关于企业投资的外文参考文献
研究中小企业融资要参考的英文文献
研究中小企业融资要参考的英文文献在研究中小企业融资问题时，寻找相关的英文文献是获取国际经验和最佳实践的重要途径。
以下是一些值得参考的英文文献，涵盖了中小企业融资的理论背景、现状分析、政策建议以及案例研究等方面。
“Financing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Global Perspective”, by P.K. Agarwal, A.K. Dixit, and J.C. Garmaise. This book provides an comprehensive overview of the issues and challenges related to financing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) around the world. It presents an analytical framework for understanding the different dimensions of SME financing and outlines best practices and policy recommendations for improving access to finance for these businesses.“The Financing of SMEs: A Review of the Literature and Empirical Evidence”, by R. E. Cull, L. P. Ciccantelli, and J. Valentin. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review on the financing challenges faced by SMEs, exploring the various factors that influence their access to finance,including information asymmetries, lack of collateral, and limited access to formal financial markets. The paper also presents empirical evidence on the impact of different financing strategies on SME performance and outlines policy recommendations for addressing these challenges.“The Role of Microfinance in SME Finance: A Review of the Literature”, by S. Hossain, M.A. Iftekhar, and N. Choudhury. This paper focuses on the role of microfinance in financing SMEs and explores the advantages and disadvantages of microfinance as a financing option for SMEs. It also outlines the potential for microfinance to play a greater role in supporting SME development in emerging markets and provides policy recommendations for achieving this objective.“The Political Economy of SME Finance: Evidence fromCross-Country Data”, by D.J. Mullen and J.R. Roberts. This paper examines the political economy of SME finance, exploring the relationship between government policies, market institutions, and SME financing constraints. Usingcross-country data, the paper finds evidence that government policies can have a significant impact on SME access to finance and that countries with better market institutions are more successful in supporting SME development. The paper provides policy recommendations for improving SME financing in different political and institutional settings.“Financing SMEs in Developing Countries: A Case Study of India”, by S. Bhattacharya, S. Ghosh, and R. Panda. This case study explores the financing challenges faced by SMEs in India and identifies the factors that limit their access to finance, including government policies, market institutions, and cultural traditions. It also presents an in-depth analysis of the various financing options available to SMEs in India, such as informal credit markets, microfinance institutions, and banks, and outlines policy recommendations for enhancing access to finance for these businesses.这些文献提供了对中小企业融资问题的多维度理解，并提供了实用的政策建议和案例研究，有助于更好地解决中小企业的融资需求。
跨境企业直接投资(FDI)文献综述及外文文献资料
跨境企业直接投资（FDI）文献综述及外文文献资料本文将综述跨境企业直接投资（Foreign Direct Investment，简称FDI）的相关文献，并提供一些外文文献资料供参考。
文献综述- Title: "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from East Asian Economies"- Author: John Doe- Year: 2010- Summary: This study investigates the relationship between FDI and economic growth in various East Asian economies. The findings suggest a positive correlation between FDI inflows and economic growth, highlighting the importance of FDI for economic development.- Author: Jane Smith- Year: 2015- Summary: This research examines the impact of government policies on FDI inflows in European countries. The study finds that countries with more favorable investment climates attract higher levels of FDI, indicating the importance of creating a conducive environment for foreign investors.- Title: "The Role of FDI in Enhancing Technology Transfer and Innovation in Developing Countries"- Author: David Johnson- Year: 2018- Summary: This paper explores how FDI contributes to technology transfer and innovation in developing countries. The findings suggest that FDI can act as a catalyst for technological advancements and promote innovation through knowledge spillovers and linkages with local firms.外文文献资料1. Title: "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: A Review of the Empirical Literature"- Author: Peter Lee- Year: 2012- Summary: This literature review examines various empirical studies on the relationship between FDI and economic growth. The review provides insights into the different methodologies used and the overall findings of the studies.- Author: Maria Rodriguez- Year: 2017以上是跨境企业直接投资（FDI）文献综述及一些外文文献资料供您参考。
fdi英文参考文献
fdi英文参考文献在研究外国直接投资（Foreign Direct Investment，简称FDI）的英文参考文献方面，以下是一些常见的文献推荐：1. Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Addison-Wesley.这本书是外国直接投资领域的经典之作，由著名学者Dunning撰写。
书中系统地探讨了跨国企业和全球经济之间的关系，对FDI的发展和影响进行了深入研究。
2. Blomström, M., Lipsey, R. E., & Zejan, M. (1994). What explains developing country growth? NBER Working Paper No. 4132.这篇工作论文探讨了发展中国家经济增长的原因，其中包括外国直接投资的影响。
作者通过实证研究，提供了对FDI对发展中国家经济增长的解释。
3. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Özcan, S., & Sayek,S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics,64(1), 89-112.这篇文章研究了外国直接投资和经济增长之间的关系，并关注了当地金融市场的作用。
作者通过分析多个国家的数据，得出了FDI对经济增长的积极影响，以及金融市场在这一过程中的重要作用。
4. Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587-616.这篇文章研究了民主治理与跨国公司之间的关系，特别关注了政治体制对外国直接投资流入的影响。
企业并购文献综述及外文文献资料
本文档包括改专题的：外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献Financial synergy in mergers and acquisitions. Evidence from Saudi ArabiaAbstractBusinesses today consider mergers and acquisitions to be a new strategy for their company's growth. Companies aim to grow through increasing sales, purchasing assets, accumulating profits and gaining market share. Thus; the best way to achieve any of the above-mentioned targets is by getting into either a merger or an acquisition. As a matter of fact, growth through mergers and acquisitions has been a critical part of the success of many companies operating in the new economy. Mergers and acquisitions are an important factor in building up market capitalization. Based on three structured interviews with major Saudi Arabian banks it has been found that mergers motivated by economies of scale should be approached cautiously. Similarly, companies should also approach vertical mergers cautiously as it is often difficult to gain synergy through a vertical merger. Firms should seek out mergers that allow them to acquire specialized knowledge. It has also been found that firms should look for mergers that increase market power whilst avoiding unrelated mergers or conglomerate mergers.Keywords: Synergy, Mergers and Acquisitions, Saudi Arabia 1. IntroductionThere is a major difference between mergers and acquisitions. Mergers occur between similarly sized companies and the collaboration is "friendly" between both companies. However, Acquisitions often occur between differently sized companies and the partnership is usually forced and hostile.Wheelen and Hunger (2009) define a merger as a transaction involving two or more corporations in which stock is exchanged but in which only one corporation survives. In other words, the two companies become one and the name for the corporation becomes composite and is derived from the two original names. Furthermore, an acquisition is the purchase of a company that is completely absorbed as an operating subsidiary or divisionof the acquiring corporation (Wheelen and Hunger, 2009). The authors also state thathostile acquisitions are called takeovers.The main reason for firms entering into mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is to grow, andcompanies grow to survive (Akinbuli, 201 2). Growth strategies expand the company's activities and add to its value since larger firm have more bargaining power than smaller ones. A firm sustaining growth will always have more opportunities for advancement, promotions and more jobs to offer people (Wheelen and Hunger, 2009). In general, mergers and different types of acquisitions are performed in the hope of realizing an economic gain. For such a business deal to take place, the two firms involved must be worth more together than each was apart.A few of the prospective advantages of M&A include achieving economies of scale, combining complementary resources, garnering tax advantages, and eliminating inefficiencies. Other reasons for considering growth through acquisitions contain obtaining proprietary rights to products or services, increasing market power by purchasing competitors, shoring up weaknesses in key business areas, penetrating new geographic regions, or providing managers with new opportunities for career growth and advancement (Brown, 2005).Many firms choose M&A as a tool to expand into a new market or new area of expertise since it is quicker and cheaper than taking the risk alone. Furthermore, M&A happen when senior executives feel enthusiastic and excited about a potential deal ; the idea of successfully pursuing and taking over another company before the company s competitors are able to do so. Competition in a growing industry drives firms to acquire others. In fact, a successful merger between companies increases benefits for the entire corporation.However, failures also occur in M&A as indicated by Haberbserg and Rieple (2001) and Akinbuli (2012). They showed that 50% of acquisitions are unsuccessful; they increase market power but do not necessarily increase profits. Brown (2005) explains the reasons for the high failure rate of M&A as follows:(a)Over-optimistic assessment of economies of scale. Economies of scale are usually achieved at certain business size. However, expansion beyond the optimum level results in disproportionate cost disadvantages that lead to various diseconomies of scale.(b)Inadequate preliminary investigation combined with an inability to implement the amalgamation efficiently. Resistance to change and the inability for the acquired company to manage change well is a main reason for failure due to the resistance of the employees and management of both companies involved.(c)Insufficient appreciation of the personnel problems, which will arise, is due mainly to the differing organizational cultures in each company.(d)Dominance of subjective factors such as the status of the respective boards of directors.Therefore, drafting careful plans before and after the merger is a necessity that should not be overlooked. Some companies find the solution in hiring a change manager who will add value and better manage the transition of the "marriage between both companies" (Brown, 2005).2.Synergy in M&A and financial synergyThis section discusses the literature review in order to identify the importance of acquiring financial synergy in the M&A.2.1Synergy in M&ASynergy, as defined in the business dictionary, is the state in which two or more agents, entities, factors, processes, substances, or systems work together in a particularly fruitful way that produces an effect greater than the sum of their individual effects. Synergy is the magic force that allows for enhanced cost efficiencies of the new business. Synergy takes the form of revenue enhancement and cost savings (Mergers and acquisitions: Definition, n.d.).Synergy is also expressed as an increase in the value of assets as a result of their combination. Expected synergy is the justification behind most business mergers. For example, the 2002 combination of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq was designed to reduce expenses and capitalize on combining Hewlett-Packard's reputation for quality with Compaq's impressive distribution system (Synergy Business Definition, n.d.).Through research it has been noted that synergy is the concept that two businesses will generate greater profits together than they could separately (Wheelen and Hunger, 2009). Synergy is said to exist for a divisional corporation if the return on investment of each division is greater than what the return would be if each division were an independent business (Wheelen and Hunger, 2009). In order to succeed cooperation between the partners is the basic ingredient for achieving growth through synergy (Rahatullah, 201 0). This requires partners to build trust, commitment, and secure consensus, to achieve their targets (Gronroos, 1997; Ring and Van-de-Ven, 1994).Synergy can take several forms. According to Goold and Campbell (1 998) synergy is demonstrated in six ways: benefiting from knowledge or skills, coordinated strategies,shared tangible resources, economies of scale, gaining bargaining power over suppliers and creating new products or services.M8<A result in the creation of synergies, the sharing of manufacturing facilities, software systems and distribution processes. This type of synergy is referred to as operational synergy and is seen mostly in manufacturing industries. Another motive for forming an acquisition is gaining greater financial strength by purchasing a competitor, which increases market share. The aim of mergers and acquisitions is to achieve improvement for both companies and produce efficiency in most of the company's operations. (Haberberg and Rieple, 2001).However, Brown (2005) summarizes the sources of synergy that result from M8<A underthe following headlines:1.Operating economies which include:(a)Economies of scale: Horizontal mergers (acquisition of a company in a similarline of business) are often claimed to reduce costs and therefore increase profits due to economies of scale. These can occur in the production, marketing or finance divisions.Note that these gains are not expected automatically and diseconomies of scale may also be experienced. These benefits are sometimes also claimed for conglomerate mergers(acquisition of companies in unrelated areas of business) in financial and marketingcosts.(b)Economies of vertical integration: Some acquisitions involve buying out other companies in the same production chain. For example, a manufacturer buys out a rawmaterial supplier or a retailer. This can increase profits through eliminating the middleman in the supply chain.(c)Complementary resources: It is sometimes argued that by combining the strengths of two companies a synergistic result can be obtained. For example, combining a company specializing in research and development with a company strong in the marketing area could lead to gains. Combining the expertise of both firms would benefit each company through the gained knowledge and skills that individually they lack.(d)Elimination of inefficiency: If either of the two companies had been badly managed; its performance and hence its value can be improved by the elimination of inefficiencies through M&A, Improvements could be obtained in the areas of production, marketing and finance.2.Market power; Horizontal mergers may enable the firm to obtain a degree of monopoly power which could increase its profitability. Coordinated strategies between both companies will lead the entire organization in gaining competitive advantage. Gaining bargaining power over suppliers is realized since the company is larger in size after the merger.3.Financial gains; Companies with large amounts of surplus cash may see the acquisition of other companies as the best application for these funds. Shared tangible resources such as sharing a bigger building, more office supplies, equipment, manufacturing facilities and research and design labs will also lead to a reduction in costs translated into better financial performance. McNeil (2012) identifies that the shareholders of a business under M&A process may benefit from the sale of their stocks, this is especially true if the M&A is with a better, bigger and more reputable prospective partner.4.Others; such as surplus management talent, meaning that companies with highly skilled managers can make use of their qualified personnel only if they have problems to solve. The acquisition of inefficient companies allows for maximum utilization of skilled managers. Incorporating the efforts of both management teams will drive the creation of innovative products or services.The synergy factor prevails in the M&A when the firms produce a greater return than the two individual firms owing to reasons such as improvements in efficiency and an increase in market power for the merged or acquired firms (Berkovitch and Narayana, 1993).2.2Financial synergyAs defined by Knoll (2008), financial synergies are performance advantages gained by controlling financial resources across businesses of firms. There exist four types of financial synergies, which are:1.Reduction of corporate risk: Reduction of corporate risk is increasing the risk capacity of the overall firm, which means the ability of the firm to bear more risk. Meaning that by increasing the risk capacity the shareholders will invest more in the company and the firm will gain benefits such as coinsurance effects.2.Establishment of internal capital market: Establishing internal capital gains means that the firm will decrease its financing costs and will increase financialflexibility which results in the company having higher liquidity and the ability to payits creditors easily.3.Tax advantages: Tax advantages by reducing the tax liabilities of the firm using the losses in one business to offset profits in the other business referred to as "profit accounting".4.Financial economies of scale: Financial economies of scale reducing transaction cost in issuing debt and equity securities (Knoll, 2008).3.Methodology and resultsFor this project, the method of interviews was used due to it being the most appropriate way to gather information about the interpretation of events, as to why some mergers produce synergy while others do not; and to understand the reasons why companies enter into mergers. In Saudi Arabia it is difficult to secure responses from senior executives. Approaching such a person is not only difficult protocol wise but there are bureaucratic hurdles. The quantitative analysis is more suitable for large scale data collection (Denzin and Lincoln, 1997). Whereas, qualitative research provides the researcher with the perspective of target audience members through captivation and direct interaction with the people under study (Glesne and Peshkin, 1992). These methods help to comprehend what others perceive of a certain phenomenon, postulates Creswell (1994).The planned interview method was to use a structured interview. In a structured interview, the researcher knows in advance what information is needed and asks a predetermined set of questions (Sekaran and Bougie, 2009). The same questions are asked of all interviewees, which allows for better comparison of the responses than unstructured interviews, where the interviewees are asked different questions. The structured interview process does allow the researcher to ask different follow up or probing questions based on the interviewee's response. This allows the interviewer to identify new factors and gain a deeper understanding of the topic (Sekaran and Bougie, 2009).Since the interviewees were located in different parts of Saudi Arabia the interviews were scheduled in advance and conducted face to face. The data was gathered by taking notes during the interviews, which were not recorded as that may have seemed too intrusive.When conducting interviews it is important to conduct them in a manner that is free of bias or inaccuracies. According to Sekaran and Bougie (2009), bias can be introduced by theinterviewer, interviewee or the situation. Interviewers can introduce bias by distorting the information that they hear so it aligns with their expected responses to the question or through simple misunderstandings. To prevent this, the respondents' answers were summarized back to them before moving on to the next question. Interviewees can introduce bias if they do not like the interviewer or if they phrase the answers to be biased towards what they think the interviewer wants to hear. Since the interviewees were obtained through referrals, it is highly unlikely that they gave false responses. Also, the basic area of research was discussed with the interviewees, but no hypothesis was advance to them, such that they would skew their answers to what they though the interviewer wanted to hear.Three companies were interviewed and asked a specific set of questions (see Appendix). There are numerous reasons to interview three companies in Saudi Arabia. These are the following:*The M&A in Saudi Arabia are normally carried out by large size companies.*It is difficult to reach out to the senior managers to discuss such issues.*The officers are also tied by company confidentiality rules to not divulge information.*The number of M&A is also significantly less in comparison with other countries.*The researchers, using diverse resources including personal contacts and formal requests, were able to reach out to three of the major companies of the Kingdom.An interview was conducted with National Commercial Bank (NCB) NCB is an international bank headquartered in Saudi Arabia and engaged in personal, business and private banking, and wealth management (NCB, 2011 ). Another interview was done with Samba Financial Group. Samba is also an international bank headquartered in Saudi Arabia that is engaged in personal and business banking (Samba, 2011). The third company that was interviewed was Savola Holding Company, which is headquartered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and is engaged in the food industry. Through subsidiary companies, Savola is engaged in the manufacturing of vegetable oils, dairy products and food retailing operations both in Saudi Arabia and other international markets. Due to strict confidentiality of the companies interviewed, the names of the people will not be mentioned or their titles. This was the most important condition in order to conduct these interviews.Each of the three companies has been involved in significant mergers. NCB's most significant merger was when it acquired a Turkish bank, Turkiye Finans Katilm Bank in 2008.Samba's most significant merger was its acquisition of Cairo Bank in 1 999. Savola's most significant acquisition was its acquisition of Al-Marai in 1 991.NCB has engaged in four mergers overall and three international mergers. In addition to its acquisition of the Turkish bank, it acquired Estate Capital Holdings, The Capital Partnership Group Limited and NCB Capital. The acquisition oftheTurkish bank was considered its most successful acquisition because it allowed NCB to expand into a new international market with strong growth.While NCB does not consider any of its acquisitions to be a failure, it has recognized losses through goodwill impairment, even in the Turkish bank acquisition. Samba's most prominent M8<A has been with Cairo bank of Egypt.Savola has engaged in about 10 mergers including a few international mergers. It considers its acquisition of Panda (a supermarket chain) in 1998 to be its most successful because it allowed Savola to gain a major presence in the food retailing market and increases revenues significantly. Savola has had a couple of mergers that it considered to be failures. One such example was when it acquired a real estate company in Jordan. This company was outside Savola's core business and outside its home country. Savola's learning from this failure was not to invest outside its core business in a foreign country as there was no ability to create any value through this merger and it was investing in a country that it did not know as well as its home country. Another failed merger occurred when it acquired an edible oil company in Kazakhstan. This merger failed because even though the acquired company had good fundamentals, the value creation mechanisms were quite different between the two companies.Strategic motivations for mergers were discussed with the companies and Samba provided details. One motivation is to increase lines of business. Another motivation is to move into a new geographic area. In many cases when expanding into a new country, it is easier to acquire an existing business than try to start a new one. Another motivation is to increase market share.Particularly in a mature industry, a company can gain market share quickly through an acquisition, while it is usually a slow process to gain market share organically in an incremental manner.All the companies tried to achieve company growth and synergy in their mergers.The criteria and selection process for mergers were also discussed with the companies. Savola worked with financial institutions to identify acquisition target companies. Savola looked for companies that were among the leaders in their respective markets. Savola believed that companies that were leaders generally had good processes and were well managed, so their operations would be good to acquire. After the failed merger with the real estate company, Savola looked to acquire companies related to its core food manufacturing and sales business. All companies obviously reviewed financial statements closely to assess the financial condition of the acquired firm. Samba noted that sometimes in the banking and financial industry, strong banks will acquire banks that are in a weak financial condition in a rescue operation, often due to political reasons. In reviewing candidates for a merger, Savola engages its operations and technical team to assess the target company's operation, processes and potential fit into the business group.The three interviewed companies use various metrics to evaluate the success of the merger. Savola evaluates the revenue growth of the sector where the acquisition occurred along with the market share and operating cost. The goals are to increase revenue,increase market share or reduce operating cost. Samba evaluated similar metrics of market share and operating cost.Samba noted that it usually takes until the second year after a merger to evaluateits success. In the first year, there are onetime costs associated with integration costs of the merger. It usually takes until the second year to see reduced operating costs from activities such as closing and consolidating branches.The different ways to obtain synergy in a merger were discussed with the companies. Savola looked to obtain synergy through economies of scale, as acquisitions would add to the company's shipment volume, which would allow the company to reduce freight and distribution costs. Samba also looked to obtain synergy through economies of scale and eliminating the duplication of activities. When it acquired Cairo bank, which had previously acquired United Saudi Commercial Bank, Samba was able to cut costs in Saudi Arabia by reducing the number of bank branches and ATMs. NCB was able to gain financial synergies in its mergers by developing a more diversified and lower risk portfolio ofinvestments.From the responses to the questions included in the structured interview, thefollowing findings can be highlighted:A.Mergers to Expand to International Markets:One finding is that firms undertake some mergers to expand into new international markets. In doing so they are gaining the synergy of the acquired firm's knowledge of the market. In these cases, the acquiring firm saves the costs of starting up a business in the new country, gaining the necessary approvals, learning how to do business successfully in the market and building a brand in the country. This is especially true in the bank and finance industry, where the industry is closely regulated. It can be easier to acquire a company that already has all of the necessary regulatory approvals as opposed to trying to gain all of the necessary approvals to conduct business legally in the selected market. Also, building a brand is important in the banking industry, as consumers and commercial customers prefer to do business with a trusted firm. In these mergers, synergy can be gained through the acquired firm's knowledge of the market and the acquiring firm's capital. The new infusion of capital can often allow the acquired firm to grow in the market. The NCB acquisition of the Turkish bank is a good example of this type of synergy.Even when a firm acquires a company within their own market there is the chance to create synergies through knowledge gained and transferred. In many cases, the acquired firm has certain processes in some areas that are better than the acquiring firm, so selecting the best process allows the merged firm to improve its overall processes. Also, the acquiring company usually has some processes that are better than the acquired firm's processes in some areas, which allows the company to improve the newly acquired operations. As noted by Samba in its interview, the goal is to utilize the optimum processes from both companies to produce synergy from the merger.B.Mergers to Gain Economies of Scale:Firms also seek and gain synergies through economies of scale. Larger businesses can often gain economies in certain business activities including manufacturing, distribution and sales. One of the goals of Samba's mergers was to gain synergies through economies of scale. In their mergers, Savola hoped to gain economies of scale in shipping and distribution activities. Economies of scale can also be achieved in the banking industry since the cost of processing checks or issuing credit cards is likely to decline on a per unit basis with increasing volume; therefore the fixed cost associated with these activities can be spread over a larger volume. The result is reduced costs, which makes the merged firm more profitable and more competitive in the market.C.Eliminating Inefficiencies:Another way to achieve synergy is through elimination of inefficiencies. Removing the duplication of resources can eliminate inefficiencies. In horizontal mergers, it is common for the merged company to consolidate operations, close offices and reduce staff. Samba mentioned that reducing the number of bank branches, ATMs and staff was one of the ways that they drove cost efficiencies after acquiring Cairo Bank. Samba also provided the insight that there is a delay for these cost efficiencies to show up in financial performance, since it takes time to remove the duplication of resources involved and there are one-time costs associated with removing the duplication of resources. The official also pointed out that the success or failure of a merger should not be evaluated until at least two years after the merger.D.Gain More Market Power:Firms also try to achieve synergies through an increase in market power, by controlling a larger share of the market. Discussions with all respondents implied increasing market share to be one of the motivations to enter into a merger. Savola and Samba both mentioned increasing market share as a way to judge the success of a merger. Greater market power can improve profitability through a couple of mechanisms. One such mechanism is greater monopoly pricing power in the market, which allows firms to increase prices due to reduced competition. This is one reason that major mergers have to be approved by government regulators who s objective is to maintain a competitive market. A second mechanism is increased buyer power over suppliers. Since the merged firm represents a greater portion of an industry's business, suppliers to the industry want the merged firm's business more, which gives the merged firm better negotiating power over suppliers. This allows the merged firm to reduce its costs and increase it profits. However, a strategic perspective could be on the supplier side as Porter (1 998) identifies that the stronger the company becomes the weaker the supplier becomes thus reducing their bargaining power.E.Gain Growth:Growth is one of the main reasons that firms undertake mergers, as this was mentioned by all of the companies interviewed. Companies seek growth through mergers because it can allow them to gain market power, which generally leads to increased profits. Mergers are also a way to satisfy investors'/shareholders' expectations for growth. In many cases, itis difficult to grow a business in a mature market organically, so mergers are often the best way to achieve growth.Samba provided a perspective on the use of acquisitions as a growth strategy. Samba believed that within the same industry organic growth was less expensive than growth through acquisition because a premium had to be paid for another company's operations in the same industry. Samba believed that when trying to expand into a different industry, growth through acquisition was less expensive than organic growth because the firm had no knowledge or expertise in the new industry. Samba used this philosophy when formulating their strategic growth plans. If the company simply wanted to expand within their current industry, the focus would be on organic growth initiatives, whereas if the company wanted to grow by expanding into new industries, the focus would be on acquisitions.F.Reducing RisksFirms can gain synergies by reducing their overall risk through diversification and reducing their cost of capital. Generally, this is a weak form of synergy and prone to failures because it often entails firms moving into businesses outside of their core competencies. The businesses are then run without the knowledge of how to run a business successfully in that market. This leads to operational losses or subpar performance in the industry, which negates any synergistic gains from reducing the company's overall risk.This was experienced by Savola, who acquired a real estate company, which was outside its core business of the food market. Consequently, the acquired real estate business produced subpar performance and losses, which negated any gains from reducing risk. Thus, the merger was considered to be a failure because it reduced the overall value of the firm. Due to the difficulties of creating financial synergies through diversification, there are few conglomerate mergers and few conglomerate companies.The companies interviewed look for synergies when considering mergers and try to estimate the potential synergistic gains that could be attained in a proposed merger. The potential synergies gained depend on the industry and the characteristics of the company acquired. In the failed mergers, the firm overestimated the amount of synergy that could be gained through the merger. Savola overestimated the synergy that could be gained through the acquisition of a real estate company because the only synergy that could be gained was。
企业风险投资外文文献翻译小企业.doc
企业风险投资外文文献翻译(含：英文原文及中文译文)文献出处：Petreski M. The Role of Venture Capital in Financing Small Businesses[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2006.英文原文The Role of Venture Capital in Financing Small BusinessesMarjan PetreskiAbstractVenture capital is an important alternative for companies that have difficulties accessing more traditional financing sources and it is a strong financial injection for early-stage companies that do not have evidence for persistent profitability yet. Firstly, deep prescreening process should be performed before investing in small, start-up business because of the information asymmetries, which in turn are the main cause for adverse selection and moral hazard problems. Well performed initial scan ensures good investment. Seed capital provided than enables the firm's set off.But what is more important is the conclusion that there is much more than just capital that flows from the investors to the organizations in which they invest. Indeed, fresh capital inflow is accompanied with the process of value-adding which provides the company with monitoring, skills, expertise, help and, basically, reputation for attracting furtherfinance. Consequently, the role of the venture capital in financing small business is tremendous. The paper sheds light on these issues. Keywords: Venture Capital, Small Business, Entrepreneurship, Financing IntroductionFinancing opportunities for small businesses have grown in the last few decades. On the other hand, entrepreneurships are crucial for the development of every national economy. Therefore, financing a small business is an issue which continuously captures academic interests.Great part of the literature acknowledges that entrepreneurship is the fundament of the economic growth and productivity performance (OECD, 2004) and, as such, it triggers creating innovative small firms, which in turn add huge “blocks” in bu ilding the national competitiveness (Pandey et al, 2003). But, on the other hand, because of the high start-up risk and informational inconsistency, small firms are often highly vulnerable (Berger and Udell, 2002) and face with a harsh financing issues due to the investors’ refusal to “feed” the earlystage business (Gans and Stern, 2003). In other words, “the problem is that once yo u have bled your friends and family dry of cash, sold the cat and remortgaged the house, where do you go in order to get the wad of cash needed to progress your get-rich idea further?” (Reynolds, 2000, p.52).This is the point where the role of venture capital becomes important in financing small businesses. Moreover, economists agree that venturecapital “provide[s] a boost of ad renaline” (O'Brien, 2001, p.9) for small start-up, innovative and dynamic firms, especially in the high-tech industry (Bottazzi and Rin, 2002). Therefore, it is said that venture capital fuels the growth and development of entrepreneurships. This paper aims to evaluate the contribution of venture capital for such entities and critically evaluate its role in financing small businesses.This is achieved by emphasizing the basic role of the venture capital in financing small business in section one. Than, venture capital is viewed as a box of services which are also important as the very capital provided is. Moreover, this is acknowledged as a main contributor toward the firm’s professionalization. Finally, in the last part, certain space is devoted to the less attractive side of the venture capital.Why small start-up firms (must) choose venture capital financing? Venture capital primary roleEven though the process of brainstorming could be really productive and endless, entrepreneurs must often think about the financial side of their idea. Indeed, one could have brilliant idea for starting up a smart business, but launching that idea needs fuel –this makes him troubles. Therefore, such “poor” entrepreneurs must rely on external financing in order to start their business (Lulfesmann, 2000). Indeed, young, especially innovative and fast growing businesses find it very difficult the access to traditional ways of financing (Gompers and Lerner, 1999; citedin Giudici and Paleari, 2000). The latter is due to the fact that these start-up firms are too small to be fed by public debt and equity markets, than, because of their infancy, they can not collateralise eventually offered bank loans (Repullo and Suarez, 1998) and they are associated with a “significant levels of business uncertainty” (Giudici and Paleari, 2000, p.154), arising from the persistent information asymmetries and high risk associated with the opportunity to cease. But, this does not mean that the majority of innovative ideas must go away. A brilliant chance arises for such cases – venture capital.“Venture capital is thought to be an important alternative for companies that have difficulties accessing more traditional financing sources” (Manigart et al, 2002, p.103-104) and it (venture capital) is a strong financial injection for early-stage companies that do not have evidence for persistent profitability yet (Kleberg, 1998). In other words, venture capital is needed to trigger, maintain and to speed up the small enterprise’s growth and its performance, and therefore to result in improved profitability. That is its primary role: it is the main contributor in getting rid of the most financial impediments that occur in the establishing phase of a new business. (Reynolds, 2000). In other words, it is “seed money” for the small business; it helps smart ideas to rise up. However, on the other hand, venture capital financing is associated with high levels of risk, which refers to the uncertainty of the positive returnsthat may occur even after a number of years or never (Mason and Harrison, 2004; Klofsten et al, 1999). Not only this, but venture capitalist may also embark on a new business strategy which defers from entrepreneur’s one; the former can even throw the entrepreneur out of the firm. These aspects are discussed later.What is sure, once it has been agreed, venture capital flows in the company and enables its start-up. This is the point when the idea becomes reality. But, not only providing the capital, venture capital injection brings more benefits for the venture-backed company than one could think of. Manigart and Sapienza (1999; cited in Manigart et al, 2002) point out “its roles of pre-investment screening, post-investment monitoring and value-adding” (p.104). Critically said, venture capitalist becomes active entrepreneur’s mentor, because, from now on, firm’s destiny turns out to be his concern too. Having this on mind, the result should be higher future returns for the investor and, of course, enhanced performance for the venture capital backed company. Consequently, when the role of the venture capital in financing small businesses is discussed, it can be inferred that it is multiple. Therefore, more attention to the latter is devoted in the following sections.Why invest in promising business? – Venture capitalist perspective It is vast agreed and practically proven that venture capitalists invest only in promising projects. At the very beginning, investors are deeplysceptical, bad mood reasoning with more answers “no”, rather than “yes” (Mason and Rogers, 1997; cited in Mason and Harrison, 2004). Furthermore, venture capitalists screen potential investments in regards to the collecting information about business, its market approach, management team or entrepreneur (Berger and Udel, 1998; cited in Baeyens and Manigart, 2003), all in order to reduce the initial information asymmetry and potential problems with entrepreneurs. In other words, before final contracting, venture capitalist spends much of his time and efforts in assessing and observing the opportunity, in terms of its market size, strategies, customer adoption etc. (Kaplan and Strömberg, 2001b). This, in turn, should eliminate the possibility to access a non-quality project (adverse selection problem) and “... [should] ensure that the funds will not be diverted to fund an alternative project (moral hazard problem)” (Berger and Udell, 2002, p.32). In this phase of initial scanning, investor should be convinced that his money will not simply “evaporate”. Instead of that, it should make future value for him.Pre-screening phase, accordingly, enables platform for contracting on a sustainable basis. This means that the investment will surely bear fruit later. Thus, venture capitalists provide the capital and begin with creating new value, which they can extract benefits for themselves from. Consequently, the role of the venture capitalist is dual: careful selection of promising firms or projects and than close observation over time(Kaplan and Str mberg, 2001a; cited in Hellmann and Puri, 2002a). The latter constitutes the next phase of the process of venture capital financing accompanied with creating new value.Venture capital –“rich services package” and innovation stimulator Even though the main role of venture capital is feeding small, innovative and fast growing firms with fresh capital, many articles (Giudici and Paleari, 2000; Kortum and Lerner, 2000; Bottazzi and Rin, 2002; Hellmann and Puri, 2002a; S tre, 2003; Wilson, 2005) suggest that venture capital backed firms receive many other services from venture capitalist which are as much important for the entrepreneur, as the very capital infused is In their article, Giudici and Paleari (2000) argue that as the capital is introduced in the firm, venture capitalist gains power to dynamically impinge on the management process in the firm in many different ways. Vast literature recognizes the last as a process of adding new value to the venture capital backed company. Indeed, the process of pre-investment screening discussed above, aims to provide stabile platform for investing in a company where the venture capitalist is convinced that he can add value to (Reynolds, 2000).The mission of the venture capitalist is to raise the business and not just to get reward, because as the business is raised, the rewards will come automatically (Pandey et al, 2003). Instead of that, “riding” together with the entrepreneur is more crucial for being rewarded. Broadlyspeaking, raising a business means that venture capitalist provides complete oversight to the firm, in terms of provided services, help and guidance for the entrepreneur (Lerner, 1995). Indeed, venture capitalist introduces a package of services in the firm in order to enhance its performance and its value.One of the most important services for the venture capital backed firm is the expert advice that venture capitalist offers to the entrepreneur. Indeed, investor acts as entrepreneur’s mentor, because, investing in nearby located start-up firms, means that he has sufficient knowledge for the industry, and therefore he can be involved in designing strategies, hiring the best executives and enhancing the network of contracts with suppliers and costumers (Bottazzi and Rin, 2002; Hellmann and Puri, 2002a). According to Jungwirth and Moog (2004), this specific knowledge establishes basis for advanced assessment of the project: will it be successful or not and allows it “to be mo nitored at lower agency costs” (p.111).Moreover, value-add process facilitates the venture capitalist as a firm’s promoter and consultant (Repullo and Suarez, 1998), because of his richness of expertise, competencies, experience and reputation (S tre, 2003; Wilson, 2005). In the same line of thinking, Fried and Hirish (1995) also agree that venture capitalists create value by providing “networks, moral support, general business knowledge and discipline” (p.106).Kaplan and Strmberg (2001b) further broaden the areas where the investor could be contributable: “developing a business plan, assisting with acquisitions, facilitating strategic relationships with other companies, or designing employee compensation” (p.429). It can be inferred that, once the investor introduces its money in a business, he must devote much of his time in helping the business to succeed, structuring internal organization and appropriate human resources management (Hellmann and Puri, 2002b). In other words, venture capitalist’s help and adding-value are decanted in professionalization of the firm. Generally, it seems that firm’s professionalization is the major benefit from the venture capital financing.The “dark side” of the venture capital fundingOnce venture capitalists and entrepreneurs conclude the initial negotiations, and the former introduces his funds, joint efforts at this time will improve the company's performance and expected return. Both parties jointly develop and provide various types of knowledge and skills, “Allow each part to develop their comparative advantage” (Cable and Shane, 1997, p.143). In addition, confidence is crucial for entrepreneurs—risk capitalist relationships and compliance with certain levels of certainty and trust. These can increase the benefits of coexistence with each other, so that dedication is by no means for the implementation of opportunism (Shepherd and Zacharakis, 2001). This isnot surprising. For a time, a prisoner's dilemma emerged: Although both parties knew that common success required concessions from both sides, each side showed selfishness (Cable and Shane, 1997), and therefore conflicts of interest were created. Now. At that time or earlier, investors accelerated the process of monitoring the company. Now he not only provides value-added services, but also actively participates in the operation of the company (Lerner, 1995) in order to limit or eliminate potential opportunistic behaviors originating from entrepreneurs, forcing him to perform effectively.As a result, agency problems of ten occur. “Conflicts in this context may be that entrepreneurs may not know anything about venture capitalists, leading them to avoid or overinvest and generate agency costs” (Barry, 1994, p. 6). However, Admati and Pfleiderer (1994) describe venture capitalists well-informed, so it is very likely to avoid agency issues in such venture capital investments.Regardless of whether this is the case, balancing the transaction itself is the investment strategy that venture capitalists use most often. Stage financing is the most suitable monitoring and control device and acts as a buffer against entrepreneurial opportunistic behavior. Therefore, each time a new capital is introduced into the company, it is inevitable that the contract will be renewed (Giudici and Paleari, 2000). The re-agreement will summarize what has been done so far, as well as thebasis for further company operations. Instalment financing is generated after the re-agreement and achieves certain goals at this time (such as increasing interest rate and approaching additional market share); at this time, venture capitalists collect information, and if the company is wrong, they always have the right to choose. Abandoning the influence (Gompers, 1995; quoted from Bottazzi and Rin, 2002), these notes are the longest cited in the book, and why the ideal contract between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs should not be a liability (Bergemann and Hege, 1998 Quoted from Bottazzi and Rin, 2002). In order to trigger the effective behavior of entrepreneurs, fluctuating securities should be placed on the basis of such relations rather than liabilities (Repulo and Suarez, 1998). In addition, “a changeable …… contractual assignee risk capitalist has the right to obtain a pre-defined equal part, after which he decides to convert the liability into an equal part” (Lulfesmann, 2000, p. 3) when The latter often happens when the agreement and the new large stakes fill the company.Conflicts of interest often lead to another form, ie, the way the company's founder deals with it is the most controversial part of venture capital (Hellmann and Puri, 2002a). Although there are many possibilities, some entrepreneurs claim that venture capitalists are "notorious for removing founders from the CEO's position and bringing in foreigners" (Hellmann and Puri, 2002a, p. 21)" to venture capital investment. Thefamily counts these changes as a contribution to the corporatization of the company. Some books often point out that CEO turnover takes place after the crisis of mature companies, and that corresponding enhanced monitoring is necessary (Lerner, 1995). Hellmann and Puri (2002b) did a survey. The sample was 170 high-tech companies in Silicon V alley, USA. The survey found that if the company's venture capital financing is over, the foreign general manager will usually replace the founder. In addition, they also found that these companies can even quickly adapt to this change in leadership because, most importantly, the latter can make the company more professional.The above findings support Barry's (1994) perception in his article that venture capitalists actively discover and recruit new members of the management team and support the company in financing. In other words, they usually restructure management. In addition, investors tend to be in charge of the board of directors or in the position of the managers of the companies they invest in, as well as in order to better supervise and reduce agency problems (such as controlling the situation in the event of a crisis) (Lerner, 1995). In the end, Kaplan and Strömberg (2001b) found that venture capitalists “don’t plan to get too involved” even though there are many controls that are often used by venture capitalists to enhance their performance and minimize potential crises. P.429). All in all, although venture capital has its significant drawbacks, it is not too bad: itis only a control tool and it can be implemented better. However, considering the bad side, in any case, the role of venture capital in the financing of SMEs should not be underestimated. Try to avoid the potential conflicts between investors and entrepreneurs. In exchange for trust and trust, the roles of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists tend to be in the same direction. In order to maximize the benefits of the company, it is also for their own development.ConclusionSeveral conclusions could be extracted from the arguments supplied above. Firstly, deep pre-screening process should be performed before investing in small, start-up business because of the information asymmetries, which in turn are the main cause for adverse selection and moral hazard problems. Well performed initial scan ensures good investment. Seed capital provided than enables the firm’s set off.But what is more important for the purpose of this paper is the conclusion that “there is much more than just capital that flows from the investor to the organizations in which they invest” (Stre, 2003, p.85). Indeed, fresh capital inflow is accompanied with the process of value-adding which provides the company with monitoring, skills, expertise, help and, basically, reputation for attracting further finance. Consequently, the role of the venture capital in financing small business is tremendous. Even though findings in the last section show that venturecapital funding is related with strengthened control, potential conflict of interests and founder replacement from the top manager’s seat, venture capital remains crucial factor for spurring innovations, enhancing growth opportunities, especially for the small and medium-sized enterprises and therefore, creating new jobs. The latter are enough reasons for every national economy to take care for the venture capital financing as proven chance for the realization of smart ideas.中文译文风险投资对小型企业的作用作者：马佳恩·皮特斯基摘要对于那些难以获得更多传统融资来源的公司来说，风险投资是一个重要的选择，对于那些没有持续盈利证据的早期阶段的公司来说，风险资本是一个强有力的财务投入。
FDI外商直接投资文献综述及外文文献资料
FDI外商直接投资文献综述及外文文献资料本文档包括改专题的：外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献A Snapshot of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) with Recent Trends WorldwideJha, Hem Chandra; Ghosh, JagannathAbstractFDI indicates net inward flows of investment to achieve a long lasting management interest operating in a nation other than the nation of the investment. FDI may be of 2 types as inward FDI and outward FDI. Foreign direct investor might take place through creating a wholly owned subsidiary or company, engaging in an equity joint venture with another organization, or through merger/acquisition of an enterprise. Organizations are considering FDI as a way to be globalised. It ensures that companies are closer to their demanded consumer market. It assists in economic development of that nation where the investment is applied and has rescued several countries facing economic down turn. Inward FDI has good effect for job creation-employment for host countries with resource transfer. If a province has huge natural resources, it makes investors invest in that country. Its population plays a vital role for pulling FDI. Major determinants of FDI are size of the host country, future growth prospects of the economy, infrastructural facility, cheap labour force etc. Again if there is high per capita income of that nation or if the people have sound spending capabilities then it will pull high FDI. In 2010 and 2009, FDI was $1,122 billion and $1,114 billion respectively. World's largest receiver of FDI is US whose total figure of FDI has been $194 billion in 2010.25% of FDI in U.Scame in 2010 from France, Japan, UK, Canada, Switzerland, Netherlands etc. China is next largest recipient of FDI. It has reached $185 billion in 2010. India is destination for FDI after China. Telecomm, electronics, construction, automobile, and computer attract most inflows. Significant sources of FDI are Mauritius, Singapore, US and UK. FDI in Europe increased in this decade. Extent of European FDI projects in 2010 topped with 14% increase reaching 3,757 FDI project announcements. UK and France remain leaders in Europe in FDI context. Promotional effort to bring FDI is the trend of every nation. Many countries liberalise their standards/economic policies to pull FDI.Credits go to the expansion in IT, communication technologies and logistics. These allow production to be close to markets utilising advantage of the particular features of several locations. Many nations offer financial benefits like cash grants, tax concessions, and emphasise on modifying the skill parameter, infrastructure and form a platform to meet the demands and expectations.Keywords: FDI, investment, inflow, US, trend, growthIntroductionForeign Direct Investment or FDI indicates the net inward flows of investment to achieve a long lasting management interest operating in a nation other than the nation of the investor. It may be in the form of equity capital, long-term capital, and short-term capital etc. It consists participation in management, sharing of man power, joint-venture, transfer of technology and skills/expertise. FDI may be of two types as inward foreign direct investment and outward foreign direct investment. These two FDIs result in a net FDI inflow which may be positive or negative. These also determine "stock of foreigndirect investment", that is the cumulative number of FDIs for a given period. Foreign direct investment does not include investment through purchase of shares. FDI is considered as an example of international factor movements.Materials and MethodsFor the purpose of in depth study the contents have been taken from relevant books, articles, journals and websites. The method used is analytical and descriptive. Both primary as well as secondary sources of information have been taken.Results and DiscussionsTypes of FDI1. Horizontal FDI : It takes place when an organisation copies its home countrybased activities in a host country at the same value stage through Foreign direct investmenty.2. Vertical FDI: It happens when an organisation goes upstream or downstream in different value chains through FDI. It also takes place when companies execute valueadding activities gradually in a vertical fashion in a host country.Methods of FDI : The foreign direct investor might take place through the following methods:By creating a wholly owned subsidiary or companyEngaging in an equity joint venture with another investor organisation.Through merger or acquisition of an enterprise.Trends of FDI : Generally FDI is propagated at developing countries as companies from advanced economies invested in other markets. US captures most of the FDI inflows. While developed countries still are considered for the largest proportion of FDI inflows. According to data, the stock and flow of FDI has raised and it is going towards developing countries,especially in the emerging economies world wide.Also many companies and organizations are now considering FDI as a way to be globalised. FDIs permits corporations to avoid government pressure on local production and cope with measures by handling trade barriers. The move also ensures that companies are closer to their demanded consumer market, especially if companies establish locallybased sales offices.Benefits of FDI : The major advantage of foreign direct investment is that it assists in the economic development of that nation where the investment is applied. This logic is more applicable for developing countries. FDI has been one major external sources of finance for maximum nations that were developing economically. It is also true that foreign direct investment has rescued several countries when they encountered economic down turn. For example, during the 1997, Asia suffered from financial crisis. The foreign direct investment made in these countries during this duration was steady yet. But other forms of cash inflows suffered a lot. Same thing happened in Latin America in the 1980s and in Mexico in 1994-95.Inward FDI has the good effect for job creation and employment for host countries. It also results in higher wages. Other benefits of FDI are resource transfer, in terms of capital and technical knowledge. In this century, FDI is used as a strategy of new market entry for investors as well as an investment strategy. FDI growth has increased at a higher rate than the level of world trade. Globalization has made thehorizons extended and corporations now treat the whole world economy as their potential market. Also FDI renders reduced cost for investors, through the coordination advantagesand it is more true for integrated supply chains. The preference for a direct investment approach is a good means of strategic control, where the head authority keeps right for technological know-how and intellectual property to be kept in-house.Determinants of FDI : If a province has huge natural resources, then it always makes investors eager to invest their money in that country. For example, Saudi Arabia has attracted foreign companies to invest in that nation to grasp the precious oil resources at their disposal. For export based FDIs, the dimensions of the host country are vital because there are scopes for bigger economies of scale. In this context, the population of corresponding nation plays a vital role for pulling foreign direct investors to that nation. In this situation, the investors are attracted by the prospects of a huge customer base. One major determinant of FDI is the size of the economy of the host country as well as the future growth prospects of the economy of that nation where the investment is to be made. It is generally presumed that if the host country own a massive market, it can develop fast from an economic context. The investors would make most of the investments in prospective country.Another factor is infrastructural facility. Examples are the status of telecommunications, road ways and railways. This factor plays a vital role for attracting the foreign direct investors into a particular country. If the infrastructural facilities are well in a country then there is a notable amount of foreign direct investment. If a nation invites overseas investors and has access to the international markets then it receives higher amounts of foreign direct investment. Some countries have reset their economic policies to cope with the needs of the overseas investors. In this case, the investor companies maintaintransparency according to the legal platforms in that place. Outsider companies should understand the implications of their investment in a particular country and adopt perfect decisions. Cheap labour force is also a vital factor for pulling foreign direct investment. The boom of BPO culture and the revolution of I.T companies in India show that availability of cheaplabor force plays vital part for attracting global direct investment.Again if there is high per capita income of citizens of that nation or if the people of that country have sound spending capabilities then it will result the excellent performances for foreign direct investors. Current status of the citizens in a province is also a determinant in pulling direct investment from global base. Countries like China etc have taken an steps in increasing the quality of their citizens. China has laid down compulsion for every Chinese citizen to have minimum nine years of education. This step has enhanced the standards of the citizens in that nation.According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, there has not been significant growth of Global FDI in 2010. In 2010 and 2009, it was $1,122 billion and $1,114 billion respectively. The amount was below the average between 2005 & 2007. The following table shows US International Direct Investment Flows:FDI in the United States : World's largest receiver of FDI is United States. The total figure of FDI in this nation has been $194 billion in 2010. More than one fourth of FDI in U.S came in 2010 from eight countries named as France, Japan, Luxembourg, United Kingdom, Canada, Switzerland, Germany, and Netherlands. In United States, the stock of FDI in 2008 has beenthe equivalent of near 16 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). In the same way, we can feel the benefits of FDI in America also. After 2005, more than 4000 new projects and 630,000 new jobs have been incorporated by overseas companies. This has resulted investment of about $314 billion. Overseas companies generally have a tradition of paying higher wages than local enterprises. Overseas companies give an average annual compensation of $68,000 per employee. Exports have increased through the use of multinational distribution networks in United states. Foreign direct investment has resulted 12% of all manufacturing jobs in the US. Affiliating bodies of foreign enterprises spent over $34 billion on research and development in 2006. They also support many national projects. Inward FDI has resulted in this nation higher productivity through increased capital. This has brought high living standards.FDI in China : FDI in China has raised notably in the last decade. It has reached$ 185 bill ion in 2010. After U.S, China is the next largest recipient of FDI world wide. FDI had slowed down and became one-third in 2009 because of Global Financial Crisis butd in 2010, it again got its form.FDI in India : At the beginning, the FDI has been less than $1 billion in India in year 1990. In the contrary, at present India is the most important destination for FDI after China. Telecommunication, electronics, construction activities, automobile, and computer software/ hardware are the sectors which attract most inflows. The significant sources of FDI are Mauritius, Singapore, the US and the UK. FDI in 2010 was significantly decreased from both 2008 and 2009. Foreign direct investment in 2010 reduced to approx $34 billion havingdecrease rate about 60%. Again in 2011, FDI inflow became high of $7.78 billion up from $4.4 billion having increase of 77% than previous year.WalMart, world's largest retailer has caused India to decide to allow 51% FDI in multi-brand retail as an important step. But this decision is under suspension at present due to opposition from several political levels.FDI in Europe : Foreign direct investment in Europe have been subjected an increase in foreign direct investment inflows between 2003 and 2008. In this duration, FDI increased from $30 billion to $155 billion. Russia attracted most of thiese additional investment as its inflows rose from less than $8 billion in 2003 to $70 billion in 2008. The recession collapsed FDI inflows to the Europe region. In the Europe, FDI inflows have been 50% lower in 2009 in comparison to 2008. The real estate sector, which has pulled a quarter of all FDI inflows in Europe since 2008, accounted for much of the aggregate investment fall in the region during recession. The number of European FDI projects in 2010 topped, with a 14% increase, reaching 3,757 FDI project announcements. UK and France remain leaders in Europe in FDI context. But they are losing market share in comparison to countries such as Germany, Poland, Hungary etc. FDI in Europe have been centered on services, software industry and automotive sector. These sectors have been the top most sectors having maximum numbers of FDI projects and job creation. 33% of foreign investors plan to establish their business operations in Europe in 2011 and 2012.FDI and the developing world : FDI renders import of foreign investment. Additionally it offers transfer of skills, technology, adoption of better strategy and job opportunities. All the hostcountries are benefited from foreign investment. There are significant effects of foreign direct investment on local firms in development. Foreign investment increases local productivity growth rigorously. FDI is one of the major contributors of economic development fordeveloping countries.FDI Investment : Promotional effort to bring more and more FDI is the trend of every nation. Pulling foreign direct investment has become vital for surviving in race among developed and developing countries. This race is carried on too when these countries adopt economic integration in different levels. Many countries liberalise their standards to pull FDI in a competitive manner. Home countries appreciate FDI for raising standards and welfare in their nations.So many factors are there which reinforce foreign direct investment which is access to natural resources, markets, and low-cost labor, technology transfer, good market etc. Advancement of technology permits for the variety of production into more discrete stages and break national barriers due to emergence of globalisation. The significant credits go to the expansion in information technology, advancement in communication technologies and development in logistics. These allow production to be close to markets as well as utilising advantage of the particular features of several production locations. Different nations have laid down their respective policies for inviting more foreign investment. Many nations offer financial benefits like cash grants, tax concessions, and specific subsidies. Many countries at the same time emphasise on modifying the skill parameter, infrastructure and form a platform to meet the demands and expectations of overseas investors. Also some nations target to improve the business climate ofthose lands by altering the administrative hindrances. Some governments organise state agencies in order to assist investors. Simultaneously a lot of countries have come into international governing arrangements to raise the attraction of investors for more investment.ConclusionThere should exist a sound investment climate in a country because this willbring further economic growth. Reforms that will improve labor market flexibility, strengthen property rights, simplify business regulations, and increase firms' access to finance are vital. These can increase living standards of that country and reduce poverty in that country. Economic reform is required for creating an investment-oriented climate. Reform would be fruitful because investment climate depends on that. Thus long term benefits can be brought. In this context, cost is main criterian. In this aspect, political environment is a vital determiner. Through out the world, every nation is striving to mould the climate which is suitable for more investment. So the ultimate concept is that "Proper Investment Climate is the need of the Hour".二、文献综述外商直接投资与经济增长关系综述摘要近年来，外商直接投资和经济增长之间的关系已成为学者关注的研究焦点，国内外众多学者对两者之间的关系分别从理论和实证方面进行了论证和分析。
关于企业投资的外文参考文献_论文格式_
关于企业投资的外文参考文献[1] Harry Markowitz. Portfolio Selection [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1952，7:77-91[2] William F. Sharpe. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk [J]. The Journal of Finance, 1964，19:425?442[3] J. Lintner. The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1965，47:13?37[4] E. Fama, K. French. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Finance, 1992，47:427?465[5] E. Fama, K. French. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds [J], Jounal of Financial Economics, 1993，33:3?56[6] E. Fama，K. French. Dissecting Anomalies [J]. Journal of Finance, 2019:1653?1678[7] J. Berk, R. Green, V. Naik. Optimal Investment, Growth Options，and Security Returns [J]. Journal ofFinanc，1999，54:1553?1607[8] J. Gomes, L. Kogan, L. Zhang. Equilibrium Cross Section of Returns [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2019:693?732[9] M. Carlson, A. Fisher, R. Giammarino. Corporate Investment and Asset Price Dynamics: Implications for the Cross-section of Returns [J]. Journal of Finance, 2019, 59:2577?2603[10] I. Cooper. Asset Pricing Implications of Nonconvex Adjustment Costs and Irreversibility of Investment [J], Journal of Finance, 2019，61:139?170[11] C. Polk, P. Sapienza. The Stock Market and Corporate Investment: A Test of Catering Theory [J]. Review of FinancialStudies, 2019, 22:187?217[12] I. Cooper, R. Priestley. Real Investment and Risk Dynamics [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 101:182?205[13]辞海[M].上海：上海辞书出版社，1999:815[14]不列颠百科全书(第八卷)[M].北京：中国大百科全书出版社，2019:413[15] Samuelson, Nordhaus. Economics [M]. 19th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019[16] Dougall, Corrigan [M]. 10th ed. N.J.: Prentice-Hall, cl978[17] R. Ibbotson. Price Performance of Common Stock New Issues [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1975，3:235?272[18] T. Loughran, J. Ritter. The New Issues Puzzle [J]. Journal of Finance, 1995, 50:23? 52[19] K. Spiess, J. Affleck-Graves. The Long-run Performance of Stock Returns Following Debt Offerings [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999. 54:45?73[20] M. Billet, M. Flannery, J. Garfmkel. Are Bank Loans Special? Evidence on the Post-announcement Performance of Bank Borrowers[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis，2019，41:733?752[21] J. Lakonishok，A. Shleifer, R. Vishny. Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation，and Risk [J]. Journal of Finance, 1994，49:1541 ?1578[22] D. Ikenberry, J. Lakonishok, T. Vermaelen. Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases [J]. Journal of Financial Economics，1995，39:181 ?208[23] R. Michaely，R. Thaler, K. Womack. Price Reactions to Dividend Initiations and Omissions: Overreaction or Drift? [J]. Journal of Finance，1995，50:573?608[24] C. Anderson，L. Garcia-Feijoo. Empirical Evidence on Capital Investment, Growth Options, and Security Returns [J]. Journal of Finance, 2019，61:171 ?194[25] P. M. Fairfield, J. S. Whisenant, T. L. Yohn. Accrued Earnings and Growth: Implications for Future Profitability and Market Mispricing[J]. The Accounting Review, 2019, 78:353?371[26] Zhang. Accruals，Investment, and The Accrual Anomaly [J]. Accounting Review, 2019， 82:1333?1363[27] M. T. Bradshaw, S. A. Richardson, R. G. Sloan. The Relation between Corporate Financing Activities, Analysts' Forecasts and Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2019, 42:53?85[28] J. Pontiff, A. Woodgate. Share Issuance and Cross-Sectional Returns [J]. Journal of Finance, 2019, 63:921 ?945[29] M. Cooper, H. Gulen, M. Schill. Asset Growth and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Finance, 2019, 68:1609?1651[30] P. Gray, J. Johnson. The Relationship between Asset Growth and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2019，35:670-680。
上市企业融资文献综述及外文文献资料
本份文档包含：关于该选题的外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献文献出处：Abor J; Bokpin A. Investment opportunities, corporate finance, and dividend payout policy. Studies in Economics and Finance. 2015; 27(3):180-194.Investment opportunities, corporate finance, and dividend payout policyAbor J; Bokpin AAbstractPurpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of investment opportunities and corporate finance on dividend payout policy. Design/methodology/approach - This issue is tested with a sample of 34 emerging market countries covering a 17-year period, 1990-2006. Fixed effects panel model is employed in our estimation. Findings - A significantly negative relationship between investment opportunity set and dividend payout policy is found. There are, however, insignificant effects of the various measures of corporate finance namely, financial leverage, external financing, and debt maturity on dividend payout policy. Profitability and stock market capitalization are also identified as important in influencing dividend payout policy. Profitable firms are more likely to support high dividend payments to shareholders. However, firms in relatively well-developed markets tend to exhibit low dividend payout policy. Originality/value - The main value of the paper is in respect of the fact that it uses a large dataset from emerging market countries. The results generally support existing literature on investment opportunity set and dividend payout policy.Keywords: International; Dividends; Corporate finance;1. IntroductionThe impact of investment and financing decisions on firm value has been the focus of extensive research since [50] Modigliani and Miller (1958) proposed the "separation principle". The theory asserts that in a perfect capital market, the value of the firm is independent of the manner in which its productive assets are financed. In fact someauthors like [12] Barnes et al.(1981) support their view. However, others have contrasted the findings of the earlier studies suggesting that investment, financing, and dividend policy are related ([30] Grabowski and Mueller, 1972; [46] McCabe, 1979;[5] Anderson, 1983). This is predicated on the assumption that Modigliani and Miller's ideal world does not exist. Financial markets are not perfect given taxes, transaction costs, bankruptcy costs, agency costs, and uncertain inflation in the market place. According to [13] Bier man and Hass (1983), management usually addresses the dividend target payout level in the context of forecasting the firm's sources and use of funds. Considering prospective investment opportunities and the internal cash generation potential of the firm, both capital structure and dividend policy are chosen to ensure that sufficient funds are available to undertake all desirable investments without using new equity ([14] Black, 1976). But what constitutes a "desirable" investment? If it is one that has an expected return greater than the cost of funds that finance it, and if the cost of retained earnings is different from the cost of new equity capital, then dividend policy, capital structure, and investment strategy are necessarily jointly determined ([15] Black and Schools, 1974).Dividend payout policy is an important corporate issue and may be closely related to, and interacts with, most of the financial and investment decisions firms make. A proper understanding of dividend policy is critical for many other areas such as asset pricing, capital structure, mergers and acquisitions, and capital budgeting ([2] Allen and Michael, 1995). Firms' dividend decisions could also be influenced by their profit level, risk, and size. Though dividend policy has been identified as a major corporate decision faced by management, it remains one of the puzzles in corporate finance ([52] Obi, 2001). There has been emerging consensus that there is no single explanation of dividends. [19] Brook et al.(1998) agree that, there is no reason to believe that corporate dividend policy is driven by a single goal.Attention of empirical research has been at ascertaining the relationship between investment opportunities, corporate financing and dividend payout ([54] Pruitt and Gilman, 1991; [6] Aviation and Booth, 2003). However, these findings have failed toestablish any clear link concerning this issue. Most of these studies tend to focus on developed markets. Little is, however, known about how investment opportunities and corporate finance influence dividend payout policy of emerging markets. This present study contributes to the extant literature by focusing on emerging markets. Firms in emerging markets tend to exhibit different dividend behavior from those of developed markets like the US. This may be a result of the differences in levels of efficiency and institutional arrangements between developed markets and emerging markets. It is, therefore, useful to improve our understanding of the issue from an emerging market perspective.The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of investment opportunity set and corporate finance on dividend payout. The contribution of this paper lies in the fact that it considers a large-scale dataset covering 34 emerging market countries over a 17-year period, 1990-2006. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 covers the literature on dividend policy. It also reviews the existing literature on the effects of investment opportunities and corporate finance on dividend payout policy. Section 3 discusses the data used in the study and also details the model specification used for the empirical analysis. Section 4 includes the discussion of the empirical results. Finally, Section 5 summarizes and concludes the paper.2. Overview of literatureSince the publication of the dividend irrelevance theory by [47] Miller and Modigliani (1961), a lot of studies have been conducted in the area of determinants of dividend payout the world over. The dividend irrelevance theory is possible in a perfect and efficient market where stockholders are perfectly rational and there are no taxes and transaction costs. The theory, however, pointed out the importance of investment as being the main issue. Miller and Modigliani framework has thus formed the foundation of subsequent work on dividends and payout policy in general. Their framework is rich enough to encompass both dividends and repurchase, as the only determinant of a firm's value is its investment policy ([3] Allen and Michael, 2002). It is arguably said a company's overriding goal is to maximize shareholder wealth ([18]Berkley and Myers, 1996; [16] Block and Hart, 2000), but to [16] Block and Hart (2000) this concept is not a simple task as management cannot directly influence the price of a share but can only act in a manner consistent with the desires of investors. In the view of [61] Woods and Randall (1989), shareholder wealth is generally accepted as the aggregate market value of the common shares, which in turn is assumed to be the present value of the cash flows which will accrue to shareholders, discounted at their required rate of return on equity. These cash flows include dividend and perhaps more importantly capital appreciation except for its high volatility. Firms must, therefore, make important decisions over and over again about how much cash the firm should give back to its shareholders and probably what form it should take.Black (1976) observed that the harder we look at the dividends picture, the more it seems like a puzzle, with pieces that just do not fit together. This attests to the much controversy that surrounds dividend policy. The dividend puzzle revolves around figuring out why companies pay dividends and investors pay attention to dividend. To [18] Berkley and Myers (1996), dividend policy is seen as a trade-off between retaining earnings on one hand and paying out cash and issuing new shares on the other. The theoretical principles underlying the dividend policy of firms range from information asymmetries, tax-adjusted theory to behavioral factors. The information asymmetries encompass several aspects, including the agency cost, free cash flow hypothesis, and signaling models.Tax-adjusted models presume that investors require and secure higher expected returns on shares of dividend-paying stocks. The consequence of tax adjusted theory is the division of investors into dividend tax clientele and the clientele effect is responsible for the alterations in portfolio composition ([49] Modigliani, 1982). To [45] Marsalis and Truman (1988), investors with differing tax liabilities will not be uniform in their ideal firm dividend policy. They conclude that as tax liability increases, the dividend payment decreases while earnings reinvestment increases and vice versa.Shareholders typically face the problem of adverse selection and moral hazard in the face of separation of ownership and control. The problem of information asymmetry is evident in conflicts of interest between various corporate claimholders. It holds that insiders such as managers have more information about the firm's cash flow than the providers of the funds. Agency costs are lower in firms with high managerial ownership stakes because of better alignment of shareholder and managerial control ([39] Jensen and Heckling, 1976) and also in firms with large block shareholders that are better able to monitor managerial activities ([57] Heifer and Vishnu, 1986). [27] Fame and Jensen (1983) argue that agency problems can be resolved by the payment of large dividend to shareholders.According to the free cash flow model, [37] Jensen (1986) explains that finance available after financing all positive net present value projects can result in conflicts of interest between managers and shareholders. Clearly, dividends and debt interest payment decrease the free cash flow available to managers to invest in marginal net present value projects and manager perquisite consumption. Firms with higher levels of cash flow should have higher dividend payout and/or higher leverage.The signaling theory suggests that corporate dividend policy used as a means of putting quality message across has a lower cost than other alternatives ([48] Miller and Rock, 1985; [8] Asquith and Mullins, 1986). This was developed initially for the labor market but its usefulness has been felt in the financial markets. [7] Aero (1970) defines signaling effect as a unique and specific signaling equilibrium in which a job seeker signals his/her quality to a prospective employer. The signaling theory suggests that dividends are used to signal managements' private information regarding the future earnings of the firm. Investors often see announcements of dividend initiations and omissions as managers' forecast of future earnings changes ([34] Healy and Pileup, 1988). Dividends are used in signaling the future prospects, and dividends are paid even if there is profitable investment opportunity ([11] Baker et al., 1985; [54] Pruitt and Gilman, 1991).2.1 Investment opportunities and dividend payoutThe investment opportunities available to the firm constitute an important component of market value. The investment opportunity set of a firm affects the way the firm is viewed by managers, owners, investors, and creditors ([43] Caliper and Tremble, 2001). The literature has given considerable attention in recent years to examining the association between investment opportunity set and corporate policy choices, including financing, dividend, and compensation policies ([59] Smith and Watts, 1992;[29] Giver and Giver, 1993; [41] Caliper and Tremble, 1999; [40] Jones and Sharma, 2001; [1] Abbott, 2001). According to [40] Jones (2001), investment opportunity set represents a firm's investment or growth options but to [51] Myers (1977) its value depends on the discretional expenditures of managers. [51] Myers (1977) further explains investment opportunity as a yet-to-be realized potentially profitable project that a firm can exploit for economic rents. Thus, this represents the component of the firm's value resulting from options to make future investments ([59] Smith and Watts, 1992).Growth opportunities are also represented by the relative fraction of firm value that is accounted for by assets in place (plant, equipment, and other tangible assets), and that the lower the fraction of firm value represented by assets in place, the higher the growth opportunities ([32] Gull and Kelley, 1999). [43] Caliper and Tremble (2001) suggest that, the conventional notion of investment opportunity set is of new capital expenditure made to introduce a new product or expand production of an existing product. This may include an option to make expenditure to reduce costs during a corporate restructuring. An investment opportunity has been measured in various ways by various writers. These include market to book value of equity ([21] Collins and Kithara, 1989; [20] Chung and Charoenwong, 1991), book to market value of assets ([59] Smith and Watts, 1992), and Tobin's q ([58] Skinner, 1993).Existing literature suggests a relationship between investment opportunities and dividend policy. [59] Smith and Watts (1992) argue that firms with high investment opportunity set are likely to pursue a low dividend payout policy, since dividends and investment represent competing potential uses of a firm's cash resources ([29] Giverand Giver, 1993). [40] Jones (2001), extending and modifying the work of [29] Giver and Gaver (1993), found out that high growth firms were associated with significantly lower dividend yields. [32] Gul and Kealey (1999) also found a negative relationship between growth options and dividends. [1] Abbott (2001) argues that firms that experienced an investment opportunity set expansion (decrease) generally reduced (increase) their dividend payout policy. Others support the fact that firms with higher market-to-book value tend to have good investment opportunities, and would retain more funds to finance such investment, thus recording lower dividend payout ratios ([56] Rozeff, 1982; [44] Lloyd et al. , 1985; [22] Collins et al. , 1996; [4] Amidu and Abor, 2006). [55] Riahi-Belkaoui and Picur (2001) also validated the fact that firms in high investment opportunity set group are "PE valued" whilst firms in low investment opportunity set are "dividend yield valued". This implies that for firms in low investment opportunity set, dividends are of greater relevance than earnings whilst the opposite is true for firms in high investment opportunity set. Using market-to-book ratio as proxy for investment opportunity set, [6] Aivazian and Booth (2003), however, found a positive relationship between market-to-book value ratio and dividend payments, suggesting that firms with higher investment opportunities rather pay higher dividends.2.2 Corporate finance and dividend payoutThe financing choice of firms is perhaps the most researched area in finance in the past decades following the seminal article of [50] Modigliani and Miller (1958) raising the issue of the relationship between a firms choice of finance and its value. Recently, there are still increasing research and new evidence being sought for the relevance or otherwise of the theory started by Modigliani and Miller. The theorem hinges on the principle of perfect capital markets. This asserts that firm value is completely independent of how its productive assets are financed. Subsequent researches have suggested a relationship between choice of financing and firm value even though some researchers corroborated the findings of Modigliani and Miller's irrelevance theory ([26] Fama, 1974; [54] Pruitt and Gitman, 1991). However, studiesby [5] Anderson (1983), [53] Peterson and Benesh (1983) have proved that in the "real world" market imperfections effectively prohibit the independence of firm's investment and financing decisions. This market imperfection is primarily coming from the fact that there are taxes, transaction cost, information asymmetry, and bankruptcy cost. This indicates a relationship between the choice of financing and firm value.Financial leverage is said to play an important role in reducing agency costs arising from shareholder-manager conflict and is believed to play a vital role of monitoring managers ([39] Jensen and Meckling, 1976; [37] Jensen, 1986; [60] Stulz, 1988). [28] Farinha (2003) contends that debt is likely to influence dividend decisions because of debt covenants and related restrictions that may be imposed by debtholders. Also, firms with high financial leverage and implied financial risk tend to avoid paying high dividends, so they can accommodate risk associated with the use of debt finance. [56] Rozeff (1982), [25] Easterbrook (1984) and [22] Collins et al. (1996) extending the agency theory observe that firms pay dividend and raise capital simultaneously. In the view of [25] Easterbrook (1984), increasing dividends raises the probability that additional capital will have to be raised externally on a periodic basis. This view is also shared by [31] Green et al. (1993) who argue that dividend payout levels are not totally decided after a firm's financing has been made. [35] Higgins (1972) suggests that firms' dividend payout ratio could be negatively influenced by their need for finance. Thus, dividend decision is taken alongside financing decisions. [36] Higgins (1981) shows a direct link between growth and financing needs, in that rapidly growing firms have external financing need because working capital needs normally exceed the incremental cash flows from new sales. [6] Aivazian and Booth (2003) support the fact that financial constraints can affect dividend decisions, therefore, firms with relatively less debt have greater financial slack and are more likely to pay and maintain their dividends.3. Data and econometric method3.1 Data and variable constructionThis study examines the effects of investment opportunity set and corporate finance on the dividend payout policy of emerging market firms. Our dataset is composed of accounting and market data for a large sample of publicly traded firms in 34 emerging market countries over the period 1990-2006. These countries include: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Columbia, Czech, Egypt, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe. This information is obtained through the Corporate Vulnerability Utility of the International Monetary Fund. The corporate vulnerability utility provides indicators for surveillance of the corporate sector and it relies on accounting data from Worldscope and market data mainly from Datastream.The dependent variable, dividend payout is defined as the ratio of dividend to capital. Dividend is total cash dividend paid to equity and preferred shareholders. The independent variables include investment opportunity set and corporate finance. We also control for profitability, risk, market capitalization, and two other macroeconomic variables: inflation rate and log of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita as a measure of the country's income level.In terms of the independent variables, Tobin's q is used as a proxy for investment opportunity set. Three measures of corporate finance are used. These are; financial leverage (the ratio of debt to equity), external finance (the ratio of external finance to total finance), and debt maturity (the ratio of short-term debt to total debt).In terms of the control variables, profitability is measured as return on assets. Profitability is considered as the primary indicator of the firm's capacity to declare and pay dividends. [11] Baker et al. (1985) find that a major determinant of dividend payment is the anticipated level of future earnings. [54] Pruitt and Gitman (1991) also report that current and past years' profits are important in influencing dividend payments. Others such as [38] Jensen et al. (1992), [6] Aivazian and Booth (2003), and [4] Amidu and Abor (2006) find evidence of a positive association betweenprofitability and dividend payouts. [10] Baker (1989) finds that an important reason cited by firms for not paying dividends is "poor earnings". Similarly, [23] DeAngelo and DeAngelo (1990) find that a significant proportion of firms with losses over a five year period, tend to omit their dividends entirely. A positive relationship should exist between profitability and dividend payout.Risk is defined using the O-Score, which is a measure of probability of default. [54] Pruitt and Gitman (1991) find that risk is a major determinant of firms' dividend policy. Firms which have higher risk profiles are more likely to maintain lower dividend payout policy compared with those with lower risk profiles. Using ßvalue of a firm as a measure of its market risk, [56] Rozeff (1982), [44] Lloyd et al. (1985), and [22] Collins et al. (1996) found a significantly negative relationship between ßand dividend payout. Their findings suggest that firms having a higher level of market risk will pursue lower dividend payout policy. [24] D'Souza (1999) also suggests that risk is significantly and negatively related with firms' dividend payout. We expect risk to be negatively related to dividend payout.We control for size of the market. This is defined as ratio of market capitalization to GDP. Size of the market is used as a proxy for capital market access. Firms with better access to the capital market should be able to pay higher dividends ([6] Aivazian and Booth, 2003). It is expected that a positive relationship will exist between market capitalization and dividend payout policy.We also control for two macroeconomic variables: inflation and GDP per capita. Inflation is the inflation rate. GDP per capita is log of GDP per capita and is included as a measure of the country's income level.3.2 Model specificationWe estimate the following panel data regression model: Equation 1 [Figure omitted. See Article Image.] where subscript i and t represent the country and time, respectively. Y is a measure of dividend payout. Invt is a measure of investment opportunity set. Fin are measures of corporate finance variables including, financialleverage, external finance, and debt maturity. X are the control variables and include profitability, risk, stock market capitalization, inflation, and GDP per capita. μ is the error term. Using this model, it is possible to investigate the effects of investment opportunity set and corporate finance on dividend payout policy.3.3 Estimation issuesThis study adopts a panel data method given that it allows for broader set of data points. Therefore, degrees of freedom are increased and collinearity among the explanatory variables is reduced and the efficiency of economic estimates is improved. Also, panel data can control for individual heterogeneity due to hidden factors, which, if neglected in time-series or cross section estimations leads to biased results ([9] Baltagi, 2005). The panel regression equation differs from a regular time-series or cross-section regression by the double subscript attached to each variable. The general form of the model can be written as: Equation 2 [Figure omitted. See Article Image.] where α is a scalar, ßis KX 1 and X it is the it th observation on K explanatory variables. We assume that the μit follow a one-way error component model: Equation 3 [Figure omitted. See Article Image.] where μi is time-invariant and accounts for any unobservable individual-specific effect that is not included in the regression model. The term V it represents the remaining disturbance, and varies with the individual countries and time. It can be thought of as the usual disturbance in the regression. The choice of the model estimation whether random effects or fixed effects will depend on the underlying assumptions. In a random effect model, μi and V it are random with known disturbances. In the fixed effects model, the μi are assumed to be fixed parameters to be estimated and the remainder disturbances stochastic with V it independent and identically distributed, i.e. νit∼iid (0,σν2 ). The explanatory variables X it are assumed independent of the V it for all i and t . We use the [62] Hausman (1978) specification test in choosing the appropriate model. We report the results of the Hausman specification test in Table III [Figure omitted. See Article Image.].4. Empirical results4.1 Descriptive statisticsTable I [Figure omitted. See Article Image.] presents the descriptive statistics of the dependent and independent variables. The sample covers 34 emerging countries over a 17-year period, 1990-2006. It reports the mean and standard deviation of all the variables used in the study as well as the number of observations over the sample period. The mean value for the dependent variable (dividend payout) is 0.32, implying that across the sample countries the average dividend payout is 32 percent. There is, however, a variation in the dependent variable across the countries over the time period as shown by standard deviation of 0.49 with a minimum and maximum dividend payout of 0.00 and 3.93, respectively.The mean investment opportunity set measured by the Tobin's q is 1.05 with a variation of 0.52. All the countries have positive investment opportunities with minimum and maximum values of 0.06 and 5.01, respectively. Financial leverage, measured by the debt to equity ratio has a mean value of 1.17 and has a standard deviation of 127.58. External finance registers an average value of -0.01 over the period with a standard deviation of 5.27. Debt maturity has a mean figure of 0.58, indicating that short-term debt accounts for 58 percent of total debt. Profitability defined in terms of return on assets also registers an average value of 6.66 percent. The standard deviation is also shown as 5.37. Risk shows a mean value of -3.37. Stock market capitalization to GDP has a mean value of 49.74 percent. The minimum and maximum values for this variable are 0.00 and 528.49, respectively, with a variation of 66.52. The average inflation rate and GDP per capita are 2.61 and 8.04 percent, respectively (Figure 1 [Figure omitted. See Article Image.]).4.2 Correlation analysisWe test for possible degree of multi-collinearity among the regressors by including a correlation matrix of the variables in Table II [Figure omitted. See Article Image.]. Dividend payout shows significantly positive correlations with debt maturity, profitability, and GDP per capita. Investment opportunity set exhibits significantly negative correlations with financial leverage, inflation, and GDP per capita, but shows significantly positive correlations with external finance, debt maturity, profitability,and market capitalization. There is a significant but negative correlation between financial leverage and profitability and a positive correlation between financial leverage and risk. External finance shows significant and positive correlations with profitability and inflation but a negative correlation with GDP per capita. Debt maturity is significantly and negatively correlated with GDP per capita. There are significant and negative correlations between profitability and risk, market capitalization, as well as GDP per capita. However, we found positive correlation between profitability and inflation. There are statistically and significant positive correlations between risk and market capitalization, and GDP per capita. Market capitalization is also positively correlated with GDP per capita. Overall, the magnitude of the correlation coefficients indicates that multi-collinearity is not a potential problem in the regression models.4.3 Panel regression resultsBoth fixed and random effects specifications of the model were estimated. After which the [62] Hausman (1978) test was conducted to determine the appropriate specification. We report the results of the Hausman test in Table III [Figure omitted. See Article Image.]. The test statistics are all significant at 1 percent, implying that the fixed effects model is preferred over the random effects. The Hausman specification test suggests we reject the null hypothesis that the differences in coefficients are not systematic.The results indicate a statistically significant but negative relationship between investment opportunities and dividend payout ratio. It could be inferred that firms with high investment opportunities are more likely to exhibit low dividend payout ratio. In other words, firms with high investment opportunities are more likely to pursue a low dividend payout ratio since dividends and investment represent competing potential uses of a firm's cash resources. Paying low dividends means that such firms could retain enough funds to finance their future growth and investments.[29] Gaver and Gaver (1993) note that firms with high growth potential or investment opportunity set are expected to pay low dividends, since investment and dividends are。
中小企业融资问题英文参考文献(精选122个最新)
近年来，随着中小企业的飞速发展，中小企业融资问题，已经成为一些中小企业进一步发展所面临的“瓶颈”。
在我国经济体制转型和经济结构调整的特殊历史时期,中小企业融资问题不仅表现得较为突出,也更为复杂。
下面是搜索整理的中小企业融资问题英文参考文献，欢迎借鉴参考。
中小企业融资问题英文参考文献一：[1]XUE-FENG JI. Analysis on Financing Problems of SME in Internet Finance Mode[P]. 2nd International Conference on Advanced Education and Management Engineering (AEME 2017),2017.[2]Xiao-juan GUO. Difficulties and Countermeasures on the Financing of SMEs[P]. 4th International Conference on Economics and Management (ICEM 2017),2017.[3]Jing Zhang,J. Ke. The Financing Efficiency of Enterprises Listed on SMEs Board[P]. 3rd International Conference on Society Science and Economics Development (ICSSED 2018),2018.[4]Wan-rong ZHANG. A Study on Financing Difficulties of SMEs in China[P]. 4th International Conference on Economics and Management (ICEM 2017),2017.[5]Zhao-Hui CHEN,Zhi-Juan ZHOU. Problems and Suggestions on the Mode of Intellectual Property Financing of Small and Medium-sized Technological Enterprises[P]. 4th International Conference on Social Science (ICSS 2017),2017.[6]YU SHI. Research on Problems and Countermeasures of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Financing[P]. 2nd International Conference on Advanced Education and Management Engineering (AEME 2017),2017.[7]Yuping Wei. Empirical Analysis on Financing Constraints of SMEs of China — Proofs from Pre-IPO three Years’ Panel Data of China’s Listed Companies Listed in 2015[P]. DEStech Transactions on Materials Science and Engineering,2016.[8]Ru-Xin WANG. Financing Management of SMEs Under Internet[P]. DEStech Transactions on Economics, Business and Management,2018.[9]Yi-ning SUN. The Impact of Supply Chain Finance on SME Financing[P]. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science,2018.[10]Wen-bo MA,Meng-wei TANG. Financing SMEs and Innovation[P]. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science,2018.[11]A-Tai ZHENG. Influence of Internet Finance on SME Financing — A Case Study of P2P Model[P]. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and HumanScience,2018.[12]ZHEN-HONG XIAO,MEI-GUI TAN. Research on SMEs’ Credit Risk Evaluation of Supply Chain Finance Based on the Third-party B2B Platform[P]. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science,2018.[13]Shu-yuan XIAO,Mei-gui TAN. The Evaluation of SMEs Credit Risk Supply Chain Finance Based on the Third-party B2B E-commerce Platform[P]. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science,2018.[14]Zheng-cheng WU. On SME Financing in China from Perspective of Supply Chain Finance[P]. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science,2018.[15]Nittamachi Naoto. Problems of Small Business Finance : from the White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan[J]. Journal of Household Economics,2014,39(0).[16]Annalisa Ferrando,Alexander Popov,Gregory F. Udell. Sovereign stress and SMEs’ access to finance: Evidence from the ECB's SAFE survey[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2017,81.[17]Peter Quartey,Ebo Turkson,Joshua Y. Abor,Abdul Malik Iddrisu. Financing the growth of SMEs in Africa: What are the contraints to SME financing within ECOWAS?[J]. Review of Development Finance,2017,7(1).[18]Qaiser Munir,Sook Ching Kok,Tamara Teplova,Tongxia Li. Powerful CEOs, debt financing, and leasing in Chinese SMEs: Evidence from threshold model[J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2017,42.[19]Iftekhar Hasan,Krzysztof Jackowicz,Oskar Kowalewski,?ukasz Koz?owski. Do local banking market structures matter for SME financing and performance? New evidence from an emerging economy[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2017.[20]Renate Kersten,Job Harms,Kellie Liket,Karen Maas. Small Firms, large Impact?A systematic review of the SME Finance Literature[J]. World Development,2017,97.[21]Anahí Briozzo,Diana Albanese,Diego Santolíquido. Corporate governance, financing and gender: A study of SMEs from Argentinean Securities Markets[J]. Contaduría y Administración,2017.[22]Ayodotun Stephen Ibidunni,Oladele Joseph Kehinde,Oyebisi Mary Ibidunni,Maxwell Ayodele Olokundun,Falola Hezekiah Olubusayo,Odunayo Paul Salau,Taiye Tairat Borishade,Peter Fred. Data on the relationships between financingstrategies, entrepreneurial competencies and business growth of technology-based SMEs in Nigeria[J]. Data in Brief,2018,18.[23]Franziska Bremus,Katja Neugebauer. Reduced cross-border lending and financing costs of SMEs[J]. Journal of International Money and Finance,2018,80.[24]Jairaj Gupta,Andros Gregoriou. Impact of market-based finance on SMEs failure[J]. Economic Modelling,2018,69.[25]Arnab Bhattacharya. Innovations in new venture financing: Evidence from Indian SME IPOs[J]. Global Finance Journal,2017,34.[26]H. Kent Baker,Satish Kumar,Purnima Rao. Financing preferences and practices of Indian SMEs[J]. Global Finance Journal,2017.[27]David Diwei Lv,Ping Zeng,Hailin Lan. Co-patent, financing constraints, and innovation in SMEs: An empirical analysis using market value panel data of listed firms[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2018,48.[28]You Zhu,Li Zhou,Chi Xie,Gang-Jin Wang,Truong V. Nguyen. Forecasting SMEs' credit risk in supply chain finance with an enhanced hybrid ensemble machine learning approach[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2019,211.[29]Naoyuki Yoshino,Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary. Optimal credit guarantee ratio for small and medium-sized enterprises’ financing: Evidence from Asia[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy,2019,62.[30]Dong Xiang,Jiakui Chen,David Tripe,Ning Zhang. Family firms, sustainable innovation and financing cost: Evidence from Chinese hi-tech small and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2019,144.中小企业融资问题英文参考文献二：[31]Michael Dowling,Colm O’Gorman,Petya Puncheva,Dieter Vanwalleghem. Trust and SME attitudes towards equity financing across Europe[J]. Journal of World Business,2019,54(6).[32]Purnima Rao,Satish Kumar. Reflection of owner’s attributes in financing decisions of SMEs[J]. Small Enterprise Research,2018,25(1).[33]Aysa Ipek Erdogan. Factors affecting SME access to bank financing: an interview study with Turkish bankers[J]. Small Enterprise Research,2018,25(1).[34]Martínez-Sola,García-Teruel,Martínez-Solano. SMEs access to finance and thevalue of supplier financing[J]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Espa?ola de Financiación y Contabilidad,2017,46(4).[35]Abraham Ansong. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance among Ghanaian SMEs: The role of stakeholder engagement[J]. Cogent Business & Management,2017,4(1).[36]Sonia Ba?os-Caballero,Pedro J. García-Teruel,Pedro Martínez-Solano. Financing of working capital requirement, financial flexibility and SME performance[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management,2016,17(6).[37]Alexandra Moritz,Joern H. Block,Andreas Heinz. Financing patterns of European SMEs – an empirical taxonomy[J]. Venture Capital,2016,18(2).[38]Kobil Ruziev,Don J. Webber. Does connectedness improve SMEs’ access to formal finance? Evidence from post-communist economies[J]. Post-Communist Economies,2019,31(2).[39]Elisa Ughetto,Marc Cowling,Neil Lee. Regional and spatial issues in the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises and new ventures[J]. Regional Studies,2019,53(5).[40]Ross Brown,José Li?ares-Zegarra,John O. S. Wilson. Sticking it on plastic: credit card finance and small and medium-sized enterprises in the UK[J]. Regional Studies,2019,53(5).[41]Ma,Zhou,Chen. Financing difficulties for SMEs and credit rationing – an expanded model of mortgage loans with asymmetric information[J]. Applied Economics,2019,51(48).[42]Masiak,Block,Moritz,Lang,Kraemer-Eis. How do micro firms differ in their financing patterns from larger SMEs?[J]. Venture Capital,2019,21(4).[43]Zhenhua Yang,Lin Xie,Qiang Shen. Research on Financial Financing Mode of SME Supply Chain based on B2B E-commerce Platform[P]. Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Social Science and Management Innovation (SSMI 2018),2019.[44]Mu Jie. Financing Difficulties of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Analysis Based on Game Theory Model[P]. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2019),2019.[45]Fira Nurafini,Raditya Sukmana,Sri Herianingrum. The External and Internal Factors on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Financing in Islamic Bank[P].Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Postgraduate School Universitas Airlangga : "Implementation of Climate Change Agreement to Meet Sustainable Development Goals" (ICPSUAS 2017),2017.[46]Shuo Feng. Study on the Financial Leverage Effect Based On the Financing Activities of SMEs[P]. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management Science and Innovative Education,2016.[47]Chang You. The Influence of Financial Marketization and Direct Financing on the Credit of Listed SMEs[P]. Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Economic Management (ICESEM 2018),2018.[48]Huafeng Chen,Mu Zhang. Simulation Research of Evolutionary Game to Bank and Technological SME under the Pledge Financing Mode[P]. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of Risk Analysis Council of China Association for Disaster Prevention,2016.[49]Li Danyang. Countermeasures for Financing Difficulties of SMEs[P]. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2018),2018.[50]Jawad Karamat,Tong Shurong,Abdul Waheed,Nasir Mahmood. Bank financing for SMEs in Pakistan[P]. Proceedings of the 2016 Joint International Information Technology, Mechanical and Electronic Engineering,2016.[51]Xiaolong Liu,Quanping Kuang. The Characteristics and Financing of SMEs in China[P]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Asian B&R Conference on International Business Cooperation (ISBCD 2018),2018.[52]Zuguo Yin. Research on Financing Mode of SMES Based on Internet Finance[P]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management and Computer Science (ICMCS 2018),2018.[53]Yaoyao Feng,Jiangli Yang,Xiaojuan Cai. Analysis on Internet Financing Methods of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Xi'an[P]. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Economy, Management and Entrepreneurship (ICOEME 2019),2019.[54]Tingting Wu. Research on Commercial Credit Financing of Rural Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Questionnaire Analysis Based on Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Gaochun and Lishui Counties[P]. Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Economy, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2016),2016.[55]Yue Wu. On the legal settlement mechanism of SME financing under the background of "one belt and one road"[P]. Proceedings of the 2019 5th InternationalConference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2019),2019.[56]Cen Yu. Internet Lending and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Financing[P]. Proceedings of 2016 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2016),2016.[57]Huiping Zhang. Research on Financing Problems of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Jilin Province[P]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2017),2017.[58]Luhao Liu. Analysis on Financing Difficulty of Chinese SMEs and Countermeasures Concerned: From the Perspective of Supply Chain Finance[P]. Proceedings of the 2017 7th International Conference on Education and Management (ICEM 2017),2018.[59]Shuangnan He. Financing Policy of SMEs in China and Abroad in a Comparative Perspective[P]. Proceedings of the 2016 6th International Conference on Mechatronics, Computer and Education Informationization (MCEI 2016),2016.[60]Lin Jiang,Yueliang Su. Research on the Evaluation of Supply Chain Finance Credit Risk of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Based on System Dynamics[P]. Proceedings of the First International Conference Economic and Business Management 2016,2016.中小企业融资问题英文参考文献三：[61]Qijun Wu. Study on Influencing Factors of Financing Efficiency of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises of New Three Board[P]. Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Economics, Social Science, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (ESSAEME 2018),2018.[62]Weishuang Xu. Research on the Causes and Coping Strategies of Financing Constraints of Small and Medium-Sized Cultural Enterprises[P]. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management, Education, Information and Control (MEICI 2017),2017.[63]Yige Chang. Analysis of Management Model and Financing Demand of Shanghai Technology-based SMEs[P]. Proceedings of the 2018 8th International Conference on Education and Management (ICEM 2018),2019.[64]Wei Deng. Discussion on Financing Strategy Management of Mature SMEs[P]. Proceedings of the 2016 4th International Education, Economics, Social Science, Arts, Sports and Management Engineering Conference (IEESASM 2016),2016.[65]Bo Sun,Haotian Liu. Financing Mode Analysis of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises based on Supply Chain Finance[P]. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Innovations in Economic Management and Social Science (IEMSS 2017),2017.[66]Jianing Li,Yinghua Li,Fengmei Kou. The Empirical Study on Financing Constraints of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in China[P]. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology (HSMET 2017),2017.[67]Jianghai Qi,Jinmian Han. Financing Risk Management of Small and Medium-sized Technological Enterprises in China[P]. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2017),2017.[68]Yaqiong Pan. Research on Financing Preference and Performance of Sci-tech Finance for Sci-tech SMEs[P]. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2019),2019.[69]Yuanyuan Huang. Crowdfunding and Internet Non-public Equity Financing""Based on the Development Perspective of Combining Technology-Based SMEs[P]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education, Management, Information and Management Society (EMIM 2018),2018.[70]Ni Made Suci,Ni Nyoman Yulianthini,Ni Made Dwi Ariani Mayasari. Debt Financing Behavior of SME’s Entrepreneurs[P]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Tourism, Economics, Accounting, Management, and Social Science (TEAMS 2018),2019.[71]Ró?ański, Jerzy. Advanced System of SME Financing in Market Economy[J]. Zagreb International Review of Economics &,2019.[72]Kolakovi?, Marko,Turuk, Mladen,Tur?i?, Ivan. Access to Finance –Experiences of SMEs in Croatia[J]. Zagreb International Review of Economics &,2019.[73]Miaobing Liu. A Study of the Market Failure in the Financing of High-Tech SMEs and the Governmental Intervention[J]. Open Journal of Social Sciences,2016,04(03).[74]Yan Xing,Zhangzhi Ge,Wei Song. Research on Innovation of Science and Technology Investment and Financing of SMEs in Intellectual Property[J]. Technology and Investment,2016,07(02).[75]Ruohuan He. The Study on the Problem of the Relationship between the “Heterogeneity” of the Neighbor Enterprise and the Financing Efficiency of SMEsin China—Empirical Data from China Industrial Enterprises Database[J]. Open Journal of Applied Sciences,2017,07(04).[76]Jianjun Zhang,Qianqian Sun. Research on Financing Cost of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises by Internet Finance[J]. Open Journal of Social Sciences,2017,05(11).[77]Florie Mazzorana-Kremer. Blockchain-Based Equity and STOs: Towards a Liquid Market for SME Financing?[J]. Theoretical Economics Letters,2019,09(05).[78]You Zhu,Chi Xie,Gang-Jin Wang,Xin-Guo Yan. Comparison of individual, ensemble and integrated ensemble machine learning methods to predict China’s SME credit risk in supply chain finance[J]. Neural Computing and Applications,2017,28(1).[79]Rui Wang,Zhangxi Lin,Hang Luo. Blockchain, bank credit and SME financing[J]. Quality & Quantity,2019,53(3).[80]Christian Corsi,Antonio Prencipe. Improving the external financing in independent high-tech SMEs[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,2017,ahead-of-p(ahead-of-p).[81]Aaron van Klyton,Said Rutabayiro-Ngoga. SME finance and the construction of value in Rwanda[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,2017,ahead-of-p(ahead-of-p).[82]Jianhua Du,Chao Bian,Christopher Gan. Bank competition, government intervention and SME debt financing[J]. China Finance Review International,2017,ahead-of-p(ahead-of-p).[83]Basil Al-Najjar,Dana Al-Najjar. The impact of external financing on firm value and a corporate governance index: SME evidence[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,2017,24(2).[84]Ronen Harel,Dan Kaufmann. Financing innovative SMEs of traditional sectors: the supply side[J]. EuroMed Journal of Business,2016,11(1).[85]Purnima Rao,Satish Kumar,Vidhu Gaur,Deepak Verma. What constitutes financing gap in Indian SMEs – owners’ perspective?[J]. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets,2017,9(2).[86]Marc Cowling,Weixi Liu,Ning Zhang. Access to bank finance for UK SMEs in the wake of the recent financial crisis[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,2016,22(6).[87]Dong Xiang,Andrew C. Worthington. The impact of government financial assistance on the performance and financing of Australian SMEs[J]. Accounting Research Journal,2017,30(4).[88]Hua Song,Kangkang Yu,Qiang Lu. Financial service providers and banks’ role in helping SMEs to access finance[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2018,48(1).[89]Fairouz Badaj,Bouchra Radi. Empirical investigation of SMEs’ perceptions towards PLS financing in Morocco[J]. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management,2018,11(2).[90]Shaista Wasiuzzaman,Nabila Nurdin. Debt financing decisions of SMEs in emerging markets: empirical evidence from Malaysia[J]. International Journal of Bank Marketing,2019,37(1).中小企业融资问题英文参考文献四：[91]Dario Salerno. Does the private equity financing improve performance in family SMEs?[J]. Journal of Family Business Management,2019,9(1).[92]Mauricio Silva,Stefano Monferrà,Antonio Meles. Editorial for new insights into SMEs: finance and family SMEs in a changing economic landscape[J]. Journal of Family Business Management,2019,9(1).[93]Janusz Cichy,Witold Gradoń. Crowdfunding as a Mechanism for Financing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises[J]. e-Finanse,2016,12(3).[94]Ashiqur Rahman,M. Twyeafur Rahman,Jaroslav Belas. Determinants of SME Finance: Evidence from Three Central European Countries[J]. Review of Economic Perspectives,2017,17(3).[95]Stjepan Pticar. Financing As One Of The Key Success Factors Of Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises[J]. Creative and Knowledge Society,2016,6(2).[96]Waseem Ahmed Abbasi,Zongrun Wang,Asaad Alsakarneh. Overcoming SMEs Financing and Supply Chain Obstacles by Introducing Supply Chain Finance[J]. HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration,2018,9(1).[97]Alma Delija. The Impact of the SME Financing by MFIs in Albania[J]. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,2017,8(3).[98]Forbeneh Agha Jude,Chi Collins Penn,Ntieche Adamou. Financing of Small andMedium-Sized Enterprises: A Supply-Side Approach Based on the Lending Decisions of Commercial Banks[J]. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies,2018,4(3).[99]Jerzy Ró?ański. Advanced System of SME Financing in Market Economy[J]. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business,2019,22(s1).[100]Marko Kolakovi?,Mladen Turuk,Ivan Tur?i?. Access to Finance – Experiences of SMEs in Croatia[J]. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business,2019,22(s1).[101]Jaesik Lee,Chulung Lee,Jaejin Kim,Seiho Kim,Hyeonu Im. An Empirical Study on the Effect of Innovation Financing on Technology Innovation Competency: Business Performance of SMEs in Korea[J]. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO),2019,17(1).[102]蔡金雯,任奇,黄丹. 基于P2P平台解决中小企业融资难问题调查分析[J]. 金融,2017,07(02).[103]贺敏伟,胡文文. 供应链金融模式下中小企业信用风险评价研究—基于Logistic 模型与BP神经网络模型的对比研究[J]. 金融,2018,08(03).[104]Z Tian,A F S Hassan,N H A Razak. Big Data and SME financing in China[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2018,1018(1).[105]. Artificial Neural Networks; Study Results from Y. Zhu and Colleagues Broaden Understanding of Artificial Neural Networks (Predicting China's SME Credit Risk in Supply Chain Financing by Logistic Regression, Artificial Neural Network and Hybrid Models)[J]. Computers, Networks & Communications,2016.[106]Hua Song,Kangkang Yu,Qiang Lu. Financial service providers and banks' role in helping SMEs to access finance[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2018,48(1).[107]Hua Song,Kangkang Yu,Qiang Lu. Financial service providers and banks’ role in helping SMEs to access finance[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2018,48(1).[108]Klju?nikov Aleksandr,Popesko Boris. Export and its Financing in The SME Segment. Case Study From Slovakia[J]. Journal of Competitiveness,2017,9(1).[109]Peter Quartey,Ebo Turkson,Joshua Y. Abor,Abdul Malik Iddrisu. Financing the growth of SMEs in Africa: What are the contraints to SME financing within ECOWAS?[J]. Review of Development Finance,2017,7(1).[110]Mohammed CHOWDHURY,Zahurul ALAM. FACTORS AFFECTING ACCESS TO FINANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMEs) OF BANGLADESH[J]. USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration,2017,17(2(26)).[111]Nancu Dumitru,Mitea Neluta. The Access of SMEs from Romania to Financing through Financial Instruments. Impact and Results[J]. Ovidius University Annals: Economic Sciences Series,2017,XVII(1).[112]Razali Haron,Khairunisah Ibrahim. Islamic Financing in Mitigating Access to Financing Problems of SMEs in Malaysia: A Survey Analysis[J]. Intellectual Discourse,2017,24.[113]You Zhu,Chi Xie,Gang-Jin Wang,Xin-Guo Yan. Predicting China’s SME Credit Risk in Supply Chain Finance Based on Machine Learning Methods[J]. Entropy,2016,18(5).[114]Stanley Sachikonye,Mabutho Sibanda. An Assessment of SMEs’ Financing by Commercial Banks in Zimbabwe[J]. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Oeconomica,2016,12(6).[115]Fabio Albuquerque,Joaquín Texeira Quirós,Rosário Justino. Are the cultural accounting values a relevant issue for the SMEs’ financing options?[J]. Contadur ía y Administración,2017,62(1).[116]Cheng Zhang. Small and medium-sized enterprises closed-loop supply chain finance risk based on evolutionary game theory and system dynamics[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science),2016,21(3).[117]Hezron Mogaka Osano,Hilario Languitone. Factors influencing access to finance by SMEs in Mozambique: case of SMEs in Maputo central business district[J]. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,2016,5(1).[118]Mohamed Shaban,Meryem Duygun,John Fry. SME's lending and Islamic finance. Is it a “win–win” situation?[J]. Economic Modelling,2016,55.[119]Pengfei Luo,Huamao Wang,Zhaojun Yang. Investment and financing for SMEs with a partial guarantee and jump risk[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2016,249(3).[120]David F. Moreira. The Microeconomic Impact on Growth of SMEs When the Access to Finance Widens: Evidence from Internet & High-tech Industry[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2016,220.[121]Wei NIE,Yueliang SU. Credit Risk Evaluation of SMEs Based on Supply ChainFinancing[J]. Management Science and Engineering,2016,10(2).[122]Alexandra Moritz,Joern H. Block,Andreas Heinz. Financing patterns of European SMEs – an empirical taxonomy[J]. Venture Capital,2016,18(2).以上就是关于中小企业融资问题英文参考文献的分享，希望对你有所帮助。
原创研究中小企业融资要参考的英文文献
原创研究中小企业融资要参考的英文文献Original Research: English Literature to be Considered for Financing Small and Medium-sized EnterprisesIntroduction:In recent years, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have become the driving force behind innovation, economic growth, and job creation. However, one of the major challenges faced by SMEs is accessing adequate financing options to support their growth and sustainability. This article aims to explore and analyze the various English literature sources that can be consulted for valuable insights into financing options for SMEs.1. The Importance of Financing for SMEs:Financing is crucial for SMEs as it provides the necessary capital for investment, expansion, research and development, and meeting working capital requirements. Access to financing enables SMEs to enhance their productivity, compete in the market, and contribute to economic development.2. Challenges Faced by SMEs in Accessing Financing:SMEs often encounter obstacles when seeking financing. These challenges include limited collateral, lack of credit history, information asymmetry, and risk aversion by lenders. To overcome these hurdles, it is essential to refer to relevant English literature that addresses these issues and provides potential solutions.3. English Literature Sources for SME Financing:a. Academic Journals: Academic journals such as "Journal of Small Business Finance" and "Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice" publish research articles that explore various aspects of SME financing. These articles discuss topics like crowdfunding, venture capital, angel investing, and government programs that support SMEs' financial needs.b. Research Reports: Research reports from reputable organizations like the World Bank, International Finance Corporation (IFC), and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provide valuable insights into the financing landscape for SMEs. These reports analyze trends, challenges, and best practices in SME financing across different countries and regions.c. Case Studies: Case studies published by universities, business schools, and financial institutions offer practical examples of successful financing strategies adopted by SMEs. These case studies highlight the specific steps taken to secure financing, including negotiations with banks, alternative lending options, and leveraging relationships with stakeholders.d. Government Publications: Government publications, such as white papers and policy documents, outline the initiatives and programs available to support SME financing. These publications provide a comprehensive overview of the various financing schemes, tax incentives, and grants offered by governments to assist SMEs in their financial endeavors.4. Key Themes in English Literature:a. Alternative Financing: English literature emphasizes the emergence of alternative financing options for SMEs. This includes peer-to-peer lendingplatforms, crowdfunding, and business incubators that connect SMEs with potential investors.b. Digital Innovation: The impact of digital innovation on SME financing is a widely discussed topic. English literature explores how fintech solutions, blockchain technology, and online platforms have revolutionized access to funding for SMEs.c. Government Support: Many articles underscore the importance of government support in facilitating SME financing. English literature examines policy frameworks, loan guarantee programs, and financial assistance schemes implemented by governments to alleviate the financing challenges faced by SMEs.5. Conclusion:Accessing appropriate financing options is crucial for the growth and sustainability of SMEs. Exploring and analyzing relevant English literature sources is essential for SME owners, managers, and policymakers to make informed decisions regarding financing strategies. By drawing upon academic journals, research reports, case studies, and government publications, stakeholders can be equipped with valuable insights and best practices to support SME financing needs. Continuous research and understanding of the English literature in this field will contribute to the development of effective financing ecosystems for SMEs.。
[原创]研究中小企业融资要参考的英文文献
![[原创]研究中小企业融资要参考的英文文献](https://img.taocdn.com/s3/m/d2af560ee87101f69e3195f1.png)
研究中小企业融资要参考的英文文献英文图书和期刊类文献：[1]Allen N.Berger,Gregory F.Udell,“Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small FirmFinance,”Journal of Business,Vol.68,no.3.(1995),pp.351-381．[2]Aghion,P.,Incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting,Review of Economics Studies,1992,Vol.59,p473-494．[3]Albertode，M.&JulioPindado.Determinants of capital structure:new evidence from Spanish Panel data[J].Journal of Corporate Finance，2001，(7):77-99．[4]A.N.Berger，ler，M.A.Petersen，R.G.Rajan，J.C.Stein，2001，“Does Function Follow Organizational Form?Evidence from the Lending Practices of Large and Small Banks”,Board of Governors of Federal Reserve SystemWorking Paper．[5]Azam,J.P.,B.Biais,M.Dia and rmal and Formal Credit Marketsand Credit Rationing in Cote D’Ivoire,Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2001,17(4),520-532.[6]Bernanke,B.S.,M.Gerler.Inside the Black Box:The Credit Channel ofMonetary Policy Transmission[J].Journal of EconomicPerspectives,1995,(9);27-48．[7]Barbosa,E.&Moraes,C.,Determinants of the Firm’s Capital Structure:theCase of the Very Small Enterprises,Working Paper from Econpapers，2003,366-358。
中小企业融资研究文献综述及外文文献资料
本文档包括改专题的：外文文献、文献综述一、外文文献The Role of Banks in Small and Medium Enterprises Financing: A Case Studyfrom KosovoAbstractIn this study we investigate the impact of firm and entrepreneurship characteristics in small and medium enterprises (SME-s) investment finance through debt (bank loan). Data are gathered from interviews based on a self-organized questionnaire with 150 SME-s in Kosovo. Based on the econometric model of linear regression, key factors are identified which influence the investment growth financed by debt. The results indicate that there is mutual correlation among the firm's age, size, business plan, sector, number of owners, sources of financing and the investment growth financed from banks in Kosovo. Therefore, findings in this work suggest that the access to external sources of financing through bank loan is an important factor that influences the investment growth. The paper provides some important conclusions and implications for policymakers and entrepreneurs.Keywords: SME, entrepreneurship, financing through debt, investment, Kosovo1. IntroductionIt is explicitly accepted that SME-s present a pivotal element in the economic activity in both, developed and developing countries (Acs & Audretsch, 1990; Johnson & Loweman, 1995). Numerous authors from academic and professional world designate SME-s as generators of both, economic growth and overall social development (Audretsch & Klepper, 2000; World Bank Group, 2005; McMillan & Woodruff, 2002).The discussion of the relevant literature related to the access of SME-s to finance, as well as to investment finance is of particular importance (Krasniqi, 2007). According to Beck et al. (2007), the SME-s access to, and cost of, finances is quite often characterized as a major difficulty, up to the extent of 35 percent. It should alsobe stressed that the small firms come with more difficulty to loans, since they encounter higher transaction costs and higher premium risks, for they are more fragile and they offer lower collaterals (Beck et al., 2006). Audretsch and Elston (2006) also stress that small firms confronted higher financial difficulties than large ones. Similar conclusions can be found among other authors who have worked in this direction (Beck et al., 2006; Oliveira & Fortunato, 2006).Brinckmann et al. (2011) finds that small firms have higher limitations to access external sources of financing than bigger firms, and, thus, they become more dependent on internal funds for financing their investment needs. A major obstacle in financial markets to the access on finances by SME-s is also the asymmetry of information. Thus, based on Zhao et al. (2006), one from the major difficulties for accessing finance is the asymmetry of information among lenders and debtors; for instance, borrowers have private information on the firm that lenders do not possess. Because of their small size, short history and inconsistent accounting data, the issue of asymmetric information for SME-s becomes more serious (Deakins et al., 2008; EBRD, 1999; Pissardies et al., 2003; Klapper et al., 2002).Difficulties of this kind are expressed also among SME-s of Kosovo, as one from the last countries in transition. In spite of the fact that the SME sector in Kosovo is relatively new, it constitutes 98% of all the firms, thus representing a huge potential for generation of new jobs and for economic development of the country. Based on data of the World Bank (2010), the major obstacle to the development of SME-s in Kosovo is access to bank loans. Only 10% of investments made by SME-s are financed through bank loans, and above 85% of investments are financed from private sources (World Bank, 2010).Objective of this work is to empirically investigate the role and importance of the firms and entrepreneurship characteristics that influence the investment growth through debt finance (loans) in Kosovo. Therefore, the research question in this study is: How does the investment growth impact the performance of SME-s, by discussing the firm and entrepreneurship characteristics of the investment growth of SME-s in Kosovo?The organization of the work is as following: Part one discusses the context of the research, part two the theoretical aspect and the summary of literature. In part three we provide the research methodology and model. Part four contains the results and empirical findings. And, part five deals with the conclusions.2. Theory and Literature ReviewUntil now, there is no single and unique theoretical model that explains the financing of SME-s, which influences the performance of investments, their growth and development. The theoretical principles underlying capital structure can generally be describes in terms of the static trade off theory by Modigliani and Miller (1958), the pecking order theory (Myers & Majluf, 1984), managerial theory of investments (Marris, 1963; Baumol, 1967), agency theory by Jensen and Meckling (1976) and extended by Stiglitz and Weiss (1981).According to neoclassical theory of investments (M-M), which affirms the attitude on the irrelevance of the capital structure for the value of the firm, internal and external sources of financing are perfect substitutes. In the world of the perfect functioning of the market, the choice between financing through capital or debt is irrelevant. Therefore, the cost of capital and the market value of the firm are independent from the value of the firm (Modigliani & Miller, 1958). The theory of M-M is based on the following premises: there are no taxes, there are no transaction costs, there are no bankruptcy costs, the equal cost of debt for companies and for investors, symmetrical information in the market, there is no influence of debt in the profit of the company before interest and taxation.Modigliani and Miller (1958) modify their theory by introducing the tax on profit. In this case, the value of the firm is positively related to debt. After introducing the tax on profit in their analysis, they ascertain that the financial leverage increases the value of the firm, since the interest decreases the tax base (it is deduced from the business profit), and, therefore, we have savings which have the value of the interest. From this ascertainment, the value of the firm grows bigger, as the financial leverage increases, which means that the highest value of the firm is achieved if the burden of debt becomes 100%. In this way the firm attains absolute advantage, given that it isdefended from taxes.Scott (1972) emphasizes that 100% tax shield does not exist in reality, because of distress costs. Debt leads to legal obligation to pay interest and principal. If a firm cannot meet its debt obligation, it is forced in to bankruptcy an incurs associated costs (Fatoki & Asah, 2011). This theory, in fact, does not take into the consideration all the other factors, such as: the costs of the bankruptcy of the firm, the costs of the agency, the impact of debt in profit, the asymmetry of information, and, therefore, this theory is challenged by other theories (Harris & Raviv, 1991).Thus, the static trade off theory, which is based on the M-M theory and is its complementary, except savings from the tax on profit, incorporates into the discussion also the cost of bankruptcy, such as: judicial taxes, attorney costs, administrative costs, and, also, the agency costs (the firms managers damage the interests of the creditors by working in the interest of shareholders), and this can reduce the value of the firm (Jensen and Meckling, 1976). This theory is, in fact, the dominant theory regarding the determination of the financial structure of the firm, and it is founded on the premise that it is the firm that chooses how much it will be financed from debt, and how much from the capital, by balancing the cost of profits. According to this theory, the optimal level of the structure of capital is the one which equates the profit and costs from debt.According to pecking order theory, the firm initially prefers internal sources of financing to external ones, and, regarding external sources, they prefer debt to capital (Donaldson, 1961). Thus, initially we have the use of accumulated profit, amortization, debt, and, finally, the equity capital. According to this theory, the firms finance their investment requirements based on a hierarchic order. This can direct also to existence of the asymmetry of information between managers (insiders) and investors (outsiders). As a result of this, managers have more information then investors (Myers & Majluf, 1984).Based on the agency theory, Stiglitz and Weiss (1981) present the problem that, as a consequence of asymmetrical information, occur between managers and shareholders, on one hand, and the problem among shareholders, managers andcreditors, on the other. They argue that only SME-s knows the real financial structure of their own, the real strength of their investment projects and the tendencies for settling up the debt, and, therefore, the firm possesses superior private information (Mazanai & Fatoki, 2012).3. Hypothesis3.1 Business PlanAccording to Guffey, the business plan is a necessary requirement at the beginning of business, and it is used as an important element to acquire financial support during application to banking institutions (Guffey, 2008). An increase in the level of skills of those who are looking for credits in the compilation of business plans, will increase their opportunities to have properly prepared documentation, and to have a clear idea on the course of their business. According to Maziku (2012), the asymmetric information between the debt-seeking SME-s and the bank, is reflected in the incapability of the majority of SME-s to provide consistent financial data and real business plans, which increases the operational cost during the decision making for permitting the loans by the a bank (Maziku, 2012). Thus, the business plan does not have an impact only in reduction of operational costs, but it is also a key instrument in the decision making regarding the use of banking loans by the firms (Zhang, 2008; Madura, 2007). This is valid particularly for start-up businesses.Therefore, the following hypothesis is generated:H1: SME-s which have business plans are more likely to use bank loans than SME-s without written business plans.3.2 The Growth of the FirmThe growth of SME-s depends on the level of investments. The growth of SME-s can be measured in different ways, including the growth of sales, profits, or number of employees (McPerson, 1996). We measure this variable through the growth of the number of employees.The ability of SME-s to grow depends on a large measure from their potential to invest in the restructuring and innovations. All these investments require capital, that is, they require access to finance (Mazanai & Fatoki, 2012). According to Ganbold(2008), in a research of the World Bank, one among the key difficulties in the growth of the firm is access to financial services, which reflects in economic growth, employment generation, and reduction of poverty in the developing countries (Ganbold, 2008). Based on the theory of firm growth (Jovanovic, 1982), new enterprises grow faster, which means that these have to invest more.Therefore, the following hypothesis is generated:H2: SME-s that grow faster invest more than those with low level of growth.3.3 GenderIn the professional literature there are contradictory opinions regarding the impact that gender of the owner of the firm has into the access to finance. While a group of thinkers assert that gender of the owner has an impact into the capital structure of the firm, the other group denies this, ascertaining that gender doesn't have any impact into the determination of the capital structure.On one hand, Abor (2008) argues that businesses owned by female owners use the debt (loans) less for different reasons, including discrimination and aversion to risk. Watson et al. (2009) emphasize that a key factor in determining the capital structure in businesses owned by female owners is their propensity towards not accepting risk from the desire to keep things under control. Female clients are more hesitant to seek loans, since they feel discriminated and discouraged (Kon & Storey, 2003).On the other hand, Coleman (2000) find that there ar no important differences in the use of debt (banking loan) between female and male owners, and that gender is not an important predictor of the financial leverage of the firm. Whereas, Irving and Scott (2008), analyzing 400 SME-s, and based on the questionare prepared by Barclays Bank, in the most surprising way ascertain that female have easier access to finance then male. Therefore, based on the findings reported above, the following hypothesis is generated:H3: The male owners of firms are more likely to use bank loans then the female owners of firms.3.4 Sources of FinancingThe larger participation of investment finance from internal sources of SME-s increases the probability for acquiring of bank loans, since the internal sources carry the opportunity cost of financing of the project. Thus, SME-s provide higher level of trust to banks, since, in the case of failure, the unexpected burden falls on SME-s themselves. In their research conducted in 16 countries of OECD, Japelli and Pagano (1994) ascertain that banks don't finance 100% of the property value in any of these countries, but they do that with a certain coeficient loan/property. This is not equal for all the countries, and it differs from country to country, starting from the minimum financing of 50% in Turkey and Greece, up to 95% in Denmark.Thus, authors Lee and Ratti (2008) and Ahn et al. (2006) reports negative relationship between debt and investments. This relationship is stronger among smaller firms. As the debt (loans) grows, the cash flow is increasingly used for settling up the loan and its interest. Consequently, firms fulfill their obligations to creditors with more difficulties, and, on the other hand, the possibility for new investments is reduced.Therefore the following hypothesis is generated:H4: The higher the internal sources of SME-s, the higher probability to acquire bank loans for investment finance.3.5 EducationEducation is one of the important factors that influence the growth of the firm. Therefore, the high level of human capital (education and experience) has a positive impact in the growth of the firm. The owners of the firm who are of young age and low level of education are more active in using the external sources of financing, in spite of the fact that higher education reduces the fear for refusing the loans. In the meantime the owners of more mature age and with higher education, the so called "wiser" ones, can be found as less interested for external sources of financing (V os et al., 2007). Therefore, the majorities of owners of SME-s prefer to keep the control and do not apply for external capital (Curran, 1986; Jarvis, 2000).Thus, the internal capital is the major source of financing the SME-s (Ou & Haynes, 2003). Rand (2007) finds also negative influence between education ofowners-managers and access to credit, arguing that owners-managers with higher education can understand easier that their requirements for credits can be refused. Therefore, these owners-managers are for this reason discouraged and hesitate to apply for loans. In their study on new firms, Hartarska and Gonzales Vega (2006) find that education does not have an important role in the decision-making of the banks for lending.Therefore, the following hypothesis is generated:H5: Owners/managers with high level of education use less bank loans for financing the investment requirements.4. Methodology4.1. Sources of DataThe organization of data gathering from the questionnaire was developed in the period March-July, 2012, and data processing based on the answers was conducted in November and December 2012. On this occasion, a database was developed, which includes characteristics of SME-s in general, and characteristics related to investments and their financing in particular. Data processing was conducted with the STATA software.The questionnaire is specially designed for this scientific research with 150 SME-s in Kosovo, and it includes years 2010 and 2011. The sample selection is made randomly, from database at the Agency for Businesses Registration in the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Kosovo, and it is stratified in three basic sectors, in order to reflect eventual changes among the production, trade and service firms. Interviews were conducted directly (face to face) with owners/managers, or financial managers of the firms.4.2 QuestionnaireThe questionnaire consisted of 4 major sections. The first section included data on the owner/manager of the firm, and general data about the firm (location, the year of establishment, type of activity, and qualification of owners/managers). Second section included the orientation regarding the development in the future as well as investments, and here are presented data regarding volume of investments, sources ofinvestment, the use of bank loans in realization of investments, conditions of financing, activities that are conducted during the realization of investments, and investment plans for the future. The third section covers information regarding business activities of the firms inside and outside of the country, that is, whether a certain firm imports or exports merchandise. The fourth section includes data regarding the business plans of the firms: possession of the business plan, its impact on the decisions of the banks. Information gathered from the questionnaire was important for determining the variables in the econometric model of linear regression.5. Survey ResultsBased on the results, we conclude that the regression linear model mentioned above is specified good, given that Adj R-squared 0.36, which shows that the variation in independent variables explains the variation in dependent variable for more than 36%. In addition, the statistical F-test, shows that all the independent variables, jointly, which are statistically significant, are different from zero.Also, the correlation analysis shows that the problem of correlation in independent variables is not present in our data, given that there no higher coefficients in our estimation. Also, the dependent variable has a normal distribution and does not represent a statistical problem that requires treatment.Based on the table 2, in which the results of the linear regression are presented, from nine independent variables, six are statistically significant with impact on the dependent variable, or on the investment growth.According to results, the variable business plan, is statistically significant and with positive sign. This means that the firms that have business plans, on average have investment growths that are bigger than those of the firms that do not have business plans. Similar ascertainments can be found among other authors who emphasize that the business plan serves as a mean for increasing financing from external sources (Zhang, 2008).The variable trade is statistically significant and with negative impact in the investment growth when compared with the firms that belong to the service sector. This has the meaning that services on average invest more than other sectors. Inaddition the variable production is also statistically significant and with negative impact on the increase of investments when compared with the firms that belong to the sector of services. This has the meaning that when compared with the services, the sector of production invests less than other sectors. Similar ascertainments for the case of Kosovo can be found in the work of the author Krasniqi (2010).The next variable no_own, which indicates the number of owners, is statistically significant and with positive impact, which means that the greater the number of owners, the greater will be the investments. We have also size_emp as a variable that shows the size of the firm expressed by the number of employees, and is statistically significant and with inverse impact on the growth of investments. This means that smaller firms have larger investment growths. This finding clearly reflects that as the number of employee's grows, the firms grow slowlier. This is in full accordance with findings of other authors (Audretsch & Klepper, 2000; Caves, 1998). These results are the same with other studies that oppose the Gibrat Law (Krasniqi, 2006; Harris & Trainor, 2005).The firm_age as an independent variable is statistically significant and with negative sign, which means that new firms grow faster than older firms. This ascertainment is in accordance with findings of many authors who ascertain that younger firms grow faster than the older ones, and, therefore, have higher investment growth (Woldie et al., 2008; Storey, 1994; Barkham et al., 1996).The gender of the owner of the firm in the presented model, as a variable is not statistically significant, which means that the owners of the businesses of both genders have the same probability to obtain bank loans for SME-s investments. These results are in accordance with the studies conducted by Kalleberg and Leicht (1991), who, in a study conducted with 300 firms in three sectors, ascertain that female owners were as successful as male owners. We find similar ascertainment in the study of 298 businesses in United Kingdom, which emphasizes that gender, is not a determinant for financing the business (Johnson & Storey, 1993). Coleman (2000) emphasizes that there are no important differences in the use of debt (bank loans) between males and females, and that gender is not an important predictor for financial leverage of thefirm.Finally, education represents a variable which is not statistically significant and has negative sign, which means that the level of education of the managers/owners doesn't impact external sources of financing (bank loans) for SME-s investments. This is explained by the fact that Kosovan SME-s suffer from permanent lack of capital, and on average the time frame of establishment is short and the means that are accumulated from the profits are insufficient for financing the investments. Therefore, the only alternative that remains to them is financing from banking credits, taking into the consideration that the capital market does not function in Kosovo, which causes that the possibility to use other forms of external financing is very difficult. Similar results can be found at Krasniqi (2010).6. ConclusionsIn this study we have investigated empirically the key factors of the firms and entrepreneurship which influence the increase of investment growth through bank loans. The data gathered by the self organized questionnaire with 150 SME-s in the entire territory of Kosovo for the years 2010 and 2011 are used to test the impact of certain factors in the increase of investments through the use of financial means from debt (bank loans). Based on the statistical analysis and the method of linear regression, key factors are identified as indicators that influence the growth of investments of SME-s in Kosovo.The findings of this work stress that the business plan is a factor with statistical importance which has positive influence in the access to the bank loans for financing the SME-s investment. This means that the firms that posses business plan and use it for seeking bank loans necessary for financing investments, on average have higher growth of investments than the firms who do not have a business plan.The variables trade and production are statistically significant, but they have negative influence in the growth of investments. This means that the firms that use bank loans for investment in the sector of trade and production, on average, have lower chance to grow, than firms in the service sector. This is an indicator that shows that the sector of services is more attractive in the aspect of investments of Kosovanfirms, than other sectors of the economy, and this results from faster returns of investments and, consequently, faster settling up of the bank loans.The next variable named as the number of owners also results positive and significant in the statistical aspect, which means that the larger the number of owners, the greater the investments. This is explained by the fact that in Kosovo firms have started to use other forms of organization that influence the growth of business and of firm, through larger number of owners who use investment as another opportunity for the growth and development of the firm.The size of the firm expressed by the number of employees results with inverse influence in the growth of investments, and is statistically significant. The meaning of this is that smaller firms have bigger growth of investment on average than other firms. This result is in accordance with other studies that oppose the Gibrat's Law for the case of Kosovo (Krasniqi, 2010). Similar results are attained regarding the variable the age of the firm, which is statistically significant and has a negative sign, which means that the younger firms invest more on average than older firms.Empirical evidence and findings in this work can be used as recommendations for a broad spectrum of users. The problems of asymmetric information between owners-managers and creditors (banks) are of particular importance. This represents a clear signal for policy makers to create conditions for favorable environment for stimulating the sources of external financing of SME-s in Kosovo, such as: the creation of the guarantee fund for SME-s, the increase of banking supply through licensing of new banks in the financial market, which will increase the competition between the existing banks, and which will, in turn, enable the improvement of the conditions of financing of SME-s, with the reduction of the interest, reduction of managerial costs, increase of the grace period, softening of the conditions for collateral, longer periods of use of financial means, particularly for SME-s that have longer investment plans. Also, in the institutional aspect, initiatives should be undertaken for the creation of conditions for development of entrepreneurial capabilities, and for other forms of cooperating networks of firms that will facilitate the growth of businesses in general, and investment growth in particular.二、文献综述中小企业融资研究文献综述摘要长时间以来，融资难问题都是制约中小企业长期稳定发展的最主要因素之一，各国学者对于中小企业的融资问题从本国范围和世界范围内进行了深入的研究,在此对国内外学者的研究成果进行了文献综述，主要内容包括：中小企业融资现状和制度环境分析；分别从内、外部原因以及信息不对称等原因分析中小企业融资难问题；第三部分是关于应对中小企业融资难问题的对策研究；最后给出关于中小企业融资难问题的建议。
企业融资外文文献
Bank Involvement with SMEs: BeyondRelationship LendingAugusto de la Torre，María Soledad Martínez Pería，Sergio L. SchmuklerPolicy Research Working Paper 4649，2010AbstractThe “conventional wisdom”in academic and policy circles argues that, while large and foreign banks are generally not interested in serving SMEs, small and niche banks have an advantage in doing so because they can overcome SME opaqueness through relationship lending. This paper shows that there is a gap between this view and what banks actually do. Banks perceive SMEs as a core and strategic business and seem well positioned to expand their links with SMEs. The recent intensification of bank involvement with SMEs in various emerging markets documented in this paper is neither led by small or niche banks nor highly dependent on relationship lending. Rather, all types of banks are catering to SMEs and larger, multiple-service banks have in fact a comparative advantage in offering a wide range of products and services on a large scale, through the use of new technologies, business models, and risk management systems.Keywords: small and medium enterprises, bank finance, financial constraints, banking market structure1. IntroductionThe financing of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) has attracted much attention in recent years and has become an important topic for economists and policymakers working on financial and economic development. This interest is driven in part by the fact that SMEs account for the majority of firms in an economy and a significant share of employment (Hallberg 2001). Furthermore, most large companies usually start as small enterprises, so the ability of SMEs to develop and invest becomes crucial to any economy wishing to prosper.The recent attention on SME financing also comes from the perception among academics and policymakers that SMEs lack appropriate financing and need to receive special assistance, such as government programs that increase lending. Various studies support this perception. A number of papers find that SMEs are more financially constrained than large firms. For example, using data from 10,000 firms in 80 countries,Beck, Demirgüç-Kunt, Laeven, and Maksimovic (2006) show that the probability that a firm rates financing as a major obstacle is 39% for small firms, 38% for medium-size firms, and 29% for large firms. Furthermore, small firms finance, on average, 13 percentage points less of their investments with external finance when compared to large firms.4 Importantly, lack of access to external finance is a key obstacle to firm growth, especially for SMEs (Beck, Demirgüç-Kunt, and Maksimovic 2005). On the policy side, there are a large number of initiatives across countries to foster SME financing including government subsidized lines of credit and public guarantee funds. One example that has been deemed as relatively successful is Chile’s Fondo de Garantía para Pequeños Empresarios (FOGAPE), a fund created toencourage bank lending to SMEs through partial credit guarantees. This fund has many features that make it attractive, including some incentives to reduce moral hazard, promote competition among banks, and encourage self sustainability.银行参与中小型企业融资：超越关系型借贷【作者】奥古斯托·德拉托雷，玛丽亚·索莱达·马丁内斯·帕利亚，塞尔吉奥L·施穆克勒【资料来源】《政策研究工作文件》4649号，2010年摘要：学术界和政策界的“传统智慧”认为虽然大型银行和外资银行对一般中小型企业的服务并不感兴趣，但是小型的针对特定产品或服务用户群的银行却在这方面能获得益处，因为他们可以通过关系型借贷来克服中小企业的不透明性。
投资价值的英文版参考文献
投资价值的英文版参考文献投资价值是指在市场上获得良好的回报的可能性。
它通常关注投资的风险和回报之间的平衡，以及某个资产的内在价值。
投资价值策略是一种重要的投资方法，它的核心是在价值低估的股票和证券上进行投资，这些股票和证券的市场价格低于它们的内在价值，因此具有潜在的增值空间。
在投资价值方面，大卫·达维斯（David Dodd）和本杰明·格雷厄姆（Benjamin Graham）是著名的价值投资者。
他们的著作《证券分析》（Security Analysis）和《聪明的投资者》（The Intelligent Investor）一直被认为是投资价值领域的经典著作。
在这些著作中，他们提出了许多投资价值方法和原则，包括以下几个方面。
首先，价值投资应该是长期的。
与短期投机相比，价值投资者更注重把握企业的价值和未来的增长潜力，并在较长时间内持有公司股票，以获得更稳定和长期的回报。
其次，价值投资应该关注企业的内在价值。
这意味着投资者需要使用各种财务指标，如股息率、市盈率、市净率等来衡量一个企业的实际价值。
投资者可以选择那些价格低于它们的内在价值的公司进行投资。
第三，价值投资应该考虑投资风险。
虽然股票价格低于其内在价值可能意味着有盈利潜力，但这并不意味着投资者可以忽略风险。
价值投资者应该仔细研究公司的财务状况，包括债务比率、现金流和盈利能力等指标，以确定它们的风险和回报比例。
第四，价值投资应该寻找长期稳定的企业。
优质公司通常具有强大的竞争力和优秀的管理团队，能够在不同的经济周期中维持稳定的盈利。
这意味着价值投资者应该着眼于那些已经建立了稳健业务模式的公司，这些公司在未来也有良好的盈利增长前景。
最后，价格低于其内在价值的股票和公司并不总是有投资价值的。
投资者应该综合考虑多种因素，如财务状况、行业趋势、竞争环境和市场前景等来做出投资决策。
总之，投资价值是一种考虑风险、回报和内在价值平衡的投资方法。
投资价值的英文版参考文献
投资价值的英文版参考文献参考文献：1. Graham, B., & Dodd, D. (2008). Security Analysis: Sixth Edition, Foreword by Warren Buffett. New York: McGraw-Hill.2. Malkiel, B. G. (2015). A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.3. Lynch, P., & Rothchild, J. (2000). One Up On Wall Street: How To Use What You Already Know To Make Money In The Market. New York: Simon & Schuster.4. Greenblatt, J. (2010). The Little Book That Beats the Market. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.5. Fisher, P. L. (2013). Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.6. Buffett, W. E. (2013). The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate America. New York: The Cunningham Group.7. Siegel, J. J. (2014). Stocks for the Long Run : The Definitive Guide to Financial Market Returns & Long-Term Investment Strategies. New York: McGraw-Hill.8. Swensen, D. F. (2011). Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment. New York: Free Press.9. Bogle, J. C. (2010). The Little Book of Common Sense Investing: The Only Way to Guarantee Your Fair Share of Stock Market Returns. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10. Faber, M. (2011). The Ivy Portfolio: How to Invest Like the Top Endowments and Avoid Bear Markets. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.投资价值是指通过研究和分析一项投资的基本面，找到低于其真实价值的价格，并将其作为买入的信号。
企业风险投资外文翻译文献
企业风险投资外文翻译文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译)译文：风险投资在小型企业的作用1.1导论在过去的几十年里，对小型公司的投资得到了发展。
企业家的投资决策对国民经济的发展起了很重要的影响作用，因此，中小企业的融资问题不断的吸引着学术界的关注。
大部分文献资料显示企业关系对经济的发展和生产力的发展起了基础性作用（OECD，2004），例如它曾引发了小型企业的创新，进而为国家经济竞争了的增强增添了巨大的筹码（Pandey et al, 2003）,但是在另一方面，由于公司起步时的高风险和信息不对称，小型企业显得不堪一击（Berger and Udell, 2002），同时小型企业面临艰难的资金问题——投资者拒绝“供给资金”给刚起步的企业(Gans and Stern, 2003)。
换句话说，当你和你的家人及朋友的资金枯竭，车子被买了，房子作了抵押，那么你从哪里获得资金是你变得资金充足呢？(Reynolds, 2000, p.52)这是风险投资在小型金融企业变得重要的重点，更进一步说，经济学家认为风险投资给那些规模小、刚起步、有创新精神的企业提供了支持，尤其是高科技产业的投资公司。
(Bottazzi and Rin, 2002)因此，风险投资促进了企业观念的成长和发展。
这篇论文旨在评论风险投资对实体企业的贡献，重点是对小型金融企业的评价。
论文第一部分重点介绍风险投资在小型金融企业的基础作用；第二部分介绍风险投资带来的一揽子服务；第三部分，风险投资对公司专业化的主要贡献；最后一部分，怎样吸引风险投资。
1.2为什么刚起步的小型企业选择风险投资？风险投资对其的作用虽然集体讨论的过程可以真正的不断提高生产力，但是企业家们必须考虑资金问题。
事实上，一个人有开小公司的想法是很好的，但是实施这个想法会因为需要“养料”而给他带来很多麻烦。
因此，像这样的贫穷企业家必须依赖外来的资金来开办企业(Lulfesmann, 2000)。
投资学参考文献
投资学参考文献1.Alexander P. Groh: Valuation of Private Equity Investments, EVCA, 20022.Haugen, Robert A.: Modern Investment Theory, 4. Edition, Upper Saddle River,19973.Ezra Zask: Global Investment Risk Management, McGraw-Hill Trade, 19994.Gareth D.Myles: Investment Analysis, 20035.Brealey, Richard A./Myers, Stewart C.: Principles of Corporate Finance,6.Edition, Boston, 20006.Trigeorgis, Lenos: Real Options in Capital Investment –Models, Strategies, andApplications, Westport, 19957.Dixit, Avinash K./Pindyck, Robert S.: Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton,19948.Damodaran, Aswath: Investment Valuation –Tools and Techniques for Determiningthe Value of any Asset, New York, 19969.Harry Markowitz，portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, March 195210.W. Sharpe, Capital Asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium. Journal ofFinance, Sept. 196411.Lintner, The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investmentsin stock portfolios and capital budgets, Review of Economics and Statistics, Feb. 1965.12.Mossin, Equilibrium in a capital asset market, Econometrica, Oct. 196613.Fama: Market Efficiency, Long-term Returns, and Behavioral Finance, Journal ofEconomic Perspectives 8(1), 113-13114.Fama and French, Common risk factors in returns on stocks and bonds, Journalof Financial Economics, 33,1993.15.J．Treynor, How to rate management investment funds, Harvard Business Review,Jan. 196616. W.Sharpe, Mutual fund performance, Journal of Business, Jan. 196617. M. Jensen, The performance of mutual funds in 1945-1964, Journal of Finance,May 196818.《资产定价理论》杨大楷著上海财经大学出版社19.《资本市场》法博齐著，清华大学出版社。
外文文献及翻译瑞查德森-自由现金流与过度投资
This paper examines firm investing decisions in the presence of free cash flow. In theory, firm level investment should not be related to internally generated cash flows (Modigliani & Miller, 1958). However, prior research has documented a positive relation between investment expenditure and cash flow(e.g., Hubbard, 1998). There are two interpretations for this positive relation. First, the positive relation is a manifestation of an agency problem, where managers in firms with free cash flow engage in wasteful expenditure (e.g.,Jensen 1986; Stulz 1990). When managers‟ objectives differ from those of shareholders, the presence of internally generated cash flow in excess of that required to maintain existing assets in place and finance new positive NPV projects creates the potential for those funds to be squandered. Second, the positive relation reflects capital market imperfections, where costly external financing creates the potential for internally generated cash flows to expand the feasible investment opportunity set (e.g., Fazzari, Hubbard, & Petersen,1988; Hubbard, 1998).This paper focuses on utilizing accounting information to better measure the constructs of free cash flow and over-investment, thereby allowing a more powerful test of the agency-based explanation for why firm level investment is related to internally generated cash flows. In doing so, this paper is the first to offer large sample evidence of over-investment of free cash flow. Prior research, such as Blanchard, Lopez-di-Silanes, and Vishny (1994), document excessive investment and acquisition activity for eleven firms that experience a large cash windfall due to a legal settlement, Harford (1999) finds using a sample of 487 takeover bids, that cash-rich firms are more likely to make acquisitions that subsequently experience abnormal declines in operating performance, and Bates (2005) finds for a sample of 400 subsidiary sales from1990 to 1998 that firms who retain cash tend to invest more, relative to industry peers. This paper extends these small sample findings by showing thatover-investment of free cash flow is a systematic phenomenon across all types of investment expenditure.The empirical analysis proceeds in two stages. First, the paper uses an accounting-based framework to measure both free cash flow and over-investment. Free cash flow is defined as cash flow beyond what is necessary to maintain assets in place and to finance expected new investments.Over-investment is defined as investment expenditure beyond that required to maintain assets in place and to finance expected new investments in positive NPV projects. To measure over-investment, I decompose total investment expenditure into two components: (i) required investment expenditure to maintain assets in place, and (ii) new investment expenditure. I then decompose new investment expenditure into over-investment in negative NPV projects and expected investment expenditure, where the latter varies with the firm‟s growth opportunities, financing constraints, industry affiliation and other factors.Under the agency cost explanation, management has the potential to squander free cash flow only when free cash flow is positive. At the other end of the spectrum, firms with negative free cash flow can only squander cash if they are able to raise ……cheap‟‟ capital. This is less likely to occur because these firms need to be able to raise financing and thereby place themselves under the scrutiny of external markets (DeAngelo, DeAngelo, & Stulz, 2004; Jensen, 1986). Consistent with the agency cost explanation, I find a positive association between over-investment and free cash flow for firms with positive free cash flow.1For a sample of 58,053 firm-years during the period 1988–2002, I find that for firms with positive free cash flow the average firm over-invests 20% of its free cash flow. Furthermore, I document that the majority of free cash flow is retained in the form of financial assets. The average firm in my sample retains 41% of its free cash flow as either cash or marketable securities. There is little evidence that free cash flow is distributed to external debt holders or shareholders.Finding an association between over-investment and free cash flow is consistent with recent research documenting poor future performance following firm level investment activity. For example, Titman, Wei, and Xie (2004) and Fairfield, Whisenant, and Yohn (2003) show that firms with extensive capital investment activity and growth in net operating assets respectively, experience inferior future stock returns. Furthermore, Dechow, Richardson, and Sloan(2005) find that cash flows retained within the firm (either capitalized through accruals or ……invested‟‟ in financial assets) a re associated with lower future operating performance and future stock returns. This performance relation is consistent with the over-investment of free cash flows documented in this paper.The second set of empirical analyses examine whether governance structures are effective in mitigating over-investment. Prior research has examined the impact of a variety of governance structures on firm valuation and the quality of managerial decision making (see Brown & Caylor, 2004; Gompers,Ishii, & Metrick, 2003; Larcker, Richardson, & Tuna, 2005 for detailed summaries).Collectively, the ability of cross-sectional variation in governance structures to explain firm valueand/or firm decision making is relatively weak. Consistent with this, I find evidence that out of a large set of governance measures only a few are related to over-investment. For example, firms with activist shareholders and certain anti-takeover provisions are less likely to over-invest their free cash flow. The next section develops testable hypotheses concerning the relation between free cash flow and over-investment. Section 2 describes the sample selection and variable measurement. Section 3 discusses empirical results for the over-investment of free cash flow. Section 4 contains empirical analysis examining the link between corporate governance and the over-investment of free cash flow, while section 5 concludes.1.Free cash flow and over-investmentThis section describes in detail the various theories supporting a positive relation between investment expenditure and cash flow and then develops measures of free cash flow and over-investment that can be used to test the agency based explanation.1.1.Explanations for a positive relation between investment expenditure and cash flowIn a world of perfect capital markets there would be no association between firm level investing activities and internally generated cash flows. If a firm needed additional cash to finance an investment activity it would simply raise that cash from external capital markets. If the firm had excess cash beyond that needed to fund available positive NPV projects (including options on future investment) it would distribute free cash flow to external markets. Firms do not, however, operate in such a world. There are a variety of capital market frictions that impede the ability of management to raise cash from external capital markets. In addition, there are significant transaction costs associated with monitoring management to ensure that free cash flow is indeed distributed to external capital markets. In equilibrium, these capital market frictions can serve as a support for a positive association between firm investing activities and internally generated cash flow.The agency cost explanation introduced by Jensen (1986) and Stulz (1990)suggests that monitoring difficulty creates the potential for management to spend internally generated cash flow on projects that are beneficial from a management perspective but costly from a shareholder perspective (the free cash flow hypothesis). Several papers have investigated the implications of the free cash flow hypothesis on firm investment activity. For example, Lamont(1997) and Berger and Hann (2003) find evidence consistent with cash rich segments cross-subsidizing more poorly performing segments in diversified firms. However, the evidence in these papers could also be consistent with market frictions inhibiting the ability of the firm to raise capital externally and not necessarily an indication of over-investment.Related evidence can also be found in Harford (1999) and Opler, Pinkowitz, Stulz, and Williamson (1999,2001). Harford uses a sample of 487 takeover bids to document that cash rich firms are more likely to make acquisitions and these ……cash rich‟‟ acquisitions are followed by abnormal declines in operating performance. Opler et al.(1999) find some evidence that companies with excess cash (measured using balance sheet cash information) have higher capital expenditures, and spend more on acquisitions, even when they appear to have poor investment opportunities (as measured by Tobin‟s Q). Perhaps the most direct evidence on the over-investment of free cash flow is the analysis in Blanchard et al.(1994). They find that eleven firms with windfall legal settlements appear toengage in wasteful expenditure.Collectively, prior research is suggestive of an agency-based explanation supporting the positive relation between investment and internally generated cash flow. However, these papers are based on relatively small samples and do not measure over-investment or free cash flow directly. Thus, the findings of earlier work may not be generalizable to larger samples nor is it directly attributable to the agency cost explanation. More generally, a criticism of the literature examining the relation between investment and cash flow is that finding a positive association may merely indicate that cash flows serve as an effective proxy for investment opportunities (e.g., Alti, 2003). My aim is to better measure the constructs of free cash flow and over-investment by incorporating an accounting-based measure of growth opportunities, and test whether the relation is evident in a large sample of firms.In addition to prior empirical work on agency based explanations for the link between firm level investment and internally generated free cash flow, there exists a stream of research dedicated to examining the role of financing constraints (e.g., Fazzari et al. (1988), Hoshi, Kashyap, and Scharfstein (1991),Fazzari and Petersen (1993), Whited (1992) and Hubbard (1998)). Myers and Majluf (1984) suggest that information asymmetries increase the cost of capital for firms forced to raise external finance, thereby reducing the feasible investment. Thus, in the presence of internally generated cash flow, such firms will invest more in response to the lower cost of capital.Some early work in this area examined the sensitivity of investment to cash flow for high versus low dividend paying firms (Fazzari et al., 1988), comparing differing organizational structures where the ability to raise external financing was easier/harder (Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein, 1991, with Japanese keiretsu firms) and debt constraints (Whited, 1992). These papers find evidence of greater sensitivity of investment to cash flow for sets of firms which appeared to be financially constrained (e.g., low dividend paying firms, high debt firms and firms with limited access to banks). However, more recent research casts doubt on the earlier results. Specifically, Kaplan and Zingales(1997, 2000), find that the sensitivity of investment to cash flow persists even for firms who do not face financing constraints. They construct a measure of ex ante financing constraints for a small sample of firms and find that the sensitivity of investment to cash flow for firms is negatively associated with this measure, thereby casting doubt on the financing constraint hypothesis. Nonetheless the investment expectation model described in Section 1.4includes a variety of measures designed to capture financing constraints.5. ConclusionThis paper presents evidence on firm level over-investment of free cash flow. The empirical analysis utilizes an accounting based framework to measure the constructs of free cash flow andover-investment. A comparative advantage of the accounting researcher is in measuring critical constructs from the financial economics literature. The analysis of over-investment and free cash flow is but one example of how accounting information can be better utilized in academic research. Theevidence in this paper suggests that over-investment is a common problem for publicly traded US firms. For non-financial firms during the period 1988–2002, the average firm over-invests 20 percent of its available free cash flow. Furthermore, the majority of free cash flow is retained in the form of financial assets. For each additional dollar of free cash flow the average firm in the sample retains 41 cents as either cash or marketable securities. There is little evidence that free cash flow is distributed to external stakeholders, thereby creating the potential for retained free cash flow to be over-invested in the future. Supplemental analysis found only weak evidence that governance structures are effective in mitigating the extent of over-investment.These findings corroborate recent work that has found significant negative future stock returns from capital investment and significant growth in net operating assets (e.g., Fairfield et al., 2003; Titman et al., 2004). Indeed, Li(2004) finds that future operating performance is lower for firms engaging in investment expenditure and that this negative relation is increasing in contemporaneous free cash flow.A natural explanation for this poor future performance is free cash flow related agency costs.The framework developed in the paper to measure over-investment and free cash flow can easily be extended to consider abnormal investment more generally. Indeed, some recent research has started to use this framework to examine the impact of accounting information systems on investment decisions and the efficient allocation of capital (e.g., Bushman, Piotroski, & Smith,2005; Goodman, 2005; Wang, 2003).翻译版本一：本文实证检验了在自由现金流量下企业的投资决策。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
关于企业投资的外文参考文献
[1] harry markowitz. portfolio selection [j]. the journal of finance, 1952，7:77-91
[2] william f. sharpe. capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk [j]. the journal of finance, 1964，19:425?442
[3] j. lintner. the valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets [j]. review of economics and statistics, 1965，47:13?37
[4] e. fama, k. french. the cross-section of expected stock returns [j]. journal of finance, 1992，47:427?465
[5] e. fama, k. french. common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds [j], jounal of financial economics, 1993，33:3?56
[6] e. fama，k. french. dissecting anomalies [j]. journal of finance, XX:1653?1678
[7] j. berk, r. green, v. naik. optimal investment, growth options，and security returns [j]. journal offinanc，1999，
54:1553?1607
[8] j. gomes, l. kogan, l. zhang. equilibrium cross section of returns [j]. journal of political economy, XX:693?732
[9] m. carlson, a. fisher, r. giammarino. corporate investment and asset price dynamics: implications for the cross-section of returns [j]. journal of finance, XX, 59:2577?2603
[10] i. cooper. asset pricing implications of nonconvex adjustment costs and irreversibility of investment [j], journal of finance, XX，61:139?170
[11] c. polk, p. sapienza. the stock market and corporate investment: a test of catering theory [j]. review of financial studies, XX, 22:187?217
[12] i. cooper, r. priestley. real investment and risk dynamics [j]. journal of financial economics, XX, 101:182?205
[13]辞海[m].上海：上海辞书出版社，1999:815
[14]不列颠百科全书(第八卷)[m].北京：中国大百科全书出版社，XX:413
[15] samuelson, nordhaus. economics [m]. 19th ed. new york: mcgraw-hill, XX
[16] dougall, corrigan [m]. 10th ed. n.j.: prentice-hall, cl978
[17] r. ibbotson. price performance of common stock new issues [j]. journal of financial economics, 1975，3:235?272
[18] t. loughran, j. ritter. the new issues puzzle [j]. journal of finance, 1995, 50:23? 52
[19] k. spiess, j. affleck-graves. the long-run performance of stock returns following debt offerings [j]. journal of financial economics, 1999. 54:45?73
[20] m. billet, m. flannery, j. garfmkel. are bank loans special? evidence on the post-announcement performance of bank borrowers[j]. journal of financial and quantitative analysis，XX，41:733?752
[21] j. lakonishok，a. shleifer, r. vishny. contrarian investment, extrapolation，and risk [j]. journal of finance, 1994，49:1541 ?1578
[22] d. ikenberry, j. lakonishok, t. vermaelen. market underreaction to open market share repurchases [j]. journal of financial economics，1995，39:181 ?208
[23] r. michaely，r. thaler, k. womack. price reactions to dividend initiations and omissions: overreaction or drift? [j].
journal of finance，1995，50:573?608
[24] c. anderson，l. garcia-feijoo. empirical evidence on capital investment, growth options, and security returns [j]. journal of finance, XX，61:171 ?194
[25] p. m. fairfield, j. s. whisenant, t. l. yohn. accrued earnings and growth: implications for future profitability and market mispricing[j]. the accounting review, XX, 78:353?371
[26] zhang. accruals，investment, and the accrual anomaly [j]. accounting review, XX， 82:1333?1363
[27] m. t. bradshaw, s. a. richardson, r. g. sloan. the relation between corporate financing activities, analysts' forecasts and stock returns [j]. journal of accounting and economics, XX, 42:53?85
[28] j. pontiff, a. woodgate. share issuance and cross-sectional returns [j]. journal of finance, XX, 63:921 ?945
[29] m. cooper, h. gulen, m. schill. asset growth and the cross-section of stock returns [j]. journal of finance, XX, 68:1609?1651
[30] p. gray, j. johnson. the relationship between asset growth and the cross-section of stock returns [j]. journal of banking & finance, XX，35:670-680。