最新环境会计方面的外文文献
会计 外文翻译 外文文献 英文文献 新会计准则
附录外文资料:On February 15, 2006, the Ministry of Finance issued 1 item of basic accounting standards and 38 specific guidelines, the new set of accounting standards system. Standards issued, the community gave wide attention, the securities industry, business circles, academic circles gave height the opinion, think this is the second in 1993 accounting reform after another is of great significance to the accounting reform, marking China's convergence with international financial reporting standards of enterprise accounting standards system formally established, to improve the China's socialist market economic system, improve the level of opening up and accelerate China's integration into the global economy has important significance.Also expressed their concerns and worries, mainly reflected in the following aspects: a fair value is difficult to "fair", and is very likely to become the profit manipulation tools; two is the enterprise may to adjust earnings manipulation debt restructuring, debt restructuring will once again become the darling of the securities market; three is the new standard published may induce "fair" phenomenon, which may lead to the end of 2006 enterprises will impairment assault back, at the same time accounts receivable impairment will still give listing Corporation profit adjustment leaves lots of space. These concerns whether it can become a reality? The new standards will become the corporate profits manipulation of the tool? Here we have to this a few worry about one to launch the analysis:A moderate, fair value applicationThe history of our country is a listing Corporation with the fair value of profit manipulation. Fair value appeared in 1998 in "debt recombines", "non monetary transactions" specific accounting standards, after the actual operation in many companies the abuse of fair value and profit manipulation in 2001 revised guidelines by the restriction of the use of. The new criterion system in financial tool, real estate investment, not the combination under common control, debt restructuring andnon-monetary transactions etc. are carefully adopted the fair value accounting standards, thus becoming the one large window. Past episodes of "story" will repeat itself? To this one problem we analyzed from the following aspects:First of all, the fair value of the assets can be achieved by using fair value valuation is the international accounting standards, the United States and most market economic countries accounting standards in general practice. International already crossed the "want" present value and fair value debate stage, and mainly in "how to use" stage; International did not because of "Enron event" appear and delay the study and adopt present value and the fair value of the process. From the beginning of 1975, 30 years, FASB on the fair value measurement system research has not stopped, the fair value in the accounting standards in the United States are used more and more widely. As of 2004, at the end of 12, FASB has released a total of 153 financial accounting standards, fair value accounting standards and related 60 (forever, 2005).Fair value has a profound theoretical basis for the ten, it accords with the economic income concept, the comprehensive income concept, cash flow and market price of accounting assumption, accounting goal, modern relevance and reliability of quality characteristics of accounting elements, essential characteristics, future basic accounting, value and value concept, measurement values and net surplus theory and financial statements of the primitive logic (Xie Sifone, 2005).The use of fair value can effectively enhance the relevance of accounting information for investors, creditors, and other stakeholders to provide more help to the information for decision making. Take the investment real estate, book 20000000 yuan, if the city price rises to $200000000 accounting should reflect 200000000 yuan, such information is really true and useful. If still persist in the statements that the 20000000 yuan, accounting treatment is simple, but this information does not help the decision-making of investors, even misleading. Any reform will not give up eating for fear of choking, accounting reform is no exception. In line with international standards is the direction, is to represent the general trend, this point is in the affirmative.Secondly, suitable for the application of the fair value of the "soil" preliminary already form. Fair value is the product of the market economy. In 2003 the Central Committee made on perfecting the socialist market economic system a number of issues, symbolizes that our country market economy already from start-up to improve, the market economy status of China has been established. The securities market of our country after ten years of development and perfection, to strengthen corporategovernance, improve operational transparency, clear violations, establishing listing Corporation integrated supervision system has made great progress. China Securities Regulatory Commission promoting the share-trading reform pilot, listing and financing program, has issued a number of regulations, strengthen the listing Corporation information disclosure and fraud and strength; the Ministry of finance to increase the quality of accounting information and the CPA audit quality inspection; listing Corporation governance level rises further, CPA, assets assessment division, independent directors such as rational economic choice for listing Corporation irregularities built several "firewall"; the majority of investors in the analysis of accounting information to judge, effective screening capacity is enhanced, the effectiveness of the securities market gradually improve. In addition, after joining the WTO, large amount of foreign capital into China, financial derivatives trading activity, produce a number, different features of derivative financial instruments, such as futures (Futures), option (Options), forward contract (Forwards Contract), swap (Swaps) etc.. As the derivative financial instruments no initial net investment is required, or very few requirements of net investment, the historical cost of its incapable of action, only the fair value to carry on the accurate recognition and measurement..FASl33 stated: fair value measurement of financial instruments is the best measurement attribute, the derivative financial instruments, fair value measurement attribute is the only. Potential of time shift, which contributes to the application of the fair value of the environment is preliminary already implementation. We must adopt the development strategy view ", not" once bitten, twice shy of ten years".In third, the fair value of the criteria in the new application is more cautious, does not lead to abuse. Compared with international financial reporting standards: China accounting standards system in determining the scope of the application of fair value, the more fully consider China's national conditions, the improvement was prudent. The use of fair value must satisfy certain conditions, in the basic guidelines in section forty-third clearly pointed out that the replacement cost, net realizable value of, present value, fair value, should be to ensure that the identified elements of accounting amounts can be obtained and the reliable measurement. In relation to specific standards, the use of fair value measurement, has clearly defined constraints. For example, in real estate investment criteria specified by the fair value measurement model, the following conditions shall be met simultaneously: one is the investmentproperty real estate located in active trading market of real estate; two is the enterprise can from the real estate trading market on the same or similar real estate market prices and other information, thus the investment real estate to make a reasonable estimate of fair value.Visible in the investing real estate standards, ban contains more hypothetical valuation techniques used, only in a certain reliability on the basis that the use of fair value, and not all of the investment real estate can be applied the fair value. So as long as the strictly in accordance with the standards, fair value will really be fair.For instance in non monetary transactions for the use of fair value, the new standards in exchange of non-monetary assets, fair value and change the carrying value of the assets included in the current profits and losses of the difference between the two conditions, namely the exchange must be commercial in nature, and a change of assets or the fair value of the assets surrendered can be measured reliably. Commercial essence refers to, must be changed in the future cash flow of the assets at risk, time and amount of assets surrendered and were significantly different, or substitution of assets and the assets surrendered the present value of estimated future cash flows are different, and the difference between the assets and the change of the fair value of the assets is more significant than the. The new guidelines are also provided to determine whether is commercial in nature, an enterprise shall pay attention to whether or not the transacting parties are related party relationship. Related party relationship may lead to the occurrence of non monetary assets exchange is not commercial in nature. These preconditions, will effectively restricted to non monetary assets exchange way of earnings manipulation behavior. From these rules, we can see that, the application of fair value is strictly restricted conditions, the fair value is not allowed to abuse.The new standards require that the fair value to "reliable" and not "just, fair value estimate" is no longer the eraser ruler. The author thinks, fair value to be profit manipulation tools need to also have three elements: the listing Corporation management deliberate fraud, accounting audit staff lose occupation moral and securities market regulatory failure. In fact with the three elements, any system can effectively play a protective role, therefore, establishing and perfecting accounting standards supporting management system is urgent.Two, the debt restructuring reform from the bottomThe new debt restructuring guidelines stipulated in debt restructuring gains can be included in the current profits and losses. As a debtor's listing Corporation, the new debt restructuring guidelines means that, once the creditor concessions, listing Corporation acquired interests will be directly included in the current income, into a profit report. Debt restructuring is likely to increase profits, improve earnings per share. But this approach achieved with the international convergence of financial reporting standards, reflects the essence of transaction debt restructuring, debt restructuring gains is after all the creditors rather than owners concessions, the past will not pass the profit and loss statement directly included in the capital reserve, it is under the special background of a matter of expediency, now be included in the profit and loss, is not "white" the "black", but the reform from the bottom. The new guidelines on the definition of debt restructuring, made clear only in "the debtor's financial difficulties." the premise condition, can get debt concession confirmed as debt restructuring gains. This condition will be restricted to a certain extent, the new guidelines on abuse, prevent inappropriate acknowledgement of debt reorganization gains.Some people think that some affiliates can also through a remit a debt, a high performance to price manipulation, insider trading, is still small shareholders suffered losses. In fact, this fear is a bit much. This is because, first, for *ST and ST company, fantasy on debt restructuring benefit, reaching for the stars is futile. Because the 2004 amendment of the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange rules, one is freed, after deducting non-recurring profits and losses, net profit is positive. Debt restructuring to listing Corporation profits, in actual accountant operation, will be included in operating income, which belongs to the non-recurring profit and loss, thus can in St, the stars are deducted from; second, has experienced more than 10 years of stock market investors' groundless talk, analysis and judgment ability and self protection consciousness had very big rise, debt restructuring guidelines requiring companies to disclose the fair value of the methods and basis for the ascertainment, investors can easily recognize the debt restructuring packaging profits, in order to make a rational choice .Investors blindly follow Zhuang, slaughter age has gone for ever.In three, the impairment of Chinese characteristicsNew guidelines for asset impairment provisions, asset impairment loss is confirmed, in the later period may not be back. It is based on the real situation of our country, last ditch of major change, it is with international accounting standards, with substantial differences in the. New guidelines for asset impairment will effectively curb the use impairment as a "secret reserve" adjusting profit situation. Guidelines for the implementation, use impairment adjusting profit space will become more and more small, the provision of manual adjustment of profits will be more and more difficult. Some people write civil point out new guidelines for asset impairment induced by releasing will "go" phenomenon, cause some "hidden profits" of the industry and Related Companies, possible impairment in 2006 will be ready to strike back, "crow change Phoenix" may reproduce. We analyze, first of all, if the listing Corporation snatches in the new guidelines before the implementation of the 2006 year rushs impairment, we must first examine whether such actions are the reasonable basis, namely the original has provision for the impairment of an asset value now is really picks up, and if so, to adjust the asset value will make the accounting information more real, related; secondly, in 2006 large red back impairment must make appropriate evidence of the original provision for the impairment of appropriateness, otherwise the previous provision is the abuse of accounting estimation results, should be in accordance with the accounting error handling, a reversal of impairment cannot be used as the 2006 annual profit. Moreover, the financial sector has been aware of this problem, and takes positive and effective measures, prevent the assault to adjust profit listing Corporation. In addition, some time ago the market that new guidelines will make A shares listing Corporation in 2006 to increase net profit 20000000000 Yuan hearsay, the survey is author's subjective, concerned media specially clarification.Others receivables and other four impairment expressed worry, think accounts receivable (especially the "shareholders of account") will become the "eight project" of the main means of profit manipulation. In fact, in the new guidelines, receivables is as financial assets, and the depreciation detailed provisions, requires that there must be "objective evidence" of impairment to provision for impairment, such evidence includes the debtor serious financial difficulties, is likely to fail or other financial restructuring. Can be said that the criterion is more and more perfect, then the "this year that cannot take back full provision, next year 'efforts' and back", this "to practice deception" approach, which itself has violated rules, to pass the CPA audit and hidfrom investors eye, I'm afraid some difficulty.Through the above analysis, we can see some people on the new criterion a few concerns, many in reality does not exist, or is in the process of the reform of the price to be paid for, and far from their imagination so serious. But these concerns also remind standards departments in the formulation of standards to the full attention of guidelines for the technical and economic consequences, in the setting of the new guidelines in the process, give full consideration to guideline implementation may arise in the course of the various problems, and further make a specific interpretation and explanation, improving guidelines operation, improve accounting information quality.Also need to point out in particular, accounting standards is a production of accounting information of the specification, it is to solve the problem of "how to do". On the accounting standards of the malicious misuse of guidelines for the implementation of the "people", from the perspective of the listing Corporation is the ecological problems, to strengthen supervision, occupation moral construction, improve the ability of investors screening accounting information system engineering to solve, cannot be attributed to the guidelines themselves. And the new accounting and auditing standards system come on stage; it is to promote the improvement of listing Corporation governance ecology effective measure. Say from this meaning, we are not going to worry about me, but "criteria for the beat and breathe out".Note: ① according to the "Shanghai Stock Exchange Listing Rules (2004 Revision)" provisions, *ST indicated the presence of terminating the listing of special processing and ST risk for other special treatment.Main referencesMinistry of finance. In 2006 accounting standards for business enterprises. Economic Science PressYu Monishing. The 2005 fair value in the United States of America's application research. Financial theory, 9Xie Stiffen, wearing Zili.2005 present value and fair value accounting: financial reform is the important premise of twenty-first Century. Theory and practice of Finance and economics, 9中文资料:2006年2月15日,财政部发布了包括1项基本准则和38项具体准则在内的新的一整套企业会计准则体系。
成本会计 外文翻译 外文文献 英文文献 中小企业环境成本会计的实施
IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTAL COSTACCOUNTING IN SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZEDCOMPANIES1.ENVIRONMENTAL COST ACCOUNTING IN SMESSince its inception some 30 years ago, Environmental Cost Accounting (ECA) has reached a stage of development where individual ECA systems are separated from the core accounting system based an assessment of environmental costs with (see Fichter et al., 1997, Letmathe and Wagner , 2002).As environmental costs are commonly assessed as overhead costs, neither the older concepts of full costs accounting nor the relatively recent one of direct costing appear to represent an appropriate basis for the implementation of ECA. Similar to developments in conventional accounting, the theoretical and conceptual sphere of ECA has focused on process-based accounting since the 1990s (see Hallay and Pfriem, 1992, Fischer and Blasius, 1995, BMU/UBA, 1996, Heller et al., 1995, Letmathe, 1998, Spengler and H.hre, 1998).Taking available concepts of ECA into consideration, process-based concepts seem the best option regarding the establishment of ECA (see Heupel and Wendisch , 2002). These concepts, however, have to be continuously revised to ensure that they work well when applied in small and medium-sized companies.Based on the framework for Environmental Management Accounting presented in Burritt et al. (2002), our concept of ECA focuses on two main groups of environmentally related impacts. These are environmentally induced financial effects and company-related effects on environmental systems (see Burritt and Schaltegger, 2000, p.58). Each of these impacts relate to specific categories of financial and environmental information. The environmentally induced financial effects are represented by monetary environmental information and the effects on environmental systems are represented by physical environmental information. Conventional accounting deals with both – monetary as well as physical units – but does not focus on environmental impact as such. To arrive at a practical solution to the implementation of ECA in a company’s existing accounting system, and to comply with the problem of distinguishing between monetary and physical aspects, an integrated concept is required. As physical information is often the basis for the monetary information (e.g. kilograms of a raw material are the basis for the monetary valuation of raw material consumption), the integrationof this information into the accounting system database is essential. From there, the generation of physical environmental and monetary (environmental) information would in many cases be feasible. For many companies, the priority would be monetary (environmental) information for use in for instance decisions regarding resource consumptions and investments. The use of ECA in small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) is still relatively rare, so practical examples available in the literature are few and far between. One problem is that the definitions of SMEs vary between countries (see Kosmider, 1993 and Reinemann, 1999). In our work the criteria shown in Table 1 are used to describe small and medium-sized enterprises.Table 1. Criteria of small and medium-sized enterprisesNumber of employees TurnoverUp to 500 employees Turnover up to EUR 50mManagement Organization- Owner-cum-entrepreneur -Divisional organization is rare- Varies from a patriarchal management -Short flow of information stylein traditional companies and teamwork -Strong personal commitmentin start-up companies -Instruction and controlling with- Top-down planning in old companies direct personal contact- Delegation is rare- Low level of formality- High flexibilityFinance Personnel- family company -easy to survey number of employees- limited possibilities of financing -wide expertise-high satisfaction of employeesSupply chain Innovation-closely involved in local -high potential of innovationeconomic cycles in special fields- intense relationship with customersand suppliersKeeping these characteristics in mind, the chosen ECA approach should be easy to apply, should facilitate the handling of complex structures and at the same time be suited to the special needs of SMEs.Despite their size SMEs are increasingly implementing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems like SAP R/3, Oracle and Peoplesoft. ERP systems support business processes across organizational, temporal and geographical boundaries using one integrated database. The primary use of ERP systems is for planning and controlling production and administration processes of an enterprise. In SMEs however, they are often individually designed and thus not standardized making the integration of for instance software that supports ECA implementation problematic. Examples could be tools like the “eco-efficiency” approach of IMU (2003) or Umberto (2003) because these solutions work with the database of more comprehensive software solutions like SAP, Oracle, Navision or others. Umberto software for example (see Umberto, 2003) would require large investments and great background knowledge of ECA – which is not available in most SMEs.The ECA approach suggested in this chapter is based on an integrative solution –meaning that an individually developed database is used, and the ECA solution adopted draws on the existing cost accounting procedures in the company. In contrast to other ECA approaches, the aim was to create an accounting system that enables the companies to individually obtain the relevant cost information. The aim of the research was thus to find out what cost information is relevant for the company’s decision on environmental issues and how to obtain it.2.METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING ECASetting up an ECA system requires a systematic procedure. The project thus developed a method for implementing ECA in the companies that participated in the project; this is shown in Figure 1. During the implementation of the project it proved convenient to form a core team assigned with corresponding tasks drawing on employees in various departments. Such a team should consist of one or two persons from the production department as well as two from accounting and corporate environmental issues, if available. Depending on the stage of the project and kind of inquiry being considered, additional corporate members may be added to the project team to respond to issues such as IT, logistics, warehousing etc.Phase 1: Production Process VisualizationAt the beginning, the project team must be briefed thoroughly on the current corporate situation and on the accounting situation. To this end, the existing corporate accounting structure and the related corporate information transfer should be analyzed thoroughly. Following the concept of an input/output analysis, how materials find their ways into and out of the company is assessed. The next step is to present the flow of material and goods discovered and assessed in a flow model. To ensure the completeness and integrity of such a systematic analysis, any input and output is to be taken into consideration. Only a detailed analysis of material and energy flows from the point they enter the company until they leave it as products, waste, waste water or emissions enables the company to detect cost-saving potentials that at later stages of the project may involve more efficient material use, advanced process reliability and overview, improved capacity loads, reduced waste disposal costs, better transparency of costs and more reliable assessment of legal issues. As a first approach, simplified corporate flow models, standardized stand-alone models for supplier(s), warehouse and isolated production segments were established and only combined after completion. With such standard elements and prototypes defined, a company can readily develop an integrated flow model with production process(es), production lines or a production process as a whole. From the view of later adoption of the existing corporate accounting to ECA, such visualization helps detect, determine, assess and then separate primary from secondary processes.Phase 2: Modification of AccountingIn addition to the visualization of material and energy flows, modeling principal and peripheral corporate processes helps prevent problems involving too high shares of overhead costs on the net product result. The flow model allows processes to be determined directly or at least partially identified as cost drivers. This allows identifying and separating repetitive processing activity with comparably few options from those with more likely ones for potential improvement.By focusing on principal issues of corporate cost priorities and on those costs that have been assessed and assigned to their causes least appropriately so far, corporate procedures such as preparing bids, setting up production machinery, ordering (raw) material and related process parameters such as order positions, setting up cycles of machinery, and order items can be defined accurately. Putting several partial processes with their isolated costs intocontext allows principal processes to emerge; these form the basis of process-oriented accounting. Ultimately, the cost drivers of the processes assessed are the actual reference points for assigning and accounting overhead costs. The percentage surcharges on costs such as labor costs are replaced by process parameters measuring efficiency (see Foster and Gupta, 1990).Some corporate processes such as management, controlling and personnel remain inadequately assessed with cost drivers assigned to product-related cost accounting. Therefore, costs of the processes mentioned, irrelevant to the measure of production activity, have to be assessed and surcharged with a conventional percentage.At manufacturing companies participating in the project, computer-integrated manufacturing systems allow a more flexible and scope-oriented production (eco-monies of scope), whereas before only homogenous quantities (of products) could be produced under reasonable economic conditions (economies of scale). ECA inevitably prevents effects of allocation, complexity and digression and becomes a valuable controlling instrument where classical/conventional accounting arrangements systematically fail to facilitate proper decisions.Thus, individually adopted process-based accounting produces potentially valuable information for any kind of decision about internal processing or external sourcing (e.g. make-or-buy decisions).Phase 3: Harmonization of Corporate Data – Compiling and AcquisitionOn the way to a transparent and systematic information system, it is convenient to check core corporate information systems of procurement and logistics, production planning, and waste disposal with reference to their capability to provide the necessary precise figures for the determined material/energy flow model and for previously identified principal and peripheral processes. During the course of the project, a few modifications within existing information systems were, in most cases, sufficient to comply with these requirements; otherwise, a completely new software module would have had to be installed without prior analysis to satisfy the data requirements.Phase 4: Database conceptsWithin the concept of a transparent accounting system, process-based accounting can provide comprehensive and systematic information both on corporate material/ energy flowsand so-called overhead costs. To deliver reliable figures over time, it is essential to integrate a permanent integration of the algorithms discussed above into the corporate information system(s). Such permanent integration and its practical use may be achieved by applying one of three software solutions (see Figure 2).For small companies with specific production processes, an integrated concept is best suited, i.e. conventional and environmental/process-oriented accounting merge together in one common system solution.For medium-sized companies, with already existing integrated production/ accounting platforms, an interface solution to such a system might be suitable. ECA, then, is set up as an independent software module outside the existing corporate ERP system and needs to be fed data continuously. By using identical conventions for inventory-data definitions within the ECA software, misinterpretation of data can be avoided.Phase 5: Training and CoachingFor the permanent use of ECA, continuous training of employees on all matters discussed remains essential. To achieve a long-term potential of improved efficiency, the users of ECA applications and systems must be able to continuously detect and integrate corporate process modifications and changes in order to integrate them into ECA and, later, to process them properly.中小企业环境成本会计的实施一、中小企业的环境成本会计自从成立三十年以来,环境成本会计已经发展到一定阶段,环境会计成本体系已经从以环境成本评估为基础的会计制度核心中分离出来(参考Fichter et al., 1997, Letmathe 和Wagner , 2002)。
外文:环境会计
环境会计我们现在在哪里,我们将走向何方作者:Joy E. Hecht国民收入核算制度不断改变,利率处于上升趋势,增加对经济和环境之间联系的理解。
环境成本会计领域取得了大的进步是在过去20年里,成为数十个几个国家一个变化而神秘的努力,并且在一些国家建立起来。
但是这种观点可能结合国家的经济作用账目环境问题纳入他们的收入,既不是快速销售,也不是很快的过程,自从20世纪60年代就已经进行讨论。
尽管本文介绍了困难和争议,但是利息在不断变化的国民收入核算体系中增长,以促进了解的经济与环境的关系为什么要改变?世界各国政府在发展被称为国民收入账户经济数据系统作为计算总的宏观经济指标,例如国内产品。
建设一个国家的经济把环境放入这样一个账户,是对一些明显的作为国家确定、联合国与国际通用的账户的弊端在全国系统账户体系(SNA)的一个回应。
SNA的一个缺陷往往是他们对环境的保护成本无法确定。
因此,花的钱,比如说,把污染控制设备的烟囱来算作增加国内生产总值,即使开支不是经济生产,一些争论这样说。
这些批评者要求从其他人的账户内区分“防御性”的支出。
更误导人的是,事实上一些环境商品没有被销售,虽然他们提供了经济价值。
薪材聚集在森林,肉类和鱼类聚集消费,药用植物就是例子。
那么,饮用水和灌溉水,其销售价格反映分配和处理基础设施的成本,而不是水本身。
虽然有些国家也把这些商品放在的国民收入账户中,但是没有这样做的标准存在。
当商品包括在账目中,他们仍然不能被从那些有销售的中分辨出来。
衡量是环境服务困难的,例如的水的保护由森林承担,和农作物是由昆虫提供的。
虽然有些专家呼吁将其列入对环境调整账目,通常既没有经济价值,也不是服务退化涵盖的。
另一方面,然而,替代品和服务的需要,以取代他们,例如水处理植物,对GDP是有贡献的,可是令人误解。
还有一个问题是,国家收入账户对待制造折旧资本和自然折旧资本是不同的。
体育资本建筑物或一台机器,例如,在计算折旧按照传统的会计核算原则,而所有的自然是资本消耗计为收入。
环境会计方面的外文文献
EVOLUTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT PROGRAMJ. H. MadayT. L. KuusinenOctober 1991Presented at theEnvironmental Auditing Conference October 22-23, 1991Seattle, WashingtonWork supported bythe U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-ACO6-76RLO 1830Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352DISCLAIMERThis report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States。
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.Evolution of an Environmental Audit ProgramJoseph H. Maday, Jr. (ASQC-CQA)Technical Group Leader - Quality Verification DepartmentandTapio KuusinenSenior Research ScientistEnvironmental Policy and Compliance GroupPacific Northwest LaboratoryRichland, Washington 99352ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis document was prepared under the direction of the U.S. Environment Protection Agency’s (EPA) Small Business Division. There were numerous reviewers from government and private organizations. Additionally, the following provided important advice and/or reference materials:* Small Business Ombudsman, Maine Department of Environmental Protection* Tennessee Small Business Assistance Program* New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection* Massachusetts Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction (OTA)* Iowa Waste Reduction Center, University of Northern Iowa* Florida Small Business Assistance ProgramThe products and services included in this document were contributed for review by commercial and government sources. The project team is thankful for their timely cooperation.ABSTRACTInternational and national standards, and in some cases corporate policies require that planned and scheduled audits be performed to verify all aspects of environmental compliance and to determine effective implementation of the environmental management program. An example of this can be found in the definition of auditing as provided by U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Policy Statement on Environmental Auditing. It defines environmental auditing as follows:"Environmental auditing is a systematic, documented, periodic and objective reviewby regulated entities of facility operations and practices related to meetingenvironmental requirements. Audits can be designed to accomplish any or all ofthe following: verify compliance with environmental requirements, evaluate theeffectiveness of environmental management systems already in place, or assess risksfrom regulated and unregulated materials and practices.Auditing serves as a quality assurance check to help improve the effectiveness ofbasic environmental management by verifying that management practices are inplace, functioning and adequate. ''Many specifications further emphasize that the audit be performed to written procedures or checklists (to provide later documentation) by personnel who do not have direct responsibility for performing the activities being audited. The results of such audits are generally required to be documented, reported to, and reviewed by, responsible management. Follow-up action will be taken where indicated. The responsible organization can then take follow-up action as needed.An effective auditing program is a useful tool for improving environmental compliance. If developed properly, the program will point out areas of weakness and areas of potential problems. An auditing program will also identify environmental compliance activities that meet or exceed expectations.At the Pacific Northwest Laboratory(PNL), Environmental Audits used to consist of nontechnical auditors auditing to findings published in General Accounting Office reports. Today's practice of deploying a composite team of technical specialists and nontechncial auditors to audit to specific environmental programmatic requirements provides, we believe, a significant improvement.国际和国家的标准, 而且在一些情形企业的政策需要那计划了的和预定的稽核是运行到查证所有的环境服从的方面和决定环境管理的有效落实计画。
绿色会计信息披露与上企业可持续发展外文翻译文献编辑
文献信息文献标题:Green Accounting and Sustainable Development of Listed Vietnamese Enterprises (绿色会计与越南上市企业的可持续发展) 文献作者:Nguyen Thi Hong Nga,Hong Thi Viet Ha,Nguyen Thi Thanh Long 文献出处:《Journal of Asian Review of Public Affairs and Policy》,2019, 4(1):26-42字数统计:英文2804单词,16549字符;中文4600汉字外文文献Green Accounting and Sustainable Development of ListedVietnamese EnterprisesAbstract Sustainable development is the indispensable trend of each nation in general, each enterprise in particular in the world. Vietnamese enterprises are not out of the trend. Green accounting has a close relationship with sustainable development. This research focuses on sustainable development, Green accounting according to the angle of disclosure of responsibility information in the Vietnamese enterprises's sustainable development report, that suggests the direction of application green accounting in these enterprises. This study has conducted research at 226 Vietnamese listed enterprises in five sectors, including real estate and construction, technology, industrial manufacturing, energy in 2016. The result shows that although Vietnam has issued regulations on disclosure of sustainable development information of enterprises, including information on environmental and social responsibility, the number of enterprises that have not yet disclosed responsibility information is quite large, and the quality and volume of responsibility information disclosure of corporate is still limited.Keywords: sustainable development, green accounting, responsibilityINTRODUCTIONAccording to Ominic Scriven, CEO of Dragon Capital, responsible and sustainable investment is becoming one of the most important investment criteria in the world. In Asia, this investment trend is also developing. Total management assets for global sustainability investment criteria has expanded considerably in recent years. According to data from The Global Sustainable Investment Association (GSIA), the number of assets increased from $ 13.3 trillion at the beginning of 2012 to $ 21.4 trillion in early 2014 and $ 22.89 trillion at the beginning of 2016. In this, the strongest growth regions are the United States, Canada, and Europe, accounting for over 90 % of total sustainable investment assets. Asia accounts for a negligible proportion, with a focus on Japan. Thus, in order for Vietnam to attract this long-term capital, we need to have good preparation steps in the transparency of information and improve the quality of listed companies through good risk management about ESG (environmental, social, and governance). This will help improve Vietnam's capital market ranking within the region. Sustainable development associated with green finance, green accounting.Green accounting is not a new issue; it has been addressed by Parker since 1971, the American Accounting Association in 1973, Ullmann in 1976, Dierkes and Preston in 1977 (Dierkes & Preston, 1977; J. E. Parker, 1971; A. E. Ullmann, 1976); however, at this stage the green accounting not only received little attention from researchers but also organizations. Up to the 80's, 90's, many studies related to green accounting was announced with the scope to be considered further as the aspects of accounting social relation of social performance, financial performance and society responsible information disclosure (Deegan, 2007; R.H. Gray, 2002; R.H. Gray, 2005; Mathews, 1997; Milne, 2007; Owen, 2008; L. D. Parker, 2005; A. A. Ullmann, 1985) and in many studies of other green accounting until now. Over the past three decades, green accounting has been centered around the issue of social responsibility disclosures, the relationship between social performance and the interests of researchers and organizations. And financial performance is especially in the context of emergingeconomies facing the problems of pollution and degradation of resources. Prioritizing economic development, many countries have become manufacturing workshops and over-exploitation of natural resources has had a great impact on the environment. Many countries are developing have the worry and concern given to the issue of pollution and degradationof natural resources, climate change, public health,... It has gradually shifted towards sustainable development, linking economic growth with social development and environmental protection. Green accounting in the context of sustainable development of an organizationis concerned with the relationship between financial performance and the responsibility for disclosing social information (with particular attention to environmental information).Vietnam is a country classified as a developing country, an emerging economy, which has a natural resource to be blessed, but in recent decades, economic growth has been offset by environmental pollution and resource degradation,... This study does not focus on green accounting research from a macro perspective of a country that studies the microcosm of an organization. The objectives of this research are to determine whether the green accounting status of Vietnamese listed companies and recommend the application of green accounting for Vietnamese enterprises towards sustainable development.METHODOLOGYTo consider corporate responsibility information disclosure, this paper studies the annual reports of 262 listed companies, before Circular No.155/2015 were issued in 2016, one year after the Circular No.155/2015 took effect. The purpose of the review the data of listed companies in 2016 is to assess the level of their responsibility disclosure without compulsory government regulations. Companies are in real estate and construction (89 companies), Technology (7 companies), Industrial production (72 companies) Energy (24 companies), Agriculture (34 companies). In addition, the authors also study the sustainability report of a number of Vietnam firms which have developed their own sustainable development reports to assess the quality ofAccording to Cooke (1989), Chau & Gray (2002), Hossain et al. (1995), Dang et al. (2018), "1" score will be given to the company when any responsibility information is available in the annual report and "0" if no responsibility information is available in theannual report (Chau & Gray, 2002; Cooke, 1989; Dang, Pham, Tran, & Dang, 2018; Hossain, M.H. B., & Rahman, 1995). Authors read information on annual reports, focusing on information about environmental responsibility disclosures, including Resource management; Energy consumption; Water consumption; Compliance with environmental protection laws, other account information include employee related policies and reporting responsibilities to the local communities (according to Circular No.155/2015/TT-BTC). "1" score will be given to companies if they have any responsibility information in annual reports and "0" if no response information is available in the annual reports.According to Wallace & Naser (1995), information disclosure is an abstract concept that is difficult to measure directly (Wallace, 1995). The level of disclosure of the information studied is based on the attributes of the information, including reliability of information, the objectivity of information, timeliness of information and comprehensiveness of information. So, this research divides the level of information disclosure into the following levels: weak, normal, passable good, good, excellent. The level of disclosure is assessed by the authors, based on the number of pages and detail of disclosure.All of the collected data will be aggregated and analyzed as descriptive statistics.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONAmong 226 companies selected survey in five areas above, 162 companies reported responsibility information, accounting for 71.7%, 64 companies without responsibility accounted for 28.3%. The article focuses on 162 enterprises to assess the level of disclosure of responsibility information.According to the authors' compilation of the company's 2016 annual reports, the number of companies reporting on the management of raw materials, energy consumption, and water consumption was quite high, at around 62.3% - 73.5%. That sample has focused on companies operating in areas that have an impact on the environment. But there was no any company which published information relating to the compliance with the law on environmental protection. 100% of companies reported policies related to employees, 95.1% of companies reported on responsibility for the local community. This is fairly easy to publish compared to information that has an impact on the environment.In-depth study of 162 listed companies disclosed the information disclosed in the Circular 155/2015/TT-BTC among the 226 surveyed companies that showed the number of pages published about the corporate responsibility is relatively low. The number of pages which has from 1 to 5 pages in annual reporting accounts for nearly70%, which is mainly 1-2 pages.on the environmental impact assessment. Most of the companies only reached thenormal level, that is, 14.2% was rated as weak, an excellent level reached only 5.6%. integrated liability information in its annual report since 2015, before the effective date of Circular 155/2015/TT-BTC. The report on environmental, social and communityimpacts is presented in detail, full of evidence and continues to be very well implemented in 2016, 2017. Figure 1- The combined results of the number of pages reporting responsibility in the annualreport of the surveyed enterprises69 7%The content presented in the report is rather sketchy, lack of evidence with datall.U%111, ・1,20 p.ifjt's ・ 20 K pJgi'SFigure 2- Comprehensive results on the level of reporting responsibility in the annual report ofThe case study of BMP shows that BMP is the company that has disclosedenterprises surveyed by the content■ wejk■ nornulpassabie Rood・ Good■ Excellenl31.5%37.7% 11.1% 14.2%In Vietnam, a number of enterprises and corporation company have been pioneers inmaking sustainable development reports since there is no legal requirement for mandatory reporting such as Bao Viet Holdings (BVH), Vietnam Dairy Products Joint-Stock Company (VNM), DHG Pharmaceutical Joint Stock Company (DHG), PetroVietnam Drilling and Well Services Corporation (PVD), Hoang Anh Gia Lai Joint Stock Company (HNG), Vietnam Brewery Company Limited (VBL), Vicostone Joint Stock Company (VCS), ... For these companies, the disclosure of environmental responsibility information is sufficiently detailed, detailed and detailed. In the case of content disclosure, environmental and social responsibility accounts for up to 50% of the sustainable development report (about 60 pages). All reports are publicly available on their website.Pham (2011) study of 30 listed companies Vietnam has shown that the high level of awareness of corporate social responsibility is not a factor in ensuring that enterprises fulfill and fulfill their social responsibility reporting obligations, but the perception of Vietnamese consumers and their procurement decisions have an impact on the implementation of social responsibility and disclosure obligations (Duc Hieu Pham, 2011). Pham and Do (2015) investigate the factors affecting the extent of voluntary disclosure by examining the annual reports of 205 listed industrial and manufacturing companies listing; evidence from that study suggests are companies with high foreign ownership have a high level of voluntary disclosure and the company size is an important factor related to the increased level of voluntary disclosure in annual reports of Vietnamese listed companies (D. H. Pham & Do, 2015). Another study by Dang (2018) for 289 listed Vietnamese firms found that there are three factors that influence the level of disclosure of corporate social responsibility information, sustainable development in the annual report of the enterprises areprofitability, business size and independent auditing (Dang et al., 2018). CONCLUSIONSAs a result, Vietnamese enterprises can be divided into two groups: Enterprises with responsibility disclosures on their own Sustainability Reports and sustainable disclosures in annual reports. These two groups differ greatly in the quality of information presented. If enterprises have made a report on sustainable development, the information on environmental and social responsibilities is provided in a large, clear manner in allrespects, reflecting the necessary information in accordance with the standards of GRI, while enterprises disclose responsibility information in the annual report, as described above, the information quality is relatively low, lack of information on environmental responsibility, published information, lack of evidence, the capacity is quite limited. We believe that with Vietnam's new regulations and close monitoring, Vietnamese enterprises can better fulfill their disclosure obligations, green accounting is applicable to businesses in the near future.Sustainable development is still a new concept in the Vietnamese market. Investors face many difficulties in finding information, evaluating and communicating with businesses on issues related to environmental, social and governance (ESG). Initiatives promoting and implementing sustainable development, particularly in clean energy development projects, also face many challenges; The process of changing cognition, thinking also takes time. Sustainable development is becoming a central task of the world economy, with Vietnam, sustainable development being a demand throughout the year 2020, to ensure a harmonious balance between economic growth and preservation environmental protection with social development. This is a joint responsibility and requires more efforts from policymakers and market participants. Climate change is threatening the prosperity and negative impact on the economic, social and environmental lives of all humanity. Vietnam is one of the ten countries most affected by climate change, due to sea level rise by 2030, according to The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) projections, about 45% of agricultural land is destroyed and saline intrusion, 22 million those who are likely to lose their homes, the damage could be up to 10% of GDP. When it comes to social responsibility, this is the number that we need to reflect on in order to make the right decisions on investing and doing business. Thus, integrating environmental, social and governance into business processes, in an effort to minimize the negative impacts that may adversely affect the environment, ecosystems, and communities are the social responsibility of the business.In order to do that, we think that the state management agencies should study the promulgation of legal regulations on green accounting, including regulations on increasing transparency, developing policies addressing environmental, social and economic issues, maintaining an understanding of regulations on performance measurement, reporting,monitoring, testing, and interpretation of information related to impact social, environmental and economic. Establish and guide the measurement and recognition of environmental costs, other social costs and disclose information in the financial statements. Information can be integrated into the financial statement, published in the annual report or the report on sustainable development. In addition, it is necessary to strengthen the auditor's monitoring of the disclosure of information by enterprises. The state should have clear penalties for businesses when detecting disclosure of responsibility information does not comply with regulations. This is the factor that Dang (2018) study has shown to affect the level of disclosure of corporate responsibility information.Raising awareness of enterprises about improving the quality of responsibility information in annual reports, such as: organizing more conferences relating to information disclosure; disclosing data about enterprises operating effectively, sustainable development which is contributed from the transparency and quality of information disclosure. Continue to issue and implement bonus policies, support businesses that they disclose full transparency information about social, environmental responsibility to encourage them to better implement and widely communicate to consumers.On the enterprise side, it is important that businesses formally set up a set of policies and procedures for environmental and social management of their own operations. At the same time, specify the full-time human resources, coordinate with other departments in the organization to record the necessary data related to this issue, then evaluate and analyze the impact, proposed solutions (in consultation with consultants if necessary), indicators, step by step improvement of negative impacts and assessment of the progress of indicators each year. In addition, Pham (2011) showed that the perception of vietnamese consumers and their purchasing decisions have an impact on the implementation of corporate social responsibility and corporate responsibility disclosure obligations (Duc Hieu Pham, 2011). Consequently, the state needs to disseminate widely in order to raise consumer awareness, thereby influencing their purchasing decisions to influence enterprises to make them more accountable to the environment and society as well as the release of information related to the environment, society.This study only approached green accounting in Vietnamese enterprises on the one hand,which is the responsibility information disclosure in the reports of the enterprise without having comprehensive research on green accounting such as the technical aspects of financial accounting and management accounting. Further research will clarify the situation of green accounting in Vietnamese enterprises and study the factors that affect the application of green accounting in Vietnamese enterprises.中文译文绿色会计与越南上市企业的可持续发展摘要可持续发展是世界各国特别是企业发展的必然趋势。
国内外环境管理会计的文献综述
国内外环境管理会计的文献综述:管理会计学在财务会计学的不断成熟与发展基础上演变而来的,以下是小编搜集整理的一篇探究国内外环境管理会计的论文范文,供大家阅读借鉴。
1、环境管理会计的相关概念管理会计,由传统的财务会计发展演变而来,但财务会计更多服务于企业外部,管理会计则主要服务于企业内部,故又被称为“内部报告会计”,是将为企业决策层提供有效的短期经营计划和决策作为目标,而进行的一系列日常管理活动。
环境管理会计涵盖了管理会计与环境付出成本两个范畴。
同管理会计功能相似,是一种为企业内部做出短期计划和决策所服务的,但更多侧重于管理所要付出的环境成本的行为,是一种主要针对企业物料与能源消耗以及废弃物排放等所付出成本的管理活动。
2、国外学者关于环境管理会计的文献综述1992年,美国环境保护协会针对环境与资源问题,专门立项了环境会计项目,这标志着环境管理会计学的诞生。
近年来,环境管理会计受到了愈来愈多的关注和重视。
2.1美国学者关于环境管理会计的研究美国环境保护局1990年出台了“污染防治法案”,为大力推进该法案的施行,该当局又于1992年建立了环境会计项目,即环境管理会计的诞生标志,旨在“促使并激发企业更全面的理解环境成本,同时将其运用于决策”(干胜道,钟朝宏,2004)[1].随后在1993年,又有美国环境保护协会、美国成本工程师协会、美国企业圆桌会、美注册会计师协会、美管理会计师协会等一众国际组织联合公布了《利益相关者行动议程:工作室对环境成本的会计与资本预算的一项报告》(美国环境保护局,1994),这是全世界公认的有关环境管理会计最早的文献之一。
2.2欧洲学者关于环境管理会计的研究欧盟下属的环境管理会计协会成立于1997年,其主要研究对象是欧盟设立的一个名叫“生态管理”的项目。
该协会日常的讨论形式主要是电子邮件,每年召开1次年会。
英国环境局,主要是通过研究企业内部的环境成本,综合分析后将其研究成果广泛运用于企业的环境成本控制方面,旨在为企业提供更高效的环境会计。
国内外环境会计研究文献综述
1引言随着环境问题的日益严重,促使企业履行合理开发资源、保护自然环境等社会责任显得尤为重要。
与传统财务会计经济利益最大化的目标不同,环境会计高度重视生态环境保护,注重合理开发和利用自然资源。
环境会计通过会计学的原理和方法,反映企业在环境中开展的经济活动和形成的现象,兼顾经济效益和环境效益。
因此,注重环境会计的研究将促进人类社会的可持续发展。
2环境会计概念及理论基础2.1环境会计定义环境会计(Environmental Accounting )又被称为绿色会计(Green Accounting ),属于传统会计的分支。
环境会计是指运用会计学基本原理和方法,采用多种计量方法与属性,对企业的环境活动与环境有关的经济活动的反映及控制。
自20世纪90年代以来,我国政府和相关组织积极推动环境会计的研究,制定了一系列政策和规则,环境会计的研究进一步深入开展。
2.2相关理论基础环境会计形成和发展的过程中有着丰富的理论基础,学者把会计学理论、可持续发展理论与环境经济学相结合,形成了环境会计理论框架,以反映和控制企业在环境中的经营活动。
环境会计是对传统会计的继承与发展。
学者把会计目标、要素、假设等会计学基本理论应用到环境会计,形成了环境会计理论框架。
同样的,会计要素的确认和计量等内容也得到了继承,在环境会计中形成了环境会计要素的概念、确认方法和计量标准等内容。
可持续发展作为一种关于人与环境的发展思想和战略,对人类社会的发展具有深远的影响。
而对于传统会计而言,注重经济效益的同时无法为企业的可持续发展提供充分支持,所以有学者开始将可持续发展与会计联系起来。
环境会计主要涉及环境经济学中的外部性理论。
对于传统会计而言,其目标是经济利益最大化,企业的经营活动势必会对自然资源造成过度开发,从而引发外部性问题。
3国外环境会计理论概述国外对于环境会计的研究较早。
1971年,比姆斯(F.A.Beams )发表《控制污染的社会成本转换研究》,建议企业在公开的财务报告中披露污染责任信息[1]。
环境会计信息披露外文文献翻译中英文.pdf
外文文献翻译原文及译文(本文档归max118 网hh2018 所有,仅供下载使用)中文标题:印度环境会计披露实践的影响因素:来自NIFTY 公司的经验证据文献出处:The IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2016译文字数:3900 多字原文Factors Influencing Environmental Accounting and Disclosure Practices in India: Empirical Evidence from NIFTY CompaniesB Omnamasivaya* and M S V PrasadThe study examines the factors determining the level of environmental disclosure information by taking a sample of NIFTY 50 companies from National Stock Exchange (NSE). The environmental information disclosure is measured by using an Environmental Accounting Disclosure Index (EADI) and the variables used in the study are profitability, corporate size, age, financial leverage, industry type, legal ownership and foreign operations. The relationship is tested using multiple regression analysis. The results show that there is a positive relationship between EADI and profitability, financial leverage, industry type and legal ownership, and a negative relationship between EADI and corporate size, age and foreign operations.IntroductionClimate change is one of the greatest challenges that the world is facing today. Climate change is the variation in the global climate over time. The climate change creates manifold problems like global warming, glacier meltdown, soil erosion, land degradation, deforestation, loss of biodiversity and all kinds of pollution. Human influence on the nature is one of the major causes of such problems. Indiscriminate use of resourcesand undue influence on nature in the name of development can be identified as the prime causes of climate change. As a result, in the last few decades, the adverse effect of environmental pollution on economic development has become a public concern all over the world (Goswami, 2014).The state of world‘s environment and the impact of mankind on the ecology of the world have led to increased public concern and scrutiny of the operations and performance of organizations. Globally, corporations are expected to include environmental concerns in business operations and interaction with stakeholders. As a result, firms can no longer ignore the problems of the society in which they operate. This has thus instituted a social contract between organizations and the environment, thereby making environmental responsibility a corporate dictate (Olayinka and Oluwamayowa, 2014).Every business has responsibility to use the resources at judiciously. Every enterprise needs to behave like a good corporate citizen, and the corporate behavior is judged by its actions related to the community, the steps taken to protect the environment or pollution control. In the context of the Indian corporate sector, companies are not performing as good citizens. Due to this reason many laws have been laid down by the government for making the companies good corporate citizens and fulfill their social responsibility (Chauhan, 2005).In India, the economic reforms initiated in the 1990s have unwittingly contributed to a rise in environmental problems. The awareness level of stakeholders and public regarding the environmental issues has increased the pressure on companies to disclose environmental information. As a result, the companies have started disclosing the environmental information in annual reports and sustainability reports to satisfy all their stakeholders.The Indian government has taken several steps to protect the environment. It has set up the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) with the aim to coordinate, among the states and the various ministries, the issues relating to environmental protection and antipollution measures. Necessary legislation has also been passed. In India, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) were established under the Water Act. The CPCB has identified 17 categories of industries which are highly polluting (Joshi et al., 2011).In India, specific environmental accounting rules or environmental disclosure guidelines for communication to different stakeholder groups are not available for Indian companies. There is no mandatory requirement for quantitative disclosure of (financial) environmental information in annual reports either under the Companies Act or as per the Indian Accounting Standards. Furthermore there are 23 stockexchanges in India which are controlled by the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992. Each of these stock exchanges has different listing requirement for Indian companies to disclose environmental information. Therefore, any environmental disclosure by Indian companies is purely voluntary (Makori and Jagongo, 2013). Against this backdrop, the present study examines the factors determining the level of environmental disclosure information in India.Legitimacy TheoryIn order to explain the reasons for environmental disclosure, we use legitimacy theory. There are many theories which explain the various reasons for social and environmental accounting disclosures, but legitimacy theory is the most suitable theory to explain the environmental disclosure. Organizations cannot survive without meeting the societal expectations. The society expects that the organizations should be proactive in protecting the environment and minimizing the environmental hazards. In case organizations fail to meet the societal expectations, there is a severe threat to their existence. Nowadays Indian companies are legitimizing because of the awareness about environmental disclosure practices in the society. Therefore, Indian companies are taking several steps to protect the environment and are disclosing the relevant environmental information in their annual reports and company websites.Legitimacy relates to the environmental issues which are disclosedin the companies’ annual reports. This indicates the management concerns towards the community. Therefore, the management of different companies or managers have different ideas or thoughts about what the society expects and managers will adapt different strategies to show the society that the organization is meeting the expectations of the community (Zain, 2006).The theory of legitimacy is based on two fundamental ideas: companies need to legitimize their activities, and the process of legitimacy that confers benefits to businesses. Thus, the first element is compatible with the idea that environmental disclosure is related to the social pressure. In this context, the need for legitimacy is not the same for all companies due to the degree of social pressure the company is exposed to, and the level of response to this pressure. There are a number of factors which determine the degree of social pressure on companies and their responses to the pressure. These factors are potential determinants of corporate social disclosure. The second component is based on the idea that companies can expect to benefit by a legitimate behavior based on the social responsibility activity. In addition to that, the legitimacy theory provides a comprehensive framework to explain both the determinants and consequences of social disclosure (Mohamed et al., 2014).Literature ReviewKokubu et al. (2001) examined the annual reports of 1,203 companies to investigate the determinants of environmental disclosure. Environmental disclosure was measured by using an environmental disclosure index and the six independent variables used in the study were company size, financial performance, strength of consumer relations, dependence on debt, dependence on the capital market and type of industry. The study found that company size and industry type influence environmental disclosure.Elijido-Ten (2004) conducted a study on the determinants of environmental disclosures by using 40 Malaysian companies by applying stakeholder theory. The environmental disclosure was measured by using an environmental disclosure index. The study used three determinants: stakeholder power, strategic posture and economic performance. The study found that both top management and government power were the determinants of environmental disclosure, and it was also found that there was no relationship between economic performance and environmental disclosure.Yuen et al. (2009) examined 200 companies to investigate the relationship between firm characteristics and voluntary disclosure. Voluntary disclosure practices were measured by using a disclosure index and the independent variables used in the study were concentration of ownership, ownership by state, individual ownership, firm size, leverage,profitability and type of industry. The study found that individual ownership, audit committee, firm size, and leverage positively related to voluntary disclosure.Galani et al. (2011) examined the relationship between environmental disclosure and firm size by using 100 Greek companies. Environmental disclosure was measured by using environmental disclosure index and the independent variables tested in the study were profitability, size and listing status. The study found that there was a positive significant relationship between environmental disclosure and size of the firm and it was also found that there was no relationship between environmental disclosure and profitability listing requirements.Joshi et al. (2011) analyzed as ma ny as 45 Indian companies’ annual reports to investigate the factors influencing environmental disclosure. The environmental disclosure was measured using environmental disclosure index and the independent variables used in the study were profitability, size, accounting firm, industry, foreign operations, age, ownership and financial leverage. The study found that size and industry were significant determinants for environmental disclosure.Rouf (2011) examined the relationship between firm-specific characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) by taking 176 Bangladesh companies. CSRD was measured by using the CSRD index and the variables in the study were independent directorsand firm size. The study found that there was a positive relationship between CSRD and independent directors and firm size did not affect CSRD.Abdo and Al-Drugi (2012) studied whether any company characteristics influenced environmental disclosures by using 43 Libyan oil and gas companies. Environmental disclosures were measured using content analysis through word count and four characteristics were selected: company’s size, privatization, age, and nationality. The study found that there was a positive association between environmental disclosure and company’s size, company’s privatization, and company’s nationality; and it was also found that the age of the company was significant and negatively related to the level of environmental disclosure.Oba and Fodio (2012) examined the relationship between board characteristics and quality of environmental disclosure by taking 21 companies in Nigeria. Environmental disclosure was measured by using an environmental disclosure index and the independent variables used in the study were board size, foreign directors, gender mix, and board independence. The study found that there was no relationship between board size and environmental disclosure.Suttipun and Stanton (2012) conducted a study on the determinants of environmental disclosure by using 75 Thai companies. The environmental disclosure was measured by word count and the fiveindependent variables used in the study were size of the company, type of industry, ownership status, profitability and country of origin of the company. The study found that there was a positive relationship between environmental disclosure and size of the company.Development of HypothesesCorporate SizeMany of the researchers found a positive relationship between environmental disclosure and size, and many studies supported that large- sized firms disclose more on environment (e.g., Kokubu et al. 2001; Joshi et al., 2011; Suttipun and Stanton, 2012; Makori and Jagongo, 2013; Akbaş , 2014; and Sulaimana et al., 2014).There is a contrast between small enterprises and large enterprises. Large companies require more funds and for that they raise funds through external sources. For attracting the investors and to reduce the agency cost, large companies disclose more information and therefore get public support (Joshi et al., 2011).ProfitabilityThe profitability of a firm is an important factor in determining the environmental disclosure practices. As for whether environmental issues are important or not, it is argued that when the profit is low, the importance of environmental issues is low (Joshi et al., 2011). Many studies have reported that there is a positive relationship betweenprofitability and environmental disclosure (e.g., Nurhayati et al., 2015). A very few studies did not support that (e.g., Galani et al. 2011; Rouf, 2011; Akbaş , 2014; and Sulaimana et al., 2014).Many studies have used the profitability ratios like Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Investment (ROI), Return on Equity (ROE), Net Profit Margin and Dividend Per Share (DPS) to measure the firm profitability. This study uses ROE to measure profitability.Financial LeverageThe agency theory states that with the increase of debt proportion in capital structure, the greater is likely to be the conflict of interest between shareholders, creditors and managers; and the higher the agency cost, the greater is the incentive for managers to disclose more information. From the perspective of social and environmental responsibilities, companies with higher financial leverage are willing to disclose more environmental information to maintain good relationship with stakeholders (Joshi et al., 2011).Many studies have supported the association between financial leverage and environmental disclosure (Joshi et al., 2011; and Sulaimana et al., 2014). They reported that financial leverage has no impact on the disclosure level in India. Kokubu et al. (2001) stated that debt did not significantly influence the corporate environmental reports in Japan. However, this study uses debt-equity ratio for measuring financialleverage.Industry TypeMany studies have examined whether the industry influences the disclosure of environmental information, and many studies have supported strongly that environmental-sensitive companies disclose more environmental information than non-environmental-sensitive companies. Joshi et al. (2011) stated that environmental-sensitive companies in India are likely to disclose more environmental protection information than others. Akbaş (2014) reported that t here is a significant positive relationship between industry membership and the extent of environmental disclosure.ConclusionThe study examined the factors influencing EADI by taking a sample of 50 companies listed on NSE. The environmental accounting disclosure is measured by EADI, and the independent variables used in the study are corporate size, age, profitability, financial leverage, legal ownership, industry and foreign operations. The relationship is tested using multiple regression analysis. The R2 under the model is 0.6033, which indicates that the model is capable of explaining 60.33% of variability in the disclosure of environmental information in the sample companies. The adjusted R2 indicates that 53.72% of variation in the dependent variable is explained by the variations in the independentvariables. The results of multiple regression reveal that there is a positive relationship between EADI and profitability, financial leverage, industry type, and legal ownership, and a negative relationship between EADI and corporate size, age and foreign operations.Limitations: The main limitation of the study is that the data was selected only for one year. The sample size was also limited. Another limitation of the study is that there are many variables which may influence environmental disclosure like board of directors, CEO’s role, audit firm size, etc., but we have selected very few variables.Future Scope: There is huge scope for further research on environmental accounting disclosure in the Indian context, as there is less amount of research on this subject. Further research can focus on the relationship between environmental accounting disclosure practices and financial performance of the companies.译文印度环境会计披露实践的影响因素:来自NIFTY 公司的经验证据B Omnamasivaya,M S V Prasad该研究通过从国家证券交易所(NSE)获取NIFTY 50 公司的样本来分析环境披露信息水平的影响因素。
2024年会计论文外文参考文献
[18] 王斌,李苹莉. 关于企业预算目标确定及其分解的理论分析[J]. 会计研究. 2001(08)
[19] 《管理会计应用与发展的典型案例研究》课题组,林斌,刘运国,谭光明,张玉虎. 作业成本法在我国铁路运输企业应用的案例研究[J]. 会计研究. 2001(02)
[6] 余绪缨. 关于培养高层次管理会计人才的认识与实践[J]. 财会月刊. 2007(22)
[7] 余绪缨. 管理会计学科建设的方向及其相关理论的新认识[J]. 财会通讯(综合版). 2007(02)
[8] 于增彪,王竞达,袁光华. 中国管理会计的未来发展:研究方法、热点实务和人才培养[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报. 2006(01)
2024年会计论文外文参考文献
会计论文外文参考文献1
[1]徐静.我国企业社会责任会计信息披露探析[J].企业导报.2012(15) :22-25.
[2]张明霞.李云鹏.企业社会责任会计信息披露问题研究[J].经济研究导刊.2011(20):40-43.
[3] 路秀平.任会来.我国社会责任会计信息披露模式现实选择 [J]. 会计之友 (上旬刊).2012(12):89-92.
[20] 胡玉明. 21世纪管理会计主题的转变--从企业价值增值到企业核心能力培植[J]. 外国经济与管理. 2001(01)
本文来源:网络收集与整理,如有侵权,请联系作者删除,谢谢!
[4]林斌,饶静.上市公司为什么自愿披露内部控制鉴证报告.一基于信号传递理论的实证研宄[J].会计研究,2009 (2): 45-52.
外文文献翻译译文
环境管理会计(EMA)是管理会计发展的趋势Christine Jasch摘要:组织机构和会计师们为什么应该关心环境问题?来自供应链、资金提供商、监管机构以及其他利益相关者对于环境绩效及其信息披露的压力,导致组织机构的与环境相关的成本不断增加。
但同时提高环境绩效能够带来潜在的货币利益这一观点也逐渐得到人们的认同,传统的会计实务不能充分提供对于环境管理和与之相关的战略决策所需要的信息。
由于联合国可持续发展事务署下的环境管理会计工作组的成立,以及由它主办的出版物的发行,环境管理会计得到了促进和提升。
最近,国际会计师联合会发行了一份关于环境管理会计的指导性文件,这将进一步推动环境管理会计在会计师中的应用。
这期《清洁生产》杂志的关于环境管理会计的这个特别问题,侧重于它的方法论背景,以及来自澳大利亚、奥地利、阿根廷、加拿大、日本和立陶宛的案例研究经验。
正文:环境问题伴随者相关费用,收入和利益,正被世界上大多数国家的公民,政府组织,合作型领导人给予越来越多的关注.但是,有一个越来越广泛的共识,那就是,传统的会计不能为合理的支持在环境管理责任方面的决策制定提供准确的信息.为了填补这个差距,目前,EMA的新兴领域已经受到持续增加的关注.在19世纪九十年代早期,美国环保署是第一个成立了正式的项目去促进EMA的采纳的国家机构.从那时起,在30个国家的组织已经开始推动和落实EMA的许多不同类型的与环保相关的管理措施. 对于EMA的广泛关注是由于联合国可持续发展事务司对EMA的提倡以及其对EMA书籍的委托出版。
国际会计师联合会决定授权在由联合国科学发展司EMA工作组发表的最早的关于EMA 两本出版物的基础上发展一个关于EMA的指导性文件以整合关于EMA的最好的信息并与此同时进行必要的更新和添加.这个文件既不是有规定的要求的标准,也不是个描述性研究报告.它意在成为一个提供指导性信息的文件,作为监管要求,标准和纯粹信息的中间地带.这样, 它的目标是提供了一个总体框架和EMA的定义是相当全面,这是一致的可能与其他现有的,广泛应用于环境会计框架与EMA必须通力合作,以减少一些就这一重要议题的国际混乱功能。
关于环境会计的参考文献
关于环境会计的参考⽂献 写作环境会计的会计论⽂时,有哪些参考⽂献可以借鉴呢?下⾯是店铺为你整理的环境会计的参考⽂献篇,希望对你有帮助。
环境会计的参考⽂献篇1 环境会计理论分析 摘要: 随着⼈类社会的不断发展,⾃然社会受到了较⼤的冲击。
当前的环境已经受到了较为严重的破坏,环境资源⽇益恶化。
为了实现环境保护,满⾜社会和谐发展的实际需求。
创造⼀个⽣态环境变化的会计信息环境已经成为⼈们关注的重点。
环境会计也就在这种背景下产⽣。
当前,我国的环境会计还处于⼀个探索的阶段,其已然成为了现代会计的重要组成部分。
为了满⾜实践的需求,其还需要创设⼀套完整的会计基础理论。
关键词: 环境会计;理论分析;启⽰研究 1环境会计理论的⽬标与假设 1.1环境会计理论的⽬标 ⼀般来说,环境会计⽬标可以分为两个层次:基本⽬标和具体⽬标。
环境会计的基本⽬标是协调企业的经济效益与⽣态效益,使之能够达到⼀个协调发展的状态。
具体⽬标是向环境利害关系⼈提供与环境相关的⼀些信息。
这个信息主要是经济化的。
1.2环境会计理论的假设 环境会计理论假设是在环境会计已经出现,但是该种理论还缺乏其构建的基础上,所进⾏的⼀种具象化的⾏为。
⼀般来说,其主要包涵四个假设: (1)会计主体假设。
这是将其核算对象明确化,以满⾜其实际⼯作地需求。
(2)可持续发展与会计分期假设。
这是针对环境的转变,⽽对环境会计的主体提出的⼀个约束性条件,以预见主体未来的⾛向。
(3)环境资源稀缺性与环境价值的假设。
承认环境资源的价值,并且将其与劳动价值分离,从⽽形成⼀个特殊的理论体系。
(4)货币计量的多元计量假设。
会计作为⼀个经济信息系统,其需要提供⼀定的信息量。
⽽计量单位的确定可能会制约信息的提供。
尤其是针对环境会计⽽⾔,因此,必须要将其多元化。
2环境会计理论的计量与确认 2.1环境会计的计量 环境会计的计量实际上是对环境资产、环境负债、环境效益等多个与会计相关的要素来进⾏核算时需要采⽤的货币计量⽅案。
环境会计核算模式研究外文文献翻译最新译文字数3000多字
环境会计核算模式研究外文文献翻译最新译文字数3000多字文献出处:Mount R. Environmental reporting and accounting in Australia: Progress, prospects and research priorities [J]. Science of the T otal Environment, 2015, 7(3): 338-349.原文The Research of Environmental Accounting ModeMount RAbstractEnvironmental accounting research began in the 1970 s. Bemons wrote the social cost of pollution control research on conversion and marin's article 1973 accounting problems of pollution, has opened the prologue of environmental accounting research. Into the 80 s countries have serious consequences for the environmental pollution, more alert, intuitive understanding, many large multinational companies began to prepare the annual environmental special expense budgets, to solve the problem of environmental protection. In June 1992, the United Nations held a conference on environment and development in Brazil, through the convention on environmental protection, "21st century agenda", will determine the sustainable development as a guide to the common development of the global strategy and action. Was held in March 1995, the international accounting and reporting standard thirteenth session of the intergovernmental expert working group, the main issue is the environment accounting; it marks the environmental problems in the development of the world as a important subject has to depth development.Keywords: Environmental accounting; Measurement; The internalization of external costs. Information disclosure1 IntroductionWith the progress of science and technology, the development of productivity, the surge of population, more and more serious damage to natural, human caused global warming, acid rain, flood, abnormal climate phenomena, such as have constitute a serious threat to human survival and development. These widespread environmental problems derived from the social and economic activities of the whole world, and as the main economic activities of enterprises lack by accounting systemarrangement, etc, necessary constraints, did not effectively take responsibility to society, natural environment pollution. It caused the world attention to people of insight, hope to carry out international cooperation norms and constraints in enterprise production and business operation activities affect the environment resources. Then, in 1998 Geneva, Switzerland, the United Nations international accounting and reporting standard intergovernmental expert working group on the 15th meeting, discuss and passed about environmental accounting and reporting system, complete the international guide - the announcement of the position of environmental accounting and reporting. Out of this guide pointed out the direction for the research of environmental accounting. After that, to solve the problem of environmental accounting, many experts and scholars put forward the view of the environmental accounting system should be established.Environmental accounting system is generally divided into two aspects of macroscopic and microscopic. Macro environment accounting is a social perspective to look at the value of resources and environment and ecological environment balanceproblems. At the same time, the micro environmental accounting as a macro environment accounting support, reflected the enterprise as a member of the society, should assume due to the business activities on the environment pollution caused by the responsibility and obligation. This requires the micro field should reflect the enterprise environment accounting system, adopts appropriate recognition and measurement method, comprehensive, continuous, systematically reflect the enterprise's environmental expenditure and income, and the environmental behavior of enterprises to supervise and analysis of information relevant to the user to provide comprehensive enterprise information, meet the requirements of the public enterprise shall bear the obligation of environmental protection demands.2 The overview of current researchEnvironmental accounting as a new branch of accounting is a combination of environment, environmental economics and development economics, accounting concepts and knowledge. Accordingly, environmental accounting in addition to adhering to the basic principle and basic method of accounting, it at the same time toabsorb and reference to include the environment, environmental economics (and its branch disciplines such as economics and pollution hazards economics, resource economics, ecological economics), in the field of development economics and other disciplines and a series of concepts and methods, on this basis to form a set of environmental accounting theory and method system. Environmental accounting theory and method of system involves the environment accounting hypothesis, accounting target, environment accounting object,etc. Core at the same time, involved in the field of environmental accounting measurement problem, given the environment accounting measurement are different from the traditional accounting, environment accounting measurement basis has the characteristics of multiplicity: opportunity cost, marginal cost and replacement costs can act as environmental accounting measurement basis. In addition, in view of the fuzziness of environmental accounting measurement can be reference to the principle of environmental economics explained; About environmental accounting report, there are two main types: supplementary report mode and independent mode. In addition, about the content of the environmental cost accounting management involves both environmental financial accounting recognition, measurement, and embodies the environmental management accounting cost control, investment decision-making, and the requirements of performance evaluation. Environmental accounting is an important part of implementing sustainable development strategy. Under the concept of sustainable development, the enterprise should be the environmental protection work through to the whole process of production and operation of the enterprise. At the same time, the assessment on the operator's fiduciary duty, should not only consider the economic accountability, should also include the social and environmental accountability.2.1 Environmental accounting research in the United StatesThe research and application of the environmental accounting is in the leading level in the world. This is mainly due to the United States environmental protection agency (hereinafter referred to as the EPA) strong impetus. Under the impetus of the EPA, many research institutions and associationreleased the stakeholders actionagenda: studio of environmental cost accounting and capital budget of a report. The report, for the development of environmental accounting, needs to solve the problem of four centers: (1) the good understanding of related terms and concepts;(2) to create internal and external management incentives;(3) education, guidance and promotion;(4) the development and dissemination of analysis tools, methods and systems. Since then, the EPA environmental accounting project along the direction of theoretical research and practical experience summed up two. In the first, first expounds the significance of environmental accounting, define the basic concepts of environment accounting. Second, EPA within the enterprise environment cost can be divided into traditional costs, hidden costs, or costs, image and public relations costs four categories, in addition to the external social costs. Finally, analyzes how the environment accounting for cost allocation, capital budgeting, process or product design, etc. The EPA argues that successful environmental management system must carry on the measurement of all environmental costs, and applied to a variety of decision-making; In the second aspect, the EPA has obtained results can be further divided into three types: one is the individual case study, to summarize the successful experience of the world's leading enterprises. Two is case set, is mainly the study of some of the same industry company; it is through the field observation and interview, questionnaire survey form a benchmark study. The combination of theory with practice to make the environment more accurately find out the problems existing in the accounting job, determine the direction of further improvement.2.2 South Korea's environmental accountingSince the mid - 1990 - s, South Korean some company began to research environmental accounting. This is mainly originated from South Korea the increased cost of environmental pollution prevention. South Korean company’s pollution p revention and control of cost from 1993 to 1999 at double-digit rate has increased dramatically, which makes the enterprise product cost rising, seriously affected the market competitiveness. On the other hand, due to the government regulation force increasing environmental regulations make financial institutions such as the external creditors more focus on enterprise environmental risk and performance, underpressure to companies to look for cost effective optimization method to improve environmental performance. Based on this, many companies have begun to realize the advance of the importance of environmental management strategy and environmental performance report, but the practice is in its infancy. Environmental accounting practice in order to promote South Korea, South Korea's environment ministry (KMOE) issued a covering the scope of environmental accounting related about "the accounting standards of environmental costs and liabilities" report, the purpose is to provide theoretical basis and the introduction of environmental accounting in South Korea relevant methods, mainly includes the definition of environmental accounting, environmental accounting conceptual framework, and the field environment accounting practices and environmental accounting in South Korea, and other standard draft.3 Environmental accounting theory basisEnvironmental accounting is closely connected withaccounting, the accounting profession of the environmental accounting mainly embodied in environmental accounting as a branch of accounting, the recognition and measurement should be the product of the multi-discipline together, its basic value can be activities to the environment and related economic activity provides reflect and control. Mainly embodied in five aspects:3.1 Environmental accounting is a new branch of accountingHere involves three levels of content: first, the environmental accounting as a branch of enterprise accounting, on the whole reflects the existing enterprise accounting (including financial accounting, management accounting, etc.), the basic principle and basic methods, and only in special cases should be considered the influence of environmental factors; Second, the economic development, the more important accounting, this concept applies not only to environmental accounting, but also in the environmental accounting factors coordination, balance social interests, enterprise and play an important role in environmental effects; Third, environment accounting is aimed at companies, administrative institution of environmental effect and influence is relatively small, or only play the role of enterprises andenvironmental work, so in the future a period of administrative institutions to establish the necessity of environmental accounting is low. This from another Angle, interpretation of environmental accounting is a branch of accounting.3.2 Environmental accounting is the product of the combination of interdisciplinary developmentEnvironmental accounting is the environment, environmental economics and development economics, theproduct of the combination of accounting. Accordingly, environmental accounting in addition to adhering to the basic principle and basic method of accounting, it at the same time to absorb and reference to include the environment, environmental economics (and its branch disciplines such as economics and pollution hazards economics, resource economics, ecological economics), in the field of development economics and other disciplines and a series of concepts and methods, on this basis to form a set of environmental accounting theory and method system.3.3 Environmental accounting to make the scope of the accounting entity is broaderEnvironmental accounting and financial accounting is the same need to consider the concept of accounting entity. This due to the accounting entity concept as the main body of accounting in the enterprises, to undertake the rights and obligations of assets and liabilities. For environmental accounting, the body is not just a for-profit economic organization, and should be considered a social unit and link in the total system, need a certain amount of social responsibility, and environmental accounting entity concept is beyond the scope of general enterprise accounting entity and should as far as possible from the perspective of social and environmental control of the enterprise the management activities. Otherwise, environmental accounting will be established. At the same time, the accounting should not only on the enterprise's economic benefit, but also examine environmental benefits as well as the reflection of the enterprise the combination of two kinds of benefits, which is reflected in the environmental accounting measurement model selection. Concrete embodiment in should adopt the method ofmonetary measurement, and to use the real measurement. In the monetary measurement should not only use the strong historical cost, reliabilityand need to consider the adoption of other measurement model.译文环境会计核算模式研究作者:Mount R摘要环境会计的研究始于70 年代。
会计环境对会计确认与计量的影响 外文文献译文及原文精品文档18页
Contents Abstract..........................................................................................I Introduction (Ⅱ)Efficient Accounting Systems (1)Chapter 1 Accounting (1)1.1 The decision of accounting (2)1.2 The functions of accounting (4)Chapter 2 Accounting environment (7)2.1 The goal of accountant is the starting point in which accounting environment affects the accounting information system (9)2.2 Accounting assumed reveals close link between accounting and its interdependent external environment (10)2.3 Accounting standards disclose the request of accountingenvironment to accounting information (13)Chapter 3 Accounting system (15)Conclusion (30)References (31)Thanks (32)Efficient Accounting SystemsThe existence and development of everything are under certain environmental conditions. Accounting, as one of the most important practice of human activities is not a cases outside. Accounting environment have the base sense for the smooth conduct of the activities of accounting, while various accounting environmental factors will have isolated impact on total activity of the accounting system. The study of the structure of the accounting environment system and the relations between the various elements in this system made us to be much more realistic in this area ofaccounting theory and practice, to build a harmonious Environmental System for clear direction, so as to promote the accounting cause of sustainable development.Chapter 1 Accounting1.1 The decision of accountingAccounting is one of the fastest growing fields in the modern business world. Every new shore, school, restaurant, or filling station indeed, any new enterprise of any kind increases the demand for accountants. Consequently, the demand for accountants is generally much greater than the supply. Government official often have a legal background: similarly, the men and women in management often have a background in accounting. They are usually familiar with the methodology of finance and fundamentals of fiscal and business administration.Today’s accountants ar e as diverse as their job assignments. Accountants may be male or female, outgoing or conservative, but they are all analytical. They may have backgrounds in art history or computer programming. They come from every ethnic and cultural background.The accounting backgrounds can open doors to most lines of business. In short, accounting deals with all facets of anorganization —purchasing, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution. This is why accounting provides such an excellent basis for business experience. Accounting is an information system necessitated by the great complexity of modern business.1.2 The functions of accountingOne of the most important functions of accounting is to accumulate and report financial information that shows an organization’s financial position and the results of its operations to its interested users. These users include managers, stockholders, banks and other creditors, governmental agencies, investment advisors, and the general public. For example, stockholders must have an organization’s financial information in order to measure its management’s performance and to evaluate their own holdings. Banks and other creditors must consider the financial strength of a business before permitting it to borrow funds. Potential investors need financial data in order to compare prospective investments. Also many laws require that extensive financial information be reported to the various levels of government. Businesses usually publish such reports at least annually. To meet the needs of the external users, a framework of accounting standards, principles and procedures known as “generally accepted accounting principles” have been developedto insure the relevance and reliability of the accounting information contained in these external financial reports. The subdivision of the accounting process that produces these external reports is referred to as financial accounting.Another important function of accounting is to provide the management inside an organization with the accounting information needed in the organization’s internal decision-making, which relates to planning, control, and evaluation within an organization. For example, budgets are prepared under the directions of a company’s controller on an annual basis and express the desi res and goals of the company’s management. A performance report is supplied to help a manager focus his attention on problems or opportunities that might otherwise go unnoticed. Furthermore, cost-benefit data will be needed by a company’s management in deciding among the alternatives of reducing prices, increasing advertising, or doing both in attempt to maintain its market shares. The process of generating and analyzing such accounting information for internal decision –making is often referred to as managerial accounting and the related information reports being prepared are called internal management reports. As contrasted with financial accounting, a management accounting information system provides both historical and estimated information that is relevant to thespecific plans on more frequent basis. And managerial accounting is not governed by generally accepted accounting principles. Chapter 2 Accounting environmentThe growth of organizations, changes in technology, government regulation, and the globalization of economy during the twentieth century have spurred the development of accounting. As a result, a number of specialized fields of accounting have evolved in addition to financial accounting and managerial accounting, which include auditing, cost accounting, tax accounting, budgetary accounting, governmental and not –for-profit accounting, human resources accounting, environmental accounting, social accounting, international accounting, etc. For example, tax accounting encompasses the preparation of tax returns and the consideration of the tax consequences of proposed business transactions or alternative courses of action. Governmental and not-for-profit accounting specializes in recording and reporting the transactions of various governmental units and other not-for-profit organizations. International accounting is concerned with the special problems associated with the international trade of multinational business organizations. All forms of accounting, in the end, provide information to the related users and help them make decisions.Accountant the environment has, the development closely with accountant related, and decided that accountant the thought that the accounting theory, accountant organize, accountant the legal system as well as the accountancy level of development historic condition and the particular case.Studies accountant the environment the influence which develops to accountant, should take accountant the goal, accountant suppose, the accounting standards as the clue.2.1 The goal of accountant is the starting point in which accounting environment affects the accounting information system Each kind of accountant under the pattern accountant the goal concrete difference may sum up as accountant the environment different result. Looking from longitudinal, the different historical period, accountant the environment is different, accountant the goal is also different, from this causes the accounting information existence huge difference; Looking from crosswise, different national accountant the environment is different, accountant the goal content has the difference, its accounting information is also unique. About accountant the goal, the theorists have “the policy-making useful view” and “the management responsibility view” the s truggle. What policy-making useful view interdependence is the developed capital market, theresources request and is entrusted with something the relations are establishes through the capital market. Thus, the resources entrusting party and is entrusted with something the side responsibility relations intermediary becomes because of the capital market fuzzy. But the responsibility view to base the resources request which forms in the direct intercourse with is entrusted with something the relations. Western various countries and the international accounting standards committee approve the policy-making useful view. If the international accounting standards committee said that “must focus the attention to provide to the economic decision-making useful inform ation”. Comparatively speaking, the management responsibility view depends on each other accountant the environment and the Chinese present stage economic reform and the development actual situation even more tallies. The current our country financial inventory accounting's essential target, should locate, in approaches the trustee to report the fiduciary duty in the fulfillment situation. Because of from the time, the management responsibility view mainly faces the future, but faces in the past and the present. But in accountant confirmed that the standard and the measurement foundation's choices aspect, the foothold in the past and the present must be easier than in the future the foothold, provided the information quality even more drewclose to the goal the request.Because just accountant the goal affects the accounting information system's basic reason, therefore, the environment embarks from accountant to accountant the goal locates, can cause the accounting theory to move toward the accounting practice from Yu the accounting practice.2.2 accountants supposed has promulgated accountant between the external environment close relations which depended on each other with it.Accountant supposes is the accounting personnel the reasonable judgment which locates to the accounting the change which does not decide accountant who the environment makes, is the accounting basic premise Accountant supposes to financial inventory accounting has the overall importance influence, it is the behavior main body and the general situation embarks from accountant constructs the system info, American Accounting standards Committee Respective Accountant Research department's first memoir is “accountant's fundamental assumption”. Although theoretically speaking, the sound value information will have the guidance compared to the historical costs information regarding the user future economic decision-making, just like but US Chartered accountant the Association financial report Technical committee will publish thetopic will be "Improvement Enterprise Reported that - - Customer Guidance" said that the numerous users did not advocate by the sound value pattern substitution historical costs pattern, its reason will mainly be stems from the guarantee financial report information consistency, reliable and the cost - benefit principle consideration. However, they advocate many kinds of measurement attribute mix valuation.Accountant supposes is based on the external environment uncertainty proposed that therefore, may say that accountant supposes is the accounting theory and accountant the environment connected border meeting point, depends on each other accountant with it the environment to have the extremely close relationship. 2.3 The accounting standards disclose accountant the environment to the accounting information requestAccountant the environment to accounting standards' influence, may manifest in the accounting standards technical nature, the social two aspects.1. Technical nature. The accounting standards were considered that is one kind of pure objective restraint organization, one merely technical's standard method, its goal is enables accounting practice processing the science, to be reasonable, to be consistent. Since produces the behavior has universal restraint accountantafter accountant the standard system, accountant reforms mainly displays in accountant the standard system's reform, but accountant standard system's reform, displays for concrete accountant the computing technique innovation.2. Sociality. The different accounting standards will have the different accounting information, thus affects the different main body benefit, it will cause part of people to profit, but another part of people possibly suffer injury. The accounting standards produce the economic consequences prove its and impure objective. Accounting standards' sociality materially is the economic interest question, immediate influence to economic interest between related various aspects assignment. One of market economy's base elements is the fair competition;All market economy participants cannot different form the rank difference because of the right status. If the administrative right trades the behavior with the market economy to unify in together, will destroy the market mechanism, will be unable to realize the market economy effective disposition resources function. Therefore accounting standards' formulation organization must be the neutral organization, guarantees the accounting standards fairness and the rationality.Chapter 3 Accounting SystemAccounting system refers to establish accounting andaccounting supervision procedure and method of business activities. Effective accounting system should do:1. Confirmed and record all real business, timely and detailed description of economic business, so in the financial and accounting reports of economic business appropriately classified.2. Measurement value of economic business, so in the financial and accounting reports records in the appropriate monetary value.3. Determine the time, business to business records in the appropriate accounting period.4. In the financial and accounting reports, business and proper disclosure of expression related matters.有效会计体系任何事物都是在一定的环境条件下存在和发展的, 作为人类重要实践活动之一的会计活动也不例外。
环境会计信息披露外文文献翻译中英文.pdf
外文文献翻译原文及译文(本文档归max118 网hh2018 所有,仅供下载使用)中文标题:印度环境会计披露实践的影响因素:来自NIFTY 公司的经验证据文献出处:The IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2016译文字数:3900 多字原文Factors Influencing Environmental Accounting and Disclosure Practices in India: Empirical Evidence from NIFTY CompaniesB Omnamasivaya* and M S V PrasadThe study examines the factors determining the level of environmental disclosure information by taking a sample of NIFTY 50 companies from National Stock Exchange (NSE). The environmental information disclosure is measured by using an Environmental Accounting Disclosure Index (EADI) and the variables used in the study are profitability, corporate size, age, financial leverage, industry type, legal ownership and foreign operations. The relationship is tested using multiple regression analysis. The results show that there is a positive relationship between EADI and profitability, financial leverage, industry type and legal ownership, and a negative relationship between EADI and corporate size, age and foreign operations.IntroductionClimate change is one of the greatest challenges that the world is facing today. Climate change is the variation in the global climate over time. The climate change creates manifold problems like global warming, glacier meltdown, soil erosion, land degradation, deforestation, loss of biodiversity and all kinds of pollution. Human influence on the nature is one of the major causes of such problems. Indiscriminate use of resourcesand undue influence on nature in the name of development can be identified as the prime causes of climate change. As a result, in the last few decades, the adverse effect of environmental pollution on economic development has become a public concern all over the world (Goswami, 2014).The state of world‘s environment and the impact of mankind on the ecology of the world have led to increased public concern and scrutiny of the operations and performance of organizations. Globally, corporations are expected to include environmental concerns in business operations and interaction with stakeholders. As a result, firms can no longer ignore the problems of the society in which they operate. This has thus instituted a social contract between organizations and the environment, thereby making environmental responsibility a corporate dictate (Olayinka and Oluwamayowa, 2014).Every business has responsibility to use the resources at judiciously. Every enterprise needs to behave like a good corporate citizen, and the corporate behavior is judged by its actions related to the community, the steps taken to protect the environment or pollution control. In the context of the Indian corporate sector, companies are not performing as good citizens. Due to this reason many laws have been laid down by the government for making the companies good corporate citizens and fulfill their social responsibility (Chauhan, 2005).In India, the economic reforms initiated in the 1990s have unwittingly contributed to a rise in environmental problems. The awareness level of stakeholders and public regarding the environmental issues has increased the pressure on companies to disclose environmental information. As a result, the companies have started disclosing the environmental information in annual reports and sustainability reports to satisfy all their stakeholders.The Indian government has taken several steps to protect the environment. It has set up the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) with the aim to coordinate, among the states and the various ministries, the issues relating to environmental protection and antipollution measures. Necessary legislation has also been passed. In India, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) were established under the Water Act. The CPCB has identified 17 categories of industries which are highly polluting (Joshi et al., 2011).In India, specific environmental accounting rules or environmental disclosure guidelines for communication to different stakeholder groups are not available for Indian companies. There is no mandatory requirement for quantitative disclosure of (financial) environmental information in annual reports either under the Companies Act or as per the Indian Accounting Standards. Furthermore there are 23 stockexchanges in India which are controlled by the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992. Each of these stock exchanges has different listing requirement for Indian companies to disclose environmental information. Therefore, any environmental disclosure by Indian companies is purely voluntary (Makori and Jagongo, 2013). Against this backdrop, the present study examines the factors determining the level of environmental disclosure information in India.Legitimacy TheoryIn order to explain the reasons for environmental disclosure, we use legitimacy theory. There are many theories which explain the various reasons for social and environmental accounting disclosures, but legitimacy theory is the most suitable theory to explain the environmental disclosure. Organizations cannot survive without meeting the societal expectations. The society expects that the organizations should be proactive in protecting the environment and minimizing the environmental hazards. In case organizations fail to meet the societal expectations, there is a severe threat to their existence. Nowadays Indian companies are legitimizing because of the awareness about environmental disclosure practices in the society. Therefore, Indian companies are taking several steps to protect the environment and are disclosing the relevant environmental information in their annual reports and company websites.Legitimacy relates to the environmental issues which are disclosedin the companies’ annual reports. This indicates the management concerns towards the community. Therefore, the management of different companies or managers have different ideas or thoughts about what the society expects and managers will adapt different strategies to show the society that the organization is meeting the expectations of the community (Zain, 2006).The theory of legitimacy is based on two fundamental ideas: companies need to legitimize their activities, and the process of legitimacy that confers benefits to businesses. Thus, the first element is compatible with the idea that environmental disclosure is related to the social pressure. In this context, the need for legitimacy is not the same for all companies due to the degree of social pressure the company is exposed to, and the level of response to this pressure. There are a number of factors which determine the degree of social pressure on companies and their responses to the pressure. These factors are potential determinants of corporate social disclosure. The second component is based on the idea that companies can expect to benefit by a legitimate behavior based on the social responsibility activity. In addition to that, the legitimacy theory provides a comprehensive framework to explain both the determinants and consequences of social disclosure (Mohamed et al., 2014).Literature ReviewKokubu et al. (2001) examined the annual reports of 1,203 companies to investigate the determinants of environmental disclosure. Environmental disclosure was measured by using an environmental disclosure index and the six independent variables used in the study were company size, financial performance, strength of consumer relations, dependence on debt, dependence on the capital market and type of industry. The study found that company size and industry type influence environmental disclosure.Elijido-Ten (2004) conducted a study on the determinants of environmental disclosures by using 40 Malaysian companies by applying stakeholder theory. The environmental disclosure was measured by using an environmental disclosure index. The study used three determinants: stakeholder power, strategic posture and economic performance. The study found that both top management and government power were the determinants of environmental disclosure, and it was also found that there was no relationship between economic performance and environmental disclosure.Yuen et al. (2009) examined 200 companies to investigate the relationship between firm characteristics and voluntary disclosure. Voluntary disclosure practices were measured by using a disclosure index and the independent variables used in the study were concentration of ownership, ownership by state, individual ownership, firm size, leverage,profitability and type of industry. The study found that individual ownership, audit committee, firm size, and leverage positively related to voluntary disclosure.Galani et al. (2011) examined the relationship between environmental disclosure and firm size by using 100 Greek companies. Environmental disclosure was measured by using environmental disclosure index and the independent variables tested in the study were profitability, size and listing status. The study found that there was a positive significant relationship between environmental disclosure and size of the firm and it was also found that there was no relationship between environmental disclosure and profitability listing requirements.Joshi et al. (2011) analyzed as ma ny as 45 Indian companies’ annual reports to investigate the factors influencing environmental disclosure. The environmental disclosure was measured using environmental disclosure index and the independent variables used in the study were profitability, size, accounting firm, industry, foreign operations, age, ownership and financial leverage. The study found that size and industry were significant determinants for environmental disclosure.Rouf (2011) examined the relationship between firm-specific characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) by taking 176 Bangladesh companies. CSRD was measured by using the CSRD index and the variables in the study were independent directorsand firm size. The study found that there was a positive relationship between CSRD and independent directors and firm size did not affect CSRD.Abdo and Al-Drugi (2012) studied whether any company characteristics influenced environmental disclosures by using 43 Libyan oil and gas companies. Environmental disclosures were measured using content analysis through word count and four characteristics were selected: company’s size, privatization, age, and nationality. The study found that there was a positive association between environmental disclosure and company’s size, company’s privatization, and company’s nationality; and it was also found that the age of the company was significant and negatively related to the level of environmental disclosure.Oba and Fodio (2012) examined the relationship between board characteristics and quality of environmental disclosure by taking 21 companies in Nigeria. Environmental disclosure was measured by using an environmental disclosure index and the independent variables used in the study were board size, foreign directors, gender mix, and board independence. The study found that there was no relationship between board size and environmental disclosure.Suttipun and Stanton (2012) conducted a study on the determinants of environmental disclosure by using 75 Thai companies. The environmental disclosure was measured by word count and the fiveindependent variables used in the study were size of the company, type of industry, ownership status, profitability and country of origin of the company. The study found that there was a positive relationship between environmental disclosure and size of the company.Development of HypothesesCorporate SizeMany of the researchers found a positive relationship between environmental disclosure and size, and many studies supported that large- sized firms disclose more on environment (e.g., Kokubu et al. 2001; Joshi et al., 2011; Suttipun and Stanton, 2012; Makori and Jagongo, 2013; Akbaş , 2014; and Sulaimana et al., 2014).There is a contrast between small enterprises and large enterprises. Large companies require more funds and for that they raise funds through external sources. For attracting the investors and to reduce the agency cost, large companies disclose more information and therefore get public support (Joshi et al., 2011).ProfitabilityThe profitability of a firm is an important factor in determining the environmental disclosure practices. As for whether environmental issues are important or not, it is argued that when the profit is low, the importance of environmental issues is low (Joshi et al., 2011). Many studies have reported that there is a positive relationship betweenprofitability and environmental disclosure (e.g., Nurhayati et al., 2015). A very few studies did not support that (e.g., Galani et al. 2011; Rouf, 2011; Akbaş , 2014; and Sulaimana et al., 2014).Many studies have used the profitability ratios like Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Investment (ROI), Return on Equity (ROE), Net Profit Margin and Dividend Per Share (DPS) to measure the firm profitability. This study uses ROE to measure profitability.Financial LeverageThe agency theory states that with the increase of debt proportion in capital structure, the greater is likely to be the conflict of interest between shareholders, creditors and managers; and the higher the agency cost, the greater is the incentive for managers to disclose more information. From the perspective of social and environmental responsibilities, companies with higher financial leverage are willing to disclose more environmental information to maintain good relationship with stakeholders (Joshi et al., 2011).Many studies have supported the association between financial leverage and environmental disclosure (Joshi et al., 2011; and Sulaimana et al., 2014). They reported that financial leverage has no impact on the disclosure level in India. Kokubu et al. (2001) stated that debt did not significantly influence the corporate environmental reports in Japan. However, this study uses debt-equity ratio for measuring financialleverage.Industry TypeMany studies have examined whether the industry influences the disclosure of environmental information, and many studies have supported strongly that environmental-sensitive companies disclose more environmental information than non-environmental-sensitive companies. Joshi et al. (2011) stated that environmental-sensitive companies in India are likely to disclose more environmental protection information than others. Akbaş (2014) reported that t here is a significant positive relationship between industry membership and the extent of environmental disclosure.ConclusionThe study examined the factors influencing EADI by taking a sample of 50 companies listed on NSE. The environmental accounting disclosure is measured by EADI, and the independent variables used in the study are corporate size, age, profitability, financial leverage, legal ownership, industry and foreign operations. The relationship is tested using multiple regression analysis. The R2 under the model is 0.6033, which indicates that the model is capable of explaining 60.33% of variability in the disclosure of environmental information in the sample companies. The adjusted R2 indicates that 53.72% of variation in the dependent variable is explained by the variations in the independentvariables. The results of multiple regression reveal that there is a positive relationship between EADI and profitability, financial leverage, industry type, and legal ownership, and a negative relationship between EADI and corporate size, age and foreign operations.Limitations: The main limitation of the study is that the data was selected only for one year. The sample size was also limited. Another limitation of the study is that there are many variables which may influence environmental disclosure like board of directors, CEO’s role, audit firm size, etc., but we have selected very few variables.Future Scope: There is huge scope for further research on environmental accounting disclosure in the Indian context, as there is less amount of research on this subject. Further research can focus on the relationship between environmental accounting disclosure practices and financial performance of the companies.译文印度环境会计披露实践的影响因素:来自NIFTY 公司的经验证据B Omnamasivaya,M S V Prasad该研究通过从国家证券交易所(NSE)获取NIFTY 50 公司的样本来分析环境披露信息水平的影响因素。
环境会计参考文献
Hendrik
A.
Verfaillte
and
Robin Bidwell
WBCSD
WBCSD WBCSD
1993
1997
2000 6
2000 11
3
5
9
EPA
:
pp. 24-62
7
WBCSD
http://ww w.greenlea fpublishing .com/catal ogue/cea.h tm CICA www.cica.ca
(Green Ledgers: Case
Studies
in
Corporate
Environmental Accounting )
(Handbuch
Umweltkostenrechnung)
Daryl Ditz, Janet Ranganathan, Daryl Banks
World Resources Institute
EPA (Introduction to Environmental Accounting as a Business Tool: Key Concepts and Terms)
:
EPA
The Lean and Green Supply
Chain: A Practical Guide for
Materials Managers and Supply
BP 2000 pp.64-105
http://ww / opptintr/ac ctg/ http://ww / opptintr/ac ctg/
BP 2000 pp.24-62
关于环境会计研究的文献综述
关于环境会计的研究综述摘要:环境日益恶化,人们对环保的呼声越来越强烈,因此研究环境,保护生态,成为当今最为关注的问题。
由于经济的快速发展,科技的飞速发展导致了环境问题成为人们越来越关心的问题,如何既能保证经济和技术的进步,又同时能缓和环境问题,成为现在急需解决的问题。
环境会计也是基于环境问题而产生的。
本文在前人研究的基础上,阐述了环境会计要素的确认与计量,并提出环境会计的信息披露模式,旨在提供环境会计研究的理论成果。
关键词:环境会计;环境资产;环境费用;环境成本;环境负债;信息披露1环境会计的文献综述1.1国外环境会计研究的文献综述20世纪70年代,以马林(J.T.Marlin)的《污染的会计问题》和比蒙斯(F.A.Beams)撰写的《控制污染的社会成本转换研究》为代表,拉开了环境会计研究的序幕。
在环境会计研究的领域中,欧洲西方国家一直占领先地位。
以下一些机构的研究最为显著,如加拿大特许会计师协会,美国财务会计准则委员会,英国注册会计师协会等,他们的研究主要表现在一下方面:(1)关于环境负债与环境成本的确认与计量问题。
加拿大特许会计师协会的《环境成本与负债:会计与财务报告问题》(1993),美国环保的《公司的绿色会计》(1998)《为企业经营决策评估潜在环境负债》(1998)美国财务会计准则委员会(FASB)第五号准则公告《或有事项会计》。
第14号解释公告《损失金额的合理预计》等都是关于环境负债和成本的报告,从负债角度看待和处理问题,都是用于知道环境成本与负债实物的会计文献,探讨了如何将环境成本和负债融合到财务报告和具体实例中。
(2)关于企业环境信息披露的问题。
加拿大特许会计师协会的《环境绩效报告》(1994)和《加拿大的环境报告:对1993年度的调查》对环境信息披露的仿佛和实际披露的现状做了详细论述。
(3)关于企业经营决策中环境会计导论:《主要的概念和术语》一书对环境会计的很多专业语言作了解释,并且探讨了在企业的生产经营中如何把企业的环境信息融合进去。
会计环境 外文翻译 外文文献 英文文献 环境会计
外文翻译:环境会计——我们现在所处的状况及我们前进的方向by Joy E. Hecht利益增长改变国民收入核算制度以促进了解经济和环境之间的联系。
在过去的二十年间..环境会计领域取得了很大的进步.它从一个比较冷僻领域努力到现在已经是一个经几十个国家测试和多方面的完善的领域。
但是.国家有可能把环境的经济作用结合到国民收入账户中..这种既不是快速的卖空.也不是种快速的过程。
自从20世纪60年代以来..这种想法已经被讨论。
尽管在这篇文章中面临重重困难和争议.但是.与日剧增的在国民收入核算制度中所产生的利益促进了我们对经济和环境直接关系的了解。
为何改变?世界各国政府建立经济数据系统称为国民收入账户.它是用来计算宏观经济的指标.如国内生产总值。
建立一个国家经济环境使用到这种账户是回应几个在依照由联合国规定并且在全世界广泛使用的国民核算体系中认识到的缺点.其中一个缺点就是环境保护中的费用不能被鉴别出来。
因此.有些人辩称道.所花的费用.也就是说.用来安装控制环境污染的装置随着国内生产总值的增幅.即使开支也不是经济化地生产。
这些批评者呼吁区分防御性的花费要从账户中其他部分支出。
同时,虽然有些环境商品上不了市场..但是它们提供了经济价值。
这种现象是令人费解的。
薪材聚集在森林.肉类和鱼类聚集消费.药用植物它们都是例证.同样的用于喝和灌溉的水.其出售价格只是反映了分配和处理基本设施的花费.而不是水本身。
虽然有些国家确实把这类货物包括在其国民收入账户.但没有存在着这样做的标准惯例。
当非市场货物列入账户中.他们仍然无法从那些销售的产品中区分出来。
重视环境服务如森林提供的集水区保护与昆虫提供作物施肥是很困难的。
虽然有些专家呼吁将它们列入环保调整账户..但是那些有经济价值和退化的服务都没有包括进。
在另一方面.需要候补货物和服务来代替比如说水处理设备.用来对国民生产总值做贡献..它是有误导之嫌。
还有个问题是.国民收入账户对待制成品资本的折旧和自然资本的折旧是不同的。
会计外文文献
企业的社会责任企业社会责任(CSR )已成为一个全球趋势,涉及企业,国家,国际组织和民间社会组织.但这远远不能清楚CSR的主张,有什么真正的趋势,是从哪里开始,在哪里发展,谁是项目的主要行动者。
如果把它作为一种社会运动,我们必须要问:什么运动和谁执行?讨论有助于我们反思形成的趋势和如何管理某些特点来迅速和广泛地在全球各地进行扩展,并增加了以下体制变革,特别是对变化中国家之间、企业法人和民间社会组织关系之间的界限的作用.企业社会责任的趋势在三个方面:作为一个管理框架,新的要求,地方企业;作为动员企业行为,以协助国家的发展援助;和作为管理趋势.每一个这些画像表明,中心的某些行为,关系,驾驭团队和利益.我的例子表明,没有人对这些意见似乎比别人更准确,而是,活动包括规范的不同利益、作用因素、起源和轨迹。
这些多重身份的趋势可以部分描述其成功以及它的争论,脆弱性和流动性.许多公司现在有具体的计划和小节在其网站上处理企业社会责任。
在过去,软条例和指导网络,国际公认的规则一直是一种重要机制,作用在公司、国家和国家间组织的需求,例如,发布指导方针和条例的公司。
在这背景下,国际组织仍然是重要的行动者,他们正在寻求与跨国公司进行对话,而不是试图通过国家控制企业社会责任。
各国际组织不是对企业的社会责任监管机构;而他们却是监管和自我约束的倡议之间的经纪人的最合适人选.对社会负责行为和监测这些行为的需求越来越多地以国家以外的这些组织为渠道,并强调赞成高比例的自律。
因此,我们看到了软法律(Morth, 2004)的出现,或者是Knill 和Lehmkuhl (2002) 所说的“被规管的自律”,和Moran (2002)所归纳的“精细”或“非正式”规章。
我更喜欢“软法律”和“软规章”的说法,因为他们并不总是非正式的。
软规章常常包括正式报告和统筹程序。
还有,从统筹和行政的观点来看,那些规章和精细还是相去甚远的.社会责任的措施和规章在公司和他们的利益相关者之间的对话中发展.联合国全球契约是发展中的软规章框架的中心。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
EVOLUTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT PROGRAMJ. H. MadayT. L. KuusinenOctober 1991Presented at theEnvironmental Auditing ConferenceOctober 22-23, 1991Seattle, WashingtonWork supported bythe U.S. Department of Energyunder Contract DE-ACO6-76RLO 1830Pacific Northwest LaboratoryRichland, Washington 99352DISCLAIMERThis report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States。
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.Evolution of an Environmental Audit ProgramJoseph H. Maday, Jr. (ASQC-CQA)Technical Group Leader - Quality Verification DepartmentandTapio KuusinenSenior Research ScientistEnvironmental Policy and Compliance GroupPacific Northwest LaboratoryRichland, Washington 99352ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis document was prepared under the direction of the U.S. Environment Protection Agency’s (EPA)Small Business Division. There were numerous reviewers from government and private organizations. Additionally, the following provided important advice and/or reference materials:* Small Business Ombudsman, Maine Department of Environmental Protection* Tennessee Small Business Assistance Program* New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection* Massachusetts Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction (OTA)* Iowa Waste Reduction Center, University of Northern Iowa * Florida Small Business Assistance ProgramThe products and services included in this document were contributed for review by commercial andgovernment sources. The project team is thankful for their timely cooperation.ABSTRACTInternational and national standards, and in some cases corporate policies require that planned and scheduled audits be performed to verify all aspects of environmental compliance and to determine effective implementation of the environmental management program. An example of this can be found in the definition of auditing as provided by U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Policy Statement on Environmental Auditing. It defines environmental auditing as follows:"Environmental auditing is a systematic, documented, periodic and objective reviewby regulated entities of facility operations and practices related to meetingenvironmental requirements. Audits can be designed to accomplish any or all ofthe following: verify compliance with environmental requirements, evaluate theeffectiveness of environmental management systems already in place, or assess risksfrom regulated and unregulated materials and practices.Auditing serves as a quality assurance check to help improve the effectiveness ofbasic environmental management by verifying that management practices are inplace, functioning and adequate. ''Many specifications further emphasize that the audit be performed to written procedures or checklists (to provide later documentation) by personnel who do not have direct responsibility for performing the activities being audited. The results of such audits are generally required to be documented, reported to, and reviewed by, responsible management. Follow-up action will be taken where indicated. The responsible organization can then take follow-up action as needed.An effective auditing program is a useful tool for improving environmental compliance. If developed properly, the program will point out areas of weakness and areas of potential problems. An auditing program will also identifyenvironmental compliance activities that meet or exceed expectations.At the Pacific Northwest Laboratory(PNL), Environmental Audits used to consist of nontechnical auditors auditing to findings published in General Accounting Office reports. Today's practice of deploying a composite team of technical specialists and nontechncial auditors to audit to specific environmental programmatic requirements provides, we believe, a significant improvement.国际和国家的标准, 而且在一些情形企业的政策需要那计划了的和预定的稽核是运行到查证所有的环境服从的方面和决定环境管理的有效落实计画。