Upper Bounds on the Lightest Higgs Boson Mass in General Supersymmetric Standard Models

合集下载

Singlet Extensions of the MSSM

Singlet Extensions of the MSSM
TABLE 1. Symmetries associated with each model and their respective terms in the superpotential; the number of states in the neutralino and Higgs sectors are also given. All models have two charginos, χi± , and one charged Higgs boson, H ± . We ignore possible CP violation in the Higgs sector. Model: Symmetry: Extra superpotential term MSSM – – – 4 2 1 NMSSM Z3 κ ˆ3 3S (cubic) 5 3 2 nMSSM
R, ZR Z5 7
UMSSM U (1)′ – – 6 3 1
sMSSM U (1)′
ˆ tF S (tadpole) 5 3 2
λS S1 S2 S3 (trilinear secluded)
9 6 4
χi0 Hi0 A0 i
The additional CP-even and CP-odd Higgs boson, associated with the inclusion of the singlet field, yield interesting experimental consequences at colliders. For recent reviews of these models including their typical Higgs mass spectra and dominant decay modes, see Ref. [9, 10]. The tree-level Higgs mass-squared matrices are found from the potential, V , which is a sum of the F -term, D-term and soft-terms in the lagrangian, as follows. VF = |λ Hu · Hd + tF + κ S2 |2 + |λ S|2 |Hd |2 + |Hu |2 , VD = (2) g2 G2 2 |Hd |2 − |Hu |2 + 2 |Hd |2 |Hu |2 − |Hu · Hd |2 , (3) 8 2 g ′2 2 (4) + 1 QHd |Hd |2 + QHu |Hu |2 + QS |S|2 2 κ 2 2 2 2 2 3 = m2 d |Hd | + mu |Hu | + ms |S| + As λ SHu · Hd + Aκ S + tS S + h.c. . 3

Upper bound on the lightest neutralino mass in the Minimal Non--minimal Supersymmetric Stan

Upper bound on the lightest neutralino mass in the Minimal Non--minimal Supersymmetric Stan

bottom-right 2 × 2 block of
†m [4]
ν ∗ µef f , (4) |ν |2 √ 2 where σ ˜ 2 = MZ cos2 2β + |ν |2 sin2 2β, ν = λv/ 2. Since the minimal eigenvalue of any hermitian matrix is less than its smallest diagonal element the lightest |µef f |2 + σ ˜2 ∗ νµef f
a On b e-mail:
leave of absence from the Theory Department, ITEP, Moscow, Russia. r.nevzorov@
neutralino mass matrix reads
0 = Mχ ˜
M1
0 M2 M Z cW cβ − M Z cW sβ 0
Supersymmetric (SUSY) models provide an elegant explanation for the dark matter energy density observed in the Universe. To prevent rapid proton decay in SUSY models the invariance of the Lagrangian under R–parity transformations is usually imposed. As a consequence the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is absolutely stable and can play the role of dark matter. In most supersymmetric scenarios the LSP is the lightest neutralino, which provides the correct relic abundance of dark matter if it has a mass of O(100 GeV). In this article we explore the neutralino sector in the framework of the simplest extension of the minimal SUSY model (MSSM) — the Minimal Non– minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MNSSM). The superpotential of the MNSSM can be written as follows [1–3] ˆ(H ˆ d ǫH ˆ u) + ξS ˆ + WMSSM (µ = 0) , WMN SSM = λS (1)

了不起的盖茨比第七章英语单词知乎

了不起的盖茨比第七章英语单词知乎

了不起的盖茨比第七章英语单词知乎以下是《了不起的盖茨比》第七章中出现的一些单词及其用法解释:1. Debauch: (verb) to corrupt morally or by intemperance or sensuality.Example: The wild party in Gatsby's mansion was filled with debauchery and excess.2. Sotto voce: (adverb) in a low voice, or in an undertone.Example: Jordan spoke to Nick sotto voce, revealing a secret that nobody else could hear.3. Affront: (verb) to insult intentionally.Example: Tom felt affronted when Gatsby openly declared his love for Daisy.4. Elude: (verb) to evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill.Example: Despite all efforts, the truth about Gatsby's past eluded everyone.5. Nebulous: (adjective) hazy, vague, indistinct, or confused.Example: Gatsby's actual identity remained nebulous to many of his party guests.6. Meretricious: (adjective) alluring by a show of flashy or vulgar attractions, but often without real value.Example: Daisy was not impressed by the meretricious displays of wealth at Gatsby's parties.7. Contemptuous: (adjective) showing or expressing contempt or disdain; scornful.Example: Tom looked at Gatsby with a contemptuous expression, as he considered him a social climber.8. Ineffable: (adjective) incapable of being expressed or described in words; inexpressible.Example: Daisy experienced an ineffable sense of longing when Gatsby took her for a drive in his fancy car.9. Ramification: (noun) a consequence or implication; a branching out.Example: The ramification of Gatsby's obsession with Daisy was the destruction of his own life.10. Libertine: (noun) a person who is morally or sexually unrestrained, especially a dissolute man.Example: Gatsby was often seen as a libertine, indulging in extravagant parties and relationships.11. Sluggish: (adjective) displaying slow or lazy movements or responses.Example: The sluggish summer heat made everyone at the party feel lethargic and unmotivated.12. Pander: (verb) to cater to the lower tastes or base desires of others.Example: Gatsby's extravagant parties were seen by some as an attempt to pander to the desires of the wealthy elite.13. Incarnation: (noun) a particular physical form or state; a concrete or actual form of a quality or concept.Example: Gatsby believed that he could recreate himself into an incarnation of the man Daisy truly desired.14. Inexplicable: (adjective) unable to be explained or accounted for.Example: Daisy's sudden attraction towards Gatsby seemed inexplicable to many, considering their past.15. Insidious: (adjective) proceeding in a gradual, subtle way, but with harmful effects.Example: Tom warned Daisy about Gatsby's insidious intentions, accusing him of trying to steal her away.16. Supercilious: (adjective) behaving or looking as though one thinks they are superior to others; arrogant.Example: Tom's supercilious attitude towards Gatsby was evident in his condescending mannerisms.17. Saunter: (verb) to walk in a slow, relaxed, and confident manner.Example: Gatsby sauntered across the lawn towards Daisy, trying to appear nonchalant.18. Harrowed: (adjective) distressed or disturbed.Example: Gatsby's harrowed expression revealed the emotional turmoil he was experiencing.19. Truculent: (adjective) eager or quick to argue or fight; aggressively defiant.Example: Tom showed his truculent nature when he confronted Gatsby about his relationship with Daisy.20. Portentous: (adjective) of or like a portent; foreboding; full of unspecified meaning.Example: The dark clouds and thunderous sky seemed portentous, as if something significant was about to happen.21. Gaudiness: (noun) the quality of being tastelessly showy or overly ornate.Example: Despite the gaudiness of Gatsby's mansion, the guests were drawn to its opulence.22. Indiscernible: (adjective) impossible to see or clearly distinguish.Example: In the chaos of the party, individual voices became indiscernible and blended into a cacophony.23. Intermittent: (adjective) occurring at irregular intervals; not continuous or steady.Example: The intermittent rain throughout the night dampened the enthusiasm of the party guests.24. Stratum: (noun) a layer or a series of layers of rock in the ground.Example: Gatsby tried to climb the social stratum, hoping to be accepted by the upper class.25. Harlequin: (noun) a character in traditional pantomime; a buffoon.Example: Gatsby's harlequin smile hid the sadness and longing he felt for Daisy.26. Disconcerting: (adjective) causing one to feel unsettled or disturbed.Example: Daisy's disconcerting confession about her true feelings left Gatsby feeling disoriented and hurt.请注意,以上的双语例句是根据所给的单词和上下文进行编写的,但并非《了不起的盖茨比》中的原文。

马丁·路德·金英文演讲:我已达至峰顶

马丁·路德·金英文演讲:我已达至峰顶

马丁·路德·金英文演讲:我已达至峰顶马丁·路德·金英文演讲:我已达至峰顶Thank you very kindly, my friends. As I listened to Ralph Abernathy and his eloquent and generous introduction and then thought about myself, I wondered who he was talking about. It's always good to have your closest friend and associate to say something good about you. And Ralph Abernathy is the best friend that I have in the world. I'm delighted to see each of you here tonight in spite of a storm warning. You reveal that you are determined to go on anyhow.Something is happening in Memphis; something is happening in our world. And you know, if I were standing at the beginning of time, with the possibility of taking a kind of general and panoramic view of the whole of human history up to now, and the Almighty said to me, "Martin Luther King, which age would you like to live in?" I would take my mental flight by Egypt and I would watch God's children in their magnificent trek from the dark dungeons of Egypt through, or rather across the Red Sea, through the wilderness on toward the promised land. And in spite of its magnificence, I wouldn't stop there.I would move on by Greece and take my mind to Mount Olympus. And I would see Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Euripides and Aristophanes assembled around the Parthenon. And I would watch them around the Parthenon as they discussed the great and eternal issues of reality. But I wouldn't stop there.I would go on, even to the great heyday of the Roman Empire. And I would see developments around there, through various emperorsand leaders. But I wouldn't stop there.I would even come up to the day of the Renaissance, and get a quick picture of all that the Renaissance did for the cultural and aesthetic life of man. But I wouldn't stop there.I would even go by the way that the man for whom I am named had his habitat. And I would watch Martin Luther as he tacked his ninety-five theses on the door at the church of Wittenberg. But I wouldn't stop there.I would come on up even to 1863, and watch a vacillating President by the name of Abraham Lincoln finally come to the conclusion that he had to sign the Emancipation Proclamation. But I wouldn't stop there.I would even come up to the early thirties, and see a man grappling with the problems of the bankruptcy of his nation. And come with an eloquent cry that we have nothing to fear but "fear itself." But I wouldn't stop there.Strangely enough, I would turn to the Almighty, and say, "If you allow me to live just a few years in the second half of the 20th century, I will be happy."Now that's a strange statement to make, because the world is all messed up. The nation is sick. Trouble is in the land; confusion all around. That's a strange statement. But I know, somehow, that only when it is dark enough can you see the stars. And I see God working in this period of the twentieth century in a way that men, in some strange way, are responding.Something is happening in our world. The masses of people are rising up. And wherever they are assembled today, whether they are in Johannesburg, South Africa; Nairobi, Kenya; Accra, Ghana; NewYork City; Atlanta, Georgia; Jackson, Mississippi; or Memphis, Tennessee -- the cry is always the same: "We want to be free."And another reason that I'm happy to live in this period is that we have been forced to a point where we are going to have to grapple with the problems that men have been trying to grapple with through history, but the demands didn't force them to do it. Survival demands that we grapple with them. Men, for years now, have been talking about war and peace. But now, no longer can they just talk about it. It is no longer a choice between violence and nonviolence in this world; it's nonviolence or nonexistence. That is where we are today.And also in the human rights revolution, if something isn't done, and done in a hurry, to bring the colored peoples of the world out of their long years of poverty, their long years of hurt and neglect, the whole world is doomed. Now, I'm just happy that God has allowed me to live in this period to see what is unfolding. And I'm happy that He's allowed me to be in Memphis.I can remember -- I can remember when Negroes were just going around as Ralph has said, so often, scratching where they didn't itch, and laughing when they were not tickled. But that day is all over. We mean business now, and we are determined to gain our rightful place in God's world.And that's all this whole thing is about. We aren't engaged in any negative protest and in any negative arguments with anybody. We are saying that we are determined to be men. We are determinedto be people. We are saying -- We are saying that we are God's children. And that we are God's children, we don't have to live like we are forced to live.Now, what does all of this mean in this great period of history? It means that we've got to stay together. We've got to stay together and maintain unity. You know, whenever Pharaoh wanted to prolong the period of slavery in Egypt, he had a favorite, favorite formula for doing it. What was that? He kept the slaves fighting among themselves. But whenever the slaves get together, something happens in Pharaoh's court, and he cannot hold the slaves in slavery. When the slaves get together, that's the beginning of getting out of slavery. Now let us maintain unity.Secondly, let us keep the issues where they are. The issue is injustice. The issue is the refusal of Memphis to be fair and honest in its dealings with its public servants, who happen to be sanitation workers. Now, we've got to keep attention on that. That's always the problem with a little violence. You know what happened the other day, and the press dealt only with the window-breaking. I read the articles. They very seldom got around to mentioning the fact that one thousand, three hundred sanitation workers are on strike, and that Memphis is not being fair to them, and that Mayor Loeb is in dire need of a doctor. They didn't get around to that.Now we're going to march again, and we've got to march again, in order to put the issue where it is supposed to be -- and force everybody to see that there are thirteen hundred of God's children here suffering, sometimes going hungry, going through dark and dreary nights wondering how this thing is going to come out. That'sthe issue. And we've got to say to the nation: We know how it's coming out. For when people get caught up with that which is right and they are willing to sacrifice for it, there is no stopping point short of victory.We aren't going to let any mace stop us. We are masters in our nonviolent movement in disarming police forces; they don't know what to do. I've seen them so often. I remember in Birmingham, Alabama, when we were in that majestic struggle there, we would move out of the 16th Street Baptist Church day after day; by the hundreds we would move out. And Bull Connor would tell them to send the dogs forth, and they did come; but we just went before the dogs singing, "Ain't gonna let nobody turn me around."Bull Connor next would say, "Turn the fire hoses on." And as I said to you the other night, Bull Connor didn't know history. He knew a kind of physics that somehow didn't relate to the transphysics that we knew about. And that was the fact that there was a certain kind of fire that no water could put out. And we went before the fire hoses; we had known water. If we were Baptist or some other denominations, we had been immersed. If we were Methodist, and some others, we had been sprinkled, but we knew water. That couldn't stop us.And we just went on before the dogs and we would look at them; and we'd go on before the water hoses and we would look at it, and we'd just go on singing "Over my head I see freedom in the air." And then we would be thrown in the paddy wagons, and sometimes wewere stacked in there like sardines in a can. And they would throw us in, and old Bull would say, "Take 'em off," and they did; and we would just go in the paddy wagon singing, "We Shall Overcome." And every now and then we'd get in jail, and we'd see the jailers looking through the windows being moved by our prayers, and being moved by our words and our songs. And there was a power there which Bull Connor couldn't adjust to; and so we ended up transforming Bull into a steer, and we won our struggle in Birmingham. Now we've got to go on in Memphis just like that. I call upon you to be with us when we go out Monday.Now about injunctions: We have an injunction and we're going into court tomorrow morning to fight this illegal, unconstitutional injunction. All we say to America is, "Be true to what you said on paper." If I lived in China or even Russia, or any totalitarian country, maybe I could understand some of these illegal injunctions. Maybe I could understand the denial of certain basic First Amendment privileges, because they hadn't committed themselves to that over there. But somewhere I read of the freedom of assembly. Somewhere I read of the freedom of speech. Somewhere I read of the freedom of press. Somewhere I read that the greatness of America is the right to protest for right. And so just as I say, we aren't going to let dogs or water hoses turn us around, we aren't going to let any injunction turn us around. We are going on.We need all of you. And you know what's beautiful to me is to see all of these ministers of the Gospel. It's a marvelous picture. Who is it that is supposed to articulate the longings and aspirations of the people more than the preacher? Somehow the preacher must have a kind of fire shut up in his bones. And wheneverinjustice is around he tell it. Somehow the preacher must be an Amos, and saith, "When God speaks who can but prophesy?" Again with Amos, "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream." Somehow the preacher must say with Jesus, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me," and he's anointed me to deal with the problems of the poor."And I want to commend the preachers, under the leadership of these noble men: James Lawson, one who has been in this struggle for many years; he's been to jail for struggling; he's been kicked out of Vanderbilt University for this struggle, but he's still going on, fighting for the rights of his people. Reverend Ralph Jackson, Billy Kiles; I could just go right on down the list, but time will not permit. But I want to thank all of them. And I want you to thank them, because so often, preachers aren't concerned about anything but themselves. And I'm always happy to see a relevant ministry.It's all right to talk about "long white robes over yonder," in all of its symbolism. But ultimately people want some suits and dresses and shoes to wear down here! It's all right to talk about "streets flowing with milk and honey," but God has commanded us to be concerned about the slums down here, and his children who can't eat three square meals a day. It's all right to talk about the new Jerusalem, but one day, God's preacher must talk about the new New York, the new Atlanta, the new Philadelphia, the new Los Angeles, the new Memphis, Tennessee. This is what we have to do.Now the other thing we'll have to do is this: Always anchorour external direct action with the power of economic withdrawal. Now, we are poor people. Individually, we are poor when you compare us with white society in America. We are poor. Never stop and forget that collectively -- that means all of us together -- collectively we are richer than all the nations in the world, with the exception of nine. Did you ever think about that? After you leave the United States, Soviet Russia, Great Britain, West Germany, France, and I could name the others, the American Negro collectively is richer than most nations of the world. We have an annual income of more than thirty billion dollars a year, which is more than all of the exports of the United States, and more than the national budget of Canada. Did you know that? That's power right there, if we know how to pool it.We don't have to argue with anybody. We don't have to curse and go around acting bad with our words. We don't need any bricks and bottles. We don't need any Molotov cocktails. We just need to go around to these stores, and to these massive industries in our country, and say, "God sent us by here, to say to you that you're not treating his children right. And we've come by here to ask you to make the first item on your agenda fair treatment, where God's children are concerned. Now, if you are not prepared to do that, we do have an agenda that we must follow. And our agenda calls for withdrawing economic support from you."And so, as a result of this, we are asking you tonight, to go out and tell your neighbors not to buy Coca-Cola in Memphis. Go by and tell them not to buy Sealtest milk. Tell them not to buy -- what is the other bread? -- Wonder Bread. And what is the other bread company, Jesse? Tell them not to buy Hart's bread. As JesseJackson has said, up to now, only the garbage men have been feeling pain; now we must kind of redistribute the pain. We are choosing these companies because they haven't been fair in their hiring policies; and we are choosing them because they can begin the process of saying they are going to support the needs and the rights of these men who are on strike. And then they can move on town -- downtown and tell Mayor Loeb to do what is right.But not only that, we've got to strengthen black institutions.I call upon you to take your money out of the banks downtown and deposit your money in Tri-State Bank. We want a "bank-in" movement in Memphis. Go by the savings and loan association. I'm not asking you something that we don't do ourselves at SCLC. Judge Hooks and others will tell you that we have an account here in the savings and loan association from the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. We are telling you to follow what we are doing. Put your money there. You have six or seven black insurance companies here in the city of Memphis. Take out your insurance there. We want to have an "insurance-in."Now these are some practical things that we can do. We begin the process of building a greater economic base. And at the same time, we are putting pressure where it really hurts. I ask you to follow through here.Now, let me say as I move to my conclusion that we've got to give ourselves to this struggle until the end. Nothing would be more tragic than to stop at this point in Memphis. We've got tosee it through. And when we have our march, you need to be there. If it means leaving work, if it means leaving school -- be there. Be concerned about your brother. You may not be on strike. But either we go up together, or we go down together.Let us develop a kind of dangerous unselfishness. One day a man came to Jesus, and he wanted to raise some questions about some vital matters of life. At points he wanted to trick Jesus, and show him that he knew a little more than Jesus knew and throw him off base....Now that question could have easily ended up in a philosophical and theological debate. But Jesus immediately pulled that question from mid-air, and placed it on a dangerous curve between Jerusalem and Jericho. And he talked about a certain man, who fell among thieves. You remember that a Levite and a priest passed by on the other side. They didn't stop to help him. And finally a man of another race came by. He got down from his beast, decided not to be compassionate by proxy. But he got down with him, administered first aid, and helped the man in need. Jesus ended up saying, this was the good man, this was the great man, because he had the capacity to project the "I" into the "thou," and to be concerned about his brother.Now you know, we use our imagination a great deal to try to determine why the priest and the Levite didn't stop. At times we say they were busy going to a church meeting, an ecclesiastical gathering, and they had to get on down to Jerusalem so they wouldn't be late for their meeting. At other times we would speculate that there was a religious law that "One who was engaged in religious ceremonials was not to touch a human body twenty-four hours before the ceremony." And every now and then we begin to wonder whethermaybe they were not going down to Jerusalem -- or down to Jericho, rather to organize a "Jericho Road Improvement Association." That's a possibility. Maybe they felt that it was better to deal with the problem from the causal root, rather than to get bogged down with an individual effect.But I'm going to tell you what my imagination tells me. It's possible that those men were afraid. You see, the Jericho road is a dangerous road. I remember when Mrs. King and I were first in Jerusalem. We rented a car and drove from Jerusalem down to Jericho. And as soon as we got on that road, I said to my wife, "I can see why Jesus used this as the setting for his parable." It's a winding, meandering road. It's really conducive for ambushing. You start out in Jerusalem, which is about 1200 miles -- or rather 1200 feet above sea level. And by the time you get down to Jericho, fifteen or twenty minutes later, you're about 2200 feet below sea level. That's a dangerous road. In the days of Jesus it came to be known as the "Bloody Pass." And you know, it's possible that the priest and the Levite looked over that man on the ground and wondered if the robbers were still around. Or it's possible that they felt that the man on the ground was merely faking. And he was acting like he had been robbed and hurt, in order to seize them over there, lure them there for quick and easy seizure. And so the first question that the priest asked -- the first question that the Levite asked was, "If I stop to help this man, what will happen to me?" But then the Good Samaritan came by. And he reversed the question:"If I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?"That's the question before you tonight. Not, "If I stop to help the sanitation workers, what will happen to my job. Not, "If I stop to help the sanitation workers what will happen to all of the hours that I usually spend in my office every day and every week as a pastor?" The question is not, "If I stop to help this man in need, what will happen to me?" The question is, "If I do not stop to help the sanitation workers, what will happen to them?" That's the question.Let us rise up tonight with a greater readiness. Let us stand with a greater determination. And let us move on in these powerful days, these days of challenge to make America what it ought to be. We have an opportunity to make America a better nation. And I want to thank God, once more, for allowing me to be here with you.You know, several years ago, I was in New York City autographing the first book that I had written. And while sitting there autographing books, a demented black woman came up. The only question I heard from her was, "Are you Martin Luther King?" And I was looking down writing, and I said, "Yes." And the next minute I felt something beating on my chest. Before I knew it I had been stabbed by this demented woman. I was rushed to Harlem Hospital. It was a dark Saturday afternoon. And that blade had gone through, and the X-rays revealed that the tip of the blade was on the edge of my aorta, the main artery. And once that's punctured, your drowned in your own blood -- that's the end of you.It came out in the New York Times the next morning, that if I had merely sneezed, I would have died. Well, about four days later, they allowed me, after the operation, after my chest had been opened,and the blade had been taken out, to move around in the wheel chair in the hospital. They allowed me to read some of the mail that came in, and from all over the states and the world, kind letters came in. I read a few, but one of them I will never forget. I had received one from the President and the Vice-President. I've forgotten what those telegrams said. I'd received a visit and a letter from the Governor of New York, but I've forgotten what that letter said. But there was another letter that came from a little girl, a young girl who was a student at the White Plains High School. And I looked at that letter, and I'll never forget it. It said simply,Dear Dr. King,I am a ninth-grade student at the White Plains High School."And she said,While it should not matter, I would like to mention that I'm a white girl. I read in the paper of your misfortune, and of your suffering. And I read that if you had sneezed, you would have died. And I'm simply writing you to say that I'm so happy that you didn't sneeze.And I want to say tonight -- I want to say tonight that I too am happy that I didn't sneeze. Because if I had sneezed, I wouldn't have been around here in 1960, when students all over the South started sitting-in at lunch counters. And I knew that as they were sitting in, they were really standing up for the best in the American dream, and taking the whole nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug deep by the Founding Fathers inthe Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.If I had sneezed, I wouldn't have been around here in 1961, when we decided to take a ride for freedom and ended segregation in inter-state travel.If I had sneezed, I wouldn't have been around here in 1962, when Negroes in Albany, Georgia, decided to straighten their backs up. And whenever men and women straighten their backs up, they are going somewhere, because a man can't ride your back unless it is bent.If I had sneezed -- If I had sneezed I wouldn't have been here in 1963, when the black people of Birmingham, Alabama, aroused the conscience of this nation, and brought into being the Civil Rights Bill.If I had sneezed, I wouldn't have had a chance later that year, in August, to try to tell America about a dream that I had had.If I had sneezed, I wouldn't have been down in Selma, Alabama, to see the great Movement there.If I had sneezed, I wouldn't have been in Memphis to see a community rally around those brothers and sisters who are suffering.I'm so happy that I didn't sneeze.And they were telling me --. Now, it doesn't matter, now. It really doesn't matter what happens now. I left Atlanta this morning, and as we got started on the plane, there were six of us. The pilot said over the public address system, "We are sorry for the delay, but we have Dr. Martin Luther King on the plane. And to be sure that all of the bags were checked, and to be sure that nothing would be wrong with on the plane, we had to check out everything carefully. And we've had the plane protected and guarded all night."And then I got into Memphis. And some began to say the threats,or talk about the threats that were out. What would happen to mefrom some of our sick white brothers?Well, I don't know what will happen now. We've got some difficult days ahead. But it really doesn't matter with me now, because I've been to the mountaintop.And I don't mind.Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its place. But I'm not concerned about that now. I just want to do God's will. And He's allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I've looked over. And I've seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the promised land! mlkmountaintop3.JPGAnd so I'm happy, tonight.I'm not worried about anything.I'm not fearing any man!Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord!。

Higgs boson mass in supersymmetry to three loops

Higgs boson mass in supersymmetry to three loops
II. THE HIGGS BOSON MASS IN THE MSSM
At tree-level, the mass matrix of the neutral, CP-even Higgs bosons h, H has the following form: M2 H,tree = sin 2β × 2 2 2 2 2 MZ cot β + MA tan β −MZ − MA 2 2 2 2 −MZ − MA MZ tan β + MA cot β (1) .
SFB/CPP-08-14, TTP08-08, WUB08-02
Higgs boson mass in supersymmetry to three loops
R.V. Harlander1 , P. Kant2 , L. Mihaila2 , M. Steinhauser2
1 2
Fachbereich C, Theoretische Physik, Universit¨ at Wuppertal, 42097 Wuppertal, Germany Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Univerrlsruhe, Germany (Dated: June 21, 2008)
2 The diagonalization of M2 H,tree gives the tree-level result for Mh and MH , and leads to the well-known bound Mh < MZ which is approached in the limit tan β → ∞. Quantum corrections to the Higgs boson masses are incorporated by evaluating the poles of the Higgs boson propagator at higher orders. As mentioned in the Introduction, the numerically dominant contributions can be obtained in the approximation of zero external momentum (see, e.g., Refs. [23]) which we will adopt in the following. Furthermore, we will only consider corrections of order αt α2 s . Apart from the quark, squark, and gluino masses, there is another parameter with mass dimension, the trilinear coupling of the soft SUSY breaking terms, At . Before renormalization, we express it through the stop masses Mt ˜2 , the stop mixing angle θt , and the ˜1 , Mt bilinear Higgs parameter µSUSY as follows:

The Standard Model of Particle Physics

The Standard Model of Particle Physics

a r X i v :h e p -p h /9812285v 1 8 D e c 1998The Standard Model of Particle PhysicsMary K.Gaillard 1,Paul D.Grannis 2,and Frank J.Sciulli 31University of California,Berkeley,2State University of New York,Stony Brook,3Columbia UniversityParticle physics has evolved a coherent model that characterizes forces and particles at the mostelementary level.This Standard Model,built from many theoretical and experimental studies,isin excellent accord with almost all current data.However,there are many hints that it is but anapproximation to a yet more fundamental theory.We trace the development of the Standard Modeland indicate the reasons for believing that it is incomplete.Nov.20,1998(To be published in Reviews of Modern Physics)I.INTRODUCTION:A BIRD’S EYE VIEW OF THE STANDARD MODEL Over the past three decades a compelling case has emerged for the now widely accepted Standard Model of elementary particles and forces.A ‘Standard Model’is a theoretical framework built from observation that predicts and correlates new data.The Mendeleev table of elements was an early example in chemistry;from the periodic table one could predict the properties of many hitherto unstudied elements and compounds.Nonrelativistic quantum theory is another Standard Model that has correlated the results of countless experiments.Like its precursors in other fields,the Standard Model (SM)of particle physics has been enormously successful in predicting a wide range of phenomena.And,just as ordinary quantum mechanics fails in the relativistic limit,we do not expect the SM to be valid at arbitrarily short distances.However its remarkable success strongly suggests that the SM will remain an excellent approximation to nature at distance scales as small as 10−18m.In the early 1960’s particle physicists described nature in terms of four distinct forces,characterized by widely different ranges and strengths as measured at a typical energy scale of 1GeV.The strong nuclear force has a range of about a fermi or 10−15m.The weak force responsible for radioactive decay,with a range of 10−17m,is about 10−5times weaker at low energy.The electromagnetic force that governs much of macroscopic physics has infinite range and strength determined by the finestructure constant,α≈10−2.The fourth force,gravity,also has infinite range and a low energy coupling (about 10−38)too weak to be observable in laboratory experiments.The achievement of the SM was the elaboration of a unified description of the strong,weak and electromagnetic forces in the language of quantum gauge field theories.Moreover,the SM combines the weak and electromagnetic forces in a single electroweak gauge theory,reminiscent of Maxwell’s unification of the seemingly distinct forces of electricity and magnetism.By mid-century,the electromagnetic force was well understood as a renormalizable quantum field theory (QFT)known as quantum electrodynamics or QED,described in the preceeding article.‘Renormalizable’means that once a few parameters are determined by a limited set of measurements,the quantitative features of interactions among charged particles and photons can be calculated to arbitrary accuracy as a perturbative expansion in the fine structure constant.QED has been tested over an energy range from 10−16eV to tens of GeV,i.e.distances ranging from 108km to 10−2fm.In contrast,the nuclear force was characterized by a coupling strength that precluded a perturbativeexpansion.Moreover,couplings involving higher spin states(resonances),that appeared to be onthe same footing as nucleons and pions,could not be described by a renormalizable theory,nor couldthe weak interactions that were attributed to the direct coupling of four fermions to one another.In the ensuing years the search for renormalizable theories of strong and weak interactions,coupledwith experimental discoveries and attempts to interpret available data,led to the formulation ofthe SM,which has been experimentally verified to a high degree of accuracy over a broad range ofenergy and processes.The SM is characterized in part by the spectrum of elementaryfields shown in Table I.The matterfields are fermions and their anti-particles,with half a unit of intrinsic angular momentum,or spin.There are three families of fermionfields that are identical in every attribute except their masses.Thefirst family includes the up(u)and down(d)quarks that are the constituents of nucleons aswell as pions and other mesons responsible for nuclear binding.It also contains the electron and theneutrino emitted with a positron in nuclearβ-decay.The quarks of the other families are constituentsof heavier short-lived particles;they and their companion charged leptons rapidly decay via the weakforce to the quarks and leptons of thefirst family.The spin-1gauge bosons mediate interactions among fermions.In QED,interactions among elec-trically charged particles are due to the exchange of quanta of the electromagneticfield called photons(γ).The fact that theγis massless accounts for the long range of the electromagnetic force.Thestrong force,quantum chromodynamics or QCD,is mediated by the exchange of massless gluons(g)between quarks that carry a quantum number called color.In contrast to the electrically neutralphoton,gluons(the quanta of the‘chromo-magnetic’field)possess color charge and hence couple toone another.As a consequence,the color force between two colored particles increases in strengthwith increasing distance.Thus quarks and gluons cannot appear as free particles,but exist onlyinside composite particles,called hadrons,with no net color charge.Nucleons are composed ofthree quarks of different colors,resulting in‘white’color-neutral states.Mesons contain quark andanti-quark pairs whose color charges cancel.Since a gluon inside a nucleon cannot escape its bound-aries,the nuclear force is mediated by color-neutral bound states,accounting for its short range,characterized by the Compton wavelength of the lightest of these:theπ-meson.The even shorter range of the weak force is associated with the Compton wave-lengths of thecharged W and neutral Z bosons that mediate it.Their couplings to the‘weak charges’of quarksand leptons are comparable in strength to the electromagnetic coupling.When the weak interactionis measured over distances much larger than its range,its effects are averaged over the measurementarea and hence suppressed in amplitude by a factor(E/M W,Z)2≈(E/100GeV)2,where E is the characteristic energy transfer in the measurement.Because the W particles carry electric charge theymust couple to theγ,implying a gauge theory that unites the weak and electromagnetic interactions,similar to QCD in that the gauge particles are self-coupled.In distinction toγ’s and gluons,W’scouple only to left-handed fermions(with spin oriented opposite to the direction of motion).The SM is further characterized by a high degree of symmetry.For example,one cannot performan experiment that would distinguish the color of the quarks involved.If the symmetries of theSM couplings were fully respected in nature,we would not distinguish an electron from a neutrinoor a proton from a neutron;their detectable differences are attributed to‘spontaneous’breakingof the symmetry.Just as the spherical symmetry of the earth is broken to a cylindrical symmetry by the earth’s magneticfield,afield permeating all space,called the Higgsfield,is invoked to explain the observation that the symmetries of the electroweak theory are broken to the residual gauge symmetry of QED.Particles that interact with the Higgsfield cannot propagate at the speed of light,and acquire masses,in analogy to the index of refraction that slows a photon traversing matter.Particles that do not interact with the Higgsfield—the photon,gluons and possibly neutrinos–remain massless.Fermion couplings to the Higgsfield not only determine their masses; they induce a misalignment of quark mass eigenstates with respect to the eigenstates of the weak charges,thereby allowing all fermions of heavy families to decay to lighter ones.These couplings provide the only mechanism within the SM that can account for the observed violation of CP,that is,invariance of the laws of nature under mirror reflection(parity P)and the interchange of particles with their anti-particles(charge conjugation C).The origin of the Higgsfield has not yet been determined.However our very understanding of the SM implies that physics associated with electroweak symmetry breaking(ESB)must become manifest at energies of present colliders or at the LHC under construction.There is strong reason, stemming from the quantum instability of scalar masses,to believe that this physics will point to modifications of the theory.One shortcoming of the SM is its failure to accommodate gravity,for which there is no renormalizable QFT because the quantum of the gravitationalfield has two units of spin.Recent theoretical progress suggests that quantum gravity can be formulated only in terms of extended objects like strings and membranes,with dimensions of order of the Planck length10−35m. Experiments probing higher energies and shorter distances may reveal clues connecting SM physics to gravity,and may shed light on other questions that it leaves unanswered.In the following we trace the steps that led to the formulation of the SM,describe the experiments that have confirmed it,and discuss some outstanding unresolved issues that suggest a more fundamental theory underlies the SM.II.THE PATH TO QCDThe invention of the bubble chamber permitted the observation of a rich spectroscopy of hadron states.Attempts at their classification using group theory,analogous to the introduction of isotopic spin as a classification scheme for nuclear states,culminated in the‘Eightfold Way’based on the group SU(3),in which particles are ordered by their‘flavor’quantum numbers:isotopic spin and strangeness.This scheme was spectacularly confirmed by the discovery at Brookhaven Laboratory (BNL)of theΩ−particle,with three units of strangeness,at the predicted mass.It was subsequently realized that the spectrum of the Eightfold Way could be understood if hadrons were composed of three types of quarks:u,d,and the strange quark s.However the quark model presented a dilemma: each quark was attributed one half unit of spin,but Fermi statistics precluded the existence of a state like theΩ−composed of three strange quarks with total spin3A combination of experimental observations and theoretical analyses in the1960’s led to anotherimportant conclusion:pions behave like the Goldstone bosons of a spontaneously broken symmetry,called chiral symmetry.Massless fermions have a conserved quantum number called chirality,equalto their helicity:+1(−1)for right(left)-handed fermions.The analysis of pion scattering lengths andweak decays into pions strongly suggested that chiral symmetry is explicitly broken only by quarkmasses,which in turn implied that the underlying theory describing strong interactions among quarksmust conserve quark helicity–just as QED conserves electron helicity.This further implied thatinteractions among quarks must be mediated by the exchange of spin-1particles.In the early1970’s,experimenters at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center(SLAC)analyzed thedistributions in energy and angle of electrons scattered from nuclear targets in inelastic collisionswith momentum transfer Q2≈1GeV/c from the electron to the struck nucleon.The distributions they observed suggested that electrons interact via photon exchange with point-like objects calledpartons–electrically charged particles much smaller than nucleons.If the electrons were scatteredby an extended object,e.g.a strongly interacting nucleon with its electric charge spread out by acloud of pions,the cross section would drop rapidly for values of momentum transfer greater than theinverse radius of the charge distribution.Instead,the data showed a‘scale invariant’distribution:across section equal to the QED cross section up to a dimensionless function of kinematic variables,independent of the energy of the incident electron.Neutrino scattering experiments at CERN andFermilab(FNAL)yielded similar parison of electron and neutrino data allowed adetermination of the average squared electric charge of the partons in the nucleon,and the result wasconsistent with the interpretation that they are fractionally charged quarks.Subsequent experimentsat SLAC showed that,at center-of-mass energies above about two GeV,thefinal states in e+e−annihilation into hadrons have a two-jet configuration.The angular distribution of the jets withrespect to the beam,which depends on the spin of thefinal state particles,is similar to that of themuons in anµ+µ−final state,providing direct evidence for spin-1√where G F is the Fermi coupling constant,γµis a Dirac matrix and12fermions via the exchange of spinless particles.Both the chiral symmetry of thestrong interactions and the V−A nature of the weak interactions suggested that all forces except gravity are mediated by spin-1particles,like the photon.QED is renormalizable because gauge invariance,which gives conservation of electric charge,also ensures the cancellation of quantum corrections that would otherwise result in infinitely large amplitudes.Gauge invariance implies a massless gauge particle and hence a long-range force.Moreover the mediator of weak interactions must carry electric charge and thus couple to the photon,requiring its description within a Yang-Mills theory that is characterized by self-coupled gauge bosons.The important theoretical breakthrough of the early1970’s was the proof that Yang-Mills theories are renormalizable,and that renormalizability remains intact if gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken,that is,if the Lagrangian is gauge invariant,but the vacuum state and spectrum of particles are not.An example is a ferromagnet for which the lowest energy configuration has electron spins aligned;the direction of alignment spontaneously breaks the rotational invariance of the laws ofphysics.In QFT,the simplest way to induce spontaneous symmetry breaking is the Higgs mech-anism.A set of elementary scalarsφis introduced with a potential energy density function V(φ) that is minimized at a value<φ>=0and the vacuum energy is degenerate.For example,the gauge invariant potential for an electrically charged scalarfieldφ=|φ|e iθ,V(|φ|2)=−µ2|φ|2+λ|φ|4,(3)√λ=v,but is independent of the phaseθ.Nature’s choice forθhas its minimum atspontaneously breaks the gauge symmetry.Quantum excitations of|φ|about its vacuum value are massive Higgs scalars:m2H=2µ2=2λv2.Quantum excitations around the vacuum value ofθcost no energy and are massless,spinless particles called Goldstone bosons.They appear in the physical spectrum as the longitudinally polarized spin states of gauge bosons that acquire masses through their couplings to the Higgsfield.A gauge boson mass m is determined by its coupling g to theHiggsfield and the vacuum value v.Since gauge couplings are universal this also determines the√Fermi constant G for this toy model:m=gv/2,G/2|φ|=212F=246GeV,leaving three Goldstone bosons that are eaten by three massive vector bosons:W±and Z=cosθw W0−sinθw B0,while the photonγ=cosθw B0+sinθw W0remains massless.This theory predicted neutrino-induced neutral current(NC)interactions of the typeν+atom→ν+anything,mediated by Z exchange.The weak mixing angleθw governs the dependence of NC couplings on fermion helicity and electric charge, and their interaction rates are determined by the Fermi constant G Z F.The ratioρ=G Z F/G F= m2W/m2Z cos2θw,predicted to be1,is the only measured parameter of the SM that probes thesymmetry breaking mechanism.Once the value ofθw was determined in neutrino experiments,the√W and Z masses could be predicted:m2W=m2Z cos2θw=sin2θwπα/QUARKS:S=1LEPTONS:S=13m3m Q=0m quanta mu1u2u3(2–8)10−3e 5.11×10−4c1c2c3 1.0–1.6µ0.10566t1t2t3173.8±5.0τ 1.77705/3g′,where g1isfixed by requiring the same normalization for all fermion currents.Their measured values at low energy satisfy g3>g2>g1.Like g3,the coupling g2decreases with increasing energy,but more slowly because there are fewer gauge bosons contributing.As in QED,the U(1)coupling increases with energy.Vacuum polarization effects calculated using the particle content of the SM show that the three coupling constants are very nearly equal at an energy scale around1016GeV,providing a tantalizing hint of a more highly symmetric theory,embedding the SM interactions into a single force.Particle masses also depend on energy;the b andτmasses become equal at a similar scale,suggesting a possibility of quark and lepton unification as different charge states of a singlefield.V.BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE STANDARD MODEL ELEMENTSThe SM contains the set of elementary particles shown in Table I.The forces operative in the particle domain are the strong(QCD)interaction responsive to particles carrying color,and the two pieces of the electroweak interaction responsive to particles carrying weak isospin and hypercharge. The quarks come in three experimentally indistinguishable colors and there are eight colored gluons. All quarks and leptons,and theγ,W and Z bosons,carry weak isospin.In the strict view of the SM,there are no right-handed neutrinos or left-handed anti-neutrinos.As a consequence the simple Higgs mechanism described in section IV cannot generate neutrino masses,which are posited to be zero.In addition,the SM provides the quark mixing matrix which gives the transformation from the basis of the strong interaction charge−1Finding the constituents of the SM spanned thefirst century of the APS,starting with the discovery by Thomson of the electron in1897.Pauli in1930postulated the existence of the neutrino as the agent of missing energy and angular momentum inβ-decay;only in1953was the neutrino found in experiments at reactors.The muon was unexpectedly added from cosmic ray searches for the Yukawa particle in1936;in1962its companion neutrino was found in the decays of the pion.The Eightfold Way classification of the hadrons in1961suggested the possible existence of the three lightest quarks(u,d and s),though their physical reality was then regarded as doubtful.The observation of substructure of the proton,and the1974observation of the J/ψmeson interpreted as a cp collider in1983was a dramatic confirmation of this theory.The gluon which mediates the color force QCD wasfirst demonstrated in the e+e−collider at DESY in Hamburg.The minimal version of the SM,with no right-handed neutrinos and the simplest possible ESB mechanism,has19arbitrary parameters:9fermion masses;3angles and one phase that specify the quark mixing matrix;3gauge coupling constants;2parameters to specify the Higgs potential; and an additional phaseθthat characterizes the QCD vacuum state.The number of parameters is larger if the ESB mechanism is more complicated or if there are right-handed neutrinos.Aside from constraints imposed by renormalizability,the spectrum of elementary particles is also arbitrary.As discussed in Section VII,this high degree of arbitrariness suggests that a more fundamental theory underlies the SM.VI.EXPERIMENTAL ESTABLISHMENT OF THE STANDARD MODELThe current picture of particles and interactions has been shaped and tested by three decades of experimental studies at laboratories around the world.We briefly summarize here some typical and landmark results.FIG.1.The proton structure function(F2)versus Q2atfixed x,measured with incident electrons or muons,showing scale invariance at larger x and substantial dependence on Q2as x becomes small.The data are taken from the HERA ep collider experiments H1and ZEUS,as well as the muon scattering experiments BCDMS and NMC at CERN and E665at FNAL.A.Establishing QCD1.Deep inelastic scatteringPioneering experiments at SLAC in the late1960’s directed high energy electrons on proton and nuclear targets.The deep inelastic scattering(DIS)process results in a deflected electron and a hadronic recoil system from the initial baryon.The scattering occurs through the exchange of a photon coupled to the electric charges of the participants.DIS experiments were the spiritual descendents of Rutherford’s scattering ofαparticles by gold atoms and,as with the earlier experi-ment,showed the existence of the target’s substructure.Lorentz and gauge invariance restrict the matrix element representing the hadronic part of the interaction to two terms,each multiplied by phenomenological form factors or structure functions.These in principle depend on the two inde-pendent kinematic variables;the momentum transfer carried by the photon(Q2)and energy loss by the electron(ν).The experiments showed that the structure functions were,to good approximation, independent of Q2forfixed values of x=Q2/2Mν.This‘scaling’result was interpreted as evi-dence that the proton contains sub-elements,originally called partons.The DIS scattering occurs as the elastic scatter of the beam electron with one of the partons.The original and subsequent experiments established that the struck partons carry the fractional electric charges and half-integer spins dictated by the quark model.Furthermore,the experiments demonstrated that three such partons(valence quarks)provide the nucleon with its quantum numbers.The variable x represents the fraction of the target nucleon’s momentum carried by the struck parton,viewed in a Lorentz frame where the proton is relativistic.The DIS experiments further showed that the charged partons (quarks)carry only about half of the proton momentum,giving indirect evidence for an electrically neutral partonic gluon.1011010101010FIG.2.The quark and gluon momentum densities in the proton versus x for Q 2=20GeV 2.The integrated values of each component density gives the fraction of the proton momentum carried by that component.The valence u and d quarks carry the quantum numbers of the proton.The large number of quarks at small x arise from a ‘sea’of quark-antiquark pairs.The quark densities are from a phenomenological fit (the CTEQ collaboration)to data from many sources;the gluon density bands are the one standard deviation bounds to QCD fits to ZEUS data (low x )and muon scattering data (higher x ).Further DIS investigations using electrons,muons,and neutrinos and a variety of targets refined this picture and demonstrated small but systematic nonscaling behavior.The structure functions were shown to vary more rapidly with Q 2as x decreases,in accord with the nascent QCD prediction that the fundamental strong coupling constant αS varies with Q 2,and that at short distance scales (high Q 2)the number of observable partons increases due to increasingly resolved quantum fluc-tuations.Figure 1shows sample modern results for the Q 2dependence of the dominant structure function,in excellent accord with QCD predictions.The structure function values at all x depend on the quark content;the increases at larger Q 2depend on both quark and gluon content.The data permit the mapping of the proton’s quark and gluon content exemplified in Fig.2.2.Quark and gluon jetsThe gluon was firmly predicted as the carrier of the color force.Though its presence had been inferred because only about half the proton momentum was found in charged constituents,direct observation of the gluon was essential.This came from experiments at the DESY e +e −collider (PETRA)in 1979.The collision forms an intermediate virtual photon state,which may subsequently decay into a pair of leptons or pair of quarks.The colored quarks cannot emerge intact from the collision region;instead they create many quark-antiquark pairs from the vacuum that arrange themselves into a set of colorless hadrons moving approximately in the directions of the original quarks.These sprays of roughly collinear particles,called jets,reflect the directions of the progenitor quarks.However,the quarks may radiate quanta of QCD (a gluon)prior to formation of the jets,just as electrons radiate photons.If at sufficiently large angle to be distinguished,the gluon radiation evolves into a separate jet.Evidence was found in the event energy-flow patterns for the ‘three-pronged’jet topologies expected for events containing a gluon.Experiments at higher energy e +e −colliders illustrate this gluon radiation even better,as shown in Fig.3.Studies in e +e −and hadron collisions have verified the expected QCD structure of the quark-gluon couplings,and their interference patterns.FIG.3.A three jet event from the OPAL experiment at LEP.The curving tracks from the three jets may be associated with the energy deposits in the surrounding calorimeter,shown here as histograms on the middle two circles,whose bin heights are proportional to energy.Jets1and2contain muons as indicated,suggesting that these are both quark jets(likely from b quarks).The lowest energy jet3is attributed to a radiated gluon.3.Strong coupling constantThe fundamental characteristic of QCD is asymptotic freedom,dictating that the coupling constant for color interactions decreases logarithmically as Q2increases.The couplingαS can be measured in a variety of strong interaction reactions at different Q2scales.At low Q2,processes like DIS,tau decays to hadrons,and the annihilation rate for e+e−into multi-hadronfinal states give accurate determinations ofαS.The decays of theΥinto three jets primarily involve gluons,and the rate for this decay givesαS(M2Υ).At higher Q2,studies of the W and Z bosons(for example,the decay width of the Z,or the fraction of W bosons associated with jets)measureαS at the100GeV scale. These and many other determinations have now solidified the experimental evidence thatαS does indeed‘run’with Q2as expected in QCD.Predictions forαS(Q2),relative to its value at some reference scale,can be made within perturbative QCD.The current information from many sources are compared with calculated values in Fig.4.4.Strong interaction scattering of partonsAt sufficiently large Q2whereαS is small,the QCD perturbation series converges sufficiently rapidly to permit accurate predictions.An important process probing the highest accessible Q2 scales is the scattering of two constituent partons(quarks or gluons)within colliding protons and antiprotons.Figure5shows the impressive data for the inclusive production of jets due to scattered partons in pp collisions reveals the structure of the scattering matrix element.These amplitudes are dominated by the exchange of the spin1gluon.If this scattering were identical to Rutherford scattering,the angular variable0.10.20.30.40.511010FIG.4.The dependence of the strong coupling constant,αS ,versus Q using data from DIS structure functions from e ,µ,and νbeam experiments as well as ep collider experiments,production rates of jets,heavy quark flavors,photons,and weak vector bosons in ep ,e +e −,and pt ,is sensitive not only to to perturbative processes,but reflectsadditional effects due to multiple gluon radiation from the scattering quarks.Within the limited statistics of current data samples,the top quark production cross section is also in good agreement with QCD.FIG.6.The dijet angular distribution from the DØexperiment plotted as a function ofχ(see text)for which Rutherford scattering would give dσ/dχ=constant.The predictions of NLO QCD(at scaleµ=E T/2)are shown by the curves.Λis the compositeness scale for quark/gluon substructure,withΛ=∞for no compositness(solid curve);the data rule out values of Λ<2TeV.5.Nonperturbative QCDMany physicists believe that QCD is a theory‘solved in principle’.The basic validity of QCD at large Q2where the coupling is small has been verified in many experimental studies,but the large coupling at low Q2makes calculation exceedingly difficult.This low Q2region of QCD is relevant to the wealth of experimental data on the static properties of nucleons,most hadronic interactions, hadronic weak decays,nucleon and nucleus structure,proton and neutron spin structure,and systems of hadronic matter with very high temperature and energy densities.The ability of theory to predict such phenomena has yet to match the experimental progress.Several techniques for dealing with nonperturbative QCD have been developed.The most suc-cessful address processes in which some energy or mass in the problem is large.An example is the confrontation of data on the rates of mesons containing heavy quarks(c or b)decaying into lighter hadrons,where the heavy quark can be treated nonrelativistically and its contribution to the matrix element is taken from experiment.With this phenomenological input,the ratios of calculated par-tial decay rates agree well with experiment.Calculations based on evaluation at discrete space-time points on a lattice and extrapolated to zero spacing have also had some success.With computing advances and new calculational algorithms,the lattice calculations are now advanced to the stage of calculating hadronic masses,the strong coupling constant,and decay widths to within roughly10–20%of the experimental values.The quark and gluon content of protons are consequences of QCD,much as the wave functions of electrons in atoms are consequences of electromagnetism.Such calculations require nonperturbative techniques.Measurements of the small-x proton structure functions at the HERA ep collider show a much larger increase of parton density with decreasing x than were extrapolated from larger x measurements.It was also found that a large fraction(∼10%)of such events contained afinal。

On the Interactions of Light Gravitinos

On the Interactions of Light Gravitinos

On the Interactions of Light GravitinosT.E.Clark1,Taekoon Lee2,S.T.Love3,Guo-Hong Wu4Department of PhysicsPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette,IN47907-1396AbstractIn models of spontaneously broken supersymmetry,certain light gravitino processes are governed by the coupling of its Goldstino components.The rules for constructing SUSY and gauge invariant actions involving the Gold-stino couplings to matter and gaugefields are presented.The explicit oper-ator construction is found to be at variance with some previously reported claims.A phenomenological consequence arising from light gravitino inter-actions in supernova is reexamined and scrutinized.1e-mail address:clark@2e-mail address:tlee@3e-mail address:love@4e-mail address:wu@1In the supergravity theories obtained from gauging a spontaneously bro-ken global N=1supersymmetry(SUSY),the Nambu-Goldstone fermion, the Goldstino[1,2],provides the helicity±1degrees of freedom needed to render the spin3gravitino massive through the super-Higgs mechanism.For a light gravitino,the high energy(well above the gravitino mass)interactions of these helicity±1modes with matter will be enhanced according to the su-persymmetric version of the equivalence theorem[3].The effective action de-scribing such interactions can then be constructed using the properties of the Goldstinofields.Currently studied gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking models[4]provide a realization of this scenario as do certain no-scale super-gravity models[5].In the gauge mediated case,the SUSY is dynamically broken in a hidden sector of the theory by means of gauge interactions re-sulting in a hidden sector Goldstinofield.The spontaneous breaking is then mediated to the minimal supersymmetric standard model(MSSM)via radia-tive corrections in the standard model gauge interactions involving messenger fields which carry standard model vector representations.In such models,the supergravity contributions to the SUSY breaking mass splittings are small compared to these gauge mediated contributions.Being a gauge singlet,the gravitino mass arises only from the gravitational interaction and is thus farsmaller than the scale √,where F is the Goldstino decay constant.More-2over,since the gravitino is the lightest of all hidden and messenger sector degrees of freedom,the spontaneously broken SUSY can be accurately de-scribed via a non-linear realization.Such a non-linear realization of SUSY on the Goldstinofields was originally constructed by Volkov and Akulov[1].The leading term in a momentum expansion of the effective action de-scribing the Goldstino self-dynamics at energy scales below √4πF is uniquelyfixed by the Volkov-Akulov effective Lagrangian[1]which takes the formL AV=−F 22det A.(1)Here the Volkov-Akulov vierbein is defined as Aµν=δνµ+iF2λ↔∂µσν¯λ,withλ(¯λ)the Goldstino Weyl spinorfield.This effective Lagrangian pro-vides a valid description of the Goldstino self interactions independent of the particular(non-perturbative)mechanism by which the SUSY is dynam-ically broken.The supersymmetry transformations are nonlinearly realized on the Goldstinofields asδQ(ξ,¯ξ)λα=Fξα+Λρ∂ρλα;δQ(ξ,¯ξ)¯λ˙α= F¯ξ˙α+Λρ∂ρ¯λ˙α,whereξα,¯ξ˙αare Weyl spinor SUSY transformation param-eters andΛρ≡−i Fλσρ¯ξ−ξσρ¯λis a Goldstinofield dependent translationvector.Since the Volkov-Akulov Lagrangian transforms as the total diver-genceδQ(ξ,¯ξ)L AV=∂ρ(ΛρL AV),the associated action I AV= d4x L AV is SUSY invariant.The supersymmetry algebra can also be nonlinearly realized on the matter3(non-Goldstino)fields,generically denoted byφi,where i can represent any Lorentz or internal symmetry labels,asδQ(ξ,¯ξ)φi=Λρ∂ρφi.(2) This is referred to as the standard realization[6]-[9].It can be used,along with space-time translations,to readily establish the SUSY algebra.Under the non-linear SUSY standard realization,the derivative of a matterfield transforms asδQ(ξ,¯ξ)(∂νφi)=Λρ∂ρ(∂νφi)+(∂νΛρ)(∂ρφi).In order to elim-inate the second term on the right hand side and thus restore the standard SUSY realization,a SUSY covariant derivative is introduced and defined so as to transform analogously toφi.To achieve this,we use the transformation property of the Volkov-Akulov vierbein and define the non-linearly realized SUSY covariant derivative[9]Dµφi=(A−1)µν∂νφi,(3) which varies according to the standard realization of SUSY:δQ(ξ,¯ξ)(Dµφi)=Λρ∂ρ(Dµφi).Any realization of the SUSY transformations can be converted to the standard realization.In particular,consider the gauge covariant derivative,(Dµφ)i≡∂µφi+T a ij A aµφj,(4)4with a=1,2,...,Dim G.We seek a SUSY and gauge covariant deriva-tive(Dµφ)i,which transforms as the SUSY standard ing the Volkov-Akulov vierbein,we define(Dµφ)i≡(A−1)µν(Dνφ)i,(5) which has the desired transformation property,δQ(ξ,¯ξ)(Dµφ)i=Λρ∂ρ(Dµφ)i, provided the vector potential has the SUSY transformationδQ(ξ,¯ξ)Aµ≡Λρ∂ρAµ+∂µΛρAρ.Alternatively,we can introduce a redefined gaugefieldV aµ≡(A−1)µνA aν,(6) which itself transforms as the standard realization,δQ(ξ,¯ξ)V aµ=Λρ∂ρV aµ, and in terms of which the standard realization SUSY and gauge covariant derivative then takes the form(Dµφ)i≡(A−1)µν∂νφi+T a ij V aµφj.(7) Under gauge transformations parameterized byωa,the original gaugefield varies asδG(ω)A aµ=(Dµω)a=∂µωa+gf abc A bµωc,while the redefinedgaugefield V aµhas the Goldstino dependent transformation:δG(ω)V aµ= (A−1)µν(Dνω)a.For all realizations,the gauge transformation and SUSY transformation commutator yields a gauge variation with a SUSY trans-formed value of the gauge transformation parameter,δG(ω),δQ(ξ,¯ξ)=δG(Λρ∂ρω−δQ(ξ,¯ξ)ω).(8) 5If we further require the local gauge transformation parameter to also trans-form under the standard realization so thatδQ(ξ,¯ξ)ωa=Λρ∂ρωa,then the gauge and SUSY transformations commute.In order to construct an invariant kinetic energy term for the gaugefields, it is convenient for the gauge covariant anti-symmetric tensorfield strength to also be brought into the standard realization.The usualfield strengthF a αβ=∂αA aβ−∂βA aα+if abc A bαA cβvaries under SUSY transformations asδQ(ξ,¯ξ)F aµν=Λρ∂ρF aµν+∂µΛρF aρν+∂νΛρF aµρ.A standard realization of thegauge covariantfield strength tensor,F aµν,can be then defined asF aµν=(A−1)µα(A−1)νβF aαβ,(9) so thatδQ(ξ,¯ξ)F aµν=Λρ∂ρF aµν.These standard realization building blocks consisting of the gauge singlet Goldstino SUSY covariant derivatives,Dµλ,Dµ¯λ,the matterfields,φi,their SUSY-gauge covariant derivatives,Dµφi,and thefield strength tensor,F aµν, along with their higher covariant derivatives can be combined to make SUSY and gauge invariant actions.These invariant action terms then dictate the couplings of the Goldstino which,in general,carries the residual consequences of the spontaneously broken supersymmetry.A generic SUSY and gauge invariant action can be constructed[9]asI eff=d4x detA L eff(Dµλ,Dµ¯λ,φi,Dµφi,Fµν)(10)6where L effis any gauge invariant function of the standard realization basic building ing the nonlinear SUSY transformationsδQ(ξ,¯ξ)detA=∂ρ(ΛρdetA)andδQ(ξ,¯ξ)L eff=Λρ∂ρL eff,it follows thatδQ(ξ,¯ξ)I eff=0.It proves convenient to catalog the terms in the effective Lagranian,L eff, by an expansion in the number of Goldstinofields which appear when covari-ant derivatives are replaced by ordinary derivatives and the Volkov-Akulov vierbein appearing in the standard realizationfield strengths are set to unity. So doing,we expandL eff=L(0)+L(1)+L(2)+···,(11)where the subscript n on L(n)denotes that each independent SUSY invariant operator in that set begins with n Goldstinofields.L(0)consists of all gauge and SUSY invariant operators made only from light matterfields and their SUSY covariant derivatives.Any Goldstinofield appearing in L(0)arises only from higher dimension terms in the matter covariant derivatives and/or thefield strength tensor.Taking the light non-Goldstinofields to be those of the MSSM and retaining terms through mass dimension4,then L(0)is well approximated by the Lagrangian of the mini-mal supersymmetric standard model which includes the soft SUSY breaking terms,but in which all derivatives have been replaced by SUSY covariant ones and thefield strength tensor replaced by the standard realizationfield7strength:L(0)=L MSSM(φ,Dµφ,Fµν).(12) Note that the coefficients of these terms arefixed by the normalization of the gauge and matterfields,their masses and self-couplings;that is,the normalization of the Goldstino independent Lagrangian.The L(1)terms in the effective Lagrangian begin with direct coupling of one Goldstino covariant derivative to the non-Goldstinofields.The general form of these terms,retaining operators through mass dimension6,is given byL(1)=1[DµλαQµMSSMα+¯QµMSSM˙αDµ¯λ˙α],(13)Fwhere QµMSSMαand¯QµMSSM˙αcontain the pure MSSMfield contributions to the conserved gauge invariant supersymmetry currents with once again all field derivatives being replaced by SUSY covariant derivatives and the vector field strengths in the standard realization.That is,it is this term in the effective Lagrangian which,using the Noether construction,produces the Goldstino independent piece of the conserved supersymmetry current.The Lagrangian L(1)describes processes involving the emission or absorption of a single helicity±1gravitino.Finally the remaining terms in the effective Lagrangian all contain two or more Goldstinofields.In particular,L(2)begins with the coupling of two8Goldstinofields to matter or gaugefields.Retaining terms through mass dimension8and focusing only on theλ−¯λterms,we can writeL(2)=1F2DµλαDν¯λ˙αMµν1α˙α+1F2Dµλα↔DρDν¯λ˙αMµνρ2α˙α+1F2DρDµλαDν¯λ˙αMµνρ3α˙α,(14)where the standard realization composite operators that contain matter and gaugefields are denoted by the M i.They can be enumerated by their oper-ator dimension,Lorentz structure andfield content.In the gauge mediated models,these terms are all generated by radiative corrections involving the standard model gauge coupling constants.Let us now focus on the pieces of L(2)which contribute to a local operator containing two gravitinofields and is bilinear in a Standard Model fermion (f,¯f).Those lowest dimension operators(which involve no derivatives on f or¯f)are all contained in the M1piece.After application of the Goldstino field equation(neglecting the gravitino mass)and making prodigious use of Fierz rearrangement identities,this set reduces to just1independent on-shell interaction term.In addition to this operator,there is also an operator bilinear in f and¯f and containing2gravitinos which arises from the product of det A with L(0).Combining the two independent on-shell interaction terms involving2gravitinos and2fermions,results in the effective actionIf¯f˜G˜G =d4x−12F2λ↔∂µσν¯λf↔∂νσµ¯f9+C ffF2(f∂µλ)¯f∂µ¯λ,(15)where C ff is a model dependent real coefficient.Note that the coefficient of thefirst operator isfixed by the normaliztion of the MSSM Lagrangian. This result is in accord with a recent analysis[10]where it was found that the fermion-Goldstino scattering amplitudes depend on only one parameter which corresponds to the coefficient C ff in our notation.In a similar manner,the lowest mass dimension operator contributing to the effective action describing the coupling of two on-shell gravitinos to a single photon arises from the M1and M3pieces of L(2)and has the formIγ˜G˜G =d4xCγF2∂µλσρ∂ν¯λ∂µFρν+h.c.,(16)with Cγa model dependent real coefficient and Fµνis the electromagnetic field strength.Note that the operator in the square bracket is odd under both parity(P)and charge conjugation(C).In fact any operator arising from a gauge and SUSY invariant structure which is bilinear in two on-shell gravitinos and contains only a single photon is necessarily odd in both P and C.Thus the generation of any such operator requires a violation of both P and ing the Goldstino equation of motion,the analogous term containing˜Fµνreduces to Eq.(16)with Cγ→−iCγ.Recently,there has appeared in the literature[11]the claim that there is a lower dimensional operator of the form˜M2F2∂νλσµ¯λFµνwhich contributes to the single photon-102gravitino interaction.Here˜M is a model dependent SUSY breaking massparameter which is roughly an order(s)of magnitude less than √.¿Fromour analysis,we do notfind such a term to be part of a SUSY invariant action piece and thus it should not be included in the effective action.Such a term is also absent if one employs the equivalent formalism of Wess and Samuel [6].We have also checked that such a term does not appear via radiative corrections by an explicit graphical calculation using the correct non-linearly realized SUSY invariant action.This is also contrary to the previous claim.There have been several recent attempts to extract a lower bound on the SUSY breaking scale using the supernova cooling rate[11,12,13].Unfortu-nately,some of these estimates[11,13]rely on the existence of the non-SUSY invariant dimension6operator referred to ing the correct low en-ergy effective lagrangian of gravitino interactions,the leading term coupling 2gravitinos to a single photon contains an additional supression factor ofroughly Cγs˜M .Taking√s 0.1GeV for the processes of interest and using˜M∼100GeV,this introduces an additional supression of at least10−12in the rate and obviates the previous estimates of a bound on F.Assuming that the mass scales of gauginos and the superpartners of light fermions are above the core temperature of supernova,the gravitino cooling of supernova occurs mainly via gravitino pair production.It is interesting to11compare the gravitino pair production cross section to that of the neutrino pair production,which is the main supernova cooling channel.We have seen that for low energy gravitino interactions with matter,the amplitudes for gravitino pair production is proportional to1/F2.A simple dimensional analysis then suggests the ratio of the cross sections is:σχχσνν∼s2F4G2F(17)where GF is the Fermi coupling and√s is the typical energy scale of theparticles in a supernova.Even with the most optimistic values for F,thegravitino production is too small to be relevant.For example,taking √F=100GeV,√s=.1GeV,the ratio is of O(10−11).It seems,therefore,thatsuch an astrophysical bound on the SUSY breaking scale is untenable in mod-els where the gravitino is the only superparticle below the scale of supernova core temperature.We thank T.K.Kuo for useful conversations.This work was supported in part by the U.S.Department of Energy under grant DE-FG02-91ER40681 (Task B).12References[1]D.V.Volkov and V.P.Akulov,Pis’ma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz.16(1972)621[JETP Lett.16(1972)438].[2]P.Fayet and J.Iliopoulos,Phys.Lett.B51(1974)461.[3]R.Casalbuoni,S.De Curtis,D.Dominici,F.Feruglio and R.Gatto,Phys.Lett.B215(1988)313.[4]M.Dine and A.E.Nelson,Phys.Rev.D48(1993)1277;M.Dine,A.E.Nelson and Y.Shirman,Phys.Rev.D51(1995)1362;M.Dine,A.E.Nelson,Y.Nir and Y.Shirman,Phys.Rev.D53,2658(1996).[5]J.Ellis,K.Enqvist and D.V.Nanopoulos,Phys.Lett.B147(1984)99.[6]S.Samuel and J.Wess,Nucl.Phys.B221(1983)153.[7]J.Wess and J.Bagger,Supersymmetry and Supergravity,second edition,(Princeton University Press,Princeton,1992).[8]T.E.Clark and S.T.Love,Phys.Rev.D39(1989)2391.[9]T.E.Clark and S.T.Love,Phys.Rev.D54(1996)5723.[10]A.Brignole,F.Feruglio and F.Zwirner,hep-th/9709111.[11]M.A.Luty and E.Ponton,hep-ph/9706268.13[12]J.A.Grifols,R.N.Mohapatra and A.Riotto,Phys.Lett.B400,124(1997);J.A.Grifols,R.N.Mohapatra and A.Riotto,Phys.Lett.B401, 283(1997).[13]J.A.Grifols,E.Masso and R.Toldra,hep-ph/970753.D.S.Dicus,R.N.Mohapatra and V.L.Teplitz,hep-ph/9708369.14。

Calculable Upper Limit on the Mass of the Lightest Higgs Boson in Any Perturbatively Valid

Calculable Upper Limit on the Mass of the Lightest Higgs Boson in Any Perturbatively Valid

G.L. Kane, Chris Kolda, and James D. Wells Randall Physics Laboratory University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120
ABSTRACT
We show that there is a calculable upper limit on the mass of the lightest Higgs boson in any supersymmetric theory that remains perturbative up to a high scale . There are no restrictions on the Higgs sector, or the gauge group or particle content. We estimate the value of the upper limit to be mh◦ < 146 GeV for 100 GeV < ∼ Mt < ∼ 145 GeV, from
[2]
adding to mh◦ a numerically important contri-
bution proportional to Mt2 and logarithmically dependent on squark masses. In the minimal (non-supersymmetric) Standard Model (SM) there is also ainations of triplets can occur that give no contribution to the ρ-parameter but have large vev’s that could drive mh◦ up. We also add numerical contributions that could affect the value of the limit in certain regions (e.g., the b and τ contributions for large tan β ). It is extraordinary that the mass of the lightest Higgs boson has an upper limit determined by weak scale parameters in a general supersymmetric theory so long as the theory remains perturbatively valid up to a high mass scale. It is also remarkable that the limit is a calculable one. It might have happened that quantities such as soft-supersymmetry breaking parameters that are bounded but unknown entered into the limit, e.g. into the equations that determine the upper limits on the self-couplings, in which case no useful numerical value could have been obtained. In the next section we present the derivation of the limit, and then we present the numerical value of the limit. Computing the precise value of the limit is very difficult for two reasons, first because in arbitrary extended supersymmetric theories many effects feed

了不起的盖茨比第七章英语单词知乎

了不起的盖茨比第七章英语单词知乎

了不起的盖茨比第七章英语单词知乎全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1The Vocabulary of Chapter 7 in The Great GatsbyHey guys, it's your buddy here breaking down some of the juicy vocabulary from the climactic Chapter 7 of F. Scott Fitzgerald's classic novel The Great Gatsby. This chapter is just dripping with symbolism and deeper meaning, so get ready to have your mind blown by some of these wildly descriptive words and phrases.Let's start with one of the very first sentences: "It was when curiosity about Gatsby was highest that the lights in his house failed to go on one Saturday night..." The word "curiosity" really sets the tone, hinting at the mystery and intrigue surrounding our enigmatic host. The public's fascination with Gatsby has reached a fever pitch at this point.A little later, Gatsby is described as looking at Daisy "with unmistakable eyes." The eyes are the windows to the soul, and with this metaphorical description, we get a glimpse into Gatsby's raw desire and passion for the woman he idolizes. Hisgaze is intense and revealing - there's no missing the depth of his feelings.As tensions start to rise between Tom and Gatsby, the language becomes more volatile. When Tom begins ranting about Gatsby's suspicious background, he describes it as one of Gatsby's "fudge lies." This colloquial insult belittles whatever stories Gatsby has been spinning about his past as nothing more than cheap falsehoods.The argument quickly escalates and Tom blurts out, "You're crazy! I won't go home! I'm not a goddamn maniac!" The profanity and over-the-top delivery signals that Tom has been pushed to the edge by Gatsby's threats to his marriage. The proud, arrogant master of the house is losing his cool in spectacular fashion.My favorite descriptive phrase of the whole chapter is used to portray Daisy's indecisiveness between her husband and lover: "She hesitated, balancing awkwardly like that was whichever way she fell." Just picture a clumsy tightrope walker wobbling unsteadily, in danger of toppling over at any second! It's the perfect metaphor for Daisy's precarious position.Towards the climax, when Gatsby finally confronts Tom over his treatment篇2The Dazzling Vocabulary of Gatsby's Soirée (Chapter 7)What's up, word nerds? It's your resident literary geek here, ready to dive deep into the linguistic treasures of F. Scott Fitzgerald's magnum opus, The Great Gatsby. Today, we're focusing our literary magnifying glass on the scintillating vocabulary from Chapter 7 – the chapter that culminates in Gatsby's legendary soirée. Get ready to have your mind blown by Fitzgerald's masterful command of the English language!Let's kick things off with a word that sets the tone for the entire chapter: "ferocious." When describing the sweltering heat, Fitzgerald writes, "The straw seats of the car crammed against the backs of his thighs, and the heat.....was beginning to be ferocious." This one word instantly conjures up images of an unrelenting, savage heat that refuses to be tamed. It's a fantastic example of how a single, well-chosen adjective can pack a powerful punch.Moving on, we encounter the delightfully archaic word "obsequious." Fitzgerald uses it to describe the manner in which one of Gatsby's servants, a "confidential sort of man," greeted the guests. The word paints a vivid picture of a servile, overlydeferential demeanor, perfectly capturing the essence of a butler catering to the whims of the ultra-wealthy. Bonus points for Fitzgerald's impeccable character development through his word choices!Next up, we have the deliciously evocative phrase "grinding avalanche of hurry." Fitzgerald employs this linguistic gem to depict the chaotic rush of arrivals at Gatsby's party. Can't you just envision the frenzied swarm of guests, all clamoring to be a part of the revelry? The word "avalanche" conjures up images of an unstoppable force, while "hurry" adds a sense of urgency and breathlessness. Poetry in motion, folks!But wait, there's more! How about the delightfully whimsical word "sumptuous" used to describe the decadent buffet at Gatsby's bash? The very sound of the word, with its luscious vowels and luxurious consonants, is enough to make one's mouth water. Fitzgerald's choice of vocabulary here perfectly encapsulates the opulence and indulgence of the party.And let's not forget the tantalizing phrase "violently alive." Fitzgerald uses this to describe the raucous energy of the party, likening it to a living, breathing entity. The addition of the adverb "violently" adds a sense of intensity and fervor that perfectly captures the unbridled enthusiasm of the revelers.But perha ps the pièce de résistance of Chapter 7's vocabulary is the word "ecstatic." Fitzgerald employs this gem when describing the guests' reaction to Gatsby's grand entrance: "...all of the intimate revelry going on upstairs had now been solemn removed from him, and he stood on the canvas with her ecstatic before them." The word "ecstatic" perfectly captures the reverence and awe with which the partygoers regarded Gatsby, the enigmatic host of this lavish spectacle.And that's just a taste of the linguistic smorgasbord that Fitzgerald serves up in Chapter 7. From the carefully curated adjectives and adverbs to the impeccably crafted phrases, every word choice is a masterclass in precision and evocation.So, there you have it, fellow word enthusiasts – a veritable feast of vocabulary from one of literature's most celebrated chapters. Whether you're a seasoned Gatsby aficionado or a newcomer to Fitzgerald's world, this chapter is sure to leave you in awe of the author's linguistic prowess. Now go forth and dazzle your peers with your newfound knowledge of "ferocious," "obsequious," and all the other gems we've uncovered. Until next time, happy reading (and word-nerding)!篇3Word Power! Mastering the Vocab of The Great Gatsby Chapter 7What's up, word nerds and Gatsby geeks? Your friendly neighborhood book lover is back with another epic vocabulary guide. This time, we're diving deep into the linguistic wonders of Chapter 7 from F. Scott Fitzgerald's legendary novel, The Great Gatsby.Now, I know what you're thinking, "But wait, isn't this just another boring list of words?" Nah, fam, this ain't no ordinary word list. We're about to embark on a literary adventure that'll have you slinging fancy vocab like a boss by the end of it.So, grab your highlighters, crack open your notebooks, and get ready to unleash your inner wordsmith. Let's start with the first word on our list:Colossal (adj.): Extremely large, gigantic, or massive.Example: "The colossal significance of that light had now vanished forever."Yep, you guessed it – we're talking about that iconic green light at the end of Daisy's dock. The one that symbolized Gatsby's colossal dreams and aspirations. Oh, the depth, the symbolism! It's enough to make a literature nerd swoon.Incredulous (adj.): Unwilling or unable to believe something.Example: "He had been full of the idea so long, dreamed it right through to the end, waited with his teeth set, so to speak, at an inexplicable pitch of expectancy."Gatsby's incredulous about his dreams finally coming true, fam. After all those years of pining and planning, can you blame the guy for being a little skeptical? It's like when you finally snag that limited edition sneaker drop after camping out for days –pure disbelief.Reproachful (adj.): Expressing disapproval or disappointment.Example: "One of her gemlike wings seemed to flutter reproachfully at me."Ah, yes, the classic symbol of the night moth fluttering its reproachful wings. Fitzgerald really knows how to pack a punch with his imagery, doesn't he? It's like the moth is judging us for our poor life choices. Tough crowd.Disillusioned (adj.): Disappointed and no longer able to believe something.Example: "He knew that when he kissed this girl, and forever wed his unutterable visions to her perishable breath, his mind would never romp again like the mind of God."Talk about a disillusioned dreamboat! Gatsby's realizing that his idealized version of Daisy might not match up with reality. It's a harsh wake-up call, but hey, at least he's got those snazzy shirts to console him.Incessant (adj.): Continuing without pause or interruption.Example: "The incessant falls of rain whipping in through the streaky windows."Oh, the incessant rain – a classic literary device for setting the mood. It's like nature's way of mirroring the emotional turmoil our characters are going through. Bonus points if you can recite this description while standing dramatically in the rain.Anemic (adj.): Lacking vigor, vitality, or substance.Example: "The anemic body of her little-baited love had taken on a pale, corpse-like hauteur."Yikes, talk about a harsh description! Fitzgerald's not pulling any punches here, calling out Daisy's love life as anemic and corpse-like. It's a brutal reality check for our beloved socialite,but hey, at least she's got those fancy pearls to make her feel better.Ecstatic (adj.): Feeling or expressing overwhelming happiness or rapturous delight.Example: "His heart was ecstatic, his mind confused – the warm, disordered ecstatic moment!"Ecstatic, disordered, and entirely too extra – that's our Gatsby in a nutshell. But can you really blame the guy? After all those years of chasing his dreams, he's finally living his best life. It's like scoring front-row tickets to your favorite artist's concert –pure, unadulterated ecstasy.Baroque (adj.): Highly ornate and extravagant in style.Example: "The baroque and incredible and untranslatable beauty of kids on a green, evocative hilltop."Ah, the "baroque and incredible" beauty of childhood innocence. Fitzgerald really knows how to tug at our heartstrings, doesn't he? It's like he's reminding us of simpler times, before we got caught up in the rat race of life. Sigh, those were the days.Tranquil (adj.): Calm, peaceful, and quiet.Example: "The tranquil beauty of the night faded in ghostly retrospect."And just like that, the tranquil beauty of the night is gone, faded into the ghostly realm of retrospect. It's a poignant reminder that nothing lasts forever, not even the most idyllic of moments. But hey, at least we got to bask in its glory for a little while, right?Transcendent (adj.): Surpassing the ordinary; exceptional or sublime.Example: "His transcendent conviction of his own exemption from decay."Ah, Gatsby, the eternal optimist. Even in the face of adversity, he clings to his transcendent conviction that he's immune to the harsh realities of life. It's both admirable and a tad delusional, but hey, we love him for it.Well, there you have it, folks – a crash course in the vocabulary of The Great Gatsby Chapter 7. By now, you should be feeling like a true literary scholar, ready to impress your friends and professors with your newfound word power.But wait, there's more! As a special bonus, here's a sneak peek at the vocab we'll be tackling in Chapter 8:Immutable (adj.): Unchanging, unchangeable.Ephemeral (adj.): Lasting for a very short time; transitory.Inscrutable (adj.): Impossible to understand or interpret.Oh, the tantalizing mysteries that await us! But for now, let's bask in the glory of Chapter 7's linguistic treasures. Until next time, my fellow word warriors – keep those dictionaries handy and those highlighters at the ready!。

光亮 周深 英文版

光亮 周深 英文版

光亮周深英文版In the vast musical landscape, Zhou Shen's "Bright" stands out as a captivating and enchanting composition, evoking a sense of both light and shadow. Its English version, a translation that preserves the essence of the original while introducing a new cultural dimension, offers a unique perspective on the song's themes and emotions."Bright" is not just a song; it's a journey through the complexities of human existence. The lyrics, both in Chinese and English, explore themes of hope, perseverance, and the pursuit of dreams in the face of adversity. The melody, carried by Zhou Shen's soaring vocals, is both haunting and uplifting, reflecting the duality of life's challenges and triumphs.The English version of "Bright" maintains the emotional depth and narrative arc of the original. The translator has done a remarkable job of capturing the essence of thelyrics while adapting them to a different linguistic and cultural context. The result is a song that feels both familiar and fresh, resonating with a new audience while remaining true to its original intent.One of the most striking aspects of the English version is how it handles the symbolism of light and shadow. In the original Chinese lyrics, these elements are used to represent the fluctuations of life's emotional landscape, with light symbolizing hope and positivity, and shadow representing challenges and doubt. The English translation retains this symbolism, but it also introduces a new layerof interpretation, allowing listeners to draw parallels between their own lives and the themes explored in the song. Another noteworthy aspect of the English version isZhou Shen's vocals. His voice, which is already renownedfor its emotional range and technical proficiency, shines even brighter in this new rendition. His ability to convey the song's emotional depth and narrative arc through his vocals is truly remarkable, making the English version of "Bright" a standout among his discography.Beyond the lyrics and vocals, the production of the English version is also noteworthy. The instrumentation and arrangement complement the emotional tone of the song perfectly, creating a sonic landscape that is bothimmersive and engaging. The result is a song that is notjust enjoyable to listen to, but also thought-provoking and emotionally charged.In conclusion, the English version of Zhou Shen's "Bright" is a triumph of translation and reinterpretation. It preserves the essence of the original while introducing new layers of meaning and interpretation. Through its lyrics, vocals, and production, it explores themes of hope, perseverance, and the pursuit of dreams in a way that is both accessible and profound. For fans of Zhou Shen and lovers of music in general, this English version offers a new and exciting way to experience one of his most beloved compositions.**光亮周深英文版**在广阔的音乐天地中,周深的《光亮》以其迷人的魅力脱颖而出,展现了光与影的交织。

比奇堡顶流英文

比奇堡顶流英文

比奇堡顶流英文Hogwarts: The Epitome of Top-tier English EducationNestled in the picturesque countryside of Scotland, Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry stands as a testament to the finest English education. Its formidable architecture and rich history have captivated the imaginations of millions around the world. In this article, we will delve into the various aspects that make Hogwarts the pinnacle of English education.1. Academic ExcellenceAt Hogwarts, academic excellence is the cornerstone of education. The experienced faculty, known as professors, ensure that students receive a comprehensive education across a broad range of subjects. From the intricacies of Potions to the complexities of Transfiguration, students are equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in the magical world.2. Holistic DevelopmentHogwarts emphasizes the holistic development of its students. In addition to their academic pursuits, students are encouraged to participate in extracurricular activities such as Quidditch, a high-energy sport played on broomsticks. This not only promotes physical fitness but also fosters teamwork and a competitive spirit.Furthermore, Hogwarts provides a nurturing environment for students to cultivate their magical talents. The school houses four distinct groups, known as Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, and Slytherin. Through thesehouses, students forge lifelong friendships, learn the importance of loyalty and courage, and develop a sense of belonging.3. Magical CurriculumThe unique curriculum at Hogwarts sets it apart from any other educational institution. Students undergo a specialized magical education that includes subjects such as Charms, Defense Against the Dark Arts, and Herbology. These courses not only enrich students' understanding of the magical world but also instill values such as bravery and justice.One notable aspect of the Hogwarts curriculum is the inclusion of the study of magical creatures. Care of Magical Creatures, taught by the enigmatic Hagrid, gives students the opportunity to interact with a wide range of mythical creatures. This hands-on experience not only educates students about magical beings but also promotes empathy and respect for all creatures, no matter their nature.4. Ethical EducationIntertwined with the academic curriculum is an emphasis on ethical education. Hogwarts places great importance on teaching students the difference between right and wrong, as well as the consequences of their actions. Through the study of ethical dilemmas in classes like Defense Against the Dark Arts, students develop a strong moral compass and a sense of responsibility toward themselves and others.Hogwarts also promotes diversity and inclusivity, celebrating individuality and embracing students from all walks of life. This fosters asupportive environment that encourages understanding and acceptance, preparing students for the complexities of the real world.5. Historical SignificanceNo discussion of Hogwarts would be complete without acknowledging its rich history. Founded over a thousand years ago, the school has withstood the test of time, surviving wars and revolutions. Its majestic halls have witnessed the development of countless skilled wizards and witches. The historical weight embedded within its walls imparts a sense of pride and tradition to all those who pass through its doors.The legacy of Hogwarts extends beyond the realm of education, encompassing cultural significance as well. Through the tales of Harry Potter and his friends, J.K. Rowling has introduced the magic of Hogwarts to millions of readers, bringing the enchanting world of English education to the forefront of popular culture.In conclusion, Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry stands as the epitome of top-tier English education. With its commitment to academic excellence, holistic development, unique curriculum, ethical education, and rich history, Hogwarts continues to inspire and shape generations of young minds. It is truly a symbol of the transformative power of education, transcending the boundaries of fiction and becoming an enduring icon in the realm of imagination.。

历届奥运会会徽及含义

历届奥运会会徽及含义

历届奥运会会徽及含义2007-10-31 06:50 奥运会会徽是奥运会最有权威性的形象标志。

历届奥运会会徽的图案虽然千差万别,但都有⼀个共同的标志,即相互套连的奥林匹克五环标志,同时衬以表现奥运城和东道国历史、地理、民族⽂化传统等特点的主体图案,使⼈⼀眼就可辨认。

Moscow 1980 Emblem 莫斯科“斯⼤林风格”的会徽 The official emblem was created by Vladimir Arsentyev. Above the Olympic rings we find parallel lines in the shape of a pyramid, and a five pointed star which serves as a reminder of the flag of the Kremlin. 两条交汇的跑道⽤简单的弧线勾勒出⼀栋“斯⼤林风格”的前苏联标志性建筑,鲜艳的红⾊代表了社会主义的⾚⾊政权,最上⽅的五⾓星既是建筑的⼀部分也象征着前苏联强⼤的国⼒,这样的设计显然带有强烈的政治意味。

Los Angeles 1984 Emblem 洛杉矶“运⾏之星”独具匠⼼ The star is a universal symbol of the highest aspirations of mankind, the horizontal bars portray the speed with which the contestants pursue the excellence, while the repetition of the star shape connotes the spirit of competition between equally outstanding physical forms. 设计师鲁尼恩打造出了⼀个被称做“运⾏之星”的会徽。

Absolute Upper Bound on the 1-loop Corrected mass of $S_1$ in the NMSSM

Absolute Upper Bound on the 1-loop Corrected mass of $S_1$ in the NMSSM

a rXiv:h ep-ph/964243v14Apr1996The Absolute Upper Bound on the 1-loop Corrected mass of S 1in the NMSSM Seung Woo Ham and Sun Kun Oh Institute for Advanced Physics,Department of Physics,Kon-Kuk University,Seoul 143-701,Korea Bjong Ro Kim III.Phys.Inst.A,RWTH Aachen,52056Aachen,Germany Abstract We examine in detail radiative corrections to the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass due to the top quark and scalar quark loops in the next-to-minimal super-symmetric standard model (NMSSM).We take into account the nondegenerate state for the top scalar quark masses.In our analysis,the mass matrix of the top scalar quark contains the gauge terms.Therefore our formula for the scalar Higgs boson mass matrix at the 1-loop level includes the contribution of thegauge sector as well as the effect of the top scalar quark mass splitting.Thus we calculate the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass using our formula.We find that the absolute upper bound on the 1-loop corrected mass of the lightest scalar Higgs boson is about 156GeV.I.INTRODUCTIONOne of the main motivations for a supersymmetric extension of the standard model (SM)is the fact that a calculation of the1-loop corrections to the Higgs boson mass yields a quadratic divergence arising from the SM particle loops.In a supersymmetric theory,all particles in the SM are accompanied by their superpartners.Therefore,all quadratic divergences are eliminated by the cancellation between ordinary particle and its superpartner loops.As a matter of fact,supersymmetry(SUSY)requires the existance of supermulti-plets made up of fermions and bosons with equal masses.If SUSY is to be relevant for the physical world,it must be broken,either softly or spontaneously.That is,SUSY must broken because in experiment one does not observe degenerate Bose-Fermi mul-tiplets.Thus the Higgs boson mass at the tree level receives quadratic corrections that are limited by an incomplete cancelation of the SM particle and its superpartner loops.In the SM,only one Higgs doublet is required to give masses to the quarks and leptons.SUSY requires at least two Higgs doublets.One is needed to give masses to the up-type quarks and the other to the down-type quarks and leptons.This is the minimal supersymmetric extension of the SM.The minimal supersymmetric standard model(MSSM)is the most widely studied supersymmetric extension of the SM.The physical mass spectra of the Higgs bosons consist of two neutral scalars,one neutral pseudoscalar,and a pair of charged scalars.According to the tree level potential,the mass of the lightest scalar Higgs boson have to be lighter than the Z boson mass,and the the charged Higgs boson mass must be heavier than the W boson mass.Recently radiative corrections to the Higgs boson masses have been calculated by many authors.The tree level constraints on the charged Higgs boson mass can be violated when the top quark mass is heavy and the pseudoscalar Higgs boson mass is light.This means that radiative corrections to the charged Higgs boson mass can be negative contributions.However,these corrections to the tree level result are numer-ically very small[1,2].On the other hand radiative corrections to the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass give a significant contribution and the mass of the lightest scalar Higgs boson can be substantially heavier than the Z boson mass[3-5].If one considers about more general extensions of the Higgs sector[6],the tree level results in the MSSM can be changed.The simplest extension is the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model(NMSSM).The Higgs sector in the NMSSM consists of two Higgs doublits H1and H2and a Higgs singlet chiral superfield N.In this model,the superpotential contains a new coupling among two Higgs doublits and a Higgs singlet.Thus the parameterµin the superpontial of the MSSM can be generated dynamically by the vacuum expectation value(VEV)of the singlet Higgsfield[7].The NMSSM has ten real degrees of freedom.After the Higgs mechanism takes place,three degrees of freedom correspond to neutral(G)and charged(G+,G−)unphysical Goldstone bosons,the other seven correspond to neutral(S1,S2,S3,P1,P2)andcharged(C+,C−)physical particles.Here S1,S2,and S3are scalar Higgs bosons while P1and P2are pseudoscalar Higgs bosons.As a result,the effective number of parameters describing the Higgs sector at the tree level is six.As we have already mentioned above,the tree level result in the NMSSM is a little different from that in the MSSM.The mass of the charged Higgs boson may be lighter or heavier than the W boson mass.Also the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass can be heavier than the Z boson mass[8].Therefore the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass of the NMSSM at the tree level is heavier than that of the MSSM.Furthermore radiative corrections to the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass lead to a important contributions.It is well known that the largest contribution to the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass comes from the top quark and scalar quark loops[9].These effects are quite substantial when the top scalar quark mass is much heavier than the top quark mass.This implies that at least one top scalar quark mass is heavier than top quark mass.If the top quark and scalar quark masses are identical,the contribution of radiative corrections to the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass vanishes.Assuming the degeneracy of the left-and right-handed top scalar quarks,radiative corrections to the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass are studied in ref.[10,11].Especially, the authers of ref.[11]performed a low energy renormalization group analysis of the Higgs sector of the model,and they arrived at the conclusion that the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass is123GeV for m t=180GeV if the masses of the top scalar quark were assumed to be degenerate at M SUSY=1TeV.The main aim of this paper is to explore all the parameter space and provide an accurate numerical evaluation for the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass in the NMSSM.We examine in detail the radiative corrections to the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass using the1-loop effective potential.In general,the contribution of radiative corrections due to the bottom quark and scalar quark loops to the tree level mass of the lightest scalar Higgs boson is very small numerically. Therefore we use the effective potential which includes the contribution of the top quark and scalar quark loops assuming the nondegenerate of the top scalar quark masses.Thus the mass splitting among the top scalar quark give a significant effect to the upper bound of the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass.In fact,there have been many studies about the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass including radiative corrections in the NMSSM.Unlike their calcula-tions we especially use the top scalar quark mass matrix containing the gauge terms in the1-loop effective potential.Therefore our formalism for the scalar Higgs boson mass matrix at the1-loop level contains the contributions of the gauge sector.After including radiative corrections,the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass becomes dependent on m Q,m T,A t,and m t as free parameters as well as the pa-rameters at the tree level.Of course our formalism for the mass matrix is given by the complicated expression.Nevertherless we believe that the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass obtained by our formalism can provide a reliable result.II.HIGGS BOSON MASSESThe scalar Higgs potential of the NMSSM comes from the auxiliary F-and D-fields and the soft SUSY breaking terms.The Higgs boson masses in the model at the tree level are given by the relevant potentialV0=V F+V D+V soft(1) which is expressed in terms of two Higgs doubletfields H1and H2and a complex singletfield N asV F=|λ|2[(|H1|2+|H2|2)|N|2+|H1H2|2]+|k|2|N|4−(λk∗H1H2N∗2+H.c.),V D=g228(|H2|2−|H1|2)2,(2)V soft=m2H1|H1|2+m2H2|H2|2+m2N|N|2−(λAλH1H2N+H.c.)−(13N3.We assume that only neutral components of the three Higgsfields H1,H2,and N acquire vacuum expectation values v1,v2,and x,respectively.Without loss of generality,we also assume that the vacuum expectation values are real and positive. The conditions that the Higgs potential becomes minimum at H1=v1,H2=v2,and N=x yield three constraints,which can eliminate the soft SUSY breaking parametersm H1,m H2,and m N from the potential V0.Then the mass spectra of the Higgs bosons can be expressed in terms of six pa-rameters,λ,k,Aλ,A k,x,and tanβ=v2/v1.Note that m2Z=(g21+g22)v2/2for v=2xv2Aλsin2β,(3) M012=(λ2v2−1M 023=2λ2xv sin β−λv cos β(A λ+2kx ),M 013=2λ2xv cos β−λv sin β(A λ+2kx ).When the above mass matrix is diagonalized,we would obtain squared masses for the three scalar Higgs bosons.The smallest eigenvalue yields the mass of the lightest scalar Higgs boson,m S 1.The tree-level masses obtained from V 0are subject to radiative corrections.These corrections are contributed in supersymmetric models by the quark and scalar quark loops.According to the Coleman-Weinberg mechanism [12],the 1-loop corrections are given by the effective potential containing the mass squared matrix M 2of the scalar quark,V 1=1Λ2−332π2m 4˜q 1 log m 2˜q 12+3Λ2−316π2m 4q log m 2q2,(6)where m ˜q 1and m ˜q 2are the masses of the top scalar quark,m ˜q 1<m ˜q 2and m t is the top quark mass.In terms of V 1,the mass matrix of the scalar Higgs bosons including radiative corrections at the 1-loop level is given byM 1ij = ∂2V 1v i ∂V 1Higgs sector and thus are nonzero.The two eigenvalues of the upper-left block-diagonal submatrix are the squared masses of the left-and right-handed top scalar quarks,and those of the lower-right block-diagonal submatrix the squared masses of the left-and right-handed bottom scalar quarks.Although the contribution of the bottom quark and scalar quark loops for large tanβis not negligible,generally the leading radiative corrections to the scalar Higgs bosons are the contribution of the top quark and scalar quark loops.Taking only the top quark and scalar quark into account,the matrix elements of M2depending on the neutral Higgs sector are:M11=m2Q+h2t|H02|2−g214(|H01|2−|H02|2),M12=h t(λNH01+A t H0∗2), M22=m2T+h2t|H02|2+g212(m2Q+m2T)+12(m2Q−m2T)+(212m2Z)cos2β 2+m2t(A t+λx cotβ)2 18π2∆21g(m2˜t1,m2˜t2)+3m4Z cos2βΛ4+3sin2β−(46m2Z)2cos2β f(m2˜t1,m2˜t2)+3m2˜t1−m2˜t2log m2˜t1M122=34π2v2sin2βlogm2t16π2v2 m2t A tλx cotβ3m2W−516π2v 4m2t m2˜t1−m2˜t2log m2˜t132π2v2 2m2t2m2Z sinβ2log m2˜t1m2˜t28π2m4tλ2cot2β(A t+λx cotβ)2g(m2˜t1,m2˜t2)+38π2∆1∆2g(m2˜t1,m2˜t2)+3m2Z sin2βsin2β−m2Z log m2˜t1m2˜t232π2v2 (46m2Z)2sin2β−2m2t A tλx32π2v m2Z cosβ∆2+(4m2t(m2˜t1−m2˜t2)log m2˜t1 8π2∆2m2tλcotβ(A t+λx cotβ)g(m2˜t1,m2˜t2)+3m2tλcotβsinβ−m2Z sinβ A t+λx cotβm2˜t2−3m2t A tλcotβ8π2∆1m2tλcotβ(A t+λx cotβ)g(m2˜t1,m2˜t2)+3m2Z m2tλcosβcotβm2˜t1−m2˜t2log m2˜t116π2v sinβ(A t+2λx cotβ)f(m2˜t1,m2˜t2)(10)with∆1=m2tλx2v (m2Q−m2T)+(46m2Z)cos2β (46m2Z),∆2=m2t A t2v (m2Q−m2T)+(46m2Z)cos2β(46m2Z).(11)The two functions f and g are defined asf(m21,m22)=1Λ2−m22logm22(m21−m22)3 (m21+m22)log m22m b.(13)Thus the maximum value of the free parameter tanβis about39for m t=175and m b =4.5GeV.From the values of tanβand m t,the value of the couplingλis given by the analysis of the renormalization group equation.Here we assume that m˜t1is heavier than the mass of the top quark.For the convenience we then define the ratio of the top scalar quark masses by R,0<R=m˜t1Thus R is the inverse of the mass splitting among the top scalar quark.This implies that the mass splitting among the top scalar quark increases with decreasing R values,vice versa.The curves for the maximum and minimum of R are denotted by R maximum and R minimum in Fig.1.As can be seen in thefigure,these curves decreases monotonically as the value of A t increases to3000GeV.That is,the mass splitting among the top scalar quark always increases with increasing A t value.Next we now wish to evaluate the numerical result for the upper bound on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass including radiative corrections in the NMSSM.The radiatively corrected squared masses of the scalar Higgs bosons are obtained as the eigenvalues of M0+M1.It is not easy to obtain an analytic expression for the smallest eigenvalue,m2S1,in terms of the various parameters that are present in M0+M1. The lightest scalar Higgs boson mass at the1-loop level is obtained by the numerical diagonalizion of the mass matrix of the scalar Higgs boson.Fig.2shows the upper bounds on the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass including the radiative corrections due to the top quark and scalar quark loops,as a function of x,for m t=175GeV and tanβ=2,0<λ≤0.87,0<k≤0.63,and100GeV ≤Aλ(A k,m Q,m T)≤1000GeV.The bounds on m S1for A t=1000,2000,and3000 GeV have maximum values as the value of x approach1000GeV.The bound for A t =2000GeV is greater than those for the other values of A t when the value of x is given by1000GeV.We can infer that the bound on m S1for tanβ=2and x=1000 GeV is not increase thought the value of A t is greater than3000GeV.Therefore the upper bound on m S1for tanβ=2and x=1000GeV is determined in terms of a value between1000and3000GeV.Thus we come to the conclusion that the upper bound on m S1for tanβ=2and x=1000GeV can be greater than143GeV in an energy between A t=1000and3000GeV.In Fig.3we plot the upper bound on m S1for tanβ=6when the other parameters are given by the same parameter space as those of Fig.2.Wefind from Fig.3that the upper bound on m S1for x=300GeV and A t=2000 GeV is about151GeV.The value of m S1=151GeV is greater than that for tanβ=2 in Fig.2.Therefore,let us calculate the upper bound on m S1for tanβ=10through the same parameter space as those in Fig.3.Fig.4shows that the upper bound onm S1for x=160GeV and A t=2000GeV is about148GeV.But the value of m S1=148GeV is smaller than that for tanβ=6in Fig.3.From Fig.2,Fig.3,and Fig.4,we surmise that the upper bound on m S1for tanβ>10is smaller than that on m S1for tanβ=6.In Fig.5we plot the upper bound on m S1at the1-loop level,as a function of A t, for m t=175GeV,0<λ≤0.87,0<k≤0.63,and100GeV≤Aλ(A k,m Q,m T,x)≤1000GeV.The upper bound on m S1for tanβ=6is not increase though the value of A t is greater than3000GeV.Again we conject that m S1have a maximum value in a value between tanβ=2and10.Fig.6shows that the upper bounds on m S1at the tree level and1-loop level,as a function of tanβ,for m t=175GeV,0<λ≤0.87, 0<k≤0.63,100GeV≤Aλ(A k,m Q,m T,x)≤1000GeV,and0GeV≤A t≤3000 GeV.The absolute upper bound on m S1at the tree level and1-loop level are101and156GeV for tanβ≈2.7,respectively.IV.RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONSIn order to devise effective search strategies for the detection of Higgs particle, the study for the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass is very important.Particularly, supersymmetric models impose strong constraints on the lightest Higgs boson mass. In the NMSSM the upper bound on m Sat the tree level is about130GeV for all the1parameter space.By the renormalization group analysis the improved upper bound on is about101GeV for m t≈175GeV.m S1We know from the previous papers that the top quark and scalar quark loops have a positive effect on the lightest Higgs boson mass when radiative corrections to the Higgs sector of the tree level are considered.But authors of the papers calculated the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass with some approximations.Here we examine in detail radiative corrections to the lightest Higgs boson mass without some approximations.The input parameters at the1-loop level as well as at the tree level are varied independently.Wefind from Fig.1that A t play an important role in the mass splitting among the top scalar quark.Here the value of A t is allowed to vary from0GeV to 3000GeV.The free parameters,Aλ,A k,m Q,m T,and x are limited as masses below 1000GeV.In this case,the upper limits on the top scalar quark masses for m t=175 GeV are approximately given by∼1000GeV.We are investigated the dependence of the lightest scalar Higgs boson mass on all input parameters.We calculated radiative corrections to the lightest Higgs boson mass using the1-loop effective potential in the NMSSM.Here we consider the contribution of the top quark and scalar quark loops for the effective potential.We take the mass matrix of the top scalar quark including the gauge term.Fur-thermore the mass matrix of the top scalar quark are given as the nongenerate state. Additionally we assume that the lower limits on the top scalar quark masses are greater than the top quark mass.Thus radiative correctons to the lightest Higgs boson mass contain the effect of the mass spliting among the top scalar quark and the contribu-tion of the gauge sector.An analytic formula for the scalar Higgs boson mass matrix including these effects are derived.The upper bound on m Scontaining these effects1is calculated by our formula.have a maximum value as A t Wefind from Fig.5that the upper bound on m S1approach a particular value.But the value of A t can not exceed3000GeV when theis maximised.In other tofind the absolute upper bound as a upper bound on m S1function of tanβincluding radiative corrections,we maximized over the parameter space using numerical analysis.The result of our calculation are presented in Fig.6. We alsofind from Fig.6that there exists the absolute upper bound on m Sof about1156GeV.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work is supported in part by the Basic Science Research Institute Program, Ministry of Education,BSRI-96-2442.REFERENCES[1]A.Brignole,J.Ellis,G.Ridolfi,and F.Zwirner,Phys.Lett.B271,123(1991).[2]M.A.Diaz and H.E.Haber,Phys.Rev.D45,4246(1992).[3]H.E.Haber and R.Hempfling,Phys.Rev.Lett.66,1815(1995).[4]J.Kodaira,Y.Yasui,and K Sasaki,Phys.Rev.D50,7035(1994).[5]J.L.Lopez and D.V.Nanopoulos,Phys.Lett.B266,397(1991).[6]J.R.Espinosa and M.Quiros,Phys.Lett.B279,92(1992).[7]P.N.Pandita,Phys.Lett.B318,338(1993).[8]J.Ellis,J.Gunion,H.Haber,L.Roszkowski,and F.Zwirner,Phys.Rev.D39844(1989).[9]U.Ellwanger and M.Rausch de Traubenberg,Z.Phys.C53,521(1992).[10]U.Ellwanger,Phys.Lett.B303,271(1993).[11]T.Elliott,S.F.King,and P.L.White,Phys.Lett.B305,71(1993);B31456(1993).[12]J.Ellis,G.Ridolfi,and F.Zwirner,Phys.Lett.B257,83(1991);B262,477(1991).[13]U.Ellwanger and M.Lindner,Phys.Lett.B301,365(1993).[14]J.Kamoshita,Y.Okada,and M.Tanaka,Phys.Lett.B328,67(1994).[15]T.Elliott,S.F.King,and P.L.White,Phys.Rev.D49,2435(1994).[16]S.F.King and P.L.White,Phys.Rev.D52,4183(1995).[17]CDF Collaboration,F.Abe et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.74,2626(1995);D0Collabo-ration,S.Abachi et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.74,2632(1995).Figure CaptionsFig. 1.The mass ratio of the top scalar quarks,as a function of A t,for m t=175 GeV,0<λ≤0.87,2≤tanβ≤10,and100GeV≤m Q(m T,x)≤1000GeV.The upper and lower curves are the maximum and minimum of R,respectively.Fig.2.The upper bound on the lightest Higgs boson mass at the1-loop level,as a function of x,for m t=175GeV,tanβ=2,0<λ≤0.87,0<k≤0.63,and100 GeV≤Aλ(A k,m Q,m T)≤1000GeV.These curves correspond to A t=1000,2000, and3000GeV,respectively.Fig.3.The same as Fig.2,except for tanβ=6.Fig.4.The same as Fig.2,except for tanβ=10.Fig. 5.The upper bound on the lightest Higgs boson mass at the1-loop level,as a function of A t,for m t=175GeV,0<λ≤0.87,0<k≤0.63,and100GeV ≤Aλ(A k,m Q,m T,x)≤1000GeV.These curves correspond to tanβ=2,6,and10, respectively.Fig.6.The absolute upper bound on the lightest Higgs boson mass,as a function of tanβ,for m t=175GeV,0<λ≤0.87,0<k≤0.63,100GeV≤Aλ(A k,m Q,m T,x)≤1000GeV,and0GeV≤A t≤3000GeV.These curves correspond to the tree level and1-loop level,respectively.。

Get清风Einstein'sGreatestBlunder原文

Get清风Einstein'sGreatestBlunder原文

Einstein's-Greatest-Blunder 原文Gravity in Reverse: the Tale of Albert Einstein's "Greatest Blunder" Natural History, 12/01/03by Neil deGrasse TysonCosmology has always been weird. Worlds resting on the backs of turtles, matter and energy coming into existence out of much less than thin air. And now, just when you'd gotten familiar, if not really comfortable, with the idea of a big bang, along comes something new to worry about. A mysterious and universal pressure pervades all of space and acts against the cosmic gravity that has tried to drag the universe back together ever since the big bang. On top of that, "negative gravity" has forced the expansion of the universe to accelerate exponentially, and cosmic gravity is losing the tug-of-war.For these and similarly mind-warping ideas in twentieth-century physics, just blame Albert Einstein.Einstein hardly ever set foot in the laboratory; he didn't test phenomena or use elaborate equipment. He was a theorist who perfected the "thought experiment," in which you engage nature through your imagination, inventing a situation or a model and then working out the consequences of some physical principle.If--as was the case for Einstein--a physicist's model is intended to represent the entire universe, then manipulating the model should be tantamount to manipulating the universe itself. Observers and experimentalists can then go out and look for the phenomena predicted by that model. If the model is flawed, or if the theorists make a mistake in their calculations, the observers will detect a mismatch between the model's predictions and the way things happen in the real universe. That's the first cue to try again, either by adjusting the old model or by creating a new one.One of the most powerful and far-reaching theoretical models ever devised is Einstein's theory of general relativity, published in 1916 as "The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity" and refined in 1917 in "Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity." Together, the papers outline the relevant mathematical details of how everything in the universe moves under the influence of gravity. Every few years, laboratory scientists devise ever more precise experiments to test the theory, only to extend the envelope of its accuracy.Most scientific models are only hall baked, and have some wiggle room for the adjustment of parameters to fit the known universe. In the heliocentric universe conceived by the sixteenth-century astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus, for example, planets orbited the Sun in perfect circles. The orbit-the-Sun part was correct, but the perfect-circle part turned out to be a bit off. Making the orbits elliptical made the Copernican system more accurate.Yet, in the case of Einstein's relativity, the founding principles of the entire theory require that everything take place exactly as predicted. Einstein had, in effect, built a house of cards, with only two or three simple postulates holding up the entire structure. (Indeed, on learning of a 1931 book titled 100 Authors Against Einstein, he responded, "Why one hundred? If I am incorrect, one would have been enough.")That unassailable structure--the fact that the theory is fully baked--is the source of one of the most fascinating blunders in the history of science. Einstein's 1917 refinement of his equations of gravity included a new term--denoted by the Greek letter lambda--in which his model universe neither expands nor contracts. Because lambda served to oppose gravity within Einstein's model, it could keep the universe in balance, resisting gravity's natural tendency to pull the whole cosmos into one giant mass. Einstein's universe was indeed balanced, but, as the Russian physicist Alexsandr Friedmann showed mathematically in 1922, it was in a precarious state--like a ball at the top of a hill, ready to roll down in one direction or another at the slightest provocation. Moreover, giving something a name does not make it real, and Einstein knew of no counterpart in the physical universe to the lambda in his equations.Einstein's general theory of relativity--called GR by verbally lazy cognoscenti--radically departed from all previous thinking about the attraction of gravity. Instead of settling for Sir Isaac Newton's view of gravity as "action at a distance" (a conclusion that discomfited Newton himself), GR regards gravity as the response of a mass to the local curvature of space and time caused by some other mass. In other words, concentrations of mass cause distortions--dimples, really-in the fabric of space and time. Those distortions guide the moving masses along straight-line geodesics, which look like the curved trajectories that physicists call orbits. John Archibald "Wheeler, a physicist at Princeton University, put it best when he summed up Einstein's concept this way: "Matter tells space how to curve; space tells matter how to move."In effect, GR accounts for two opposite phenomena: good ol' gravity, such as the attraction between the Earth and a ball thrown into the air or between the Sun andthe Earth; and a mysterious, repulsive pressure associated with the vacuum of space-time itself. Acting against gravity, lambda preserved what Einstein and every other physicist of his day had strongly believed in: the status quo of a static universe. Static it was, but stable it was not. And to invoke an unstable condition as the natural state of a physical system violates scientific credo: you cannot assert that the entire universe is a special case that happens to be precariously balanced for eternity. Nothing ever seen, heard, or measured has acted that way in the history of science. Yet, in spite of being deeply uneasy with lambda, Einstein included it in his equations.Twelve years later, in 1929, the U.S. astronomer Edwin P. Hubble discovered that the universe is not static after all: convincing evidence showed that the more distant a galaxy, the faster that galaxy is receding from the Earth. In other words, the universe is growing. Embarrassed by lambda, and exasperated by having thus blown the chance to predict the expanding universe himself, Einstein discarded lambda, calling its introduction his life's "greatest blunder."That wasn't the end of the story, though. Off and on over the decades, theoreticians would exhume lambda--more commonly known as the "cosmological constant"--from the graveyard of discredited theories. Then, sixty-nine years later, in 1998, science exhumed lambda one last time, because now there was evidence to justify it. Early that year two teams of astrophysicists--one led by Saul Perlmutter of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California; the other by Brian Schmidt of Mount Stromlo and Siding Springs Observatories in Canberra, Australia--made the same remarkable announcement. Dozens of the most distant supernovas ever observed, they said, appeared noticeably dimmer than expected--a disturbing finding, given the well-documented behavior of this species of exploding star. Reconciliation required that either those distant supernovas acted quite differently from their nearer brethren, or else they were as much as 15 percent farther away than the prevailing cosmological models had placed them.Not only was the cosmos expanding, but a repulsive pressure within the vacuum of space was also causing the expansion to accelerate. Something had to be driving the universe outward at an ever-increasing pace. The only thing that "naturally" accounted for the acceleration was lambda, the cosmological constant. When physicists dusted it off and put it back in Einstein's original equations for general relativity, the state of the universe matched the state of Einstein's equations.To an astrophysicist, the supernovas used in Perlmutter's and Schmidt's studies are worth their weight in fusionable nuclei. Each star explodes the same way, igniting a similar amount of fuel, releasing a similarly titanic amount of energy in a similarperiod of time, and therefore achieving a similar peak luminosity. Hence these exploding stars serve as a kind of yardstick, or "standard candle," for calculating cosmic distances to the galaxies in which they explode, out to the farthest reaches of the universe.Standard candles simplify calculations immensely: since the supernovas all have the same wattage, the dim ones are far away and the bright ones are nearby. By measuring their brightness (a simple task), you can tell exactly how far away they are from you. If the luminosities of the supernovas were not all the same, brightness alone would not be enough to tell you which of them are far from Earth and which of them are near. A dim one could be a high-wattage bulb far away or a low-wattage bulb close up.Fine. But there's a second way to measure the distance to galaxies: their speed of recession from our Milky Way, a recession that's part and parcel of the overall cosmic expansion. As Hubble was the first to show, the expansion of the universe makes distant objects race away from us faster than the nearby ones do. By measuring a galaxy's speed of recession (another straightforward task), you can deduce its distance from Earth.If those two well-tested methods give different distances for the same object, something must be wrong. Either the supernovas are bad standard candles, or our model for the rate of cosmic expansion as measured by galaxy speeds is wrong.Well, something was wrong in 1998. It turned out that the supernovas are splendid standard candles, surviving the careful scrutiny of many skeptical investigators. Astrophysicists were left with a universe that is expanding faster than they had ever thought it was. Distant galaxies turned out to be even farther away than their recession speed had seemed to indicate. And there was no easy way to explain the extra expansion without invoking lambda, the cosmological constant.Here, then, was the first direct evidence that a repulsive pressure permeated the universe, opposing gravity. That's what resurrected the cosmological constant overnight. And now cosmologists could estimate its numerical value, because they could calculate the effect it was having: the difference between what they had expected the expansion to be and what it actually was.That value for lambda suddenly signified a physical reality, which now needed a name. "Dark energy" carried the day, suitably capturing our ignorance of its cause. The most accurate measurements done to date have shown dark energy to be the most prominent thing in town.The shape of our four-dimensional universe comes from the relation between the amount of matter and energy that inhabits the cosmos and the rate at which the cosmos is expanding. A convenient mathematical measure of that shape is usually written as the uppercase Greek letter omega ([OMEGA]). If you take the matter-energy density of the universe, and divide it by the matter-energy density required to just barely halt the expansion (known as the "critical" density), you get omega.Because both mass and energy cause space-time to warp, or curve, omega effectively gives the shape of the cosmos. If omega is less than one, the actual mass-energy falls below the critical value, and the universe expands forever in every direction for all of time. In that case, the shape of the universe is analogous to the shape of a saddle, in which initially parallel lines diverge. If omega is equal to one, the universe expands forever, but only barely so; in that case the shape is fiat, preserving all the geometric rules we all learned in high school about parallel lines. If omega exceeds one, parallel lines converge, and the universe curves back on itself, ultimately recollapsing into the fireball whence it came.At no time since Hubble discovered the expanding universe has any team of observers ever reliably measured omega to be anywhere close to one. Adding up all the mass and energy they could measure, dark matter included, the biggest values from the best observations topped out at about 0.3. Since that's less than one, as far as observers were concerned, the universe was "open" for the business of expansion, riding a one-way saddle into the future.Meanwhile, beginning in 1979, Alan H. Guth, a physicist at MIT, and others advanced an adjustment to big bang theory that cleared up some nagging problems. In brief, Guth explained why things look about the same everywhere in the universe.A fundamental by-product of this update to the big bang was that it drove omega toward one. Not toward one-half. Not toward two. Certainly not toward a million. Toward one.Scarcely a theorist in the world had a problem with that requirement, because it helped get the big bang to account for the global properties of the known universe. There was, however, another little problem: the update predicted three times as much mass and energy as observers could find. Undeterred, the theorists said the observers just weren't looking hard enough.At the end of the tallies, visible matter alone could account for very little of the critical density. How about the mysterious dark matter? Nobody knows what dark matter is, but observers knew there is five times as much dark matter as visiblematter. They added that in as well. Alas, still way too little mass-energy. The observers were at a loss. "Guys," they protested, "there's nothing else out there." And the theorists answered, "Just keep looking."Both camps were sure the other camp was wrong--until the discovery of dark energy. That single component raised the mass-energy density of the universe to the critical level. Yes, if you do the math, the universe holds three times as much dark energy as anything else.A skeptical lot, the community of astrophysicists decided they would feel better about the result if there were some way to corroborate it. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) was just what the doctors ordered and needed. This NASA satellite, launched in 2001, was the latest and best effort to measure and map the cosmic microwave background, the big bang's blueprint for the amount and distribution of matter and energy in the universe. Astrophysicists can now say with confidence that omega is indeed equal to one: the matter-energy density of the universe we know and love is equal to the critical density. The tabulation? The cosmos holds 73 percent dark energy, 23 percent dark matter, and a measly 4 percent ordinary matter, the stuff you and I are made of.For the first time ever, the theorists and observers kissed and made up. Both, in their own way, were correct. Omega is one, just as the theorists demanded of the universe, even though you can't get there by adding up all the matter--dark or otherwise--as they had naively presumed. There's no more matter running around the cosmos today than had ever been estimated by the observers. Nobody had foreseen the dominating presence of cosmic dark energy, nor had anybody imagined it as the great reconciler of differences.So what is this stuff? As with dark matter, nobody knows. The closest anybody has come to a reasonable guess is to presume that dark energy is a quantum effect--whereby the vacuum of space, instead of being empty, actually seethes with particles and their antimatter counterparts. They pop in and out of existence in pairs, and don't last long enough to be measured. Their transient existence is captured in their moniker: virtual particles.But the remarkable legacy of quantum mechanics--the physics of the small--demands that we give these particles serious attention. Each pair of virtual particles exerts a little bit of outward pressure as it ever so briefly elbows its way into space. Unfortunately, when you estimate the amount of repulsive "vacuum pressure" that arises from the abbreviated lives of virtual particles, the result is more than [10.sup.120] times bigger than the value of the cosmological constantderived from the supernova measurements and WMAP. That may be the most embarrassing calculation ever made, the biggest mismatch between theory and observation in the history of science.I'd say astrophysicists remain clueless--but it's not abject cluelessness. Dark energy is not adrift, with nary a theory to call home. It inhabits one of the safest homes we can imagine: Einstein's equations of general relativity. It's lambda. Whatever dark energy turns out to be, we already know how to measure it and how to calculate its effects on the cosmos.Without a doubt, Einstein's greatest blunder was having declared that lambda was his greatest blunder.A remarkable feature of lambda and the accelerating universe is that the repulsive force arises from within the vacuum, not from anything material. As the vacuum grows, lambda's influence on the cosmic state of affairs grows with it. All the while, the density of matter and energy diminishes without limit. With greater repulsive pressure comes more vacuum, driving its exponential growth--the endless acceleration of the cosmic expansion.As a consequence, anything not gravitationally bound to the neighborhood of the Milky Way will move away from us at ever-increasing speed, embedded within the expanding fabric of space-time. Galaxies now visible will disappear beyond an unreachable horizon. In a trillion or so years, anyone alive in our own galaxy may know nothing of other galaxies. Our--or our alien Milky Way brethren's--observable universe will merely comprise a system of nearby stars. Beyond the starry night will lie an endless void, without form: "darkness upon the face of the deep."Dark energy, a fundamental property of the cosmos, will, in the end, undermine the ability of later generations to comprehend their universe. Unless contemporary astrophysicists across the galaxy keep remarkable records, or bury an awesome time capsule, future astrophysicists will know nothing of external galaxies--the principal form of organization for matter in our cosmos. Dark energy will deny them access to entire chapters from the book of the universe.Here, then, is my recurring nightmare: Are we, too, missing some basic pieces of the universe that once was? What part of our cosmic saga has been erased? What remains absent from out theories and equations that ought to be there, leaving us groping for answers we may never find?Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson is the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York City.。

Shifts in the Properties of the Higgs Boson from Radion Mixing

Shifts in the Properties of the Higgs Boson from Radion Mixing

a rXiv:h ep-ph/22155v32J ul23SLAC-PUB-9132Shifts in the Properties of the Higgs Boson from Radion Mixing ∗J.L.Hewett and T.G.Rizzo Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University Stanford CA 94309,USA Abstract We examine how mixing between the Standard Model Higgs boson,h ,and the radion present in the Randall-Sundrum model of localized gravity modifies the expected properties of the Higgs boson.In particular,we demonstrate that the total and partial decay widths of the Higgs,as well as the h →gg branching fraction,can be substantially altered from their Standard Model expectations.The remaining branching fractions are modified less than <∼5%for most of the parameter space volume.The Randall-Sundrum(RS)model of localized gravity[1]offers a potential solution to the hierarchy problem that can be tested at present and future accelerators[2].In the original version of this model,the Standard Model(SM)fields are confined to one of two branes that are embedded in a5-dimensional anti-de Sitter space(AdS5)described by the metric ds2=e−2k|y|ηµνdxµdxν−dy2,with y=r cφwhere r c is the compactification radius andφdescribes the5th dimension.The parameter k characterizes the curvature of the 5-dimensional space and is naturally of order the Planck scale.The two branes form the boundaries of the AdS5slice and gravity is localized on the brane located at y=0.Mass parameters on the Standard Model brane,located at y=r cπ,are red-shifted compared to those on the y=0brane and are given byΛπ=M P l is the reduced Planck scale.In order to address the hierarchy problem,Λπ∼TeV and hence the separation between the two branes,r c,must have a value of kr c∼11−12.A number of authors [3]have demonstrated that this quantity can be naturally stabilized by a mechanism which leads directly to the existence of a massive bulk scalarfield.Fluctuations about the stabilized RS configuration allow for two massless excitations described in the metric byηµν→gµν(x)and r c→T(x).Thefirst corresponds to the graviton and T(x)is a new scalarfield arising from the g55component of the metric and is known as the radion(r0).This scalarfield corresponds to a quantum excitation of the separation between the two branes.The mass of the radion is proportional to the backreaction of the bulk scalar vacuum expectation value(vev)on the metric.Generally,one expects that the radion mass should be in the range of a few×10GeV≤m r0≤Λπ,where the lower limit arises from radiative corrections and the upper bound is the cutoffof the effectivefieldis then expected to be below the scaleΛπimplying that the theory.The radion mass m rradion may be the lightest newfield present in the RS model.The radion couples tofields on the Standard Model brane via the trace of the stress-energy tensor with a strengthΛ∝Λπ1of order the TeV scale,L eff=−r0(x)Tµµ/Λ.(1)Note thatΛ=√−g ind R(4)[g ind]H†H.(2)Here H is the Higgs doubletfield,R(4)[g ind]is the4-d Ricci scalar constructed out of the induced metric g ind on the SM brane,andξis a dimensionless mixing parameter assumed to be of order unity and with unknown sign.The above action induces kinetic mixing between the r0and h0fields.The resulting Lagrangian can be diagonalized by a set offield redefinitions and rotations[7],h0=Ah+Br,(3)r0=Ch+Dr,withA=cosθ−6ξγ/Z sinθ,(4)B=sinθ+6ξγ/Z cosθ,C=−sinθ/Z,D=cosθ/Z,2where h,r represent the physicalfields,andγ=v12[1±(1+4/γ2)1/2],(6) For example,ifγtakes on the natural valuesγ=0.2(0.1)thenξmust lie in the approximate range−0.754≤ξ≤0.921(−1.585≤ξ≤1.752).The masses of the physical states,r,h,are then given bym2±=1T2−4F ,(7)where m+(m−)is the larger(smaller)of the two masses andT=(1+t2)m2h0+m2r/Z,(8)F=m2h0m2r/Z2,with m h0,r0being the weak interaction eigenstate masses and t=6ξγ/Z.This mixing will clearly affect the phenomenology of both the radion and Higgsfields.In particular,the bounds on the Higgs mass from the standard globalfit to precision electroweak data are modified,allowing for a Higgs boson(and radion)mass of order several hundred GeV[7]. Here,we examine the modifications to the properties of the Higgs boson,in particular its decay widths and branching fractions,induced by this mixing andfind that substantial differences from the SM expectations can be obtained.3Figure1:Constraints on the mass of the radion assuming m h=125GeV as a function of ξas described in the text forγ=0.1(green,outer curves)and0.2(red,inner curves).The allowed region lies between the solid curves.In the lower panel the regions excluded by LEP searches are also shown and they lie between the corresponding solid and dashed curves.4To make predictions in this scenario we need to specify four parameters:the massesof the physical Higgs and radionfields,m h,r,the mixing parameterξ,and the ratioγ=v/Λ.Clearly this ratio cannot be too large asΛπis already bounded from below by collider andelectroweak precision data[2];Tevatron data for contact interactions yields the constraints Λπ>∼300,1500,4500GeV for k/M P l≤0.1[2],which in turn implies v/Λ<∼0.1.For definiteness we will relax this bound somewhat and take v/Λ≤0.2along with a physical Higgs mass of125GeVin our analysis.We note that large absolute values ofξand wide ranges of v/Λhave beenentertained in the literature.The values of the two physical masses themselves are not arbitrary.When we require the weak eigenstate mass-squared parameters of the unmixed radion and Higgsfields to be real,as is demanded by hermiticity,we obtain an additional constraint on the ratio of the physical radion and Higgs masses which depends on bothξandγ.Defining the ratio r=(m+/m−)2,onefinds that these two conditions require that r must be bounded from below byr min=1+2t2±2|t|√space for a light radion is certainly not closed.As one decreases the assumedfixed value of v/Λ,the size of the allowed low mass region grows since the radion couplings to the Z boson are rapidly shrinking.Onceξ,γand m h,r are specified,the angleθdescribing the rotations into the Higgs-radion physical states becomes calculable;onefinds thattan2θ=2tZ2m2h0 m2r−m2h.The weak basis masses are given bym2h0=m2++m2−± 2(1+t2),(11)with the sign chosen positive(negative)when m h(m r)is identified with m±.In either caseone obtains m r0=Zm+m−/m h.We now turn our attention to the properties of the Higgs boson in this model when mixing with the radion is included.Following the notation of Csaki et al.[7],the couplings of the physical Higgs to the SM fermions and massive gauge bosons V=W,Z is now given byL=−1Λsinθ/Z]h,(12) where the angleθis defined above and can now be calculated in terms of the four parameters ξ,v/Λ,and the physical Higgs and radion masses.Note that the shifts to the fermionic and massive gauge boson couplings are identical.Denoting the combinationsα=cosθ−t sinθ6Figure2:Ratio of Higgs partial widths to their SM values,RΓ,as a function ofξassuming a physical Higgs mass of125GeV:red for fermion pairs or massive gauge boson pairs,green for gluons and blue for photons.This corresponds to gluons,photons,V¯V from bottom to top on the right.In the top panel we assume m r=300GeV and v/Λ=0.2.In the bottom panel the solid(dashed)curves are for m r=500(300)GeV and v/Λ=0.2(0.1).7andβ=−sinθ/Z,the corresponding Higgs coupling to gluons can be written asL=c gαs2v [(α+vΛ].(14)Here,thefirst term is the usual one-loop top-quark contribution to the ggh coupling,whereas the second term arises from the trace anomaly and appears solely from the mixing.b3=7 is the SU(3)β-function and F g is a well-known kinematic function of the ratio of masses of the top-quark to the physical Higgs boson[9].Similarly the physical Higgs coupling to two photons is now given byL=cγαemv [−(α+vΛ].(16)Here,b2=19/6and b Y=−41/6are the SU(2)×U(1)β-functions and Fγis another well-known kinematic function[9]of the ratios of the W boson and top-quark masses to the physical Higgs mass,and second term again originates from the trace anomaly.Note that in the simultaneous limitsα→1,β→0we recover the usual SM results.From these expressions we can now compute the modifications to the various decay widths and branching fractions of the SM Higgs due to mixing with the radion.Fig.2shows the ratio of the various Higgs partial widths in comparison to their SM expectations as a function of the parameterξfor sample values of m r and vfinal states are very similar;this is due to the relatively large magnitude of Fγwhile the combination b2+b Y is rather small.(ii)On the otherhand,the shift for the ggfinal state can be substantial;here,F g is numerically smaller than Fγand b3is quite large,resulting in a large contribution from the trace anomaly term.(iii)For relatively light radions with a lower value ofΛ,the Higgs decay width into the ggfinal state can be vanishingly small.This is due to a strong destructive interference between the two contributions to the amplitude for values ofξnear−1.(iv)Increasing the value of m r has less of an effect than does a decrease in the ratio vThe deviation from SM expectations for the various branching fractions,as well as the total width,of the Higgs are displayed in Fig.3as a function of the mixing parameter ξ.As above,the range of the curves reflects the allowed parameter region forξ.We see that the gluon branching fraction and the total width may be drastically different than that of the SM.As we will see below,the former may greatly affect the Higgs production cross section at the LHC.However,theγγ,f¯f,and V V(where V=W,Z)branching fractions only receive small corrections to their SM values,of order<∼5−10%for almost all of the parameter region except near the edges of the parameter space.Observation of these shifts will require the precise determination of the Higgs branching fractions which is obtainable at a future high energy e+e−Linear Collider[10].Once these measurements are performed, constraints on the radion parameter space may be extracted as will be discussed below. These small changes in the ZZh and hb¯b couplings of the Higgs boson can also lead to small reductions in the Higgs search reach from LEPII.This is presented in Fig.4for several sets of parameters;except for extreme parameter cases this reduction in reach is rather modest.At the LHC,the dominant production mechanism and signal for a light Higgs boson is gluon-gluon fusion through a triangle graph with subsequent decay intoγγ.Both the production cross section and theγγbranching fraction are modified by mixing with the radion,leading to the results illustrated in Fig.5.Thisfigure shows that the Higgs production rate in this channel at the LHC can be either significantly reduced or somewhat enhanced in comparison to the expectations of the SM due to the effects of mixing.For some values of the parameters the reduction can be by more than an order of magnitude which could seriously hinder the discovery of the Higgs via this channel at the LHC.The s-channel production of the Higgs boson at a high energy photon photon collider is an important channel for determining the properties of the Higgs.In Fig.6we see that decreases in the production rate of the Higgs compared to SM expectations can also occur10Figure4:Lower bound on the mass of the Higgs boson from direct searches at LEP as a function ofξincluding the effects of mixing.The red(green;blue)curves correspond to the choice m r=300GeV,v/Λ=0.2(300,0.1;500,0.2)and represent the curves from bottom to top.11Figure5:The ratio of production cross section times branching fraction for pp→h→γγvia gluon fusion with radion mixing to the SM expectations as a function ofξ.The Higgs mass is taken to be125GeV.The red(blue;green)curves correspond to the choice m r=300 GeV,v/Λ=0.2(500,0.2;300,0.1),from left to right on the RHS of thefigure.12in the reactionγγ→h→b¯b when mixing with the radion is included.Again,once such mixing is taken into account,the event rate is reduced,possibly hampering the statistical ability of a future high energy photon collider to measure the Higgs properties.However, note that the potential reductions in rate for this channel are not as drastic as those which may be realized at the LHC.Figure6:The ratio of production cross section times branching fraction forγγ→h→b¯b with radion mixing to the SM expectations as a function ofξ.The Higgs mass is taken to be 125GeV.The red(blue;green)curves,corresponding to the bottom(middle,top)curves, represent the parameter choices m r=300GeV,v/Λ=0.2(500,0.2;300,0.1).Once data from both the LHC and the Linear Collider(LC)is available,the radion parameter space can be explored using both direct searches and indirect measurements.In fact,the precision measurements of the Higgs boson couplings discussed above can be used to constrain the radion parameter space beyond what may be possible via direct searches for the radion.For purposes of demonstration,let us assume that the LHC and LC determine, within their capabilities,that the Higgs couplings are consistent with the predictions of the ing the expectations for Higgs production at the LHC and LC from the analyses13contained in Ref.[10],we derive the resulting excluded regions in theξ−m r parameter plane.This is displayed in Fig.7for various values of v/Λfor the sample case of m h=125 GeV.In thisfigure,the allowed region lies between the corresponding pair of vertical curves. Here,we see that if such a set of measurements of the Higgs properties are realized,then a large fraction of the radion parameter space would be excluded.Direct radion searches at these colliders would fully cover the lower portion of the remaining parameter space up to the radion search reach.Together,the direct and indirect constraints would then only allow for a high mass radion with small mixing as a possibility under this scenario.Figure7:95%CL indirect bounds on the mass and mixing of the radion arising from the precision measurements of the Higgs couplings obtainable at the LHC and a Linear Collider for a Higgs mass of125GeV.The allowed region lies between the corresponding pair of vertical curves.From the inner to outer curves,they represent the parameter values v/Λ=0.2,0.15,0.10,and0.05,respectively.Lastly,we note that the patterns of the shifts in the Higgs boson properties due to radion mixing are distinct from those in other models of new physics.For example,consider the two Higgs double model[9].In this model,the ratio of the hV V coupling to its SM14value is given by sin(β−α)and the similar ratio for the ht¯t coupling is cosα/sinβ,where tanβis the ratio of vevs of the two Higgs doublets andαis the mixing angle between the two doublets.In one variant of this model,the corresponding ratio of the hb¯b coupling is equal,up to a sign,of that for the ht¯t coupling,while in a second version of the model the hb¯b ratio is−sinα/cosβ.In either case,this spectrum of couplings cannot be reproduced via radion mixing.In summary,we see that Higgs-radion mixing,which is present in some extra dimen-sional scenarios,can have a substantial effect on the properties of the Higgs boson.These modifications affect the total and partial widths,as well as the branching fractions,of Higgs decay into variousfinal states.This,in turn,can significantly alter the expectations for Higgs production at LEP,the LHC,and a photon collider.For some regions of the parameters, the size of these shifts in the Higgs widths and branching fractions may require the precision of a Linear Collider in order to be studied in detail.Note Added:A related paper[11]appeared on the arXiv four months after this work and one year after a preliminary version of this work was presented at summer conferences [12].References[1]L.Randall and R.Sundrum,Phys.Rev.Lett.83,3370(1999);Phys.Rev.Lett.83,4690(1999).[2]For an overview of RS phenomenology,see H.Davoudiasl,J.L.Hewett and T.G.Rizzo,Phys.Rev.Lett.84,2080(2000);Phys.Lett.B493,135(2000);and Phys.Rev.D63, 075004(2001).15[3]W.D.Goldberger and M.Wise,Phys.Rev.Lett.83,4922(1999)and Phys.Lett.475,275(2000);C.Csaki,M.Graesser,L.Randall and J.Terning,Phys.Rev.D62,045015 (2000);C.Charmousis,R.Gregory and V.A.Rubakov,Phys.Rev.D62,067505(2000);T.Tanaka and X.Montes,Nucl.Phys.B582,259(2000).[4]G.F.Giudice,R.Rattazzi and Wells,Nucl.Phys.B595,250(2001).[5]U.Mahanta and A.Datta,Phys.Lett.B483,196(2000);T.Han,G.D.Kribs andB.McElrath,Phys.Rev.D64,076003(2001);M.Chaichian,A.Datta,K.Huitu andZ.Yu,hep-ph/0110035;M.Chaichian,K.Huitu,A.Kobakhidze and Z.-H.Yu,Phys.Lett.B515,65(2001);S.B.Bae,P.Ko,H.S.Lee and J.Lee,Phys.Lett.B487,299 (2000);S.B.Bae and H.S Lee,hep-ph/0011275;S.C.Park,H.S.Song and J.Song, hep-ph/0103308;S.R.Choudhury,A.S.Cornell and G.C.Joshi,hep-ph/0012043;K.Cheung,Phys.Rev.D63,056007(2001).[6]G.D.Kribs,in Proc.of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on the Future of ParticlePhysics(Snowmass2001)ed.R.Davidson and C.Quigg,hep-ph/0110242.[7]C.Csaki,M.Graesser,and G.D.Kribs,Phys.Rev.D63,065002(2001).[8]For a recent summary of LEP Higgs boson searches and original references,see A.Sopczak,hep-ph/0112082.[9]J.F.Gunion,H.E.Haber,G.L.Kane and S.Dawson,The Higgs Hunter’s Guide,,(Addison-Wesley,Redwood City,CA1990),SCIPP-89/13.[10]M.Battaglia and K.Desch,hep-ph/0101165.See also,M.Carena,D.W.Gerdes,H.E.Haber,A.S.Turcot,and P.M.Zerwas,“Executive Summary of the Snowmass2001 working group on Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,”in Proc.of the APS/DPF/DPB16Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics,ed by R.Davidson and C.Quigg, hep-ph/0203229.[11]D.Dominici,B.Grzadkowski,J.F.Gunion and M.Toharia,arXiv:hep-ph/0206192.[12]J.L.Hewett and T.G.Rizzo,in Proc.of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study on theFuture of Particle Physics(Snowmass2001)ed.N.Graf,eConf C010630,P338(2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0112343];G.Azuelos et al.,“The beyond the standard model working group:Summary report,”proceedings of Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders,Les Houches,France,21May-1Jun2001,arXiv:hep-ph/0204031.17SLAC-PUB-9132Shifts in the Properties of the Higgs Boson fromRadion Mixing∗J.L.Hewett and T.G.RizzoStanford Linear Accelerator CenterStanford UniversityStanford CA94309,USAAbstractWe examine how mixing between the Standard Model Higgs boson,h,and the radion present in the Randall-Sundrum model of localized gravity modifies the expected properties of the Higgs boson.In particular,we demonstrate that the total and partial decay widths of the Higgs,as well as the h→gg branching fraction,can be substantially altered from their Standard Model expectations.The remaining branching fractions are modified less than<∼5%for most of the parameter space volume.The Randall-Sundrum(RS)model of localized gravity[1]offers a potential solution to the hierarchy problem that can be tested at present and future accelerators[2].In the original version of this model,the Standard Model(SM)fields are confined to one of two branes that are embedded in a5-dimensional anti-de Sitter space(AdS5)described by the metric ds2=e−2k|y|ηµνdxµdxν−dy2.The parameter k characterizes the curvature of the 5-dimensional space and is naturally of order the Planck scale.The two branes form the boundaries of the AdS5slice and gravity is localized on the brane located at y=0.Mass parameters on the Standard Model brane,located at y=r cπ,are red-shifted compared to those on the y=0brane and are given byΛπ=M P l is the reduced Planck scale.In order to address the hierarchy problem,Λπ∼TeV and hence the separation between the two branes,r c,must have a value of kr c∼11−12.A number of authors [3]have demonstrated that this quantity can be naturally stabilized by a mechanism which leads directly to the existence of a massive bulk scalarfield.Fluctuations about the stabilized RS configuration allow for two massless excitations described in the metric byηµν→gµν(x)and r c→T(x).Thefirst corresponds to the graviton and T(x)is a new scalarfield arising from the g55component of the metric and is known as the radion(r0).This scalarfield corresponds to a quantum excitation of the brane separation.The mass of the radion is proportional to the backreaction of the bulk scalar vacuum expectation value(vev)on the metric.Generally,one expects that the radion mass should be in the range of a few×10GeV≤m r0≤Λπ,where the lower limit arises from radiative corrections and the upper bound is the cutoffof the effectivefield theory.The is then expected to be below the scaleΛπimplying that the radion may be radion mass m rthe lightest newfield present in the RS model.The radion couples tofields on the Standard Model brane via the trace of the stress-energy tensor with a strengthΛ∝Λπof order the1TeV scale,L eff=−r0(x)Tµµ/Λ.(1)√Note thatΛ=−g ind R(4)[g ind]H†H.(2) Here H is the Higgs doubletfield,R(4)[g ind]is the Ricci scalar constructed out of the induced metric g ind on the SM brane,andξis a dimensionless mixing parameter assumed to be of order unity and with unknown sign.The above action induces kinetic mixing between the r0and h0fields.The resulting Lagrangian can be diagonalized by a set offield redefinitions and rotations[4],h0=cosρ(h cosθ−r sinθ),(3)r0=h(sinθ−sinρcosθ)+r(cosθ+sinρsinθ),where h,r represent the physicalfields and6ξvtanρ=,(m2r0−m2h0)cos2ρwith v≃246GeV being the SM vacuum expectation value.The masses of the physical2states are then given by1m2r,h=M P l=1.0,0.1,0.01,respectively.Curvature constraints suggest that k/.Explicitly onefinds that eitherΛm2r1+sin2ρ(6)3Figure1:Constraint on the mass of the radion assuming m h=125GeV as a function of the productξv/Λas described in the text.The disallowed region lies between the solid curves. The regions excluded by LEP searches assuming v/Λ=0.2are also shown and are labeled by‘LEP’.4orm2r1+sin2ρ(7) must hold.Note that it is disfavored for the radion to have a mass near that of the Higgs when there is significant mixing.The resulting excluded region is shown in Fig.1for the demonstrative case of m h=125GeV.These constraints are somewhat restrictive;if we take ξvv (m f¯ff−m2V VµVµ)[cosρcosθ+vFigure2:Ratio of Higgs widths to their SM values,RΓ,as a function ofξassuming a physical Higgs mass of125GeV:red for fermion pairs or massive gauge boson pairs,green for gluons and blue for photons.This corresponds to gluons,photons,V¯V from top to bottom on the right.In the top panel we assume m r=300GeV and v/Λ=0.2.In the bottom panel the solid(dashed)curves are for m r=500(300)GeV and v/Λ=0.2(0.1).6written asL=c gαs2v [(α+vΛ].(10)Here,thefirst term is the usual one-loop top-quark contribution to the ggh coupling,whereas the second term arises from the trace anomaly and appears solely from the mixing.b3=7 is the SU(3)β-function and F g is a well-known kinematic function of the ratio of masses of the top-quark to the physical Higgs boson[9].Similarly the physical Higgs coupling to two photons is now given byL=cγαemv [−(α+vΛ].(12)Here,b2=19/6and b Y=−41/6are the SU(2)×U(1)β-functions and Fγis another well-known kinematic function[9]of the ratios of the W boson and top-quark masses to the physical Higgs mass,and second term again originates from the trace anomaly.Note that in the simultaneous limitsα→1,β→0we recover the usual SM results.From these expressions we can now compute the modifications to the various decay widths and branching fractions of the SM Higgs due to mixing with the radion.Fig.2shows the ratio of the various Higgs partial widths in comparison to their SM expectations as a function of the parameterξfor sample values of m r and vfinal state can be substantial;here,F g is numerically smaller than Fγand b3is quite large, thus yielding a large contribution from the trace anomaly term.(iii)For relatively light radions with a lower value ofΛ,the Higgs decay width into the ggfinal state can come close to vanishing.This is due to a strong destructive interference between the two contributions to the amplitude for values ofξnear−1.(iv)Increasing the value of m r has less of an effect than does a decrease in the ratio vthat of the SM.As we will see below,the former may greatly affect the Higgs production cross section at the LHC.However,theγγ,f¯f,and V V(where V=W,Z)branching fractions only receive small corrections to their SM values,of order<∼5−10%for almost all of the parameter region.Observation of these shifts will require the precise determination of the Higgs branching fractions which is obtainable at a future high energy e+e−Linear Collider[10].Once these measurements are performed,constraints on the radion parameter space may be extracted as will be discussed below.These small changes in the ZZh and hb¯b couplings of the Higgs boson can also lead to small reductions in the Higgs search reach from LEPII.This is presented in Fig.4for several sets of parameters;except for extreme cases this reduction in reach is rather modest.Figure4:Lower bound on the mass of the Higgs boson from direct searches at LEP as a function ofξincluding the effects of mixing.The red(blue;green)curves correspond to the choice m r=300GeV,v/Λ=0.2(500,0.2;300,0.1)and represent the curves from bottom to top.At the LHC,the dominant production mechanism and signal for a light Higgs boson9is gluon-gluon fusion through a triangle graph with subsequent decay intoγγ.Both the production cross section and theγγbranching fraction are modified by mixing with the radion,leading to the results illustrated in Fig.5.Thisfigure shows that the Higgs production rate in this channel at the LHC is always reduced in comparison to the expectations of the SM due to the effects of mixing.For some values of the parameters this reduction can be by more than an order of magnitude which could seriously hinder Higgs discovery via this channel at the LHC.Figure5:The ratio of production cross section times branching fraction for pp→h→γγvia gluon fusion with radion mixing to the SM expectations as a function ofξ.The Higgs mass is taken to be125GeV.The red(blue;green)curves correspond to the choice m r=300 GeV,v/Λ=0.2(500,0.2;300,0.1).The s-channel production of the Higgs boson at a high energy photon photon collider is an important channel for determining the properties of the Higgs.In Fig.6we see that decreases in the production rate of the Higgs compared to SM expectations can also occur in the reactionγγ→h→b¯b when mixing with the radion is included.Again,once such mixing is taken into account,the event rate is reduced,possibly hampering the statistical10ability of a future high energy photon collider in measuring the Higgs properties.However, note that the potential reductions in rate for this channel are not as drastic as those which may be realized at the LHC.Figure6:The ratio of production cross section times branching fraction forγγ→h→b¯b with radion mixing to the SM expectations as a function ofξ.The Higgs mass is taken to be125GeV.The red(blue;green)curves,corresponding to the bottom(middle,top)top curves,represent the parameter choices m r=300GeV,v/Λ=0.2(500,0.2;300,0.1).Once data from both the LHC and the Linear Collider(LC)is available,the radion parameter space can be explored using both direct searches and indirect measurements.In fact,the precision measurements of the Higgs boson couplings discussed above can be used to constrain the radion parameter space beyond what may be possible via direct searches for the radion.For purposes of demonstration,let us assume that the LHC and LC determine, within their capabilities,that the Higgs couplings are consistent with the predictions of the ing the expectations for Higgs production at the LHC and LC from the analyses contained in Ref.[10],we derive the resulting excluded regions in theξ−m r parameter11。

当教会弟弟的那一刻我长大了英语作文

当教会弟弟的那一刻我长大了英语作文

全文分为作者个人简介和正文两个部分:作者个人简介:Hello everyone, I am an author dedicated to creating and sharing high-quality document templates. In this era of information overload, accurate and efficient communication has become especially important. I firmly believe that good communication can build bridges between people, playing an indispensable role in academia, career, and daily life. Therefore, I decided to invest my knowledge and skills into creating valuable documents to help people find inspiration and direction when needed.正文:当教会弟弟的那一刻我长大了英语作文全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1The Moment I Grew Up When I Taught My Little BrotherAs the older sibling, I had always felt a sense of responsibility towards my little brother, Jason. From the day he was born, I made a silent vow to be the best big sister I could be – to guidehim, protect him, and be his role model. However, it wasn't until I took on the task of teaching him that I truly understood the weight of that commitment and the profound impact it would have on both of our lives.It all began one sunny afternoon when Jason came home from school, his brow furrowed and his backpack slung dejectedly over his shoulder. As he plopped down on the couch beside me, I could sense the frustration radiating off him like waves."What's wrong, buddy?" I asked, setting aside my book."I just don't get it," he mumbled, pulling out his math workbook. "No matter how hard I try, I can't seem to understand fractions."I peered over his shoulder at the page filled with daunting fractions and equations, and a surge of sympathy washed over me. I remembered how challenging that concept had been for me at his age, and how lost and discouraged I had felt. Without a second thought, I made a decision that would change the course of our relationship."Don't worry, Jason," I said, putting my arm around his shoulders. "I'll help you. We'll work through this together."From that day on, our living room became a makeshift classroom, and I assumed the role of teacher. With patience and determination, I broke down the concepts into bite-sized pieces, using analogies and real-life examples to make the abstract ideas more tangible. I made flashcards, created games, and even resorted to bribery with his favorite snacks when his attention started to wane.At first, the progress was slow, and there were moments when I felt like giving up. Jason would grow frustrated, and I would question my ability to effectively convey the information. But I refused to let either of us quit. I dug deeper, researching different teaching methods and adjusting my approach until I found what worked best for him.Gradually, I witnessed a transformation in Jason. The furrows on his brow began to smooth out, and his eyes would light up with comprehension. He started raising his hand in class and answering questions correctly. His confidence blossomed, and he even began helping his classmates who were struggling.But the true revelation didn't come until one evening when Jason bounded through the front door, his face flushed with excitement."Guess what?" he exclaimed, waving a graded test in my face. "I got an A!"In that moment, as I enveloped him in a bear hug and felt the swell of pride in my chest, I realized that this experience had been about so much more than just teaching fractions. It had been a journey of growth – for both of us.Through the process of imparting knowledge to my little brother, I had learned invaluable lessons about patience, perseverance, and the art of effective communication. I had developed a newfound appreciation for the dedication and skill of teachers, and a deeper understanding of the challenges they face daily.More importantly, I had gained a profound sense of responsibility and a desire to make a positive impact on those around me. I realized that being a role model extended far beyond setting a good example; it meant actively investing in the lives of others and playing a part in shaping their futures.As I watched Jason blossom under my tutelage, I saw glimpses of the remarkable young man he would become. And in those moments, I felt a sense of purpose and fulfillment that transcended any academic achievement.From that point on, our bond as siblings deepened in ways I could never have imagined. Jason looked up to me not just as his big sister, but as a mentor and confidant. He sought my advice on everything from school projects to navigating the complexities of friendships and growing up.In turn, I learned to cherish our relationship in a new light, recognizing the profound impact I could have on his life simply by being present, engaged, and willing to share my experiences and knowledge.As the years passed, our roles began to shift and evolve. There were times when Jason became the teacher, patiently guiding me through the intricacies of technology or explaining the nuances of the latest social media trends. Our relationship became a continuous exchange of wisdom and understanding, each of us contributing to the growth and development of the other.Looking back on that pivotal moment when I decided to teach my little brother, I realize that it was a turning point – a rite of passage that marked my transition from childhood to adulthood. It was the moment when I stopped being just a big sister and became a mentor, a guide, and a source of inspiration.Through that experience, I discovered the profound joy and fulfillment that comes from making a positive impact on someone else's life. I learned that true growth and maturity stem not from academic achievements or societal milestones, but from the choices we make to invest in others and contribute to their personal journeys.As I stand on the precipice of adulthood, ready to embark on my own path, I carry with me the lessons and values instilled during those precious moments of teaching my little brother. I understand that true success lies not in individual accomplishments, but in the lasting impact we have on the lives of those around us.And in those quiet moments when I reflect on the person I have become, I can't help but smile and feel a profound sense of gratitude for the opportunity to be a teacher, a mentor, and a role model – not just to my little brother, but to all those whose lives I will have the privilege of touching in the years to come.篇2The Moment I Grew Up When I Taught My Little BrotherI can vividly recall the day it happened - the moment I truly felt like I had grown up and taken on more responsibility. It was asunny Saturday morning, and my little brother Timmy and I were home alone while our parents were out running errands. At 7 years old, Timmy was full of youthful energy and curiosity about the world around him. I, being 5 years older at 12, was at that transformative age where childhood silliness was giving way to the realities of becoming a teenager.Timmy had been pestering me for what felt like hours to play his favorite game - pirates. He loved dressing up with an eye patch, brandishing a plastic sword, and demanding I walk the plank off the edge of his bed while he tried to "make me talk" like a captive. I had indulged him a few times that morning, but was quickly growing bored of his persistent pleading."Jacob, please be the captain again! I'll let you have all the treasure this time," Timmy begged, giving me his signature puppy dog eyes. I shook my head and let out an exasperated sigh."Not right now, Timmy. I'm too old for那mon pirate games,"I stated definitively, hoping he'd take the hint.His bright smile instantly turned to a frown, and I could see the disappointment wash over his cherub-like face. In that moment, I was struck by a realization - up until now, I had been viewing the games and adventures we shared through thesimplistic lens of a child, where meaningless fun was the only objective. But Timmy wasn't just play-acting; in his mind, these imaginary excursions were vivid, living experiences that brought him immense joy.By shutting down his attempts to kickstart another magical world for us, I was metaphorically slamming a door on his childhood innocence that I had once shared and still clung to in many ways. The weight of being the "big brother" and role model settled onto my shoulders more forcefully than ever before. I recognized that nurturing Timmy's youthful spirit and keeping that light of pure, unbridled imagination aglow within him was suddenly my charge to uphold.Feeling a newfound sense of purpose, I knelt down to meet Timmy at eye level. "Wait, actually on second thought, we can play pirates again for a little while if you want," I backtracked. "But this time, I'll let you be the captain, and I'll show you how we can make the game even more fun!"Timmy's frown turned upside down in an instant as he threw his little arms around me. "Really?? You're the best brother ever!"I chuckled and tousled his mop of blond hair. "Alright Captain, what's our mission for today? Looking for buried treasure again?"He scrunched up his face in thought for a few moments before his eyes lit up. "No, let's pretend we're explorers searching for a mythical island that no one has ever found before! Like the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle!""Love that idea," I responded enthusiastically. "Why don't you grab some paper and crayons, and you can draw us a map to follow? Make it look really old and mysterious."Timmy eagerly compiled maps upon maps, some signaling the locations of sea monsters and some pointing towards the fabled island, which he dubbed "Tinseltown" based on its rumored streets paved with gold and jewels. Each time he finished an addition, he would excitedly run over to show me, explaining in remarkable detail the significance of every X and squiggly line.As he worked, I rearranged the living room to resemble the interior of a rickety boat's lower deck, sectioning off areas with blankets and pillows to create nooks and pathways. By the time his maps were complete, our make-believe vessel was ready to set sail on the high seas in search of Tinseltown."All aboard, Captain Timmy!" I announced in my best pirate's growl once he had finished his final map. "Where shall we set a course to first based on your charts?"Thus began one of the most epic imaginary voyages I have ever experienced. For the next few hours, Timmy and I paddled our way through raging storms, fended off giant sea creatures, and got hopelessly lost more times than I could count, abandoning our maps in favor of his newly spun tales of which way we should turn next.I was utterly amazed at the boundless creativity flowing from my little brother and found myself becoming more entranced and invested in our adventure with every twist and turn. Any lingering doubts I had about being "too old" for these sorts of childish games had completely melted away. I realized that true wonder and fascination with the world has no age limit; it comes from within, fueled by your willingness to tap into those reservoirs of pure, unlimited potential for imagination.When our journey inevitably led us to the fabled shores of Tinseltown at last, the look of absolute awe and delight on Timmy's face was worth more than all the metaphorical riches our made-up island could offer. As he ran around the kitchen collecting bits of foil and balled-up paper to serve as his "treasures," I couldn't help but feel an immense sense of pride and affirmation about how I had made this experience so special for him.In that moment, it dawned on me that I had crossed an invisible threshold into a more mature mindset. Instead of shutting out Timmy's attempts to live in his imaginary world, I had embraced the chance to be a co-creator and bring his fantasies to vivid life. By enriching his childhood rather than dismissing it, I had taken my first confident strides towards growing up and becoming the loving role model a younger sibling deserves.As we cleaned up the disarray of maps, blanket boats, and pirated treasures, Timmy looked up at me with complete adoration. "That was the most fun I've ever had, Jacob. You're the best explorer and big brother ever!"I smiled warmly and pulled him in for a hug. "Thanks, Captain. And thank you for letting me be part of your incredible adventure today. You've got an amazing imagination, and I feel so lucky I got to see it in action."In the days and years that followed, I strived to carry forward that same selfless consideration for Timmy's creative impulses and formative childhood experiences. Whether it was inspiring thrilling new storylines for his toys, putting on wildly choreographed musical performances, or exploring the woods near our house like we were the first settlers in a new land, Irecognized my role was to foster and safeguard that beautiful innocence for as long as I possibly could.Looking back now, I'm so grateful for that pivotal day when I made the conscious decision to grow up just a little bit. It wasn't marked by any major life event or ceremonious transition - just a simple realization about what truly matters in life. By shifting my perspective to see the world through my little brother's wonderstruck eyes, I gained more wisdom about love, empathy, and appreciating life's simplest joys than any textbook or lecture could impart.Those imaginary adventures with Timmy were the first steps I took towards becoming passionate about bringing happiness and inspiration to others, which eventually led me to my current calling as a teacher. Each day, I strive to awaken that same unbridled curiosity about our world in my students, encouraging them to explore the boundaries of their imagination like I once did under Timmy's enthusiastic "captaincy."While I may be all grown up now, I'll never lose that profound sense of childlike awe I re-discovered when I agreed to join in my little brother's latest and greatest adventure that fateful day. It's what motivates me to constantly seek out opportunities to view life through a lens of limitless wonder andpossibility. For it was in selflessly agreeing to bring Timmy's fantasies to life that day that I truly began living out my own greatest realized dreams and aspirations for the first time.篇3The Moment I Grew Up: Teaching My Little BrotherAs the oldest of three siblings, I had always felt a sense of responsibility towards my younger brother and sister. However, it wasn't until the summer before my junior year of high school that I truly understood what it meant to be the "big sibling." That was the summer my parents entrusted me with the daunting task of tutoring my little brother, who was struggling with reading and writing. Little did I know, this experience would be a pivotal moment in my journey towards adulthood.My brother, Tommy, was a rambunctious nine-year-old who found it challenging to sit still for more than five minutes. The idea of him focusing on academics during the carefree summer months seemed like an impossible feat. However, my parents were adamant that he needed extra help to catch up before the start of the new school year. And so, the role of teacher fell upon my unsuspecting shoulders.The first few sessions were nothing short of disastrous. Tommy would fidget, whine, and do everything in his power to avoid the worksheets I had meticulously prepared. I found myself growing increasingly frustrated, resorting to tactics I had once sworn never to use – bribery with treats and threats of punishment. It was a losing battle, and I could feel the weight of failure weighing heavily upon me.It was then that I realized I needed to approach this challenge differently. I stepped back and tried to remember what it was like to be a young child, struggling to grasp concepts that seemed so simple to my older self. I recalled the teachers who had made learning enjoyable for me – those who had turned lessons into games and made me forget that I was even learning.With this newfound perspective, I decided to scrap the worksheets and dry textbook exercises. Instead, I turned our lessons into interactive adventures, using storytelling,role-playing, and hands-on activities to make the material more engaging. We would act out scenes from storybooks, using different voices and props to bring the characters to life. Or, we would go on scavenger hunts around the house, searching for objects that started with certain letters or fit into specific categories.Slowly but surely, I began to see a transformation in Tommy. The whining and fidgeting subsided, replaced by a newfound enthusiasm for learning. He would eagerly await our daily sessions, bubbling with excitement over what adventures awaited us. And as his interest grew, so did his grasp of the material.But more than just academic progress, I witnessed a deeper change within myself. I found myself exhibiting qualities I had previously only admired from afar – patience, creativity, and an unwavering determination to help my little brother succeed. I was no longer just his sibling; I had become his mentor, his guide, and his cheerleader.With each passing week, I gained a newfound appreciation for the art of teaching. I learned to adapt to Tommy's unique learning style, tailoring my approach to his strengths and weaknesses. I celebrated his triumphs, no matter how small, and encouraged him to persevere through his struggles.And in those moments of triumph, when Tommy's face would light up with the joy of understanding, I felt a profound sense of accomplishment that went beyond mere academic success. I was shaping a young mind, instilling in him a love for learning that would serve him for years to come.As the summer drew to a close, and our lessons came to an end, I found myself filled with a bittersweet mixture of pride and sadness. I was proud of the progress Tommy had made, but I would miss our daily adventures into the realms of knowledge.It was then that I realized the true significance of our journey together. It wasn't just about helping my little brother catch up academically; it was about something far greater. It was about stepping into the role of a responsible, caring, and nurturing adult – a role that I had been unconsciously preparing for my entire life.In those summer months, I had grown up in ways I never could have imagined. I had developed a deeper sense of empathy, understanding the importance of meeting others where they are and tailoring my approach to their needs. I had honed my communication skills, learning to explain complex concepts in simple, engaging ways.But perhaps most importantly, I had discovered the incredible feeling of making a positive impact on someone else's life. Witnessing Tommy's newfound confidence and love for learning filled me with a sense of purpose that extended far beyond the confines of our makeshift classroom.As I stepped onto the campus for my junior year, I carried with me a newfound maturity and a deeper appreciation for the value of education. I understood that learning was not just about memorizing facts and figures; it was about igniting a spark of curiosity and wonder that would fuel a lifelong journey of discovery.And while the journey ahead was sure to be filled with its own challenges and obstacles, I felt better equipped to face them head-on. For in those summer months of teaching my little brother, I had learned invaluable lessons about perseverance, creativity, and the power of positive reinforcement – lessons that would serve me well in the years to come.As I reflect on that pivotal summer, I am filled with gratitude for the opportunity to have walked in the shoes of a teacher, if only for a brief period. It was a transformative experience that taught me far more than I could have ever imparted to my little brother. It was the moment I truly grew up, embracing the responsibilities and joys of adulthood while still cherishing the wonder and imagination of childhood.And as I look towards the future, I carry with me the knowledge that teaching is not just a profession, but a calling – a chance to shape young minds and leave a lasting impact on theworld. Perhaps one day, I too will have the privilege of standing at the front of a classroom, guiding the next generation on their own journeys of discovery.But for now, I am content to have had this small taste of what it means to be an educator, a mentor, and a role model. For in those fleeting summer months, I learned a lesson that will stay with me forever – that true growth comes not from the acquisition of knowledge, but from the ability to share it with others, one mind and one heart at a time.。

用英语写企业计划

用英语写企业计划

用英语写企业计划Ah, the corporate plan. The bane of every office worker's existence, the white whale of business, and the thing that keeps the printer industry afloat. Let's dive into this,shall we?The Great Corporate OdysseyIn the heart of the bustling metropolis, where the coffee runs as thick as the blood of a thousand espresso machines, our story begins. It's a tale as old as time: a group of people in suits, armed with PowerPoint, set out to conquer the world—or at least the next fiscal quarter.Our intrepid heroes, the Board of Directors, gather'round the conference table, a sacred circle of decision-making. The air is thick with the scent of ambition and ahint of burnt bagels from the break room. They are about to embark on the Great Corporate Odyssey: crafting the annual plan.Enter stage left, the CEO, a man of few words but many PowerPoint slides. He begins with a flourish, "Ladies and gentlemen, let's make this year's plan the best one yet!" The room fills with a mixture of enthusiasm and the dread of impending deadlines.The CFO, a numbers wizard, pulls out her trusty abacus(it's 2024, but who's counting?). She starts crunching numbers, her fingers dancing like a maestro conducting an orchestra of digits. "We're looking at a 15% increase in revenue," she announces, and the room cheers, or at least nods in approval.Next up, the CMO, the storyteller of the group, takes the stage. With a twinkle in his eye, he weaves a tale of marketing campaigns that will have the competition eating out of our hands—metaphorically speaking, of course. "Think ofit as a symphony of social media," he says, and the room is momentarily transported to a world where likes and shares are the currency of success.The HR rep chimes in, "And we'll need to hire more people to keep up with this growth." The room collectively shudders at the thought of more interviews and onboarding sessions but nods in agreement.As the day wears on, the plan takes shape. It's a beast of a document, a Frankenstein's monster of strategic goals and financial forecasts. But it's a monster they've created, and they're proud.Finally, after hours of debate, negotiation, and the occasional power nap, the plan is set. It's not perfect, but it's a plan. And in the world of business, a plan is a beacon of hope, a roadmap to success.As the sun sets on another day in the corporate jungle, our heroes leave the conference room, exhausted butvictorious. They've laid the groundwork for the future, and now it's time to execute.And so, the Great Corporate Odyssey continues, one plan at a time. Here's to the next year, may it be as fruitful as the last, and may the printer ink never run dry.And there you have it, folks. A corporate plan, written with the flair of a bard and the precision of a surgeon. May it serve as both a guide and a source of amusement in these trying times. Cheers!。

故宫博物院英文导游介绍

故宫博物院英文导游介绍

故宫博物院.The.Palace.MuseumWhat strikes one first in a bird's -eye view of Beijing proper is a vast tract of golden roofs flashing brilliantly in the sun with purple walls occasionally emerging amid them and a stretch of luxuriant tree leaves flanking on each side. That is the former Imperial Palace, popularly known as the Forbidden City, from which twenty-four emperors of the Ming and Qing Dynasties ruled China for some 500years--from1420 to 1911. The Ming Emperor Yong Le, who usurped the throne from his nephew and made Beijing the capital, ordered its construction, on which approximately 10,000 artists and a million workmen toiled for 14 years from 1406 to 1420. At present, the Palace is an elaborate museum that presents the largest and most complete ensemble of traditional architecture complex and more than 900,000 pieces of court treasures in all dynasties in China.Located in the center of Beijing, the entire palace area, rectangular in shape and 72 hectares in size, is surrounded by walls ten meters high and a moat 52 meters wide. At each corner of the wall stands a watchtower with a double-eave roof covered with yellow glazed tiles.The main buildings, the six great halls, one following the other, are set facing south along the central north-south axis from the Meridian Gate, the south entrance, to Shenwumen, the great gate pi ercing in the north wall. On either side of the palace are many comparatively small buildings. Symmetrically in the northeastern section lie the six Eastern Palaces and in the northwestern section the six Western Palaces. The Palace area is divided into two parts: the Outer Court and the Inner Palace. The former consists of the first three main halls, where the emperor received his courtiers and conducted grand ceremonies, while the latter was the living quarters for the imperial residence. At the rear of the Inner Palace is the Imperial Garden where the emperor and his family sought recreation.The main entrance to the Palace is the Meridian Gate(1), which was so named because the emperor considered himself the "Son of the Heaven" and the Palace the center of the universe, hence thenorth-south axis as the Meridian line going right through the Palace. The gate is crowned with five towers, commonly known as the Five-Phoenix Towers(2), which were installed with drums and bells. When the emperor went to the Temple of Heaven, bells were struck to mark this important occasion. When he went to the Ancestral Temple, it was the drums that were beaten to publicize the event.Beyond the Meridian Gate unfolds a vast courtyard across which the Inner Golden Water River runs from east to west. The river is spanned by five bridges, which were supposed to be symbols of the five virtues preached by Confucius--benevolence, righteousness, rites, intelligence, and fidelity(3).At the north end of the courtyard is a three-tiered white marble terrace, seven meters above the ground, on which, one after another, stand three majestic halls; the Hall of Supreme Harmony(4), the Hall of Complete Harmony(5), and the Hall of Preserving Harmony(6).The Hall of Supreme Harmony, rectangular in shape, 27 meters in height, 2,300 square meters in area, is the grandest and most important hall in the Palace complex. It is also China's largest existing palace of wood structure and an outstanding example of brilliant color combinations. This hall used to be the throne hall for ceremonies which marked great occasions: the Winter Solstice, the Spring Festival, the emperor's birthday and enthronement, and the dispatch of generals to battles, etc. On such occasions there would be an imperial guard of honor standing in front of the Hall that extended all the way to the Meridian gate.On the north face of the hall in the center of four coiled-golden dragon columns is the "Golden Throne", which was carved out of sandalwood. The throne rests on a two-meter-high platform with a screen behind it. In front of it, to the left and right, stand ornamental cranes, incense burners and other ornaments. The dragon columns entwined with golden dragons measure one meter in di ameter. The throne itself, the platform and the screen are all carved with dragon designs. High above the throne is a color-painted coffered ceiling which changes in shape from square to octagonal to circular as it ascends layer upon layer. The utmost central vault is carved with the gilded design of a dragon toying with pearls.when the Emperor mounted the throne, gold bells and jade chimes sounded from the gallery, and clouds of incense rose from the bronze cranes and tortoises and tripods outside the hall on the terrace. The aura of majesty created by the imposing architecture and solemn ritual were designed to keep the subjects of the "Son of the Heaven" in awe and reverence.The Hall of Complete Harmony is smaller and square with windows on all sides. Here the emperor rehearsed for ceremonies. It is followed by the Hall of Preserving Harmony in which banquets and imperial examinations were held.Behind the Hall of Preserving Harmony lies a huge marble ramp with intertwining clouds and dragons carved in relief. The slab, about 6.5 meters long, 3 meters wide and 250 tons in weight, is placed between two flights of marble steps along which the emperor's sedan was carried up or down the terrace. It is the largest piece of stone carving in the Imperial Palace. Quarried in the mountains scores of kilometers southwest of Beijing, this gigantic stone was moved to the city by sliding it over a specially paved ice road in winter. To provide enough water to build the ice road, wells were sunk at very 500 meters along the way.The three halls of the Inner Palace are replicas of the three halls in the front, but smaller in size. They are the Palace of Heavenly Purity(7), the Hall of Union(8), and the Palace of Earthly Tranquility(9).The Palace of Heavenly Purity was once the residence of the Ming emperors and the first two of the Qing emperors. Then the Qing Emperor Yong Zheng moved his residence to the Palace of Mental Cultivation and turned it into an audience hall to receive foreign envoys and handled the state affairs. The prom otion and demotion of officials were also decided in this hall. After the emperor's death his coffin was placed here for a 49-day period of mourning.The Palace of Union was the empress's throne room and the Hall of Earthly Tranquility, once a private living room for the empress, was partitioned. The west chamber served religious purposes and the east one was the bridal chamber where the newly married emperor and empress spent their first two nigh ts after their wedding.The Imperial Garden was laid out during the early Ming dynasty. Hundreds of pines and cypresses offer shade while various flowers give colors to the garden all year round and fill the air with their fragrance. In he center of the garden is the Hall of Imperial Peace, a Daoist temple, with a flat roof slightly sloping down to the four eaves. This type of roof was rare in ancient Chinese architecture. In he northeastern corner of the garden is a rock hill, known as the Hill of the Piled-up Wonders, which is topped with a pavilion. At the foot of the hill are two fountains which jet two columns of water high into the air. It is said that on the ninth night of the ninth month of the lunar calendar, the empress would mound the hill to enjoy the autumn scene. It is also believed that climbing to a high place on that day would keep people safe from contagious diseases.The six Western Palaces were residences for empresses and concubines. They are kept in their original way for show. The six Eastern Palaces were the residences for them too. But now they serve as special museums: the Museum of Bronze, the Museum of Porcelain and the Museum of Arts and Crafts of the Ming and Qing dynasties. In the northeastern-most section of the Inner Palace are the Museum of Traditional Chinese Paintings and the Museum of Jewelry and Treasures where rare pieces of imperial collections are on display.Now the Forbidden City is no longer forbidding, but inviting. A visit to the Palace Museum will enrich the visitors' knowledge of history, economy, politics, arts as well as architecture in ancient China.Notes:1. the Meridian Gate 午门2. the Five-Phoenix Towers 五凤楼3. benevolence, righteousness, rites, intelligence, and fidelity 仁、义、礼、智、信4. the Hall of Supreme Harmony 太和殿5. the Hall of Complete Harmony 中和殿6. the Hall of Preserving Harmony 保和殿7. the Palace of Heavenly Purity 乾清宫8. the Hall of Union 交泰殿9. the Palace of Earthly Tranquility 坤宁宫前门Qianmen is located in the axes wire of Beijing and being the nearest part to the Forbidden City, Qianmen Street occupies special position of Beijing and the heart of Beijing people. Qianmen i s not a simple name of a district but a symbol of Beijing. It is regarded that only entering to the Qianmen street can be recognized that you really come to Beijing. In other words, your Beijing trip will be spoiled without coming to Qianmen Street, from which you can tell how important the Qianmen Street in people’s heart.Qianmen Street starts from the Moon Bay in north and stretches to Zhushikou in South, with a total length of 840 meters. According to historical materials, since the Ming Dynasty, it is a road leading 24 emperors to pray in the Temple of Heaven, therefore it is also known as” Heaven Street”. In its almost 600 years history, the Qianmen Street has destroyed and restored for several times, but its prosperous commercial street position has never changed.Qianmen Street has concentrated the culture, style and features of Beijing, at the same time also witnessed the profound changes of Beijing in different periods. So, Qianmen Street attracts numerous of tourists every year and plays an important role in international communication. Qianmen Street is well preserved of historical sites, cultural relics and style and features of Beijing. Experts believed it is the cultural centre of Beijing architecture, business, folk-custom and opera. It is a vivid folk custom museum of ancient and today’s Beijing.The reconstruction of Qianmen began in May 2007 and completed in August 2008. It is reported that the reconstruction scheme was discussed and amended by 16 experts32 times in four years. It is said that the original scheme planed to restore the street to be the ancient style of Ming and Qing Dynasty. However, the street has been destroyed by the eight-power allied forces as early as 1900, Actually, Qianmen Street formed in late Qing Dynasty and the early years of the Republic of China was more familiar to Beijing men, and it reached its heyday during in the 1920s and 1930s. Therefore, finally decided to restore Qinamen Street is in accordance with old photos of Qianmen of that time.The new Qianmen Street has been the second largest pedestrian Avenue in Beijing only following the prosperous Wangfujing Street. Beijing famous time-honored brands, such as Quanjude, Ruifuxiang, Yueshengzhai and Guanghe Grand theater ect. In addition, many world-famous brands are appeared there, such as, starbuck, Apple, Nike, ect大剧院BEIJING’S new futuristic National Center for the Performing Arts, f ormerly known as the National Grand Theater, will begin the formal performance season Dec. 22.Among international performers who will be appearing will be conductors Valery Gergiev and Seiji Ozaw a, and sopranos Kathleen Battle and Kiri Te Kanawa. Apart from the Mariinsky Theater of Russia, other famous foreign orchestras, such as the New York Philharmonic, will also give performances.These shows were expected to attract audiences totaling 300,000 and more than 20,000 tickets had already been sold for the opening season.Despite the huge development costs and high profile, the National Center for the Performing Arts was not just for the wealthy, he said.The center will sell tickets for as little as 30 yuan (US$4) and the average ticket price will be lower than that for a regular show in Beijing.However, the cost of tickets for the inaugural show is far higher, ranging from 180 yuan to 1,080 yuan.The building has been controversial, with some describing the arts complex designed by French architect Paul Andreu as out of keeping with its near neighbor, the Forbidden City. Others hail it as a futuristic, signature building. The certer, which is to the west of Tian’anmen Square, boasts three large halls — a2,416-seat opera house, a 2,017-seat concert hall and a 1,040-seat theater. Construction of the National Grand Theater began in December 2001 and was completed in late September this year. Total investment was 2.69 billion yuan.天安门Tian’an men( the Gate of Heavenly P eace), is located in the center of Beijing. It was first built in 1417 and named Chengtianmen( the Gate of Heavenly Succession). At the end of the Ming Dynasty, it was seriously damaged by war. When it was rebuilt under the Qing in 1651, it was renamed Tia n’anmen, and served as the main entrance to the Imperial City, the administrative and residential quarters for court officials and retainers. The southern sections of the Imperial City wall still stand on both sides of the Gate. The tower at the top of the gate is nine-room wide and five –room deep. According to the Book of Changes, the two numbers nine and five, when combined, symbolize the supreme status of a sovereign.During the Ming and Qing dynasties, Tian’anmen was the place where state ceremonies too k place.On October 1, 1949, chairman Mao Zedong proclaimed on Tian’anmen Rostrum the founding of the People’s Republic of China. Since then Tian’anmen has been the symbol of New Chine\a. Chairman Mao’s portrait is hung above the central entrance, flanked by two slogans:” Long Live the Great Unity of the Peoples of the World”. Today , the splendour of Tian’anmen attracts million of visitors from all over the world. The Rostrum on its top was opened in 1988 to the public for the first time in its history. It offers a panoramic view of the Square and the city proper.Tian’anmen Square has an area of 44 hectares( 109 acres) that can acc ommodate as many as one million people for public gatherings. It has witnessed may historical events in China’s modern history and is a place for celebrations on such festive days as international Labour Day on May 1st and national Day on October 1st.Around the Square are several famous buildings:1. The Great Hall of the People2. The Museum of Chinese History and the Museum of the Chinese Revolution3. The Monument to the People’s Heroes4. Chairman Mao’s Ma usoleumTian'anmen Square has now completed its renovation after eight months’ hard work to welcome the 50th anniversary of the People’s Republic in 1999.王府井Wangfujing commercial street of our positioning in its international first-class commercial street. The world's leading commercial streets have common characteristics, one of the features is that it has a long history, the history of Wangfujing Street can be traced back to the 13th century, the early Yuan Dynasty in 1267, on the streets has become so far Have been 700 years. In this 700-plus years, Wangfujing great changes have taken place.From its name, is the beginning Three-way Street, later called 10 Palace Street, Palace Street, to 1905, as Wangfujing Street has a sweet dig wells, so called from the 1905 start of Wangfujing Street. Wangfujing genuine commercial activities from the beginning of the 15th century, truly a relatively prosperous business Street is 1903. In an abandoned training camp of the Qing Dynasty God built the famous market in the East after the market from the early 20th century, forming a famous commercial street, formed a relatively busy commercial street and has 100 years of history.In Beijing, such a large scale, so long history, such a high visibility, Wangfujing should be said to be unique. It's a long history and relatively high popularity, and its relatively large size. After the founding of the PRC, quickly formed the city's one of several major commercial area, where claims are settled in New China's first department store in Beijing Wangfujing Department Store, and then some well-known old and famous and well-known enterprises, commercial enterprises migration To the Wangfujing Street. So far, the Wangfujing area has 16 well-known old and famous, there are some services like the Department of Arts, Lee Sheng sporting goods store for the franchise business, a franchise of commercial enterprises. To 1993 before large-scale transformation, Wangfujing at home and abroad has been a very famous. Wangfujing opened a new page should be from 1993 onwards, the municipal government decided to set up the development of Wangfujing Street office building, and then on Wangfujing Stree t in thetransformation of a large-scale planning and management. From 1993 we started to re-do the Wangfujing area planning, planning construction projects in a total of 51, so far we have built a 17, 17, a total construction area of over 1.5 million square meters. Therefore, from 1993, the Wangfujing Street after a large-scale transformation of its hardware facilities are close to world-class level.。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

a good enough description of the radiative contribution to the lightest Higgs boson mass in a general supersymmetric standard model. Our definition of lightest Higgs boson is the CP = +1 bosonic state whose mass is not controlled by Λs in the sense that it has a finite limit when Λs → ∞. In that limit supersymmetry decouples and the latter state becomes the SM Higgs boson. We will include radiative corrections for Λs = 1 T eV using the RG approach [8]. The radiative squared mass ∆m2 r is β -dependent and has to be added to the tree-level mass. The tree-level bound (1) does not hold in NMSSMs. The case of the MSSM plus a singlet with coupling λ to H1 · H2 was first studied in [9, 10] where a tree-level bound was founrtly supported by CICYT under contract AEN90-0139. Supported by a grant of Comunidad de Madrid, Spain. e-mail:quiros@roca.csic.es.
The most outstanding challenge for present (Tevatron, LEP) and future (LEP200, NLC, LHC, SSC) colliders is the discovery of the Higgs boson [1], which might confirm the standard model as the final theory of the electroweak interactions. However, though the standard model (SM) is in excellent agreement with all precision measurements at present energies [1, 2], extensions thereof are not excluded at higher scales. The most appealing of these extensions, which provides a technical solution to the hierarchy puzzle, is the supersymmetric standard model [3]. Supersymmetric models have well constrained Higgs sectors [4] which can provide crucial tests of them. In particular, the most constraining feature of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) is the existence of an absolute upper bound on the tree-level mass of the CP = +1 lightest Higgs boson mh ≤ mZ | cos 2β |, (1)
2 m2 h ≤ cos 2β +
2λ2 cos2 θW sin2 2β m2 Z, g2
(3)
which is Λs -independent. From (3) we see that the bound on mh is linked to the bound on λ if we require the theory to remain perturbative between Λs and Λ. For Λ = ΛGU T , the unification scale of gauge coupling constants, the bound (3) was studied in [11, 12] and [13], where radiative corrections were properly included. The case of one extra singlet has been recently reconsidered in [14], where the dependence of mh on Λ was studied; [15], where radiative corrections where considered in the effective potential approach; and [16], where comparison with the corresponding non-supersymmetric scenario was established. All of these results agree, when they overlap, with our previous calculation [13] within less than 5%. More general models, e.g. the MSSM plus any number of singlets or three SU (2) triplets (whose vacuum expectation values (VEVs) can respect the custodial symmetry at tree-level), were presented by ourselves in [11, 13] and, more recently, also considered in [17]. In this paper we will present upper bounds on the lightest Higgs boson mass in a general class of models: supersymmetric standard models with an arbitrary Higgs sector. We will assume:
J. R. Espinosa† and M. Quir´ os‡ Instituto de Estructura de la Materia Serrano 123, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Abstract In a general supersymmetric standard model there is an upper bound mh on the tree level mass of the CP = +1 lightest Higgs boson which depends on the electroweak scale, tan β and the gauge and Yukawa couplings of the theory. When radiative corrections are included, the allowed region in the (mh , mt ) plane depends on the scale Λ, below which the theory remains perturbative, and the supersymmetry breaking scale Λs , that we fix to 1 T eV . In the minimal model with Λ = 1016 GeV : mh < 130 GeV and mt < 185 GeV . In nonminimal models with an arbitrary number of gauge singlets and Λ = 1016 GeV : mh < 145 GeV and mt < 185 GeV . We also consider supersymmetric standard models with arbitrary Higgs sectors. For models whose couplings saturate the scale Λ = 1016 GeV we find mh < 155 GeV and mt < 190 GeV . As one pushes the saturation scale Λ down to Λs , the bounds on mh and mt increase. For instance, in models with Λ = 10 T eV , the upper bounds for mh and mt go to 415 GeV and 385 GeV , respectively.
where tan β ≡ v2 /v1 , vi ≡ Hio . Therefore a negative result on the Higgs search would seem to exclude phenomenological supersymmetry at all making its search at future accelerators unnecessary. However relation (1) is spoiled by two effects: i) Radiative corrections, and ii) The enlargement of the Higgs sector in non-minimal supersymmetric standard models (NMSSMs). Only the simultaneous consideration of both effects can provide reliable bounds in general supersymmetric models. Radiative corrections have been computed in the MSSM by different groups using different methods: standard diagrammatic techniques [5], the one-loop effective potential [6] and the renormalization group (RG) approach including one [7] and two [8] loop corrections. All approaches provide remarkably coincident results. The latter is reliable provided that
相关文档
最新文档