英语辩论赛反方一辩开场词

OK. Thanks my fellow debater. Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.We are glad that the definition we made about corpse donation is similar with fellow debaters’. However, I can’t agree with debaters’opinion.We insist that upon death, each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use, or for organ transplant. According to this topic, what is"should be given"? Is it a forced obligation? Donation has the firstly basic principle is voluntary. And what is the voluntary principle? It refers to the dead and his family donate the corpse with voluntary.If lack of voluntary,it is not the "donation" but robbery. The followings are the reasons for our opposition.

First of all, we approval that corpse donation can really meet the needs of scientific use or organ transplant .Especially for part people who require organ to transplant to save their lives, but how much is this part? In China,the current medical system is not perfect, and cost of the transplant operation is so high even more than 30,000. Besides,after operation, medicine also spent a amount of overhead. All of cost goes beyond the ability to pay for a general family .

Secondly, both people and the State do not have right to violate the value with another one. Forced corpse donation on the surface is to defend the patient's right to survival, but meanwhile it destroys the right the dead and his families to choose freely.

In addition,the deceased's body belongs to himself, although he died ,the right to process the corpse should be given to the deceased’s successor.That is a performance of inherited relationship. However enforced donation undoubtedly breaks the inherited system. The reason why the donation is forced is that the organ is rare and so many patients need it.Similarly,money is also need

urgently,should people donate their heritage to the State? Obviously say NO! They are all voluntary donations.Without will of the parties,the donation would become robbery.If we can not control our body,where are the human rights?If we can not dominate our money freely, what is the necessity of wills? Is it a wastepaper? The State makes the law to give us rights to protect ourselves from infringement .But he prevents us to use our rights?Where is the equity? Why we can’t freely make our decisions?Who can give you the rights to robber our body without our consent?

Finally, please debaters explain to us how can the State deal with these people who don’t want to donate their bodies? Directly forced occupying without any comments? Are there not any other more moderate ways get the same effect? What is “should be given”?That is to say,people’s corpse must be given to the State after his death,no matter whether he is willing or not.Then,where are our rights?So we insist that upon death ,each person’s body should not be given to the State for scientific use or organ donation. Thank you .

Yes ! The value of others lives is quite precious, but personal belief does not have signification? Chinese traditional belief is that "your body is something you receive from your parents”.Even death, leaving the whole body is not just only a formality,but it represents our respect for human rights, and respect for the deceased.