2011年12月英语六级全真预测试卷及答案(1)
英语六级模拟及答案详解9套汇总
2011年12月预测模拟题第一套Part ⅡReading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes)Will Electronic Medical Records Improve Health Care?Electronic health records (EHRs) have received a lot of attention since the Obama administration committed $19 billion in stimulus funds earlier this year to encourage hospitals and health care facilities to digitize patient data and make better use of information technology. The healthcare industry as a whole, however, has been slow to adopt information technology and integrate computer systems, raising the question of whether the push to digitize will result in information that empowers doctors to make better-informed decisions or a morass of disconnected data.The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) knows firsthand how difficult it is to achieve the former, and how easily an EHR plan can fall into the latter. UPMC has spent five years and more than $1 billion on information technology systems to get ahead of the EHR issue. While that is more than five times as much as recent estimates say it should cost a hospital system, UPMC is a mammoth network consisting of 20 hospitals as well as 400 doctors' offices, outpatient sites and long-term care facilities employing about 50,000 people.UPMC's early attempts to create a universal EHR system, such as its ambulatory electronic medical records rolled out between 2000 and 2005, were met with resistance as doctors, staff and other users either avoided using the new technology altogether or clung to individual, disconnected software and systems that UPMC's IT department had implemented over the years.On the mendAlthough UPMC began digitizing some of its records in 1996, the turning point in its efforts came in 2004 with the rollout of its eRecord system across the entire health care network. eRecord now contains more than 3.6 million electronic patient records, including images and CT scans, clinical laboratory information, radiology data, and a picture archival and communication system that digitizes images and makes them available on PCs. The EHR system has 29,000 users, including more than 5,000 physicians employed by or affiliated with UPMC.If UPMC makes EHR systems look easy, don't be fooled, cautions UPMC chief medical information officer Dan Martich, who says the health care network's IT systems require a "huge, ongoing effort" to ensure that those systems can communicate with one another. One of the main reasons is that UPMC, like many other health care organizations, uses a number of different vendors for its medical and IT systems, leaving the integration largely up to the IT staff.Since doctors typically do not want to change the way they work for the sake of a computer system, the success of an EHR program is dictated not only by the presence of the technology but also by how well the doctors are trained on, and use, the technology. Physicians need to see the benefits of using EHR systems both persistently and consistently, says Louis Baverso, chief information officer at UPMC's Magee-Women's Hospital. But these benefits might not be obvious at first, he says, adding, "What doctors see in the beginning is that they're losing their ability to work with paper documents, which has been so valuable to them up until now."Opportunities and costsGiven the lack of EHR adoption throughout the health care world, there are a lot of opportunities to get this right (or wrong). Less than 10 percent of U.S. hospitals have adopted electronic medical records even in the most basic way, according to a study authored by Ashish Jha, associate professor of health policy and management at Harvard School of Public Health. Only 1.5 percent have adopted a comprehensive system of electronic records that includes physicians' notes and orders and decision support systems that alert doctors of potential drug interactionsor other problems that might result from their intended orders.Cost is the primary factor stalling EHR systems, followed by resistance from physicians unwilling to adopt new technologies and a lack of staff with adequate IT expertise, according to Jha. He indicated that a hospital could spend from $20 million to $200 million to implement an electronic record system over several years, depending on the size of the hospital. A typical doctor's office would cost an estimated $50,000 to outfit with an EHR system.The upside of EHR systems is more difficult to quantify. Although some estimates say that hospitals and doctor's offices could save as much as $100 million annually by moving to EHRs, the mere act of implementing the technology guarantees neither cost savings nor improvements in care, Jha said during a Harvard School of Public Health community forum on September 17. Another Harvard study of hospital computerization likewise determined that cutting costs and improving care through health IT as it exists today is "wishful thinking". This study was led by David Himmelstein, associate professor at Harvard Medical School.The cost of getting it wrongThe difference between the projected cost savings and the reality of the situation stems from the fact that the EHR technologies implemented to date have not been designed to save money or improve patient care, says Leonard D'Avolio, associate center director of Biomedical Informatics at the Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MA VERIC). Instead, EHRs are used to document individual patients' conditions, pass this information among clinicians treating those patients, justify financial reimbursement and serve as the legal records of events.This is because, if a health care facility has $1 million to spend, its managers are more likely to spend it on an expensive piece of lab equipment than on information technology, D'Avolio says, adding that the investment on lab equipment can be made up by charging patients access to it as a billable service. This is not the case for IT. Also, computers and networks used throughout hospitals and health care facilities are disconnected and often manufactured by different vendors without a standardized way of communicating. "Medical data is difficult to standardize because caring for patients is a complex process," he says. "We need to find some way of reaching across not just departments but entire hospitals. If you can't measure something, you can't improve it, and without access to this data, you can't measure it."To qualify for a piece of the $19 billion being offered through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), healthcare facilities will have to justify the significance of their IT investments to ensure they are "meaningful users" of EHRs. The Department of Health and Human Services has yet to define what it considers meaningful useAggregating info to create knowledgeIdeally, in addition to providing doctors with basic information about their patients, databases of vital signs, images, laboratory values, medications, diseases, interventions, and patient demographic information could be mined for new knowledge, D'Avolio says. "With just a few of these databases networked together, the power to improve health care increases exponentially," D'Avolio suggested. "All that is missing is the collective realization that better health care requires access to better information—not automation of the status quo." Down the road, the addition of genomic information, environmental factors and family history to these databases will enable clinicians to begin to realize the potential of personalized medicine, he added.1. In America, it is slow to adopt information technology because —————.A) the funds invested by the government is not enough in the pastB) EHRs have received less attention of the public in the pastC) whether it will be useful to doctors or not is doubtfulD) UPMC knows how difficult it is to digitize the hospital2. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) —————.A) is the first medical center to adopt information technologyB) satisfy the requirement of the government on information technologyC) spent less money on information technology than it was estimatedD) attempted to created a universal EHR system, but met some difficulties3. The health care network‟s IT systems require a lot of effort to ensure it can communicate with one another mainly because —————..A) the integration among different system is largely up to the IT staffB) UPMC is like many other health care organizations in the United StatesC) UPMC makes EHR systems look easyD) UMPC began digitizing some of its records in 19964. The success of the EHR program is decided by —————..A) the fact whether the information technology is available or notB) the fact how well the doctors are trained to use the information technologyC) not only the presence of the technology but the doctor‟s training on technolog yD) the fact whether physicians can see the benefits of using EHR systems5. The most important reason of most hospitals being reluctant to adopt EHR system is that —————.A) the cost is too high for the hospital to affordB) physicians are unwilling to adopt itC) there is a lack of staff with adequate IT expertiseD) doctor worry about its negative influence on patients6. According to the study led by David Himmelstein through health IT —————.A) it is possible to cut the costs of the hospitalB) it is possible to improve the health careC) it ensure neither cost saving nor improvement in careD) it could save as much as $100 million annually7. The hospital‟s managers prefer to —————.A) spend money on an expensive piece of equipment than on information technologyB) charge patients access to the information technology as a billable serviceC) purchase the information technology to improve the health care of the hospitalD) invest more money on the training of the physicians to charge patients more money8. Jha said the mere act of implementing the technology guarantees ______________________.9. D'Avolio says the investment on lab equipment can be made up by_____________________.10. Databases of vital signs, images, laboratory values, medications, diseases, interventions, and patient demographic information could be ____________________.Passage OneThe Super Bowl is one of the biggest events on the advertising calendar, as companies vie to produce the most memorable and innovative ads. The battle for the National Football League's ultimate prize attracts more viewers than anything else on American television and provides a "symbolic pulsetaking" for the advertising industry every February, says John Frelinghuysen, an analyst at Bain and Company, a consultancy. But this year the patient is in poor health. All the advertising slots(广告摊位) for the 2008 Super Bowl had been sold by the end of November 2007, despite the $ 2.6 million price of each. For 2009 the price has risen to $ 3 million, but at least,ten slots (out of 67) are still looking for a buyer.General Motors, which ran 11 ads on Super Bowl Sunday in February 2008, has already said that it will not run any in 2009. America's two other big carmakers, Ford and Chrysler, are likely to follow suit. Tellingly, Monster com, an online job-search company, said recently that it was buying a slot. Instead of the usual parade of expensive ads paying tribute to American consumerism, 2009's Super Bowl will reflect a country in recession and indicate a hard year for the advertising industry.Most forecasts for next year say that ad spending in America will decline by 5% or more. Much depends on the fate of the automotive industry: carmakers and dealers normally spend around $ 20 billion a year on advertising, but Chrysler and Ford scaled back their expenditure by more than 30% in the first nine months of 2008, and are expected to make further cuts in 2009 as they struggle for survival.The car industry's situation will hurt all media, but especially television. Analysts at BMO Capital Markets predict that total spending on television ads will fall by almost 9% next year. Only newspapers, where a decline of 12% is expected, are forecast to fare worse. Carmakers have already shifted some of their advertising spending to the Internet, and are likely to go further in 2009. Car ads make up 25% of advertising revenues for local television channels, and carmakers have been among the most consistent buyers of high-priced ads on national television.So far local stations have been most affected by falling spending on advertising. National stations have been safer, because they operate on longer-term contracts with advertisers. But in the New Year they will also feel the chill, as companies fail to renew their contracts. Television, which has remained strong as print media have lost advertising dollars and readers to the Internet, could enter a decline of its own. "Next on the list is TV stations," says Anthony Diclemente, a media analyst at Barclays Capital.52. Why does the author give the example of Super Bowl?A) Because it is the most popular football games in America.B) Because it shows advertisers' enthusiasm in running slots has dropped.C) Because it is an event that attracts the attention of advertisers.D) Because it will be right on in America in 2009.53. Why can't at least ten slots find a buyer (Last sentence, Para. 1 ) according to the passage?A) The price for running the advertising slots has risen to $ 3 million.B) It is not attractive any more for the advertising industry.C) The advertising industry is suffering a hard year.D) The advertising slots have been on the rise since 2007.54. What may the carmakers resort to for promoting their automobiles and cutting down expenditure?A) Buying low-priced ads on national television.B) Renewing new contracts with national stations.C) Shifting their advertising spending to the Internet.D) Relying on such print media as newspaper.55. What does the sentence "Next on the list is TV stations" ( last paragraph) said by Anthony Diclemente mean?A) What he is going to analyze next is TV stations.B) What advertisers prefer to use is TV stations.C) TV station is the next to be defeated by Internet.D) He would choose TV station as a second choice.56. We can learn from the passage that ______.A) Ford and Chrysler will run the advertising slots in 2009B) 2009's Super Bowl will still be an expensive ads paradeC) America's ad spending this year will decline by 5% or moreD) Carmakers' fate determines to certain extent the ad spending in AmericaPassage TwoAccording to some individuals, if your house is built in the right position, this may affect your success in life, which seems strange to many people. However, to believers in Feng-Shui, or the art of geomancy, not only the position but also the choice of decorations and even the color of your home can mean the difference between good fortune and disaster. This art has been practiced for centuries in China and is still used all over South East Asia. Even the huge Hong Kong banks call in a geomant if they are planning to build new offices. They have such faith in his knowledge that if he advises them to move, they will alter their plans for even their biggest buildings.Like many Oriental beliefs the geomant's skill depends on the idea of harmony in nature. If there is no imbalance between the opposing forces of Yin and Yang, the building will bring luck to its inhabitants. This means that the house must be built on the right spot as well as facing the right direction, and also be painted an auspicious color. For instance, if there are mountains to the north, this will protect them from evil influences. If the house is painted red, this will bring happiness to the occupants while green symbolizes youth and will bring long life. Other factors, such as the owner's time and date of birth, are taken into account, too. The geomant believes that unless all these are considered when choosing a site for construction, the fortune of the people using it will be at risk.Indeed, to ignore the geomant's advice can have fatal results. The death of the internationally famous Kung-Fu star, Brucee Lee, has been used as an example. It is said that when Lee found out that the house he was living in was an unlucky one, he followed a geomant's advice and installed an eight-sided mirror outside his front door to bring him luck. Unfortunately, a storm damaged the mirror and the house was left unprotected from harmful influences. Soon afterwards Lee died in mysterious circumstances.Not only is Feng-Shui still used in South East Asia, but it has also spread right across the world. Even in modern New York a successful commercial artist called Milton Glaser has found it useful. He was so desperate after his office was broken into six times that he consulted a geomant. He was told to install a fish tank with six black fish and fix a red clock to the ceiling. Since then he has not been burglarized once. It may seem an incredible story, but no other suitable explanation has been offered.57. From the passage we can infer that Feng-Shui is NOT used in ______.A) Hong Kong B) the United States C) Japan D) Thailand58. Geomants believe that ______.A) houses must only be painted red B) houses must face mountainsC) nature and life should be in harmony D) green is an unlucky color59. Geomants think that the reason for Bruce Lee's death is that ______.A) he didn't follow the geomants' advice B) he installed an eight-sided mirrorC) he misunderstood the geomant's advice D) a storm damaged the protection for his house60. The story of Milton Glaser shows that ______.A) colors are not important in geomancy B) geomancy is used by artistsC) geomancy is used in the West D) the fight against crime is being won61. Which of the following best describes geomancy?A) It is a style of Oriental decoration.B) It is a type of painting.C) it is an ancient Chinese belief called Feng-Shui.D) It is an architectural design.第二套Part ⅡReading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes)Will Electronic Medical Records Improve Health Care?Electronic health records (EHRs) have received a lot of attention since the Obama administration committed $19 billion in stimulus funds earlier this year to encourage hospitals and health care facilities to digitize patient data and make better use of information technology. The healthcare industry as a whole, however, has been slow to adopt information technology and integrate computer systems, raising the question of whether the push to digitize will result in information that empowers doctors to make better-informed decisions or a morass of disconnected data.The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) knows firsthand how difficult it is to achieve the former, and how easily an EHR plan can fall into the latter. UPMC has spent five years and more than $1 billion on information technology systems to get ahead of the EHR issue. While that is more than five times as much as recent estimates say it should cost a hospital system, UPMC is a mammoth network consisting of 20 hospitals as well as 400 doctors‟ offices, outpatient sites and long-term care facilities employing about 50,000 people.UPMC‟s early attempts to create a universal EHR system, such as its ambulatory electronic medical records rolled out between 2000 and 2005, were met with resistance as doctors, staff and other users either avoided using the new technology altog ether or clung to individual, disconnected software and systems that UPMC‟s IT department had implemented over the years.On the mendAlthough UPMC began digitizing some of its records in 1996, the turning point in its efforts came in 2004 with the rollout of its eRecord system across the entire health care network. eRecord now contains more than 3.6 million electronic patient records, including images and CT scans, clinical laboratory information, radiology data, and a picture archival and communication system that digitizes images and makes them available on PCs. The EHR system has 29,000 users, including more than 5,000 physicians employed by or affiliated with UPMC.If UPMC makes EHR systems look easy, don‟t be fooled, cautions UPMC chief medical information officer Dan Martich, who says the health care network‟s IT systems require a "huge, ongoing effort" to ensure that those systems can communicate with one another. One of the main reasons is that UPMC, like many other health care organizations, uses a number of different vendors for its medical and IT systems, leaving the integration largely up to the IT staff.Since doctors typically do not want to change the way they work for the sake of a computer system, the success of an EHR program is dictated not only by the presence of the technology but also by how well the doctors are trained on, and use, the technology. Physicians need to see the benefits of using EHR systems both persistently and consistently, says Louis Baverso, chief information of ficer at UPMC‟s Magee-Women‟s Hospital. But these benefits might not be obvious at first, he says, adding, "What doctors see in the beginning is that they‟re losing their ability to work with paper documents, which has been so valuable to them up until now."Opportunities and costsGiven the lack of EHR adoption throughout the health care world, there are a lot of opportunities to get this right (or wrong). Less than 10 percent of U.S. hospitals have adopted electronic medical records even in the most basic way, according to a study authored by Ashish Jha, associate professor of health policy and management at Harvard School of Public Health. Only 1.5 percent have adopted a comprehensive system of electronic records that includes physicians‟ notes and o rders and decision support systems that alert doctors of potential drug interactions or other problems that might result from their intended orders.Cost is the primary factor stalling EHR systems, followed by resistance from physicians unwilling to adopt new technologies and a lack of staff with adequate IT expertise, according to Jha. He indicated that a hospitalcould spend from $20 million to $200 million to implement an electronic record system over several years, depending on the size of the hospita l. A typical doctor‟s office would cost an estimated $50,000 to outfit with an EHR system.The upside of EHR systems is more difficult to quantify. Although some estimates say that hospitals and doctor‟s offices could save as much as $100 million annuall y by moving to EHRs, the mere act of implementing the technology guarantees neither cost savings nor improvements in care, Jha said during a Harvard School of Public Health community forum on September 17. Another Harvard study of hospital computerization likewise determined that cutting costs and improving care through health IT as it exists today is "wishful thinking". This study was led by David Himmelstein, associate professor at Harvard Medical School.The cost of getting it wrongThe difference between the projected cost savings and the reality of the situation stems from the fact that the EHR technologies implemented to date have not been designed to save money or improve patient care, says Leonard D‟Avolio, associate center director of Biomedica l Informatics at the Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MA VERIC). Instead, EHRs are used to document individual patients‟ conditions, pass this information among clinicians treating those patients, justify financial reimbu rsement and serve as the legal records of events.This is because, if a health care facility has $1 million to spend, its managers are more likely to spend it on an expensive piece of lab equipment than on information technology, D‟Avolio says, adding th at the investment on lab equipment can be made up by charging patients access to it as a billable service. This is not the case for IT. Also, computers and networks used throughout hospitals and health care facilities are disconnected and often manufactured by different vendors without a standardized way of communicating. "Medical data is difficult to standardize because caring for patients is a complex process," he says. "We need to find some way of reaching across not just departments but entire hospitals. If you can‟t measure something, you can‟t improve it, and without access to this data, you can‟t measure it."To qualify for a piece of the $19 billion being offered through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), healthcare facilities will have to justify the significance of their IT investments to ensure they are "meaningful users" of EHRs. The Department of Health and Human Services has yet to define what it considers meaningful useAggregating info to create knowledgeIdeally, in addition to providing doctors with basic information about their patients, databases of vital signs, images, laboratory values, medications, diseases, interventions, and patient demographic information could be mined for new knowledge, D‟Avolio says. "With ju st a few of these databases networked together, the power to improve health care increases exponentially," D‟Avolio suggested. "All that is missing is the collective realization that better health care requires access to better information—not automation of the status quo." Down the road, the addition of genomic information, environmental factors and family history to these databases will enable clinicians to begin to realize the potential of personalized medicine, he added.1. In America, it is slow to adopt information technology because .A) the funds invested by the government is not enough in the pastB) EHRs have received less attention of the public in the pastC) whether it will be useful to doctors or not is doubtfulD) UPMC knows how difficult it is to digitize the hospital2. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) .A) is the first medical center to adopt information technologyB) satisfy the requirement of the government on information technologyC) spent less money on information technology than it was estimatedD) attempted to created a universal EHR system, but met some difficulties3. The health care network‟s IT systems require a lot of effort to ensure it can communicate with one another mainly because .A) the integration among different system is largely up to the IT staffB) UPMC is like many other health care organizations in the United StatesC) UPMC makes EHR systems look easyD) UMPC began digitizing some of its records in 19964. The success of the EHR program is decided by .A) the fact whether the information technology is available or notB) the fact how well the doctors are trained to use the information technologyC) not only the presence of the technology but the doctor‟s training on technologyD) the fact whether physicians can see the benefits of using EHR systems5. The most important reason of most hospitals being reluctant to adopt EHR system is that .A) the cost is too high for the hospital to affordB) physicians are unwilling to adopt itC) there is a lack of staff with adequate IT expertiseD) doctor worry about its negative influence on patients6. According to the study led by David Himmelstein through health IT .A) it is possible to cut the costs of the hospitalB) it is possible to improve the health careC) it ensure neither cost saving nor improvement in careD) it could save as much as $100 million annually7. The hospital‟s managers prefer to .A) spend money on an expensive piece of equipment than on information technologyB) charge patients access to the information technology as a billable serviceC) purchase the information technology to improve the health care of the hospitalD) invest more money on the training of the physicians to charge patients more money8. Jha said the mere act of implementing the technology guarantees ______________________.9. D‟Avolio says the investment on lab equipment can be made up by_____________________.10. Databases of vital signs, images, laboratory values, medications, diseases, interventions, and patient demographic information could be ____________________.Passage OneComputers are now employed in an increasing number of fields in our daily life. Computers have been taught to play not only checkers, but also championship chess, which is a fairly accurate yardstick for measuring the computer‟s progress in the ability to learn from experience.Because the game requires logical reasoning, chess would seem to be perfectly suited to the computer. All a programmer has to do is to give the computer a program evaluating the consequences of every possible response to every possible move, and the computer will win every time. In theory this is a sensible approach; in practice it is impossible. Today, a powerful computer can analyze 40,000 moves a second. That is an impressive speed. But there are an astronomical number of possible moves in chess—literally trillions. Even if such a program were written (and in theory it could be, given enough people and enough time), there is no computer capable of holding。
2011年12月六级真题
2011年12月六级真题Part I WritingDirections:For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled Excessive Use of Plastic Bags. You should write at least 120 words following the outline given below in Chinese.1.目前塑料袋存在的问题2.减少使用塑料袋的重要性3.如何做到减少使用塑料袋Excessive Use of Plastic BagsIn recent years, the excessive use of plastic bags has become a topic of great concern. Plastic bags are lightweight, convenient, and inexpensive to produce, which explains their popularity across the globe. However, their convenience comes at a significant cost to the environment.The problems associated with plastic bags are numerous. Firstly, plastic bags are non-biodegradable, which means they will persist in the environment for hundreds of years, causing serious pollution. They are often littered and end up in water bodies, where they pose a threat to marine life. Secondly, plastic bags are derived from fossil fuels, contributing to the depletion of non-renewable resources and exacerbating climate change.Reducing the use of plastic bags is of paramount importance. Firstly, it can help alleviate environmental pollution. By using reusable shopping bags made of cloth or fabric, we can significantly decrease the demand for plastic bags and reduce the amount of waste generated. This, in turn, can minimize the harmful effects on the ecosystem and protect marine life.Moreover, reducing the use of plastic bags can help conserve non-renewable resources. The production of plastic bags relies heavily on fossil fuels, which are finite and will eventually run out. By using alternative materials or adopting sustainable practices like utilizing biodegradable bags, we can ensure the sustainable use of resources for future generations.To achieve the goal of reducing plastic bag usage, several steps can be taken. Firstly, governments should introduce regulations or impose taxes on plastic bags to deter their use. This approach has proved effective in countries like Ireland, where a plastic bag tax has resulted in a significant reduction in usage. Secondly, promoting education and raising public awareness is crucial. By educating the public about theharms of plastic bags and the benefits of alternative options, individuals can make informed choices and actively participate in reducing plastic bag consumption.In conclusion, the excessive use of plastic bags has severe consequences for the environment and the sustainable use of resources. It is a collective responsibility to address this issue. By reducing plastic bag usage through regulatory measures, education, and public awareness campaigns, we can contribute to a greener and more sustainable future.Part III Listening ComprehensionSection ADirections:In this section, you will hear 8 short conversations and 2 long conversations. At the end of each conversation, one or more questions will be asked about what was said. Both the conversation and the questions will be spoken only once. After each question, there will be a pause. During the pause, you must read the four choices marked A), B), C) and D), and decide which is the best answer. Then mark the corresponding letter on the Answer Sheet with a single line through the center.11. W: How’s your Chinese food?M: Wonderful. I love Chinese food. Actually, I learned how to cook Chinese dishes when I was in China.Q: What did the man do in China?12. W: Excuse me, is there a bus stop nearby?M: Yes, go straight for about two blocks. The bus stop is right over there.Q: What does the man mean?… (更多内容请访问 Markdown 文档)。
2011年12月英语四级全真预测试卷及答案(1)-1
最牛英语口语培训模式:躺在家里练口语,全程外教一对一,三个月畅谈无阻!洛基英语,免费体验全部在线一对一课程:/wenkxd.htm(报名网址)Part IV Reading Comprehension (Reading in Depth) (25 minutes)Section ADirections: In this section, there is a passage with ten blanks. You are required to select one word for each blank from a list of choices given in a word bank following the passage. Read the passage through carefully before making your choices. Each choice in bank is identified by a letter. Please mark the corresponding letter for each item on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the center. You may not use any of the words in the bank more than once.Questions 47 to 56 are based on the following passage.Perhaps like most Americans you have some extra pounds to 47 . You may even have tried a fad diet or two, but found yourself right back where you started. The key to weight loss is regular 48 activity. And surprisingly, you don’t have to give up eating or make the gym your second home to see long-term, 49 effects.You body needs a certain amount of energy to maintain basic 50 such as breathing, blood circulation and digestion. The energy required to keep your organs functioning is referred to as the resting or basal metabolic rate.Any time you are active, 51 energy is required. It is obtained from glycogen and fat stored in the blood, liver, and muscles. The key to losing weight is to draw on the fat rather than on the carbohydrate reserves.Which of the two energy sources you use depends on the intensity and 52 of your activity. The higher the intensity, the more your body will pull from the stored carbohydrates. The lower the intensity, the more your body will 53 on fat as its fuel.Aerobic exercise is most 54 for weight loss. When you perform aerobic activities you 55 contract large muscle groups such as your legs and arms. Walking, running, rollerblading, swimming, dancing, and jumping jacks are all forms of aerobic activity.Surprisingly, if your aerobic activity is low to moderately intense and of long duration, you will burn more fat than if you had 56 in a short burst of high-intensity exercise. In short, a brisk 30-minute walk will burn fat while a 100-yard sprint will burn glycogen.[A] positive[B] additional[C] duration[D] effective[E] shed[F] physical[G] food[H] functions [I] participated[J] rely[K] cut[L] repeatedly[M] uses[N] little[O] obviousSection BDirections: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statement. For each of them there are four choices marked [A], [B], [C]and [D]. You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the center.Passage OneQuestions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage.There are many ways of defining success. It is accurate to say that each of us has our own concept of success to the extent that each of us is responsible for setting our own goals and determining whether we have met these goals satisfactorily. Because each of us possesses unique differences in genetic ability and favorable environments in which to express these abilities, it is necessarily true that we must define success broadly.For some people, simply being able to live their life with a minimum of misery and suffering is considered a success. Think of the peace of mind of the poor shepherd who tends his sheep, enjoys his frugal life with his family in the beauty of nature, and who is respected because he does a good job of achieving the goals expected of and accepted by his and his society. On the other hand, it seems that even though some people appear to be rich in material possessions, many of them seem to be miserable and consider themselves unsuccessful when judged by their own standards of success. Because not all ventures can be successful, one should not set unrealistic goals for achieving success, but if one has self-confidence it would be unfortunate to set one’s goals at too low a level of achievement.A wise counselor once said to a young man who was experiencing frustration with his own professional success: "You do not have to set your goal to reach the moon in order to have success in traveling. Sometimes one can be very successful merely by taking a walk in the park or riding the subway downtown," The counselor added, " You have not really failed and spoiled your chances for success until you have been unsuccessful at something you really like, and to which you have given you best effort."57. In the first paragraph, the author implies that ________ are essential in achieving success.[A] ability and goals [C] ability and environment[B] goals and determination [D] goals and environment58. The word "frugal" (Line 2, Para. 2) means ________.[A] wealthy [C] thrifty[B] wasteful [D] miserable59. Some rich people consider themselves unsuccessful because ________.[A] their life is miserable [C] their goals are too low[B] they do not live in peace [D] they are not rich enough by their own standards.60. The last paragraph implies that ________.[A] we should have high goals [C] success means taking a walk in the park[B] success means achieving great goals [D] success means trying one’s best at what onereally likes61. This passage mainly talks about ________.[A] the definition of success [C] how to set goals[B] how to achieve success [D] the importance of goalsPassage TwoQuestions 62 to 66 are based in the following passage.When Mike Kelly first set out to build his own private space-ferry service, he figures his bread-and-butter business would be lofting satellite into high earth orbit. Now he thinks he may have figured wrong. "People were always asking me when they could go," says Kelly, who runs Kelly Space Technology, "I realized the real market is in space tourism."According to preliminary market surveys, there are 10,000 would-be space tourists willing to spend $1 million each to visit the final frontier. Space Adventures in Arlington have taken more than 130 deposits for a two-hour, $98,000 space tour tentatively set to occur by 2005. This may sound great, but there are a few hurdles. Putting a simple satellite into orbit—with no oxygen, life support or return trip necessary—already costs and astronomical $2,200/kg. And that doesn’t include the cost of insuring rich and possibly litigious(爱打官司的)passengers. The entire group of entrepreneurs trying to corner the spacetourism market has between them "just enough money to blow up one rocket".The U.S. space agency has plenty of money but zero interest in making space less expensive for the little guys. So the little guys are racing to do what the government has failed to do: design a reusable launch system that’s inexpensive, safe and reliable. Kelly Space’s prototype looks like a plane that has sprouted rocket engines. Rotary Rocket in California has a booster with rotors to make a helicopter-style return to earth. The first passenger countdowns are still years away, but bureaucrats at the Federal Aviation Administration in Washington are already informally discussing flight regulations. After all, you can’t be too prepared for a trip to that galaxy far, far away.62. Which of the following is the best title for the passage?[A] Take Vacations in Space [C] Flight Regulations in Space Travels[B] Building Hotels in Space [D] Cost of Space Traveling63. The phrase "bread-and-butter business" (Line 1, Pare.1) most probably means ________.[A] a business to sell bread and butter [C] the business to make a living[B] a business to produce bread and butter [D] a traveling agency64. How much is the 2-hour space tour for each person according to Space Adventures in Arlington?[A] $1 million. [B] $10,000. [C] $98,000 [D] $22,00065. Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?[A] The biggest hurdle for the space-tourism project is lack of a life supporting system.[B] The entrepreneurs trying to explore the space-tourism have plenty of money.[C] The government has little interests in this project.[D] The first passenger countdowns are within a few years.66. What’s the author’s tone in the last sentence of the passage?[A] Objective. [C] Approving.[B] Ironical. [D] Enthusiastic.“成千上万人疯狂下载。
2011年12月大学英语六级真题
First,they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving theworld's books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company.In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books,Robert Darnton,the head of Harvard University's library,argued that because such books are a common resource–the possession of us all–only public,not-for-profit bodies should be given the power to control them.The second related criticism is that Google's scanning of books is actually illegal.This allegation has led to Google becoming mired in(陷入)a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case in Charles Dickens'Bleak House look straightforward.At its centre,however,is one simple issue:that of copyright.The inconvenient fact aboutmost books,to which Google has arguably paid insufficient attention,is that they are protected by copyright.Copyright laws differ from country to country,but in general protection extends forthe duration of an author's life and for a substantial period afterwards,thus allowing the author's heirs to benefit.(In Britain and America,this post-death period is70years.)This means,of course, that almost all of the books published in the20th century are still under copyright–and the last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined.Of the roughly40 million books in US libraries,for example,an estimated32million are in copyright.Of these,some 27million are out of print.Outside the US,Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thus in the "public domain"(works such as the Bodleian's first edition of Middlemarch,which anyone can read for free on Google Books Search).But,within the US,the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works.In its defence,Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are incopyright–arguing that such displays are"fair use".But critics allege that by makingelectronic copies of these books without first seeking the permission of copyright holders,Google has committed piracy."The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied onlyonce authors have expressly given their permission,"says Piers Blofeld,of the Sheil Land literary agency in London."Google has reversed this–it has simply copied all these works without bothering toask."In2005,the Authors Guild of America,together with a group of US publishers,launched a class action suit(集团诉讼)against Google that,after more than two years of negotiation,ended with an announcement last October that Google and the claimants had reached an out-of-court settlement.The full details are complicated-the text alone runs to385pages–and trying to sum arise it is no easy task."Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible,"says Blofeld, one of the settlement's most vocal British critics.Broadly,the deal provides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors and publishers whose rights it has breached(including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates from their works).In exchange for this,the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future.This settlement hands Google the power-but only with the agreement of individual rights holders–to exploit its database of out-of-print books.It can include them in subscription deals soldto libraries or sell them individually under a consumer licence.It is these commercial provisions that are proving the settlement's most controversial aspect.Critics point out that,by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database,the settlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the company's role from provider of information to seller."Google's business model has always been to provide information for free,and sell advertising on the basis of the traffic this generates,"points out James Grimmelmann,associate professor at New York Law School.Now,he says,because of the settlement's provisions,Google could become a significant force in bookselling.Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on"orphan"works,where there is noknown copyright holder–these make up an estimated5-10%of the books Google has scanned.Under the settlement,when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work,commercial control automatically reverts to Google.Google will be able to display up to20% of orphan works for free,include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer licence.It is by no means certain that the settlement will be enacted(执行)–it is the subject of a fairness hearing in the US courts.But if it is enacted,Google will in effect be off the hook as faras copyright violations in the US are concerned.Many people are seriously concerned by this-and the company is likely to face challenges in other courts around the world.No one knows the precise use Google will make of the intellectual property it has gained by scanning the world's library books,and the truth,as Gleick,an American science writer and member of the Authors Guild,points out,is that the company probably doesn't even know itself.But what is certain is that,in some way or other,Google's entrance into digital bookselling will have a significant impact on the book world in the years to come.注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
2011年大学英语六级模拟试题及精确答案
2010年大学英语六级考试最新模拟试题(精确版)更多相关四六级试题:大学英语四级:2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(10)/exam/7666.html2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(9)/exam/7665.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(8)/exam/7664.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(7)/exam/7660.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(6)/exam/7655.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(5)/exam/7654.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(4)/exam/7653.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(3)/exam/7652.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(2)/exam/7629.html 2011年大学英语四级(CET-4)预测试卷(1)/exam/7629.html大学英语六级:2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(10)/exam/7617.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(9)/exam/7616.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(8)/exam/7614.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(7)/exam/7608.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(6)/exam/7607.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(5)/exam/7606.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(4)/exam/7600.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(3)/exam/7596.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(2)/exam/7591.html 2011年大学英语六级(CET-6)预测试卷(1)/exam/7589.html。
2011年12月英语六级真题及答案
2011年12月大学英语六级(CET-6)真题试卷Part III Listening Comprehension (35 minutes)Section ADirections:In this section, you will hear 8 short conversations and 2 long conversations. At the end of each conversation, one or more questions will be asked about what was said. Both theconversation and the questions will be spoken only once. After each question there willbe a pause. During the pause, you must read the four choices marked A), B), C) and D),and decide which is the best answer. Then mark the corresponding letter on AnswerSheet 2 with a single line through the centre.注意:此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
11. A) Cancel the trip to prepare for the test.B) Review his notes once he arrives in Chicago.C) Listen to the recorded notes while driving.D) Prepare for the test after the wedding.12. A) The woman will help the man remember the lines.B) The man lacks confidence in playing the part.C) The man hopes to change his role in the play.D) The woman will prompt the man during the show.13. A) Preparations for an operation. C) Arranging a bed for a patient.B) A complicated surgical case. D) Rescuing the woman's uncle.14. A) He is interested in improving his editing skills.B) He is eager to be nominated the new editor.C) He is sure to do a better job than Simon.D) He is too busy to accept more responsibility.15. A) He has left his position in the government.B) He has already reached the retirement age.C) He made a stupid decision at the cabinet meeting.D) He has been successfully elected Prime Minister.16. A) This year's shuttle mission is a big step in space exploration.B) The man is well informed about the space shuttle missions.C) The shuttle flight will be broadcast live worldwide.D) The man is excited at the news of the shuttle flight.17. A) At an auto rescue center. C) At a suburban garage.B) At a car renting company. D) At a mountain camp.18. A) He got his speakers fixed. C) He listened to some serious musicB) He went shopping with the woman. D) He bought a stereo system.Questions 19 to 21 are based on the conversation you have just heard.19. A) Providing aid to the disabled.B) Printing labels for manufactured goods.C) Promoting products for manufacturers.D) Selling products made for left-handers.20. A) Most of them are specially made for his shop.B) All of them are manufactured in his own plant.C) The kitchenware in his shop is of unique design.D) About half of them are unavailable on the market.21. A) They specialise in one product only. C) They run chain stores in central London.B) They have outlets throughout Britain. D) They sell by mail order only.Questions 22 to 25 are based on the conversation you have just heard.22. A) It publishes magazines. C) It runs sales promotion campaigns.B) It sponsors trade fairs. D) It is engaged in product design.23. A) The ad specifications had not been given in detail.B) The woman's company made last-minute changes.C) The woman's company failed to make payments in time.D) Organising the promotion was really time-consuming.24. A) Extend the campaign to next year. C) Run another four-week campaign.B) Cut the fee by half for this year. D) Give her a 10 percent discount.25. A) Stop negotiating for the time being. C) Reflect on their respective mistakesB) Calm down and make peace. D) Improve their promotion plans.Section BDirections:In this section, you will hear 3 short passages. At the end of each passage, you willhear some questions. Both the passage and the questions will be spoken only once.After you heara question, you must choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) andD). Then mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through thecentre.注意:此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。
大学英语六级考试2011年12月真题答案
2011 年12 月大学真题答案快速阅读1. Google claims its plan for the world’s biggest online library is _____ 【答案】B. to serve the interest of the general public2.According to Santiago de la Mora, Google’s book-scanning project will 【答案】B. broaden humanity’s intellec tual horizons3.Opponents of Google Books believe that digitally archiving the world's books should be controlled by_______. 【答案】C. non-profit organizations4.【答案】D. the copyright of the books it scanned5.【答案】B. the online display of in-copyright books is not for commercial use6.【答案】B. It was settle after more than two years of negotiation.7.【答案】D. The commercial provision of the settlement8.【答案】Providing information for free9.【答案】orphan works10.【答案】change the world’s book marketSection A11.【答案】A) Listen to the recorded notes while driving.12.【答案】C) The man lacks confidence in playing the part.13.【答案】A) Arranging a bed for a patient14.【答案】A) He is too busy to accept more responsibility.15. 【答案】C) He has left his position in the government.16. 【答案】D) The man is well informed about the space shuttle missions.17. 【答案】A) At a car renting company18. What did the man do over the weekend? 【答案】A) He listened to some serious music.19: What kind of business does the man engaged in? 【答案】B) Selling products made for left-handers.20: What does the man say about his stock of products? 【答案】D) Most of them are specially made for his shop.21: What does the man say about other people in his line of business? 【答案】D) They sell by mail order only.22: What do we lea rn about the man’s company? 【答案】C)It sponsors trade fairs.23: Why was the campaign delayed according to the man? 【答案】C)The woman's company made last-minute changes.24: What does the woman propose as a solution to the problem? 【答案】D) Cut the fee by half for this year.25: What does the man suggest they do at the end of the conversation? 【答案】D)Reflect on their respective mistakes.26. What does the passage say about most of the mice used for experiments? 【答案】D)They sacrifice their lives for the benefit of humans.27 Why did the so-called bad mice have to be captured and destroyed? 【答案】C) They may affect the results of experiments.28 When are mice killed without prior approval? 【答案】C) When they become escapees.29 Why does the speaker say what the Hera’s did at home is ironical? 【答案】A)While holding a burial ceremony for a pet mouse, they were killing pest mice.30.What does the speaker say about the natives of New York? 【答案】D) They take it for granted.31.What does the speaker say commuters give to New York? 【答案】A) Tidal restlessness.32.What do we learn about the settlers of New York? 【答案】B) They are adventurers from all over the world.33.As the speaker walked into the living room, what was being shown on TV? 【答案】D) A murder mystery34.What does the speaker say about watching television? 【答案】C)It is unhealthy for the viewers.35.What can we say about the speaker? 【答案】B) He can’t resist the temptation of T.V. either.(36)detect (37)delicate (38)identifying (39)apartment (40)revolution (41)dramatically 42)primitive (43)vessels(44)Although simple versions of miniature devices have had an impact, advanced versions are still several years away.(45)that can sense when to release an airbag and how to keep engines and breaks operating efficiently.(46)when scientists now think about future machines doing large and complex tasks, they’re thinking smaller than ever before. 仔细阅读Section A47. values, abilities and strengths48. doing the right things49. positive mental attitude50. manage themselves51. trustSection BPassage One52.D53.A It indicates that economic activities in the US have increased.54.C Producers of agricultural goods and raw materials55.C People’s reluctance to spend56. B To increase their market share overseas. Passage Two57.A. they still have a place among the world leaders.58.B. It does not reflect the differences among universities.59. A. concentration of resources in a limited number of universities.60. A. Fully utilize their research to benefit all sectors of society.61. C. By promoting the efficiency of technology transfer agencies.完形填空62:resolved 63:what 64:essence 65:hopped 66:include 67:barely 68:purchase 69:merely 70:combined 71:on 72:ended up 73:wrapped 74:infinitely 75:toxic 76:household 77:even 78:endeavor 79:far 80:that 81:contact翻译82:may be knocked down by car83:does he take himself to be an expert 。
2011年12月英语六级(CET-6)考试真题及答案(估分)-中大网校
2011年12月英语六级(CET-6)考试真题及答案(估分) 总分:710分及格:426分考试时间:140分Part I Writing(1)Part II Reading Comprehension快速阅读 单选题(1)阅读以下短文回答{TSE}题(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)快速阅读填空题(1)(2)(3)Listening Comprehension (35 minutes)听力选择题(1)<p> 点击播放听力音频:<embed height="56" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin" width="300" src="/m2/tingli/cet6/lnzt/201112cet6.mp3" autostart="false" /> </p><p> </embed/>根据所听材料,回答{TSE}题(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)根据所听材料,回答{TSE}题(10)(11)(12)根据所听材料,回答{TSE}题(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)根据所听材料,回答{TSE}题(21)(22)(23)根据所听材料,回答{TSE}题(24)(25)听力填空题(1)根据所听材料,回答{TSE}题(2)第37题(3)第38题(4)第39题(5)第40题(6)第41题(7)第42题(8)第43题(9)第44题(10)第45题(11)第46题Part III Reading Comprehension (Reading in Depth)(25 minutes)仔细阅读 填空题(1)阅读以上短文,回答{TSE}题(2)(3)(4)(5)仔细阅读 选择题(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)阅读以上短文,回答{TSE}题(7)(8)(9)(10)Part V CLOZE (1)阅读以上短文,回答{TSE}题(2)答案(3)答案(4)答案(5)答案(6)答案(7)答案(8)答案(9)答案(10)答案(11)答案(12)答案(13)答案(14)答案(15)答案(16)答案(17)答案(18)答案(19)答案(20)答案Part VI Translation (5 minutes)(1)翻译以下{TSE}题(2)(3)(4)(5)答案和解析Part I Writing (1) :Part II Reading Comprehension快速阅读 单选题(1) :B(2) :B(3) :C(4) :D(5) :B(6) :B(7) :D快速阅读填空题(1) :(2) :(3) :Listening Comprehension (35 minutes)听力选择题(1) :A(2) :C(3) :A(4) :A(5) :C(6) :D(7) :A(8) :(9) :无(10) :无(11) :无(12) :无(13) :无(14) :无(15) :无(16) :D(17) :C(18) :C(19) :A(20) : D(21) :A(22) :B(23) :D(24) :C(25) :B听力填空题(1) :(2) :(3) :(4) :(5) :(7) :(8) :(9) :(10) :(11) :Part III Reading Comprehension (Reading in Depth)(25 minutes)仔细阅读 填空题(1) :(2) :(3) :(4) :(5) :仔细阅读 选择题(1) :(2) :A(3) :C(4) :C(6) :A(7) :B(8) :A(9) :A(10) :CPart V CLOZE(1) :B(2) :A(3) :D(4) :D(5) :C(6) :C(7) :C(8) :B(9) :C(10) :B(11) :A(12) :A(13) :A(14) :C(15) :B(16) :C(17) :D(18) :A(19) :B(20) :BPart VI Translation (5 minutes)(1) :(2) :(3) :(4) :(5) :。
2011年12月6级真题答案汇总
2011年12月大学英语六级考试Part I WritingThe Way to SuccessSuccess is something everyone looks for, longs for and dies for. But have you ever considered what success is? Some may hold that success means one has beautiful life, like pretty house, cool cars and grea t power. It’s indeed one way to define success. But to me, success is doing something one really feels like doing.To achieve this kind of success, one has to bear in mind three essential prerequisites, namely knowing where your interest really lies in, possessing the strong will to pursue your interest and having the diligence to realize your dream. In other words, they are “what” “why” and “how” of success. It’s really luckily good for one, especially for the younger generation of today to find their dreams, follow them and in the end, make them come true and become successful.Although it’s never easy to succeed, progressing with the strong will and diligence towards the right direction, you’ll be the one!本篇亮点:1. 排比词组或句子的运用:Success is something everyone looks for, longs for and dies for.…namely, knowing where your interest really lies in, possessing the strong will to pursue your interest and having the diligence to realize your dream.2. bear in mind3. lie in4. strong will to pursue your interest本文有待提高之处:1. 文中人称有些混乱。
11年12月英语六级真题及答案(完整版+免费版)[1]
Part I Writing (30 minutes)Directions:For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled The Way to Success by commenting on Abraham Lincoln's famous remark, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree, and I will spend, the first four sharpening the axe." Youshould write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words.The Way to Success注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions:In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from thefour choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentenceswith the information given in the passage.Google's Plan for World's Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of Piracy?In recent years, teams of workers dispatched by Google have been working hard to make digital copies of books. So far, Google has scanned more than 10 million titles from libraries in America and Europe - including half a million volumes held by the Bodleian in Oxford. The exact method it uses is unclear; the company does not allow outsiders to observe the process.Why is Google undertaking such a venture? Why is it even interested in all thoseout-of-print library books, most of which have been gathering dust on forgotten shelves for decades? The company claims its motives are essentially public-spirited. Its overall mission, after all, is to "organize the world's information", so it would be odd if that information did not include books.The company likes to present itself as having lofty aspirations. "This really isn't about making money. We are doing this for the good of society." As Santiago de la Mora, head of Google Books for Europe, puts it: "By making it possible to search the millions of books that exist today, we hope to expand the frontiers of human knowledge."Dan Clancy, the chief architect of Google Books, does seem genuine in his conviction that this is primarily a philanthropic (慈善的) exercise. "Google's core business is search and find, so obviously what helps improve Google's search engine is good for Google," he says. "But we have never built a spreadsheet (电子数据表) outlining the financial benefits of this, and I have never had to justify the amount I am spending to the company's founders."It is easy, talking to Clancy and his colleagues, to be swept along by their missionary passion. But Google's book-scanning project is proving controversial. Several opponents have recently emerged, ranging from rival tech giants such as Microsoft and Amazon to small bodies representing authors and publishers across the world. In broad terms, these opponents have leveled two sets of criticisms at Google.First, they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving the world's books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company. In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books, Robert Danton, the head of Harvard University's library, argued that because such books are a common resource – the possession of us all – only public,not-for-profit bodies should be given the power to control them.The second related criticism is that Google's scanning of books is actually illegal. This allegation has led to Google becoming mired in (陷入) a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jaundice and Jaundice case in Charles Dickens' Bleak House look straightforward.At its centre, however, is one simple issue: that of copyright. The inconvenient fact about most books, to which Google has arguably paid insufficient attention, is that they are英语六级protected by copyright. Copyright laws differ from country to country, but in general protection extends for the duration of an author's life and for a substantial period afterwards, thus allowing the author's heirs to benefit. (In Britain and America, this post-death period is 70 years.) This means, of course, that almost all of the books published in the 20th century are still under copyright – and the last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined. Of the roughly 40 million books in US libraries, for example, an estimated 32 million are in copyright. Of these, some 27 million are out of print.Outside the US, Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thus in the "public domain" (works such as the Bodleian's first edition of Middlemarch, which anyone can read for free on Google Books Search).But, within the US, the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works. In its defense, Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are in copyright– arguing that such displays are "fair use". But critics allege that by making electronic copies of these books without first seeking the permission of copyright holders, Google has committed piracy."The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied only once authors have expressly given their permission," says Piers Bluffed, of the Sheila Land literary agency in London. "Google has reversed this – it has simply copied all these works without bothering task."In 2005, the Authors Guild of America, together with a group of US publishers, launched a class action suit (集团诉讼) against Google that, after more than two years of negotiation, ended with an announcement last October that Google and the claimants had reached anout-of-court settlement. The full details are complicated - the text alone runs to 3853pages– and trying to summarize it is no easy task. "Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible," says Bluffed, one of the settlement's most vocal British critics.Broadly, the deal provides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors and publishers whose rights it has breached (including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates from their works). In exchange for this, the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future.This settlement hands Google the power - but only with the agreement of individual rights holders – to exploit its database of out-of-print books. It can include them in subscription deals sold to libraries or sell them individually under a consumer license. It is these commercial provisions that are proving the settlement's most controversial aspect.Critics point out that, by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database, the settlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the company's role from provider of information to seller. "Google's business model has always been to provide information for free, and sell advertising on the basis of the traffic this generates," points out James Grimmelman, associate professor at New York Law School. Now, he says, because of the settlement's provisions, Google could become a significant force in bookselling.Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on "orphan" works, where there is no known copyright holder – these make up an estimated 5-10% of the books Google has scanned. Under the settlement, when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work, commercial control automatically reverts to Google. Google will be able to display up to 20% of orphan works for free, include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer license.It is by no means certain that the settlement will be enacted (执行) – it is the subject of fairness hearing in the US courts. But if it is enacted, Google will in effect be off the hook as far英语六级as copyright violations in the US are concerned. Many people are seriously concerned by this - and the company is likely to face challenges in other courts around the world.No one knows the precise use Google will make of the intellectual property it has gained by scanning the world's library books, and the truth, as Gerick, an American science writer and member of the Authors Guild, points out, is that the company probably doesn't even know itself. But what is certain is that, in some way or other, Google's entrance into digital bookselling will have a significant impact on the book world in the years to come.注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
大学英语六级试卷-11年12月六级真题答案解析
2011年12月英语六级真题答案汇总Section A11.【答案】A) Listen to the recorded notes while driving.12.【答案】C) The man lacks confidence in playing the part.13.【答案】A) Arranging a bed for a patient14.【答案】A) He is too busy to accept more responsibility.15. 【答案】C) He has left his position in the government.16. 【答案】D) The man is well informed about the space shuttle missions.17. 【答案】A) At a car renting company26 What does the passage say about most of the mice used for experiments? 【答案】D)They sacrifice their lives for the benefit of humans.27 Why did the so-called bad mice have to be captured and destroyed?【答案】C) They may affect the results of experiments.28 When are mice killed without prior approval?【答案】C) When they become escapees.29 Why does the speaker say what the Herzau’s did at home is ironical?【答案】A)While holding a burial ceremony for a pet mouse, they were killing pest mice.30. What does the speaker say about the natives of New York?【答案】D) They take it for granted.31. What does the speaker say commuters give to New York?【答案】A) Tidal restlessness.32. What do we learn about the settlers of New York?【答案】B) They are adventurers from all over the world.33. As the speaker walked into the living room, what was being shown on TV? 【答案】D)A murder mystery34. What does the speaker say about watching television?【答案】C)It is unhealthy for the viewers.35. What can we say about the speaker?【答案】B) He can’t resist the temptation of T.V. either.36. detect37. delicate38. identifying39. apartment40. revolution41. dramatically42.primitive43.vessels44. Although simple versions of miniature devices have had an impact, advanced versions are still several years away45.that can sense when to release an airbag and how to keep engines and breaks operating efficiently46. when scientists now think about future machines doing large and complex tasks, they’re thinking smaller than ever beforeSection A47. values, abilities and strengths48. doing the right things49. positive mental attitude50. manage themselves51. trustSection B53. A It indicates that economic activities in the US have increased.54. C Producers of agricultural goods and raw materials55. C People’s reluctance to spend56. B To increase their market share overseas.57. A. they still have a place among the world leaders.58. B. It does not reflect the differences among universities.59. A. concentration of resources in a limited number of universities.60. A. Fully utilize their research to benefit all sectors of society.61. C. By promoting the efficiency of technology transfer agencies. Part V Cloze62:resolved63:what64:essence65:hopped66:include67:barely68:purchase69:merely70:combined71:on72:ended up73:wrapped74:infinitely75:toxic76:household77:even78:endeavor79:far80:that81:contact1. Google claims its plan for the world’s bigge st online library is _____【答案】B. to serve the interest of the general public2. According to Santiago de la Mora, Google’s book-scanning project will【答案】B. broaden humanity’s intellectual horizons3. Opponents of Google Books believe that digitally archiving the world's books should be controlledby_______.【答案】C. non-profit organizations4.【答案】D. the copyright of the books it scanned5. 【答案】B. the online display of in-copyright books is not for commercial use6.【答案】B. It was settle after more than two years of negotiation.7. 【答案】D. The commercial provision of the settlement8. 【答案】Providing information for free9. 【答案】orphan works10. 【答案】change the world’s book marketPart VI Translation1. You shouldn't have run across the road without looking, you would have been knocked down by a car. (也许会被车撞到)2 By no means does he regard himself as an expert, (他把自己当成专家) although he knows a lot about the field.3 He doesn't appreciate the sacrifice his friends have made for him, however, he takes it for granted.(把他们所做的视作理所应当)4 Janet told me that she would rather her mother not have interfered with her marriage.(不干涉她的婚姻)5 To keep up with the expanding frontiers of scholarship. Edward Wilson found himself always searching for information on the internet. (经常上网查信息)。
11年12月英语六级真题及答案(完整版+免费版)
Part I Writing (30 minutes)The Directions:For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled by commenting on Abraham Lincoln's famous remark, "Give me six Way to Success by commenting on Abraham Lincoln's famous remark, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree, and I will spend, the first four sharpening the axe." You200 words.should write at least 150 words but no more than The Way to Success注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 m Directions:In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer th Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the questions on A nswer Sheet 1.four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.Google's Plan for World's Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of Piracy?In recent years, teams of workers dispatched by Google have been working hard to make digital copies of books. So far, Google has scanned more than 10 million titles from libraries in America and Europe - including half a million volumes held by the Bodleian in Oxford. The exact method it uses is unclear; the company does not allow outsiders to observe the process. Why is Google undertaking such a venture? Why is it even interested in all those out-of-print library books, most of which have been gathering dust on forgotten shelves for on, after decades? The company claims its motives are essentially public-spirited. Its overall missiall, is to "organize the world's information", so it would be odd if that information did not include books. The company likes to present itself as having lofty aspirations. "This really isn't about making money. We are doing thi s for the good of society." As Santiago de la Mora, head of Google Books for Europe, puts it: "By making it possible to search the millions of books that exist toda we hope to expand the frontiers of human knowledge." Dan Clancy, the chief architect of Google Books, does seem genuine in his conviction that this is primarily a philanthropic (慈善的慈善的) exercise. "Google's core business is search and find, so obviously what helps improve Google's search engine is good for Google," he says. "But we hav never built a spreadsheet (电子数据表电子数据表) outlining the financial benefits of this, and I have never had to justify the amount I am spending to the company's founders." It is easy, talking to Clancy and his colleagues, to be swept along by their missionary passion. But Google's book-scanning project is proving controversial. Several opponents have recently emerged, ranging from rival tech giants such as Microsoft and Amazon to small bodies representing authors and publishers across the world. In broad terms, these opponents have leveled two sets of criticisms at Google. First, they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving the world's books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company. In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books, Robert Danton, the head of Harvard University's library, argued that because such books are a common resource – the possession of us all – only public, not-for-profit bodies should be given the power to control them. The second related criticism is that Google's scanning of books is actually illegal. This allegation has led to Google becoming mired in (陷入陷入) a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jaundice and Jaundice case in Charles Dickens' Bleak House look straightforward. At its centre, however, is one simple issue: that of copyright. The inconvenient fact about most books, to which Google has arguably paid insufficient attention, is that they are protected by copyright. Copyright laws differ from country to country, but in general protection extends for the duration of an author's life and for a substantial period afterwards, thus allowings 70 years.) This the author's heirs to benefit. (In Britain and America, this post-death period imeans, of course, that almost all of the books published in the 20th century are still under copyright – and the last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined. Of the roughly 40 million books in US libraries, for example, an estimated 32 million are in copyright. Of these, some 27 million are out of print. Outside the US, Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thuin the "public domain" (works such as the Bodleian's first edition of Middlemarch, which anyone can read for free on Google Books Search). But, within the US, the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works. In its defense, Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are in copyright– arguing that such displays are "fair use". But critics allege that by making ders, Google electronic copies of these books without first seeking the permission of copyright holhas committed piracy. "The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied only once authors have expressly given their permission," says Piers Bluffed, of the Sheila Land – it has simply copied all these works literary agency in London. "Google has reversed this without bothering task." In 2005, the Authors Guild of America, together with a group of US publishers, launched 集团诉讼) against Google that, after more than two years of negotiation, class action suit (集团诉讼ended with an announcement last October that Google and the claimants had reached an out-of-court settlement. The full details are complicated - the text alone runs to 385 pages– and trying to summarize it is no easy task. "Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible," says Bluffed, one of the settlement's most vocal British critics. Broadly, the deal provides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors and publishers whose rights it has breached (including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates from their works). In exchange for this, the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future. This settlement hands Google the power - but only with the agreement of individual rights holders – to exploit its database of out-of-print books. It can include them in subscription deals sold to libraries or sell them individually under a consumer license. It is these commercia provisions that are proving the settlement's most controversial aspect. Critics point out that, by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database, the settlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the company's role from provider of information to seller. "Google's business model has always been to provide information for free, and sell advertising on the basis of the traffic this generates," points out James Grimmelman, associate professor at New Y ork Law School. Now, he says, because of the settlement's provisions, Google could become a significant force in bookselling. Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on "orphan" works, where there is n known copyright holder – these make up an estimated 5-10% of the books Google has scanned. Under the settlement, when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work, commercial control automatically reverts to Google. Google will be able to display up to 20% of orphan works for free, include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer license. enacted (执行It is by no means certain that the settlement will be 执行) – it is the subject of fairness hearing in the US courts. But if it is enacted, Google will in effect be off the hook as as copyright violations in the US are concerned. Many people are seriously concerned by this and the company is likely to face challenges in other courts around the world. No one knows the precise use Google will make of the intellectual property it has gained b scanning the world's library books, and the truth, as Gerick, an American science writer and member of the Authors Guild, points out, is that the company probably doesn't even know itself. But what is certain is that, in some way or other, Google's entrance into digital bookselling will have a significant impact on the book world in the years to come. 注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
2011年12月英语六级真题及答案详解
2011年12月大学英语六级真题及答案Part I Writing (30 minutes)Directions:For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled The Way to Success by commenting on Abraham Lincoln's famousremark, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree, and I will spend, the firstfour sharpening the axe." You should write at least150words but no morethan200words.The Way to Success注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions:In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1.For questions 1-7, choose the bestanswer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10,complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.Google's Plan for World's Biggest Online Library: Philanthropy Or Act of Piracy?In recent years, teams of workers dispatched by Google have been working hard tomake digital copies of books. So far, Google has scanned more than 10 million titles from librariesin America and Europe - including half a million volumes held by the Bodleian in Oxford. Theexact method it uses is unclear; the company does not allow outsiders to observe the process.Why is Google undertaking such a venture? Why is it even interested in all thoseout-of-printlibrary books, most of which have been gathering dust on forgotten shelves for decades? Thecompany claims its motives are essentially public-spirited. Its overall mission, after all, is to "organise the world's information", so it would be odd if that information did not include books.The company likes to present itself as having lofty aspirations. "This really isn't about making money. We are doing this for the good of society." As Santiago de la Mora, head of Google Books for Europe, puts it: "By making it possible to search the millions of books that exist today, we hope to expand the frontiers of human knowledge."Dan Clancy, the chief architect of Google Books, does seem genuine in his conviction that thisis primarily a philanthropic (慈善的) exercise. "Google's core business is search and find, soobviously what helps improve Google's search engine is good for Google," he says. "But we havenever builta spreadsheet (电子数据表) outlining the financial benefits of this, and I have neverhad to justify the amount I am spending to the company's founders."It is easy, talking to Clancy and his colleagues, to be swept along by their missionary passion. But Google's book-scanning project is proving controversial. Several opponents have recently emerged, ranging from rival tech giants such as Microsoft and Amazon to small bodies representing authors and publishers across the world. In broad terms, these opponents have levelled two sets of criticisms at Google.First, they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving theworld's books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company. In a recent essay in the New YorkReview of Books, Robert Darnton, the head of Harvard University's library, argued that becausesuch books are a common resource – the possession of us all – only public, not-for-profit bodiesshould be given the power to control them.The second related criticism is that Google's scanning of books is actually illegal. This allegation has led to Google becoming mired in (陷入) a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case in Charles Dickens' Bleak House look straightforward.At its centre, however, is one simple issue: that of copyright. The inconvenient fact aboutmost books, to which Google has arguably paid insufficient attention, is that they are protectedby copyright. Copyright laws differ from country to country, but in general protection extends forthe duration of an author's life and for a substantial period afterwards, thus allowing the author's heirs to benefit. (In Britain and America, this post-death period is 70 years.) This means, of course,that almost all of the books published in the 20th century are still under copyright – and the last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined. Of the roughly 40 million books in US libraries, for example, an estimated 32 million are in copyright. Of these, some 27 million are out of print.Outside the US, Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thus in the "public domain" (works such as the Bodleian's first edition of Middlemarch, which anyone canread for free on Google Books Search).But, within the US, the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works. Inits defence, Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are in copyright– arguing that such displays are "fair use". But critics allege that by making electronic copies of these books without first seeking the permission of copyright holders, Google has committed piracy."The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied onlyonce authors have expressly given their permission," says Piers Blofeld, of the Sheil Land literary agency in London. "Google has reversed this – it has simply copied all these works without bothering toask."In 2005, the Authors Guild of America, together with a group of US publishers, launched a class action suit (集团诉讼) against Google that, after more than two years of negotiation, endedwith an announcement last October that Google and the claimants had reached an out-of-courtsettlement. The full details are complicated - the text alone runs to 385 pages– and trying tosummarise it is no easy task. "Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible," saysBlofeld, one of the settlement's most vocal British critics.Broadly, the deal provides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors andpublishers whose rights it has breached (including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates fromtheir works). In exchange for this, the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future.This settlement hands Google the power - but only with the agreement of individual rights holders – to exploit its database of out-of-print books. It can include them in subscription deals sold to libraries or sell them individually under a consumer licence. It is these commercial provisions that are proving the settlement's most controversial aspect.Critics point out that, by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database, thesettlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the company's role from provider of information to seller. "Google's business model has always been to provide information for free, and sell advertising on the basis of the traffic this generates," points out James Grimmelmann, associate professor at NewYork Law School. Now, he says, because of the settlement's provisions, Google could become a significant force in bookselling.Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on "orphan" works, where there is noknown copyright holder – these make up an estimated 5-10% of the books Google has scanned. Under the settlement, when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work, commercial control automatically reverts to Google. Google will be able to display up to 20% oforphan works for free, include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer licence.It is by no means certain that the settlement will be enacted (执行) – it is the subject of afairness hearing in the US courts. But if it is enacted, Google will in effect be off the hook as faras copyright violations in the US are concerned. Many people are seriously concerned by this - and the company is likely to face challenges in other courts around the world.No one knows the precise use Google will make of the intellectual property it has gained byscanning the world's library books, and the truth, as Gleick, an American science writer and member of the Authors Guild, points out, is that the company probably doesn't even know itself. But what is certain is that, in some way or other, Google's entrance into digital bookselling will have a significant impact on the book world in the years to come.注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
最新 2011年12月英语六级冲刺预测试题及答案(1)-精品
2011年12月英语六级冲刺预测试题及答案(1)Part Ⅰ Writing (30 minutes)Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled College Students on the Job Market. You should write at least 150 words following the outline given below.1.当今大学生面临着严重的就业压力2.这一现象的产生有多方面的原因3.解决的办法College Students on the Job Market_____________________________________________________________________ ________Part I Writing【写作思路】本文是关于对某种社会现象的讨论,探讨其原因,并提供解决问题的方案。
毕业生就业压力大,是目前比较热门的话题,媒体、社会以及学生本人都会时不时的讨论,所以文章难度不是很大。
文章开篇提出就业压力大的问题,毕业生越来越多,而就业市场却保持稳定,两者之间的不平衡,导致毕业生面临越来越大的就业压力。
第二段讨论出现这种问题的原因。
第一方面,从宏观上来看,整个世界的经济危机影响了就业市场;第二方面,从学校招生来看,热门专业人数过多,结果供过于求,而冷门专业学生很少,结果供不应求。
第三段针对第二段的原因,探讨相应的解决方案。
从政府的角度出发,要尽可能的采取各种手段帮助经济恢复,帮助学生就业;从个人角度出发,要学会自主选择,不追潮流,学习自己感兴趣的,努力提高自身素质,增强竞争能力。
【参考范文】。
最新 2011年12月英语四级冲刺预测试题及答案(1)-精品
2011年12月英语四级冲刺预测试题及答案(1)partI Writing (30 minute)注意:此部分试题在答题卡1上。
Directions:For this part ,you are allowed 30minute to write a short essay on the topic of students selecting theirfectures.You should write at least 120 words following theoutline when bellow:1.有些大学允许学生自由选择某些课程的任课教师2.学生选择教师时所考虑的主要因素3.学生自选任课教师的益处和可能产生的问题On Students Selecting Lecturers范文:On Students Choosing LecturersNowadays, some universities give students the right to choose who teaches some of their classes. This has led to some debate over whether students should be given this much power.There are several factors that students consider when choosing a lecturer, including the teaching style of the lecturer, thelecturer's academic background, and the lecturer's reputation among students. The ideal lecturer is one who has an interesting teaching style, a diverse academic background, and a good reputation among students.There are both positive and negative aspects to allowing students to choose their lecturers. Giving students the choice encourages them to take ownership for their classes, and also puts pressure on teachers to improve their teaching quality.However, the factors that students consider might not be the ones that lead to the highest quality of education. Schools might end up with lecturers who teach interesting classes without much content.。
2011年12月英语六级答案解析
2011年12月大学英语六级考试答案解析Part I Writing【标准版】The Way to SuccessSuccess is something everyone looks for,longs for and dies for.But have you ever considered what success is? Some may hold that success means one has beautiful life,like pretty house,cool cars and great power.It’s indeed one way to define success.But to me,success is doing something one really feels like doing.To achieve this kind of success,one has to bear in mind three essential prerequisites,namely knowing where your interest really lies in,possessing the strong will to pursue your interest and having the diligence to realize your dream.In other words,they are“what”“why”and“how”of success.It’s really luckily good for one,especially for the younger generation of today to find their dreams,follow them and in the end,make them come true andbecome successful.Although it’s never easy to succeed,progressing with the strong will and diligence towards the right direction,you’ll be the one!【作文解析】这是一篇议论文。
2011年12月大学英语六级真题
First,they have questioned whether the primary responsibility for digitally archiving theworld's books should be allowed to fall to a commercial company.In a recent essay in the New York Review of Books,Robert Darnton,the head of Harvard University's library,argued that because such books are a common resource–the possession of us all–only public,not-for-profit bodies should be given the power to control them.The second related criticism is that Google's scanning of books is actually illegal.This allegation has led to Google becoming mired in(陷入)a legal battle whose scope and complexity makes the Jarndyce and Jarndyce case in Charles Dickens'Bleak House look straightforward.At its centre,however,is one simple issue:that of copyright.The inconvenient fact aboutmost books,to which Google has arguably paid insufficient attention,is that they are protected by copyright.Copyright laws differ from country to country,but in general protection extends forthe duration of an author's life and for a substantial period afterwards,thus allowing the author's heirs to benefit.(In Britain and America,this post-death period is70years.)This means,of course, that almost all of the books published in the20th century are still under copyright–and the last century saw more books published than in all previous centuries combined.Of the roughly40 million books in US libraries,for example,an estimated32million are in copyright.Of these,some 27million are out of print.Outside the US,Google has made sure only to scan books that are out of copyright and thus in the "public domain"(works such as the Bodleian's first edition of Middlemarch,which anyone can read for free on Google Books Search).But,within the US,the company has scanned both in-copyright and out-of-copyright works.In its defence,Google points out that it displays only small segments of books that are incopyright–arguing that such displays are"fair use".But critics allege that by makingelectronic copies of these books without first seeking the permission of copyright holders,Google has committed piracy."The key principle of copyright law has always been that works can be copied onlyonce authors have expressly given their permission,"says Piers Blofeld,of the Sheil Land literary agency in London."Google has reversed this–it has simply copied all these works without bothering toask."In2005,the Authors Guild of America,together with a group of US publishers,launched a class action suit(集团诉讼)against Google that,after more than two years of negotiation,ended with an announcement last October that Google and the claimants had reached an out-of-court settlement.The full details are complicated-the text alone runs to385pages–and trying to sum arise it is no easy task."Part of the problem is that it is basically incomprehensible,"says Blofeld, one of the settlement's most vocal British critics.Broadly,the deal provides a mechanism for Google to compensate authors and publishers whose rights it has breached(including giving them a share of any future revenue it generates from their works).In exchange for this,the rights holders agree not to sue Google in future.This settlement hands Google the power-but only with the agreement of individual rights holders–to exploit its database of out-of-print books.It can include them in subscription deals soldto libraries or sell them individually under a consumer licence.It is these commercial provisions that are proving the settlement's most controversial aspect.Critics point out that,by giving Google the right to commercially exploit its database,the settlement paves the way for a subtle shift in the company's role from provider of information to seller."Google's business model has always been to provide information for free,and sell advertising on the basis of the traffic this generates,"points out James Grimmelmann,associate professor at New York Law School.Now,he says,because of the settlement's provisions,Google could become a significant force in bookselling.Interest in this aspect of the settlement has focused on"orphan"works,where there is noknown copyright holder–these make up an estimated5-10%of the books Google has scanned.Under the settlement,when no rights holders come forward and register their interest in a work,commercial control automatically reverts to Google.Google will be able to display up to20% of orphan works for free,include them in its subscription deals to libraries and sell them to individual buyers under the consumer licence.It is by no means certain that the settlement will be enacted(执行)–it is the subject of a fairness hearing in the US courts.But if it is enacted,Google will in effect be off the hook as faras copyright violations in the US are concerned.Many people are seriously concerned by this-and the company is likely to face challenges in other courts around the world.No one knows the precise use Google will make of the intellectual property it has gained by scanning the world's library books,and the truth,as Gleick,an American science writer and member of the Authors Guild,points out,is that the company probably doesn't even know itself.But what is certain is that,in some way or other,Google's entrance into digital bookselling will have a significant impact on the book world in the years to come.注意:此部分试题请在答题卡1上作答。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2011年12月英语六级全真预测试卷及答案(1)Part Ⅰ Writing (30 minutes)Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled College Students on the Job Market. You should write at least 150 words following the outline given below.1.当今大学生面临着严重的就业压力2.这一现象的产生有多方面的原因3.解决的办法College Students on the Job MarketPart I Writing【写作思路】本文是关于对某种社会现象的讨论,探讨其原因,并提供解决问题的方案。
毕业生就业压力大,是目前比较热门的话题,媒体、社会以及学生本人都会时不时的讨论,所以文章难度不是很大。
文章开篇提出就业压力大的问题,毕业生越来越多,而就业市场却保持稳定,两者之间的不平衡,导致毕业生面临越来越大的就业压力。
第二段讨论出现这种问题的原因。
第一方面,从宏观上来看,整个世界的经济危机影响了就业市场;第二方面,从学校招生来看,热门专业人数过多,结果供过于求,而冷门专业学生很少,结果供不应求。
第三段针对第二段的原因,探讨相应的解决方案。
从政府的角度出发,要尽可能的采取各种手段帮助经济恢复,帮助学生就业;从个人角度出发,要学会自主选择,不追潮流,学习自己感兴趣的,努力提高自身素质,增强竞争能力。
【参考范文】More and more graduates are going out of universities and entering into the society every year while the demand on the job market remains stable. The college students are facing greater and greater pressure in job-hunting.There are many reasons behind the current phenomenon. To begin with, the economy has been confronted with depression in recent years on a global level,and it takes time for the worldwide economy to recover. What’s more, there is an element of irrationality in the enrollment of the campuses. Some hot majors have enrolled too many students, and many people compete for one position after graduation, whereas the majors with little attention have few students, and more graduates are needed than the campus can supply.The solution to this problem lies with both the government as a whole and the individual in specific. The government takes whatever measures possible to help the economy recover and to create more job opportunities for the applicants. And for the individual students, it is better to study what they are interested in and to gain experience through practice, thus better prepared for the society.Part ⅡReading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.Will Electronic Medical Records Improve Health Care?Electronic health records (EHRs) have received a lot of attention since the Obama administration committed $19 billion in stimulus funds earlier this year to encourage hospitals and health care facilities to digitize patient data and make better use of information technology. The healthcare industry as a whole, however, has been slow to adopt information technology and integrate computer systems, raising the question of whether the push to digitize will result in information that empowers doctors to make better-informed decisions or a morass of disconnected data.The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) knows firsthand how difficult it is to achieve the former, and how easily an EHR plan can fall into the latter. UPMC has spent five years and more than $1 billion on information technology systems to get ahead of the EHR issue. While that is more than five times as much as recent estimates say it should cost a hospital system, UPMCis a mammoth network consisting of 20 hospitals as well as 400 doctors’ offices, outpatient sites and long-term care facilities employing about 50,000 people.UPMC’s early attempts to create a universal EHR system, such as its ambulatory electronic medical records rolled out between 2000 and 2005, were met with resistance as doctors, staff and other users either avoided using the new technology altogether or clung to individual, disconnected software and systems that UPMC’s IT department had implemented over the years.On the mendAlthough UPMC began digitizing some of its records in 1996, the turning point in its efforts came in 2004 with the rollout of its eRecord system across the entire health care network. eRecord now contains more than 3.6 million electronic patient records, including images and CT scans, clinical laboratory information, radiology data, and a picture archival and communication system that digitizes images and makes them available on PCs. The EHR system has 29,000 users, including more than 5,000 physicians employed by or affiliated with UPMC.If UPMC makes EHR systems look easy, don’t be fooled, cautions UPMC chief medical information officer Dan Martich, who says the health care network’s IT systems require a "huge, ongoing effort" to ensure that those systems can communicate with one another. One of the main reasons is that UPMC, like many other health care organizations, uses a number of different vendors for its medical and IT systems, leaving the integration largely up to the IT staff.Since doctors typically do not want to change the way they work for the sake of a computer system, the success of an EHR program is dictated not only by the presence of the technology but also by how well the doctors are trained on, and use, the technology. Physicians need to see the benefits of using EHR systems both persistently and consistently, says Louis Baverso, chief information officer at UPMC’s Magee-Women’s Hospital. But these benefits might not be obvious at first, he says, adding, "What doctors see in the beginning is that they’re losing their ability to work with paper documents, which has been so valuable to them up until now."Opportunities and costsGiven the lack of EHR adoption throughout the health care world, there are a lot of opportunities to get this right (or wrong). Less than 10 percent of U.S. hospitals have adopted electronic medical records even in the most basic way, according to a study authored by Ashish Jha, associate professor of health policy and management at Harvard School of Public Health. Only 1.5 percent have adop ted a comprehensive system of electronic records that includes physicians’ notes and orders and decision support systems that alert doctors of potential drug interactions or other problems that might result from their intended orders.Cost is the primary factor stalling EHR systems, followed by resistance from physicians unwilling to adopt new technologies and a lack of staff with adequate IT expertise, according to Jha. He indicated that a hospital could spend from $20 million to $200 million to implement an electronic record system over several years, depending on the size of the hospital. A typical doctor’s office would cost an estimated $50,000 to outfit with an EHR system.The upside of EHR systems is more difficult to quantify. Although some estimates say that hospitals and doctor’s offices could save as much as $100 million annually by moving to EHRs, the mere act of implementing the technology guarantees neither cost savings nor improvements in care, Jha said during a Harvard School of Public Health community forum on September 17. Another Harvard study of hospital computerization likewise determined that cutting costs and improving care through health IT as it exists today is "wishful thinking". This study was led by David Himmelstein, associate professor at Harvard Medical School.The cost of getting it wrongThe difference between the projected cost savings and the reality of the situation stems from the fact that the EHR technologies implemented to date have not been designed to save money or improve patient care, says Leonard D’Avolio, associate center director of Biomedical Informatics at theMassachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC). Instead, EHRs are used to document individual p atients’ conditions, pass this information among clinicians treating those patients, justify financial reimbursement and serve as the legal records of events.This is because, if a health care facility has $1 million to spend, its managers are more likely to spend it on an expensive piece of lab equipment than on information technology, D’Avolio says, adding that the investment on lab equipment can be made up by charging patients access to it as a billable service. This is not the case for IT. Also, computers and networks used throughout hospitals and health care facilities are disconnected and often manufactured by different vendors without a standardized way of communicating. "Medical data is difficult to standardize because caring for patients is a complex process," he says. "We need to find some way of reaching across not just departments but entire hospitals. If you can’t measure something, you can’t improv e it, and without access to this data, you can’t measure it."To qualify for a piece of the $19 billion being offered through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), healthcare facilities will have to justify the significance of their IT investments to ensure they are "meaningful users" of EHRs. The Department of Health and Human Services has yet to define what it considers meaningful useAggregating info to create knowledgeIdeally, in addition to providing doctors with basic information about their patients, databases of vital signs, images, laboratory values, medications, diseases, interventions, and patient demographic information could be mined for new knowledge, D’Avolio says. "With just a few of these databases networked together, the power to improve health care increases exponentially," D’Avolio suggested. "All that is missing is the collective realization that better health care requires access to better information—not automation of the status quo." Down the road, the addition of genomic information, environmental factors and family history to these databases willenable clinicians to begin to realize the potential of personalized medicine, he added.1. In America, it is slow to adopt information technology because —————.A) the funds invested by the government is not enough in the pastB) EHRs have received less attention of the public in the pastC) whether it will be useful to doctors or not is doubtfulD) UPMC knows how difficult it is to digitize the hospital2. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) —————.A) is the first medical center to adopt information technologyB) satisfy the requirement of the government on information technologyC) spent less money on information technology than it was estimatedD) attempted to created a universal EHR system, but met some difficulties3. The health care network’s IT systems require a lot of effort to ensure it can communicate with one another mainly because —————..A) the integration among different system is largely up to the IT staffB) UPMC is like many other health care organizations in the United StatesC) UPMC makes EHR systems look easyD) UMPC began digitizing some of its records in 19964. The success of the EHR program is decided by —————..A) the fact whether the information technology is available or notB) the fact how well the doctors are trained to use the information technologyC) not only the presence of the technology but the doctor’s training on technologyD) the fact whether physicians can see the benefits of using EHR systems5. The most important reason of most hospitals being reluctant to adopt EHR system is that —————.A) the cost is too high for the hospital to affordB) physicians are unwilling to adopt itC) there is a lack of staff with adequate IT expertiseD) doctor worry about its negative influence on patients6. According to the study led by David Himmelstein through health IT —————.A) it is possible to cut the costs of the hospitalB) it is possible to improve the health careC) it ensure neither cost saving nor improvement in careD) it could save as much as $100 million annually7. The hospital’s managers prefer to —————.A) spend money on an expensive piece of equipment than on information technologyB) charge patients access to the information technology as a billable serviceC) purchase the information technology to improve the health care of the hospitalD) invest more money on the training of the physicians to charge patients more money8. Jha said the mere act of implementing the technology guarantees ______________________.9. D’Avolio says the investment on lab equipment can be made up by_____________________.10. Databases of vital signs, images, laboratory values, medications, diseases, interventions, and patient demographic information could be ____________________.Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning)原文精译【1】给自己的事业买最好的保险消防队无意之中淹没了Mad Gab’s的总部,Mad Gab’s是Gabrielle Melchionda 二十多年前建立的美容公司。