区域供水与分散集中式供水优劣比较

合集下载
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

区域供水与分散集中式供水优劣比较
区域供水与分散集中式供水优劣比较
仲春林
【期刊名称】《大家健康(中旬版)》
【年(卷),期】2014(000)012
【摘要】目的:通过区域供水与分散集中式供水优劣比较,为今后继续做好农村饮水安全工程提供依据。

目的:对该区2011~2013年122家供水单位,202个监测点所采集1032份水样监测结果进行对比分析。

结果:该区2011~2013年水样合格率分别为54.73%、75.64%、88.84%,项次合格率分别为95.84%、97.45%、99.31%,微生物指标合格率分别为94.37%、98.21%、98.80%,差异均有显著性,且2013年三项指标合格率均明显提高。

结论:区域供水大大好于分散集中式供水水质,实行区域供水可以基本保证农村居民喝上放心安全饮用水。

%Objective:Through comparing the regional water supply and distribute-centralized water supply mode advantages and disadvantages,providing the basis to continue to do a good job of rural drinking water safety project in the future. Method:T o compare and analyse the monitoring results of 1032 water samples collected from 202 monitoring sites in this ditrict during 2011 to 2013. Results:The qulification rates of water samples in this district from 2011 to 2013 are 54. 73%,75. 64%,88. 84%. The qulification rates of items are 95. 84%,97. 45%,99. 31%. The qulification rates of microorganism index are 94. 37%, 98. 21%,98. 80%. The differences are all significant and the qualification rates of the three indexes are all improve markedly.。

相关文档
最新文档