法律辩论演讲稿

法律辩论演讲稿
英文回答：
My fellow jurors, I stand before you today to argue
that the defendant, Mr. Smith, is not guilty of the charges against him. The prosecution has failed to meet its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Smith committed the crimes he is accused of.
The prosecution's case rests solely on the testimony of a single eyewitness, who has already been impeached for making inconsistent statements about what he saw. There is no physical evidence linking Mr. Smith to the crime scene, and the prosecution's timeline of events is riddled with holes.
In addition, the prosecution has presented no evidence to rebut Mr. Smith's alibi defense. Mr. Smith has produced witnesses who can attest to his whereabouts at the time of the crime, and there is no evidence to suggest that these
witnesses are lying.
The prosecution's case is simply too weak to sustain a conviction. The evidence is flimsy, the witnesses are unreliable, and the timeline of events is impossible. I
urge you to find Mr. Smith not guilty on all charges.
中文回答：
各位陪审员，我今天站在这里，是为了论证被告史密斯先生对
于针对他的指控无罪。

检察方未能达到要求，拿出证据证明史密斯
先生肯定犯下了他被指控的罪行。

检察方的案件完全依赖于一个目击证人的证词，而这个证人已
经因对他所见所闻做出前后不一致的陈述而被弹劾。

没有物证将史
密斯先生与犯罪现场联系起来，检察方对事件的时间表也漏洞百出。

此外，检察方也没有提交任何证据来反驳史密斯先生不在场辩护。

史密斯先生出示了能够证明他在犯罪时身处何处的证人，而且
没有证据表明这些证人撒了谎。

检察方的案子根本太弱了，不足以维持有罪判决。

证据薄弱，
证人不可靠，时间表也不成立。

我敦促你们裁定史密斯先生对于所有指控无罪。