内部控制外文文献及翻译 精品
内部控制l论文相关 外文翻译
审计委员会、董事会和内部控制重大缺陷的整治Audit Committees, Boards of Directors, and Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control译文：本研究探讨审核委员会和董事会的有效性是否与公司的内部控制的重大缺陷修复的及时性有关。
选取的样本包括从2003年7月至2004年12月编报公司根据的“萨班斯- 奥克斯利法案”第302节披露的至少一种重大弱点。
采用Logistic回归分析发现，较大的审计委员会，审计委员会，更大的非会计财务专业知识，以及更多的独立委员会的企业更容易及时地修复重大缺陷。
这些结果表明，审计委员会及董事会对监督整治重大缺陷发挥了重要作用。
总的来说，这项研究有助于我们了解审计委员会和董事会根据萨班斯- 奥克斯利法案“的制度的有效性。
这项研究还确定了整治重大缺陷及时性的重要决定因素，这是提高财务报告质量和恢复投资者信心的关键。
研究表明，审核委员会的质量与该公司的内部控制的质量呈正相关。
克里希南（2005）使用的样本公司，改变了审计师在1994-2000年期间发现，独立审计委员会和审计委员会的财务专业知识是不太可能与内部控制的问题有相关性。
Zhang等人（2007）使用在“萨班斯- 奥克斯利法”颁布后披露内部控制缺陷的样本公司，发现这些企业更可能有财务专业知识少的审计委员会。
如果审计委员会的质量与内部控制的质量有关，似乎有理由相信，一个更有效的审计委员会将确保及时修复重大缺陷，以保持内部控制的有效性。
一个有效的审计委员会可以直接进行，通过审查财务和会计人员的会计程序和控制来监督公司的控制。
当发现重大弱点，有效的审计委员会，更可能采取实用的方法，并和审计师讨论如何整治重大缺陷。
通过努力跟进有关建议，以改善内部控制和监测整治力度的进展，一个更有效的审计委员会可能导致重大缺陷的及时整治。
虽然审计委员会在监督整治重大缺陷中发挥了重要作用，但在整治过程中，董事会可以提供增量的监督。
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)内部控制系统披露—一种可替代的管理机制根据代理理论，各种治理机制减少了投资者和管理者之间的代理问题（Jensen and Meckling，1976； Gillan，2006）。
传统上，治理机制已经被认定为内部或外部的。
内部机制包括董事会及其作用、结构和组成（Fama，1980；Fama and Jensen，1983），管理股权(Jensen and Meckling，1976)和激励措施，起监督作用的大股东(Demsetz and Lehn，1985)，内部控制系统(Bushman and Smith，2001)，规章制度和章程条款(反收购措施)和使用的债务融资（杰森，1993）。
外部控制是由公司控制权市场(Grossman and Hart,1980)、劳动力管理市场（Fama,1980）和产品市场（哈特,1983）施加的控制。
各种各样的金融丑闻，动摇了世界各地的投资者，公司治理最佳实践方式特别强调了内部控制系统在公司治理中起到的重要作用。
内部控制有助于通过提供保证可靠性的财务报告，和临时议会对可能会损害公司经营目标的事项进行评估和风险管理来保护投资者的利益。
这些功能已被的广泛普及内部控制系统架构设计的广泛认可，并指出了内部控制是用以促进效率，减少资产损失风险，帮助保证财务报告的可靠性和对法律法规的遵从（COSO,1992）。
尽管有其相关性，但投资者不能直接观察，因此也无法得到内部控制系统设计和发挥功能的信息，因为它们都是组织内的内在机制、活动和过程（Deumes and Knechel,2008）。
由于投资者考虑到成本维持监控管理其声称的（Jensen and Meckling，1976）,内部控制系统在管理激励信息沟通上的特性，以告知投资者内部控制系统的有效性,是当其他监控机制（该公司的股权结构和董事会）比较薄弱，从而为其提供便捷的监控（Leftwich et等, 1981）。
内部控制外文翻译资料
Internal management, establish a sound internal control system, enterprises and the needs for enterprises to face market risks and challenges. Only in accordance with the actual situation of their own, developed to meet the needs of internal management control system, and strictly follow the implementation can be sustained, steady and healthy development.内部管理，建立健全内部控制制度，企业和企业面临的市场风险和挑战的需要。
只有按照自己的实际情况，开发出满足内部管理控制系统的需求，并严格遵照执行能够持续，稳定和健康的发展。
The so-called internal control, the means by the enterprises board of directors, managers and other staff implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, operating efficiency and effectiveness of existing laws and regulations to follow, and so provide reasonable assurance that the purpose of the course. Internal controls related to enterprise production and management of the control environment, risk assessment, supervision and decision-making, information and transfer and self-examination, from a business perspective on the whole in all aspects of production. Their effective implementation will undoubtedly promote enterprise production and management to a new level, to promote the rationalization of business processes and standardization.所谓内部控制，董事会的企业董事会，经理和其他员工实施的，为保证财务报告的可靠性，现有的法律法规，经营的效率和效果跟踪，并提供合理的保证，本课程的教学目的。
本科毕业论文内部控制外文文献翻译完整版中英对照
A Clear Look at Internal Controls: Theory and ConceptsHammed Arad (Philae)Department of accounting, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, IranBarak Jamshedy-NavidFaculty Member of Islamic Azad University, Kerman-shah, IranAbstract: internal control is an accounting procedure or system designed to promote efficiency or assure the implementation of a policy or safeguard assets or avoid fraud and error. Internal Control is a major part of managing an organization. It comprises the plans, methods, and procedures used to meet missions, goals, and objectives and, in doing so, support performance-based management. Internal Control which is equal with management control helps managers achieve desired results through effective stewardship of resources. Internal controls should reduce the risks associated with undetected errors or irregularities, but designing and establishing effective internal controls is not a simple task and cannot be accomplished through a short set of quick fixes. In this paper the concepts of internal controls and different aspects of internal controls are discussed. Keywords: Internal Control, management controls, Control Environment, Control Activities, Monitoring1. IntroductionThe necessity of control in new variable business environment is not latent for any person and management as a response factor for stockholders and another should implement a great control over his/her organization. Control is the activity of managing or exerting control over something. he emergence and development of systematic thoughts in recent decade required a new attention to business resource and control over this wealth. One of the hot topic a bout controls over business resource is analyzing the cost-benefit of each control.Internal Controls serve as the first line of defense in safeguarding assets and preventing and detecting errors and fraud. We can say Internal control is a whole system of controls financial and otherwise, established by the management for the smooth running of business; it includes internal cheek, internal audit and other forms of controls.COSO describe Internal Control as follow. Internal controls are the methods employed to help ensure the achievement of an objective. In accounting and organizational theory, Internal control is defined as a process effected by an organization's structure, work and authority flows, people and management information systems, designed to help the organization accomplish specific goals or objectives. It is a means by which an organization's resources are directed, monitored, and measured. It plays an important role in preventing and detecting fraud and protecting the organization's resources, both physical (e.g., machinery and property) and intangible (e.g., reputation or intellectual property such as trademarks). At the organizational level, internal control objectives relate to the reliability of financial reporting, timely feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and compliance with laws and regulations. At the specific transaction level, internal control refers to the actions taken to achieve a specific objective (e.g., how to ensure the organization's payments to third parties are for valid services rendered.) Internal controlprocedures reduce process variation, leading to more predictable outcomes. Internal controls within business entities are called also business controls. They are tools used by manager's everyday.* Writing procedures to encourage compliance, locking your office to discourage theft, and reviewing your monthly statement of account to verify transactions are common internal controls employed to achieve specific objectives.All managers use internal controls to help assure that their units operate according to plan, and the methods they use--policies, procedures, organizational design, and physical barriers-constitute. Internal control is a combination of the following：1. Financial controls, and2. Other controlsAccording to the institute of chartered accountants of India internal control is the plan of organization and all the methods and procedures adopted by the management of an entity to assist in achieving management objective of ensuring as far as possible the orderly and efficient conduct of its business including adherence to management policies, the safe guarding of assets prevention and detection of frauds and error the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records and timely preparation of reliable financial information, the system of internal control extends beyond those matters which relate to the function of accounting system. In other words internal control system of controls lay down by the management for the smooth running of the business for the accomplishment of its objects. These controls can be divided in two parts i.e. financial control and other controls.Financial controls:- Controls for recording accounting transactions properly.- Controls for proper safe guarding company assets like cash stock bank debtor etc- Early detection and prevention of errors and frauds.- Properly and timely preparation of financial records I e balance sheet and profit and loss account.- To maximize profit and minimize cost.Other controls: Other controls include the following:Quality controls.Control over raw materials.Control over finished products.Marketing control, etc6. Parties responsible for and affected by internal controlWhile all of an organization's people are an integral part of internal control, certain parties merit special mention. These include management, the board of directors (including the audit commit tee), internal auditors, and external auditors.The primary responsibility for the development and maintenance of internal control rests with an organization's management. With increased significance placed on the control environment, the focus of internal control has changed from policies and procedures to an overriding philosophy and operating style within the organization. Emphasis on these intangible aspects highlights the importance of top management's involvement in the internal control system. If internal control is not a priority for management, then it will not be one for people within the organization either.As an indication of management's responsibility, top management at a publicly owned organization will include in the organization's annual financial report to the shareholders a statement indicating that management has established a system of internal control that management believes is effective. The statement may also provide specific details about the organization's internal control system.Internal control must be evaluated in order to provide management with some assurance regarding its effectiveness. Internal control evaluation involves everything management does to control the organization in the effort to achieve its objectives. Internal control would be judged as effective if its components are present and function effectively for operations, financial reporting, and compliance. he boards of directors and its audit committee have responsibility for making sure the internal control system within the organization is adequate. This responsibility includes determining the extent to which internal controls are evaluated. Two parties involved in the evaluation of internal control are the organization's internal auditors and their external auditors.Internal auditors' responsibilities typically include ensuring the adequacy of the system of internal control, the reliability of data, and the efficient use of the organization's resources. Internal auditors identify control problems and develop solutions for improving and strengthening internal controls. Internal auditors are concerned with the entire range of an organization's internal controls, including operational, financial, and compliance controls.Internal control will also be evaluated by the external auditors. External auditors assess the effectiveness of internal control within an organization to plan the financial statement audit. In contrast to internal auditors, external auditors focus primarily on controls that affect financial reporting. External auditors have a responsibility to report internal control weaknesses (as well as reportable conditions about internal control) to the audit committee of the board of directors.8. Limitations of an Entity's Internal ControlInternal control, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity's control objectives. The likelihood of achievement is affected by limitations inherent to internal control. These include the realities that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes. For example, errors may occur in designing,Maintaining, or monitoring automated controls. If an entity’s IT personnel do not completely understand how an order entry system processes sales transactions, they may erroneously design changes to the system to process sales for a new line of products. On the other hand, such changes may be correctly designed but misunderstood by individuals who translate the design into program code. Errors also may occur in the use of information produced by IT. For example, automated controls may be designed to report transactions over a specified dollar limit for management review, but individuals responsible for conducting the review may not understand the purpose of such reports and, accordingly, may fail to review them or investigate unusual items.Additionally, controls, whether manual or automated, can be circumvented by the collusion of two or more people or inappropriate management override of internal control. For example, management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter the terms and conditions of the entity’s standard sales con tract in ways that would preclude revenuerecognition. Also, edit routines in a software program that are designed to identify and report transactions that exceed specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.Internal control is influenced by the quantitative and qualitative estimates and judgments made by management in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of an entity’s internal control. The cost of an entity's internal control should not exceed the benefits that are expected to be derived. Although the cost-benefit relationship is a primary criterion that should be considered in designing internal control, the precise measurement of costs and benefits usually is not possible.Custom, culture, and the corporate governance system may inhibit fraud, but they are not absolute deterrents. An effective control environment, too, may help reduce the risk of fraud. For example, an effective board of directors, audit committee, and internal audit function may constrain improper conduct by management. Alternatively, the control environment may reduce the effectiveness of other components. For example, when the nature of management incentives increases the risk of material misstatement of financial statements, the effectiveness of control activities may be reduced.9. Balancing Risk and ControlRisk is the probability that an event or action will adversely affect the organization. The primary categories of risk are errors, omissions, delay and fraud In order to achieve goals and objectives, management needs to effectively balance risks and controls. Therefore, control procedures need to be developed so that they decrease risk to a level where management can accept the exposure to that risk. By performing this balancing act "reasonable assurance” can be attained. As it relates to financial and compliance goals, being out of balance can causebe proactive, value-added, and cost-effective and address exposure to risk.11. ConclusionThe concept of internal control and its aspects in any organization is so important, therefore understanding the components and standards of internal controls should be attend by management. Internal Control is a major part of managing an organization. Internal control is an accounting procedure or system designed to promote efficiency or assure the implementation of a policy or safeguard assets or avoid fraud and error. According to custom definition, Internal Control is a process affected by an entity's board of directors, management and other personnel designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories namely. The major factors of internal control are Control environment, Risk assessment, Control activities, Information and communication, Monitoring. This article reviews the main standards and principles of internal control and described the relevant concepts of internal control for all type of company.内部控制透视：理论与概念哈米德阿拉德（Philae）会计系，伊斯兰阿扎德大学，哈马丹，伊朗巴克Joshed -纳维德哈尼学院会员伊斯兰阿扎德大学，克尔曼伊朗国王，伊朗摘要：内部控制是会计程序或控制系统，旨在促进效率或保证一个执行政策或保护资产或避免欺诈和错误。
(精品)中小企业内部控制-外文参考文献(整理)
内部控制英文文献翻译及参考文献-英语论文
内部控制英文文献翻译及参考文献-英语论文内部控制英文文献翻译及参考文献目录摘要 (1)1 选题背景 (2)2内部控制理论的概述 (3)2.1 内部控制的根本性质 (3)2.2内部控制的责任 (3)3 确保内部控制的充分性 (5)4 先天的内部控制 (9)5 结论 (11)Abstract (12)1 Background Topics (13)2 Internal control theory outlined (15)2.1 The Fundamental Nature Of Intaral Control (15)2.2 Responsibillty For Internal Control (15)3 Ensuring that the internal control adequacy (17)4 Inherent limitations of internal control (22)5 Conclusion (25)参考文献[1] 陈继云.COSO报告与内部控制研究[M].上海：上海会计.2002.06.[2] 陈敏圭.论改进企业报告一美国注册会计师协会财务报告特别委员会综合报告[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社.1997.[3] 楼德华，傅黎瑛.中小企业内部控制[M].上海：上海三联书店，2005.[4] 李亚.民营企业公司治理[M].北京：机械工业出版社.2006.[5] 张厚义，候光明，明立志，梁传运.中国私营企业发展报告[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社. 2005.[6] 娆贤涛，王连娟.中国家族企业现状、问题与对策[M].北京：企业管理出版社.2005.[7] Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Tready Commission(COSO)[D].Enterprise RiskManagement Framework.2003.[8] 陈冠任.中国私营企业如何做大做强做优[M].北京：北京工业大学出版社.2003.[9] 中国(海南)改革发展研究院.中小企业发展—挑战与对策[M].北京：中国经济出版社.2005.[10] 欧江波，唐碧海，邓晓蕾，江彩霞，雷宣云，张赛飞.促进我国中小企业发展政策研究[M].广州：中山大学出版.2002.[11] 李国盛.内部控制的现状、成因、对策及建议[J].北京：《四川会计》第2001第2期.[12] 徐根兴，陈勇鸣.民营企业加速发展期的运行方式[M].北京：中共中央党校出版社.2005.[13] 杨加陆，范军，方青云，袁蔚，孙慧.中小企业管理[M].上海：复旦大学出版社.2004.[14] Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance [M].The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance， Gee Co.Ltd， London..[15] 李华刚.民营企业为何难长大[M].北京：民族与建设出版社.2004.[16] 张丽.W公司内部控制评估与设计[D].《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库》.2005年5月.[17] KPMG: Sarbanes_ Oxley section 404.management of internal control and the proposed auditing standards[S] .2002.[18] Foh，Noreen.Control Self-Assessment.A New Approach to Auditing，Ives Business Journal[J].Sep/Oct 2000.[19] 马云涛.ＸＸ民营高科技内部控制体系研究[D].［西北土业大学硕士学位论文］西安西北土业大学.2005－09.[20] 熊筱燕，罗建云，王殿龙.会计控制论[M].北京：新华出版社.2002. 1263内部控制英文文献翻译及参考文献摘要内部控制这个概念已经不是一个新概念。
内部控制外文文献格式范例
本科毕业论文外文文献及译文文献、资料题目：Problems and Countermeasures on CorporateInternal Audit in China文献、资料来源：Asian Social Science文献、资料发表日期：2011.01院（部）：商学院专业：会计学班级：会计XX姓名：XXX学号：2008XXXXX指导教师：XXX翻译日期：2012.5.27外文文献：Problems and Countermeasures on Corporate Internal Audit inChinaRefers to internal control by the enterprise's board of directors, management and other personnel to impact on the following goals to provide reasonable assurance that the process of:1. The reliability of financial reporting;2. The effectiveness and efficiency of operation;3. Compliance with laws and regulations related to the situationThe definition of internal control highlighted internal control is a process, that is, a means to an end and not an end in itself. Internal control procedure is not only by policy regulations, the certificate forms and composition, but also by man-made factors. The definition of "reasonable assurance" concept, meaning that internal control in fact can not be goals for the organization to provide an absolute guarantee. Reasonable assurance that also means that the organization's internal control costs should not exceed the expected benefits received.Although the definition of internal control covers a wide range, but not all of the internal control measures associated with the audit of the financial statements. In general, audit-related and only the reliability of financial reporting and control measures, that is, those who report on the impact of external financial information prepared by control measures. However, if other control measures can affect the implementation of audit procedures auditors used by the reliability of data, these control measures may also be relevant. For example, auditors in the implementation of analytical procedures used by non-financial data (such as the production of statistical data) of the control measures associated with the audit.Internal control audit of internal control is a special form; this is an internal economic activities and management system of regulation, reasonable and effective independent rating agencies, in a sense to other internal controls to control. Internal audits in enterprises should maintain relative independence, should be independent of the other management departments, preferably by the Board or the Board under the leadership. OIA department is responsible for review of the internal control system of the implementation and results of the review board to the enterprise or the top management report to the authorities. Internal audit work more carefully, the sound internalcontrol system, the more internal controls to enhance the efficiency and reliability.Internal audit refers to an economic monitoring activity that sections or independent auditing organizations and persons inside enterprises, according to national laws, regulations and policies, apply special process and methods to audit the financial receipts and expenditures and economic activities of their own sections and enterprises, to find out their authenticity, legitimacy and validity, and to propose suggestions. The research on internal audit can promote the effectiveness and efficiency of internal audit, benefit effective running of corporate internal control system, improve the quality of accounting information, strengthen corporate internal management, increase business efficiency and effect, and ensure the security and integrity of corporate assets. Differently from western countries, China’s internal audit was established and developed under the Government’s help. However, compared to social audit and governmental audit, China’s internal audit obviously lags behind no matter on institution setup or on functional effect. Internal audit has developed for over two decades, but people still can’t be embedded inwardly, especially most of corporate directors, who think internal audit is dispensable, and has no direct relationship with corporate economic benefit. Some corporate directors consider internal audit restricts their self business rights and weakens their authority. Thus, they either do not set internal audit department, or deprive its rights even if it exists. The staffs in internal audit department are even excluded and isolated, and ca n’t play their roles as expected.With the development of market economy and embedded ness of reform, many new situations and problems have emerged continuously. However, China has no integrated internal audit laws yet so far. Present internal audit regu lation is “Audit Requirements for Internal Audit Work” which was issued in 1987 and can’t meet the requirement of current economic situation. China’s enterprises pay little attention to in ternal audit, and internal audit staff has a low quality of corporate, so it stays at low position inside enterprises. It is difficult to attract talents into internal audit team. Therefore, renewal of the team can’t be accomplish ed, which results in single knowledge structure of audit staff, especially lack of risk management knowledge and information technology knowledge.Firstly, they are lack of cultural knowledge, theoretical level and professional technique. At present, most of internal audit staffs change their profession from financial department or other departments, so their scarcity of knowledge disenable them get competent in internal audit work.Secondly, there are few full-time employees, but many part-time ones. The problems also represent as: lack of further education, unreasonable knowledge structure, shortage of systematic audit specialization knowledge and skill learning, poor mastery of modern audit means, vacancy of EDP internal audit and network information internal audit. Lastly, individual audit staffs are lack of professional ethics, influenced by unhealthy social ethos. They behave irregularly on audit and their audit style is not solid as well, which ruins their authority and image.China’s internal aud it staffs come form internal enterprises, who are guided directly by their own enterprises, so they hardly show the authority of internal audit.Being a significant characteristic, authority is as important as independence. As internal audit is lack of authority it should have had, it is hard to play monitoring roles.Modern enterprise system requires internal audit make pre-, interim, and post-monitor and evaluate. As internal audit exists inside audited organizations, its functions should be more inclined to pre-audit and interim auditing with increasing economic benefit as a target, and emphasize on accomplishing managerial functions.China’s audit means is sti ll manual audit, which greatly restricts the efficiency of internal audit monitoring. As for audit procedure, auditing risks increase due to incomplete consideration on audit scheme, imperfect audit evidence, non-detailed audit work division, non-standard operation of audit staffs, and so on.We need to make good use of efficient and effective internal audit, neither only depending on individual enterprise nor social restriction, but all efforts from the state, society and enterprises. Definitely speaking, we propose the following countermeasures.“No rules, no standards.” China is la ck of special laws and regulations on internal audit, which is the key reason why internal audit ca n’t guarantee its desired effect. Therefore, we suggest the government to fully study current economic trend on internal audit and issue feasible laws and regulations on internal audit in order to legally guarantee the necessity, work scope, authority and practice regulation of internal audit.According to the above discussion, the shortage of independence and authority is the key factor that internal audit can’t play its roles. However, if internal audit is charged by relevant staffs of audited organizations, and guided by the management of that as well, internal audit, in any case,can’t guarantee its independence and authority. If the government can qualify internal audit staffs, systematically manage qualified staffs, appoint them according to corporate practical needs, assess and monitor them and distribute salary to them by the government, and implement regular turn, the independence and authority of internal audit will be greatly promoted, at the same time, the quality of the staffs also will enormously increase.It is not enough for the state and society to regulate and define internal audit functions only. Corporate managers should change their minds, and make clear that internal audit staffs are friends but not enemies and more functions of internal audit are strengthening corporate management, therefore, they are the important force and specialists of corporate management. Only in this way, can managers play roles of internal audit forwardly, cooperate with internal audit staffs positively, eliminate interference mood, and strengthen internal audit work voluntarily.Internal audit should tra nsform from “monitoring dominant” to “service dominant”, strengthen service function, highlight the “introversion” of internal audit, base on the requirem ents of corporate management, and ensure the business target of corporate optimal value. Along with increasingly strengthening corporate internal control, gradual improvement of corporate governance structure, and continuous promotion of accounting information quality, regular audit target or beneficial audit target will be promoted to be main audit target, meanwhile, the focus of internal audit work will transfer as well. In the case of good opportunity, corporate internal audit should be adjusted on its working emphasis correspondingly. And working field also needs to be changed from financial audit to managerial audit. On the basis of effective development or proper ap pointment of external section’s engaging in financial au dit, internal audit department should focus on internal control audit, managerial (operative) audit, economic responsibility audit, contract (agreement) audit, engineering audit, environment internal audit, quality control audit, risks management audit, strategy management audit and management fraud audit.The so-called internal control, the means by the enterprises board of directors, managers and other staff implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, operating efficiency and effectiveness of existing laws and regulations to follow, and so provide reasonable assurance that the purpose of the course. Internal controls related to enterprise production and management of the control environment, risk assessment, supervision and decision-making,information and transfer and self-examination, from a business perspective on the whole in all aspects of production. Their effective implementation will undoubtedly promote enterprise production and management to a new level, to promote the rationalization of business processes and standardization.The construction of the internal control system and effective operation of enterprises depends on good corporate governance structure. Modern enterprise ownership and management rights of separation, on the objective need for a standardized corporate governance, strengthen internal controls to protect the owners, operators, creditors and other legitimate rights and interests. However, the current situation, most of the state-owned enterprise restructuring, although the formal establishment of the corporate governance structure, but since property rights are clear, investors are deficient, did not form an effective internal checks and balances of power, coupled with the inherent internal control Limitations, resulting in weakening the intensity of internal control.中文译文：中国企业内部审计存在的问题及对策内部控制是指受到企业的董事会、管理层和其他人员影响的，旨在对下列目标的实现提供合理保证的过程：1．财务报告的可靠性；2．经营效果和效率；3．遵守相关法律和法规的情况内部控制的定义强调了内部控制是一个程序，即达到目的的手段，而且其本身并不是目的。
internal control and risk management内部控制与风险管理 外文翻译学士学位论文
Internal control and risk management1.Internal control --, standard and legislationIn 1985, the United States in order to curb the growing business of accounting fraud activities, formed a committee against financial fraud Treadway committee), (accounting fraud activities investigation led to reason and proposed solutions. The scheme emphasized the importance of internal control, requests and Suggestions of all listed companies should provide in the annals of internal control reports. The report shall include admit management authorities of financial reporting and internal control is responsible, and discuss the implementation of these responsibilities.In The end The mission Treadway Committee after The five, The commission launched organization jointly established a new Committee - The Com - mittee COSO (Sponsoring Organizations of The Treadway of ordinary), namely The organizing Committee Treadway Committee launched. It consists of the American public institute of certified public accountants (AICPA), American accounting association (AAA), international financial management association (FEI), internal auditors association (type IIA), international accounting association (NAA would) (a managerial accounting association jointly sponsored IMA predecessor). COSO continue to study and in 1992 it issued a programmatic document about the Internal Control, namely "Internal Control - the overall framework" (Internal Control - IntegratedFramework). The reports are put forward the COSO U.S. federal reserve, the United States securities and exchange commission, the Basel committee regulators or international organizations such as the recognition and adopted, many of these definitions, Suggestions and ideas absorbed into the legislation and regulations, worldwide has had a broad impact. Since THE end of 2001, THE United States broke with enron, worldcom, xerox and other companies financial cases of fraud as a representative of accounting scandals, hit U.S. capital markets and THE economy, also concentrated exposure for American companies in THE existing problem of internal control, thus causing THE United States adopted THE "sasha class nice --, THE extension of THE law (SARBANES OXLEY ACT) -. The bill made clear company managers CEO and CFO finance director of internal control, and will be held directly responsible shall undertake economic and criminal consequences; Greatly improve the punishment of accounting fraud; Strengthening the internal audit, external audit and audit supervision. This legislation represents a large capital marketsystem, also make the progress of the importance of internal control people have more deeply.2.The internal control and risk management comparisonInternal control and risk management has the close relation. COSO internal control is that part of the risk management. Therefore, the committee in the whole framework of internal control - the basis of, and in 2003 issued a new report --, "enterprise risk management framework". At present the report was only a rough draft, in public, revised later, is expected to formally released this year. The enterprise risk management framework "inherit and contains the whole framework of internal control - the main content also expanded the three elements, added a goal, updated some ideas for countries to provide a unified enterprise risk management terms and concepts of comprehensive application guide system.COSO internal control and risk management of the definition and elements were: Internal control: enterprise internal control is by the enterprise board of directors, managers, and other staff to implement, for financial reporting accuracy, business activity of efficiency and effect, the relevant laws and regulations such as the follow to achieve the goal of the process and provide reasonable assurance. It includes five elements: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, the surveillance.Risk management: enterprise risk management is a process of the board of directors, the management of enterprises and other personnel to implement, applied in strategy formulation and enterprise all levels of activity, aims to identify possible influence enterprise various potential events, and according to enterprise's risk preference for enterprises to manage risk, to achieve the goal of providing reasonable assurance. It has eight elements: the internal environment, goal setting, event risk identification, risk assessment, countermeasures, control activities, information and communication, the surveillance.The two reports from the COSO perspective, the enterprise risk management and internal control has the following similar or different places:First, they are made by "enterprise board, management and other personnel to implement", emphasize the point, says the participation parties on the internal control and risk management has a corresponding roles and responsibilities.Second, they are all clearly is a "process", not as a static thing, such as system files, technical model and so on, also not be alone or extra activities, such asinspection, evaluation is best placed inside enterprise daily management process, as a kind of routine operation mechanism to construction.Third, they are for the realization of the goal of enterprise provide reasonable assurance. Risk management objectives are four categories, including three categories and internal control collocated, namely report targets, business targets and follow the targets. But the report targets have expanded, it not only include financial report, also requires all the accuracy of internal and external non-financial class report issued by the accurate and reliable. In addition, risk management increased the strategic target, namely and enterprise vision or mission related high-level objectives. This means that risk management is not only ensure management efficiency and effect, and intervention in the enterprise strategy (including business objectives) formulation process.Fourth, risk management and internal control elements have five aspects, i.e. (overlap is control or internal) environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, the surveillance. These coincide most of their goals and realization mechanism coincide of similar decision. Risk management increased goal setting, event identification and risk countermeasures three factors. Coincide elements, connotation, for example, has been extended internal control environment including honest character and moral values, staff quality and ability, the board of directors and the audit committee, management philosophy and management style, the organizational structure, the power and the allocation of responsibility, human resource policies and practices seven aspects. Risk management "internal environment" in addition to include these seven aspects outside, still include risk management philosophy, risk preference (appetite) and risks associated cultural three new content. In the risk assessment elements, risk management requires the consideration of the inherent risk and residual risk, with expectations, worst case values or probability distribution measure risk and to consider time preferences and risk association between the role. In information and communication, risk management emphasized the past, present and future of the relevant data about obtaining and analysis, provides information of the depth and timeliness, etc.Fifth, risk management proposes risk portfolio and the overall risk management (in tegrated management) - are new idea. The enterprise risk management framework "in the theory of modern financial borrowing portfolio risk theory, this paper puts forward the concept of combination and overall management from enterprise level,demanding dispersed in the overall grasp all levels and departments of enterprise, the risk exposure with overall consideration risk countermeasures, prevent dispersed consider and coping by department, such as will risk the risk in technology, financial, separated by information technology, environment, safety, quality, auditing departments, and considering the interaction between risk events, prevent two tendencies: one is the department's risk in risk preference can withstand ability, but within the overall effect may be beyond sustaining limit, because individual risk influence is not always add, may be multiplied; Second is the risk of individual departments over its limits, but exposure to the overall risk level haven't beyond sustaining range, because sometimes has offset the effects of the event of the effect. At this time, and further, strive for higher return risk with room to grow. According to risk portfolio and the overall management point of view, need unification consideration risk events as risk countermeasures between interaction between, overall risk management plan formulated.3. Internal control and risk management inner linkEnterprise system evolution and risk associated with the development. The establishment of a limited liability system is running or partnership enterprise organization from the key turning into a modern shares, it enables shareholders steps possessions and enterprise property and enterprise economic responsibility independent, shareholder transformation will no longer affect the enterprise credit capacity for equity transactions, expanded range and increased liquidity, which reduces the risk of investment and promoting enterprise financing, contributed to today a giant corporation.In order to make equity trading and the shareholders transform business continuity, influence and to make capital and management ability realize more optimal combination of ownership and management, enterprise in the modern enterprise of altitude, which also separate brings new risks, namely professional operators might not perform its accountability and shareholders' expense. In addition, limited liability may also lure enterprise engaged in high risk and damage the project's creditors. Because in limited liability, the potential revenue mainly by the enterprise (shareholders) to obtain, and the risk of failure, the major that bankruptcy is borne by the obligee. The risk is not marketization, the market competition spontaneous constraints or market transactions, such as providing a hedge product quality or natural disasters, but mechanism, belongs to the organization or trade in agency issues,need to regulate rules and system. These systems include corporate governance in the liability system, such as financial report, an internal control and audit, etc.Internal control and risk management is the fundamental role maintenance, security enterprise asset investor interest, and create new value. Fama&Jensen (1983) analyzed under the board of directors of ownership and separation of the internal control functions; Jensen (1993) further analyzed the American board of directors in internal control with reasons for the failure of performance. Theoretically, the enterprise internal control is the enterprise system component, is in the enterprise management and ownership of the separation of investor benefit under the condition of the protection mechanism. Its purpose is to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the accounting information management, prevent manipulation of statements and fraud and protect the company's property security, comply with the law in order to maintain the company's reputation and avoid incur pecuniary loss, etc. The historical origin of internal control, the requirements to earlier more basic, easier or appropriate rise to legislative level. Enterprise risk management is in the new technology and the market conditions of natural extension of internal control. COSO in the enterprise risk management framework of risk management of significance about when this is the case discussion: "enterprise risk management strategy and organization used in the various levels activities. It enables managers in the face of uncertainty can identify, evaluate and manage risk, play the role of creation and maintain value. Risk management can make risk preference and strategic keeps consistent, will risk and growth and return overall consideration, promote the decision against risks and reduce the risk and losses, identify business management and enterprise crossover risk, for various risks to provide overall countermeasures, capture opportunities and make capital rationalization." COCO in explaining the generalized control and risk discusses way: "' leadership 'in the face of uncertainty include choice." risk "refers to individuals or organizations are making choices adverse consequences after the possibility of suffering. The risk is opportunity counterparts." Obviously, these discussions have realized that enterprise exists for shareholders or stakeholders (for nonprofit organization, etc.), and create value value creation is not only passive assets security, it should also include the use of opportunity. Moreover, the threat of shareholder value comes not from the operator internal factors such as accounting frauds, including from the market risk, etc.Technology and market conditions, promote the new progress of internal controlto risk management. In advanced information technology conditions, accounting records realized the electronic control, real-time update, make traditional error-detection and prevent disadvantages accounting control seems outdated. However, the risk is often caused by trading or organization innovation, these innovation comes from emerging market practice, such as enron will energy trading large developed into similar financial derivatives trading. On the other hand, environmental protection and the enforcement of protection of consumer rights, strengthened the social responsibility of the enterprise, if an enterprise may have inadvertently, suffer from commodity market or capital market for the enterprise, and punish the performance brand value, or the capital market capitalisation put-downs. Therefore, the enterprise need a daily operation function and structure to guard against risks, including abide by laws and regulations, and ensure the trust of investors and ensure financial information management efficiency, etc. Therefore, from maintenance and promote this basic function value creation standpoint, risk management and internal control target is consistent, just in new technology and the market conditions, in order to effectively protect the interests of investors need in the basis of the development of internal control more active and more comprehensive risk management.4.From internal control to risk managementThere is a debate that risk management include internal control, or internal control contains risk management. The author thinks that what kind of conclusion that is not very important, the most important is to clear risk management and internal control of the relation between the superposition place. Who's wider, may be with time, technology, market conditions, legal and regulatory practice and different, for example, in the early development of internal control, market risk management tools and technology conditions are not fully (such as computer systems, statistics theory, quantity model, hedge tools and insurance etc.), then the internal control contains (alternative) risk management function is very natural. Even in the same era, different industry their emphasis may also different, for example, in the financial industry regulatory strict or involving the people's lives and health pharmacy and medical industry, the urgency of risk management, enterprise stronger with risk management leading internal control may be more convenient. And in some other enterprise, in order to comply with information disclosure requirements of internal control reports with the internal control system, enterprise for leading, give attention to two ormorethings risk management may be more suitable.Because of the internal control and risk management is the intrinsic relation, countries with different ways were gradually integrate internal control and risk management connected. January 8, 2004, China's relevant aspects held the "commercial bank risk management and internal control BBS", this shows that our banking also began to internal control and risk management connected.The Basel committee "issued by the banking group of internal control system framework said:" the board of directors approved and regularly check the overall strategy, and important system, understand the main risk, the bank for these risks setting acceptable level, ensure management to take necessary steps to identifying, measuring, supervision and control these risks..." Here, the risk management is obviously the content into the internal control framework. In the UK the FSA comprehensive standards (TheCombined Code) about the internal control regulation, it is first in official documents containing definitely in risk management in internal under control. This code is that the board should keep sound internal control system to protect shareholders investment and enterprise assets (principle d. 2). The board of directors at least once a year, and check the effectiveness of enterprise internal control systems, and to shareholders and report. Reports should include all the control, such as financial, management, follow control and risk management (d. 2.1). This rule is listed on the London stock exchange enterprise must abide by.Canadian association of certified accountants control standards committee (COCO) think "control should include risk identification and reduce the risk of", in which not only include the risk of achieving specific goals related, but also include general, if can't identify and took advantage of the opportunity, cannot make enterprise in the face of not anticipate events and uncertain information while maintaining flexibility or resilient. In 1992 the COSO internal control - in the whole framework will risk assessment of the internal control as one of the five elements, in the latest on the introduction of the "enterprise risk management framework" and further integrate internal control expanded to risk management, clearly put risk management include internal control.The author believes that in the actual business process, risk management and internal control is inseparable in rule or legislative process, consideration scope and control strength, the requirements, the greater the control range will be weaker. For its core problems, such as financial reporting accurate and reliable, the most suitable forlegislation to form to constraint, and other more broad content may be more suitable for rules and guidelines. The different levels of the enterprise internal risk management and internal control, the leading relative order can also be different, for example, from the enterprise strategic risk in turn to the management risk, financial risk, and finally to the financial report, risk management and internal control the relative importance should vary. In strategic risk, the risk management should play a leading role play complexation and internal control. This role reversal to financial report, gradually level, should play a leading role is the internal control, risk management play complexation.Despite the risk management and internal control an inner link, but the reality of or on behalf of the current application level of internal control and risk management and lots of gap. The typical risk management attention in particular business with strategic choice or business decisions related to compare the benefits and risks of, for example, banking credit management or market (price) risk management such as exchange rate, interest rate risk, etc. The typical internal control refers to accounting control, audit activities, are generally confined to financial related department. What they all have in common is low level, small range, confined to a few functional departments, and no penetration or applied in enterprise management process and the whole management system, therefore, sometimes looks risk management and internal control or independent of each other two things. Along with the internal control and risk management constantly improve and become more comprehensive, they inevitably overlapping and fusion between until unity.内部控制与风险管理周兆生1、内部控制———标准与立法1985年美国为了遏制日益猖獗的会计舞弊活动,成立了一个反财务舞弊委员会(Treadway委员会),调查导致会计舞弊活动的原因,并提出了解决方案。
内部控制——整体构架【外文翻译】
外文翻译原文INTERNAL CONTROL – INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK Material Source:Addendum to “Reporting to External Parties” May 1994 Author:Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission Senior executives have long sought ways to better control the enterprises they run. Internal controls are put in place to keep the company on course toward profitability goals and achievement of its mission, and to minimize surprises along the way. They enable management to deal with rapidly changing economic and competitive environments, shifting customer demands and priorities, and restructuring for future growth. Internal controls promote efficiency, reduce risk of asset loss, and help ensure the reliability of financial statements and compliance with laws and regulations.Because internal control serves many important purposes, there are increasing calls for better internal control systems and report cards on them. Internal control is looked upon more and more as a solution to a variety of potential problems.What Internal Control IsInternal control means different things to different people. This causes confusion among businesspeople, legislators, regulators and others. Resulting miscommunication and different expectations cause problems within an enterprise. Problems are compounded when the term, if not clearly defined, is written into law, regulation or rule.This report deals with the needs and expectations of management and others. It defines and describes internal control to:(1)Establish a common definition serving the needs of different parties.(2)Provide a standard against which business and other entities —large or small, in the public or private sector, for profit or not —can assess their control systems and determine how to improve them.Internal control is broadly defined as a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:(1)Effectiveness and efficiency of operations.(2)Reliability of financial reporting.(3)Compliance with applicable laws and regulations.The first category addresses an entity’s basic business objectives, including performance and profitability goals and safeguarding of resources. The second relates to the preparation of reliable published financial statements, including interim and condensed financial statements and selected financial data derived from such statements, such as earnings releases, reported publicly. The third deals with complying with those laws and regulations to which the entity is subject. These distinct but overlapping categories address different needs and allow a directed focus to meet the separate needs.Internal control systems operate at different levels of effectiveness. Internal control can be judged effective in each of the three categories, respectively, if the board of directors and management have reasonable assurance that:(1)They understand the extent to which the enti ty’s operations objectives are being achieved.(2)Published financial statements are being prepared reliably.(3)Applicable laws and regulations are being complied with.While internal control is a process, its effectiveness is a state or condition of the process at one or more points in time.Internal control consists of five interrelated components. These are derived from the way management runs a business, and are integrated with the management process. The components are:(1)Control Environment —The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure. Control environment factors include the integrity, ethical values and competence of the entity’s people; management’s philosophy and operating style; the way management assigns authority and responsibility, and organizes and develops its people; and the attention and direction provided by the board of directors.(2)Risk Assessment — Every entity faces a variety of risks from external and internal sources that must be assessed. A precondition to risk assessment is establishment of objectives, linked at different levels and internally consistent. Risk assessment is the identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of the objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed.Because economic, industry, regulatory and operating conditions will continue to change, mechanisms are needed to identify and deal with the special risks associated with change.(3)Control Activities — Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure management directives are carried out. They help ensure that necessary acti ons are taken to address risks to achievement of the entity’s objectives. Control activities occur throughout the organization, at all levels and in all functions. They include a range of activities as diverse as approvals, authorizations, verifications, reconciliations, reviews of operating performance, security of assets and segregation of duties.(4)Information and Communication — Pertinent information must be identified, captured and communicated in a form and timeframe that enable people to carry out their responsibilities. Information systems produce reports, containing operational, financial and compliance-related information, that make it possible to run and control the business. They deal not only with internally generated data, but also information about external events, activities and conditions necessary to informed business decision-making and external reporting. Effective communication also must occur in a broader sense, flowing down, across and up the organization. All personnel must receive a clear message from top management that control responsibilities must be taken seriously. They must understand their own role in the internal control system, as well as how individual activities relate to the work of others. They must have a means of communicating significant information upstream. There also needs to be effective communication with external parties, such as customers, suppliers, regulators and shareholders.(5)Monitoring — Internal control systems need to be monitored–a process that assess es the quality of the system’s performance over time. This is accomplished through ongoing monitoring activities, separate evaluations or a combination of the two. Ongoing monitoring occurs in the course of operations. It includes regular management and supervisory activities, and other actions personnel take in performing their duties. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations will depend primarily on an assessment of risks and the effectiveness of ongoing monitoring procedures. Internal control deficiencies should be reported upstream, with serious matters reported to top management and the board.There is synergy and linkage among these components, forming an integrated system that reacts dynamically to changing conditions.There is a direct relationship between the three categories of objectives, which are what an entity strives to achieve, and components, which represent what is needed to achieve the objectives. All components are relevant to each objectives category. When looking at any one category — the effectiveness and efficiency of operations, for instance —all five components must be present and functioning effectively to conclude that internal control over operations is effective.What Internal Control Can DoInternal control can help an entity achieve its performance and profitability targets, and prevent loss of resources. It can help ensure reliable financial reporting. And it can help ensure that the enterprise complies with laws and regulations, avoiding damage to its reputation and other consequences. In sum, it can help an entity get to where it wants to go, and avoid pitfalls and surprises along the way.What Internal Control Cannot DoUnfortunately, some people have greater, and unrealistic, expectations. They look for absolutes, believing that:(1)Internal control can ensure an entity’s success —that is, it will ensure achievement of basic business objectives or will, at the least, ensure survival. Even effective internal control can only help an entity achieve these objectives. It can provide management information about the entity’s progress, or lack of it, toward their achievement. But internal control cannot change an inherently poor manager into a good one. And, shifts in government policy or programs, competitors’ actio ns or economic conditions can be beyond management’s control. Internal control cannot ensure success, or even survival.(2)Internal control can ensure the reliability of financial reporting and compliance with laws and regulations.This belief is also unwarranted. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable — not absolute — assurance to management and the board regarding achievement of an entity’s objectives. The likelihood of achievement is affected by limitations inherent in all internal control systems. These include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion of two or more people, and management has the ability to override the system. Another limiting factor is that the design of an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.Thus, while internal control can help an entity achieve its objectives, it is not a panacea.What to DoActions that might be taken as a result of this report depend on the position and role of the parties involved:(1)Senior Management — Most senior executives who contributed to this study believe they are basically “in control” of their organizations. Many said, however, that there are areas of their company —a division, a department or a control component that cuts across activities —where controls are in early stages of development or otherwise need to be strengthened. They do not like surprises. This study suggests that the chief executive initiate a self-assessment of the control system. Using this framework, a CEO, together with key operating and financial executives, can focus attention where needed.(2)Board Members — Members of the board of directors should discuss with senior management the state of the entity’s internal control system and provide oversight as needed. They should seek input from the internal and external auditors.(3)Other Personnel — Managers and other personnel should consider how their control responsibilities are being conducted in light of this framework, and discuss with more senior personnel ideas for strengthening control. Internal auditors should consider the breadth of their focus on the internal control system, and may wish to compare their evaluation materials to the evaluation tools.(4)Legislators and Regulators —Government officials who write or enforce laws recognize that there can be misconceptions and different expectations about virtually any issue. Expectations for internal control vary widely in two respects. First, they differ regarding what control systems can accomplish. As noted, some observers believe internal control systems will, or should, prevent economic loss, or at least prevent companies from going out of business. Second, even when there is agreement about what internal control systems can and can’t do, and abo ut the validity of the “reasonable assurance” concept, there can be disparate views of what that concept means and how it will be applied.(5)Professional Organizations —Rule-making and other professional organizations providing guidance on financial management, auditing and related topics should consider their standards and guidance in light of this framework. To the extent diversity in concept and terminology is eliminated, all parties will benefit.(6)Educators —This framework should be the subject of academic researchand analysis, to see where future enhancements can be made.With the presumption that this report becomes accepted as a common ground for understanding, its concepts and terms should find their way into university curricula.We believe this report offers a number of benefits. With this foundation for mutual understanding, all parties will be able to speak a common language and communicate more effectively. Business executives will be positioned to assess control systems against a standard, and strengthen the systems and move their enterprises toward established goals. Future research can be leveraged off an established base. Legislators and regulators will be able to gain an increased understanding of internal control, its benefits and limitations. With all parties utilizing a common internal control framework, these benefits will be realized.译文内部控制——整体构架资料来源：美国全美反舞弊性财务报告委员会著1994年第二版作者：C o m m i t t e e o f S p o n s o r i n g O r g a n i z a t i o n s委员会高层管理人员一直在探求更好的企业经营控制之道。
内部控制外文文献及翻译
中文4500字本科生毕业设计（论文）外文原文及译文所在系管理系学生姓名郭淼专业会计学班级学号指导教师2013年6月外文文献原文及译文Internal ControlEmergence and development of the theory of the evolution of the internal controlInternal control in Western countries have a long history of development, according to the internal control characteristics at different stages of development, the development of internal control can be divided into four stages, namely the internal containment phase, the internal control system phase, the internal control structure phase, overall internal control framework stage.Internal check stages: infancy internal controlBefore the 1940s, people used to use the concept of internal check. This is the embryonic stage of internal control. "Keshi Accounting Dictionary" definition of internal check is "to provide effective organization and mode of operation, business process design errors and prevent illegal activities occur. Whose main characteristic is any individual or department alone can not control any part of one or the right way to conduct business on the division of responsibility for the organization, each business through the normal functioning of other individuals or departments for cross-examination or cross-control. designing effective internal check to ensure that all businesses can complete correctly after a specified handler in the process of these provisions, the internal containment function is always an integral part. "The late 1940s, the internal containment theory become important management methods and concepts. Internal check on a "troubleshooting a variety of measures" for the purpose of separation of duties and account reconciliation as a means to money and accounting matters and accounts as the main control object primary control measures. Its characteristics are account reconciliation and segregation of duties as the main content and thus cross-examination or cross-control. In general, the implementation of internal check function can be roughly divided into the following four categories: physical containment; mechanical containment; institutional containment; bookkeeping contain. The basic idea is to contain the internal "security is the result of checks and balances," which is based on two assumptions: First: two or more persons1西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）or departments making the same mistake unconsciously chance is very small; Second: Two or more the possibility of a person or department consciously partnership possibility of fraud is much lower than a single person or department fraud. Practice has proved that these assumptions are reasonable, internal check mechanism for organizations to control, segregation of duties control is the foundation of the modern theory of internal control.Internal control system phases:generating of internal controlThe late1940s to the early1970s, based on the idea of internal check, resulting in the concept of the internal control system, which is the stage in the modern sense of internal control generated. Industrial Revolution has greatly promoted the major change relations of production, joint-stock company has gradually become the main form of business organization of Western countries, in order to meet the requirements of prevailing socio-economic relations,to protect the economic interests of investors and creditors, the Western countries have legal requirements in the form of strengthen the corporate financial and accounting information as well as internal management of this economic activity.In 1934, the "securities and exchange act" issued by the U.S. government for the first time puts forward the concept of "internal accounting control", the implementation of general and special authorization book records, trading records, and compared different remedial measures such as transaction assets. In 1949, the American institute of certified public accountants (AICPA) belongs to the audit procedures of the committee (CPA) in the essential element of internal control: the system coordination, and its importance to management department and the independence of certified public accountants' report, the first official put forward the definition of internal control: "the design of the internal control includes the organization and enterprise to take all of the methods and measures to coordinate with each other. All of these methods and measures used to protect the property of the enterprise, to check the accuracy of accounting information, improve the efficiency of management, promote enterprise stick to established management guidelines." The definition from the formulation and perfecting the inner control of the organization, plan, method and measures such as rules and regulations to implement internal control, break through the limitation of control related to the financial and accounting department directly, the four objectives of internal control, namely the enterprise in commercial2外文文献原文及译文activities to protect assets, check the veracity and reliability of financial data, improve the work efficiency, and promote to management regulations. The definition of positive significance is to help management authorities to strengthen its management, but the scope of limitation is too broad. In 1958, the commission issued no. 29 audit procedures bulletin "independent auditors evaluate the scope of internal control", according to the requirements of the audit responsibility, internal control can be divided into two aspects, namely, the internal accounting control and internal management control. The former is mainly related to the first two of the internal control goal, the latter mainly relates to the internal control after two goals. This is the origin of the internal control system of "dichotomy". Because the concept of management control is vague and fuzzy, in the actual business line between internal control and internal accounting control is difficult to draw. In order to clear the relations between the two, in 1972 the American institute of certified public accountants in the auditing standards announcement no. 1, this paper expounds the internal management control and internal accounting control: the definition of "internal management control including, but not limited to organization plan, and the administrative department of the authorized approval of economic business decision-making steps on the relevant procedures and records. This authorization of items approved activities is the responsibility of management, it is directly related to the management department to perform the organization's business objectives, is the starting point of the economic business accounting control." At the same time, the important content of internal accounting control degree and protect assets, to ensure that the financial records credibility related institutions plans, procedures and records. After a series of changes and redefine the meaning of the internal control is more clear than before and the specification, increasingly broad scope, and introduces the concept of internal audit, has received recognition around the world and references, the internal control system is made.The internal control structure stage: development of the internal controlTheory of internal control structure formed in the 90 s to the 1980 s, this phase of western accounting audit of internal control research focus gradually from the general meaning to specific content to deepen. During this period, the system management theory has become the new management idea, it says: no physical objects in the world are composed of elements of3西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）system, due to the factors, there exists a complicated nonlinear relationship between system must have elements do not have new features, therefore, should be based on the whole the relationship between elements. System management theory will enterprise as a organic system composed of subsystems on management, pay attention to the coordination between the subsystems and the interaction with the environment. In the modern company system and system management theory, under the concept of early already cannot satisfy the need of internal control systems. In 1988, the American institute of certified public accountants issued "auditing standards announcement no. 55", in the announcement, for the first time with the word "internal control structure" to replace the original "internal control", and points out that: "the enterprise's internal control structure including provide for specific target reasonable assurance of the company set up all kinds of policies and procedures". The announcement that the internal control structure consists of control environment, accounting system (accounting system), the control program "three components, the internal control as a organic whole composed of these three elements, raised to the attention of the internal control environment.The control environment, reflecting the board of directors, managers, owners, and other personnel to control the attitude and behavior. Specific include: management philosophy and operating style, organizational structure, the function of the board of directors and the audit committee, personnel policies and procedures, the way to determine the authority and responsibility, managers control method used in the monitoring and inspection work, including business planning, budgeting, forecasting, profit plans, responsibility accounting and internal audit, etc.Accounting systems, regulations of various economic business confirmation, the collection, classification, analysis, registration and preparing method. An effective accounting system includes the following content: identification and registration of all legitimate economic business; Classifying the various economic business appropriate, as the basis of preparation of statements; Measuring the value of economic business to make its currency's value can be recorded in the financial statements; Determine the economic business events, to ensure that it recorded in the proper accounting period; Describe properly in the financial statements of4外文文献原文及译文economic business and related content.The control program, refers to the management policies and procedures, to ensure to achieve certain purpose. It includes economic business and activity approval; Clear division of the responsibility of each employee; Adequate vouchers and bills setting and records; The contact of assets and records control; The business of independent audit, etc. Internal structure of control system management theory as the main control thought, attaches great importance to the environmental factors as an important part of internal control, the control environment, accounting system and control program three elements into the category of internal control; No longer distinguish between accounting control and management control, and uniform in elements describe the internal control, think the two are inseparable and contact each other.Overall internal control framework stages: stage of internal controlAfter entering the 1990 s, the study of internal control into a new stage. With the improvement of the corporate governance institutions, the development of electronic information technology, in order to adapt to the new economic and organizational form, using the new management thinking, "internal control structure" for the development of "internal control to control the overall framework". In 1992, the famous research institutions internal control "by organization committee" (COSO) issued a landmark project - "internal control - the whole framework", also known as the COSO report, made the unification of the internal control system framework. In 1994, the report on the supplement, the international community and various professional bodies widely acknowledged, has wide applicability. The COSO report is a historical breakthrough in the research of internal control theory, it will first put forward the concept of internal control system of the internal control by the original planar structure for the development of space frame model, represents the highest level of the studies on the internal control in the world.The COSO report defines internal control as: "designed by enterprise management, to achieve the effect and efficiency of the business, reliable financial reporting and legal compliance goals to provide reasonable assurance, by the board of directors, managers and other staff to5西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）implement a process." By defining it can be seen that the COSO report that internal control is a process, will be affected by different personnel; At the same time, the internal control is a in order to achieve business objectives the group provides reasonable guarantee the design and implementation of the program. The COSO report put forward three goals and the five elements of internal control. The three major target is a target business objectives, information and compliance. Among them, the management goal is to ensure business efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control; Information goal is refers to the internal control to ensure the reliability of the enterprise financial report; Compliance goal refers to the internal controls should abide by corresponding laws and regulations and the rules and regulations of the enterprise.COSO report that internal control consists of five elements contact each other and form an integral system, which is composed of five elements: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring and review.Control Environment: It refers to the control staff to fulfill its obligation to carry out business activities in which the atmosphere. Including staff of honesty and ethics, staff competence, board of directors or audit committee, management philosophy and management style, organizational structure, rights and responsibilities granted to the way human resources policies and implementation.Risk assessment: It refers to the management to identify and take appropriate action to manage operations, financial reporting, internal or external risks affecting compliance objectives, including risk identification and risk analysis. Risk identification including external factors (such as technological development, competition, changes in the economy) and internal factors (such as the quality of the staff, the company nature of activities, information systems handling characteristics) to be checked. Risk analysis involves a significant degree of risk estimates to assess the likelihood of the risk occurring, consider how to manage risk.Control activities: it refers to companies to develop and implement policies and procedures, and 6外文文献原文及译文to take the necessary measures against the risks identified in order to ensure the unit's objectives are achieved. In practice, control activities in various forms, usually following categories: performance evaluation, information processing, physical controls, segregation of duties.Information and communication: it refers to enable staff to perform their duties, to provide staff with the exchange and dissemination of information as well as information required in the implementation, management and control operations process, companies must identify, capture, exchange of external and internal information. External information, including market share, regulatory requirements and customer complaints and other information. The method of internal information including accounting system that records created by the regulatory authorities and reporting of business and economic matters, maintenance of assets, liabilities and owners' equity and recorded. Communication is so that employees understand their responsibilities to maintain control over financial reporting. There are ways to communicate policy manuals, financial reporting manuals, reference books, as well as examples such as verbal communication or management.Monitoring: It refers to the evaluation of internal controls operation of the quality of the process, namely the reform of internal control, operation and improvement activities evaluated. Including internal and external audits, external exchanges.Five elements of internal control system is actually wide-ranging, interrelated influence each other. Control environment is the basis for the implementation of other control elements; control activities must be based on the risks faced by companies may have a detailed understanding and assessment basis; while risk assessment and control activities within the enterprise must use effective communication of information; Finally, effective monitoring the implementation of internal control is a means to protect the quality. Three goals and five elements for the formation and development of the internal control system theory laid the foundation, which fully reflects the guiding ideology of the modern enterprise management idea that security is the result of systems management. COSO report emphasizes the integration framework and internal control system composed of five elements, the framework for the7西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）establishment of an internal control system, operation and maintenance of the foundation.In summary,because of social, economic and environmental change management, internal control functions along with the changes, in order to guide the evolution of the internal control theory. As can be seen from the history of the development of internal control theory, often derived from the internal control organizational change management requirements, from an agricultural economy to an industrial economy, innovation management methods and tools for the development of the power to bring internal controls.From the internal containment center,controlled by the internal organization of the mutual relations between the internal control of various subsystems and went to COSO as the representative to the prevention and management loopholes to prevent the goal, through the organization of control and information systems,to achieve the overall system optimization of modern internal sense of control theory, from Admiral time, corresponding to the two economic revolution.Therefore, in the analysis of foreign internal control theory and Its Evolution, requires a combination of prevailing socio-economic environment and business organization and management requirements, so as to understand the nature of a deeper internal control theory of development.8外文文献原文及译文译文：内部控制Ge.McVay一、内部控制理论的产生与发展演进内部控制在西方国家已经有比较长的发展历史，根据内部控制在不同发展阶段的特征，可以将内部控制的发展分为四个阶段，即内部牵制阶段、内部控制制度阶段、内部控制结构阶段、内部控制整体框架阶段。
外文文献翻译-企业内部控制
外文文献及翻译THE CONCEPT OF INTERNALCONTROLSYSTEM: THEORETICALASPECTVaclovas Lakis, Lukas Giriūnas*Vilnius University, LithuaniaIntroductionOne of the basic instruments of enterprise control, whose implementation in modern economic conditions provide conditions for achieving a competitive advantage over other enterprises is the creation of an effective internal control system. In the industry sector, the market is constantly changing, and this requires changing the attitude to internal control from treating it only in the financial aspect to the management of the control process. Internal control as such becomes an instrument and means of risk control, which helps the enterprise to achieve its goals and to perform its tasks. Only an effective internal control in the enterprise is able to help objectively assessing the potential development and tendencies of enterprise performance and thus to detect and eliminate the threats and risks in due time as well as to maintain a particular fixed level of risk and to provide for its reasonablesecurity .The increasing variety of concepts of internal control systems requires their detailed analysis. A detailed analysis of the conceptions might help find the main reasons for their increasing number. It may also help to elaborate a structural scheme of the generalized concept of internal control. Consequently, it may help decrease the number of mistakes and frauds in enterprises and to offer the precautionary means that might help to avoid mistakes and build an effective internal control system.The purpose of the study: to compile the definition of the concept of internal control system and to elaborate the structural scheme of the generalized conception for Lithuanian industrial enterprises.The object of the research: internal control.To achieve the aim, the following tasks were carried out:to examine the definitions of internal control;to design a flowchart for the existing definitions of internal control;to formulate a new internal control system definition;? to identify the place of the internal control system in a company’s objectives and ? its management activities.Study methods: for the analysis of the conceptions of control, internal control, theconcept of internal control system, systematic and comparative means of scietific methods of analysis were used.1. Research of control conceptionAccording to J. Walsh, J. Seward (1990), H. K. Chung, H. Lee Chong, H. K.Jung (1997), control may be divided into two types – internal and external controls those might help to equalize authority or concerned party‘s attitudes to some certain organization control. Internal control involves the supreme enterprise control apparatus and enterprise shareholders, whereas external control might be defined as the power in the market or branch, competitive environment or state business regulation. Such analytical division is essential when analysing industrial or other enterprises, because this attitude to control makes it more specific and properly defined.The identification of an appropriate primary theoretical base is an important task in forming the structure of knowledge about the study subject. Appropriately selected conceptions enable to elucidate the essence of the processes, to characterize them and to realize their interplays and interaction principles. Conceptions may be defined as a summation of empirical cognition which transforms practically achieved results into conceptions. The above ideas might be taken as abstractions and lead to an ungrounded conclusion, and through conceptions the reality might be lost. Operating with more than one conceptions allows to form a universal opinion about the reality. Noteworthy, when operating with conceptions an optimal agreement might be found between theory and practice: using the common point of contact –conceptions –a theorist and a practician will always find the way and understand one another.The main problem of internal control is related to the definition of control conception and the identification of the place of internal control in an organization. Constant changes of the extent, functions and roles of internal control enable to form acommon definition of internal control and to identify its place in an organization.Analysis of the concept of internal control and its interpretation are essential for assessing the internal control system, because the conception of control is widely used not only in scientific research, but also in the daily activities of an enterprise; therefore the same conception might have a lot of various meanings and interpretations. Analysis of the concept provides conditions for the further research, because it is impossible to form a model of internal control assessment if the research object is unknown. A lot of definitions and variations of control can be found in thepublications by Lithuanian and foreign scientists and in public information sources. For example, in the Dictionary of International Words (2002), control is defined as: supervision, inspection of something; comparison of actual and required ? conditions; an enterprise or a group of people that control the work and responsibility of other ? enterprises or groups of people;maintenance of something.?In addition to the above seven internal control, and documentation control. Performance control and worker quality control, etc. The new system of accounting supervision system on the unit interior, the main contents of the internal control system.On the other hand, in the specialized Dictionary of Economic Terms (2005), control is defined as a performance with a definite influence on the management of an enterprise, as rights based on laws and contracts that involve proprietary rights to the whole property or its part, or any other rights that enable to exert a significant influence on the management and performance of an enterprise, or state supervision. Even in common information sources the definitions of control are formulated differently, although the common meaning is quite similar. Analysis and practical studies of Lithuanian scientists’ works enable to state that there is no one solid concept, definition or description of control. For example, E. Bu?kevi?iūt? (2008) says that when control is more particularly defined, its rules and requirements are described in more detail, it becomes more effective, more specific, more psychologically suggestive, it gives more freedom limits of choice for supervisors and less possibilities of lawlessness for people under control when. Identifying the object of the research, it should be noted that different definitions of control are given in scientific studies by Sakalas, 2000; Navickas, 2011; Katkus, 1997; Bu?kevi?iūt?, 2008; Drury, 2012; Bi?iulaitis, 2001; Lee Summers, 1991; Patrick, Fardo, 2009; Spencer, Pickett, 2010; Gupta, 2010 and other Lithuanian and foreign scientists (see Fig. 1).The different conceptions and their interpretations indicate that there is no solid opinion about how to define control, and even scientists and practicians themselves do not agree upon a unified definition or description of control or the conception of internal control and its interpretations. In scientific literature, different interpretations of control conceptions are usually related to different aspects of this conception, and their meaning in different situations may be defined in different ways depending on the situation and other external factors. According to A. Katkus (1997), C. Drury (2009), R. Bi?iulaitis (2001), D. R. Patrick, S. W. Fardo (2009), K. H. S. Pickett (2010), during a long-term period control is usually related to achieving the alreadysettled goals, their improvement and insurance. In other information sources (Dictionary of International Words, 2002; Sakalas, 2000; Bukeviiūt, 2008; Lee Summers, 1991) control is emphasized as a certain means of inspection which provides a possibility to regulate the planned and actual states and their performance. Despite these different opinions, control might be reasoned and revealed as a traditional function of any object of control, emphasized as one of the main self-defence means from the possible threats in the daily performance of an organization. There is also a more modern approach. For example, V. Navickas (2011) and P. Gupta (2010), presenting the concept of control, name it not only as one of the main factors that influence the organization’s performance and influences its management, but also as one of the assessment means of the taken decisions and achieved values. Such interpretation of the conception of control shows the main role of control. For example, R. Kanapickien? (2008) has analysed a big number of control definitions and says that only an effective and useful control should exist in an enterprise because each enterprise tries to implement its purposes and avoid the possible losses, i.e. mistakes and frauds. According to J.A. Pfister (2009), there are several types of control, and they can be grouped into strategic, management, and internal control. Thus, different researchers give different definitions of control, their descriptions have different goals, but different control definitions lead to numerous variations in the analysis of the conception of control. Thus, to create an effective control, the presence of its unified concept becomes a necessity and the basis for ensuring an effective control of the organization’s performance. The existence of different conceptions of control also indicates that there might be different types or kinds of control.2. The conception of internal controlHistorical development of internal control as individual enterprise system is not as broad as other management spheres in science directions. The definition of internal control was presented for the first time in 1949 by the American Institute of Certificated Accountants (AICPA). It defined internal control as a plan and other coordinated means and ways by the enterprise to keep safe its assets, check the covertness and reliability of data, to increase its effectiveness and to ensure the settled management politics. However, the presented definition of control concept has been constantly improved, and nowadays there is quite an extensive set of conceptions that indicates the system of internal control as one of the means of leadership to ensure safety of enterprise assets and its regular development. In 1992, the COSOmodelappeared; its analysis distinguished the concepts of risk and internal control. Nnow, the concept of internal control involved not only accounting mistakes and implementing means of their prevention, but also a modern attitude that might identify the spheres of control management and processes, and also a motivated development of their detailed analysis. The Worldwide known collapses of such companies as Enron, Worldcom, Ahold, Parmalat and others determined to issue in 2002 the Law of Sarbanes–Oxley in the USA, in which attention is focused on the effectiveness of the enterprise internal control system and its assessment. Such a significant law as that of Sarbanes–Oxley has dearly show that not only the internal control system must be concretized and clearly defined, but also the means of implementing the internal control system and assessing their effectiveness must be covered. The concept of internal control was further improved by such Lithuanian and foreign scientists as A.Сонин(2000), D. Robertson (1993), M.R. Simmons (1995), I. Toliatien? (2002), V. Lakis (2007), R. Biiulaitis (2001), J. Mackeviius (2001) and the international scientific organizations COSO, INTOSAI, CICA, IT Governance Institute.A comparative analysis of the introduced concepts of internal control shows that the usage of the concept of internal control is quite broad as it is supposed to involve the performance not only of the state, but also of the private sector. Although the conception of internal control is defined in different ways emphasizing its different aspects, the essential term still remains the same in all authors’ definitions: internal control is the inspection, observation, maintenance and regulation of the enterprise’s work (see Fig. 3.).It should be also be mentioned that the system of internal control may be defined in different ways every time. For example, R. T. Yeh and S. H. Yeh (2007) pay attention to the fact that usually such values as honesty, trust, respect, openness, skills, courage, economy, initiative, etc. are not pointed out, although they definitely can influence not only the understanding of the concept of internal control, but also its definition, because in different periods of time and in different situations it can obtain slightly different shades of meaning. Control and people, and values produced by people or their performance are tightly connected; consequently, internal control must be also oriented to the enterprise’s values, mission and vision; it does not matter how differently authors define the conception assessment limits: significant attention must be paid not to internal control itself, but to the identification of its functions andevaluation. Mostly internal control is concerned with authority management tools that help to control processes and achieve enterprise goals (COSO, 1992; Сонин, 2000; INTOSAI, 2004; CobiT, 2007; Toliatien?, 2002; Coco, 1995).C.J. Buck, J.B. Breuker (2008) declare internal control as a mistake detecting and correctingsystem; although J. Mackevi?ius (2001) and R. Bi?iulaitis (2001a) state that internal control is defined as a summation of certain rules, norms and means, actually such definitions are identical, but internal control must be related to safety, the rational use of property and the reliability of financial accounting.Results of a comprehensive analysis of internal control enable to state that, although different authors give different definitions of internal control, there are still some general purposes of the system of internal control, aimed, to ensure reliable and comprehensive information, to protect the property and documents, to enssure an effective economic performance, observation of accounting principles and presentation of reliable financial records, obeying laws and executive acts, enterprise rules and the effective control of risk. Analysis of concept of internal control, presented in both foreign and Lithuanian literature enables to formulate its generalized definition: the system of internal control is part of enterprise management system, which ensures the implementation of its goals, effective economic and commercial performance, observance of accounting principles and an effective control of risks, which enables to minimize the number of intentional and unintentional mistakes and to avoid frauds in the process of enterprise performance, made by its authority or employees.The internal control is an important symbol of modern enterprise management, through the practice of the conclusion is: to control is strong, weak, without control is controlled, disorderly. The new regulations "accounting law 27 units shall establish and perfect the system of supervision unit interior accountant. Unit interior accountant controls on the execution, the internal control is.The internal control is the formation of a series of measures to control functions, procedures, methods, and standardized and systematized, make it become a rigorous, relatively complete system. According to the control of the internal control can be divided into different purpose accounting control and management control. Accounting control and protection of assets is safe, the accounting information authenticity and integrity and financial activities related to the legitimacy of control, Management control means to ensure operation policy decision, implementation ofbusiness activities and promote the efficiency and effectiveness, and the effect of the relevant management to achieve the goals of control. Accounting control and management control and not mutually exclusive, incompatible, some control measures can be used for accounting control, and can also be used to control.The goal is to ensure that the internal control unit operations efficiency and effect, safety, economic information of assets and financial reports of reliability. Its main functions: one is to achieve target management policy and management, Second is the assets of safety protection unit is complete, prevent loss of assets, Three is to guarantee the business and financial accounting information authenticity and integrity. In addition, the legitimacy of the financial activities within the unit is the internal control goals.Good, although the internal control to achieve these goals, but whether the internal control design and operation, it is not how to eliminate its inherent limitations. This limitation must also be clear and prevention. Main show is: (1) the limited by cost benefit principle, (2) if the employee has different responsibility ignore control program, misjudgment, even the collusion, inside and outside, often cause in fraud internal control malfunction, (3) management personnel abuse, and to set up or Passover control of internal control ignored, also can make the establishment of internal control non-existing.The internal control system in a company must cover and help to properly organize and control the entire activity of the company; thus, according to majority of authors, internal control is all-inclusive activity in financial and management accounting, as well as in the strategic management of projects, operations, personneland the total quality management. However, the most important thing is that internal control should not only cover the entire activity of the company, but also take into account its objectives, goals and tasks in order to make its economic-commercial activity as effective as possible. Analysis of scientific literature in the field shows that it is important not only to predict the particular areas of internal control and interrelate them, but also to stress that the most important objective of internal control is the effective management of risk by identifying and eliminating errors and frauds inside the company. Therefore, the concept of internal control offered by the authors covers a company’s areas of activities, its tasks and objectives; also, it provides for the main goal – an effective risk management.Despite the quantitative indicators used for goal assessment, each enterprise and especially extractive industry enterprises where attention should be focused onavoiding mistakes and fraud should elaborate and introduce a really effective and optimal system of internal control and accounting so as to strengthen its position in the market and optimize profitability.ConclusionsThe analysis of control definitions has shown that rather wide variations of definitions and their interpretations prove control to be a wide concept, mainly due to the fact that control has quite many different aspects and its meaning in different situations may be also defined differently.Nevertheless, there are still some general aspects of the system of internal control, which include ensuring reliable and comprehensive information, protecting the property and documents, to ensure an effective economic performance, keeping to the principles of accounting and presenting reliable financial records, obeying laws and executive acts, enterprise rules and ensuring an effective control of risk.As a result of the study, the authors present an inclusive and generalizing definition of internal control: the system of internal control is part of the enterprise management system that ensures the implementation of the enterprise’s goals, its effect ive economic-commercial performance, observance of accounting principles and an effective control of work risks, which enables to minimize the number of intentional and unintentional mistakes, and to avoid frauds in the process of enterprise performance, made by its authority or employees.中文翻译：内部控制制度：理论研究拉基斯，卢卡斯维尔纽斯大学，立陶宛引言企业控制的基本工具之一，建立一个有效的内部控制制度，为现代经济条件下企业获得竞争优势提供了条件。
内部控制外文文献及翻译
LNTU---Acc附录A关于内部控制的意见 如果要证明功能扩展到包含内部控制的有效性，那么报告准则则必须制定，若干基本问题必须被解决。
随着日益频繁增长，审计员听取了他们应该发表的一个效力于客户的内部控制制度建议的意见。
这一证明功能扩展的主张者迅速指出，目前已经有了实例如独立审计师的报告公开他们的客户的内部控制制度和一些政府机构的成效，包括一些空置中的美国证券和交易委员会，都需要一个报告。
这些证实类型的反对者公布了任何关于内部控制的有效性，他们认为，目前有显着性差异监管机构的报告要求和提出意见的内部控制将会误导公众。
本文综述了目前报告的做法，考虑到理想状态相关的危害的特点，并最后提出了一些在任何给与最后判决之前必要的予以回答的问题。
现状报告 虽然审计员的报告中的一些情况提及了内部控制的性质，但作出的本质陈述还有很大不同的效应。
大型银行。
关于对内部控制的观点事实上出现在一些大型银行和看法发行的年度报告中。
有时这些意见是被董事会要求的。
例如，下面的主张出现在1969年年度报告的一个大型纽约银行中，作为第3款的独立会计师的标准短形式的报告： 我们的审核工作包括评价有效性，大块的内部会计控制，其中还包括内部审计。
我们认为，在于程序的影响下，再加上银行内部审计工作人员所进行的审核，这些构成一个有效的系统的内部会计控制。
意见被提供给几个其他银行，但它们基本上引用的意见是一样的。
美国证券交易委员会的规定。
美国证券交易委员会表格X-17A-5，要求独立审计师作出某些有关的内部控制陈述，并必须在每年的大多数成员国家与每一个证券经纪或注册的交易商根据1934年证券交易法第15条进行交流时。
此外，美国证券交易委员会的第17a-5(g)规定要求独立的核数师的报告要包含“一份如，是否会计师审查了程序，要安全措施保障客户的证券的声明中”此外，许多股票交易所要求该报告要表明审查已取得的“会计制度，内部会计控制和程序，是为维护证券，包括适当的测试它们对以后的期间，检验日期前”，很显然，美国证券交易委员会的工作人员更倾向于考虑，会计师包括了语言相似，所要求的所有报告的交流提交给证券交易委员会。
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)内部控制系统披露—一种可替代的管理机制根据代理理论，各种治理机制减少了投资者和管理者之间的代理问题（Jensen and Meckling，1976； Gillan，2006）。
传统上，治理机制已经被认定为内部或外部的。
内部机制包括董事会及其作用、结构和组成（Fama，1980；Fama and Jensen，1983），管理股权(Jensen and Meckling，1976)和激励措施，起监督作用的大股东(Demsetz and Lehn，1985)，内部控制系统(Bushman and Smith，2001)，规章制度和章程条款(反收购措施)和使用的债务融资（杰森，1993）。
外部控制是由公司控制权市场(Grossman and Hart,1980)、劳动力管理市场（Fama,1980）和产品市场（哈特,1983）施加的控制。
各种各样的金融丑闻，动摇了世界各地的投资者，公司治理最佳实践方式特别强调了内部控制系统在公司治理中起到的重要作用。
内部控制有助于通过提供保证可靠性的财务报告，和临时议会对可能会损害公司经营目标的事项进行评估和风险管理来保护投资者的利益。
这些功能已被的广泛普及内部控制系统架构设计的广泛认可，并指出了内部控制是用以促进效率，减少资产损失风险，帮助保证财务报告的可靠性和对法律法规的遵从（COSO,1992）。
尽管有其相关性，但投资者不能直接观察，因此也无法得到内部控制系统设计和发挥功能的信息，因为它们都是组织内的内在机制、活动和过程（Deumes and Knechel,2008）。
由于投资者考虑到成本维持监控管理其声称的（Jensen and Meckling，1976）,内部控制系统在管理激励信息沟通上的特性，以告知投资者内部控制系统的有效性,是当其他监控机制（该公司的股权结构和董事会）比较薄弱，从而为其提供便捷的监控（Leftwich et等,1981）。
内部控制中英文文献
Appendix：Disclosure on Internal Control SystemsAs a Substitute of Alternative GovernanceMechanismsAccording to agency theory, various governance mechanisms reduce the agency problem between investors and management (Jensen and Meckling, 1976; Gillan, 2006). Traditionally, governance mechanisms have been identified as internal or external. Internal mechanisms include the board of directors, its role, structure and composition (Fama, 1980; Fama and Jensen, 1983), managerial share ownership (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) and incentives, the supervisory role played by large shareholders (Demsetz and Lehn, 1985), the internal control system (Bushman and Smith, 2001), bylaw and charter provisions (anti-takeover measures) and the use of debt financing (Jensen, 1993). External control is exerted by the market for corporate control (Grossman and Hart, 1980), the managerial labor market (Fama, 1980) and the product market (Hart, 1983).After the various financial scandals that have shaken investors worldwide, corporate governance best practices have stressed in particular the key role played by the internal control system (ICS) in the governance of the firm. Internal control systems contribute to the protection of investors’ interests both by promoting and giving assu rance on the reliability of financial reporting, and by addressing the boards’ attention on the timely identification, evaluation and management of risks that may compromise the attainment of corporate goals. These functions have been widely recognized by the most diffused frameworks for the design of ICS that have stated the centrality of internal control systems in providing reasonable assurance to investors regarding the achievement of objectives concerning the effectiveness and efficiency of operations, the reliability of financial reporting and the compliance with laws and regulations (COSO, 1992; 2004).Notwithstanding their relevance, investors cannot directly observe ICSs and therefore cannot get information on their design and functioning because they areinternal mechanisms, activities and processes put in place within the organization (Deumes and Knechel, 2008).As investors take into account the costs they sustain to monitor management when pricing their claims (Jensen and Meckling 1976), management have incentives to communicate information on the characteristics of the ICS in order to inform investors on the effectiveness of ICS when other monitoring mechanisms (the ownership structure of the firm and the board of directors) are weak, and thereby providing them with the convenient level of monitoring (Leftwich et al., 1981). The possible existence of substitution among different mechanisms has been debated in corporate governance literature (Rediker and Seth, 1995; Fernandez and Arrondo, 2005) based on Williamson’s (1983) substitute hypothesis, which argues that the marginal role of a particular control mechanism depends upon its relative importance in the governance system of the firm.In this paper, we contend that disclosure on the characteristics of ICS is a relevant alternative governance mechanism in the monitoring package selected by the management. According to Leftwich et al. (1981) “managers select a monitoring package, and the composition of the chosen package depends on the costs and benefits of the various monitoring devices” (p. 59).In particular, we focus particular on the relationship between ICS disclosure and two other mechanisms of the monitoring package ( the ownership structure of the firm and the board of directors) that according to literature (Jensen and Meckling, 1976; Fernandez and Arrondo,2005; Gillan, 2006) play a relevant role in monitoring management’s behavior. We posit that incentives for reporting on the ch aracteristics of ICS depend on the supervisory role played by t he firms’ ownership structure and board of directors.We therefore examine the contents and extent of ICS disclosure of 160 European firms listed in four different stock exchanges (London, Paris, Frankfurt and Milan) on a three-year period (2003 - 2005). By using this international sample, we are able to the depict some features of different institutional environments.We find evidence that disclosure on ICS is a substitute for the monitoring role played by other governance mechanisms as ownership concentration, institutional ownership, the proportion of independent directors sitting on the board and the proportion of accounting expert members on the audit committee.We add to previous literature on the governance role played by disclosure on ICS by adopting a complete disclosure framework that allows us to consider in detail the content and extent of information the management discretionarily communicates on the ICS of the firm. While corporate governance best practices ask for the disclosure on the characteristics of the ICS, they do not provide instructions on whatmanagement should disclose and on the extent of such disclosure. Such lack of instructions leaves management with a discretionary choice on the narrative content of ICS disclosure.This paper off ers empirical support for Williamson’s (1983) substitute hypothesis among different governance mechanisms and it has relevant policy implications.While most corporate governance studies consider disclosure as a complementary mechanism management adopts to reinforce the governance system of the firm (Chen and Jaggi, 2000; Eng and Mak, 2003; Barako et al., 2006) and indeed provide contrasting results, in this study we show that disclosure on ICS substitutes for other governance mechanisms. This means that not necessarily better governance implies greater transparency and disclosure. Firms adhere to corporate governance best practices by disclosing information on the ICS and such disclosure is more extensive when investors need more assurance about the protection of their interests, when other governance mechanisms are weak. On the other side, when the governance system is sound, management have less incentives to extensively disclose information on the ICS, as this is a costly activity and its benefits are overwhelmed by the other governance mechanisms.The evidence provided by the empirical research has important policy implications, because it offers insights to firms and practitioners on the relevance of disclosure on internal control systems as a monitoring mechanism for investors. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. The next section reviews the theoretical background and develops the research hypotheses. The research method isdescribed in section 3, followed by results discussed in section 4. Concluding remarks are presented in the last section.Theoretical Background and Hypotheses DevelopmentAccording to corporate governance literature, the main internal monitoring mechanisms are the board of directors, the ownership structure of the firm, and the internal control system (Gillan, 2006). In particular, ICSs play a central role in the protection of investors’ interests both assuring the reliability of financial reporting and promoting the timely identification, assessment and management of relevant risks that encumber upon the business. The centrality of ICS in corporate governance has been widely recognized by the vast majority of codes of best practice1.In order to express their concerns and price their claims, investors need to get information on the design and functioning of monitoring mechanisms. In the cases of mechanisms like the ownership structure and the board of directors, information concerning structure and composition, type and composition ofcommittees in place, number of meetings and so on, is publicly available. In some other cases, the enforcement of reporting on ICS weaknesses or material deficiencies - like those required by the SOX - provide investors with relevant information about possible gaps in the functioning of the ICS (Leone, 2007).Nevertheless, specific information on the characteristics of the ICS is indeed more difficult and expensive to gather because ICSs are complex sets of activities and processes carried out internally to the firm (Deumes and Knechel, 2008; Bronson et al., 2006). Indeed, while corporate governance best practices require to disclose information on the ICS, they do not provide instruction on the narrative contents of ICS disclosure. Therefore, investors are unlikely to be informed about the nature, extent, processes and quality of internal controls, unless disclosure on the characteristics of the ICS is provided by the management. The content and extent of such disclosure will depend on the existing monitoring package (Leftwich et al., 1981; Williamson, 1983) of the firm.At the best of our knowledge, disclosure on the specific characteristics and functioning of ICS has been deserved poor attention. While the introduction of theSOX in the USA, and the related requirement for disclosure on ICS deficiencies or material weaknesses has increasingly attracted academic interest in recent times (among the others see Ash Baugh et al., 2007; Doyle et al., 2007; Leone, 2007), only few studies focused on the specific characteristics of ICS disclosure.Bronson et al. (2006) examine firm characteristics associated to disclosure on ICS before it was made mandatory by SOX. They find a positive association between the likelihood of issuing a management report on internal control and corporate governance variables like the number of audit committee meetings and the percentage of institutional shareholders. Deumes and Knechel (2008) identify a list of six disclosure items that capture the ICS information generally available in the annual reports of firms analyzed. They find that the disclosure index on ICS is significantly associated to variables that proxy for the agency costs of equity and with variables that proxy for agency costs of debt.According to our theoretical framework, if disclosure on ICS acts as an alternative governance mechanism, when the pricing of claims is high (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) -due to the fact that the other various monitoring devices already in place are not effective enough to limit the costs of the agency relationship - we expect that disclosure on ICS acts as substitute for other monitoring mechanisms in order to reduce the overall intensity of agency conflicts (Williamson, 1983, Fernandez and Arrondo, 2005).In order to test this hypothesis, we focus on two fundamental elements of the monitoring package,besides the disclosure on ICS: the ownership structure and the board of directors. Corporate governance studies identify three proxies for the supervisory role of the ownership structure: i) the supervisory role of large investors, ii) the monitoring role of institutional investors and iii) the alignment effect of managerial ownership. We expect that the incentives for management to disclose information on the firm’s ICS will be higher for those firms where the monitoring r played by the owners is weaker.Literature and empirical evidences attribute to large shareholders a key supervisory role. Kang and Shivdasani (1995) detected a positive association between the presence of large shareholders and management’s turnover in underperforming firms. On the other side, a disperse ownership is usually associated to a lower monitoring ability and greater information symmetries (Shleifer and Vishny, 1986; Zeckhauser and Pound, 1990; Barako et al. 2006).Alternatively said, the direct supervision performed by large shareholders reduces the need for alternative monitoring mechanisms. Consequently, we expect that incentives to disclose on ICS are higher when the ownership is diffused.Institutional investors also play a relevant supervisory role. While individual investors in public firms have little incentive to monitor management as they are exposed to private costs against which there are public benefits (Grossman and Hart, 1980), institutional investors have higher incentives to play an active monitoring role on the management because of their large voting power (Milgrom and Roberts, 1992). Moreover, institutional investors can access to management through privileged information channels, in order to get disclosure on the firm’s operations (S chadewitz and Blevins, 1998). Thus we expect that in presence of institutional investors, management have lower incentives to disclose on ICS.The last proxy for the supervisory role of the ownership structure is the managerial ownership. It is generally accepted that management’s stock ownership contributes to the alignment of managerial and shareholders’ interes ts (Jensen and Meckling, 1976; Bronson etal., 2006; Deumes and Knechel, 2008), thus reducing the agency conflicts inside the firm (Eng and Mak, 2003; Fernandez and Arrondo, 2005 Cheng and Courtenay, 2006). As managerial stock ownership reduces the need for monitoring, we expect that incentives to disclose on ICS are higher when the level of managerial ownership is lower.Boards of directors play a crucial role in monitoring management as shareholders delegate to them the power to control managerial decisions. Previous literature (Carcelo and Neal, 2000;Fernandez and Arrondo, 2005; Krishan, 2005) identifies different proxies for the capability of the board to monitor managerial behavior : i) the proportion of independent directors, ii) the presence of CEO duality, iii) the presence of accounting experts and iv) the monitoring ability of the audit committee. We expect that the more powerfulthe monitoring role of the board of directors, the lower the incentives for management to disclose information on ICS. Independent directors are expected to monitor the activities of the board and to limit managerial opportunism (Fama, 1980; Fama and Jensen, 1983). Empirical evidences support this expectation. Rosenstein and Wyatt (1990) explain the positive stock price effects associated to the appointment of a new independent director in terms of positive reaction signals of the markets to the monitoring role played by the outsiders. A number of studies document a positive relationship between the proportion of independent directors on the board and firms’ performance (Baysinger and Butler, 1985; Goodstein and Boeker, 1991; Pearce and Zahra, 1992): the proportion of independent directors of the board is considered a proxy of the capability of the board to control managerial actions (Fernandez and Arrondo, 2005) thus supporting a positive association between the proportion of independent members of the board and effectiveness of their monitoring role. Therefore, we expect that the higher the presence of independent directors, the lower incentives for management to voluntarily disclose on ICS.-- Sergio Beretta. Disclosure on Internal Control Systems-As a Substitute ofAlternative Governance Mechanisms, Bocconi University，Press.2009.附录：内部控制系统披露—一种可替代的管理机制根据代理理论，各种治理机制减少了投资者和管理者之间的代理问题(Jensen and Meckling, 1976； Gillan, 2006)。
内部控制【外文翻译】
内部控制【外文翻译】外文文献翻译译文一、外文原文原文：Internal controlIntroductionThe system of internal control over financial reporting in Japan under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) was implemented as of the fiscal year starting on April 1 2008.Under this system, executive officers of listed companies are obligated to evaluate their company's internal control over financial reporting and to file the results of such evaluation in the form of an internal audit report with the Financial Services Agency (FSA). In this report, executive officers should state material weakness if they judge any material weakness exists in the company's internal control over financial reporting. The report should also be audited by outside accounting auditors before being filed with the FSA. Since most Japanese companies have a fiscal year that ends in March, June 2009 will be the first time most companies file such a report.When the internal control system was introduced, it made reference to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of the US. Under the Japanese system, clear standards were set regarding the set-up of internal controls over financial reporting in an effort to prevent the creation of excessive documentation and to control costs, two issues which had occurred in the US. However, even with such standards, some uncertainty exists. In particular, uncertainty arises regarding the connection between this system under the FIEA and the rules of the Companies Act.Failure to submit the internal audit report or submission of false statements can lead to liabilities and criminal penalties under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). However, if there is a material weakness in the company's internal controls over financial reporting and executive officers disclose such material weakness in theinternal audit report, no sanctions will be imposed under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, nor will it directly lead to the director's liabilities under the Companies Act. Rather, disclosure of such material weakness is thought to be desirable, because by disclosing such material weakness, a company can improve the quality of its internal control over financial reporting, which will enable the company to submit more accurate financial reports in the future.Internal control is a process-effected by an entity's board of directors, management, and other personnel--designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Internal control consists of the following five interrelated components.1、Control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure.2、Risk assessment is the entity's identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of its objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed.3、Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure that management directives are carried out.4、Information and communication are the identification, capture, and exchange of information in a form and time frame that enable people to carry out their responsibilities.5、Monitoring is a process that assesses the quality of internal control performance over time.The interlaced audit issue is as follows: under the internal control system of the Companies Act, company auditors must audit the method and the results of the accounting audit conducted by outside accounting auditors. On the other hand, the internal control system of the FIEA requires the outside accounting auditors to auditthe company auditors' monitoring of internal financial controls. Therefore, company auditors that audit outside accounting auditors under the Companies Act are audited by the same outside accounting auditors under the FIEA. This interlaced audit however is expected to make each audit more effective because the company auditor and the outside accounting auditor will each monitor the audit of the other.The time lag issue is expected to arise due to the timing of the submissions of the various audit reports required under the FIEA and the Companies Act. Company auditors will need to prepare and submit audit reports regarding the execution of duties by directors for the fiscal year as required by the Companies Act. However, it is expected that these audit reports will be submitted before the internal audit report required under the FIEA is submitted and audited by the outside accounting auditors. Thus, if the internal audit report points out a material weakness that was not referred to in the audit reports prepared by the company auditor, the company auditor will be placed in a difficult position and will need to decide whether to amend andmake changes to the audit reports as such audit reports should also disclose such weaknesses. However, if the directors, the company auditors, and the accounting auditors are cooperating properly, this issue would not arise.It is expected that the system of internal control over financial reporting will prompt companies to build better control systems through cooperation between the directors, company auditors and outside accounting auditors.Connection between the two internal control systemsOn the internal financial controls and internal accounting control the similarities and differences.A difference between monitoring and control objectives.Reason for the difference between the two, simply because of financial supervision and control of the target company's material flow and cash flow, and accounting internal control object is the information flow. Understanding of Marx's words, “the production and the production of bookkeeping records are two different things after all, just to ship the same loading and shipping order are two differentthings.” Corporate material production process is based on the currency as the leading material movement, production and operation of the currency as the beginning and the end result, is achieving its goal of expanding the value of value. And accounting control is passed that have occurred in the material flow, capital flow formed by the flow of information to be the recognition, measurement, reporting. The former to productivity gains, the latter objective, the real target. However, operation of the accounting value of enterprise assets, after all, subordinate to the overall objective, we should also ask for the overall objective of internal control should also be an asset value of its end. Whyis this request? This is because the production activities of financial decisions and accounting need to subordinate corporate financial activities, accounting control objectives are to be subject to financial control target.Internal accounting control system is now setting goals, still remain in traditional accounting supervision and legal, reasonable levels, while ignoring the principles of economic efficiency, not subordinated to the overall goal of corporate finance. We know that even if the security integrity of corporate assets and personnel compliance. However, poor economic efficiency of enterprises can not continue to exist, then such an accounting internal control system, despite the integrity of the specification how beneficial for them? Accounting supervision, internal accounting controls, is the business management of the important part, if not for the continued survival and development of enterprises play a useful role, it is indeed sad . Although the internal financial control and internal accounting control objectives differ, but the overall goal should always be consistent. Accounting control objectives should always be subject to financial supervision and corporate goals. Accounting internal controls for business expenses from their own legitimacy and rationality to make judgments, give expenditure or expenditure not to start. This is the person in charge of the accounting organization's powers. The specific operation is completed by the cashier. Economic business is completed, signed by the person in charge, after verification of the accounting charge, the decision to grant or not to grant reimbursement claims. Practices through review of the original certificate and found areas of doubt or vulnerability. In acheck, be controlled when reimbursement. Another majoraccounting internal control task is to ensure that the accounting information provided by an objective, true, complete and timely.Financial internal control is based on the financial accounts of enterprises as the main target of supervision, to consider the legality of the decision-making costs, reasonable, and consistent with the principles of economic interests. The right balance of enterprises in the enterprise legal person units, in determining the expenditure, the accounting bodies and accounting personnel to provide business only the amount of funds available for expenditure obligations, and no decision-making rights. Usually the meeting was the participation by the general accountant, accounting bodies and accounting personnel did not participate in conference events. Therefore, the financial supervision to monitor the main orientation is very necessary. Financial supervision should be in advance of supervision as well, so that you can not burn in prevention. Matter of course, need supervision in order to promptly correct the error.From a doctrinal perspective the Catholic Church is highly centralized under the authority of the pope and his bishops. However, from an administrative perspective the church is quite decentralized with each diocese and each parish within the diocese having a fair amount of autonomy. Dioceses have virtually no external or regulatory oversight of their financial statements. Unlike corporations which provide quarterly financial statements to the SEC and hold quarterly conference calls with outside analysts, the church is subject to almost no recurring outside financial scrutiny. Many dioceses voluntarily post their audited annual financial statements on their website at the conclusion of the year-end audit. Additionally, many dioceses provide parishioners with an annual financial and administrativenewsletter which provides a highly summarized view of the cash flows for the year and the results of social and spiritual programs offered by the diocese. But many other dioceses do neither. Since they are not required by law to be transparent and accountable in their finances, they choose to keep their finances private.Corporate Financial Controls。
企业内部控制外文翻译文献编辑
Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise RiskManagement (内部控制与企业风险管理透视)dil Kaya《Eurasian Business Perspectives》,2022,11(02):379-389英文 2788 单词， 16276 字符；中文 5242 汉字Grounded on the literature review on Enterprise Risk Management(ERM) this paper aims to analyze the extent and the effectiveness of internal control as well as ERM and to explore their connection with the value creation. A theoretical lens is used to discuss whether effective internal control and ERM enhance performance and increase value creation ability. ERM is most frequently defined with the reference to the 2004 Guidance document published by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission (COSO). Proponents of COSO’s ERM Integrated Framework describe this framework as “a world-level template for best practice”, and claim that ERM used by management to enhance an organization ability to manage uncertainty and to consider how much risk to accept as it strives to increase stakeholder value. Additionally the Internal Control— Integrated Framework is a viable and suitable framework for designing, implementing, conducting and assessing the effectiveness of internal control and for reporting. The relationship between value creation and ERM is widely investigated in academic literature. Empirical studies on the value creation abilities of ERM and internal control suggest that there is a positive relation between value creation,internal control and ERM. These studies reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high-qualityERM adoption and implementation. Using different identifier of ERM such as Standard and Poor’s risk management ratings or presence of a Chief Risk Officer, the findings of empirical studies reveal that higher ERM quality is associated with less resource constraint, better corporate governance and better accounting performance. Additionally academic studies indicate that the risk-based communication is reinforced with ERM implication.Enterprise risk management , Internal control , Value creationChanging business and operating environments, increased competition, technology driven, global scale and complex structure of companies have increased the importance of effective internal control and risk management. Enterprise risk management (ERM)is a process that is viewed today as an indicator for optimal achievement of companies’ mission and execution of its strategy. This is also a coping mechanism vis -`a-vis new demand for reporting purposes and additional compliance mandate placed on organizations to have effective internal control and risk management. Rating agencies e.g. Standard & Poor’s have included ERM assessment in ratings of insurance companies since 2022. Furthermore the stakeholders’ demand for more transparency and accountability on the business decisions and governance forces enterprises to have effective internal control and ERM. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission (COSO) has released two frameworks provide guidance for management in implementing and evaluating effective enterprise risk management and internal control processes,leading to the improvement of organizational performance and governance. These are COSO’s Internal Control—Integrated Framework and COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework.COSO guidance is recognized as being globally and its integrated frameworks are viewed as being the principal tools that enable organizations to enhance their capacity in dealing with uncertainty that presents both risk and opportunity with the potential to erode or enhance value.Proponents of COSO’s ERM Integrated Framework describe this framework as “a wor ld-level template for best practice”, and claim that ERM used by management to strengthen an organization ability to manage uncertainty and to consider how much risk to accept as it strives to increase stakeholder value.Additionally the Internal Control—Integrated Framework is a viable and suitable framework for designing, implementing, conducting and assessing the effectiveness of internal control and for reporting. COSO’s principal argument is that the essential prerequisites of firms’ long term success are good risk management and internal control (DeLoach and Thomson 2022).While internal control has been always an important field for internal and external audit, risk management has been a vital concern on the fields of finance and insurance but it is received widespread attention following accounting and corporate scandals in the beginning 2000s and 2022 global crisis (Wu et al. 2022). Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act and its impacts and repercussions on global capital markets have put the spotlight on COSO’s Internal Control Framework and the recent economic crisis has heightened considerably the importance of ERM (Landsittel and Rittenberg 2022).Grounded on the literature review on ERM this paper aims to analyze the extent and the effectiveness of internal control as well as ERM and to explore their connection with the value creation. A theoretical lens is used to discuss whether effective internal control and ERM enhance performance and increase value creation ability. The remainder of the paper is presented in three sections. Section 2 expands upon the COSO Integrated Frameworks. This is followed by the related literature that provides an overview of empirical research findings on internal control and enterprise risk management. The fourth and final section provides a conclusion providing some final comments.Whether applied individually or together,COSO frameworks are the principal guidance used by organizations to address internal and external pressures placed onthem to have effective internal control and risk management. Originally formed in 1985, COSO is voluntary private sector initiative dedicated to improve organizational performance and governance through effective internal control, enterprise risk management, and fraud deterrence. Its sponsoring organizations are the Institute of Internal Auditors, the American Accounting Association, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Financial Executives International, and the Institute of Management Accountants.COSO ’s first Internal Control Framework is released in 1992 and is admitted widely as a recognized standard for developing and maintaining effective and efficient internal control. On May 14, 2022, as a result of multiyear project, COSO updated this Framework to include enhancements and clarifications for users.COSO (2022a, p. 3) defines internal control as “a process, affected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:–Effectiveness and efficiency of operations–Reliability of financial reporting–Compliance with applicable laws and regulations ” .There is a growing support for the general argument that the effectiveness of internal control is a crucial and challenging system for organizations. COSO’s Internal Control Framework is developed in expecting to help and support organizations to design, implement, conduct and assess these systems of internal control. Components, objectives and entity levels presented three dimensions of internal control. These are presented in Table 1.Table 1 Three dimensions of internal controlSource: COSO (1992)ComponentsObjectives Organizational levels Control environments OperationsEntity level Risk assessment ReportingDivision Control activities ComplianceOperating unit Information and communicationMonitoring activitiesFunctionThe strength of the internal control system is to improve organizations’achievements of their objectives through providing effectiveness and efficiency of their operations, reliability of their financial reporting and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Internal control system needs to be assessed regularly to check its effectiveness. There are 17 relevant principles associated with the internal components. These are presented in Table 2.Table 2 Principles of internal control17 Principals by internal control componentsControl environmentmitment to integrity and ethical values2.Oversight of the development and performance of internal control3.Establishment of structures, reporting, authorities and responsibilitiesmitment to competence5.AccountabilityRisk assessment6.Suitable objectives7.Risk identification and analysis8.Assessment of fraud risk9.Identification and analysis of significant change Control activitiesControl activities10.Selection and development of control activities11.Selection and development of general controls over technology12 Deployment through policies and proceduresInformation and communication13 Use of relevant information14 Internal communication15 External communicationMonitoring16.Conduct of ongoing and/or separate evaluations17.Evaluation and communication of deficienciesSource: COSO (2022b) Internal Control Integrated Framework Poster Another area that COSO provides guidance is risk management that organizations need to effectively deal with uncertainty for optimal achievement of their mission and execution of their strategy. ERM Integrated Framework is developed as a process,ongoing and flowing through the enterprise that comprises aligning risk appetite and strategy, improving risk responses of the entity and seizing opportunities. According to Arnold et al. (2022), this strategic approach to the riskmanagement concentrates on the opportunity side of risk identification and response.ERM is defined by COSO (2004, p. 4) as “a process, affected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, and manage risks to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the entity’s objectives” . Internal control is an integral part of ERM.COSO’s ERM Framework (2004) and its new exposure draft emphasize that where properly implemented and executed ERM enables organizations to grow shareholder’s value through facilitating management’s ability deal effectively with uncertainty and enhancing the ability to communicate value creation.The COSO’s three dimensional model of ERM that is similar to its Internal Control Framework is presented in Table 3.Table 3 Three dimensions of ERMComponents Objectives Organizational levelsInternal environments Strategic Entity levelObjective setting Operations DivisionEvent identification Reporting Business unitRisk assessment Compliance SubsidiaryRisk responseControl activitiesInformation and communicationSource: COSO (2004)ERM and internal control is a fast growing area of interest in the academic research. Empirical studies use public information or survey data for measuring ERM implementation and majority of these studies have positive findings on the relationship of value creation and ERM.Different measures are used in empirical studies of internal control and ERM. Tobin’s Q ratio is the most commonly used as proxy for firm value in empirical risk management studies. This widely used ratio compares the market value of a firm’sassets to their replacement cost (Hoyt and Liebenberg 2022, 2022). It is usually calculated as the market value of equity plus the book value of liabilities divided by the book value of assets (Hoyt and Liebenberg 2022; McShane et al. 2022). Beasley et al. (2022) examine equity market reactions to announcements of appointments of senior executive officers overseeing the ERM processes.Researchers use also different measures for the identification of ERM practices in a firm. The existence of a Chief Risk Officer (CRO) position or similarly a senior risk officer is widely used as an identifier of ERM implication (Lundqvist 2022; Beasley et al. 2022; Hoyt and Liebenberg 2022; Liebenberg and Hoyt 2003; Pagach and Warr 2022). In several studies, firms have been asked directly through survey about their level of ERM implementation (Beasley et al. 2005). Risk management ratings from S&P are also used by many empirical studies (McShane et al. 2022). S&P ratings are said to be more sophisticated and comprehensive measure of ERM (Lundqvist 2022).Gordon et al. (2022) create an ERM index; variable data are collected from publicly available information, for example: sales, number of employees, material weakness disclosures, announcements of financial restatements, and auditor fees. The findings of this study suggest that the connection between ERM and firm performance is related to the proper match between ERM and firm level factors. These factors are the contextual variables surrounding the firm such as environment uncertainty, industry competition, firm complexity, and monitoring by Board of Directors.Razali et al. (2022) examined the determinants of ERM adoption in Malaysian Public Listed Companies and they found that firms with high turnover,appointing CRO and not diversifying internationally seem to adopt ERM. Lundqvist (2022) distinguished four components or pillars of ERM to measure how firms implement ERM dimensions.The first pillar is the general internal environment and objective setting; the second pillar is the general control activities, information and communication;the third one is the holistic organization of risk management;and finally the fourth pillar is the specific identification and risk assessment activities. According to the author, a well implemented ERM must have all four pillars; but onlythe third one separates ERM from non-ERM companies.According to DeLoach and Thomson (2022), the COSO ERM framework enhances risk-focused communication that comprises the issues relevant to improving governance, assessing risk, designing risk responses and control activities, facilitating relevant information and communication flows,and monitoring ERM and internal control performance. Baxter et al. (2022) pointed also the positive aspects of ERM; and they found that “higher quality ERM is associated with better corporate governance (i.e., audit committees charged with direct oversight of risk), less audit-related risk (i.e., stable auditor relationships and effective internal controls), presence of risk officers/committees, and boards with longer tenure” (Baxter et al. 2022, p. 1265).O’Don nell (2005) developed a theoretical understanding of how and when ERM facilitates value chain activities. Paape and Spekle´ (2022) investigated risk management effectiveness of COSO Frameworks for the mechanistic view on risk appetite and tolerance. Liebenberg and Hoyt (2003) found that financial leverage is positively associated with ERM implementation, but using a broader set of indicators, Hoyt and Liebenberg (2022) found that ERM has a negative relation to leverage. According to Liebenberg and Hoyt (2003), a major obstacle to empirical research in ERM is the difficulty in identifying firms engaging in ERM. Firms typically do not disclose whether they are managing risks in an integrated manner. Grace et al. (2022) investigated specific aspects of ERM’s value creation in insurance companies and they found that ERM practices significantly increase costs and revenues efficiency and they documented the impact of board involvement on reducing firm costs and augmenting firm value.McShane et al. (2022) examined the relationship between risk management and firm value using S&P’s ERM ratings. They found a positive relationship between firm value and increasing level of traditional risk management but not for a higher ERM rating. Their findings suggest that firm value augments as firms implement increasingly more sophisticated traditional risk management but does not augment further as firms attain ERM.Arnold et al. (2022) investigated ERM and organizational structure from a strategic management perspective in the context of Sarbanes Oxley Act’s section 404 requirements by companies. They found a powerful relationship between the strength of ERM processes and organizational flexibility and this relation is mediated by the level of IT compatibility. Furthermore, Arnold et al. (2022) found that ERM have a positive impact on supply chain performance and they imposed a theoretical understanding of ERM’s impact on the values chain activities.To conclude this section, empirical studies on the value creation abilities of ERM and internal control present in general positive findings.Most of the studies found positive relation between value creation,internal control and ERM.These studies reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high -quality ERM adoption and implementation.The studies which use Standard and Poor’s risk management ratings,reveal that higher ERM quality is associated with less resource constraint, better corporate governance and better accounting performance. Beside these findings some researchers assert that there is no evidence that application of the COSO frameworks improve risk management and internal control effectiveness. Neither do they find a support for value creation ability of these frameworks. There are still some questions to be posed and answered by researchers on the effectiveness and efficiency of internal control and ERM.Internal control and ERM effectiveness is crucial to identify events that may impact the organization’s well-being and erode the shareholder’s value and respond to identified risks. New demand for reporting purposes and additional compliance mandate placed on organizations to have effective internal control and risk management have enhanced the role and importance of ERM. COSO frameworks are the principal guidance used by organizations to address the issues relevant to improving governance, strategy setting, business planning, and execution, monitoring and adapting processes of an enterprise.Over the past years, a substantial body of academic research on internal controland ERM has developed on the search of empirical evidence on whether and how they affect corporate values. These studies have generated a number of findings that should be of interest to the development of risk management in companies. Understanding how academic literature assesses internal control and ERM practices has significant value. Also important is the recognition that the role of risk managers is crucial for companies that are positioned to strategically align their goals of main stakeholders.Empirical researches support the significance and importance of the ERM practices on providing value for shareholders in an environment where the stakeholders are increasingly demanding for more transparency and accountability on the business decisions and governance. Additionally academic studies indicate that the risk-based communication is reinforced with ERM implication.本文以企业风险管理(ERM)文献综述为基础，旨在分析内部控制和企业风险管理的范围和有效性，并探讨其与价值创造的关系。
(完整版)内部控制英文文献目录
内部控制英文文献目录1.内部控制管制对盈余质量的影响：来自德国的证据（March 2008）The effect of internal control regulation on earnings quality: Evidence from Germany2.内部控制制度如何影响财务报告？（Altamuro，June 24, 2009）How Does Internal Control Regulation Affect Financial Reporting3.财务报告内部控制缺陷的决定因素（Doyle，May 15, 2006）Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting4.应计质量与财务报告内部控制（Doyle，January 24, 2007）Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting5.SOX内部控制缺陷对公司风险与权益资本成本的影响（Ashbaugh-Skaife，June 10, 2008）The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity6.审计委员会质量、审计师独立性与内部控制缺陷（Zhang）Audit Committee Quality, Auditor Independence, and Internal Control Weaknesses7.小企业受益于内部控制缺陷审计师认证吗Do Small Firms Benefit from Auditor Attestation of Internal Control Effectiveness8.内部控制缺陷的决定因素（Jahmani）Determinants of Internal Control Weaknesses In Accelerated Filers9.操控性应计项目能帮助区分内部控制缺陷和欺诈吗Do Discretionary Accruals Help Distinguish between Internal Control Weaknesses and Fraud10.财务报告质量对债务契约的影响：来自内部控制缺陷报告的证据（Costello，September 4, 2010）The impact of financial reporting quality on debt contracting: Evidence from internal control weakness reports11.重大内部控制缺陷与盈余管理Material Internal Control Weaknesses and Earnings Management in the Post-SOX Environment12.家族企业的内部控制（April 2013）Internal Controls in Family-Owned Firms（）13.内部控制质量对企业并购绩效的影响研究Study on the Impact of the Quality of Internal Control on the Performance of M&A14.内部控制质量与信用违约互换利差（January 2014）Internal Control Quality and Credit Default Swap Spreads15.家族企业内部控制：特征和后果Internal Control in Family Firms: Characteristics and Consequences16.内部控制报告与会计信息质量：洞察”遵守或解释的“内部控制制度Internal control reporting and accounting quality：Insight "comply-or-explain" internal control regime 17.内部控制报告与会计稳健性Internal Control Reporting and Accounting Conservatism18.会计信息质量影响产品市场契约吗？来自政府合同授予的证据（March 2014）Does Accounting Quality Influence Product Market Contracting? Evidence from Government Contract Awards19.公司特征与财务报告质量：尼日利亚制造业上市公司的证据20.内部控制情况与专家审计师选择The Association between Internal Control Situations and Specialist Auditor Choices21.审计费用反应了控制风险的风险溢价吗（2013-07）Do Audit Fees Reflect Risk Premiums for Control Risk?22.内部控制质量与审计定价Internal Control Quality and Audit Pricing under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act23.内部控制缺陷与权益资本成本：来自萨班斯法案404节披露的证据Internal Control Weakness and Cost of Equity: Evidence from SOX Section 404 Disclosures24.内部控制缺陷与信息不确定性Internal Control Weaknesses and Information Uncertainty25.重大内部控制缺陷与股票价格崩溃危险：来自404条款披露的证据（May 2013）Material Weakness in Internal Control and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from SOX Section 404 Disclosure26.SOX内部控制缺陷对公司风险与权益资本成本的影响The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity27.信用评级、债务成本与内部控制信息披露：SOX302和SOX404法的比较28.萨班斯-奥克斯利法案对会计信息债务契约价值的影响The Effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on the Debt Contracting Value of Accounting Information29.财务报告内部控制的不利意见与审计师解聘/辞职Adverse Internal Control over Financial Reporting Opinions and Auditor Dismissals/Resignations30.新管理人员任命与随后的SOX法案404的意见Appointment of New Executives and Subsequent SOX 404 Opinion31.萨班斯奥克斯利：有关萨班斯法案404影响的证据Sarbanes-Oxley: The Evidence Regarding the Impact of Sox 40432.内部控制有效性自愿披露的经济决定因素及后果：从首次公开发行的证据（March 2013）Economic Determinants and Consequences of Voluntary Disclosure of Internal Control Effectiveness: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings33.非营利组织中内部控制问题的原因和后果The Causes and Consequences of Internal Control Problems in Nonprofit Organizations34.SOX内部控制披露在公司控制权市场中的价值The Value of SOX Internal Control Disclosures in the Market for Corporate Control35.内部控制缺陷与销售、一般的及行政费用的非对称性行为Internal Control Weakness and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs 36.内部控制缺陷及补救措施披露对投资者感知的盈余质量的影响The Impact of Disclosures of Internal Control Weaknesses and Remediation on Investor-Perceived Earnings Quality37.内部控制缺陷与美国上市的中国公司与美国公司的审计师SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Auditors of U.S.-Listed Chinese versus U.S. Firms38.内部控制信息披露与代理成本—来自瑞士的非金融类上市公司的证据（January 2013）Internal Control Disclosure and Agency Costs Evidence from Swiss listed non-financial Companies 39.萨班斯奥克斯利法案与公司投资：来自自然实验的新证据The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Corporate Investment: New Evidence from a Natural Experiment40.国内投资者保护、所有权结构与交叉上市公司遵守SOX要求披露内部控制缺陷Home Country Investor Protection, Ownership Structure and Cross-Listed Firms’Compliance with SOX-Mandated Internal Control Deficiency Disclosure41.审计师对披露重大缺陷相关风险的看法Auditors’ Perceptio ns of the Risks Associated with Disclosing Material Weaknesses42.交叉上市公司提供与美国公司相同质量的披露？来自萨班斯-奥克斯利法案302条款下的内部控制缺陷信息披露的证据Do cross-listed firms provide the same quality disclosure as U.S. firms? Evidence from the internal control deficiency disclosure under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act43.内部控制缺陷与并购绩效Internal Control Weaknesses and Acquisition Performance44.萨班斯-奥克斯利法案302条款下的内部控制缺陷对审计费用的影响The Effect of Internal Control Weakness under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Audit Fees 45.审计师对财务报告内部控制的评价对审计费用、债务成本及净遵从收益The Effect of Auditors’ Assessment of Internal Control of over Financial Reporting on Audit Fees, Cost of Debt and Net Compliance Benefit46.上市公司披露的信息含量与萨班斯-奥克斯利法案Information Content of Public Firm Disclosures and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act47.财务错报与股票市场的契约：从增发的证据Financial Misstatements and Contracting in the Equity Market: Evidence from Seasoned Equity Offerings48.公司治理质量与SOX 302条款下内部控制报告Corporate Governance Quality and Internal Control Reporting Under Sox Section 30249.审计委员会质量、审计师独立性与内部控制缺陷Audit Committee Quality, Auditor Independence, and Internal Control Weaknesses50.SOX404条款的影响：成本，盈余质量与股票价格The Effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, Earnings Quality, and Stock Prices51.内部控制缺陷与银行贷款契约：来自SOX404条款披露的证据Internal Control Weakness and Bank Loan Contracting: Evidence from SOX Section 404 Disclosures 52.审计师对财务报告内部控制的决策：分析、综合和研究方向Auditors’ Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Decisions: Analysis, Synthesis, and Research Directions53.应计质量与财务报告内部控制（Doyle，The Accounting Review, forthcoming）Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting54.业绩基础CEO和CFO 薪酬对内部控制质量的影响The impact of performance-based CEO and CFO compensation on internal control quality55.内部控制重大缺陷与CFO 薪酬Internal Control Material Weaknesses and CFO Compensation56.财务报告内部控制缺陷的决定因素Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting57.内部控制与管理指南Internal Control and Management Guidance58.2002萨班斯-奥克斯利法案302条款下内部控制缺陷的市场反应以及这些缺陷的特征Market Reactions to the Disclosure of Internal Control Weaknesses and to the Characteristics of those Weaknesses under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 200259.自愿报告内部风险管理和控制系统的经济激励Economic Incentives for Voluntary Reporting on Internal Risk Management and Control Systems60.后萨班斯法案时代审计意见的信息含量The information content of audit opinions in the post-sox era61.上市公司披露的信息含量与萨班斯-奥克斯利法案（April, 2010）Information Content of Public Firm Disclosures and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act62.信息摩擦如何影响公司资产流动性的选择？萨班斯法案404条款的影响How d o Informational Frictions Affect the Firm’s Choice of Asset Liquidity? The Effect of SOX Section 40463.已审计的信息披露给资本市场参与者带来利益是什么（December 19, 2013）What are the benefits of audited disclosures to equity market participants64.诉讼风险与审计定价：公众股权的作用（January 7, 2013）Litigation Risk and Audit Pricing: The Role of Public Equity65.萨班斯-奥克斯利法案对IPO和高收益债券发行人的影响The Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley on IPOs and High Yield Debt Issuers66.来自金融危机的公司治理的经验教训The Corporate Governance Lessons from the Financial Crisis67.谁对企业欺诈吹口哨Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud68.内部控制缺陷与现金持有价值Internal Control Weakness and Value of Cash Holdings69.民族文化和制度环境对内部控制信息披露的影响The impact of national culture and institutional Environment on internal control disclosures70.财务报告质量与权益资本成本之间联系的讨论：一些个人的意见（June 6, 2013）Some Personal Observations on the Debate on the Link between Financial Reporting Quality and the Cost of Equity Capital71.使用盈利预测同时估计企业层面的权益资本成本和长期增长Using Earnings Forecasts to Simultaneously Estimate Firm-Specific Cost of Equity and Long-Term Growth72.高管薪酬差距与权益资本成本Executive Pay Disparity and the Cost of Equity Capital73.财务报告质量与公司债券市场（博士论文，Mingzhi Liu, 2011）Financial Reporting Quality and Corporate Bond MarketsReferencesAboody, D., J. Hughes, and J. Liu. (2005) Earnings quality, insider trading, and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 43: 651–673.Akins, B., J. Ng and R. Verdi (2012) Investor competition over information and the pricing of information asymmetry. The Accounting Review 87(1): 35-58.Ali, A., A. Klein and J. Rosenfeld. (1992) Analysts’ use of information about permanent and transitory earnings components in forecasting annual EPS. The Accounting Review 67: 183-198.Amihud, Y., and H. Mendelson. (1986) Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics 17: 223–249.Artiach, T. and P. Clarkson. (2011) Disclosure, conservatism and the cost of equity capital: A review of the foundation literature. Accounting and Finance 51(1): 2-49.Ashbaugh-Skaiffe, H., D. Collins, W. Kinney, Jr., and R. LaFond (2009) The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies on firm risk and cost of equity. Journal of Accounting Research 47(1): 1-43. Armstrong, C., J. Core, D. Taylor and R. Verrecchia (2011) When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital? Journal of Accounting Research 49(1): 1-40.Balakrishnan, K., R. Vashishtha and R. Verrecchia (2012) Aggregate competition, information asymmetry and cost of capital: Evidence from equity market liberalization. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.Barron, O., O. Kim, S. Lim and D. Stevens (1998) Using analysts forecasts to measure properties on analysts’ information environment. The Accounting Review 73: 421-433.Barry, C., and S. Brown. (1985) Differential information and security market equilibrium. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20: 407–422.Barth, M., W. Beaver, and W. Landsman (2001) The relevance of value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view,” Journal of Accounting and Economics (Sept): 77-104. Barth, M., Y. Konchitchki and W. Landsman (2013) Cost of capital and earnings transparency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, forthcoming.Beyer A., D. Cohen, T. Lys and B. Walther (2010) The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50: 296-343.Bhattacharya, N., F. Ecker, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper (2012) Direct and mediated association among earnings quality, information asymmetry, and the cost of capital, The Accounting Review 87(2): 449-482. Botosan, C. (1997) Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72: 323–350. Botosan, C., and M. Plumlee. (2002) A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 21–40.Botosan, C., M. Plumlee and Y. Xie (2004) The role of information precision in determining the cost of equity capital. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (2-3): 233-259.Botosan, C., and M. Plumlee. (2005) Assessing alternative proxies for the expected risk premium. The Accounting Review 80: 21-53.Botosan, C., M. Plumlee and H. Wen. (2011) The relation between expected returns, realized returns, and firm risk characteristics. Contemporary Accounting Research 28(4): 1085-1122.Brown, P. and T. Walter (2012) The CAPM: Theoretical validity, empirical intractability and practical applications. Abacus 1-7.Callahan, C., R. Smith and A. Spencer (2012) An examination of the cost of capital implications of FIN 46. The Accounting Review 87(4): 1105-1134.Chava, S., and A. Purnanandam (2010) Is default risk negatively related to stock returns? Review of Financial Studies 23: 2523-2559.Chen, S., B. Miao and T. Shevlin (2013) A new measure of disclosure quality: The level of disaggregation of accounting data in annual reports. Working paper, The University of Texas at Austin. Christensen, P., L. de la Rosa and G. Feltham (2010) Information and the cost of capital: An ex ante perspective. The Accounting Review 85(3): 817-848.Clarkson, P., J. Guedes and R. Thompson (1996) On the diversifiability, observability, and measurement of estimation risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31: 69084.Claus, J., and J. T homas (2001) Equity premia as low as three percent? Evidence from analysts’ earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. The Journal of Finance 56(5): 1629-1666. Clinch G., and B. Lombardi (2011) Information and the cost of capital: the Easley-O’Hara (2004) model with endogeneous information acquisition. Australian Journal of Management 36(5): 5-14.Coles, J., U. Loewenstein, and J. Suay. (1995) On equilibrium pricing under parameter uncertainty. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30: 347–374.Core, J., (2001) A review of the empirical disclosure literature: Discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 441-456.Core, J., W. Guay and R. Verdi, (2008) Is accruals quality a priced risk factor? Journal of Accounting and Economics 46: 2-22.Daniel, K. and S. Titman, 1997, Evidence on the characteristics of cross-sectional variation in common stock returns. Journal of Finance 52, 1-33.Daske, H., L Hail, C. Leuz and R. Verdi (2008) Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research 46: 1085-1142.Daske, H., L Hail, C. Leuz and R. Verdi, (2013) Adopting a label: Heterogeneity in the economic consequences around IAS/IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research 51(3):495-548. Dechow, P. and I. Dichev. (2002) The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 35-59.Dechow, P., W. Ge and C. Schrand (2010) Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50: 344-401. Dhaliwal, D., L. Krull and W. Moser (2005) Dividend taxes and implied cost of equity capital. Journalof Accounting Research 43(5): 675-708.Dhaliwal, D., L. Krull and O. Li (2007) Did the 2003 Tax Act reduce the cost of equity capital? Journal of Accounting and Economics 43(1): 121-150.Diamond, D., and R. Verrecchia. (1991) Disclosure, liquidity, and cost of capital. Journal of Finance 46: 1325–59.Dye, R., (2001) An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 181-235.Easley, D., S. Hvidkjaer and M. O’Hara. (2002) Is information risk a determinant of asset returns. Journal of Finance 57: 2185-2221.Easley, D., and M. O’Hara. (2004) Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Fi nance 59: 1553–1583.Easton, P. (2004) PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review 79(1): 73-96.Easton, P., and S. Monahan. (2005) An evaluation of accounting based measures of expected returns. The Accounting Review 80: 501–538.Easton, P., and S. Monahan. (2010) Evaluating accounting-based measures of expected returns: Easton and Monahan and Botosan and Plumlee redux. Working paper, University of Notre Dame.Ecker, F., J. Francis, I. Kim, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper (2006). A returns-based representation of earnings quality. The Accounting Review 81: 749–780.Fama, E., and J. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy 81: 607–636.Fama, E., and K. French. (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47(2): 427-465.Fama, E., and K. French. (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 3–56.Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., and K. Schipper. (2004) Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79: 967-1010.Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., and K. Schipper. (2005) The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics 39: 295-327.Francis, J., Nanda, D., and P. Olsson. (2008) Voluntary disclosure, information quality, and costs of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (1): 53-99.Gebhardt,W., C. Lee and B. Swaminathan (2001) Towards an ex ante cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 39(1): 135-176.Goh, B-W., J. Lee, C-Y. Lim and T. Shevlin (2013) The effect of corporate tax avoidance on the cost of equity. Working paper, Singapore Management University.Gow, I., G. Ormazabal and D. Taylor (2010) Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research The Accounting Re view 85(2): 483-512.Gray, P., P. Koh and Y. Tong (2009) Accruals quality, information risk and cost of capital: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 36(1-2): 51-72.Guay, W., S.P. Kothari and S. Shu (2011) Properties of implied cost of capital using analysts’ forecasts. Australian Journal of Management 36(2): 125-149.Hail, L. (2002) The impact of voluntary corporate disclosure on the ex-ante cost of capital for Swiss firms European Accounting Review 11: 741-773.Hail, L., and C. Leuz. (2006) International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Journal of Accounting Research 44(3): 485-531.Healy, P., and K. Palepu (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 405-440. Hirshleifer, D., K. Hou, and S.H. Teoh (2012) The accrual anomaly: Risk or mispricing? Management Science (58-2); 320–335.Holthausen, R., and R. Watts (2001) The relevance of value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics (Sept): 3-75.Hribar, P. and T, Jenkins. (2004) The effect of accounting restatements on earnings revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies 9(2-3): 337-356.Hughes, J. S., J. Liu, and J. Liu. (2007) Information asymmetry, diversification, and cost of capital. The Accounting Review 82: 705–729.Hughes, J. S., J. Liu, and J. Liu. (2009) On the association between expected returns and implied cost of capital” Review of Accounting Studies 14: 246-259.Hutchens, M. and S. Rego (2013) Tax risk and the cost of equity capital. Working paper, Indiana University.Hwang, L-S., W-J. Lee, S-Y. Lim and K-H. Park, (2013) Does information risk affect the implied cost of equity capital? An analysis of PIN and adjusted PIN. Journal of Accounting and Economics 55(2-3): 148-167.Kim, D., and Y. Qi (2010) Accruals quality, stock returns, and macroeconomic conditions. The Accounting Review 85(3): 937-978.Klein, R., and V. Bawa. (1977) The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 215–231.Kothari, S.P., X. Li and J. Short. (2009) The effect of disclosures by management, analysts, and financial press on cost of capital, return volatility, and analyst forecasts: A study using content analysis. The Accounting Review 82(5): 1255-1297.Kravet, T. and T. Shevlin. (2010) Accounting restatements and information risk. Review of Accounting Studies 15: 264-294.Kyle, A. (1985) Continuous auctions and insider trade. Econometrica 53(6): 1315-1335.Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. Verrecchia. (2007) Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45(2): 385–420.Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. Verrecchia. (2012) Information asymmetry, information precision, and the cost of capital. Review of Finance 16: 1-29.Lambert, R., (2009) Discussion of “on the association between expected returns and implied cost of capital” Review of Accounting Studies 14: 260-268.Leuz, C., and R. Verrecchia (2004) Firms’ capital allocation choices, information quality, and the cost of capital. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.Li, V., T. Shevlin and D. Shores (2013) Revisiting the AQ measure of accrual quality. Working paper, University of Washington.Lys, T., and S. Sohn. (1990) The association between revisions of financial analyst’ earnings forecasts and security price changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13: 341-363.Mashruwala, C. and S. Mashruwala (2011) The pricing of accrual quality: January versus the rest of the year. The Accounting Review 86(4): 1349-1381.McInnis, J. (2010) Earnings smoothness, average returns and implied cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 85(1): 315-341.Mohanram, P., and D. Gode (2013) Removing predictable analyst forecast errors to improve implied cost of equity estimates. Review of Accounting Studies 18: 443-478.Ogneva, M., K.R. Subramanyam, and K. Raghunandan (2007) Internal control weakness and cost of equity: Evidence from SOX Section 404 disclosures. The Accounting Review 82(5):1255-1297. Ogneva, M., (2012) Accrual quality, realized returns, and expected returns: The importance of controlling for cash flow shocks, The Accounting Review 87(4): 1415-1444.Petersen, M., (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance data panels: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22(1): 435-480.Petkova, R. (2006) Do the Fama-French factors proxy for innovation in predictive variables? Journal of Finance 61: 581-612.Reidl, E., and G. Serafeim (2011) Information risk and fair values: An examination of equity betas. Journal of Accounting Research 49(4): 1083-1122.Strobl, G., (2013) Earnings manipulation and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, forthcoming.Verrecchia, R. (2001) Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 97-180. Vuolteenaho, T. (2002) What drives firm-level stock returns? The Journal of Finance 57: 233–264.How Do Various Forms of Auditor Rotation Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from China内部控制质量、企业风险与权益资本成本——理论分析与实证检验1.Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting.Accounting Review, Oct2007, V ol.82 Issue52.Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control An Empirical Analysis.FullAccounting Review,Apr2005, Vol. 80 Issue 23.Balancing the Dual Responsibilities of Business Unit Controllers Field and Survey Evidence.Accounting Review, Jul2009, Vol. 84 Issue44.Corporate Governance and Internal Control over Financial Reporting A Comparison ofRegulatory Regimes Accounting Review, May2009, Vol. 84 Issue 35.Earnings Management of Firms Reporting Material Internal Control Weaknesses under Section404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing, Nov2008, Vol. 27 Issue 26.Economic Incentives for V oluntary Reporting on Internal Risk Management and Control Systems.Auditing, May2008, V ol. 27 Issue 67.Firm Characteristics and Voluntary Management Reports on Internal Control. Auditing, Nov2006,Vol. 25 Issue28.Former Audit Partners on the Audit Committee and Internal Control Deficiencies. AccountingReview, Mar2009, V ol. 849.Internal Control Quality and Audit Pricing under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Auditing, May2008, Vol.2710.Internal Control Weakness and Cost of Equity Evidence from SOX Section 404 DisclosuresAccounting Review, Oct2007, Vol. 8211.Internal Control Weaknesses and Information Uncertainty. Accounting Review, May2008, Vol. 8312.Internal Controls and the Detection of Management Fraud. Journal of Accounting Research,Spring99, Vol. 3713.Reducing Management's Influence on Auditors Judgments An Experimental Investigation of SOX404 Assessments Accounting Review, Nov2008, V ol. 8314.SOX Section 404 Material Weakness Disclosures and Audit Fees.Full Auditing, May2006, Vol.2515.The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality.Accounting Review, Jan2008, Vol. 8316.The Impact of SOX Section 404 Internal Control Quality Assessment on Audit Delay in the SOXEra. Auditing, Nov2006, Vol. 25Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & Kinney Jr., W. R. (2007). The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 166–192.Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney Jr, W. R., & Lafond, R. (2009). The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1),1–43.Bahramian, A. (2011), Evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls in an Investment Company, Master Thesis in Imam Hossein University, Iran.Daraby, M, (2006), analyzing the effect of strengthening internal controls, audit reports of companies listed on the Stock Audit, Master Thesis in Azan Islamic university.Doyle, J., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007). Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 193–223.Feng, M., Li, C., & McVay, S. (2009). Internal control and management guidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2–3), 190–209.Maham K., Poriya Nasab, A. (2000), Internal control) Integrated Framework( , Report of the Committee of the Commission Tardy, azman Hesabresy, Pages 118, 135.Ogneva, M., Subramanyam, K. R., & Raghunandan, K. (2007). Internal control weakness and cost of equity: evidence from SOX Section 404 disclosures. The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1255-1297.Rezaie Jahangoshaee, H, (1996). A analytical study of the degree of reliance of independent auditors on firms internal controls, Master Thesis, shahid Beheshti University, Iran.。
内部控制文献英文翻译
The enterprise internal control theoryThe internal control is an important symbol of modern enterprise management, through the practice of the conclusion is: to control is strong, weak, without control is controlled, disorderly. The new regulations "accounting law 27 units shall establish and perfect the system of supervision unit interior accountant. Unit interior accountant controls on the execution, the internal control is.What is the internal controlThe internal control is the formation of a series of measures to control functions, procedures, methods, and standardized and systematized, make it become a rigorous, relatively complete system. According to the control of the internal control can be divided into different purpose accounting control and management control. Accounting control and protection of assets is safe, the accounting information authenticity and integrity and financial activities related to the legitimacy of control, Management control means to ensure operation policy decision, implementation of business activities and promote the efficiency and effectiveness, and the effect of the relevant management to achieve the goals of control. Accounting control and management control and not mutually exclusive, incompatible, some control measures can be used for accounting control, and can also be used to control.The goal is to ensure that the internal control unit operations efficiency and effect, safety, economic information of assets and financial reports of reliability. Its main functions: one is to achieve target management policy and management, Second is the assets of safety protection unit is complete, prevent loss of assets, Three is to guarantee the business and financial accounting information authenticity and integrity. In addition, the legitimacy of the financial activities within the unit is the internal control goals.Good, although the internal control to achieve these goals, but whether the internal control design and operation, it is not how to eliminate its inherent limitations. This limitation must also be clear and prevention. Main show is: (1) the limited by cost benefit principle, (2) if the employee has different responsibility ignore control program, misjudgment, even the collusion, inside and outside, often cause in fraud internal control malfunction, (3) management personnel abuse, and to set up or Passover control of internal control ignored, also can make the establishment of internal control non-existing.Second, the basic structure of internal controlThe basic structure of internal control. Mainly includes controlenvironment, accounting system and control procedures in three aspects:(a) control environment. Control environment refers to establish or implement a policy of various factors, which affect mainly reflects unit managers and other personnel to control the attitude, understanding and action. Specific include: management ideas and management style, unit organization structure, functions and managers of these functions, determine the powers and responsibilities of the manager monitoring and inspection method, the working personnel policy measures to control, and its implementation, this unit of various external business relations.(2) accounting system. Accounting system refers to establish accounting and accounting supervision procedure and method of business activities. Effective accounting system should do:1, confirmed and record all real business, timely and detailed description of economic business, so in the financial and accounting reports of economic business appropriately classified.2 and measurement value of economic business, so in the financial and accounting reports records in the appropriate monetary value.3 and determine the time, business to business records in the appropriate accounting period.4 in the financial and accounting reports, business and proper disclosure of expression related matters.(3) control procedures. Control program to formulate policy and managers to ensure a certain procedure. Specific include: business and economic activity approval, The relevant personnel division of responsibilities clear, and prevent fraud, The bill and certificates and use, should guarantee business activities and recorded properly, Property and its use to have documented exposure measures to protect, For registered business valuation, and to review, etc.Third, the basic way of internal controlThe basic way of internal control mainly has: organization planning control, authorized control, budget control, material control, cost control, risk control and audit control.(a) to organize the control. According to the internal control requirements, the unit in determining the organizational structure andimprove the process, incompatible duties shall follow the principle of separation, the so-called incompatible duties, refers to those if by a man or a department, and may cheat yourself concealing its position of frauds. The economic activity of the unit can usually divided into five stages: namely, the approval issued by authorized, execution, and records. Normally, if each step by the relatively independent researchers (or department), can guarantee the separation incompatible duties, facilitating the function of the internal control. Organize and control mainly includes two aspects:1 and incompatible duties of separation. If the accounting work of accountant and cashier incompatible duties, need to separate. Should be separate positions usually have an authorized: economic business duties to separation, Execute a business with the position of the post to review: Execution of an economic position and record the business to business position: Keep a record of the property of the position and position of property to separation etc. Incompatible duties separation is based on the assumption that two personal unconscious accomplice a possibility, but the possibility of a person gains more than two people. If this hypothesis, breakthrough incompatible duties of separation cannot play control function.2, the organization's control. A unit of economic activities according to the needs of different departments and institutions set, the organization's set of responsibilities and should reflect the mutual control requirements. Specific requirement is: the responsibility and authority of the organizations must be licensed and guarantee the authority within the scope of authority without intervention, Each business must pass in operation of the department and guarantee in different departments concerned to check each other, In every business, should belong to was not inspectors, in order to ensure that the inspectors check out the problem was solved quickly.(2) authorized control. The authorized department of internal control unit to handle business or staff access control. Some departments or units within a clerk in the treatment of economic business, must be authorized or approved to, no approval. Authorized control unit can guarantee the implementation course and abuse. Authorized are generally authorized and particular authorized two forms: general mandate is to deal with average economic business level and the approval of the right conditions stipulated in the unit, usually in the internal control of clarifying, Special authorization of special economic business processing is theright level and approval conditions, such as when a prescribed amount exceeds the economic business department, only after approval within specific authorized to handle. Authorized the basic control requirement is: first, must be clear and specific license authorization of the general line and responsibility, Secondly, to clear the authorized business each program, Again, to establish the necessary examination system, to ensure that the processing after the authorized business working quality. Some current unit executes leadership "pen", with the approval of the internal control principles and requirements, should reform. Practice has proved, rights should be restricted, lose the right to restrict the corruption which easily.(3) budget control. Budget control is an important aspect of internal control, including financing, financing, purchasing, production, sales, investment and management activities. The economic business units to prepare detailed budget and plan, and through the authorized by relevant departments, the budget or plan implementation control, the basic requirements: first, the unit budget must reflect the management goal, and clear responsibility. Second, the budget shall be permitted by the authorized to budget adjustments to budget and more practical. Third, it shall timely feedback or regular budget implementation.(4) physical assets control. Physical assets control mainly include restrictions to control inventory control and regular two, this is the real assets of unit of safety control measures. There are two main: first, to limit to strictly control, to physical assets and the relevant documents of the physical assets, such as cash and bank deposit, securities and inventory, warehouse, the warehouser except cashier personnel and other personnel is limited, contact, to ensure the safety of assets. Second, regular physical assets inventory, guarantee the physical assets conform with the actual amount recorded book, such as accounts inconsistent, should investigate the cause and treatment. In addition to the above, physical assets control say from broad sense, also include the physical assets of purchase, storage, and shipping and sales process control.(5) cost control. Modern cost control can be divided into "extensive" and "intensive" two. Extensive cost control, refers to the production technology, product process under the condition of invariable, rely solely on reducing consumption materials, reasonable material to lower the cost of cost control, Intensive cost control, refers to raise the level of technology to improve the production technology, product process, thus reducing the cost control. These two kinds of methods, combining modern cost control.1, extensive cost control, the cost of raw materials procurement control from the final product sold throughout, and is one of the most fundamental and most main control method. First, the raw materials procurement cost control. For bulk materials generally used to open ZhaoBiaoFa or according to manufacturer direct purchasing. Second, the use of materials cost control. Generally, there are two ways: one is the objective cost control, it is through the "target cost price - goals profits target =", which is obtained by cost method to control costs. Veto Second, it is the cost control of various assignments, and through the analysis of cost drivers, costs and expenses of the collection, not only more reasonable truly computational cost, and thus find income and cost ratio or not only put no gains, so can largely reduce costs. Third, product sales, cost control. Mainly propaganda cost control, notable is, advertising, promotional role played only product quality is the foundation of the user's trust. Therefore, we should grasp investment and expenses of the matching principle. [NextPage]2 and intensive cost control. And can be divided into two types: one is to improve production technology by to reduce cost control. There are many ways to improve production technology, such as the introduction of new production line adopts high-tech products, etc. Two is improved by process to reduce the cost of cost control. Intensive cost control on intellectual achievements, it can make the excess profit achievements.(6) risk control. Risk is usually referred to as a result of the action, and the risk associated with another concept is uncertain. Some people only know beforehand action may result, but don't know they appear probability, or both all don't know, but only as a rough estimate. For example, enterprise test-manufacturing a new product, this product can certainly advance trial success or failure. But don't know these two consequences of possibility appeared. Business decisions are generally in uncertain circumstances. In practice, a result of action has many may not sure, risk, And as a result of the action, it is certainly not risk. The risk control is to prevent and avoid as far as possible adverse outcome. According to the reasons of the formation of risk and risk management can generally be divided into two categories: the financial risk,1, management risk. Risk management refers to the production and business operation reasons for corporate profits to the uncertainty. Due to the production and operation of enterprises will be derived from many aspects of the external and internal factors, thus greatly, and the uncertaintyof uncertainty, causes the enterprise profit margins or the changes, thus bringing risk. Operational risk changes from the external, nonetheless, enterprises should adopt the effective internal control measures to prevent.2, financial risk. Financial risk and risk, it is to because debt and the enterprise's financial results for uncertainty. Companies operating in the capital, debt all except the part of self-capital, borrowed funds for enterprise self-capital affect profitability, At the same time, borrowed money to repay captital with interest, if unable to repay debts that are due, the enterprise will into financial difficulties or bankruptcy. When the enterprise rate than pre-tax profit margins funds borrowed funds rate, use borrowed money earn profits and residual interest except compensation and thus make the self-capital profitability improve. However, if the enterprise income tax profit margins than money borrowed funds, at this moment, use borrowed money to finance the profits are not pay interest, still need to use their own funds to pay interest on the part of the profit margins, thereby reducing the self-capital, make enterprise losses incurred, even the bankruptcy of the danger. The risk for financing risk. The size of the risk degree of self-capital by borrowing money, borrowed money ratio, the greater the risk degree proportion with smaller proportion, borrowed funds, risk degree also decrease. For financial risk control, the key is to ensure a reasonable capital structure, maintain the appropriate level of debt, should make full use of the debt management skill gain financial leverage income, improve the self-capital profitability, To avoid excessive debt caused by the financial risk, which is the important link of the enterprise internal control, must take the necessary measures to prevent fundraising risk.(7) auditing control. Audit control mainly refers to the internal audit, internal audit and control of accounting is to supervise. Accounting information to internal audit, internal control is an integral part of the internal control is a kind of special form. Internal auditing is an organization in all kinds of activities and the internal control system of independent evaluation to determine whether the policy implementation, establish the procedure is in compliance with the standard of resources utilization, whether reasonable, effective and unit of objectives achieved. Internal audit content is very extensive, generally include internal financial audit and internal management audit. Internal audit supervision of accounting information, and is not only the internal control is effective means to ensure that the accounting information is true and complete. According to the basic principle of internal control and accounting work in our country actual situation, the new "law" regulation, the unit shall in internal accounting supervision system ofaccounting information in the regular internal audit methods and procedures, in order to make the internal audit institutions or internal auditors of accounting information system and procedure of audit work. In addition to the above seven internal control, and documentation control. Performance control and worker quality control, etc. The new system of accounting supervision system on the unit interior, the main contents of the internal control system. Including: responsibilities, and strict procedures, truthfully record, regular check, etc. In practice, establishing and implementing internal control should also consider: enterprise scale, organizational system and the owners' rights and interests; etc. Business property, diversity and complexity, Transfer, processing, and the methods to information, Applicable regulatory requirements, etc. At present many enterprise internal control was not good, except knowledge level, the main reasons of the administration is to establish and implement effective internal control of power, pressure, coerce, enough. This change of the accounting law depends on the implementation of new science and the modern enterprise system and the establishment of corporate governance structure. To help enterprises to establish internal control, can consult other countries and regions, by the relevant departments of the internal control of some important industry and points for each unit, reference, and learning to use gradually perfect the internal control system, in order to promote the comprehensive enterprise in our country, and in essence.企业内部控制理论内部控制是现代企业管理的重要标志，通过了结论的做法是：以控制强，弱，无控制的控制，无序。
企业内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献
企业内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)译文：内部控制环境外文翻译摘要：为了保证企业需求内部控制活动的有效性和信息的可靠性以及遵守法律的适用性，每个组织要选择最适合的控制系统。
因此，就必须考虑到意外事故的风险是否切合权变理论。
本文研究的是检视这些风险特点的选择是否适应他们公司内部控制结构和它是否会导致一些更加优惠的有效性的评估控制管理。
虽然内部控制的组成部分已进行单独控制，本文尝试阐明内部控制的关键点并将其放到更加广阔的背景中。
结果证明，基于对741家芬兰公司的调查研究，表明公司用内部控制结构来应对环境的不确定性，并观测控制的有效性的战略对其内部控制结构有着显著的效果。
关键词：内部控制、成效、权变理论、结构方块建模1.绪论人们普遍认为，一个内部控制系统可以帮助企业降低风险，并且使财务报表的可靠性得以保证。
因此，越来越多的企业在他们具体的操作环境下更多的关注自己的内部控制。
在巨大的管理压力下，如何提高内部控制的有效性以及董事会和股东之间的沟通效果，是目前企业亟待解决的重要问题。
由于内部控制可能会影响长期的报告，因此审计人员、供应商、客户都对内部控制关注相当。
Kinney在2000年指出，尽管内部控制对公司影响很大，但在组织环境中内部控制结构却无法实现。
虽然关于内部控制的文献在国际研究上已取得进展，但迄今为止，内部控制的研究数量有限。
在2004年Selte and Widener出版的专业文章中提出，在管理控制中研究较少的内部控制有着很强的实用性。
本文的研究结论有助于了解内部控制结构及其在公司环境中观察到对公司的效果。
即使内部控制结构框架中提出了一个标准化的结构和内部控制目标，但仍然需要注意的是，有效地内部控制是要根据公司的不同特点来制定的。
因此，即使是内部控制的框架中也无法提供一个企业的特点和其控制系统的关系。
因此，本研究利用一个应急方法，审查内部控制结构的设计，并且将其放到不同的环境下观察其效果。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
附录A关于内部控制的意见如果要证明功能扩展到包含内部控制的有效性，那么报告准则则必须制定，若干基本问题必须被解决。
随着日益频繁增长，审计员听取了他们应该发表的一个效力于客户的内部控制制度建议的意见。
这一证明功能扩展的主张者迅速指出，目前已经有了实例如独立审计师的报告公开他们的客户的内部控制制度和一些政府机构的成效，包括一些空置中的美国证券和交易委员会，都需要一个报告。
这些证实类型的反对者公布了任何关于内部控制的有效性，他们认为，目前有显着性差异监管机构的报告要求和提出意见的内部控制将会误导公众。
本文综述了目前报告的做法，考虑到理想状态相关的危害的特点，并最后提出了一些在任何给与最后判决之前必要的予以回答的问题。
现状报告虽然审计员的报告中的一些情况提及了内部控制的性质，但作出的本质陈述还有很大不同的效应。
大型银行。
关于对内部控制的观点事实上出现在一些大型银行和看法发行的年度报告中。
有时这些意见是被董事会要求的。
例如，下面的主张出现在1969年年度报告的一个大型纽约银行中，作为第3款的独立会计师的标准短形式的报告：我们的审核工作包括评价有效性，大块的内部会计控制，其中还包括内部审计。
我们认为，在于程序的影响下，再加上银行内部审计工作人员所进行的审核，这些构成一个有效的系统的内部会计控制。
意见被提供给几个其他银行，但它们基本上引用的意见是一样的。
美国证券交易委员会的规定。
美国证券交易委员会表格X-17A-5，要求独立审计师作出某些有关的内部控制陈述，并必须在每年的大多数成员国家与每一个证券经纪或注册的交易商根据1934年证券交易法第15条进行交流时。
此外，美国证券交易委员会的第17a-5(g)规定要求独立的核数师的报告要包含“一份如，是否会计师审查了程序，要安全措施保障客户的证券的声明中”此外，许多股票交易所要求该报告要表明审查已取得的“会计制度，内部会计控制和程序，是为维护证券，包括适当的测试它们对以后的期间，检验日期前”，很显然，美国证券交易委员会的工作人员更倾向于考虑，会计师包括了语言相似，所要求的所有报告的交流提交给证券交易委员会。
审计范围的报告通常如下：我们审核了声明的财务状况（姓名）以及（时间）。
我们的审核是根据公认的审计标准，并据此包括审查会计制度，内部会计控制和程序，为维护证券及这种测试，因为因为我们事先认为在必要的情况下。
检查了（日期）和会计记录和其他必要的审计程序，（着重添加）为了避免进行混淆的类型审查，这有关“普遍接受的审计标准”改为了“相应接受的审计标准”。
请注意，是要求满足表达的意见是否适当，因为该报告仅仅在审查中指出。
如果在内部控制材料的不足之处，独立审计师需要向美国证券交易委员会报告，但根据规则Rule I7a-5(b)(3)，不足之处可在一份机密报告的补充报告。
如果没有发现材料不足，则代表这既不被要求也不期待。
因此，美国证券交易委员会的报告并不构成表达意见的内部控制的有效性，并在这方面，很大不同于发表了报告的几个大型银行。
其他政府机构。
政府机构大相径庭的关于所需的内部控制报告的类型。
或许是要求是最严格的是被市场经济所管理。
1967年的市场经济修正案243部分要求核数师评估专营公司的会计制度和内部控制要在大量的OEO补助资金已用完之前。
核数师的报告必须包括以下意见：会计制度和内部控制的（专营公司和代表机构）被认为是（充分，不够），以保障资产的专营公司，是检查准确性和可靠性的会计数据，是促进运营效率和鼓励遵守规定的管理政策。
有些机构需要一个非常类似于由证券交易委员会为经纪人给出的报告。
例如，联邦住房贷款银行委员会，要求核数师的报告表明，内部控制进行了审查，并要求提交一份载有管理的关于任何系统的弱点的并建议其改正意见函。
关于内部控制可取的报告相信这些报告的内部控制是可取的人提出主要有以下两个原因。
首先，他们认为这样的报告将是有益于在公众评价管理层的业绩这方面的责任。
有些人认为这样的报告作为一个可行的和合乎逻辑的第一步报告管理的表现在其他领域。
其次是内部控制的先进的倡导者提出的报告将提供额外依赖于未经编辑的中期财务报表的基础。
鉴于日益增加的重要性和其他临时季度报表，他们主张认为，这些报告将提供一个有益的公共服务。
相反，在另一方面，与之有关关切的是，这些报告将会因为风险的误解和不必要的依赖伤害公众。
因此，关键的问题是向读者多做内部控制在评估结果方面的潜在好处和危险的这样的报告。
关于内部控制灾害的报告如果报告是关于内部控制对于专业和报告的用户拥有潜在利益的，那么是什么阻碍了完全可以承担责任报告的内部控制呢？首先，确实没有可以全面评价的内部控制这样的事物。
核数师对于内部控制是按照特定类型的错误和可能发生的在违规行为中因为程序的具体类别的交易及相关资产的弱点的谬误。
除非是在每一个方面抖很优秀的内部控制，对于是否存在足够的整体系统概括是极其困难的。
一个地区的内部控制的优势在通常下不会抵消另一个领域的弱点。
现金收据程序的弱点是不靠减轻强度处理的现金付款，而且充分收集过程不能取代失效的控制权的结算程序。
第二，与总体评价密切相关的各种困难，存在着一个不可比拟的对财务报表作为一个整体的意见，并提出作为内部控制系统一个整体的意见。
内部控制的弱点有一个潜在的重大影响的行动，但其重要性不能以同样的一个已知金额错误可以对财务报表作为一个整体的方式被评价。
因此，难以制定一个标准的报告的语言，其中的偏差可被视为具有特别的和已知的意义。
第三，关于有任何效性系统的内部控制存在许多内部的局限性。
某些行动不受范围之内的内部控制制度的管制。
控制程序，主要依靠联结取决于分离的不相容的职责来被被避免。
管理人员负责管理的内部控制系统，他们有能力实施故意错误和违规行为。
尽管控制可能依靠低级别的雇员来防止类似的行动。
可也许事实上最重要的内在联系表现在人手控制程序，它是依赖于人类的判断和意志，并有许多错误所产生的误解，错误，疏忽，分心或疲劳的可能性。
最后，由于其他关于内部控制部分问题的报告对一部分用户有可能创造一个重大的无理推论和误导。
其中最突出的可能的误解为毫无道理的预测到未来期间伴随过度依赖未经财务信息。
内部控制的审查和测试只在测试中所涉及。
在未来，一些条件条件下，程序和承诺可能发生变化。
产生许多变化，可能会发生的变化导致了遵守既定的程序，包括新员工或员工谁接管了新的责任，在业务量上不寻常的波动会导致员工采取走捷径，和创新的行动，或推出新的类型的交易。
此外，财务决算的可靠性显著影响不属于受制度管制的管理的判决。
鉴于内部控制的重大危险的看法，这些表述的意见应注意和谨慎。
目前，关于内部控制缺乏实地的工作和报告标准所发表的意见，以及会计师事务所提供的一份报告暴露一个未定义的责任。
内部控制的许多问题都必须解决的意见之前，应当有规律的定期印发期刊。
这些问题可分为基本问题和报告准则的问题。
基本问题内部控制意见的发表对于除了管理者以外的任何人包含的重要信息吗？管理的信函提出改进内部控制制度是一个传统的独立审计产物。
而这些内部控制的报告的价值被认为是一个重要的服务来管理，内部控制反对意见的问题被各方以外的其他管理所重视。
内部控制的倡导者的意见认为报告是在有限的范围内，增加了在将来可以可靠性不受影响的依赖未经编辑的财务信息为基础，。
目前，在保留意见的财务报表无可能的基础上，他的测试，其中包括一个内部控制重要延伸审计程序所必需的，但核数师的报告已经没有办法知道这一点。
一份突出的弱点内部控制回减少缺陷，而且读者将会从本质上了解，大大减少应放在未经财务信息发布期间经审计的报表的依赖。
此外，更重要的是，发表关于内部控制意见的管理报告的重大受托义务来制定，安装和监督适当的内部控制系统。
，关于内部控制的显着报告在假定情况下地延伸到核数师的责任以外的签发意见的财务报表吗？任何证明功能延长的建议引起恐惧关于伴随延长的法律责任。
虽然明确范围内答案的获得在诉讼之前不能承担法律责任，有一些观点可以猜测得到。
一种观点是，最可能发生的原因的行为将出现疲软时，未报告的内部控制导致财务状况或经营结果的期间所涵盖意见重大的错报，在这种情况下，报告中的缺陷可能会得到广泛的重视从而依靠群众的报告可能损坏。
在这种情况下，审计员可能因为他对财务报表提出意见参与诉讼是。
还有一种可能性重大错误或违规行为造成的蓄意歪曲或联合雇员管理，这个没有系统的内部控制事可以防止的。
核数师的责任是对这些应类似于他的责任项目的财务报表时，对他提出了无保留意见的重大误导，如果因为蓄意歪曲或联合雇员管理。
只要他遵守公认的审计标准，他将不负责。
另一种对法律责任的观点是内部控制意见的表达将提请人们注意当前的责任，并增加这些责任。
反对审计的原告将缺乏对收取审计员有一个新的指控来。
此外，如果内部控制这一问题的审查和评价成为一个点的诉讼，陪审团评估这一技术问题可能会更加困难，而不是评价有关的财务报表格式的证词。
内部控制的报告应需要或应该在自由裁量权的管理情况下自愿和发表的吗？这似乎并不在核数师的省要求报告的内部控制。
该报告没有添加任何信誉经审计的财务报表，因此，并不需要建立一个公平的财务状况和经营业绩。
那些反对的意见认为，内部控制只有“积极”的意见，内部控制将是适当的发表。
管理将自然有一个有重大缺陷的内部控制暴露于公众视野，因此，不会让不利的意见被发表。
这些有利于内部控制意见必须在某处对这种新的报告的做法实行。
自愿报告披露，如果它们包含重要信息，已成为一种需要通过公众压力或武力的方法。
是否可以编写不会误导报告使用者的报告？是否报告在功能的准确性和清晰方面有误导性将是一个认识和了解所拥有的用户的报告。
一个最重要内部控制的危险的报告的可能性，是一部分用户毫无道理的和误导的推论。
短形式经验的财务报表报告表明，它可作为重要的一份报告，内部控制的报告并不代表它是准确的代表出席了国家会议。
其实，这个问题的答案在很大的程度上取决于得到的报告准则的问题答案。
报告准则问题内部控制的报告是一个单独的报告不同于财务报表的意见吗？虽然有一定的关系，评价内部控制和财务报表的意见是经审计的财务报表和内部控制评价后有重大区别的。
他认为在形成的报表，审计评价内部控制只是一个中间步骤的检查。
认为内部控制没有进一步的补充财务报表和任何意义的信誉，这是真正的，应当避免。
当然，内部控制的评价，报告中必须提到财务报表时，内部控制是不够的，遵守公认的审计标准是不可能的。
在极端情况下，内部控制实际上是不存在的，一个免责的声明认为是适当的。
在这种情况下未入帐的交易是有很大的概率，证明文件的审查是非常怀疑的，并发布资产负债表日后事项不能得到充分的审查。
如果认为对财务报表和内部控制的意见之间的区别是必须有力作出的，认为内部控制应是一个单独的报告。