How to Judge on Students
高考英语范文：对让学生给老师打分的看法讲解学习
高考英语范文：对让学生给老师打分的看法For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic: Students’ Rating of Their Teachers。
You should write at least 120 words following the outline given below in Chinese.1. 学生给老师打分已经普遍2. 人们对其持不同态度3. 我的看法Students’ Rating of Their TeachersNowadays, it has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade teachers as for teachers to grade students. In some universities students’ rating has even become the only source of information on teaching effectiveness..This, however, has caused great controversy. Some are in favor of the rating system, They hold that since students attend the teachers’ classes every day, they should have their opinion about their teachers’ effectivenes s. Others, on the contrary, are strongly against it. They believe that there is much more to teaching than what is shown on students’ rating forms. Students should not be expected to judge whether the materials they use are up to date or how well the teacher knows about the subject. These judgments require professional knowledge, which is best left for the teachers’ colleagues.I think students’ rating of their teachers is necessary, but it should be conducted in a way that can really shed meaningful ligh t on teachers’ performance. Instead of rating the teachers’ knowledge on the subject, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a teacher’s ability to communicate with students, his or her relationship with students, and his or her ability to arouse students’ interest in the subject.预测三：宿舍和谐生活Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic On a Harmonious Dormitory Life. You should write at least 120 words following the outline given below in Chinese:1. 宿舍生活有时会出现不和谐的情况;2. 一个和谐宿舍生活的必要性;3. 如何创造和谐的宿舍生活。
合格的学生TheQualifiedStudents(大学英语作文)
合格的学生The Qualified Stude nts大学英语作文How to evaluate stude nts? When it comes tothis questi on,I thi nk most people will have a word in front of their mi nd. Itisscore. But now some people propose another opinion. They don ' t think it isright to value a student is qualified or not only by their scores. As far as Iam concern ed, I would sta nd in the latter side, because I thi nk to qualifystude nts only by score is on e-side and not good for the developme nt ofstude nts.如何评价学生？当谈到这个问题时，我想大多数人都会在他们脑海里浮现一个词。
那就是分数。
但现在有人提出另一种看法。
他们认为只根据分数来衡量学生是否合格是不对的。
就我而言，我支持后者，因为我认为只通过分数来评价学生是否合格是片面的，并不利于学生的发展。
The first and foremost, to value stude ntsonly by scores isnot good for their development. If the unique expectation forstudents is to get high scores, students will become high marks imbecile. Theymay know nothing except study. In the long term, it will have n egative effect on their life and futurecareer. If a person can ' t take care of themselves, howcan they do well in other thi ngs? In additi on, their school life must be verybored, because there is only study in it.首先，只通过成绩来衡量学生不利于学生的发展。
judge用法归纳
judge用法归纳关键信息项：1、 judge 作为动词的常见用法基本含义：＿___________________________搭配用法：＿___________________________时态变化：＿___________________________2、 judge 作为名词的常见用法基本含义：＿___________________________常见搭配：＿___________________________3、 judge 相关的短语和习语列举：＿___________________________含义解释：＿___________________________11 judge 作为动词的常见用法111 基本含义“judge”作为动词，最常见的意思是“判断；评判；断定”。
例如：“It's difficult to judge his ability just from one test”（仅从一次测试很难判断他的能力。
）112 搭配用法“judge by ／from”表示“根据判断”，如：“Judge by his ac cent, he must be from the south”（从他的口音判断，他一定来自南方。
）“judge between A and B”表示“在 A 和 B 之间做出判断”，例如：“The teacher has to judge between the two students' answers”（老师得在这两个学生的答案之间做出判断。
）113 时态变化“judge”的过去式是“judged”，过去分词也是“judged”。
现在分词是“judging”。
12 judge 作为名词的常见用法121 基本含义作为名词，“judge”常见的意思是“法官；裁判员；鉴定人”。
比如：“The judge sentenced the criminal to ten years in prison”（法官判处罪犯十年监禁。
以学习成绩作为教师评估的优缺点英语作文
以学习成绩作为教师评估的优缺点英语作文全文共5篇示例，供读者参考篇1Should Teachers Be Graded on Our Test Scores?I'm just a kid, but I have some thoughts on whether teachers should get graded based on how well us students do on tests. It's a pretty big deal since teachers' jobs could be on the line! After giving it some serious thought, I think there are some good points on both sides.On the one hand, grading teachers by student test scores seems like it could be a good way to measure if they are actually teaching us the stuff we need to know. The whole point of going to school is to learn things, right? So if a teacher's students keep failing tests year after year, maybe that teacher isn't doing a great job explaining things in a way we can understand. They might need some extra training or to try different teaching methods.It would also motivate teachers to work really hard to make sure we understand everything. If their paycheck and career depend on how well we do on tests, you can bet they'll go theextra mile with creative lessons, tons of practice, and doing everything possible to get the material to "click" for each student. They'd make sure no one falls behind. My math teacher Mrs. Jacobson always says "When you think you've explained something slowly and clearly enough, go even slower!" Grading teachers this way would make them all be like Mrs. Jacobson.Plus, it seems fair to judge teachers based on results. In lots of other jobs, people get evaluated on whether they actuallly achieved the goals, not just good intentions. Teachers' goal is to help students learn, so evaluating them on if we're learning makes sense. It holds them accountable in a measurable way. You could say we're the customers of the school system, so our test scores show if we're getting our money's worth from our teachers!However, there are some really big problems I can think of with grading teachers by student test scores. The main issue is that it's super unfair to teachers. There are so many factors that impact how well we do on tests beyond what goes on in the classroom. Some teachers might get classes full of students from wealthier families who have advantages like libraries of books at home, after-school tutors, technology for studying, and parents with time to help with homework. Other teachers could have atougher mix of students who face challenges like poverty, unsafe neighborhoods, need to work jobs to support their families, or having no one at home to help them study.It would be totally unfair to judge the teachers in those two situations by the same standard. The teacher with the privileged students could have a total cakewalk, while the other teacher has to start from way behind and work twice as hard just to get students to class every day. But then they get punished for factors totally outside their control? No way, Jose! A teacher shouldn't lose their job just because they drew the short straw with a tough group of students for that year. It's too much luck of the draw.And that's just talking about stuff with the students themselves. What if the school has bad materials like 20-year-old textbooks, few computers, or classrooms that leak when it rains? What if the teacher has 40 kids crammed into their class because the school is overcrowded? How can they possibly give each student excellent attention then? Or what if half the students don't speak English at home, adding an extra challenge? There are so many factors beyond a teacher's control that could make students score worse on tests. It's totally misguided to reducethat whole complicated situation into a single test score number as a teacher evaluation.Speaking of tests, that's another huge problem: tests are just one narrow way of measuring learning. Doing well on the state standardized math test doesn't necessarily show everything a student learned in math that year. Maybe a student struggles with timed multi-choice tests due to test anxiety but is actually a calculus whiz who just needs untimed work to show her skills. Or an artistic student with a different "learning language" could get labelled as a poor learner by subpar test scores despite being a creative genius. Plenty of my friends dread the Big Test day because their skills don't shine through on those types of exams, but they're still bright and hardworking the rest of the year. Evaluating teachers based only on those test scores means we're using a warped lens to judge their performance.So in my opinion, while it's theoretically a good idea to hold teachers accountable for whether students are actually learning, using standardized test scores as the main measurement is problematic. Too many outside factors skew the results in ways that punish teachers unfairly based on their students' backgrounds and circumstances rather than their actual teaching ability and effort. If a teacher is doing hands-on activities, givingexamples students can relate to, offering tutoring, exploring different learning styles, giving retakes on tests, having high attendance, and most students "get it" based on their in-class work...yet they still "fail" based on those once-a-year bubble tests? Major red flag that we're using an imperfect system.Instead, I think teachers should be evaluated more holistically by well-trained evaluators looking at student work samples, tests, AND other educational artifacts over the whole school year. Definitely listen to students' feedback as well! We have strong opinions on what teaching styles work best. As long as students are showing consistent progress toward standards and a love of learning is being instilled, that's what matters - not just teaching towards filling in dots on a Scantron sheet once a year.In conclusion, using test scores to grade teachers is a hotly debated issue with pros and cons to consider. In a perfect world, it would incentivize great teaching and hold educators accountable. But the reality is disabilities, poverty, lack of school resources, language barriers, and other discrepancies skew results in a way that isn't a fair, holistic picture of teaching quality. We have to evaluate teachers in multiple, meaningful ways - not just one flawed metric. Just my two cents as a 10-year-old! I maynot have the credentials, but I'm literally experiencing this stuff as a student. Make sure to listen to kids' voices too when making decisions that impact our education.篇2The Good and Bad of Grading Teachers on Our GradesHey there! My name is Jamie and I'm a 5th grader at Oakwood Elementary School. Today I want to talk to you about something really important - how our teachers get graded themselves! You might be surprised to learn that one big way they get evaluated is based on how well we students do on our tests and assignments. Isn't that crazy? Their job performance depends a lot on our grades!There are some good things about this篇3Evaluating Teachers Based on Student Test Scores: The Good and the BadHey there! My name is Jamie and I'm a 5th grader. Today I want to talk to you about something really important – how we judge if teachers are doing a good job or not. The big debate is whether we should mostly look at the test scores of the studentsto decide if a teacher is awesome or not so great. There are some good points about doing it this way, but also some not so good points. Let me break it down for you!The Good StuffOne of the main good things about using test scores to rate teachers is that it gives us a clear way to measure how much the students are actually learning. The whole point of teachers is to help us gain knowledge and skills, right? So if a teacher's students get really high test scores, it probably means that teacher is explaining things in a way that helps the students understand and remember all that stuff.Another plus side is that test scores are fairly objective. It's not just someone's opinion on whether the teacher is great or not. The scores don't lie – they show in black and white how the students are doing. This makes it harder for teachers to get higher ratings just because a principal really likes them, rather than based on if they're truly effective in the classroom.Using test scores can also motivate teachers to work really hard to make sure their students do well. If their pay or job is tied to those scores, you know teachers will give it their absolute best effort to help all their students master the material for the tests. They'll make their lessons super clear and interesting so we don'tzone out and actually learn and remember the stuff we need to know.The Bad StuffEven though test scores measure something important, they don't show the whole picture of how good a teacher is. There's way more to being an excellent teacher than just helping students get high test scores. A great teacher also builds our confidence, makes us love learning, teaches us important life lessons beyond just academic stuff, and helps us become good people overall. Test scores can't measure any of those things.Another problem is that stuff outside of the teacher's control can really impact test scores. Like if a student has a difficult home life, learning disabilities, or other challenges, those things can drag their test scores down even if they have a wonderful teacher who works their heart out. Or if the budgets for a school district get slashed and classroom materials get old and crappy, students might not test as well as they could through no fault of their teachers.Finally, putting so much emphasis on testing can lead to some really bad stuff, like teachers spending too much class time on boring test prep instead of engaging lessons. Or even teachers helping students cheat so their scores look artificiallyhigh! Testing is important but it shouldn't be the ONLY thing that matters.My Thoughts OverallAs you can probably tell, I see some legitimate good reasons why using student test scores could be a fair way to evaluate teachers, but I also see a bunch of downsides that really worry me. Maybe the best solution is to use test scores as just one factor amongmany others when deciding if a teacher is knocking it out of the park. Other important things to consider could be:Observations of the teacher's actual instructional skills and how they run their classroomSurveys of students, parents, and other teachers about the teacher's effectivenessWhether the teacher is meeting other professional responsibilities like communicating with parents, keeping good records, etc.The teacher's knowledge of their subject areaThe teacher's commitment to professional development to always keep improvingThe growth students make over the course of a year, not just a single test scoreThat way, test scores provide one useful piece of data, but they don't make or break how a teacher is rated. We'd get a much more complete picture of whether that teacher is the full package – knowledgeable, well-prepared, engaging, caring, and able to make a real difference in kids' lives beyond just bubbling the right answers on a test.What do you think about all this? I may just be a 5th grader but this is a really important issue that affects all of us students. I want my teachers to be evaluated fairly based on everything they do for us, not just a number on a piece of paper. Let me know if you agree or if you see it differently! Thanks for listening.篇4My Opinion on Grading TeachersHi there! My name is Jamie and I'm a 5th grader at Oakwood Elementary School. Today I want to talk to you about something that's been on my mind a lot lately – how my teachers get evaluated and graded themselves.At my school, one of the main ways the principal decides if a teacher is doing a good job or not is by looking at the test scoresand grades of the students in that teacher's class. Teachers whose students get really good grades and high test scores are seen as effective educators. But teachers whose students don't do as well on tests and assignments get lower ratings.I have some thoughts on whether this is a good way to judge how talented a teacher is or not. There are some pros and cons to it that I've been thinking about.One of the good things about using student grades is that it gives you a clear, objective way to measure a teacher's performance. Tests and assignments have right and wrong answers, so you can easily see which students are understanding the material well based on their scores. If a teacher's whole class is getting A's andB's, it probably means that teacher is really helping the students learn.Another pro is that it motivates teachers to work hard and find good ways to help their students understand and remember what's being taught. If teachers know their job ratings depend on how well their students score, it will push them to come up with creative lesson plans and find the best strategies for each individual student. They'll try their best to make sure nobody falls behind.However, there are also some downsides to grading teachers based on student performance. One issue is that sometimes a teacher can be amazing at their job, but still have students who don't get perfect grades for reasons outside the teacher's control. Maybe some students have a hard home situation that makes it tough to focus on schoolwork. Or maybe they struggle with test anxiety or learning disabilities that impact their scores, even if they understand the material itself.It doesn't seem totally fair to judge that teacher as ineffective just because some of their students didn't get all A's on the report card. There are so many factors that go into how well a student篇5The Ups and Downs of Grading Teachers by Their Students' GradesHey there! My name is Jamie and I'm a 5th grader at Oakwood Elementary School. Today I want to talk to you about something that's been getting a lot of discussion lately - whether teachers should be judged based on how well their students do on tests and assignments. It's a tricky topic with some good points on both sides. Let me break it down for you!On the one hand, using student grades to rate teachers does seem to make a certain amount of sense. After all, the main job of a teacher is to help students learn and understand the material. If a teacher is really effective at explaining things clearly and making sure the class understands, you'd expect their students to get good grades on tests, quizzes, homework and so on. Judging teachers by their students' performance is kind of like judging a coach based on whether their team wins games. The players' success or failure reflects on the coach's ability to train them properly.It's also a way to try to be objective instead of just going off of subjective opinions about a teacher. Numbers and data like test scores seem like a more solid, factual way to measure a teacher's effectiveness compared to things like classroom observations which could be more open to interpretation. Grades give you a concrete metric to work with.And teachers who are consistently getting great results from their students must be doing something right, right? Those would be the teachers you'd want to study and maybe try to model because their methods are clearly working well. On the flip side, if a teacher's students are bombing tests and failingassignments year after year, that could be a sign that they're struggling andneed more training or support.However, there are some big potential downsides to judging teachers mainly by student grades. For one thing, students' performance can be impacted by all sorts of factors that have nothing to do with the teacher's skills. Some students might struggle because of things going on in their personal lives, like problems at home or health issues. Some kids might just not be good test-takers or have a hard time with the format of stdandardized tests even if they've understood the material well.A student's performance can also depend a lot on their own motivation and howhard they choose to work and prepare. Even an awesome, engaging teacher can only do so much if students don't pay attention in class, don't do their homework, or don't really apply themselves. A teacher can explain a concept clearly, butif students zone out or don't put in effort to understand it, they'll probably still do poorly.Another issue is that different students start at such varied levels. A teacher might do an incredible job that year, but if their students began far behind grade level, they still might notmeasure as well on standardized tests as students from a more affluent school who were already ahead. Getting studentswho are years behind up to standardproficiency in a single year is often unrealistic no matter how talented the teacher. Judging that teacher solely based on test scores wouldn't be fair.It could also put a lot of pressure on teachers to just ruthlessly "teach to the test" rather than helping students learn and grow in a deeper, more well-rounded way. If teachers' evaluations and maybe even theirjobs depended mainly on students passing standardized tests, some might be tempted to narrow the curriculum to only cover what's on those tests and use drills and memorization methods rather than more enriching lessons. That doesn't seem like a great way to do education.At my school, there are so many factors that go into how we perform. I have amazing teachers who work so hard, but some students in my class don't take school seriously or stuffy parents don't make sure they get their work done. I have friends who battle things like ADHD or anxiety which can make it harder for them to focus andperform their best. We also have kids who are learning English as a second language. It wouldn't be fair to judge my teachers just based on how our whole class does on standardized tests that don't take into account all the different challenges students might face.So in my opinion, while looking at student grades can give some insight into a teacher's skill level, it shouldn't be the only factor or even the biggest factor in evaluating teachers. Things like lesson observations, feedback from students and parents, classroom engagement andwhether the teacher creates a positive learning environment should probably be weighed more heavily. Student growth from the beginning of the year to the end could be looked at rather than just how they tested at the end. Teachers should definitely be held accountable, but using student test scores as the main measure doesn't seem very fair or accurate to me.Those are just my thoughts as a 10-year-old kid though! I may not have everything totally figured out. But I do know that teaching is a reeeeeally tough job, and there's no perfect way to evaluate it. I just hope whatever systemwe use appreciates all the amazing teachers who pour so much time and effort into nurturing us kids. We're lucky to have them!。
教师是否应该告诉学生该做什么？Should The Teacher Tell Students What to Do- _英语作文
教师是否应该告诉学生该做什么？Should The Teacher TellStudents What to Do?What is the responsibility to a teacher? There is no doubt that it is teach student. But the problem is how to teach students. Should the teacher tell students what to do? Some people say yes, but some say no. Both of them have their own reasons. After a long time considering, I think both opinions are reasonable. My reasons are as following.教师的职责是什么？毫无疑问，教育学生。
但问题是如何教学生。
老师应不应该告诉学生该怎么做？有些人说应该，而有些人则说不应该，他们都有自己的理由。
经过长时间的考虑，我觉得两种观点都是合理的。
我的理由如下。
On the one hand, for the young age students, they don’t have too much life experience and know little knowledge, so they usually need the teacher tells them what to do. As we all have been young, we know that when facing things, we will be empty in our mind at that age. We will have no idea. At that time, if the teacher can help us, tell us what to do, we will finish the things efficiently.一方面，对于年龄比较小的学生，他们对生活没有太多的经验,知道的知识也甚少，所以他们通常需要老师告诉他们要怎么做。
请外教做评委
Dear Ms.Smith, __________________________________________________ With best wishes. Yours, Lihua
打草稿时需注意： 1. 第一人称“我”来给外教写信 时态：做自我介绍时用一般现在时 叙述演讲的相关信息用一般将来时 发出邀请时可以用虚拟语气表示委婉和礼貌 各种时态穿插使用，使文章的叙述有条理 2. 虽然书信的开头和结尾已经给出，但在结尾时加上： 期待对方的来信或希望对方能准时参加 3. 注意发散思维，添加细节，比如：谈到本次演讲比赛 的主题可以说：in order to raise the students’ awareness of protecting nature 在谈到比赛选手时：Up to ten candidates from our school are expected to present themselves at the competition.
It will be held in the afternoon on 15th, June , in Classroom 501, starting at two and ending three hours later.（时间， 地点）Ten students from our school will deliver their speeches on the common topic.(选手） …… which will be held in our school on June 15， in Classroom 501. It will start at 2:00 pm and last for three hours， （时间地点）during which ten students from our school will deliver their speeches on the given topic.(选手）
英语复习 2
英语复习1. College will be the most important years in your life只有在大学里你才会正真发现学习的真谛2.Most importantly，be sure to make frierds with those who are sincere when you are in college最重要的是，当你在大学里，和那些真诚的人做朋友3.Everyane should only his dest to give dack his mother’s love每个人都应该尽可能回报父母的爱4.This is piece of la nd worth 5000$这块地值5美元5.You should realize that the skill of learning is something is something you cherish forever你应该意识到，学习的能力是你终身受用的6.You should fllow your passion in college and no the trapped in what others think在大学里你要追随自己的激情，不要困扰别人怎么说或怎么想7.Most importantly,be sure to make friends with those who are sincere when you are in college最重要的是在大学里交有时，一定要找那些为人真诚的8.You should try your best to carr out your promise once you make in/Once you make a promise,you should try his best to carry it out一旦做出承诺，你就应该尽可能地覆行它9.Ｅvery one should try his best to give back his mother’s love每个人都尽可能回报母亲的爱10.After a day’s hard work,I often feel exhausted经过一天的辛勤劳作之后，常常感到精疲力尽11.He is good at dealing with all types of people他善于同各种人员打交到12.Most importantly,make friends and be happy.College friends are often the best in life, because during college you are colser to them.pick the ones who are closer to them than to your family Pick a few friends and become really close to them. Pick the ones who are sincere to you. Don’t worry about their hobbies,grades,grades,or even looks.people are not perfect,so as they are sincere,trust them and be good to them.They will give back.To win the trust and respect of others,you need to trust and respect others first.Whether it is for managenment,work,or friendship,this is something you should ponder最重要的是在大学里你要交一些朋友，快乐的生活，大学交的朋友往往是一生中最好的朋友，因为在大学里你和朋友的交往比家人的交往更密切，挑选一些真诚的朋友，亲近他们，要挑选那些对你真诚之人，别在乎他们的爱好，成绩基至长相，人无完人，只要他们真诚，就信任他们，善待他们，他们会给你相同的回报，要想得到他人的信任和尊重，只有先去信任和尊重他人无论是管理，工作或者交友都值得你思考13.I returned a few hours lafter,after 300 jump shots and twodozen laps around the block.I was exhausted,so I grabbed the book on the table,Very soon I was attracted by the story,I read on.I didn’t stop until the summer had ended,and a fall had taken ita place.几个小时后，我在绕街区跑24圈，跳起投篮300下之后回了家，我感到精疲力尽，于是就拿起了妈妈放在桌子上的书读了起来，很快，我就被书中的故事吸引住了，我读啊读，一直读到夏天结束，秋天来临。
高中英语单词天天记judge素材
· judge· v. [dʒʌdʒ] ( judges; judged; judging )·· 双解释义· vt. & vi.审判; 评判; 断定act as a judge; give a decision in a competition, etc.; form an opinion about· 基本要点•1.judge的基本意思是“评判”“审判”,指法庭或类似(如仲裁)机构对悬而未决或争论不止的事依据证据、法律或道德标准等作出判断。
引申可指“评价”。
2.judge还可表示“断定”,指人根据自己的逻辑思维对他人〔物、事物〕作出判断。
judge可用作不及物动词,也可用作及物动词,用作及物动词时接名词、代词或带疑问词的动词不定式作宾语,也可接that从句、疑问词从句作宾语。
可用于被动结构。
3.judge还可接以动词不定式、介词短语或“(to be+) n./adj.”充当补足语的复合宾语。
充当judge宾语补足语的动词不定式可带to,也可不带to。
当该动词不定式所表示的时间先于judge所表示的时间时,应用不定式的完成式,且to不可省略。
4.当judge接以动词不定式充当宾语,形容词或名词充当其补足语的复合结构时,通常采用形式宾语的结构,即以it作形式宾语,而将真正宾语动词不定式置于补语的后面。
5.judge可接介词by或from表示“根据…作出判断”,两者意思上无差别。
judge by〔from〕引导的分句其主语与句子主语并不一定一致。
•· 词汇搭配••judge the distance 判断距离•judge the murder case 审理谋杀案•judge the quality 评价质量••judge accurately 准确地判断•judge adversely 相反地评论•judge brutally 残酷地评判•judge candidly 正直地审判•judge casually 非正式地评判•judge cautiously 谨慎地评判•judge delightedly 高兴地评判•judge equitably 公正地评判•judge fairly 公正地审判•judge fondly 盲目地评判•judge freely 随意地评判•judge harshly 从严判决•judge hastily 仓促地审判•judge immediately 立即评判•judge intelligently 聪明地评判•judge kindly 仁慈地审判•judge leniently 从宽判决•judge peacefully 平静地判决•judge philosophically 冷静地判决•judge probably 适当地评判•judge recklessly 轻率地评判•judge regretfully 遗憾地判决•judge reluctantly 不情愿地评判•judge rightly 正确地审判•judge scientifically 科学地判决•judge secretly 秘密地判决•judge sensibly 明智地判决•judge shamefully 无耻地评判•judge unfairly 不公正地审判•judge unwisely 不明智地评判••judge according to 根据…评价•judge at a show 在展览会上作评审工作•judge between right and wrong 判断是非•judge between the two 在这两个中选一个,判断(是非)•judge by 从…来判断,根据…来判断•judge by what sb say 由某人的话看来•judge for oneself 自己作出判断•judge from 从…判断,根据…来判断•judge from sb's manner 从某人的举止上判断•judge from the facts 根据事实判断•judge of 对…评价•judge of a man by his looks 以貌取人•judge of a picture 评价一幅画•judge on 下评语· 常用短语•judge between(v.+prep.)在…间判定优劣 decide which is the better of two things or people〔说明〕 judge between通常不用于进行体。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
How to Judge on Students’ Drill
It’s apparent that students’ drill is a regular activity prepares especially for the fresh in middle school or campus in china. However, out of expectation, someone still have a negative opinion on this significant campaign. Thus this, I think it is necessary to show the worth of students’drill in three respects connecting with students, parents and school side.
Above all, as the main part of drill, quit a lot of students are the man who has the strongest voice to thus affection and function. During the arduous military training, they can be benefited on some precious words like persistence, solidarity, responsibility, which they could merely contact with before.
Then, for the part of school side, it is a chance, also a challenge for themselves to figure out and amend weakness that not only existing in children but hiding in education pattern because education itself could not be perfect. That’s to say, there may be still a long way to go.
When it comes to parents, who have an objection to military training on account of it may be harm to their favorite kids must change their minds. Otherwise, their
kids will only become beautiful but fragrant flowers that being overprotected in greenhouse. Why not just let kids go and try to live by self?
What can be concluded from above is that whoever related to students’drill should have a clear recognizance of itself and have a light of development to the campaign.。