TPO20综合写作范文
托福作文真题+范文185篇之Topic20
Topic20：小孩在农村比在大城市成长好，你同意与否？Topic 20 It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.［托福TOEFL参看范文之一］Topic: 20With the development of the transportation system and some residence institution, the world is getting smaller and smaller, and people are not restricted in only one area. In addition to the convenient condition, because there are different places with different cultures, living standards, education environment and other disparity, they are inclined to transfer from one place to the other. Is it better to move around than stay in one place? I believe there are no uniform answers,but in my opinion, I do agree with the claim that to move around is better than to stay in one place.Most people’s growth comes with the transfers in their life. As for me, when I was young I lived in a small county. Because the school in there was not suitable to me, I transferred from my little county to a city to get a better education. As soon as I got to the city, I was amazed that the world here was so different here as my hometown .If I still lived in my hometown, it was impossible for meto make the wildest guess at what the real world looked like. The first transfer has made me toimagine my own life and spur on me to go further. With the confidence, I went into a university which I would never think of it before. The university is located in a different city so that I have to come into another world. Compared with my living city, the one is more complicated in which there are different people, more convenient transportation, more competitive environment. I love all of this very much. Communicating with different students and teachers, I have learned muchfrom them which will benefit me throughout my life and my lifestyle. Now I am in a graduate school also so beautiful that I will never regret my selection of leaving my hometown because the transfer has given me a splendid life.Also, like we students, there are many adults transferring their work place in order to grasp better opportunities. No matter in industry, in agriculture or in service, workers have rights to choose their work companies which leads them to work from place to place and then they accumulate precious experience and skills to get priorities to others.People not only transfer in their own country, but also go abroad to get education, work or live through the rest of their life inappropriate countries. We can see that many students including me want to go to the foreign countries to study further and forge ourselves, and that many parents send their little sons or daughters to foreign countries to study. After all, diverse circumstances give persons new experience and broaden their narrow sight, even help them get morecomprehensive understanding of the world, the society and our life itself.However, some people may say that if people move around, they will pay for much such as money, time and energy. It is right to say that it takes one person some time to get used to his or her new environment, new personal relationship which indeed influences the growth of children, the efficiency of our work and the stability of our society and family. And I have to admit that people should make considerate plans before changing their places and may not transfer aimlesslyand frequently. But I think sometimes it is just all the friction that has made the world wealthier and more beautiful. Therefore, I still think it is better to travel around than to live in one place.［托福TOEFL参看范文之二］There are advantages and disadvantages to a childhood in either the country or a city. It's hard to say which is better. Growing up inthe country means a certain amount of isolation. You're in a small town or on a farm and not with a lot of people. Even more important, the people you meet every day tend to be just like you. Most will be the same race as you, have the same background as you, and will have gone to the same schools as you. In the city, the people you meet are all different. There are different races and different cultures. You get a more interesting mix.City people tend to come from a lot of different places and move around a lot. So, there isn't the sense of community in the city that you have in the country. People in the city can live in the same apartment building for twenty years and never get to know their neighbors. In the country, everybody knows everybody. For a child, this means the country is more secure. A child can get lost or hurt in the city and have no one to turn to. In the country, everyone's a neighbor. People in the country feel connected to each other.A child growing up in the city has the advantage of a lot of interesting and exciting places to visit. He or she can go to the zoo, museums, art galleries and concerts. There are a lot of restaurants with different kinds of food. It's easy to see every new movie that comes out. Children in the country don't have a lot of these activities nearby.All in all, I think a childhood in the city is better because itprepares you more for what real life is like.［托福TOEFL参看范文之三］Where is a better place for children to grow up, the countryside or the big city? The answer to this question differs from individual to individual. As far as I am concerned, it is better for children to grow up in a big city.Some people argue that the countryside is an ideal place for children to grow up. For one thing, it is less polluted than the city. The air is fresh in the countryside. The sky is bluer and the water is clearer. Living in such a place is good to the children’s health. For another, as children like playing, only the countryside can satisfy them well. They can run everywhere, play games in the field, swim in the river. On the contrary, the city cannot provide such places for children. Maybethey can only stay at home and watch TV.Although I do agree that growing up in the countryside has one or more advantages, I insist that it is far better to choose the city as the right place for children. To begin with, living in the city can broaden their horizons. They can meet a lot of people and hear a number of things that will never happen in the countryside.In addition, city means more chance to receive better education. In most countries, it is no doubt that the education level in the city ishigher than that of the country. As a result, children can meet better teachers and receive high quality of education in the city.Last but not least, children can also develop many hobbies in the city. They can learn to play the piano, draw and so on, which are impossible in the country.In conclusion, I believe that it is better for children to grow up in the city not only because it can broaden their horizons, but also because they can receive better education and have a chance to develop many hobbies there.。
TPO20-TASK3
听力部分：Conversation：Now listen to two students discussing the article.Woman: What on earth is the university thinking?Man: Huh? What do you mean?Woman: Well, those buildings aren’t just used for classes. That’s where my evening study group usually meets.Man: Oh, of course, that’s true. But you could go to the library instead. Woman: Yeah, but the library only has a few rooms that people can use for group meetings which is why classrooms are so convenient. But now, if it’s winter and cold, where can we go?Man: Right! In the middle of winter, forget it! Or even it’s just kind of cold o ut. Woman: It’d be pretty unpleasant.Man: Oh, but still, they obviously have to do something about the situation. Woman: Oh, I agree. They have to do something but they should find a solution that isn’t so disruptive, to academics no less.Man: Such as?Woman: Well, for one, if they replaced all those old windows, they are so drafty. They let the cold in. And if they insulated the buildings better, these are really old buildings. Charming, but,Man: But not at all energy-efficient, yeah, you’re probably ri ght.Woman: There’re some really basic improvements they can make that’ll make a huge difference in the long term that can solve the problem and still leave us somewhere to study.QuestionThe man expresses his opinion about the change described in the article. Briefly summarize the change then state his opinion about the change and explain the reasons he gives for holding that opinion.。
托福范文及赏析-TPO20独立写作-智课网
智课网TOEFL备考资料托福TPO独立写作TPO20Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.题目翻译成功人士尝试新事物并且冒险，而不是只去做他们擅长的事。
审题关键词New things, Take risks, Know how to do well论证分析正: Knowing what to do and what is going on next are the two basic principles in life.反： At the same time, taking risks in special situations ensures the success.范文We are all interested in finding out how successful people gain success. A majority of people claim that successful people tend to take risks and avoid only doing what they already know. This statement is somewhat reliable since successful people indeed do something unusual. However, their unusual behavior is based on things that have been known for a long time.Let us take Albert Einstein as the first example. As we all know, he invented the theory of Quantum Mechanics, which was so different from what people already knew in physics. This theory led to his personal success in the field of theoretical physics. However, almost all of us ignore the fact that he also did really well in traditional physics. He made his discovery based on his research on traditional physics. A more recent example is Steve Jobs, who was the chief executive officer of Apple. We usually oversee his achievement in the innovative Apple system and applications. In fact, without deep knowledge of basic computer system or electronic devices, he could not have put his innovation into use. Actually, successful people do take risks after they have done what they have known for sure.Basic things can provide proof for innovative actions. Before taking risks, we just need to evaluate the risks and its proof. Anything in the world should have solid proof, or it can never become reality. To become successful, we just need to learn better about basic things, or things we have already known well, in the first place. Just as Steve and Albert, suppose they had no background knowledge at all, how could they have taken risks that are challenging?Another importance of things we know is that they enlighten us on different aspects. By the time we do things that are quite familiar well, we can easily find out their limitations and come up with some methods of improvement. Einstein first did his research on lights, which was so familiar with people at that time, and found out some limitations of the characters of lights. Without background information, we just cannot see the little faults, let alone take risks doing something unusual.All in all, people who get final success actually do try things and take risks, but actually their risky behavior is based on what they have already known well. So the basic step for their success is to do familiar things well. This must be the philosophy of any successful people, and, should also be the philosophy of all of us as well.满分要素剖析语言表达本文长短句结合，错落有致，很有节奏感。
托福英语综合写作范文【原创】
TPO 3The authenticity of the portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet attributed to Rembrandt was doubted in the reading. However, the lecture believes that this painting was indeed a masterpiece by Rembrandt.The reading argues that Rembrandt, as one of the most prominent painters in the world, is known for his attention to details, is unlikely make a mistake of inconsistence between the lavish fur and the servile white linen cap. However, the lecturer points out that the fur was later added on by other people for commercial purposes. When the fur is removed, the actual painting underneath matches with the rest of this portrait.Another controversy is the discordance of light and shadow in this painting. According to the reading, the dark color of the fur collar should leave a shadow rather than lighting up servants face. However, the lecturer mentioned that a whitish cloth revealed upon the removal of the dark fur collar. Therefore, in the original painting, the collar would have reflected the light and then illuminated her face.Finally, the author suspects the genuineness of this painting due to glued wood panel, a style that has never been observed in Rembrand t’s other paintings. Nevertheless, the lecture explained that it was also added by the others. In addition, when all the wood pieces near the margin are removed, the remaining central part is made from the wood coming from the same tree as that of his self-portrait, providing a strong evidence for the authenticity of this painting.TPO 15Cane toads, firstly introduced from America, proliferated in Australia and thus posed a threat to some local animals. The reading listed three measures to control the spread of cane toads, but the lecturer points out limitations to these solutions.First, the reading suggests that building national fence would prevent cane toads’ spread, which has been proved successful for the case of rabbits in early twentieth century. On the contrary, the lecturer thinks this method would be unsuccessful in that young toads and toads’ eggs will be carried by the water stream through the gaps between the fence to the other side. And It takes only a few young toads or toad eggs for this species to thrive in a new area.As for the second way mentioned in the reading-capturing and destroying toads near water by volunteers-the lecturer believes that it comes with a severe side effect. Without/Lacking in training, most volunteer will fail to distinguish between cane toads and native frogs especially when they are young, and thus they might accidentally kill the endangered native frogs.Finally, according to the reading, a special virus can be designed to specifically hurt cane toads will effectively curb their population increase without harming other creatures. The professor admits that this virus can reduce cane toad’s population in Australia. However, chances are that this virus will be transported to Central and South America through researchers or pet collectors. As a result, it will damage the whole ecosystem because cane toads are native species there.TPO 16The reading passage addresses the concern that the archaeology industry in the United Kingdom encountered many limitations and problems. However, in the lecture, the professor says that new rules and guidelines introduced in 1990s actually solved these problems.To start with, the reading claims that many artifacts were lost or destroyed due to the increasing construction work. On the contrary, the professor says that the new rules required examinations before the construction, which were conducted by professional archaeologists of the site, to see if the site was of archaeological interest. The company would either excavate the artifacts or build around the site once it is considered to be archaeologically valuable.Secondly, the reading states that previous funds provided by the government to support the archaeological research are insufficient. The new rules demanded that the construction company, rather than the government, should pay all the cost incurred during the whole process, including the initial examination as well as the extra work carried out throughout the preservation plan. This new source of funding allowed archaeologists to study a greater range of projects than they could in the past.Finally, according to the reading, there are only few positions in archaeology before andmany archaeology-related talents have to find other jobs instead. However, according to the new rules, all stages of the preservation plan were hiring archaeologists to do all kinds of work, ranging from examining the site, processing data to writing reports. As a result, the rules have created many job opportunities in the archaeological field.TPO 20The “let it burn”policy was questioned after the fire in Yellowstone. However, the professor stood by the policy by mentioning positive changes happening in Yellowstone after the fire.According to the reading, a variety of trees were heavily scorched from the fire, let alone many small plants in the forest. However, the listening points out that the fire has actually diversified the vegetation in Yellowstone afterwards. This is because some plants now have an open unshaded space to thrive and heat from the fire also caused some seeds to successfully germinate.Second, while the reading believes that the fire has either killed or permanently driven away animals, the listening mentioned a stronger food chain, and a more vibrant ecosystem formed later. Accompanying diversification of vegetation, seared area became an ideal living place for small animals like rabbits. In turn, their predators also arrived in this land.Lastly, the reading says that the 1988 fire shortened the tourist season of Yellowstone park, and had subsequently inflicted huge damage on local economy. The listening points out that low rainfall, strong wind and other extreme weather conditions caused the fire to be massive. Such combination of bad weather has never happened afterwards; Yellowstone has not witness a fire of such magnitude after 1988. It is now still one of the most popular places to visit in America.TPO 23The reading mainly raised three hypotheses that explain the decline in numbers of yellow cedars. However, the listening points out the weaknesses of these hypotheses respectively.First, the reading believes that insect parasites, specifically cedar bark beetles, are responsible for the population decline since record shows that beetles attacks have killed yellow cedars. However, the listening points out that those trees that died from beetles’ attack was already sick and was going to die anyway. In fact, yellow cedars are much more resistant to bug infection as their bark and leaves contain chemical substances that is poisonous to insects.Second, the reading says brown bears usually claw at yellow cedars for bark as their food resource. As a result, trees weaken and then drop in numbers. However, according to the listening, yellow cedars grown on both mainland and islands across northwestern coast. Islands are not habit for brown bears, yet yellow cedars there are also disappearing. Thus, the aggressive feeding habit of brown bears is not an adequate explanation.The third hypothesis mentioned by reading concerns with climate change. The alteration of temperature patterns has rendered the roots of yellow cedar so sensitive that they are easily damaged by freeze of winter, which in turn undermines their health and causes their death. The listening, however, accuses the reading of neglecting the fact that more trees are dying at lower elevation, which is warmer, than at higher elevation. This is completely opposite to what the reading has suggested. Even though yellow cedar roots did become sensitive, it is not the reason for population decline.TPO 26The reading claims that Zebra Mussel’s invasion into North America is unstoppable and will subsequently become a menace to native fish populations there. The lecturer, however, believes that there are indeed ways to curb the spread of Zebra Mussels, and even if they manage to invade North America, they will not necessarily harm all the fish population.First, according to the reading, these mussels, originating from Eastern Europe, get a free ride to North America in the fresh water named ballast water at the bottom of the ships. However, the listening points out that mussels cannot live in salt water. Therefore, if all the ships are required to empty its ballast water and then fill in with salt water during thetrip, all Zebra mussels cannot possibly survive their journey to North America, let alone settling down there.Second, the reading says that once the mussels arrive in North America, their hardy nature and lack of predators will help them dominate the whole area, but the lecturer finds this unconvincing. He said that in Europe, there were no predators for Zebra mussels at first, either. However, they did not thrive because local aquatic birds gradually recognized them as a new source of food, and started to consume majority of them. The lecturer is confident that the same situation will occur in North America again.Lastly, the reading expresses its concerns over the detriment mussels will bring to overall fish population by explaining that they will fight many fish for plankton, a major food resource for both sides. While the lecturer admits this disadvantage of mussel colonization, he also suggests that the advent of mussels will be a blessing for some fish living at the bottom of the lake as these fish feed on nutrients generated by Zebra mussels.TPO 30The author in the passage suspects the burning mirror theory in Greek’s defense against Roman navy. However, the lecturer thinks that the points made in the reading are unconvincing.First, the reading believes Greeks did not possess the technology to produce a mirror large enough to ignite ships. The listening points out that the burning mirror did not have to be a single piece of glass. It can be accomplished by arranging dozens of polished copper into a parabolic curve, whose properties were known to Greek at that time. Second, according to the reading, experiments showed that burning mirror would have taken ten minutes to set unmoving wood on fire, and Roman ships would not stay static for that long. However, the listening mentions that Greeks did not have to aim at wood on the ship. A sticky substance called pitch used to seal gaps between woods can catch fire within seconds with burning mirror, and the fire will quickly spread to the wood, and then finally the whole ship.Third, the reading states that there was no reason for ancient Greeks to develop anotherweapon since they had already possessed the flaming arrow, which was more efficient to set fire than the burning mirror. However, the listening argues that Roman soldiers were every familiar with those flaming arrow, so they would be prepared to tackle fires caused by them. In contrast, burning mirror could set fire anywhere possible on the ship and thus baffle the soldiers.TPO 43The reading proposes three hypotheses on the living style of the agnostids, and the speaker has pointed out the weaknesses of them respectively.First, the reading states that agnostids, like many other arthropods, may be free-swimming predators that feed on small animals. The speaker challenges this statement by saying that free-swimming predators usually have large developed eyes enabling them to find food. However, agnostids are nearly blind and also do not have special sensory organs to locate their food. Therefore, it is impossible for them to prey on small organisms in ancient oceans.Second, according to the reading, agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor where dead organisms and bacteria can serve as their food resources. The listening mentions that the fact that agnostids inhabited multiple geographic areas that scatter across large distances indicated their ability to move fast. This is uncharacteristic for seafloor dwellers who usually move slowly and stay localized. Thus, agnostids might not be seafloor dwellers. Last, the speaker says that a great quantity of parasites would have easily kills the hosts they live on. Thus, in order for the hosts to survive, the number of agnostids must be within certain limits, contradictory to the discovery that many species contain great amount of fossilized agnostids. In other words, agnostids could not have existed as parasites as they would have easily killed their hosts.TPO 44Quite opposite to what is said in the reading, the listening holds the opinion that many archaeologists believe the silver coin was originated in European and brought to North America by the Norse, a European explorer, by providing three pieces of evidenceFirst, the reading material states that the distance between the discovery site of the coin and Norse settlement was more than a thousand kilometers, indicating a small chance that the coin belonged to them. However, the lecture opposes it by saying that native Americans were interested in collecting things from other places, so it is possible that they reached Norse settlements during long distance travels and brought the coin back to Maine.Second, the reading claims that the absence of other coins denied the ownership of the found silver coin to the Norse. However, the Norse only stayed in America temporarily, and the listening suggests a possibility that they might have packed all their valuable possessions when returning to Europe. Thus, it makes perfect sense that only one coin was left behind and discovered later.Third, the lecturer agrees with the reading in that native Americans may fail to recognize silver coins as currency, but it also points out that the Norse surmised native Americans liked beautiful things. Silver coins might be appealing to native Americans as they could have been used in necklaces or other type of jewelry. In other words, in contrast to the reading, the Norse could have traded with native Americans with these coins.。
tpo综合作文范文
tpo综合作文范文导语：ETS推出的TPO系列是各位考生在备战新托福考试时非常重要的资料之一，下面是新托福名师推荐的TPO综合写作中的满分范文，希望能帮助许多刚刚接触新托福的朋友们了解和熟悉综合写作的方式和套路，拿到新托福综合写作的高分。
tpo综合作文范文一The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have negative effects for companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.According to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity. If this occurs, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to increased profits for the enterprise.The second point of difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on the unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving————来源网络搜集整理，仅供个人学习查参考money, employers might raise their expectations of 4-day employees rather than recruit more people.Consequently, employees who work 4 days will be forced to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and no additional jobs will be created.Finally, the lecturer argues that under the new policy, employees will experience not only decreased quality of life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied with their lives.tpo综合作文范文二Does modern technology help students learn more information and learn it more quickly?Marvelous as it looks at first sight, modern technology does not help students learn information at a greater speed and with higher efficiency in most cases; or it could work towards the opposite direction which led students to lose their initiative to learn and explore.First of all, one property of modern technology is latentlyharmful to any learning mind –it distracts. One thing we feel about when we are searching for information online is that the internet, as an outstanding example of modern technology and even regarded as the innovator of education, provides us with not only relevant results to make use of, but also external links to click. More than once I turned on my computer to check school library for resources, but ended up watching YB videos. In this case, computer as a representative of modern technology plays a negative role in learning information. We do acquire more information with the convenient tool, yet most of them are irrelevant and in the end procrastinating would lower our learning.Also, students would easily become disoriented in the huge sea of information. Although modern technology could equip us with easy access to information, the huge amount of resources would actually leave us discombobulated. Therefore, it is only we possess information more quickly rather than we learn it more quickly. An illustrating example is my experience with a HK digital library which stores almost all the books I desire. At first I enjoyed downloading them from the database, however, one month later I ended up with hundreds of books stored in my hardware yet none of them finished or ever clicked.Furthermore, modern technology gives students an illusionthat information and real knowledge is easy to learn –just by clicking mouse or watching videos. But in fact this forms only the first step towards useful information and effective learning, as learning of any kind requires full concentration and interactive thinking, which are almost absent in the pocess of popular e-learning experience.To summarize, modern technology does not help students learn more information and learn it more quickly, though it does make access to information and resources much more easily. The popular e-learning still lacks the concentration, depth, and interaction that are the hallmark of traditional ways of educating and learning.。
12月20日托福写作真题答案及解析
12月20日托福写作真题答案及解析12月20日托福综合写作Integrated Writing:READNINGLISTENINGAlaska whales 和Iceberg属于两种不同的种类1两种动物的颜色不太一样1 由于海藻本身有色差，加之在不同的季节颜色不一样，所以被其覆盖的whale 看起来会darker一些；同时观察时节不一样，也影响了观察的结果。
2 生存的水域不一样2 两种动物的饮食习惯不一样：一种喜欢吃mammals, 故原地不同；另一种喜欢吃fish，故被Russia海域的鱼吸引走了。
3 年龄不一样3 用fin测年龄不靠谱。
在20岁之后，fin就停止生长了。
所以，实际年龄会比估计的年龄大一些。
12月20日托福独立写作题目Independent Writing:Out of the following three things, which one would you prefer to regulate in order to improve your health? 2012.1.13NA/2012.11.2ML1. The kind of food you eat2. The amount of exercise3. The amount of stress in your lifeModern society has turned humans into curious creatures. Our ancestors were highly active thanks to their hunter-gatherer lifestyle; they ate fairly balanced diets due to the limited availability of fats and simple carbohydrates; and they relied on stress as a survival mechanism that kept them alert during intermittent periods of danger. Now, many of us spend upwards of 8 hours a day sedentary at our jobs; we eat unbalance diets of pre-prepared foods in order to save time; and we are constantly stressed due to a never-ending bombardment of stressors coming from our contemporary lifestyle. Managing all three things--diet, exercise, and stress--would be a daunting task for anyone, so if I had to pick one thing to improve my health, it would probably be exercise.To begin with, exercise is much easier to manage than both your diet and your stress. In order to manage your diet effectively, need to reduce or eliminate certain foods you enjoy eating, as well as create a comprehensive plan that balances your intake of different nutrients like proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. This is too much for most people, which explains the prevalence of “fad diets” that involve, for example, only eating a single type of food; these diets rarely ever work, and can even be dangerous. Managing stress is similarly difficult, because there are so many potential stressors to account for (work, kids, bills, etc.) and it may not be plausible to try and manage all ofthem. Exercise, on the other hand, can be effective even when simple. Take running: This exercise requires no forethought and can be done pretty much everywhere by pretty much everyone, yet carries a laundry list of health benefits ranging from boosting the immune system to lower the risk of breast cancer.Also, exercise has the scientifically measurable benefit of improving mood. When we perform physically demanding activities such as running, the brain releases a rush of endorphins that produces feelings of euphoria. From an evolutionary perspective, this is a neurological reward that encourages us to run and be healthy--we’r e basically built to be runners. If you can incorporate running (or some similar form of exercise) into your weekly routine, you’ll notice your mood improve almost immediately. And there’s also another, indirect way exercise improves mood: When you’re fit, you feel much better about yourself. I don’t just mean in the narcissistic way, either-- knowing that you’re exercising is just a good feeling.Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, exercise can lead to both better eating habits as well as lower overall stress. Exercise is in fact an excellent way to manage stress, and is recommended by medical authorities as a way to strengthen the brain’s buffers against it. It is even recommended by doctors for treating depression. This stress reduction from exercise can in turn lead to better food choices, since stress is an major contributor to poor eating habits, and eating healthy is much easier when you’re feeling good about yourself. Anyone who’s reached for junk-food during a stressful situation can tell you that.Obviously, diet, exercise, and stress management are all important for living a healthy life. However, if you had to choose only one, I’d say that exercise wins out when it comes to getting the most bang for your buck.。
托福TPO20口语Task4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文
托福TPO20口语Task4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文为了帮助大家高效备考托福，为大家带来托福TPO20口语T ask4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文，希望对大家备考有所帮助。
托福TPO20口语Task4阅读文本：FranchisingMany popular and well-known business chains, such as fast food restaurants, use a practice known as franchising. In franchising, someone who wants to open a store or restaurant pays an established company for the right to use the company’s name and sell the company’s products. Selling an established, in-demand product that has immediate name recognition benefits the new business by reducing the risk that the business will fail. In exchange, the new business agrees to follow all of the standard practices of the company with the name it wants to use.托福TPO20口语Task4听力文本：Now listen to part of a lecture on this topic in a business management class.(male professor) OK, so we've been talking about starting a business. Let's say I want to open up a pizza restaurant. Well, I know how tough it is to make a new business succeed. And I want a sure thing, so I contact the big company that owns a chain of pizza places. Let's say it's called, “Pizza Town.” And I pay for the rights to call my restaurant Pizza Town and to sell Pizza Town's special, one of a kind, pizza.Now, since everyone has heard of Pizza Town, it's really popular, I don't have to worry about whether people would want to eat my pizza or not, I already know this pizza will sell well because it's a known thing. And that means there's a better chance my business will succeed.Now, in exchange for being able to call my restaurant Pizza Town, I haveto agree to run the business the Pizza Town way. And Pizza Town trains me to do this. They show me how to do everything, how to make my pizzas taste like Pizza Town pizzas, how to advertise, even how to make my store look like a Pizza Town. Now, this means that I don’t have a lot of freedom or choice in the way I run my business. But in a lot of ways, this is great for me. After all, Pizza Town’s way generally works. They sel l a lot of pizza.托福TPO20口语Task4题目：Using the example given by the professor, explain how franchising works.托福TPO20口语Task4满分范文：Franchising is a business practice in which someone pays an established company to buy the right to use the company's name and sell its product. For example, the professor wants to open a pizza restaurant, so he pays some money to an established company called Pizza Town for the right to run a Pizza Town restaurant. Since Pizza T own is already very famous and popular, the professor doesn't have to worry whether there will be customers. So he'll have a better chance of success. And also, his restaurant has to follow all the standardized practice of Pizza Town restaurant, like the decoration of the restaurant and the ad, and his staffs have to be trained by the company to produce the very same Pizza Town pizza. Therefore, even though he doesn't have much freedom, the professor can still make the business succeed through the practice of franchising. (127 words) 以上是给大家整理的托福TPO20口语T ask4阅读文本+听力文本+题目+满分范文，希望对你有所帮助!。
TPO20综合写作范文
TPO20综合写作范文The reading passage explores the topic of the “Let it burn” policy. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that the “Let it burn”policy is fundamental positive policy, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.First, the professor argues in the lecture that the fire enhanced the diversity of vegetation in Yellowstone Park, even though the reading passage suggests that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. This is because that the fire has created a opportunity for some new plants to grow, for instance, the small plants which needed open un-shaded area and the seeds which demanded high levels of heat to germinate, which means that the small vegetations would had a better environment after the large trees had been destroyed. Obviously, the professor's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the park wildlife was affected, and there was also concern that the destruction of habitats and food chains, the professor states that the fire also created new opportunities for s ome animals’ thriving that the population could recover and strengthened certain food chains. Then he supports this point with the fact that, for example, the new plants offered perfect habitats for some animals like rabbits and hares, and promote their pr edators’ booming thesurvived animals would be stronger after fire.Finally, the professor asserts that the fire did not influence tourism negatively since it would not happen every year, whereasthe author of the reading claim that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that it was very unusual combination of several factors, such as low rainfall, strong winds and accumulation of dry undergrowth, that caused the fire in Yellowstone in 1988 , and visitors came back to park next year and each year after that.In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading about that the fire is a disaster for Yellowstone is incorrect.。
20年全国二卷英语作文范文
20年全国二卷英语作文范文As the sun dipped below the horizon, the city's skyline was bathed in a warm glow, a prelude to the vibrant nightlife that was about to unfold.The streets buzzed with energy, each corner echoing with laughter and the clatter of footsteps. The aroma of street food wafted through the air, a tantalizing invitation to the city's diverse culinary delights.In the heart of the city, a group of friends gathered, their faces illuminated by the soft glow of a street lamp. Their conversations were a tapestry of stories, woven with threads of shared experiences and dreams yet to be realized.As the night deepened, the city's pulse quickened. Neon lights flickered to life, casting a kaleidoscope of colors on the bustling streets. The city, once a canvas of day, had transformed into a vibrant masterpiece of the night.Amidst the cacophony of the city, a moment of silencefell upon a quiet park. A couple sat on a bench, their hands entwined, sharing a tender moment under the watchful gaze of the moon.The city's heartbeat was a symphony of sounds, from the distant hum of traffic to the soft rustle of leaves in the park. It was a testament to the city's vitality, a living,breathing entity that never ceased to amaze.As the night drew to a close, the city began to wind down, its energy ebbing like the tide. Yet, even in the stillness, there was a promise of renewal, a whisper of the next day's adventures.In the quiet of the early morning, the city slumbered, a peaceful respite before the cycle of life began anew. The sun would rise, and with it, the city would awaken once more, ready to embrace another day of stories and dreams.。
托福TPO20综合写作阅读+听力原文+满分范文【雷哥托福】
托福TPO20综合写作阅读+听力原文+满分范文【雷哥托福整理】在备考托福写作的过程中，总是将托福的独立作文放在了第一位，但是实际上，综合作文也是占到了作文总分30分里面的50%的分值，不要等到分数出来了，才发现其实是综合作文的limited或者fair极大的影响了自己的分数。
考过的同学会发现托福综合作文分数不高，很大程度上是受我们听力实力的影响，我们很多托福考生的听力分数只有16分上下的时候，对于托福综合作文的听力妥妥的是束手无策，而且很多托福考生还感觉自己都听懂了，那也只能说明你听懂了大意，但是听力里面要的是每一个细节！请注意，是每一个细节！雷哥托福小托君给大家分享TPO1-30综合作文部分的阅读和听力文本全集与综合作文的满分作文，以及满分作文的解析。
如果自己的托福综合作文分数如果可以很给力的话，就已经搞定了15分的分数，可以极大地缓解托福独立作文的压力。
TPO20 综合写作听力+阅读原文ReadingIn the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn”policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1988, forest fires in Yellowstone, the most famous national park in the country, burned for more than two months and spread over a huge area, encompassing more than 800,000 acres. Because of the large scale of the damage, many people called for replacing the “let it burn”policy with a policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. Three kinds of damage caused by the “let it burn”policy were emphasized by critics of the policy.First, Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park’s trees and othervegetation. When the fires finally died out, nearly one third of Yellowstone’s land had been scorched. Trees were charred and blackened from flames and smoke. Smaller plants were entirely incinerated. What had been a national treasure now seemed like a devastated wasteland.Second, the park wildlife was affected as well. Large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire. Many smaller species were probably unable to escape. There was also concern that the destruction of habitats and the disruption of food chains would make it impossible for the animals that survived the fire to return.Third, the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had negative consequences for the local economy. With several thousand acres of the park engulfed in flames, the tourist season was cut short, and a large number of visitors decided to stay away. Of course, local businesses that depended on park visitors suffered as a result.ListeningActually fires are natural part of ecological cycle and their role is not just destructive but also creative. That is why the “let it burn”policy is fundamentally a good one, even if it sometimes causes fires of the 1988 Yellowstone fire. Let’s look at what happened after 1988 Yellowstone fire.First, vegetation. As you might imagine, scorched areas were in time colonized by new plants. As a matter of fact, the plants in Yellowstone became more diverse because the fire created an opportunity for certain plants that could not grow otherwise. For example, areas where the trees have been destroyed by fire could now be taken over by smaller plants that needed open and shaded space to grow. And another example, seeds of certain plants species won’t germinate unless they’re exposed to very high levels of heat. So, those plants started appearing after the fire as well.It’s a similar story with the animals. Not only did their population recover, but the fire also created new opportunities. For instance, the small plants that replaced trees after the fire created an ideal habitat for certain small animals like rabbits and hares. And when rabbits and hares started thriving, so did some predators that depended on them for food. So, certain food chains actually became stronger after the fire than they were before.And last, fires like 1988 Yellowstone fire would be a problem for tourism if they happened every year. But they don’t. it was a very unusual combination of factors that year, low rainfall, unusually strong winds, accumulation of dry undergrowth that caused fire to be so massive. This combination has not occurred since and Yellowstone has not seen such a fire since 1988. Visitors came back to the park next year and each year after that.由于篇幅有限，托福综合写作满分范文，在雷哥托福微信公众号获取。
托福写作 综合写作 Integrated writing
Integrated writingTpo 20Opposite views concerning whether the "let it burn" policy has apparent advantages for forests are displayed in the passage and the listening material.First, the passage points out that about one third of Yellowstone's land was destroyed in the fire, which converted one national treasure into rubbles and ruins. The speaker, however, is skeptical of this point. Conveying a message that the fire provided just an necessary opportunity for small plants to grow, the speaker is convicted that the fire was to a large extent conducive to the Yellowstone Park in that it simply helped increase the diversity of species of this area.Second, the reading material suggests that the fire seriously damaged the wildlife in the park by saying tiny animals weren't able to flee from the area and the scorched land was impossible for the escaped ones to come back to. Nevertheless, the professor cites the fact that the population would soon rise up again, accompanied by the emergence of new species. And at the same time, small animals like rabbits and hares would find a more suitable habitat; the reappearance of their predators would soon make a stronger food chain.Third, the speaker is convinced that the 1988 fire compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, thus posing negative consequences on the local economy. Yet, the speech maker believes that the fire was just an accident and would not happen in a long period of time. Hence, tourism and local economy would soon recover from the disasterand reach the value of old times.Tpo 21The professor claims that there are serious problems and costs associated with planting genetically modified trees, challenging the view in the reading passage that planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring tremendous benefits.First, the passage says that genetic modification is a good way to protect the trees against harsh natural conditions or possible infections because they are designed to be hardier. However, the lecturer claims that genetic modification does not ensure their survival because these trees are genetically more unified. So, if their genes are not designed for a particular condition, such as climate change or invasion of new pests, they might be eradicated altogether.Second, the passage says that genetically modified trees tend to grow faster, give more fruits and therefore provide greater financial returns for the growers. However, the lecturer points out that this is not the whole picture, because the seeds of genetically modifies trees are more costly and the law requires farmers to pay for the company for every genetically modified tree that is planted.Finally, the passage says that genetic modification is a good solution for the protection of wild trees from overexploitation. But the professor points out that these trees are genetically more aggressive and typically planted among the natural trees. They might out-compete the natural trees for natural resources and eventually edge them out.The reading passage and the listening material both discuss the topic whether ethanol fuel is a good replacement for gasoline. The writer argues that ethanol fails to be the ideal alternative biofuel, while the professor thinks quite the opposite and refutes the three points one by one.First, the reading passage indicates that the ethanol fuel may not solve the global warming mainly caused by burning gasoline in that burning ethanol also generates carbon dioxide. However, the listening passage contents that by using ethanol fuel instead of gasoline, the amount of carbon dioxide will decline because ethanol comes from corn which can remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere via photosynthesis. In a word, the professor does not go along with the author in this point.The second aspect provided by the author is that in making significant amount of ethanol, a large number of plants will be consumed. Therefore, animals will lose a substantial source of forage. This point is completely rejected by the lecturer who claims that ethanol can be produced from parts of plant which are not edible. According to the professor, it is quite possible for ethanol fuel manufacturers to choose maize without taking up food for animals. In this way, the second reason of the reading material is refuted by the lecture.Finally, the professor suggests that with the current supportive strategies, once the customers start purchasing ethanol, the ethanol producers will increase their supply. Shortly afterwards, according to the principles of market and economy, the ethanol product will become cheaper. To further illustrate his point, the professor cites a studywhich anticipates that if the amount of ethanol product goes up to two times bigger than current level, the average cost of this alternative fuel will decrease to merely 60% of the original price per unit of product. This contradicts the reading passage that the price of ethanol fuel will face a rapid boom once the government ceases the supportive help of tax subsidies.。
托福TPO20口语Task1题目+满分范文
为了帮助大家高效备考托福，为大家带来托福TPO20口语Task1题目+满分范文，希望对大家备考有所帮助。
托福TPO20独立口语Task1题目： Choose a quality you think makes someone a valuable member of a team. Explain why you think it is an important quality for a team or group member to have. 托福TPO20独立口语Task1满分范文： I think a valuable member of a team should be cooperative. If a member is cooperative, he or she will take the goal of the team as main goal not that of his or her own as the main goal. So he or she is willing to help other team members, to talk with others, to solve problems with others. Once I attended a computer program group. At that time we had four members and only one day left before we had to submit the program. So we all decided to gather together and stay overnight, writing the program, sharing ideas, discussing and solving problems. That was the time I felt we were like a team. 以上是给大家整理的托福TPO20口语Task1题目+满分范文，希望对你有所帮助!。
托福TPO20综合写作材料及
托福TPO20综合写作材料及在美国，对森林大火采取的是不扑灭的策略，但是1988年燃烧了两个月的黄石公园森林大火使很多人主张取消这种策略。
下面的托福TPO20综合写作材料就这两种观点进行了陈述，欢迎阅读!托福TPO20综合写作范文The reading passage argues that the "let it burn" policy should be replaced by the policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. However, the professor raises serious counter argumentsagainst the reading paragraph by providing three aspects as listed below:First, according to the speaker, the natural forest fires are a cycle of creative eventhey have a large scale of the damage, and after the fires, new plants which became more diverse than before existed in the Yellowstone. For example, some big plants were replaced by the small ones appeared in the Yellowstone due to the open and shaded lands. Another example isthat it was a better place for certain seeds thanks to the high level of the heat. This point directly contradicts what the passage indicates.Second, the reading passage states that the fire was adestruction of habitats and the disruption of the food chain. The professor, however, stated that the population had already recovered,and created some ideal habitats for the small animals such as rabbitsand hares. Moreover, since the rabbits and hares began to live there,the predators who lived on them came to live in the Yellowstone, too. Therefore, certain food chain was stronger than before. This is another point where the listening opposes the reading passage.Third, quite different from what had been stated in the reading passage, the lecturer said that the fire in 1988 was quite unusual andit did not happen every year. Moreover, the massive fire was caused by the low rain fall and the strong wind, which would not occur again. Besides, the victors still come back to the Yellowstone next year and each year after that. This point refutes the view stated in the reading passage.托福TPO20综合写作阅读材料：In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1988, forest fires in Yellowstone, the most famous national park in the country, burned for more than two months and spread over a huge area, encompassing more than 800,000 acres. Because of the large scale of the damage, many people called for replacing the “let it burn” policy with a policy of extinguishing forest firesas soon as they appeared. Three kinds of damage caused by the “let it burn” policy were empha sized by critics of the policy.在美国，从 1960 年代末开始就非常普遍地对森林大火采取不扑灭的策略。
TPO20综合写作
Three kinds of damage caused by the “let it burn” are brought up by critics to call for substituting the “let it burn” policy for a policy of putting out the fires as soon as they occurred. However, these ideas are refuted by the professor, maintaining that the fires are a part of nature and people should focus on what happens after the fires.First of all, the author argues that the Yellowstone fires destroyed the park’s trees and vegetation and even eliminated smaller plants. By contrast, the professor claims that actually after the fires, many new plants appeared and covered the scorched areas, making the area more diverse than before.For example, the fires provided opportunities for smaller plants that tended to grow in open and unshaded areas. Besides, some seeds were only able to germinate under high level of temperature.Furthermore, the author maintains the fires would also affect the park wildlife, because large animals flew away and smaller species might not escape successfully. However, the professor challenges this idea by claiming that the scorched areas in fact could be suitable habitats for some animals like rabbits and hares, and those depending on the rabbits and hares for food would come, too, which would finally strengthen the food chain.Finally, the author insists that the fires may decrease the value of the park as a tourist spot and thus affect the local economy. On the contrary, the professor states that big fires like Yellowstone fires do not happen every year, and since 1988, no big fires like Yellowstone fires have occurred. Besides, after the fires, tourists still come to the park next year and year after year.范文：In the lecture the professor raises counterarguments to each of the three points mentioned in the reading passage about the damages in the Yellowstone National Park caused by the "let it burn" policy. Contrary to the reading, the professor asserts that natural fire is necessary for ecological cycle and the "let it burn" is a good policy.First of all, the article claims that the big fire causes astronomical damage to trees and vegetation in Yellowstone. The lecturer, by contrast, argues against this view and states that vegetation burned will be covered with new plants which create a more diverse plantation environment. For example the fire can give a chance for smaller plants to grow because it eliminates those tall trees.Another crucial point the writer makes is that wildlife is seriously affected in the fire owing to the destruction of habitat and the break of food chains. The lecturer, however, disagrees with this idea and contends that not only do animals recovered after the fire but they were provided with new opportunities because of the fire. For example, smaller plants which appeared after the fire formed new habitats for animals such as rabbits. With the increase of these animals came their predators, a phenomenon which actually strengthens the food chain.Finally, while the author maintains that the fire negatively affected local economy by reducing the value of Yellowstone's tourist attraction, the professor argues that the fire can't affect economy seriously because such kind of destructive fire barely happens. Its happening was due to the combination of a large variety of unusual conditions which was impossible for most of the time. Furthermore, the fire has not happened since 1988, so the fire has very limited effect on the local economy.。
TPO1-26综合写作完全例文解析
List of Contents (TPO综合写作例文解析整理版)Contents TPO 1PAGES 1TPO 27 TPO 3 16 TPO 423 TPO 530 TPO 636 TPO 742 TPO 848 TPO 954 TPO 1059 TPO 11 65 TPO 1270 TPO 13 76 TPO 1482 TPO 1587 TPO 1693 TPO 1799 TPO 18104 TPO 19108 TPO 20113 TPO 21119 TPO 22124 TPO 23129 TPO 24134 TPO 25139 TPO 26140TPO 01阅读材料：In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each d ay. H owever, m any e mployees w ant t o w ork a f our-‐day w eek a nd a re w illing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-‐day workweek for four-‐fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the i ndividual c ompanies a nd t he e mployees w ho d ecided t o t ake t he o ption.在美国，职员一般执行的一周五天，每天八小时工作制。
托福TPO20综合写作阅读原文+听力原文+满分范文
¡¡¡¡ÎªÁË°ïÖú´ó¼Ò¸ßЧ±¸¿¼Íи££¬Îª´ó¼Ò´øÀ´Íи£TPO20×ÛºÏд×÷ÔĶÁÔÎÄ+ÌýÁ¦ÔÎÄ+Âú·Ö·¶ÎÄ£¬Ï£Íû¶Ô´ó¼Ò±¸¿¼ÓÐËù°ïÖú¡£¡¡¡¡Íи£TPO20×ÛºÏд×÷ÔĶÁÔÎÄÎı¾£º¡¡¡¡In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The ¡°let it burn¡± policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1988, forest fires in Yellowstone, the most famous national park in the country, burned for more than two months and spread over a huge area, encompassing more than 800,000 acres. Because of the large scale of the damage, many people called for replacing the ¡°let it burn¡± policy with a policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. Three kinds of damage caused by the ¡°let it burn¡± policy were emphasized by critics of the policy. First, Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park¡¯s trees and other vegetation. When the fires finally died out, nearly one third of Yellowstone¡¯s land had been scorched. Trees were charred and blackened from flames and smoke. Smaller plants were entirely incinerated. What had been a national treasure now seemed like a devastated wasteland. Second, the park wildlife was affected as well. Large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire. Many smaller species were probably unable to escape. There was also concern that the destruction of habitats and the disruption of food chains would make it impossible for the animals that survived the fire to return. Third, the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had negative consequences for the local economy. With several thousand acres of the park engulfed in flames, the tourist season was cut short, and a large number of visitors decided to stay away. Of course, local businesses that depended on park visitors suffered as a result.¡¡¡¡Íи£TPO20×ÛºÏд×÷ÌýÁ¦ÔÎÄÎı¾£º¡¡¡¡Actually fires are natural part of ecological cycle and their role is not just destructive but also creative. That is why the ¡°let it burn¡± policy is fundamentally a good one, even if it sometimes causes fires of the 1988 Yellowstone fire. Let's look at what happened after 1988 Yellowstone fire.First, vegetation. As you might imagine, scorched areas were in time colonized by new plants. As a matter of fact, the plants in Yellowstone became more diverse because the fire created an opportunity for certain plants that could not grow otherwise. For example, areas where the trees have been destroyed by fire could now be taken over by smaller plants that needed open and shaded space to grow. And another example, seeds of certain plants species won't germinate unless they're exposed to very high levels of heat. So, those plants started appearing after the fire as well. It's a similar story with the animals.Not only did their population recover, but the fire also created new opportunities. For instance, the small plants that replaced trees after the fire created an ideal habitat for certain small animals like rabbits and hares. And when rabbits and hares startedthriving, so did some predators that depended on them for food. So, certain food chains actually became stronger after the fire than they were before.And last, fires like 19888 Yellowstone fire would be a problem for tourism if they happened every year.But they don't. It was a very unusual combination of factors that year, low rainfall, unusually strong winds, accumulation of dry undergrowth that caused fire to be so massive. This combination has not occurred since and Yellowstone has not seen sucha fire since 1988. Visitors came back to the park next year and each year after that.¡¡¡¡Íи£TPO20×ÛºÏд×÷Âú·Ö·¶ÎÄ1£º¡¡¡¡The reading passage argues that the "let it burn" policy should be replaced bythe policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. However, the professor raises serious counterarguments against the reading paragraph by providing three aspects as listed below: First, according to the speaker, the natural forest fires are a cycle of creative even they have a large scale of the damage, and afterthe fires, new plants which became more diverse than before existed in the Yellowstone.For example, some big plants were replaced by the small ones appeared in the Yellowstonedue to the open and shaded lands. Another example is that it was a better place for certain seeds thanks to the high level of the heat. This point directly contradicts what the passage indicates. Second, the reading passage states that the fire wasa destruction of habitats and the disruption of the food chain. The professor, however, stated that the population had already recovered, and created some ideal habitatsfor the small animals such as rabbits and hares. Moreover, since the rabbits and hares began to live there, the predators who lived on them came to live in the Yellowstone, too. Therefore, certain food chain was stronger than before. This is another point where the listening opposes the reading passage. Third, quite different from whathad been stated in the reading passage, the lecturer said that the fire in 1988 was quite unusual and it did not happen every year. Moreover, the massive fire was causedby the low rain fall and the strong wind, which would not occur again. Besides, the victors still come back to the Yellowstone next year and each year after that. This point refutes the view stated in the reading passage.¡¡¡¡Íи£TPO20×ÛºÏд×÷Âú·Ö·¶ÎÄ2£º¡¡¡¡The reading passage argues that the "let it burn" policy should be replaced bythe policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. However, the professor raises serious counterarguments against the reading paragraph by providing three aspects as listed below: First, according to the reading, Yellowstone fires caused great damage to the park¡¯s trees and other vegetation. However, the professor refutes with the fact that the plants in Yellowstone became more diverse and some new species colonized scorched area. For example, some big plants were replaced bythe small ones appeared in the Yellowstone due to the open and shaded lands. Also, high levels of heat contributes to the germination of seeds of certain plants. Second, the reading passage states that the fire caused destruction of habitats and。
20年高三二模英语作文范文浦东
20年高三二模英语作文范文浦东Pudong, a vibrant district in Shanghai, China, embodies the city's rapid development and futuristic skyline. Situated east of the Huangpu River, Pudong has transformed from farmland into a global financial hub and a symbol of China's economic prowess.The journey to Pudong begins with its iconic landmarks. The Oriental Pearl Tower, with its distinctive spheres and observation decks, offers panoramic views of Shanghai's cityscape. Nearby, the Shanghai Tower stands tall as the world's second-tallest building, showcasing modern architecture and engineering feats.Beyond its skyscrapers, Pudong boasts cultural and recreational attractions. The Shanghai Science and Technology Museum captivates visitors with interactive exhibits on science, nature, and technology. In contrast, Century Park provides a serene retreat with gardens, lakes,and jogging trails, offering a peaceful respite from urban bustle.Pudong's development is also marked by its economic significance. The Lujiazui financial district hosts multinational corporations and financial institutions, underscoring Shanghai's role as a global financial center. Meanwhile, the Shanghai Disney Resort attracts tourists with its magical experiences and entertainment offerings.Transportation infrastructure enhances Pudong's accessibility and connectivity. The Shanghai Maglev Train connects Pudong Airport to the city center in minutes, showcasing cutting-edge technology and efficiency. Additionally, bridges and tunnels across the Huangpu River facilitate seamless travel between Pudong and Puxi, Shanghai's older district.Culturally, Pudong reflects Shanghai's dynamism and diversity. Its neighborhoods blendtraditional Chinese elements with modern influences, offering a glimpse into the city's rich heritage and contemporary lifestyle. Local markets, restaurants, and art galleries showcase a blend of global and local flavors, catering to diverse tastes and preferences.In conclusion, Pudong epitomizes Shanghai's transformation into a global metropolis. Its skyscrapers, cultural landmarks, and economic vitality illustrate China's journey towards modernization and innovation. Whether exploring its futuristic architecture or savoring its cultural offerings, Pudong invites visitors to witness the intersection of tradition and progress in one of the world's most dynamic cities.。
TPO综合写作范文16-20
TPO16The professor explained three aspects of the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom, each of which has successfully addressed the problems mentioned in the reading passage concerning the preservation of artifacts, the funding of archaeological research, and career opportunities in archaeology.First, the professor pointed out that according to the new guidelines, any construction project must undergo an evaluation process in order for the archaeological value of the site to be ascertained. If a site is determined to contain precious objects, a panel of experts is convened to draw up a preservation plan. This measure has proven very effective in addressing the first problem mentioned in the reading –careless and irresponsible construction projects being pursued without any regard for archaeological preservation.Second, the lecturer explained that the new guidelines shifted the responsibility for funding archaeological work, from initial examination to future preservation, from the government to construction companies. As a result of this shift,the second problem highlighted in the reading concerninginsufficient government funds for archaeological research has been significantly addressed.The professor’s last point concerned the final p roblem raised in the reading material – a decline in archaeology-related job opportunities. She argued that thanks to the new guidelines, many skillful, full-time archaeological experts and professionals are nowneeded to handle work at various stages of archaeological investigation, research, and preservation.TPO17The reading passage claims that the number of birds in the IS will definitely decline. Yet the professor argues that bird population will not shrink due to increase in human population, agriculture, and pesticide use as suggested by the author.First, the professor points out that urban growth, while harmful to some types of birds, could provide habitats for many other types. As a matter of fact, urban and suburban dwellers complain frequently aout too many birds, this , however,contradicts the statement in the reading that urban development causes birds to disappear.Second, the professor explains that agricultural develop won’t affect bird population as the reading illustrates. Newly-introduced and highly productive crops continuously contribute to production enhancement and less land use, making it unnecessary for humans to destroy wilderness areas.Third, while convinced of the harmfulness of pesticide use to birds concluded in th e passage, the professor don’t think it will be a problem in the future, in that people are increasingly aware of this problem, and are therefore developing less toxic pesticides and pest resistant crops as solutions.TPO18The reading and listening materials have a conflict of opinions about how to preserve Torryea Taxifolia. The writer puts forward three methods to address the problem, which are contradicted by the following lecture.Firstly, the writer suggests that Torryea can be reestablished in cool and damp microclimate within Florida, while the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle.According to him, the microclimate is affected by the larger region and can hardly offer the right condition for its growth. Due to global warming and drained wetland, the environment is too dry for Torryea to survive.Secondly, the author proposes that Torryea can be relocated farfrom where it currently grows. However, the speaker casts doubt on this proposal by raising the example of black locus tree. When it was movedfar north, it spread so quickly and killed out native endangered trees. So assisted migration is ineffective for its unpredicted outcome for other species.The third measure put forward by the writer is to preserve/ develop Torryea in research centers. By contrast, in accordance with the speaker, this method is not going to work out. The reason is that researchcenters fail to offer enough capacity to hold large and diverse population, which is usually sufficed by natural environment where Torryea can resist diseases. As a result this method is not going towork out.TPO19The professor' presentation deals with the issue which is the same as what the reading passage concentrates on. however, he oppositely thinks that the three reasons mentioned in the reading about the negative influence of buzzing on consumer andsociety all are unfounded. and he also gives us three reason to support his idea, which makes what the reading dubious. Primarily, even though the reading passage suggest that the buzzers will mislead the consumer by using that consumer does not know they are buzzers, the professor frown on this point. this is because buzzers are those who truly think the product is good. so they will put the misleading information to the consumers.Further, in the opposition to the statement about the consumersless critically paying attention on the product when buzzers adverting their product, the professor maintains that quite the opposite, the consumer will ask more when a buzzer sells a product. and the professor proves this is true by pointing out the specific question which consumer will ask for buzzers, such as the duration of certain product being used and the price of the product.Finally, the professor claims that the new tactic buzzing, will not pose threaten for the social relationships, while the reading passage cites this as a powerful reason to reject buzzing. and the professor demonstrates that the process of buzzing is the process that people share a good experience and product, so on the contrary, this will benefit that society.so the third reason to refuse this new tactic in advertising is also unsustainable.To sum up, the professor has clearly showed that the central reason using to refuse the buzzing advertising tactic in the reading is untenable.TPO 20Though the passage holds that the Let It Burn policy adopted by the massive practices dealing with natural forest fires is too destructive for vegetation, wild life and tourism economy as a whole, the lecture raises opposite evidence to support the policy. According to the lecturer, the wild forest fires cannot only be destructive forces, they are also creative hopes necessary in a complete ecological cycle.First, for the vegetation, it’s biased for the pa ssage only to focus on the trees and small plants that are burned, charred and blackened in a fire. As shown in the lecture, after the same fire, new plants, especially the small ones can make use of the empty spaces left over and take strong roots there. Other plants whose seeds need strong heat to develop would also benefit from the burning and then thrive in the new environment.Second, the exaggerated stress in the passage on dead wild life is neither proper. When some species can experience adisaster in the fire, other species can take the niche and fit in well. So the lecturer believes the overall habitat for living creaturesjust changes after a fire; and the thriving of small animals like rabbit and hare can bring along the prosperity of their predators, thus forging a new stronger food chain.Third, the tourism economy in the natural parks won’t be ruined as the passage assumes. The lecturer points to the fact that wild fire of the same scale as the 1988 one is quite rare in history. Their scarce visit to the landscape may interfere with the tourism industry for one year or two, but they never stand as a long term threat to the local economy.。
托福2021年11月20日作文考试真题及答案
托福2021年11月20日作文考试真题及答案托福的作文考试，有独立写作和综合写作两部分，需要大家对两者进行进行了解。
下面是小编整理的托福2021年11月20日作文考试真题及答案。
独立写作Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for older people to take risks and explore new things than younger people.综合写作水手死于铅中毒，有些人认为是罐头食品的原因。
阅读：1.罐头虽然里面含有金属铅但是制作的时候这个剂量都是控制的，只是少量，而且食物在罐头里储存的时间很短，所以不应该是罐头导致的。
2.当时的其他船员也都会食用这种罐头，假如真的因为罐头不可能只有这一例中毒案件3. 他们有一个净化水的系统，所有用水都是干净的，所以不可能是食物导致的。
听力反驳：1. 虽然放的时间很短，但确实那些食物是inside of cans2. 水手身体没有经过test而且light poisoning很难被识别出来3. 通过净化器的水不能用于drinking和cooking，而海水对人身体不好，所以净化器没有用。
速度提升其实对于托福作文来说，不外乎四个字“熟能生巧”。
但是互相我们写托福写作的过程，其实2个部分最为消耗我们的时间，第一个就是构思的过程，第二个就是想一句话怎么表达的过程。
这两个部分是最为消耗时间的。
因此，其实缩减写作文时间的过程，就是减少这两个部分所消耗的时间。
首先说第一个部分，构思的过程。
其实想必绝大多数上过辅导班的考友们都知道托福作文就是传统的，龙头凤尾猪肚子，这样的写作方式。
第一段表明自己的观点，然后接下来每一段一开始给出分论点，最后一段进行总结，就这么简单。
但是实际上，这是我们想的方向不对，总是在向很宏观的想。
这里的诀窍就是向细分领域想!当我们总是在想建筑对社会很好的时候，我们就是会很想象到理由以及例子，但是如果我们想得很细的时候，就发现好说了，比如我们可以说赵州桥，既有实用价值，也有观赏价值。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
The reading passage explores the topic of the “Let it burn” policy. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that the “Let it burn”policy is fundamental positive policy, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.
First, the professor argues in the lecture that the fire enhanced the diversity of vegetation in Yellowstone Park, even though the reading passage suggests that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. This is because that the fire has created a opportunity for some new plants to grow, for instance, the small plants which needed open un-shaded area and the seeds which demanded high levels of heat to germinate, which means that the small vegetations would had a better environment after the large trees had been destroyed. Obviously, the professor's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the park wildlife was affected, and there was also concern that the destruction of habitats and food chains, the professor states that the fire also created new opportunities for some animals’ thriving that the population could recover and strengthened certain food chains. Then he supports this point with the fact that, for example, the new plants offered perfect habitats for some animals like rabbits and hares, and promote their predators’ booming the
survived animals would be stronger after fire.
Finally, the professor asserts that the fire did not influence tourism negatively since it would not happen every year, whereas the author of the reading claim that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that it was very unusual combination of several factors, such as low rainfall, strong winds and accumulation of dry undergrowth, that caused the fire in Yellowstone in 1988 , and visitors came back to park next year and each year after that.
In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading about that the fire is a disaster for Yellowstone is incorrect.。