IELTS答题卡
雅思听力答题卡需注意的问题总结
雅思听力答题卡需注意的问题总结雅思索试目前有两种形式，分别是传统的笔试，另外一种就是此时此刻报名比拟广泛的机考。
但是许多考生还是不习惯于机考，就选择了传统的笔考，对这一局部考生来说必须要留意答题卡的问题。
那么雅思听力考试在填写答题卡的时候须要留意哪些问题?雅思听力答题卡需留意的问题总结Q1：答题卡的誊写时间?A：听力录音播放时间约30分钟，誊写答题卡时间为10分钟。
所以考试的时候考生可以先把答案标在试题册上，在录音播放完毕时，再抄到答题卡上。
Q2：这非常钟够用吗?A：通过以往的经历来看，绝大局部考生都可以在非常钟内誊抄完，所以只要不是存心拖延，时间完全足够，许多考试还可以在誊写完之后检查一下单词的拼法。
Q3：写答题卡的时候怎么知道还剩下多长时间呢?A：听完录音后考生不要摘下耳机，耳机中会有剩余时间的提示，例如“five minutes left”。
此外，考生可以在平常的练习中就进展计时训练，对誊卡时间有所把握，防止考试时的不适应。
Q4：阅卷时对大小写有要求吗?A：对于一些专出名词，许多同学会纠结是否须要首字母大写。
事实上，相比于大小写，官方给出的说法是“拼法精确很重要”，除了专出名词首字母大写外，答案可用大写也可用小写。
假如还是不放心的同学，可以把答案全部变成大写。
Q5：填空题的单词写英式或者美式拼法有没有影响呢?A：官方给出的说法是“运用美式拼法或英式拼法均可”。
那么，这类词有哪些常见例子呢?Q6：日期该怎么写?A：不管美式还是英式，年份必须在最终。
日月年是英式的惯用写法，月日年是美式的惯用写法，依次的话根本遵照录音原文的依次写就好，虽然两者都可以得分。
Q7：假如要写冠词的话，算不算在字数限制内呢?A：填空题必需严格遵守字数限制。
假如语法功底不太好或者没有明确听到原文念的详细是哪一个冠词的话，大可不必写冠词。
冠词不是雅思听力考试考察的重点。
Q8：缩写可以运用吗?A：除了刚刚所说的月份须要写全拼外，常见的例如am、pm、Dr./Doctor等可以写缩写。
雅思考试答题卡填写图
雅思考试答题卡填写图1. 填写个人信息雅思考试答题卡上有一些空白区域，需要填写个人信息。
以下是个人信息的填写要求：•姓名：填写自己的全名，注意大小写和拼写准确性。
•历次考试编号：如果这是你第一次参加雅思考试，这个空白留空即可。
如果你曾经参加过雅思考试，则需要填写你之前考试的准考证号码或者考试编号。
•考试日期：填写今天的日期，包括年、月和日。
•准考证号码：填写你的准考证号码，确保准确无误。
以下是一个示例，展示了如何填写个人信息：名字温馨提示Student Name 请在这一栏填写你的全名。
Previous Test Reference No. 如果这是你第一次参加雅思考试，这一栏请留空。
Test Date 请填写今天的日期，格式为“年-月-日”。
Candidate No. 请填写你的准考证号码。
2. 听力测试答题区雅思考试的听力测试部分会播放一系列录音，你需要记录你听到的答案。
听力答题区由多个表格组成，每个表格对应一个听力任务。
以下是填写听力答题区的基本要求：•填写表头：每个表格上方有一个表头，标明了题号、问题以及空白区域的含义。
确保理解每个表头，以便正确填写答案。
•填写答案：在每个表格的相应空白处填写你听到的答案。
可以使用大写字母、数字或符号来填写答案。
•注意题号：确保将你的答案正确对应到相应的题号上。
混淆题号可能导致严重的得分错误。
以下是一个示例，展示了如何填写听力答题区：听力答题区示例录音Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5录音1 A B D A C录音2 C A B D C录音3 B C A D B录音4 D A B D C录音5 A D B A C3. 阅读测试答题区雅思考试的阅读测试部分包含了一系列文章和相关问题。
你需要在答题卡上记录你的答案。
以下是填写阅读答题区的基本要求：•填写表头：同听力答题区一样，每个表格上方有一个表头，标明了题号、问题以及空白区域的含义。
确保理解每个表头，以便正确填写答案。
雅思答题卡
雅思答题卡一、READING1、READING PASSAGE 3You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.Accentuate the negativeJul 5th 2010, 10:11 by The Economist online A FOR everyone else what the picture showed was the glaciers: for the Dutch it was the floodingLast January errors in the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) hit the headlinesThe chapter on Asia in the report by the IPCC's second working group, charged with looking at the impact of climate change and adapting to it, mistakenly claimed that the Himalayan glaciers would be gone by2035This contradicted some reasonably basic physics, had not been predicted by the glacier specialists in the first working group and was unsupported by any evidenceThere was a report from the 1990s which said something similar about all the world's non-polar glaciers, but it gave the date as 2350Then there was a crucial typo and some shoddy referencingNevertheless the IPCC's chair, Rajendra Pachauri, had lashed out at people bringing the criticism up, accusing them of “voodoo science”He then had to eat his words, and set up a panel to look into ways the IPCC might be improved. B Inspired by this to look for other errors, a journalist for a Dutch newspaper spotted that the chapter on Europe gave a figure for the area of the Netherlands below sea level that was much too largeThe area at risk of flooding by the sea had been conflated with that at risk of flooding by the Rhine and the Meuse riversThat the careful Dutch should have provided faulty information and not spotted it in the review process was an embarrassment to the environment minister, Jacqueline Cramer; following a debate in parliament she called on the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), to look at all the regional chapters in the working group II report and make sure they were up to snuffThis the PBL has now done and its report has already been published. C The authors try hard to make clear that their findings do not undermine the IPCC's conclusions on climate changeAnd there is nothing in their report as egregious as the glaciers or as embarrassing as the Dutch sea levelBut they did find a number of things to take issue with, most of which they thought minor but eight of which they classed as major; and their work seems to bring out a systemic tendency to stress negative effects over positive onesThis tendency can be defendedBut a reading of the report suggests there may also be broader and potentially more misleading bias. D The auditors found one distinct error which they deemed major: a statement about the frequency of turbulence in South African fishing waters which had been translated directly into a statement about the productivity of the fisheriesThe IPCC has indicated it will produce an erratum for this, and for a number of other errors all concerned deemed minorBut the PBL also identified seven statements, which, while not errors, it thought were deserving of comment. E Perhaps the most striking relates to AfricaThe table in the summary for policy makers reads: “By 2020, in some countries, yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by up to 50%.” The evidence on which this is based says only that yields during years in which there are droughts could be reduced by 50%Furthermore, the relevant reference applies only for Morocco—and it cites as its source an earlier paper that the PBL says no one, including the IPCC authors, now seems able to find. F Other criticisms turn on a tendency to generalizeResearch showing decreased yields of millet, groundnuts and cowpeas in Niger becomes a claim that crop yields are decreasing in the Sahel, the strip that separates the Sahara from the savannah in Africa, rather than that the yields of some crops are decreasing in some parts of the SahelThe results of research on cattle in Argentina are applied to livestock (which would include pigs, chickens, llamas and the rest) throughout South AmericaThe expert authors do not provide a compelling reason for their claim that fresh water availability will decline overall in south, east and Southeast Asia, or that the balance of climate-related effects on the health of Europeans will be negative. G Another problem identified by the PBL analysis is that, in general, negative impacts are stressed over positive onesThe table in the summary for policymakers is almost unremittingly bad news; the conclusions in the chapters that fed into it, while far from cheery, were more mixedIn a similar way, when there is a range of possible impacts, the top end of the range tends to get more play in the summaries for policy makers than the bottom end doesThe PBL says that this is a reasonable way to proceed in a document that is explicitly aimed at policy makers thinking about adaptation, but it is not clear how transparent this approach is to readers. H This may reflect a larger issueWork on the impacts of climate change--the literature Working Group II assesses—tends to focus on vulnerabilities and damage for much the same reason the IPCC authors doThey seem more important, more urgent and quite possibly more fundableThe UN Framework Convention on Climate Change requires countries to assess their vulnerabilities, and these assessments are fodderfor Working Group IIThus the evidence base from which an assessment of impacts has to start is to some extent skewed. I Perhaps the most worrying thing about the PBL report, though, is a rather obvious one about which its authors say littleIn all ten of the issues that the PBL categorized as major (the original errors on glaciers and Dutch sea level, and the eight others identified in the report), the impression that the reader gets from the IPCC is more strikingly negative than the impression which would have been received if the underlying evidence base had been reflected as the PBL would have wished, with more precise referencing, more narrow interpretation and less authorial judgmentA large rise in heat related deaths in Australia is mentioned without noting that most of the effect is due to population rather than climate changeA claim about forest fires in northern Asia seems to go further than the evidence referred to--in this case a speech by a politician--would warrant. J A suspicion thus gains ground that the way in which the IPCC synthesizes, generalizes and checks its findings may systematically favor adverse outcomes in a way that goes beyond just serving the needs of policy makersAnecdotally, authors bemoan fights to keep caveats in place as chapters are edited, refined and summarizedThe PBL report does not prove or indeed suggest systematic bias, and it stresses that it has found nothing that should lead the parliament of the Netherlands, or anyone else, to reject the IPCC's findingsBut the panel set up to look at the IPCC's workings should ask some hard questions about systematic tendencies to accentuate the negative.1．Questions 27-29Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.Write the correct letter in boxes 27-29 on your answer sheet.27. How did the IPCC's chair respond to the charge of IPCC's mistaken report about Himalayan's oncoming disappearance?A. He absolutely denied it and retorted fiercely.B. He sincerely accepted it and promised to make some improvement later.C. He hesitated a lot and didn't know how to react for a while.D. He felt it hard to accept it at first but demonstrated a positive attitude towards it.【答案】D【解析】根据题干关键词“IPCC’s chair ，mistaken report about Himalayan’s”定位至A段最后两句，据此可知IPCC主席开始抨击提意见的人，但随后收回自己的话并且成立智囊团试图解决问题。
雅思考试答题卡填写指南
雅思考试答题卡填写指南【正文】雅思考试答题卡填写指南一、简介雅思考试是一项全球公认的英语能力评估考试，广泛用于英语非母语国家的教育和移民领域。
在雅思考试中，答题卡的填写是非常重要的环节。
本文将为考生提供一份详细的雅思考试答题卡填写指南，以便考生更准确、高效地完成答题卡的填写过程。
二、答题卡的基本结构雅思考试答题卡分为Listening、Reading和Writing三个部分，每个部分又分为多个题目。
答题卡的基本结构如下：1. 考生信息栏考生需在此栏填写个人信息，包括姓名、候考号等。
务必填写清晰、准确，并与准考证上的信息一致。
2. Listening部分Listening部分的答题卡由多个题目组成，每个题目对应一个编号。
考生需要填写自己的答案或选择。
答案的填写方式有多种，如填写字母或者数字等。
3. Reading部分Reading部分的答题卡也由多个题目组成，每个题目同样对应一个编号。
考生需要根据题目要求进行填涂、勾选或者填写答案。
填涂时要用2B铅笔填涂答题卡。
4. Writing部分Writing部分的答题卡主要用于书写作文。
考生需要在指定的空间内写出自己的作文内容，并在规定位置填写相关信息。
三、答题卡填写注意事项1. 使用黑色字迹的签字笔或圆珠笔填写答题卡，避免使用铅笔或者其他颜色的笔进行填写。
2. 答题卡上的字母和数字一定要填写清晰、准确。
在填写字母时要注意大小写，数字需填写完整。
3. 答题卡上往往会有不同类型的题目，如单选、多选、填空等。
考生在填写时要仔细理解题目要求，准确选择或填写答案。
4. 在填涂选择题选项时，要填涂完整，避免出现半涂或者错涂的情况。
填涂时要使用2B铅笔，填涂题号和选项对应位置，并将字母填涂黑。
5. 在填写作文时，要在规定的位置书写作文内容，并遵循作文字数限制。
作文内容要清晰、连贯，语法正确，避免出现涂改现象。
6. 在答题卡上不得出现任何无关信息、涂抹、划线或其他标记。
雅思考试填写答题卡的细节问题
雅思考试填写答题卡的细节问题雅思考试中的笔试答题需要考生填写答题卡，那么在做雅思试题时，答题卡填写需要注意什么呢下面小编为大家介绍雅思笔试答题基础知识。
雅思答题卡基础知识：试卷的颜色是不一样的，听力是浅粉色，阅读是灰色的，写作白色，有时还会出现黄色。
答题卡就和剑桥雅思后面附的答题卡的样子是一样的，答题卡上没有中文，考官不会说英文，答题卡上要填涂的有：名字(拼音，姓的下面要划线)、考试日期，第一语言(中文)的代码、考试号(涂数字前要在前面框框里写数字)，应该就没了，很简单的，试卷上要写名字。
雅思听力答题卡填写中的注意事项：1.货币数目必须在前面写货币符号$ A$等,即使原文已经给出,也要转移到答题纸上2.如未给例子,时间为;如给例子,则按照例子模仿.另外要注意.和.3.专有名词,人名,地名首字母在填表时必须大写4.熟练拼写星期和月份,不可以使用缩写5.大写的专有名词在雅思为路标词汇,使用它帮助定位6.若所写答案不超过三个单词,则每个单词都必须保留(注意:单词必须准确,意思对也不可以)7.听力中注意大小写，单复数,在没听清楚的情况下，确定单词不是不可数名词则为复数8.选择题时,所有选项在磁带中都会听到，注意关系。
单选，若听到并列的选项,则都不是;多选,单独出现的选项一般不是答案9.听到数字如百分比,时间，分数，年代，年龄，日期,将其写在空白处作备用答案10.填空题有'and",转移答案到答题纸上的时候要抄上and11.听到although后注意放在其后的一句话的意思12.填空题按照题号的顺序走，如故三句话没跟上，则越过两个空13.磁带中如果有拼写某个字母的单词,必是某处答案,将其写在空白处填写雅思听力答题卡是最简单也最关键的一步，大家一定要用心填写。
雅思考试相关小知识：中国的雅思考试中心有4个华北华中中心：Centre number为CN001城市包括：北京、天津、哈尔滨、长春、沈阳、大连、济南、青岛、西安、乌鲁木齐、郑州、武汉、太原华南中心：Centre number为CN002城市包括：广州，深圳，福州，厦门，海口，南宁，长沙华西中心：Centre number为CN172城市包括：重庆，成都，昆明和贵阳华东中心：Centre number为CN004城市包括：上海，南京，杭州，合肥。
雅思考试填写答题卡的细节问题
雅思考试填写答题卡的细节问题(总2页)--本页仅作为文档封面，使用时请直接删除即可----内页可以根据需求调整合适字体及大小--雅思考试填写答题卡的细节问题雅思考试中的笔试答题需要考生填写答题卡，那么在做雅思试题时，答题卡填写需要注意什么呢？下面小编为大家介绍雅思笔试答题基础知识。
雅思答题卡基础知识：试卷的颜色是不一样的，听力是浅粉色，阅读是灰色的，写作白色，有时还会出现黄色。
答题卡就和剑桥雅思后面附的答题卡的样子是一样的，答题卡上没有中文，考官不会说英文，答题卡上要填涂的有：名字(拼音，姓的下面要划线)、考试日期，第一语言(中文)的代码、考试号(涂数字前要在前面框框里写数字)，应该就没了，很简单的，试卷上要写名字。
雅思听力答题卡填写中的注意事项：1.货币数目必须在前面写货币符号$ A$等,即使原文已经给出,也要转移到答题纸上2.如未给例子,时间为;如给例子,则按照例子模仿.另外要注意.和.3.专有名词,人名,地名首字母在填表时必须大写4.熟练拼写星期和月份,不可以使用缩写5.大写的专有名词在雅思为路标词汇,使用它帮助定位6.若所写答案不超过三个单词,则每个单词都必须保留(注意:单词必须准确,意思对也不可以)7.听力中注意大小写，单复数,在没听清楚的情况下，确定单词不是不可数名词则为复数8.选择题时,所有选项在磁带中都会听到，注意关系。
单选，若听到并列的选项,则都不是;多选,单独出现的选项一般不是答案9.听到数字如百分比,时间，分数，年代，年龄，日期,将其写在空白处作备用答案10.填空题有'and",转移答案到答题纸上的时候要抄上and11.听到although后注意放在其后的一句话的意思12.填空题按照题号的顺序走，如故三句话没跟上，则越过两个空13.磁带中如果有拼写某个字母的单词,必是某处答案,将其写在空白处填写雅思听力答题卡是最简单也最关键的一步，大家一定要用心填写。
雅思考试相关小知识：中国的雅思考试中心有4个华北华中中心：Centre number为CN001城市包括：北京、天津、哈尔滨、长春、沈阳、大连、济南、青岛、西安、乌鲁木齐、郑州、武汉、太原华南中心：Centre number为CN002城市包括：广州，深圳，福州，厦门，海口，南宁，长沙华西中心：Centre number为CN172城市包括：重庆，成都，昆明和贵阳华东中心：Centre number为CN004城市包括：上海，南京，杭州，合肥2。