公园应该收费吗-Should The Park Charge-

合集下载

英语作文关于公园是否要收费

英语作文关于公园是否要收费Should Parks Charge Admission Fees?The debate surrounding whether parks should charge admission fees has been ongoing for quite some time, with arguments on both sides holding firm ground. While some advocate for the introduction of fees to ensure the parks' sustainability and proper maintenance, others believe that parks should remain free for all to enjoy, serving as a public resource and an integral part of urban green spaces.On the one hand, charging admission fees in parks can provide a steady source of revenue for their upkeep and improvement. With the increasing cost of maintaining and enhancing park facilities, funds from admission fees can be channeled towards essential services like landscaping, sanitation, and security. This ensures that parks remain clean, safe, and well-maintained, creating a pleasant environment for visitors. Additionally, the revenue generated can be used to introduce new amenities andattractions, further enhancing the visitor experience.Moreover, charging admission fees can help regulate the flow of visitors, reducing overcrowding and congestion in popular parks. This is especially relevant during peak seasons and holidays when parks often become overcrowded, impacting the quality of visitors' experience. By setting a price barrier, parks can discourage unnecessary visits, ensuring that those who truly value the experience are able to enjoy it.However, there are also compelling arguments against charging admission fees in parks. One of the main reasonsis that parks serve as a vital public resource, providing opportunities for people to engage with nature, relax, and exercise. They are an integral part of urban green spaces, promoting physical and mental health,。

高中英语真题-2014高考英语书面表达基础训练题(5)及答案

高中英语真题:2014高考英语书面表达基础训练题（5）及答案【2014高考英语吉林省实验中学一模试题】书面表达（满分 25分）作文：最近,你校同学正在参加某英文报组织的一场讨论.讨论的主题是:公园要不要收门票?请你根据下表所提供的信息,给报社写一封信,客观地介绍讨论情况.注意: 1. 信的开头已为你写好.2. 词数: 100 左右.3. 参考词汇: 门票--- entrance fees【参考范文】Dear editor,I'm writing to tell you about the discussion we've had about whe ther an entrance fee should be charged for parks.Opinions are divided on the question. 60％ of the students are against the idea of entrance fees. They believe a public park sh ould be free of charge. People need a place where they can res t and enjoy themselves. Charging entrance fees will no doubt k eep some people away. What is more, it will become necessary to build gates and walls, which will do harm to the appearance of a city.On the other hand, 40％ think that fees should be charged beca use you need money to pay gardeners and other workers, and t o buy plants and young trees. They suggest, however, fees sho uld be charged low.Yours trulyLi Hua【2013界广东省汕头市质量测评试题】基础写作（满分is分）和睦的家庭有利于孩子的个性发展和家人的身心健康。

公园是否应该收费英语作文

公园是否应该收费英语作文The question of whether parks should charge admission fees is a multifaceted issue that sparks passionate debate from various perspectives. While some advocate for free access to these green havens, others contend that fees are necessary for maintenance and improvement. Let's delve into the heart of this debate, exploring the arguments on both sides of the fence. Advocates for free park entry often highlight the fundamental right to access nature's beauty and recreational spaces. Parks, they argue, provide a sanctuary from the hustle and bustle of urban life, offering a place for people to unwind, connect with nature, and engage in physical activity. Imposing fees creates a financial barrier that disproportionately impacts low-income families and individuals, potentially depriving them of these essential benefits. Parks are seen as public goods, much like libraries and schools, that should be accessible to all members of society regardless of their economic status. Furthermore, free parks foster a sense of community and social cohesion. They serve as gathering places for people of diverse backgrounds to interact, fostering a sense of belonging and shared ownership. Families gather for picnics, children frolic on playgrounds, and neighbors connect on park benches, strengthening the social fabric of the community. Charging entrance fees could disrupt these social interactions and create a sense of exclusivity, potentially leading to social fragmentation and isolation. On the other hand, proponents of park fees point to the financial realities of maintaining these green spaces. Parks require significant resources for upkeep, including landscaping, trash removal, security, and facility maintenance. With increasing budget constraints, municipalities often struggle to allocate sufficient funds for parks, leading to deterioration and neglect. Entrance fees, they argue, provide a sustainable source of revenue that can be directly reinvested into park maintenance and improvements, ensuring their long-term viability. Moreover, fees can serve as a tool for managing park usage and mitigating overcrowding. Popular parks often face issues with overuse, leading to environmental damage, noise pollution, and conflicts among visitors. By implementing entrance fees, park authorities can regulate visitor numbers, reduce wear and tear on the environment, and enhance the overall visitor experience. Additionally, fees can incentivize responsible behavior, asvisitors who pay for access may be more likely to value and respect the park's resources. The debate becomes even more nuanced when considering the diversetypes of parks and their unique needs. Large national parks with extensive infrastructure and amenities may justify entrance fees to support their operations, while smaller community parks might prioritize free access to serve the local population. Additionally, tiered fee structures, with discounts for residents or low-income individuals, could strike a balance between revenue generation and inclusivity. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to charge park fees should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific context and needs ofeach park and its surrounding community. In conclusion, the question of park fees is not a simple one. While the principle of free access to nature and public spaces resonates deeply, the financial realities of park maintenance cannot be ignored. Finding a sustainable solution requires a thoughtful approach that balances the needs of the community, the environment, and the long-term viability of these treasured green spaces. Open dialogue, community engagement, and creative solutions are essential to ensure that parks remain accessible and enjoyable for generations to come.。

【英语作文】高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗

【英语作文】高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗
随着城市建设不断发展，公园作为人们休闲放松的场所也越来越受到重视。

关于公园
是否应该收取门票的问题却一直引发了广泛的讨论。

有人认为，公园应该收门票，这样可
以减轻政府负担，提供更好的维护和管理；而另一些人则认为，公园是公众的文化娱乐场所，收门票会限制人们的参观和游玩。

Furthermore, charging admission fees can also help reduce overcrowding in parks. Many popular parks are often overcrowded, especially during weekends and holidays. This not only affects visitors' experience, but also puts pressure on the park facilities and environment. By charging admission fees, the number of visitors can be effectively controlled, preventing overcrowding and ensuring a better experience for those who choose to visit.。

高考英语满分作文加翻译

高考英语满分作文加翻译篇一，公园要不要收门票?最近，你校同学正在参加某英文报组织的一场讨论。

讨论的主题是：公园要不要收门票?请你根据下表所提供的信息，给报社写一封信，客观地介绍讨论情况。

60％的同学认为40％的同学认为1．不应该收门票2公园是公众休闲的地方3l如收门票，需建大门、围墙，会影响城市形象1．应收门票，但票价不要太高2．支付园林工人工资3．购新花木注意：1．信的开头已为你写好。

2．词数：100左右。

3．参考词汇：门票---entrance feeDear editor,I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. 60% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee do not meet people’s expectations, for a park is consideredto be a place where the public can have a good time when they are not busy either at home or at work. If an entrance fee must be paid by the visitors for a park, it will be necessary to build a gate and surrounding walls. In the end a city will take on a bad look. 40% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee can be accepted, but it must not be too expensive. The money from ticket selling can be used for paying the gardeners in the park and buying some other kinds of flowers and trees.With regard to myself, I think an entrance fee is useful, for it can be used to protect a park. Do we share the same opinion, dear editor?Yours truly,Li Hua亲爱的编辑，本人写信是要告诉你，我们是否要收门票公园的探讨。

高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗_英语作文

高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗亲爱的编辑，我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。

我们60％的同学认为入场费不符合人民的期望，为一个公园被认为是一个地方，市民可以有一个良好的时候，他们不在家或在工作繁忙。

如果入会费必须用于支付公园的游客，有必要建立一个大门和围墙。

在最后一个城市将在一个坏的外观。

我们40％的同学认为入场费可以接受，但不能过于昂贵。

从门票销售的钱可以用来支付在公园的园丁，购买鲜花和树木等种。

至于我自己，我认为入场费是有用的，因为它可以用来保护公园。

我们是否有同感，亲爱的编辑器？此致李华Dear editor,I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should not be bought before one enters a park, for it is a place forthe public to go to when they are free. If a ticket must be bought, a gate and walls have to be built for a park, which will make a city look ugly. Forty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should be bought before one enters a park, but that the price of the ticket should be reasonable. Money that is got from ticket selling can be used to pay the gardening workers and buy different kinds of flowers and trees. As for myself, I really think parks are good places to go to at weekends and on holidays. At the same time, we, as visitors, should pay the entrance fee when we enter a park. After all, it takes a lot of money to maintain a park in good working order. Do you aGREe with me, dear editor?Yours truly,Li Hua亲爱的编辑，我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。

2020年英语六级翻译预测：公园免费开放

2020年英语六级翻译预测：公园免费开放长久以来，人们一直对市区公园是否应该收门票的话题争论不休。

一些人认为市区公园是用纳税人的钱建立起来的，是供人们休闲、娱乐的公共场所，所以应该是免费的。

另一方面，还有一些人称，考虑到中国人口众多，公民责任意识淡薄的情况，一旦免费开放市区公园，这些公园会管理不善，将不可避免地受到损坏。

综合考虑两种观点，我较认同后者。

能够确定的是市区公园免费开放要与经济发展情况相适合，因为这需要财政的支持。

所以，以中国现有的经济水平，免费开放市区公园的目标要逐步实现。

【翻译词汇】市区公园 urban park门票 entrance fee纳税人 taxpayer休闲 leisure娱乐 entertainment公共场所 public establishment考虑到 considering公民责任意识淡薄 lack of a sense of civic duty较认同 be inclined to与…相适合 proceed with财政的 financial逐步 step by step【精彩译文】The question whether urban parks should charge an entrance fee or not has been a source of controversy for a long time. On the one hand, some people claim that urban parks, supposed to be places where people have leisure and entertainment, are public establishments that have been created with taxpayers’ money and thus should be free. On the other hand, some others maintain that, considering China’s large population and lack of a sense of civic duty, once the parks are free of charge, they will not be properly managed and will inevitably be damaged. When considering opinions of both sides, I am inclined to the latter view.It’s certain that free entry to urban parks should proceed with economic development, as it needs financial support. Hence, the current economic level in China reflects that free entry to parks can only be realized step by step.。

公园是否应该免费开放英语作文

公园是否应该免费开放英语作文Public Parks: Should They Be Free to Access?The debate surrounding the accessibility of public parks has been a long-standing one, with arguments on both sides of the issue. On one hand, proponents argue that public parks should be free and open to all, as they are a valuable community resource that should be available to everyone regardless of their financial situation. On the other hand, opponents argue that charging for access to public parks is necessary to maintain and improve these spaces, ensuring that they can continue to be enjoyed by the public.One of the primary arguments in favor of free public parks is the idea that they serve as a vital resource for the community. Public parks provide a space for people to engage in physical activity, enjoy the outdoors, and connect with their neighbors. This is particularly important for individuals and families who may not have the means to access private recreational facilities or travel to more remote natural areas. By making public parks free to access, these spaces become more inclusive and accessible to all members of the community, regardless of their socioeconomic status.Moreover, proponents of free public parks argue that they play a crucial role in promoting public health and well-being. Regular physical activity, which can be easily incorporated into visits to public parks, has been shown to have numerous benefits, including reduced risk of chronic diseases, improved mental health, and increased overall quality of life. By making public parks free to access, more people may be inclined to take advantage of these spaces, leading to improved community health outcomes.Another argument in favor of free public parks is the potential for these spaces to serve as hubs of community engagement and social interaction. Public parks can provide a neutral gathering place where people from diverse backgrounds can come together, fostering a sense of community and promoting social cohesion. This can be particularly valuable in urban areas, where access to green spaces may be limited and opportunities for social interaction can be scarce. By keeping public parks free to access, these spaces can continue to serve as inclusive and welcoming environments for all members of the community.On the other hand, opponents of free public parks argue that charging for access is necessary to maintain and improve these spaces. Maintaining public parks can be a significant financial burden for local governments, and revenue generated from admission fees can be used to fund essential maintenance, upgrades, andconservation efforts. This can help ensure that public parks remain well-kept, safe, and enjoyable for all visitors.Additionally, opponents argue that charging for access to public parks can help to manage overcrowding and ensure that these spaces are not overused or abused. By implementing admission fees, parks can limit the number of visitors at any given time, reducing the strain on infrastructure and natural resources. This can help to preserve the integrity and sustainability of public parks, ensuring that they can continue to be enjoyed by the community for years to come.Furthermore, some opponents suggest that charging for access to public parks can help to fund additional amenities and services that enhance the visitor experience. This could include the development of new recreational facilities, the implementation of educational programs, or the provision of enhanced security and maintenance services. By generating revenue from admission fees, public parks can potentially offer a more comprehensive and enjoyable experience for visitors.In conclusion, the debate over whether public parks should be freeto access is a complex and multifaceted issue. While there are valid arguments on both sides, it is ultimately up to local communities and policymakers to determine the best approach based on their specific needs and priorities. Regardless of the decision, it is clear that publicparks play a vital role in promoting community well-being, and ensuring their accessibility and sustainability should be a top priority.。

公园是否该收取门票_高考英语作文

公园是否该收取门票最近，你校同学正在参加某英文报组织的一场讨论。

讨论的主题是：公园要不要收门票?请你根据下表所提供的信息，给报社写一封信，客观地介绍讨论情况。

1.不应该收门票2 公园是公众休闲的地方3 如收门票，需建大门、围墙，会影响城市形象1.应收门票，但票价不要太高2.支付园林工人工资3.购新花木注意：1.信的开头已为你写好。

2.词数：100左右。

3.参考词汇：门票---entrance feedear editor.i’m writing to tell you about the discussion we havehad about whether an entrancefee should be charged for parks.dear editor,i’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. 60% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee do not meet people’s expectations, for a park is considered to be a place where the public can have a good time when they are not busy either at home or at work. if an entrance fee must be paid by the visitors for a park, it will be necessary to build a gate and surrounding walls. in the end a city will take on a bad look. 40% of us schoolmates think that an entrance fee can be accepted, but it must not be too expensive. the money from ticket sellingcan be used for paying the gardeners in the park and buying some other kinds of flowers and trees.with regard to myself, i think an entrance fee is useful, for it can be used to protect a park. do we share the same opinion, dear editor?yours truly,li huadear editor,i’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. sixty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should not be bought before one enters a park, for it is a place for the public to go to when they are free. if a ticket must be bought, a gate and walls have to be built for a park, which will make a city look ugly. forty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should be bought before one enters a park, but that the price of the ticket should be reasonable. money that is got from ticket selling can be used to pay the gardening workers and buy different kinds of flowers and trees. as for myself, i really think parks are good places to go to at weekends and on holidays. at the same time, we, as visitors, should pay the entrance fee when we enter a park. after all, it takes a lot of money to maintain a park in good working order. do you agree with me, dear editor?yours truly,li huadear editor,i’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. sixty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee should not be forced on the public. they believe parks are theplace where the public enjoy themselves at their leisure. they think that a gate and wails are to be built if an entrance fee is to be charged. the city will not look so beautiful as it should have. forty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee is ok, but it shouldn’t be out of control. entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new types of flowers and trees. for myself, i’d like to say that if we all work hard to build our city into a flower garden, who cares about the entrance fee for parks?yours truly,li hua。

经历作文之我的经历英语作文

我的经历英语作文【篇一：我的经历200字作文】我的经历200字作文我的爸爸妈妈是来自农村的，自然条件就不好！从2008年起就送我去尚志上学，他们也在家乡干了一个小吃。

每天很早就起来干活了。

看着他们真辛苦。

那时我刚去尚志，学习跟不上。

我有点上火，自然父母也跟着上火。

我刚一去时我的语文是52分，数学是49分，外语是20分。

当时急的我直哭，妈妈告诉我要坚强。

老师也鼓励我！经过我的努力，我升初中的时候我以语文98，数学99.5，外语97的成绩升入了希望中学。

我以后会更加努力。

我想告诉你，现在学的不好没关系。

抓紧学，以后一切皆有可能。

希望你能比我学得更好！【篇二：高三英语作文范文和写作句型背诵】高三英语作文范文背诵一．基础写作1. 关于公园是否应该收费（由于是2002年题目，没有5句的限制） dear editor,i’m writing to tell you about the discussion we’ve had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks.opinions are divided on the question. 60% of the students are against the idea of entrance fees. they believed a public park should be free of charge. people need a place where they can rest and enjoy themselves. charging entrance fees will nodoubt keep some people away. what is more, it will become necessary to build gates and walls, which will do harm to the appearance of a city.on the other hand, 40% think that fees should be charged because you need money to pay gardeners and other workers and to buy plants and young trees. they suggest, however,fees should be charged low.yours truly,li hu我写信来是为了告诉您关于我们对公园应否收取门票的看法。

公园免费开放的利与弊英语作文

公园免费开放的利与弊英语作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1Title: The Pros and Cons of Parks Being Open to the Public for FreeParks are important public spaces that provide a range of benefits to the community. In recent years, the idea of opening parks for free has gained traction as a way to promote accessibility and inclusion. While this move has its advantages, there are also some drawbacks that need to be considered.Firstly, making parks free to the public can encourage more people to visit and enjoy these green spaces. This can lead to increased physical activity and mental well-being among individuals. Parks offer a place for people to relax, exercise, and socialize, which can have a positive impact on their overall health and happiness.Furthermore, opening parks for free can promote environmental awareness and conservation. When people have regular access to parks, they are more likely to appreciate andvalue them. This can lead to increased efforts to protect and preserve these natural spaces for future generations.On the other hand, there are potential downsides to opening parks for free. One concern is the increase in park overcrowding and wear and tear on park facilities. If large numbers of people visit parks without any entry fee, it can put strain on the infrastructure and maintenance of these areas. This could lead to a decline in the quality of park amenities and services.Additionally, the lack of entry fees could result in decreased funding for park maintenance and improvements. Parks rely on revenue from entry fees to cover costs such as upkeep, repairs, and new developments. Without this funding source, parks may struggle to maintain their standards and may not be able to provide the same level of service to the public.In conclusion, the decision to open parks for free involves a balance of benefits and drawbacks. While free access can promote inclusivity, health, and environmental stewardship, it also poses challenges in terms of park management and sustainability. To address these concerns, it may be necessary to explore alternative funding models or implement measures to regulate park usage. Ultimately, the goal should be to ensurethat parks remain accessible and enjoyable for all while maintaining their integrity and value for future generations.篇2Advantages and Disadvantages of Free Admission to ParksIntroductionParks are public spaces that offer a wide range of benefits to communities. They provide opportunities for recreational activities, social interaction, and contact with nature. Many people argue that parks should be open to the public for free, while others believe that entrance fees are necessary to cover maintenance costs. In this essay, we will explore the advantages and disadvantages of allowing free admission to parks.Advantages of Free Admission1. Inclusivity: When parks are open to the public for free, people of all income levels can enjoy them. This promotes social equality and ensures that everyone has access to green spaces for relaxation and recreation.2. Health Benefits: Parks provide opportunities for physical exercise and proximity to nature, which can improve mental andphysical health. Making parks free to enter encourages more people to use them, leading to a healthier population.3. Social Interaction: Public parks bring together people from diverse backgrounds and foster social interaction. When parks are free, they become popular gathering spaces for communities, strengthening social bonds and promoting a sense of belonging.4. Environmental Awareness: Free access to parks encourages more people to engage with nature and learn about environmental conservation. This can lead to increased awareness of environmental issues and support for initiatives to protect natural spaces.5. Economic Benefits: Free parks can attract more visitors, which can boost local economies through increased tourism and spending on park-related activities. This can be particularly beneficial for communities that rely on tourism for income.Disadvantages of Free Admission1. Maintenance Costs: Parks require regular maintenance to keep them clean, safe, and functional. Without admission fees to cover these costs, parks may suffer from neglect and deteriorate over time, leading to a decline in their quality and attractiveness to visitors.2. Overcrowding: When parks are free, they may attract larger crowds, especially during peak times. This can lead to congestion, noise, and a decrease in the overall enjoyment of the park experience for visitors.3. Lack of Funds for Improvements: Without admission fees, park authorities may struggle to fund much-needed improvements and upgrades to park facilities. This can result in outdated amenities, limited options for recreational activities, and a less appealing park environment.4. Sustainability Concerns: Free parks may face challenges in terms of sustainability, as they rely solely on government funding or donations to cover operating costs. This can make them vulnerable to budget cuts and political changes, putting their long-term viability at risk.5. Equity Issues: While free parks promote inclusivity, they may also face challenges in terms of equity, as some communities may benefit more from free access to parks than others. This can lead to disparities in park quality and resources, exacerbating social inequalities.ConclusionIn conclusion, the decision to offer free admission to parks is a complex issue with both advantages and disadvantages. While free parks promote inclusivity, health benefits, and social interaction, they may also face challenges in terms of maintenance costs, overcrowding, and sustainability. Ultimately, finding a balance between free access and adequate funding for park maintenance is essential to ensure the long-term viability and enjoyment of public parks for all.篇3Title: Pros and Cons of Free Admission to ParksIntroductionPublic parks are essential spaces in urban areas that provide opportunities for recreation, relaxation, and communing with nature. The debate over whether parks should be free to enter is a contentious one, with arguments on both sides. In this essay, we will explore the benefits and drawbacks of making parks open to the public at no cost.Advantages of Free Admission to Parks1. AccessibilityOne of the primary benefits of free admission to parks is increased accessibility. Removing entry fees ensures that everyone, regardless of their income level, can enjoy the benefits of public green spaces. This promotes social equity and ensures that parks are truly public spaces that are accessible to all members of the community.2. Health and Well-beingParks provide opportunities for physical exercise, relaxation, and mental well-being. By removing the barrier of admission fees, more people can take advantage of these health benefits and incorporate regular visits to parks into their routines. This can have a positive impact on the overall health and wellness of the community.3. Community EngagementWhen parks are free to enter, they become hubs for community engagement and social interaction. Families, friends, and neighbors can gather in these shared spaces to picnic, play games, and enjoy recreational activities together. This fosters a sense of community and strengthens social bonds among residents.4. Environmental AwarenessBy making parks free to enter, more people are encouraged to visit and appreciate the natural beauty of these green spaces. This can lead to increased environmental awareness and consciousness, as individuals become more connected to nature and invested in protecting the environment.Disadvantages of Free Admission to Parks1. Maintenance CostsMaintaining public parks requires significant financial resources for landscaping, upkeep, and infrastructure improvements. When parks are free to enter, there may be a strain on the budget allocated for park maintenance, leading to deterioration of facilities and amenities over time.2. OvercrowdingRemoving entry fees to parks can also result in overcrowding, especially during peak times and seasons. Large crowds can detract from the peaceful and relaxing atmosphere that parks are intended to provide, making it less enjoyable for visitors.3. Vandalism and MisuseFree admission to parks may also lead to an increase in vandalism, littering, and other forms of misuse. When parks are not perceived as valuable or worth preserving, some individualsmay not show the necessary respect for these public spaces, leading to damage and degradation.ConclusionIn conclusion, the debate over whether parks should be free to enter is multifaceted, with both advantages and disadvantages to consider. While free admission promotes accessibility, health, community engagement, and environmental awareness, it also poses challenges in terms of maintenance costs, overcrowding, and misuse. Ultimately, the decision to make parks free to enter should be carefully weighed against these factors to ensure that these valuable public spaces continue to serve the needs of the community for generations to come.。

公园应该收费吗-Should The Park Charge-_英语作文

公园应该收费吗?Should The Park Charge?最近，你校同学正在参加某英文报社组织的一场讨论。

讨论的主题是：公园要不要收费？请你根据下面所提供的信息，给报社写一封信，客观地介绍讨论的情况。

60%的同学认为:1．不应收门票2．公园是公众休闲的地方3．如收门票，需修大门、围墙，会影响城市形象40%的同学认为:1．应收门票，但票价不宜高2．支付园林工人工资3．购新花木注意：1．信的开头已为你写好。

2．词数：100左右。

3．参考词汇：门票 entrance feeDear Editor,亲爱的编辑，I'm writing to tell you about the discussion we've had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks．我写信是要告诉你关于我们是否要收公园门票的讨论。

Opinions are divided on the question. 60% of the students are against the idea of entrance fees. They believe a public park should be free of charge. People need a place where they can rest and enjoy themselves． Charging entrance fees will no doubt keep some people away. What is more, it will become necessary to build gates and walls, which will do harm to theappearanceof a city．在这个问题上我们意见有分歧。

60%的同学反对这个收门票的想法。

公园是否应该免费开放英语作文

Should Parks Be Free to Visit?The debate on whether parks should be free to visit is a contentious issue, with varying opinions from different stakeholders. While some argue that parks should be accessible to all without any financial barrier, others believe that charging a fee is necessary to maintain their quality and sustainability.On the one hand, the argument for free parks centers around inclusivity and accessibility. Parks provide a vital green space for recreation, relaxation, and exercise, and they should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial status. Free parks can promote social cohesion and community engagement, as they become a shared space where people from different backgrounds can gather and enjoy nature.Moreover, free parks can encourage more people to visit and appreciate nature, fostering a sense of environmental responsibility and conservation. This can have a positive impact on the local environment, as more people become aware of the importance of protecting and preserving green spaces.On the other hand, the argument for charging a fee for parks focuses on their maintenance and sustainability. Parks require regular maintenance, including landscaping, cleaning, and facility repairs. Charging a fee can generate revenue to cover these costs, ensuring that the parks are well-maintained and continue to provide a quality experience for visitors.Additionally, charging a fee can help to limit overcrowding in parks, ensuring that everyone has a comfortable and enjoyable experience. This can be particularly important during peak hours or on weekends and holidays, when parks can become overcrowded and noisy.In conclusion, whether parks should be free to visit depends on the specific context and circumstances. While free parks promote inclusivity, accessibility, and environmental awareness, charging a fee can ensure their sustainability and maintenance. A balanced approach could involve introducing a tiered pricing system, where residents pay a reduced fee or have free access, while non-residents pay a higher fee. This would allow for both inclusivity and sustainability, ensuring that parks remain accessible to all while generating sufficient revenue for their upkeep.关于公园是否应该免费开放的问题，不同利益相关者持有不同的观点，因此引发了一场激烈的争论。

参观公园要花钱吗英文作文

参观公园要花钱吗英文作文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成，希望大家下载以后，能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改，请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料，如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等，如想了解不同资料格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!Visiting a park usually requires an entrance fee, but it depends on the specific park you are visiting. Some parks are free to enter, while others may charge a small fee for maintenance and upkeep.Parks are often funded by the local government or private organizations, so they may not always charge visitors for entry. However, some parks, especially those with special attractions or facilities, may require a fee to cover the costs of maintaining the park and providing a pleasant experience for visitors.It's always a good idea to check the park's website or contact them directly to find out if there is an entrance fee and how much it is. Some parks offer discounts for children, seniors, or local residents, so it's worth looking into the options available.Even if there is a fee to enter the park, it's usuallya small price to pay for the enjoyment and relaxation that a park can provide. Plus, the money goes towards keeping the park clean, safe, and well-maintained for everyone to enjoy.So, while it's not always the case, visiting a park may require you to pay a small fee. But the benefits of spending time in nature and enjoying the park's amenities often make it well worth the cost.。

高中英语作文另2篇：讨论公园要不要收门票

高考英语满分作文第三篇Dear editor,I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee should not be forced on the public. They believe parks are the place where the public enjoy themselves at their leisure. They think that a gate and wails are to be built if an entrance fee is to be charged. The city will not look so beautiful as it should have. Forty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee is OK, but it shouldn’t be out of control. Entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new types of flowers and trees. For myself, I’d like to say that if we all work hard to build our city into a flower garden, who cares about the entrance fee for parks?Yours truly,Li Hua高考英语满分作文第四篇Dear editor,I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Those against charging entrance fee for parks take up 60%. They are of one mind that parks are a place for the public’s enjoyment. If tickets are demanded on the visitors of a park, a gate has to be set up and so have the walls on the four sides. If so, city will not look as beautiful as it would. Otherwise, those in favour of charging entrance fee for parks take up 40%. They all think that ticket price should be controlled properly, and that entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new sorts of flowers and trees. The truth lies in the hands of the majority. Does my argument stand to reason, dear editor?Yours truly,Li Hua。

公园是否收费英文作文

公园是否收费英文作文英文：Is the park free or does it charge an admission fee? This question is one that many people ask before visiting a park. In my experience, it really depends on the park. Some parks are free to enter while others charge a fee. 。

For example, I live near a state park that charges a fee for admission. The fee is usually around $5 per car, but it can vary depending on the season and the day of the week. This fee goes towards maintaining the park, including the trails, picnic areas, and facilities. 。

On the other hand, there are plenty of parks that are free to enter. City parks, for example, are often free and open to the public. These parks may not have as many amenities as a state park, but they still provide a great opportunity to get outside and enjoy nature. 。

In general, it's important to do some research before visiting a park to find out if there is an admission fee. This information can usually be found on the park's website or by calling their office. 。

2019年高中英语作文-公园该不该收门票-

公园该不该收票?
注意：1．信的开头已为你写好。
2．词数：100左右。
3．参考词汇：门票---entrance fee
Dear editor,
I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee should not be forced on the public. they believe parks are the place where the public enjoy themselves at their leisure. they think that a gate and wails are to be built if an entrance fee is to be charged. the city will not look so beautiful as it should have. Forty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee is OK, but it shouldn’t be out of control. Entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new types of flowers and trees. For myself, I’d like to say that if we all work hard to build our city into a flower garden, who cares about the entrance fee for parks?