药物经济学中效用的基本概念
合集下载
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
x
(worse)
Healthy
LIFE ‘B’
Health state i (better)
V (Hi) 1 (1V (Hj)) x t
t
Healthy
V(Hi)=0.6+0.4V(Hj)
Discrete choice experiment (DCE)
31
DCE
o An attribute-based approach to collected stated preference
Designed to obtain comparable scores to the SG
How much time a respondent would like to give up to be in a healthier state compared to a less health state
o What is the “utility” in cost utility analysis?
3
Health utility
A single measure for multiple (composite?) health outcomes (i.e. effectiveness, and side effects)
LIFE ‘A’ x
Full health
t
Loneliness
LIFE ‘B’
Death
U(full health)*x +U(loneliness)*(t-x)= 0 U(loneliness)= - 0.25
29
TTO- temporary states
LIFE ‘A’
Health state j
8
Steps for direct measurement
Step One
Developing health state descriptions
Step Two
Eliciting preferences
Step Three
Calculating health utilities
9
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Death p
Ti
step 2: ×
×
Healthy
×
Value of Ti on a scale from 0 (death) to 1 (healthy): V(Ti) = p/10
Value of Tj on a scale from 0 (death) to 1 (healthy): V(Tj) = p/10+ (m/10)((10-p)/10) = 0.3+0.28 = 0.58
Anchored at 0 for dead and 1 for full health
Comparability across different treatments or diseases
4
von Neumann-Morgenstern utility theory
“A mathematical decision theory describing how a rational individual should make decisions when faced with uncertain outcomes.”
2
Preference, value, utility
o Preference is greater liking/desire toward something over others
o Value measures preference under certainty
o Utility measures preference under uncertainty
10
VAS
➢ A respondent ranks health states according to his/her preference and then places them on a line or scale
➢ Interval or spacing between placements corresponds to the difference in preference as perceived by that respondent
von Neumann and Morgenstern 1944
5
Axioms of vNM utility theory
o Existence and transitivity of preference A › B or A ‹ B or A ~ B If A › B and B › C , then A › C If A ~ B and B ~ C , then A ~ C
6
How to measure health utilities?
With established elicitation techniques Direct measure ▪ Designing your own questionnaire/protocol ▪ Applying directly elicitation techniques Indirect measure ▪ Use of established questionnaire ▪ Calculating health utilities using scoring algorithms based on elicitation techniques
=1 1-p
=0.8 p
=0
The greater a person’s willingness to accept
the risk of death to avoid living in a health state, then the lower is the utility for that health state to him/her.
Loneliness
CHOICE “B”
100
% chance
Death
p*U(full health) + (1 - p)*U(loneliness)=0 24
CHOICE “A”
SG – temporary states
25
% chance
75
% chance
C
0.25 0.75
Healthy
o Rooted in the economic theory of random utility maximization
o Originally developed in transport economics and marketing research
o Measuring preference under certainty or uncertainty
Measuring preference under certainty
27
LIFE ‘A’
TTO - chronic states
x
Full health
Death
LIFE ‘B’
Insomnia
U(insomnia)=x/t
t
Death
U(insomnia)=0.5 28
TTO –worse than death states
m
Death
×
d
Insomnia
×
ppΒιβλιοθήκη Full health×
U(insomnia) = (m-d)/(p-d) = 0.38
14
VAS - temporary states
m
step 1: ×Ti
Tj
×
Healthy
×
Value of Tj on a scale from 0 (Ti) to 1 (healthy): V(Tj) = m/10
Without established elicitation techniques ▪ Judgment
7
Direct measures
Visual analogue scale (VAS) Standard gamble (SG) Time trade-off (TTO) Discrete choice experiment (DCE)
17
Risk-based choices in SG questions
Finding p such that: U (Hi)= pU(HFull health) +(1-p)U(Hdeath)
=p
18
What does a utility tell…
CHOICE
Insomnia p Full health
o Independence of preference If A › B then pA +(1-p)C › pB +(1-p)C
o Continuity of preference If A › B and B › C, then existing a probability p, B ~ [pA +(1-p)C]
Health state j (worse)
CHOICE “B”
100
% chance
Health state i (better)
U(Hi)= p+ (1 - p)U(Hj)
U(Hi)= 0.25+0.75U(Hj)
Time trade-off (TTO)
26
TTO
Developed specifically for use in health care by Torrance et al (1972).
SG-chronic states (cont’d)
CHOICE “A”
10
% chance
90
% chance
C
0.10 0.90
Full health
Death
CHOICE “B”
100
% chance
Insomnia
21
22
CHOICE “A”
Worse than death?
0
% chance
Measuring health utilities for economic evaluation
What is utility?
o In economics, utility is a measure of relative satisfaction. It is a term referring to the total satisfaction received by a consumer from consuming a good or service.
19
CHOICE “A”
SG- chronic states
90
% chance
10
% chance
90/10 C
10/90 0.90
…
0.10
50/50
Full health
CHOICE “B”
100
% chance
Death Insomnia
U(insomnia)= p/100 U(insomnia)= 0.9 20
32
A simple DCE example
➢ Measuring preference under certainty
11
Variants of VAS
12
Health state description
m
Death
×
Insomnia
×
Full health
×
U(insomnia) = m/10 = 0.40
13
VAS-chronic states
15
Standard Gamble (SG)
16
SG
First presented by von Neumann and Morgenstern in 1944
Classic method based directly on the vNM utility theory
Extensively used in decision analysis Measuring preference under uncertainty
100
% chance
C
0.10 0.90
Full health
Death
CHOICE “B”
100
% chance
Loneliness
23
SG - worse than death states
CHOICE “A”
10
% chance
90
% chance
C
0.10 0.90
Full health
1- p Death
MEASUREMENT
UTILITY SCALE
Find p
Assume p=0.8 would risk 20% chance of death to avoid living with insomnia
U (Full health) U (Insomnia)
U (Death)