英文论文审稿意见英文版
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
英文论文审稿意见汇总
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is no ted that your manu script n eeds careful edit ing by some one with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me thods used in the study.
. Furthermore, an expla natio n of why the authors did these various experime nts should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的ratio nale:
Also, there are few expla nati ons of the rati on ale for the study desig n. 4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:
The con clusi ons are overstated. For example, the study did not show
if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:
A hypothesis n eeds to be prese nted 。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:
What was the rati on ale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义:
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,
write one sect ion to defi ne the problem
&如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.
9、对 claim,如 A >B 的证明,verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improveme nt on previous work.
10、严谨度问题:
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.
11、格式(重视程度):
In additi on, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not
completely correct.
I have attached a pdf file with "I nstructi ons for Authors" which shows examples. .Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are un sure, please con sult the formatti ng n struct ions to authors that are
give n un der the "I nstruct ions and Forms" butt on in he upper right-ha nd corner of the scree n.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):有关语言的审稿人意见:
It is no ted that your manu script n eeds careful edit ing by some one with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. . The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper tran slatio n/reviewi ng service before submissi on; on ly the n can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical an d/or spell ing mistakes or are not complete senten ces.
.As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are pro
blems with sentence structure, verb ten se, and clause con struct ion.
. The En glish of your manu script must be improved before resubmissi on. We str ongly