内部控制外文翻译
内部控制l论文相关 外文翻译
审计委员会、董事会和内部控制重大缺陷的整治Audit Committees, Boards of Directors, and Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control译文：本研究探讨审核委员会和董事会的有效性是否与公司的内部控制的重大缺陷修复的及时性有关。
选取的样本包括从2003年7月至2004年12月编报公司根据的“萨班斯- 奥克斯利法案”第302节披露的至少一种重大弱点。
采用Logistic回归分析发现，较大的审计委员会，审计委员会，更大的非会计财务专业知识，以及更多的独立委员会的企业更容易及时地修复重大缺陷。
这些结果表明，审计委员会及董事会对监督整治重大缺陷发挥了重要作用。
总的来说，这项研究有助于我们了解审计委员会和董事会根据萨班斯- 奥克斯利法案“的制度的有效性。
这项研究还确定了整治重大缺陷及时性的重要决定因素，这是提高财务报告质量和恢复投资者信心的关键。
研究表明，审核委员会的质量与该公司的内部控制的质量呈正相关。
克里希南（2005）使用的样本公司，改变了审计师在1994-2000年期间发现，独立审计委员会和审计委员会的财务专业知识是不太可能与内部控制的问题有相关性。
Zhang等人（2007）使用在“萨班斯- 奥克斯利法”颁布后披露内部控制缺陷的样本公司，发现这些企业更可能有财务专业知识少的审计委员会。
如果审计委员会的质量与内部控制的质量有关，似乎有理由相信，一个更有效的审计委员会将确保及时修复重大缺陷，以保持内部控制的有效性。
一个有效的审计委员会可以直接进行，通过审查财务和会计人员的会计程序和控制来监督公司的控制。
当发现重大弱点，有效的审计委员会，更可能采取实用的方法，并和审计师讨论如何整治重大缺陷。
通过努力跟进有关建议，以改善内部控制和监测整治力度的进展，一个更有效的审计委员会可能导致重大缺陷的及时整治。
虽然审计委员会在监督整治重大缺陷中发挥了重要作用，但在整治过程中，董事会可以提供增量的监督。
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)内部控制透视：理论与概念摘要：内部控制是会计程序或控制系统，旨在促进效率或保证一个执行政策或保护资产或避免欺诈和错误。
内部是一个组织管理的重要组成部分。
它包括计划、方法和程序使用，以满足任务，目标和目的，并在这样做，支持基于业绩的管理。
内部控制是管理阶层的平等与控制可以帮助管理者实现资源的预期的有效管理的结果通过。
内部控制应减少或违规错误的风险关联未被发现的，但设计和建立有效的内部控制不是一个简单的任务，不可能是一个实现通过快速修复短套。
在此讨论了内部文件的概念的不同方面的内部控制和管制。
关键词：内部控制，管理控制，控制环境，控制活动，监督1、介绍环境需要新的业务控制变量不为任何潜在的股东和管理人士的响应因子为1，另外应执行/她组织了一个很大的控制权。
控制是管理活动的东西或以上施加控制。
思想的产生和近十年的发展需要有系统的商业资源和控制这种财富一个新的关注。
主题之一热一回合管制的商业资源是分析每个控制成本效益。
作为内部控制和欺诈的第一道防线，维护资产以及预防和侦查错误。
内部控制，我们可以说是一种控制整个系统的财务和其他方面的管理制定了为企业的顺利运行;它包括内部的脸颊，内部审计和其他形式的控制。
COSO的内部控制描述如下。
内部控制是一个客观的方法用来帮助确保实现。
在会计和组织理论，内部控制是指或目标目标的过程实施由组织的结构，工作和权力流动，人员和具体的管理信息系统，旨在帮助组织实现。
这是一种手段，其中一个组织的资源被定向，监控和测量。
它发挥着无形的（重要的作用，预防和侦查欺诈和保护组织的资源，包括生理（如，机械和财产）和乙二醇，声誉或知识产权，如商标）。
在组织水平，内部控制目标与可靠性的目标或战略的财务报告，及时反馈业务上的成就，并遵守法律，法规。
在具体的交易水平，内部控制是指第三方采取行动以实现一个具体目标（例如，如何确保本组织的款项，在申请服务提供有效的。
内部控制外文文献格式范例
本科毕业论文外文文献及译文文献、资料题目：Problems and Countermeasures on CorporateInternal Audit in China文献、资料来源：Asian Social Science文献、资料发表日期：2011.01院（部）：商学院专业：会计学班级：会计XX姓名：XXX学号：2008XXXXX指导教师：XXX翻译日期：2012.5.27外文文献：Problems and Countermeasures on Corporate Internal Audit inChinaRefers to internal control by the enterprise's board of directors, management and other personnel to impact on the following goals to provide reasonable assurance that the process of:1. The reliability of financial reporting;2. The effectiveness and efficiency of operation;3. Compliance with laws and regulations related to the situationThe definition of internal control highlighted internal control is a process, that is, a means to an end and not an end in itself. Internal control procedure is not only by policy regulations, the certificate forms and composition, but also by man-made factors. The definition of "reasonable assurance" concept, meaning that internal control in fact can not be goals for the organization to provide an absolute guarantee. Reasonable assurance that also means that the organization's internal control costs should not exceed the expected benefits received.Although the definition of internal control covers a wide range, but not all of the internal control measures associated with the audit of the financial statements. In general, audit-related and only the reliability of financial reporting and control measures, that is, those who report on the impact of external financial information prepared by control measures. However, if other control measures can affect the implementation of audit procedures auditors used by the reliability of data, these control measures may also be relevant. For example, auditors in the implementation of analytical procedures used by non-financial data (such as the production of statistical data) of the control measures associated with the audit.Internal control audit of internal control is a special form; this is an internal economic activities and management system of regulation, reasonable and effective independent rating agencies, in a sense to other internal controls to control. Internal audits in enterprises should maintain relative independence, should be independent of the other management departments, preferably by the Board or the Board under the leadership. OIA department is responsible for review of the internal control system of the implementation and results of the review board to the enterprise or the top management report to the authorities. Internal audit work more carefully, the sound internalcontrol system, the more internal controls to enhance the efficiency and reliability.Internal audit refers to an economic monitoring activity that sections or independent auditing organizations and persons inside enterprises, according to national laws, regulations and policies, apply special process and methods to audit the financial receipts and expenditures and economic activities of their own sections and enterprises, to find out their authenticity, legitimacy and validity, and to propose suggestions. The research on internal audit can promote the effectiveness and efficiency of internal audit, benefit effective running of corporate internal control system, improve the quality of accounting information, strengthen corporate internal management, increase business efficiency and effect, and ensure the security and integrity of corporate assets. Differently from western countries, China’s internal audit was established and developed under the Government’s help. However, compared to social audit and governmental audit, China’s internal audit obviously lags behind no matter on institution setup or on functional effect. Internal audit has developed for over two decades, but people still can’t be embedded inwardly, especially most of corporate directors, who think internal audit is dispensable, and has no direct relationship with corporate economic benefit. Some corporate directors consider internal audit restricts their self business rights and weakens their authority. Thus, they either do not set internal audit department, or deprive its rights even if it exists. The staffs in internal audit department are even excluded and isolated, and ca n’t play their roles as expected.With the development of market economy and embedded ness of reform, many new situations and problems have emerged continuously. However, China has no integrated internal audit laws yet so far. Present internal audit regu lation is “Audit Requirements for Internal Audit Work” which was issued in 1987 and can’t meet the requirement of current economic situation. China’s enterprises pay little attention to in ternal audit, and internal audit staff has a low quality of corporate, so it stays at low position inside enterprises. It is difficult to attract talents into internal audit team. Therefore, renewal of the team can’t be accomplish ed, which results in single knowledge structure of audit staff, especially lack of risk management knowledge and information technology knowledge.Firstly, they are lack of cultural knowledge, theoretical level and professional technique. At present, most of internal audit staffs change their profession from financial department or other departments, so their scarcity of knowledge disenable them get competent in internal audit work.Secondly, there are few full-time employees, but many part-time ones. The problems also represent as: lack of further education, unreasonable knowledge structure, shortage of systematic audit specialization knowledge and skill learning, poor mastery of modern audit means, vacancy of EDP internal audit and network information internal audit. Lastly, individual audit staffs are lack of professional ethics, influenced by unhealthy social ethos. They behave irregularly on audit and their audit style is not solid as well, which ruins their authority and image.China’s internal aud it staffs come form internal enterprises, who are guided directly by their own enterprises, so they hardly show the authority of internal audit.Being a significant characteristic, authority is as important as independence. As internal audit is lack of authority it should have had, it is hard to play monitoring roles.Modern enterprise system requires internal audit make pre-, interim, and post-monitor and evaluate. As internal audit exists inside audited organizations, its functions should be more inclined to pre-audit and interim auditing with increasing economic benefit as a target, and emphasize on accomplishing managerial functions.China’s audit means is sti ll manual audit, which greatly restricts the efficiency of internal audit monitoring. As for audit procedure, auditing risks increase due to incomplete consideration on audit scheme, imperfect audit evidence, non-detailed audit work division, non-standard operation of audit staffs, and so on.We need to make good use of efficient and effective internal audit, neither only depending on individual enterprise nor social restriction, but all efforts from the state, society and enterprises. Definitely speaking, we propose the following countermeasures.“No rules, no standards.” China is la ck of special laws and regulations on internal audit, which is the key reason why internal audit ca n’t guarantee its desired effect. Therefore, we suggest the government to fully study current economic trend on internal audit and issue feasible laws and regulations on internal audit in order to legally guarantee the necessity, work scope, authority and practice regulation of internal audit.According to the above discussion, the shortage of independence and authority is the key factor that internal audit can’t play its roles. However, if internal audit is charged by relevant staffs of audited organizations, and guided by the management of that as well, internal audit, in any case,can’t guarantee its independence and authority. If the government can qualify internal audit staffs, systematically manage qualified staffs, appoint them according to corporate practical needs, assess and monitor them and distribute salary to them by the government, and implement regular turn, the independence and authority of internal audit will be greatly promoted, at the same time, the quality of the staffs also will enormously increase.It is not enough for the state and society to regulate and define internal audit functions only. Corporate managers should change their minds, and make clear that internal audit staffs are friends but not enemies and more functions of internal audit are strengthening corporate management, therefore, they are the important force and specialists of corporate management. Only in this way, can managers play roles of internal audit forwardly, cooperate with internal audit staffs positively, eliminate interference mood, and strengthen internal audit work voluntarily.Internal audit should tra nsform from “monitoring dominant” to “service dominant”, strengthen service function, highlight the “introversion” of internal audit, base on the requirem ents of corporate management, and ensure the business target of corporate optimal value. Along with increasingly strengthening corporate internal control, gradual improvement of corporate governance structure, and continuous promotion of accounting information quality, regular audit target or beneficial audit target will be promoted to be main audit target, meanwhile, the focus of internal audit work will transfer as well. In the case of good opportunity, corporate internal audit should be adjusted on its working emphasis correspondingly. And working field also needs to be changed from financial audit to managerial audit. On the basis of effective development or proper ap pointment of external section’s engaging in financial au dit, internal audit department should focus on internal control audit, managerial (operative) audit, economic responsibility audit, contract (agreement) audit, engineering audit, environment internal audit, quality control audit, risks management audit, strategy management audit and management fraud audit.The so-called internal control, the means by the enterprises board of directors, managers and other staff implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, operating efficiency and effectiveness of existing laws and regulations to follow, and so provide reasonable assurance that the purpose of the course. Internal controls related to enterprise production and management of the control environment, risk assessment, supervision and decision-making,information and transfer and self-examination, from a business perspective on the whole in all aspects of production. Their effective implementation will undoubtedly promote enterprise production and management to a new level, to promote the rationalization of business processes and standardization.The construction of the internal control system and effective operation of enterprises depends on good corporate governance structure. Modern enterprise ownership and management rights of separation, on the objective need for a standardized corporate governance, strengthen internal controls to protect the owners, operators, creditors and other legitimate rights and interests. However, the current situation, most of the state-owned enterprise restructuring, although the formal establishment of the corporate governance structure, but since property rights are clear, investors are deficient, did not form an effective internal checks and balances of power, coupled with the inherent internal control Limitations, resulting in weakening the intensity of internal control.中文译文：中国企业内部审计存在的问题及对策内部控制是指受到企业的董事会、管理层和其他人员影响的，旨在对下列目标的实现提供合理保证的过程：1．财务报告的可靠性；2．经营效果和效率；3．遵守相关法律和法规的情况内部控制的定义强调了内部控制是一个程序，即达到目的的手段，而且其本身并不是目的。
internal control and risk management内部控制与风险管理 外文翻译学士学位论文
Internal control and risk management1.Internal control --, standard and legislationIn 1985, the United States in order to curb the growing business of accounting fraud activities, formed a committee against financial fraud Treadway committee), (accounting fraud activities investigation led to reason and proposed solutions. The scheme emphasized the importance of internal control, requests and Suggestions of all listed companies should provide in the annals of internal control reports. The report shall include admit management authorities of financial reporting and internal control is responsible, and discuss the implementation of these responsibilities.In The end The mission Treadway Committee after The five, The commission launched organization jointly established a new Committee - The Com - mittee COSO (Sponsoring Organizations of The Treadway of ordinary), namely The organizing Committee Treadway Committee launched. It consists of the American public institute of certified public accountants (AICPA), American accounting association (AAA), international financial management association (FEI), internal auditors association (type IIA), international accounting association (NAA would) (a managerial accounting association jointly sponsored IMA predecessor). COSO continue to study and in 1992 it issued a programmatic document about the Internal Control, namely "Internal Control - the overall framework" (Internal Control - IntegratedFramework). The reports are put forward the COSO U.S. federal reserve, the United States securities and exchange commission, the Basel committee regulators or international organizations such as the recognition and adopted, many of these definitions, Suggestions and ideas absorbed into the legislation and regulations, worldwide has had a broad impact. Since THE end of 2001, THE United States broke with enron, worldcom, xerox and other companies financial cases of fraud as a representative of accounting scandals, hit U.S. capital markets and THE economy, also concentrated exposure for American companies in THE existing problem of internal control, thus causing THE United States adopted THE "sasha class nice --, THE extension of THE law (SARBANES OXLEY ACT) -. The bill made clear company managers CEO and CFO finance director of internal control, and will be held directly responsible shall undertake economic and criminal consequences; Greatly improve the punishment of accounting fraud; Strengthening the internal audit, external audit and audit supervision. This legislation represents a large capital marketsystem, also make the progress of the importance of internal control people have more deeply.2.The internal control and risk management comparisonInternal control and risk management has the close relation. COSO internal control is that part of the risk management. Therefore, the committee in the whole framework of internal control - the basis of, and in 2003 issued a new report --, "enterprise risk management framework". At present the report was only a rough draft, in public, revised later, is expected to formally released this year. The enterprise risk management framework "inherit and contains the whole framework of internal control - the main content also expanded the three elements, added a goal, updated some ideas for countries to provide a unified enterprise risk management terms and concepts of comprehensive application guide system.COSO internal control and risk management of the definition and elements were: Internal control: enterprise internal control is by the enterprise board of directors, managers, and other staff to implement, for financial reporting accuracy, business activity of efficiency and effect, the relevant laws and regulations such as the follow to achieve the goal of the process and provide reasonable assurance. It includes five elements: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, the surveillance.Risk management: enterprise risk management is a process of the board of directors, the management of enterprises and other personnel to implement, applied in strategy formulation and enterprise all levels of activity, aims to identify possible influence enterprise various potential events, and according to enterprise's risk preference for enterprises to manage risk, to achieve the goal of providing reasonable assurance. It has eight elements: the internal environment, goal setting, event risk identification, risk assessment, countermeasures, control activities, information and communication, the surveillance.The two reports from the COSO perspective, the enterprise risk management and internal control has the following similar or different places:First, they are made by "enterprise board, management and other personnel to implement", emphasize the point, says the participation parties on the internal control and risk management has a corresponding roles and responsibilities.Second, they are all clearly is a "process", not as a static thing, such as system files, technical model and so on, also not be alone or extra activities, such asinspection, evaluation is best placed inside enterprise daily management process, as a kind of routine operation mechanism to construction.Third, they are for the realization of the goal of enterprise provide reasonable assurance. Risk management objectives are four categories, including three categories and internal control collocated, namely report targets, business targets and follow the targets. But the report targets have expanded, it not only include financial report, also requires all the accuracy of internal and external non-financial class report issued by the accurate and reliable. In addition, risk management increased the strategic target, namely and enterprise vision or mission related high-level objectives. This means that risk management is not only ensure management efficiency and effect, and intervention in the enterprise strategy (including business objectives) formulation process.Fourth, risk management and internal control elements have five aspects, i.e. (overlap is control or internal) environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, the surveillance. These coincide most of their goals and realization mechanism coincide of similar decision. Risk management increased goal setting, event identification and risk countermeasures three factors. Coincide elements, connotation, for example, has been extended internal control environment including honest character and moral values, staff quality and ability, the board of directors and the audit committee, management philosophy and management style, the organizational structure, the power and the allocation of responsibility, human resource policies and practices seven aspects. Risk management "internal environment" in addition to include these seven aspects outside, still include risk management philosophy, risk preference (appetite) and risks associated cultural three new content. In the risk assessment elements, risk management requires the consideration of the inherent risk and residual risk, with expectations, worst case values or probability distribution measure risk and to consider time preferences and risk association between the role. In information and communication, risk management emphasized the past, present and future of the relevant data about obtaining and analysis, provides information of the depth and timeliness, etc.Fifth, risk management proposes risk portfolio and the overall risk management (in tegrated management) - are new idea. The enterprise risk management framework "in the theory of modern financial borrowing portfolio risk theory, this paper puts forward the concept of combination and overall management from enterprise level,demanding dispersed in the overall grasp all levels and departments of enterprise, the risk exposure with overall consideration risk countermeasures, prevent dispersed consider and coping by department, such as will risk the risk in technology, financial, separated by information technology, environment, safety, quality, auditing departments, and considering the interaction between risk events, prevent two tendencies: one is the department's risk in risk preference can withstand ability, but within the overall effect may be beyond sustaining limit, because individual risk influence is not always add, may be multiplied; Second is the risk of individual departments over its limits, but exposure to the overall risk level haven't beyond sustaining range, because sometimes has offset the effects of the event of the effect. At this time, and further, strive for higher return risk with room to grow. According to risk portfolio and the overall management point of view, need unification consideration risk events as risk countermeasures between interaction between, overall risk management plan formulated.3. Internal control and risk management inner linkEnterprise system evolution and risk associated with the development. The establishment of a limited liability system is running or partnership enterprise organization from the key turning into a modern shares, it enables shareholders steps possessions and enterprise property and enterprise economic responsibility independent, shareholder transformation will no longer affect the enterprise credit capacity for equity transactions, expanded range and increased liquidity, which reduces the risk of investment and promoting enterprise financing, contributed to today a giant corporation.In order to make equity trading and the shareholders transform business continuity, influence and to make capital and management ability realize more optimal combination of ownership and management, enterprise in the modern enterprise of altitude, which also separate brings new risks, namely professional operators might not perform its accountability and shareholders' expense. In addition, limited liability may also lure enterprise engaged in high risk and damage the project's creditors. Because in limited liability, the potential revenue mainly by the enterprise (shareholders) to obtain, and the risk of failure, the major that bankruptcy is borne by the obligee. The risk is not marketization, the market competition spontaneous constraints or market transactions, such as providing a hedge product quality or natural disasters, but mechanism, belongs to the organization or trade in agency issues,need to regulate rules and system. These systems include corporate governance in the liability system, such as financial report, an internal control and audit, etc.Internal control and risk management is the fundamental role maintenance, security enterprise asset investor interest, and create new value. Fama&Jensen (1983) analyzed under the board of directors of ownership and separation of the internal control functions; Jensen (1993) further analyzed the American board of directors in internal control with reasons for the failure of performance. Theoretically, the enterprise internal control is the enterprise system component, is in the enterprise management and ownership of the separation of investor benefit under the condition of the protection mechanism. Its purpose is to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the accounting information management, prevent manipulation of statements and fraud and protect the company's property security, comply with the law in order to maintain the company's reputation and avoid incur pecuniary loss, etc. The historical origin of internal control, the requirements to earlier more basic, easier or appropriate rise to legislative level. Enterprise risk management is in the new technology and the market conditions of natural extension of internal control. COSO in the enterprise risk management framework of risk management of significance about when this is the case discussion: "enterprise risk management strategy and organization used in the various levels activities. It enables managers in the face of uncertainty can identify, evaluate and manage risk, play the role of creation and maintain value. Risk management can make risk preference and strategic keeps consistent, will risk and growth and return overall consideration, promote the decision against risks and reduce the risk and losses, identify business management and enterprise crossover risk, for various risks to provide overall countermeasures, capture opportunities and make capital rationalization." COCO in explaining the generalized control and risk discusses way: "' leadership 'in the face of uncertainty include choice." risk "refers to individuals or organizations are making choices adverse consequences after the possibility of suffering. The risk is opportunity counterparts." Obviously, these discussions have realized that enterprise exists for shareholders or stakeholders (for nonprofit organization, etc.), and create value value creation is not only passive assets security, it should also include the use of opportunity. Moreover, the threat of shareholder value comes not from the operator internal factors such as accounting frauds, including from the market risk, etc.Technology and market conditions, promote the new progress of internal controlto risk management. In advanced information technology conditions, accounting records realized the electronic control, real-time update, make traditional error-detection and prevent disadvantages accounting control seems outdated. However, the risk is often caused by trading or organization innovation, these innovation comes from emerging market practice, such as enron will energy trading large developed into similar financial derivatives trading. On the other hand, environmental protection and the enforcement of protection of consumer rights, strengthened the social responsibility of the enterprise, if an enterprise may have inadvertently, suffer from commodity market or capital market for the enterprise, and punish the performance brand value, or the capital market capitalisation put-downs. Therefore, the enterprise need a daily operation function and structure to guard against risks, including abide by laws and regulations, and ensure the trust of investors and ensure financial information management efficiency, etc. Therefore, from maintenance and promote this basic function value creation standpoint, risk management and internal control target is consistent, just in new technology and the market conditions, in order to effectively protect the interests of investors need in the basis of the development of internal control more active and more comprehensive risk management.4.From internal control to risk managementThere is a debate that risk management include internal control, or internal control contains risk management. The author thinks that what kind of conclusion that is not very important, the most important is to clear risk management and internal control of the relation between the superposition place. Who's wider, may be with time, technology, market conditions, legal and regulatory practice and different, for example, in the early development of internal control, market risk management tools and technology conditions are not fully (such as computer systems, statistics theory, quantity model, hedge tools and insurance etc.), then the internal control contains (alternative) risk management function is very natural. Even in the same era, different industry their emphasis may also different, for example, in the financial industry regulatory strict or involving the people's lives and health pharmacy and medical industry, the urgency of risk management, enterprise stronger with risk management leading internal control may be more convenient. And in some other enterprise, in order to comply with information disclosure requirements of internal control reports with the internal control system, enterprise for leading, give attention to two ormorethings risk management may be more suitable.Because of the internal control and risk management is the intrinsic relation, countries with different ways were gradually integrate internal control and risk management connected. January 8, 2004, China's relevant aspects held the "commercial bank risk management and internal control BBS", this shows that our banking also began to internal control and risk management connected.The Basel committee "issued by the banking group of internal control system framework said:" the board of directors approved and regularly check the overall strategy, and important system, understand the main risk, the bank for these risks setting acceptable level, ensure management to take necessary steps to identifying, measuring, supervision and control these risks..." Here, the risk management is obviously the content into the internal control framework. In the UK the FSA comprehensive standards (TheCombined Code) about the internal control regulation, it is first in official documents containing definitely in risk management in internal under control. This code is that the board should keep sound internal control system to protect shareholders investment and enterprise assets (principle d. 2). The board of directors at least once a year, and check the effectiveness of enterprise internal control systems, and to shareholders and report. Reports should include all the control, such as financial, management, follow control and risk management (d. 2.1). This rule is listed on the London stock exchange enterprise must abide by.Canadian association of certified accountants control standards committee (COCO) think "control should include risk identification and reduce the risk of", in which not only include the risk of achieving specific goals related, but also include general, if can't identify and took advantage of the opportunity, cannot make enterprise in the face of not anticipate events and uncertain information while maintaining flexibility or resilient. In 1992 the COSO internal control - in the whole framework will risk assessment of the internal control as one of the five elements, in the latest on the introduction of the "enterprise risk management framework" and further integrate internal control expanded to risk management, clearly put risk management include internal control.The author believes that in the actual business process, risk management and internal control is inseparable in rule or legislative process, consideration scope and control strength, the requirements, the greater the control range will be weaker. For its core problems, such as financial reporting accurate and reliable, the most suitable forlegislation to form to constraint, and other more broad content may be more suitable for rules and guidelines. The different levels of the enterprise internal risk management and internal control, the leading relative order can also be different, for example, from the enterprise strategic risk in turn to the management risk, financial risk, and finally to the financial report, risk management and internal control the relative importance should vary. In strategic risk, the risk management should play a leading role play complexation and internal control. This role reversal to financial report, gradually level, should play a leading role is the internal control, risk management play complexation.Despite the risk management and internal control an inner link, but the reality of or on behalf of the current application level of internal control and risk management and lots of gap. The typical risk management attention in particular business with strategic choice or business decisions related to compare the benefits and risks of, for example, banking credit management or market (price) risk management such as exchange rate, interest rate risk, etc. The typical internal control refers to accounting control, audit activities, are generally confined to financial related department. What they all have in common is low level, small range, confined to a few functional departments, and no penetration or applied in enterprise management process and the whole management system, therefore, sometimes looks risk management and internal control or independent of each other two things. Along with the internal control and risk management constantly improve and become more comprehensive, they inevitably overlapping and fusion between until unity.内部控制与风险管理周兆生1、内部控制———标准与立法1985年美国为了遏制日益猖獗的会计舞弊活动,成立了一个反财务舞弊委员会(Treadway委员会),调查导致会计舞弊活动的原因,并提出了解决方案。
内部控制——整体构架【外文翻译】
外文翻译原文INTERNAL CONTROL – INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK Material Source:Addendum to “Reporting to External Parties” May 1994 Author:Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission Senior executives have long sought ways to better control the enterprises they run. Internal controls are put in place to keep the company on course toward profitability goals and achievement of its mission, and to minimize surprises along the way. They enable management to deal with rapidly changing economic and competitive environments, shifting customer demands and priorities, and restructuring for future growth. Internal controls promote efficiency, reduce risk of asset loss, and help ensure the reliability of financial statements and compliance with laws and regulations.Because internal control serves many important purposes, there are increasing calls for better internal control systems and report cards on them. Internal control is looked upon more and more as a solution to a variety of potential problems.What Internal Control IsInternal control means different things to different people. This causes confusion among businesspeople, legislators, regulators and others. Resulting miscommunication and different expectations cause problems within an enterprise. Problems are compounded when the term, if not clearly defined, is written into law, regulation or rule.This report deals with the needs and expectations of management and others. It defines and describes internal control to:(1)Establish a common definition serving the needs of different parties.(2)Provide a standard against which business and other entities —large or small, in the public or private sector, for profit or not —can assess their control systems and determine how to improve them.Internal control is broadly defined as a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:(1)Effectiveness and efficiency of operations.(2)Reliability of financial reporting.(3)Compliance with applicable laws and regulations.The first category addresses an entity’s basic business objectives, including performance and profitability goals and safeguarding of resources. The second relates to the preparation of reliable published financial statements, including interim and condensed financial statements and selected financial data derived from such statements, such as earnings releases, reported publicly. The third deals with complying with those laws and regulations to which the entity is subject. These distinct but overlapping categories address different needs and allow a directed focus to meet the separate needs.Internal control systems operate at different levels of effectiveness. Internal control can be judged effective in each of the three categories, respectively, if the board of directors and management have reasonable assurance that:(1)They understand the extent to which the enti ty’s operations objectives are being achieved.(2)Published financial statements are being prepared reliably.(3)Applicable laws and regulations are being complied with.While internal control is a process, its effectiveness is a state or condition of the process at one or more points in time.Internal control consists of five interrelated components. These are derived from the way management runs a business, and are integrated with the management process. The components are:(1)Control Environment —The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure. Control environment factors include the integrity, ethical values and competence of the entity’s people; management’s philosophy and operating style; the way management assigns authority and responsibility, and organizes and develops its people; and the attention and direction provided by the board of directors.(2)Risk Assessment — Every entity faces a variety of risks from external and internal sources that must be assessed. A precondition to risk assessment is establishment of objectives, linked at different levels and internally consistent. Risk assessment is the identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of the objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed.Because economic, industry, regulatory and operating conditions will continue to change, mechanisms are needed to identify and deal with the special risks associated with change.(3)Control Activities — Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure management directives are carried out. They help ensure that necessary acti ons are taken to address risks to achievement of the entity’s objectives. Control activities occur throughout the organization, at all levels and in all functions. They include a range of activities as diverse as approvals, authorizations, verifications, reconciliations, reviews of operating performance, security of assets and segregation of duties.(4)Information and Communication — Pertinent information must be identified, captured and communicated in a form and timeframe that enable people to carry out their responsibilities. Information systems produce reports, containing operational, financial and compliance-related information, that make it possible to run and control the business. They deal not only with internally generated data, but also information about external events, activities and conditions necessary to informed business decision-making and external reporting. Effective communication also must occur in a broader sense, flowing down, across and up the organization. All personnel must receive a clear message from top management that control responsibilities must be taken seriously. They must understand their own role in the internal control system, as well as how individual activities relate to the work of others. They must have a means of communicating significant information upstream. There also needs to be effective communication with external parties, such as customers, suppliers, regulators and shareholders.(5)Monitoring — Internal control systems need to be monitored–a process that assess es the quality of the system’s performance over time. This is accomplished through ongoing monitoring activities, separate evaluations or a combination of the two. Ongoing monitoring occurs in the course of operations. It includes regular management and supervisory activities, and other actions personnel take in performing their duties. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations will depend primarily on an assessment of risks and the effectiveness of ongoing monitoring procedures. Internal control deficiencies should be reported upstream, with serious matters reported to top management and the board.There is synergy and linkage among these components, forming an integrated system that reacts dynamically to changing conditions.There is a direct relationship between the three categories of objectives, which are what an entity strives to achieve, and components, which represent what is needed to achieve the objectives. All components are relevant to each objectives category. When looking at any one category — the effectiveness and efficiency of operations, for instance —all five components must be present and functioning effectively to conclude that internal control over operations is effective.What Internal Control Can DoInternal control can help an entity achieve its performance and profitability targets, and prevent loss of resources. It can help ensure reliable financial reporting. And it can help ensure that the enterprise complies with laws and regulations, avoiding damage to its reputation and other consequences. In sum, it can help an entity get to where it wants to go, and avoid pitfalls and surprises along the way.What Internal Control Cannot DoUnfortunately, some people have greater, and unrealistic, expectations. They look for absolutes, believing that:(1)Internal control can ensure an entity’s success —that is, it will ensure achievement of basic business objectives or will, at the least, ensure survival. Even effective internal control can only help an entity achieve these objectives. It can provide management information about the entity’s progress, or lack of it, toward their achievement. But internal control cannot change an inherently poor manager into a good one. And, shifts in government policy or programs, competitors’ actio ns or economic conditions can be beyond management’s control. Internal control cannot ensure success, or even survival.(2)Internal control can ensure the reliability of financial reporting and compliance with laws and regulations.This belief is also unwarranted. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable — not absolute — assurance to management and the board regarding achievement of an entity’s objectives. The likelihood of achievement is affected by limitations inherent in all internal control systems. These include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the collusion of two or more people, and management has the ability to override the system. Another limiting factor is that the design of an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.Thus, while internal control can help an entity achieve its objectives, it is not a panacea.What to DoActions that might be taken as a result of this report depend on the position and role of the parties involved:(1)Senior Management — Most senior executives who contributed to this study believe they are basically “in control” of their organizations. Many said, however, that there are areas of their company —a division, a department or a control component that cuts across activities —where controls are in early stages of development or otherwise need to be strengthened. They do not like surprises. This study suggests that the chief executive initiate a self-assessment of the control system. Using this framework, a CEO, together with key operating and financial executives, can focus attention where needed.(2)Board Members — Members of the board of directors should discuss with senior management the state of the entity’s internal control system and provide oversight as needed. They should seek input from the internal and external auditors.(3)Other Personnel — Managers and other personnel should consider how their control responsibilities are being conducted in light of this framework, and discuss with more senior personnel ideas for strengthening control. Internal auditors should consider the breadth of their focus on the internal control system, and may wish to compare their evaluation materials to the evaluation tools.(4)Legislators and Regulators —Government officials who write or enforce laws recognize that there can be misconceptions and different expectations about virtually any issue. Expectations for internal control vary widely in two respects. First, they differ regarding what control systems can accomplish. As noted, some observers believe internal control systems will, or should, prevent economic loss, or at least prevent companies from going out of business. Second, even when there is agreement about what internal control systems can and can’t do, and abo ut the validity of the “reasonable assurance” concept, there can be disparate views of what that concept means and how it will be applied.(5)Professional Organizations —Rule-making and other professional organizations providing guidance on financial management, auditing and related topics should consider their standards and guidance in light of this framework. To the extent diversity in concept and terminology is eliminated, all parties will benefit.(6)Educators —This framework should be the subject of academic researchand analysis, to see where future enhancements can be made.With the presumption that this report becomes accepted as a common ground for understanding, its concepts and terms should find their way into university curricula.We believe this report offers a number of benefits. With this foundation for mutual understanding, all parties will be able to speak a common language and communicate more effectively. Business executives will be positioned to assess control systems against a standard, and strengthen the systems and move their enterprises toward established goals. Future research can be leveraged off an established base. Legislators and regulators will be able to gain an increased understanding of internal control, its benefits and limitations. With all parties utilizing a common internal control framework, these benefits will be realized.译文内部控制——整体构架资料来源：美国全美反舞弊性财务报告委员会著1994年第二版作者：C o m m i t t e e o f S p o n s o r i n g O r g a n i z a t i o n s委员会高层管理人员一直在探求更好的企业经营控制之道。
内部会计控制毕业论文外文翻译
附录A:internal control systeminternal control the management of internal checking, with the development of society has put forward the accounting control, management control, internal control structure, internal control integrated framework, internal control risk management framework, concepts.1.internal checkingas recorded in the historical books, as early as in the year before 3600 left and right of the Mesopotamia Cultural period, which, at that time was extremely simple financial management activities, the author requested the money to be paid for by money payment list, and by another record will be the inventory reconciliation and summary reports; and in ancient Egypt, the oversight officer of the institution; and the ancient Roman Empire of the royal treasury, there has been a double account; my Western Zhou period there have been "a bit financial access, the tree, the eyes and ears had been chapter." The period during the Song dynasty in the main library and 3 in the easy. All of these are internal checking of the application. Therefore, internal checking a person is not safe disposal account, and another person cannot be independent of the control system, that is to say it must be two employees of mutual restraint and mutual inspection. internal checking the implementation of the system is to two is of universal significance of the basic assumption that: One is two or more than two persons or departments inadvertently committing the same the possibility of errors is very small, 2 is two or more than two persons or departments of conscious collusion collusion and fraud of possibilities is far lower than a single individual or department for fraud. As part of its internal control, internal checking requirements in management, all the assets and cash and cash equivalents of receipt and payment, clearing and its registration, it should be by two or more people to deal with, in order to check each other, and troubleshooting the disadvantages.2.internal control systemwith the industrial revolution, the AB, the market competition is becoming increasingly intense, the original simple internal checking system gradually by individual economic control to all economic activities. The United States registered accounting belonging to the Association of the audit procedures in the 1958 release of the 29 audit procedures bulletin the independent auditors evaluating internal control of the internal accounting controls, in the internal control in the internalaccounting control", and "internal management control, and the internal accounting control" is defined as: "The security of property and the accuracy of the accounting records, and reliability with direct contact of the methods and procedures. internal accounting control, including the authorization and approval system, the financial assets of the physical control; accounting and preparation of financial statements, their property assets, and other on-the-job separation; as well as the internal audit and control.In 1972, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in the Auditing Standards Bulletin No. 1 in accounting control and management control of the definition of a re-specification. The notice pointed out that the accounting control plans and procedures, in order to safeguard assets and financial data for reliability, and for the following points provide reasonable assurance that: 1. Implementation of the economic business must meet the level of a general authorization or special authorization requirements; 2. Record economic business must, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or other criteria based on financial statements, and the protection of assets; 3. To access assets, must be approved by the senior management; 4. accounting personnel must be in a certain interval period, the assets of the account number for the amount and the physical assets of the number and amount in the inventory stock, once it is found that difference, it is timely to take effective measures to remedy the situation. In 1973, the Auditing Standards Bulletin No. 1 of the amendment, it is necessary to further improve the accounting control of the definition and scope.3 internal control structure80's of the 20th Century, Western auditors gradually believe that internal control should be the focus of the internal control structure. In 1988 the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in the audit guidelines Bulletin No. 55 of the notice stated that: "The Enterprise Internal control structures, including the provision to meet enterprise-specific goals and establish the norms and procedures. Notice of the internal control structure of the 3 elements, namely the control environment, the accounting system and control procedures. control environment, including the establishment of, and the strengthening or weakening of specific policies and procedures that affect various factors; accounting system provides the economic business identification, analysis, classification, and registration, as well as a report of the method, at the same time it made clear the assets and liabilities of the operational and management responsibilities; and control procedures wherebymanagement guidelines and procedures, with a view to achieving a certain goal. internal control structure, there are no longer clear distinction between accounting control and management control, and the content and scope has expanded to include more management control of the content. The salient features of which are the control environment, the elements, and stressed that the management of internal control of the attitudes, awareness and behavior, and control of their environment, lease, and that these factors is to achieve control objectives of the environment that requires auditors to assess the risks involved, in addition to our concern about accounting system and control procedures, it is responsible for the internal and external environment for evaluation. From the accounting control" and "management control" of the case, and that the internal control structure of the building, so that internal control has expanded the scope and content, and, more importantly, from a single policy and procedural changes to the 3 elements of build Chongqing people have learned, + thesis into the "structure" in order to bring about the internal control of the heat sink to the system of change and development. This shift also led the internal control from the technology-oriented enterprise to guide development.4 internal control the overall research frameworkto the 1990s, in order to curb the ever fiercer accounting fraud activities, 1992 COSO Committee published the internal control integrated framework report, as a result of the 1994 revision, and the internal control is defined as: "The internal control is a business by the Board, the management and other staff, the management layer is designed to achieve the following objectives and provide reasonable assurance that the process: Improve business performance and efficiency, and ensure that the financial reporting reliable and relevant laws are followed. Report and the internal control of the "3 elements" to "5 elements, namely control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Since then, internal control into the overall framework of the era. COSO consolidation of the internal control framework emphasized the following concepts: the first, internal control is a long-term process that is used to achieve the purpose of the tool, and not an end in itself; its 2, internal control is in the organization at every level of staff, and is not simply a policy, the manual and a table; its 3, the internal control of the board of directors and management to provide reasonable assurance that, rather than an absolute guarantee of its 4, the internal control by adjusting to achieve one or more independent, but there are cross-cuttingobjectives.5 risk-management frameworksince the start of the 21st century, there have been a few major events, in particular, the Enron bankruptcy, WorldCom's scandal and Xerox's take account of events, the heavy blow to the investor confidence in capital markets. Based on this, and in 2004 for the month of September, the Commission COSO published the enterprise risk management framework, the constructor has an internal risk control framework, internal control of 4 goals and 8 major elements. 4 goals, strategic objectives, operational objectives, objective of the report and the legitimacy of target. 8 elements, respectively, to control the environment, goals, risk identification, risk assessment, risk response, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. The report also pointed out that the risk to the business management is a process, and it is composed of a main body of the board of directors and management, as well as all of the other employees, and to the specified strategic and cross-cutting the enterprise production and management, and is designed to identify and assess the possible impact that the principal objectives of the potential issues and risk management, and to make it to the main goal of providing a risk capacity within reasonable assurance.The COSO for the enterprise risk management" concept of the State, has a strong emphasis on the following concepts: A. enterprise risk management is a process, and it flows to the business; B. enterprise risk management is applied to develop a strategy for the entire process; C. enterprise risk management is in the organization at all levels of all staff in the implementation of the; D. enterprise risk management throughout the business, at all levels and units, including the Enterprise at all levels of the risk portfolio;E. enterprise risk management to identify any in the event of a may affect business operations and production potential, and the risk to control the inclusion of risk capacity; F. enterprise risk management will be able to provide a corporate board and management to provide reasonable assurance that; G Enterprise Risk Management's goal was to achieve one or more different types, but also cross-cutting goals.附录B:内部控制制度发展内部控制源于企业管理的内部牵制，随着社会的发展先后提出了会计控制、管理控制、内部控制结构、内部控制整合框架、内部控制风险管理框架等概念。
内部控制外文文献及翻译
中文4500字本科生毕业设计（论文）外文原文及译文所在系管理系学生姓名郭淼专业会计学班级学号指导教师2013年6月外文文献原文及译文Internal ControlEmergence and development of the theory of the evolution of the internal controlInternal control in Western countries have a long history of development, according to the internal control characteristics at different stages of development, the development of internal control can be divided into four stages, namely the internal containment phase, the internal control system phase, the internal control structure phase, overall internal control framework stage.Internal check stages: infancy internal controlBefore the 1940s, people used to use the concept of internal check. This is the embryonic stage of internal control. "Keshi Accounting Dictionary" definition of internal check is "to provide effective organization and mode of operation, business process design errors and prevent illegal activities occur. Whose main characteristic is any individual or department alone can not control any part of one or the right way to conduct business on the division of responsibility for the organization, each business through the normal functioning of other individuals or departments for cross-examination or cross-control. designing effective internal check to ensure that all businesses can complete correctly after a specified handler in the process of these provisions, the internal containment function is always an integral part. "The late 1940s, the internal containment theory become important management methods and concepts. Internal check on a "troubleshooting a variety of measures" for the purpose of separation of duties and account reconciliation as a means to money and accounting matters and accounts as the main control object primary control measures. Its characteristics are account reconciliation and segregation of duties as the main content and thus cross-examination or cross-control. In general, the implementation of internal check function can be roughly divided into the following four categories: physical containment; mechanical containment; institutional containment; bookkeeping contain. The basic idea is to contain the internal "security is the result of checks and balances," which is based on two assumptions: First: two or more persons1西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）or departments making the same mistake unconsciously chance is very small; Second: Two or more the possibility of a person or department consciously partnership possibility of fraud is much lower than a single person or department fraud. Practice has proved that these assumptions are reasonable, internal check mechanism for organizations to control, segregation of duties control is the foundation of the modern theory of internal control.Internal control system phases:generating of internal controlThe late1940s to the early1970s, based on the idea of internal check, resulting in the concept of the internal control system, which is the stage in the modern sense of internal control generated. Industrial Revolution has greatly promoted the major change relations of production, joint-stock company has gradually become the main form of business organization of Western countries, in order to meet the requirements of prevailing socio-economic relations,to protect the economic interests of investors and creditors, the Western countries have legal requirements in the form of strengthen the corporate financial and accounting information as well as internal management of this economic activity.In 1934, the "securities and exchange act" issued by the U.S. government for the first time puts forward the concept of "internal accounting control", the implementation of general and special authorization book records, trading records, and compared different remedial measures such as transaction assets. In 1949, the American institute of certified public accountants (AICPA) belongs to the audit procedures of the committee (CPA) in the essential element of internal control: the system coordination, and its importance to management department and the independence of certified public accountants' report, the first official put forward the definition of internal control: "the design of the internal control includes the organization and enterprise to take all of the methods and measures to coordinate with each other. All of these methods and measures used to protect the property of the enterprise, to check the accuracy of accounting information, improve the efficiency of management, promote enterprise stick to established management guidelines." The definition from the formulation and perfecting the inner control of the organization, plan, method and measures such as rules and regulations to implement internal control, break through the limitation of control related to the financial and accounting department directly, the four objectives of internal control, namely the enterprise in commercial2外文文献原文及译文activities to protect assets, check the veracity and reliability of financial data, improve the work efficiency, and promote to management regulations. The definition of positive significance is to help management authorities to strengthen its management, but the scope of limitation is too broad. In 1958, the commission issued no. 29 audit procedures bulletin "independent auditors evaluate the scope of internal control", according to the requirements of the audit responsibility, internal control can be divided into two aspects, namely, the internal accounting control and internal management control. The former is mainly related to the first two of the internal control goal, the latter mainly relates to the internal control after two goals. This is the origin of the internal control system of "dichotomy". Because the concept of management control is vague and fuzzy, in the actual business line between internal control and internal accounting control is difficult to draw. In order to clear the relations between the two, in 1972 the American institute of certified public accountants in the auditing standards announcement no. 1, this paper expounds the internal management control and internal accounting control: the definition of "internal management control including, but not limited to organization plan, and the administrative department of the authorized approval of economic business decision-making steps on the relevant procedures and records. This authorization of items approved activities is the responsibility of management, it is directly related to the management department to perform the organization's business objectives, is the starting point of the economic business accounting control." At the same time, the important content of internal accounting control degree and protect assets, to ensure that the financial records credibility related institutions plans, procedures and records. After a series of changes and redefine the meaning of the internal control is more clear than before and the specification, increasingly broad scope, and introduces the concept of internal audit, has received recognition around the world and references, the internal control system is made.The internal control structure stage: development of the internal controlTheory of internal control structure formed in the 90 s to the 1980 s, this phase of western accounting audit of internal control research focus gradually from the general meaning to specific content to deepen. During this period, the system management theory has become the new management idea, it says: no physical objects in the world are composed of elements of3西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）system, due to the factors, there exists a complicated nonlinear relationship between system must have elements do not have new features, therefore, should be based on the whole the relationship between elements. System management theory will enterprise as a organic system composed of subsystems on management, pay attention to the coordination between the subsystems and the interaction with the environment. In the modern company system and system management theory, under the concept of early already cannot satisfy the need of internal control systems. In 1988, the American institute of certified public accountants issued "auditing standards announcement no. 55", in the announcement, for the first time with the word "internal control structure" to replace the original "internal control", and points out that: "the enterprise's internal control structure including provide for specific target reasonable assurance of the company set up all kinds of policies and procedures". The announcement that the internal control structure consists of control environment, accounting system (accounting system), the control program "three components, the internal control as a organic whole composed of these three elements, raised to the attention of the internal control environment.The control environment, reflecting the board of directors, managers, owners, and other personnel to control the attitude and behavior. Specific include: management philosophy and operating style, organizational structure, the function of the board of directors and the audit committee, personnel policies and procedures, the way to determine the authority and responsibility, managers control method used in the monitoring and inspection work, including business planning, budgeting, forecasting, profit plans, responsibility accounting and internal audit, etc.Accounting systems, regulations of various economic business confirmation, the collection, classification, analysis, registration and preparing method. An effective accounting system includes the following content: identification and registration of all legitimate economic business; Classifying the various economic business appropriate, as the basis of preparation of statements; Measuring the value of economic business to make its currency's value can be recorded in the financial statements; Determine the economic business events, to ensure that it recorded in the proper accounting period; Describe properly in the financial statements of4外文文献原文及译文economic business and related content.The control program, refers to the management policies and procedures, to ensure to achieve certain purpose. It includes economic business and activity approval; Clear division of the responsibility of each employee; Adequate vouchers and bills setting and records; The contact of assets and records control; The business of independent audit, etc. Internal structure of control system management theory as the main control thought, attaches great importance to the environmental factors as an important part of internal control, the control environment, accounting system and control program three elements into the category of internal control; No longer distinguish between accounting control and management control, and uniform in elements describe the internal control, think the two are inseparable and contact each other.Overall internal control framework stages: stage of internal controlAfter entering the 1990 s, the study of internal control into a new stage. With the improvement of the corporate governance institutions, the development of electronic information technology, in order to adapt to the new economic and organizational form, using the new management thinking, "internal control structure" for the development of "internal control to control the overall framework". In 1992, the famous research institutions internal control "by organization committee" (COSO) issued a landmark project - "internal control - the whole framework", also known as the COSO report, made the unification of the internal control system framework. In 1994, the report on the supplement, the international community and various professional bodies widely acknowledged, has wide applicability. The COSO report is a historical breakthrough in the research of internal control theory, it will first put forward the concept of internal control system of the internal control by the original planar structure for the development of space frame model, represents the highest level of the studies on the internal control in the world.The COSO report defines internal control as: "designed by enterprise management, to achieve the effect and efficiency of the business, reliable financial reporting and legal compliance goals to provide reasonable assurance, by the board of directors, managers and other staff to5西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）implement a process." By defining it can be seen that the COSO report that internal control is a process, will be affected by different personnel; At the same time, the internal control is a in order to achieve business objectives the group provides reasonable guarantee the design and implementation of the program. The COSO report put forward three goals and the five elements of internal control. The three major target is a target business objectives, information and compliance. Among them, the management goal is to ensure business efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control; Information goal is refers to the internal control to ensure the reliability of the enterprise financial report; Compliance goal refers to the internal controls should abide by corresponding laws and regulations and the rules and regulations of the enterprise.COSO report that internal control consists of five elements contact each other and form an integral system, which is composed of five elements: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring and review.Control Environment: It refers to the control staff to fulfill its obligation to carry out business activities in which the atmosphere. Including staff of honesty and ethics, staff competence, board of directors or audit committee, management philosophy and management style, organizational structure, rights and responsibilities granted to the way human resources policies and implementation.Risk assessment: It refers to the management to identify and take appropriate action to manage operations, financial reporting, internal or external risks affecting compliance objectives, including risk identification and risk analysis. Risk identification including external factors (such as technological development, competition, changes in the economy) and internal factors (such as the quality of the staff, the company nature of activities, information systems handling characteristics) to be checked. Risk analysis involves a significant degree of risk estimates to assess the likelihood of the risk occurring, consider how to manage risk.Control activities: it refers to companies to develop and implement policies and procedures, and 6外文文献原文及译文to take the necessary measures against the risks identified in order to ensure the unit's objectives are achieved. In practice, control activities in various forms, usually following categories: performance evaluation, information processing, physical controls, segregation of duties.Information and communication: it refers to enable staff to perform their duties, to provide staff with the exchange and dissemination of information as well as information required in the implementation, management and control operations process, companies must identify, capture, exchange of external and internal information. External information, including market share, regulatory requirements and customer complaints and other information. The method of internal information including accounting system that records created by the regulatory authorities and reporting of business and economic matters, maintenance of assets, liabilities and owners' equity and recorded. Communication is so that employees understand their responsibilities to maintain control over financial reporting. There are ways to communicate policy manuals, financial reporting manuals, reference books, as well as examples such as verbal communication or management.Monitoring: It refers to the evaluation of internal controls operation of the quality of the process, namely the reform of internal control, operation and improvement activities evaluated. Including internal and external audits, external exchanges.Five elements of internal control system is actually wide-ranging, interrelated influence each other. Control environment is the basis for the implementation of other control elements; control activities must be based on the risks faced by companies may have a detailed understanding and assessment basis; while risk assessment and control activities within the enterprise must use effective communication of information; Finally, effective monitoring the implementation of internal control is a means to protect the quality. Three goals and five elements for the formation and development of the internal control system theory laid the foundation, which fully reflects the guiding ideology of the modern enterprise management idea that security is the result of systems management. COSO report emphasizes the integration framework and internal control system composed of five elements, the framework for the7西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）establishment of an internal control system, operation and maintenance of the foundation.In summary,because of social, economic and environmental change management, internal control functions along with the changes, in order to guide the evolution of the internal control theory. As can be seen from the history of the development of internal control theory, often derived from the internal control organizational change management requirements, from an agricultural economy to an industrial economy, innovation management methods and tools for the development of the power to bring internal controls.From the internal containment center,controlled by the internal organization of the mutual relations between the internal control of various subsystems and went to COSO as the representative to the prevention and management loopholes to prevent the goal, through the organization of control and information systems,to achieve the overall system optimization of modern internal sense of control theory, from Admiral time, corresponding to the two economic revolution.Therefore, in the analysis of foreign internal control theory and Its Evolution, requires a combination of prevailing socio-economic environment and business organization and management requirements, so as to understand the nature of a deeper internal control theory of development.8外文文献原文及译文译文：内部控制Ge.McVay一、内部控制理论的产生与发展演进内部控制在西方国家已经有比较长的发展历史，根据内部控制在不同发展阶段的特征，可以将内部控制的发展分为四个阶段，即内部牵制阶段、内部控制制度阶段、内部控制结构阶段、内部控制整体框架阶段。
外文文献翻译-企业内部控制
外文文献及翻译THE CONCEPT OF INTERNALCONTROLSYSTEM: THEORETICALASPECTVaclovas Lakis, Lukas Giriūnas*Vilnius University, LithuaniaIntroductionOne of the basic instruments of enterprise control, whose implementation in modern economic conditions provide conditions for achieving a competitive advantage over other enterprises is the creation of an effective internal control system. In the industry sector, the market is constantly changing, and this requires changing the attitude to internal control from treating it only in the financial aspect to the management of the control process. Internal control as such becomes an instrument and means of risk control, which helps the enterprise to achieve its goals and to perform its tasks. Only an effective internal control in the enterprise is able to help objectively assessing the potential development and tendencies of enterprise performance and thus to detect and eliminate the threats and risks in due time as well as to maintain a particular fixed level of risk and to provide for its reasonablesecurity .The increasing variety of concepts of internal control systems requires their detailed analysis. A detailed analysis of the conceptions might help find the main reasons for their increasing number. It may also help to elaborate a structural scheme of the generalized concept of internal control. Consequently, it may help decrease the number of mistakes and frauds in enterprises and to offer the precautionary means that might help to avoid mistakes and build an effective internal control system.The purpose of the study: to compile the definition of the concept of internal control system and to elaborate the structural scheme of the generalized conception for Lithuanian industrial enterprises.The object of the research: internal control.To achieve the aim, the following tasks were carried out:to examine the definitions of internal control;to design a flowchart for the existing definitions of internal control;to formulate a new internal control system definition;? to identify the place of the internal control system in a company’s objectives and ? its management activities.Study methods: for the analysis of the conceptions of control, internal control, theconcept of internal control system, systematic and comparative means of scietific methods of analysis were used.1. Research of control conceptionAccording to J. Walsh, J. Seward (1990), H. K. Chung, H. Lee Chong, H. K.Jung (1997), control may be divided into two types – internal and external controls those might help to equalize authority or concerned party‘s attitudes to some certain organization control. Internal control involves the supreme enterprise control apparatus and enterprise shareholders, whereas external control might be defined as the power in the market or branch, competitive environment or state business regulation. Such analytical division is essential when analysing industrial or other enterprises, because this attitude to control makes it more specific and properly defined.The identification of an appropriate primary theoretical base is an important task in forming the structure of knowledge about the study subject. Appropriately selected conceptions enable to elucidate the essence of the processes, to characterize them and to realize their interplays and interaction principles. Conceptions may be defined as a summation of empirical cognition which transforms practically achieved results into conceptions. The above ideas might be taken as abstractions and lead to an ungrounded conclusion, and through conceptions the reality might be lost. Operating with more than one conceptions allows to form a universal opinion about the reality. Noteworthy, when operating with conceptions an optimal agreement might be found between theory and practice: using the common point of contact –conceptions –a theorist and a practician will always find the way and understand one another.The main problem of internal control is related to the definition of control conception and the identification of the place of internal control in an organization. Constant changes of the extent, functions and roles of internal control enable to form acommon definition of internal control and to identify its place in an organization.Analysis of the concept of internal control and its interpretation are essential for assessing the internal control system, because the conception of control is widely used not only in scientific research, but also in the daily activities of an enterprise; therefore the same conception might have a lot of various meanings and interpretations. Analysis of the concept provides conditions for the further research, because it is impossible to form a model of internal control assessment if the research object is unknown. A lot of definitions and variations of control can be found in thepublications by Lithuanian and foreign scientists and in public information sources. For example, in the Dictionary of International Words (2002), control is defined as: supervision, inspection of something; comparison of actual and required ? conditions; an enterprise or a group of people that control the work and responsibility of other ? enterprises or groups of people;maintenance of something.?In addition to the above seven internal control, and documentation control. Performance control and worker quality control, etc. The new system of accounting supervision system on the unit interior, the main contents of the internal control system.On the other hand, in the specialized Dictionary of Economic Terms (2005), control is defined as a performance with a definite influence on the management of an enterprise, as rights based on laws and contracts that involve proprietary rights to the whole property or its part, or any other rights that enable to exert a significant influence on the management and performance of an enterprise, or state supervision. Even in common information sources the definitions of control are formulated differently, although the common meaning is quite similar. Analysis and practical studies of Lithuanian scientists’ works enable to state that there is no one solid concept, definition or description of control. For example, E. Bu?kevi?iūt? (2008) says that when control is more particularly defined, its rules and requirements are described in more detail, it becomes more effective, more specific, more psychologically suggestive, it gives more freedom limits of choice for supervisors and less possibilities of lawlessness for people under control when. Identifying the object of the research, it should be noted that different definitions of control are given in scientific studies by Sakalas, 2000; Navickas, 2011; Katkus, 1997; Bu?kevi?iūt?, 2008; Drury, 2012; Bi?iulaitis, 2001; Lee Summers, 1991; Patrick, Fardo, 2009; Spencer, Pickett, 2010; Gupta, 2010 and other Lithuanian and foreign scientists (see Fig. 1).The different conceptions and their interpretations indicate that there is no solid opinion about how to define control, and even scientists and practicians themselves do not agree upon a unified definition or description of control or the conception of internal control and its interpretations. In scientific literature, different interpretations of control conceptions are usually related to different aspects of this conception, and their meaning in different situations may be defined in different ways depending on the situation and other external factors. According to A. Katkus (1997), C. Drury (2009), R. Bi?iulaitis (2001), D. R. Patrick, S. W. Fardo (2009), K. H. S. Pickett (2010), during a long-term period control is usually related to achieving the alreadysettled goals, their improvement and insurance. In other information sources (Dictionary of International Words, 2002; Sakalas, 2000; Bukeviiūt, 2008; Lee Summers, 1991) control is emphasized as a certain means of inspection which provides a possibility to regulate the planned and actual states and their performance. Despite these different opinions, control might be reasoned and revealed as a traditional function of any object of control, emphasized as one of the main self-defence means from the possible threats in the daily performance of an organization. There is also a more modern approach. For example, V. Navickas (2011) and P. Gupta (2010), presenting the concept of control, name it not only as one of the main factors that influence the organization’s performance and influences its management, but also as one of the assessment means of the taken decisions and achieved values. Such interpretation of the conception of control shows the main role of control. For example, R. Kanapickien? (2008) has analysed a big number of control definitions and says that only an effective and useful control should exist in an enterprise because each enterprise tries to implement its purposes and avoid the possible losses, i.e. mistakes and frauds. According to J.A. Pfister (2009), there are several types of control, and they can be grouped into strategic, management, and internal control. Thus, different researchers give different definitions of control, their descriptions have different goals, but different control definitions lead to numerous variations in the analysis of the conception of control. Thus, to create an effective control, the presence of its unified concept becomes a necessity and the basis for ensuring an effective control of the organization’s performance. The existence of different conceptions of control also indicates that there might be different types or kinds of control.2. The conception of internal controlHistorical development of internal control as individual enterprise system is not as broad as other management spheres in science directions. The definition of internal control was presented for the first time in 1949 by the American Institute of Certificated Accountants (AICPA). It defined internal control as a plan and other coordinated means and ways by the enterprise to keep safe its assets, check the covertness and reliability of data, to increase its effectiveness and to ensure the settled management politics. However, the presented definition of control concept has been constantly improved, and nowadays there is quite an extensive set of conceptions that indicates the system of internal control as one of the means of leadership to ensure safety of enterprise assets and its regular development. In 1992, the COSOmodelappeared; its analysis distinguished the concepts of risk and internal control. Nnow, the concept of internal control involved not only accounting mistakes and implementing means of their prevention, but also a modern attitude that might identify the spheres of control management and processes, and also a motivated development of their detailed analysis. The Worldwide known collapses of such companies as Enron, Worldcom, Ahold, Parmalat and others determined to issue in 2002 the Law of Sarbanes–Oxley in the USA, in which attention is focused on the effectiveness of the enterprise internal control system and its assessment. Such a significant law as that of Sarbanes–Oxley has dearly show that not only the internal control system must be concretized and clearly defined, but also the means of implementing the internal control system and assessing their effectiveness must be covered. The concept of internal control was further improved by such Lithuanian and foreign scientists as A.Сонин(2000), D. Robertson (1993), M.R. Simmons (1995), I. Toliatien? (2002), V. Lakis (2007), R. Biiulaitis (2001), J. Mackeviius (2001) and the international scientific organizations COSO, INTOSAI, CICA, IT Governance Institute.A comparative analysis of the introduced concepts of internal control shows that the usage of the concept of internal control is quite broad as it is supposed to involve the performance not only of the state, but also of the private sector. Although the conception of internal control is defined in different ways emphasizing its different aspects, the essential term still remains the same in all authors’ definitions: internal control is the inspection, observation, maintenance and regulation of the enterprise’s work (see Fig. 3.).It should be also be mentioned that the system of internal control may be defined in different ways every time. For example, R. T. Yeh and S. H. Yeh (2007) pay attention to the fact that usually such values as honesty, trust, respect, openness, skills, courage, economy, initiative, etc. are not pointed out, although they definitely can influence not only the understanding of the concept of internal control, but also its definition, because in different periods of time and in different situations it can obtain slightly different shades of meaning. Control and people, and values produced by people or their performance are tightly connected; consequently, internal control must be also oriented to the enterprise’s values, mission and vision; it does not matter how differently authors define the conception assessment limits: significant attention must be paid not to internal control itself, but to the identification of its functions andevaluation. Mostly internal control is concerned with authority management tools that help to control processes and achieve enterprise goals (COSO, 1992; Сонин, 2000; INTOSAI, 2004; CobiT, 2007; Toliatien?, 2002; Coco, 1995).C.J. Buck, J.B. Breuker (2008) declare internal control as a mistake detecting and correctingsystem; although J. Mackevi?ius (2001) and R. Bi?iulaitis (2001a) state that internal control is defined as a summation of certain rules, norms and means, actually such definitions are identical, but internal control must be related to safety, the rational use of property and the reliability of financial accounting.Results of a comprehensive analysis of internal control enable to state that, although different authors give different definitions of internal control, there are still some general purposes of the system of internal control, aimed, to ensure reliable and comprehensive information, to protect the property and documents, to enssure an effective economic performance, observation of accounting principles and presentation of reliable financial records, obeying laws and executive acts, enterprise rules and the effective control of risk. Analysis of concept of internal control, presented in both foreign and Lithuanian literature enables to formulate its generalized definition: the system of internal control is part of enterprise management system, which ensures the implementation of its goals, effective economic and commercial performance, observance of accounting principles and an effective control of risks, which enables to minimize the number of intentional and unintentional mistakes and to avoid frauds in the process of enterprise performance, made by its authority or employees.The internal control is an important symbol of modern enterprise management, through the practice of the conclusion is: to control is strong, weak, without control is controlled, disorderly. The new regulations "accounting law 27 units shall establish and perfect the system of supervision unit interior accountant. Unit interior accountant controls on the execution, the internal control is.The internal control is the formation of a series of measures to control functions, procedures, methods, and standardized and systematized, make it become a rigorous, relatively complete system. According to the control of the internal control can be divided into different purpose accounting control and management control. Accounting control and protection of assets is safe, the accounting information authenticity and integrity and financial activities related to the legitimacy of control, Management control means to ensure operation policy decision, implementation ofbusiness activities and promote the efficiency and effectiveness, and the effect of the relevant management to achieve the goals of control. Accounting control and management control and not mutually exclusive, incompatible, some control measures can be used for accounting control, and can also be used to control.The goal is to ensure that the internal control unit operations efficiency and effect, safety, economic information of assets and financial reports of reliability. Its main functions: one is to achieve target management policy and management, Second is the assets of safety protection unit is complete, prevent loss of assets, Three is to guarantee the business and financial accounting information authenticity and integrity. In addition, the legitimacy of the financial activities within the unit is the internal control goals.Good, although the internal control to achieve these goals, but whether the internal control design and operation, it is not how to eliminate its inherent limitations. This limitation must also be clear and prevention. Main show is: (1) the limited by cost benefit principle, (2) if the employee has different responsibility ignore control program, misjudgment, even the collusion, inside and outside, often cause in fraud internal control malfunction, (3) management personnel abuse, and to set up or Passover control of internal control ignored, also can make the establishment of internal control non-existing.The internal control system in a company must cover and help to properly organize and control the entire activity of the company; thus, according to majority of authors, internal control is all-inclusive activity in financial and management accounting, as well as in the strategic management of projects, operations, personneland the total quality management. However, the most important thing is that internal control should not only cover the entire activity of the company, but also take into account its objectives, goals and tasks in order to make its economic-commercial activity as effective as possible. Analysis of scientific literature in the field shows that it is important not only to predict the particular areas of internal control and interrelate them, but also to stress that the most important objective of internal control is the effective management of risk by identifying and eliminating errors and frauds inside the company. Therefore, the concept of internal control offered by the authors covers a company’s areas of activities, its tasks and objectives; also, it provides for the main goal – an effective risk management.Despite the quantitative indicators used for goal assessment, each enterprise and especially extractive industry enterprises where attention should be focused onavoiding mistakes and fraud should elaborate and introduce a really effective and optimal system of internal control and accounting so as to strengthen its position in the market and optimize profitability.ConclusionsThe analysis of control definitions has shown that rather wide variations of definitions and their interpretations prove control to be a wide concept, mainly due to the fact that control has quite many different aspects and its meaning in different situations may be also defined differently.Nevertheless, there are still some general aspects of the system of internal control, which include ensuring reliable and comprehensive information, protecting the property and documents, to ensure an effective economic performance, keeping to the principles of accounting and presenting reliable financial records, obeying laws and executive acts, enterprise rules and ensuring an effective control of risk.As a result of the study, the authors present an inclusive and generalizing definition of internal control: the system of internal control is part of the enterprise management system that ensures the implementation of the enterprise’s goals, its effect ive economic-commercial performance, observance of accounting principles and an effective control of work risks, which enables to minimize the number of intentional and unintentional mistakes, and to avoid frauds in the process of enterprise performance, made by its authority or employees.中文翻译：内部控制制度：理论研究拉基斯，卢卡斯维尔纽斯大学，立陶宛引言企业控制的基本工具之一，建立一个有效的内部控制制度，为现代经济条件下企业获得竞争优势提供了条件。
内部控制外文翻译
外文翻译原文来源：R e s e a r c h P a p e r, J u l y2009,S o c i a l S c i e n c e R e s e a r c hN e t w o r k中文译文：内部控制透视：理论与概念学院专业姓名学号指导教师年月日内部控制透视：理论与概念环境需要新的业务控制变量不为任何潜在的股东和管理人士的响应因子为1，另外应执行/她组织了一个很大的控制权。
控制是管理活动的东西或以上施加控制。
思想的产生和近十年的发展需要有系统的商业资源和控制这种财富一个新的关注。
主题之一热一回合管制的商业资源是分析每个控制成本效益。
作为内部控制和欺诈的第一道防线，维护资产以及预防和侦查错误。
内部控制，我们可以说是一种控制整个系统的财务和其他方面的管理制定了为企业的顺利运行;它包括内部的脸颊，内部审计和其他形式的控制。
COSO的内部控制描述如下。
内部控制是一个客观的方法用来帮助确保实现。
在会计和组织理论，内部控制是指或目标目标的过程实施由组织的结构，工作和权力流动，人员和具体的管理信息系统，旨在帮助组织实现。
这是一种手段，其中一个组织的资源被定向，监控和测量。
它发挥着无形的（重要的作用，预防和侦查欺诈和保护组织的资源，包括生理（如，机械和财产）和乙二醇，声誉或知识产权，如商标）。
在组织水平，内部控制目标与可靠性的目标或战略的财务报告，及时反馈业务上的成就，并遵守法律，法规。
在具体的交易水平，内部控制是指第三方采取行动以实现一个具体目标（例如，如何确保本组织的款项，在申请服务提供有效的。
）内部控制程序reduce程变异，导致更加具有可预见性outcomes。
在业务实体内部控制也被称为业务控制。
它们是日常的工具使用的经理。
所有管理人员使用的内部控制，以帮助确保他们的经营单位，按照计划，他们使用的方法-政策、程序、组织设计和身体的障碍构成。
内部控制是对以下组合： 1、财务控制 2、其他控件。
内部控制外文文献及翻译
LNTU---Acc附录A关于内部控制的意见 如果要证明功能扩展到包含内部控制的有效性，那么报告准则则必须制定，若干基本问题必须被解决。
随着日益频繁增长，审计员听取了他们应该发表的一个效力于客户的内部控制制度建议的意见。
这一证明功能扩展的主张者迅速指出，目前已经有了实例如独立审计师的报告公开他们的客户的内部控制制度和一些政府机构的成效，包括一些空置中的美国证券和交易委员会，都需要一个报告。
这些证实类型的反对者公布了任何关于内部控制的有效性，他们认为，目前有显着性差异监管机构的报告要求和提出意见的内部控制将会误导公众。
本文综述了目前报告的做法，考虑到理想状态相关的危害的特点，并最后提出了一些在任何给与最后判决之前必要的予以回答的问题。
现状报告 虽然审计员的报告中的一些情况提及了内部控制的性质，但作出的本质陈述还有很大不同的效应。
大型银行。
关于对内部控制的观点事实上出现在一些大型银行和看法发行的年度报告中。
有时这些意见是被董事会要求的。
例如，下面的主张出现在1969年年度报告的一个大型纽约银行中，作为第3款的独立会计师的标准短形式的报告： 我们的审核工作包括评价有效性，大块的内部会计控制，其中还包括内部审计。
我们认为，在于程序的影响下，再加上银行内部审计工作人员所进行的审核，这些构成一个有效的系统的内部会计控制。
意见被提供给几个其他银行，但它们基本上引用的意见是一样的。
美国证券交易委员会的规定。
美国证券交易委员会表格X-17A-5，要求独立审计师作出某些有关的内部控制陈述，并必须在每年的大多数成员国家与每一个证券经纪或注册的交易商根据1934年证券交易法第15条进行交流时。
此外，美国证券交易委员会的第17a-5(g)规定要求独立的核数师的报告要包含“一份如，是否会计师审查了程序，要安全措施保障客户的证券的声明中”此外，许多股票交易所要求该报告要表明审查已取得的“会计制度，内部会计控制和程序，是为维护证券，包括适当的测试它们对以后的期间，检验日期前”，很显然，美国证券交易委员会的工作人员更倾向于考虑，会计师包括了语言相似，所要求的所有报告的交流提交给证券交易委员会。
内部控制-整体框架【外文翻译】
外文翻译原文：Internal Control –Integrated FrameworkRisksThe process of identifying and analyzing risk is an ongoing iterative process and is a critical component of an effective internal control system. Managements must focus carefully on risks at all levels of the entity and take the necessary actions to manage them.Risk IdentificationAn entity’s performance can be at risk due to internal or external factors. These factors, in turn, can affect either stated or implied objectives. Risk increases as objectives increasingly differ from past performance. In a number of areas of performance, an entity often does not set explicit entity-wide objectives because it considers its performance to be acceptable. Although there might not be an explicit or written objective in these circumstances, there is an implied objective of “no change” or “as is.” This does not mean that an implied objective is without either internal or external risk. For example, an entity might view its service to customers as acceptable, yet, due to a change in a competitor’s practices, its service, as viewed by its customers, might deteriorate.Regardless of whether an objective is stated or implied, an entity’s risk-assessment process should consider risks that may occur. It is important that risk identification be comprehensive. It should consider all significant interactions — of goods, services and information —between an entity and relevant external parties. These external parties include potential and current suppliers, investors, creditors, shareholders, employees, customers, buyers, intermediaries and competitors, as well as public bodies and news media.Risk identification is an iterative process and often is integrated with the planning process. It also is useful to consider risk from a “clean sheet of paper” approach, and not merely relate the risk to the previous review.Entity Level. Risks at the entity-wide level can arise from external or internal factors. Examples include:External Factors●Technological developments can affect the nature and timing of research and development, or lead to changes in procurement.●Changing customer needs or expectations can affect product development, production process, customer service, pricing or warranties.●Competition can alter marketing or service activities.●New legislation and regulation can force changes in operating policies and strategies.●Natural catastrophes can lead to changes in operations or information systems and highlight the need for contingency planning.●Economic changes can have an impact on decisions related to financing, capital expenditures and expansion.Internal Factors●A disruption in information systems processing can adversely affect the entity’s operations.●The quality of personnel hired and methods of training and motivation can influence the level of control consciousness within the entity.● A change in management responsibilities can affect the way certain controls are effected.●The nature of the entity’s activities, and employee accessibility to assets, can contribute to misappropriation of resources.●An unassertive or ineffective board or audit committee can provide opportunities for indiscretions.Many techniques have been developed to identify risks. The majority —particularly those developed by internal and external auditors to determine the scope of their activities —involve qualitative or quantitative methods to prioritize and identify higher-risk activities. Other practices include: periodic reviews of economic and industry factors affecting the business, senior management business-planningconferences and meetings with industry analysts. Risks may be identified in connection with short- and long-range forecasting and strategic planning. Which methods an entity selects to identify risks is not particularly important. What is important is that management considers carefully the factors that may contribute to or increase risk. Some factors to consider include: past experiences of failure to meet objectives; quality of personnel; changes affecting the entity such as competition, regulations, personnel, and the like; existence of geographically distributed, particularly foreign, activities; significance of an activity to the entity; and complexity of an activity.To illustrate, an importer of apparel and footwear established an entity-wide objective of becoming an industry leader in high-quality fashion merchandise. Risks considered at the entity-wide level included: supply sources, including the quality, number and stability of foreign manufacturers; exposures to fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies; timeliness of receiving shipments and effect of delays in customs inspections; availability and reliability of shipping companies and costs; likelihood of international hostilities and trade embargoes; and pressures from customers and investors to boycott doing business in a foreign country whose government adopts unacceptable policies. These were in addition to the more generic risks considered, such as the impact of a deterioration in economic conditions, market acceptance of products, new competitors in the entity’s market, and changes in environmental or regulatory laws and regulations.Identifying external and internal factors that contribute to risk at an entity-wide level is critical to effective risk assessment. Once the major contributing factors have been identified, management can then consider their significance and, where possible, link risk factors to business activities.Activity Level. In addition to identifying risk at the entity level, risks should be identified at the activity level. Dealing with risks at this level helps focus risk assessment on major business units or functions such as sales, production, marketing, technology development, and research and development. Successfully assessing activity-level risk also contributes to maintaining acceptable levels at the entity-widelevel.In most instances, for any stated or implied objective, many different risks can be identified. In a procurement process, for example, an entity may have an objective related to maintaining adequate raw materials inventory. The risks to not achieving the activity objective might include goods not meeting specifications, or not being delivered in needed quantities, on time or at acceptable prices. These risks might affect the way specifications for purchased goods are communicated to vendors, the use and appropriateness of production forecasts, identification of alternative supply sources and negotiation practices.Potential causes of failing to achieve an objective range from the obvious to the obscure and from the significant to the insignificant in potential effect. Certainly, readily apparent risks that significantly affect the entity should be identified. To avoid overlooking relevant risks, this identification is best made apart from assessment of the likelihood of the risk occurring. There are, however, practical limitations to the identification process, and often it is difficult to determine where to draw the line. It doesn’t make much sense to consider the risk of a meteor falling from space onto a company’s production facility, while it may be reasonable to consider the risk of an airplane crash for a facility located near an airport runway.Risk AnalysisAfter the entity has identified entity-wide and activity risks, a risk analysis needs to be performed.The methodology for analyzing risks can vary, largely because many risks are difficult to quantify.Nonetheless, the process —which may be more or less formal —usually includes:●Estimating the significance of a risk;●Assessing the likelihood (or frequency) of the risk occurring;●Considering how the risk should be managed —that is, an assessment of what actions need to be taken.A risk that does not have a significant effect on the entity and that has a lowlikelihood of occurrence generally does not warrant serious concern. A significant risk with a high likelihood of occurrence, on the other hand, usually demands considerable attention. Circumstances in between these extremes usually require difficult judgments. It is important that the analysis be rational and careful.There are numerous methods for estimating the cost of a loss from an identified risk. Management should be aware of them and apply them as appropriate. However, many risks are indeterminate in size. At best they can be described as “large,” “moderate” or “small.”Once the significance and likelihood of risk have been assessed, management needs to consider how the risk should be managed. This involves judgment based on assumptions about the risk, and reasonable analysis of costs associated with reducing the level of risk. Actions that can be taken to reduce the significance or likelihood of the risk occurring include a myriad of decisions management may make every day. These range from identifying alternative supply sources or expanding product lines to obtaining more relevant operating reports or improving training programs. Sometimes actions can virtually eliminate the risk, or offset its effect if it does occur. Examples are vertical integration to reduce supplier risk, hedging financial exposures and obtaining adequate insurance coverage.Note that there is a distinction between risk assessment, which is part of internal control, and the resulting plans, programs or other actions deemed necessary by management to address the risks. The actions undertaken, as discussed in the prior paragraph, are a key part of the larger management process, but not an element of the internal control system.Along with actions for managing risk is the establishment of procedures to enable management to track the implementation and effectiveness of the actions. For example, one action an organization might take to manage the risk of loss of critical computer services is to formulate a disaster recovery plan. Procedures then would be affected to ensure that the plan is appropriately designed and implemented. Those procedures represent “control activities”, discussed in Chapter 4.Before installing additional procedures, management should consider carefullywhether existing ones may be suitable for addressing identified risks. Because procedures may satisfy multiple objectives, management may discover that additional actions are not warranted; existing procedures may be sufficient or may need to be performed better.Management also should recognize that it is likely some level of residual risk will always exist not only because resources are always limited, but also because of other limitations inherent in every internal control system. These are discussed in Chapter 7.Risk analysis is not a theoretical exercise. It is often critical to the entity’s success. It is most effective when it includes identification of all key business processes where potential exposures of some consequence exist. It might involve process analysis, such as identification of key dependencies and significant control nodes, and establishing clear responsibility and accountability. Effective process analysis directs special attention to cross-organizational dependencies, identifying, for example: where data originate, where they are stored, how they are converted to useful information and who uses the information. Large organizations usually need to be particularly vigilant in addressing intracompany and intercompany transactions and key dependencies. These processes can be positively affected by quality programs which, with a “buy-in”by employees, can be an important element in risk containment.Unfortunately, the importance of risk analysis is sometimes recognized too late, as in the case of a major financial services firm where a senior executive offered what amounted to a wistful epitaph: “We just didn’t think we faced so much risk.”Managing ChangeEconomic, industry and regulatory environments change, and entities’ ac tivities evolve. Internal control effective under one set of conditions will not necessarily be effective under another. Fundamental to risk assessment is a process to identify changed conditions and take actions as necessary.Thus, every entity needs to have a process, formal or informal, to identify conditions that can significantly affect its ability to achieve its objectives. Asdiscussed further in Chapter 5, a key part of that process involves information systems that capture, process and report information about events, activities and conditions that indicate changes to which the entity needs to react. Such information may involve changes in customer preferences or other factors affecting demand for the company’s products or services. Or, it may involve new technology affecting production processes or other business activities, or competitive or legislative or regulatory developments. With the requisite information systems in place, the process to identify and respond to changing conditions can be established.This process will parallel, or be a part of, the entity’s regular risk assessment process described above. It involves identifying the changed condition — this requires having mechanisms in place to identify and communicate events or activities that affect the entity’s objectives —and analyzing the associated opportunities or risks. Such analysis includes identifying potential causes of achieving or failing to achieve an objective, assessing the likelihood that such causes will occur, evaluating the probable effect on achievement of the objectives and considering the degree to which the risk can be controlled or the opportunity exploited.Although the process by which an entity manages change is similar to, if not a part of, its regular risk-assessment process, it is discussed separately. This is because of its critical importance to effective internal control and because it can too easily be overlooked or given insufficient attention in the course of dealing with everyday issues.Source: Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), Internal Control–Integrated Framework, 1992:P39-44译文：内部控制-整体框架风险识别和分析风险的过程是一个重复不断的过称，并且是有效内部控制制度的关键组成部分。
内部控制外文翻译
外文翻译原文来源：Hammed Arad (philac). A Clear Look at Internal Controls [D].Theory and Concepts Research Paper, 2009内部控制透视：理论与概念环境需要新的业务控制变量不为任何潜在的股东和管理人士的响应因子为1，另外应执行/她组织了一个很大的控制权。
控制是管理活动的东西或以上施加控制。
思想的产生和近十年的发展需要有系统的商业资源和控制这种财富一个新的关注。
主题之一热一回合管制的商业资源是分析每个控制成本效益。
作为内部控制和欺诈的第一道防线，维护资产以及预防和侦查错误。
内部控制，我们可以说是一种控制整个系统的财务和其他方面的管理制定了为企业的顺利运行;它包括内部的脸颊，内部审计和其他形式的控制。
COSO的内部控制描述如下。
内部控制是一个客观的方法用来帮助确保实现。
在会计和组织理论，内部控制是指或目标目标的过程实施由组织的结构，工作和权力流动，人员和具体的管理信息系统，旨在帮助组织实现。
这是一种手段，其中一个组织的资源被定向，监控和测量。
它发挥着无形的（重要的作用，预防和侦查欺诈和保护组织的资源，包括生理（如，机械和财产）和乙二醇，声誉或知识产权，如商标）。
在组织水平，内部控制目标与可靠性的目标或战略的财务报告，及时反馈业务上的成就，并遵守法律，法规。
在具体的交易水平，内部控制是指第三方采取行动以实现一个具体目标（例如，如何确保本组织的款项，在申请服务提供有效的。
）内部控制程序reduce程变异，导致更加具有可预见性outcomes。
在业务实体内部控制也被称为业务控制。
它们是日常的工具使用的经理。
所有管理人员使用的内部控制，以帮助确保他们的经营单位，按照计划，他们使用的方法-政策、程序、组织设计和身体的障碍构成。
内部控制是对以下组合： 1、财务控制 2、其他控件。
根据内部控制研究所印度特许会计师是该组织计划和所有的方法和程序，通过了包括一个由管理机构，以协助实现业务管理的目的是确保尽可能高效有序进行可能的坚持管理政策，对资产的安全护卫预防和信息检测欺诈行为和错误的准确性和完整性的财务会计的可靠记录，及时编制，控制系统内部的事务以外延伸涉及到会计系统的功能。
内部控制【外文翻译】
内部控制【外文翻译】外文文献翻译译文一、外文原文原文：Internal controlIntroductionThe system of internal control over financial reporting in Japan under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) was implemented as of the fiscal year starting on April 1 2008.Under this system, executive officers of listed companies are obligated to evaluate their company's internal control over financial reporting and to file the results of such evaluation in the form of an internal audit report with the Financial Services Agency (FSA). In this report, executive officers should state material weakness if they judge any material weakness exists in the company's internal control over financial reporting. The report should also be audited by outside accounting auditors before being filed with the FSA. Since most Japanese companies have a fiscal year that ends in March, June 2009 will be the first time most companies file such a report.When the internal control system was introduced, it made reference to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of the US. Under the Japanese system, clear standards were set regarding the set-up of internal controls over financial reporting in an effort to prevent the creation of excessive documentation and to control costs, two issues which had occurred in the US. However, even with such standards, some uncertainty exists. In particular, uncertainty arises regarding the connection between this system under the FIEA and the rules of the Companies Act.Failure to submit the internal audit report or submission of false statements can lead to liabilities and criminal penalties under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). However, if there is a material weakness in the company's internal controls over financial reporting and executive officers disclose such material weakness in theinternal audit report, no sanctions will be imposed under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, nor will it directly lead to the director's liabilities under the Companies Act. Rather, disclosure of such material weakness is thought to be desirable, because by disclosing such material weakness, a company can improve the quality of its internal control over financial reporting, which will enable the company to submit more accurate financial reports in the future.Internal control is a process-effected by an entity's board of directors, management, and other personnel--designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Internal control consists of the following five interrelated components.1、Control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure.2、Risk assessment is the entity's identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of its objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed.3、Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure that management directives are carried out.4、Information and communication are the identification, capture, and exchange of information in a form and time frame that enable people to carry out their responsibilities.5、Monitoring is a process that assesses the quality of internal control performance over time.The interlaced audit issue is as follows: under the internal control system of the Companies Act, company auditors must audit the method and the results of the accounting audit conducted by outside accounting auditors. On the other hand, the internal control system of the FIEA requires the outside accounting auditors to auditthe company auditors' monitoring of internal financial controls. Therefore, company auditors that audit outside accounting auditors under the Companies Act are audited by the same outside accounting auditors under the FIEA. This interlaced audit however is expected to make each audit more effective because the company auditor and the outside accounting auditor will each monitor the audit of the other.The time lag issue is expected to arise due to the timing of the submissions of the various audit reports required under the FIEA and the Companies Act. Company auditors will need to prepare and submit audit reports regarding the execution of duties by directors for the fiscal year as required by the Companies Act. However, it is expected that these audit reports will be submitted before the internal audit report required under the FIEA is submitted and audited by the outside accounting auditors. Thus, if the internal audit report points out a material weakness that was not referred to in the audit reports prepared by the company auditor, the company auditor will be placed in a difficult position and will need to decide whether to amend andmake changes to the audit reports as such audit reports should also disclose such weaknesses. However, if the directors, the company auditors, and the accounting auditors are cooperating properly, this issue would not arise.It is expected that the system of internal control over financial reporting will prompt companies to build better control systems through cooperation between the directors, company auditors and outside accounting auditors.Connection between the two internal control systemsOn the internal financial controls and internal accounting control the similarities and differences.A difference between monitoring and control objectives.Reason for the difference between the two, simply because of financial supervision and control of the target company's material flow and cash flow, and accounting internal control object is the information flow. Understanding of Marx's words, “the production and the production of bookkeeping records are two different things after all, just to ship the same loading and shipping order are two differentthings.” Corporate material production process is based on the currency as the leading material movement, production and operation of the currency as the beginning and the end result, is achieving its goal of expanding the value of value. And accounting control is passed that have occurred in the material flow, capital flow formed by the flow of information to be the recognition, measurement, reporting. The former to productivity gains, the latter objective, the real target. However, operation of the accounting value of enterprise assets, after all, subordinate to the overall objective, we should also ask for the overall objective of internal control should also be an asset value of its end. Whyis this request? This is because the production activities of financial decisions and accounting need to subordinate corporate financial activities, accounting control objectives are to be subject to financial control target.Internal accounting control system is now setting goals, still remain in traditional accounting supervision and legal, reasonable levels, while ignoring the principles of economic efficiency, not subordinated to the overall goal of corporate finance. We know that even if the security integrity of corporate assets and personnel compliance. However, poor economic efficiency of enterprises can not continue to exist, then such an accounting internal control system, despite the integrity of the specification how beneficial for them? Accounting supervision, internal accounting controls, is the business management of the important part, if not for the continued survival and development of enterprises play a useful role, it is indeed sad . Although the internal financial control and internal accounting control objectives differ, but the overall goal should always be consistent. Accounting control objectives should always be subject to financial supervision and corporate goals. Accounting internal controls for business expenses from their own legitimacy and rationality to make judgments, give expenditure or expenditure not to start. This is the person in charge of the accounting organization's powers. The specific operation is completed by the cashier. Economic business is completed, signed by the person in charge, after verification of the accounting charge, the decision to grant or not to grant reimbursement claims. Practices through review of the original certificate and found areas of doubt or vulnerability. In acheck, be controlled when reimbursement. Another majoraccounting internal control task is to ensure that the accounting information provided by an objective, true, complete and timely.Financial internal control is based on the financial accounts of enterprises as the main target of supervision, to consider the legality of the decision-making costs, reasonable, and consistent with the principles of economic interests. The right balance of enterprises in the enterprise legal person units, in determining the expenditure, the accounting bodies and accounting personnel to provide business only the amount of funds available for expenditure obligations, and no decision-making rights. Usually the meeting was the participation by the general accountant, accounting bodies and accounting personnel did not participate in conference events. Therefore, the financial supervision to monitor the main orientation is very necessary. Financial supervision should be in advance of supervision as well, so that you can not burn in prevention. Matter of course, need supervision in order to promptly correct the error.From a doctrinal perspective the Catholic Church is highly centralized under the authority of the pope and his bishops. However, from an administrative perspective the church is quite decentralized with each diocese and each parish within the diocese having a fair amount of autonomy. Dioceses have virtually no external or regulatory oversight of their financial statements. Unlike corporations which provide quarterly financial statements to the SEC and hold quarterly conference calls with outside analysts, the church is subject to almost no recurring outside financial scrutiny. Many dioceses voluntarily post their audited annual financial statements on their website at the conclusion of the year-end audit. Additionally, many dioceses provide parishioners with an annual financial and administrativenewsletter which provides a highly summarized view of the cash flows for the year and the results of social and spiritual programs offered by the diocese. But many other dioceses do neither. Since they are not required by law to be transparent and accountable in their finances, they choose to keep their finances private.Corporate Financial Controls。
行政事业单位内部控制外文
1.Internal Control of AdministrationAmong the forms of control that apply to the administration of special importance is the internal control of the administration. The organization of this form of control, presents more detailed regulation of mutual relations within the administration and authority which as a rule have higher administrative organs toward lower administrative bodies. Internal administrative control sometimes is referred to as the hierarchical control, as derived from administrative systems that rely on pure principle of hierarchy, under whose administration the work is not primarily regulated by law (Stefan, Pavle, Marko, 2002, pg 396).Internal control, as part of system of a wider audit has close relation with it, as his recommendations and assessments serve as the basis to make necessary improvements in procedures and rules proclaimed as a legal obligation.This form of control means that the activity of public administration is subject to the constitution, laws and regulations and international standards and agreements ratified by the Republic of Macedonia.The essence of internal control is seen as this type of control that does not come outside the frames of administrative organization, but remains within the administration implemented in a way how an administrative body is overseeing the work of other administrative bodies. Due to the specific relations that have prevailed in the past between the administration bodies, this form of control is seen as the most importanton legal or technical terms (Ivo, 1997, p. 110).Internal controls means the organization and the methods used to assist and ensure that program managers are achieving their expected results ,that resources used to implement these programs are consistent with the purposes of a public entity and that they are obtained by fraud, abuse, etc.. The main objective of internal control is to express the responsibility of the administration. The objective of internal control in the public sector is that by building systems, design and implementation of rules1 Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu (1748). The Spirit of Laws.2 SIGMA Papers No. 27: European Principles for Public Administration2.From the administrative theory, administrative control means exercising influence over the senior administrative pendant body organs, related to the successful performance of their official duties. Administrative control, which is exercised over the work of administrative bodies, is adjusted by legal norms and laws of the higher bodies.There have been developed various forms of administrative control in order to ensure the operation and coordination between different administrative structures on vertical and horizontal line that ensure normal and lawful operation of state administration. Internal control is the kind of control that is exercised within a ministry, other central institutions, local government body, etc.., And the control exerted by them on the bodies, public entities and institutions subordinate to their area 1 .Republican government exercises control and supervision over the work and acts of ministries, with the right of abrogation and annulment of administrative acts of ministries and administrative organizations which have public authority, whereas under conditions prescribed by law, ministries supervise the work of other administrative state bodies and local self-governance bodies under the authority provided by law. Internal control aims at improving the method of work of every employee to realize his duties, as well as activation of versatile and smoothoperation of all levels within the body or institution.Its objective is to increase the efficiency of the control and improvement of control rules, to prevent or detect violations of law in the field of public administration, to combat deviant phenomena (corruption, bribery), which are prevalent in public administration with negative consequences for society as a whole. These rules intend preservation and utilization of human resources, as well as finance to increase social welfare.From comparative analysis of administrative systems in different countries, administrative control is done in two ways: a)l Instancional control and b) hierarchical control or official supervision.Instancional control - means control over administrative acts through unsatisfied parties with an administrative act in the first instance body, which means that without complaint there is no instancional control. The unsatisfied party could appeal an administrative decision which affects the body on the highest administrative level.An appeal is a critical element of instancional control (conditio sine qua non). Appeal is a regular legal tool by which an aggrieved party with attacks on the administrative decision will realize any right or obligation, and it represents the main institution of administrative proceedings, where enables interested parties to be protected from unlawful or arbitraries of state administration bodies.In the political and legal system of the Republic of Macedonia, the right of appeal is the right of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution of the country. It guarantees the right to appeal against individual legal acts adopted in the first instance proceedings before courts, administrative bodies or other organizations and institutions exercising public authority 2 .In the instancional control, object of supervision is the concrete administrative act, namely the decision to be issued in administrative matters in the direct implementation of the provisions, which will decide the rights and obligations or the public interest to individuals, legal persons and other parties 3.So , instancional control takes place in the general administrative procedure, with the filing of an aggrieved party. In accordance with the Law on general administrative procedure against the decision of first instance, an aggrieved party may appeal through the appeal to the body of second instance.1 Ermir D,( 2003), Administrative Law I, Tirana, p. 201.2 Constitution of Republic of Macedonia, 1991.3 Law of internal control in the public sector, (officiale gazete of RM, nr.69/04)Reforming Public Administration1003Powers of bodies that decide on the basis of complaints consist in the cancellation or cancellation of administrative act.The issue of administrative settlement (decisions) is one of the main issues of administrative reform. In developing the administrative procedures in the Republic of Macedonia, but also in other countries, European Union countries, applyadministrative law principles (rule of law, transparency, equality before the law, etc.). Principles of administrative procedure apply to all levels of administrative decisions.The effective functioning of the administrative procedures contributes to the legitimacy of administrative bodies in the exercise of its powers and ensures efficiency and legal certainty on providing of services to citizens.Hierarchical control - as a form of internal administrative control is carried out ex officio (ex officio), respectively, higher administrative organs have the right and both are also obliged to exercise control over the work of lower administrative organs. In the context of administrative oversight, it is observed that higher administrative bodies exercise supervision over lower administrative bodies on the implementation of laws and other acts, as well as the legality of the work and procedures of public administration bodies, in accordance with the law (the body by a decision of its own can cancel the decision of the lower body). Hierarchical control or hierarchical supervision may be exercised in different ways and forms. Thus, the control may be from individual concrete acts of lower bodies and may even belong to the overall work of one or more lower bodies. Supervision is done by the inspectorate and auditing.Important function of control is control by auditors. The purpose of audit is that to entity leaders it ensures objective evaluation, independent, with the aim of improving the performance of the entity and internal control effectiveness, respecting the principle of legality, independence, fairness, economy, effectiveness and efficiency etc. Control through audit is an independent and objective instrument, which verifies the data, gives advice in order to improve the work of the entity in achieving its objectives.The internal auditor has the right to see all financial statements, books, records and other documents and may request all information which he or she needs to perform control.3. Control within Municipal InstitutionsThe existence and functioning of control and supervision over the work of municipal authorities is evident, and it is usually carried out by the state government, administrative bodies and special bodies of local self-government.The procedure for controlling and monitoring includes equally all acts and regulations of the municipal authorities and subject to assessment are in legal Basis of the act, the operative part and process of adoption. The system of control and supervision of municipalities is established to build an effective system of control and supervision, over the work of the bodies of local self-government.The system of internal control and supervision is one of the basic preconditions for preventing certain irregularities in the functioning of all institutions. The data show that the system of internal control and supervision is not sufficiently established and accepted in the municipalities, which in itself speaks about the need for its establishment, in order to proactively influence regarding the elimination of certain irregularities.Most municipalities today have not appointed an internal auditor. This indicatesa violation of legal regulations in terms of establishing the system of internalcontrols and supervision in accordance with positive legal norms.European Integration - Realities and Perspectives 20121004In the context of rights and duties of the municipality established by law,supervision can be performed by the council, the mayor and authorities,organizational forms of municipal administration and managed clerks.The Municipal Council within their jurisdictions decides and adopts appropriatelegislation primarily in the area of the municipal budget, establishment of publicservices, adopts programs, plans and other authorities under their jurisdiction.In practice this can most vividly be presented with the possibility that thecouncil has for rejecting certain decisions or solutions offered by the mayor orthe relevant departments of the municipality, especially the most clear case is theabsence of the municipal budget, the rejection of the final bill of municipality,etc.Within the jurisdiction of the mayor, his power of supervision of the Councilcontrols the legal regulations of the council, publishes regulations of the councilin the official gazette of the municipality and ensures the implementation of Councildecisions, and others.4. Citizens as Supervisors of the Work of Public Administration BodiesCitizens in any democratic society enjoy the right to participate in theinstitutions of public character and to be informed about the work of governmentalinstitutions, parliamentary activity, courts, local self-government and allinstitutions of public character. Communication of public institutions withdifferent groups of citizens, the media and citizen participation in policy making,decision making and control process, are important elements of each society buildin a democratic way. Citizens have the right to directly participate in decisionmaking processes in public institutions and it is their right which cannot come intoquestion, it is also the right behind which stand and guarantee the internationalacts and those of the country (whether central or local). Freedom of informationis one of the fundamental human rights of citizen specified in the Constitution ofthe Republic of Macedonia (Article 16) and citizens are guaranteed access to gettingthe right information and the receiving and transmission of information. One of themost important international documents that provided, fixed and guaranteed the rightof citizens to directly participate in decision making processes in localauthorities, is undoubtedly the European Convention on Local Self-Government of theCouncil of Europe 1.Citizens’ access to existing institutions to oversee the issues of theirinterest, it is considered relatively low with many aspects to improve citizensaccess to bodies of public administration and should provide easier and moreappropriate access of citizens to the authorities of control and supervision.Without governance transparency there is no democratic society. The benefit istwofold because, citizens participate in setting priorities, and then the controlduring their realization; on the other hand the power verifies the correctness of its policy and strengthens the trust between citizens. Public assessment is the best way of control; yet it does not mean that supervision by competent authorities should be abandoned.5. Conclusions – Recommendations- Through the use of legal and political instruments of control is intended to preserve and advance the functioning of democratic institutions, democratic values and citizens in protecting the public and privat interests. - The purpose of exercising administrative control and taking measures is to apply legitimacy, to determine the responsibility of administrative bodies and officials who have violated the law. - Internal control aims to ensure that final decisions will be legal and administrative bodies in exercising their activities respected already established legal rules.1 European Convention on Local Self-Government of the Council of EuropeReforming Public Administration1005- The main objective of internal control is to increase the efficiency of the control and improvement of control rules, to prevent or detect violations of law in the field of public administration, to fight deviant phenomena that are prevalent in public administration with negative consequences for the society in general. - Administration bodies which develop administrative procedures should strengthen internal control system, including supervision of administrative decision-making process in the first instance and under the grievance procedure. - The managing bodies of public administration bodies in all levels of administration should receive reports and information for developing supervision of administrative procedures and this will be the basis for improving the quality of work of administrative bodies. - Administrative control of the Government towards the administration should be perceived only。
内部控制制度【外文翻译】
外文翻译原文Internal Control SystemsMaterial Source:Encyclopedia of Business Author:Audrey Gramling Internal control can be described as any action taken by an organization to help enhance the likelihood that the objectives of the organization will be achieved. The definition of internal control has evolved as different internal control models have been developed. This article will describe these models, present the definitions of internal control they provide, and indicate the components of internal control. Various parties responsible for and affected by internal control will also be discussed.THE COSO MODELIn the United States many organizations have adopted the internal control concepts presented in the report of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Published in 1992, the COSO report defines internal control as:a process, effected by an entity's board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:1.effectiveness and efficiency of operations2.reliability of financial reportingpliance with applicable laws and regulationsCOSO describes internal control as consisting of five essential components, include:1.The control environment2.Risk assessment3.Control activitiesrmation and communication5.MonitoringAs the base of the pyramid, the control environment is arguably the most important component because it sets the tone for the organization. Factors of thecontrol environment include employees' integrity, the organization's commitment to competence, management's philosophy and operating style, and the attention and direction of the board of directors and its audit committee.Risk assessment refers to the identification, analysis, and management of uncertainty facing the organization. Risk assessment focuses on the uncertainties in meeting the organization's financial and operational objectives. Changes in personnel, new product lines, or rapid expansion could affect an organization's risks.Control activities include the policies and procedures maintained by an organization to address risk-prone areas. An example of a control activity is a policy requiring approval by the board of directors for all purchases exceeding a predetermined amount. Control activities were once thought to be the most important element of internal control, but COSO suggests that the control environment is more critical since the control environment fosters the best actions, while control activities provide safeguards to prevent wrong actions from occurring.Information and communication encompasses the identification, capture, and exchange of financial, operational, and compliance information in a timely manner. People within an organization who have timely, reliable information are better able to conduct, manage, and control the organization's operations.Monitoring refers to the assessment of the quality of internal control. Monitoring activities provide information about potential and actual breakdowns in a control system that could make it difficult for an organization to accomplish its goals. Informal monitoring activities might include management's checking with subordinates to see if objectives are being met. A more formal monitoring activity would be an assessment of the internal control system by the organization's internal auditors.OTHER CONTROL MODELSSome users of the COSO report have found it difficult to read and understand.A model that some believe overcomes this difficulty is found in a report from the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, which was issued in 1995. The report presents a control model referred to as Criteria of Control (CoCo). The CoCo model, which builds on COSO, is thought to be more concrete and user-friendly. CoCo describes internal control as actions that foster the best result for an organization. These actions, which contribute to the achievement of the organization's objectives, center around:1.Effectiveness and efficiency of operations2.Reliability of internal and external reportingpliance with applicable laws and regulations and internal policiesCoCo indicates that control comprises:those elements of an organization (including its resources, systems, processes, culture, structure and tasks) that, taken together, support people in the achievement of the organization's objectives.CoCo model recognizes four interrelated elements of internal control, including purpose, capability, commitment, and monitoring and learning. An organization that performs a task is guided by an understanding of the purpose of the task and supported by capability (information, resources, supplies, and skills). To perform the task well over time, the organization needs a sense of commitment. Finally, the organization must monitor task performance to improve the task process. These elements of control, which include twenty specific control criteria, are seen as the steps an organization takes to foster the right action.In addition to the COSO and CoCo models, two other reports provide internal control models. One is the Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation's Systems Auditability and Control (SAC), which was issued in 1991 and revised in 1994. The other is the Information Systems Audit and Control Foundation's COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology), which was issued in 1996.The Institute of Internal Auditors issued SAC to provide guidance to internal auditors on internal controls related to information systems and information technology (IT). The definition of internal control included in SAC is:a set of processes, functions, activities, sub-systems, and people who are grouped together or consciously segregated to ensure the effective achievement of objective and goals.COBIT focuses primarily on efficiently and effectively monitoring information systems. The report emphasizes the role and impact of IT control as it relates to business processes. This control model can be used by management to develop clear policy and good practice for control of IT. The following COBIT definition of internal control was adapted from COSO:The policies, procedures, practices, and organizational structures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that business objectives will be achieved and that undesired events will be prevented or detected and corrected.While the specific definition of internal control differs across the various models, a number of concepts are very similar across these models. In particular, themodels emphasize that internal control is not only policies and procedures to help an organization accomplish its objectives but also a system affected by people. In these models, people are perceived to be central to adequate internal control.These models also stress the concept of reasonable assurance as it relates to internal control. Internal control systems cannot guarantee that an organization will meet its objectives. Instead, internal control can only be expected to provide reason -able assurance that a company's objectives will be met. The effectiveness of internal controls depends on the competency and dependability of the organization's people. Limitations of internal control include faulty human judgment, misunder -standing of instructions, errors, management override of controls, and collusion. Further, because of cost-benefit considerations, not all possible controls will be implemented. Because of these inherent limitations, internal controls cannot guarantee that an organization will meet its objectives.PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FOR AND AFFECTED BY INTERNAL CONTROLWhile all of an organization's people are an integral part of internal control, certain parties merit special mention. These include management, the board of directors (including the audit committee), internal auditors, and external auditors.The primary responsibility for the development and maintenance of internal control rests with an organization's management. With increased significance placed on the control environment, the focus of internal control has changed from policies and procedures to an overriding philosophy and operating style within the organization. Emphasis on these intangible aspects highlights the importance of top management's involvement in the internal control system. If internal control is not a priority for management, then it will not be one for people within the organization either.As an indication of management's responsibility, top management at a publicly owned organization will include in the organization's annual financial report to the shareholders a statement indicating that management has established a system of internal control that management believes is effective. The statement may also provide specific details about the organization's internal control system.Internal control must be evaluated in order to provide management with some assurance regarding its effectiveness. Internal control evaluation involves everything management does to control the organization in the effort to achieve its objectives. Internal control would be judged as effective if its components are present andfunction effectively for operations, financial reporting. The board of directors and its audit committee have responsibility for making sure the internal control system within the organization is adequate. This responsibility includes determining the extent to which internal controls are evaluated. Two parties involved in the evaluation of internal control are the organization's internal auditors and their external auditors.Internal auditors' responsibilities typically include ensuring the adequacy of the system of internal control, the reliability of data, and the efficient use of the organization's resources. Internal auditors identify control problems and develop solutions for improving and strengthening internal controls. Internal auditors are concerned with the entire range of an organization's internal controls, including operational, financial, and compliance controls.Internal control will also be evaluated by the external auditors. External auditors assess the effectiveness of internal control within an organization to plan the financial statement audit. In contrast to internal auditors, external auditors focus primarily on controls that affect financial reporting. External auditors have a responsibility to report internal control weaknesses to the audit committee of the board of directors.译文内部控制制度资料来源：商业百科全书作者：奥德丽·格拉姆内部控制被认为是任何能够提高组织目标完成效率的措施。
企业内部控制外文翻译文献编辑
Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise RiskManagement (内部控制与企业风险管理透视)dil Kaya《Eurasian Business Perspectives》,2022,11(02):379-389英文 2788 单词， 16276 字符；中文 5242 汉字Grounded on the literature review on Enterprise Risk Management(ERM) this paper aims to analyze the extent and the effectiveness of internal control as well as ERM and to explore their connection with the value creation. A theoretical lens is used to discuss whether effective internal control and ERM enhance performance and increase value creation ability. ERM is most frequently defined with the reference to the 2004 Guidance document published by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission (COSO). Proponents of COSO’s ERM Integrated Framework describe this framework as “a world-level template for best practice”, and claim that ERM used by management to enhance an organization ability to manage uncertainty and to consider how much risk to accept as it strives to increase stakeholder value. Additionally the Internal Control— Integrated Framework is a viable and suitable framework for designing, implementing, conducting and assessing the effectiveness of internal control and for reporting. The relationship between value creation and ERM is widely investigated in academic literature. Empirical studies on the value creation abilities of ERM and internal control suggest that there is a positive relation between value creation,internal control and ERM. These studies reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high-qualityERM adoption and implementation. Using different identifier of ERM such as Standard and Poor’s risk management ratings or presence of a Chief Risk Officer, the findings of empirical studies reveal that higher ERM quality is associated with less resource constraint, better corporate governance and better accounting performance. Additionally academic studies indicate that the risk-based communication is reinforced with ERM implication.Enterprise risk management , Internal control , Value creationChanging business and operating environments, increased competition, technology driven, global scale and complex structure of companies have increased the importance of effective internal control and risk management. Enterprise risk management (ERM)is a process that is viewed today as an indicator for optimal achievement of companies’ mission and execution of its strategy. This is also a coping mechanism vis -`a-vis new demand for reporting purposes and additional compliance mandate placed on organizations to have effective internal control and risk management. Rating agencies e.g. Standard & Poor’s have included ERM assessment in ratings of insurance companies since 2022. Furthermore the stakeholders’ demand for more transparency and accountability on the business decisions and governance forces enterprises to have effective internal control and ERM. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission (COSO) has released two frameworks provide guidance for management in implementing and evaluating effective enterprise risk management and internal control processes,leading to the improvement of organizational performance and governance. These are COSO’s Internal Control—Integrated Framework and COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework.COSO guidance is recognized as being globally and its integrated frameworks are viewed as being the principal tools that enable organizations to enhance their capacity in dealing with uncertainty that presents both risk and opportunity with the potential to erode or enhance value.Proponents of COSO’s ERM Integrated Framework describe this framework as “a wor ld-level template for best practice”, and claim that ERM used by management to strengthen an organization ability to manage uncertainty and to consider how much risk to accept as it strives to increase stakeholder value.Additionally the Internal Control—Integrated Framework is a viable and suitable framework for designing, implementing, conducting and assessing the effectiveness of internal control and for reporting. COSO’s principal argument is that the essential prerequisites of firms’ long term success are good risk management and internal control (DeLoach and Thomson 2022).While internal control has been always an important field for internal and external audit, risk management has been a vital concern on the fields of finance and insurance but it is received widespread attention following accounting and corporate scandals in the beginning 2000s and 2022 global crisis (Wu et al. 2022). Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act and its impacts and repercussions on global capital markets have put the spotlight on COSO’s Internal Control Framework and the recent economic crisis has heightened considerably the importance of ERM (Landsittel and Rittenberg 2022).Grounded on the literature review on ERM this paper aims to analyze the extent and the effectiveness of internal control as well as ERM and to explore their connection with the value creation. A theoretical lens is used to discuss whether effective internal control and ERM enhance performance and increase value creation ability. The remainder of the paper is presented in three sections. Section 2 expands upon the COSO Integrated Frameworks. This is followed by the related literature that provides an overview of empirical research findings on internal control and enterprise risk management. The fourth and final section provides a conclusion providing some final comments.Whether applied individually or together,COSO frameworks are the principal guidance used by organizations to address internal and external pressures placed onthem to have effective internal control and risk management. Originally formed in 1985, COSO is voluntary private sector initiative dedicated to improve organizational performance and governance through effective internal control, enterprise risk management, and fraud deterrence. Its sponsoring organizations are the Institute of Internal Auditors, the American Accounting Association, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Financial Executives International, and the Institute of Management Accountants.COSO ’s first Internal Control Framework is released in 1992 and is admitted widely as a recognized standard for developing and maintaining effective and efficient internal control. On May 14, 2022, as a result of multiyear project, COSO updated this Framework to include enhancements and clarifications for users.COSO (2022a, p. 3) defines internal control as “a process, affected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:–Effectiveness and efficiency of operations–Reliability of financial reporting–Compliance with applicable laws and regulations ” .There is a growing support for the general argument that the effectiveness of internal control is a crucial and challenging system for organizations. COSO’s Internal Control Framework is developed in expecting to help and support organizations to design, implement, conduct and assess these systems of internal control. Components, objectives and entity levels presented three dimensions of internal control. These are presented in Table 1.Table 1 Three dimensions of internal controlSource: COSO (1992)ComponentsObjectives Organizational levels Control environments OperationsEntity level Risk assessment ReportingDivision Control activities ComplianceOperating unit Information and communicationMonitoring activitiesFunctionThe strength of the internal control system is to improve organizations’achievements of their objectives through providing effectiveness and efficiency of their operations, reliability of their financial reporting and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Internal control system needs to be assessed regularly to check its effectiveness. There are 17 relevant principles associated with the internal components. These are presented in Table 2.Table 2 Principles of internal control17 Principals by internal control componentsControl environmentmitment to integrity and ethical values2.Oversight of the development and performance of internal control3.Establishment of structures, reporting, authorities and responsibilitiesmitment to competence5.AccountabilityRisk assessment6.Suitable objectives7.Risk identification and analysis8.Assessment of fraud risk9.Identification and analysis of significant change Control activitiesControl activities10.Selection and development of control activities11.Selection and development of general controls over technology12 Deployment through policies and proceduresInformation and communication13 Use of relevant information14 Internal communication15 External communicationMonitoring16.Conduct of ongoing and/or separate evaluations17.Evaluation and communication of deficienciesSource: COSO (2022b) Internal Control Integrated Framework Poster Another area that COSO provides guidance is risk management that organizations need to effectively deal with uncertainty for optimal achievement of their mission and execution of their strategy. ERM Integrated Framework is developed as a process,ongoing and flowing through the enterprise that comprises aligning risk appetite and strategy, improving risk responses of the entity and seizing opportunities. According to Arnold et al. (2022), this strategic approach to the riskmanagement concentrates on the opportunity side of risk identification and response.ERM is defined by COSO (2004, p. 4) as “a process, affected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, and manage risks to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the entity’s objectives” . Internal control is an integral part of ERM.COSO’s ERM Framework (2004) and its new exposure draft emphasize that where properly implemented and executed ERM enables organizations to grow shareholder’s value through facilitating management’s ability deal effectively with uncertainty and enhancing the ability to communicate value creation.The COSO’s three dimensional model of ERM that is similar to its Internal Control Framework is presented in Table 3.Table 3 Three dimensions of ERMComponents Objectives Organizational levelsInternal environments Strategic Entity levelObjective setting Operations DivisionEvent identification Reporting Business unitRisk assessment Compliance SubsidiaryRisk responseControl activitiesInformation and communicationSource: COSO (2004)ERM and internal control is a fast growing area of interest in the academic research. Empirical studies use public information or survey data for measuring ERM implementation and majority of these studies have positive findings on the relationship of value creation and ERM.Different measures are used in empirical studies of internal control and ERM. Tobin’s Q ratio is the most commonly used as proxy for firm value in empirical risk management studies. This widely used ratio compares the market value of a firm’sassets to their replacement cost (Hoyt and Liebenberg 2022, 2022). It is usually calculated as the market value of equity plus the book value of liabilities divided by the book value of assets (Hoyt and Liebenberg 2022; McShane et al. 2022). Beasley et al. (2022) examine equity market reactions to announcements of appointments of senior executive officers overseeing the ERM processes.Researchers use also different measures for the identification of ERM practices in a firm. The existence of a Chief Risk Officer (CRO) position or similarly a senior risk officer is widely used as an identifier of ERM implication (Lundqvist 2022; Beasley et al. 2022; Hoyt and Liebenberg 2022; Liebenberg and Hoyt 2003; Pagach and Warr 2022). In several studies, firms have been asked directly through survey about their level of ERM implementation (Beasley et al. 2005). Risk management ratings from S&P are also used by many empirical studies (McShane et al. 2022). S&P ratings are said to be more sophisticated and comprehensive measure of ERM (Lundqvist 2022).Gordon et al. (2022) create an ERM index; variable data are collected from publicly available information, for example: sales, number of employees, material weakness disclosures, announcements of financial restatements, and auditor fees. The findings of this study suggest that the connection between ERM and firm performance is related to the proper match between ERM and firm level factors. These factors are the contextual variables surrounding the firm such as environment uncertainty, industry competition, firm complexity, and monitoring by Board of Directors.Razali et al. (2022) examined the determinants of ERM adoption in Malaysian Public Listed Companies and they found that firms with high turnover,appointing CRO and not diversifying internationally seem to adopt ERM. Lundqvist (2022) distinguished four components or pillars of ERM to measure how firms implement ERM dimensions.The first pillar is the general internal environment and objective setting; the second pillar is the general control activities, information and communication;the third one is the holistic organization of risk management;and finally the fourth pillar is the specific identification and risk assessment activities. According to the author, a well implemented ERM must have all four pillars; but onlythe third one separates ERM from non-ERM companies.According to DeLoach and Thomson (2022), the COSO ERM framework enhances risk-focused communication that comprises the issues relevant to improving governance, assessing risk, designing risk responses and control activities, facilitating relevant information and communication flows,and monitoring ERM and internal control performance. Baxter et al. (2022) pointed also the positive aspects of ERM; and they found that “higher quality ERM is associated with better corporate governance (i.e., audit committees charged with direct oversight of risk), less audit-related risk (i.e., stable auditor relationships and effective internal controls), presence of risk officers/committees, and boards with longer tenure” (Baxter et al. 2022, p. 1265).O’Don nell (2005) developed a theoretical understanding of how and when ERM facilitates value chain activities. Paape and Spekle´ (2022) investigated risk management effectiveness of COSO Frameworks for the mechanistic view on risk appetite and tolerance. Liebenberg and Hoyt (2003) found that financial leverage is positively associated with ERM implementation, but using a broader set of indicators, Hoyt and Liebenberg (2022) found that ERM has a negative relation to leverage. According to Liebenberg and Hoyt (2003), a major obstacle to empirical research in ERM is the difficulty in identifying firms engaging in ERM. Firms typically do not disclose whether they are managing risks in an integrated manner. Grace et al. (2022) investigated specific aspects of ERM’s value creation in insurance companies and they found that ERM practices significantly increase costs and revenues efficiency and they documented the impact of board involvement on reducing firm costs and augmenting firm value.McShane et al. (2022) examined the relationship between risk management and firm value using S&P’s ERM ratings. They found a positive relationship between firm value and increasing level of traditional risk management but not for a higher ERM rating. Their findings suggest that firm value augments as firms implement increasingly more sophisticated traditional risk management but does not augment further as firms attain ERM.Arnold et al. (2022) investigated ERM and organizational structure from a strategic management perspective in the context of Sarbanes Oxley Act’s section 404 requirements by companies. They found a powerful relationship between the strength of ERM processes and organizational flexibility and this relation is mediated by the level of IT compatibility. Furthermore, Arnold et al. (2022) found that ERM have a positive impact on supply chain performance and they imposed a theoretical understanding of ERM’s impact on the values chain activities.To conclude this section, empirical studies on the value creation abilities of ERM and internal control present in general positive findings.Most of the studies found positive relation between value creation,internal control and ERM.These studies reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high -quality ERM adoption and implementation.The studies which use Standard and Poor’s risk management ratings,reveal that higher ERM quality is associated with less resource constraint, better corporate governance and better accounting performance. Beside these findings some researchers assert that there is no evidence that application of the COSO frameworks improve risk management and internal control effectiveness. Neither do they find a support for value creation ability of these frameworks. There are still some questions to be posed and answered by researchers on the effectiveness and efficiency of internal control and ERM.Internal control and ERM effectiveness is crucial to identify events that may impact the organization’s well-being and erode the shareholder’s value and respond to identified risks. New demand for reporting purposes and additional compliance mandate placed on organizations to have effective internal control and risk management have enhanced the role and importance of ERM. COSO frameworks are the principal guidance used by organizations to address the issues relevant to improving governance, strategy setting, business planning, and execution, monitoring and adapting processes of an enterprise.Over the past years, a substantial body of academic research on internal controland ERM has developed on the search of empirical evidence on whether and how they affect corporate values. These studies have generated a number of findings that should be of interest to the development of risk management in companies. Understanding how academic literature assesses internal control and ERM practices has significant value. Also important is the recognition that the role of risk managers is crucial for companies that are positioned to strategically align their goals of main stakeholders.Empirical researches support the significance and importance of the ERM practices on providing value for shareholders in an environment where the stakeholders are increasingly demanding for more transparency and accountability on the business decisions and governance. Additionally academic studies indicate that the risk-based communication is reinforced with ERM implication.本文以企业风险管理(ERM)文献综述为基础，旨在分析内部控制和企业风险管理的范围和有效性，并探讨其与价值创造的关系。
内部控制文献英文翻译
The enterprise internal control theoryThe internal control is an important symbol of modern enterprise management, through the practice of the conclusion is: to control is strong, weak, without control is controlled, disorderly. The new regulations "accounting law 27 units shall establish and perfect the system of supervision unit interior accountant. Unit interior accountant controls on the execution, the internal control is.What is the internal controlThe internal control is the formation of a series of measures to control functions, procedures, methods, and standardized and systematized, make it become a rigorous, relatively complete system. According to the control of the internal control can be divided into different purpose accounting control and management control. Accounting control and protection of assets is safe, the accounting information authenticity and integrity and financial activities related to the legitimacy of control, Management control means to ensure operation policy decision, implementation of business activities and promote the efficiency and effectiveness, and the effect of the relevant management to achieve the goals of control. Accounting control and management control and not mutually exclusive, incompatible, some control measures can be used for accounting control, and can also be used to control.The goal is to ensure that the internal control unit operations efficiency and effect, safety, economic information of assets and financial reports of reliability. Its main functions: one is to achieve target management policy and management, Second is the assets of safety protection unit is complete, prevent loss of assets, Three is to guarantee the business and financial accounting information authenticity and integrity. In addition, the legitimacy of the financial activities within the unit is the internal control goals.Good, although the internal control to achieve these goals, but whether the internal control design and operation, it is not how to eliminate its inherent limitations. This limitation must also be clear and prevention. Main show is: (1) the limited by cost benefit principle, (2) if the employee has different responsibility ignore control program, misjudgment, even the collusion, inside and outside, often cause in fraud internal control malfunction, (3) management personnel abuse, and to set up or Passover control of internal control ignored, also can make the establishment of internal control non-existing.Second, the basic structure of internal controlThe basic structure of internal control. Mainly includes controlenvironment, accounting system and control procedures in three aspects:(a) control environment. Control environment refers to establish or implement a policy of various factors, which affect mainly reflects unit managers and other personnel to control the attitude, understanding and action. Specific include: management ideas and management style, unit organization structure, functions and managers of these functions, determine the powers and responsibilities of the manager monitoring and inspection method, the working personnel policy measures to control, and its implementation, this unit of various external business relations.(2) accounting system. Accounting system refers to establish accounting and accounting supervision procedure and method of business activities. Effective accounting system should do:1, confirmed and record all real business, timely and detailed description of economic business, so in the financial and accounting reports of economic business appropriately classified.2 and measurement value of economic business, so in the financial and accounting reports records in the appropriate monetary value.3 and determine the time, business to business records in the appropriate accounting period.4 in the financial and accounting reports, business and proper disclosure of expression related matters.(3) control procedures. Control program to formulate policy and managers to ensure a certain procedure. Specific include: business and economic activity approval, The relevant personnel division of responsibilities clear, and prevent fraud, The bill and certificates and use, should guarantee business activities and recorded properly, Property and its use to have documented exposure measures to protect, For registered business valuation, and to review, etc.Third, the basic way of internal controlThe basic way of internal control mainly has: organization planning control, authorized control, budget control, material control, cost control, risk control and audit control.(a) to organize the control. According to the internal control requirements, the unit in determining the organizational structure andimprove the process, incompatible duties shall follow the principle of separation, the so-called incompatible duties, refers to those if by a man or a department, and may cheat yourself concealing its position of frauds. The economic activity of the unit can usually divided into five stages: namely, the approval issued by authorized, execution, and records. Normally, if each step by the relatively independent researchers (or department), can guarantee the separation incompatible duties, facilitating the function of the internal control. Organize and control mainly includes two aspects:1 and incompatible duties of separation. If the accounting work of accountant and cashier incompatible duties, need to separate. Should be separate positions usually have an authorized: economic business duties to separation, Execute a business with the position of the post to review: Execution of an economic position and record the business to business position: Keep a record of the property of the position and position of property to separation etc. Incompatible duties separation is based on the assumption that two personal unconscious accomplice a possibility, but the possibility of a person gains more than two people. If this hypothesis, breakthrough incompatible duties of separation cannot play control function.2, the organization's control. A unit of economic activities according to the needs of different departments and institutions set, the organization's set of responsibilities and should reflect the mutual control requirements. Specific requirement is: the responsibility and authority of the organizations must be licensed and guarantee the authority within the scope of authority without intervention, Each business must pass in operation of the department and guarantee in different departments concerned to check each other, In every business, should belong to was not inspectors, in order to ensure that the inspectors check out the problem was solved quickly.(2) authorized control. The authorized department of internal control unit to handle business or staff access control. Some departments or units within a clerk in the treatment of economic business, must be authorized or approved to, no approval. Authorized control unit can guarantee the implementation course and abuse. Authorized are generally authorized and particular authorized two forms: general mandate is to deal with average economic business level and the approval of the right conditions stipulated in the unit, usually in the internal control of clarifying, Special authorization of special economic business processing is theright level and approval conditions, such as when a prescribed amount exceeds the economic business department, only after approval within specific authorized to handle. Authorized the basic control requirement is: first, must be clear and specific license authorization of the general line and responsibility, Secondly, to clear the authorized business each program, Again, to establish the necessary examination system, to ensure that the processing after the authorized business working quality. Some current unit executes leadership "pen", with the approval of the internal control principles and requirements, should reform. Practice has proved, rights should be restricted, lose the right to restrict the corruption which easily.(3) budget control. Budget control is an important aspect of internal control, including financing, financing, purchasing, production, sales, investment and management activities. The economic business units to prepare detailed budget and plan, and through the authorized by relevant departments, the budget or plan implementation control, the basic requirements: first, the unit budget must reflect the management goal, and clear responsibility. Second, the budget shall be permitted by the authorized to budget adjustments to budget and more practical. Third, it shall timely feedback or regular budget implementation.(4) physical assets control. Physical assets control mainly include restrictions to control inventory control and regular two, this is the real assets of unit of safety control measures. There are two main: first, to limit to strictly control, to physical assets and the relevant documents of the physical assets, such as cash and bank deposit, securities and inventory, warehouse, the warehouser except cashier personnel and other personnel is limited, contact, to ensure the safety of assets. Second, regular physical assets inventory, guarantee the physical assets conform with the actual amount recorded book, such as accounts inconsistent, should investigate the cause and treatment. In addition to the above, physical assets control say from broad sense, also include the physical assets of purchase, storage, and shipping and sales process control.(5) cost control. Modern cost control can be divided into "extensive" and "intensive" two. Extensive cost control, refers to the production technology, product process under the condition of invariable, rely solely on reducing consumption materials, reasonable material to lower the cost of cost control, Intensive cost control, refers to raise the level of technology to improve the production technology, product process, thus reducing the cost control. These two kinds of methods, combining modern cost control.1, extensive cost control, the cost of raw materials procurement control from the final product sold throughout, and is one of the most fundamental and most main control method. First, the raw materials procurement cost control. For bulk materials generally used to open ZhaoBiaoFa or according to manufacturer direct purchasing. Second, the use of materials cost control. Generally, there are two ways: one is the objective cost control, it is through the "target cost price - goals profits target =", which is obtained by cost method to control costs. Veto Second, it is the cost control of various assignments, and through the analysis of cost drivers, costs and expenses of the collection, not only more reasonable truly computational cost, and thus find income and cost ratio or not only put no gains, so can largely reduce costs. Third, product sales, cost control. Mainly propaganda cost control, notable is, advertising, promotional role played only product quality is the foundation of the user's trust. Therefore, we should grasp investment and expenses of the matching principle. [NextPage]2 and intensive cost control. And can be divided into two types: one is to improve production technology by to reduce cost control. There are many ways to improve production technology, such as the introduction of new production line adopts high-tech products, etc. Two is improved by process to reduce the cost of cost control. Intensive cost control on intellectual achievements, it can make the excess profit achievements.(6) risk control. Risk is usually referred to as a result of the action, and the risk associated with another concept is uncertain. Some people only know beforehand action may result, but don't know they appear probability, or both all don't know, but only as a rough estimate. For example, enterprise test-manufacturing a new product, this product can certainly advance trial success or failure. But don't know these two consequences of possibility appeared. Business decisions are generally in uncertain circumstances. In practice, a result of action has many may not sure, risk, And as a result of the action, it is certainly not risk. The risk control is to prevent and avoid as far as possible adverse outcome. According to the reasons of the formation of risk and risk management can generally be divided into two categories: the financial risk,1, management risk. Risk management refers to the production and business operation reasons for corporate profits to the uncertainty. Due to the production and operation of enterprises will be derived from many aspects of the external and internal factors, thus greatly, and the uncertaintyof uncertainty, causes the enterprise profit margins or the changes, thus bringing risk. Operational risk changes from the external, nonetheless, enterprises should adopt the effective internal control measures to prevent.2, financial risk. Financial risk and risk, it is to because debt and the enterprise's financial results for uncertainty. Companies operating in the capital, debt all except the part of self-capital, borrowed funds for enterprise self-capital affect profitability, At the same time, borrowed money to repay captital with interest, if unable to repay debts that are due, the enterprise will into financial difficulties or bankruptcy. When the enterprise rate than pre-tax profit margins funds borrowed funds rate, use borrowed money earn profits and residual interest except compensation and thus make the self-capital profitability improve. However, if the enterprise income tax profit margins than money borrowed funds, at this moment, use borrowed money to finance the profits are not pay interest, still need to use their own funds to pay interest on the part of the profit margins, thereby reducing the self-capital, make enterprise losses incurred, even the bankruptcy of the danger. The risk for financing risk. The size of the risk degree of self-capital by borrowing money, borrowed money ratio, the greater the risk degree proportion with smaller proportion, borrowed funds, risk degree also decrease. For financial risk control, the key is to ensure a reasonable capital structure, maintain the appropriate level of debt, should make full use of the debt management skill gain financial leverage income, improve the self-capital profitability, To avoid excessive debt caused by the financial risk, which is the important link of the enterprise internal control, must take the necessary measures to prevent fundraising risk.(7) auditing control. Audit control mainly refers to the internal audit, internal audit and control of accounting is to supervise. Accounting information to internal audit, internal control is an integral part of the internal control is a kind of special form. Internal auditing is an organization in all kinds of activities and the internal control system of independent evaluation to determine whether the policy implementation, establish the procedure is in compliance with the standard of resources utilization, whether reasonable, effective and unit of objectives achieved. Internal audit content is very extensive, generally include internal financial audit and internal management audit. Internal audit supervision of accounting information, and is not only the internal control is effective means to ensure that the accounting information is true and complete. According to the basic principle of internal control and accounting work in our country actual situation, the new "law" regulation, the unit shall in internal accounting supervision system ofaccounting information in the regular internal audit methods and procedures, in order to make the internal audit institutions or internal auditors of accounting information system and procedure of audit work. In addition to the above seven internal control, and documentation control. Performance control and worker quality control, etc. The new system of accounting supervision system on the unit interior, the main contents of the internal control system. Including: responsibilities, and strict procedures, truthfully record, regular check, etc. In practice, establishing and implementing internal control should also consider: enterprise scale, organizational system and the owners' rights and interests; etc. Business property, diversity and complexity, Transfer, processing, and the methods to information, Applicable regulatory requirements, etc. At present many enterprise internal control was not good, except knowledge level, the main reasons of the administration is to establish and implement effective internal control of power, pressure, coerce, enough. This change of the accounting law depends on the implementation of new science and the modern enterprise system and the establishment of corporate governance structure. To help enterprises to establish internal control, can consult other countries and regions, by the relevant departments of the internal control of some important industry and points for each unit, reference, and learning to use gradually perfect the internal control system, in order to promote the comprehensive enterprise in our country, and in essence.企业内部控制理论内部控制是现代企业管理的重要标志，通过了结论的做法是：以控制强，弱，无控制的控制，无序。
内部控制外文翻译.doc
内部控制外文翻译外文翻译原文来源：Research Paper, July XXXX年月日A Clear Look at Internal Controls: Theory and Concepts内部控制透视：理论与概念The necessity of control in new variable business environment is not latent for any person and managementas a response factor for stockholdersand another should implement a greatcontrol over his/her organization. 环境需要新的业务控制变量不为任何潜在的股东和管理人士的响应因子为1，另外应执行/她组织了一个很大的控制权。
控制是管理活动的东西或以上施加控制。
思想的产生和近十年的发展需要有系统的商业资源和控制这种财富一个新的关注。
One of the hot topic a boutcontrols over business resource is analyzingthe cost-benefit of each control. 主题之一热一回合管制的商业资源是分析每个控制成本效益。
作为内部控制和欺诈的第一道防线，维护资产以及预防和侦查错误。
内部控制，我们可以说是一种控制整个系统的财务和其他方面的管理制定了为企业的顺利运行;它包括内部的脸颊，内部审计和其他形式的控制。
COSOdescribe Internal Control as follow. Internalcontrols are the methods employed to help ensure the achievement of an objective. COSO的内部控制描述如下。
内部控制是一个客观的方法用来帮助确保实现。
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献
会计内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献n:Internal control is an accounting re or control system ___ policies。
protecting assets。
and preventing fraud and errors。
It is an important component of nal management that includes planning。
methods。
and res used to meet tasks。
goals。
and objectives。
and in doing so。
supports performance-based management。
Internal control is equal to management control and can help managers achieve the expected effective management of resources。
However。
designing and establishing effective internal control is not a simple task and cannot be achieved through quick fixes。
This article discusses the different aspects of the concept of internal control and management.Keywords: internal control。
management control。
control environment。
control activities。
n2.Internal Control Perspective: ___The environment requires new business control variables that are not responsive to any potential ___ control。
内部控制外文翻译资料
Internal management, establish a sound internal control system, enterprises and the needs for enterprises to face market risks and challenges. Only in accordance with the actual situation of their own, developed to meet the needs of internal management control system, and strictly follow the implementation can be sustained, steady and healthy development.内部管理，建立健全内部控制制度，企业和企业面临的市场风险和挑战的需要。
只有按照自己的实际情况，开发出满足内部管理控制系统的需求，并严格遵照执行能够持续，稳定和健康的发展。
The so-called internal control, the means by the enterprises board of directors, managers and other staff implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, operating efficiency and effectiveness of existing laws and regulations to follow, and so provide reasonable assurance that the purpose of the course. Internal controls related to enterprise production and management of the control environment, risk assessment, supervision and decision-making, information and transfer and self-examination, from a business perspective on the whole in all aspects of production. Their effective implementation will undoubtedly promote enterprise production and management to a new level, to promote the rationalization of business processes and standardization.所谓内部控制，董事会的企业董事会，经理和其他员工实施的，为保证财务报告的可靠性，现有的法律法规，经营的效率和效果跟踪，并提供合理的保证，本课程的教学目的。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
外文翻译原文来源：R e s e a r c h P a p e r,J u l y2009,S o c i a l S c i e n c e R e s e a r c hN e t w o r k中文译文：内部控制透视：理论与概念学院专业姓名学号指导教师年月日内部控制透视：理论与概念环境需要新的业务控制变量不为任何潜在的股东和管理人士的响应因子为1，另外应执行/她组织了一个很大的控制权。
控制是管理活动的东西或以上施加控制。
思想的产生和近十年的发展需要有系统的商业资源和控制这种财富一个新的关注。
主题之一热一回合管制的商业资源是分析每个控制成本效益。
作为内部控制和欺诈的第一道防线，维护资产以及预防和侦查错误。
内部控制，我们可以说是一种控制整个系统的财务和其他方面的管理制定了为企业的顺利运行;它包括内部的脸颊，内部审计和其他形式的控制。
COSO的内部控制描述如下。
内部控制是一个客观的方法用来帮助确保实现。
在会计和组织理论，内部控制是指或目标目标的过程实施由组织的结构，工作和权力流动，人员和具体的管理信息系统，旨在帮助组织实现。
这是一种手段，其中一个组织的资源被定向，监控和测量。
它发挥着无形的（重要的作用，预防和侦查欺诈和保护组织的资源，包括生理（如，机械和财产）和乙二醇，声誉或知识产权，如商标）。
在组织水平，内部控制目标与可靠性的目标或战略的财务报告，及时反馈业务上的成就，并遵守法律，法规。
在具体的交易水平，内部控制是指第三方采取行动以实现一个具体目标（例如，如何确保本组织的款项，在申请服务提供有效的。
）内部控制程序reduce程变异，导致更加具有可预见性outcomes。
在业务实体内部控制也被称为业务控制。
它们是日常的工具使用的经理。
所有管理人员使用的内部控制，以帮助确保他们的经营单位，按照计划，他们使用的方法-政策、程序、组织设计和身体的障碍构成。
内部控制是对以下组合：1、财务控制2、其他控件。
根据内部控制研究所印度特许会计师是该组织计划和所有的方法和程序，通过了包括一个由管理机构，以协助实现业务管理的目的是确保尽可能高效有序进行可能的坚持管理政策，对资产的安全护卫预防和信息检测欺诈行为和错误的准确性和完整性的财务会计的可靠记录，及时编制，控制系统内部的事务以外延伸涉及到会计系统的功能。
换句话说内部控制系统的控制下由管理奠定了它的对象的顺利运行的业务的成就。
这些控件可以分为两个部分，即财务控制和其他控制。
财务控制：-控制交易的会计记录正确。
-控制适当的安全护卫公司债务人如现金股票等资产银行-早期发现和预防错误和舞弊。
-正确和及时编制财务记录我é资产负债表和损益表。
-以利润最大化和成本最小化。
其他控制：其它控制包括以下内容：质量控制。
控制原材料。
控制成品。
营销控制等虽然一个组织的人都是有效的内部控制的组成部分，某些方面值得特别一提。
这些包括管理，董事会（包括审计犯发球），内部审计员和外部审计员。
为发展和维护内部控制的主要责任在于一个组织的管理。
随着对控制环境放在更大的重要性，对内部控制的重点已经从政策和程序，以压倒一切的理念和经营作风在组织内。
这些无形的方面重点突出了高层管理人员在内部控制系统的参与的重要性。
如果内部控制是不是管理工作的重中之重，那么它将不属于任何组织的人之一。
作为管理部门的责任，在公有机构的最高管理层表示将包括在该组织的年度财务报告，股东声明，说明管理层已建立了内部控制的管理层认为是有效的制度。
声明还可以提供有关该组织的内部控制制度的具体细节。
内部控制必须进行评估，以提供一些关于其有效性保障管理。
内部控制评价涉及所有管理不控制，努力实现其目标的组织。
内部控制的评价将作为有效的，如果它的成分和功能是目前有效的运营，财务报告和遵守。
他公司的董事和审计委员会已为确保组织内的内部控制制度的责任是足够的。
这种责任包括确定在何种程度上的内部控制进行评估。
两个内部控制评价有关各方都是该组织的内部审计和外部审计师。
内部审计人员的职责通常包括：确保对内部控制制度是否充分，数据的可靠性，以及该组织的资源的有效利用。
内部审计查明的问题和控制发展，改善和加强内部控制的解决方案。
内部审计人员关心的是一个组织的内部控制的范围，包括业务，财务，及合规监控。
内部控制，也可以由外部审计师进行评估。
外部审计人员在评估一个组织的内部控制的有效性，以计划的财务报表的审计。
相对于内部审计，外部审计的重点主要放在控制影响的财务报告。
外聘核数师有责任报告内部控制的弱点（以及有关的内部控制报告的情况）向董事会审计委员会。
一、限制实体的内部控制内部控制，无手术无论多么精心设计，并能提供的控制目标合理保证实现实体的。
该成果的可能性是控制受限制固有的内部。
包括现实，人的判断决策可以有故障而在内部控制故障发生的原因人类的失败，如简单的错误或失误。
例如，错误可能发生在设计，维持，或监测自动化控制。
如果一个实体的资讯科技人员不完全了解一个订单输入系统处理销售交易，他们可能会错误地设计系统改变到到销售的，以过程产品线换成一个新的，另一方面，这种变化可能是正确的设计，但个人误解谁翻译成程序代码的设计。
错误也可能会出现在IT产品使用信息。
例如，自动化控制，可设计报告的审查交易超过限额管理的规定美元，但个人负责进行有关检讨可能不明白这样的目的，报告和因此，他们可能无法审查或调查不寻常的物品。
此外，控制，无论是手动或自动的，可控制规避内部勾结的两个或两个以上的管理凌驾于人或不适当的。
例如，管理人员可进入方的协定，客户改变的条款和销售条件的实体的标准合同的方式，将排除收入确认。
此外，编辑残疾人例程一个软件程序，旨在发现和报告交易，或超过规定的信用额度可能会被改写。
内部控制是影响的定量和定性的估计和控制的判断作出管理评估一个公司的内部成本效益的关系。
在控制成本的一个实体的内部不应超过所带来的利益是预期。
虽然成本效益的关系是首要的标准，应考虑在设计内部控制，精密测量和福利的费用通常是不可能的。
自定义，文化和公司治理制度可能抑制欺诈，但他们不是绝对的威慑。
一个有效的控制环境，也可能有助于减少欺诈风险。
例如，一个有效的董事会董事，审计委员会和内部审计功能可以限制管理层的不当行为。
另外，控制环境，可减少对其他部门的效力。
例如，当激励性质的管理增加了财务报表重大错报风险的，控制的有效性的活动可能会减少。
二、权衡风险与控制风险的概率是一个事件或行动会产生不利影响的组织。
类别的风险的基本都是错误，遗漏，延误和欺诈为了实现目标和目的，管理需要有效地平衡风险和控制。
因此，控制程序，必须制定减少风险，使他们到一个水平，管理可以接受的风险这一点。
通过执行这个平衡法“合理的保证”，可以实现的。
由于涉及到财政和遵守的目标，正在失去平衡可能会导致以下问题：为了达到一个平衡风险与控制，内部控制应积极主动，增值，成本效益和解决所面临的风险。
三、结论该组织内部控制的概念，并在任何方面是如此的重要，因此了解组件和内部控制标准应参加由管理。
内部控制是一个组织管理的重要组成部分。
内部控制是一种错误的会计程序或系统，旨在促进效率或保证一个执行政策或保护资产或避免欺诈和。
按照惯例的定义，分类，即内部控制是一个过程的影响下由一个实体的董事会中，管理人员和其他人员设计方面的成就，提供合理保证的目标。
内部控制的主要因素是控制环境，风险评估，控制活动，信息与沟通，监控。
本文综述了主要的标准和内部控制原则，并介绍公司的类型为所有相关的内部控制的概念。
A Clear Look at Internal Controls: Theory and ConceptsThe necessity of control in new variable business environment is not latent for any person and management as a response factor for stockholders and another should implement a great control over his/her organization. Control is the activity of managing or exerting control over something. he emergence and development of systematic thoughts in recent decade required anew attention to business resource and control over this wealth. One of the hot topic a bout controls over business resource is analyzing the cost-benefit of each control.Internal Controls serve as the first line of defense in safeguarding assets and preventing and detecting errors and fraud. We can say Internal control is a whole system of controls financial and otherwise, established by the management for the smooth running of business; it includes internal cheek, internal audit and other forms of controls.COSO describe Internal Control as follow. Internal controls are the methods employed to help ensure the achievement of an objective. In accounting and organizational theory, Internal control is defined as a process effected by an organization's structure, work and authority flows, people and management information systems,designed to help the organization accomplish specific goals or objectives. It is a means by which an organization's resources are directed, monitored, and measured. It plays an important role in preventing and detecting fraud and protecting the organization's resources, both physical (e.g., machinery and property) and intangible (e.g., reputation or intellectual property such as trademarks). At the organizational level, internal control objectives relate to the reliability of financial reporting, timely feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and compliance with laws and regulations. At the specific transaction level, internal control refers to the actions taken to achieve a specific objective (e.g., how to ensure the organization's payments to third parties are for valid services rendered.) Internal control procedures reduce process variation, leading to more predictable outcomes. Internal controls within business entities are called also business controls. They are tools used by manager's everyday.Writing procedures to encourage compliance, locking your office to discourage theft, and reviewing your monthly statement of account to verify transactions are common internal controls employed to achieve specific objectives.All managers use internal controls to help assure that their units operate according to plan, and the methods they use--policies, procedures, organizational design, and physicalbarriers-constitute. Internal control is a combination of the following：1. Financial controls, and2. Other controlsAccording to the institute of chartered accountants of India internal control is the plan of organization and all the methods and procedures adopted by the management of an entity to assist in achieving management objective of ensuring as far as possible the orderly and efficient conduct of its business including adherence to management policies, the safe guarding of assets prevention and detection of frauds and error the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records and timely preparation of reliable financial information, the system of internal control extends beyond those matters which relate to the function of accounting system. In other words internal control system of controls lay down by the management for the smooth running of the business for the accomplishment of its objects. These controls can be divided in two parts i.e. financial control and other controls.Financial controls:- Controls for recording accounting transactions properly.- Controls for proper safe guarding company assets like cash stock bank debtor etc- Early detection and prevention of errors and frauds.- Properly and timely preparation of financial records I e balance sheet and profit and loss account.- To maximize profit and minimize cost.Other controls: Other controls include the following:Quality controls.Control over raw materials.Control over finished products.Marketing control, etcWhile all of an organization's people are an integral part of internal control, certain parties merit special mention. These include management, the board of directors (including the audit commit tee), internal auditors, and external auditors.The primary responsibility for the development and maintenance of internal control rests with an organization's management. With increased significance placed on the control environment, the focus of internal control has changed from policies and procedures to an philosophy and operating style within organization. Emphasis on these intangible aspects highlights the importance of top management's involvement in the internal control system. If internal control is not a priority for management, then it will not be one for people within the organization either.As an indication of management's responsibility, top management at a publicly owned organization will include in the organization's annual financial report to the shareholders a statement indicating that management has established a system of internal control that management believes is effective. The statement may also provide specific details about the organization's internal control system.Internal control must be evaluated in order to provide management with some assurance regarding its effectiveness.Internal control evaluation involves everything management does to control the organization in the effort to achieve its objectives. Internal control would be judged as effective if components are present and function effectively for operations, financial reporting, and compliance.he boards of directors and its audit committee have responsibility for making sure the internal control systey within the organization is adequate. This responsibility includes determining the extent to which internal controls are evaluated. Two parties involved in the evaluation of internal control are the organization's internal auditors and their external auditors.Internal auditors' responsibilities typically include ensuring the adequacy of the system of internal control, the reliability of data, and the efficient use of the organization's resources.Internal auditors identify control problems and develop solutions for improving and strengthening internal controls. Internal auditors are concerned with the entire range of an organization's internal controls, including operational, financial, and compliance controls.Internal control will also be evaluated by the external auditors. External auditors assess the effectiveness of internal control within an organization to plan the financial statement audit. In contrast to internal auditors, external auditors focus primarily on controls that affect financial reporting. External auditors have a responsibility to report internal control (as well as reportable conditions about internal control) to the audit committee of the board of directors.一、Limitations of an Entity's Internal ControlInternal control, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity's control objectives. The likelihood of achievement is affected by limitations inherent to internal control. These include the realities that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes. For example, errors may occur in designing, Maintaining, or monitoring automated controls. If an entity’s IT personnel do not completely understand how an order entry system processes sales transactions, they may erroneously design changes to the system to process sales for a new line of products. On the other hand, such changes may be correctly designed but misunderstood by individuals who translate the design into program code. Errors also may occur in the use of information produced by IT. For example, automated controls may be designed to report transactions over a specified dollar limit for management review, but individuals responsible for conducting the review may not understand the purpose of such reports and, accordingly, may fail to review them or investigate unusual items.Additionally, controls, whether manual or automated, can be circumvented by the collusion of two or more people or inappropriate management override of internal control. For example, management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter the terms and conditionsof the entity’s standard sales contract in ways that would preclude revenue recognition. Also, edit routines in a software program that are designed to identify and report transactions that exceed specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.Internal control is influenced by the quantitative and qualitative estimates and judgments made by management evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of an entity’s internal control. The cost of an entity's internal control should not exceed the benefits that are expected to be derived. Although the cost-benefit relationship is a primary criterion that should be considered in designing internal control, the precise measurement of costs and benefits usually is not possible.Custom, culture, and the corporate governance system may inhibit fraud, but they are not absolute deterrents. An effective control environment, too, may help reduce the risk of fraud. For example, an effective board of directors, audit committee, and internal audit function may constrain improper conduct by management. Alternatively, the control environment may reduce the effectiveness of other components. For example, when the nature of management incentives increases the risk of material misstatement of financial statements, the effectiveness of control activities may be reduced.二、Balancing Risk and ControlRisk is the probability that an event or action will adversely affect the organization. The primary categories of risk are errors, omissions, delay and fraud In order to achieve goals and objectives, management needs to effectively balance risks and controls. Therefore, control procedures need to be developed so that they decrease risk to a level where management can accept the exposure to that risk. By performing this balancing act "reasonable assurance” ca n be attained. As it relates to financial and compliance goals, being out of balance can cause the following problems:value-added, and cost-effective and address exposure to risk.三、ConclusionThe concept of internal control and its aspects in any organization is so important, therefore understanding the components and standards of internal controls should be attend by management. Internal Control is a major part of managing an organization. Internal control is an accounting procedure or system designed to promote efficiency or assure the implementation of a policy or safeguard assets or avoid fraud and error. According to custom definition, Internal Control is a process affected by an entity's board of directors, management and other personnel designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories namely. The major factors of internal control are Control environment, Risk assessment, Control activities, Information and communication, Monitoring. This article reviews the main standards and principles of internal control and described the relevant concepts of internal control for all type of company.。