二语习得引论读书笔记chapter1-2
二语习得引论-读书笔记-chapter-1-2
一.概论Chapter 1. Introducing SLA1.Second language acquisition (SLA)2.Second language (L2)(也可能是第三四五外语) also commonly called a target language (TL)3.Basic questions:1). What exactly does the L2 learner come to know?2). How does the learner acquire this knowledge?3). Why are some learners more successful than others?4.linguistic; psychological; social.Only one (x) Combine (√)Chapter 2. Foundations of SLAⅠ. The world of second languages1.Multi-; bi-; mono- lingualism1)Multilingualism: the ability to use 2 or more languages.(bilingualism: 2 languages; multilingualism: >2)2)Monolingualism: the ability to use only one language.3)Multilingual competence (Vivian Cook, Multicompetence)Refers to: the compound state of a mind with 2 or more grammars.4)Monolingual competence (Vivian Cook, Monocompetence)Refers to: knowledge of only one language.2.People with multicompetence (a unique combination) ≠ 2 monolingualsWorld demographic shows:3.Acquisition4.The number of L1 and L2 speakers of different languages can only beestimated.1)Linguistic information is often not officially collected.2)Answers to questions seeking linguistic information may not bereliable.3) A lack of agreement on definition of terms and on criteria foridentification.Ⅱ. The nature of language learning1.L1 acquisition1). L1 acquisition was completed before you came to school and thedevelopment normally takes place without any conscious effort.2). Complex grammatical patterns continue to develop through the1) Refers to: Humans are born with an innate capacity to learnlanguage.2) Reasons:♦Children began to learn L1 at the same age and in much the same way.♦…master the basic phonological and grammatical operations in L1 at 5/ 6.♦…can understand and create novel utterances; and are not limited to repeating what they have heard; the utterances they produce are often systematically different from those of the adults around them.♦There is a cut-off age for L1 acquisition.♦L1 acquisition is not simply a facet of general intelligence.3)The natural ability, in terms of innate capacity, is that part oflanguage structure is genetically “given” to every human child.3. The role of social experience1) A necessary condition for acquisition: appropriate socialexperience (including L1 input and interaction) is2) Intentional L1 teaching to children is not necessary and may havelittle effect.3) Sources of L1 input and interaction vary for cultural and socialfactors.4) Children get adequate L1 input and interaction→sources has littleeffect on the rate and sequence of phonological and grammatical development.The regional and social varieties (sources) of the input→pronunciationⅢ. L1 vs. L2 learningⅣ. The logical problem of language learning1.Noam Chomsky:1)innate linguistic knowledge must underlie language acquisition2)Universal Grammar2.The theory of Universal Grammar:Reasons:1)Children’s knowledge of language > what could be learned from theinput.2)Constraints and principles cannot be learned.3)Universal patterns of development cannot be explained bylanguage-specific input.Children often say things that adults do not.♦Children use language in accordance with general universal rules of language though they have not developed the cognitive ability to understand these rules. Not learned from deduction or imitation.♦Patterns of children’s language development are not directly determined by the input they receive.。
二语习得读书笔记
一、Key issues in second language acquisition(二语习得的关键问题)调查SLA的框架:(1)situational factors(形势)(2)Input(输入)(3)Learner differences(学习者差异)(4)Learner processes(学习过程)(5)Linguistics output(语言输出)1.situational factors(形势)Linguistic environment:situational factors & Input根据语言环境的不同,两种类型的习得:(1)naturalistic SLA(自然二语习得)(2)Classroom SLA(课堂二语习得)2.linguistic input(语言输入)中心问题是:语言输入在多大的程度上决定了SLA的过程,是仅仅激发了学习过程,还是机构化SLA?本地话语者是其话语水平适应L2学习者,另一个问题是:这些话语调整在促进学习中起到什么作用。
3.learner differences(学习者差异)潜在影响因素:年龄,个人能力水平(aptitude)和智力(intelligence),动机(motivation)和需求(needs),个性(personality)和认知方式(cognitive style)另一种差异:学习者的L1,要保证对比分析假说(contrastive analysis hypothesis)服从实验测试(empirical test)4.Learner processes(学习过程)学习过程包含认知学习过程(cognitive Learner processes)和语言学习过程(linguistic Learner processes)认知学习过程分为三个范畴:(1)学习战略(learning strategies):内化新的L2知识(2)产生战略(production strategies):学习者利用其现存的L2知识的方式(3)交流战略(communication strategies):用于当学习者缺乏L2资源导致交流受阻时用的战略。
二语习得第二章
section one: Errors and error analysis
step1. Identifying errors step2. Describing errors step3. Expaining errors step4. Error evaluation
Identifying errors
the free variation
Variability constitutes an essential stage in the acquistion of grammatical structures.
begin acquire other verb forms but initially they use these interchaneably with the simple form start to use the forms systematically
Learners vary in their use of L2 according to: the linguistic context the situation context the psycholinguistic context
the free variation
the linguistic context
paint(future,present and past time) painted(for past time)
painted(in planned discourse) paint (in unplanned discourse) elimainate non-target forms and painted(consistently use the target language form to to refer to past time) perform the same function as native speakers
第二语言习得导论 (笔记)
第二语言习得:是指人们在获得母语的基础上习得另一种或几种语言的过程。
母语:第一语言,通常是指学习者所属种族,社团使用的语言,因而也称作“本族语”。
就语言获得的方式而言,习得是指非正式的语言获得,儿童大都是通过这种方式来获得母语的,学习是指正式的语言获得,即通过课堂教学的方式来获得第二语言。
就语言获得的心理过程而言,习得是指在下意识状态下获得的语言,而学习一般是指有意识的语言获得。
心理学者一般称前者为内隐学习,后者为外显学习。
习得是通过无意识或者下意识的方式来获得语言知识。
学习则是在有意识的状态下,通过规则学习来获得语言知识。
就语言获得的知识类型而言,通过习得方式获得的是隐性语言知识,通过学习获得的是显性语言知识,所以,学者们通常用“picking up a language”来描述习得,就像儿童那样下意识的,毫不费力的获得一种语言。
而学习,学者们认为knowing about a language,即学习一种显性语言知识,而不是language learning,即获得一种语言。
SLA的发端:20世纪60年代末。
1、在《中介语》中首次提出SLA的研究对象:学习者的语言系统(学习者在目的语学习的过程中产生的语言)。
2、把学习者的语言系统作为与其母语和目的语系统相对应的,独立的语言系统。
汉语作为SLA的研究起点:《中介语理论与外国人学习汉语的语音偏误分析》鲁健骥,1984。
乔姆斯基对“刺激——反应”模式的批判1、语言最重要的特点之一是移置型,行为主义无法表达这种特性。
2、句子结构的重要特征之一是成分结构和表层结构的不吻合性。
3、合乎语法的句子不一定有意义。
4、行为主义无法合理解释语言习得。
行为主义对语言本质的看法:1、语言是一套习惯,语言习得是此习惯的养成。
2、揭示语言行为的模式是刺激反应理论。
3、人们的话语就是对其环境或他人的语言,行为所做的一系列反应。
4、把语言行为加以强化,便形成了语言习惯。
5、语言行为则是语言习惯的总和。
SLA_二语习得重要问题总结
SLA 期末考试提纲Week 9Chapter 1 Introducing Second Language AcquisitionChapter 2 Foundations of Second Language AcquisitionPART ONE: Definition:1.Second Language Acquisition (SLA): a term that refers both to the study of individuals and groups who are learning a language subsequent to learning their first one as young children, and to the process of learning that language.2.Formal L2 learning: instructed learning that takes place in classrooms.rmal L2 learning: SLA that takes place in naturalistic contexts.4.First language/native language/mother tongue (L1): A language that is acquired naturally in early childhood, usually because it is the primary language of a child’s family. A child who grows up in a multilingual setting may have more than one “first” language.5.Second language (L2): In its general sense, this term refers to any language that is acquired after the first language has been established. In its specific sense, this term typically refers to an additional language which is learned within a context where it is societally dominant and needed for education, employment, and other basic purposes. The more specific sense contrasts with foreign language, library language, auxiliary (帮助的,辅助的) language, and language for specific purposes.6.Target language: The language that is the aim or goal of learning.7.Foreign language: A second language that is not widely used in the learners’ immediate social context, but rather one that might be used for future travel or other cross-cultural communication situations, or one that might be studied as a curricular requirement or elective in school with no immediate or necessary practical application.8.Library language: A second language that functions as a tool for further learning, especially when books and journals in a desired field of study are not commonly published in the learner’s L1.9.Auxiliary language: A second language that learners need to know for some official functions in their immediate sociopolitical setting. Or that they will need for purposes of wider communication, although their first language serves most other needs in their lives.10.Linguistic competence: The underlying knowledge that speakers/hearers have of a language. Chomsky distinguishes this from linguistic performance.11.Linguistic performance: The use of language knowledge in actual production.municative competence: A basic tenet (原则、信条、教条) of sociolinguistics defined as “what a speaker needs to know to communicate appropriately within a particular language community” (Saville-Troike 2003)13.Pragmatic competence: Knowledge that people must have in order to interpret and convey meaning within communicative situations.14.Multilingualism: The ability to use more than one language.15.Monolingualism: The ability to use only one language.16.Simultaneous multilingualism: Ability to use more than one language that were acquired during early childhood.17.Sequential multilingualism: Ability to use one or more languages that were learned after L1 had already been established.18.Innate capacity: A natural ability, usually referring to children’s natural ability to learn or acquire language.19.Child grammar: Grammar of children at different maturational levels that is systematic in terms of production and comprehension.20.Initial state: The starting point for language acquisition; it is thought to include the underlying knowledge about language structures and principles that are in learners’ heads at the very start of L1 or L2 acquisition.21.Intermediate state: It includes the maturational changes which take place in “child grammar”, and the L2 developmental sequence which is known as learner language.22.Final state: The outcome of L1 and L2 leaning, also known as the stable state of adult grammar.23.Positive transfer: Appropriate incorporation of an L1 structure or rule in L2 structure.24.Negative transfer: Inappropriate influence of an L1 structure or rule on L2 use. Also called interference.25.Poverty-of-the-stimulus: The argument that because language input to children is impoverished and they still acquire L1, there must be an innate capacity for L1 acquisition.26.Structuralism: The dominant linguistic model of the 1950s, which emphasized the description of different levels of production in speech.27.Phonology: The sound systems of different languages and the study of such systems generally.28.Syntax: The linguistic system of grammatical relationships of words within sentences, such as ordering and agreement.29.Semantics: The linguistic study of meaning.30.Lexicon: The component of language that is concerned with words and their meanings.31.Behaviorism: The most influential cognitive framework applied to language learning in the 1950s. It claims that learning is the result of habit formation.32.Audiolingual method: An approach to language teaching that emphasizes repetition and habit formation. This approach was widely practiced in much of the world until at least the 1980s.33.Transformational-Generative Grammar: The first linguistic framework with an internal focus, which revolutionized linguistic theory and had profound effect on both the study of first and second languages. Chomsky arguedeffectively that the behaviorist theory of language acquisition is wrong because it cannot explain the creative aspects of linguistic ability. Instead, humans must have some innate capacity for language.34.Principles and Parameters (model): The internally focused linguistic framework that followed Chomsky’s Transformational-Generative Grammar. It revised specifications of what constitutes innate capacity to include more abstract notions of general principles and constraints common to human language as part of a Universal Grammar.35.Minimalist program: The internally focused linguistic framework that followed Chomsky’s Principles and Parameters model.This framework adds distinctions between lexical and functional category development, as well as more emphasis on the acquisition of feature specification as a part of lexical knowledge.36.Functionalism: A linguistic framework with an external focus that dates back to the early twentieth century and has its roots in the Prague School (布拉格学派) of Eastern Europe. It emphasizes the information content of utterances and considers language primarily as a system of communication. Functionalist approaches have largely dominated European study of SLA and are widely followed elsewhere in the world.37.Neurolinguistics: The study of the location and representation of language in the brain, of interest to biologists and psychologists since the nineteenth century and one of the first fields to influence cognitive perspectives on SLA when systematic study began in 1960s.38.Critical period: The limited number of years during which normal L1 acquisition is possible.39.Critical Period Hypothesis: The claim that children have only a limited number of years during which they can acquire their L1 flawlessly; if they suffered brain damage to the language areas, brain plasticity in childhood would allow other areas of the brain to take over the language functions of the damaged areas, but beyond a certain age, normal language development would not be possible. This concept is commonly extended to SLA as well, in the claim that only children are likely to achieve native or near-native proficiency in L2.rmation processing (IP): A cognitive framework which assumes that SLA (like learning of other complex domains) proceeds from controlled to automatic processing and involves progressive reorganization of knowledge.41.Connectionism: A cognitive framework for explaining learning processes, beginning in the 1980s and becoming increasingly influential. It assumes that SLA results from increasing strength of associations between stimuli and responses.42.Variation theory: A microsocial framework applied to SLA that explores systematic differences in learner production which depend on contexts of use.43.Accommodation theory: A framework for study of SLA that is based on the notion that speakers usually unconsciously change their pronunciation and even the grammatical complexity of sentences they use to sound more like whomever they are talking to.44.Sociocultural theory (SCT): An approach established by Vygotsky which claims that interaction not only facilitates language learning but is a causative force in acquisition. Further, all of learning is seen as essentially a social process which is grounded in sociocultural settings.45.Ethnography(人种论、民族志) of communication: A framework for analysis of language and its functions that was established by Hymes(1966). It relates language use to broader social and cultural contexts, and applies ethnographic methods of data collection and interpretation to study of language acquisition and use.46.Acculturation(文化适应): Learning the culture of the L2 community and adapting to those values and behavior patterns.47.Acculturation Model/Theory: Schumann’s (1978) theory that identifies group factors such as identity and status which determine social and psychological distance between learner and target language populations. He claims these influence outcomes of SLA.48.Social psychology: A societal approach in research and theory that allows exploration of issues such as how identity, status, and values influence L2 outcomes and why. It has disciplinary ties to both psychological and social perspectives. PART TWO: Short & Long answers:Chapter 11.What are the similarities and differences between linguists, psycholinguist, sociolinguists and social psycholinguists? P3(1)Linguists emphasize the characteristics of the differences and similarities in the languages that are being learned, and thelinguistic competence (underlying knowledge) and linguistic performance (actual production) of learners at various stages of acquisition.(2)Psychologists emphasize the mental or cognitive processes involved in acquisition, and the representation of languages in the brain.(3)Sociolinguists emphasize variability in learner linguistic performance, and extend the scope of study to communicative competence(underlying knowledge that additionally accounts for language use, or pragmatic competence).(4)Social psychologists emphasize group-related phenomena, such as identity and social motivation, and the interactional and larger social contexts of learning.2.What are the differences between second language, foreign language, library language and auxiliary language? P4(1)A second language is typically an official or societally dominant language needed for education, employment, and other basic purposes. It is often acquired by minority group members or immigrants who speak another language natively. In this more restricted sense, the term is contrasted with other terms in this list.(2)A foreign language is one not widely used in the learners' immediate social context which might be used for future travel or other cross-cultural communication situations, or studied as a curricular requirement or elective in school, but with no immediate or necessary practical application.(3)A library language is one which functions primarily as a tool for future learning through reading, especially when books or journals in a desired field of study are not commonly published in the learners' native tongue.(4)An auxiliary language is one which learners need to know for some official functions in their immediate political setting, or will need for purposes of wider communication, although their first language serves most other needs in their lives.3.Why are some learners more (or less) successful than other? P5The intriguing question of why some L2 learners are more successful than others requires us to unpack the broad label “learners” for some dimensions of discussion. Linguistics may distinguish categories of learners defined by the identity and relationship of their L1 and L2; psycholinguists may make distinctions based on individual aptitude for L2 learning, personality factors, types and strength of motivation, and different learning strategies; sociolinguists may distinguish among learners with regard to social, economic, and political differences and learner experiences in negotiated interaction; and social psychologists may categorize learners according to aspects of their group identity and attitudes toward targetlanguage speakers or toward L2 learning itself.Chapter21.List at least five possible motivations for learning a second language at an older age. P10The motivation may arise from a variety of conditions, including the following:Invasion or conquest of one’s country by speakers of another language;A need or desire to contact speakers of other languages ineconomic or other specific domains;Immigration to a country where use of a language other than one's L1 is required;Adoption of religious beliefs and practices which involve use of another language;A need or desire to pursue educational experienceswhere access requires proficiency in another language;A desire for occupational or social advancement whichis furthered by knowledge of another language;An interest in knowing more about peoples of other cultures and having access to their technologies or literatures.2.What are the two main factors that influence the language learning? P13(1)The role of natural ability: Humans are born with a natural ability or innate capacity to learn language.(2)The role of social experience: Not all of L1 acquisition can be attributed to innate ability, for language-specific learning also plays a crucial role. Even if the universal properties of language are preprogrammed in children, they must learn all of those features which distinguish their L1 from all other possible human languages. Children will never acquire such language-specific knowledge unless that language is used with them and around them, and they will learn to use only the language(s) used around them, no matter what their linguistic heritage. American-born children of Korean or Greek ancestry will never learn the language of their grandparents if only English surrounds them, for instance, and they will find their ancestral language just as hard to learn as any other English speakers do if they attempt to learn it as an adult. Appropriate social experience, including L1 input and interaction, is thus a necessary condition for acquisition.3.What is the initial state of language development for L1 and L2 respectively? P17-18The initial state of L1 learning is composed solely of an innate capacity for language acquisition which may or may not continue to be available for L2, or may be available only in some limited ways. The initial state for L2 learning, on the other hand, has resources of L1 competence, world knowledge, and established skills for interaction, which can be both an asset and an impediment.4.How does intermediate states process? P18-19The cross-linguistic influence, or transfer of prior knowledge from L1 to L2, is one of the processes that is involved ininterlanguage development. Two major types of transfer which occur are: (1) positive transfer, when an L1 structure or rule is used in an L2 utterance and that use is appropriate or “correct” in the L2; and (2) negative transfer (or interference), when an L1 structure or rule is used in an L2 utterance and that use is inappropriate and considered an “error”.5.What is a necessary condition for language learning (L1 or L2)? P20Language input to the learner is absolutely necessary for either L1 or L2 learning to take place. Children additionally require interaction with other people for L1 learning to occur. It is possible for some individuals to reach a fairly high level of proficiency in L2 even if they have input only from such generally non-reciprocal sources as radio, television, or written text.6.What is a facilitating condition for language learning? P20While L1 learning by children occurs without instruction, and while the rate of L1 development is not significantly influenced by correction of immature forms or by degree of motivation to speak, both rate and ultimate level of development in L2 can be facilitated or inhabited by many social and individual factors, such as (1) feedback, including correction of L2 learners' errors; (2) aptitude, including memory capacity and analytic ability; (3) motivation, or need and desire to learn; (4) instruction, or explicit teaching in school settings.7.Give at least 2 reasons that many scientists believe in someinnate capacity for language. P21-24The notion that innate linguistic knowledge must underlie (指原则、理由构成某学说...的基础,潜在于...之下)language acquisition was prominently espoused (采纳或支持事业理念)by Noam Chomsky. This view has been supported by arguments such as the following:(1)Children’s knowledge of language goes beyond what could be learned from the input they receive: Children often hear incomplete or ungrammatical utterances along with grammatical input, and yet they are somehow able to filter the language they hear so that the ungrammatical input is not incorporated into their L1 system. Further, children are commonly recipients of simplified input from adults, which does not include data for all of the complexities which are within their linguistic competence. In addition, children hear only a finite subset of possible grammatical sentences, and yet they are able to abstract general principles and constraints which allow them to interpret and produce an infinite number of sentences which they have never heard before.(2)Constraints and principles cannot be learned: Children’s access to general constraints and principles which govern language could account for the relatively short time ittakes for the L1 grammar to emerge, and for the fact that it does so systematically and without any “wild” divergences. This could be so because innate principles lead children to organize the input they receive only in certain ways and not others. In addition to the lack of negative evidence , constraints and principles cannot be learnt in part because children acquire a first language at an age when such abstractions are beyond their comprehension; constraints and principles are thus outside the realm of learning process which are related to general intelligence.(3)Universal patterns of development cannot be explained by language-specific input: In spite of the surface differences in input, there are similar patterns in child acquisition of any language in the world. The extent of this similarity suggests that language universals are not only constructs derived from sophisticated theories and analyses by linguists, but also innate representations in every young child’s mind.8.Linguists have taken an internal and/or external focus to the study of language acquisition. What is the difference between the two? P25-26Internal focus emphasizes that children begin with an innate capacity which is biologically endowed, as well as the acquisition of feature specification as a part of lexical knowledge; while external focus emphasizes the information content of utterances, and considers language primarily as a system of communication.9.What are the two main factors for learning process in the study of SLA from a psychological perspective? P26-27(1) Information Processing, which assumes that L2 is a highly complex skill, and that learning L2 is not essentially unlike learning other highly complex skills. Processing itself is believed to cause learning;(2) Connectionism, which does not consider language learning to involve either innate knowledge or abstraction of rules and principles, but rather to result from increasing strength of associations (connections) between stimuli and responses.10.What are the two foci for the study of SLA from the social perspective? P27(1) Microsocial focus: the concerns within the microsocial focus relate to language acquisition and use in immediate social contexts of production, interpretation, and interaction. (2) Macrosocial focus: the concerns of the macrosocial focus relate language acquisition and use to broader ecological contexts, including cultural, political, and educational settings.Week10Chapter 5 Social contexts of Second Language AcquisitionPART ONE: Definitionmunicative competence: A basic tenet of sociolinguistics defined as “what a speaker needs to know to communicate appropriately within a particular language community”(Saville-Troike 2003)nguage community: A group of people who share knowledge of a common language to at least some extent.3.Foreigner talk: Speech from L1 speakers addressed to L2 learners that differs in systematic ways from language addressed to native or very fluent speakers.4.Direct Correction: Explicit statements about incorrect language use.5.Indirect correction: Implicit feedback about inappropriate language use, such as clarification requests when the listener has actually understood an utterance.6.Interaction Hypothesis: The claim that modifications and collaborative efforts which take place in social interation facilitate SLA because they contribute to the accessibility of input for mental processing.7.Symbolic mediation: A link between a person’s current mental state and higher order functions that is provided primarily by language; considered the usual route to learning (oflanguage, and of learning in general). Part of Vygosky’s Sociocultural Theory.8.Variable features: Multiple linguistic forms (vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, discourse) that are systematically or predictably used by different speakers of a language, or by the same speakers at different times, with the same meaning or function.9.Linguistic context: Elements of language form and function associated with the variable element.10.Psychological context: factors associated with the amount of attention which is being given to language form during production, the level of automaticity versus control in processing, or the intellectual demands of a particular task.11.Microsocial context: features of setting/situation and interaction which relate to communicative events within which language is being produced, interpreted, and negotiated.12.Accommodation theory: A framework for study of SLA that is based on the notion that speakers usually unconsciously change their pronunciation and even the grammatical complexity of sentences they use to sound more like whomever they are talking to .13.ZPD: Zone of Proximal Development, an area ofpotential development where the learner can only achieve that potential with assistance. Part of Vygosky’s Soci ocultural Theory.14.Scaffolding: Verbal guidance which an expert provides to help a learner perform any specific task, or the verbal collaboration of peers to perform a task which would be too difficult for any one of them in individual performance.15.Intrapersonal interaction: communication that occurs within an individual's own mind, viewed by Vygosky as a sociocultural phenomen.16.Interpersonal interaction: Communicative events and situations that occur between people.17.Social institutions:The systems which are established by law, custom, or practice to regulate and organize the life of people in public domains: e.g. politics, religion, and education.18.Acculturation: learning the culture of the L2 community and adapting to those values and behavioral patterns.19.Additive bilingualism: The result of SLA in social contexts where members of a dominant group learn the language of a minority without threat to their L1 competence or to their ethnic identity.20.Subtractive bilingualism: The result of SLA in socialcontexts where members of a minority group learn the dominant language as L2 and are more likely to experience some loss of ethnic identity and attrition of L1 skills—especially if they are children.21.Formal L2 learning: formal/instructed learning generally takes place in schools, which are social institutions that are established in accord with the needs, beliefs, values, and customs of their cultural settings.rmal L2 learning: informal/naturalistic learning generally takes place in settings where people contact—and need to interact with—speakers of another language.PART TWO: Short & Long answers1.what is the difference between monolingual and multilingual communicative competence?Differencese between monolingual and multilingual communicative competence are due in part to the different social functions of first and second language learning, and to the differences between learning language and learning culture.The differences of the competence between native speakers and nonative speakers include structural differences in the linguisitc system, different rules for usage in writing or conversation, andeven somewhat divergent meanings for the “same” lexical forms. Further, a multilingual speaker’s total communicative competence differs from that of a monolingual in including knowledge of rules for the appropriate choice of language and for switching between languages, given a particular social context and communicative purpose.2.what are the microsocial factors that affect SLA? P101-102a) L2 variation b) input and interaction c) interaction as the genesis of language3.What is the difference between linguistic & communicative competence (CC)?Linguistic competence- It was defined in 1965 by Chomsky as a speaker's underlying ability to produce grammatically correct expressions. Linguistic competence refers to knowledge of language. Theoretical linguistics primarily studies linguistic competence: knowledge of a language possessed by “an ideal speak-listener”.Communicative competence- It is a term in linguistics which refers to “what a speaker needs to know to communicate appropriately within a particular language community”, such as alanguage user's grammatical knowledge of syntax , morphology , phonology and the like, as well as social knowledge about how and when to use utterances appropriately.4.Why is CC in L1 different from L2?L1 learning for children is an integral part of their sociolization into their native language community. L2 learning may be part of second culture learning and adaptation, but the relationship of SLA to social and cultural learning differs greatly with circumstances.5.What is Accommodation Theory? How does this explain L2 variation?Accommodation theory: Speakers (usually unconsciously) change their pronunciation and even the grammatical complexity of sentences they use to sound more like whomever they are talking to. This accounts in part for why native speakers tend to simply their language when they are talking to a L2 learner who is not fluent, and why L2 learners may acquire somewhat different varieties of the target language when they have different friends.6.Discuss the importance of input & interaction for L2 learning. How could this affect the feedback provided to students?ⅰ. a) From the perspective of linguistic approaches: (1) behaviorist: they consider input to form the necessary stimuli and feedback which learners respond to and imitate; (2) Universal Grammar: they consider exposure to input a necessary trigger for activating internal mechanisms; (3) Monitor Model: consider comprehensible input not only necessary but sufficient in itself to account for SLA;b) From the perspective of psychological approaches: (1) IP framework: consider input which is attended to as essential data for all stages of language processing; (2) connectionist framework: consider the quantity or frequency of input structures to largely determine acquisitional sequencing;c) From the perspective of social approaches: interaction is generally seen as essential in providing learners with the quantity and quality of external linguistic input which is required for internal processing.ⅱ. Other types of interaction which can enhance SLA include feedback from NSs which makes NNs aware that their usage is not acceptable in some way, and which provides a model for “correctness”. While children rarely receive such negative evidence。
二语习得第一,二章笔记
Chapter 1. Introducing Second Language AcquisitionI. What id SLA?1. The definition of SLASLA, that is Second Language Acquisition. It refers both to the study of individual and groups who are learning a language subsequent to learning their first one as young children, and to the process of learning that language. The additional language is called a second language or target language.2.The scope of SLAIt includes informal L2 learning and formal L2 learning.Informal L2 learning take place in naturalistic context, formal L2 learning takes place in classrooms.3.Three basic questionsIn trying to understand the process of second language acquisition, we are seeking to answer three basic questions:(1)What exactly does the L2 learner come to know?(2)How does the learner acquire this knowledge?(3)Why are some learners more successful than others?There are probably no answers that all second language researches would agree on completely. This is because SLA is highly complex in nature, and in part because scholars studying SLA come from academic disciplines which differ greatly in theory and research methods.II. What is a second Language?A second language is typically an official or societally dominant language needed for education, employment, and other basic purposes.A foreign language is one not widely used in the learners' immediate social context which might be used for further travel or other cross-cultural communication situations, or studied as a curricular requirement or elective in school, but with no immediate or necessary practical application.A library language is one which functions primarily as a tool for further learning through reading, especially when books or journals in a desired field of study are not commonly published in the learners' native tongue.An auxiliary language is one which learners need to know for some official functions in their immediate political setting, or will need for purposes of wider communication, although their first language serves most other needs in their lives.III. What is a first language?Acquisition of more than one language during early childhood is called simultaneous multilingualism.Sequential multilingualism: learning additional languages after L1.IV. Diversity in learning and learnersWhat is learned in acquiring a second language, as well as how it islearned is often influenced by whether the situation involves informal exposure to speakers of other languages, immersion in a setting where one needs a new language to meet basic needs, or formal instruction in school, and these learning conditions are often profoundly influenced by powerful social, cultural, and economic factors affecting the status of both languages and learners.Chapter 2 Foundations of Second Language AcquisitionI. The world of second languageNot only is bilingualism worldwide, it is a phenomenon that has existed since the beginning of language in human history. It is probably true that no language group has ever existed in isolation from other language groups. There are many more bilingual or multilingual individuals in the world than there are monolingual.Multilingualism refers to the ability to use two or more languages.Monolingualism refers to the ability to use only one.Those who grow up in a multilingual environment acquire multilingual competence in the natural course of using two or more languages from childhood with the people around them, and tend to regard it as perfectly normal to do so. Adding second languages at an older age often takes considerable effort, however, and thus requires motivation. This motivation may arise from a variety of conditions, including the following:(1)invasion or conquest of one's country by speakers of another language;(2)A need or desire to contact speakers of other languages in economic or other specific domains;(3)Immigration to a country where use of a language other than one's another language;(4)Adoption of religious beliefs and practices which involve use of another language.(5)A need or desire to pursue educational experience s where access requires proficiency in another language;(6)A desire for occupational or social advancement which is furthered by knowledge of another language;(7)An interest in knowing more about peoples of other cultures and having access to their technologies or literatures.II. Reasons for uncertainty in reporting language data include some which have social and political significance, and some which merely reflect imprecise or ambiguous terminology, for example:1.Linguistic information is often not officially collected2.Answers to questions seeking linguistic information may not be reliable3.There is lack of agreement on definition of terms and on criteria for identificationIII. The nature of language learningBy the age of six months an infant has produced all of the vowel sounds and most of the consonant sounds of any language in the world.On average children have mastered most of the distinctive sounds of their first language before they are three years old, and an awareness of basic discourse patterns such as conversational turn-taking appear at aneven earlier age. Children control most of the basic L1 grammatical patterns before they are five or six, although complex grammatical patterns continue to develop through the school years.The understanding of how children accomplish the early mastery of L1has changed radically in the past fifty years or so. (1). It was suggested that first language acquisition is in larger part the result of children's natural desire to please their doting parents. (2). Others argued that children's language acquisition is purposive, that they develop language because of their urge to communicate their wants and needs to the people who take care of them. (3). The most widely held view by the middle of the twentieth century was that children learn language by imitation .IV. The role of natural abilityHumans are born with a natural ability or innate capacity to learn language. In viewing the natural ability to acquire language in terms of innate capacity, we are saying that part of language structure is genetically "given" to every human child. If a child had to consciously learn the set of abstract principles that indicate which sequences of words are possible sentences in their language as opposed to those that are not, only the smartest would learn to talk, and it would take them many more years than it actually does.V. The role of social experienceEven if the universal properties of language are preprogrammed inchildren, they must learn all of those features which distinguish their L1 from all other possible human languages. Appropriate social experience , including L1 input and interaction, is thus a necessary condition for acquisition.Sources of L1 input and interaction vary depending on cultural and social factors. Mother's talk is often assumed to be the most important source of early language input to children. The relative importance of input from other young children also varies in different cultures, as does the importance of social institutions such as nursery schools.When young children's social experience includes people around them using two or more languages, they have the same innate capacity to learn both or all of them.VI. L1 versus L2 learningThis brief comparison of L1 and L2 learning is divided into three phases. The first is the initial state, which many linguists ans psychologists believe includes the underlying knowledge about language structures and principles that is in learner's heads at the very start of L1or L2 acquisition. The second phase, the intermediate states, covers all stages of basic language development. The third phase is the final state, which is the outcome of L1and L2 learning.(1). Initial stateSome linguists and psychologists believe that the genetic predispositionwhich children have from birth to learn language remains with them throughout life, and that differences in the final outcomes of L1and L2 learning are attributable to other factors. Others believe that some aspects of the innate capacity which children have for L1 remain in force for acquisition of subsequent languages, but that some aspects of this natural ability are lost with advancing age.There is complete agreement , however, that since L2 acquisition follows L1 acquisition , a major component of the initial state for L2 learning must be prior knowledge of L1.(2).Intermediate statesThere is similarity in that the development of both L1and L2 is largely systematic, including predictable sequencing of many phenomena within each and some similarity of sequencing across languages, and in the fact that L1and L2 learners both play a creative role in their own language development and do not mimic what they have heard or been taught. ·processes·necessary conditions·facilitating conditions(3)final stateThe final state is the outcome of L1or L2 learning . The final state of L1development is native linguistic competence. While vocabulary learning and cultivation of specialized registers may continue intoadulthood,the basic phonological and grammatical systems of whatever languages children hear around them re essentially established by the age of about five or six years , along with vocabulary knowledge and interaction skills that are adequate for fulfilling communicative functions. VII. The logical problem of language learningThe "problem" as it has been formulated by linguists relates most importantly to syntactic phenomena. As noted in the preceding section, most linguists ans psychologist assume this achievement must be attributed to innate and spontaneous language-learning construct and/or process. The notion that innate linguistic knowledge must underline language acquisition. This view has been supported by arguments such as the following:1.Children's knowledge of language goes beyond what could be learned from the input they receiveThis is essentially the poverty -of- the- stimulus argument. According to this argument, children often hear incomplete or ungrammatical utterances along with grammatical input,and yet they are somehow able to filter the language they hear so that the ungrammatical input is not incorporated into their L1 system.2.Constrains and principles cannot be learnedConstrains ans principles cannot be learned in part because children acquire a first language at an age when such abstractions are beyond theircomprehension; Constrains ans principles are thus outside the realm of learning processes which are related to general intelligence.3.Universal patterns of development cannot be explained by language-specific inputThe extent of this similarity suggests that language universals are not only constructs derived from sophisticated theories and analyses by linguists, but also innate representations in every young child's mind. The logical problem of language learningFirst of all, children often say things that adults do not.Next, children use language in accordance with general universal rules of language even though they have not yet developed the cognitive ability necessary to understand these rules.Finally, patterns of children's language development are not directly determined by the input they receive.VIII. Frameworks for SLAFrameworks for study of SLATimeline linguistic psychological social195os and before structuralism behaviorism sociocultural theory 1960s TGG neurolinguistics information processing ethnography of communication variation theory1970s functionalism humanistic models acculturation theroy1980s principles and parameters model connectionism social psychology1990s minimalist program processabilityThis view is still influential in SLA approaches which are concerned with the role of input and interaction.1.linguisticThere have been two foci for the study fo SLA from a linguistic perspective since 1960:internal and external. The internal focus has been based primarily on the work of Noam Chomsky and his followers. It sets the goal of study as accounting for speakers' internalized, underlying knowledge of language rather than the description of surface forms as in earlier Structuralism. The external focus for the study of SLA has emphasized language use, including the functions of language which are realized in learners' production at different stages of development.2.PsychologicalThere have been three foci in the study of SLA from a psychological perspective: languages and the brain, learning processes and learner differences.Language and the brainThe location and representation of language in the brain has been of interest to biologists and psychologists since the nineteenth century. And the expanding field of Neurolinguistics was one of the first to influencecognitive perspectives on SLA when systematic study began in th e1960s.Learning processesThe focus on learning processes has been heavily influenced by computer-based Information Processing(IP) models of learning, which were established in cognitive psychology by the 1960s. Explanations of SLA phenomena based on this framework involve assumptions that L2 is a highly complex skill, and that learning L2 is not essentially unlike learning other highly complex skills.Learner differencesThe focus on learner differences in SLA has been most concerned with the question of why some learners are more successful than others. This framework calls for consideration of emotional involvement in learning, such as affective factors of attitude, motivation, and anxiety level.SocialThere are two foci for the study of SLA from this perspective:micro-social and macro-social.Micro-social focusThe concerns within the micro-social focus relate to language acquisition and use in immediate social contexts of production, interpretation and interaction.Macro-social focusThe concerns fo the macro-social focus relate language acquisition and use to broader ecological contexts, including cultural, political and educational settings.。
《对外汉语教育学引论》背诵梳理2.2.1.2第一语言习得和第二语言习得背诵逻辑助记口诀(2)
《对外汉语教育学引论》背诵梳理2.2.1.2第一语言习得和第二语言习得背诵逻辑助记口诀(2)今天我们来展开梳理本书中五个语言习得理论中的前两个理论:以行为主义心理学为基础的刺激—反应论;以乔姆斯基转换生成语法为基础的先天论。
获取更新版笔记可以后台回复:引论笔记。
一、刺激—反应论刺激—反应论是基于行为主义心理学的理论。
回顾行为主义心理学理论,主要论点就是否认意识,反对内省,只通过实验的方法研究人的行为。
这一派的语言习得理论深刻沿袭了对应的心理学的观点。
1.定义(1)第一语言习得理论是由斯金纳提出,他的理论提倡采用严格的科学方法对人类可以观察到的行为进行客观研究,反对研究人内部的意识思维活动。
把习得语言看做一种人类的行为,行为主义认为语言不是先天所有,而是后天习得,强调外部条件在第一语言习得中的作用。
通过刺激—反应—强化养成习惯。
儿童学话就是对环境所给予的刺激做出相应的反应,开始是对成人语言的模仿,如果模仿得比较接近,就从成人那得到奖励或赞许,这样他的反应就得到强化。
为了获得更多的奖励,儿童一次次重复就形成了语言习惯。
奥斯古德(美)根据托尔曼中介变量理论提出“中介说”。
意思就是,在外显的刺激和外显反应中间增加了因联想而引起的隐含的刺激和隐含的反应的中介因素。
(2)第二语言习得理论由拉多提出的对比分析假说。
他认为,第二语言获得也是刺激—反应—强化的过程。
由于我们已经掌握了一定的知识(例如第一语言),这个时候已经获得的知识、技能、方法对学习新知识、技能(例如第二语言)会有影响,这个影响就叫做迁移。
其中,起积极促进作用的叫做正迁移。
起阻碍作用的叫做负迁移。
根据语言谱系树理论,同一个语系甚至语族的两个语言,他们一定有很多结构、词汇相似之处。
第一语言和第二语言相似的语言成分容易学,不同成分则难学。
这一假说认为第二语言习得的主要障碍来自于第一语言(母语)的干扰。
需要通过对比两种语言的结构异同来预测第二语言习得的难点和易产生的错误,以便在教学中采用强化手段突出这些难点和重点,克服母语的干扰并建立习惯。
《二语习得引论》(第二章)翻译报告
L1speakers(in millions)L2speakers(in millions) Chinese1,20015
English427950
Spanish266350
a second or a later-acquired language,at least
portion of their formal education,than there are children educated exclusively via the first language.(1999:1)
Given the size and widespread distribution of multilingual populations,it is somewhat surprising that an overwhelming proportion of the scientific attention which has been paid to language acquisition relates only to monolingual conditions and to first language acquisition.While there are interesting similarities between L1and L2 acquisition,the processes cannot be equated,nor can multilingualism be assumed to involve simply the same knowledge and skills as monolingualism except in more than one language.This point is made most cogently by Vivian Cook,who introduced the concept of multilingual competence(his term is“multicompetence”)to refer to‘'the compound state of a mind with two【or more]grammars”(1991:112).This is distinguished from monolingual competence(or“monocompetence”in Cook’S terminology),which refers to knowledge of only one language.
二语习得引论-读书笔记-chapter-1-2
一.概论Chapter 1. Introducing SLA1.Second language acquisition (SLA)2.Second language (L2)(也可能是第三四五外语) also commonly called a target language (TL)3.Basic questions:1). What exactly does the L2 learner come to know?2). How does the learner acquire this knowledge?3). Why are some learners more successful than others?4.linguistic; psychological; social.Only one (x) Combine (√)Chapter 2. Foundations of SLAⅠ. The world of second languages1.Multi-; bi-; mono- lingualism1)Multilingualism: the ability to use 2 or more languages.(bilingualism: 2 languages; multilingualism: >2)2)Monolingualism: the ability to use only one language.3)Multilingual competence (Vivian Cook, Multicompetence)Refers to: the compound state of a mind with 2 or more grammars.4)Monolingual competence (Vivian Cook, Monocompetence)Refers to: knowledge of only one language.2.People with multicompetence (a unique combination) ≠ 2 monolingualsWorld demographic shows:3.Acquisition4.The number of L1 and L2 speakers of different languages can only beestimated.1)Linguistic information is often not officially collected.2)Answers to questions seeking linguistic information may not bereliable.3) A lack of agreement on definition of terms and on criteria foridentification.Ⅱ. The nature of language learning1.L1 acquisition1). L1 acquisition was completed before you came to school and thedevelopment normally takes place without any conscious effort.2). Complex grammatical patterns continue to develop through the1) Refers to: Humans are born with an innate capacity to learnlanguage.2) Reasons:♦Children began to learn L1 at the same age and in much the same way.♦…master the basic phonological and grammatical operations in L1 at 5/ 6.♦…can understand and create novel utterances; and are not limited to repeating what they have heard; the utterances they produce are often systematically different from those of the adults around them.♦There is a cut-off age for L1 acquisition.♦L1 acquisition is not simply a facet of general intelligence.3)The natural ability, in terms of innate capacity, is that part oflanguage structure is genetically “given” to every human child.3. The role of social experience1) A necessary condition for acquisition: appropriate socialexperience (including L1 input and interaction) is2) Intentional L1 teaching to children is not necessary and may havelittle effect.3) Sources of L1 input and interaction vary for cultural and socialfactors.4) Children get adequate L1 input and interaction→sources has littleeffect on the rate and sequence of phonological and grammatical development.The regional and social varieties (sources) of the input→pronunciationⅢ. L1 vs. L2 learningⅣ. The logical problem of language learning1.Noam Chomsky:1)innate linguistic knowledge must underlie language acquisition2)Universal Grammar2.The theory of Universal Grammar:Reasons:1)Children’s knowledge of language > what could be learned from theinput.2)Constraints and principles cannot be learned.3)Universal patterns of development cannot be explained bylanguage-specific input.Children often say things that adults do not.♦Children use language in accordance with general universal rules of language though they have not developed the cognitive ability to understand these rules. Not learned from deduction or imitation.♦Patterns of children’s language development are not directly determined by the input they receive.。
第二语言习得阅读笔记
《第二语言习得》阅读笔记:习得笔记一1 外向型的学习者善谈和善于反映有利于获得更多的输入和实践机会,但他们往往不注重语言的形式。
内向型的学习者更长于利用他们沉静的性格对输入与规则进行深入细致的分析,对语料进行对比观察,因而在注重形式与规则的教学环境下更有优势。
(评:因而对于不同性格场学员要有不同的教学策略与教学方法)2 动机和态度是决定不同学习者达到不同程度水平的主要因素。
动机可以分为情景性动机,工具性动机,社会性动机(综合性动机)(评:因而刺激并加强学习者学习动机促使其主动学习是外语教学的必要策略。
)3 理想的外语学习者特点 a 可以适应团体的活力与语言的交际特性,克服焦虑 b 积极寻找机会使用目的语,并练习倾听指向他的言语,作出反应 c 通过学习规则掌握交际的多样形式,并可以创造性使用 d 在进入少年阶段,应该积极主动地学习基础的语言概念与规则(语法)d. 主动地区分、储存并监测目的语的特征,并可以在过程中持续纠正。
e 具备外语学习强烈的综合动机与工具性动机习得笔记二1 通过偏误分析发现,只有25%的语言偏误由于母语的负迁移导致,其他往往由于过分应用一般认知手段,如类比及概括等产生。
(评:学习者过度自信对于语言学习有害。
教学者在讲解规律时,除了一般性规律,一定不可以特殊的现象)2 对待偏误的态度行为主义观点:错误是刺激反应过程中的偏差,需要新的正确的刺激强化加以矫正。
认知主义观点:错误恰恰说明学习者是灵活积极的,有辨别能力的,不需特别的加以矫正,错误会随着对目的语了解的深入自然消失。
3 因而教师对待偏误的态度:a 规则无知引起的理解性错误,指出并讲解,b 表达性错误,初期—接触正确言语,促使其意识并逐步理解纠正中后期—指出并强化正确言语(刺激—反应)(评:偏误分析的最大价值为改变了教师对于偏误本质的认识)习得笔记三1 一般而言,词汇错误比语法错误更影响交流,语音错误除非十分严重,否则影响最小。
二语习得引论读书笔记chapter
二语习得引论读书笔记c h a p t e r文件管理序列号:[K8UY-K9IO69-O6M243-OL889-F88688]一.概论Chapter 1. Introducing SLA1.Second language acquisition (SLA)2.Second language (L2)(也可能是第三四五外语)also commonly called a target language (TL)Refers to: any language that is the aim or goal of learning.3.Basic questions:1). What exactly does the L2 learner come to know2). How does the learner acquire this knowledge3). Why are some learners more successful than othersDifferent answers from different fields4.3 main perspectives:linguistic; psychological; social.Only one (x) Combine (√)Chapter 2. Foundations of SLAⅠ. The world of second languages1.Multi-; bi-; mono- lingualism1)Multilingualism: the ability to use 2 or more languages.(bilingualism: 2 languages; multilingualism: >2)2)Monolingualism: the ability to use only one language.3)Multilingual competence (Vivian Cook, Multicompetence)Refers to: the compound state of a mind with 2 or more grammars.4)Monolingual competence (Vivian Cook, Monocompetence)Refers to: knowledge of only one language.2.People with multicompetence (a unique combination) ≠ 2monolingualsWorld demographic shows:3.Acquisition4.The number of L1 and L2 speakers of different languages canonly be estimated.1)Linguistic information is often not officially collected.2)Answers to questions seeking linguistic information maynot be reliable.3)A lack of agreement on definition of terms and on criteriafor identification.Ⅱ. The nature of language learning1.L1 acquisition1). L1 acquisition was completed before you came to schooland the development normally takes place without anyconscious effort.2). Complex grammatical patterns continue to develop throughthe school years.< < 3 years old Master an awareness of basic discourse patterns< 3 years old Master most of the distinctive sounds of L1< 5 or 6 years old Control most of the basic L1 grammatical patterns2. The role of natural ability1) Refers to: Humans are born with an innate capacity tolearn language.2) Reasons:Children began to learn L1 at the same age and in much thesame way.…master the basic phonological and grammatical operations in L1 at 5/ 6.…can understand and create novel utterances; and are not limited to repeating what they have heard; the utterances they produce are often systematically different fromthose of the adults around them.There is a cut-off age for L1 acquisition.L1 acquisition is not simply a facet of generalintelligence.3)The natural ability, in terms of innate capacity, is thatpart of language structure is genetically “given”to every human child.3. The role of social experience1) A necessary condition for acquisition: appropriate socialexperience (including L1 input and interaction) is2) Intentional L1 teaching to children is not necessary andmay have little effect.3) Sources of L1 input and interaction vary for cultural andsocial factors.4) Children get adequate L1 input and interaction→sourceshas little effect on the rate and sequence of phonological and grammatical development.The regional and social varieties (sources) of the input→pronunciationⅢ. L1 vs. L2 learning1.L1 and L2 development:Final state NativeMultilingual competencecompetence2.Understanding the statesⅣ. The logical problem of language learning1.Noam Chomsky:1)innate linguistic knowledge must underlie languageacquisition2)Universal Grammar2.The theory of Universal Grammar:Reasons:1)Children’s knowledge of language > what could be learnedfrom the input.2)Constraints and principles cannot be learned.3)Universal patterns of development cannot be explained bylanguage-specific input.Children often say things that adults do not.Children use language in accordance with generaluniversal rules of language though they have notdeveloped the cognitive ability to understand theserules. Not learned from deduction or imitation.Patterns of children’s language development are notdirectly determined by the input they receive.Ⅴ. Frame works for SLA。
第二语言习得电子笔记
学习与习得的区别:
1.习得的方法主要靠在自然语言环境中的语言交际活动,没有大纲和教材;学习是在教师指导下通过模仿和练习来理解掌握语言规则;
2.习得是一种潜意识的行为,目的性不明确;学习则是主体为了掌握一种新的交际工具所进行的目的性非常明确的活动,除了本身自觉要求之外,还有外部的督导、考试、竞争等外部因素的作用,是一种有意识的行为;
3.习得一般是在使用该目的语的社会环境中进行的;学习主要在课堂环境下进行,可能有目的语环境,也可能没有;
4.习得时注意力主要集中在语言的功能和意义上;学习的主要注意点在语言形式上,有意识的系统的掌握语音词汇语法,经常忽略了语言的意义;
5.习得需要大量的时间,习得效果一般都较好;学习花费时间一般较少,但学习效果通常不佳。
Krashen 把通过这两个方式获得语言的过程看作彼此独立的学习过程。
乔姆斯基在60年代提出的概念:
语言能力:是指人们所具有的语言知识,是一种内化了的包括语音、词汇、语法等的语言规则体系。
Performance(语言表达):指的是交际双方在语言的理解与生成过程中对其内在语法的运用。
社会语言学家海姆斯在60年代提出了“交际能力”的概念:运用语言(或非语言手段)进行社会交往的能力,包括传递信息、交流思想和表达感情。
交际能力四特征:语法性——指语法上是否正确;可接受性——在交际中是否被接受;得体性——在一定的语境中是否恰当,是否合乎社会文化习惯;现实性——是否是现实中常用。
第二语言习得研究概况-读书笔记
第二语言习得研究概况-读书笔记第一篇:第二语言习得研究概况-读书笔记第二语言习得研究概况第一章介绍1.1 L2在世界中的地位:不仅在学校,而且影响人们生活的方方面面,在这个相互依存的世界里,SLA和二语使用无处不在。
1.2 为什么研究二语习得1.3 SLA领域的发展SLA研究的范围必须足够的广用来包含很多的受试,说很多不同的语言,在很多背景下因为很多原因习得很多L2。
第二章二语习得研究方法1.重要的不是选择定质方法范式还是定量方法范式,运用性质的最优结合来处理研究问题。
2.SLA研究者开始探寻SLA过程的理解,希望当语言教学与SLA 协调的时候语言教学会提高。
毫无疑问有好多相同点和不同点在教学中的习得和非教学中的习得。
然而我们不能忽视他们之间的相似性。
3.数据的收集尽可能真实自然,设计的好的工具能够使生产、直觉和情感数据的收集更加有效。
而且能够产色和那个更多完整和可比较的数据。
学习者在不同的任务中语言表现不同,因此应从多个角度来处理研究问题,并且研究者应避免做出不适当的概括。
4.语言水平很难定义,更别说测量。
第三章 SLA:数据分析的类型后一种分析的类型包含了前者,而不是代替前者。
除形位句法以外,语言的其他方面和交流能力也要能考虑到,对于语义方面,行为形成或规则形成都不可用,话语联想,多项区分和概念学习有更大的解释力。
第四章中介语研究:实证发现4.2.1 自由变量原因(1)IL在发展中变化地非常快(2)比起小孩习得母语来说,大一点的儿童和成人SL习得者很少认知上和心理语言学上受限制。
4.2.2 系统变量4.2.3 自由变量阻碍发展4.2.1对于变量的多种解释4.3 IL展现了共同的习得顺序和发展序列4.3.1习得顺序:形位研究4.3.2 发展序列:疑问句4.3.3 发展序列:否定句4.4 IL收学习者L1的影响相似点而不是不同点引起了主要的问题4.4.1 L1如何影响SLA(1)发展序列的步子被打断了(2)发展结构的数量改变了L1-L2的不同并没有改变发展序列,只是推迟了,推迟了开始,增加了次阶段。
第二语言习得导论笔记和概念总结
第一章:语言习得和语言教学第一课:第一语言和第二语言第一语言是个人身份的标志,总体水平也高于第二语言。
第二语言可以在不同环境中获得。
外语环境和二语环境,它们的区分主要取决于课堂之外的目的与是否常用。
第一、而与环境和外语环境的对立,取决与目的与在社区中是否常用。
第二、外语环境和二语环境的区分,有时并不像认为的那么简单。
第三、随着科学技术的进步,特别是因特网的普及,二语环境和外语环境的区别可能变得不那么重要。
第二课:语言习得语言习得即指语言习得这一现象,也指对这现象的研究。
第一语言习得研究的是儿童学习母语问题,也称“母语习得”。
第二语言习得包括对母语之外的所有语言的习得研究,研究对象一般是成年人。
语言习得研究中,有两个基本问题:逻辑问题和发展问题。
逻辑问题研究的课题是:语言习得是如何成为可能的?发展问题指的是:语言习得遵循一定的发展顺序和步骤。
第三课:应用语言学科德是应用语言学的早期代表人物之一。
语言教学和第二语言习得仍然是应用语言学的两个重要领域,但是应用语言学的研究范学科。
与应用语言学相对的,是理论语言学。
理论语言学的目的是对语言系统本身进行理论描述,找出其规律。
第四课:语言教学第一语言教学(母语教学)语言教学母语环境中的第二语言教学(或二语教学)第二语言教学对外环境的第二语言教学(外语教学)上图说明第二语言教学在两个层面上出现即广义:第二语言教学是从基本性质角度进行的分类,与第一语言教学相对。
狭义:第二语言教学是从学习环境角度进行的分类,和外语教学相对。
研究重点:学习机制、学习者语言、语言环境和语言习得、学习者个体差异。
第二语言教学研究的重点是教师和教学过程,第二语言习得研究的重点是学习和学习过程,包括中介语。
第五课:教学理念反应的是对语言学习和语言教学的基本认识。
包括:学习什么、怎样学习、如何教授。
理念是从一个人所受的全部语言教育当中,从这个人的语言学习有关的全部经历当中感悟出来的。
比较系统,有比较深厚的理论基础。
读书笔记(RodEllisSecondLanguageAcquisition)
/s/blog_4b92bfc0010006f2.html(Oct. 22, 2007)读书笔记—Second Language Acquisition(Rod Ellis, 上海外语教育出版社)2006-12-03 20:15:41这本书用简洁的语言概述了第二语言习得的研究状况,通俗易懂,对于刚入门的读者来说会有很大帮助。
我认为该书在编排上最大的优点是在书的末尾有与正文有关的一些小案例,可以帮助读者更好的理解和掌握作者在书中讲到的理论。
在读完这本书后,我自己感觉收获颇丰。
——Second Language Acquisition(Rod Ellis, 上海外语教育出版社)1. What’s ‘Second Language Acquisition’?1) Introduction: describing and explaining L2 acquisitionL2 is fairly a recent phenomenon, belonging to the second half of the twentieth century. ‘L2 acquisition’ can be defined as the way in which people learn a language other than their mother tongue ,inside or outside of a classroom, and Second Language Acquisition (SLA) as the study of this.2) What are the goals of SLA?In general, SLA has not focused on the communicative aspects of language development but on the formal features of language that linguists have traditionally concentrated on. One of the goals of SLA description of L2 acquisition. Another is explanation : identifying the external and internal factors that account for why learners acquire an L2 in the way they to . One of the external factors is the social milieu in which learning takes place. Another external factor is the input that learners receive, that is , the samples of language to which a learner exposed. The internal factors are as follows: (1) Learners possess cognitive mechanisms which enable them to extract information about the L2 from the input ;(2)L2 learners bring an enormous amount of knowledge to task of learning an L2;(3)L2 learners possess general knowledge about the world which they can draw on to help them understand L2 input; (4) L2 learners possess communication strategies that can help them take effective use of their L2 knowledge.The goals of SLA , then , are to describe how L2 acquisition proceeds and to explain this process and why some learners seem to be better at is than others.2. The nature of learner language1) The main way of investigating L2 acquisitionThe main way of investigating L2 acquisition is by collecting and describing samples of learner language . The description may focus on the kinds of errors learners make and how these errors change over time, or it may identify developmental patterns by describing the stages in the acquisition of particular grammatical features such as past tense, or it may examine the variability found in learner language.2) Errors and error analysis(1) The first step in analyzing learner errors is to identify them. It is difficult to identify errors because of two reasons: firstly, it is often difficult to identifythe exact errors that learners make. secondly, it’s hard to distinguish errors and mistakes.(2) The second step is describing errors. Once all the errors have been identified , they can be described and classified into types. There are several ways of doing this . One way is to classify general ways in which the learners utterances differ from the reconstructed target-language utterance. Such ways include ‘omission’, ‘misinformation’ and ‘disordering’.(3) Explaining errors: the identification and description of errors are preliminaries to the much more interesting task of trying to explain why they occur.(4) Error evaluation3) Development patterns(1) The early stages of L2 acquisition : in the circumstances which L2 learners learna language as a natural, untutored process, they undergo a silent period. When learners do begin to speak in the L2 their speech is likely to manifest two particular characteristics. One is the kind of formulaic chunks. The second characteristic of early speech is propositional simplification.(2) The order of acquisition: accuracy order and the order of acquisition(3) Sequence of acquisition4) Variability in learner languageLearner’s language is systematic, but it is also variable. These two characteristics are not contradicted because it is possible that variability is also systematic.(1) It appears that learners vary in their use of the L2 according to linguistic context.(2) Learners also vary the linguistic forms they use in accordance with the situational context.(3) Another important factor that accounts for the systematic nature of variability is the psycholinguistic context.But it would seem that at least some variability is ‘free’. Learners do sometimes use two or more forms in free variation.3. Interlanguage1) Behaviorist learning theory2) A mentalist of language learningIn the 1960 and 1970 , a mentalist theory first language (L1) acquisition emerged. According to this theory:(1) Only human beings are capable of learning language.(2) The human mind is equipped with a faculty for learning language, referred to as a Language Acquisition Device. This is separate from the faculties responsible for other kinds of cognitive activity ( for example, logical reasoning).(3) This faculty is the primary determinant of language acquisition(4) Input is needed, but only to ‘trigger’ the operation of the language acquisition device.The conception of interlanguage drew directly on these mentalist views of L1 acquisition.3) What’s ‘interlanguage’?The term ‘interlanguage’ was coined by the American linguist, Larry Selinker, in recognition of the fact that L2 learners construct a linguistic system that draws, in part, on the learner’s L1 but it also different from it and also from the target language. A learner’s interlanguage is, therefore, a unique linguistic system. The concept of interlanguage involves the following premises about L2 acquisition: (1) The learner constructs a system of abstract linguistic rules which underlies comprehension and production of the L2. This system of rules is viewed as a ‘mental grammar’ and is referred to as an ‘interlanguage’.(2) The learner’s grammar is permeable.(3) The learner’s grammar is transitional.(4) Some researchers have claimed that the systems learners construct contain variable rules.(5) Learners employ various learning strategies to develop their interlanguages.(6) The learner’s grammar is likely to fossilize.4)A computational model of L2 acquisitionInput →intake→L2 knowledge →output4.Social aspects of interlanguageThree rather different approaches to incorporating a social angle on the study of L2 acquisition can be identified. The first views interlanguage as consisting of different ‘styles’ which learners call upon under different conditions of language use. The second concerns how social factors determine the input that learners use to construct their interlanguage. The third considers how the social identities that learners negotiate in their interactions with native speakers shape their opportunities to speak and, thereby , to learn an L2.1) Interlanguage as a stylistic continuumDrawing on work on variability in learner language, Elaine Tarone has proposed that interlanguage involves a stylistic continuum.Another theory that also draws on the idea of stylistic variation but which is more obviously social is Howard Gile’s accommodation theory.2) The acculturation model of L2 acquisitionA similar perspective on the role of social factors in L2 acquisition can be found in John Schumann’s acculturation model.3) Social identity and investment in L2 learningThe notions of ‘subject to’ and ‘subject of’ are central to Bonny Peirce’s view of the relationship between social context and L2 acquisition.5 Discourse aspects of interlanguageThe study of learner discourse in SLA has been informed by two rather different goals. On the one hand there have been attempts to discover how L2 learners acquire the ‘rules’ of discourse that inform native-speaker language use. On the other hand, a number of researchers have sought to show how interaction shapes interlanguage development.1) Acquiring discourse rules2) The role of input and interaction in L2 acquisition(1) According to Stephen Krashen’s input hypothesis, L2 acquisition takes place when a learner understands input that contains grammatical forms that are at ‘i+1’. According to Krashen , L2 acquisition depends on comprehension input.Michael Long’s interaction hypothesis also emphasizes the importance of comprehensible input but claims that it is most effective when it is modified through the negotiation of meaning.(2) Another perspective on the relationship between discourse and L2 acquisition is provided by Evelyn Hatch. Hatch emphasizes the collaborative endeavors of the learners and their interlocutors in constructing discourse and suggests that syntactic structures can grow out of the process of building discourse.(3) Other SLA theorists have drawn on the theories of L.S. Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist , to explain how interaction serves as the bedrock of acquisition.3) The role of output in L2 acquisitionKrashen argues that ‘Speaking is the result of acquisition not it’s cause’. In contrast, Merrill Swain has argued that comprehensible output also plays a part in L2 acquisition.6 Psycholinguistic aspects of interlanguage1) L1 transferIt is clear that the transfer is governed by learners perceptions about what is transferable and by their stage of development.2) The role of consciousness in L2 acquisitionStephen Krashen has argued the need to distinguish ‘acquired’L2 knowledge and ‘learned’ Ls knowledge . He claims that the former is developed subconsciously through comprehending input while communicating, while the latter is developed consciously through deliberate study of the L2.Richard Schmidt has pointed out that the term ‘consciousness’ is often used very loosely in SLA and argues that there is a need to standardize the concepts that underlie its use.Schmidt argues that no matter whether learning is intentional or incidental, it involves conscious attention to features in the input.3) Processing operations(1) Operating principlesThe study of the L1 acquisition of many different languages has led to the identification of a number of general strategies which children use to extract and segment linguistic information from the language they hear. Dan Slobin has referred to these strategies as operation principles. Roger Anderson describes a number of operating principles for L2acquisition, and he claims that his principles are ‘macro principles’.4) Processing constraints5) Communicative strategies6) Two types of computational modelOne type involves the idea of ‘serial processing’. The alternative type of apparatus involves the idea of parallel distributed processing.7. Linguistic aspects of interlanguage1) Typological universals: relative clausesA good example of how linguistic enquiry can shed light on interlanguage development can be found in the study of relative clauses.2) Universal GrammarChomsky argues that language is governed by a set of highly abstract principles that provides parameters which are given particular settings in different languages.3)learnabilityChomsky has claimed that children learning their L1 must rely on innate knowledge of language because otherwise the task facing them is an impossible one.4) The critical period hypothesisThe critical period hypothesis states that there is a period during which language acquisition is easy and complete and beyond which it is difficult and typically incomplete.5) Access to UGWe will briefly examine a number of theoretical positions.a) Complete access: An assumption is that full target-language competence is possible and that there is no such thing as a critical period.b) No access : The argument here is that UG is not available to adult L2 learners.c) Partial access: Another theoretical possibility is that learners have access to part of UG but not others.d) Dual accessAccording to this position, adult L2 learners make use of both UG and general learning strategies.6) Markedness7) Cognitive versus linguistic explanations8. Individual differences in L2 acquisition1) Language aptitudeEarly work by John Carroll led to the identification of a number of components of language aptitude. These are:(1) Phonemic coding ability.(2) Grammatical sensitivity.(3) Inductive language learning ability.(4) Rote learning ability.2) MotivationVarious kinds of motivation have been identified: instrumental, integrative, resultative and intrinsic.3) Learning strategiesDifferent kinds of learning strategies have been identified.Cognitive strategies are those that are involved in the analysis, synthesis, or transformation of learning materials.Metacognitive strategies are those involved in planning, monitoring, and evaluating learning.Social/ affective strategies concern the ways in which learners choose to interact with other speakers.9.Instruction and L2 acquisitionSome researchers have studied what impact teaching has on L2 learning. In this chapter we will consider three branches of this research. The first concerns whether teaching learners grammar has any effect on their interlanguage development. The second draws on the research into individual learner differences. The third branch looks at strategy training.1) Form-focused instruction2) Does form-focused instruction work?3) What kind of form-focused instruction works best?Given that instruction can work, it becomes important to discover whether some kinds of instruction work better than others. To illustrate this we will consider a number of options in form-focused instruction. The first concerns the distinction between input-based and production-based practice.The second issue concerns conscious-raising.4) Learner-Instruction matchingA distinct possibility is that the same instructional option is not equally for all L2 learners.5) Strategy strainingMost of the research on strategy training has focused on vocabulary learning.。
二语习得手册笔记1-普遍语法二语习得的逻辑问题
中介语:L2学习者内化了心理语法,一个自然的语言系统可以用语言规则来描述。
目前的生成语言学关注中介语的表征,这一焦点可以视为原始的中介语假说的衍生。
中介语能力的本质,中介语语法多大程度上类似于其他语法以及UG的作用,都有一些明确的论述。
一直在争论的问题:UG是否对L2有调节作用,程度多大。
这个问题源于1.语言的普遍性的个别观点和2.关于语言能力本质的个别假说。
生成语法的传统观点,语法是心理表征,普遍规限制这些表征。
语言的普遍性的存在源于人类思想的属性,语法的存在源于他们的普遍规则。
UG在L2习得中的作用,前十年,主要关注“Access”:探索UG在非一语习得中是否仍然有效,这一问题关系到一些基本的问题:什么是自然的语言语法?语言能力的本质是什么,又是如何习得?UG的解释是一个局部的答案,至少在一语语法习得中是这样。
没有具体的天生的语言规则来限制语法,不可能习得语言?在L2习得研究中,问题是:中介语表征是否受UG的限制。
2. UG和语言习得的逻辑问题逻辑问题的由来:柏拉图本人认为,人类就是凭借天赋神授的理性,才得以获得广博无限的知识。
“柏拉图问题”同样表现在儿童语言能力的获得上。
对这一问题研究数十年的乔姆斯基,到最近还发出这样的惊叹: “儿童知道的远比经验提供的多……在语言生长的高峰时间,虽然儿童的语言接触非常有限,语言环境又模棱两可,但儿童大约每小时就可以学会一个词。
儿童理解词汇方式之精巧奇妙,非任何词典能及……语言习得更像是一般器官的生长;它是发生在儿童身上的事,并非儿童所做的事。
”(Chomsky , 2000 :6 - 7)语言学家们把这一表现在儿童语言知识获得过程中的“柏拉图问题”称之为语言习得中的“逻辑问题”。
简单地说, 逻辑问题基于所谓的“刺激贫乏说”,旨在解决儿童语言有限、残缺、不足的语料输入及最终能在短短几年里迅速而一致地获得丰富的语言系统这一貌似不合逻辑的问题。
无论是经验主义哲学的感觉经验,还是行为主义的刺激反应、重复模仿的“逻辑”都无法给予圆满的解释。
二语学习理论 第二版读书笔记
二语学习理论第二版读书笔记二语学习理论:二语课堂上,应注重培养自主探究能力和协作学习精神。
二语学习和其他学科一样需要学生在教师的引导下对新知识进行研究、消化和吸收。
学生在获取教师教授的大量语言信息后,自主地加以分析和研究,从中发现问题,探索解决问题的方法,学生的能力不断得到锻炼和提高,还有效地实现了学习的个性化,为今后的独立研究奠定了基础。
二语学习较之母语学习艰难许多,一方面学习者身处母语环境,使用第二语言的机会较少,另一方面第二语言的学习会受到母语的影响。
建构主义学习理论又提出情景是意义建构的必要前提。
要求二语教学者应切实把学生对二语的需求放在首位,在课堂上创设与真实情境相仿的学习情境来刺激学生的求知欲,促使他们自觉主动地投入到二语学习中来。
比如英语视听说课上,教师可以根据课堂主题即时地从网络上搜索原汁原味的英语信息供学生参考,这样学生不单接触到了真实鲜活的语言材料,学习的兴趣更加浓厚,又保证了语言的准确性便于学生大胆运用。
第二版读书笔记:一、学习的概念学习有广义学习、次广义的学习和狭义学习。
1,广义学习认为学习是人和动物共有的一种心理现象。
学习是有机体在后天生活过程中,通过练习或经验而产生的行为或心理比较持久的变化。
2,次广义的学习专指人类的学习,人类学习是在社会生活实践中,以语言为中介,自觉地、积极主动地掌握社会和个体经验的过程。
人类的学习与动物的学习有本质区别:第一,从内容上看,人的学习是掌握社会历史经验和个体经验的过程。
第二,从方式上看,动物学习是一个直接经验的过程,而人的学习是通过社会传递,以语言为中介。
第三,从性质上看,动物的学习是一个自发的适应过程,而人的学习是一种有目的、自觉的、积极主动的过程。
3,狭义的学习——学生的学习学生的学习:在教师的指导下,有目的、有计划、有组织、有系统地进行的,是在较短的时间内接受前人所积累的科学文化知识,并以此来充实自己的过程。
学生的学习是人类学习的一种形式,与人类学习有共同之处,又有其特点:第一,以掌握间接经验为主。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
一.概论Chapter 1. Introducing SLA1.Second language acquisition (SLA)2.Second language (L2)(也可能是第三四五外语)also commonly called a target language (TL) Scopes Takes place in ExamplesInformal L2 learning Naturalistic contexts “pick up”Interacting Formal L2 learning Classes or courses ClassesL2 learning that involves a mixture of formal and informal learning Naturalistic contextscombined with Classesor coursesInteracting and learning inclasses at the same time3.Basic questions:1). What exactly does the L2 learner come to know2). How does the learner acquire this knowledge3). Why are some learners more successful than othersFields EmphasizeLinguists Characteristics of the differences and similarities in thelanguages that are being learned;The linguistic competence (underlying knowledge) andlinguistic performance (actual production).Psychologists and psycholinguists The mental or cognitive processes involved in acquisition; The representation of languages in the brain.Sociolinguists Variability in learner linguistic performance;Communicative competence (pragmatic competence).Social psychologists Group-related phenomena;The interactional and larger social contexts of learning.Applied linguists about SLA Any one or more perspectives above; Theory and research for teaching.4.linguistic; psychological; social.Only one (x) Combine (√)Chapter 2. Foundations of SLAⅠ. The world of second languages1.Multi-; bi-; mono- lingualism1)Multilingualism: the ability to use 2 or more languages. (bilingualism: 2languages; multilingualism: >2)2)Monolingualism: the ability to use only one language.3)Multilingual competence (Vivian Cook, Multicompetence)Refers to: the compound state of a mind with 2 or more grammars.4)Monolingual competence (Vivian Cook, Monocompetence)Refers to: knowledge of only one language.2.People with multicompetence (a unique combination) ≠2 monolingualsWorld demographic shows:3.Acquisition4.The number of L1 and L2 speakers of different languages can only be estimated.1)Linguistic information is often not officially collected.2)Answers to questions seeking linguistic information may not be reliable.3) A lack of agreement on definition of terms and on criteria for identification.Ⅱ. The nature of language learning1.L1 acquisition1). L1 acquisition was completed before you came to school and thedevelopment normally takes place without any conscious effort.2). Complex grammatical patterns continue to develop through the school years.Time Children will< 6 months (infant) Produce all of the vowel sounds and most of theconsonant sounds of any language in the world.Learn to discriminate the among the sounds that make adifferent in the meaning of words (the phonemes)< < 3 years old Master an awareness of basic discourse patterns< 3 years old Master most of the distinctive sounds of L1< 5 or 6 years old Control most of the basic L1 grammatical patterns2. The role of natural ability1) Refers to: Humans are born with an innate capacity to learn language.2) Reasons:Children began to learn L1 at the same age and in much the same way.…master the basic phonological and grammatical operations in L1 at 5/ 6.…can understand and create novel utterances; and are not limited torepeating what they have heard; the utterances they produce are oftensystematically different from those of the adults around them.There is a cut-off age for L1 acquisition.L1 acquisition is not simply a facet of general intelligence.3)The natural ability, in terms of innate capacity, is that part of languagestructure is genetically “given” to every human child.3. The role of social experience1) A necessary condition for acquisition: appropriate social experience (includingL1 input and interaction) is2) Intentional L1 teaching to children is not necessary and may have little effect.3) Sources of L1 input and interaction vary for cultural and social factors.4) Children get adequate L1 input and interaction→sources has little effect onthe rate and sequence of phonological and grammatical development.The regional and social varieties (sources) of the input→pronunciationⅢ. L1 vs. L2 learningStates L1 L2Initial state Innate capacity Innate capacity; L1 knowledge;World knowledge; Interaction skillsIntermedia te states BasicprocessesChildgrammarMaturation Learnerlanguage(interlanguage-IL)TransferNecessaryconditionsInputreciprocalinteractionInputFacilitatingconditionsFeedback; aptitude;motivation;instruction…Final state Native competence Multilingual competence2.Understanding the statesⅣ. The logical problem of language learning1.Noam Chomsky:1)innate linguistic knowledge must underlie language acquisition2)Universal Grammar2.The theory of Universal Grammar:Reasons:1)Children’s knowledge of language > what could be learned from the input.2)Constraints and principles cannot be learned.3)Universal patterns of development cannot be explained by language-specificinput.Children often say things that adults do not.Children use language in accordance with general universal rules of language though they have not developed the cognitive ability to understand these rules. Not learned from deduction or imitation.Patterns of children’s language development are not directly determined by the input they receive.≤1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990sL Structuralism Transformational-GenerativeGrammar Functionalism Principles andParametersModelMinimalistProgramP Behaviroism NeurolinguisticsInformationProcessing HumanisticmodelsConnectionism processabilityS Socioculturaltheory Ethnography ofCommunicationVariation TheoryAcculturationTheoryAccommodationTheorySocialPsychologyPerspective Focus FrameworkLinguistic Internal Transformational-Generative Grammar;Principles and Parameters Model;Minimalist ProgramExternal FunctionalismPsychological Languagesand the BrianNeurolinguisticsLearning processes Informational Processing; Processability; ConnectionismIndividualdifferencesHumanistic ModelsSocial Microsocial Variation Theory;Accommodation Theory; Sociocultural Theory Macrosocial Ethnography of Communication;Acculturation Theory; Social Psychology。