考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死
安乐死的英文作文
安乐死的英文作文英文：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people believe that individuals who are terminally ill or suffering from unbearable pain should have the right to choose to end their own lives with the help of a physician. Others argue that euthanasia goes against the sanctity of life and can lead to abuse.Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized under certain circumstances. For example, if a patient has a terminal illness and is in constant pain, they should have the right to end their suffering. However, strict regulations and guidelines must be put in place to prevent abuse and ensure that the patient is making an informed decision.In my opinion, the decision to end one's own life is adeeply personal one and should not be made lightly. It is important for the patient to have access to counseling and support to help them make an informed decision. Additionally, the physician who assists with the euthanasia should be well-trained and experienced in end-of-life care.中文：安乐死，也称为协助自杀或慈悲杀死，是一个备受争议的话题，已经争论了几十年。
安乐死的英语作文
安乐死的英语作文安乐死的英语作文一：安乐死（532字）Euthanasia is one of society's most widely and hotly debated moral issues. It has pained and exhausted the courts for entirely toolong, questioning the ethics and morality of the issue. It is a never-ending loop that by no means considers our right, or the victim's right, to freedom.I believe that euthanasia is only debated and kept on the political agenda to keep the courts busy, thereby ensuring the security of political pocket books.The vast majority of the population is in favor of euthanasia. However, their elected candidates don't represent their views. Thuseliminating their power of democracy and right to freedom.安乐死的英语作文二：安乐死（1030字）Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As the picture given above depicts, a late-stage cancer patient is terminally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing. Some people think thatphysician-assisted suicide can relieve dying patients ofunbearable pain and suffering. They maintain that as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he has done nothing illegal even if the patient uses the drug to hasten death. Others are strongly opposed tophysician-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has no right to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I’m concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if they prolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am in favor of mercy killing.安乐死的英语作文三：安乐死（815字）The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。
安乐死英文精选全文
30%
recent years.
20%
10%
0%
1947
1973
1983 recent
years
Part 3:But at the same time there
are many people disagree this
They keesonal
die happily.
Phenomenon
Reasons for support Another attitude Summary
Phenomenon
• Now there are a lot of people have an incurable disease. They want to be part of people with euthanasia over his own life. But it is not allowed ……
安乐死的看法英语作文
安乐死的看法英语作文Euthanasia, derived from the Greek words 'eu' meaning good, and 'thanatos' meaning death, is a complex and controversial topic that has sparked intense debate across the globe. This essay aims to explore the various viewpoints surrounding euthanasia, considering its ethical, legal, and social implications.The Right to Die with DignityProponents of euthanasia argue that individuals should have the autonomy to decide the circumstances of their own death, especially when faced with terminal illness or unbearable suffering. They believe that a dignified death, free from prolonged pain and devoid of loss of personal dignity, is a fundamental human right. The concept of 'death with dignity' is central to this perspective, emphasizing the importance of personal choice and control over one's life.The Slippery Slope ArgumentOn the opposing side, critics of euthanasia often raise the 'slippery slope' concern. They fear that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a societal acceptance of endinglives under less stringent conditions, potentially leading to the exploitation of the elderly, disabled, or those with mental health issues. This perspective emphasizes thesanctity of life and the potential for abuse if euthanasiabecomes a societal norm.Medical Ethics and the Role of DoctorsThe role of medical professionals in euthanasia is also a point of contention. Doctors take an oath to do no harm (primum non nocere), and some argue that assisting in a patient's death violates this fundamental principle. However, others believe that the role of doctors should evolve with societal values and patient needs, allowing them to assist in ending a patient's suffering when all other options have been exhausted.Legal and Regulatory ChallengesLegally, euthanasia presents a myriad of challenges. Countries that have legalized euthanasia, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, have strict protocols to prevent abuse. However, there are concerns about the enforceability of these regulations and the potential for them to be misapplied. The legal debate often revolves around balancing the rights of individuals with the need to protect vulnerable populations.Religious and Cultural ConsiderationsReligious and cultural beliefs significantly influence attitudes towards euthanasia. Many religious doctrines teach the sanctity of life and prohibit actions that intentionally end a life. In contrast, some cultures may place a higher value on the quality of life and the relief of suffering,which can lead to more accepting views of euthanasia. ConclusionThe debate on euthanasia is multifaceted, involving deeplyheld personal beliefs, ethical considerations, and legal complexities. As society evolves, so too will the discourse surrounding this sensitive issue. It is crucial for lawmakers, medical professionals, and the public to engage in open and respectful dialogue to navigate the challenges thateuthanasia presents.In conclusion, while euthanasia elicits strong emotions and divergent views, it is a conversation that is vital to our understanding of human rights, medical ethics, and the value we place on life itself. As we continue to develop as a society, the perspectives on euthanasia will undoubtedly continue to shift and adapt, reflecting the ever-changing landscape of human values and needs.。
对安乐死的看法英语作文
对安乐死的看法英语作文English:I believe that euthanasia, or assisted suicide, is a complex and controversial issue. On one hand, it can be seen as a compassionate choice for individuals who are suffering from terminal illness and wish to end their lives on their own terms. It can also be viewed as a way to alleviate the emotional and financial burden on their families. However, on the other hand, there are ethical and moral considerations surrounding the intentional ending of a person's life, regardless of the circumstances. There are also concerns about the potential for abuse and coercion in the practice of euthanasia. Ultimately, I believe that the focus should be on improving palliative care and providing support for individuals facing terminal illnesses, rather than legalizing euthanasia as a solution.中文翻译:我认为安乐死，或者辅助自杀，是一个复杂而有争议的问题。
对安乐死的看法英语作文
对安乐死的看法英语作文英文回答：Euthanasia is a complex and multifaceted issue that raises profound moral, ethical, and legal questions. In my opinion, the decision of whether or not to pursueeuthanasia should be a deeply personal one, based on the individual's values, beliefs, and circumstances.There are many factors to consider when contemplating euthanasia. One important aspect is the individual'squality of life. If someone is suffering from a terminal illness or a debilitating condition that causes unbearable pain or suffering, euthanasia may provide a way for them to end their life with dignity and on their own terms.Another factor to consider is the individual's autonomy. The right to make decisions about one's own body and lifeis a fundamental human right. This includes the right to choose to end one's own life if the individual is of soundmind and has made a fully informed decision.However, euthanasia also raises concerns aboutpotential abuse or coercion. It is important to ensure that individuals who choose euthanasia are not being pressured or manipulated into making a decision they do not truly want. There must also be safeguards in place to prevent euthanasia from being used as a means of eliminating people with disabilities or those who are considered a burden to society.Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to pursue euthanasia is a deeply personal one that should be made by the individual involved, in consultation with their loved ones and healthcare providers. It is a complex issue with no easy answers, but it is one that must be approached with compassion, understanding, and respect for the individual's autonomy.中文回答：安乐死是一个复杂而且多方面的议题，它引发了深刻的道德、伦理和法律问题。
关于安乐死的英语作文
关于安乐死的英语作文Euthanasia, derived from the Greek words 'eu' meaning good and 'thanatos' meaning death, refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. It is a complex and controversial topic that has sparked vigorous debate across the globe. This essay aims to explore the ethical considerations surrounding euthanasia, the legal standpoints, and the emotional implications for patients, families, and medical professionals.Firstly, the ethical argument for euthanasia is often grounded in the principle of autonomy, which is the right of individuals to make decisions about their own lives and bodies. Proponents argue that if a person is suffering from a terminal illness with no prospect of recovery, they should have the right to choose a dignified and peaceful death rather than prolonging their agony. This perspective is closely tied to the concept of 'death with dignity,' which emphasizes the importance of personal choice and control over one's own fate.On the other hand, the ethical opposition to euthanasia is frequently based on the sanctity of life principle, which holds that life is inherently valuable and should be preserved. Critics argue that intentionally ending a life, even with the intention of relieving suffering, is morally wrong and that there is an intrinsic duty to preserve life. They also raise concerns about the potential for abuse, suchas the possibility of euthanasia being performed without the patient's full and informed consent.Legally, euthanasia is a highly contentious issue. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, euthanasia is permitted under strict conditions. However, in many other countries, it remains illegal and is considered a criminal act. The legal landscape is constantly evolving as societal attitudes and medical capabilities change, and this oftenleads to a dynamic legal debate that reflects the broader ethical concerns.The emotional and psychological impact of euthanasia on patients, their families, and the medical professionals involved cannot be understated. For patients, the decision to choose euthanasia may bring a sense of relief from the burden of their suffering. However, it can also lead to feelings of guilt and sadness. Families may experience a mix of emotions, including relief, grief, and possibly regret. Doctors and nurses, who have sworn to uphold the Hippocratic Oath to dono harm, may struggle with the moral conflict ofparticipating in euthanasia.In conclusion, euthanasia is a deeply complex issue that touches on the core of human values and beliefs about life, death, and the right to choose. While some argue for theright to die with dignity, others uphold the sanctity of life and the potential risks of legalizing euthanasia. As society continues to grapple with this issue, it is crucial to approach it with sensitivity, respect for individual autonomy,and a commitment to ensuring the highest ethical standards in medical practice.。
安乐死英语作文
安乐死英语作文Euthanasia, derived from the Greek words "eu" meaning good, and "thanatos" meaning death, refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. It is a complex and controversial topic that has sparkedvigorous debate across the globe. This essay aims to explore the ethical considerations surrounding euthanasia, the arguments for and against it, and the legal implications it carries.One of the primary ethical considerations in the euthanasia debate is the principle of autonomy, which is the right of individuals to make decisions about their own lives and bodies. Proponents of euthanasia argue that if a person is suffering from an incurable disease and is in unbearable pain, they should have the right to choose a dignified and peaceful death. They believe that respecting a patient's wishes is a fundamental aspect of medical ethics.On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia often cite the sanctity of life as a reason to oppose it. They argue thatlife is inherently valuable and that intentionally ending a life, even to alleviate suffering, is morally wrong. This perspective is often rooted in religious beliefs or philosophical convictions that see life as a gift to be preserved at all costs.Another significant ethical concern is the potential forabuse. Critics fear that legalizing euthanasia could lead toa slippery slope where the vulnerable, such as the elderly or disabled, might be pressured into ending their lives prematurely. They also worry about the possibility of asystem that might be exploited by those with malicious intent, leading to a devaluation of human life.The debate over euthanasia is further complicated by thelegal landscape, which varies widely from country to country. In some nations, euthanasia is legal under strict conditions, while in others, it remains a criminal offense. The Netherlands, for example, has one of the most liberal euthanasia laws, allowing it under specific criteria,including the patient's persistent suffering and clear, voluntary request. In contrast, countries like the United States have a patchwork of state laws, with some states permitting assisted suicide under certain conditions, but not euthanasia.In conclusion, the issue of euthanasia is multifaceted, involving deeply held beliefs about the value of life, the limits of medical intervention, and the rights of individuals to self-determination. While the ethical debate continues, it is clear that the topic of euthanasia touches on the core of what it means to be human and will likely remain acontentious issue for the foreseeable future. As society evolves, so too will the dialogue around this profound question, and it is crucial that we approach it with empathy, respect for individual rights, and a commitment to thehighest ethical standards.。
英文摘要范文(安乐死)
Writing (40 minutes)Directions：In this part there is an essay in Chinese．Read it carefully and then write a summary of at least 200 words in English on the ANSWER SHEET．Make sure that your summary covers all the major points of the article．长期以来，我国传统医德把“救人活命”、“延年益寿”当作医生唯一职责，认为医学的目的是维持生命，即使最低的生命质量也应不惜代价去延续它，这种道义主义偏重生命的数量，而不顾及生命的价值和效果。
我们认为，救死扶伤应该是指那些有存活意义的生命，对于拯救绝症垂死的生命，那只是一个善良的愿望，并无任何积极意义。
医务人员不惜一切代价，借助现代医疗设备，维护病人的心跳和呼吸，延长一个无价值的生命，表面上看来实行了人道主义，合乎医学伦理道德，实际上却是无谓地延长和加重了病人的痛苦。
安乐死作为满足绝症病人“无痛致死”愿望的一种临终处置方法，它不是授人以死，而是授死者以安乐，它不是死亡的直接原因和性质，而是死亡过程中的一种良好状态。
安乐死的本质不是决定“生与死”，而是决定垂死病人死亡的过程是“痛苦死”还是“安乐死”，它的目的在于使必死的病人无痛苦地死去，提高生命末端的质量，体面地、有尊严走向死亡。
因此，安乐死不是非人道的“变相杀人”，它蕴含着极高的伦理道德意义。
首先，实施安乐死符合病人的自身利益。
对于身患绝症，临近死亡、肉体极度痛苦的病人应其本人的恳求予以安乐死，它并没有改变病人必死的结局，只是改变了病人继续忍受和延长毫无意义的痛苦的命运，是对病人选择死亡的时间和方式、以尽早摆脱肉体痛苦和精神折磨的权利的：尊重和保障。
因此，实施安乐死，是在特定情况下病人的最高利益的体现，符合医学伦理道德的基本要求。
mercykilling（安乐死）5篇
mercykilling（安乐死）5篇第一篇：mercykilling(安乐死)Euthanasia Euthanasia or mercy killing which aims to induce the painless death of a person for triggers assumed to be merciful, including four types for instance voluntary and direct, involuntary and direct, and so forth, is one of the biggest controversial issues of this decade.People who oppose to mercy killing argue that the euthanasia interferes with laws of nature, especially to those who share sincere religious beliefs, it is a desecration to the God.Also assisted death or assisted suicide may contribute to crime of people illegally taking advantage of it to deprive other people of their life, which is disguised violation of the right to life.When it comes to me, whereas, euthanasia helps to relieve terminally ill patient from agonizing pain, which not merely fulfills one's desire for a self-determined death but also set aside their family from the pain of having to witness torture that the patient does not need to bear.Additionly, Death as nature as birth, is sometimes a process that require assistance, and mercy killing one of such help.A case in point is that when one is under extreme suffering in the body and spirit and the overwhelming existence of life become a nightmare, assisted suicide may be a good way.Finally, when one is suffering a sever and incurable disease which we can not even cope with, euthanasia can be a choice for it being not contempt for life or moral decline, but a form of respect for life.第二篇：浅议安乐死浅议“安乐死”近来，绵阳某中学教师唐昀因不堪忍受病痛和精神上的重压，向成都华西医院提出安乐死被拒一事，使安乐死再度成为社会的敏感话题。
安乐死 Die With Pleasure_英语作文
安乐死Die With PleasureMercy killling has been the hot issue and some animals were accepted this way of death. In some countries, mercy killing is legal for human being. When people are badly ill and have given up life, they wished to die with pleasure. Betsy Davis made her choice.安乐死一直是一个热点话题，一些动物接受了这种方式离去。
在一些国家，安乐死是合法的。
当人们病得很严重的时候，对生命已经放弃了希望，他们就希望快乐地死去。
贝特西·戴维斯就做出了自己的选择。
Betsy Davis was an artist and she suffered from ALS. After being treated for some time, she still got sick worse and worse and she had big trouble in moving, so she decided to accept mercy killing. But she was not going to die sadly, instead, she emailed her families and friends to join her good-bye party for two days, and she told them not to be sad but only with pleasure. 贝特西·戴维斯是一个艺术家，她患有肌萎缩性侧索硬化症，接受一段时间治疗后，病情仍然恶化了，她难以移动，所以她决定接受安乐死。
英文作文(安乐死)
Euthanasia should be illegalSubmitted by: XxxxxxEnglish WritingDecember 15, 2009OutlineThesis: Euthanasia should be illegal.(1)Introduction: the definition and general introduction of euthanasia is broughtabout.(2)The legality of euthanasia differs in different countries and more importanceshould be attached to ethics and moral principles.(3)From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for fourreasons.A.Some patients choose euthanasia just because of poverty.B.Some doctors may give up the efforts to save the sufferers if euthanasia ispermitted.C.The euthanasia may be used to murder the patients.D.No one should be denied the right to live.(4)A survey is introduced about people‟s attitude toward euthanasia.(5)Conclusion: euthanasia should be made illegal.Euthanasia should be illegalThe term …euthanasia‟ derives from the ancient Greek word euthanatos, meaning …easy death,‟ which combines eu …good‟ and thanatos …death‟. In Webster‟s dictionary euthan asia is defined as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy”（Pestalozzi 263）. Generally speaking, euthanasia is not a new problem, and until now, it is still a controversial issue. The euthanasia itself is a complex problem which covers so many fields, such as law, ethics, medical principle and so on.As to the legality of euthanasia, although euthanasia law was legalized in some west countries, such as Netherlands, which is the first country to make euthanasia legal, there is no definite legal provision to allow euthanasia in our country. To many of us, to perform euthanasia on the sufferer is no less than murdering. Of course, we have to admit that euthanasia can lessen the pain of the sufferer to a certain extent so that the patient can die without enduring so much pain. But, we should also realize that there are surely ethics and moral principles which we should attach more importance to.From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for four reasons. First, some sufferers, especially those in poverty, choose euthanasia just because they do not want the family to get involved into financial problems. As their family members, should we give up and see the one who are intimate to us die in desperate? The answer is of course not. What we should do is just to back them andencourage them. Second, if euthanasia is permitted, then some doctors may just give up the efforts to save the sufferer and abandon the patients to euthanasia, which may insult the essence and mission of the doctor. Third, in order to get the estates of the patients, the relatives of the sufferer and the doctor may take advantage of euthanasia to murder the patients. Fourth, life is given to us only once, thus, no one should be denied the right to die. Here, I would like to mention the euthanasia issue happened in Florida America. That is the story about Terri Schindler-Schiavo, who was in a condition of diminished consciousness since 1990. Although at last, she was disconnected from life support at the request of her husband, this event still drew much public attention and even the US government was involved (Wikipedia). Schindler-Schiavo has died, but the argumentation of her death and the argumentation about moral principles have not stopped.As to the attitudes towards euthanasia in general and attitudes towards legalization of euthanasia, doctor Radulovic and Mojsilovic had once made a survey among oncologists, home care physicians (family doctors), third-year medical students and lawyers. The result showed that more than half of the individuals (57%) were against euthanasia, and 61% are against the legalization of euthanasia (Radulovic and Mojsilovic 400-412). So, making efforts to reduce the pains of sufferer, trying our best to save the patient, showing more care to the patient, and improving the service of the hospital are really something more important than euthanasia.As to the legality of euthanasia, different people may have different opinions. But we should always believe that medical problems today may be solved tomorrow. Sothe sufferer should not be given up. As long as we have confidence, then everything is possible. Besides, euthanasia is to some extent against the ethics and is not widely accepted. So, euthanasia should be made illegal.Works cited:Pestalozzi, “Euthanasia: do we know it and do we need it?”, Support Care Cancer, no.10 (April 2002):263-264.Radulovic, Mojsilovic, “Attitudes of oncologists, family doctors, medical students and lawyers to euthanasia”, Support Care Cancer, no.6 (1998):410-415Terri Schiavo case, Wikipedia, /wiki/Terri_Schiavo: Accessed December 18, 2009。
安乐死的英语作文
安乐死的英语作文安乐死的英语作文安乐死的英语作文一：安乐死（532字）Euthanasia is one of society's most widely and hotly debated moral issues. It has pained and exhausted the courts for entirely toolong, questioning the ethics and morality of the issue. It is a never-ending loop that by no means considers our right, or the victim's right, to freedom.I believe that euthanasia is only debated and kept on the political agenda to keep the courts busy, thereby ensuring the security of political pocket books.The vast majority of the population is in favor of euthanasia. However, their elected candidates don't represent their views. Thuseliminating their power of democracy and right to freedom.安乐死的英语作文二：安乐死（1030字）Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As the picture given above depicts, a late-stage cancer patient is terminally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing. Some people think thatphysician-assisted suicide can relieve dying patients ofunbearable pain and suffering. They maintain that as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he has done nothing illegal even if the patient uses the drug to hasten death. Others are strongly opposed tophysician-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has no right to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctorsto help the dying end their lives.As far as I’m concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if they prolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am in favor of mercy killing.安乐死的英语作文三：安乐死（815字）The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。
安乐死的看法英语作文
安乐死的看法英语作文关于安乐死的看法英语作文Directions： For this part you are allowed thirty minutes to write a composition on the topic Should Euthanasia Be Legalized? You should write no less than 150 words and base your composition on the outline （given in Chinese） below：1、有的人赞成实行安乐死2、有的人反对安乐死合法化3、我的看法。
范文：Euthanasia, a quiet and easy death, or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made the headlines frequently. Many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.As is pointed out, to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. To his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his life entails. However, the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. Is it humane, for example, that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feel guilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die? Is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis? And is it possible that euthanasia could be taken advantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes?Since the legalization of euthanasia will raise serious moral and social issues, the decision our society makes about euthanasia will undoubtedly have tremendous consequences insociety.单词：1. euthanasia：adj. 安乐死2. mercy：n. 仁慈，宽容；怜悯；幸运；善行3. headline：n. 大标题；内容提要；栏外标题；头版头条新闻4. applaud：vt. 赞同；称赞；向…喝采5. legalized：adj. 合法的6. benefit：vt. 有益于，对…有益7. terminally：adv. 处于末期症状上8. excruciating：adj. 折磨人的；使苦恼的`9. painlessly：adv. 无痛苦地，不费力地10. relief：n. 减轻，解除；安慰11. drain：n. 消耗12. sustain：vt. 维持13. legalization ：n. [法] 合法化；法律认可14. guilty：adj. 有罪的；内疚的15. diagnosis：n. 诊断16. ulterior：adj. 隐秘不明的17. criminal：adj. 刑事的；犯罪的；罪恶的18. purpose：n. 目的；用途19. moral：adj. 道德的20. issue：n. 问题21. undoubtedly：adv. 确实地，无庸置疑地22. tremendous：adj. 极大的，巨大的；惊人的23. consequence：n. 结果词组：1. point out：指出2. day and night：日以继夜3. like a vegetable：像一个植物人4. be allowed to do sth.：被允许做某事5. take advantage of：利用句子分析：To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to en d his life painlessly is a good release.1）who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”做定语修饰a terminally ill person 2）to be allowed to end his life painlessly为整句句子的主语，his life指的是a terminally ill person’s life，所以整句句子的中心意思在最后，即：to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release。
安乐死论文 英文版
Advantages of the Implementation of EuthanasiaEuthanasia, originated from the Greek, formerly refers to "happy death" or "dignified death". In several English dictionaries, it is explained as 〝painless death of a person with an incurable and miserable disease or of an aging person〞, or 〝the practice of killing without pain a person who is suffer from a disease that cannot be cured〞. Chinese scholars define euthanasia like this "to an incurable patient in critically ill critical condition, due to his physical and spiritual suffering, with the patient’s and their relatives’ request and after the doctor's approval, the operation of the method which lead the patient to die without pain〞(1).In the 1930s, in American and some European countries scholars began to promote euthanasia. In American people established the "death without pain" society and British a "voluntary analogue death" community was built, people started activities related with euthanasia in order to achieve the legal admission.Afterwards, legal issues about euthanasia have been discussed over the whole world; hence much progress has been achieved. Since 1980s, some developed western countries gradually passed some laws and regulations related to euthanasia. In China, June 1986, the first euthanasia case happened Shaanxi province, Hanzhong city. And in 1992, June 25, Shaanxi provincial higher people's court upheld this case in the second final -- not guilty plea (2). This case caused quite a sensation at that time, and proposed the issues of Chinese euthanasia. From then on, discussions about the issue have never stopped.Virtually there are many advantages of implementing euthanasia, in terms of social, family, and the patients themselves. In this essay all the benefits will be elaborated respectively as follows. With regard to the social benefits, if the euthanasia is applied legally, not only the large amount of medicinal expense, but the medicinal resources can be saved reasonably.Firstly, the implementation of euthanasia can reduce the social burden of medical expenses. According to statistics, there are 5 ~ 7 million vegetative patients in current China, consequently, in order to maintain these patients of medical expenses of the first year cost in hospital the cost is 10 to 30 million Yuan, and after hospitalization it costs about 6 ~ 9 million each year(5). Meanwhile every year the total money that needs to spend on the home treatment and nursing costs at least 1.5 million. Thus to maintain such is two much expensive and the big deal of money can be used in other more useful fields.Secondly, euthanasia helps save more medicine resources and thus realizes a more reasonable distribution of them. As a developing country, all sorts of medical resources in the domestic market are still relatively in deficiency. However, patients without survival hope occupy medical equipment and medical personnel in long term, and they use a lot of medical drugs to continue a meaningless hope. This apparently is a serious waste to limited health resources. If these resources can be used for those more urgent and hopeful patients, they will receive an effective utilization. Thirdly, euthanasia does much good to the transplant of human organ. At present each country is faced with the human organ source shortage predicament. Since there are no enough organ sources, many patients die. If those seriously ill patients without curable hope can denote their organs after euthanasia, more alive patients will recover.However, some people are against the implantation of euthanasia in the view that those hopeless patients have their own right to live and the society should not sacrifice their common rights. But as far as laws are concerned, euthanasia is implemented according to the patient, theirfamily and the doctor’s willing, therefore, it is an end of the patients’suffering rather than sacrifice.If the opponents of euthanasia are against the social benefits as mentioned above, people can not ignore the requests of the patients themselves. For those who are seriously ill and incurable, a painless death is a satisfactory ending to them. Through euthanasia, they will die peacefully without the physical and spiritual suffering. 1971 in Dutch, a doctor helped her mother to apply euthanasia according to her mother’s request, thus her mother can rest after horrible torture. In this way both the patient and people around receive a resolution. For those who are against this issue and take this behavior as illegal, they should stand in the patients’ shoes and realize that they would rather die dignifiedly than suffering.Meanwhile, it is not doubt that an incurable patient causes heavy burden to the family. Relatives of such patients have a moral obligation to take care of them. However, in the long run, both the nurse and seeing of patients’ torture put the whole family a lot of pressure. Meanwhile, there is still a great financial burden. As for the patients themselves, they would not let to see the family take so many troubles for them. So with the implementation of euthanasia, the patient can reduce the family’s emotional suffering as well as the economic burden.On the contrary, some humanists argue that euthanasia shows the indifference and coldness of the family, which results in remote relationships among people. However, in the family’s perspective, it is just because they don’t want the patients to suffer any more that they agree to use euthanasia, which also is a manifestation of their love and care to the patient rather than being indifferent.Every coin has two sides, and it is the same with the issue of euthanasia. People blame it for the shrinking of responsibility, human coldness and crimes it brings, at the same time many others are calling for the legalization of it. From the above elaborations, and take the consideration of the patients themselves, the family burdens and the social benefits, a conclusion can be drawn that advantages of euthanasia outweigh its disadvantages. Therefore, the permission of legalization of euthanasia should be advocated for the sake of the whole society.References1. 楚东平.安乐死[M].上海:上海文化出版社,1988:10.2. 王晓慧.论安乐死[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2004.3. 欧阳涛：“安乐死的现状与立法”，载《法制与社会发展》1996年第5期.4. 呼满红张晖《“安乐死”离我们有多远》载《民主与法制》2001年第11期.5. He Nong ＆Zhu Xiaoying, a survey and analysis of social attitude toward euthanasia, Journal of Tianjin Manager College, 2009(04).6. Zhang Wangqiang, The Analysis of the Necessity and Practicality of Euthanasia in China, Theory Research, 2010(14).7. Li Yingxia, About Euthanasia, Manager Journal, 2009(09).8. Nicolas p. Dictionary of Western Philology, The People’s Press, 2001:2.9. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, China Social and Science Press, 1998:3.。
英语作文（安乐死）
英语作文（安乐死）第一篇：英语作文(安乐死)The protagonist of the “Death doctor” is a very special doctor, his work is send these people who are suffering pain and incurable patients calm into heaven, rather than to save the dying patients.However, his practice is contrary to the traditional values of the United States, therefore, it’s controversial and criticized.The furore was over when jack has been sentenced to prison.However, the debate on euthanasia is still continuing.This is a film that deals with medical reform and euthanasia.The biggest argument in the film is the right to life and death, especially death.According to customary law, suicide is indeed a crime.Jack argues that this is a chaotic medieval darkness, should be completely abandoned, the process of law is too slow, euthanasia in many countries such as Europe have been supported, why in the United States which claims to be dominated by democracy and freedom, is still subject to those stupid medieval customary law, subject to people backward thinking.Everyone has the freedom to pursue a better life, and everyone has the power to choose the end of life.From the humanitarian point of view, I can not deny the correctness of euthanasia.The ultimate pain of the body will completely deprive all the meaning and pleasure of a person's life, which is not the same as the spiritual distortions.It's hard to imagine that you're still trying to accuse her of violating ethics by calling her immoral.The health of the disease before and after the twisted shape formed a very sharp contrast.In any case are not cured, linger to live, it is better to leave as soon as possible calm.As a doctor, he knows how to respect life.And the young athlete,because after the injury can not continue his beloved movement, which into a severe depression, that life is meaningless, he asked to be euthanized, but the application was rejected by Jack.As a doctor, he still knows how precious his life is.Now, there are many Chinese wh o need Jack's death doctor to “save” the people, but how many relatives agree with the patient as early as heaven?I think life is not how long can be happy, is whether to do their own responsibility, only their own responsibility to do so before they can be worthy of the day, overlooking ashamed.I do not want euthanasia to get the support of the majority, but if that day really comes, I have nothing to complain about, because everyone has their own choice, and I will respect what they think is the right choice.第二篇：英语作文：安乐死（1）有利于病人的自身利益。
安乐死_英语辩论
安乐死_英语辩论第一篇：安乐死_英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurancecompanies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he isreasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“,meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allo w patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s lifemeans the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatose patient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死
范文（八）
Writi ng （图画提纲式议论文）
Directio ns: Study the followi ng picture carefully and write an essay of 160 -
200 words in which you should
1）describe the picture.
2）state differe nt views on mercy killi ng, and
3）give your opinion on it.
晚期癌症病人请求安乐死。
我们怎么办？
范文
Mercy killi ng is one of the most con troversial issues in the world of medici ne. As the picture give n above depicts, a late-stage cancer patie nt is term in ally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.
The picture really sets me thinkin g. It implies that people differ in their
attitudes towards the mercy killi ng. Some people think that physicia n-assisted
suicide can relieve dying patie nts of un bearable pain and sufferi ng. They maintain
that as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he has
done nothing illegal even if the patie nt uses the drug to haste n death. Others are
stron gly opposed to physicia n-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has no
right to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.
As far as I'm concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if they
prolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am in
favor of mercy killing. (207 words)
译文：
安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。
正如上面所示的画所描绘的，一位晚期癌症病人病入膏肓，请求医生们实施安乐死。
但医生们看上去十分尴尬，感到无能为力，因为他们不知道该怎么办。
这幅画确实发人深省。
它暗示，人们在对待安乐死上看法不一致。
有些人认为，医助自杀可以减轻垂死病人不堪忍受的痛苦。
他们主张，只要医生开药是为了合法的医疗目的，那么即使病人使用这种药物加速了死亡，医生也没有做什么违法的事。
其他人则强烈反对医助自杀。
他们坚持认为，医生无权给病人开足以控制痛苦的药物，如果那样做会加速死亡的话。
他们的结论是，医生帮助垂危病人结束生命是违法的。
依我看，医生有义务帮助垂死病人缓解病痛。
我还认为，如果医生延长了垂死病人不必要的痛苦的话，那他们应该受到惩处。
总之，我赞成安乐死。
Word是学生和职场人士最常用的一款办公软件之一，99.99% 的人知道它，但其实，这个软件背后，
还有一大批隐藏技能你不知道。
掌握他们，你将开启新世界的大门。
Tab+Enter,在编过号以后，会自动编号段落
Ctrl + D 调出字体栏，配合 Tab+Enter 全键盘操作吧
Ctrl + L 左对齐， Ctrl + R 右对齐， Ctrl + E 居中
Ctrl + F 查找，Ctrl + H 替换。
然后关于替换，里面又大有学问！
有时候Word文档中有许多多余的空行需要删除，这个时候我们可以完全可以用查找替换”来轻松解决。
打开编辑”菜单中的替换”对话框，把光标定位在查找内容”输入框中，单击高级”按钮，选择特殊字符”中的段落标记”两次，在输入框中会显示“ "PAP'，然后在替换为”输入框中用上面的方法插入
一个段落标记”（个“AP”），再按下全部替换”按钮。
这样多余的空行就会被删除。
Ctrl + Z 是撤销，那还原呢？就是 Ctrl + Y ，撤销上一步撤销！
比如我输入abc,按一下F4,就会自动再输入一遍 abc。