回复审稿意见,模板
逐条回复审稿意见模板
逐条回复审稿意见模板审稿意见一:引言部分需要更加明确和简洁谢谢您的建议。
引言部分确实需要更加明确和简洁,以便让读者更好地理解本文的目的和背景。
我们将对其进行修改,使其更加精炼和聚焦。
审稿意见二:数据部分存在一些错误和遗漏非常感谢您的反馈。
我们将会仔细检查数据部分,并纠正任何错误或遗漏。
为了确保数据的准确性和完整性,我们将进行必要的修改和补充。
审稿意见三:分析方法需要更加详细地描述您的建议非常中肯。
在分析方法部分,我们将增加更多细节和解释,以便读者更好地理解我们所采用的方法和逻辑。
这将有助于增强本文的可信度和可重复性。
审稿意见四:结论部分需要更加深入和具体您的意见很有价值。
结论部分确实需要更加深入和具体,以便更好地总结本文的主要发现和贡献。
我们将对其进行扩展和深化,以提供更加详细和有意义的结论。
审稿意见五:参考文献部分需要更新和补充感谢您的建议。
参考文献部分确实需要更新和补充,以便更好地反映该领域的最新进展和研究成果。
我们将对其进行审查和更新,以确保其完整性和时效性。
审稿意见六:图表和插图需要改进和优化您的意见很有指导意义。
图表和插图的质量对于增强文章的可读性和可视化效果非常重要。
我们将对其进行改进和优化,以提高其清晰度和可理解性。
审稿意见七:语言表达和语法需要更加准确非常感谢您的反馈。
语言表达和语法对于保持文章的一致性和流畅性至关重要。
我们将对其进行审查和修正,以确保其准确性和专业性。
审稿意见八:结构安排需要更加合理和有序您的建议非常有建设性。
结构安排对于文章的逻辑性和可读性具有重要影响。
我们将仔细审视文章的结构,并进行必要的调整和优化,以便使其更加合理和有序。
审稿意见九:小标题和段落划分需要更加清晰您的反馈很有价值。
小标题和段落划分可以使文章更加易于阅读和理解。
我们将仔细审查文章的小标题和段落划分,并进行必要的修改和完善,以提高其清晰度和易读性。
审稿意见十:格式排版需要更加规范和专业感谢您的宝贵意见。
回复审稿人意见模板
Dear Editor and Reviewers:On behalf of my co-authors, we are very grateful to you for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript. we appreciate you very much for your positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Thermal Process and Mechanism of Phase Transition and Detoxification of Glass-ceramics from Asbestos Tailings” (ID: NOC-D-18-01200).We have studied reviewers’ comments carefully and tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. The following are the responses and revisions I have made in response to the reviewers' questions and suggestions on an item-by-item basis. Thanks again to the hard work of the editor and reviewer!Response to the comments of Reviewer #1Comment No. 1: Page number should be included in the manuscript.Response:Thanks to Reviewer for reminder, we added the page number to the manuscript.Comment No. 2: Is it differential thermal analysis or differential scanning calorimetry? (Abstract)Response: The crystallization and phase change of the samples were investigated by thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC), and the results were shown in figure 2.Comment No. 3: Please clarify: "Asbestos tailings are tailings produced during the mining and beneficiation of chrysotile (fibrid asbestos)" Given the fact that chrysotile is carcinogenic please include in the Introduction part some aspects about health regulations/concerns to take care during synthesis of chrysotile containing materials. For instance, which is the safety/allowed threshold for chrysotile content in building materials? (Introduction)Response: It is really true as Reviewer mentioned that due to the hazards of chrysotile, the use of chrysotile containing materials have been banned completely in many countries, and for the recycling of chrysotile containing materials, there are some legal restrictions which I have added to the section of Introduction. There are some safety hazards in the synthesis and use of asbestos-containing materials inevitably, however this concern doesn't exist in our experiment, because the samples prepared in the experiment are completely free of asbestos, which is explained in the response to Reviewer#2 below.Comment No. 4: Magnification within 1000-500 range included in the experimental part, but x5000 magnification is met in Figs 6. (Experimental characterization) Response: We are very sorry for our negligence of mistakenly writing the magnification range as 500-1000 in the experimental characterization, actually the magnification range is 500-5000.Response to the comments of Reviewer #2Comment No. 1: Manuscript deals with transformation of unhealthy chrysotile (serpentine) into forsterite and /or enstatite-containing materials for decorative building purposes. However, chrysotile content of the obtained materials should be thoroughly controlled.Response: Thank you for your valuable comment, it is definitely a critical issue that chrysotile content of the obtained materials (glass-ceramics) should be thoroughly controlled. Actually, the chrysotile in serpentine starts at 600℃ and completely removes hydroxyl at 700℃ resulting the decomposition of original minerals and the disintegration of structure, and form harmless substances including amorphous silica and forsterite. So in the experiment, the fiber structure chrysotile can be completely destroyed after pre-firing at 700℃. Furthermore, in the thermal treatment of crystallization and sintering at higher temperatures, the residue that has not been completely decomposed can be further decomposed and totally converted into harmless phases including forsterite, enstatite, etc. by solid phase reaction and solid-liquid reaction. Ultimately, the product was entirely asbestos-free and which can be seen from the morphology of the samples in figure 6.Response to the comments of Reviewer #3Comment No. 1: Give some reference for the chemical content of Asbestos tailings for the benefit of the reader. (Introduction)Response: As Reviewer suggested that it is indeed better to give some reference for the chemical content of Asbestos tailings. Two reference (reference 2 and reference 3) were added to confirm the chemical content and phase composition of asbestos tailings. Comment No. 2: How do you distinguish between the main crystal phase and the subcrystalline phase?Response: we are sorry that we may have not expressed it clearly, the word “subcrystalline” used in my manuscript may be not accurate. I think it would be suitable to change it to the word “minor”. The content of different crystal phases in the sample were determined by rietveld refinement using GSAS, and the results are shown below (with the weight fraction of forsterite being 39.44%, enstatite 24.92%, diopside 21.18% and magnesioferrite14.45% respectively). According to the result, it can be seen that the main crystal phases are forsterite and enstatite, and the minor phases are diopside and magnesioferrite.Fig 1. Rietveld refinement of the sample crystallized at 850℃ and sintered at 1200℃Comment No. 3: English has to be immproved.Response : Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we will take great effort to modify the sentence to make it more professional. The portion of language modification are marked in green in the revised manuscript, and I hope it can meet with requirement. 10203040506070802 ( )R e l a t i v e i n t e n s i t y (a .u .) × ① ② ③ ④ CalcObsDiff ① ② ③ ④Forsterite 39.44%Enstatite 24.92% Diopside 21.18%Magnesioferrite 14.45%。
sci回复审稿人意见模板
sci回复审稿人意见模板在科学研究中,稿件被审稿人退回需要进行修改,这时需要给审稿人回复并说明哪些地方进行了修改。
下面是SCI回复审稿人意见模板,供广大科研人员参考。
Dear Reviewer [审稿人的姓名],Thank you for your detailed and constructive comments on our manuscript entitled [文章标题]. We appreciate the time and effort you have put into reviewing our manuscript. We have carefully considered your comments, and have made the following revisions to the manuscript:[在此处列出对于审稿人提出的每个问题的修改意见及回复。
每个修改都应标注修改位置,例如:“Modified sentence in the second paragraph of the Introduction (line 14-15) to read a s follows:”(在引言部分第二段(第14-15行)更改句子如下:)]Once again, we would like to express our gratitude to you for your invaluable feedback and constructive comments, which have contributed significantly to the improvement of our manuscript. Wehope that the revised version of our manuscript meets with your approval.Sincerely yours,[你的名字]。
sci审稿人回复模板
sci审稿人回复模板尊敬的作者,感谢您将您的研究成果提交到我们的期刊。
我们认真评审了您的论文,并收到了两位匿名审稿人的审稿意见。
根据审稿人的意见,我们对您的论文做出了如下的回复和修改建议。
审稿人1认为您的研究具有一定的创新性和重要性,但同时也提出了一些需要改进的方面。
首先,审稿人1认为您的理论基础不够扎实,建议您在文献综述部分增加一些相关研究的引用,并进一步探讨和分析这些研究的结果。
此外,审稿人1还建议您在方法部分更加详细地描述您的实验设计,以便其他研究人员可以重复您的实验并验证您的结果。
最后,审稿人1提出了一些对实验结果的质疑,并认为您的数据分析方法可以进一步改进,以提高结果的可靠性和可重复性。
审稿人2对您的研究方法和结果表示了肯定,但也提出了一些需要改进的意见。
首先,审稿人2认为您的论文在讨论和结论部分的解释和推论过于主观,建议您进一步分析和解释实验结果,以便读者能够更好地理解您的研究成果。
此外,审稿人2还指出您的论文在语言表达和逻辑结构上存在一些问题,建议您重新组织论文结构,并在写作上进行一些修正和改进。
基于以上审稿人的意见,我们建议您对您的论文进行如下的修改和完善:1. 在文献综述部分增加一些相关研究的引用,并进一步讨论和分析这些研究的结果,以加强您的理论基础和研究创新性的论述。
2. 在方法部分更加详细地描述您的实验设计,包括实验步骤、材料和设备的详细信息,以便其他研究人员可以重复您的实验并验证您的结果。
3. 对于审稿人1对实验结果的质疑,您可以重新进行数据分析,采用更加可靠和精确的方法,以提高结果的可信度和可重复性。
4. 在讨论和结论部分,您可以进一步分析和解释实验结果,阐述您的研究成果对该领域的贡献,以及未来的研究方向和潜在的应用价值。
5. 在论文的写作上,您需要重新组织论文结构,提高语言表达的准确性和逻辑结构的清晰性。
您可以寻求专业的语言编辑服务来帮助您修正和改进论文的写作。
希望以上修改建议对您有所帮助。
中文审稿人意见模板 -回复
中文审稿人意见模板-回复
[中文审稿意见模板],以中括号内的内容为主题,写一篇1500-2000字的文章,逐步回答以下问题:
1. 您在文章中提出的主题或问题是什么?
2. 您的文章中引用的相关研究或数据是否准确并可靠?
3. 您的论证是否清晰、有条理?
4. 文章的结构是否合理、有序?
5. 您的语法、拼写和标点符号是否正确?
6. 您的文体是否得当,适合您的目标读者?
7. 您的观点和论据是否充分、有说服力?
8. 文中是否存在模糊或不明确之处?
9. 是否有需要进一步发展或探索的方向?
10. 是否有其他需要注意或改进的方面?
11. 总体而言,您的文章是否具有足够的质量和准确性,对读者有价值?
12. 是否愿意继续审稿或提供进一步的意见?
请根据上述问题回答每个问题,并将回答整理成一篇文稿。
(完整word版)回复审稿人意见模板
(完整word版)回复审稿人意见模板如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见(精典语句整理)如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见1.所有问题必须逐条回答。
2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。
3.满足不了的也不要回避,说明不能做的合理理由。
4.审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用,并讨论透彻。
1.最重要的是逐条回答,即使你答不了,也要老实交代;不要太狡猾,以至于耽误事;2. 绝大部分实验是不要真追加的,除非你受到启发,而想改投另外高档杂志----因为你既然已经写成文章,从逻辑上肯定是一个完整的“story” 了。
以上指国际杂志修稿。
国内杂志太多,以至于稿源吃紧,基本没有退稿,所以你怎么修都是接受。
我的文章水平都不高,主要是没有明显的创新性,也很苦恼。
但是除了开始几篇投在国内杂志外,其他都在国际杂志(也都是SCI)发表。
以我了解的情况,我单位其他同志给国内杂志投稿,退稿的极少,只有一次被《科学进展》拒绝。
究其原因,除了我上面说的,另外可能是我单位写稿子还是比较严肃,导师把关也比较严的缘故。
自我感觉总结(不一定对):1)国内杂志审稿极慢(少数除外),但现在也有加快趋势;3)国内杂志要求修改的稿子,如果你自己不修,他最后也给你发;2)....引用审稿人推荐的文献的确是很重要的,要想办法和自己的文章有机地结合起来。
至于实验大部分都可以不用补做,关键是你要让审稿人明白你的文章的重点是什么,这个实验对你要强调的重点内容不是很必要,或者你现在所用的方法已经可以达到目的就行了。
A revised manuscript with the correction sections red marked was attached as the supplemental material and for easycheck/editing purpose.Should you have any questions, please contact us without hesitate.然后再附上Q/A,基本上嘱条回答,写的越多越好(老师语)。
sci回复审稿人意见模板
sci回复审稿人意见模板Dear [Reviewer's Name],Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript entitled [Manuscript Title]. We appreciate your valuable feedback and constructive suggestions, which have been extremely helpful in improving the quality and clarity of our work. Following your suggestions, we have made the necessary revisions, and we believe that these changes have considerably strengthened the manuscript.Below, we address each of your specific comments in detail:1. [Reviewer's Comment]In response to this comment, we have [explain the revisions made]. These changes have [justify how the revisions have addressed the concern] and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.2. [Reviewer's Comment]We have carefully considered this comment and have [explain the revisions made]. This has [describe the impact of the revisions on the manuscript] and has improved the overall flow and organization of the manuscript.3. [Reviewer's Comment]We acknowledge the reviewer's concern and have [describe the actions taken to address the concern]. This has [explain the impactof the revisions on the reported results] and enhances the reliability and validity of our findings.We sincerely appreciate your thorough and thoughtful review, which has undoubtedly enhanced the quality of this manuscript. We hope that the revisions we made have adequately addressed your concerns. If you have any further suggestions, please do not hesitate to let us know.Once again, thank you for your time and expertise in reviewing our manuscript.Best regards,[Your Name]。
mdpi回复审稿人模板
mdpi回复审稿人模板尊敬的审稿人:非常感谢您对我们论文的审稿工作,并提供了宝贵的意见和建议。
根据您的要求,我们特别为您准备了回复审稿人的模板,以便更好地回应您的意见。
首先,我们对您的审稿意见表示衷心的感谢。
您的建议对我们的研究工作具有重要的指导意义。
在此,我们将逐一回复您提出的问题和建议。
1. 关于问题一:您提到我们在方法部分的描述不够清晰。
我们对此深表歉意,并已对论文进行了修改。
我们重新组织了方法部分的内容,以更加清晰和详细的方式描述我们所采用的方法。
我们相信这样的修改能够更好地展示我们的研究方法。
2. 关于问题二:您对我们的实验结果提出了一些疑问。
我们非常感谢您的关注,并已仔细检查了我们的实验数据和结果。
经过进一步的分析,我们发现在实验过程中确实存在一些误差。
我们已经对实验进行了重新验证,并对结果进行了修正。
现在,我们的实验结果更加准确和可靠。
3. 关于问题三:您对我们的讨论部分提出了一些建议。
我们非常感谢您的建议,并已对讨论部分进行了修改。
我们重新组织了讨论的结构,并加入了更多的分析和解释,以更好地回答研究问题。
我们相信这样的修改能够使我们的讨论更加深入和有说服力。
4. 关于问题四:您对我们的引用格式提出了一些要求。
我们非常重视您的意见,并已对引用格式进行了仔细检查和修改。
我们确保所有的引用都符合学术规范,并在文中提供了正确的引用信息。
我们对此前的疏忽表示歉意,并感谢您的指正。
最后,再次感谢您对我们论文的审稿工作,并提供了宝贵的意见和建议。
我们非常重视您的意见,并已根据您的建议对论文进行了修改。
我们相信这样的修改能够使我们的论文更加完善和优秀。
如果您还有其他问题或建议,我们将非常乐意听取并进行相应的修改。
再次感谢您的辛勤工作和宝贵意见!祝好!作者。
中文回复审稿人模板范文
中文回复审稿人模板范文
[标题:中文回复审稿人模板范文]
尊敬的审稿人:
非常感谢您对我们的稿件进行了认真的审稿工作。
通过您的指导和意见,我们深感受益匪浅,并且在您的建议下,我们对稿件进行了充分的修改和改进。
首先,我们诚挚地感谢您对我们的研究题目和研究方法的肯定和认可。
您对我们的研究目标和问题的准确把握,为我们提供了非常有价值的指导。
在您的建议下,我们进一步完善了研究框架,增加了对一些关键概念的解释,使得文章更容易被读者理解和接受。
同时,我们也要对您提出的一些批评和建议表示衷心的感谢。
您对我们的实证分析提出的一些建议和质疑,帮助我们更加准确地解释和阐释研究结论。
我们在回复中详细解释了每个问题,并对我们的研究进行了补充和修正。
相信我们的回答能够使您对我们的论文更有信心。
此外,我们也注意到了您在审稿意见中提到的对于结论的进一步讨论和对现有研究的拓展。
经过我们的认真思考和研究,在回复中我们确实对这些问题进行了进一步的探讨,提出了一些建议性的观点供读者参考。
我们深信,这些观点能够对相关领域的研究和实践产生积极的指导作用。
最后,我们再次对您的悉心审稿表示由衷的感谢。
我们非常感激您能够花费宝贵的时间对我们的稿件进行评审,并为我们提供了宝贵的意见和建议。
我们承诺会认真对待您提出的意见,对文章进行进一步修改和完善,使其在学术界具有更大的影响力。
再次感谢您的辛勤工作和宝贵意见!
衷心祝好!
作者。
中文审稿意见答复信模板
中文审稿意见答复信模板英文回答:Dear Editor,。
Thank you for your thoughtful and constructive comments on our manuscript entitled "Title of Manuscript." We appreciate the time and effort you have taken to review our work, and we believe that your suggestions will help us to improve the quality of our manuscript.We have carefully considered your comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly. Below, we provide a point-by-point response to each of your comments.Comment 1: The introduction lacks sufficient background information on the topic.Response: We have added a new paragraph to the introduction that provides more background information onthe topic. We have also included references to relevant literature to support our claims.Comment 2: The methods section is not clear and concise.Response: We have revised the methods section to makeit more clear and concise. We have also added more detailto the experimental procedures and provided moreinformation about the statistical analyses that we used.Comment 3: The results section is difficult to follow.Response: We have reorganized the results section to make it more logical and easier to follow. We have also added more descriptive text to the figures and tables.Comment 4: The discussion section does not adequately address the implications of the findings.Response: We have revised the discussion section to address the implications of our findings in more detail. We have also included a new paragraph that discusses thelimitations of our study and suggests directions for future research.Comment 5: The manuscript is not well-written and contains several grammatical errors.Response: We have carefully proofread the manuscript and corrected all grammatical errors. We have also improved the overall clarity and flow of the writing.We believe that the revised manuscript is now of higher quality and more suitable for publication in your journal. We thank you again for your helpful comments and look forward to hearing from you soon.Sincerely,。
杂志三审意见范文模板
杂志三审意见范文模板示例1:尊敬的编辑:我写信是为了回应您对我提交的文章进行的三审意见。
首先,我要感谢您和您的团队在审核过程中投入的时间和精力,并提供有益的指导和建议。
以下是我的回应和对每个意见的解释:意见一:需要进一步扩展和深入探讨某些观点。
回应:我理解您的观点,确实有一些观点可以进一步加强和拓展。
我会在文章中加入更多的细节和论据,以更全面地论述我的观点。
同时,我会结合相关的案例或实例来加强我所提出的观点,并向读者提供更多有关的背景信息。
意见二:需要更精确地诠释某些术语和概念。
回应:我同意您的观点,确实有一些术语和概念需要更清晰地解释。
在我的文章中,我将重新审视那些相关的术语和概念,并确保在阐述过程中使用更简明易懂的语言。
我将通过提供定义、举例或类比等方式,使这些术语和概念更易于理解。
意见三:需要在结尾部分提供一些具体的建议或总结。
回应:感谢您的建议,我会在文章的结尾部分提供一些具体的建议或总结。
这些建议将与文章的主题密切相关,并且能够为读者提供一些实用的指导或启示。
我会确保这部分内容既有深度又有启发性,以使读者在阅读完文章后对主题有更加深入的理解。
再次感谢您和您的团队对我提交的文章进行三审。
我将根据您的指导进行修改,努力创作出更加优质和有价值的文章。
如果您对我的回应有任何进一步的意见,请随时告知。
谢谢您对我的支持和指导!此致敬礼[您的名字]示例2:标题:杂志三审意见范文模板导言:在学术发表的过程中,接受杂志的三审意见是常见的事情。
三审意见是对作者的研究成果进行分析和评价的重要环节,它对于文章最终是否能够发表具有决定性的作用。
本文将提供一个杂志三审意见范文模板,帮助作者理解和回应审稿人提出的质疑和建议。
一、回顾三审意见摘要:审稿人一:主要关注研究方法和数据分析,对文章中的样本大小和统计方法表示疑虑,并提出加入实地调查的建议。
审稿人二:对论文的结构和逻辑提出质疑,认为文章中的结论不够准确和明确。
感谢审稿人的意见模板
感谢审稿人的意见模板
尊敬的审稿人:
首先,非常感谢您为我投稿的文章提供宝贵的审稿意见。
我非常重视您的审稿结论,并将根据您的建议进行修改,使文章更加完整、严谨。
您在文章中提出的宝贵意见,使我受益良多。
您的审稿意见指出了文章的论述比较笼统,重点未能突出,希望我从研究的实际出发,更加深入地分析研究问题,不断强化文章结构。
您还建议我对文章中提出的理论模型和观点进行更严格的质疑,尽可能地提出具体的结论。
我也意识到文章忽略了某些重要细节,文中语句有些比喻,不易于被理解,且文章中少用数据支持观点。
基于此,我将对修改的内容进行系统修改,尽量减少模糊的比喻,对文中的观点进行更多的支撑,并在每一段若干句内容中插入明确的数据表。
此外,您还提出文章未及时引用某些文献理由,这无疑是一个有用的发现。
因此,我在文章中加入了之前没有考虑的文献,以此来强化论证和逻辑性。
谨此,
致敬!。
回复审稿人意见模板
回复审稿人意见模板Response: Thank you for pointing out the error in our abstract。
We have corrected it to state that we used XXX.Response to the comments of Reviewer #2Comment No。
1: The n XXX.Response: We have revised the XXX of our research objectives.Comment No。
2: The n XXX analysis of the results.Response: XXX analysis of our results and their XXX.Comment No。
3: Some of the figures are difficult to read and need to be improved.Response: We have XXX.Response to the comments of Reviewer #3Comment No。
1: The language and grammar need to be improved.Response: XXX.Comment No。
2: Some of the XXX.Response: XXX n to make it more clear and understandable.Overall。
XXX to address the reviewers' comments and ns。
and we hope that our revised manuscript will meet the standards of the journal。
Thank you again for your time and XXX.XXX (TG-DSC) method was used to XXX and phase changeof the samples。
审稿人意见回复 模板
审稿人意见回复模板
尊敬的审稿人:
非常感谢您对我们稿件的审稿意见和建议。
对于您提到的问题,我们已经进行了仔细的查看和分析,并将根据您的意见对稿件进行修正和改进。
以下是我们对您提到的具体问题的回复:
1. 问题1:请进一步解释实验方法和结果的相关细节。
回复:非常感谢您的建议,我们将对实验方法和结果进行更
详细的描述,以便读者更好地理解我们的研究。
2. 问题2:请提供更多支持您的结论的证据。
回复:非常感谢您的意见,我们将采取措施,进一步提供支
持我们结论的数据和实验证据,以加强论文的可信度。
3. 问题3:请检查论文的语法和拼写错误。
回复:感谢您指出此类问题,我们会仔细检查论文中的语法
和拼写错误,并进行必要的修正。
再次感谢您的审稿意见和建议。
我们会认真对待每一条意见,并对稿件进行修改,以改进我们的研究质量和论文内容。
谢谢您对我们稿件的关注与支持!
此致
作者名字。
回复审稿人意见模板
如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见(精典语句整理)如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见1. 所有问题必须逐条回答。
2. 尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。
3. 满足不了的也不要回避,说明不能做的合理理由4. 审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用,并讨论透彻。
以下是本人对审稿人意见的回复一例,仅供参考。
续两点经验:1. 最重要的是逐条回答,即使你答不了,也要老实交代;不要太狡猾,以至于耽误事;2. 绝大部分实验是不要真追加的,除非你受到启发,而想改投另外高档杂志---■因为你既然已经写成文章,从逻辑上肯定是一个完整的“story 了。
以上指国际杂志修稿。
国内杂志太多,以至于稿源吃紧,基本没有退稿,所以你怎么修都是接受。
我的文章水平都不高,主要是没有明显的创新性,也很苦恼。
但是除了开始几篇投在国内杂志外,其他都在国际杂志(也都是SCI)发表。
以我了解的情况,我单位其他同志给国内杂志投稿,退稿的极少,只有一次被《某某科学进展》拒绝。
究其原因,除了我上面说的,另外可能是我单位写稿子还是比较严肃,导师把关也比较严的缘故。
自我感觉总结(不一定对):1)国内杂志审稿极慢(少数除外),但现在也有加快趋势;2)国内杂志编辑人员认真负责的人不多,稿子寄去后,少则几个月,多则一年多没有任何消息;3)国内杂志要求修改的稿子,如果你自己不修,他最后也给你发;4)国外杂志要求补充实验的,我均以解释而过关,原因见少帖)。
还因为:很少杂志编辑把你的修改稿再寄给当初审稿人的,除非审稿人特别请求。
编辑不一定懂你的东西,他只是看到你认真修改,回答疑问了,也就接受了(当然高档杂志可能不是这样,我的经验只限定一般杂志(影响因子1-5)o欢迎大家批评指正。
我常用的回复格式:Dear reviewer:I am very grateful to your comme nts for the manu script. Accord ing with your advice, we ame nded the releva nt part in manu script. Some of your questi ons were an swered below.1)2)引用审稿人推荐的文献的确是很重要的,要想办法和自己的文章有机地结合起来。
审稿意见回复模板
审稿意见回复模板
您好,
非常感谢您在百忙之中对本文章做出审稿意见,我们非常重视您的反馈意见。
在接受审稿意见的基础上,我们为本篇文章做了如下改动:
(一)
相比原版,该文章将总体结构进行了调整,使其从各个角度、全面地论述了分析主题,突出了文章的主题思路。
为了体现文章的权威性,在审稿意见的基础上,我们还特别增加
了一些相关文献参考,以进一步增强本文的权威性和可信性。
在行文表达方面,文章比原版进行了更深入地改进,明确指出前言、主体内容,以及
结论的轮廓,更加一致、清楚地表述了文章的主要观点。
根据审稿的意见,本文中的专业
术语更加普遍和清晰,能更加有效地传达文章的观点,使文章的理论框架更规范化。
在改进的基础上,本文中的文献参考也做了相应的改进,以回应审稿意见,补充本文
的完整性。
最后,我们再次对您作出审稿意见表示诚挚的感谢,衷心希望通过审稿意见的持续贡献,能够使本文更加完美。
此致
敬礼
xxx。
sci审稿人回复模板
sci审稿人回复模板感谢您对我们的研究工作的关注和审稿意见。
我们已经仔细阅读了您的评论,并做出以下回复:1.首先,我们非常感谢您对我们的研究所做出的肯定和鼓励。
这对我们来说是一种巨大的动力。
2.对于您提出的关于方法的问题,我们已经认真考虑并进行了进一步的分析。
我们同意您的观点,目前我们正在重新评估并改进我们的方法。
3.关于数据分析的问题,我们确实意识到了在文章中可能存在的一些不足之处。
我们会重新进行数据分析,以更精确地支持我们的结论。
4.对于您提到的讨论部分缺乏深度的问题,我们感谢您的指出。
我们将在修订中进一步扩展和深化讨论部分,以更全面地解释我们的发现。
5.对于您对我们对比其他研究的不充分的批评,我们非常认同。
我们将在修订中增加更多的参考文献,以更全面地比较我们的研究与现有文献的联系。
6.您提到的实验设计和样本容量的问题已经引起了我们的注意。
我们将重新评估我们的实验设计,并增加样本容量以提高实验的可靠性和泛化性。
7.关于您关于讨论中对潜在机制的解释不足的批评,我们认识到了这一问题,并将在修订中增加和完善对潜在机制的解释。
8.您对我们的结果和结论的质疑提供了一个新的视角。
我们会对我们的结果进行重新分析,并考虑您的观点,以确保我们的结论更具说服力和可靠性。
9.针对您关于我们实验的外部效度的疑虑,我们会重新评估我们的实验方法,并增加更多的外部参照,以确保我们的研究结果更具泛化性。
10.对于您反馈的拼写和语法错误,我们会在修订中进行仔细的校对,以确保文章的语言表达更加正确和流畅。
11.感谢您的建议,我们确实考虑过进行进一步的控制变量。
我们将在修订中补充更详细的控制变量操作,以解决您的疑虑。
12.关于您观察到的样本偏倚,我们会在修订中详细讨论我们的样本招募过程,并考虑您的建议以改进我们的样本代表性。
13.对于您对我们的实证方法的质疑,我们会重新评估我们的数据收集和分析方法,并考虑您的建议以提高实证的可靠性和有效性。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
回复审稿意见,模板篇一:SCI 审稿意见回复范文论文题目:Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B (一种病毒)所投杂志:Life Sciences投稿结果:这次大修后又经过一次小修,被接受发表编辑信内容(注:有删节):Dear Mr. XXX,Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below.If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures.A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission.You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area.We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript.To submit a revision, go to and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Joseph J. Bahl, PhDEditorLife SciencesFormat Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style.Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1:XXXXX (略)Reviewer #2:XXXXX (略)Editors note and suggestions: (注:编辑的建议)Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注:一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B. Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC. Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of viruses. From the similarity of theserum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to bioinactivation. The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Introduction: some sentences can be made less passive. example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig 1. ... While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997). These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and animals.>>>The authors should check the entire manuscriptfor spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid)>>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX)and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)>>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion section.>>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend thewording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.>>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE.Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for errors. If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at bahl@ Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences作者回复信原稿:Dear Dr. Bahl,I’m (注:正式信函不要简写)very appreciate (注:不适合作为给编辑回信的开始,同时有语法错误)for your comments and suggestions.I (注:实际上是学生做的)have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again (注:要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作). Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection. Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices (注:用词错误)were calculated(注:用词不当). Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere (注:语法错误)measured by RT-PCR.I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and suggestions. I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE. Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth.Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: (注:可附在给编辑的回复信后)Reviewer #1:XXXXXReviewer #2:XXXXXEditors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth(注:多处语法错误).Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative(注:语法错误).The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer (注:不具体). Introduction:some sentences can be made less passive.Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English (注:语法错误,句子不通顺).The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errorsAnswer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors (注:不必道歉,按建议修改即可). I have carefully corrected them.The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in theguideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX) and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)Answer: I changed the style of references.Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.Answer: (注:作者请编辑公司帮回答)reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Answer: Thank you for your suggestions. I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2).I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements (注:一般不是延误或人为失误,不必轻易道歉,按建议修改即可). Your comments and suggestions really helpedme a lot. I have put great efforts to this review. I wish it can be satisfactory.If there’s (注:正式信函不要简写)any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact me.Thank you again for your time and patience. Look forward to hear (注:语法错误)from you.Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)建议修改稿:Dear Dr. Bahl,Thanks you very much for your comments and suggestions.As suggested, we have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection with virus B. Mortality, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic scores were determined. In addition, mRNA expression of IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were measured by RT-PCR.We have revised the manuscript, according to thecomments and suggestions of reviewers and editor, and responded, point by point to, the comments as listed below. Since the paper has been revised significantly throughout the text, we feel it is better not to highlight the amendments in the revised manuscript (正常情况最好表明修改处).The revised manuscript has been edited and proofread by a medical editing company in Hong Kong.I would like to re-submit this revised manuscript to Life Sciences, and hope it is acceptable for publication in the journal.Looking forward to hearing from you soon.With kindest regards,Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)Replies to Reviewers and EditorFirst of all, we thank both reviewers and editor for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions.Replies to Reviewer #1:Xxxxx (略)Replies to Reviewer #2:Xxxxx (略)Replies to the Editors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contmeporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of Sophoridine against Coxsackievirus B3 and its pharmacokinetics in rats” to make it more clear and read more smoothly.篇二:教你审稿意见回复信怎么写教你审稿意见回复信怎么写来源:医学论文——达晋医学编译达晋医学编译小编知道大多数的稿件在被期刊接受前需要经历至少一次修稿,作者在收到大修或小修的决定后,必须根据审稿意见修改论文,然后将修改稿重新递交给期刊,同时附上逐点回复,在返还修改稿的时候,还需要递交cover letter,这封信通常称为 response letter(回复信)或 rebuttal letter(反驳信)。