中国审判制度in english

合集下载

中国的审判制度(1)

中国的审判制度(1)

中国的审判制度(1)审判制度就是法院制度,包括法院的设置、法官、审判组织和活动等方面的法律制度。

(一)人民法院的组织和职权根据现行宪法和人民法院组织法的规定,人民法院是国家审判机关,其组织体系是:地方各级人民法院、专门人民法院和最高人民法院。

各级各类人民法院的审判工作统一接受最高人民法院的监督。

地方各级人民法院根据行政区划设置,专门法院根据需要设置。

1、地方各级人民法院分为:基层人民法院、中级人民法院、高级人民法院。

根据《人民法院组织法》规定基层人民法院包括县、自治县人民法院、不设区的市、市辖区人民法院,其职权主要有:(1)审判刑事、民事和行政案件的第一审案件,但是法律另有规定的除外。

对于所受理的案件,认为案情重大应当由上级人民法院审判的时候,可以请求移送上级人民法院审判。

(2)处理不需要开庭审判的民事纠纷和轻微的刑事案件。

(3)指导人民调解委员会的工作。

为便利人民诉讼,由基层人民法院设若干人民法庭,作为派出机构,但人民法庭不是一个审级。

其职权是审理一般民事和轻微刑事案件,指导人民调解委员会的工作,进行法制宣传,处理人民来信,接待人民来访。

它的判决和裁定就是基层人民法院的判决和裁定。

中级人民法院包括在省、自治区内按地区设立的中级人民法院,在中央直辖市的中级人民法院、省、自治区辖市和自治州中级人民法院,其职权主要有:(1)审判下列案件:①法律规定由它管辖的第一审案件。

按照刑事诉讼法的规定,中级人民法院管辖的第一审刑事案件是:危害国家安全案件;可能判处无期徒刑、死刑的普通刑事案件;外国人犯罪或者我国公民侵犯外国人合法权益的刑事案件。

按照民事诉讼法的规定,中级人民法院管辖的民事案件是重大的涉外案件,在本辖区内有重大影响的案件,最高人民法院指令中级人民法院管辖的案件。

按照行政诉讼法的规定,中级人民法院管辖的第一审行政案件是:确认发明专利权案件;海关处理案件;对国务院各部门或者省、自治区、直辖市人民政府所作的具体行政行为提起诉讼的案件;本辖区内重大、复杂的案件。

我国审判制度

我国审判制度

我国审判制度我国审判制度是中国法律体系中非常重要的一部分。

审判制度旨在保障公正、公平的司法审判,确保法律的平等适用和维护公民的合法权益。

本文将就我国审判制度的特点和运行机制进行探讨。

一、审判制度的特点1.1 法官独立性我国审判制度注重法官的独立行使审判权。

根据法律规定,法官应当独立执行法律,并不受任何非法干涉。

法官在审判案件时,应当客观、公正地行使权力,不受外界的干扰。

1.2 司法透明度我国审判制度注重司法的透明度。

审判过程应当公开进行,保证当事人和公众对审判的了解和监督。

同时,我国设立了各级法院的官方网站,及时公布法院的审判信息,便于广大民众获取相关信息。

1.3 诉讼平等原则我国审判制度坚持诉讼平等原则。

无论当事人身份、职务地位、财富状况等,对待每一个当事人都应当一视同仁,确保每个人在司法程序中都能享受平等权利和机会。

1.4 法治观念的强化我国审判制度致力于强化法治观念,加强全社会的法律意识。

通过广泛宣传普及法律知识,提高人民群众对法律的认识和尊重,促使每个人遵守法律,共同建设法治社会。

二、审判制度的运行机制2.1 诉讼程序我国审判制度中,诉讼程序是司法审判活动的重要环节。

一般而言,诉讼程序包括起诉、受理、审理、裁判和执行等程序。

起诉方向法院提交起诉申请,法院受理后进行审理,最终作出裁判,并由执行机关执行。

整个过程遵循事实公正、法律适用的原则。

2.2 审判权的行使我国审判制度规定了法官行使审判权的程序和方式。

法官根据审理案件的需要,听取当事人的陈述和辩论意见,调查事实,收集证据,依法作出独立的裁判。

同时,法官还需借助法律、法规和相关判例等依据,确保裁判结果的合法性和公正性。

2.3 司法监督机制为了保证审判制度的公正性和有效性,我国设立了多个层次的司法监督机构。

例如,最高人民法院负责对各级法院的裁判进行监督,检察院负责对检察机关的工作进行监督。

同时,还设立了司法责任制,对违法行为进行严肃处理,维护司法公信力。

中国审判制度inenglish

中国审判制度inenglish

I. The Trial System2008-4-25 17:14 clicks: 240The trial system refers to the court system governing the establishment of courts, judges, and trials.Organization and Responsibilities of People's CourtsAccording to the current Constitution, and the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, People's Courts represent the main trial organ of the state. Organizationally, this court system consists of local courts, special courts and the Supreme Court, with all the first two subject to the supervision of the latter. Local courts are established in accordance with the administrative divisions, while special courts are set up where necessary.1. Local courts are divided into three levels: Grassroots, Intermediate and Higher.Under the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, grassroots-level courts consist of tribunalsin counties/autonomous counties, cities without administrative districts, or administrative districts of cities. Their responsibilities are:· Try criminal, civil and admi nistrative cases as courts of first hearing, except where otherwise provided for by law. Cases deemed to be of a serious nature that should be handled by superior courts can be referred to those superior courts;· Handle civil disputes and misdemeanors t hat do not need trials;· Guide the work of the People's Arbitration Committees.To facilitate lawsuits, grassroots courts may set up tribunals, which are not trial units, but have the responsibility to hear general civil and misdemeanors, guide the work of People's Arbitration Committees, publicize laws and regulations, and handle petitions. Their judgments and decisions represent the judgments and decisions of the grassroots People's Courts.Intermediate courts are those set up in prefectures, cities directly under provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) and districts in the four municipalities directly under the central government (hereinafter referred to as "municipalities"). Their responsibilities include:· Try the following categories of cases:a) First-hearing cases under their jurisdiction, as prescribed by law. According to the Law on Criminal Procedures, these cases include those involving national security; criminal cases that may involve life imprisonment or the death penalty; criminal cases committed by foreigners or cases involving Chinese citizens violating the lawful rights and interests of foreigners. According to the Law on Civil Procedures, civil cases heard by intermediate courts are major foreign-related cases; cases of major implications within their jurisdictions; and cases that intermediate courtsare ordered to hear by the Supreme Court. In addition, according to the Law on Administrative Procedures, intermediate courts are authorized to hear the following cases: verification of patent rights; customs handling; suits against administrative actions taken by State Council departments or governments of the provinces (autonomous regions, municipalities); other important and complicated cases;b) First-hearing cases transferred by grassroots courts;c) Cases appealing or protesting the verdicts and decisions of grassroots courts.For criminal, civil and administrative cases that intermediate courts deem to be of a serious nature, the intermediate court may request that the cases be transferred to superior courts.· Supervise the performance of grassroots courts within their jurisdiction. They have the power to examine or order grassroots courts to re-examine verdicts or decisions issued by those courts that have already taken effect but that have been found to contain errors.According to the law on court organization, Higher Courts are set up in provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities). Their responsibilities include:· Try the following categories of cases:a) Criminal, civil and administrative cases of major proportions and complications under their jurisdiction, as provided for by the law;b) First-hearing cases transferred by lower courts;c) Cases appealing or protesting the verdicts and decisions made by lower courts. Higher courts in areas where a maritime court is located are authorized to try cases appealing the verdicts and rulings made by the maritime court;d) Protested cases submitted by prosecutors in accordance with trial-monitoring procedures.· Review first-hearing cases involving the death penalty ruled by intermediate courts where the accused renounces the right to appeal. If the Higher Court raises no objection to the death penalty, it then files the case with the Supreme Court for verification; if it disagrees with the death penalty ruling, it can either re-examine the case or refer the case back to the Intermediate Court.· Review cases submitted by intermediate courts involving a death penalty with two years' reprieve.· Approve certain death-penalty cases as authorized by the Supreme Court.· Supervise trials by lower courts. For verdicts or judgments passed by lower courts that have been found to contain errors, higher courts are authorized to hear or ask lower courts to reexaminethe case.2. Special courts are courts set up in special departments for special cases wherever necessary. Currently, China has special courts handling military, maritime, railway cases.Military courts are set up at three levels: grassroots; Great Military Region, Services and Arms; and the PLA Court.The PLA Court is the supreme military court whose responsibilities include:· Try first-hearing cases involving crimes committed by individuals above the division commander level.· Try foreign-related criminal cases.· Try second-hearing cases, verification and review of cases involving death penalty.Great Military Region and Services and Arms Courts are intermediate courts set up in great military regions, the navy, the air force, the Second Artillery Army and the PLA General Headquarters. Their responsibilities include:· Try first-hearing cases involving crimes committed by individuals at the deputy division commander and regiment level.· Try cases that may involve death penalty and cases under their jurisdiction as authorized or designated by superior military courts.· Try cases appealing or protesting rulings or verdicts passed by lower courts.Grassroots military courts consist of tribunals set up in armies, provincial military regions, naval fleets, and air forces within Great Military Regions and in army units deployed in Beijing directly under the headquarters. Their responsibilities include:· Try cases involving crimes comm itted by individuals under the battalion commander level and first-hearing cases that may involve a penalty up to life imprisonment.· Try first-hearing cases under its jurisdiction as authorized or designated by superior military courts.Maritime courts are special courts set up to try first-hearing maritime or sea-shipping cases for the purpose of exercising judicial jurisdiction over maritime affairs. In May 1989, the Supreme People's Court made a Decision on the Scope of Cases to Be Handled by Maritime Courts. That decision specified that maritime courts handle maritime or commercial cases between Chinese legal persons/citizens, between Chinese legal persons/citizens and foreign legal persons/citizens, andbetween foreign legal persons/citizens. These cases fall into 14 subsets in five categories:· Ten categories of cases involving maritime torts and disputes, including: damage claim cases involving collision of vessels; damage claim cases involving vessels colliding into buildings and facilities on the sea, sea-linked waters and ports; claim cases involving vessels discharging or leaking hazardous materials or waste water causing water pollution or damaging other vessels or cargo; claim cases involving casualties in the course of sea-borne shipping or operations on the sea, sea-linked waters and ports.· Fourteen categories of commercial cases, including: cases involving shipping contract disputes; contract dispute cases involving passengers and baggage; cases involving seaman labor contract disputes; cases involving maritime rescue and salvage contract disputes; cases involving maritime insurance contract disputes.· Eleven other categories of maritime cases, including: cases involving major liabilities in shipping and maritime operations; cases involving port operation disputes; cases involving general average disputes; cases involving offshore development and exploitation; cases involving the ownership, proprietorship, mortgage or preferred maritime right of claim of vessels; administrative cases involving maritime or inland river authorities; and cases involving maritime fraud.· Five categories of cases involving maritime enforcement, including: cases involving compulsory enforcement requested by maritime and inland river authorities; cases involving applications for enforcement of arbitration awards filed by litigants; cases involving applications filed with Chinese maritime courts by litigants for recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards given by arbitration agencies in foreign countries or regions, in accordance with provisions of the convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration; cases involving applications filed by litigants to Chinese maritime courts for assistance in enforcement of rulings given by foreign courts, in accordance with judicial assistance accords China signed with foreign countries, or with the principle of reciprocity.· Two categories of cases involving requests for preservation: cases involving pleas for detaining vessels prior to the opening of trial; cases involving pleas for detaining cargoes aboard ships or fuel for the ships prior to the opening of trial.Railway transportation tribunals are special courts set up along railways that try the following types of cases:· Criminal cases investigated by railway public-security authorities and filed by railway prosecutors.· Cases involving economic disputes. In accordance with rulings of the Supreme People's Court, these cases fall into 12 categories: cases involving railway cargo transportation contract disputes; cases involving disputes over the execution of international railway collaborationcontracts; cases involving economic disputes within the railway system; cases involving torts that have resulted in damages to railways in violation of railway safety regulations; and tort cases involving human and property losses caused by railway operations and dispatch operations, where the litigant chooses to bring action to the railway tribunal.3.The Supreme People's Court is located in Beijing, capital city of China. It is the highest judicial organ, exercising the highest judicial power while supervising lower courts and special courts. The Supreme People's Court is presided over by one president and a number of vice presidents, chief justices and justices. The Supreme People's Court exercises the following powers:· Supervise lower courts and special courts. For judgments and rulings passed by lower and special courts that have been found to contain errors, the Supreme People's Court have the power to hear the cases or order lower courts to reexamine the cases.· Try the following cases:a) First-hearing cases falling under its jurisdiction as prescribed by the law or as deemed necessary by the court itself. The Law on Criminal Procedure stipulates that the Supreme People's Court has first-hearing right to try criminal and civil cases of major proportions nationwide. The Law on Administrative Procedure provides that the Supreme People's Court has first-hearing jurisdiction over administrative cases of a material and complicated nature.b) Cases appealing or protesting rulings of higher courts and special courts, and protested cases submitted by the Supreme People's Procuratorate in accordance with legal procedures.· Approve death penalty cases.· Issue judicial interpretations on how to apply law and writs.· Lead and manage judicial administration of courts at all levels across the country.Judge SystemThe judge system, a major component of the judiciary, refers to all the rules and institutions related to the election and qualification of judges, forms of election, tenures, rewards and penalties, and salary and compensation of judges. China promulgated a Judge Law on February 28, 1995, which contains 17 chapters and 42 articles.1. Qualifications of JudgesJudges exercise state judicial power in accordance with law. They include presidents and vice presidents of courts at various levels, members of judicial committees, presidents and vice presidents of tribunals, judges and assistant judges. The responsibility of judges is to participate in collegiate panels or be independent judges at trials.Judges are elected with the following qualifications:· A citizen of the People's Republic of China;· At least 23 years o f age;· Supports the Constitution of the People's Republic of China;· In good political, professional and moral standing;· In good health;· A graduate of law from an institution of higher learning, or a non-law graduate from an institution of higher learning with in-depth knowledge of law, with two years of working experience; or holders of a bachelor's degree in JD with a full year of working experience; those holding a Master's or Ph.D. degree in JD are not subject to the working-experience limit described above.Those that have been penalized for crimes or have been dismissed from their public offices shall not be elected judges.In addition, according to the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, presidents, vice presidents, presiding judge and deputy presiding judge of tribunals, judges and assistant judges, as well as People's Assessors shall be citizens with voting rights and rights of being elected, 23 years of age and with legal knowledge.2. The Appointment and Removal of JudgesThe Constitution and laws provide for the powers and procedures for appointing and removing judges.Presidents of courts at local levels are elected and removed by the People's Congress at the same level and the tenure of the presidents is the same as the People's Congress; the president nominates the vice president, members of the Judicial Committee, presiding judges, deputy presiding judges and judges for appointment and removal by the Standing Committee of the People's Congress at the same level. Assistant judges of a court are appointed and removed by the president of the court. Judges sitting at special courts are elected and removed with procedures separately set forth by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.Primary judges and assistant judges are recruited from among qualified candidates through open examination. The president, vice president, members of the Judicial Committee, presiding judge and deputy presiding judge shall be selected from among candidates who have practical working experience.Judges shall not concurrently hold positions in the Standing Committee of the People's Congress,executive offices, the procuratorate, business, non-profit institutions, or in the legal profession.Judges who have lost their citizenship, been found to be incompetent, been unable to perform their duties for a protracted period of time due to disciplinary violations, criminal records or health reasons, shall be removed from their position in accordance with legal procedures.3. Safeguards for JudgesThe Judge Law provides judges with the following safeguards:· Professional safeguards: Judges shall be granted adequate powers and working conditions in order to perform their duties; they shall be free from interference in exercising their judicial powers from any administrative authorities or individual; they shall not be removed, demoted, dismissed or disciplined unless for statutory reasons and procedures.· Salary safeguards: Judges shall receive remuneration for their per formance of duties and enjoy insurance and other benefits.· Corporal safeguard: Judges shall receive legal protection for their corporal, property and residential safety.· Others: Judges shall have the right to resign, petition or accuse, or particip ate in training.4. PromotionsJudges are divided into 12 levels, with the president of the Supreme People's Court being the Chief Justice and those between Level 2 and 12 being labeled Justice, Senior Judge and Judge. The level of seniority is determined by the judge's position, performance, professionalism and seniority. Promotions are based on annual performance reviews, which are conducted by the courts where the judges serve. Performance reviews shall be conducted in an objective, impartial manner and combine evaluations by both superiors and subordinates.5. Rewards and Penalties Judges are rewarded for their outstanding performance and contributions. Rewards can be public recognition of performance, Third Reward, Second Reward, First Reward and the conferring of an honorary title.Judges must not engage in any of the following acts: disseminate information harmful to the reputation of the state; participate in illegal organizations; participate in anti-government gatherings, demonstrations and protests; participate in strikes; embezzle or take bribes; practice favoritism in breach of law; extort confessions by torture; conceal or forge evidence; leak state secrets or confidential information related to judicial proceedings; abuse power to violate the lawful rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations; neglect duties resulting in wrong rulings or serious damages to the litigant(s); purposefully delay proceedings;abuse power to seek profit for themselves or others; engage in business activities; meet in private with litigants and their representatives and accept their gifts and favors.Judges who engage in any of the above acts will be disciplined to varying degrees. These can be warnings; a record of demerit in personal files; a record of a major demerit; demotion; removal from position; dismissal from office. A removal from position is accompanied by a lowering of salary and rank; those who have committed a crime will be prosecuted for their criminal liabilities.6. Other ProvisionsJudges enjoy rights of retirement, resignation, training, petition and complaint. After retirement, they shall be entitled to pension insurance and other benefits as prescribed by the state.Forms of Court TrialsAccording to the Law on the Organization of People's Court and other laws, trials of People's Courts take the following forms:1. Sole Judge CourtThis kind of court is presided over by one judge for trying simple cases. Legally speaking, these cases include:· First-hearing criminal cases handled upon complaint and other minor criminal cases;· Simple civil cases and cases involving economic disputes handled by grassroots courts and their detached tribunals;· Cases tried using special procedures, except for cases i nvolving voters' qualification or other complicated cases, which should be tried by a collegiate panel.2. Collegiate PanelsCollegiate panels consist of at least three judges or a combination of judges and People's Assessors. First-hearing criminal and civil cases are generally tried by a collegiate panel except for those simple cases for which a sole judge is sufficient. First-hearing administrative cases, without exception, are handled by a collegiate panel; second-hearing, reexamined cases and death penalty verification cases are handled by a collegiate panel.A collegiate panel, as a basic form of the People's Court, is not inflexible in its composition; rather, its members are appointed on a case-by-case basis. The president or the presiding judge designates a judge to be the chief judge. When the president of the court or the presiding judge of a tribunal themselves attend a case, they serve as the chief judge concurrently. When assessinga case, the collegiate panel should follow the principle of the minority submitting to the opinions of the majority when disagreement arises. The opinions of the minority, however, should be recorded in the court log with signatures of members of the panel.3. Judicial CommitteeAccording to the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, courts at all levels set up a Judicial Committee, the members of which are nominated by the president for appointment by the People's Congress at the same level. The Judicial Committee is presided over by the president of the court and its responsibilities include:· Deliberate on major, complicated cases;· Summarize judicial practices;· Discuss other judicial issues.The Fundamentals of China's Judicial System1. Open TrialsArticle 125 of the Constitution provides that open trials mean that all cases tried by courts should be conducted openly unless otherwise provided for by the law. Even cases that are not tried openly should be publicized when the verdict is passed. "Open" means the entire process should be open to public auditing and to the press. For cases that, by law, should be open to the public, the court should announce before the trial opens the outline of the case, the name of the litigant, the time and the place of the trial.Article 7 of the Law on the Organization of People's Courts provides that the following three types of cases are not open to the public:· Cases involving state secrets;· Cases involving personal privacy;· Cases involving crimes committed by minors.In addition, in accordance with provisions of civil procedure law, cases involving divorce and trade secrets may, upon request by litigants, not be open to the public.2. Defense SystemThe Constitution and the law on the organization of courts provide that the accused is entitled to the right to a proper defense. The law on criminal procedure further provides that the courtshave the obligation to ensure that the accused obtains defense, and sets forth specific procedures that any suspects or accused may, in addition to exercising the right to defend themselves, appoint one or two representatives to defend them. Those eligible to defend the accused include:· Lawyers;· Persons recommended by people's organizations or the employer of the suspect or the accused;· Th e custodian or relative of the suspect or the accused.However, those that are currently serving a sentence or those that have been deprived of, or are restricted in personal freedom should not represent the suspect or the accused.For public-prosecuted cases, the suspect has the right to appoint a defender starting from the day the case is transferred for prosecution; for privately prosecuted cases, the accused has the right to appoint a defender anytime. Should the accused, for economic or other reasons, be unable to appoint a defender to a court where a public prosecutor appears, the court may designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge. Furthermore, when the accused is blind, deaf, mute or a minor and has not appointed a defender, or when the accused may face death penalty and does not appoint a defender, the court should designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge.3. Second Instance Being FinalArticle 12 of the Law on the Organization of People's Courts states that the courts have to try cases on two levels, with the second instance being the final judgment. This means a case is closed after going through two levels of trial.The courts practice a four-level system in which the second instance is the final judgment. Jurisdiction depends on the nature and complexity of the case. Should the litigant not agree with the judgment or ruling of the first instance, he or she may, within a specified period of time, appeal to the higher court. If the procuratorate believes that the first-instance ruling or judgment is indeed mistaken, it may, within a specified period of time, protest the ruling or judgment to the higher court. If, within the specified period of time, the litigant fails to appeal and the procurator fails to protest, then the first-instance judgment or ruling stands as the legally binding judgment or ruling. The superior court, after reviewing appealed or protested cases in accordance with second-instance procedures, passes a judgment or ruling that is the final judgment or ruling. Except for cases involving the death penalty, all other cases take legal effect immediately upon announcement.In accordance with legal provisions, the following cases are tried with the first instance being final:· F irst-instance cases handled by the Supreme People's Court;· Cases heard by grassroots courts in accordance with civil procedures, such as voter qualification cases, cases determining citizens to be legally disabled or partially disabled, cases pronouncing persons missing, cases pronouncing persons dead, or cases determining property unclaimed.4. System of Collegiate PanelsArticle 10 of the Law on the Organization of People's Court provides that courts shall practice a system of collegiate panels when trying cases. Except for first-instance simple civil cases and other cases otherwise provided for by the law, all cases are tried with a collegiate panel present. This system refers to a panel of at least three judges or a combination of at least three judges and People's Assessors, as opposed to trials conducted by one judge alone. The composition of the collegiate panel should be an odd number, usually three, and the principle of the minority submitting to the majority is observed, provided that the opinions of the minority are recorded in the court log. The judges and People's Assessors enjoy the same rights.5. Challenge SystemThe challenge system refers to a system in which judicial officers shall or are required to withdraw from the cases because of their special relationship with these cases or litigants, which may undermine the impartiality of the judgment.In accordance with criminal procedures, judges, prosecutors and investigators who meet any of the following conditions shall voluntarily withdraw or be challenged by litigants or their representatives to withdraw from the cases:· They themselves are litigants or next-of-kin of litigants;· They themselves or their close relatives hold stakes in the case;· They have held the positio ns as witness, expert witness, defender or the advocate of litigants in incidental civil actions;· They have other types of relations with litigants to the suit that may affect the fair handling of the case.These restrictions apply to secretaries, translators and experts as well.The withdrawal of judges is decided by the president of the court; while the withdrawal of the president is decided by the Judicial Committee of the court.The civil procedure law and administrative procedure law have similar provisions.6. System for Verification of Death Penalty CasesThis system refers to the procedures and rules that have to be observed in verifying death penalty cases.The Law on the Organization of People's Courts and the Criminal Procedure Law provide that all death penalty cases, unless handled by the Supreme People's Court, are reported to the Supreme People's Court for verification and approval. The Supreme People's Court, if necessary, may authorize Higher People's Courts at the provincial level to exercise that power for death-penalty cases involving homicides, rape, robbery, explosion and other crimes that seriously threaten public security and social security. Cases involving a death penalty with a two-year probation ruled by intermediate courts are verified and approved by higher courts. Death penalty cases ruled by intermediate courts are first verified and approved by higher courts before being submitted to the Supreme People's Court for verification and approval. Should the higher court disagree with the death penalty verdict, it may want to hear the case or refer it back for re-examination.7. System for Judicial SupervisionAlso known as the re-examination system, this refers to a special arrangement for the court to reexamine judgments and rulings that have already taken effect. It actually represents a remedy to the system of second instance being final.According to the Law on the Organization of People's Courts and the three procedural laws on civil, criminal and administrative cases, China's system of judicial supervision comprises the following components:· The precondition for initiating the judicial supervision procedure is that judgments and rulings that have already taken effect have been found to contain errors in establishment of facts or application of laws.· The judicial supervision procedure can only be initiated by presidents of courts, superior courts, superior procuratorates, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate.· The way this procedure works is that presidents of courts ask the Judicial Committee to handle the matter; the Supreme People's Court asks or designates lower courts to reexamine the case; the Supreme People's Procuratorate and higher procuratorates protest a case in accordance with procedures for judicial supervision.· In reexamining a case under the judicial supervision procedure, courts form a separate Collegiate Panel. If the original case was a first-instance case, then it should be re-examined in accordance with first-instance procedures; rulings or judgments arising thereof are subject to appeal or protest. If the original case was a second-instance case, or was tried by higher courts, then second-instance procedures should be followed and rulings or judgments arising thereof shall be final.。

我国的审判制度是

我国的审判制度是

我国的审判制度是我国的审判制度是阶段性审判制度吗?我国的审判制度是以人民法院为核心,以审判活动为主要形式,通过审判程序解决各类社会纠纷的制度。

在中国,审判制度被分为多个阶段,每个阶段都有其独特的特点和功能。

首先,我国的审判制度中存在的第一个阶段是诉讼程序的开始阶段,也叫做立案阶段。

立案阶段是指当诉讼当事人提起诉讼并提交诉讼材料后,法院对案件进行初步审查,并根据法定程序和条件决定是否受理该案。

在这个阶段,法院会对诉讼材料进行审查、确认诉讼请求、进行证据预审等,以确保案件符合立案条件。

同时,法院还会通知被告,告知其案件的事实和理由,并要求其提供答辩意见及相关证据。

这一阶段的目的在于确保案件正式进入法院审判程序。

第二个阶段是庭前程序阶段,也称为准备阶段。

在庭前程序中,法院会组织当事人进行调解、判决前和调查取证活动等。

其中,调解是一种有效解决民事争议的手段,法院会通过调解促使当事人和解或达成和解协议;判决前活动则包括开庭审理前的研究案件材料、组织法庭辩论等;而调查取证活动则是为了进一步了解案件事实情况,包括对证人的传唤、勘验现场等。

庭前程序的目的是为了充分调查收集证据,确保案件事实清楚、证据充分,为法院做出公正裁决奠定基础。

第三个阶段是庭审程序阶段,也是审判的核心环节。

庭审程序是通过法庭公开进行的,法官依法对当事人的陈述和证据进行评估,并对案件进行法律解释和适用。

在庭审中,法院会听取原告和被告的陈述意见,并提出质询、辩论等,以全面了解案件事实和法律问题。

庭审中,法官还可以向当事人征询专家意见或者委托独立司法鉴定,以便能够作出准确的判决。

庭审程序的目的在于保护当事人的诉讼权利,确保争议的公正裁决。

最后,我们来到了判决阶段,也是整个审判制度的终点。

在这个阶段,法院会根据庭审中所获得的证据和法律规定,在合法的范围内制定和发布判决书。

判决书是法院根据事实和法律进行综合分析和评判后作出的最终判决结果,它对于维护社会秩序和保障公民权利具有重要意义。

中国审判制度的主要内容

中国审判制度的主要内容

中国审判制度的主要内容审判制度是我国依法治国的一项重要法律制度,公开审判制度也是诉讼活动的重要法定原则。

审判活动依法公开进行,是我国现行法律对人民法院审判活动的基本要求。

以下是xx制度为您搜集整理的《审判制度的主要内容》,供参考。

【审判制度】审判制度就是法院制度,包括法院的设置、法官、审判组织和活动等方面的法律制度。

(一) 人民法院的组织和职权根据现行宪法和人民法院组织法的规定,人民法院是国家审判机关,其组织体系是:地方各级人民法院、专门人民法院和最高人民法院。

各级各类人民法院的审判工作统一接受最高人民法院的监督。

地方各级人民法院根据行政区划设置,专门法院根据需要设置。

1、地方各级人民法院分为:基层人民法院、中级人民法院、高级人民法院。

基层人民法院根据《人民法院组织法》规定基层人民法院包括县、自治县人民法院、不设区的市、市辖区人民法院,其职权主要有:(1) 审判刑事、民事和行政案件的第一审案件,但是法律另有规定的除外。

对于所受理的案件,认为案情重大应当由上级人民法院审判的时候,可以请求移送上级人民法院审判。

(2) 处理不需要开庭审判的民事纠纷和轻微的刑事案件。

(3) 指导人民调解委员会的工作。

为便利人民诉讼,由基层人民法院设若干人民法庭,作为派出机构,但人民法庭不是一个审级。

其职权是审理一般民事和轻微刑事案件,指导人民调解委员会的工作,进行法制宣传,处理人民来信,接待人民来访。

它的判决和裁定就是基层人民法院的判决和裁定。

中级人民法院中级人民法院包括在省、自治区内按地区设立的中级人民法院,在中央直辖市的中级人民法院、省、自治区辖市和自治州中级人民法院,其职权主要有:(1) 审判下列案件:① 法律规定由它管辖的第一审案件。

按照刑事诉讼法的规定,中级人民法院管辖的第一审刑事案件是:危害国家安全案件;可能判处无期徒刑、死刑的普通刑事案件;外国人犯罪或者我国公民侵犯外国人合法权益的刑事案件。

按照民事诉讼法的规定,中级人民法院管辖的民事案件是重大的涉外案件,在本辖区内有重大影响的案件,最高人民法院指令中级人民法院管辖的案件。

中国审判制度基本内容

中国审判制度基本内容

中国审判制度基本内容首先,中国审判制度强调司法独立。

司法独立是确保审判活动独立自主进行的重要保障。

中国宪法规定了司法独立的基本原则,明确规定审判机关只服从宪法和法律,不受行政机关和社会团体的干涉。

同时,中国设立了独立的司法机关,法官享有审判独立权,不受其他机关的指令和干预。

此外,法官还受到法律的保护,任何人不得非法干涉和打压法官履职。

其次,中国审判制度注重检察监督。

中国的审判制度中设有检察机关,负责对案件的合法性进行监督和检查,保证司法公正和法律的实施。

中国的检察机关是独立于司法机关的法律监督机构,不仅对案件进行事后监督,还对行政机关、公共机关的违法行为进行监督,确保法律的统一和执行的公正。

公正审判是中国审判制度的核心要素之一、中国的审判制度要求对每个案件进行公正、公平的审判,保护当事人的合法权益。

中国的法官在审判活动中要遵循法律原则,保证各方的平等发言权,采用公开审理、公开宣判,听取各方的意见和证据,进行公正的判断和决定。

中国还设立了上诉机制,保证当事人有权利上诉,实现对一审判决的再审查,以纠正可能的错误和不公。

同时,中国审判制度强调平等诉讼。

平等诉讼是确保当事人在诉讼过程中享有同等权益的原则。

中国的审判制度要求在诉讼过程中,当事人的权益受到平等尊重,不论是公民、法人、国家机关还是社会团体,都应当依法参与诉讼,平等地享有诉讼权利和义务,并且根据实际情况提供法律援助,保障诉讼平等的实现。

最后,中国审判制度强调法官责任。

法官的责任是保证审判活动的公正进行。

中国的审判制度要求法官在审判活动中严格遵守法律、法规和法官行为规范,比如依法保守秘密、廉洁从事审判活动等。

同时,中国还设立了法官责任委员会,对法官的行为进行监督和问责,对违反职业操守的法官进行处理,维护审判的公正性和尊严。

总结起来,中国审判制度是一套相对完备的司法制度体系,其主要内容包括司法独立、检察监督、公正审判、平等诉讼、法官责任等要素。

这些要素相互协调、相互促进,为中国社会主义法治国家的运行提供了重要保障。

审判流程英语术语

审判流程英语术语

审判流程英语术语English: The process of a trial involves several key stages. The first stage is the pre-trial stage, where the prosecutor and defense attorney engage in discovery, motions, and plea bargaining. Next is the trial stage, where the evidence is presented, witnesses are called, and arguments are made by both sides. Following the trial stage is the post-trial stage, where the jury deliberates and reaches a verdict. If the verdict is guilty, then the sentencing stage follows, where the judge determines the punishment based on the nature of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating factors. Throughout the entire process, the defendant has the right to legal representation, a fair trial, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.Chinese: 审判流程包括几个关键阶段。

第一阶段是审前阶段,检察官和辩护律师进行发现、动议和辩诉。

中国审判制度

中国审判制度

中国审判制度第二章中国审判制度一、审判权的独立性审判权的独立性是中国审判制度的基本原则。

根据中国宪法规定,人民法院是国家独立的审判机关,它独立行使审判权,不受任何行政、司法和经济组织的干涉。

这保证了司法活动的公正性和独立性,有效地防止了滥用权力和腐败现象的发生。

二、人民法院的组织架构根据中国人民法院组织法,中国人民法院设立最高人民法院、地方各级人民法院和军事法院。

最高人民法院是中国的最高审判机关,是独立的司法机构,对全国所有的法院行使监督管理职权,并负责解释法律。

地方各级人民法院按照地域划分,包括省高级人民法院、市中级人民法院和基层人民法院。

军事法院则是负责处理军事案件的专门法院。

三、审判活动的程序规定中国审判制度强调法律的适用和程序的公正。

中国以当事人的平等地位为基础,充分保障当事人的诉讼权利,确保当事人在审判活动中的合法权益。

中国的审判活动符合法定程序,包括立案、调查、侦查、开庭审理、判决等环节。

在审判活动中,保障当事人的申辩权、辩护权、证据权和质证权等基本权利,有效保证当事人的合法权益。

四、审判活动的公开和透明中国审判制度强调审判活动的公开和透明。

中国人民法院根据需要,对审判活动进行公开,让社会公众了解和监督司法活动,防止滥用监察权力和腐败现象。

公开审判有利于促进司法公信力的提升,增强社会对司法机关的信任。

五、司法责任制的建立中国审判制度强调建立和完善司法责任制。

司法责任制是指中国人民法院对法官进行法治教育、法治检查和法治监督,对法官依法行政和执法不公开进行纠正和追责。

司法责任制的建立有利于保证审判活动的公平公正,增强司法活动的合法性和权威性。

六、司法的推进中国审判制度不断进行司法。

中国人民法院积极探索司法的有效途径,通过改进司法机关的工作方式和工作机制,提高审判效率,加强司法公正,促进司法透明。

司法的目标是建设人民满意的审判机关,进一步完善中国的司法体制。

在中国审判制度的基础上,依法治国的原则得到有效推进,司法公正和司法独立的原则得到了贯彻和落实,司法不断深化,中国的司法制度日益完善,为维护社会公平正义和促进国家和谐稳定发挥了重要作用。

中国的审判制度(英)(2)

中国的审判制度(英)(2)

中国的审判制度(英)(2)3. Safeguards for JudgesThe Judge Law provides judges with the following safeguards:Professional safeguards: Judges shall be granted adequate powers and working conditions in order to perform their duties; they shall be free from interference in exercising their judicial powers from any administrative authorities or individual; they shall not be removed, demoted, dismissed ordisciplined unless for statutory reasons and procedures.Salary safeguards: Judges shall receive remuneration for their performance of duties and enjoy insurance and other benefits.Corporal safeguard: Judges shall receive legal protection for their corporal, property andresidential safety.Others: Judges shall have the right to resign, petition or accuse, or participate in training.4. PromotionsJudges are divided into 12 levels, with the president of the Supreme People's Court being theChief Justice and those between Level 2 and 12 being labeled Justice, Senior Judge and Judge. The level of seniority is determined by the judge's position, performance, professionalism and seniority. Promotions are based on annual performance reviews, which are conducted by the courts where the judges serve. Performance reviews shall be conducted in an objective, impartial manner and combine evaluations by both superiors and subordinates.5. Rewards and PenaltiesJudges are rewarded for their outstanding performance and contributions. Rewards can be public recognition of performance, Third Reward, Second Reward, First Reward and the conferring of an honorary title.Judges must not engage in any of the following acts: disseminate information harmful to the reputation of the state; participate in illegal organizations; participate in anti-government gatherings, demonstrations and protests; participate in strikes; embezzle or take bribes; practice favoritism in breach of law; extort confessions by torture; conceal or forge evidence; leak state secrets or confidential information related to judicial proceedings; abuse power to violate the lawful rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations; neglect duties resulting in wrong rulings or serious damages to the litigant(s); purposefully delay proceedings; abuse power to seek profit for themselves or others; engage in business activities; meet in private with litigants and their representatives and accept their gifts and favors.Judges who engage in any of the above acts will be disciplined to varying degrees. These can be warnings;a record of demerit in personal files; a record of a major demerit; demotion; removal from position;dismissal from office. A removal from position is accompanied by a lowering of salary and rank; those who have committed a crime will be prosecuted fortheir criminal liabilities.6. Other ProvisionsJudges enjoy rights of retirement, resignation, training, petition and complaint. After retirement, they shall be entitled to pension insurance and other benefits as prescribed by the state.Forms of Court TrialsAccording to the Law on the Organization ofPeople's Court and other laws, trials of People's Courts take the following forms:1. Sole Judge CourtThis kind of court is presided over by one judge for trying simple cases. Legally speaking, these cases include:First-hearing criminal cases handled upon complaint and other minor criminal cases;Simple civil cases and cases involving economic disputes handled by grassroots courts and their detached tribunals;Cases tried using special procedures, except for cases involving voters' qualification or other complicated cases, which should be tried by a collegiate panel.2. Collegiate PanelsCollegiate panels consist of at least three judges or a combination of judges and People's Assessors. First-hearing criminal and civil cases are generally tried by a collegiate panel except for those simple cases for which a sole judge is sufficient. First-hearing administrative cases, without exception, are handled by a collegiate panel; second-hearing, reexamined cases and death penalty verification cases are handled by a collegiate panel.A collegiate panel, as a basic form of thePeople's Court, is not inflexible in its composition; rather, its members are appointed on a case-by-case basis. The president or the presiding judge designatesa judge to be the chief judge. When the president of the court or the presiding judge of a tribunal themselves attend a case, they serve as the chiefjudge concurrently. When assessing a case, the collegiate panel should follow the principle of the minority submitting to the opinions of the majority when disagreement arises. The opinions of the minority, however, should be recorded in the court log with signatures of members of the panel.3. Judicial CommitteeAccording to the Law on the Organization ofPeople's Courts, courts at all levels set up aJudicial Committee, the members of which are nominated by the president for appointment by the People's Congress at the same level. The Judicial Committee is presided over by the president of the court and its responsibilities include:Deliberate on major, complicated cases;Summarize judicial practices;Discuss other judicial issues.The Fundamentals of China's Judicial System1. Open TrialsArticle 125 of the Constitution provides that open trials mean that all cases tried by courts should be conducted openly unless otherwise provided for by the law. Even cases that are not tried openly should be publicized when the verdict is passed. "Open" means the entire process should be open to public auditing and to the press. For cases that, by law, should be open to the public, the court should announce before the trial opens the outline of the case, the name of the litigant, the time and the place of the trial.Article 7 of the Law on the Organization ofPeople's Courts provides that the following threetypes of cases are not open to the public:Cases involving state secrets;Cases involving personal privacy;Cases involving crimes committed by minors.In addition, in accordance with provisions ofcivil procedure law, cases involving divorce and tradesecrets may, upon request by litigants, not be open to the public.2. Defense SystemThe Constitution and the law on the organizationof courts provide that the accused is entitled to the right to a proper defense. The law on criminal procedure further provides that the courts have the obligation to ensure that the accused obtains defense, and sets forth specific procedures that any suspects or accused may, in addition to exercising the right to defend themselves, appoint one or two representatives to defend them. Those eligible to defend the accused include:Lawyers;Persons recommended by people's organizations or the employer of the suspect or the accused;The custodian or relative of the suspect or the accused.However, those that are currently serving a sentence or those that have been deprived of, or arerestricted in personal freedom should not representthe suspect or the accused.For public-prosecuted cases, the suspect has the right to appoint a defender starting from the day the case is transferred for prosecution; for privately prosecuted cases, the accused has the right to appoint a defender anytime. Should the accused, for economicor other reasons, be unable to appoint a defender to a court where a public prosecutor appears, the court may designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge. Furthermore, when the accused is blind, deaf, mute or a minor and has not appointed a defender, or when the accused may face death penalty and doesnot appoint a defender, the court should designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge.3. Second Instance Being FinalArticle 12 of the Law on the Organization ofPeople's Courts states that the courts have to try cases on two levels, with the second instance beingthe final judgment. This means a case is closed after going through two levels of trial.The courts practice a four-level system in which the second instance is the final judgment.Jurisdiction depends on the nature and complexity of the case. Should the litigant not agree with the judgment or ruling of the first instance, he or she may, within a specified period of time, appeal to the higher court. If the procuratorate believes that the first-instance ruling or judgment is indeed mistaken, it may, within a specified period of time, protest the ruling or judgment to the higher court. If, within the specified period of time, the litigant fails to appeal and the procurator fails to protest, then the first-instance judgment or ruling stands as the legally binding judgment or ruling. The superior court, after reviewing appealed or protested cases in accordance with second-instance procedures, passes a judgment or ruling that is the final judgment or ruling. Exceptfor cases involving the death penalty, all other cases take legal effect immediately upon announcement.In accordance with legal provisions, the following cases are tried with the first instance being final:First-instance cases handled by the SupremePeople's Court;Cases heard by grassroots courts in accordancewith civil procedures, such as voter qualification cases, cases determining citizens to be legally disabled or partially disabled, cases pronouncing persons missing, cases pronouncing persons dead, or cases determining property unclaimed.4. System of Collegiate PanelsArticle 10 of the Law on the Organization of People's Court provides that courts shall practice a system of collegiate panels when trying cases. Except for first-instance simple civil cases and other cases otherwise provided for by the law, all cases are tried with a collegiate panel present. This system refers to a panel of at least three judges or a combination of at least three judges and People's Assessors, as opposed to trials conducted by one judge alone. The composition of the collegiate panel should be an odd number, usually three, and the principle of the minority submitting to the majority is observed,provided that the opinions of the minority are recorded in the court log. The judges and People's Assessors enjoy the same rights.5. Challenge SystemThe challenge system refers to a system in which judicial officers shall or are required to withdraw from the cases because of their special relationship with these cases or litigants, which may undermine the impartiality of the judgment.In accordance with criminal procedures, judges, prosecutors and investigators who meet any of the following conditions shall voluntarily withdraw or be challenged by litigants or their representatives to withdraw from the cases:They themselves are litigants or next-of-kin of litigants;They themselves or their close relatives hold stakes in the case;They have held the positions as witness, expert witness, defender or the advocate of litigants in incidental civil actions;They have other types of relations with litigants to the suit that may affect the fair handling of the case.These restrictions apply to secretaries, translators and experts as well.The withdrawal of judges is decided by the president of the court; while the withdrawal of the president is decided by the Judicial Committee of the court.The civil procedure law and administrative procedure law have similar provisions.6. System for Verification of Death Penalty CasesThis system refers to the procedures and rulesthat have to be observed in verifying death penalty cases.The Law on the Organization of People's Courts and the Criminal Procedure Law provide that all death penalty cases, unless handled by the Supreme People's Court, are reported to the Supreme People's Court for verification and approval. The Supreme People's Court, if necessary, may authorize Higher People's Courts atthe provincial level to exercise that power for death-penalty cases involving homicides, rape, robbery, explosion and other crimes that seriously threaten public security and social security. Cases involving a death penalty with a two-year probation ruled by intermediate courts are verified and approved byhigher courts. Death penalty cases ruled by intermediate courts are first verified and approved by higher courts before being submitted to the Supreme People's Court for verification and approval. Should the higher court disagree with the death penalty verdict, it may want to hear the case or refer it back for re-examination.7. System for Judicial SupervisionAlso known as the re-examination system, thisrefers to a special arrangement for the court to reexamine judgments and rulings that have alreadytaken effect. It actually represents a remedy to the system of second instance being final.According to the Law on the Organization ofPeople's Courts and the three procedural laws on civil,criminal and administrative cases, China's system of judicial supervision comprises the following components:The precondition for initiating the judicial supervision procedure is that judgments and rulingsthat have already taken effect have been found to contain errors in establishment of facts orapplication of laws.The judicial supervision procedure can only be initiated by presidents of courts, superior courts, superior procuratorates, the Supreme People's Courtand the Supreme People's Procuratorate.The way this procedure works is that presidents of courts ask the Judicial Committee to handle the matter; the Supreme People's Court asks or designates lower courts to reexamine the case; the Supreme People's Procuratorate and higher procuratorates protest a case in accordance with procedures for judicial supervision.In reexamining a case under the judicial supervision procedure, courts form a separateCollegiate Panel. If the original case was a first-instance case, then it should be re-examined in accordance with first-instance procedures; rulings or judgments arising thereof are subject to appeal or protest. If the original case was a second-instance case, or was tried by higher courts, then second-instance procedures should be followed and rulings or judgments arising thereof shall be final.8. System of Judicial AssistanceThis refers to a practice whereby the judicial authorities of a country (usually courts), in accordance with international treaties orbilateral/multilateral agreements (or the principleof reciprocity in the absence of a treaty), perform the judicial procedures at the request of another country's judicial authorities or parties to a lawsuit.Judicial assistance in China consists of three aspects:Delivery of documents and investigations in search of evidence;Mutual recognition and enforcement of courtrulings and arbitration awards;Criminal judicial assistance, including delivery of documents, investigation in search of evidence and extradition of criminals.。

中国审判制度

中国审判制度

中国审判制度中国审判制度是指中华人民共和国依法进行司法审判的体制和机构。

该制度的基本原则是依法独立公正行使审判权,旨在保障公民的合法权益,维护社会公平正义。

中国的审判制度主要由三个层级构成:最高人民法院作为最高审判机关,高级人民法院和基层人民法院作为下级审判机关。

最高人民法院负责对重大案件进行审判监督,制定司法解释和司法政策,保证法律的统一适用。

高级人民法院则负责对重要案件和上诉案件进行审理,确保司法的公正与威信。

基层人民法院则承担着处理各类案件的主要责任,为当地百姓提供司法服务。

在中国的审判制度中,审判人员独立行使审判权,不受任何其他机关、团体或个人的干涉。

审判人员要根据法律和事实,客观公正地行使审判权,确保当事人的合法权益得到保护。

同时,中国的审判制度也注重对当事人的合法权益的保障,确保当事人在审判过程中的权益得到充分尊重。

作为一个社会主义国家,中国的审判制度也注重社会公平正义的维护。

在审判过程中,法院会根据事实和法律的规定,对案件进行公正公平的审理,维护社会公众的合法权益。

同时,中国还积极推进司法改革,加强对审判权的监督和制约,确保司法机关的公正性和透明度。

虽然中国的审判制度在不断完善和发展,但仍然面临一些挑战。

其中,司法公正和公信力是最重要的问题之一。

尽管中国政府一直在努力推进司法改革和加强司法独立,但仍然存在一些司法腐败和不公正的现象。

此外,司法资源的不足以及司法审判的效率问题也需要进一步加以解决。

总之,中国的审判制度在法律保障、司法独立和社会公平正义方面取得了一定的成绩。

但还需要不断进行改革和完善,以进一步提高司法公正和公信力,确保公民的合法权益得到更好的保护。

中国的司法制度(英)

中国的司法制度(英)

The judiciary in China has both broad and narrow meanings. Broadly speaking, the judiciary means law-enforcement activities conducted by the country's judicial organs and organizations in handling prosecuted or non-prosecuted cases. Narrowly speaking, it applies to law-enforcement activities conducted by the country's judicial organs in handling prosecuted cases. This presentation uses the term in the broader sense. Judicial organs here mean public-security organs (including state security organs) responsible for investigation, prosecution, trial and execution of cases, the prosecutors, the trial institutions and the custodial system. Judicial organizations here refer to lawyers, public notaries, and arbitration organizations. The latter, though not part of the judicial apparatus, are an integral part and a link in the overall judiciary system. The judiciary system in general refers to the nature, mission, organizational setup, principles and procedures of judicial organs and other judicial organizations. This system comprises sub-systems for investigation, prosecution, trial procedures, jails, judicial administration, arbitration, lawyers, public notaries and state compensation. I. The Trial System II. Prosecution System III. System Governing Investigations IV. Jail System V. Arbitration System VI. Lawyer System VII. Mediation System VIII. Public Notary System IX. System for Judicial Administration X. State Compensation System XI. Legal Assistance。

中华人民共和国法官法 中英文

中华人民共和国法官法 中英文

中华人民共和国法官法中英文The People's Republic of China's Judges LawThe People's Republic of China has established a comprehensive legal system that governs the role and responsibilities of judges within the country's judicial system. The Judges Law of the People's Republic of China, which was first enacted in 1995 and has since been amended several times, is a crucial piece of legislation that outlines the qualifications, appointment, and duties of judges in China.The primary purpose of the Judges Law is to ensure the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, as well as to promote the professionalism and integrity of judges. The law establishes clear criteria for the selection and appointment of judges, including requirements for educational background, legal experience, and moral character. Judges in China must possess a bachelor's degree in law or a related field, have at least three years of legal work experience, and demonstrate a strong commitment to upholding the rule of law and serving the interests of the people.The Judges Law also defines the powers and responsibilities ofjudges, outlining their authority to hear cases, render judgments, and enforce legal decisions. Judges are required to exercise their duties impartially, without fear or favor, and to base their rulings solely on the evidence presented and the applicable laws and regulations. The law also prohibits judges from engaging in any activities that could compromise their independence or integrity, such as accepting bribes, abusing their power, or engaging in political activities.One of the key features of the Judges Law is its emphasis on the ongoing training and professional development of judges. The law requires judges to participate in regular training programs and to continuously update their knowledge of the law and legal procedures. This is intended to ensure that judges remain current with the latest legal developments and are able to effectively fulfill their duties.The Judges Law also includes provisions for the supervision and accountability of judges. Judges are subject to periodic performance evaluations, and can be disciplined or removed from office for misconduct or failure to fulfill their duties. The law also establishes a system of judicial review, which allows for the appeal of judicial decisions to higher courts.Overall, the Judges Law of the People's Republic of China plays a crucial role in shaping the judicial system and ensuring the fairnessand integrity of the legal process. By setting clear standards for the selection, training, and conduct of judges, the law helps to promote the rule of law and protect the rights and interests of the Chinese people.。

中国的司法行政管理制度(英)

中国的司法行政管理制度(英)

中国的司法行政管理制度(英)System for Judicial AdministrationThe judicial administration is an important component of the state apparatus and a majorfunctional department of the government. It is responsible for administering judicial execution and managing laws and regulations.Organizationally, the Ministry of Justice supervises all the judicial departments across the country; local judicial authorities are subordinate to superior judicial authorities and to the government at the same level.Main responsibilities of judicial authorities include:1. Manage Reform-through-labor and Reeducation-through-labor InstitutionsOrganize and lead reform-through-labor and reeducation-through-labor work;Set the location of jails and reformatories and placement of prisoners and inmates;Direct, supervise and inspect prisons and reformatories and accurately implement policies and guidelines for reform- and re-education-through-labor work;Propose or review decisions concerning reform- or re-education-through-labor;Draft and review long-term plans and annual plans;Direct jails and reformatories to improve management;Sum up and promote advanced practices in reform- and re-education-through-labor;Inspect and handle major incidents that take place at jails or reformatories;Mete out disciplinary penalties for wardens who violate laws or discipline;Manage, inspect, train and promote officers atjails and reformatories.2. Regulate LawyersSupervise and direct lawyers, law firms and bar associations;Review constitutions of bar associations;Handle applications for taking part in lawyers qualification examination and administer the examination;Confer lawyer's qualifications and licenses;Determine the setup of law firms and the development of lawyers;Draft rules for legal assistance;Penalize lawyers who breach professional discipline, including revoking qualifications of those who are seriously incompetent;Develop rules for lawyers to charge fees;Sum up and promote good practices of lawyers;Draft development plans for the legal profession.3. Regulate Public NotariesSupervise public notaries;Determine the setup of public notary offices, the staffing, organization and examination of public notaries;Appoint and remove the director and deputydirector of public notary offices;Supervise fee-charging and expenditures by public notaries;Perform disciplinary inspections of public notaries;Sum up and promote good practices of public notaries.4. Manage Training of Judicial OfficialsDraft guidelines for training judicial officials and develop training plans;Direct the operation of political and law schools, including training of faculty and developing of textbooks;Sum up and promote good practices in training.5. Manage Legal EducationSet the direction of legal education, draft development plans, coordinate legal education nationwide, and collaborate with the Ministry of Education in supervising legal education across the country;Appoint and remove leading officials of political and law schools affiliated with the Ministry of Justice, review and approve capital expenditures and major expenditures of those schools, determine the setup of programs, enrolment and placement of graduates;Take the lead in developing textbooks for legal education across the country.6. Direct People's Mediation CommitteesManage the organizational, ideological and operational buildup of People's Mediation Committees and direct them in their mediation work;Study causes, characteristics and patterns ofcivil disputes and propose ways to prevent such disputes;Publicize policies, laws and ethics;Sum up and promote good practices in mediation.7. Promote Public Awareness of Rule of LawThis includes collaboration with relevant departments in launching publicity campaigns,introducing legal courses into schools and publishing legal periodicals and books.8. Supervise Foreign Affairs of Judicial Departments.The Ministry of Justice supervises all foreign affairs of the country's judicial organs. This entails determination of direction, scope and forms of foreign affairs and logistical arrangements; sending delegations to visit abroad and attend international conferences; receiving foreign visitors and briefing them on China's legal developments; conducting international legal assistance.9. Supervise Theory-building and Research in Judicial AdministrationDefine the organizational setup and missions of research institutions in the judicial apparatus;Draft laws, regulations and rules concerning judicial administration;Study issues related to judicial administration, crimes (particularly juvenile delinquency).。

中国的审判制度(英)(2)

中国的审判制度(英)(2)

中国的审判制度(英)(2)3. Safeguards for JudgesThe Judge Law provides judges with the following safeguards:Professional safeguards: Judges shall be granted adequate powers and working conditions in order to perform their duties; they shall be free from interference in exercising their judicial powers from any administrative authorities or individual; they shall not be removed, demoted, dismissed or disciplined unless for statutory reasons and procedures.Salary safeguards: Judges shall receive remuneration for their performance of duties and enjoy insurance and other benefits.Corporal safeguard: Judges shall receive legal protection for their corporal, property and residential safety.Others: Judges shall have the right to resign, petition or accuse, or participate in training.4. PromotionsJudges are divided into 12 levels, with the president of the Supreme People’s Court being the Chief Justice and those between Level 2 and 12 being labeled Justice, Senior Judge and Judge. The level of seniority is determined by the judge’s position, performance, professionalism and seniority. Promotions are based on annual performance reviews, which are conducted by the courts where the judges serve. Performance reviews shall be conducted in an objective, impartial manner and combine evaluations by both superiors and subordinates.5. Rewards and PenaltiesJudges are rewarded for their outstanding performance and contributions. Rewards can be public recognition of performance, Third Reward, Second Reward, First Reward and the conferring of an honorary title.Judges must not engage in any of the following acts: disseminate information harmful to the reputation of the state; participate in illegal organizations; participate in anti-government gatherings, demonstrations and protests; participate in strikes; embezzle or take bribes; practice favoritism in breach of law; extort confessions by torture; conceal or forge evidence; leak state secrets or confidential information related to judicial proceedings; abuse power to violate the lawful rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations; neglect duties resulting in wrong rulings or serious damages to the litigant(s); purposefully delay proceedings; abuse power to seek profit for themselves or others; engage in business activities; meet in private with litigants and their representatives and accept their gifts and favors.Judges who engage in any of the above acts will be disciplined to varying degrees. These can be warnings; a record of demerit in personal files; a record of a major demerit; demotion; removal from position; dismissal from office. A removal from position is accompanied by a lowering of salary and rank; those who have committed a crime will be prosecuted for their criminal liabilities.6. Other ProvisionsJudges enjoy rights of retirement, resignation, training, petition and complaint. After retirement, they shall be entitled to pension insurance and other benefits as prescribed by the state.Forms of Court TrialsAccording to the Law on the Organization of People’s Court and other laws, trials of People’s Courts take the following forms:1. Sole Judge CourtThis kind of court is presided over by one judge for trying simple cases. Legally speaking, these cases include:First-hearing criminal cases handled upon complaint and other minor criminal cases;Simple civil cases and cases involving economic disputes handled by grassroots courts and their detached tribunals;Cases tried using special procedures, except for cases involving voters’ qualification or other complicated cases, which should be tried by a collegiate panel.2. Collegiate PanelsCollegiate panels consist of at least three judges or a combination of judges and People’s Assessors. First-hearing criminal and civil cases are generally tried by a collegiate panel except for those simple cases for which a sole judge is sufficient. First-hearing administrative cases, without exception, are handled by a collegiate panel; second-hearing, reexamined cases and death penalty verification cases are handled by a collegiate panel.A collegiate panel, as a basic form of the People’s Court, is not inflexible in its composition; rather, its members are appointed on a case-by-case basis. The president or the presiding judge designates a judge to be the chief judge. When the president of the court or the presiding judge of a tribunal themselves attend a case, they serve as the chief judge concurrently. When assessing a case, the collegiate panel should follow the principle of the minority submitting to the opinions of the majority when disagreement arises. The opinions of the minority, however, should be recorded in the court log with signatures of members of the panel.3. Judicial CommitteeAccording to the Law on the Organization of People’s Courts, courts at all levels set up a Judicial Committee, the members of which are nominated by the p resident for appointment by the People’s Congress atthe same level. The Judicial Committee is presided over by the president of the court and its responsibilities include:Deliberate on major, complicated cases;Summarize judicial practices;Discuss other judicial issues.The Fundamentals of China’s Judicial System1. Open TrialsArticle 125 of the Constitution provides that open trials mean that all cases tried by courts should be conducted openly unless otherwise provided for by the law. Even cases that are not tried openly should be publicized when the verdict is passed. “Open” means the entire process should be open to public auditing and to the press. For cases that, by law, should be open to the public, the court should announce before the trial opens the outline of the case, the name of the litigant, the time and the place of the trial.Article 7 of the Law on the Organization of People’s Courts provides that the following three types of cases are not open to the public: Cases involving state secrets;Cases involving personal privacy;Cases involving crimes committed by minors.In addition, in accordance with provisions of civil procedure law, cases involving divorce and trade secrets may, upon request by litigants, not be open to the public.2. Defense SystemThe Constitution and the law on the organization of courts provide that the accused is entitled to the right to a proper defense. The law on criminal procedure further provides that the courts have the obligation to ensure that the accused obtains defense, and sets forth specific procedures that any suspects or accused may, in addition to exercisingthe right to defend themselves, appoint one or two representatives to defend them. Those eligible to defend the accused include: Lawyers;Persons recommended by people’s organizations or the employer of the suspect or the accused;The custodian or relative of the suspect or the accused.However, those that are currently serving a sentence or those that have been deprived of, or are restricted in personal freedom should not represent the suspect or the accused.For public-prosecuted cases, the suspect has the right to appoint a defender starting from the day the case is transferred for prosecution; for privately prosecuted cases, the accused has the right to appoint a defender anytime. Should the accused, for economic or other reasons, be unable to appoint a defender to a court where a public prosecutor appears, the court may designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge. Furthermore, when the accused is blind, deaf, mute or a minor and has not appointed a defender, or when the accused may face death penalty and does not appoint a defender, the court should designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge.3. Second Instance Being FinalArticle 12 of the Law on the Organization of People’s Courts states that the courts have to try cases on two levels, with the second instance being the final judgment. This means a case is closed after going through two levels of trial.The courts practice a four-level system in which the second instance is the final judgment. Jurisdiction depends on the nature and complexity of the case. Should the litigant not agree with the judgment or ruling of the first instance, he or she may, within a specified period of time, appeal to the higher court. If the procuratorate believes that thefirst-instance ruling or judgment is indeed mistaken, it may, within a specified period of time, protest the ruling or judgment to the higher court. If, within the specified period of time, the litigant fails to appeal and the procurator fails to protest, then the first-instance judgment or ruling stands as the legally binding judgment or ruling. The superior court, after reviewing appealed or protested cases in accordance with second-instance procedures, passes a judgment or ruling that is the final judgment or ruling. Except for cases involving the death penalty, all other cases take legal effect immediately upon announcement.In accordance with legal provisions, the following cases are tried with the first instance being final:First-instance cases handled by the Supreme People’s Court;Cases heard by grassroots courts in accordance with civil procedures, such as voter qualification cases, cases determining citizens to be legally disabled or partially disabled, cases pronouncing persons missing, cases pronouncing persons dead, or cases determining property unclaimed.4. System of Collegiate PanelsArticle 10 of the Law on the Organization of People’s Court provides that courts shall practice a system of collegiate panels when trying cases. Except for first-instance simple civil cases and other cases otherwise provided for by the law, all cases are tried with a collegiate panel present. This system refers to a panel of at least three judges or a combination of at least three judges and People’s Assessors, as opposed to trials conducted by one judge alone. The composition of the collegiate panel should be an odd number, usually three, and the principle of the minority submitting to the majority is observed, provided that the opinions of the minority are recorded in the court log. The judges and People’s Assessors enjoy the same rights.5. Challenge SystemThe challenge system refers to a system in which judicial officers shall or are required to withdraw from the cases because of their special relationship with these cases or litigants, which may undermine the impartiality of the judgment.In accordance with criminal procedures, judges, prosecutors and investigators who meet any of the following conditions shall voluntarily withdraw or be challenged by litigants or their representatives to withdraw from the cases:They themselves are litigants or next-of-kin of litigants;They themselves or their close relatives hold stakes in the case;They have held the positions as witness, expert witness, defender or the advocate of litigants in incidental civil actions;They have other types of relations with litigants to the suit that may affect the fair handling of the case.These restrictions apply to secretaries, translators and experts as well.The withdrawal of judges is decided by the president of the court; while the withdrawal of the president is decided by the Judicial Committee of the court.The civil procedure law and administrative procedure law have similar provisions.6. System for Verification of Death Penalty CasesThis system refers to the procedures and rules that have to be observed in verifying death penalty cases.The Law on the Organization of People’s Courts and the Criminal Procedure Law provide that all death penalty cases, unless handled by the Supreme Peo ple’s Court, are reported to the Supreme People’s Court for verification and approval. The Supreme People’s Court, if necessary, may authorize Higher People’s Courts at the provincial level to exercise thatpower for death-penalty cases involving homicides, rape, robbery, explosion and other crimes that seriously threaten public security and social security. Cases involving a death penalty with a two-year probation ruled by intermediate courts are verified and approved by higher courts. Death penalty cases ruled by intermediate courts are first verified and approved by higher courts before being submitted to the Supreme People’s Court for verification and approval. Should the higher court disagree with the death penalty verdict, it may want to hear the case or refer it back for re-examination.7. System for Judicial SupervisionAlso known as the re-examination system, this refers to a special arrangement for the court to reexamine judgments and rulings that have already taken effect. It actually represents a remedy to the system of second instance being final.According to the Law on the Organization of People’s Courts and the three procedural laws on civil, criminal and administrative cases, China’s system of judicial supervision comprises the follow ing components:The precondition for initiating the judicial supervision procedure is that judgments and rulings that have already taken effect have been found to contain errors in establishment of facts or application of laws.The judicial supervision procedure can only be initiated by presidents of courts, superior courts, superior procuratorates, the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate.The way this procedure works is that presidents of courts ask the Judicial Committee to handle the matter; the Supreme People’s Court asks or designates lower courts to reexamine the case; the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and higher procuratorates protest a case in accordance with procedures for judicial supervision.In reexamining a case under the judicial supervision procedure, courts form a separate Collegiate Panel. If the original case was a first-instance case, then it should be re-examined in accordance with first-instance procedures; rulings or judgments arising thereof are subject to appeal or protest. If the original case was a second-instance case, or was tried by higher courts, then second-instance procedures should be followed and rulings or judgments arising thereof shall be final.8. System of Judicial AssistanceThis refers to a practice whereby the judicial authorities of a country (usually courts), in accordance with international treaties or bilateral/multilateral agreements (or the principle of reciprocity in the absence of a treaty), perform the judicial procedures at the request of another country’s judicial authorities or parties to a lawsuit.Judicial assistance in China consists of three aspects:Delivery of documents and investigations in search of evidence;Mutual recognition and enforcement of court rulings and arbitration awards;Criminal judicial assistance, including delivery of documents, investigation in search of evidence and extradition of criminals.。

中国审判制度(第二章)

中国审判制度(第二章)


在省、自治区内按地区设立的和在直辖市内设立的中级人民 法院院长,由省、自治区、直辖市人民代表大会常务委员会 根据主任会议的提名决定任免,副院长、审判委员会委员、 庭长、副庭长和审判员由高级人民法院院长提请省、自治区、 直辖市的人民代表大会常务委员会任免。 初任法官采用严格考核的办法,按照德才兼备的标准, 从通过国家统一司法考试取得资格,并且具备法官条件的人 员中择优提出人选。人民法院的院长、副院长应当从法官或 者其他具备法官条件的人员中择优提出人选。 法官不得兼任人民代表大会常务委员会的组成人员,不 得兼任行政机关、检察机关以及企业、事业单位的职务,不 得兼任律师。

一、人民法院的性质和任务
性质: 人民法院是人民民主专政的工具, 是国家的审判机关。
人民法院的任务:

1.通过审理刑事案件,惩办一切犯罪分子, 维护国家的安全和社会稳定。 2.通过审理民事案件,依法确认民事权利义 务关系,制裁民事违法行为,保障社会主义 公共财产、群众集体所有财产和公民个人 合法财产,维护各类社会主体的合法权益。

第五节 中国审判的主要制度

一、两审终审制度

两审终审制度,是指一个案件经过两级 法院审判即宣告终结的制度。

二、人民陪审员制度
人民陪审员制度是我国法律规定的由审 判员和人民陪审员组成合议庭对案件共同 进行审判的一项制度。
三、回避制度

回避制度,是指审判人员由于与其承办 的案件或案件当事人有某种特殊关系,可能 影响案件的公正处理,因而不得参与该案件 审判活动的制度。
如:军事法院院长并不是经过人大选举产生的,而是 由最高人民法院同中央军事委员会任命的。


专门法院:
专 门 法 院 铁 法路 院运 输

中国审判制度的主要内容

中国审判制度的主要内容

中国审判制度的主要内容审判制度是我国依法治国的一项重要法律制度,公开审判制度也是诉讼活动的重要法定原则。

审判活动依法公开进行,是我国现行法律对人民法院审判活动的基本要求。

以下是制度网为您搜集整理的《中国审判制度的主要内容》,供参考。

【中国审判制度】审判制度就是法院制度,包括法院的设置、法官、审判组织和活动等方面的法律制度。

(一) 人民法院的组织和职权根据现行宪法和人民法院组织法的规定,人民法院是国家审判机关,其组织体系是:地方各级人民法院、专门人民法院和最高人民法院。

各级各类人民法院的审判工作统一接受最高人民法院的监督。

地方各级人民法院根据行政区划设置,专门法院根据需要设置。

1、地方各级人民法院分为:基层人民法院、中级人民法院、高级人民法院。

基层人民法院根据《人民法院组织法》规定基层人民法院包括县、自治县人民法院、不设区的市、市辖区人民法院,其职权主要有:(1) 审判刑事、民事和行政案件的第一审案件,但是法律另有规定的除外。

对于所受理的案件,认为案情重大应当由上级人民法院审判的时候,可以请求移送上级人民法院审判。

(2) 处理不需要开庭审判的民事纠纷和轻微的刑事案件。

(3) 指导人民调解委员会的工作。

为便利人民诉讼,由基层人民法院设若干人民法庭,作为派出机构,但人民法庭不是一个审级。

其职权是审理一般民事和轻微刑事案件,指导人民调解委员会的工作,进行法制宣传,处理人民来信,接待人民来访。

它的判决和裁定就是基层人民法院的判决和裁定。

中级人民法院中级人民法院包括在省、自治区内按地区设立的中级人民法院,在中央直辖市的中级人民法院、省、自治区辖市和自治州中级人民法院,其职权主要有:(1) 审判下列案件:① 法律规定由它管辖的第一审案件。

按照刑事诉讼法的规定,中级人民法院管辖的第一审刑事案件是:危害国家安全案件;可能判处无期徒刑、死刑的普通刑事案件;外国人犯罪或者我国公民侵犯外国人合法权益的刑事案件。

按照民事诉讼法的规定,中级人民法院管辖的民事案件是重大的涉外案件,在本辖区内有重大影响的案件,最高人民法院指令中级人民法院管辖的案件。

中国的审判制度英

中国的审判制度英

国介绍中国的审判制度概述中国的审判制度是指根据宪法和法律规定,以人民法院为主要实施机构,在一定程序内,处理民事、刑事、行政等方面的法律问题,并作出裁定、判决等具有法律效力的最终结论。

中国的审判制度有着丰富的历史背景和深厚的文化底蕴,经过不断的发展和改革,已经逐渐成熟和完善。

中国的司法体系中国的司法体系是由最高人民法院、高级人民法院、中级人民法院和基层人民法院等多级别构成的。

其中,最高人民法院是最高审判机关,主要负责监察和指导全国的审判工作。

各级人民法院除了承担审案工作外,还需承担调解、仲裁和执行工作等。

除了人民法院以外,还有人民检察院和公安部门等司法工作者负责相关工作。

人民检察院主要负责对犯罪行为进行认定和起诉,而公安部门则主要负责调查犯罪行为并取证。

中国的审判程序中国的审判程序包括以下几个环节:立案立案是指法院对案件材料进行审查,决定是否进行立案并正式受开庭审理开庭审理是指法院将案件按照规定的程序进行公开审理的过程。

在开庭审理中,被告有权利进行申辩和辩护,法院也会聆听双方的意见并进行调节。

判决在审理完毕后,法院会进行判决或裁定,作出法律效力的最终结论。

上诉如果当事人不满意法院的判决,可以进行上诉,并由更高一级的法院进行再审。

中国的审判制度特点中国的审判制度具有以下几个特点:法制化中国的审判制度注重遵循法律,保护公民的权利,并严格执行法律。

公正性中国的审判制度最大的特点就是追求公正。

法院应当在法律规定的范围内,依照法律的规定和审判的程序,公正地行使审判职权,保护公民的合法权益。

公开性在中国的审判制度中,公开审理是非常重要的环节。

公开审理既是客观、公正地判决案件的基础,也是促进公民参与司法的一种方式。

民主化中国的审判制度注重人民群众的民主参与。

在审判的过程中,人民群众有权利进行监督和参与,并通过各种途径向法院反映意见和建议。

总结中国的审判制度已经发展成为一个比较完整和成熟的体系。

它注重法制化、公正性、公开性和民主化,旨在保护公民的合法权益,并促进社会的稳定和发展。

中国的审判制度英

中国的审判制度英

国文献综述概述中国的审判制度一直都备受人们关注。

近年来,随着全球化的进程和中国在世界舞台上的崛起,越来越多的英文文献被翻译成中文并在国内发表。

同时,也有大量的外文文献介绍和分析了中国的审判制度。

本文将综述一些最新的英文文献,以期向读者展示中国审判制度的现状、特点和发展趋势。

中国审判制度的历史和法律基础中国的司法制度历史悠久,可以追溯到公元前221年秦始皇统一中国并制定法律。

1949年中华人民共和国成立后,中国采取的是社会主义法律制度,在这个制度下,司法权归国家所有,审判工作由各级人民法院行使。

得益于中国全面建设法治国家的决策,中国的审判制度发生了不小的变化和进步。

中国的司法体系包括最高人民法院和各级人民法院。

在司法实践中,人民法院要依法独立、公正、公开地进行审判,同时还要遵循指导性案例制度等多项法律规定。

中国审判制度的特点从法律层面来看中国的审判制度呈现出一些独特的特点。

首先,中国注重将法制和人权权利相结合,以保障公民权利。

其次,中国的司法体系中有非诉讼解决纠纷的机制,例如调解、仲裁等,这种机制提高了审判效率。

第三,为了维护审判的权威性和司法公正性,中国的审判制度强调机关的独立性、法官的专业性、公开性和透明度。

从司法实践来看从中国的司法实践来看,中国的审判制度也呈现出独特的特点。

首先,中国的司法实践中,各级法院在审判中注重维护社会安定、国家利益和个人权利的平衡。

其次,中国的审判实践中注重对个案的细致审理,同时还强调指导性案例制度,并力求处理好个案和案例的关系。

第三,在中国的司法实践中,有很多法律制度取得了显著的成效,例如行政复议制度、公益诉讼等。

中国审判制度的现状和发展趋势现状近年来,中国的审判制度取得了不少进步。

例如,2014年刑事诉讼法的通过引起了全球的关注,其在理论上将很多维权要求沿用到了以前极少涉及的领域中;2016年,最高人民法院还建立了中国首个全国性的知识产权法院,以增强知识产权保护。

审判制度规定

审判制度规定

审判制度概述审判制度是一个国家法律体系中的重要组成部分,它包括了一系列规定和程序,以确保公正和公正地审理案件。

审判制度的主要目标是保障人权、维护社会秩序和促进正义。

本文将探讨审判制度的基本原则、组成部分以及它在不同国家中的不同实施方式。

基本原则公正公正是审判制度的核心原则之一。

它要求法官和法院在审理案件时不受外界压力和干扰,客观、中立地处理案件。

公正意味着每个人都有平等的机会,接受公正的审判,并享受到法律的保护。

公开公开也是审判制度的基本原则之一。

公开审判确保了司法活动的透明度和公众的监督权。

公开审判对于维护司法独立和防止滥用权力非常重要。

快速快速审判是保障司法效率的一个重要原则。

它意味着案件应当在合理的时间内得到审判,并及时作出裁决。

快速审判可以保护被告人的权利,并防止以拖延战术来削弱对方的合法权益。

组成部分法官与法院法官是审判制度中的核心人物。

他们负责主持庭审、依法进行判决,并保证案件得到公正审理。

法官应具备独立、中立的品质,以便能够客观地处理案件。

法院是审判制度的实施机构。

它提供了审理案件的场所和设施,负责组织庭审,接受当事人的申诉和上诉。

法院在司法活动中扮演着至关重要的角色。

当事人权利保障审判制度保障当事人在司法程序中的一系列权利,以确保公正和公平的审判。

这些权利包括: - 被告人有权知晓起诉指控的内容和证据; - 被告人有权辩护,并提供证据进行自我辩护; - 当事人有权尽早获得诉讼决定,并进行上诉; - 被判有罪的人有权申请上诉或请求复议。

证据和法律适用审判制度依靠证据和法律来做出裁决。

证据包括书证、物证和口证等,通过证据来证明事实和认定责任。

法院在审理案件时,会根据适用的法律法规来判断和裁决。

法治原则法治原则是审判制度的基石。

它要求法院以法律为依据来行使审判权,保证司法活动的合法性和适当性。

国际审判制度的实施方式英美法系英美法系是由英国传统法律体系发展而来的一种法律体系。

英美法系以判例法为基础,法官通过解释和适用先例来作出裁决。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

I. The Trial System2008-4-25 17:14 clicks:240 The trial system refers to the court system governing the establishment of courts, judges, and trials.Organization and Responsibilities of People's CourtsAccording to the current Constitution, and the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, People's Courts represent the main trial organ of the state. Organizationally, this court system consists of local courts, special courts and the Supreme Court, with all the first two subject to the supervision of the latter. Local courts are established in accordance with the administrative divisions, while special courts are set up where necessary.1. Local courts are divided into three levels: Grassroots, Intermediate and Higher.Under the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, grassroots-level courts consist of tribunalsin counties/autonomous counties, cities without administrative districts, or administrative districts of cities. Their responsibilities are:· Try criminal, civil and administrative cases as courts of first hearing, except where otherwise provided for by law. Cases deemed to be of a serious nature that should be handled by superior courts can be referred to those superior courts;· Handle civil disputes and misdemeanors that do not need trials;· Guide the work of the People's Arbitration Committees.To facilitate lawsuits, grassroots courts may set up tribunals, which are not trial units, but have the responsibility to hear general civil and misdemeanors, guide the work of People's Arbitration Committees, publicize laws and regulations, and handle petitions. Their judgments and decisions represent the judgments and decisions of the grassroots People's Courts.Intermediate courts are those set up in prefectures, cities directly under provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) and districts in the four municipalities directly under the central government (hereinafter referred to as "municipalities"). Their responsibilities include:· Try the following categories of cases:a) First-hearing cases under their jurisdiction, as prescribed by law. According to the Law on Criminal Procedures, these cases include those involving national security; criminal cases that may involve life imprisonment or the death penalty; criminal cases committed by foreigners or cases involving Chinesecitizens violating the lawful rights and interests of foreigners. According to the Law on Civil Procedures, civil cases heard by intermediate courts are major foreign-related cases; cases of major implications within their jurisdictions; and cases that intermediate courts are ordered to hear by the Supreme Court. In addition, according to the Law on Administrative Procedures, intermediate courts are authorized to hear the following cases: verification of patent rights; customs handling; suits against administrative actions taken by State Council departments or governments of the provinces (autonomous regions, municipalities); other important and complicated cases;b) First-hearing cases transferred by grassroots courts;c) Cases appealing or protesting the verdicts and decisions of grassroots courts.For criminal, civil and administrative cases that intermediate courts deem to be of a serious nature, the intermediate court may request that the cases be transferred to superior courts.· Supervise the performance of grassroots courts within their jurisdiction. They have the power to examine or order grassroots courts to re-examine verdicts or decisions issued by those courts that have already taken effect but that have been found to contain errors.According to the law on court organization, Higher Courts are set up in provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities). Their responsibilities include:· Try the following categories of cases:a) Criminal, civil and administrative cases of major proportions and complications under their jurisdiction, as provided for by the law;b) First-hearing cases transferred by lower courts;c) Cases appealing or protesting the verdicts and decisions made by lower courts. Higher courts in areas where a maritime court is located are authorized to try cases appealing the verdicts and rulings made by the maritime court;d) Protested cases submitted by prosecutors in accordance with trial-monitoring procedures.· Review first-hearing cases involving the death penalty ruled by intermediate courts where the accused renounces the right to appeal. If the Higher Court raises no objection to the death penalty, it then files the case with the Supreme Court for verification; if it disagrees with the death penalty ruling, it can eitherre-examine the case or refer the case back to the Intermediate Court.· Review cases submitted by intermediate courts involving a death penalty with two years' reprieve.· Approve certain death-penalty cases as authorized by the Supreme Court.· Supervise trials by lower courts. For verdicts or judgments passed by lower courts that have been found to contain errors, higher courts are authorized to hear or ask lower courts to reexamine the case.2. Special courts are courts set up in special departments for special cases wherever necessary. Currently, China has special courts handling military, maritime, railway cases.Military courts are set up at three levels: grassroots; Great Military Region, Services and Arms; and the PLA Court.The PLA Court is the supreme military court whose responsibilities include:· Try first-hearing cases involving crimes committed by individuals above the division commander level.· Try foreign-related criminal cases.· Try second-hearing cases, verification and review of cases involving death penalty.Great Military Region and Services and Arms Courts are intermediate courts set up in great military regions, the navy, the air force, the Second Artillery Army and the PLA General Headquarters. Their responsibilities include:· Try first-hearing cases involving crimes committed by individuals at the deputy division commander and regiment level.· Try cases that may involve death penalty and cases under their jurisdiction as authorized or designated by superior military courts.· Try cases appealing or protesting rulings or verdicts passed by lower courts.Grassroots military courts consist of tribunals set up in armies, provincial military regions, naval fleets, and air forces within Great Military Regions and in army units deployed in Beijing directly under the headquarters. Their responsibilities include:· Try cases involving crimes committed by individuals under the battalion commander level andfirst-hearing cases that may involve a penalty up to life imprisonment.· Try first-hearing cases under its jurisdiction as authorized or designated by superior military courts.Maritime courts are special courts set up to try first-hearing maritime or sea-shipping cases for the purpose of exercising judicial jurisdiction over maritime affairs. In May 1989, the Supreme People's Court made a Decision on the Scope of Cases to Be Handled by Maritime Courts. That decision specified that maritime courts handle maritime or commercial cases between Chinese legal persons/citizens, between Chinese legal persons/citizens and foreign legal persons/citizens, and between foreign legalpersons/citizens. These cases fall into 14 subsets in five categories:· Ten categories of cases involving maritime torts and disputes, including: damage claim cases involving collision of vessels; damage claim cases involving vessels colliding into buildings and facilities on the sea, sea-linked waters and ports; claim cases involving vessels discharging or leaking hazardous materials or waste water causing water pollution or damaging other vessels or cargo; claim cases involving casualties in the course of sea-borne shipping or operations on the sea, sea-linked waters and ports.· Fourteen categories of commercial cases, including: cases involving shipping contract disputes; contract dispute cases involving passengers and baggage; cases involving seaman labor contract disputes; cases involving maritime rescue and salvage contract disputes; cases involving maritime insurance contract disputes.· Eleven other categories of maritime cases, including: cases involving major liabilities in shipping and maritime operations; cases involving port operation disputes; cases involving general average disputes; cases involving offshore development and exploitation; cases involving the ownership, proprietorship, mortgage or preferred maritime right of claim of vessels; administrative cases involving maritime or inland river authorities; and cases involving maritime fraud.· Five categories of cases involving maritime enforcement, including: cases involving compulsory enforcement requested by maritime and inland river authorities; cases involving applications for enforcement of arbitration awards filed by litigants; cases involving applications filed with Chinese maritime courts by litigants for recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards given by arbitration agencies in foreign countries or regions, in accordance with provisions of the convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration; cases involving applications filed by litigants to Chinese maritime courts for assistance in enforcement of rulings given by foreign courts, in accordance with judicial assistance accords China signed with foreign countries, or with the principle of reciprocity.· Two categories of cases involving requests for preservation: cases involving pleas for detaining vessels prior to the opening of trial; cases involving pleas for detaining cargoes aboard ships or fuel for the ships prior to the opening of trial.Railway transportation tribunals are special courts set up along railways that try the following types of cases:· Criminal cases investigated by railway public-security authorities and filed by railway prosecutors.· Cases involving economic disputes. In accordance with rulings of the Supreme People's Court, these cases fall into 12 categories: cases involving railway cargo transportation contract disputes; cases involving disputes over the execution of international railway collaboration contracts; cases involving economic disputes within the railway system; cases involving torts that have resulted in damages to railways in violation of railway safety regulations; and tort cases involving human and property losses caused by railway operations and dispatch operations, where the litigant chooses to bring action to the railway tribunal.3.The Supreme People's Court is located in Beijing, capital city of China. It is the highest judicial organ, exercising the highest judicial power while supervising lower courts and special courts. The Supreme People's Court is presided over by one president and a number of vice presidents, chief justices and justices. The Supreme People's Court exercises the following powers:· Supervise lower courts and special courts. For judgments and rulings passed by lower and special courts that have been found to contain errors, the Supreme People's Court have the power to hear the cases or order lower courts to reexamine the cases.· Try the following cases:a) First-hearing cases falling under its jurisdiction as prescribed by the law or as deemed necessary by the court itself. The Law on Criminal Procedure stipulates that the Supreme People's Court has first-hearing right to try criminal and civil cases of major proportions nationwide. The Law on Administrative Procedure provides that the Supreme People's Court has first-hearing jurisdiction over administrative cases of a material and complicated nature.b) Cases appealing or protesting rulings of higher courts and special courts, and protested cases submitted by the Supreme People's Procuratorate in accordance with legal procedures.· Approve death penalty cases.· Issue judicial interpretations on how to apply law and writs.· Lead and manage judicial administration of courts at all levels across the country.Judge SystemThe judge system, a major component of the judiciary, refers to all the rules and institutions related to the election and qualification of judges, forms of election, tenures, rewards and penalties, and salary and compensation of judges. China promulgated a Judge Law on February 28, 1995, which contains 17 chapters and 42 articles.1. Qualifications of JudgesJudges exercise state judicial power in accordance with law. They include presidents and vice presidents of courts at various levels, members of judicial committees, presidents and vice presidents of tribunals, judges and assistant judges. The responsibility of judges is to participate in collegiate panels or be independent judges at trials.Judges are elected with the following qualifications:· A citizen of the People's Republic of China;· At least 23 years of age;· Supports the Constitution of the People's Republic of China;· In good political, professional and moral standing;· In good health;· A graduate of law from an institution of higher learning, or a non-law graduate from an institution of higher learning with in-depth knowledge of law, with two years of working experience; or holders of a bachelor's degree in JD with a full year of working experience; those holding a Master's or Ph.D. degree in JD are not subject to the working-experience limit described above.Those that have been penalized for crimes or have been dismissed from their public offices shall not be elected judges.In addition, according to the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, presidents, vice presidents, presiding judge and deputy presiding judge of tribunals, judges and assistant judges, as well as People's Assessors shall be citizens with voting rights and rights of being elected, 23 years of age and with legal knowledge.2. The Appointment and Removal of JudgesThe Constitution and laws provide for the powers and procedures for appointing and removing judges.Presidents of courts at local levels are elected and removed by the People's Congress at the same level and the tenure of the presidents is the same as the People's Congress; the president nominates the vice president, members of the Judicial Committee, presiding judges, deputy presiding judges and judges for appointment and removal by the Standing Committee of the People's Congress at the same level. Assistant judges of a court are appointed and removed by the president of the court. Judges sitting at special courts are elected and removed with procedures separately set forth by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.Primary judges and assistant judges are recruited from among qualified candidates through open examination. The president, vice president, members of the Judicial Committee, presiding judge and deputy presiding judge shall be selected from among candidates who have practical working experience.Judges shall not concurrently hold positions in the Standing Committee of the People's Congress, executive offices, the procuratorate, business, non-profit institutions, or in the legal profession.Judges who have lost their citizenship, been found to be incompetent, been unable to perform their duties for a protracted period of time due to disciplinary violations, criminal records or health reasons, shall be removed from their position in accordance with legal procedures.3. Safeguards for JudgesThe Judge Law provides judges with the following safeguards:· Professional safeguards: Judges shall be granted adequate powers and working conditions in order to perform their duties; they shall be free from interference in exercising their judicial powers from any administrative authorities or individual; they shall not be removed, demoted, dismissed or disciplined unless for statutory reasons and procedures.· Salary safeguards: Judges shall receive remuneration for their performance of duties and enjoy insurance and other benefits.· Corporal safeguard: Judges shall receive legal protection for their corporal, property and residential safety.· Others: Judges shall have the right to resign, petition or accuse, or participate in training.4. PromotionsJudges are divided into 12 levels, with the president of the Supreme People's Court being the Chief Justice and those between Level 2 and 12 being labeled Justice, Senior Judge and Judge. The level of seniority is determined by the judge's position, performance, professionalism and seniority. Promotions are based on annual performance reviews, which are conducted by the courts where the judges serve. Performance reviews shall be conducted in an objective, impartial manner and combine evaluations by both superiors and subordinates.5. Rewards and Penalties Judges are rewarded for their outstanding performance and contributions. Rewards can be public recognition of performance, Third Reward, Second Reward, First Reward and the conferring of an honorary title.Judges must not engage in any of the following acts: disseminate information harmful to the reputation of the state; participate in illegal organizations; participate in anti-government gatherings, demonstrations and protests; participate in strikes; embezzle or take bribes; practice favoritism in breach of law; extort confessions by torture; conceal or forge evidence; leak state secrets or confidential information related to judicial proceedings; abuse power to violate the lawful rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations; neglect duties resulting in wrong rulings or serious damages to the litigant(s); purposefully delay proceedings; abuse power to seek profit for themselves or others; engage in business activities; meet in private with litigants and their representatives and accept their gifts and favors.Judges who engage in any of the above acts will be disciplined to varying degrees. These can be warnings; a record of demerit in personal files; a record of a major demerit; demotion; removal from position; dismissal from office. A removal from position is accompanied by a lowering of salary and rank; those who have committed a crime will be prosecuted for their criminal liabilities.6. Other ProvisionsJudges enjoy rights of retirement, resignation, training, petition and complaint. After retirement, they shall be entitled to pension insurance and other benefits as prescribed by the state.Forms of Court TrialsAccording to the Law on the Organization of People's Court and other laws, trials of People's Courts take the following forms:1. Sole Judge CourtThis kind of court is presided over by one judge for trying simple cases. Legally speaking, these cases include:· First-hearing criminal cases handled upon complaint and other minor criminal cases;· Simple civil cases and cases involving economic disputes handled by grassroots courts and their detached tribunals;· Cases tried using special procedures, except for cases involving voters' qualification or other complicated cases, which should be tried by a collegiate panel.2. Collegiate PanelsCollegiate panels consist of at least three judges or a combination of judges and People's Assessors. First-hearing criminal and civil cases are generally tried by a collegiate panel except for those simple cases for which a sole judge is sufficient. First-hearing administrative cases, without exception, are handled by a collegiate panel; second-hearing, reexamined cases and death penalty verification cases are handled by a collegiate panel.A collegiate panel, as a basic form of the People's Court, is not inflexible in its composition; rather, its members are appointed on a case-by-case basis. The president or the presiding judge designates a judge to be the chief judge. When the president of the court or the presiding judge of a tribunal themselves attend a case, they serve as the chief judge concurrently. When assessing a case, the collegiate panel should follow the principle of the minority submitting to the opinions of the majority when disagreement arises. The opinions of the minority, however, should be recorded in the court log with signatures of members of the panel.3. Judicial CommitteeAccording to the Law on the Organization of People's Courts, courts at all levels set up a Judicial Committee, the members of which are nominated by the president for appointment by the People's Congress at the same level. The Judicial Committee is presided over by the president of the court and itsresponsibilities include:· Deliberate on major, complicated cases;· Summarize judicial practices;· Discuss other judicial issues.The Fundamentals of China's Judicial System1. Open TrialsArticle 125 of the Constitution provides that open trials mean that all cases tried by courts should be conducted openly unless otherwise provided for by the law. Even cases that are not tried openly should be publicized when the verdict is passed. "Open" means the entire process should be open to public auditing and to the press. For cases that, by law, should be open to the public, the court should announce before the trial opens the outline of the case, the name of the litigant, the time and the place of the trial.Article 7 of the Law on the Organization of People's Courts provides that the following three types of cases are not open to the public:· Cases involving state secrets;· Cases involving personal privacy;· Cases involving crimes committed by minors.In addition, in accordance with provisions of civil procedure law, cases involving divorce and trade secrets may, upon request by litigants, not be open to the public.2. Defense SystemThe Constitution and the law on the organization of courts provide that the accused is entitled to the right to a proper defense. The law on criminal procedure further provides that the courts have the obligation to ensure that the accused obtains defense, and sets forth specific procedures that any suspects or accused may, in addition to exercising the right to defend themselves, appoint one or two representatives to defend them. Those eligible to defend the accused include:· Lawyers;· Persons recommended by people's organizations or the employer of the suspect or the accused;· The custodian or relative of the suspect or the accused.However, those that are currently serving a sentence or those that have been deprived of, or are restricted in personal freedom should not represent the suspect or the accused.For public-prosecuted cases, the suspect has the right to appoint a defender starting from the day the case is transferred for prosecution; for privately prosecuted cases, the accused has the right to appoint a defender anytime. Should the accused, for economic or other reasons, be unable to appoint a defender to a court where a public prosecutor appears, the court may designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge. Furthermore, when the accused is blind, deaf, mute or a minor and has not appointed a defender, or when the accused may face death penalty and does not appoint a defender, the court should designate a legal-aid lawyer to defend him or her free of charge.3. Second Instance Being FinalArticle 12 of the Law on the Organization of People's Courts states that the courts have to try cases on two levels, with the second instance being the final judgment. This means a case is closed after going through two levels of trial.The courts practice a four-level system in which the second instance is the final judgment. Jurisdiction depends on the nature and complexity of the case. Should the litigant not agree with the judgment or ruling of the first instance, he or she may, within a specified period of time, appeal to the higher court. If the procuratorate believes that the first-instance ruling or judgment is indeed mistaken, it may, within a specified period of time, protest the ruling or judgment to the higher court. If, within the specified period of time, the litigant fails to appeal and the procurator fails to protest, then the first-instance judgment or ruling stands as the legally binding judgment or ruling. The superior court, after reviewing appealed or protested cases in accordance with second-instance procedures, passes a judgment or ruling that is the final judgment or ruling. Except for cases involving the death penalty, all other cases take legal effect immediately upon announcement.In accordance with legal provisions, the following cases are tried with the first instance being final:· First-instance cases handled by the Supreme People's Court;· Cases heard by grassroots courts in accordance with civil procedures, such as voter qualification cases, cases determining citizens to be legally disabled or partially disabled, cases pronouncing persons missing, cases pronouncing persons dead, or cases determining property unclaimed.4. System of Collegiate PanelsArticle 10 of the Law on the Organization of People's Court provides that courts shall practice a system of collegiate panels when trying cases. Except for first-instance simple civil cases and other cases otherwise provided for by the law, all cases are tried with a collegiate panel present. This system refers to a panel of at least three judges or a combination of at least three judges and People's Assessors, as opposed to trials conducted by one judge alone. The composition of the collegiate panel should be an odd number, usually three, and the principle of the minority submitting to the majority is observed, provided that theopinions of the minority are recorded in the court log. The judges and People's Assessors enjoy the same rights.5. Challenge SystemThe challenge system refers to a system in which judicial officers shall or are required to withdraw from the cases because of their special relationship with these cases or litigants, which may undermine the impartiality of the judgment.In accordance with criminal procedures, judges, prosecutors and investigators who meet any of the following conditions shall voluntarily withdraw or be challenged by litigants or their representatives to withdraw from the cases:· They themselves are litigants or next-of-kin of litigants;· They themselves or their close relatives hold stakes in the case;· They have held the positions as witness, expert witness, defender or the advocate of litigants in incidental civil actions;· They have other types of relations with litigants to the suit that may affect the fair handling of the case.These restrictions apply to secretaries, translators and experts as well.The withdrawal of judges is decided by the president of the court; while the withdrawal of the president is decided by the Judicial Committee of the court.The civil procedure law and administrative procedure law have similar provisions.6. System for Verification of Death Penalty CasesThis system refers to the procedures and rules that have to be observed in verifying death penalty cases.The Law on the Organization of People's Courts and the Criminal Procedure Law provide that all death penalty cases, unless handled by the Supreme People's Court, are reported to the Supreme People's Court for verification and approval. The Supreme People's Court, if necessary, may authorize Higher People's Courts at the provincial level to exercise that power for death-penalty cases involving homicides, rape, robbery, explosion and other crimes that seriously threaten public security and social security. Cases involving a death penalty with a two-year probation ruled by intermediate courts are verified and approved by higher courts. Death penalty cases ruled by intermediate courts are first verified and approved by higher courts before being submitted to the Supreme People's Court for verification and approval. Should the higher court disagree with the death penalty verdict, it may want to hear the case or refer it back for re-examination.。

相关文档
最新文档