发sci与编辑交流套话
SCI投稿全过程与编辑沟通的邮件模板
一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors: 一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title ”, which we w be considered for publication in “Journal Name”.No conflict of interest exits in thesubmission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. Iwould like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was originalresearch that has not been published previously, and not under consideration forpublication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved themanuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated 简要介⋯绍⋯一下( 论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitablefor “Journal Name ”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward toreceiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don ’t hesit contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ×××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire aboutthe status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper T文itle章稿号”), a.l(t I h D o:u g h thestatus of “With Editor ”has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted tojournal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent toreviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us.I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer ’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ×××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof.. （写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors ）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to reviseour manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive andconstructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled 文“Paper Title ”章稿号 ).We have studied reviewer ’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked inred in the paper . We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to thecomments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit foryour kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on ourpaper . Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ×××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers co’m ments concerning our manuscriptentitled “Paper Title 文章”稿号(ID):. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful forrevising and improving our paper , as well as the important guiding significance to ourresearches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hopemeet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper . The main correctionsin the paper and the responds to the reviewer ’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer ’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: ( 简⋯要⋯列出意见⋯⋯ )Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: ( 简要⋯列⋯出意见⋯⋯ )Response: ××××××。
发表SCI论文与Editor联系常用英语
发表SCI论文与Editor联系常用英语SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission o f this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated ……(简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor”has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”(ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
sci回复编辑的修改意见模板
sci回复编辑的修改意见模板1.请注意在这个段落中使用了过多的从句，可以尝试简化句子结构以提高可读性。
2.这句话的意思不够清晰，请明确表达你的意思。
3.这个词的使用可能会造成误解，请换个更准确的词语。
4.这里需要提供更多的支持性证据来支持你的观点。
5.这个观点需要更多的解释来使其更具可信度。
6.建议使用更具体的实例来说明你的观点。
7.这句话过于笼统，请更具体地描述你的意图。
8.这个观点无法与前面的句子相呼应，请改写以保持逻辑连贯性。
9.这个段落的结构需要调整以更好地组织思路。
10.这句话的措辞可能会引起误解，请重新表达。
11.这个例子不够恰当，请选择一个更合适的例子来支持你的观点。
12.这个观点与前文不一致，请调整以保持一致性。
13.这部分没有有效地连接到前文和后文，请重新安排段落结构。
14.这个观点缺乏充分的证明，请提供更多具体的细节。
15.这个段落需要更好地引导读者，以使其更容易理解你的意图。
16.这个解释过于复杂，请尝试用更简单的方式表达。
17.这个论据缺乏逻辑连贯性，请重新组织以获得更好的逻辑推理。
18.这个例子不够具体，请提供更多相关的细节来支持你的观点。
19.这句话的措辞可能会冒犯读者，请使用更客观和中立的表达方式。
20.这个段落缺少一个明确的主题句，请提供一个明确的主题来引导读者。
21.这个解释过于晦涩，请重新组织以达到更清晰的表达。
22.这个段落需要更好地连接上下文，以使读者更容易理解你的思路。
23.这个观点需要更多的支持性证据来加强其可信度。
24.这部分的论证过于片面，请考虑其他相关因素。
25.这句话的结构不够平衡，请尝试调整以提高语法流畅度。
26.这个观点过于绝对化，请更客观地表达你的意见。
27.这个例子可能会引起误解，请选择一个更清晰的例子。
28.这个段落的逻辑关系不够明确，请重新组织以获得更清晰的结构。
29.这个解释过于琐碎，请整合相关信息以获得更有说服力的观点。
30.这个论据缺乏因果关系的证明，请对其进行更详细的阐述。
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板
SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板(From Internet)一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original researc h article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript,again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest.A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of –because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studie d their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerni ng Figures 1 and 2 result froma misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
SCI投稿时的一些套话
一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for pu blication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them.If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferablenative speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have r ead the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.。
SCI投稿信件的一些套话
SCI投稿信件的一些套话一、投稿信1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by –which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .Y ours sincerelymonths however2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.3. Dear Dr. A:Please f ind enclosed for your review an original research arti cle, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.二、Dear Dr. ***: “inquire about the status of manuscript (No : ****稿件编号)I#39;m not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status ofmy submitted manuscript titled "****" (Ms. Ref. No.: ****) although the statusof "with editor" for my manuscript have been lasting for more than two weeks.I am just wondering that my manuscript has been send to reviewers or not?monthsBest regards四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the f indings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benef it of the reader,however, a number of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justi f ication. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of thesubject suff icientl y to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submitting their f indings to specialist journal such as –4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the f inding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined. 9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in T able 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. The condition of incubation are poorl y def ined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?五、给编辑的回信1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that –One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and c onclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of –and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includ es a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. Y ou will see that our original f indings are conf irmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. W e found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in T able 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewer’s comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to retain the use of T able 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The Materials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assayinghexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. Thishas been recti f ied. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out their error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included(page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better def inition than those originally submitted and to which ascale has been added.20. Following the suggestion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. T wo further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Referencesection. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a morebalance and better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope thatthe revised manuscript is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, assuggested by referees.1. 上传或写信或发E-mail投递Dear Prof. xxx(Editor):Attached(写信就用Enclosed) please find the latex(或者PDF) version of my paper entitled "xxx" with the kind request to consider it for publication in the journal xxx.The authors claim that none of the material in the paper has been published or is under considerati on for publication elsewhere.Should you receive the paper, please send me a e-mail to confirm receiptof it.Thanks a lot in advance!Sincerely, yoursxxx地址稍加修改就可以作为一个上传时用的cover letter.2. 收到中期决定一般情况下，收到编辑部的来信，让作者根据审稿人的意见修改，并且在意见中看到审稿人推荐盖文章发表，就成功了一大半。
sci回复万能模板
sci回复万能模板-范文模板及概述示例1:尊敬的读者们，感谢您对科学主题文章的关注。
以下是一份万能模板供您参考，帮助您轻松回复SCI文章。
第一段：引言在这篇文章中，作者/研究团队旨在解决/探索（问题/现象）并为相关领域的研究作出贡献。
本研究的重要性不仅在于（强调其价值），而且在于（强调其创新）。
第二段：研究方法研究方法是基于（实验设计/调查问卷/数据分析等）的，并且采用了（详细描述所用工具/模型/算法等）。
这些方法的选择使得研究结果得以准确展示（实验结果/数据分析结果）。
同时，合理的方法设计帮助我们解决了可能存在的研究限制，从而提高了研究的可靠性。
第三段：研究结果根据我们所获得的数据/实验证据，我们发现了（结果）。
具体地说，我们发现了（结果的关键发现/洞见）。
这些结果与我们最初的假设/研究问题相一致，并提供了关于（现象/事件）的新的见解。
第四段：讨论和解释在这一节中，我们对研究结果进行了详细的讨论和解释。
我们探讨了（结果/发现）如何与现有的理论/研究相符合，并提供了进一步的解释。
此外，我们还讨论了可能的影响和应用，并为未来的研究方向提出了建议。
第五段：贡献和结论通过我们的研究，我们为相关领域的学术界作出了以下重要贡献：（列举贡献）。
这些贡献不仅扩展了我们对（研究对象）的理解，而且提供了更广泛的应用前景。
总的来说，我们的研究结果对于（行业/学术界）具有重要的意义。
以上是一份可以参考的SCI文章回复模板。
请根据实际情况进行个性化修改，以确保您的回复准确、精确，并能充分展示您的研究成果的价值。
希望这份回复模板对您的文章写作有所帮助。
祝愿您的研究工作取得成功！谢谢！【致读者：感谢您对科学主题文章的关注。
以下是一份SCI回复的万能模板，希望对您有所帮助。
首段：引言在此感谢您对我们的研究进行评论。
我们对于能够与您分享我们的成果以及与您进行讨论感到十分高兴。
第二段：对评论的回应对于您的指正/疑问/建议，我们表示衷心的感谢。
sci审稿人常用话术
sci审稿人常用话术
作为一名SCI审稿人，常用的话术包括：
1. "您的研究问题是否与现有文献有所重复？"
2. "您的研究设计和方法是否科学合理，符合学术规范？"
3. "您的研究结果是否能够得出鲜明的结论，对学术界和实际应用有何意义？"
4. "您的参考文献是否充分、恰当，并且包含最新的研究进展？"
5. "您的数据是否可靠、准确，并且进行了适当的统计分析？"
6. "您的论文是否遵循了学术写作的规范，包括格式、语法和语言表达等方面？"
7. "您的研究是否存在一些局限性，您是否对这些局限性进行了充分的讨论和解释？"
8. "您的研究是否能够为相关领域的学术研究和实践工作提供有益的启示和指导？"
9. "您的论文是否具有创新性，是否能够对学术界产生积极影响？"
10. "您的论文是否适合发表在本期刊，是否能够吸引读者的关注和兴趣？"
这些话术可以帮助审稿人对论文进行全面、客观的评价，并提供有针对性的建议和意见，以促进论文的质量提升和学术交流的进展。
sci询问编辑模板
以下是一个示例模板，可用于向SCI期刊编辑询问有关稿件状态的问题：
尊敬的编辑先生/女士，
我是（作者姓名），是（论文标题）的作者之一。
我写信是想询问有关我提交的稿件（稿件编号）的当前状态。
我想知道我的稿件是否已经通过了初步审查，如果通过了，我想知道它目前处于哪个阶段。
此外，我还想了解有关审稿过程的时间表以及我需要注意的任何相关事项。
如果有任何其他信息或文件需要我提供，以便进一步推进我的稿件的处理，请告知我。
感谢您抽出宝贵的时间来回答我的问题。
我期待您的回复。
顺祝商祺！
（作者姓名）
（联系信息）。
SCI投稿全过程与编辑沟通的邮件模板
SCI投稿全过程与编辑沟通的邮件模板主题：投稿意向及附加材料的提交我们的研究题目为《XXX（研究题目）》，该研究旨在探索XXX（研究背景和目的）。
通过严格的实验设计和详尽的数据分析，我们得出了有价值的结果，并得到了积极的反馈和鼓励。
我们相信这篇文章将为贵刊的读者带来新的见解和启发。
非常感谢您的耐心阅读和评估。
期待收到您的回复，并期望与贵刊合作。
最诚挚的问候---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------主题：回复投稿及建议的修订计划非常感谢您对我们的研究结果进行评估，并提供了宝贵的建议和意见。
我们已经详细阅读并仔细考虑了您的评论，并准备了以下修订计划来回应每一条建议：1.建议1：XXX我们计划在修订后的版本中对XXX进行进一步的实验，以更充分地支持我们的结论。
我们将进行XXX，并对实验结果进行全面分析和讨论。
2.建议2：XXX对于这个问题，我们明确了XXX，并重新对这部分内容进行了修订，以更准确地反映研究结果。
3.建议3：XXX我们已经对XXX进行了修改，并在修订版中做出了相应的修正。
此外，我们还对文章的排版和结构进行了全面的检查和修订，以确保文章的逻辑清晰和布局规范。
我们诚挚地感谢您在评估过程中提供的帮助和指导，并表示我们非常愿意遵循您的建议进行修改和改进。
我们相信这些改进将进一步提高文章的质量和可读性。
附上我们的修订版文稿，以供审阅和评估。
如果您对我们的修订有任何意见或建议，请随时告知。
我们期待着您的进一步指导，并再次感谢您的专业和耐心。
最诚挚的问候---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------主题：审稿意见修订完成并重新提交感谢您仔细阅读并评估我们修订后的文章。
sci回复编辑模板
sci回复编辑模板
尊敬的编辑：
首先，我要感谢您给予我这个机会来撰写关于科学的文章。
科学是一门广泛的学科，涉及到物理、化学、生物、地理等各个领域，它不仅仅是一种知识，更是一种探索世界的方式。
在这篇文章中，我将会探讨科学的重要性、发展历程以及未来的发展方向。
科学是人类认识世界、改造世界的一种重要工具。
从古至今，人类不断通过实验、观察、推理等方法，探索自然界的规律，不断推动科学的发展。
科学的进步不仅使人类生活更加便利，也为人类认识自己的起源、未来提供了重要线索。
在科学的发展历程中，不同的学科相互渗透、相互影响，形成了复杂的学科体系。
物理学、化学、生物学等学科的发展互为支撑，为人类认识世界提供了更多的角度和方法。
同时，随着科技的不断进步，科学的研究也日益深入，探索的领域也越来越广阔。
未来，科学将继续发挥着不可替代的作用。
随着人类社会的不断发展，科学的研究也将面临更多的挑战和机遇。
例如，环境问题、能源问题、生物技术等领域的研究将成为科学的重要方向。
同时，人工智能、基因编辑等前沿技术的应用也将为科学的发展带来新的突破。
总的来说，科学的重要性不言而喻。
它不仅推动着人类社会的进步，也为人类认识自然、改造世界提供了重要的方法和工具。
科学的发展离不开科学家的不懈努力和社会的支持，希望我们能够共同努力，推动科学的发展，为人类的未来做出更大的贡献。
再次感谢您的邀请，期待您的指导和建议。
谢谢！。
(完整word版)SCI投稿全过程 与编辑沟通的邮件模板
一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors: 一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors：We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”，which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”。
No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication。
I would like to declare on behalf of my co—authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere，in whole or in part。
All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed。
In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性)。
I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1）Name A E—mail: ××××＠××××2）Name B E-mail: ××××＠××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers。
sci回复编辑模板
sci回复编辑模板尊敬的编辑，感谢您向我们提交的文章，我们对您的稿件表示欢迎并很乐于为您提供反馈和建议。
根据我们对您的投稿进行的评估和审阅，我们认为您的文章有潜力成为一篇有趣且内容丰富的科学文章。
我们希望通过以下反馈和建议，可以帮助您进一步改进和完善您的稿件。
首先，让我们来评估您的文章结构和组织方式。
您的文章开头引入了读者，并提出了文章要讨论的主题。
这是一个很好的开始，它能吸引读者的兴趣。
然而，在文章开头，我们建议您进一步提供更多背景信息来定义这个主题的重要性和目的，以确保读者对于该主题有足够的了解。
接下来，我们注意到，您在文章的主体部分提供了大量关于该主题的详细信息和讨论。
这些信息丰富了读者的知识，并提供了对相关概念和研究的深入了解。
然而，我们建议您更加注重逻辑性和条理性，以确保文章的流畅性和易读性。
您可以考虑使用标题和段落开头来引导读者进入新的主题和段落，并使用恰当的过渡词来连接不同的观点和段落。
另外，我们还鼓励您通过使用案例研究、实验结果、数据分析等具体例子来支持您的论点。
这些具体的信息和证据可以使您的文章更加可信和有说服力，并为读者提供更深入的了解。
请确保您引用的数据和信息可靠和准确，并注明出处和来源。
此外，我们建议您在文章中使用图表和插图来更好地解释和展示您的观点，这可以使您的文章更加生动和直观。
最后，我们鼓励您在文章的结尾处进行总结，并提供一些展望和未来的研究方向。
这样可以给读者一个明确的结束，同时可以激发更多的思考和讨论。
此外，我们建议您进行最后一次审查，以确保文章的语法、拼写和标点没有错误，并保持一致的文体和语气。
总而言之，您的文章有一个很好的起点和丰富的内容。
通过进一步优化结构和组织方式，使用具体的例子和数据支持您的论点，并增加图表和插图来增强可读性，您的稿件将成为一篇令人印象深刻的科学文章。
如果您对我们的反馈有任何问题或需要进一步的指导，请随时与我们联系。
我们期待着您更进一步的成果，并希望能有机会与您合作和发表您的文章。
SCI投稿全过程 与编辑沟通的邮件模板之欧阳音创编
一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, andmanuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my coauthors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed haveapproved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A Email: ××××@××××2) Name B Email:××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yourssincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××Email:××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of“With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us.I am very pleased to hear from you on thereviewer’scomments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards! Yours sincerely,××××××Cor responding author: Name: ×××Email:××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my coauthors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express ourgreat appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yourssincerely,××××××Cor responding author:Name: ×××Email:××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List ofResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to ourresearches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’scomments:Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Respo nse to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
SCI投稿全过程 与编辑沟通的邮件模板之欧阳生创编
一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my coauthors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A Email: ××××@××××2) Name B Email: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××Email: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards! Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××Email: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my coauthors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××Email: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
SCI投稿全过程 与编辑沟通的邮件模板之欧阳与创编
一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my coauthors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A Email: ××××@××××2) Name B Email: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yourssincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××Email: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am verypleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Bestregards! Yourssincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××Email: ××××@××××三、修改稿CoverletterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my coauthors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editorand reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yourssincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××Email: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hopemeet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2.Respo nse to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response:××××××。
SCI投稿全过程 与编辑沟通的邮件模板之欧阳物创编
一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict ofinterest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my coauthors that the work described was original research that has not been publishedpreviously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper issuitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A Email: ××××@××××2) Name B Email: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration of ourmanuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××Email:××××@××××二、催稿信Dear Prof. ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatlyappreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards! Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××Email:××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my coauthors, we thank you very much forgiving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studiedreviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for yourkind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corre sponding author:Name:×××Email:××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet withapproval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer#1: 1. Response tocomment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Respo nse to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
一、投稿信
1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:
I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which I should like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .
5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.
6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript
7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.
8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.
3. Dear Dr. A:
Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear Editors，
It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.
4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of - .
8. The wording and style of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.
We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editors,
We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.
4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.
3. Thank you for your letter of – and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. A:
Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journal’s readers.
9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见