional development opportunities, implement tailored support mechanisms, and make informed decisions regarding hiring, promotion, and retention of teachers. Furthermore, effective evaluation can help to hold teachers accountable for their performance and ensure that they are meeting the high standards expected of the profession.The key components of a comprehensive teacher quality evaluation system typically include a combination of the following elements:1. Classroom observations: Direct observation of teachers' instructional practices, classroom management, and student engagement by trained evaluators or administrators. This provides valuable insights into the day-to-day teaching and learning dynamics within the classroom.2. Student achievement data: Analysis of student performance onstandardized tests, classroom assessments, and other measures of academic growth. This data can help to gauge the impact of a teacher's instruction on student learning outcomes.3. Peer and self-evaluation: Feedback and assessments from colleagues, including collaborative lesson planning, peer observations, and self-reflection on teaching practices. This can foster a culture of continuous improvement and mutual support among teachers.4. Parent and student feedback: Surveys, interviews, and other forms of input from parents and students to gather their perspectives on the teacher's effectiveness, communication, and overall impact on the learning environment.5. Professional development and growth: Evaluation of a teacher's engagement in ongoing professional learning, implementation of new instructional strategies, and commitment to personal and professional growth.While the implementation of a teacher quality evaluation system is essential, it is not without its challenges and considerations. One of the primary concerns is the potential for bias and subjectivity in the evaluation process, particularly in areas such as classroom observations and student feedback. To mitigate this, it is crucial toestablish clear and transparent evaluation criteria, train evaluators thoroughly, and incorporate multiple measures to provide a comprehensive and balanced assessment.Another challenge is the need to strike a delicate balance between accountability and support. While teacher evaluation should hold educators accountable for their performance, it should also be accompanied by targeted professional development opportunities and the provision of resources and support to help teachers improve their practice. Overly punitive or punitive-focused evaluation systems can undermine teacher morale, leading to increased attrition and a reluctance to take risks or try new instructional approaches.Additionally, the implementation of teacher quality evaluation systems must consider the unique contextual factors that can influence teaching and learning, such as school resources, student demographics, and community dynamics. A one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective, and evaluation frameworks should be adaptable to the specific needs and challenges of individual schools and districts.Furthermore, the evaluation process should be designed to foster a culture of continuous improvement and collaboration among teachers. By positioning the evaluation as a tool for growth and development, rather than a means of punishment, schools can createan environment where teachers feel empowered to seek feedback, experiment with new teaching methods, and work collectively to enhance student outcomes.In conclusion, the evaluation of teacher quality is a critical component of ensuring the effectiveness and continuous improvement of the education system. By implementing a comprehensive and well-designed evaluation framework, educational institutions can identify areas of strength and weakness among their teaching staff, provide targeted support and professional development opportunities, and ultimately improve student learning and success. However, the implementation of such a system must be approached with careful consideration of the potential challenges, the need for balance between accountability and support, and the importance of fostering a collaborative and growth-oriented culture among teachers.。
评价计划的词英语
评价计划的词英语In the realm of planning, the term 'evaluation' serves as a pivotal cornerstone. It is the process of assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of a plan, ensuringthat it meets the intended goals and objectives.Evaluations are not merely a retrospective exercise; they are integral to the planning cycle, providing insights that inform the refinement of ongoing and future initiatives. By identifying strengths and weaknesses, evaluations guide adjustments and improvements, ensuring that plans remain relevant and responsive to evolving needs.A well-crafted evaluation plan is characterized by clear criteria and methods, ensuring a systematic and objective assessment. It involves the collection and analysis of data, which can be qualitative or quantitative, to measure outcomes against predetermined benchmarks.Moreover, the language of evaluation should be accessible and jargon-free, facilitating understanding and engagement among stakeholders. It is through this clarity thatevaluations can effectively communicate the value and impactof a plan, fostering trust and support for its implementation.In essence, the term 'evaluation' in planning is synonymous with accountability and learning. It is the mechanism that ensures continuous improvement and adaptation,driving progress towards the desired outcomes.However, the success of an evaluation plan hinges on its implementation. It requires commitment, resources, and a culture that values feedback and learning. When executed effectively, evaluation becomes a catalyst for innovation and excellence in planning.Lastly, the art of evaluation in planning is not static; it evolves with the changing landscape of goals and contexts. As such, it demands adaptability and foresight, ensuring that plans remain robust and relevant in a dynamic world.。
美国卓越绩效评价准则(中英文对照版)-附录1关键术语
美国卓越绩效评价准则(中英文对照版)-附录1关键术语评论:0 条查看:87 次jackiefeng发表于2008-12-23 10:28附录一关键术语“关键术语表”定义并解释了卓越绩效准则中所使用的一些重要的绩效管理术语。
行动计划(action plans)行动计划指对应于长、短期战略目标的具体行动方案。
行动计划包括了详细的资源安排和时间要求。
行动计划的制定是战略策划活动中的一个重要阶段,此时战略目标已经十分明确,从而能够得到整个组织范围内的有效理解和展开。
在本准则中,行动计划的展开包括为各个部门建立起协调一致的测量指标。
这项工作可能会要求对有关人员加以专门的培训或是招募专门的人员。
例如,对于一个处于高度竞争的行业中的供应商而言,其战略目标可以是建立和保持价格优势,其行动计划则可能是在整个组织中协调一致地设计有效的过程并建立能够核算每项活动成本的会计制度。
行动计划的展开或许就是培训各部门或团队基于成本效益原则来设定优先事项。
在整个组织层次上的分析和评审就会强调生产率、成本和质量。
同时可参见“战略目标”的定义。
校准(alignment)校准指计划、过程、信息、资源配置、行动、结果和分析在支持关键的组织目标上的一致性。
要达到有效的校准就必须对使命和目标达成共识,还必须应用多方面指标和信息在组织、关键过程和部门这三个层次上进行计划、追踪、分析和改进。
同时可参见“整合”的定义。
分析(analysis)分析指为提供有效的决策基础而对事实和数据的检证。
分析常常要涉及确定因果关系。
对组织的全面分析可以引导工作系统和工作过程管理,实现关键的组织绩效结果,促进战略目标的实现。
单个的事实和数据虽然也很重要,但通常并不能作为行动和确定优先事项的基础。
有效的行动依赖于对从事实和数据的分析中所得到的关系的理解。
轶闻(anecdotal)轶闻指缺乏具体的方法、指标、展开机制和评价、改进、学习因素的过程信息。
轶闻列举的常常是事例和个人的活动而非系统性的过程。
英语教学评价的设计方案
I. IntroductionEffective teaching evaluation is crucial for the continuous improvement of English language instruction. This proposal outlines a comprehensive design for evaluating English teaching that includes both formative and summative assessments. The goal is to provide a balanced and insightful view of the teaching and learning process, ensuring that students receive high-quality education and teachers are supported in their professional development.II. Objectives of the Evaluation1. Assess the effectiveness of English language instruction.2. Identify areas of strength and areas for improvement in teaching methods.3. Evaluate student learning outcomes.4. Provide feedback to teachers for continuous professional development.5. Ensure compliance with educational standards and best practices.III. Components of the Evaluation1. Pre-Evaluation Survey:- Administer a survey to teachers to gather information about their teaching philosophy, methods, and goals.- Collect data on student demographics and previous learning experiences.2. Observation of Classroom Instruction:- Conduct classroom observations using a structured rubric that evaluates aspects such as teaching strategies, student engagement, and management of classroom activities.- Use video recordings to capture the teaching process for further analysis.3. Student Surveys:- Administer surveys to students to gather their perspectives on the teaching and learning experience.- Include questions about the teacher's effectiveness, clarity of instructions, and overall satisfaction with the course.4. Formative Assessments:- Evaluate students' progress through regular formative assessments, such as quizzes, oral presentations, and group projects.- Use these assessments to provide ongoing feedback to both students and teachers.5. Summative Assessments:- Administer standardized tests or end-of-term exams to measure students' overall achievement.- Include a variety of assessment types, such as reading, writing, listening, and speaking tasks.6. Teacher Reflection and Self-Assessment:- Encourage teachers to reflect on their teaching practices and self-assess their performance using a professional development portfolio.- Provide opportunities for teachers to set goals and plan for improvement.IV. Evaluation Rubrics and Criteria1. Teaching Strategies:- Clarity of objectives and lesson plans.- Use of a variety of teaching methods and resources.- Adaptability to student needs and learning styles.2. Student Engagement:- Student participation and interaction.- Creation of a positive and inclusive learning environment.- Encouragement of critical thinking and problem-solving skills.3. Assessment and Feedback:- Appropriate use of formative and summative assessments.- Timely and constructive feedback to students.- Alignment of assessments with learning objectives.4. Professional Development:- Commitment to ongoing learning and professional growth.- Participation in workshops, seminars, and training sessions.- Implementation of new teaching strategies and best practices.V. Implementation and Timeline1. Preparation Phase (Months 1-2):- Develop and distribute evaluation instruments.- Train evaluators and observers.- Set up a schedule for classroom observations and student surveys.2. Data Collection Phase (Months 3-6):- Conduct classroom observations, student surveys, and teacher interviews.- Administer formative and summative assessments.- Collect teacher reflections and self-assessments.3. Analysis and Reporting Phase (Months 7-8):- Analyze collected data using appropriate statistical methods.- Prepare individualized reports for teachers and a comprehensive report for the institution.- Develop recommendations for improvement based on the evaluation findings.4. Follow-Up and Implementation Phase (Months 9-12):- Provide feedback to teachers and support them in implementing recommended changes.- Monitor the impact of the evaluation on teaching and learning outcomes.- Repeat the evaluation process to track progress over time.VI. ConclusionThis English teaching evaluation design aims to provide a comprehensive and objective assessment of the teaching and learning process. By implementing this proposal, educational institutions can ensure that their English language programs are effective, engaging, and continuously improving.。
英语演讲技巧effective evaluation
Effective EvaluationPublic speaking and leadership are skills, and like any skill they can be developed and improved. In Toast-masters, feedback is called evaluation, and it is the heart of the Toastmasters educational program. You observe the speeches and leadership roles of your fellow club members and offer evaluations of their efforts, and they do the same for you. If you truly want to improve your speaking and leadership skills, you must learn how to give and receive helpful evaluations.IntroductionHave you ever helped your child with a school assignment? Been asked by a co-worker for advice on a project? Offered suggestions to local government?If you have, you have been an evaluator. You have listened to and observed others and their work and offered feedback. You evaluate in some manner every day, at home, at the office, and in the community.In Toastmasters, evaluation is especially important. People join Toastmasters clubs to improve their speaking and leadership skills, and these skills are improved through evaluations. Members prepare and present speeches based on projects in the Competent Communication manual, or they serve in leadership roles whilecompleting projects in the Competent Leadership manual. Their fellow club members evaluate the speeches or leadership efforts, enabling the members to develop their speaking or leadership skills. The tone and content of an evaluation have great impact on the speaker and even on the club. A harsh evaluation may cause a member to leave the club. An overly kind evaluation may not help the member to improve, making the member to improve frustrated and unhappy. Good evaluators strive to find that “middle ground,”giving evaluations that are helpful and encouraging.Although most of the time you will be evaluating others in the club, the skills you learn can be applied in all aspects of your life. You will become a better listener and a more critical thinker. By reading this manual carefully and applying its tips and techniques to your evaluations, you will quickly be able to give helpful, positive, constructive evaluation methods and resources available to help you and your fellow club members, and about how your club can evaluate itself to ensure the club is meeting member needs.When you are the evaluatorThe evaluator’s roleWhen you are assigned to evaluate a speaker or leader, your purpose is to provide honest reaction in a constructive manner to the person’s efforts, using the evaluation guides provided. You are not a judge oran authority on speaking or leadership. When you evaluate, you are simply giving your own reaction to the person’s speaking or leadership efforts. An evaluation is an opinion, nothing more. This opinion should mention the effect on you, what the speaker or leader could improve, and specific recommendations for improvement. Keep in mind that you cannot change the person’s behavior or force the person to accept your ideas and suggested improvements. Nor can you demand that a speaker or leader repeat a project if you believe the person did not accomplish project objectives or otherwise did not perform well. But through your evaluation you can provide information that the speaker or leader may consider for future projects. The decision to accept your suggestions is the speaker or leader’s alone.Even when you are not the assigned evaluator, you are encouraged to give feedback. The more feedback a speaker or leader receives, the more the person benefits. This evaluation need not be as detailed as that of the assigned evaluator, but it should mention something the speaker or leader did well, something that could be improved, and a specific recommendation for improvement. Most clubs provide members with short evaluation forms to fill out and give to the speaker or leader at each meeting, or you can write your evaluation on a piece of paper.If you are a new Toastmaster, you most likely will not be assigned to evaluate until you have read this manual, spoken with your club’s vice president education about the evaluation process, attended at least three or four club meetings where others gave evaluation, and completed one or two speeches or leadership projects yourself. These activities will give you information and experience that you can draw on as you prepare your first evaluation.How to prepareThe speaker or leader has spent hours-even weeks-preparing a project. She deserves the best evaluation possible. The evaluation you provide should be thoughtfully prepared and presented. You will not need hours of presentation time, but you will need at least 15 minutes to do the following:1、Read the project.Every project in the CompetentCommunication, Advanced Communication, and Competent Leadership manuals has a different purpose and different objectives. You will have difficulty evaluating if you are not familiar with the project and objectives. Before the club meeting, obtain the manual from the person and carefully read the project description and objectives.2、Read the evaluation guide for the project.The guideexplains what you should be looking for as you evaluate. It lists specific questions about the speaker or leader and provides a space in which you may write comments. This is the written evaluation you will give to the speaker or leader after the meeting. You will also use this guide as a basis for your verbal evaluation. Your evaluation need not be limited to these points, however. If you want to comment on other aspects of the person’s efforts, you are welcome to do so.3、Talk with the spea ker or leader. This is an important yetsometimes neglected step. Your evaluation will be most helpful if you are aware of the person’s general goals and of specific areas in which the person would like help and feedback. If the leader tells you, for example, that she is working on strengthening her organization skills, you may want to specially address this in your evaluation, even though the evaluation guide does not mention it.You will also be more helpful if you are aware of previous feedback the speaker or leaders has received and any progress made. Avoid duplicating previous evaluations, and don’t merely watch for small inadequacies. Good eye contact, meaningful, natural gestures, and correct grammar contribute it the overall effect of a speech butshould not be g iven so much emphasis that they detract from the basic purpose of the evaluation.Your evaluationBefore the club meeting begins, get the manual from the speaker or leader and turn to the appropriate evaluation guide. Listen carefully and watch closely. Don’t let your mind wander or become distracted. Make notes on the evaluation guide if you want to.After the speaker or leader has finished, begin preparing your evaluation. Complete the evaluation guide, but remember that you need not comment on every question. Then prepare your verbal presentation. You won’t have time to cover everything. Instead, simply select two or three points which you feel are most important and elaborate on them. Be honest. If you did not like some aspect of the person’s performance, do not say that you did. Mention something which could be improved. Some Toastmasters like the“sandwich” approach, where a suggestion for improvement is “sandwiched”between two positive comments. Evaluate only areas that the speaker or leader has the power to change.Be specific. If the speech organization was confusing at one point, say so but clearly address what confused you and offer asuggestion for improvement. “When you were talking about the truck, I wasn’t sure if you were referring to the new one or to the old one. Giving each truck an appropriate nickname and using it throughout the speech may have worked better. That would have made the references clearer to me and maybe even have added more humor. “Or,” I found the evaluation helpful. But I believe that limiting the number of helpful suggestions to three instead of five would have been more manageable and less overwhelming for the speaker. “If you were impressed, for example, with the speaker’s description of an object, say so. “When you described that fudge cake, my mouth watered.”How you say itHow you phrase your evaluation has as much impact on the speaker or leader as the content of you evaluation. When you mean well and have good ideas but else words that put the person on the defensive, you message is lost. Carefully select your words, using the following guidelines.1、Remember that you are speaking only for yourself, givingonly your opinion. You are not speaking on behalf of the audience; in fact, your opinions may differ from those of the rest of the audience. Avoid saying“we think,”“we believe,”“the audience would have,”“the audience didn’tunderstand,” and other words that imply you are speaking on behalf of others.2、Likewise, avoid impersonal statements that imply someoneother than you is giving the evaluation is directed to someone other than the speaker. Do not say “they say,”“one must,”“people are,” or make other vague references.3、Avoid judgment words and phrases, such as “good leadersdon’t,”“that was the wrong thing to say,”“if you want to do it right, you must,”“you did,” and “you were.”4、Use words that describe your own reactions to the speaker,such as “I was impressed with,”“I was confused about,”“when I heard,” and “ I think the speech’s purpose would have been clearer if,” and “I liked it when.”5、Don’t repeat a point once you have made it. Repeating apoint can sound like nagging.6、Avoid words like “never”and “always.”Theseexaggerations detract from your message.Your deliveryWhen you evaluate, you are giving your personal opinion in a friendly, direct, nonthreatening manner. Look directly at the speaker or leader as you give your presentation. Smile. This is not a speech, and you should do nothing that calls moreattention to yourself than your effort to help the speaker or leader. Avoid exaggerated gestures or body language unless they are to illustrate a point you are making about the person’s efforts.As you concludeThe speaker or leader should always walk away from the meeting feeling motivated and eager to begin working on his next project. How you finish your evaluation often determines whether a speaker or leader is motivated or unmotivated. Conclude on a positive note that helps build self-esteem and self-confidence.You could finish by pointing out a particular part of the person’s efforts that you really liked and the effect it had on you. If the person has shown dramatic improvement in some areas, mention it and offer congratulations. Find something that affected you in a positive way and comment on it.Follow upAfter the meeting, return the manual with your written evaluation and ask if he or she has any questions or comments about your evaluation. Make sure the speaker or leader did not misinterpret anything you said. If you have other comments you would like to make verbally, do it at this point. Ask if you could have said or doneanything differently in your evaluation that would have been more helpful.Follow up with the audienceAs mentioned earlier, your evaluation is simply your opinion. You may want to speak with other members in the audience to see if your evaluation was indeed appropriate and accurate. Opinions may vary. But such feedback can help you the next time you are assigned to evaluate a speaker or leader.When you are the speaker or leaderYou joined your Toastmasters club to improve your speaking or leadership skills. Evaluations are the key to achieving this goal. You can do several things to ensure you receive the most benefit each time you speak.1、Inform the evaluator and vice president education of yourgoals. This will enable the vice president education to plan meetings that will help you to meet your goals. The evaluator also will know what to consider when evaluating your next project.2、Tell your evaluator any specific points you would like herto review. The more the evaluator knows about what you hope to accomplish or any specific areas you want help with, the more the evaluator can help you.3、During your evaluation, listen carefully to the evaluator.Look directly at the evaluator and pay attention to what is being said. Suspend all judgment or reaction and do not criticize the evaluation or make faces, other gestures, or jokes.Speakers who do not accept evaluations gracefully soon discover no one wants to evaluator, speak with the evaluator after the meeting.4、Carefully consider each comment and suggestion forimprovement. Don not rush to judgment about anything you evaluator says. Immediately dismissing the evaluator by thinking, “This fellow doesn’t know what he is talking about,”or “She missed out on some valuable feedback. Remember, the evaluator is merely offering her opinions and perceptions may be valid and useful to you, and some may not. You won’t know until you have heard and considered all of them.5、evaluate your efforts yourself. You usually can tell if youachieved your purpose, and you are most likely aware of mistakes you made. After every speech or leadership project, write down what you were pleased with and what you know you should work on when preparing your next project.6、After the meeting, speaking with the evaluator. This is youropportunity to ask any questions about the evaluation youreceived. Be careful not to attack or berate the evaluator.However, if you believe the evaluator could have said something more effectively or been able to help you more, say so, and offer specific suggestions for improvement. If the evaluator did not mention an area on which you would like his feedback, discuss this with him and solicit his opinion.7、Talk with other club members. Your evaluator was only oneperson offering one opinion. You will benefit more by soliciting feedback from other audience members. As mentioned earlier, most clubs encourage all members to give brief written feedback to a speaker. This input can be very helpful. However, verbal feedback is valuable, too. Ask other members what they thought and ask their advice for improvement.Put some variety into evaluationsThe evaluations described above are the most common methods used by clubs. But your club can occasionally try and benefit from other evaluation programs, too. Following are some suggestions: Specialized evaluation. Each evaluator is assigned a particular part to evaluate. For example, one evaluator is assigned to evaluate the opening of all three prepared speakers, while another is assigned to evaluate the organization of all three.Panel discussions. All evaluators evaluate all speech or leadership roles, making notes on items which they feel need emphasis and discussion. The general evaluator then leads a discussion with the evaluators. If enough time is available, the audience can comment, too.Videotaped evaluations.Speakers and leaders are videotaped and the tapes are reviewed during the meeting if time permits. Each evaluator refers to the tape as he gives his verbal evaluation to illustrate points he is making. Or speakers and leaders may take their tapes home for private review. In another variation, the evaluator and speaker or leader meet later to review the tape and both evaluate the presentation.Tape recorded evaluations.Speakers and leaders are recorded on audio tape. The tapes can be evaluated during the club meeting or in the manners described for videotaped evaluations.“Stop the speaker” evaluations. The evaluator stops the speaker or leader and gives immediate reaction. For example, if the speaker’s voice is too soft, the evaluator may stop the leader and say, “I can’t hear you. Speak louder.” Or the evaluator may stop the leader and say, “You may want to offer some specific suggestions for improving the meeting.” Of course, the speaker or leader must agree before the meeting to this type of evaluation, since it can be distracting.Would you like to learn more?Toastmasters International has several programs that your club can conduct to help you and your fellow club members become better evaluators. Ask your vice president education to include them in the club’s meeting schedule.The Art of Effective Evaluation(Catalog No.251) is seminar-style program that gives you tips and techniques for effective evaluations as well as the opportunity to practice them. As part of the program, you will complete a questionnaire to help you identify your club’s evaluation strengths and weakness, and you will receive a workbook that you may use as a reference later. The program is conducted by one of your club members and takes about two and one-half hours. We recommend that clubs conduct it at least once a year. “Evaluate to Motivate”(Catalog No.292) is part of the Successful club Series. This 10-miunte program also can be conducted by one of your club members for the entire club. It offers a quick review of and refresher course on evaluation techniques. Although it is not as thorough as The Art of Effective Evaluation, it is a quick way to motivate members to give better evaluations. It is also helpful to conduct this program if several new members join your club at once. Twice each year your district has a conference, offering educational programs of interest to members. Often a program on evaluation isfeatured. Check with your district officers to see when the next program is scheduled.Toastmasters International also has a program that will help the club to evaluate itself. “Moments of truth”(Catalog No.290) is another module in The Successful Club Series. The program allows you to analyze every aspect of the club’s operations, helping it to become more effective at helping members achieve their goals. The program can be conducted in one hour. We recommend the club conduct this program annually.Recommended evaluation toolsToastmasters International offers a variety of evaluation supplies and tools. In addition to the Art of Effective Evaluation, “Evaluate to Motivate,”and “Moments of Truth,”you may be interested in the following:Ballots and brief evaluations (Catalog No.163)can be used by all club members to give brief evaluations to five speakers and leaders and the Toastmaster, plus ballots for “best speaker”and other awards.Individual speech evaluation from (Catalog No.165) outlines points for the evaluator to cover.Evaluation kit(Catalog No.167) contains 25 of each of the following evaluation materials: Your Speaking Profile, IndividualSpeech Evaluation Form, and Evaluation of the Evaluator.Make every effort to develop evaluation skills. Observe other evaluators. Ask questions. Study this manual. You may even find it helpful to visit other Toastmasters clubs and listen to their evaluators. With more exposure to a variety of evaluations, you will be able to improve your own and help fellow club members improve their speaking and leadership skills. You will also be able to use your evaluation skills. You will also be able to use your evaluation skills outside of the club, becoming more confident in your interactions with others at work, at home, and in the community.。
资产评估的英语词汇
1、liabilities evaluation 负债评估2、restore replacement cost 复原重置成本3、renewal replacement cost 更新重置成本4、non—patent technique and know—how 非专利技术和秘诀5、rate of risk return on investment 风险报酬率6、personal estate 动产7、equal expedient method 对等权宜法8、adjustment coefficient of road condition 车辆行驶路况调整系数purchase cost of vehicle 车辆购置费9、long term investment evaluation 长期投资评估10、newness rate 成新率11、real estate 不动产12、product and store goods evaluation 产成品和库存商品的评估transfer of property right 产权转让13、change of property right 产权变动14、principle of property right interests subject alteration 产权利益主体变动原则 reference object 参照物15、material evaluation 材料评估16、earning ratio of capital 本金化率17、quote 报价18、variable factor adjustment method 变动因素调整法19、key—point evaluation method 重点评估法20、engineering process method with recomposed budge 重编预算工程进度法 replacement cost calculation method 重置核算法21、replacement cost method 重置成本法22、tangible assets 有形资产23、physical wear 有形损耗24、Sino—foreign cooperative business operation 中外合作经营25、Sino—foreign joint venture 中外合资经营26、intellectual property right 知识产权27、expected service life 估计使用年限(有效使用寿命)28、evaluation of construction engineering in process 在建工程评估29、construction engineering in process 在建工程30、evaluation of products in process 在产品评估31、conversion rate 折现率32、discount to present value 折现33、enterprise total assets evaluation 整体企业资产评估34、total assets of enterprise 整体企业资产35、duties of increase in value 增值税36、travelled distance 已行驶里程37、inquiry 询价38、intangible asset evaluation 无形资产评估39、earnings of intangible assets 无形资产收益额40、intangible assets 无形资产41、moral wear 无形损耗42、special privilege evaluation 特许权评估43、special privilege 特许权益44、inflation rate 通货膨胀率45、consumption tax 消费税46、current market price method 现行市价法47、current market price 现行市价48、shop survey 现场勘查49、price index method 物价指数法(指数调整法)50、price index 物价指数51、evaluation of right of use land 土地使用权评估52、right of use land 土地使用权53、land ownership 土地所有权54、practical serviced life 实际已使用年限55、claim 索赔56、present earning value method 收益现值法57、present value of earning 收益现值58、evaluation of trade mark right 商标权评估59、trade mark 商标60、trade credit evaluation 商誉评估61、trade credit 商誉62、market of equipment transfer 设备调剂市场63、equipment sublet out 设备租出64、equipment sublet in 设备租入65、adjustment coefficient of equipment work condition 设备工作状态调整系数 sale of equipment 设备出售66、equipment purchasing 设备采购67、installation and test cost of equipment 设备安装调试费68、transportation cost of equipment 设备运杂费69、equipment leasing with circulating funds 设备融资租赁70、life of equipment 设备寿命71、disposal cost of facilities 设备清理费72、adjustment coefficient of equipment utilization 设备利用调系数73、liquidation price method 清算价格法74、liquidation price 清算价格75、circulating assets 流动资产76、nominal serviced life 名义已使用年限77、book value method 历史成本法78、(FOB) free on board 离岸价79、80、verification and affirmation of assets evaluation 资产评估的验证确认 inassignable assets 不可确指的`资产81、devaluation by real degradation 实体性陈旧贬值82、engineering process method 工程进度法83、function and cost method 功能成本法84、devaluation by functional degradation 功能性陈旧贬值85、fair price 公允价格86、scale economical profit index analysis method 规模经济效益指数分析法 contract 合同87、rights and interests of contract 合同权益88、insurance of ocean transportation 海运保险费89、ocean transportation cost 海运费90、exchange rate 汇率91、time value of money 货币时间价值92、machine equipment evaluation 机器设备评估93、simple age limit method 简单年限法94、price adjustment factor 价格调整系数95、acceptance 接受96、building 建造物97、replacement cost of building 建造物重置价98、functional devaluation of building 建造物功能性贬值99、economical devaluation of building 建造物经济性贬值100、building evaluation 建造物评估101、import duties 进口关税102、economic devaluation 经济性贬值103、assignable assets 可确指的资产104、item request of assets evaluation 评估立项申请105、effective period of assets evaluation 评估有效期106、base date of assets evaluation 评估基准日107、links of evaluation 评估环节108、joint operation of enterprises 企业联营109、liquidation of enterprise 企业清算110、sale of enterprise 企业出售111、joint — stock system operation of enterprise 企业股分制经营112、annexation of enterprise 企业兼并113、resources assets 资源性资产114、resources assets evaluation 资源性资产评估115、original book value of assets 资产原值116、net book value assets 资产净值117、purpose of assets evaluation 资产评估目的118、salient features of assets evaluation 资产评估特点119、basis of assets evaluation 资产评估依据120、subject of assets evaluation 资产评估主体121、operating procedure of assets evaluation 资产评估[操作]程序(法定程序) work principle of assets evaluation 资产评估[工作]原则122、written report of assets evaluation 资产评估报告书123、statutes system of assets evaluation 资产评估法规体系124、method of assets evaluation 资产评估方法125、assets evaluation management 资产评估管理126、assets evaluation organization 资产评估机构127、hypothesis of assets evaluation 资产评估假设128、operation principle of assets evaluation 资产评估经济性(操作性)原则object of assets evaluation 资产评估客体(对象)129、check and arbitration of assets evaluation 资产评估的复核仲裁130、function of assets evaluation 资产评估的功能131、assets evaluation files 资产评估档案132、integrated age limit method 综合年限法133、integrated remainder life 综合剩余寿命134、integrated service life 综合服役年限135、certified public assets estimator 注册资产评估师136、patent 专利137、evaluation of patent right 专利权评估138、assignment of the patent right 专利权转让139、know—how evaluation 专用技术(诀窍)评估140、statistical analysis method 点面推算法141、single assets 单项资产142、(CIF) cost insurance and freight 到岸价143、system of land price 地产友情链接。
Effectiveasof:有效的
Effective as ofMarch 2001NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCEPolicy on Conflicts of Interestfor the Board of DirectorsIntroductionNCQA depends on its Board of Directors (“Board”) to reach decisions objectively, without taint, or the appearance of taint by conflicts of interest. To guard against conflicts of interest, the Board has adopted this Policy on Conflicts of Interest to identify potential areas of conflict of interest of its directors. The policy specifies the procedures to be used by the Board to address and resolve conflicts of interest, and requires the use of a Conflict of Interest Questionnaire and Disclosure Form.The existence of a conflict of interest ordinarily disqualifies a director from participating in the particular board action in which the conflict of interest has arisen. To this end, directors must refrain from participating in deliberations and decisions for which they have a conflict of interest and must completely and accurately disclose any relationships, affiliations, transactions or other interests that could contribute to a perception of a conflict of interest.NCQA seeks (1) to guard against conflicts of interest, (2) to maximize the effectiveness of NCQA, (3) to identify directors whose participation on a particular matter would not be appropriate, and (4) to address through early consideration any potential conflicts of interest. Definition of Conflict of InterestFor purposes of this Policy, the term "conflict of interest" means any direct or indirect financial relationship (as defined below), organizational affiliation, activity, transaction, or other interest which (1) could significantly impair the director's objectivity and/or (2) could create a significant unfair competitive advantage for the director or any organization with which the director has a direct financial relationship (as defined below).Selection of Board MembersIn the selection of board nominees, potential conflicts of interest are considered by the NCQA Board based upon available information. Individuals elected to the Board are asked to complete a "Conflict of Interest Questionnaire and Disclosure Form." Thereafter, any changes in the information previously supplied or any new information -- e.g., new employment, new consulting relationships, new investments, indirect financial relationships, etc. -- that are relevant to the questions of conflict of interest should be promptly reported.Open Discussion of Conflicts of InterestThe general questions of conflicts of interest, and the relevant circumstances of the individual directors will be discussed annually, or as the need arises. This discussion procedure is used because of NCQA's belief that NCQA's public service mission is served by frank discussion within the Board, from time to time, about the Board's actual objectivity or its credibility in light of its tasks and the directors' relationships, affiliations, positions, etc. Because of the sensitive nature of these discussions and the necessity that directors speak freely, these discussions will not be recorded in the minutes of the Board.QuestionnaireThe request for information on the "Conflict of Interest Questionnaire and Disclosure Form", and the discussion of potential sources of conflicts of interest are not intended to question the personal integrity of any individual. The overriding objective is to ensure that the work of NCQA is not compromised or diminished by any actual or perceived conflict of interest.General Guidelines on Conflicts of InterestDirect Financial Relationship. A director should not participate in any decision of the Board which specifically involves an organization with which the director has a “direct financial relationship.” A person has a “direct financial relationship” with an organization if he or she: is a beneficial owner of more than one percent of the equity of the organization;is a director or officer of the organization;is an employee of the organization;is engaged in the sale or lease of real estate or personal property to or from theorganization;furnishes services (including management or any other consultant services) to theorganization; orhas a creditor/debtor relationship with the organization.In addition, a director should not participate in any decision regarding the award of a contract or grant or any other substantial economic benefit, to the director, to any person with whom the director has a family or marital relationship or similar close personal relationship, to the director's immediate employer, or to any organization in which the director has a direct financial relationship, since to do so would be a conflict of interest.Likewise, a director should not participate in a matter for which there is a significant possibility, based upon the nature and scope of the board decision, that the board decision would, if implemented, have a direct and substantial economic impact on the director, on others with whom the director is closely associated or on any person with whom the director has a family or marital relationship or similar close personal relationship.Indirect Financial Relationship. The fact that a director is part of a constituency that may be affected by an NCQA board decision would not normally constitute a conflict of interest. However, there may be instances when the Board considers matters specifically involving an entity with which the director has an “indirect financial relationship.” A director has an “indirect financial relationship” with an entity if:the director has a direct financial relationship (as defined above) with an organizationthat competes with the entity (“Competing Entity”);the director has a direct financial relationship with any organization that has a directfinancial relationship with the entity (“Interested Entity”);the director's family (brother, sister, child, spouse (or similarly close person), parent, orother family member residing in the director’s home) has a direct financial relationshipwith the entity, a Competing Entity, or an Interested Entity.If the Board considers any matter involving an entity with which a director has an “indirect financial relationship,” the director shall disclose his or her relationship. Such director's participation in the matter shall only be permitted if the director's indirect financial relationship does not constitute a conflict of interest, as defined above.Public Statements and Positions. A director may have become committed to a position on a particular issue through public statements (e.g., testimony, speeches, interviews, etc.), through publications (e.g., articles, books, etc.), through close identification or association with the positions or perspectives of a particular group, or through other personal or professional activities. Ordinarily, such public statements and positions would not constitute a conflict of interest. In extreme situations -- e.g., where the director is currently the president or a representative of a professional society that espouses a position on the issue -- the situation may constitute a conflict of interest.Access to Data and Confidentiality. The opportunity to have access to sensitive information or data during the course of a director’s service on the Board, if abused or misused, may confer an unfair competitive advantage. A director may not use such information or data compiled or analyzed by NCQA for any purpose other than for NCQA's objectives. No directormay use such information or data for the director's own direct and substantial economic benefit. No director may disclose such information or data to other individuals or to organizations without the permission of NCQA. No director may use insider information or data for personal gain or the gain of others. All matters brought before the Board are confidential and may not be used for any purpose other than for NCQA's objectives. The restrictions described above do not apply to information once it has entered the public domain.Procedures for AddressingConflicts of Interestfor the Board of DirectorsThe following actions should be pursued in addressing and resolving conflicts of interest that may affect Board consideration of an issue:1. Each director shall file annually with the Board the Conflict of InterestQuestionnaire and Disclosure Form for the Board of Directors. Each director shall havea continuing obligation to disclose fully any relationships or transactions which may ariseand create or involve conflicts of interest.2. Whenever a director is unsure as to the existence of a conflict of interest, fulldisclosure shall be made to the Board of Directors, which shall determine the existence of conflicts of interest. If the Board of Directors determines that a conflict of interest exists, the affected director shall follow the procedure established in this policy.3. Any director having a conflict of interest regarding any matter presented to theBoard for action shall make certain that the existence of such conflict of interest is fully disclosed to the Board and made a matter of record.4. A director having a conflict of interest with respect to any matter coming beforethe Board shall not vote or use his or her personal influence to affect the outcome ofBoard action with respect to such matter.5. The minutes of the Board meetings shall reflect the fact that any director with aconflict of interest refrained from voting.6. If a conflict exists which will affect a director's continued service on the Board,the director shall terminate the conflicting activity or organizational association or resign from the Board. If the director fails to resolve the conflict, the Board shall remove thedirector as permitted by the Bylaws.Conflict of Interest Questionnaire and Disclosure Formfor the Board of DirectorsPlease read the NCQA Policy on Conflicts of Interest before completing this form.Any changes in information reported on this form or any new information relevant to conflicts of interest should promptly be reported to the Board of Directors.Name:Address:Telephone and Fax Numbers:Employer:Title:1. To the best of your knowledge, are you now, or haveNo Yes you ever been employed by, a director of, affiliated with, or inany way related to an organization that reviews, monitors,certifies or accredits any health insurer or health careorganization other than NCQA?If the answer to this question is “yes,” please explain thecircumstances and the name of the organization.No Yes 2. To the best of your knowledge, have you everparticipated in, or are you participating in, the review,certification or accreditation (whether sponsored by a public orprivate entity) of a health insurer or health care organization,other than an internal review of a health insurer or health careorganization for whom you work or were working at the time ofthe internal review, or other than for NCQA?If the answer to this question is “yes,” please explain the natureof the participation, the name of the reviewing entity, and thename of the health insurer or health care organization reviewed.No Yes 3. To the best of your knowledge, are you engaged in a“direct financial relationship” (as defined in the NCQA Policyon Conflicts of Interest for the Board of Directors) with a healthinsurer or health care organization?If the answer to this question is “yes,” please explain the natureof the interest and the name of the managed care organization.No Yes 4. To the best of your knowledge, does or did any memberof your family (brother, sister, child, spouse or similarly closeperson, parent, or other family member residing in your home)have a direct financial relationship with any health insurer orhealth care organization?If the answer to this question is “yes,” please explain the natureof the interest and the name of the health insurer or health careorganization.No Yes 5. Do you have any affiliations, either paid or unpaid, withany health care organization, including but not limited to, anyhealth care provider, professional organization, tradeassociation, or public interest or civic group?If the answer to this question is “yes,” please identify andexplain.No Yes 6. Have you written or published any articles, given anytestimony or speeches (or anything similar) regarding anymatter contrary to NCQA’s mission?If the answer to the above question is “yes,” please list them bydate and title, and publication (if any).No Yes 7. To the best of your knowledge, do you possess, directlyor indirectly, any interest in any supplier of goods or services toor in any organization that has a financial relationship withNCQA?If your answer to this question is “yes”, please explain thenature of the interest and the name of the supplier ororganization.No Yes 8. To the best of your knowledge, does any member ofyour family (brother, sister, child, spouse (or similarly closeperson), parent, or other family member residing in your home)possess, directly or indirectly, any interest in any supplier ofgoods or services to or in any organization that has a financialrelationship with NCQA?If your answer to this question is “yes,” please explain thenature of the interest and the name of the supplier ororganization.9. Do you have any other circumstances in yourNo Yes background or present affiliations or activities that mightreasonably be construed as a conflict of interest or give theappearance of a conflict of interest?If the answer to this question is “yes” please explain.I certify to the best of my knowledge that my responses to the above questions are true, correct and complete and I agree to comply in all respects with the NCQA Policy on Conflicts of Interest for the Board of Directors.Date:SignatureType)or(PrintName。
评价方法英文作文
评价方法英文作文英文:When it comes to evaluating something, there are several methods that can be used. The most common methods include subjective evaluation, objective evaluation, and comparative evaluation.Subjective evaluation is based on personal opinions and feelings. For example, if I were to evaluate a movie based on my personal enjoyment of it, that would be a subjective evaluation. This type of evaluation can be useful in determining how people feel about something, but it can also be biased and unreliable.Objective evaluation, on the other hand, is based on measurable criteria. For example, if I were to evaluate a car based on its fuel efficiency, that would be anobjective evaluation. This type of evaluation is more reliable than subjective evaluation, but it may not takeinto account personal preferences.Comparative evaluation involves comparing two or more things to determine which one is better. For example, if I were to evaluate two different brands of laptops to determine which one is more reliable, that would be a comparative evaluation. This type of evaluation can beuseful in making decisions, but it may not provide a complete picture of each individual thing being evaluated.Overall, the best method of evaluation depends on whatis being evaluated and the purpose of the evaluation. It is important to consider both subjective and objective factors, as well as any personal preferences or biases.中文:当涉及到评价某些事物时,有几种常见的方法可以使用。
小学英语家庭作业评价的有效方法
小学英语家庭作业评价的有效方法【摘要】Effective evaluation of elementary school English homework is crucial for students' learning progress. This article explores various methods to assess and provide feedback on students' homework effectively.To begin with, establishing clear evaluation criteria is essential to help students understand their performance standards. Moreover, it is important to consider individual differences among students and provide personalized feedback accordingly.Encouraging parents to participate in the homework evaluation process can also enhance students' learning experience and motivation.Additionally, timely feedback is key to addressing students' strengths and weaknesses promptly.Furthermore, establishing a reward system can incentivize students to put in more effort and improve their homework quality.In conclusion, effective homework evaluation methods can stimulate students' interest in learning and boost their academic progress.To enhance the effectiveness of homework evaluation, it is recommended to summarize and implement best practices.Looking ahead, the future trend of homework evaluation should focus on incorporating innovative assessment methodsto cater to diverse learning needs and styles.【关键词】家庭作业评价、小学英语、有效方法、评价标准、个体差异、家长参与、及时反馈、奖励机制、学习兴趣、学习进步、提高效果、发展方向。
the most exact evaluation -回复
the most exact evaluation -回复什么是“the most exact evaluation”?“the most exact evaluation”是一种最准确的评估方法或评价标准。
它通常用于衡量某个事物的真实价值、质量或效果,以便做出全面而合理的决策。
在各个行业和领域,人们经常使用该方法来确定产品、服务、学术研究等的真实表现和价值。
那么,如何进行“the most exact evaluation”?首先,进行“the most exact evaluation”需要明确评估的对象和目的。
无论是评估一项产品的市场价值,还是评估一篇学术论文的质量,准确定义评估目标对后续的评估步骤至关重要。
接下来,需要确定评估指标。
评估指标是用来衡量和度量评估对象的标准,它们直接关联着评估结果的准确性。
在选择评估指标时,应该考虑到评估目标的特性、所涉及的领域和行业标准。
通过对数据和信息的收集和分析,确定适当的评估指标将有助于我们得出更准确的评估结果。
随后,要收集相应的数据和信息。
根据所选的评估指标,我们需要收集与评估对象相关的数据和信息。
这些信息可以通过问卷调查、实地观察、文献研究等方式获得。
在这个过程中,需要保证数据的真实性和完整性,以确保评估结果的可靠性。
然后,进行数据分析和解读。
在数据收集完成后,需要对数据进行统计分析、图表制作等操作,以便更好地理解和解释数据。
通过这一步骤,我们可以看到评估对象的各个方面的表现,并进一步得出评估结论。
最后,对评估结果进行综合和解释。
将数据分析的结果和相关信息结合起来,对评估对象的表现进行综合评价。
这一步骤不仅包括量化指标的衡量,也需要考虑定性信息的贡献。
通过对评估结果的解释,我们能够对评估对象有更准确的了解,并可以为决策提供可靠的依据。
需要注意的是,“the most exact evaluation”是一个相对的概念。
在实际评估过程中,由于评估对象的复杂性和评估者的主观性,我们很难达到完全的准确性。
价值评价体系 英语
价值评价体系英语Value Evaluation SystemIntroduction:In today's fast-paced and globalized world, accurate assessment of value is of utmost importance. A well-structured value evaluation system plays a crucial role in decision-making processes. This article aims to explore the value evaluation system and its significance in various contexts.Definition of Value Evaluation System:A value evaluation system is a structured framework used to assess the worth, significance, or importance of an entity, idea, or concept. It involves a systematic approach that takes into account various criteria and factors to arrive at a comprehensive evaluation.Importance of a Value Evaluation System:1. Business and Economy:In the business world, a value evaluation system helps organizations determine the profitability and potential of investments, products, or services. It enables informed decision-making, promotes competitiveness, and ensures long-term sustainability.2. Education:In the field of education, a value evaluation system aids in assessing the effectiveness of teaching methods, curriculum, and educational programs. Itprovides valuable insights to improve the overall quality of education and enhance student outcomes.3. Environment:A value evaluation system is essential for evaluating the impact of human activities on the environment. It helps in determining the ecological value of natural resources, guiding eco-friendly practices, and promoting sustainable development.4. Social and Cultural:The value evaluation system plays a vital role in assessing the social and cultural importance of various aspects such as art, literature, heritage, and traditions. It aids in preserving cultural heritage, promoting diversity, and enriching societal well-being.Components of a Value Evaluation System:1. Criteria:A value evaluation system involves the identification and selection of appropriate criteria based on the context and purpose of evaluation. These criteria serve as the foundation for assessing the value of an entity.2. Weightage:Each criterion within the value evaluation system is assigned a specific weightage that reflects its relative importance. This helps in prioritizing criteria and ensuring a balanced evaluation.3. Methodology:A value evaluation system employs a defined methodology or a set of analytical tools to evaluate and quantify the value of an entity. These methods could include cost-benefit analysis, qualitative and quantitative assessment, or multi-criteria decision-making models.4. Data Collection and Analysis:Accurate data collection and analysis are essential for a value evaluation system to yield reliable results. Data sources may include surveys, interviews, expert opinions, or statistical records. Advanced analytical techniques are employed to process and interpret the collected data.5. Reporting and Communication:A value evaluation system should provide clear and concise reports presenting the evaluation results. Effective communication of these results to stakeholders ensures transparency, understanding, and acceptance of the value assessment.Challenges and Considerations:1. Subjectivity:Value evaluation can be subjective, as it often involves personal opinions, cultural nuances, and differing perspectives. Ensuring objectivity and impartiality in the evaluation process is crucial to maintain its credibility.2. Adaptability:Value evaluation systems need to be adaptable and responsive to changing contexts, societal values, and emerging trends. Regular updatesand revisions of the evaluation criteria and methodologies are necessary to remain relevant.3. Stakeholder Engagement:Incorporating the views and inputs of stakeholders during the development and implementation of a value evaluation system enhances its legitimacy and acceptance. Stakeholder engagement fosters inclusivity, credibility, and effective decision-making.Conclusion:A well-designed and implemented value evaluation system serves as a powerful tool in assessing the worth and significance of various entities in different contexts. Whether in business, education, environment, or social and cultural domains, the value evaluation system plays a crucial role in facilitating informed decision-making and promoting sustainable development. Striving for objectivity, adaptability, and stakeholder engagement ensures the effectiveness and reliability of the value evaluation system.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
CONTENTSIntroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 When You Are the Evaluator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 The Evaluator’s Role . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3How to Prepare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Your Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4How You Say It . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Your Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5As You Conclude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Follow Up with the Speaker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Follow Up with the Audience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 When You Are the Speaker or Leader . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Put Some Variety into Evaluations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Would You Like to Learn More? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Recommended Evaluation Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 EFFECTIVE EVALUATIONP ublic speaking and leadership are skills that can be developed and improved. In Toast m asters, feedback is called evaluation, and it is the heart of the Toastmasterseducational program. You observe the speeches and leadership roles of your fellowclub members and offer evaluations of their efforts, and they do the same for you. If youtruly want to improve your speaking and leadership skills, you must learn how to give and receive helpful evaluations.INTRODUCTIONHave you ever helped your child with a school assignment? Been asked by a co-worker for advice on ap roject? Offered suggestions to local g overnment?If you have, you have been an evaluator. You have listened to and observed others and their work andoffered feedback. You evaluate in some manner every day, at home, at the office, and in the community.People join Toastmasters clubs to improve their speaking and leadership skills, and these skills areimproved through evaluations. Members prepare and present speeches based on projects in the Compe-tent Communication manual, or they serve in leadership roles while c ompleting p rojects in the Competent Leadership manual. Their fellow club m embers evaluate the speeches or leadership efforts, enabling them embers to develop their speaking or leadership skills.The tone and content of an evaluation have great impact on the speaker and even on the club. A harsh evaluation may cause a member to leave the club. An overly kind evaluation may not help the member to improve, making the member frustrated and unhappy. Good evaluators strive to find a balance between the extremes, giving evaluations that are h elpful and encouraging.Although most of the time you will be evaluating others in the club, the skills you learn can be appliedin all aspects of your life. You will become a better listener and a more critical thinker. By reading this manual carefully and applying its tips and techniques to your evaluations, you will quickly be able to give helpful, positive, constructive evaluations that will motivate and genuinely help the receiver. You will also learn aboutother evaluation methods and resources available to help you and your fellow club members, and about howyour club can evaluate itself to ensure the club is meeting member needs.WHEN YOU ARE THE EVALUATORThe Evaluator’s RoleYour purpose as an evaluator is to p rovide honest reaction in a constructive manner to the person’s efforts,using the evaluation guides provided. You are not a judge or an author i ty on speaking or l eadership. Whenyou evaluate, you are simply giving your own reaction to the person’s speaking or leadership efforts. An evalu-ation is an opinion, nothing more. This o pinion should mention the effect on you, what the speaker or leaderdid well, areas where the speaker or leader could improve, and specific recommendations for improvement.Keep in mind that you cannot change the person’s behavior or force the person to accept your ideas and suggested improvements. Nor can you demand that a speaker or leader repeat a project if you believe theperson did not accomplish p roject objectives or otherwise did not p erform well. But through your evalua-tion you can provide information that the speaker or leader may consider for future projects. The decision to accept your s uggestions is the speaker or leader’s alone.EFFECTIVE EVALUATION 3Even when you are not the assigned evaluator, you are encouraged to give feedback. The more feedbacka speaker or leader receives, the more the person benefits. This evaluation need not be as detailed as that ofthe assigned evaluator, but it should mention something the speaker or leader did well, something that could be improved, and a specific recommendation for improvement.Most clubs provide members with short evaluation forms to fill out and give to the speaker or leader at each meeting, or you can write your evaluation on a piece of paper.If you are a new Toastmaster, you most likely will not be assigned to evaluate until you have read this manual, spoken with your club’s vice president education about the evaluation process, attended at leastthree or four club meetings where others gave evaluations, and completed one or two speeches or leader-ship projects yourself. These a ctivities will give you information and experience that you can draw on as you prepare your first e valuation.How to PrepareThe speaker or leader has spent hours – even weeks – preparing a project. She deserves the best evaluation possible. The evaluation you provide should be thoughtfully prepared and presented. You will not need hours of preparation time, but you will need at least 15 minutes to do the following:1. Read the project. Every project in the Competent Com m unication, Advanced Communication Series,and Competent Leadership manuals has a different p urpose and different objectives. You will haved ifficulty evaluating if you are not familiar with the project and objectives. Before the club meeting,obtain the manual from the person and carefully read the project description and objectives.2 .Read the evaluation guide for the project. The guide explains what you should be looking for asyou evaluate. It lists specific questions about the speaker or leader and provides a space in which youmay write comments. This is the written evaluation you will give to the speaker or leader after themeeting. You will also use this guide as a basis for your verbal evaluation. Your evaluation need not belimited to these points, however. If you want to comment on other aspects of the person’s efforts, youare welcome to do so.3 .Talk with the speaker or leader. This is an important yet sometimes neglected step. Your evalua-tion will be most helpful if you are aware of the person’s general goals and of specific areas in whichthe person would like help and feedback. If the leader tells you, for example, that she is working onstrengthening her organization skills, you may want to specifically address this in your evaluation, eventhough the evaluation guide does not mention it.You will also be more helpful if you are aware of previous feedback the speaker or leader has received and any progress made. Avoid duplicating previous evaluations, and don’t merely watch for small inadequacies. Good eye contact, meaningful, natural gestures, and correct grammar contribute to the overall effect of a speech but should not be given so much emphasis that they detract from the basic purpose of the evaluation.Your EvaluationBefore the club meeting begins, get the manual from the speaker or leader and turn to the appropriate evalu-ation guide. Listen carefully and watch closely. Don’t let your mind wander or become distracted. Make notes on the evaluation guide if you want to.After the speaker or leader has finished, begin preparing your evaluation. Complete the evaluation guide, but remember that you need not comment on every question. Then prepare your verbal presentation. You won’t have time to cover everything. Instead, simply select two or three points which you feel are most4 EFFECTIVE EVALUATIONimportant and elaborate on them. Be honest. If you did not like some aspect of the person’s performance, donot say that you did. Mention something the person did well in addition to something which could be improved. Some Toastmasters like the “sandwich” approach, where a suggestion for improvement is sandwichedbetween two positive comments. Evaluate only areas that the speaker or leader has the power to change.Be specific. If the speech organization was confusing at one point, say so but clearly address what con-fused you and offer a suggestion for improvement. “When you were talking about the truck, I wasn’t sure ifyou were referring to the new one or to the old one. Giving each truck an appropriate nickname and usingit throughout the speech may have worked better. That would have made the references clearer to me and maybe even have added more humor.” Or, “I found the evaluation helpful. But I believe that limiting the num-ber of helpful suggestions to three instead of five would have been more manageable and less overwhelmingfor the speaker.” If you were impressed, for example, with the speaker’s description of an object, say so. “Whenyou described that fudge cake, my mouth watered.”How You Say ItHow you phrase your evaluation has as much impact on the speaker or leader as the content of your evalu-ation. When you mean well and have good ideas but use words that put the person on the defensive, your message is lost. Carefully select your words, using the following guidelines.Remember that you are speaking only for yourself, giving only your opinion. You are not speaking onbehalf of the audience; in fact, your opinions may differ from those of the rest of the audience. Avoidsaying “we think,” “we believe,” “the audience would have,” “the audience didn’t understand,” and otherwords that imply you are speaking on behalf of others.Likewise, avoid impersonal s tatements that imply someone other than you is giving the e valuation, orimply the evaluation is directed to someone other than the speaker. Do not say “they say,” “one must,”“people are,” or make other vague references.Avoid judgment words and phrases, such as “good leaders don’t,” “that was the wrong thing to say,” “ifyou want to do it right, you must,” “you did,” and “you were.”Use words that describe your own r eactions to the speaker, such as “I was impressed with,” “I was con-fused about,” “when I heard,” and “I think the speech’s purpose would have been clearer if,” and “I likedit when.”Don’t repeat a point once you have made it. Repeating a point can sound like nagging.Avoid words like “never” and “always.” These exaggerations detract from your m essage.Your DeliveryWhen you evaluate, you are giving your personal opinion in a friendly, direct, non-threatening manner. Look directly at the speaker or leader as you give your presentation. Smile. This is not a speech, and you should do nothing that calls more attention to yourself than to your effort to help the speaker or leader. Avoid exagger-ated gestures or body language unless they are to illustrate a point you are making about the person’s efforts.As You ConcludeThe speaker or leader should always walk away from the meeting feeling motivated and eager to beginworking on his next project. How you finish your evaluation often determines whether a speaker or leader is motivated or unmotivated. Conclude on a positive note that helps build self-esteem and self-confidence.EFFECTIVE EVALUATION 5You could finish by pointing out a p articular part of the person’s efforts that you really liked and the effect it had on you. If the person has shown dramatic improvement in some area, mention it and offer congratula-tions. Find something that affected you in a positive way and c omment on it.Follow Up with the SpeakerAfter the meeting, return the m anual with your written evaluation and ask if he or she has any questions or comments about your evaluation. Make sure the speaker or leader did not misinterpret a ny t hing you said. If you have other comments you would like to make verbally, do it at this point. Ask if you could have said or done a nything differently in your eval u ation that would have been more helpful.Follow Up with the AudienceAs mentioned earlier, your evaluation is simply your opinion. You may want to speak with other membersin the audience to see if your evaluation was indeed appropriate and accurate. Opinions may vary. But such feedback can help you the next time you are assigned to evaluate a speaker or leader.WHEN YOU ARE THE SPEAKER OR LEADERYou can do several things to ensure you receive the most benefit each time you speak.1. Inform the evaluator and vice p resident education of your goals. This will enable the vicep resident education to plan meetings that will help you to meet your goals. The evaluator also willknow what to consider when evaluating your next project.2 .Tell your evaluator any specific points you would like her to review. The more the evaluatorknows about what you hope to accomplish or any specific areas you want help with, the more theevaluator can help you.3 .During your evaluation, listen c arefully to the evaluator. Look directly at the evaluator and paya ttention to what is being said. Suspend all judgment or reaction to what you hear. Be receptive and donot criticize the evaluator or make faces, other gestures, or jokes. Speakers who do not accept evalu-ations gracefully soon discover no one wants to evaluate them. If you have something to say to theevaluator, speak with the evaluator after the meeting.4. Carefully consider each comment and suggestion for improvement. Do not rush to judgmentabout anything your evaluator says. Immediately dismissing the evaluator by thinking, “This fellowdoesn’t know what he is talking about,” or “She missed the point,” means you may be missing out onsome valuable feedback. Remember, the evaluator is merely offering her opinion of what she saw andheard. Some of her opinions and perceptions may be valid and useful to you, and some may not. Youwon’t know until you have heard and considered all of them.5 .Evaluate your efforts yourself. You usually can tell if you achieved your purpose, and you are mostlikely aware of mistakes you made. After every speech or leadership project, write down what you werepleased with and what you know you should work on when preparing your next project.6. After the meeting, speak with the evaluator. This is your oppor t unity to ask any questions aboutthe evaluation you received. Be careful not to attack or berate the evaluator. However, if you believe theevaluator could have said something more effectively or been able to help you more, say so, and offers pecific suggestions for improvement. If the evaluator did not mention an area on which you would likehis feedback, discuss this with him and solicit his opinion.6 EFFECTIVE EVALUATION7. Talk with other club members. Your evaluator was only one person offering one opinion. You willbenefit more by soliciting feedback from other audience members. As mentioned earlier, most clubsencourage all members to give brief w ritten feedback to a speaker. This input can be very helpful.However, verbal feedback is valuable, too. Ask other members what they thought and ask their advicefor improvement.PUT SOME VARIETY INTO EVALUATIONSThe evaluations described above are the most c ommon methods used by clubs. But your club can occasion-ally try and benefit from other evaluation p rograms, too. Following are some suggestions:Specialized Evaluation. Each evaluator is assigned a particular part to evaluate. For example, oneevaluator is assigned to evaluate the opening of all three prepared speakers, while another is assignedto evaluate the organization of all three.Panel Discussions. All evaluators e valuate all speech or leadership roles, making notes on items which they feel need emphasis and discussion. The g eneral evaluator then leads a d is c ussion with the evalua-tors. If enough time is available, the audience can c omment, too.Video Evaluations. Speakers and leaders are recorded on video and the recordings are reviewedd uring the meeting if time permits. Each evaluator refers to the video as he gives his verbal evalua-tion to i llustrate points he is making. Or speakers and leaders may review their recordings privately. Inanother variation, the evalutor and speaker or leader meet later to review the video and both evaluatethe presentation.Audio Recorded Evaluations. Speakers and leaders are recorded and the recordings can be evaluatedduring the club meeting or in the manners described for video evaluations.“Stop the Speaker” Evaluations. The evaluator stops the speaker or leader and gives immediater eaction. For example, if the speaker’s voice is too soft, the evaluator would stop the speaker and say,“I can’t hear you. Speak louder.” Or the evaluator may stop the leader and say, “You may want to offersome specific suggestions for improving the meeting.” Of course, the speaker or leader must agreebefore the meeting to this type of evaluation, since it can be distracting.WOULD YOU LIKE TO LEARN MORE?Toastmasters International has several presentations that your club can conduct to help you and your fellowclub members become better evaluators. Ask your vice president education to include them in the club’smeeting schedule.“The Art of Effective Evaluation” (/251) is a seminar-style presentation that givesyou tips and techniques for effective evaluations as well as the opportunity to practice them. As part of the seminar, you will complete a questionnaire to help you identify your club’s evaluation strengths and weaknesses,and you will receive a workbook that you may use as a reference later. The seminar is conducted by one ofyour club members and takes about two and one-half hours. Clubs should conduct it at least once a year.“Evaluate to Motivate” (/292) is part of The Successful Club Series. This 10-minutep resentation also can be conducted by one of your club members for the entire club.It offers a quick review of evaluation techniques. Although it is not as thorough as “The Art of Effective Evaluation,” it can motivate members to give better evaluations. It is also helpful to conduct this p resentationif several new members join your club at once.EFFECTIVE EVALUATION7Twice each year your district has a conference, offering educational programs of interest to members.Often a program on evaluation is featured. Check with your district officers to see when the next program is scheduled.Toastmasters International also has a presentation that will help the club to e valuate itself. “Moments of Truth” (/290Amot) is another title in The Successful Club Series. The presentation allows you to analyze every aspect of the club’s operations, helping it to become more effective at helping members achieve their goals. The presentation can be conducted in one hour and clubs should conductthis annually.RECOMMENDED EVALUATION TOOLSIn addition to “The Art of Effective Evaluation,” “Evaluate to Motivate,” and “Moments of Truth,” you may be interested in the f ollowing:Ballots and Brief Evaluations (/163) can be used by all club m embers togive brief evaluations to five speakers and leaders and the Toastmaster, plus ballots for best speakerand other awards.Individual Speech Evaluation Form (/165) outlines points for the e valuatorto cover.Evaluation Kit (/167) contains 25 of each of the following evaluationm aterials: Your Speaking Profile, Individual Speech Evaluation Form, and Evaluation of the Evaluator.Make every effort to develop evaluation skills. Observe other evaluators. Ask questions. Study this manual. You may even find it helpful to visit other Toastmasters clubs and listen to their evaluators. With more exposure toa variety of evaluations, you will be able to improve your own and help fellow club members improve theirspeaking and leadership skills. You will also be able to use your evaluation skills outside of the club, becoming more confident in your interactions with others at work, at home, and in the community.8 EFFECTIVE EVALUATION。