财务风险管理外文文献翻译

合集下载

中小企业的财务风险管理外文文献翻译2014年译文3000字

中小企业的财务风险管理外文文献翻译2014年译文3000字Financial Risk Management for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)Financial risk management is an essential aspect of business management。

particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)。

SMEs face numerous financial risks。

including credit risk。

market risk。

liquidity risk。

and nal risk。

which can significantly impact their financial stability and growth prospects。

Therefore。

the effective management of financial risks is crucialfor SMEs to survive and thrive in today's competitive business environment.One of the primary challenges for SMEs in managing financial risks is their limited resources and expertise。

Unlike large ns。

SMEs often lack the financial resources and specialized staff to develop and implement comprehensive risk management strategies。

As a result。

财务风险管理外文文献翻译原文+译文

财务风险管理外文文献翻译原文+译文财务风险管理外文文献翻译原文+译文【2016年8月】目录原文：Financial Risk ManagementAlthough financial risk has increased significantly in recent years, risk and risk management are not contemporary issues. The result of increasingly global markets is that risk may originate with events thousands of miles away that have nothing to do with the domestic market. Information is available instantaneously, which means that change, and subsequent market reactions, occur very quickly. The economic climate and markets can be affected very quickly by changes in exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. Counterparties can rapidly become problematic. As a result, it is important to ensure financial risks are identified and managed appropriately. Preparation is a key component of risk management.What Is Risk?Risk provides the basis for opportunity. The terms risk and exposure have subtle differences in their meaning. Risk refers to the probability of loss, while exposure is the possibility of loss, although they are often used interchangeably. Risk arises as a result of exposure.Exposure to financial markets affects most organizations, either directly or indirectly. When an organization has financial market exposure, there is a possibility of loss but also an opportunity for gain or profit. Financial market exposure may provide strategic or competitive benefits.Risk is the likelihood of losses resulting from events such aschanges in market prices. Events with a low probability of occurring, but that may result in a high loss, are particularly troublesome because they are often not anticipated. Put another way, risk is the probable variability of returns.Since it is not always possible or desirable to eliminate risk, understanding it is an important step in determining how to manage it. Identifying exposures and risks forms the basis for an appropriate financial risk management strategy.How Does Financial Risk?Financial risk arises through countless transactions of a financial nature, including sales and purchases, investments and loans, and various other business activities. It can arise as a result of legal transactions, new projects, mergers and acquisitions, debt financing, the energy component of costs, or through the activities of management, stakeholders, competitors, foreign governments, or weather. When financial prices change dramatically, it can increase costs, reduce revenues, or otherwise adversely impact the profitability of an organization. Financial fluctuations may make it more difficult to plan and budget, price goods and services, and allocate capital.There are three main sources of financial risk:1. Financial risks arising from an organization’s exposure to changes in market prices, such as interest rates, exchange rates, and commodity prices.2. Financial risks arising from the actions of, and transactions with, other organizations such as vendors, customers, and counterparties in derivatives transactions3. Financial risks resulting from internal actions or failures of the organization, particularly people, processes, and systems What Is Financial Risk Management?Financial risk management is a process to deal with the uncertainties resulting from financial markets. It involves assessing the financial risks facing an organization and developing management strategies consistent with internal priorities and policies. Addressing financial risks proactively may provide an organization with a competitive advantage. It also ensures that management, operational staff, stakeholders, and the board of directors are in agreement on key issues of risk.Managing financial risk necessitates making organizational decisions about risks that are acceptable versus those that are not. The passive strategy of taking no action is the acceptance of all risks by default.Organizations manage financial risk using a variety of strategies and products. It is important to understand how these products and strategies work to reduce risk within the context of the organization’s risk tolerance and objectives.Strategies for risk management often involve derivatives. Derivatives are traded widely among financial institutions and on organized exchanges. The value of derivatives contracts, such as futures, forwards, options, and swaps, is derived from the price of the underlying asset. Derivatives trade on interest rates, exchange rates, commodities, equity and fixed income securities, credit, and even weather.The products and strategies used by market participants to manage financial risk are the same ones used by speculators to increase leverage and risk. Although it can be argued that widespread use of derivatives increases risk, the existence of derivatives enables those who wish to reduce risk to pass it along to those who seek risk and its associated opportunities.The ability to estimate the likelihood of a financial loss ishighly desirable. However, standard theories of probability often fail in the analysis of financial markets. Risks usually do not exist in isolation, and the interactions of several exposures may have to be considered in developing an understanding of how financial risk arises. Sometimes, these interactions are difficult to forecast, since they ultimately depend on human behavior.The process of financial risk management is an ongoing one. Strategies need to be implemented and refined as the market and requirements change. Refinements may reflect changing expectations about market rates, changes to the business environment, or changing international political conditions, for example. In general, the process can be summarized as follows:1、Identify and prioritize key financial risks.2、Determine an appropriate level of risk tolerance.3、Implement risk management strategy in accordance with policy.4、Measure, report, monitor, and refine as needed.DiversificationFor many years, the riskiness of an asset was assessed based only on the variability of its returns. In contrast, modern portfolio theory considers not only an asset’s riskines s, but also its contribution to the overall riskiness of the portfolio to which it is added. Organizations may have an opportunity to reduce risk as a result ofrisk diversification.In portfolio management terms, the addition of individual components to a portfolio provides opportunities for diversification, within limits. A diversified portfolio contains assets whose returns are dissimilar, in other words, weakly or negatively correlated with one another. It is useful to think of theexposures of an organization as a portfolio and consider the impact of changes or additions on the potential risk of the total.Diversification is an important tool in managing financial risks. Diversification among counterparties may reduce the risk that unexpected events adversely impact the organization through defaults. Diversification among investment assets reduces the magnitude of loss if one issuer fails. Diversification of customers, suppliers, and financing sources reduces the possibility that an organization will have its business adversely affected by changes outside management’s control. Although the risk of loss still exists, diversification may reduce the opportunity for large adverse outcomes.Risk Management ProcessThe process of financial risk management comprises strategies that enable an organization to manage the risks associated with financial markets. Risk management is a dynamic process that should evolve with an organization and its business. It involves and impacts many parts of an organization including treasury, sales, marketing, legal, tax, commodity, and corporate finance.The risk management process involves both internal and external analysis. The first part of the process involves identifying and prioritizing the financial risks facing an organization and understanding their relevance. It may be necessary to examine the organization and its products, management, customers, suppliers, competitors, pricing, industry trends, balance sheet structure, and position in the industry. It is also necessary to consider stakeholders and their objectives and tolerance for risk.Once a clear understanding of the risks emerges, appropriate strategies can be implemented in conjunction with riskmanagement policy. For example, it might be possible to change where and how business is done, thereby reducing the。

公司财务风险中英文对照外文翻译文献

中英文资料外文翻译外文资料Financial ﬁrm bankruptcy and systemic riskIn Fall 2008 when the Federal Reserve and the Treasury injected $85 billion into the insurance behemoth American International Group (AIG), themoney lent to AIGwent straight to counterparties, and very few funds remained with the insurer. Among the largest recipients was Goldman Sachs, to whomabout $12 billionwas paid to undoAIG’s credit default swaps (CDSs). The bailout plan focused on repaying the debt by slowly selling off AIG’s assets, w ith no intention of maintaining jobs or allowing the CDSmarket to continue to function as before. Thus, the government’s effort to avoid systemic risk with AIG was mainly about ensuring that ﬁrms with which AIG had done business did not fail as a result. T he concerns are obviously greatest vis-a-vis CDSs, ofwhich AIG had over $400 billion contracts outstanding in June 2008.In contrast, the government was much less enthusiastic about aiding General Motors, presumably because they believed its failure would not cause major macroeconomic repercussions by imposing losses on related ﬁrms. This decision is consistent with the view in macroeconomicresearch that financialﬁrmbankruptcies pose a greater amount of systemic risk than nonfinancial firmbankruptcies. For example, Bordo and Haubrich (2009) conclude that “...more severe ﬁnancial events are associated withmore severe recessions...” Likewise, Bernanke (1983) argues the Great Depressionwas so severe because ofweakness in the banking systemthat affected the amount of credit available for investment. Bernanke et al. (1999) hypothesize a financial accelerator mechanism, whereby distress in one sector of the economy leads to more precarious balance sheets and tighter credit conditions. This in turn leads to a drop in investment, which is followed by less lending and a widespread downturn. Were shocks to the economy always to come in the form of distress at nonﬁnancial ﬁrms, these authors argue that the business downturns would not be so severe.We argue instead that the contagious impact of a nonfinancial firm’s bankruptcy is expected to be far larger than that of a financial ﬁrm like AIG, although neither would be catastrophic to the U.S. economy through counterparty risk channels. This is not to say that an episode ofwidespread financial distress among our largest banks would not be followed by an especially severe recession, only that such failures would not cause a recession or affect the depth of a recession. Rather such bankruptcies are symptomatic of common factors in portfolios that lead to wealth losses regardless of whether any firm ﬁles for bankruptcy.Pervasive ﬁnancial fragility may occur because the failure of one ﬁrm leads to the failure of other ﬁrms which cascades through the system (e.g., Davis and Lo, 1999; Jarrow and Yu, 2001). Or systemic risk may wreak havoc when a number of ﬁnancial ﬁrms fail simultaneously, as in the Great Depression when more than 9000 banks failed (Benston, 1986). In the former case, the failure of one ﬁrm, such as AIG, Lehman Brothers or Bear Stearns, could lead to widespread failure through ﬁnancial contracts such as CDSs. In the latter case, the fact that so many ﬁnancial institutions have failed means that both the money supply and the amount of credit in the economy could fall so far as to cause a large drop in economic activity (Friedman and Schwartz, 1971).While a weak ﬁnancial systemcould cause a recession, the recession would not arise because one ﬁrm was allowed to ﬁle bankruptcy. Further, should one or the other ﬁrmgo bankrupt, the nonﬁnancial ﬁrmwould have the greater impact on the economy.Such extreme real effects that appear to be the result of ﬁnancial ﬁrm fragility have led to a large emphasis on the prevention of systemic risk problems by regulators. Foremost amo ng these policies is “too big to fail” (TBTF), the logic of which is that the failure of a large ﬁnancial institution will have ramifications for other ﬁnancial institutions and therefore the risk to the economywould be enormous. TBTF was behind the Fed’s decisions to orchestrate the merger of Bear Stearns and J.P.Morgan Chase in 2008, its leadership in the restructuring of bank loans owed by Long Term Capital Management (LTCM), and its decision to prop up AIG. TBTF may be justiﬁed if the outcome is preven tion of a major downswing in the economy. However, if the systemic risks in these episodes have been exaggerated or the salutary effects of these actions overestimated, then the cost to the efﬁciency of the capital allocation system may far outweigh any po tential beneﬁts from attempting to avoid another Great Depression.No doubt, no regulator wants to take the chance of standing down while watching over another systemic risk crisis, sowe do not have the ability to examine empiricallywhat happens to the economy when regulators back off. There are very fewinstances in themodern history of the U.S.where regulators allowed the bankruptcy of amajor ﬁnancial ﬁrm.Most recently,we can point to the bankruptcy of Lehman,which the Fed pointedly allowed to fail.However,with only one obvious casewhere TBTFwas abandoned, we have only an inkling of how TBTF policy affects systemic risk. Moreover, at the same time that Lehman failed, the Fed was intervening in the commercial paper market and aiding money marketmutual fundswhile AIGwas downgraded and subsequently bailed out. In addition, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury were scaremongering about the prospects of a second Great Depression to make the passage of TARPmore likely. Thuswewill never knowifthemarket downturn th at followed the Lehman bankruptcy reﬂected fear of contagion from Lehman to the real economy or fear of the depths of existing problems in the real economy that were highlighted so dramatically by regulators.In this paper we analyze the mechanisms by which such risk could cause an economy-wide col-lapse.We focus on two types of contagion that might lead to systemic risk problems: (1) information contagion,where the information that one ﬁnancial ﬁrmis troubled is associatedwith negative shocksat other ﬁnanc ial institutions largely because the ﬁrms share common risk factors; or (2) counterparty contagion,where one important ﬁnancial institution’s collapse leads directly to troubles at other cred-itor ﬁrms whose troubles snowball and drive other ﬁrms into distress. The efﬁcacy of TBTF policies depends crucially on which of these two types of systemic riskmechanisms dominates.Counterparty contagion may warrant intervention in individual bank failureswhile information contagion does not.If regulators do not ste p in to bail out an individual ﬁrm, the alternative is to let it fail. In the case of a bank, the process involves the FDIC as receiver and the insured liabilities of the ﬁrmare very quickly repaid. In contrast, the failure of an investment bank or hedge fund does not involve the FDIC andmay closely resemble a Chapter 11 or Chapter 7 ﬁling of a nonﬁnancial ﬁrm. However, if the nonbank ﬁnancial ﬁrm inquestion has liabilities that are covered by the Securities Industry Protection Corporation (SIPC), the ﬁrmi s required by lawunder the Securities Industry Protection Act (SIPA) to liquidate under Chapter 7 (Don and Wang, 1990). This explains in large partwhy only the holding company of Lehman ﬁled for bankruptcy in 2008 and its broker–dealer subsidiaries were n ot part of the Chapter 11 ﬁling.A major fear of a ﬁnancial ﬁrm liquidation, whether done through the FDIC or as required by SIPA, is that ﬁre sales will depress recoveries for the creditors of the failed ﬁnancial ﬁrm and that these ﬁre saleswill have ramiﬁcations for other ﬁrms in related businesses, even if these businesses do not have direct ties to the failed ﬁrm (Shleifer and Vishny, 1992). This fear was behind the Fed’s decision to extend liquidity to primary dealers inMarch 2008 – Fed Chairman Bernanke explained in a speech on ﬁnancial system stability that“the risk developed that liquidity pressuresmight force dealers to sell assets into already illiquid markets. Thismight have resulted in...[a] ﬁre sale scenario..., inwhich a cascade of failures andliquidations sharply depresses asset prices, with adverse ﬁnancial and economic implications.”(May 13, 2008 speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta conference at Sea Island, Georgia) The fear of potential ﬁre sales is expressed in further detail in t he same speech as a reason for the merger of Bear Stearns and JP Morgan:“Bear...would be forced to ﬁle for bankruptcy...[which] wouldhave forced Bear’s secured creditors and counterparties to liquidate the underlying collateral and, given the illiquidity of markets, those creditors and counter parties might well have sustained losses. If they responded to losses or the unexpected illiquidity of their holdings by pulling back from providing secured ﬁnancing to other ﬁrms, a much broader liquidity crisis wou ld have ensued.”The idea that creditors of a failed ﬁrm are forced to liquidate assets, and to do so with haste, is counter to the basic tenets of U.S. bankruptcy laws, which are set up to allow creditors the ability to maximize the value of the assets now under their control. If that value is greatest when continuing to operate, the laws allow such a reorganization of the ﬁrm. If the value in liquidation is higher, the laws are in no way prejudiced against selling assets in an orderly procedure. Bankruptcy actually reduces the likelihood of ﬁre sales because assets are not sold quickly once a bankruptcy ﬁling occurs. Cash does not leave the bankrupt firm without the approval of a judge.Without pressure to pay debts, the ﬁrm can remain in bankruptcy for months as it tries to decide on the best course of action. Indeed, a major complaint about the U.S. code is that debtors can easily delay reorganizing and slow down the process.If, however, creditors and management believe that speedy assets sales are in their best interest, then they can press the bankruptcy judge to approve quick action. This occurred in the case of Lehman’s asset sale to Barclays,which involved hiring workers whomight have split up were their divisions not sold quickly.金融公司破产及系统性的风险2008年秋，当美联邦储备委员会和财政部拒绝85亿美金巨资保险投入到美国国际集团时，这边借给美国国际集团的货款就直接落到了竞争对手手里，而投保人只得到极少的一部分资金。

企业财务风险管理外文文献

企业财务风险管理外文文献Enterprise Financial Risk Management: A Literature ReviewAbstractThe enterprise financial risk management (EFRM) is a crucial tool applied by modern enterprise to manage their financial exposure and control risks. EFRM systems have become increasingly complex with time and one must have a thorough knowledge of the different facets of enterprise finance in order to effectively use them. This literature review briefly reviews existing literature and provides current understanding of the EFRM systems. Key topics discussed include the need for EFRM and the various risk management frameworks, regulations, and tools. Additionally, recent research efforts on areas such as Enterprise Risk Management Systems (ERM) and financial forecasts are discussed.1. IntroductionRisk management is an important aspect of corporate management and is extensively applied in modern enterprises. With the emergence of globalization, uncertainties, and complexity in the global business environment, effective risk management is a necessity for all corporations. Enterprises must manage different types of risks associated with inadequate financial results, including liquidity issues, treasury and debt management, insolvency or bankruptcy, and others. Enterprise Financial Risk Management (EFRM) has become an increasingly important tool to manage the risks associated with corporate financial activities. The purpose of this review is to explorethe most recent advances and research in the field of EFRM to providea comprehensive understanding of the current state of the field.2. Need for EFRMFinancial risks are a major concern in the management of any business. Inadequate risk management can lead to financial losses and even bankruptcy. The EFRM system helps to alleviate the associated financial risks. Financial risks can arise from various sources, such as external environment changes, inadequate financial planning, and insufficient internal control systems. Therefore, enterprises should implement proper EFRM strategies to protect their financial health and minimize the associated risks.EFRM systems provide the enterprise with a comprehensive risk management framework, allowing them to identify and address any existing and potential financial risks. This risk management system also enables the enterprise to analyze the short-term and long-term effects of different management decisions and to plan and implement adequate responses. Furthermore, EFRM systems facilitate financial forecasting and help management to make informed decisions. Proper risk management reduces uncertainty and increases the enterprises’ profitability.3. EFRM Risk Management FrameworksThe first step in EFRM is to identify different financial risks. Risks can be divided into two broad categories, namely, market risks and operational risks. Market risks are the risks associated with different types of financial markets, such as foreign exchanges, stocks,commodities, and interest rates. On the other hand, operational risks are the risks associated with the operations of the enterprise. These risks involve internal factors such as personnel, policies, and procedures.Once the financial risks have been identified, the enterprise should develop a risk management strategy and goals that cover the different types of risks. Different risk management tools and techniques can be used to address these risks. These tools and techniques include the use of financial analysis, financial simulation, portfolio management, financial derivatives, and enterprise risk management systems (ERM). Additionally, regulations and compliance must be taken into account when devising a risk management framework.4. Regulations and ToolsAnother important aspect of EFRM is the application of regulations. The enterprise should ensure compliance with all applicable regulators and laws and should develop a comprehensive risk management system that adheres to all the relevant laws and regulations. Furthermore, enterprise risk management systems (ERM) have become increasingly important in the management of financial risks. ERM systems are computer-based systems that allow enterprises to manage their financial risks in an efficient and integrated manner. These systems provide support in forecasting, reporting, and decision-making.5. Recent Research EffortsOver the past few years, there has been an increasing number of research studies in the field of EFRM. Some of the recent research efforts include the development of models for financial forecasts, the assessment of ERM systems, the design of financial derivatives and structured products, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial forecasting. Further research is needed to identify new techniques and approaches that can be used to improve the effectiveness of the EFRM systems.6.ConclusionIn conclusion, effective EFRM is essential for a successful enterprise due to the increasing complexity of the global business environment. Risk management tools, techniques, and regulations must be applied to address the different types of financial risks. Additionally, research efforts in the field of EFRM are continuously increasing, and it is important to keep up to date with the latest developments.。

财务风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献

中英文资料翻译Financial Risk ManagementAlthough financial risk has increased significantly in recent years, risk and risk management are not contemporary issues. The result of increasingly global markets is that risk may originate with events thousands of miles away that have nothing to do with the domestic market. Information is available instantaneously, which means that change, and subsequent market reactions, occur very quickly. The economic climate and markets can be affected very quickly by changes in exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. Counterparties can rapidly become problematic. As a result, it is important to ensure financial risks are identified and managed appropriately. Preparation is a key component of risk management.What Is Risk?Risk provides the basis for opportunity. The terms risk and exposure have subtle differences in their meaning. Risk refers to the probability of loss, while exposure is the possibility of loss, although they are often used interchangeably. Risk arises as a result of exposure.Exposure to financial markets affects most organizations, either directly or indirectly. When an organization has financial market exposure, there is a possibility of loss but also an opportunity for gain or profit. Financial market exposure may provide strategic or competitive benefits.Risk is the likelihood of losses resulting from events such as changes in market prices. Events with a low probability of occurring, but that may result in a high loss, are particularly troublesome because they are often not anticipated. Put another way, risk is the probable variability of returns.Since it is not always possible or desirable to eliminate risk, understanding it is an important step in determining how to manage it. Identifying exposures and risks forms the basis for an appropriate financial risk management strategy.How Does Financial Risk?Financial risk arises through countless transactions of a financial nature, including sales and purchases, investments and loans, and various other business activities. It can arise as a result of legal transactions, new projects, mergers and acquisitions, debt financing, the energy component of costs, or through the activities of management, stakeholders, competitors, foreign governments, or weather. When financial prices change dramatically, it can increase costs, reduce revenues, or otherwise adversely impact the profitability of an organization. Financial fluctuations may make it more difficult to plan and budget, price goods and services, and allocate capital.There are three main sources of financial risk:1. Financial risks arising from an organization’s exposure to changes in market prices, such as interest rates, exchange rates, and commodity prices.2. Financial risks arising from the actions of, and transactions with, other organizations such as vendors, customers, and counterparties in derivatives transactions3. Financial risks resulting from internal actions or failures of the organization, particularly people, processes, and systemsWhat Is Financial Risk Management?Financial risk management is a process to deal with the uncertainties resulting from financial markets. It involves assessing the financial risks facing an organization and developing management strategies consistent with internal priorities and policies. Addressing financial risks proactively may provide an organization with a competitive advantage. It also ensures that management, operational staff, stakeholders, and the board of directors are in agreement on key issues of risk.Managing financial risk necessitates making organizational decisions about risks that are acceptable versus those that are not. The passive strategy of taking no action is the acceptance of all risks by default.Organizations manage financial risk using a variety of strategies and products. It is important to understand how these products and strategies work to reduce riskwithin the context of the organization’s risk tolerance and objectives.Strategies for risk management often involve derivatives. Derivatives are traded widely among financial institutions and on organized exchanges. The value of derivatives contracts, such as futures, forwards, options, and swaps, is derived from the price of the underlying asset. Derivatives trade on interest rates, exchange rates, commodities, equity and fixed income securities, credit, and even weather.The products and strategies used by market participants to manage financial risk are the same ones used by speculators to increase leverage and risk. Although it can be argued that widespread use of derivatives increases risk, the existence of derivatives enables those who wish to reduce risk to pass it along to those who seek risk and its associated opportunities.The ability to estimate the likelihood of a financial loss is highly desirable. However, standard theories of probability often fail in the analysis of financial markets. Risks usually do not exist in isolation, and the interactions of several exposures may have to be considered in developing an understanding of how financial risk arises. Sometimes, these interactions are difficult to forecast, since they ultimately depend on human behavior.The process of financial risk management is an ongoing one. Strategies need to be implemented and refined as the market and requirements change. Refinements may reflect changing expectations about market rates, changes to the business environment, or changing international political conditions, for example. In general, the process can be summarized as follows:1、Identify and prioritize key financial risks.2、Determine an appropriate level of risk tolerance.3、Implement risk management strategy in accordance with policy.4、Measure, report, monitor, and refine as needed.DiversificationFor many years, the riskiness of an asset was assessed based only on the variability of its returns. In contrast, modern portfolio theory considers not only an asset’s riskiness, but also its contribution to the overall riskiness of the portfolio towhich it is added. Organizations may have an opportunity to reduce risk as a result of risk diversification.In portfolio management terms, the addition of individual components to a portfolio provides opportunities for diversification, within limits. A diversified portfolio contains assets whose returns are dissimilar, in other words, weakly or negatively correlated with one another. It is useful to think of the exposures of an organization as a portfolio and consider the impact of changes or additions on the potential risk of the total.Diversification is an important tool in managing financial risks. Diversification among counterparties may reduce the risk that unexpected events adversely impact the organization through defaults. Diversification among investment assets reduces the magnitude of loss if one issuer fails. Diversification of customers, suppliers, and financing sources reduces the possibility that an organization will have its business adversely affected by changes outside management’s control. Although the risk of loss still exists, diversification may reduce the opportunity for large adverse outcomes.Risk Management ProcessThe process of financial risk management comprises strategies that enable an organization to manage the risks associated with financial markets. Risk management is a dynamic process that should evolve with an organization and its business. It involves and impacts many parts of an organization including treasury, sales, marketing, legal, tax, commodity, and corporate finance.The risk management process involves both internal and external analysis. The first part of the process involves identifying and prioritizing the financial risks facing an organization and understanding their relevance. It may be necessary to examine the organization and its products, management, customers, suppliers, competitors, pricing, industry trends, balance sheet structure, and position in the industry. It is also necessary to consider stakeholders and their objectives and tolerance for risk.Once a clear understanding of the risks emerges, appropriate strategies can be implemented in conjunction with risk management policy. For example, it might bepossible to change where and how business is done, thereby reducing the organization’s exposure and risk. Alternatively, existing exposures may be managed with derivatives. Another strategy for managing risk is to accept all risks and the possibility of losses.There are three broad alternatives for managing risk:1. Do nothing and actively, or passively by default, accept all risks.2. Hedge a portion of exposures by determining which exposures can and should be hedged.3. Hedge all exposures possible.Measurement and reporting of risks provides decision makers with information to execute decisions and monitor outcomes, both before and after strategies are taken to mitigate them. Since the risk management process is ongoing, reporting and feedback can be used to refine the system by modifying or improving strategies.An active decision-making process is an important component of risk management. Decisions about potential loss and risk reduction provide a forum for discussion of important issues and the varying perspectives of stakeholders.Factors that Impact Financial Rates and PricesFinancial rates and prices are affected by a number of factors. It is essential to understand the factors that impact markets because those factors, in turn, impact the potential risk of an organization.Factors that Affect Interest RatesInterest rates are a key component in many market prices and an important economic barometer. They are comprised of the real rate plus a component for expected inflation, since inflation reduces the purchasing power of a lender’s assets .The greater the term to maturity, the greater the uncertainty. Interest rates are also reflective of supply and demand for funds and credit risk.Interest rates are particularly important to companies and governments because they are the key ingredient in the cost of capital. Most companies and governments require debt financing for expansion and capital projects. When interest rates increase, the impact can be significant on borrowers. Interest rates also affect prices in otherfinancial markets, so their impact is far-reaching.Other components to the interest rate may include a risk premium to reflect the creditworthiness of a borrower. For example, the threat of political or sovereign risk can cause interest rates to rise, sometimes substantially, as investors demand additional compensation for the increased risk of default.Factors that influence the level of market interest rates include:1、Expected levels of inflation2、General economic conditions3、Monetary policy and the stance of the central bank4、Foreign exchange market activity5、Foreign investor demand for debt securities6、Levels of sovereign debt outstanding7、Financial and political stabilityYield CurveThe yield curve is a graphical representation of yields for a range of terms to maturity. For example, a yield curve might illustrate yields for maturity from one day (overnight) to 30-year terms. Typically, the rates are zero coupon government rates.Since current interest rates reflect expectations, the yield curve provides useful information about the market’s expectations of future interest rates. Implied interest rates for forward-starting terms can be calculated using the information in the yield curve. For example, using rates for one- and two-year maturities, the expected one-year interest rate beginning in one year’s time can be determined.The shape of the yield curve is widely analyzed and monitored by market participants. As a gauge of expectations, it is often considered to be a predictor of future economic activity and may provide signals of a pending change in economic fundamentals.The yield curve normally slopes upward with a positive slope, as lenders/investors demand higher rates from borrowers for longer lending terms. Since the chance of a borrower default increases with term to maturity, lenders demand to be compensated accordingly.Interest rates that make up the yield curve are also affected by the expected rate of inflation. Investors demand at least the expected rate of inflation from borrowers, in addition to lending and risk components. If investors expect future inflation to be higher, they will demand greater premiums for longer terms to compensate for this uncertainty. As a result, the longer the term, the higher the interest rate (all else being equal), resulting in an upward-sloping yield curve.Occasionally, the demand for short-term funds increases substantially, and short-term interest rates may rise above the level of longer term interest rates. This results in an inversion of the yield curve and a downward slope to its appearance. The high cost of short-term funds detracts from gains that would otherwise be obtained through investment and expansion and make the economy vulnerable to slowdown or recession. Eventually, rising interest rates slow the demand for both short-term and long-term funds. A decline in all rates and a return to a normal curve may occur as a result of the slowdown.财务风险管理尽管近年来金融风险大大增加，但风险和风险管理不是当代的主要问题。

财务风险管理外文文献翻译译文

Financial Risk ManagementAlthough financial risk has increased significantly in recent years, risk and risk management are not contemporary issues. The result of increasingly global markets is that risk may originate with events thousands of miles away that have nothing to do with the domestic market. Information is available instantaneously, which means that change, and subsequent market reactions, occur very quickly. The economic climate and markets can be affected very quickly by changes in exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. Counterparties can rapidly become problematic. As a result, it is important to ensure financial risks are identified and managed appropriately. Preparation is a key component of risk management.What Is Risk?Risk provides the basis for opportunity. The terms risk and exposure have subtle differences in their meaning. Risk refers to the probability of loss, while exposure is the possibility of loss, although they are often used interchangeably. Risk arises as a result of exposure.Exposure to financial markets affects most organizations, either directly or indirectly. When an organization has financial market exposure, there is a possibility of loss but also an opportunity for gain or profit. Financial market exposure may provide strategic or competitive benefits.Risk is the likelihood of losses resulting from events such as changes in market prices. Events with a low probability of occurring, but that may result in a high loss, are particularly troublesome because they are often not anticipated. Put another way, risk is the probable variability of returns.Since it is not always possible or desirable to eliminate risk,understanding it is an important step in determining how to manage it. Identifying exposures and risks forms the basis for an appropriate financial risk management strategy.How Does Financial Risk?Financial risk arises through countless transactions of a financial nature, including sales and purchases, investments and loans, and various other business activities. It can arise as a result of legal transactions, new projects, mergers and acquisitions, debt financing, the energy component of costs, or through the activities of management, stakeholders, competitors, foreign governments, or weather. When financial prices change dramatically, it can increase costs, reduce revenues, or otherwise adversely impact the profitability of an organization. Financial fluctuations may make it more difficult to plan and budget, price goods and services, and allocate capital.There are three main sources of financial risk:1. Financial risks arising from an organization’s exposure to changes in market prices, such as interest rates, exchange rates, and commodity prices.2. Financial risks arising from the actions of, and transactions with, other organizations such as vendors, customers, and counterparties in derivatives transactions3. Financial risks resulting from internal actions or failures of the organization, particularly people, processes, and systemsWhat Is Financial Risk Management?Financial risk management is a process to deal with the uncertainties resulting from financial markets. It involves assessing the financial risks facing an organization and developing management strategies consistent withinternal priorities and policies. Addressing financial risks proactively may provide an organization with a competitive advantage. It also ensures that management, operational staff, stakeholders, and the board of directors are in agreement on key issues of risk.Managing financial risk necessitates making organizational decisions about risks that are acceptable versus those that are not. The passive strategy of taking no action is the acceptance of all risks by default.Organizations manage financial risk using a variety of strategies and products. It is important to understand how these products and strategies work to reduce risk within the context of the organization’s risk tolerance and objectives.Strategies for risk management often involve derivatives. Derivatives are traded widely among financial institutions and on organized exchanges. The value of derivatives contracts, such as futures, forwards, options, and swaps, is derived from the price of the underlying asset. Derivatives trade on interest rates, exchange rates, commodities, equity and fixed income securities, credit, and even weather.The products and strategies used by market participants to manage financial risk are the same ones used by speculators to increase leverage and risk. Although it can be argued that widespread use of derivatives increases risk, the existence of derivatives enables those who wish to reduce risk to pass it along to those who seek risk and its associated opportunities.The ability to estimate the likelihood of a financial loss is highly desirable. However, standard theories of probability often fail in the analysis of financial markets. Risks usually do not exist in isolation, and theinteractions of several exposures may have to be considered in developing an understanding of how financial risk arises. Sometimes, these interactions are difficult to forecast, since they ultimately depend on human behavior.The process of financial risk management is an ongoing one. Strategies need to be implemented and refined as the market and requirements change. Refinements may reflect changing expectations about market rates, changes to the business environment, or changing international political conditions, for example. In general, the process can be summarized as follows:1、Identify and prioritize key financial risks.2、Determine an appropriate level of risk tolerance.3、Implement risk management strategy in accordance with policy.4、Measure, report, monitor, and refine as needed.DiversificationFor many years, the riskiness of an asset was assessed based only on the variability of its returns. In contrast, modern portfolio theory considers not only an asset’s riskiness, but also its contribution to the overall riskiness of the portfolio to which it is added. Organizations may have an opportunity to reduce risk as a result of risk diversification.In portfolio management terms, the addition of individual components to a portfolio provides opportunities for diversification, within limits. A diversified portfolio contains assets whose returns are dissimilar, in other words, weakly or negatively correlated with one another. It is useful to think of the exposures of an organization as a portfolio and consider the impact of changes or additions on the potential risk of the total.Diversification is an important tool in managing financial risks.Diversification among counterparties may reduce the risk that unexpected events adversely impact the organization through defaults. Diversification among investment assets reduces the magnitude of loss if one issuer fails. Diversification of customers, suppliers, and financing sources reduces the possibility that an organization will have its business adversely affected by changes outside management’s control. Although the risk of loss still exists, diversification may reduce the opportunity for large adverse outcomes.Risk Management ProcessThe process of financial risk management comprises strategies that enable an organization to manage the risks associated with financial markets. Risk management is a dynamic process that should evolve with an organization and its business. It involves and impacts many parts of an organization including treasury, sales, marketing, legal, tax, commodity, and corporate finance.The risk management process involves both internal and external analysis. The first part of the process involves identifying and prioritizing the financial risks facing an organization and understanding their relevance. It may be necessary to examine the organization and its products, management, customers, suppliers, competitors, pricing, industry trends, balance sheet structure, and position in the industry. It is also necessary to consider stakeholders and their objectives and tolerance for risk.Once a clear understanding of the risks emerges, appropriate strategies can be implemented in conjunction with risk management policy. For example, it might be possible to change where and how business is done, thereby reducing the organization’s exposure and risk. Alternatively, existingexposures may be managed with derivatives. Another strategy for managing risk is to accept all risks and the possibility of losses.There are three broad alternatives for managing risk:1. Do nothing and actively, or passively by default, accept all risks.2. Hedge a portion of exposures by determining which exposures can and should be hedged.3. Hedge all exposures possible.Measurement and reporting of risks provides decision makers with information to execute decisions and monitor outcomes, both before and after strategies are taken to mitigate them. Since the risk management process is ongoing, reporting and feedback can be used to refine the system by modifying or improving strategies.An active decision-making process is an important component of risk management. Decisions about potential loss and risk reduction provide a forum for discussion of important issues and the varying perspectives of stakeholders.Factors that Impact Financial Rates and PricesFinancial rates and prices are affected by a number of factors. It is essential to understand the factors that impact markets because those factors, in turn, impact the potential risk of an organization.Factors that Affect Interest RatesInterest rates are a key component in many market prices and an important economic barometer. They are comprised of the real rate plus a component for expected inflation, since inflation reduces the purchasing power of a lender’s assets .The greater the term to maturity, the greater theuncertainty. Interest rates are also reflective of supply and demand for funds and credit risk.Interest rates are particularly important to companies and governments because they are the key ingredient in the cost of capital. Most companies and governments require debt financing for expansion and capital projects. When interest rates increase, the impact can be significant on borrowers. Interest rates also affect prices in other financial markets, so their impact is far-reaching.Other components to the interest rate may include a risk premium to reflect the creditworthiness of a borrower. For example, the threat of political or sovereign risk can cause interest rates to rise, sometimes substantially, as investors demand additional compensation for the increased risk of default.Factors that influence the level of market interest rates include:1、Expected levels of inflation2、General economic conditions3、Monetary policy and the stance of the central bank4、Foreign exchange market activity5、Foreign investor demand for debt securities6、Levels of sovereign debt outstanding7、Financial and political stabilityYield CurveThe yield curve is a graphical representation of yields for a range of terms to maturity. For example, a yield curve might illustrate yields for maturity from one day (overnight) to 30-year terms. Typically, the rates are zero coupon government rates.Since current interest rates reflect expectations, the yield curve provides useful information about the market’s expectations of future interest rates. Implied interest rates for forward-starting terms can be calculated using the information in the yield curve. For example, using rates for one- and two-year maturities, the expected one-year interest rate beginning in one year’s time can be determined.The shape of the yield curve is widely analyzed and monitored by market participants. As a gauge of expectations, it is often considered to be a predictor of future economic activity and may provide signals of a pending change in economic fundamentals.The yield curve normally slopes upward with a positive slope, as lenders/investors demand higher rates from borrowers for longer lending terms. Since the chance of a borrower default increases with term to maturity, lenders demand to be compensated accordingly.Interest rates that make up the yield curve are also affected by the expected rate of inflation. Investors demand at least the expected rate of inflation from borrowers, in addition to lending and risk components. If investors expect future inflation to be higher, they will demand greater premiums for longer terms to compensate for this uncertainty. As a result, the longer the term, the higher the interest rate (all else being equal), resulting in an upward-sloping yield curve.Occasionally, the demand for short-term funds increases substantially, and short-term interest rates may rise above the level of longer term interest rates. This results in an inversion of the yield curve and a downward slope to its appearance. The high cost of short-term funds detracts from gains that would otherwise be obtained through investment and expansion and make the economyvulnerable to slowdown or recession. Eventually, rising interest rates slow the demand for both short-term and long-term funds. A decline in all rates and a return to a normal curve may occur as a result of the slowdown.财务风险管理尽管近年来金融风险大大增加，但风险和风险管理不是当代的主要问题。

财务风险外文原文

Political and Financial Risks and Their Mitigation Measures in Public Private Partnershipsby LIAO BOJING CHAPTER 4FINANCIAL RISKS AND THEIR MITIGATION MEASURES4.1 Interest Rate RiskIn construction project finance ventures, there is always the risk of fluctuations in interest rates. Credit is always granted with a variable rate, due to the long life of such PPP projects. In addition, unlike exchange rate risk, interest rate risk indiscriminately strikes both domestic and international projects as well as ventures with multi-currency cash flows. Sponsors and their advisors have to decide whether or not to cover against this risk, a decision that is not exactly identical throughout the life of the project (Gatti, 2008). The mitigation measures for interest rate risk mainly include:(1)Adopting an appropriate multicurrency portfolio, e.g., a dual-currency contract, which uses a foreign currency of lower rate interest, and a local currency for repayment of the principal. Various currencies have different interest rates. The private sector and its advisers must make the effects on making an ideal combination of a variety of foreign currency and cooperating with the banks so as to reduce interest rate risk. Dual-currency is to use a lower rate currency for interest accrual, and choose the local currency for repayment of the principal.(2)Balancing the floating rate and fixed-rate debt in the financing structure. When there is a lack of capital supplies in the international finance market, the interest rate will rise. Under this situation, the private sector should choose a fixed rate. When there is a surplus of capital supplies in the international finance market, the interest rate tends to go down. Therefore, a floating rate should be selected. The balanced proportion on the fixed rate and floating rate will reduce the risk and profit lost.(3)Seeking a reasonable interest rate that is guaranteed by the host government. The host government will provide a guaranteed interest rate to the private sector. During the project period,if the interest rate exceeds the required percentage, the private sector will be compensated. For example, for the north-to-south highway project in Malaysia, the project company, PLUS, received a guaranteed interest rate from the Malaysian government: if the growth of the interest rate exceeds 20%, the project company will obtain redressment of the margins from the compensation package.(4)Using interest rate derivatives(e.g., forward rate agreements, interest rate futures, swaps, options ) to insure against future interest rate fluctuations so as to reduce the interest rate risk.Forward Rate Agreements (FRA)With an FRA, the buyer pledges to pay the seller interest accrued on the principal at a pre-agreed rate, starting at a future date, and for certain period of time. The FRA buyer sets the future rate and is covered from interest rate risk. If in fact the future rate is higher than what was agreed on in thecontract, the seller of the forward rate agreement pays the difference between the two rates to the buyer. Conversely, it will be paid by the buyer if the future rate proves to be lower than the pre-set rate.Interest Rate FuturesA future is a forward agreement in which all contractual provisions are standardized. Due to this fact, futures differ from forward contracts in light of their lower risk for counterparties and greater market liquidity. In project finance ventures, interest rate futures can be used to curb the negative effect ofa rise in interest rates on a loan raised by the private sector.Interest Rate SwapIn their simplest form, interest rate swaps are a periodic exchange of fixed rate streams against floating rate streams (usually indexed to LIBOR) for a given time horizon. In an interest rate swap, one of the counterparty agrees to pay either a fixed or floating rate denominated in a particular currency to the other counterparty. In such a way, the financial cost can be well locked.Interest Rate Option (caps/floors/collars)Options are contracts that allow (but do not oblige) the buyer to purchase(call option) or sell (put option) a commodity or a financial asset at a fixed price (strike price) at a future date in exchange for payment of a premium. In project finance deals, interest rate options are used for protecting the private sector’s cash flows from interest rate risk.(5)Using bond financing in which the interest rates fixed to reduce the risk of future interest rate increase. Bonds can have fixed and floating rates of interest. In this regard, bond financing is often used in reducing interest cost and in mitigating the interest rate fluctuation risk. However, bond issuance is a long and expensive process compared to acquiring bank loans.(6)Using the supplier's credit to reduce the amount of debt and get the debt at a lower interest rate Interest rates of supplier's credit is generally lower than that in capital lending market under the same conditions, and interest rate differentials can be gained from the exporting country government subsidy.(7)Acquisition of loans and assistance from international financial institutions (e.g., Asian Development Bank and World Bank) to make the projects secure and less risky. These kinds of banks are multilateral development financial institutions. Their mission is to help developing member countries to reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their citizens. Take Asia Development Bank (ADB) as an example. It aims to promote economic and social development in Asian and Pacific countries through loans and technical assistance. From this perspective, finance projects from these institutions can be secured and are less risky.(8)Predicting the changing trend of future interest rate and making the corresponding financing preparation. Predict the trend of the future interest rate through collecting multi information. For example, ininternational financial markets with a lackof capital supply, the interest rate will gradually increase so that fixing the interest rate is appropriate; whereas whenthere is an excess supply of capital in the markets, the interest rates tend to decline so the floating rates is better.4.2 Inflation RiskIn practice, the biggest problem arising from economic mismanagement is inflation, especially for a foreign firm with assets in a country. With high inflation, the value of the cash flows received from assets will fall as the country’s currency depreciates on the foreign exchange market. The likelihood of this occurring decreases the attractiveness of foreign investment in the country (Kapila1 and Hendrickson 2001). Inflation risk derives from the fact that most contracts between SPVs and their commercial counterparties are based on revision mechanisms for rates or installments based on the behavior ofa given price index. Both industrial and financial costs and revenues are impacted by inflation risk.The mitigation measures for inflation risk mainly include:(1)Increasing the proportion of hardcurrencies in the cash flow. In general, the best way for the private sector to mitigate inflation risk is by maximizing the proportion of cash flows in hard currencies to be channeled through off-shore mechanisms.(2)Indexing the price of the service or productfrom the project to the inflation rate. Prescribe the relevant items in concession agreements and combine the price of the product and service with the price index or inflation rate of the host country. Using the pricing adjustment formula, which consists ofinflation rate factors, as the method for checking the pricing in the future terms, will allow one to adjust pricing when the inflation rate’s movement exceeds a certain range, or accordingly raise the fees, or extend the permitted period in order to guarantee sufficient cash flow to pay off debts and to assure the investment profit.(3)Including a price adjustment clause inthe long term purchase contract. If the Inflation Index adjust the price of products, the Project Company could increase charging standards on their own based on CPI. However,the foundation of the adjustment must be established by strict accounting and be effective after the government’s approval.(4)Drawing up an inflation swap to transfer inflation risk through an exchange of cash flows. To cover against inflation risk, a swap contract is signed between two parties. In an inflation swap, the private sector pays a fixed rate on a notional principal amount, while the other party pays a floating rate linked to an inflation index, such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The party paying the floating rate pays the inflation adjusted rate multiplied by the notional principal amount. For example, one party may pay a fixed rate of 3% on a two year inflation swap, and in return receives the actual inflation.(5)Investing in Treasury Inflation Protected Securities to insure the purchasing power of the project company in the future and reduce the inflation influence.A treasury security is indexed to inflation in order to protect the private sectors from the negative effects of inflation. TIPS are considered an extremely low-risk investment since they are backed by the U.S. government andsince their par value rises with inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, while their interest rate remains fixed. Interest on TIPS is paid semi-annually.(6)Choosing the favorable form of construction contract (e.g., Fixed-price Contract and Turn-key Contract) to transfer the increased cost due to inflation to contractors.Making a fixed price contract, turn-in-key contract and cost-plus contract with contractors, the risk of costoverruns caused by the increasing price of cement, steel and the labor can be transferred to the contractors.(7) Predicting the changing trend of future inflation and adjusting the price of product or service accordingly. The project company makes an inflation expectation during the period and confirms the price of the productsfor each annual operation, thus the risk can be avoided.(8) Enhancing the management of the receivable accounts to accelerate the recovery of the project funds. The receivable accounts are managed as the important aspect of financial administration, which influences the managementstate of the project company. Effective receivable accounts management brings favorable cash flow which determines the development or decline of the project.(9) Reducing the operating costs of the projectby strengthening the cost management. Cost management is also a significant part of financial management which can maintain and improve healthy financial statement of the project company.4.3 Currency Exchange RiskForeign exchange risk results from the mismatch between the revenue of the currency and payment obligations for taxes, operating expenses, debt service payments and dividend payments and profit repatriation (Wang et al.,2000). This often occurs in international projects where costs and revenues are computed in different currencies. However, a similar situation may arise in domesticprojects when the counterparty wants to bill the SPV in foreign currency (Gatti, 2008). Here is such an example in China. For investment in China's PPP projects, the foreign companies will invariably receive nearly all of their revenues in RMB. A significant portion of this revenue will need to be converted to other currencies, primarily US dollars, and remitted outside of China. The remittances are used to meet foreign currency obligations to equipment suppliers, to repay borrowings from foreign lenders and to make payments to the companies in respect of equity distributions and shareholder loans. The RMB is not freely convertible into USdollars; even if it is convertible，the exchange rate fluctuates all the time in the market or is subject to the approval of the State Administration for Exchange Control (SAEC). Also, there can be no assurance that the Chinese Government will continue to provide approvals.The mitigation measures for currency exchange risk mainly include:(1) Obtaining currency exchange risk sharing clause from host government. In the PPP agreement there usually exists a foreign exchange risk sharing clause, which means that if theexchange rate fluctuates within a range, the loss is borne by the private sector, but once the changes are beyond a certain value,the loss caused by the exchange rate fluctuations are borne by the host governmentor shared in proportion by both sides. Foreign exchange guarantee in PPP is not an international practice. Whether local government makes a guarantee highly depends on the degree of financial liberalization and complete.(2) Selecting appropriate currency to evade the currency exchange risk, e.g. foreign currency invoicing, loan currency invoicing, hard currency invoicing, and dual-currency agreement. A reasonable foreign currency structure would maintain the appropriate proportion between various currencies and optimize the multi-currency portfolio. The private sector may require the user to pay directly in the currency of the project sponsor country (foreign project sponsor) or adjust the fee structure in which a certain percentage of the loans are used for payment so as to reduce foreign exchange risk, or choose the strong currencies which show few exchange rate movements in the a long term such as US dollar and the euro and other strong currencies. Using a dual-currency or multi-currency agreement, namely you can pay by local currency or partially in other foreign currencies.(3) Enlarging financing proportion in local currency. The private sector needs to seek local lenders or structure their debt in local currency to mitigate risks. Because the revenue from projects can be used to repay the capital and interest, there is no foreign exchange problem and avoid exchange rate risk completely.(4) Using Exchange Rate Proviso Clause which can make a proper adjustment of repayment once the exchange rate exceeds the ratio between the repayment currency and hedge currency (e.g. gold proviso clause, hard currency hedge, and basket of currencies). If valuation in the contract is based on the local currency denominated, according to international practice and the "Guide to Contracting industrial projects in developing countries" developed by the United Nations, the clause on hedging should be provided in the contract terms in order to prevent any exchange rate risk. An Exchange Rate Proviso Clause is one measure that can make a proper adjustment of repayment based on the exchange rate between the repayment currency and the hedge currency, for instance, gold proviso clause, the hard currency hedge, and a basketof currencies. The latter can maintain the value of contracts in relation to the composite currency, like Special Drawing Right (SDR).(5) Using Leads and Lags to mitigate risks or improve profits. Leads will result when private sector making payments expect an increasing foreign-exchange rate, while lags arise when the exchange rate is expected to fall. Leads will result when the private sector making payments and expects an increasing foreign-exchange rate, while lags arise when the exchange rate is expected to fall. Leads and lags are used in an attempt to mitigate risks or improve profits.(6)Buying export credit insurance with export credit agencies against the currency exchange risk. Export credit insurance protects the foreign receivables against virtually all commercial and political risks that could result in non-payment of project company’s export invoices. This insurance especially is offered by national export credit agencies to help exporters to deal withthecurrency exchange risk.(7) Using Letter of Credit to substitute a portion of the security deposit, so the project company may take currency back in advance tomitigate foreign exchange rate risk. Letters of credit are often used in international transactions to ensurethat payment will be received. A letter from a bank can guarantee that a buyer's payment to a seller will be received on time and for the correct amount. In the event that the buyer is unable to make payment on the purchase, the bank will be required to cover the full or remaining amount of the purchase. By using a letter of credit to substitute a portion of the security deposit, the project company may take currency back inadvance to mitigate foreign exchange rate risk.(8) Using financial derivatives to prevent currency exchange rate risk, such as forward exchanges, swaps, foreign exchange futures/options, and currency swaps.Forward ExchangeA forward contract involves an exchange with a delayed settlement. Traders set down contract conditions (specifically the date ofsettlement and the price) upon signing the contract, and the exchange is actually settled at a future, pre-agreed date. A forward contract might pertain to a currency exchange rate (on maturity, the traders sell each other one form of currency for another on the basis of an exchange rate set when the contract is drawn up).Futures on Exchange RatesA future is a forward agreement in which all the contractual provisions are standardized. In futures markets, a clearing house serves to guarantee obligations resulting from futures exchanges. This organization requires traders to pay an initial margin as collateral and daily variation margins until the position closes. Due to this fact, futures differ from forward contracts in light of their lower risk for counterparties and greater market liquidity. Futures markets, in fact, offer contracts written on the most widely exchanged currencies on an international level (Gatti 2008).Options on Exchange RatesA currency option is a viable alternative to futures, swaps, and forwards because it represents a right to buy or sella currency at a price and accounts for the volatility or the swings in currency prices. However, options are quite expensive, because protection is bought against adverse movements in the financial price but gains are also allowed from a favorable movement in the price (Clark & Marois, 1996).Currency SwapsCurrency swaps represent an agreement between two entities where one entity promises payment in one currency and the other promisesto make payments in another currency. Basically, a foreign exchange swap indicates there is a swap of a spot buy or a sale of foreign exchange offset by a forward sale or a buy. Currency swaps are a method to swap the risk for one party while the other party assumes a certain degree of risk. However, this is probably not the best mitigation tool due tothe high expenses involved if one of the currencies is not a desired/maincurrency (Chandra and Chang, 2000).(9)Balancing lending and investing to control exchange rate risk.The Balance method is effectively used in international transactionsfor controlling currency exchange risk. Take one example of balancing lending and investing is that during the same period, the private sector makes a investment which involves a local currency with the same quantity and opposite trend in order to avoid foreign exchange risk. Other ways ofbalancing are such as Borrowing, Investing, Borrow-Spot-Invest (BSI), Lead-Spot-Invest (LSI), Forfeiting, etc.(10) Utilizing multi-currency options of a syndicated loan to arrange the financing monetary structure. From project finance practice, more than 3000 million US dollar in developing countries, or more than 100 million in developed countries, of debt financing must be resolved by syndicated loans. The project sponsor should fully consider the demand for different currencies at all stages of project implementation and make full use of multi-currency options, especially in a syndicated loan, to make reasonable arrangements for currencies structure in order to minimize the foreign exchange risk, which may cause cash flow uncertainty, such as maintaining the balance between borrowing currencies and charge currency.(11) Getting advice from international institutions regarding the project’s currency exchange risk and useful actions to minimize this risk.There are numerous institutions providing services for forecasting exchange rates. Besides, the project manager should establish his/her own group which focuses on observing exchange rate fluctuations that have occurred and analyzing its impact on project progress, while providing a prediction of the tendency of short-term and long-term exchange rate.In accordance with the above discussion, a comparison of different mitigation measures faced exchange rate risk can be concluded, as below in Table 4.1.4.4 Currency Convertibility RiskMany countries impose foreign exchange restrictions or controls to prevent currency speculation and to protect their reserves. These restrictions affect the availability and value of a currency. These controls are designed to limit a customer's ability to freely convert one currency into another. Permission to exchange currencies must be given by the central bank of that country before the transaction can take place.The mitigation measures for currency convertibility risk mainly include:(1) Obtaining the host government’s guarantees on convertibility. This applies to concessions where the convertibility of currency can be guaranteed. Obtaining guarantees from the government is always the most effective measure for mitigating the exchange rate and convertibility risks.(2) Adopting alternative forms of currencies (local and foreign currency) as repayment in contract to mitigate currency convertibility risk. Set dual-currency selective repayment in contracts to mitigate lower currency convertibility risk. Which means one portion of the payment can be made in local currency and the other payment can be in the foreign currency. This measure is significant for lower currency convertibility risk.(3) Increasing bond financing to reduce the amount of direct loans, thus reducing the project company’s currency risk. The private sector can reduce the amount of direct loans by issuing bonds that can be of fixed and floating rates of interest, thus avoiding the currency risk. In this regard, bond financing is often used in reducing interest rate risk and currency convertibility risk. However, bond issuance is a long and expensive process compared to acquiring bank loans.(4)Establishing a contingency credit facility to cover unanticipated expenses. The private sector can extract the provision of risk by a certain percentage from profits each year so as to meet unexpected financial losses.(5) Training the senior management team of the project company with the related financial knowledge. Special attention should be paid to exchange rate risk for international PPP projects. In particular, company leaders and decision-makers, management personnel, financial personnel should have an understanding about foreign exchange tendency and international economic dynamics associated with the projects. Contract negotiators’understanding of exchange rate risk should bestrengthened so as to have affective planning to avoid exchange rate risk.。

财务风险管理外文文献翻译译文

Financial Risk ManagementAlthough financial risk has increased significantly in recent years, risk and risk management are not contemporary issues. The result of increasingly global markets is that risk may originatewith events thousands of miles away that have nothing to do with the domestic market. Information is available instantaneously, which means that change, and subsequentmarket reactions, occur very quickly. The economic climate and markets can be affected very quickly by changes in exchangerates, interest rates, and commodity prices.Counterparties can rapidly become problematic. As a result, it is important to ensure financial risks are identified and managed appropriately. Preparation is a key component of risk management.What Is Risk?Risk provides the basis for opportunity. The terms risk and exposure have subtle differences in their meaning. Risk refers to the probability of loss, while exposure is the possibility of loss, although they are often used interchangeably. Risk arises as aresult of exposure.Exposure to financial markets affects most organizations, either directly or indirectly. When an organization has financial market exposure, there is a possibility of loss but also an opportunity for gain or profit. Financial market exposure may provide strategic or competitive benefits.Risk is the likelihood of losses resulting from events such as changes in market prices. Events with a low probability of occurring, but that may result in a high loss, are particularly troublesome because they are often not anticipated. Put another way, risk is the probable variability of returns.Since it is not always possible or desirable to eliminate risk, understanding it is an important step in determining how to manage it.Identifying exposuresand risks forms the basis for an appropriatefinancial risk management strategy.How Does Financial Risk?Financial risk arises through countless transactions of a financial nature, including sales and purchases, investments and loans, and various other business activities. It can arise as aresult of legal transactions, new projects, mergers and acquisitions, debt financing, the energy component of costs, or through the activities of management, stakeholders, competitors, foreign governments, or weather. When financial prices change dramatically, it can increase costs, reduce revenues, or otherwise adversely impact the profitability of an organization. Financial fluctuations may make it more difficult to plan and budget, price goods and services, and allocate capital.There are three main sources of financial risk:1.Financial risks arising from an organization e'xpsosure to changes in market prices, such as interest rates, exchange rates, and commodity prices.2.Financial risks arising from the actions of, and transactions with, other organizations such as vendors, customers, and counterparties in derivatives transactions3.Financial risks resulting from internal actions or failures of the organization, particularly people, processes, and systemsWhat Is Financial Risk Management?Financial risk management is a process to deal with the uncertainties resulting from financial markets. It involves assessingthe financial risks facing an organization and developing management strategies consistent with internal priorities and policies. Addressing financial risks proactively may provide an organization with a competitive advantage. It also ensures that management, operational staff, stakeholders, and the board of directors are in agreement on key issues of risk.Managing financial risk necessitatesmaking organizational decisions about risks that are acceptable versus those that are not.The passive strategy of taking no action is the acceptance of all risks by default.Organizations manage financial risk using a variety of strategies and products. It is important to understand how these products and strategies work to reduce risk within the context of the organization r'isks tolerance and objectives.Strategies for risk management often involve derivatives. Derivatives are traded widely among financial institutions and on organized exchanges. The value of derivatives contracts, such as futures, forwards, options, and swaps, is derived from the price of the underlying asset.Derivatives trade on interest rates, exchange rates, commodities, equity and fixed income securities, credit, and even weather.The products and strategies used by market participants to manage financial risk are the same ones used by speculators to increase leverage and risk. Although it can be argued that widespread use of derivatives increases risk, the existence of derivatives enables those who wish to reduce risk to pass it along to those who seek risk and its associated opportunities.The ability to estimate the likelihood of a financial loss is highly desirable. However, standard theories of probability often fail in the analysis of financial markets. Risks usually do not exist in isolation, and the interactions of several exposures may have to be considered in developing an understanding of how financial risk arises. Sometimes, these interactions are difficult to forecast, since they ultimately depend on human behavior.The process of financial risk management is an ongoing one. Strategies need to be implemented and refined as the market and requirements change.Refinements may reflect changing expectations about market rates, changes to the business environment, or changing international political conditions, for example. In general, the process can be summarized as follows: 1、Identify and prioritize key financial risks.2、Determine an appropriate level of risk tolerance.3、Implement risk management strategy in accordance with policy.4、Measure, report, monitor, and refine as needed.DiversificationFor many years, the riskiness of an asset was assessed based only on the variability of its returns. In contrast, modernportfolio theory considers not only an asset 'ri s kiness, but alsoits contribution to the overall riskiness of the portfolio to which it is added. Organizations may have an opportunity to reduce risk as a result of risk diversification.In portfolio management terms, the addition of individual components to a portfolio provides opportunities fordiversification, within limits. A diversified portfolio contains assets whose returns are dissimilar, in other words, weakly or negatively correlated with one another. It is useful to think of the exposures of an organization as a portfolio and consider the impact of changes or additions on the potential risk of the total.Diversification is an important tool in managing financial risks.Diversification among counterparties may reduce the risk that unexpected events adversely impact the organization through defaults. Diversification among investment assets reduces the magnitude of loss if one issuer fails.Diversification of customers, suppliers, and financing sources reduces the possibility that an organization will have its business adversely affected by changes outside management'scontrol. Although the risk of loss still exists, diversification may reduce the opportunity for large adverse outcomes.Risk Management ProcessThe process of financial risk management comprises strategies that enable an organization to manage the risks associated with financial markets.Risk management is a dynamic process that should evolve with an organization and its business. It involves and impacts many parts of an organization including treasury, sales, marketing, legal, tax, commodity, and corporate finance.The risk management process involves both internal and external analysis. The first part of the process involves identifying and prioritizing the financial risks facing an organization and understanding their relevance. It may be necessary to examine the organization and its products, management, customers, suppliers, competitors, pricing, industry trends, balance sheet structure, and position in the industry. It is also necessary to consider stakeholders and their objectives and tolerance for risk.Once a clear understanding of the risks emerges,appropriate strategies can be implemented in conjunction with risk management policy. For example, it might be possible to change where and how business is done, thereby reducing the organization 'exsposure and risk. Alternatively, existing exposures may be managed with derivatives. Another strategy for managing risk is to accept all risks and the possibility of losses.There are three broad alternatives for managing risk:1.Do nothing and actively, or passively by default, accept all risks.2.Hedge a portion of exposures by determining which exposures can and should be hedged.3.Hedge all exposures possible.Measurement and reporting of risks provides decision makers with information to execute decisions and monitor outcomes, both before and after strategies are taken to mitigate them. Since the risk managementprocess is ongoing, reporting and feedback can be used to refine the system by modifying or improving strategies.An active decision-making process is an important component of risk management. Decisions about potential loss and risk reduction provide a forum for discussion of important issues and the varying perspectives of stakeholders.Factors that Impact Financial Rates and PricesFinancial rates and prices are affected by a number of factors. It is essential to understand the factors that impact markets because those factors, in turn, impact the potential risk of an organization.Factors that Affect Interest RatesInterest rates are a key component in many market prices and an important economic barometer. They are comprised of the real rate plus a component for expected inflation, since inflation reduces the purchasing power of a lender 'a s sets.The greater the term to maturity, the greater the uncertainty. Interest rates are also reflective of supply and demand for funds and credit risk.Interest rates are particularly important to companies and governments because they are the key ingredient in the cost of capital. Most companies and governments require debt financing for expansion and capital projects. When interest rates increase, the impact can be significant on borrowers. Interest rates also affect prices in other financial markets, so their impact is far-reaching.Other components to the interest rate may include a risk premium to reflect the creditworthiness of a borrower. For example, the threat of political or sovereign risk can cause interest rates to rise, sometimes substantially, as investors demand additional compensation for the increased risk of default.Factors that influence the level of market interest rates include: 1、Expected levels of inflation 2、General economic conditions 3、Monetary policy and the stance of the central bank 4、Foreign exchange market activity 5、Foreign investor demand for debt securities 6、Levels of sovereign debt outstanding 7、Financial and political stabilityYield CurveThe yield curve is a graphical representation of yields for a range of terms to maturity. For example, a yield curve might illustrate yields for maturity from one day (overnight) to 30-yearterms. Typically, the rates are zero coupon government rates.Since current interest rates reflect expectations, the yieldcurve provides useful information about the market 'esxpectations offuture interest rates.Implied interest rates for forward-starting terms can be calculatedusing theinformation in the yield curve. For example, using rates for one-and two-year maturities, the expected one-year interestrate' s time can beginning in one year be determined.The shape of the yield curve is widely analyzed and monitored by market participants. As a gauge of expectations, it is oftenconsidered to be a predictor of future economic activity and mayprovide signals of a pending change in economic fundamentals.The yield curve normally slopes upward with a positive slope, as lenders/investors demand higher rates from borrowers for longerlending terms.Since the chance of a borrower default increases with term tomaturity, lenders demand to be compensated accordingly.Interest rates that make up the yield curve are also affected bythe expected rate of inflation. Investors demand at least theexpected rate of inflation from borrowers, in addition to lendingand risk components. If investors expect future inflation to behigher, they will demand greater premiums for longer terms tocompensate for this uncertainty. As a result, the longer the term,the higher the interest rate (all else being equal), resulting in an upward-sloping yield curve.Occasionally, the demand for short-term funds increasessubstantially, and short-term interest rates may rise above thelevel of longer term interest rates.This results in an inversion of the yield curve and a downward slopeto its appearance.The high cost of short-term funds detracts fromgains that would otherwise be obtained through investment andexpansion and make the economy vulnerable to slowdown or recession. Eventually, rising interest rates slow the demand for both short-term and long-term funds. A decline in all rates and a return to anormal curve may occur as a result of the slowdown.财务风险管理尽管近年来金融风险大大增加，但风险和风险管理不是当代的主要问题。

财务风险【外文翻译】

外文翻译原文Financial RiskMaterialSource:EssentialofFinancialRiskManagement Author:KarenA.H o r c h e r : Althoughfinancialriskhasincreasedsignificantlyinrecentyears,riskandriskmanagementarenotcontemporary issues.Theresult ofincreasingly global marketsisthatriskmayoriginatewitheventsthousands of miles away that have nothing rmationisavailableinstantaneously,whichmeansthatchange,andsubsequ entmarketreactions,occurveryquickly.Theeconomicclimateandmarketscan beaffected very quickly by changes inexchangerates,interestrates,andcommodityprices.Asaresult,it is importanttoensurefinancial risksareidentifiedandmanagedappropriately. Preparationis a keycomponentoffinancial riskmanagement.Riskprovides thebasis for opportunity. The terms risk and exposure havesubtle differences in their meaning. Risk refers to the probability of loss, whileexposure is the possibility of loss, although they are often used interchangeably.Riskarisesasaresultofexposure.Exposure to financial markets affects most organizations, either directly orindirectly.Whenanorganizationhasfinancialmarketexposure,thereisa possibilityof l oss bu t a l so a n opp ortu n i ty for g a in orprofit.R i sk i s the l ik el i ho od o f l osse s re su l ti ng from e v ents su c h a s cha ng e s in m a rketprices.Eventswitha lowprobability ofoccurring,butthatmay resultina highloss,areparticularly troublesomebecausetheyareoftennotanticipated.Since it is not always possible or desirable to eliminate financial risk,understandingitis an important step in determining how to manage it.Identifyingexposuresandrisksformsthebasis for an appropriate financial risk managementstrategy.Financial risk arises through countless transactions of a financial nature,including sales and purchases, investments and loans, and various other businessactivities,Whenpriceschangedramatically,itcanincreasecosts,reducerevenues,orotherwise adversely impact the profitability of an organization. Financialfluctuationsmay make itmoredifficulttoplanandbudgetprice goodsandservices,andallocatecapital.Therearethreemainsourcesoffinancialrisk:first,financialrisks arisingfrom an organizati on’s exposuretochanges in marketprices,such as interestrates,exchange rates, and commodity prices, second, financial risk arising from theactions of , and transaction with, other organizations such as vendors,customers,andcounterpartiesinderivativestransactions,third,financialrisksresultingfrominter nalactions or failures of the organization, particularly people, processes, andsystems.Financialriskmanagementis aprocess to deal with theuncertaintiesresultingfrom financial markets. It involves assessing the financial risks facing anorganization and developing management strategies consistent with internalpriorities and policies. Addressing financial risks proactively may provide anorganization with a competitive advantage. It also ensures that management,operational staff, stakeholder, and the board of directorsare in agreementon keyissuesofrisk.Managing financial risk necessitates making organizational decisions aboutrisksthatareacceptable versus thosethatarenot.Thepassive strategy oftakingnoactionistheacceptanceofallrisksbydefault.Organizationsmanagefinancialriskusingavarietyofstrategies.Itisimportanttounderstandhowthesestrategiesworktoreduceriskwi thinthecontextof theorganiza tion’s risktoleranceandobjectives.The ability to estimate the likelihood ofa financial loss is highly desirable.However, standard theories of probability often fail in the analysis of financialmarkets.Risks usually do not exist in isolation, and the interactions of severalexposures may have to be considered in developing an understanding of howfinancialriskarises.Sometimes,theseinteractions are difficult to forecast, sincetheyultimately dependonhumanbehavior.Theprocessoffinancialriskmanagementis anongoingone.Strategiesneedtobeimplementedand refinedas the marketand requirements change. R efinementsmay reflect changing expectations about market rates, changes to the businessenvironment,orchanginginternationalpoliticalconditions,forexample.Ingeneral,theprocessca nbe summarizedasfollows: first,identify andprioritizekey financialrisks ,second,determinean appropriatelevel ofrisk tolerance, third,implementriskmanagementstrategyinaccordance with policy, last, measure, report,monitor,andrefineasneeded.Major market risks arise out of changes to financial market prices such asexchangerates,interestrates,andcommodityprices.Majormarketrisksareusuallythemostobvioustypeoffinancialriskthatanorganizationfaces.Majormar ketrisksincludeforeignexchangerisk,interestraterisk,commodity price risk, equity pricerisk. Other important related financial risks include credit risk, operational risk,liquidityrisk,systemicrisk.T he intera ctions of sev era l ri sk s ca n a l ter or m a g n i fy the potentia l i m pa ct to anorganization.Forexample,an organizationmayhavebothcommoditypriceriskandforeign exchange risk, If both markets become adversely, the organization maysuffersignificantlossesasaresult.Therearetwocomponentstoassessingfinancialrisk,Thefirstcomponentisanunderstandingofpotentiallossas a result ofa particular rate orprice change,Thesecondcomponentisanestimateofheprobability ofsuchan eventoccurring.Interestrateriskarisesfromseveralsources,includingchangesinthe levelofinterest rates(absolute interest rate risk), changes in the shape of the yieldcurve(yield curve risk), mismatches between and the risk management strategiesundertaken(basisrisk).Intere st ra te ri sk a ffe c ts m a ny org a ni za ti ons, both borrow e r s a nd inv e stors, anditparticularlyaffectscapital-intensiveindustriesandsectors.C ha ng e s a ffe ct borrow ers throu g h the c o st of fu nd s, F or e x a m pl e, a c orporateborrowerthatutilizesfloatinginterestratedebtisexposedtorisinginterestratesthatcouldincrease thecompany’s costoffunds,A portfolio offixed income securities has exposure tointerestrates through bothchanges inyieldandgainsorlosses ona ssets held.Absoluteinterestraterisk resultsfromthepossibilityofadirectional, orup ordown,changeininterestrates.Mostorganizationsmonitorabsoluteinterestrateriskintheirriskassessment s,duetobothitsvisibility and its potential for affectingprofita bility.From aborrower’s p erspective,risinginterestrates mightresult inhigherprojectcostsandchangestofinancingorstrategicplans.Fromaninvestororlenderperspective,a decline in interest rates results in lower interest income given thesameinvestment,oralternatively,inadequatereturnoninvestmentsheld.Themostcommonmethodofhedgingabsoluteinterestrateriskis tomatch theduration of assets and liabilities, or replace floating interest rate borrowing orinvestmentswithfixed interest rate debtor investments. Another alternative is tohedgetheinterestrateriskwithtoolssuchasforwardrate agreements,swaps andintere st ra te ca ps, fl oors, a nd c olla r s.Yield curve risk results from changes in the relationship between short-termandlong-terminterestrates. In a normal interest rate environment,the yield curvehasanupward-sloping shape to it. Longer-term interest rates are higher thanshorter-terminterestratesbecause of higher risk to the lender. The steepening offlatteningoftheyieldcurvechangestheinterestratedifferentialbetween maturities,whichcanimpactborrowingandinvestmentdecisionsandthereforeprofitability.Inaninvertedyieldcurveenvironment,demandforshort-termfundspushesshort-termrates above long-termrates.The yieldcurve may appear inverted or flatacrossmostmaturities,oralternativelyonlyincertainmaturitysegments.Insuchanenvironment, ratesoflongertermstomaturitymaybeimpactedlessthanshortertermstomaturity.Whenthereisamismatchbetweenanorg anization’s a ssetsand liabilities,yieldcurverisk should beassessedasacomponentoftheorganizatio n’s intere st ra te ri sk.Creditriskisoneofthemostprevalentrisksoffinanceandbusiness,Ingeneral,creditriskisaconcernwhe nanorganizationisowedmoney ormustrely onanotherorg a niza tion to m a k e a pa y m ent to i t or o n i ts be ha l f. T he fa i lu re of a c ou nte rpa rty i sle s s of a n i s su e w he n the o rg a ni za ti on i s not ow ed m one y on a n et ba si s, a l thou g h i tdependstoa certaindegreeonthelegalenvironmentandwhetherfundsareowedonanetoraggregate basis on individual contracts.The deteriorationofcreditquality,suchasthatofa securitiesissuer,isalsoa sourceofriskthroughthereduced marketvalueofsecuritiesthatanorganizationmightown.C re dit ri sk increa se s a s ti m e to ex piry, ti m e to settl e m e nt, or ti m e to m a tu rityincrease,Themoveby international regulatorstoshorten settlementtime forcertaintypesofsecuritiestradesisaneffortto reduce systemic risk, whichinturnisbasedontheriskofindividualmarketparticipants.Italsoincreasesinan environmentofrisinginterestratesorpooreconomicfundamentals.Organization are exposed to credit risk through all business and financialtransactionsthat depend on the payment or fulfillment of obligations of others,Creditrisk that arises from exposure to a counterparty, such as in a derivativestransaction,isoftenknownascounterpartyrisk.Foreignexchange risk arises through transaction, translation, and economicexposures.It mayalsoarise from commodity-basedtransactionswhere commoditypricesaredeterminedandtradedinanothercurrency.Itincludestransactionrisk,translationrisk andstrategic risk. Transaction riskimpactsan organizatio n’s profitability throughtheincome statement.Itarises from theordinary transactionsofan organization, including purchases from suppliers and vendors, contractualpaymentsinother currencies, royalties of license fees, and sales to customers anizationsthat buyorsell productsandservicesdenominatedina foreigncurrency typically havetransactionexposure.M a na g e m e nt of tra nsa ction ri sk ca n be a n i m porta nt de te rm ina ntofcompetitivenessinaglobaleconomy.Therearefewcorporationswhosebusinessisnotaffected,eitherdirectlyorindirectly,by transactionrisk.Translationrisktraditionallyreferredto fluctuationsresult fromtheaccountingtranslationoffinancialstatement,particularly assetsand liabilities on the balancesheet. Translation exposure results wherever assets, liabilities, or profits aretranslated fromthe operatingcurrency intoa reportingcurrency.From another perspective, translation exposure affects an organization byaffectingthevalue offoreigncurrency balancesheetitems suchasaccountspayableand receivable, foreign currency cash and deposits, and foreign currency debt.Longer-term assetsand liabilities, such as thoseassociatedwith foreign operations,arelikely tobeparticularly impacted.The location and activities of major competitors may be an importantdeterminantof foreignexchangeexposure.Strategicoreconomicexposureaffectsanorganization’s c ompetitive positionas a result ofchanges in exchange rates. Economicexposure,suchasdecliningsalesfrominternationalcustomers,do notshow u p o n the ba l a n c e shee t, thou g h their i m pa ct a ppea rs i n i ncom e s ta tements.For example, a firm whose domestic currency has appreciated dramaticallymayfinditsproductsaretooexpensiveininternational marketsdespiteitseffortstoreducecostofproductionandminimizeprices.Thepricesofgoodexportedbyth efirm’s c ompetitors,whoarecoincidentallylocatedina weak-currency environment,becomecheaperbycomparisonwithoutanyactionontheirpart.译文财务风险资料来源：财务风险管理的核心作者：凯伦 A 哈克尽管在近几年，财务风险问题表现得越来越显著，但风险与风险管理并不只是当前的话题。

Financial-Risk-Management财务风险管理大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文

毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译文献、资料中文题目：财务风险管理文献、资料英文题目：Financial Risk Management 文献、资料来源：文献、资料发表（出版）日期：院（部）：专业：班级：姓名：学号：指导教师：翻译日期： 2017.02.14财务管理类本科毕业论文外文翻译译文：[美]卡伦·A·霍契.《什么是财务风险管理？》.《财务风险管理要点》.约翰.威立国际出版公司,2005:P1-22.财务风险管理尽管近年来金融风险大大增加，但风险和风险管理不是当代的主要问题。

全球市场越来越多的问题是，风险可能来自几千英里以外的与这些事件无关的国外市场。

意味着需要的信息可以在瞬间得到，而其后的市场反应，很快就发生了。

经济气候和市场可能会快速影响外汇汇率变化、利率及大宗商品价格，交易对手会迅速成为一个问题。

因此，重要的一点是要确保金融风险是可以被识别并且管理得当的。

准备是风险管理工作的一个关键组成部分。

什么是风险？风险给机会提供了基础。

风险和暴露的条款让它们在含义上有了细微的差别。

风险是指有损失的可能性，而暴露是可能的损失，尽管他们通常可以互换。

风险起因是由于暴露。

金融市场的暴露影响大多数机构，包括直接或间接的影响。

当一个组织的金融市场暴露，有损失的可能性，但也是一个获利或利润的机会。

金融市场的暴露可以提供战略性或竞争性的利益。

风险损失的可能性事件来自如市场价格的变化。

事件发生的可能性很小，但这可能导致损失率很高，特别麻烦，因为他们往往比预想的要严重得多。

换句话说，可能就是变异的风险回报。

由于它并不总是可能的，或者能满意地把风险消除，在决定如何管理它中了解它是很重要的一步。

识别暴露和风险形式的基础需要相应的财务风险管理策略。

财务风险是如何产生的呢？无数金融性质的交易包括销售和采购，投资和贷款，以及其他各种业务活动，产生了财务风险。

它可以出现在合法的交易中，新项目中，兼并和收购中，债务融资中，能源部分的成本中，或通过管理的活动，利益相关者，竞争者，外国政府，或天气出现。

财务风险【外文翻译】

外文翻译原文Financial RiskMaterial Source:Essential of Financial Risk Management Author:Karen A.H o r c h e r:Although financial risk has increased significantly in recent years, risk and risk management are not contemporary issues. The result of increasingly global markets is that risk may originate with events thousands of miles away that have nothing to do with the domestic market. Information is available instantaneously, which means that change, and subsequent market reactions, occur very quickly.The economic climate and markets can be affected very quickly by changes in exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. As a result, it is important to ensure financial risks are identified and managed appropriately. Preparation is a key component of financial risk management.Risk provides the basis for opportunity. The terms risk and exposure have subtle differences in their meaning. Risk refers to the probability of loss, while exposure is the possibility of loss, although they are often used interchangeably. Risk arises as a result of exposure.Exposure to financial markets affects most organizations, either directly or indirectly. When an organization has financial market exposure, there is a possibility of loss but also an opportunity for gain or profit.Risk is the likelihood of losses resulting from events such as changes in market prices. Events with a low probability of occurring, but that may result in a high loss, are particularly troublesome because they are often not anticipated.Since it is not always possible or desirable to eliminate financial risk, understanding it is an important step in determining how to manage it. Identifying exposures and risks forms the basis for an appropriate financial risk management strategy.Financial risk arises through countless transactions of a financial nature, including sales and purchases, investments and loans, and various other business activities,When prices change dramatically, it can increase costs, reduce revenues, or otherwise adversely impact the profitability of an organization. Financial fluctuations may make it more difficult to plan and budget price goods and services, and allocate capital.There are three main sources of financial risk :first, financial risks arising from an organization’s exposure to changes in market prices, such as interest rates, exchange rates, and commodity prices, second, financial risk arising from the actions of , and transaction with, other organizations such as vendors, customers, and counterparties in derivatives transactions, third, financial risks resulting from internal actions or failures of the organization, particularly people, processes, and systems.Financial risk management is a process to deal with the uncertainties resulting from financial markets. It involves assessing the financial risks facing an organization and developing management strategies consistent with internal priorities and policies. Addressing financial risks proactively may provide an organization with a competitive advantage. It also ensures that management, operational staff, stakeholder, and the board of directors are in agreement on key issues of risk.Managing financial risk necessitates making organizational decisions about risks that are acceptable versus those that are not. The passive strategy of taking no action is the acceptance of all risks by default.Organizations manage financial risk using a variety of strategies. It is important to understand how these strategies work to reduce risk within the context of the organization’s risk tolerance and objectives.The ability to estimate the likelihood of a financial loss is highly desirable. However, standard theories of probability often fail in the analysis of financial markets. Risks usually do not exist in isolation, and the interactions of several exposures may have to be considered in developing an understanding of how financial risk arises. Sometimes, these interactions are difficult to forecast, since they ultimately depend on human behavior.The process of financial risk management is an ongoing one. Strategies need to be implemented and refined as the market and requirements change. Refinements may reflect changing expectations about market rates, changes to the business environment, or changing international political conditions, for example. In general, the process can be summarized as follows : first, identify and prioritize key financialrisks ,second, determine an appropriate level of risk tolerance, third, implement risk management strategy in accordance with policy, last, measure, report, monitor, and refine as needed.Major market risks arise out of changes to financial market prices such as exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. Major market risks are usually the most obvious type of financial risk that an organization faces. Major market risks include foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, commodity price risk, equity price risk. Other important related financial risks include credit risk, operational risk, liquidity risk, systemic risk.The interactions of several risks can alter or magnify the potential impact to an organization. For example, an organization may have both commodity price risk and foreign exchange risk, If both markets become adversely, the organization may suffer significant losses as a result.There are two components to assessing financial risk, The first component is an understanding of potential loss as a result of a particular rate or price change, The second component is an estimate of he probability of such an event occurring.Interest rate risk arises from several sources, including changes in the level of interest rates(absolute interest rate risk), changes in the shape of the yield curve(yield curve risk), mismatches between and the risk management strategies undertaken(basis risk).Interest rate risk affects many organizations, both borrowers and investors, and it particularly affects capital-intensive industries and sectors.Changes affect borrowers through the cost of funds, For example, a corporate borrower that utilizes floating interest rate debt is exposed to rising interest rates that could increase the company’s cost of funds, A portfolio of fixed income securities has exposure to interest rates through both changes in yield and gains or losses on assets held.Absolute interest rate risk results from the possibility of a directional, or up or down, change in interest rates. Most organizations monitor absolute interest rate risk in their risk assessments, due to both its visibility and its potential for affecting profitability.From a borrower’s perspective, rising interest rates might result in higher project costs and changes to financing or strategic plans. From an investor or lender perspective, a decline in interest rates results in lower interest income given the same investment, or alternatively, inadequate return on investments held.The most common method of hedging absolute interest rate risk is to match the duration of assets and liabilities, or replace floating interest rate borrowing or investments with fixed interest rate debt or investments. Another alternative is to hedge the interest rate risk with tools such as forward rate agreements, swaps and interest rate caps, floors, and collars.Yield curve risk results from changes in the relationship between short-term and long-term interest rates. In a normal interest rate environment, the yield curve has an upward-sloping shape to it. Longer-term interest rates are higher than shorter-term interest rates because of higher risk to the lender. The steepening of flattening of the yield curve changes the interest rate differential between maturities, which can impact borrowing and investment decisions and therefore profitability.In an inverted yield curve environment, demand for short-term funds pushes short-term rates above long-term rates. The yield curve may appear inverted or flat across most maturities, or alternatively only in certain maturity segments. In such an environment, rates of longer terms to maturity may be impacted less than shorter terms to maturity. When there is a mismatch between an organization’s assets and liabilities, yield curve risk should be assessed as a component of the organization’s interest rate risk.Credit risk is one of the most prevalent risks of finance and business, In general, credit risk is a concern when an organization is owed money or must rely on another organization to make a payment to it or on its behalf. The failure of a counterparty is less of an issue when the organization is not owed money on a net basis, although it depends to a certain degree on the legal environment and whether funds are owed on a net or aggregate basis on individual contracts. The deterioration of credit quality, such as that of a securities issuer, is also a source of risk through the reduced market value of securities that an organization might own.Credit risk increases as time to expiry, time to settlement, or time to maturity increase, The move by international regulators to shorten settlement time for certain types of securities trades is an effort to reduce systemic risk, which in turn is based on the risk of individual market participants. It also increases in an environment of rising interest rates or poor economic fundamentals.Organization are exposed to credit risk through all business and financial transactions that depend on the payment or fulfillment of obligations of others, Credit risk that arises from exposure to a counterparty, such as in a derivatives transaction, is often known as counterparty risk.Foreign exchange risk arises through transaction, translation, and economic exposures. It may also arise from commodity-based transactions where commodity prices are determined and traded in another currency. It includes transaction risk, translation risk and strategic risk. Transaction risk impacts an organization’s profitability through the income statement. It arises from the ordinary transactions of an organization, including purchases from suppliers and vendors, contractual payments in other currencies, royalties of license fees, and sales to customers in currencies other than the domestic one. Organizations that buy or sell products and services denominated in a foreign currency typically have transaction exposure.Management of transaction risk can be an important determinant of competitiveness in a global economy. There are few corporations whose business is not affected, either directly or indirectly, by transaction risk.Translation risk traditionally referred to fluctuations result from the accounting translation of financial statement, particularly assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. Translation exposure results wherever assets, liabilities, or profits are translated from the operating currency into a reporting currency.From another perspective, translation exposure affects an organization by affecting the value of foreign currency balance sheet items such as accounts payable and receivable, foreign currency cash and deposits, and foreign currency debt. Longer-term assets and liabilities, such as those associated with foreign operations, are likely to be particularly impacted.The location and activities of major competitors may be an important determinant of foreign exchange exposure. Strategic or economic exposure affects an organization’s competitive position as a result of changes in exchange rates. Economic exposure, such as declining sales from international customers, do not show up on the balance sheet, though their impact appears in income statements.For example, a firm whose domestic currency has appreciated dramatically may find its products are too expensive in international markets despite its efforts to reduce cost of production and minimize prices. The prices of good exported by the firm’s competitors, who are coincidentally located in a weak-currency environment, become cheaper by comparison without any action on their part.译文财务风险资料来源：财务风险管理的核心作者：凯伦 A 哈克尽管在近几年，财务风险问题表现得越来越显著，但风险与风险管理并不只是当前的话题。

财务风险外文翻译外文文献英文文献财务风险重要性分析

外文原文How Important is Financial Risk?作者：Sohnke M. Bartram, Gregory W. Brown, and Murat Atamer起止页码：1-7出版日期（期刊号）：September 2009,V ol. 2, No. 4(Serial No. 11)出版单位：Theory and Decision, DOI 10.1007/s11238-005-4590-0Abstract：This paper examines the determinants of equity price risk for a large sample of non-financial corporations in the United States from 1964 to 2008. We estimate both structural and reduced form models to examine the endogenous nature of corporate financial characteristics such as total debt, debt maturity, cash holdings, and dividend policy. We find that the observed levels of equity price risk are explained primarily by operating and asset characteristics such as firm age, size, asset tangibility, as well as operating cash flow levels and volatility. In contrast, implied measures of financial risk are generally low and more stable than debt-to-equity ratios. Our measures of financial risk have declined over the last 30 years even as measures of equity volatility (e.g. idiosyncratic risk) have tended to increase. Consequently, documented trends in equity price risk are more than fully accounted for by trends in the riskiness of firms’ assets. Taken together, the results suggest that the typical U.S. firm substantially reduces financial risk by carefully managing financial policies. As a result, residual financial risk now appears negligible relative to underlying economic risk for a typical non-financial firm.Keywords：Capital structure；financial risk；risk management；corporate finance 1IntroductionThe financial crisis of 2008 has brought significant attention to the effects of financial leverage. There is no doubt that the high levels of debt financing by financial institutions and households significantly contributed to the crisis. Indeed, evidence indicates that excessive leverage orchestrated by major global banks (e.g., through the mortgage lending and collateralized debt obligations) and the so-called “shadow banking system” may be the underlying cause of the recent economic and financial dislocation. Less obvious is the role of financial leverage among nonfinancial firms. To date, problems in the U.S. non-financial sector have been minor compared to thedistress in the financial sector despite the seizing of capital markets during the crisis. For example, non-financial bankruptcies have been limited given that the economic decline is the largest since the great depression of the 1930s. In fact, bankruptcy filings of non-financial firms have occurred mostly in U.S. industries (e.g., automotive manufacturing, newspapers, and real estate) that faced fundamental economic pressures prior to the financial crisis. This surprising fact begs the question, “How important is financial risk for non-financial firms?” At the heart of this issue is the uncertainty about the determinants of total firm risk as well as components of firm risk.Recent academic research in both asset pricing and corporate finance has rekindled an interest in analyzing equity price risk. A current strand of the asset pricing literature examines the finding of Campbell et al. (2001) that firm-specific (idiosyncratic) risk has tended to increase over the last 40 years. Other work suggests that idiosyncratic risk may be a priced risk factor (see Goyal and Santa-Clara, 2003, among others). Also related to these studies is work by Pástor and Veronesi (2003) showing how investor uncertainty about firm profitability is an important determinant of idiosyncratic risk and firm value. Other research has examined the role of equity volatility in bond pricing (e.g., Dichev, 1998, Campbell, Hilscher, and Szilagyi, 2008).However, much of the empirical work examining equity price risk takes the risk of assets as given or tries to explain the trend in idiosyncratic risk. In contrast, this paper takes a different tack in the investigation of equity price risk. First, we seek to understand the determinants of equity price risk at the firm level by considering total risk as the product of risks inherent in the firms operations (i.e., economic or business risks) and risks associated with financing the firms operations (i.e., financial risks). Second, we attempt to assess the relative importance of economic and financial risks and the implications for financial policy.Early research by Modigliani and Miller (1958) suggests that financial policy may be largely irrelevant for firm value because investors can replicate many financial decisions by the firm at a low cost (i.e., via homemade leverage) and well-functioning capital markets should be able to distinguish between financial and economic distress. Nonetheless, financial policies, such as adding debt to the capital structure, can magnify the risk of equity. In contrast, recent research on corporate risk management suggests that firms may also be able to reduce risks and increase valuewith financial policies such as hedging with financial derivatives. However, this research is often motivated by substantial deadweight costs associated with financial distress or other market imperfections associated with financial leverage. Empirical research provides conflicting accounts of how costly financial distress can be for a typical publicly traded firm.We attempt to directly address the roles of economic and financial risk by examining determinants of total firm risk. In our analysis we utilize a large sample of non-financial firms in the United States. Our goal of identifying the most important determinants of equity price risk (volatility) relies on viewing financial policy as transforming asset volatility into equity volatility via financial leverage. Thus, throughout the paper, we consider financial leverage as the wedge between asset volatility and equity volatility. For example, in a static setting, debt provides financial leverage that magnifies operating cash flow volatility. Because financial policy is determined by owners (and managers), we are careful to examine the effects of firms’ asset and operating characteristics on financial policy. Specifically, we examine a variety of characteristics suggested by previous research and, as clearly as possible, distinguish between those associated with the operations of the company (i.e. factors determining economic risk) and those associated with financing the firm (i.e. factors determining financial risk). We then allow economic risk to be a determinant of financial policy in the structural framework of Leland and Toft (1996), or alternatively, in a reduced form model of financial leverage. An advantage of the structural model approach is that we are able to account for both the possibility of financial and operating implications of some factors (e.g., dividends), as well as the endogenous nature of the bankruptcy decision and financial policy in general.Our proxy for firm risk is the volatility of common stock returns derived from calculating the standard deviation of daily equity returns. Our proxies for economic risk are designed to capture the essential characteristics of the firms’ operations and assets that determine the cash flow generating process for the firm. For example, firm size and age provide measures of line of- business maturity; tangible assets (plant, property, and equipment) serve as a proxy for the ‘hardness’ of a firm’s assets; capital expenditures measure capital intensity as well as growth potential. Operating profitability and operating profit volatility serve as measures of the timeliness and riskiness of cash flows. To understand how financial factors affect firm risk, we examine total debt, debt maturity, dividend payouts, and holdings of cash andshort-term investments.The primary result of our analysis is surprising: factors determining economic risk for a typical company explain the vast majority of the variation in equity volatility. Correspondingly, measures of implied financial leverage are much lower than observed debt ratios. Specifically, in our sample covering 1964-2008 average actual net financial (market) leverage is about 1.50 compared to our estimates of between 1.03 and 1.11 (depending on model specification and estimation technique). This suggests that firms may undertake other financial policies to manage financial risk and thus lower effective leverage to nearly negligible levels. These policies might include dynamically adjusting financial variables such as debt levels, debt maturity, or cash holdings (see, for example, Acharya, Almeida, and Campello, 2007). In addition, many firms also utilize explicit financial risk management techniques such as the use of financial derivatives, contractual arrangements with investors (e.g. lines of credit, call provisions in debt contracts, or contingencies in supplier contracts), special purpose vehicles (SPVs), or other alternative risk transfer techniques.The effects of our economic risk factors on equity volatility are generally highly statistically significant, with predicted signs. In addition, the magnitudes of the effects are substantial. We find that volatility of equity decreases with the size and age of the firm. This is intuitive since large and mature firms typically have more stable lines of business, which should be reflected in the volatility of equity returns. Equity volatility tends to decrease with capital expenditures though the effect is weak. Consistent with the predictions of Pástor and Veronesi (2003), we find that firms with higher profitability and lower profit volatility have lower equity volatility. This suggests that companies with higher and more stable operating cash flows are less likely to go bankrupt, and therefore are potentially less risky. Among economic risk variables, the effects of firm size, profit volatility, and dividend policy on equity volatility stand out. Unlike some previous studies, our careful treatment of the endogeneity of financial policy confirms that leverage increases total firm risk. Otherwise, financial risk factors are not reliably related to total risk.Given the large literature on financial policy, it is no surprise that financial variables are,at least in part, determined by the economic risks firms take. However, some of the specific findings are unexpected. For example, in a simple model of capital structure, dividend payouts should increase financial leverage since they represent an outflow of cash from the firm (i.e., increase net debt). We find thatdividends are associated with lower risk. This suggests that paying dividends is not as much a product of financial policy as a characteristic of a firm’s operations (e.g., a mature company with limited growth opportunities). We also estimate how sensitivities to different risk factors have changed over time. Our results indicate that most relations are fairly stable. One exception is firm age which prior to 1983 tends to be positively related to risk and has since been consistently negatively related to risk. This is related to findings by Brown and Kapadia (2007) that recent trends in idiosyncratic risk are related to stock listings by younger and riskier firms.Perhaps the most interesting result from our analysis is that our measures of implied financial leverage have declined over the last 30 years at the same time that measures of equity price risk (such as idiosyncratic risk) appear to have been increasing. In fact, measures of implied financial leverage from our structural model settle near 1.0 (i.e., no leverage) by the end of our sample. There are several possible reasons for this. First, total debt ratios for non-financial firms have declined steadily over the last 30 years, so our measure of implied leverage should also decline. Second, firms have significantly increased cash holdings, so measures of net debt (debt minus cash and short-term investments) have also declined. Third, the composition of publicly traded firms has changed with more risky (especially technology-oriented) firms becoming publicly listed. These firms tend to have less debt in their capital structure. Fourth, as mentioned above, firms can undertake a variety of financial risk management activities. To the extent that these activities have increased over the last few decades, firms will have become less exposed to financial risk factors.We conduct some additional tests to provide a reality check of our results. First, we repeat our analysis with a reduced form model that imposes minimum structural rigidity on our estimation and find very similar results. This indicates that our results are unlikely to be driven by model misspecification. We also compare our results with trends in aggregate debt levels for all U.S. non-financial firms and find evidence consistent with our conclusions. Finally, we look at characteristics of publicly traded non-financial firms that file for bankruptcy around the last three recessions and find evidence suggesting that these firms are increasingly being affected by economic distress as opposed to financial distress.In short, our results suggest that, as a practical matter, residual financial risk is now relatively unimportant for the typical U.S. firm. This raises questions about the level of expected financial distress costs since the probability of financial distress islikely to be lower than commonly thought for most companies. For example, our results suggest that estimates of the level of systematic risk in bond pricing may be biased if they do not take into account the trend in implied financial leverage (e.g., Dichev, 1998). Our results also bring into question the appropriateness of financial models used to estimate default probabilities, since financial policies that may be difficult to observe appear to significantly reduce risk. Lastly, our results imply that the fundamental risks born by shareholders are primarily related to underlying economic risks which should lead to a relatively efficient allocation of capital.Before proceeding we address a potential comment about our analysis. Some readers may be tempted to interpret our results as indicating that financial risk does not matter. This is not the proper interpretation. Instead, our results suggest that firms are able to manage financial risk so that the resulting exposure to shareholders is low compared to economic risks. Of course, financial risk is important to firms that choose to take on such risks either through high debt levels or a lack of risk management. In contrast, our study suggests that the typical non-financial firm chooses not to take these risks. In short, gross financial risk may be important, but firms can manage it. This contrasts with fundamental economic and business risks that are more difficult (or undesirable) to hedge because they represent the mechanism by which the firm earns economic profits.The paper is organized at follows. Motivation, related literature, and hypotheses are reviewed in Section 2. Section 3 describes the models we employ followed by a description of the data in Section 4. Empirical results for the Leland-Toft model are presented in Section 5. Section 6 considers estimates from the reduced form model, aggregate debt data for the no financial sector in the U.S., and an analysis of bankruptcy filings over the last 25 years. Section 6 concludes.2 Motivation, Related Literature, and HypothesesStudying firm risk and its determinants is important for all areas of finance. In the corporate finance literature, firm risk has direct implications for a variety of fundamental issues ranging from optimal capital structure to the agency costs of asset substitution. Likewise, the characteristics of firm risk are fundamental factors in all asset pricing models.The corporate finance literature often relies on market imperfections associated with financial risk. In the Modigliani Miller (1958) framework, financial risk (or more generally financial policy) is irrelevant because investors can replicate the financialdecisions of the firm by themselves. Consequently, well-functioning capital markets should be able to distinguish between frictionless financial distress and economic bankruptcy. For example, Andrade and Kaplan (1998) carefully distinguish between costs of financial and economic distress by analyzing highly leveraged transactions, and find that financial distress costs are small for a subset of the firms that did not experience an “economic” shock. They conclude that financial distress costs should be small or insignificant for typical firms. Kaplan and Stein (1990) analyze highly levered transactions and find that equity beta increases are surprisingly modest after recapitalizations.The ongoing debate on financial policy, however, does not address the relevance of financial leverage as a driver of the overall riskiness of the firm. Our study joins the debate from this perspective. Correspondingly, decomposing firm risk into financial and economic risks is at the heart of our study.Research in corporate risk management examines the role of total financial risk explicitly by examining the motivations for firms to engage in hedging activities. In particular, theory suggests positive valuation effects of corporate hedging in the presence of capital market imperfections. These might include agency costs related to underinvestment or asset substitution (see Bessembinder, 1991, Jensen and Meckling, 1976, Myers, 1977, Froot, Scharfstein, and Stein,1993), bankruptcy costs and taxes (Smith and Stulz, 1985), and managerial risk aversion (Stulz,1990). However, the corporate risk management literature does not generally address the systematic pricing of corporate risk which has been the primary focus of the asset pricing literature.Lintner (1965) and Sharpe (1964) define a partial equilibrium pricing of risk in a mean variance framework. In this structure, total risk is decomposed into systematic risk and idiosyncratic risk, and only systematic risk should be priced in a frictionless market. However, Campbelletal (2001) find that firm-specific risk has increased substantially over the last four decades and various studies have found that idiosyncratic risk is a priced factor (Goyal and Santa Clara,2003, Ang, Hodrick, Xing, and Zhang, 2006, 2008, Spiegel and Wang, 2006). Research has determined various firm characteristics (i.e., industry growth rates, institutional ownership, average firm size, growth options, firm age, and profitability risk) are associated with firm-specific risk. Recent research has also examined the role of equity price risk in the context of expected financial distress costs (Campbell and Taksler, 2003, Vassalou and Xing, 2004, Almeida and Philippon, 2007, among others). Likewise, fundamental economicrisks have been shown to be to be related to equity risk factors (see, for example, Vassalou, 2003, and the citations therein). Choiand Richardson (2009) examine the volatility of the firm’s assets using issue-level data on debt and find that asset volatilities exhibit significant time-series variation and that financial leverage has a substantial effect on equity volatility.How Important is Financial Risk?财务风险的重要性作者：Sohnke M. Bartram, Gregory W. Brown, and Murat Atamer起始页码：1-7出版日期（期刊号）：September 2009,Vol. 2, No. 4(Serial No. 11)出版单位：Theory and Decision, DOI 10.1007/s11238-005-4590-0外文翻译译文：摘要：本文探讨了美国大型非金融企业从1964年至2008年股票价格风险的决定小性因素。

Financial-Risk-Management财务风险管理大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文

全球市场越来越多的问题是，风险可能来自几千英里以外的与这些事件无关的国外市场。

意味着需要的信息可以在瞬间得到，而其后的市场反应，很快就发生了。

经济气候和市场可能会快速影响外汇汇率变化、利率及大宗商品价格，交易对手会迅速成为一个问题。

因此，重要的一点是要确保金融风险是可以被识别并且管理得当的。

准备是风险管理工作的一个关键组成部分。

什么是风险？风险给机会提供了基础。

风险和暴露的条款让它们在含义上有了细微的差别。

风险是指有损失的可能性，而暴露是可能的损失，尽管他们通常可以互换。

风险起因是由于暴露。

金融市场的暴露影响大多数机构，包括直接或间接的影响。

当一个组织的金融市场暴露，有损失的可能性，但也是一个获利或利润的机会。

金融市场的暴露可以提供战略性或竞争性的利益。

风险损失的可能性事件来自如市场价格的变化。

事件发生的可能性很小，但这可能导致损失率很高，特别麻烦，因为他们往往比预想的要严重得多。

换句话说，可能就是变异的风险回报。

由于它并不总是可能的，或者能满意地把风险消除，在决定如何管理它中了解它是很重要的一步。

识别暴露和风险形式的基础需要相应的财务风险管理策略。

财务风险是如何产生的呢？无数金融性质的交易包括销售和采购，投资和贷款，以及其他各种业务活动，产生了财务风险。

企业财务风险管理外文文献翻译

文献出处：Błach J. Financial Risk Identification Based on the Balance Sheet Information[J]. Managing and Modelling of Financial Risks, 2016,1: 10-19.第一部分为译文，第二部分为原文。

默认格式：中文五号宋体，英文五号Times New Roma，行间距1.5倍。

基于资产负债表信息的财务风险识别摘要：现代经济风险暴露不断增加，所有企业都要承担不同类型的风险。

本文研究财务风险的定义，组成部分，因素和后果，以及通过资产负债表提供的信息的使用来识别和分析财务风险。

此外，还介绍了这种财务风险评估方法的优缺点，以100个最大波兰公司10年（2000-2009年）的汇总数据为例，测试了根据资产负债表信息确定财务风险的潜力。

关键词：财务风险，财务分析，风险评估，资产负债表。

1. 引言现代社会往往被描述为“风险社会”，这意味着社会的财富生产伴随着社会风险生产。

因此，在这种环境下经营的企业，被迫采取不同类型的风险识别，以发展自己，提高效率。

考虑到不同类型的标准，有各种各样的企业风险进行分析和分类。

企业风险最重要的类型之一是财务风险。

2.财务风险定义及其组成部分文献中没有统一的财务风险定义。

但问题始于风险的一般定义。

在理论上，提出了风险定义的两个概念。

第一个-负面概念将风险描述为潜在损失的威胁。

第二个-中立概念表明，风险不仅是威胁，也是机会，所以风险意味着获得不同于预期的结果的可能性。

因此，风险的定义主要取决于风险的方法，并且可能导致管理者采取的不同行动。

如果采取负面做法，管理人员的主要目标是尽可能减少潜在的损失，并设法避免危险行为，以稳定公司的情况。

在第二种情况下，经理们不仅要尽量减少损失，还要尽量利用承担风险，改善公司状况。

因此，可以从中性或消极的角度分析任何类型的风险的金融风险。

企业并购财务风险控制外文文献翻译译文3100字

企业并购财务风险控制外文文献翻译译文3100字Financial risk is one of the major XXX It refers to the risk of financial loss caused by the XXX in the value of assets。

The main types of financial risk in mergers and ns include credit risk。

interest rate risk。

exchange rate risk。

and liquidity risk。

Credit risk refers to the risk of default by the borrower。

while interest rate risk refers to the risk of XXX。

Exchange rate risk is the risk of XXX。

and liquidity risk refers to the risk of XXX.XXX。

it is XXX before the n。

including analyzing the financial status of the target company。

XXX。

and assessing the potential impact of interest rate and exchange rate XXX。

it is XXX a sound financial management system and XXX.1.2 Asset riskAsset risk refers to the risk of losses caused by the decline in the value of assets or the XXX the expected value of assets。

财务风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献

财务风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献译文：[美]卡伦〃A〃霍契.《什么是财务风险管理？》.《财务风险管理要点》.约翰.威立国际出版公司,2005:P1-22.财务风险管理尽管近年来金融风险大大增加，但风险和风险管理不是当代的主要问题。

全球市场越来越多的问题是，风险可能来自几千英里以外的与这些事件无关的国外市场。

意味着需要的信息可以在瞬间得到，而其后的市场反应，很快就发生了。

经济气候和市场可能会快速影响外汇汇率变化、利率及大宗商品价格，交易对手会迅速成为一个问题。

因此，重要的一点是要确保金融风险是可以被识别并且管理得当的。

准备是风险管理工作的一个关键组成部分。

什么是风险？风险给机会提供了基础。

风险和暴露的条款让它们在含义上有了细微的差别。

风险是指有损失的可能性，而暴露是可能的损失，尽管他们通常可以互换。

风险起因是由于暴露。

金融市场的暴露影响大多数机构，包括直接或间接的影响。

当一个组织的金融市场暴露，有损失的可能性，但也是一个获利或利润的机会。

金融市场的暴露可以提供战略性或竞争性的利益。

风险损失的可能性事件来自如市场价格的变化。

事件发生的可能性很小，但这可能导致损失率很高，特别麻烦，因为他们往往比预想的要严重得多。

换句话说，可能就是变异的风险回报。

由于它并不总是可能的，或者能满意地把风险消除，在决定如何管理它中了解它是很重要的一步。

识别暴露和风险形式的基础需要相应的财务风险管理策略。

财务风险是如何产生的呢？无数金融性质的交易包括销售和采购，投资和贷款，以及其他各种业务活动，产生了财务风险。

当金融的价格变化很大，它可以增加成本，降低财政收入，或影响其他有不利影响的盈利能力的组织。

金融波动可能使人们难以规划和预算商品和服务的价格，并分配资金。

有三种金融风险的主要来源：1、金融风险起因于组织所暴露出来的市场价格的变化，如利率、汇率、和大宗商品价格。

财务风险外文文献

外文文献The Important Of Financial RiskSohnke M. Bartram Gregory W. Brown and Murat AtamerAbstract:This paper examines the determinants of equity price risk for a largesample of non-financial corporations in the United States from 1964 to 2008. Weestimate both structural and reduced form models to examine the endogenous natureof corporate financial characteristics such as total debt debt maturity cash holdingsand dividend policy. We find that the observed levels of equity price risk areexplained primarily by operating and asset characteristics such as firm age size assettangibility as well as operating cash flow levels and volatility. In contrast impliedmeasures of financial risk are generally low and more stable than debt-to-equity ratios.Our measures of financial risk have declined over the last 30 years even as measuresof equity volatility e.g. idiosyncratic risk have tended to increase. Consequentlydocumented trends in equity price risk are more than fully accounted for by trends inthe riskiness of firms’assets. Taken together the results suggest that the typical U.S.firm substantially reduces financial risk by carefully managing financial policies. As aresult residual financial risk now appears negligible relative to underlying economicrisk for a typical non-financial firm.Keywords：Capital structure；financial risk；risk management；corporate finance1 1.IntroductionThe financial crisis of 2008 has brought significant attention to the effects offinancial leverage. There is no doubt that the high levels of debt financing by financialinstitutions and households significantly contributed to the crisis. Indeed evidenceindicates that excessive leverage orchestrated by major global banks e.g. through themortgage lending and collateralized debt obligations and the so-called “shadowbanking system”may be the underlying cause of the recent economic and financialdislocation. Less obvious is the role of financial leverage among nonfinancial firms.To date problems in the U.S. non-financial sector have been minor compared to thedistress in the financial sector despite the seizing of capital markets during the crisis.For example non-financial bankruptcies have been limited given that the economicdecline is the largest since the great depression of the 1930s. In fact bankruptcyfilings of non-financial firms have occurred mostly in U.S. industries e.g.automotive manufacturing newspapers and real estate that faced fundamentaleconomic pressures prior to the financial crisis. This surprising fact begs the question“How important is financial risk for non-financial firms”At the heart of this issue isthe uncertainty about the determinants of total firm risk as well as components of firmrisk.Recent academic research in both asset pricing and corporate finance hasrekindled an interest in analyzing equity price risk. A current strand of the assetpricing literature examines the finding of Campbell et al. 2001 thatfirm-specificidiosyncratic risk has tended to increase over the last 40 years. Other work suggeststhat idiosyncratic risk may be a priced risk factor see Goyal and Santa-Clara 2003among others. Also related to these studies is work by Pástor and Veronesi 2003showing how investor uncertainty about firm profitability is an important determinantof idiosyncratic risk and firm value. Other research has examined the role of equityvolatility in bond pricing e.g. Dichev 1998 Campbell Hilscher and Szilagyi2008.However much of the empirical work examining equity price risk takes the riskof assets as given or tries to explain the trend in idiosyncratic risk. In contrast thispaper takes a different tack in the investigation of equity price risk. First we seek tounderstand the determinants of equity price risk at the firm level by considering totalrisk as the product of risks inherent in the firms operations i.e. economic or businessrisks and risks associated with financing the firms operations i.e. financial risks.Second we attempt to assess the relative importance of economic and financial risksand the implications for financial policy.Early research by Modigliani and Miller 1958 suggests that financial policymay be largely irrelevant for firm value because investors can replicate manyfinancial decisions by the firm at a low cost i.e. via homemade leverage andwell-functioning capital markets should be able to distinguish between financial andeconomic distress. Nonetheless financial policies such as adding debt to the capitalstructure can magnify the risk of equity. In contrast recent research on corporate riskmanagement suggests that firms may also be able to reduce risks and increase valuewith financial policies such as hedging with financial derivatives. However thisresearch is often motivated by substantial deadweight costs associated with financialdistress or other market imperfections associated with financial leverage. Empiricalresearch provides conflicting accounts of how costly financial distress can be for atypical publicly traded firm.We attempt to directly address the roles of economic and financial risk byexamining determinants of total firm risk. In our analysis we utilize a large sample ofnon-financial firms in the United States.Our goal of identifying the most importantdeterminants of equity price risk volatility relies on viewing financial policy astransforming asset volatility into equity volatility via financial leverage. Thusthroughout the paper we consider financial leverage as the wedge between assetvolatility and equity volatility. For example in a static setting debt provides financialleverage that magnifies operating cash flow volatility. Because financial policy isdetermined by owners and managers we are careful to examine the effects of firms’asset and operating characteristics on financial policy. Specifically we examine avariety of characteristics suggested by previous research and as clearly as possibledistinguish between those associated of the company(i.e. factors determining economic risk) and those associated with financing the firm(i.e. factors determining financial risk).We then allow economic risk to be a determinant of financial policy in the structural framework of Leland and Toft(1996),or alternatively, in a reduced form model of financial leverage.An advantage of the structural model approach is that we are able to account for both the possibility of financial and operating implciations ofsome factors(e.g .dividends),as well as the endogenous nature of the bankruptcy decision and financial policy in general.Our proxy for firm risk is the volantility if common stock returns derived from calculating the standard deviation of daliy equity returns.Our proxies for econmic risk are designed to capture the essential charactersitics of the firm’s operations and assets that determine the cash flow generating process for the firm.For example,firm size and age provide measures of line of –business maturity; tangible assets(plant,property,and equipment)serve as a proxy for the ‘hardness’of a firm’s assets;capital expenditures measure captial intensity as well as growth potential.Operating profitability and operating profit volatility serve as measures of the timeliness and riskiness of cash flows.To understand how financial factors affect firm risk,we examine total debt,debt maturity,dividend payouts,and holdings of cash and short-term investments.The primary resuit or our analysis is surpriing:factors determining economic risk for a typical company exlain the vast majority of the varation in equity volatility.Correspondingly,measures of implied financial leverage are much lower than observed debt ratios. Specifically, in our sample covering 1964-2008 average actual net financial (market) leverage is 1.50 compared to our estimates of between 1.03 and 1.11 (depending on model specification and estimation technique).This suggests that firms may undertake other financial policise to manage financial risk and thus lower effective leverage to nearly negligible levels.These policies might include dynamically adjusting financial variables such as debt levels,debt maturity,or cash holdings (see,for example , Acharya,Almeida,and Campello,2007).In addition,many firms also utilize explicit financial risk management techniques such as the use of financial dervatives,contractual arrangements with investors (e.g. lines of credit,call provisions in debt contracts ,or contingencies in supplier contracts ),spcial purpose vehicles (SPVs),or other alternative risk transfer techniques.The effects of our ecnomic risk factors on equity volatility are generally highly statiscally significant, with predicted size and age of the firm.This is intuitive since large and mature firms typically have more stable lines of business,which shoule be reflected in the volatility. This suggests that companties with higher and more stable operating cash flows are less likely to go bankrupt, and therefore are potentially less risky .Among economic risk variables,the effects of firm size ,prfit volatility,and dividend policy on equity volatility stand out. Unlike some previous studies,our careful treatment of the endogeneity of financial policy confirms that leveage increases total firm risk. Otherwise,fiancial risk factors are not reliably to total risk.Given the large literature on financial policy , it is no surprise that financial variables are , at least in part , determined by the econmic risks frims take.However, some of the specific findings are unexpected. For example , in a simple model of capital structure ,dividend payouts should increase financial leverage since they represent an outflow of cash from the firm(i.e.,increase net debt ).We find that dividends are associated with lower risk. This suggests that paying dividends is not as much a product of financial policy as a characteristic of a firm’s operations(e.g.,a mature company with limited growth opportunities). We also estimate howsensitivities to different risk factors have changed over time.Our result indicate that most relations are fairly stable. One exception is firm age which prior to 1983 tends to be positively related to risk and has since been consisitently negatively related to risk.This is related to findings by Brown and Kapadoa (2007) that recent trends in idiosyncratic risk are related to stock listings by younger and riskier firms.。

中小企业财务风险管理外文文献翻译2017

外文文献翻译原文及译文文献出处: Sharifi, Omid. International Journal of Information, Business and Management 6.2 (May 2017): 82-94.原文Financial R isk M ana gement for Small and M edium SizedEnter pr ises(SM ES)Omid SharifiMBA, Depa rtment of Commerce and Business Ma nagement,Ka ka tiya University, House No. 2-1-664, Sa ra wa thi nega r,1．ABSTR AC Tmedium sized Enterprises (SME) do also face business risks, Similar to large companies, Small and Mwhich in worst case can cause financial distress and lead to bankruptcy. However, although SME are a major part of the India and also international - economy, research mainly focused on risk management in large corporations. Therefore the aim of this paper is to suggest a possible mean for the risk identification, analysis and monitoring, which can be applied by SME to manage their internal financial risks. For this purpose the financial analysis, which has been used in research to identify indicators for firm bankruptcy, was chosen.The data required for the study was collected from Annual report of the Intec Capital Limited. For the period of five years, from 2008 to 2012.the findings showed the data and the overview can be used in SME risk management.Keywor ds: Annual report, Small and Medium sized Enterprises, Financial Risks, Risk Management.2．INTR UDUC TIONSmall and medium sized enterprises (SME) differ from large corporations among other aspects first of all in their size. Their importance in the economy however is large . SME sector of India is considered as the backbone of economy contributing to 45% of the industrial output, 40% of India’s exports, employing 60 million people, create 1.3 million jobs every year and produce more than 8000 quality products for the Indian and international markets. With approximately 30 million SMEs in India, 12 million people expected to join the workforce in next 3 years and the sector growing at a rate of 8% per year, Government of India is taking different measures so as to increase their competitiveness in the international market. There are several factors that have contributed towards the growth of Indian SMEs.Few of these include; funding of SMEs by local and foreign investors, the new technology that is used in the market is assisting SMEsadd considerable value to their business, various trade directories and trade portals help facilitate trade between buyer and supplier and thus reducing the barrier to trade With this huge potential, backed up by strong government support; Indian SMEs continue to post their growth stories. Despite of this strong growth, there is huge potential amongst Indian SMEs that still remains untapped. Once this untapped potential becomes the source for growth of these units, there would be no stopping to India posting a GDP higher than that of US and China and becoming the world’s economic powerhouse.3. R ESEAR C H QUESTIONRisk and economic activity are inseparable. Every business decision and entrepreneurial act is connected with risk. This applies also to business of small and medium sized enterprises as they are also facing several and often the same risks as bigger companies. In a real businessenvironment with market imperfections they need to manage those risks in order to secure their business continuity and add additional value by avoiding or reducing transaction costs and cost of financial distress or bankruptcy. However, risk management is a challenge for most SME. In contrast to larger companies they often lack the necessary resources, with regard to manpower, databases and specialty of knowledge to perform a standardized and structured risk management. The result is that many smaller companies do not perform sufficient analysis to identify their risk. This aspect is exacerbated due to a lack in literature about methods for risk management in SME, as stated by Henschel: The two challenging aspects with regard to risk management in SME are therefore:1.SME differ from large corporations in many characteristics2.The existing research lacks a focus on risk management in SMEThe following research question will be central to this work:1.h ow can SME manage their internal financial risk?2.W hich aspects, based on their characteristics, have to be taken into account for this?3.W hich mean fulfils the requirements and can be applied to SME?4. L ITER ATUR E R EVIEWIn contrast to larger corporations, in SME one of the owners is often part of the management team. His intuition and experience are important for managing the company. Therefore, in small companies, the (owner-)manager is often responsible for many different tasks and important decisions. Most SME do not have the necessary resources to employ specialists on every position in the company. They focus on their core business and have generalists for the administrative functions. Behr and Guttler find that SME on average have equity ratios lower than 20%. The different characteristics of management, position on procurement and capital markets and the legal framework need to be taken into account when applying management instruments like risk management. Therefore the risk management techniques of larger corporations cannot easily be applied to SME. In practice it can therefore be observed that although SME are not facing less risks and uncertainties than large companies, their risk management differs from the practices in larger companies. The latter have the resources to employ a risk manager and a professional, structured and standardized risk management system. In contrast to that, risk management in SME differs in the degree of implementation and the techniques applied. Jonen & Simgen-Weber With regard to firm size and the use of risk management. Beyer, Hachmeister & Lampenius observe in a study from 2010 that increasing firm size among SME enhances the use of risk management. This observation matches with the opinion of nearly 10% of SME, which are of the opinion, that risk management is only reasonable in larger corporations. Beyer, Hachmeister & Lampenius find that most of the surveyed SME identify risks with help of statistics,checklists, creativity and scenario analyses. reveals similar findings and state that most companies rely on key figure systems for identifying and evaluating the urgency of business risks. That small firms face higher costs of hedging than larger corporations. This fact is reducing the benefits from hedging and therefore he advises to evaluate the usage of hedging for each firm individually. The lacking expertise to decide about hedges in SME is also identified by Eckbo, According to his findings, smaller companies often lack the understanding and management capacities needed to use those instruments.5.M ETHODOL OGYE OF FINANC IAL ANAL YSIS IN SM E R ISK M ANAGEM ENTHow financial analysis can be used in SME risk management?5.1.1 Development of financial r isk over view for SM EThe following sections show the development of the financial risk overview. After presenting the framework, the different ratios will be discussed to finally present a selection of suitable ratios and choose appropriate comparison data.5.1.2.Fr a mewor k for fina ncial r isk over viewThe idea is to use a set of ratios in an overview as the basis for the financial risk management.This provides even more information than the analysis of historicaldata and allows reacting fast on critical developments and managing the identified risks. However not only the internal data can be used for the risk management. In addition to that also the information available in the papers can be used.Some of them state average values for the defaulted or bankrupt companies one year prior bankruptcy -and few papers also for a longer time horizon. Those values can be used as a comparison value to evaluate the risk situation of the company. For this an appropriate set of ratios has to be chosen.The ratios, which will be included in the overview and analysis sheet, should fulfill two main requirements. First of all they should match the main financial risks of the company in order to deliver significant information and not miss an important risk factor. Secondly the ratios need to be relevant in two different ways. On the one hand they should be applicable independently of other ratios. This means that they also deliver useful information when not used in a regression, as it is applied in many of the papers. On the other hand to be appropriate to use them, the ratios need to show a different development for healthy companies than for those under financial distress. The difference between the values of the two groups should be large enough to see into which the observed company belongs.5.1.3.Eva lua tion of r a tios for fina ncia l r isk over v iewWhen choosing ratios from the different categories, it needs to be evaluated which ones are the most appropriate ones. For this some comparison values are needed in order to see whether the ratios show different values and developments for the two groups of companies. The most convenient source for the comparison values are the research papers as their values are based on large samples of annual reports and by providing average values outweigh outliers in the data. Altman shows a table with the values for 8 different ratios for the five years prior bankruptcy of which he uses 5, while Porporato & Sandin use 13 ratios in their model and Ohlson bases his evaluation on 9 figures and ratios [10]. Khong, Ong & Yap and Cerovac & Ivicic also show the difference in ratios between the two groups, however only directly before bankruptcy and not as a development over time [9]. Therefore this information is not as valuable as the others ([4][15]).In summary, the main internal financial risks in a SME should be covered by financial structure, liquidity and profitability ratios, which are the main categories of ratios applied in the research papers.Fina ncial str uctur eA ratio used in many of the papers is the total debt to total assets ratio, analyzing the financial structure of the company. Next to the papers of Altman, Ohlson and Porporato & Sandin also Khong, Ong & Yap and Cerovac & Ivicic show comparison values for this ratio. Thosedemonstrate a huge difference in size between the bankrupt and non-bankrupt groups.Figur e 1: Development of tota l debt/tota l a ssets r a tioData sour ce: Altman (1968), Por por a to & Sandin (2007) and Ohlson (1980), author ’s illustr a tionTherefore the information of total debt/total assets is more reliable and should rather be used for the overview. The other ratios analyzing the financial structure are only used in one of the papers and except for one the reference data only covers the last year before bankruptcy. Therefore a time trend cannot be detected and their relevance cannot be approved.C ost of debtThe costs of debt are another aspect of the financing risk. Porporato & Sandin use the variable interest payments/EB IT for measuring the debt costs. The variable shows how much of the income before tax and interest is spend to finance the debt. This variable also shows a clear trend when firms approach bankruptcy.L iquidityThe ratio used in all five papers to measure liquidity is the current ratio, showing the relation between current liabilities and current assets (with slight differences in the definition). Instead of the current ratio, a liquidity ratio setting the difference between current assets and current liabilities, also defined as working capital, into relation with total assets could be used.Figur e 2: Development of wor king capita l /total assets r a tioData sour ce: Altman (1968) and Ohlson (1980); author ’s illustr a t ioBasically the ratio says whether the firm would be able to pay back all its’current liabilities by using its’current assets. In case it is not able to, which is when the liabilities exceed the assets, there is an insolvency risk.6.C R ITIC AL R EVIEW AND C ONC L USIONWhen doing business, constantly decisions have to be made, whoseoutcome is not certain and thus connected with risk. In order to successfully cope with this uncertainty, corporate risk management is necessary in a business environment, which is influenced by market frictions. Different approaches and methods can be found for applying such a risk management. However, those mainly focus on large corporations, though they are the minority of all companies[13].Furthermore the approaches often require the use of statistical software and expert knowledge, which is most often not available in SME. They and their requirements for risk management have mainly been neglected [17][13].This also includes the internal financial risk management, which was in the focus of this paper. Due to the existing risks in SME and their differences to larger corporations as well as the lack of suitable risk management suggestions in theory, there is a need for a suggestion for a financial risk management in SME. The aim was to find a possible mean for the risk identification, analysis and monitoring, which can be applied by SME to manage their internal financial risks. For this purpose the financial analysis, which has been used in research to identify indicators for firm bankruptcy, was chosen. Based on an examination and analysis of different papers, despite of their different models, many similarities in the applied ratios could be identified. In general the papers focus on three categories of risk, namely liquidity, profitability and solvency, which are in accordance to the maininternal financial risks of SME. From the ratios the most appropriate ones with regard to their effectiveness in identifying risks.译文中小企业财务风险管理研究奥米德沙利菲1、摘要中小型企业( SME) 和大型企业一样，也面临着业务风险，在最糟糕的情况下，可能会导致金融危机，甚至破产。

财务风险管理外文文献翻译

中小企业的财务风险管理外文文献翻译2014年译文3000字

财务风险管理外文文献翻译原文+译文

公司财务风险中英文对照外文翻译文献

企业财务风险管理外文文献

财务风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献

财务风险管理外文文献翻译译文

财务风险外文原文

财务风险管理外文文献翻译译文

财务风险【外文翻译】

Financial-Risk-Management财务风险管理大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文

财务风险【外文翻译】

财务风险 外文翻译 外文文献 英文文献 财务风险重要性分析

Financial-Risk-Management财务风险管理大学毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文

企业财务风险管理 外文文献翻译

企业并购财务风险控制外文文献翻译译文3100字

财务风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献

财务风险 外文文献

中小企业财务风险管理外文文献翻译2017

财务风险外文翻译外文文献英文文献财务风险重要性分析

企业财务风险管理外文文献翻译

财务风险外文文献