SCI返修邮件模板
sci申请修改邮件模板
SCI申请修改邮件模板1. 发件人信息•发件人姓名：[Your Name]•发件人邮箱：[Your Email Address]•发件人联系方式：[Your Phone Number]•发件日期：[Date]2. 收件人信息•收件人姓名：[Recipient Name]•收件人邮箱：[Recipient Email Address]3. 尊敬的编辑（或教授）（或SCI期刊名）团队：我是[Your Name]，来信是希望对我所发表的[文章标题]进行修改并重新提交的请求。
在此信中，我将详细说明我希望对文章进行哪些修改，并附上修订后的文章摘要。
4. 文章修改请求我理解SCI期刊对论文质量的高要求以及您作为编辑（或教授）为确保文章质量所进行的工作。
我非常感谢您的耐心指导和建议，并将其用于本次修订。
根据您的意见和建议，我对文章进行了以下几个方面的修改： - 修改1：[详细描述修改1的内容] - 修改2：[详细描述修改2的内容] - 修改3：[详细描述修改3的内容]我相信这些修改将进一步提高文章的质量，并使其更适合发表在SCI期刊上。
希望您能审阅并接受本次修改后的稿件。
5. 修订后的文章摘要下面是本次修改后的文章摘要，希望您能对其进行审阅：[在此处插入修订后的文章摘要]6. 再次感谢再次感谢您对我的文章所给予的指导和建议。
我对您对于SCI学术期刊的热情与专业水平及其态度深为敬佩。
我真诚期待着您对修订后的文章的审阅意见，并衷心希望这次修订能够满足《SCI期刊名》在学术上的高要求。
我期待着与您的进一步合作和指导，并祝愿您在科学研究的路上取得更多成果。
7. 联系方式如果您对修订后的文章有任何疑问或需要进一步的信息，请随时与我联系。
我将及时回复并积极解决任何问题。
感谢您的时间和宝贵意见。
顺祝商祺！[Your Name] [Your Email Address] [Your Phone Number]。
sci给编辑的回信模板
sci给编辑的回信模板示例1:亲爱的编辑，我希望这封信能够表达我对于投稿的期望以及对于SCI杂志的重视。
我非常感谢您的评审和研究人员为我的研究工作所做出的努力和宝贵意见。
在前一次评审的基础上，我已经根据您的建议对论文进行了进一步的修改和完善。
首先，我重点解决了您对于论文结构和逻辑连贯性的担忧。
我重新组织了研究材料，并对论文进行了全面的重写。
我相信这些改进能够使读者更加清楚地理解我的研究目的、方法和结果。
此外，在您的建议下，我还对实验数据进行了更详细的分析和解释。
我将这些结果与相关文献加以对比和讨论，以支持我的观点和结论。
我相信这些变动将有助于提升论文的质量和学术价值。
对于那些在论文中存在的缺陷和不足，我也做出了一些必要的修正。
我重新审视了排版、语法和拼写错误，并确保使用了正确的引文格式。
此外，我还与合著作者进行了讨论，对于一些技术细节进行了澄清，以避免引起读者的困惑。
在这封回信中，我希望能够得到您的最终决定以及下一步的指导。
我深知SCI杂志对于优质研究的要求极高，因此我竭尽全力对论文进行了改进。
我真诚地希望我的努力能够得到认可，并有机会在您的杂志上发表。
再次感谢您对论文的评审和宝贵意见。
我期待着您的回复，并愿意进行进一步的修改和调整，以便使论文更适合您的杂志。
谢谢您的时间和耐心。
最诚挚的问候，[您的姓名]示例2:尊敬的编辑，感谢贵刊对我所提交的稿件的关注并提供意见和建议。
我非常感激能获得专业编辑的批评和指导，这对于我来说是一个宝贵的机会来提高我的写作技巧和学术水平。
根据您的指导，我已经对我的文章进行了修改和改进。
我努力克服了您所指出的问题，并在文章中作出了必要的调整。
我衷心希望这些修改能够使我的文章更具有学术价值，以及更符合贵刊的发表标准。
以下是我对您提出的主要问题的回答和我的修改说明：1. 问题一：缺乏清晰的问题陈述和研究目的。
修改措施：在文章的开头重新阐述了研究问题，并明确了研究目的。
这样可以帮助读者更好地了解文章的主要焦点。
SCI论文回信模板
四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and co nclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which include s a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized inTable 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produceda more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
sci修回答复模板
sci修回答复模板
尊敬的编辑/审稿人：
感谢您对我们的论文提出宝贵的修改意见。
我们已经仔细地考虑了您的建议，并对论文进行了相应的修改。
以下是我们对修改内容的详细说明：
1. 针对[具体审稿人建议 1]，我们进行了以下修改：
- [具体修改内容 1]
- [具体修改内容 2]
2. 对于[具体审稿人建议 2]，我们做出了如下修改：
- [具体修改内容 1]
- [具体修改内容 2]
3. 关于[具体审稿人建议 3]，我们的修改如下：
- [具体修改内容 1]
- [具体修改内容 2]
此外，我们还对论文的整体结构和语言进行了优化，以提高论文的可读性和流畅性。
再次感谢您对我们论文的关注和指导。
如果您对修改后的论文还有任何疑问或建议，请随时与我们联系。
此致
敬礼！
作者：XXX
日期：XXX。
sci返修的cover letter模板
（文章开头）亲爱的读者，今天我将为你介绍一篇专门为科学论文返修而设计的cover letter模板。
这是一篇旨在帮助科研人员更好地应对论文返修问题的文章，通过详细解析返修cover letter的写作要点，希望能够帮助到大家。
（文章主体）1. 让我们来了解什么是返修的cover letter。
返修是指在发表科学论文时，编辑或审稿人建议对稿件进行修改时，作者需要根据建议进行修订，并提交一份cover letter说明修订的具体内容和原因。
返修的cover letter在整个修改过程中起到了至关重要的作用，它不仅可以解释作者对审稿意见的回应，也可以陈述作者在修订过程中的改动和理由。
2. 针对返修的cover letter，需要注意的写作要点有哪些呢？要清晰地列出审稿人提出的意见和建议，这些要点在cover letter中需要得到充分的关注。
需要对每一条意见进行解释和回应，表明作者对审稿人的建议进行了认真的思考和修改。
要在cover letter中突出说明修订带来的变化对于论文质量的提升和对于问题解决的有效性。
3. 在撰写cover letter时，除了以上要点，还需要考虑一些细节问题。
用词要准确、逻辑要清晰、语气要尊重等等。
还要对修订过程中的关键改动做出适当的强调，让编辑和审稿人能够清晰地理解作者的修改意图。
（文章总结）通过对返修cover letter的写作要点进行详细的讲解，相信读者们对于如何撰写一份高质量的cover letter有了更清晰的认识。
在返修过程中，cover letter能够帮助作者更好地与编辑和审稿人进行沟通，是非常重要的一环。
我们应该在写作过程中认真对待每一份cover letter，在保证专业性和客观性的基础上，突出作者对于审稿意见的积极态度和认真态度。
（个人观点和理解）作为一名科研工作者，我深切地意识到返修cover letter的重要性。
在过去的科研实践中，我也曾多次面对论文返修的情况，逐渐摸索出了一套适合自己的cover letter写作方法。
SCI论文回信模板
SCI论文回信模板四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paidto the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and co nclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which include s a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized inTable 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of thepossibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produceda more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
sci返修催稿信模板
尊敬的编辑：
您好！
首先，非常感谢您在百忙之中抽出时间审阅我们的稿件。
我们收到了贵刊关于我方论文《文章标题》的审稿意见。
经过认真阅读和讨论，我们对审稿专家提出的问题和建议表示诚挚的感谢，并对其中的修改部分进行了详细的分析和思考。
针对审稿专家提出的第一点问题，我们已经对相关数据进行了重新分析，并在文中进行了补充说明。
同时，我们还对实验方法进行了优化，以提高实验结果的可靠性。
对于第二点建议，我们在讨论部分增加了对该领域的其他研究进展的引用，以丰富论文的内容。
此外，我们还对论文的语言和格式进行了细致的修改，以确保符合贵刊的要求。
经过以上修改，我们认为文章已经较好地回答了审稿专家提出的问题，并充分考虑了他们的建议。
因此，我们恳请贵刊能够给予再次审阅的机会。
我们相信经过这次修改后的文章将更加完善，更有利于推动该领域的研究进展。
为了便于您的审阅工作，我们将修改后的论文以附件形式附在此邮件中。
请您查收。
如有任何疑问或需要进一步修改的地方，请随时与我们联系。
我们将尽快进行相应的调整，并期待您的回复。
最后，再次感谢您对我们论文的关注和支持。
我们深知贵刊的影响力和学术地位，非常希望能够在贵刊发表这篇文章。
希望您能够给予我们这次宝贵的机会，我们将不胜感激。
顺祝商祺！
敬上，
[您的名字]
[您的职位]
[您的单位]
[您的联系方式]。
(2021年整理)申请SCI延期修回的信
申请SCI延期修回的信编辑整理：尊敬的读者朋友们：这里是精品文档编辑中心，本文档内容是由我和我的同事精心编辑整理后发布的，发布之前我们对文中内容进行仔细校对，但是难免会有疏漏的地方，但是任然希望（申请SCI延期修回的信）的内容能够给您的工作和学习带来便利。
同时也真诚的希望收到您的建议和反馈，这将是我们进步的源泉，前进的动力。
本文可编辑可修改，如果觉得对您有帮助请收藏以便随时查阅，最后祝您生活愉快业绩进步，以下为申请SCI延期修回的信的全部内容。
Dear XXX:Thank you for your kind considerations on our manuscript entitled "XXXXXXX"! We also want to express our deep thanks to the reviewers of the positive comments.Though we have revised some of the manuscript in accordance with the reviewers’ c omments, for the reasons of Chinese New Year and my doctoral dissertation， and reviewers had advised us to have a native-English speaker edit the manuscript for language and presentation, so we referred the Enago Corporation to edit the manuscript and this process would take some time，thus we still need more time to enhance the quality of our manuscript. May we know could we apply for extending the time limit to XXXX？With thanks！Yours sincerely,XXXXX。
sci更正申诉模板
sci更正申诉模板
尊敬的SCI期刊编辑部：
我是XXX，来自XXX大学/研究机构，文章编号为XXX，我对您
在审稿过程中提出的意见和建议表示感谢。
在仔细阅读您的意见后，我认为有必要对一些问题进行更正和解释。
首先，关于XXX问题，我们在文章中XXX部分可能存在了一些
误解。
经过进一步的分析和检查，我们发现XXX。
因此，我们对这
一点进行了修改，并在文章中进行了相应的更正。
其次，关于XXX问题，我们理解您的担忧。
我们重新审视了我
们的实验设计和数据分析，并对文章进行了修改，以更清晰地展示
我们的研究方法和结果。
此外，关于XXX问题，我们认识到您的担忧并对此深表歉意。
我们重新检查了相关数据并进行了修正，以确保文章的准确性和可
信度。
最后，我们特别感谢您的宝贵意见和建议，这些对我们的研究
工作非常有帮助。
我们已经根据您的指导对文章进行了全面的修改，并希望这些修改能够符合您的期望。
再次感谢您和审稿人的辛勤工作和耐心指导。
我们真诚希望我
们的努力能够使文章达到您的期望，并期待能够在贵刊上发表这一
研究成果。
衷心感谢！
此致。
XXX.。
sci拒稿重投的cover letter模板
sci拒稿重投的cover letter模板
摘要：
1.引言
2.拒稿原因
3.重新投稿的改进
4.期望与感谢
5.结束语
正文：
尊敬的编辑：
您好！我谨借此信向您提交我的论文“论文名称”的修改后稿，希望能在贵刊发表。
在此之前，我的论文曾被贵刊拒稿，我对此深感遗憾。
为了提高论文质量，我已经根据审稿人的建议和意见进行了全面修改。
我希望这次能够得到您的认可，并对您的时间和关注表示衷心的感谢。
首先，我想简要回顾一下论文被拒的原因。
审稿人认为我的论文在研究方法、数据分析和结论方面存在一些问题，需要进一步改进。
为了解决这些问题，我在修改过程中对论文的结构进行了调整，增强了论证的逻辑性。
同时，我对数据进行了重新分析，确保研究结果更加准确、可靠。
此外，我还对论文的结论部分进行了完善，以使其更加具有说服力。
在此次重新投稿中，我认真对待审稿人的每一条建议和意见，力求使论文更加完善。
我相信，经过我的努力，论文已经具备了在贵刊发表的条件。
我期待您能给予我这个宝贵的机会，让我的研究成果为学术界做出贡献。
最后，我要感谢您在百忙之中阅读我的信件和论文。
如果您需要我进一步提供任何补充材料或信息，请随时告知。
在此，我预祝您工作顺利，期待您的回复。
谨祝商祺！。
sci修改稿回复信模板
sci修改稿回复信模板
感谢您仔细审阅了我们投稿的文章《XXX》（编号：N），您提出的修改意见非常有帮助，我们现在对文章进行了修改，全文如下：
XXX
我们在文章中重新添加了一些参考文献，以支持论文的合理性和可信度，并对全文进行了语法和用法的检查，力求在表达上更加准确和流畅。
对于您提出的每一点意见，我们都进行了细致的考虑，并尽可能地根据您的建议进行了修改。
特别地：
[详细的修改回应]
在改写后的文章中，我们希望能够更好地体现出您的意见。
如果您还有更多建议，请不吝告知我们，我们将再次进行修改和审阅，以确保最终的质量。
期待您的审阅。
- 1 -。
论文返修（responseletter）一些很有用的套话III
论文返修（responseletter）一些很有用的套话III总结了一部分万能的套话，以体现我们对杂志社编辑和审稿人的尊重。
1、Thank you foryour email dated xxxxxx[[1 June 2016]] enclosing the reviewers’ comments. We have carefully reviewed the comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly.Our responses are given in a point-by-pointmanner below. Changes to the manuscript are shown in underline/red/bold.2、I very much appreciate the time and effort you’ve put into your comments. Your advice aboutthe formatting, structure and referencing style of my paper is most helpful.3、Further to ourcorrespondence a couple of weeks ago, I’m attaching the revised version of my articleentitled “XXXX”I have now completed all of the changes you requested: （改格式）The numerical style of in-text referencinghas been changed to author-date referencing in APA style.The list of references has been arrangedalphabetically by the last names of authors instead of numerically, and otherchanges to conform to APA style have been made to the references.The article has been restructured toinclude separate Limitations and Conclusions sections.All headings and subheadings have beenadjusted to conform to the requirements indicated in the Journal of ChangingWeather author guidelines, including the removal of numbers.All nonstandard abbreviations and acronymsused in the paper have been defined on first use and used consistentlythereafter.Abbreviations used in each table have beendefined in a note at the bottom of the table.The vertical rules/lines have been removedfrom all three tables.The tables are now attached as a separatefile instead of embedded in the paper.4、I hope that the changes I’ve made resolve all your concerns about the article. I’m more thanhappy to make an y further changes that will improve the paper and/or facilitatesuccessful publication.5、Thank you once again for your time and interest. I look forward to hearing from you.6、We thank reviewers fortheir constructive criticism, and time spent to analyze this manuscript, Theresponses, and explanations related to their comments are listed below:7、We agree with the reviewer’s comment concerningthis issue. However, …….8、As a response to the reviewer’s comment we ……..9、We thank the reviewer for the kind comments.10、we thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We havecorrected it to “XXXXX”11、We agree with the reviewer. In respond to thiscomment and to a comment raised by the other reviewer, we have revised the textas follows.12、Based on these comments and suggestions, we have made careful modifications to the original manuscript,and carefully proof-read the manuscript to minimize typographical andgrammatical errors. We believe that the manuscript has been greatly improved and hope it has reached you r magazine’s standard.13、Once again, weacknowledge your comments very much, which are valuable in improving thequality of our manuscript.14、We are verygrateful to your comments on the manuscript.15、We thank youvery much for your comments for pointing out this omission. Now, in the revisedmanuscript, we have corrected……16、We are verygrateful to your comments and thoughtful suggestions. In the revisedmanuscript, we have modified……17、In conclusion, according to the comments, we give a detailedrevision on the original manuscript. At the same time, we have thoroughlyrevised the manuscript in order to express the idea more clearly. The majorrevision are listed in the following.We believe the manuscript has beengreatly improved. Once again, thank you for the kind advice.18、thanks for your suggestions. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite a friend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. Due to our friend’s help, the article was edited extensively. And we hope the revised manuscript could be acceptable for you.好啦今天就策到这里吧，希望对大家有帮助。