GMAT写作题库范文(二十三)

合集下载

2023GMAT考试满分作文

2023GMAT考试满分作文GMAT写作题目"Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.' To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.GMAT写作满分范文：The speaker here argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor a necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural "health' or well being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception; in my observation, however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions, priorities, and choices. It is unconscionable (无节制的;过度的') to relegate normative (conforming to or based on norms *normative behavior* *normative judgments*) decisions as to which art has "value' to a few legislators and jurists (法学家;法理学家: one having a thorough knowledge of law; especially: JUDGE), who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.Third, restricting artistic expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction may chill creativity, thereby defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy or sanction. Responsibility lies with individuals to determine what art has value and to support that art.满分作文二：A powerful business leader has far more opportunity to influence the course of a community or a nation than does any government official.'Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. GMAT写作满分范文：Historical examples of both influential public officials and influential business leaders abound. However, the power of the modern-era business leader is quite different from that of the government official. On balance, the CEO seems to be better positioned to influence the course of community and of nations.Admittedly the opportunities for the legislator to regulate commerce or of the jurist to dictate rules of equity are official and immediate. No private individual can hold that brand of influence. Yet official power is tempered by our check-and-balance system (制约平衡制度) of government and, in the case of legislators, by the voting power of the electorate. Our business leaders are not so constrained, so, their opportunities far exceed those of any public official. Moreover, powerful business leaders all too often seem to hold de facto legislative and judicial power by way of their direct influence over public officials, as the Clinton Administrations fund-raising scandal of 1997 illuminated all too well.The industrial and technological eras have bred such moguls of capitalism as Pullman, Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Gates, who by the nature of their industries and their business savvy, not by force of law, have transformed our economy, the nature of work, and our very day-to-day (adj. 日常的, 逐日的) existence. Of course, many modern-day public servants have made the most of their opportunitiesfor example, the crime-busting (bust: to break or smash especially with force;) mayor Rudolph Giuliani and the new-dealing President Franklin Roosevelt. Yet their impact seems to pale next to those of our modern captains of industry.In sum, modem business leaders by virtue of the far-reaching impact of their industries and of their freedom from external constraints, have supplanted lawmakers as the great opportunists of the world and prime movers of society.GMAT写作题目"All citizens should be required to perform a specified amount of public service. Such service would benefit not only the country as a whole but also the individual participants.'Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. GMAT写作满分范文：The potential benefits of mandatory public service must be weighed against administrative problems and concerns about individual liberty. On balance (adv. 总而言之), the costs to a nation and to the participants would probably exceed the benefits.Admittedly, a colorable (adj.似是而非的) argument can be made for mandatory public service. It would help alleviate "free-rider' problems, where those who do not contribute benefit from the efforts of those who do. It would mitigate pressing social problemswith education, public health and safety, and the environment. It might instill in participants a sense of civic duty, community, and individual responsibility. Finally, it has worked on a smaller scale, particularly in urban areas, where renewal projects succeed in making communities safer, healthier, and more prosperous.Far more compelling, however, are the arguments against mandatory public service. First, who would make assignments and decide what projects are worthwhile, and how would compliance be assured? Resolving enforcement issues would require government control, in turn requiring increased taxes and/or cuts in other social programs, thereby nullifying the benefits of mandatory public service. Second, a mandatory system would open the floodgates to incompetence and inexperience. Finally, the whole notion seems tantamount to Communism insofar as each citizen must contribute, according to his or her ability, to a strong state. Modern history informs us that such systems do not work. One could argue that mandatory public service is simply a tax in the form of labor rather than dollars. However, compulsory labor smacks (v. 带有..风味) of involuntary servitude, whereas financial taxes do not.In conclusion, logistical and philosophical barriers to mandating public service outweigh its potential benefits for the nation as well as for participants.GMAT写作题目"People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform.'Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. GMAT写作满分范文：People are more likely to accept the leadership of those who have shown they can perform the same tasks they require of others. My reasons for this view involve the notions of respect and trust.It is difficult for people to fully respect a leader who cannot, or will not, do what he or she asks of others. President Clintons difficulty in his role as Commander-in-Chief (n. 总司令) serves as a fitting and very public example. When Clinton assumed this leadership position, it was well known that he had evaded military service during the Vietnam conflict. Military leaders and lower-level personnel alike made it clear that they did not respect his leadership as a result. Contrast the Clinton case with that of a business leader such as John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems, who by way of his training and experience as a computer engineer earned the respect of his employees.It is likewise difficult to trust leaders who do not have experience in the areas under their leadership. The Clinton example illustrates this point as well. Because President Clinton lacked military experience, people in the armed forces found it difficult to trust that his policies would reflect any understanding of their interests or needs. And when put to the test, he undermined their trust to an even greater extent with his naive and largely bungled attempt to solve the problem of gays (美俚同性恋者, 尤指男性同性者) in the military. In stark contrast, President Dwight Eisenhower inspired nearly devotional trust as well as respect because of his role as a military hero in World War II.In conclusion, it will always be difficult for people to accept leaders who lack demonstrated ability in the areas under their leadership. Initially, such leaders will be regarded as outsiders, and treated accordingly. Moreover, some may never achieve the insider status that inspires respect and trust from those they hope to lead.GMAT写作题目"Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most commitment and energy, who gets things done.'Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. GMAT写作满分范文：The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and commitment is complex; whether they operate in a complementary or antagonistic manner depends on: (1) the goals toward which the traits are directed, (2) the degree of emphasis on teamwork, and (3) the job of the individual within an organization.A persons ability to work effectively in a team is not in consistent per se with personal strength, energy, and commitment. If exercised in a self-serving mannerfor example, through pilfering orback stabbingthese traits can operate against the organization. Conversely, if directed toward the firms goals, these traits can motivate other team members, thereby advancing common goals. World War II generals Patton and Rommel understood this point and knew how to bring out the best individual qualities in their troops, while at the same time instilling a strong sense of team and common purpose.Nevertheless, over-emphasizing teamwork can be counterproductive for an organization. A successful team requires both natural leaders and natural followers; otherwise, a team will accomplish little. Undue emphasis on teamwork may quell initiative among natural leaders, thereby thwarting team goals. Also, teamwork can be overemphasized with a commissioned sales force of highly competitive and autonomic individuals. Overemphasis on teamwork here might stifle healthy competition, thereby defeating a firms objectives. In other organizational areas, however, teamwork is critical. For example, a product-development team must progress in lock-step (锁步) fashion toward common goals, such as meeting a rollout (: the public introduction of a new aircraft; broadly: the widespread public introduction of a new product) deadline.In sum, individual strength, commitment, and energy can complement a strong team approach; as long as individual autonomy is not undermined, all can operate in a synergistic manner to achieve an organizations goals.。

GMAT高分范文100篇（非此即彼逻辑错误）【圣才出品】

GMAT⾼分范⽂100篇（⾮此即彼逻辑错误）【圣才出品】◆⾮此即彼逻辑错误Argument72增加长期通勤乘客使⽤公家车频率的⽅法The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper.“Commuter use of the new subway train is exceeding the transit company’s projections.However,commuter use of the shuttle buses that transport people to the subway stations is below the projected volume.If the transit company expects commuters to ride the shuttle buses to the subway rather than drive there,it must either reduce the shuttle bus fares or increase the price of parking at the subway stations.”Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument.For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion.You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument,what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what,if anything,would help you better evaluate its conclusion.【参考范⽂】The author concludes that the local transit company must either reduce fares for the shuttle buses that transport people to their subway stations or increase parking fees at the stations.The reasons offered to support this conclusion are thatcommuter use of the subway train is exceeding the transit company’s expectations, while commuter use of the shuffle buses is below projected volume.This argument is unconvincing because the author oversimplifies the problem and its solutions in a number of ways.To begin with,by concluding that the transit company must either reduce shuttle fares or increase parking fees,the author assumes that these are the only available solutions to the problem of limited shuttle use.However,it is possible that other factors—such as inconvenient shuttle routing and/or scheduling,safety concerns,or an increase in carpools—contribute to the problem.If so,adjusting fares or parking fees would might not solve the problem.In addition,the author assumes that reducing shuttle fees and increasing parking fees are mutually exclusive alternatives.However,the author provides no reason for imposing an either/or choice.Adjusting both shuttle fares and parking fees might produce better results.Moreover,if the author is wrong in the assumption that parking fees and shuttle fees are the only possible causes of the problem,then the most effective solution might include a complex of policy changes—for example,in shuttle fares,parking fees,rerouting,and rescheduling.In conclusion,this argument is weak because the author oversimplifies both the problem and its possible solutions.To strengthen the argument the author must examine all factors that might account for the shuttle’s unpopularity. Additionally,the author should consider all possible solutions to determine which combination would bring about the greatest increase in shuttle use.【范⽂点评】题⼲中的社论提出下调公交车车票价格或增加地铁站停车场停车费，从⽽解决通勤旅客乘坐地铁情况超出运输公司预计，⽽乘坐公交车通勤旅客数量低于预计的问题。

【精编范文】gmat考试分析性写作例题-范文word版 (3页)

本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==gmat考试分析性写作例题在gmat考试如何才能写好一篇作文呢?下面由小编为大家搜集的gmat考试分析性写作例题，希望可以帮到大家!小贴士开始写作前，先分析题目并想好如何作答整理好思路，充分展开提供相关的论据和例子说明本部分将要求您针对所提供的论证进行批判性评价。

您不需要就话题给出自己的观点。

例题The following appeared in the editorial section of a monthly business news magazine:"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion.You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it morelogically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.答案The following is an actual AWA essay that received the highest rating:This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase.However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausibility of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a coupledollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analyzing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on。

GMAT考试写作参考

GMAT考试写作参考GMAT考试写作参考例文精选Some people believe that the best approach to effective time management is to make detailed daily and long-term plans and then to adhere to them. However, this highly structured approach to work is counterproductive. Time management needs to be flexible so that employees can respond to unexpected problems as they arise.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.The speaker claims that a detailed time-management plan fails to afford adequate flexibility to deal with the unexpected at the workplace. He seems to offer an either/or choice between planning ones time rigidly, by detailing important daily as well as long-term plans, and not planning at all; and he prefers the second choice. The speakers claim is overly simplistic, since it is possible for a detailed time-management plan to also provide flexibility.Working at any job without a detailed road map for the immediate and longer-term can trivialize the efforts of both employees and organizational units so that all their efforts bee aimless. The only sensible way proceed is toconsider first ones most important long-term objectives; then an organizational unit and its employees can orderdaily and weekly tasks aording to how much each adds to the achievement of those objectives. With a broader perspective, workers can eliminate from the list those daily activities that may seem urgent or may be most enjoyable but dontreally contribute to long-term job goals or toorganizational objectives.。

作文范文之GMAT作文模板100篇

GMAT作文模板100篇【篇一：gmat作文范例】360教育集团介绍，在gmat作文的备考过程中，考生需要在大量的练习中不断提升自己的逻辑思维能力和语言表达能力，并通过参照模板来改进gmat作文的写作方式，以达到提高gmat作文写作水平的目的。

下面就来为大家提供一些gmat作文的点评以及范例。

题目：10. the following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:“this past winter, 200 students from waymarsh state college traveled to the state capitol building to protest againstproposed cuts in funding for various state college programs. the other 12,000 waymarsh students evidently weren’tso concerned about their education: they either stayed on campus or left for winter break. since the group who didnot protest is far more numerous, it is more representative of the state’s college students than are the protesters.therefore the state legislature need not heed the appeals ofthe protesting students.”逻辑漏洞：1. 文中说另外12000学生对他们的教育不感兴趣，因为他们没参加游行，躲在学校或放假去了。

newGMAT作文黄金80题范文(整理版)

新GMAT作文黄金80题范文(按2010年新题库更正题号；按《北美GMAT范文精讲》删除题目及范文,保留此书上没有的题目及范文) By winnie 一．Analysis of Issue QuestionsIssue 21.To conserve the energy is a world-wide project. No individual country is able to do it independently.2.It is unfair to let individual nations to make sacrifices while the others do not.3.The best and the most efficient way is the whole wolrd conserve the energy simultaneously andcollectively.1，首先，虽然不愿意，但仍然要承认，自私几乎是天性。

self consideration优先。

在没有广泛的行动时，每一个国家都不愿意在自己作出牺牲的同时，其他国家没有行动。

这样不公平，也不可能达到。

这时，领导的作用很重要。

安排各国家工作，协调各国家活动。

有一个行动的指导作用。

function as the leader of the group.2，而且，保护资源是全球的问题，指望单个国家作出牺牲是不够的。

因为在全球化经济发展下，资源几乎是全球运转的。

比如，美国会向中国进口木材等原料。

所以需要合作。

大的跨国公司在其中扮演重要的角色。

比如，开发非洲的，有很多是欧洲的公司，跨国公司的举动会影响到很多国家的经济政策。

nuclear weapons proliferationby the same token(同样道理)the problem of energy conservation transcends the national borders in that either all nations must cooperate, or all will suffer.(sample上的句子)3，当然，这样是不够的，必须由各个国家充分地发挥主动的作用take positive action。

关于GMAT考试的优秀作文精选

GMAT考试的优秀作文关于GMAT考试的优秀作文精选为了方便广大考生更好的复习，综合整理了备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选，以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。

This ad recommends non-prescription Acid-Ease over non-prescription Pepticaid for relief of excess stomach acid. The only reason offered is that doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for the full-strength prescription form of Acid-Ease than for full-strength Pepticaid. While this reason is relevant, and provides some grounds for preferring Acid-Ease over Pepticaid, it is insufficient as it stands because it depends on three unwarranted assumptions.The first assumption is that the prescription form of Acid-Ease is more popular among doctors. But this might not be the case, even though doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for Acid-Ease. Acid-Ease may have been available for several more years than Pepticaid; and in the years when both products were available, Pepticaid might have actually been prescribed more often than Acid-Ease.The second assumption is that doctors prefer the prescription form of Acid-Ease for the reason that it is in fact more effective at relieving excess stomach acid. However, doctors may have preferred Acid-Ease for reasons other than its effectiveness. Perhaps Acid-Ease is produced by a larger, more familiar drug company or by one that distributes more free samples. For that matter, the medical community may have simply been mistaken in thinking that Acid-Ease was more effective. In short, the number of prescriptions by itself is not conclusive as to whether one product is actually better thananother.。

gmat写作经典范文

一、GMAT作文经典范文有什么"It is difficult for people to achieve professional success without sacrificing important aspects of a fulfilling personal life。

" Discuss the extent to which you agree ordisagree with the opinion slated above。

Support your views with reasons and/orexamples from your own experience, observations, or reading。

（理想和现实） Are professional success and a fulfilling personal life mutually exclusive? Probably not, although it is more difficult today to achieve both。

Undeniably, today's professionals must worklong hours to keep their heads above water, let alone to get ahead in life financially。

In conclusion, given the growing demands of career on today's professionals, a fulfilling personal life remains possible-by working smarter, by setting priorities, and by making suitable career choices。

GMAT英语考试作文范文

GMAT英语考试作文GMAT英语考试作文范文GMAT英语范文You can tell the ideas of a nation by its advertisements.你可以从一个国家的广告辨别出它的思想。

In order to determine whether advertisements reflect a nations ideas, it is necessary to determine whether advertisements present real ideas at all, and, if so, whose ideas they actually reflect. On both counts, it appears that advertisements fail to accurately mirror a nations ideas.Indisputably, advertisements inform us as to a nations values, attitudes, and prioritieswhat activities are worthwhile, what the future holds, and what is fashionable and attractive. For instance, a proliferation of ads for sport-utility vehicles reflects a societal concern more for safety and machismo than for energy conservation and frugality, while a plethora of ads for inexpensive on-line brokerage services reflects an optimistic and perhaps irrationally exuberant economic outlook. However, a mere picture of a social more, outlook, or fashion is not an ideait does not answer questions such as why and how?Admittedly, public-interest advertisements do present ideas held by particular segments of societyfor example, those of environmental and other public-health interest groups. However, these ads constitute a negligible percentage of all advertisements, and they do not necessarily reflect the majoritys view. Consequently, to assert that advertisements reflect a nations ideas distorts reality. In truth, they mirror only the business and product ideas of companies whose goods and services are advertised and the creative ideas of advertising firms.Moreover, advertisements look very much the same in all countries. Western and Eastern alike. Does this suggest that all nations have essentially identical ideas? Certainly not.。

GMAT考试作文

GMAT考试作⽂GMAT考试作⽂精品模板想要迅速提升GMAT作⽂的写作⽔平，⾸先就需要考⽣们参考⼤量的GMAT作⽂模板，并以此为基础不断的去总结，从⽽才能更好的掌握GMAT作⽂的写作规律。

下⾯就来为⼤家推荐⼀些GMAT作⽂的精品模板，希望能够为考⽣备考GMAT作⽂考试带来帮助。

模板⼀ In the given memorandum, the director of human resources department concluded that the employee satisfactory was surely improved after HR department’s effort on enhancing communication between management team and the staff. To support his idea, he alleged that such communication was ranked top in a previous survey so that this issue must be the cared most by employees. At first glance, this conclusion seems to some extent convincing. However, with close examination, we can find at least 3 logic flaws. I would like to discuss in the following paragraphs to disclose how groundless the allegation is. First, the director’s conclusion is based on a doubtful survey. As the director introduced, the methodology of this survey is to have employees rank the issues according to the importance. To find out whether the survey results are reliable, we need to ask several questions: How many employees are included in this survey? Are they representative to the total staff? Does the questionnaire included all the issues cared by the employees? Is there any possibility that the staff are unwilling to disclose their true thoughts since the survey might require them to sign their names on the questionnaire? Without answers to the questions above, the director can not responsibly conclude that the survey result is reliable enough for the management to draw a decision. Second, given the survey result is representative and reliable, the communication issue constantly ranked top only suggests that it’s considered important, rather than that management need to improve. Very possibly, the management communication is already well carried out in company X, while some other issues ranked second or third, which are still important, are poorly noticed, and are the real cause of dissatisfaction Last but not least, even if the communication issue is the key to enhance employee moral, and more effort focused on this issue is the right way to solve the problem, however, this does not guarantee that the issue is solved. The director should carefully examine the effect of such actions - maybe through another survey - so as to make sure that every effort they made has achieved the expected result. In summation, the argument is not as persuasive as it stands. Since the survey has not been proven reliable and the importance of communication does not necessarily suggest that there is any weakness on the issue, we have every reason to cast our doubt on the director’s conclusion that enhancing communication is the key to improve morale. Furthermore, it is imprudent for the director to suggest that the campaign that his department held is effective. To convince us, the director needs to demonstrate that employee’s satisfaction does rise after the campaign. With such solid evidence, the arguer could further explore on the questionnaire and take some other solutions into account rather than directly jump intosuggestion/conclution that… . 模板⼆ Totally disagree: Some people keep talking about the problem of ..., claiming that ....If there is one-which I leave to doubt-then it probably came from the misunderstanding or misconduct, rather than the idea itself. *** is one of the most important elements in our modern society. No matter how much we are reluctant to ... or how hard it is to make it happen, we have to adjust ourselves and embrace ..., for a ... First, in order to reveal the flaws underlying in the assertion above, we need to clarify the definition of ...Let us get down to fundamentals and admit that ...example 1. Therefore, no matter how reluctant we are to admit, ...was, is, and always will be an inevitable trend in our society. Rather than make hopeless effort to ..., people should face the reality and start to ... Second, ...is hard, but it’s never a mission impossible. Besides the emerging new technologies which can help us to make ...easier, ... can also contribute to...example 2. However, just as the author pointed out, ...sometimes has its side effects, especially when...To avoid ..., we should always stay cautious and keep in mind that...After all... To sum up, it’s my firmly hold view that... It is the ...that drive us forward, equip us with ...Though it sometimes..., we can avoid ... by ... ********************************************** Agree on both sides: ...and ..., which do you prefer? The arguer in the given material favor ..., which I do admit its advantages. However, just as a coin has its two sides, ...fails to work on ..., whereas it is applaused when...On the contrary, ...sometimes works perfectly. In my opinion, the issue of ...should be discussed case by case. On the one hand, we do need ..., since ....Reason...For instance,...When under such circumstances, I am the enthusiastic support of ... On the other hand, ...has its ground. When..., it is important to ...Let us take the case of ... as an example...Considering the ...and ..., people with common sense would obviously agree that... Maybe you will tease at me like President Harry S Truman saying "Give me a one-hand economist!". However, that’s the reality when we face such dilemmas. In some circumstances, we must integrate the both side, such as we put hands together to when we play golf: in the face of extremely complex situations, we do need a combination of ...and ... That is to say, we need to ..., and also ...The rapid development of our society is requiring far more sophisticated problem-solving skills. We have little chance to win with a simplified code of conduct. 模板三 Agree Dear reader, I’m Chinese, and what nationality are you? - Never mind, we are all human beings living in this world village. It is our responsibility to work together and make our home better. The arguer in the given material suggested that as global citizen, we should first be responsible to our earth, and then take the job to do benefit to our own countries. However, I see no conflicts between the to. If there is any, I believe we can easily solve it, since all people in this world will reach the same long-term target without difficulty. On the one hand, when we are working on your motherland, we are contributing to the whole human race. For example, a scientist working in his laboratory will share his findings no matter whether he is aiming to "make a better world" or just to contribute to his own country. In such a fast-developing era, science and technology has no boarders. All the invention, with or without penalty, will finally become the fortune of all the people on this planet. In such circumstances, when we protect the environment of our own village, we are doing favor to the whole nature. When we are making every effort to save energy, no matter by taking the underground instead of driving, or by supporting our government to invest on solar energy development, with your ballot and our tax dollars, we are playing our role of a responsibly citizen - both of the nation, and of the world. On the other hand, when we are saving our planet, we are saving our own country. Nowadays, many people with mutual belief work beyond the border on global affair. For instance, the Green Peace, a global NGO active in many countries, recruit members from all over the world, and serve all over the world. They generally believe that the environment is an organic whole. The pollution caused by low-level manufacturing in China would also poison the shrimps that American people devour. However, we have to admit that sometimes citizens, as well as nations, could appear selfish and shortsighted while exhausting their environment resources for short-round benefit. In this case, we do need to call for international cooperation to restrict such behaviors and protect our common homeland. To summarize, I would like to suggest that it is not necessary to distinguish the citizens for one country or for the globe. As long as we keep our mutual homeland, the earth, in mind, we can generally avoid the dilemma, and do what we consider right. 模板四第⼀段 : 选择1 In the argument, the author concludes that … To support his conclusion, the author cites the study indicating that …/the author points out/reasons that … In addition, the author mentions (the evidence) that … Based on this evidence, the author further recommends that …(subjunctive动词原形)/recommends …(doing). At first glance, the analysis appears thorough and compelling. However, a close/careful examination reveals various logical flaws which render the author’s line of reasoning questionable. 选择2 … (陈述同选择1) After a careful examination, I find that the argument, apparently compelling, is not well supported by the evidence. 最后⼀段：选择1 By way of conclusion, it seems that the author’s conclusion that … is seriously undermined by the (numerous) flaws in his reasoning identified above. To substantiate/strengthen the argument, the author would have to provideclear/concrete/solid/credible evidence that … In addition, the author should take into consideration that … Unless these key issues are properly addressed, the argument isn’t sound and convincing. 选择2 To sum up, it is imprudent for the author to draw the conclusion that … solely on the basis of the evidence presented, which is insufficient to lend strong support to what the author claims.// It is clear that the author fails to provide more credible evidence to support his conclusion that … To make this analysis more thorough, the author must firstly investigate … (sth.) and then provide evidence that (1) … , and (2) … To better assess/evaluate the argument, I would also need to know whether … 各种推理错误： A. 错误地认定某趋势会⼀直延续下去 In the argument, the authors stated that … Although the trend/tendency cited in the study has remained stable for the past 10 years, there is no guarantee that it/the same trend will continue over the next 20 years. The study’s results can hardly be used to predict the future. It is entirely possible/very likely that … If that is the case, … Thus the credibility of the author’s assertion is called into question. Even if the trend given in the argument will be true over the next 20 years, /Even if we grant the preceding assumption that … , /Even supposing that the same trend will continue over the next 20 years, …… B. 错误地认为某⼀事物的.程度⼤到⾜以引起某些变化 The author attributes … to the fact that … However, this line of reasoning is problematic, since no evidence is provided concerning the extent/degree to which … Perhaps … Or it is possible that … Either of these scenarios, if true, will render this connection worthless/doubtful. C. 错误地认为X就是由Y引起的，忽视了其他可能原因 In the argument, the author ascribes X to the fact that/claims that … However, it is not necessarily the case. This alone does not constitute a logical argument in favor of …// Many other factors may equally contribute to the results/could bring out the same results/may account for/affect ... // While … is one way to achieve the results, it is by no means the only way. For instance, … The argument is unsound/unwarranted until such possibilities are taken into account/considered and ruled out. // Without solid evidence linking X to Y, it is presumptuous to suggest that Y is totally responsible for these results. D. 错误地认为Y发⽣在X前，X就是Y引起的;错误地将同时发⽣的X与Y认为成由因果联系 To begin with, the author unfairly assumes that … is the cause of sth. cited. The sequence of these events, by themselves, is not sufficient to demonstrate that the former causes the latter because a chronological relationship is only one of the indicators of a causal relationship between two events./ However, the mere fact that … precedes … is insufficient to conclude that it causes these events. Perhaps … Moreover, … may not necessarily indicate that … It is also highly possible that … No additional evidence linking … and … is offered in the argument, making for the possibility that these events are not causally related but merely coincident. E. 错误的⼀概适⽤/横向对⽐ Even if … it does not follow that … According to the author, X is analogous to Y in all respects. A thorough analysis reveals, however, that the differences between X and Y outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy less than valid. For example, … affect X’s results but are virtually absent in Y. These differences may w e a k e n a c o n c l u s i o n b a s e d o n t h e a n a l o g y b e t w e e n X a n d Y / w e a k e n t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t X w i l l s u f f e r f r o m t h e s a m e f a t e a s Y i s . / p >。

GMAT作文考试范文

GMAT作文考试GMAT作文考试范文The following appeared in a proposal from the development office at Platonic University.Because Platonic University has had difficulty in meeting its expenses over the past three years, we need to find new ways to increase revenues. We should consider following the example of Greene University, which recently renamed itself after a donor who gave it $100 million. If Platonic University were to advertise to its alumni and other wealthy people that it will rename either individual buildings or the entire university itself after the donors who give the most money, the amount of donations would undoubtedly increase.Discuss how well reasoned . etc.In this argument an analogy is drawn between Platonic University and Greene University. The author argues that to solve its economic problems, Platonic University should follow the example of Greene University, which was recently named after a wealthy donor, and offer to rename individual buildings or the university itself in exchange for donations. The author believes that since this tactic worked for Greene it would undoubtedly work for Platonic, and thus provide the much-needed revenue. This argument is questionable for several reasons.In the first place, the argument rests upon the assumption that a revenue-producing strategy that works for one university will work for another as well. However, Greene and Platonic may not be sufficiently similar to warrant this assumption. For example, a small, rural university is less likely to have alumni who could afford to make significant donations than a large, urbanuniversity. Lacking specific information about the makeup of the universities, and their alumni, it is impossible to assess the likelihood that the strategy employed by Greene will work for。

GMAT考试作文参考例文

GMAT考试作文参考GMAT考试作文参考例文GMAT考试写作参考例文The following appeared as part of a memorandum from the loan department of the Frostbite National Bank.We should not approve the business loan application of the local group that wants to open a franchise outlet for the Kool Kone chain of ice cream parlors. Frostbite is known for its cold winters, and cold weather can mean slow ice cream sales. For example, even though Frostbite is a town of 10,000 people, it has only one ice cream spot the Frigid Cow. Despite the lack of competition, the Frigid Cows net revenues fell by 10 percent last winter.Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.In this memorandum the loan department of Frostbite National Bank recommends against approval of a business loan to a local group that wants to open an ice cream parlor. In support of this decision the loan department points out that Frostbite has a reputation for cold winters and sales of ice cream decrease in cold weather. This latter point is buttressed by the fact that Frostbites only ice cream parlor suffered a 10 percent decline in net revenues the previous winter. The loan departments decision is questionable for the following reasons.To begin with, since it is reasonable to expect a decline in ice cream sales during winter months, it is difficult to assess the relevance of the fact that Frostbite has cold winters to the potential success of the Kool Kone franchise. Common sense suggests that this fact would be significant only if it turned out that Frostbites winter season lasted 9 or 10 months as it does inarctic regions. In that case slow sales could be expected for most of the year and the loan departments opposition to the loan would be readily understandable. If, on the other hand, Frostbites winter season lasts only a few months and the remainder of the year is warm or hot, it is difficult to comprehend the loan departments reasoning.。

GMAT作文及参考

GMAT作文及参考GMAT作文模板及参考范文导语：下面是店铺整理的GMAT作文模板及参考范文，大家可以参考模板和范文，把有用的东西运用到考试中去，祝大家考试成功。

具体框架Justification：根据分观点的关系有如下分类一、【第一种】并列性列举：大多数人这么写如果要这么写的要求是：越往后的'分观点：越不能虚，要往实了写——因为方向一样的情况下，选择的分观点多了，就可能越往后面越没话，进而就偏虚，这样的坏处是：可能导致前后分观点存在包含关系，但是我开头的“1st，2nd”表达的含义是它们是并列的，这样就产生了logical conflict!不好。

Eg：是否同意“出国好”?1st ：出国学到一些国际化的知识2nd：出国可以积累人脉3rd：出国可以长见识——错!或：把“出国可以长见识”放在开始也不可以!因为一来就虚了，后面的“学知识”“积累社会经验”等等都可以视为包含于它的，就错了!二、【第二种】递进式层层展开——注意一个合理order：比如刚才那个不能说反了Eg："Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced. "To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above?(1)破题：1) 同意：两句话都同意。

这两句话的关系是第一句是第二句的前提。

2) 不同意：可以weaken第一句或第二句，任意，但是usually是weaken第二句，因为第一句elaborate起来相对难一些，但是想得出来也可以。

GMAT新黄金80题及作文范文（十三）（2）

92. The following is taken from an editorial in a local newspaper.“Over the past decade, the price per pound of citrus fruit has increased substantially. Eleven years ago, Megamart charged 5 cents apiece for lemons, but today it commonly charges over 30 cents apiece. In only one of these last eleven years was the weather unfavorable for growing citrus crops. Evidently, then, citrus growers have been responsible for the excessive increase in the price of citrus fruit, and strict pricing regulations are needed to prevent them from continuing to inflate prices.”当地报纸的社论：过去的10年里，桔类水果的价格实际上上升了。

11年前，Megamart每个柠檬要价5分，现在一般要价为30分一个。

过去11年只有一年不适合桔类水果生长。

显然，柑桔种植者应该对桔类水果价格过度上涨负责。

为防止他们继续哄抬价格规范价格规定很有必要。

1，小范围推大范围。

2，忽略他因，是否只有一种因素导致价格上升——不适合生长。

还有，比如环境保护，加工价格上升，人力成本上升，或者单纯的物价上涨。

monetary inflation, increased distribution and labor costs, or alterations in supply and demand conditions1，柠檬缺乏代表性，或者说，柠檬有其特殊性，譬如柠檬都是进口的，比较贵；2，天气好不一定代表物价要低，因为种植柑橘的农民已经动用了可用的资源了，产量无法再多了；3，是否物价高就是农民肆意抬高的缘故，可能是dealers在其中的作用；4，政府是否要介入，虽然价格变贵了，但是targeted customers没有变化，对整个国民经济影响不大In this editorial the author argues for the imposition of strictpricing regulations in order to prevent citrus growers from continued inflation of prices of citrus fruit. The need for such regulation is supported by the author’s contention that citrus growers have been unnecessarily raising prices of citrus fruit in the past. The evidence for this allegation is the fact that the price of lemons at Megamart has increased from 15 cents per pound to over a dollar a pound during the preceding 11-year period. The author maintains that this increase is unjustifiable because weather conditions have been favorable to citrus production in all but one of those years. This argument is flawed for several reasons.First and foremost, the author assumes that the only factor that influences the price of citrus fruit is the weather. Other factors such as monetary inflation, increased distribution and labor costs, or alterations in supply and demand conditions are completely ignored as possible sources for the increase. The charge that citrus growers have unnecessarily raised prices can be sustained only if these and other possible factors can be completely ruled out as contributing to the price increases. Since the author fails to address these factors, the recommendation calling for strict pricing regulations can be dismissed out of hand (adv. 无法控制, 脱手, 告终, 立即) as frivolous.Second, the author assumes that the only way to combat increased prices is through government intervention. In a free enterprise system many other means of affecting the pricing of goods are available. For example, boycotting a product and thereby influencing supply and demand conditions of the commodity is an effective means of influencing the price of the product. In a free market economy the call for price regulation by the government should occur only when all other means torectify the problem have been exhausted.In conclusion, the auth or’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument it would be necessary to show that the only factor influencing the price increases is the growers’ desire for increased profits.。

我的GMAT考试作文

我的GMAT考试作文Recently there is a debate over whether…..Some people assert that.., while other people believe that…As a matter of fact, the issue of whether….. is a plex and controversial one. Different people hold different views due to their distinct backgrounds. Therefore, there is not a universal answer to this question, and whether one choice takes precedence over the other may quite depend on the specific situation. The decision, nevertheless, is not an easy one to make. Actually, the final judgment should rely on a casebycase analysis. As far as I am concerned, however, I agree that…. , and do not agree that….. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.The first argument that can be presented to develop my position is that…A go od example may be found in the case that…Under this circumstance, it is obvious that….In addition, there is another reason for me to choose this statement. The reason is not far to seek…. To illustrate, let us consider that…Hence, another equally i mportant aspect is that….Admittedly, it may be true that…. in some conditions. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient supportto claim that….,Actually, these cases are rare and therefore are too specific and too weak to strengthen the view that…When the advantages and disadvantages of x and y are carefully examined, the most striking conclusion is obvious that…To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to generate an integrate whole and thus bee more convincing than any single one of them, we may be fortable to say that…., because….ARGUMENTIn this argument, the author concludes that…To support his conclusion, the author points out that…. In addition, the author reason s that…Further more, he also assumes that…. At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that…. The author unfairly assumes that…. However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to takesintosaccount other facts that might contribute to theresult that…….. It is likely that ,……………..; it is also likely that…………………………Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that………………….. (72) Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.In the second place, the argument mits a logic fallacy of“after this and therefore because of this”. In no case can the mere fact that…be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causaleffect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A does not necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts suc h as…, or…may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that……. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to…, this assumption in question can not be accepted.In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B…is pletely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.In the fourth place, the argument has also mitted a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Lacking this assumption, the conclusion that…is entirely unfounded. In fact, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from B are applicable to A. Differences between A and B clearly out weight the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example,A..., however,B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult forB to do....In addition, the conclusion unjustifiably relies on the poll while the validity of the survey itself is doubtful. The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who, when, how and by whom the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results are worthless as evidence to support that….Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either/or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results.To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the author claims. To make the argument more convincing concerning…. , the arguer would have to provide more information that………………. The arguer should also demonstrate that……………….to make this argument logically acceptable. (51)Since the author mits the above mentioned logical mistakes and fails to consider the whole situation prehensively, his ideas should not be adopted. The conclusion would be strengthened if he….In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that…. Because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that…. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.It is entirely possible that management has bee lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending.。

GMAT优秀作文230

GMAT优秀作文精选230The panys marketing department remends discontinuing a deluxe air filter and concentrating advertising efforts on an economy filter, which requires replacement more often than the deluxe model. This remendation is based on reports showing that sales of economy filters, and pany profits, have dropped significantly since the pany began manufacturing and marketing the deluxe filter six months ago. The marketing departments argument is specious inthree important respects.First, the marketing department assumes that if thepany discontinues the new deluxe air filter, customers will resume buying its economy filter. This assumption may notbe correct. Customers who prefer the deluxe model may do so because it requires replacement less often. Thus, insteadof buying the panys economy filters again, these customers may just as likely turn to a petitor for a product similarto the deluxe model. In this event, the result would be lower profits.Secondly, the marketing department fails to recognize alternative strategies that might enhance profits more than discontinuing the deluxe filter would. It is possible that lowering the price of the economy model, raising the priceof the deluxe model, or both, may actually maximize profits.A lower-priced economy filter might lure customers frompeting products and retain current customers. At the same time, buyers of the deluxe model may place a premium value on its convenience and may be willing to pay an even higher price for the filter.。

GMAT英语考试写作的参考

GMAT英语考试写作的参考GMAT英语考试写作的参考范文The following appeared in the editorial section of a daily newspaper.Although forecasts of presidential elections based on opinion polls measure current voter preference, many voters keep changing their minds about whom they prefer until the last few days before the balloting. Some do not even make a final decision until they enter the voting booth. Forecasts based on opinion polls are therefore little better at predicting election outcomes than a random guess would be.Discuss how well reasoned... etc.In this editorial the author asserts that opinion polls are little better than random guesses to predicting outcomes of presidential elections. The authors basis for this assertion is that opinion polls measure only the preferences of voters at the time of the poll and that many voters change their preferences several time before votingsome remaining undecided until the moment they cast their vote. The authors reasoning is unconvincing in two critical respects.First of all the predictions based on random guessing are such that the greater the number of candidates, the less likely the prediction will be correct. The reason for this is obvious: random guessing requires that no outside information be allowed to influence the guess. Predictions based on opinion polls, on the other hand, will differ considerably from those based on random guesses simply because outside information will influence the result. For example, in a four-person race, random guessing would yield the correct prediction 25 percent of the time,whereas the percentage of correct predictions based on opinion polls would be much higher. The reason for this disparity is simple. Opinion polls enable us to narrow the choices. That is, opinion polls serve to reduce the number of viable candidates in the voters mind and thereby increase the likelihood that the prediction based on them will be correct.。

GMAT写作Argument范文下载三十二

官方网站：GMAT写作Argument范文下载三十二GMAT写作考试的复习离不开众多的备考范文，今天，GMAT资料下载的小编为大家整理到了一些有关Argument范文，供大家参考练习，需要的小伙伴们赶快来下载吧！In this memorandum，the vice president of Road Food suggests that the company motivate its advertising agency to perform better by basing the agency's pay on the Road Food's profits. In support of this suggestion，the vice president points out that although Road Food initially thought the ad agency was following company recommendations，competitor-Street Eats earned higher profits last year. The vice president also notes that Street Eats has fewer restaurants than Road Food，and that Road Food spent nearly as much money on advertising as Street Eats did. This argument is unconvincing，since it relies on dubious assumptions and comparisons.First，the vice president assumes that the ad campaign caused the low profits. However，the vice president ignores many other factors that contribute to profitability. In particular，the fact that Road Food has been spending less advertising money per restaurant than Street Eats suggests that its unwillingness to spend more may be the main reason for disappointing profits. Second，the author implies that the ad agency failed to implement Road Food's guidelines，and that this failure was the reason for disappointing profits. However，it is equally possible that the ad agency faithfully followed all suggestions from Road Food，and that those suggestions were the cause of the disappointing profits. In this respect，the author unfairly shifts blame from Road Food to the ad agency. Third，the author's comparison between Road Food and Street Eats is less relevant than a comparison between Road Food's own profits prior to its latest ad campaign and its profits during this campaign. Comparing its own profits during these time periods would more accurately reflect the ad agency's effectiveness than comparing profits of two different companies. Finally，the author assumes that the ad agency will be more motivated if its fee is based on Road Food profits. However，the author does not support this claim. In fact，given that Road Food's profits have been lower than expected，it is just as likely that the ad agency would be less motivated by the suggested fee structure than by some other fee structure. In conclusion，the argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it，the vice president must provide evidence that the ad campaign caused last year's disappointing profits，and must examine and rule out other factors that may have contributed to disappointing profits。