英文回复信范例 Response Letter

Dear Editors and Reviewers,之五兆芳芳创作

Thank you for your letter and comments on our manuscript titled “Temporal variability in soil moisture after thinning in semi-arid Picea crassifolia plantations in northwestern China” (FORECO_2017_459). These comments helped us improve our manuscript, and provided important guidance for future research. We have addressed the editor’s and the reviewers’ comments to the best of our abilities, and revised text to meet the Forest Ecology and Management stylerequirements. We hope this meets your requirements for a publication.

We marked the revised portions in red and highlighted them yellow in the manuscript. The main comments and our specific responses are detailed below:

Editor:

Please explain how the results in this paper are significantly different from those in Zhu, X., He, Z.B., Du, J., Yang, J.J., Chen, L.F., 2015. Effects of thinning on the soil moisture of the Picea crassifolia plantation in Qilian Mountains. Forest Research. 28, 55–60.)

Response:We apologize for our earlier lack of clarity about the differences between our study and those in “Zhu, X., He, Z.B., Du, J., Yang, J.J., Chen, L.F., 2015. Effects of thinning on the soil

moisture of the Picea crassifolia plantation in Qilian Mountains. Forest Research. 28, 55–60” (named “previous article” below).Specifically, we found three main differences inthe temporal variability and hydrological responses of soil moisture between our study and the “previous article”.

First, the scope of data analysis and useweredifferent:The “previous article”just appliedthe one growing season data (from June 28th to October25th 2013) from the natural forest and the plantations with no thinning and thinned in 20% intensity. In addition, the “previous article” also has not considered the e ffect of 40% thinning on the soil moisture of the Picea crassifolia plantation. However, in the present study, we applied four years data (from June 27th2012 to October 30th 2015 in HD and NF; from January1th 2014 to October 29th 2015 in MD and LD) from the natural forest and the plantations with no thinning,thinned in 20%, and thinned in 40%intensity to analysis the temporal variability and hydrological responses of soil moisturein semi-arid Picea crassifolia plantations in northwestern China.

Second, the content of the research was different: The “previous article” only considered the spatial and temporal dynamic changes of soil moisture, but did not involve the inter-annual, and seasonal dynamic changes of the soil moisture.

In the present study, however, not only did we considered the effects of thinning on the spatial and temporal dynamic changes,the inter-annual changes, and seasonal dynamic changes of the soil moisture; but we also considered the changes in soil hydrological response after thinning.Our goals were to understand the changes in soil hydrological response and soil moisture dynamics, and to determine whether thinning management can effectively improve the state of soil moisture in the subalpine Picea crassifolia plantations in the Qilian Mountains.

Third, the research purpose and the result were also different: The mainly purpose of the “previous article” was to preliminary explore the thinning on the plantationforest soil moisture, and they found that the intermediate thinning can significantly increase soil moisture content at the depth of 60 cm.However, theydidn’t point out that which or what the thinning intensity or plantation density can bebenefit to sustainability of planted forests in these water-limited regions.In this study, not only we did confirmed that the intermediate thinning can significantly increase soil moisture content at the deep soil layer, but we also found that high planting density was the main cause of severe soil moisture deficits in the long-term, and it could be mitigated by 20