高一英语写作批判性思维练习题20题(带答案)

高一英语写作批判性思维练习题20题(带答案)
1. In a narrative essay about a boy's adventure in the forest, the writer suddenly mentions that the boy can fly without any prior indication. Is this reasonable?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：在记叙文写作中，故事发展需要有一定的逻辑性。

如果之前没有任何暗示就突然提到男孩会飞，这违背了故事发展的合理性原则。

在构建一个故事时，情节的发展应该是基于之前设定的情境或者有一定的伏笔，这样读者才能更好地理解故事的发展脉络。

2. A story describes a shy girl who always avoids public speaking. But in one scene, she suddenly gives a long and confident speech in front of a large audience without any transformation process. Is this a good way to shape the character?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：人物性格的塑造应该是连贯和渐进的。

一个一直害羞且回避公开演讲的女孩，突然毫无转变过程就在大量观众面前进行长时间且自信的演讲，这不符合人物性格塑造的原则。

人物性格的转变需要有合理的触发因素或者成长过程的描写。

3. In a narrative about a detective solving a case, the detective finds the key clue by pure luck without any investigation process. Is this
acceptable in terms of the story development?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：对于一个侦探故事来说，故事发展的关键在于侦探通过调查、推理等过程来解决案件。

如果仅仅靠运气就找到关键线索，这会使故事缺乏逻辑性和连贯性。

好的故事发展应该是基于角色的行为和努力的。

4. A story is about a kind - hearted old man. But in one part, he refuses to help a poor child without any explanation. Does this fit the character's personality?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：既然被设定为一个善良的老人，那么他的行为应该符合这个性格设定。

毫无解释地拒绝帮助一个可怜的孩子与他善良的性格相悖，在人物性格塑造上是不合理的。

5. In a narrative essay about a student's journey to school, the writer jumps from the student leaving home to suddenly arriving at school without describing the journey. Is this a proper way to develop the story?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：记叙文需要有完整的情节描述。

从学生离开家直接跳到到达学校，没有描述中间的旅程，这使得故事发展不完整，
缺乏连贯性，读者无法很好地感受到整个事件的过程。

6. A story describes a brave hero. But when facing a small dog, he shows extreme fear without any special reason. Does this match the character's description?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：勇敢的英雄形象已经被设定，在没有特殊原因的情况下，面对一只小狗表现出极度恐惧，这与之前设定的勇敢形象不匹配，在人物性格塑造上存在矛盾。

7. In a narrative about a family's picnic, the family members start arguing for no reason in the middle of the picnic. Does this contribute to a good story development?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：在记叙文里，情节发展需要有合理的原因。

如果家庭野餐进行得好好的，家庭成员毫无缘由地开始争吵，这会让故事显得突兀，不利于故事的良好发展。

8. A story is about a smart girl who always gets good grades. But in an exam, she fails without any indication of problems like illness or external factors. Is this reasonable for character development?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：对于一个总是取得好成绩的聪明女孩来说，在没有生病或者外部因素影响的情况下考试失败，这不符合人物一贯的设定，不利于人物性格的合理发展。

9. In a narrative about a runner in a race, the runner wins the race without any description of his training or efforts. Is this acceptable in terms of story development?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：在描写跑步者比赛的记叙文里，故事发展应该体现出跑步者获胜是有原因的，比如之前的训练或者努力。

如果没有这些描述，故事就缺乏说服力和逻辑性。

10. A story describes a friendly neighbor. But when a new neighbor moves in, he is very unfriendly without any backstory. Does this fit the character's personality?
A. Yes
B. No
答案：B。

解析：友好的邻居形象已经被设定，在没有背景故事的情况下对新邻居非常不友好，这与他原本友好的性格不相符，在人物性格塑造上是不合理的。

11. In an essay about environmental protection, which of the following would be the weakest argument?
A. We should protect the environment because it provides habitats for
countless species.
B. Environmental protection is necessary because it can make the air look cleaner.
C. Protecting the environment is crucial as it helps to maintain the ecological balance.
D. The environment should be protected since it is the source of many natural resources.
答案解析：B。

A选项指出环境为无数物种提供栖息地，这是一个很有力的保护它的论据。

C选项提到保持生态平衡，这是环境保护非常重要的一个方面，是合理且有力的论据。

D选项说明环境是自然资源的来源，这也能很好地支撑应该保护环境这一论点。

而B选项说环境保护是必要的因为它能让空气看起来更干净，看起来干净并不等同于实际的环境改善，这个论据比较表面和薄弱，缺乏深度和实质性意义，在批判性思维中，我们要寻找更有内涵和说服力的论据来支持论点。

12. When writing an essay on education, which statement as a thesis is the least well - defined?
A. Education is important because it broadens people's horizons and enriches their knowledge.
B. Education is kind of useful.
C. Education is essential for the development of individuals and society.
D. Education plays a vital role in shaping one's values and future.
答案解析：B。

A选项明确指出教育通过拓宽视野和丰富知识来体现其重要性，是一个比较明确的论点。

C选项表明教育对个人和社会发展的必要性，清晰地界定了教育的重要意义。

D选项说教育在塑造个人价值观和未来方面起到关键作用，也是很好的论点定义。

而B 选项“教育有点用”非常模糊，没有具体指出教育在哪些方面有用，缺乏明确性，在批判性思维中，一个好的论点应该清晰、明确地表达核心观点。

13. In an argumentative essay on environmental protection, which evidence is not relevant?
A. The increase in the number of endangered species due to habitat destruction.
B. The fact that some people like to plant flowers in their gardens.
C. The rising sea levels caused by global warming.
D. The air pollution index getting higher in industrial areas.
答案解析：B。

A选项中栖息地破坏导致濒危物种数量增加，这与环境保护密切相关，是很有力的证据。

C选项全球变暖引起海平面上升，这是环境保护话题中很关键的证据。

D选项工业区空气污染指数升高，也能很好地说明环境问题，与论点相关。

而B选项一些人喜欢在花园里种花，这只是个人爱好行为，与环境保护这个大的议题没有直接的关联，在批判性思维中，我们要确保论据与论点是紧密相关的。

14. For an essay about education reform, which of the following counter - arguments is not strong?
A. Some people think education reform will cost too much money, but the long - term benefits to society far outweigh the costs.
B. People say that education reform may disrupt the current teaching order, but without reform, the education system cannot keep up with the times.
C. Some believe that education reform is only for a small number of students, but actually, it aims to improve the overall quality of education for all students.
D. Some oppose education reform just because they don't like change.
答案解析：D。

A选项针对教育改革花费太多钱的反论点，提出长期的社会利益远超成本，是很强的反驳。

B选项针对改革可能扰乱教学秩序的反论点，指出不改革教育系统无法跟上时代，是有力的回应。

C选项对教育改革只为少数学生的观点进行反驳，说明改革是为了提高全体学生的教育质量，也是合理的。

而D选项说有些人反对教育改革仅仅是因为他们不喜欢改变，这不是一个基于理性分析的反论点，缺乏实质内容，在批判性思维中，一个好的反论点应该是基于理性分析和事实依据的。

15. In an environmental protection - themed essay, which supporting detail is not strong?
A. Recycling can reduce the amount of waste in landfills, which helps
to protect the soil.
B. Using public transportation sometimes can be a little inconvenient.
C. Planting more trees can absorb carbon dioxide and improve air quality.
D. Reducing the use of plastic bags can prevent pollution in the ocean.
答案解析：B。

A选项中回收能减少垃圾填埋场的垃圾量从而保护土壤，是很有力的支持环保的细节。

C选项种树能吸收二氧化碳改善空气质量，这是很好的支持环保的论据。

D选项减少塑料袋使用能防止海洋污染，也是有效的支持。

而B选项使用公共交通有时有点不方便，这不是支持。