压力试验报告(中英文版)
压力测试报告
GV压力测试报告拟制：周双英日期：2015-1-4 审核：日期：批准：日期：GV压力测试报告 (1)GV压力测试报告 (1)1. 概述 (3)1.1. 编写目的 (3)1.2. 项目背景 (3)1.3. 测试目标 (3)1.4. 名词解释 (4)1.5. 参考文档 (4)2. 测试环境说明 (4)3. 测试策略 (4)3.1. 人力资源 (4)3.2. 测试方案 (5)3.3. 测试场景 (5)3.3.1. 静态页面测试场景 (5)3.3.2.1. 动态页面测试场景（一） (5)3.3.2.2. 动态页面测试场景（二）（未记录） (5)3.4. 测试用例 (6)3.4.1. 1000个用户访问静态静态页面 (6)3.4.2. 100个用户访问动态页面 (6)4. 测试结果 (7)4.1. 测试结果摘要 (7)4.2. 用户运行情况：（附图） (7)4.3. 错误数：（附图） (8)4.4. 事务响应时间：（附图） (9)4.5. 每秒点击数：（附图） (10)4.6. 吞吐量（附图） (11)5. 测试结论 (12)6. 遗留问题分析 (12)7. 附件 (12)1.概述1.1.编写目的本次测试报告为GV西班牙站系统的压力测试总结报告，目的在于总结压力测试工作。
预期参考人员包括用户、测试人员、开发人员、项目管理者、质量管理人员和需要阅读本报告的高层经理。
1.2.项目背景本项目是本公司正在开发的一个购物平台，西班牙语GV购物平台。
1.3.测试目标本次测试，主要测试GV西班牙站动态和静态两个页面的压力上限，得出用户瓶颈。
1.4.名词解释测试时间：一轮测试从开始到结束所使用的时间并发线程数：测试时同时访问被测系统的线程数。
注意，由于测试过程中，每个线程都是以尽可能快的速度发请求，与实际用户的使用有极大差别，所以，此数据不等同于实际使用时的并发用户数。
每次时间间隔：测试线程发出一个请求，并得到被测系统的响应后，间隔多少时间发出下一次请求。
管道试压程序中英文版
HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TESTINGPROCEDURE水压试验程序Prepared By编制: Date日期:Reviewed By审核: Date日期:Approved By批准: Date日期:CONTENT目录1.0General综述2.0Test Preparation试验准备3.0Hydrostatic Pressure Test of Pipeline管线水压试验4.0Inspection Requirements检验要求5.0Reporting报告6.0Report Form报告表格1.0General综述1.1Piping hydrostatic testing should be performed in accordance with ASME B31.3.管线水压试验依照ASME B31.3。
1.1.1All fabrication/repair have been completed, except for operations which could notbe performed prior to the pressure test such as cosmetic grinding on the basematerial which does not affect the required thickness.除了不影响母材厚度的一些整修工作，所有制造和维修在水压试验之前完成。
1.1.2All examinations have been performed, except those required after the test.所有检验已完成，需要试验后的检验例外。
1.2Test gages used in pressure testing shall meet the following requirements.压力试验用表应满足如下要求。
软件测试部分中英文对照
Test design : 测试设计
Test driver : 测试驱动
Testing environment : 测试环境
Code rule : 编码规范
Code style : 编码风格
Common sense : 常识
Compatibility Testing : 兼容性测试
Component testing : 组件测试
Condition coverage : 条件覆盖
I18N(Internationalization) : 国际化 (90)
Incremental testing : 渐增测试
Installing testing : 安装测试
Integration testing : 集成测试
Interface : 接口
Inspection : 审查
Acceptance testing : 验收测试
Accessibility test : 软体适用性测试
Ad hoc testing : 随机测试
Algorithm analysis : 算法分析
Alpha testing : α测试
Anomaly : 异常
Exception : 异常/例外 (70)
Exception handlers : 异常处理器
Exhaustive testing : 穷尽测试
Exploratory testing : 探索性测试
Event-driven : 事件驱动
Software development plan(SDP) : 软件开发计划
耐压试验报告(中英对照)
T min
保压时间
保压时间
Time of Retaining Pressure Time of Retaining Pressure
结论：
本产品经
MPa 试验过程中，容器无渗漏，无可见的变形和异常声响;
试验结论：合格
Conclusion：
There is no leakage, visible distortion or sound during the test of this product in
耐压试验报告
Inspection Report of Pressure Test
□液压 Hy液组合 Gas and liquid combination
编号 No.：RT/ZZ-JL-12-02
产品名称 Product Name：
产品编号 Product No.：
试压部位
Test Part
壳体
Outer Casing
试验日期
Date of Test
工艺过程卡编号
Process Card NO.
/
压力表精度等级
Accurate Level of Pressure Gauge
压力表编号
Series No. of Pressure Gauge
氯离子含量(mg/L)
Date of Pressure Gauge Test
试验介质
Test Medium
介质温度(℃)
Medium Temperature
P
设计要求 压力试验 曲线
Pressure Test Curve
Required In Design
试验压力
Test pressure
3543-G710压力试验检验报告
本表等同于容规附录三（11）。
G.1～G.18 本附录所列入的18张表格为现场组焊安装的塔、容器类设备施工过程质量控制记录用表，非压力容器设备现场组对安装可参照执行，其中表SH/T 3543－G701“压力容器产品质量证明书”、SH/T 3543－G702“产品合格证”、SH/T 3543－G703“产品技术特性”、SH/T 3543－G704“产品主要受压元件使用材料一览表（含焊接材料）”、SH/T 3543－G705“产品制造变更报告”、SH/T 3543－G709“产品焊接试板力学和弯曲性能检验报告”、SH/T 3543－G710“压力试验检验报告”、SH/T 3543－G711“压力容器外观及几何尺寸检验报告”、SH/T 3543－720“设备热处理报告”等同于《压力容器安全技术监察规程》（正文表格下方标注为“容规”）附录三所列相应表格。
无损检测报告表格应采用SH/T3503《石油化工建设工程项目交工技术文件》所列无损检测表格（等同于容规附录三（6）～（9）、（13）和（14）所列表格）。
分段制造现场组装焊接的塔、容器等设备，制造与现场组焊安装为不同施工单位时: ——表SH/T 3543－G701“压力容器产品质量证明书”、SH/T 3543－G702“产品合格证”、SH/T 3543－G703“产品技术特性”、SH/T 3543－G709“产品焊接试板力学和弯曲性能检验报告”应由制造单位填写；——SH/T 3543－G704“产品主要受压元件使用材料一览表（含焊接材料）”，现场组焊施工单位可只填写焊接材料；——现场组焊质量检查、无损检测、试验等记录报告可移交设备制造单位，并由设备制造单位汇总，编入设备质量证明文件。
分段制造现场组对安装的塔、容器等设备，制造和现场组焊安装为同一施工单位或分片到货，全部现场焊接的压力容器，施工单位应按本附录所列表格填写施工过程质量控制记录，按SH/T3503 所列格式填写无损检测报告。
临床实验报告英文
Title: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a New Antihypertensive Drug in Patients with Essential HypertensionIntroduction:Hypertension, also known as high blood pressure, is a common chronic condition affecting millions of people worldwide. It is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new antihypertensive drug, Drug X, in patients with essential hypertension.Materials and Methods:Study Design:This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. The study duration was 12 weeks.Participants:A total of 200 patients with essential hypertension were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows:1. Age between 18 and 70 years2. Diagnosed with essential hypertension according to the American Heart Association guidelines3. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 m mHg at baseline4. Willingness to comply with the study protocolExclusion Criteria:1. Patients with secondary hypertension or other cardiovascular diseases2. Patients with a history of allergic reactions to the study drug orits active ingredients3. Patients on concurrent antihypertensive medications4. Patients with severe liver or kidney dysfunction5. Pregnant or lactating womenRandomization and Blinding:Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the Drug X group and the placebo group. The randomization process was performed using a computer-generated randomization list. Both the participants and the investigators were blinded to the treatment allocation.Interventions:The participants in the Drug X group received Drug X at a dose of 10 mg once daily, while the participants in the placebo group received a matching placebo. All participants continued their baseline antihypertensive therapy throughout the study.Outcome Measures:The primary outcome measure was the change in SBP and DBP from baseline to the end of the study. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of participants achieving blood pressure control (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg), the incidence of adverse events, and the changes in laboratory parameters.Data Analysis:The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages. The primary and secondary outcome measures were compared between the two groups using the independent t-test or chi-square test, as appropriate. The safety analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, and adverse events were categorized based on the World Health Organization's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).Results:Of the 200 enrolled participants, 191 completed the study. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. At the end of the study, the mean change in SBP from baseline was -15.2 mmHg in the Drug Xgroup and -8.5 mmHg in the placebo group (p < 0.001). The mean change in DBP from baseline was -9.8 mmHg in the Drug X group and -5.2 mmHg in the placebo group (p < 0.001). The proportion of participants achieving blood pressure control was 78% in the Drug X group and 38% in the placebo group (p < 0.001).The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups, with the most common being dizziness, headache, and nausea. All adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and resolved without any intervention.Conclusion:The results of this clinical trial demonstrate that Drug X is an effective and safe antihypertensive agent in patients with essential hypertension. The drug significantly reduced SBP and DBP, leading to a higher proportion of participants achieving blood pressure control. The adverse event profile was favorable, with no significant differences between the Drug X group and the placebo group.Recommendations:Based on the findings of this study, Drug X can be considered as a potential treatment option for patients with essential hypertension. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the drug in a larger population.Authors' Contributions:- Author 1: Conceived and designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript.- Author 2: Contributed to the study design, analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript.- Author 3: Provided statistical analysis and reviewed the manuscript.Conflict of Interest:The authors declare no conflicts of interest.Funding:This study was funded by [Funding Source Name].Ethical Approval:The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board [IRB Name] and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.Acknowledgments:We thank the participants for their contribution to this study.References:- [List of references]。
压力爆破实验报告
Brazing material
材料厚度(mm)
Material thickness
生产厂家
Supplier
高度(mm)
Height
宽度(mm)
Width
厚度(mm)
Thickness
接样日期
Reception date
完成日期
Finish date
Test proposal
测试目的
Sample description
内漏Internal Leakage
外漏External Leakage
端板与首片板片之间Between frontcover plate and first plate
底板与末片板片之间Between backcover plate and last plate
其他Others
注: Q1、Q2、H1、H2及Q3、Q4、H3、H4分别为同一侧接管
4.委托检验结果仅对所检验样品有效。
Inspectionresultonly bears responsibility for the received samplein case of commissioned inspection.
样品型号
Sample model
申请单编号
Application NO.
内漏Internal Leakage
外漏External Leakage
端板与首片板片之间Between front cover plate and first plate
底板与末片板片之间Between back cover plate and last plate
其他Others
辅侧泄漏位置
Metal Compression Test 实验报告 英语 金属压力测试
Metal Compression Test1.The purpose.①Measure the yield limit of low carbon steel and the ultimatestrength of cast-iron.②Observe the phenomena when the samples are compressed tobroken or deformed. And compare the properties of these two kinds of materials.2.The equipments and the instruments.Universal material testing machine, slide caliper rule.3.Samples.The samples for both two materials are short cylindrical with h(height) and d(diameter) satisfy 1<h/d<3.4.The theory.For low carbon steel, the yield limit load P s is the minimum value in the yield stageFor cast-iron, when the load comes to ultimate load P b, the sample will be broken.5.The procedure.Measure the size of samples.Use slide caliper rule to measure d o(diameter) and h(height).Calculate original sectional area A o.A o=πd o²/4Install samples.Set up parameter.Do the experiment.Do the test about low carbon steel first, get P s.When comes to the test about cast-iron, stop the test byhand, and then get the ultimate strength P b.End the experiment.6.Final data processing.All the data have three significant figures.The mechanical properties of low carbon steel:yield limit σs=P s/A o=0.295GPaThe mechanical properties of cast-iron:ultimate strength σb=P b/A o=0.603GPa A o=πd o²/4. Questions:1.The specimens satisfy 1<h/d<3. If h is bigger than 3d, thespecimen will bend and if h<d we will not observe the yield phenomenon clearly.2.For low carbon steel, when start the tensile test, with the stressincreasing the deformation is bigger and bigger. When the stress comes to the ultimate strength, it begins to decrease and the deformation increases. Then the specimen fractured. When compress the low carbon steel, the deformation increases with thestress increases with no fracture.For cast iron, when start the tensile test, the deformation increases with the stress increase at first. However when the force comes to the ultimate strength, the specimen fractures, and the stress comes to 0 immediately. When do the compress test, the performance of cast iron is the same with low carbon steel at first, however when the stress comes to its ultimate strength, it ruptured.3.The ruptured cast iron indicates that for cast iron the capacity ofstress is better than shear.4.According to the compression theory, it is the biggest shear forceon the 45°oblique section that makes the specimen fractured.Thus the radius of the middle of this specimen is bigger than other part, hence, we get a ruptured cast iron specimen with this special shape.5.For low carbon steel the yield stress of the compression test isbigger than the one in tensile test.。
压力管道水压试验报告范文
压力管道水压试验报告范文Pressure Piping Water Test Report.Test Information.Project Name: [Enter Project Name]Location: [Enter Location]Test Date: [Enter Test Date]Witness: [Enter Witness Name]Test Pressure: [Enter Test Pressure]Test Duration: [Enter Test Duration]Scope of Test.This test was conducted to verify the integrity of thepressure piping system and its components. The test included all piping, valves, fittings, and other components within the system.Test Procedure.The test was conducted in accordance with the following standards:ASME B31.1, Power Piping.ANSI/AWWA C600, Installation of Ductile-Iron Water Mains and Their Appurtenances.The test procedure involved the following steps:1. The system was isolated from all sources of water.2. The test pressure was applied to the system using a calibrated hydraulic pump.3. The system was held at the test pressure for thespecified duration.4. The system was inspected for leaks and other signs of failure.Test Results.The system held the test pressure for the entire duration of the test without any signs of failure. No leaks or other indications of system damage were observed.Conclusions.Based on the test results, it is concluded that the pressure piping system is capable of withstanding the specified test pressure. The system is therefore considered to be fit for service.Recommendations.No recommendations are required at this time.Attachments.Test data sheets.Inspection reports.中文回答：压力管道水压试验报告。
压力试验风险评估报告模板
压力试验风险评估报告模板压力试验风险评估报告模板如下：一、项目介绍该报告对进行压力试验项目进行全面风险评估，旨在识别和评估项目中可能出现的风险，并提供相关建议和措施以减少或应对这些风险。
二、风险识别在项目进行的各个环节，我们对可能存在的风险进行了全面的识别，并对其进行了分类和评估。
以下是我们所识别的风险：1. 设备故障：由于设备老化或不当维护，可能导致设备故障，影响压力试验的进行。
2. 人员误操作：由于人员疏忽或不当操作，可能导致压力试验中的人身伤害或设备损坏。
3. 环境因素：可能受到气候因素、场地条件等的影响，如恶劣的天气导致试验无法进行。
4. 材料不符合标准：使用不符合标准的材料进行压力试验，可能导致试验结果不准确或出现安全隐患。
5. 试验数据丢失或篡改：试验数据的丢失或篡改可能影响结果判定的准确性和项目的整体可信度。
三、风险评估1. 设备故障：根据设备的维护情况和老化程度，以及维护记录的完善程度对该风险进行评估。
建议定期对设备进行检查维护，并及时更换老化严重的设备，以降低该风险的发生概率。
2. 人员误操作：建议对操作人员进行培训和考核，提高其操作技能和安全意识。
同时，可以通过引入自动化系统或设置安全措施来减少人员误操作的可能性。
3. 环境因素：根据实际场地条件，选择合适的压力试验时间和地点，以减少天气等环境因素对试验的影响。
如有需要，可以建立临时遮阳、避雨设施等来保证试验能够正常进行。
4. 材料不符合标准：建议对所使用的材料进行严格的检验和测试，确保其符合相关标准。
同时，与供应商建立稳定的合作关系，定期检查供应商的生产质量，以确保材料的可靠性。
5. 试验数据丢失或篡改：建议建立起完善的数据管理系统，包括备份数据、防止数据丢失、记录数据来源等，以确保试验数据的完整性和可信度。
同时，严禁任何形式的数据篡改行为，建立相关的制度和惩罚措施。
四、风险控制措施根据风险评估结果，我们提出以下风险控制措施：1. 设备故障：定期对设备进行维护检查，及时更换老化严重的设备，建立备用设备以应对突发故障。
中英文版ISTA 1A
个别已包装产品的性能试验150磅（68千克）或小于150磅（68千克）ISTA 1系列完整性试验程序前言有三部分：概况、测试和报告z概况：提供走进试验室前所需的常识；z测试：给出在实验室做试验的特定指示；z报告：说明为了向ISTA提交试验报告而应记录的数据。
“ISTA试验程序”和“试验项目”是全世界已包装产品性能试验的主要指数。
在ISTA试验程序中给出了两个体系的度量衡。
它们是英制（英寸-磅）和国际单位制（米制/公制）。
‘英寸-磅’单位作为首选单位，而‘米制/公制’单位紧随其后的圆括号内，除了单位需分开显示的某些表中外。
z两种单位制中的任一种单位制均可作为度量单位（标准单位），但z在整个试验程序中应使用一致的标准单位；z单位被换算为两个重要的数字；z不是精确的等值；小心：在进行一项试验前，应阅读并理解整个文件。
概况“试验程序1A”是个别已包装产品的一个完整性试验。
z可用于评估一个已包装产品的性能；z可用于比较包装和产品设计的相对性能；z包装和产品被同时考虑，而不是分开考虑；z可以不包括某些运输条件，如潮湿、压力或者异常搬运。
其它的“ISTA程序”可适用于不同的条件或者满足不同的目标要求。
特别建议：z用随机振动代替固定的位移振动；采用“ISTA完整性试验程序1G”，而非“1A”。
z更详细信息，请参考“选择和使用ISTA项目与程序指南”。
ISTA 1系列试验是由完整性试验程序组成的基本试验。
z这些试验不是实际运输危险因素的模拟试验；z不必要遵守承运人的包装规定。
当被正确应用时，ISTA程序将带来实际利益：z减少损坏；z经济上平衡成本；z改进客户满意度；©2000国际安全运输协会版权所有 1A版本日期：1999年6月；修订日期：2000年7月第1/11页范围“试验程序1A”涵盖重量为150磅（68千克）或者小于150磅（68千克）的个别已包装产品的测试（当准备装运时）。
除外：在可见滑板或者货盘上的且重量超过100磅（45千克）的个别已包装产品可以根据“试验程序1E或者3E”进行测试。
压力测试报告
压力测试报告Pressure Test ReportManufacturer制造商 Record No. 记录编号Order No. 订单号Material Code物料代码Drawing-No.图号Rev.版本Product Name 产品名称Cast Oven No.炉号Pressure Test Standard压力测试标准Test Medium 测试介质Minimum Test Pressure最低测试压力Minimum Test Lasting Time最低测试持续时间□ A：Water/水□ B：Air/空气□ C：Oil/油□ D：Other/其它：□ A：bar/公斤□ B：MPa/兆帕□ C：Other/其它：Value/数值：□ A：Hour/小时□ B：Min/分钟□ C：Other/其它：Value/数值：Actual Test Data实测数据Test Date 测试日期Test Medium测试介质Test Start Time测试开始时间Test Finish Time测试结束时间Lasting Time持续时间Notice注意During the test，the minimum actual pressure shall be higher than the requested pressure and there shall be no any kind of leakage since the test start time (Including the leakage caused by testfixture),For no air pressure test ,the air shall be discharged out from the medium first.测试期间，实测压力波动的最小值必须大于规定压力，测试持续时间内，从“测试开始时间”起，应无任何形式的泄漏（包括工装引起的泄漏），对于非空气介质的测试，应将介质内的空气排出。
压力试验程序-英中对照译文
PRESSURE TEST PROCEDURE压力试验程序Prepared by:编制:Reviewed by:审核:Approved by:批准：Table of Contents目录1. Scope of Application1 适用范围2. Applicable Standards and Codes2 应用标准和规范3. Preparation before Pressure Testing3 试压前准备4. Water-containing Testing4 盛水试验5. Hydraucli Testing5 液压试验6 Gas Pressure Testing6 气压试验7. Gastightness Testing (Leakage Testing)7 气密性试验（泄露试验）8. Safety and Acceptance8 安全与验收1. Scope of Application1 适用范围This Procedure is applicable to fabrication of six atmospheric pressure vessels under Zhuhai LNG Project.本程序适用于珠海LNG 6台常温容器建造项目。
2. Applicable Standards and Codes2 应用标准和规范TSG0004-2009 “Regulations for Supervision on Safety Technology for Stationary Pressure Vessel”TSG0004-2009 固定式压力容器安全技术监察规范NB/T47003.1-2009 Steel Welded Atmospheric Pressure VesselNB/T47003.1-2009 钢制焊接常压容器GB150－1998 “Steel Pressure V essel”GB150－1998 钢制压力容器3. Preparation before Pressure Testing3 试压前准备3.1 The pressure testing for vessel shall be carried out after the vessel has been manufactured and confirmed as qualified through inspection and the assembly of vessel comes to the step of pressure testing and before the vessel is coated.3.1 容器的压力试验。
压力试验报告(中英文版)
检查时间
Inspection
由(时分)至(时分)
Fromp.m top.m
压力降
Pressure drop
试验检查结果:
Test result
1.试验压力MPa，保压分钟，压力表压降。
Test pressure:Mpa, pressure maintaining:min,Pressure drop。
According to GB 150-2011 Testing Requirements for Pressure Vessel, the air test pressure is 1.15 times of operating pressure.
压力表编号：
Pressure gauge No.
压力表精度
压力试验报告
Pressure Test Report
编号NO：
工程名称：
Project
设备编号
Equipment No
设备名称：
Equipment
试验类型：
Type of test
试验标准
Testing standard
按照GB150-2011《压力容器试验要求》标准执行，空气压力试验为容器运行压力的1.15倍，水压试验为运行压力的1.5倍。
试验
test
班组
Team
质检部
QC Dept.
审批
Approved by
日期：
Precision
系统设计压力
Design pressure
试验
过程
Test
升压时间
Pressure build-up
由(时分)至(时分)
测试中心性能试验测试中英文对照
1 高温试验
Dry heat test
IEC 60068-2-2
2 低温试验
Cold test
气候影响 (Tests of climatic influences)
3 交变湿热试验 Damp heat cyclic test
IEC 60068-2-1 IEC 60068-2-30
4 阳光辐射试验 Solar radiation test
16
Magnetic induction of 外部工频磁场 external origin 0.5mt
IEC 62053-21
17 附件工作
Operation of accessories IEC 62053-21
封装在表壳内的间断通断的如多费率计度器的电 磁铁、通讯模块等的工作对仪表误差的影响。
要点
以0.2J±0.02J的动能作用于仪表表盖的外表面 及端子上，如果仪表的外壳和端子盖没有出现影 响仪表功能及可能触及带电部件的损伤，表示合 格 仪表在非工作状态下，无包装，半正弦脉冲；峰 值加速度为300m/s2，脉冲周期18ms，试验后仪 表无损伤或信息改变并能按相应标准的要求正确 地工作。 频率范围10HZ-15HZ
实验电压:4kV
频率范围[80MHZ-2GHZ]
频率范围[150kHZ-80MHZ]
参比电压加到仪表接线端后，5s内仪表应达到全 部工作状态 在规定的起动电流条件下，仪表应能起动并连续 计量。
4 潜动试验
Test of no load condition IEC 62053-21
当施加电压而电流线路无电流时，仪表的测试输 出不应产生多于一个脉冲。 试验时，电流线路应开路，电压线路所加电压为 参比电压115%，最短时间按公式计算。
泵试验报告中英文版water pump test report
试验点记录Test data record
位号Tag No.
名称Item
数量Quantity
泵型Type
级数stage
试验条件Test Condition
介质Pump liquid: water
试验台型式Type of test platform: open
相对密度Relative density: 1.0g/m3
额定工况下振动Max. vibration level at rated flow
X（mm/s）
Y（mm/s）
Z（mm/s）
tested
specified
tested
specified
tested
specified
驱动端Drive end
＜3.0
＜3.0
＜3.0
非驱动端Non-drive end
＜3.0
动平衡
Dynamic Balance
水压试验
Hydro Test
试验标准
Test standard
试验地点
Test place
见证者
Witness by
林德Linde
Su Miaoyin
试验时间
Date
供货商Supplier
试验描述：/Test summary :
试验结果/Test result
完全同意Accept without
壳体密封环Wear ring impeller
机械密封Mechseal
轴向力平衡Balancing device
驱动器Drive
辅助
设备
Accessories
底座Base plate
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
系统设计压力
Design pressure
试验
过程
Test
升压时间
Pressure build-up
由(时分)至(时分)
Fromp.m top.m
试验压力
Test pressure
保持压力时间
Pressure maintaining
由(时分)至(时分)
Fromp.m top.m
试验压力
Test pressure
检查时间
Inspection
由(时分)至(时分)
Fromp.m top.m
压力降
Pressure drop
试验检查结果:
Test result
1.试验压力MPa，保压分钟，压力表压降。
Test pressure:Mpa, pressure maintaining:min,Pressure drop。
试验
test
班组
Team
质检部
QC Dept.
审批
Approved by
日期：
2.压力降至设计压力MPa，检查无泄漏，稳压分钟，压力表不降压。
Pressure drops to design pressure:Mpa, no leak, pressure stabilizesminandቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱno pressure drops from pressure gauge.
结论：
Conclusion:
According to GB 150-2011 Testing Requirements for Pressure Vessel, the air test pressure is 1.15 times of operating pressure.
压力表编号：
Pressure gauge No.
压力表精度
压力试验报告
Pressure Test Report
编号NO：
工程名称：
Project
设备编号
Equipment No
设备名称：
Equipment
试验类型：
Type of test
试验标准
Testing standard
按照GB 150-2011《压力容器试验要求》标准执行，空气压力试验为容器运行压力的1.15倍，水压试验为运行压力的1.5倍。