英语文献写作要点

合集下载

英语论文写作技巧

英语论文写作技巧

英语论文写作技巧
1.明确研究目的:在开始写作之前,确定研究的目的和问题是很重要的。

研究目的应该明确且具体,以便您在写作过程中能够专注于相关的信
息和论证。

2.撰写清晰的引言:引言是论文的开端,应该能够吸引读者的注意力
并概述您的研究主题。

在引言中,您需要阐述研究的背景、意义以及研究
问题。

3.合理组织论文结构:论文应该有清晰的结构,包括引言、方法、结
果和讨论部分。

每个部分都应该紧密连接并合理组织,以便读者理解您的
研究过程和结论。

4.优化段落结构:每个段落都应该有明确的中心思想,并在段落中进
行一致的探讨和论证。

确保段落之间的过渡流畅,以便读者能够理解论文
的逻辑结构。

5.精确使用术语和词汇:在写作过程中,确保使用准确和恰当的术语
和词汇。

避免使用模棱两可或不准确的词汇,这样会降低您的论文质量。

7.深入分析和讨论研究结果:在讨论部分中,不仅要总结结果,还要
对结果进行深入的分析和解释。

探讨结果的含义、可能的解释和研究的限制。

8.注意语法和拼写错误:在完成论文之前,仔细检查语法和拼写错误。

使用自动校对工具有助于检查错误,但不应完全依赖它们。

9.遵守学术道德:确保您的论文符合学术道德要求,包括不抄袭和遵
守引用规则。

正确引用使用其他学者的材料,即使是以自己的话再次表达。

写英文文献的注意事项

写英文文献的注意事项

写英文文献的注意事项When writing English literature, there are several important considerations to keep in mind to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the document. Firstly, it is crucial to conduct thorough research on the chosen topic to gather relevant and credible sources. This will provide a strong foundation for the literature and enhance its credibility. Additionally, it is important to carefully structure the document, including an introduction, body, and conclusion, to ensure a logical flow of ideas.In terms of language, it is essential to use clear, concise, and formal language throughout the literature. Avoiding colloquialisms and slang is important to maintain professionalism. Furthermore, proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling are critical to convey the intended message effectively.When citing sources, it is important to follow a recognized citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, togive proper credit to the original authors and avoid plagiarism. Additionally, it is important to critically analyze and evaluate the sources to ensure their relevance and reliability.Another important consideration is to maintain a neutral and objective tone throughout the literature, avoiding bias and emotional language. This will help to present a balanced and well-reasoned argument.Finally, it is crucial to proofread and edit the document carefully to eliminate any errors and improve the overall quality of the writing. Seeking feedback from peers or instructors can also be beneficial in refining the literature.In conclusion, when writing English literature, it is important to conduct thorough research, carefully structure the document, use clear and formal language, cite sources properly, maintain objectivity, and thoroughly proofread and edit the work. By paying attention to theseconsiderations, the quality and effectiveness of the literature can be greatly enhanced.。

英文文献综述写作要求和方法

英文文献综述写作要求和方法

英⽂⽂献综述写作要求和⽅法DefinitionA literature review(⽂献综述)is both a summary and explanation of the complete and current state of knowledge on a limited topic as found in academic books (学术著作)and journal articles(期刊论⽂). There are two kinds of literature reviews you might write at university: one that students are asked to write as a stand-alone assignment in a course, often as part of their training in the research processes in their field, and the other that is written as part of an introduction to, or preparation for, a longer work, usually a thesis or research report. The focus and perspective of your review and the kind of hypothesis(假设)or thesis argument you make will be determined by what kind of review you are writing. One way to understand the differences between these two types is to read published literature reviews or the first chapters of theses and dissertations(学位论⽂)in your own subject area. Analyze the structure of their arguments and note the way they address the issues.Purpose of the Literature ReviewIt gives readers easy access to research on a particular topic by selecting high quality articles or studies that are relevant, meaningful, important and valid(有效的)and summarizing them into one complete report.It provides an excellent starting point for researchers beginning to do research ina new area by forcing them to summarize, evaluate, and compare originalresearch in that specific area.It ensures that researchers do not duplicate work that has already been done. 你所整理的⽂章中作者主要观察的重点是什么It can provide clues(线索)as to where future research is heading or recommend areas on which to focus. 现在的研究都到了什么程度It highlights key findings.It identifies inconsistencies(⽭盾), gaps and contradictions in the literature.It provides a constructive analysis of the methodologies and approaches of other researchers. 前⾯研究者的建设性的⽅法和途径Content of the ReviewIntroductionThe introduction explains the focus and establishes the importance of the subject(主题). It discusses what kind of work has been done on the topic and identifies a ny controversies(争议)within the field or any recent research which has raised questions about earlier assumptions(假设). It may provide background or history. It concludes with a purpose or thesis statement(中⼼思想). In a stand-alone literature review, this statement will sum up and evaluate the state of the art (⽬前的⼯艺⽔平)in this field of research; in a review that is an introduction or preparatory to(为~~做准备)a thesis or research report, it will suggest how the review findings will lead to the research the writer proposes to undertake.Body(论⽂的内容)Often divided by headings/subheadings(标题/副标题), the body summarizes and evaluates the current state of knowledge in the field. It notes major themes or topics, the most important trends, and any findings about which researchers agree or disagree. If the review is preliminary to (在~~之前)your own thesis or research project, its purpose is to make an argument that will justify your proposed research. Therefore, it will discuss only that research which leads directly to your own project. ConclusionThe conclusion summarizes all the evidence presented and shows its significance. If the review is an introduction to your own research, it highlights gaps and indicates how previous research leads to your own research project and chosen methodology. If the review is a stand-alone assignment for a course, it should suggest any practical applications of the research as well as the implications and possibilities for future research.Nine Steps to Writing a Literature Review(九步法写综述)1. Find a working topic.Look at your specific area of study. Think about what interests you, and what fertile ground for study is. Talk to your professor, brainstorm, and read lecture notes and recentissues of periodicals(期刊)in the field.2. Review the literature.Using keywords search a computer database. It is best to use at least two databases relevant to your discipline. Remember that the reference lists of recent articles and reviews can lead to valuable papers.Make certain that you also include any studies contrary to your point of view.3. Focus your topic narrowly and select papers accordingly.Consider the following:What interests youWhat interests othersWhat time span(时间跨度)of research will you consider?Choose an area of research that is due for a review.4. Read the selected articles thoroughly and evaluate them.What assumptions do most/some researchers seem to be makingWhat methodologies do they use - What testing procedures, subjects, material testedEvaluate and synthesize(综合)the research findings and conclusions drawn.Note experts(专家)in the field: names/labs that are frequently referenced.Note conflicting theories, results, and methodologies.Watch for popularity of theories and how this has/has not changed over time.5. Organize the selected papers by looking for patterns and by developing sub-topics. Note things such as:Findings that are common/contested(争论)Two or three important trends in the researchThe most influential theories6. Develop a working thesis.Write a one- or two-sentence statement summarizing the conclusion you have reached about the major trends and developments you see in the research that has been done on your subject.7. Organize your own paper based on the findings from steps 4 & 5.Develop headings/subheadings. If your literature review is extensive, find a large table surface, and on it place post-itnotes(便签纸)or filing cards(档案卡)to organize all your findings into categories. Move them around if you decide that(a) they fit better under different headings, or (b) you need to establish new topic headings.8. Write the body of the paperFollow the plan you have developed above, making certain that each section links logically to the one before and after and that you have divided your sections by themes or subtopics, not by reporting the work of individual theorists or researchers.9. Look at what you have written; focus on analysis, not description.Look at the topic sentences of each paragraph. If you were to read only these sentences, would you find that your paper presented a clear position, logically developed, from beginning to end? If, for example, you find that each paragraph begins with a researcher's name, it might indicate that, instead of evaluating and comparing the research literature from an analytical point of view, you have simply described what research has been done. This is one of the most common problems withstudentFinishing Touches: Revising and Editing Your WorkRead your work out loud. That way you will be better able to identify where you need punctuation marks(标点符号)to signal pauses or divisions withinsentences, where you have made grammatical errors, or where your sentencesare unclear.Since the purpose of a literature review is to demonstrate that the writer is familiar with the important professional literature on the chosen subject, check to makecertain that you have covered all of the important, up-to-date, and pertinent texts.In the sciences and some of the social sciences it is important that your literature be quite recent; this is not so important in the humanities.Make certain that all of the citations and references are correct and that you are referencing in the appropriate style for your discipline. If you are uncertain which style to use, ask your professor.Check to make sure that you have not plagiarized either by failing to cite a source of information, or by using words quoted directly from a source. (Usually if youtake three or more words directly from another source, you should put thosewords within quotation marks, and cite the page.)Text should be written in a clear and concise academic style; it should not be descriptive in nature or use the language of everyday speech.There should be no grammatical or spelling errors.Sentences should flow smoothly and logically.In a paper in the sciences, or in some of the social sciences, the use of subheadings to organize the review is recommended.。

英文文献综述撰写要点

英文文献综述撰写要点

英文文献综述撰写要点Title: Key Points for Writing an English Literature ReviewIntroduction:A literature review is an essential component of academic research, providing a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge and research on a specific topic. Writing a literature review in English involves following certain key points to ensure its value and quality. This article will explore the important aspects of writing an English literature review, emphasizing structure, depth, and the writer's perspective.I. Understanding the Purpose and Scope of the Literature Review:1. Definition: Explain the purpose of a literature review, which is to identify and analyze the existing literature on a specific topic.2. Scope: Define the boundaries of your literature review, such as the time period, geographical location, or specific subtopics to be covered.3. Research Questions: Highlight the key research questions that your literature review aims to answer.II. Conducting a Systematic Search for Relevant Literature:1. Identify Relevant Databases: Discuss the selection of appropriate academic databases, libraries, and search engines to ensure a comprehensive collection of relevant literature.2. Search Techniques: Explain advanced search techniques, such as Boolean operators, truncation, and proximity searching, to optimize your literature search.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Describe the criteria used to include or exclude specific literature from your review, ensuring relevance and quality.III. Organizing and Structuring the Literature Review:1. Introduction: Provide a concise introduction that outlines the purpose, scope, and relevance of the literature review.2. Main Body: Organize the literature review thematically, chronologically, or methodologically, depending on the research questions and available literature.3. Synthesis and Analysis: Critically evaluate and compare the findings of different studies and authors, identifying trends, debates, contradictions, and gaps in the literature.4. Conclusion: Present a summary of the main findings, emphasizing their significance and implications for futureresearch.IV. Evaluation of the Literature:1. Quality Assessment: Develop a framework to assess the quality and reliability of the included literature sources, such as peer-reviewed journals or reputable publishers.2. Critical Analysis: Analyze the strengths and limitations of each literature source, considering methodology, sample size, data analysis, and potential bias.3. Validity and Reliability: Discuss the validity and reliability of the key findings presented in the literature, highlighting any conflicting or inconclusive evidence.V. Writer's Perspective and Understanding:1. Impartiality and Objectivity: Emphasize the importance of maintaining an impartial and objective perspective throughout the literature review while acknowledging the writer's personal biases.2. Interpretation and Insights: Offer your perspectives and insights on the literature, discussing the implications of the findings, potential research directions, and unanswered questions.3. Future Recommendations: Provide recommendations forfurther research based on your understanding of the literature and identified knowledge gaps.Conclusion:Writing a high-quality English literature review requires a systematic approach and adherence to key points such as understanding the purpose and scope, conducting a comprehensive literature search, organizing the review effectively, evaluating the quality of sources, and providing a writer's perspective. By following these guidelines, you can produce a valuable literature review that contributes to the existing knowledge on your chosen topic.Word Count: 381。

文献综述外文翻译写作规范及要求

文献综述外文翻译写作规范及要求

文献综述外文翻译写作规范及要求
文献综述是对已经发表的学术文献进行系统的综合分析和评价的一种
学术写作形式。

在撰写文献综述的过程中,外文翻译是不可或缺的一部分。

下面是一些关于外文翻译的写作规范和要求。

1.准确:外文翻译要准确无误地表达原文的意思。

翻译过程中应注意
遵守语法规则、掌握专业术语以及正确理解上下文。

2.逻辑清晰:翻译后的中文句子要符合中文语法和表达习惯,并保持
逻辑上的连贯。

避免使用过于生硬或拗口的句子结构。

3.简洁明了:文献综述注重对已有文献的概括和总结,因此翻译过程
中应力求简洁明了,避免翻译过多的细节和废话。

4.专业术语准确翻译:外文翻译中的专业术语在翻译过程中要保持准
确性。

可以参考已有的专业词典、论文翻译表格等工具来确保专业术语的
正确翻译。

5.文体和语气恰当:根据不同的文献类型和句子语境,选择合适的文
体和语气进行翻译。

可以参考论文综述的写作规范和范例,避免过于口语
化或过于正式的翻译。

在撰写文献综述的过程中,准确和恰当的外文翻译是非常重要的。


有通过准确和规范的翻译,才能保证文献综述的质量和可信度。

因此,应
该注重提升外文翻译的能力并积极学习相关的写作规范和要求。

英文科研文献的写作技巧

英文科研文献的写作技巧

英文科研文献的写作技巧
写作科研文献的技巧包括以下几个方面:
1. 确定目标读者:在开始写作之前,要明确自己的目标读者是谁,比如同行专家、学术期刊编辑、普通读者等。

不同的读者会对文献的内容、结构和语言要求有所不同,因此要根据目标读者来确定写作策略。

2. 精炼论点:科研文献需要有清晰的论点,即要传达一个明确的观点或假设。

在写作过程中,要保持论点的一致性,并用有力的证据和逻辑来支持论点。

3. 结构清晰:科研文献需要有明确的结构,以帮助读者理解文章的内容。

常见的结构包括引言、方法、结果和讨论。

在写作过程中,可以使用标题、段落和插图等手段来给文章分段和分节,提高阅读的流畅性。

4. 使用恰当的语言:科研文献需要使用准确和清晰的语言来传达研究结果和观点。

避免使用过于复杂的术语和句子结构,应尽可能使用简洁明了的表达方式,以提高读者的理解和阅读效率。

5. 引用文献:在科研文献中,要适当引用其他研究的成果和观点,以支持自己的论述。

引用的方式可以使用直接引用、间接引用或者是引用文献的摘要。

在引用时,要注意使用正确的引文格式和标注规范。

6. 编辑校对:在完成写作之后,需要进行仔细的编辑和校对。

检查文章中是否存在语法错误、拼写错误或者是表达不清晰的地方,并进行适当的修改和调整。

此外,还需要检查引文格式、图表的标注和图像的清晰度等。

通过运用以上的写作技巧,可以使科研文献更具有说服力和可读性,提高其影响力和学术价值。

学术英语写作方法

学术英语写作方法

学术英语写作方法
以下是一些学术英语写作的方法和建议:
1. 明确写作目的和受众:在开始写作之前,明确写作的目的和受众是非常重要的。

了解读者的背景和期望,以便选择适当的语言和风格。

2. 进行充分的文献研究:在进行学术写作之前,需要进行充分的文献研究,了解前人在该领域的研究成果和现状。

这有助于建立自己的观点,并为论文提供支撑。

3. 规划论文结构:根据写作目的和要求,规划论文的结构。

一般包括引言、方法、结果、讨论和结论等部分。

合理的结构有助于组织思路和表达观点。

4. 使用准确、简洁的语言:学术英语写作要求使用准确、简洁的语言表达自己的意思。

避免使用模糊、含混或口语化的表达方式。

5. 避免抄袭:在学术写作中,必须遵循学术诚信原则,避免抄袭他人的作品。

引用他人的观点或研究成果时,应正确引用并注明出处。

6. 多次修改和编辑:完成初稿后,应多次修改和编辑,检查语法错误、拼写错误、标点符号等问题。

同时,检查论文的逻辑是否清晰、内容是否连贯。

7. 寻求反馈:请导师或同学对论文进行评阅和反馈,他们可以提供宝贵的意见和建议,帮助改进论文质量。

8. 注意格式和规范:学术写作通常有特定的格式和规范要求,如引用格式、参考文献格式等。

在写作过程中,应注意遵循相应的规范。

英文文献综述写作要求和方法

英文文献综述写作要求和方法

英文文献综述写作要求和方法
写作要求:
1.选题明确:选择一个研究领域或问题来进行综述,确保选题具有一
定的研究价值和前沿性。

3.文献分析和整理:对选取的文献进行阅读和理解,并将其按照一定
的逻辑顺序进行归类和整理。

可以将文献按主题、年代或方法论等分类。

4.批判性思考:对每篇文献进行批判性思考,评估其质量、方法和结
果等方面。

可以比较不同研究间的异同点,找出研究领域的争议和不足之处。

5.逻辑结构清晰:综述应具有清晰的逻辑结构,包括引言、背景知识、文献综述、理论框架、方法、结果和讨论等部分。

每部分应有明确的目标
和清晰的连接。

写作方法:
1.引述文献:在综述中引用文献的时候,要注明作者和日期,并遵循
相应的引用规范。

可以使用文献管理软件来管理和引用文献。

2.集中引证:在综述中,可以选择性地引用文献,重点摘述文献中的
相关内容,并给出一些例子来支持和说明观点。

3.比较文献:可以将不同文献中的结论和方法进行比较,找出它们之
间的差异和共同点,并提出对于研究领域的启示和建议。

4.分析文献:对综述中的文献进行分析和评估,评价其质量和可靠性,并对其方法和结果进行讨论。

5.提出研究问题:综述中可以提出一些未解决的问题或者待研究的方向,以促进进一步的研究和探索。

综述的写作并不是简单地列出已有文献的摘要,而是要对相关研究进行整体性的分析和综合。

写作过程中要做到客观、准确和批判性思考,以提供一个对该领域最新进展的全面了解。

最后,总结整理已有研究的基础上,可以对未来的研究方向进行一定的展望。

英语论文的文献目录写作

英语论文的文献目录写作

英语论文的文献目录写作
论文作者在正文之后必须提供论文中全部引文的详细出版情况,即文献目录页。

美国高校一般称此页为workscited,其格式须注意下列几点:
1.目录页应与正文分开,另页打印,置于正文之后。

2.目录页应视为英语论文的一页,按论文页码的顺序在其右上角标明论文作者的姓和页码;如果条目较多,不止一页,则第一页不必标出作者姓和页码(但必须计算页数),其余各页仍按顺序标明作者姓和页码。

标题workscited与打印纸顶端的距离约为2.5cm,与第一条目中第一行的距离仍为0.6cm;各条目之间及各行之间的距离亦为0.6cm,不必留出更多空白。

3.各条目内容顺序分别为作者姓、名、作品名、出版社名称、出版地、出版年份及起止页码等;各条目应严格按各作者姓的首字母顺序排列,但不要给各条目编码,也不必将书条与杂志、期刊等条目分列。

4.各条目第一行需顶格打印,回行时均需缩进五格,以将该条目与其他条目区分开来。

如何写好英语论文参考文献总结?

如何写好英语论文参考文献总结?

如何写好英语论文参考文献总结?As we all know, references or citations play a vital role in any paper, article or thesis. The main purpose ofincluding citations in any written work is to acknowledge the sources from where the information was taken, while also supporting the writer's own arguments and theories. However, citing references in a paper or article can be a daunting task for most students, especially when it comes to academic writing.It is essential to get your reference list right, as a poorly referenced work can result in loss of marks and even penalties. Therefore, it is necessary to follow certain guidelines to ensure that your references are accurate and consistent throughout your paper or thesis.Here are some tips that can help you write a good reference list for your English language paper:1. Understand the referencing style recommended by your professor. This will save you time and effort in the long-run and help you avoid making mistakes. Common referencing styles used in academic writing include APA, MLA, Harvard, andChicago. It is important to use the prescribed format for citations and bibliographies as they differ in their presentation of information.2. Keep a record of your references as you go along. This will save you time later on when you are compiling the list. Make sure that you have the author's name, title of thearticle or book, date of publication, and name of the publisher. For electronic resources, ensure that you have the complete web address, date of access, and any specificedition numbers.3. Be consistent in your citations throughout the paper. Ensure that the format is consistent for both in-text citations and the reference list. This means that the full stop, comma, or capitalization used should be the same for every entry. Also, double-check the spelling of the author's name, book or article titles.4. Use reliable sources for your references. By using reputable sources, you add credibility to your paper, whichis essential in academic writing. Ensure that you have used peer-reviewed articles, academic journals, books, and otherreliable sources. Avoid using blogs or other non-credible sources for references.5. Check the referencing guide and citation tools available online. In addition to the standard referencing format, you may require specific instructions on how to cite sources such as interviews, government documents, ortechnical reports. There are many online citation tools available, such as EndNote, Mendeley, and Zotero, which can help you create your reference lists with ease.6. Use your own words when referring to other works. While it is essential to acknowledge other sources of information, it is also important to paraphrase the content in your own words. This will not only help you avoid plagiarism but will also demonstrate your understanding of the topic.In conclusion, writing a good reference list for English language papers requires attention to detail and adherence to the prescribed referencing style. By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your references are accurate and consistent, helping you to boost your academic writing credentials. Remember that accurate referencing is not just amatter of academic integrity, but also serves as evidence of the work you have done and the knowledge you have gained.。

sci英文写作

sci英文写作

sci英文写作
SCI(Science Citation Index)英文写作是指用英语撰写科学研究论文的过程。

以下是一些关于SCI 英文写作的基本要点和建议:
1. 清晰的结构:SCI 论文通常遵循IMRaD 结构(引言、方法、结果和讨论),确保每个部分都有明确的主题和逻辑顺序。

2. 精确的语言:使用准确、简洁的语言来表达你的思想。

避免使用模糊、含混或过于复杂的词句。

3. 逻辑连贯:在整个论文中保持逻辑的一致性和连贯性。

每个段落和句子都应该紧密连接,共同支持论文的主要观点。

4. 引用文献:引用已发表的研究文献来支持你的观点和方法。

遵循相应的引用格式(如APA、MLA 等)。

5. 校对和修改:在提交论文之前,务必进行仔细的校对和修改,检查语法错误、拼写错误和标点符号的使用。

6. 接受反馈:请同事或导师审阅你的论文,并接受他们的反馈和建议,以改进你的写作。

7. 不断练习:写作是一项技能,通过不断练习和阅读其他优秀的科研论文,可以提高你的SCI 英文写作能力。

学术英语文章写作注意要点

学术英语文章写作注意要点

学术英语文章写作注意要点在学术英语文章的写作中,有一些重要的要点需要注意。

下面是一些关键要点:1.确定目标和主题:在开始写作之前,明确你的目标和主题。

问自己你想要向读者传达什么信息,以及你希望通过这篇文章解决什么问题。

确保你的目标清晰明确,并且专注于一个主题。

2.结构清晰:学术文章应该具有清晰的结构,包括引言、方法、结果和讨论部分。

确保每个部分都有明确的目标,并且按照逻辑顺序进行组织。

使用标题和段落使文章结构更清晰。

3.使用恰当的语言和语法:学术英语应该使用正式和准确的语言。

确保你的语法正确,使用适当的单词和短语。

避免使用口语和俚语,以及模糊和不明确的表达方式。

5.注意引言和结论:引言部分应该概述你所研究的问题,并简要介绍你的研究目的和方法。

结论部分应总结你的研究结果,并提出可能的进一步研究方向。

6.避免冗长和罗列:学术文章应该清晰、简洁地传达你的观点和结果。

避免冗长的句子和段落,删除不必要的细节。

另外,避免简单的罗列信息,而是将其整合到连贯的段落中。

8.适应目标读者:学术文章应该根据目标读者来撰写。

考虑读者的背景和专业知识水平,并根据需要解释相关概念和术语。

9.修订和校对:在完成初稿后,仔细检查你的文章。

检查拼写、语法和标点错误,并确保文章流畅自然。

考虑请他人审阅你的文章,以获得额外的反馈和建议。

10.遵守学术道德:在撰写学术文章时,确保遵守学术道德准则。

避免抄袭他人的研究和文献,正确引用和参考。

总之,学术英语文章的写作需要注意清晰的结构、准确的语言、适当的引用和文献、简洁明了的表达,以及修订和校对。

通过遵循这些要点,你将能够撰写出高质量和专业的学术英语文章。

参考文献中外文的书写格式

参考文献中外文的书写格式

参考文献中外文的书写格式1. 书写作者信息:单一作者,姓氏,名字的首字母缩写。

例如,Smith, J.多位作者,按照作者出现的顺序写出姓氏和名字的首字母缩写,中间用逗号分隔。

例如,Smith, J., Johnson, A.若有超过七位作者,可以列出前六位作者后加上省略号,然后写上最后一位作者的姓名。

若无法找到作者,可以用匿名代替。

2. 标题信息:书名或文章标题的首字母大写,其余字母小写。

例如,The Art of War.对于期刊文章或论文,标题要用引号括起来。

例如,"The Effects of Climate Change on Biodiversity."3. 出版信息:出版年份写在作者姓名之后,用括号括起来。

例如,(2022)。

若有多个版本或者卷号,可以在括号中注明。

例如,(第2版) 或 (Vol. 5)。

出版地点一般不需要写,除非是非常特殊的情况。

4. 出版商信息:出版商的名称要完整写出,可以缩写为常用的形式。

例如,Cambridge University Press 可以缩写为Cambridge UP。

5. 文献类型:对于书籍,书名要用斜体或者下划线表示。

对于期刊文章,期刊名称要用斜体或者下划线表示。

6. DOI或URL:对于在线出版的文献,可以提供DOI(数字对象标识符)或URL链接。

下面是一些具体的例子,以便更好地理解外文参考文献的书写格式:1. 书籍:Smith, J. (2022). The Art of War. Cambridge UP.2. 期刊文章:Johnson, A., & Brown, M. (2021). "The Effects of Climate Change on Biodiversity." Environmental Science Journal, 15(3), 123-145.3. 学术论文:Lee, C., & Wang, H. (2020). "A Study on Artificial Intelligence." Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Science.请注意,这只是APA格式的一种示例,不同的引用规范可能会有细微的差异。

英文科研文献的写作技巧

英文科研文献的写作技巧

英文科研文献的写作技巧
写作科研文献的技巧可以包括以下几个方面:
1. 准备工作:在开始写作之前,进行充分的准备工作。

这包括阅读相关文献,查找和整理相关的资料和数据,并为文章撰写一个明确的大纲。

2. 简洁明了:科研文献应该争取言之有物,言简意赅,尽量用简洁明了的语言表达。

避免使用冗长的句子和复杂的词汇,确保读者能够轻松理解。

3. 逻辑结构:科研文献应该具备清晰的逻辑结构。

文章应该包含引言、方法、结果和讨论等部分,每个部分的内容都需要有明确的目的和信息。

4. 插图和表格:合理运用插图和表格可以更好地展示研究结果。

确保图表清晰易懂,并配以简明扼要的说明。

图表应该与正文相互呼应,起到补充和解释的作用。

5. 文献引用和参考文献:在科研文献中,必须遵循正确的引用规范,并列出参考文献。

确保引用的准确性和完整性,并根据期刊要求格式化参考文献。

6. 编辑和校对:在完成初稿后,需要对文章进行编辑和校对。

检查语法、拼写和标点符号等错误,并确保文章结构清晰,论证严密,没有重复或混乱的内容。

7. 合作和交流:在写作过程中,可以与同事、导师或其他专家进行合作和交流。

他们的意见和建议可能有助于完善文章,确保文章的质量和准确性。

8. 不断修订:科研文献的写作是一个不断演进的过程。

根据审稿人或编辑的意见,不断修订和改进文章,直到达到高质量的标准。

英文参考文献的标准格式

英文参考文献的标准格式

英文参考文献的标准格式
英文参考文献的标准格式通常包括以下部分:
1. 序号:在文中引用的文献按照出现的顺序进行编号。

序号一般用方括号括起来,写在引文内容的右上角。

2. 主要责任者:引用的文献的主要作者或者主编的名字。

如果文献在引文中有明确的作者标注,则直接写上作者的名字即可。

如果文献在引文中的作者标注省略了,则需要补充作者的全名。

3. 文献题名:引用的文献的题目或者标题。

如果文献在引文中有明确的题目标注,则直接写上题目即可。

如果文献在引文中的题目标注省略了,则需要补充完整的题目。

4. 文献类型标识:标识所引用文献的类型。

常见的文献类型标识包括:书籍(Book)、论文(Article)、报告(Report)、专利(Patent)等。

5. 出版地:引用的文献的出版地或者发布地。

6. 出版社:引用的文献的出版社或者发布机构。

7. 出版年:引用的文献的出版日期或者发布日期。

8. 起止页码:引用的文献在原文献中的起始页码和结束页码。

如果只引用文献的一部分,需要注明起止页码。

在写英文参考文献时,还需要注意以下几点:
1. 参考文献的格式要统一,每个文献的格式要相同,包括序号、主要责任者、文献题名、文献类型标识、出版地、出版社、出版年、起止页码等部分的格式都要保持一致。

2. 参考文献的书写顺序要按照文中引用的顺序进行排列,不能随意调换顺序。

3. 参考文献中的缩写和符号要符合规范,不能随意使用。

文献综述外文翻译写作规范及要求

文献综述外文翻译写作规范及要求

文献综述外文翻译写作规范及要求文献综述是对一定范围内已有文献的综合评述和总结,旨在回答特定研究问题、揭示研究现状、批判前人工作或发展新的研究方向等。

以下是文献综述和外文中文翻译的写作规范及要求:文献综述写作规范及要求:1.选择适当的文献范围:确定综述的主题和范围,选择与主题相关的高质量文献。

2.搜集文献:利用数据库、图书馆和互联网等途径,广泛搜集相关文献。

3.文献筛选:根据综述的目标和问题,筛选出与主题相关、有代表性的文献。

一般建议引用近几年的研究,但也可以引用经典文献。

4.综述结构:按照逻辑顺序,将文献分类、总结和评价。

一般包括引言、方法、结果和讨论等部分。

5.文章结构和语言:注意文章结构的连贯性和条理性,使用准确的科技词汇和语言,注意段落和句子的清晰性。

6.学术文献引用格式:按照学术规范,使用适当的引用格式,如APA、MLA等。

外文中文翻译写作规范及要求:1.翻译准确:理解原文意思,确保准确翻译每个词和句子。

2.语言流畅:在保证准确性的基础上,使译文语句通顺、流畅,符合汉语表达习惯。

3.词汇选择:选择恰当的词汇,尽量避免直译和生硬的译文,注意上下文的语境和词语的用法。

4.文化转换:针对涉及特定文化细节的部分,进行文化适应和转换,使读者能够理解和接受。

5.段落和结构:保持原文段落和结构的清晰,正确表达文章的逻辑和条理。

6.校对和修改:仔细校对翻译的准确性、语句的通顺性和表达的准确性,进行必要的修改和完善。

7.注明出处:在译文中注明原文的出处,并按照学术规范进行引用。

以上是文献综述和外文中文翻译的一般写作规范和要求,具体可以根据不同学科领域和学术期刊的要求进行调整和补充。

写英文论文的几个小技巧(精选5篇)

写英文论文的几个小技巧(精选5篇)

写英文论文的几个小技巧(精选5篇)第一篇:写英文论文的几个小技巧小弟不才,迄今才撰写了三篇英文文章,但写作过程中也积累了一点经验,不敢敝帚自珍,今天也斗胆向各位虫友贡献一下。

我这几篇文章,不论内容如何,但每次审稿人对于语言的评价都是还不错的,well written,总结起来不外有三个小窍门:一是平时多积累。

我在日常读文献的时候,如果发现很好的句子句式,都会记录在一个文档里面,如下面的一段话,就是我在一篇文章的摘要中发现的:This paper describes the concept of sensor networks which has been made viable by the convergence of microelectro-mechanical systems technology, wireless communications and digital electronics.First, the sensing tasks and the potential sensor networks applications are explored, and a review of factors influencing the design of sensor networks is provided.Then, the communication architecture for sensor networks is outlined, and the algorithms and protocols developed for each layer in the literature are explored.Open research issues for the realization of sensor networks are also discussed.文章用词忌重复,中文如此,英文亦然。

英文文献写作技巧常见问题

英文文献写作技巧常见问题

英文文献写作技巧常见问题1. 语法错误:在写作过程中,常常会出现一些语法错误,例如主谓不一致、动词时态错误、介词使用错误等。

为了避免这些问题,建议在写作前先对所用语法进行复习,并在写作完成后进行校对。

2. 句子结构复杂:有时候为了追求表达的精确性,会使用过于复杂的句子结构,让读者难以理解。

要避免这个问题,可以尽量使用简洁明了的句子结构,并注意句子的连贯性。

3. 过多使用被动语态:在科技文献中,被动语态的使用频率相对较高。

然而,过多地使用被动语态会使句子变得拖沓和不直接。

可以尝试使用主动语态,让句子更加生动有力。

4. 文章结构混乱:文章结构的清晰度对于读者来说非常重要。

为了让读者更好地理解文章的逻辑,建议在写文章前先制定一个合理的大纲,并在文章中使用恰当的标题和段落来组织内容。

5. 使用过于专业的术语:在科技文献中,使用一些专业术语是必要的,但过多地使用这些术语会让非专业读者困惑。

为了更好地与读者进行沟通,应尽量使用通俗易懂的语言,或者在使用专业术语时提供简单的解释。

6. 缺乏逻辑连贯性:在文章中,每个段落应该都有明确的主题,而每个句子也应该与前后句子之间有逻辑关联。

为了确保逻辑的连贯性,可以使用过渡词语或短语,如“然而”、“另外”、“因此”等。

7. 缺乏引用和参考文献:科技文献应该基于已有的研究和理论,并引用相应的参考文献。

缺乏引用和参考文献会给读者一种不严谨和不可靠的印象。

因此,确保在适当的位置引用并列出引用的文献列表,以支持自己的观点和结论。

8. 没有明确的写作目标和读者群体:在写作前应该明确自己的写作目标,并考虑自己的读者是谁。

这样可以更好地选择适合的词语、语气和写作风格,以便更好地与读者进行沟通。

9. 文章过于冗长:在科技文献中,有时候为了展示自己的研究工作,会写得过于冗长和复杂。

为了保持读者的兴趣和专注力,应尽量使用简明扼要的句子和段落,并删除冗余的信息。

10. 缺乏审校:最后,一篇好的科技文献需要经过仔细的审校。

英文文献写作技巧

英文文献写作技巧

英文文献写作技巧标题:英文文献写作技巧正文:英文文献写作是学术研究中不可或缺的一部分。

以下是一些创建与标题相符的正文并拓展的建议:1. 仔细选择主题:选择研究主题时,确保其与研究问题相关,并且具有足够的广度和深度,可以撰写一篇有价值的文献。

2. 确定读者:在开始写作之前,考虑目标读者是谁。

这将有助于在写作过程中注意他们的需要和兴趣,并确保文献内容具有适当的针对性和深度。

3. 编写概述:在正文开头编写概述,以吸引读者的兴趣并概述研究的主要结论。

概述应该简洁明了,并强调研究的重要性和创新点。

4. 提供详细的文献综述:在正文中提供详细的文献综述,以确保读者了解相关研究的背景和主要结论。

文献综述应该包括最新的研究和综述,以及与研究相关的先前研究成果的批判性分析和综合。

5. 使用适当的语言和格式:在写作过程中,使用清晰、简洁的语言,并遵循适当的文献写作格式,例如引用和参考文献格式。

确保文献引用和参考文献列表完整无误。

6. 重点突出:在正文中,确保研究重点和结论得到清晰的传达,并通过使用适当的数据和证据来支持论点。

7. 编写结论和建议:在结论部分,总结研究的主要结论,并指出研究对相关领域的贡献和启示。

在建议部分,提出建议,以促进进一步的研究和实践。

拓展:除了上述建议外,以下是一些创建与标题相符的正文并拓展的方法:1. 深入阐述研究问题:在正文中,详细阐述研究问题,并提供有关研究问题的背景和重要性的详细信息。

这将有助于读者更好地理解研究问题和目的。

2. 使用案例研究和实证分析:在正文中,使用案例研究和实证分析来支持论点,并帮助读者更好地理解研究结果。

3. 提供图表和数据:在正文中,提供图表和数据,以更清晰地传达研究结果和结论。

确保图表和数据清晰易懂,并与论点相关。

4. 引用最新研究:在正文中,引用最新的研究成果,以帮助读者了解该领域的最新发展。

5. 强调研究的重要性和创新点:在正文中,强调研究的重要性和创新点,以确保读者了解该研究的重要性和价值。

英语论文参考文献怎么写

英语论文参考文献怎么写

英语论文参考文献怎么写英语论文参考文献怎么写英语论文参考文献怎么写1(一)直接引用在正文中直接引用时,应给出作者、年份,并用带括号的数字标出页码。

若有任何资料省略,使用英文时,应用3个省略号在句中标出,中文用6个;若两句间的资料省略,英文应用4个省略号标出,中文用6个。

若要在直接引用插入自己的解释,应使用方括号。

若在资料中有什么错误拼写、错误语法或标点错误会使读者糊涂。

当中文引用超过160字时,不使用引号,而使用“块”的形式。

当英文引用超过40字时,不使用引号,而使用“块”的形式。

(二)间接引用英文引用时,在圆括号内使用两名作者的姓氏,并使用“&”来连接,在正文中,使用“and”连接两名作者。

中文引用时,在圆括号内使用两名作者的姓名,并用顿号来连接。

英文第一次引用参考资料时,列出所有的作者的姓氏,除最后一名作者之前在正文中使用逗号加“and”、在圆括号内使用逗号连接外,之前的其他作者之间使用逗号。

之后引用时,英文用第一个作者的姓随之。

中文第一次引用参考资料时,列出所有作者的`姓名,除最后两名作者之间用“和”连接外,之前的其他作者之间使用顿号”。

之后引用时,用第一名作者加等字。

当一部作品没有作者时,在文中引用参考文献目录单中的前几个字和年份。

英文文献作者姓氏相同時,相同姓氏之作者于论文中引用时均引用全名,以避免混淆。

同一作者若一作者有多篇你想引用的文献,只需用逗号来区隔作品的发表年份。

英语论文参考文献怎么写2一、毕业论文为什么需要参考文献?在撰写毕业论文的文章时,我们在文中都要提及他人的研究成果或某人的观点,这个过程通常被称为引用或参考。

对于留学生来说,一篇毕业论文的内容需要包括留学期间所有学科的主要知识点,甚至会引用一些学术比较深的相关专业的作者文献,从中提取对文章最有论证的内容做参考说明。

因为这样,导师能够发现文章到底是研究并解决什么问题?哪些问题虽然重要但目前仍解决不了的?可能的前景是什么等等,从而从侧面说明学生是站在一个什么样的高度,以什么为参照对象做研究方向的。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

EditorialWriting a Scientific Paper:I.Titles and AbstractsI graduated from the University of Cambridge in 1960with a B.A.in physics.At that time a requirement of the examination process was a three hour exam in which one was required to write an English essay on a subject chosen from a long list of topics provided.It was also a requirement of admission to the university that one had passed an exam-ination in Greek or Latin.I studied Latin for eight years.After graduation I went to work at A.E.R.E.Harwell,a government laboratory where there were strict limits on what one could publish.Each paper had to be examined,and approved,by my group leader,my department head and a declassification office before it could be submitted to a scientific journal.With my educational background and these additional checks,the writing of scientific papers was always a matter for extreme care.This does not mean that I do not sometimes read my early papers with embar-rassment.There were certainly errors and I cannot claim perfection,but I despair at the quality of many manuscripts I receive nowadays.Good science deserves good presenta-tion,not the sloppy accounts I read too often.Setting aside the issue of language problems,particu-larly for our Asian contributors,I feel I should give some pointers and advice for writing scientific papers.I intend writing a few Editorials on this subject and hope my expe-rience will be useful to others?‘‘Let’s start at the very beginning –a very good place to start’’(Sound of Music):the title and the abstract.Although these items are the first in the paper,they have to be written last.It is impossible to abstract something that has not been written!More than half the papers I re-ceive are returned to the authors for amendments to these items.I have the impression that they are usually added as something necessary to complete the submission,and little or no thought is given to them.When I started my research career there were far fewer journals and they were all available only in printed form.We used to eagerly await the arrival of the latest edition of,for example,J.Nuclear Materials,and a weekly news-letter informed us of the latest periodicals available in the Harwell library.At that time one held in one’s hands the complete paper:title,abstract,text and references.The title and abstract might later appear in Chemical Abstracts,etc.but they were originally never seen in isolation.The situation today is quite different.The title of a paper accepted for CARBON will appear on the journal website two or three weeks after acceptance and,for a fee,the ori-ginal submission can be downloaded.A month later,after the manuscript has been typeset and proofed,one is able to download and read the abstract without charge before deciding whether to pay to download the complete manu-script.The publishers tell us that a vast majority of papers today are accessed via the journal website.The number of printed copies of the journal,which used to be around 1500,has now dropped to less that 500.I know that many readers have full access to the journal website through institutional subscriptions,but there are many people who pay to download a manuscript,and because of this it is essential that both the title and the abstract give an honest indication of what the paper contains.Let me give an example.I recently received a paper whose title indicated that it concerned the preparation of carbon nanoparticles as a filler for polymers.But this was not true!The authors had only examined one polymer.An honest title would have indicated that the paper was about the preparation of carbon nanoparticles as a filler for polyethylene,or whatever polymer had been examined.Always ask yourself whether the title of your manuscript,seen in isolation ,gives a full and honest indication of the experimental work reported in the paper.Another recent submission had a title that told me that a material was synthesised ‘‘in a gas pressure atmosphere’’.I had to read well into the experimental part of the paper be-fore I learned that the atmosphere was argon!There was no indication of this in either the title or the abstract.What the author should have said was ‘‘in high pressure argon’’.Another problem with titles is the way authors think the use of a colon is ‘‘cute’’.A paper entitled ‘‘The synthesis of carbon nanotubes using a xxxx catalyst:the effect of the catalyst preparation method’’can easily be made more straightforward by writing ‘‘The effect of the catalyst prep-aration method on the synthesis of carbon nanotubes using a xxxx catalyst’’.The colon is unnecessary [I call such titles0008-6223/$-see front matter Ó2007Published by Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2007.07.009/locate/carbonCarbon 45(2007)2143–2144‘‘colonic’’,a pun that will perhaps be understood only by native English speakers].I would willingly accept the title if it were‘‘The synthesis of carbon nanotubes using a xxxx catalyst:I.The effect of the catalyst preparation method’’. In other words the authors were writing a series of manu-scripts on the use of xxxx catalyst with part II being,per-haps,‘‘The synthesis of carbon nanotubes using a xxxx catalyst:II.The influence of reaction temperature’’.The colon should be reserved for a series of multi-part papers. This does not mean that I approve of this practice.Too many multi-part papers have been divided simply as a means to improve the paper count on the author’s CV, and not to improve understanding.The title of this Edito-rial is an illustration of the correct use of the colon.As already mentioned,while the title and the abstract comefirst,they should be written last.One cannot abstract a paper that has not yet been written!The abstract is most important because it is able to give a fuller account than the title of the manuscript’s content,and it is available from the website without paying a fee.It should be concise (one paragraph)and precise,indicating to the potential reader two things:(a)what was done,and(b)important re-sults obtained.That’s all!It is not the place for history,or discussion of results.Many abstracts received can easily have theirfirst few sentences removed because they give the history,something that should be reserved for the Introduction section of the manuscript.The same can often be said of thefinal sentence or two.A comment such as ‘‘The material may be useful in capacitors’’is pure specula-tion and does not belong in an abstract.Of course,if the authors have done experiments to show its usefulness in this application,it should be mentioned.Phrases such as ‘‘we think the effect is caused by...’’do not belong in an abstract.Many abstracts I receive start like this‘‘In this paper we report a new method for the production of carbon foams from...’’.Immediately there are three mistakes:(a)‘‘In this paper...’’,and I thought is was a different paper you were discussing!(b)‘‘...we report...’’–surely it could not be an-other person reporting for you!(c)‘‘...a new method...’’, but scientific journals do not report old methods.The ab-stract should start:‘‘Carbon foams were produced from...’’.This is shorter and gets straight to the point.I have been told that some journals ban the use of‘‘new’’,‘‘novel’’etc.Everything we publish should be new.There is no need to say so.Another common start to an abstract is something like ‘‘The aim of this work was to...’’.Again,this is not neces-sary.Perhaps your aim was to achieve cold fusion!The reader wants to know simply what you did and what you found.Many abstracts contain words that can be deleted with no loss of information.‘‘Detailed’’and‘‘careful’’are com-mon examples.We expect scientists to do detailed and careful work:there should be no need to say so.‘‘A de-tailed examination of the Raman spectra shows that...’’can be changed to‘‘The Raman spectra show that...’’without any loss of information.I have just read an ab-stract that tells me that a certain composite material ‘‘was successfully fabricated’’.May I assume that if the fab-rication were unsuccessful,the process would not have been reported?The word‘‘successfully’’can be deleted. Words and phrases such as‘‘also’’,‘‘moreover’’,‘‘further-more’’and‘‘in addition’’can also usually be deleted with-out any loss or change of meaning.Another problem with many abstracts is their vague-ness.We may be told that‘‘...the activation energy was determined’’,but to be told that‘‘...the activation energy was determined to be270kcal/mol’’is far more informa-tive and precise.Very occasionally onefinds a statement such as‘‘...the activation energy was determined to be 270kcal/mol’’in the abstract,but there is no mention of the value in the text!The abstract should be a concise sum-mary of the text,and should not contain any information that is not in the text.Some abstracts,not many,cite references.This should not be necessary.The author must bear in mind that the reader of the abstract does not have access to the list of ref-erences unless the complete paper is downloaded.If it is necessary to cite a reference in an abstract,it must be given in full and not be cited as a number referring to the list of references.Finally,always remember that the abstract must be able to stand alone.The reader must be able to understand it without reference to the whole paper.For this reason I al-ways read the title and abstract of each submission and make comments on them before I look at the manuscript.I recently asked an author the question,‘‘What does this mean?’’about a statement in his abstract.He had used a word that does not exist in any dictionary that I have and I could not even guess what it meant with certainly. How would non-native English speakers understand it? The paper was resubmitted a few days later with no change to the sentence.Again I asked:‘‘What does this mean?’’The author replied,a little angry I think,that if I only read the full paper I would discover what it meant,to which I replied that the point of my comment was that it should not be necessary to read the whole paper to discover what was meant in the abstract.This vital point is not under-stood many authors.Titles and abstracts are much more important nowadays than they were10years ago.The Editor pleads with you to make sure they are accurate and can be understood in iso-lation.My maxim to keep them‘‘concise and precise’’ap-plies more today than ever before.Editor-in-ChiefPeter A.ThrowerAvailable online25July20072144Editorial/Carbon45(2007)2143–2144。

相关文档
最新文档