SCI论文写作方法(超实用)

合集下载

教你怎么写sci论文

教你怎么写s c i论文 Revised as of 23 November 2020二、英文写作的语言技巧1.I n t r o d u c t i o n：A. 如何指出当前研究的不足并有目的地引导出自己研究的重要性在叙述前人成果之后，用However来引导不足，提出一种新方法或新方向。

如：However, little information(little attention/little work/little data/little research……) (or few studies/few investigations/few researchers/few attempts……) (or no/none of these studies……) has (have) been done on (focused on/attempted to/conducted/investigated/studied(with respect to))。

如：Previous research (studies, records) has (have) failed to consider/ ignored/ misinterpreted/ neglected to/overestimated, underestimated/misleaded. thus, these previous results are inconclisive, misleading, unsatisfactory, questionable, controversial. Uncertainties (discrepanci es) still exist……研究方法和方向与前人一样时，可通过以下方式强调自己工作：However, data is still scarce(rare, less accurate)，We need to(aim to, have to) provide more documents(data, records, studies, increase the dataset). Further studies are still n e c e s s a r y(e s s e n t i a l)……强调自己研究的重要性，一般还要在However之前介绍与自己研究问题相反或相关的问题。

SCI论文写作指导

如何写SCI文章第1页SCI论文写作指导（题目—摘要—前言—结果—讨论—期刊—投稿）最近收集到一份实用、高效、全面的写作指导，具体内容如下（具体每点见相应的编号文章）1.Focusing on Your Central Message2.Eight Steps to Developing an Effective Outline3.Twelve Steps to Developing an Effective First Draft4.Ten Steps to Writing an Effective Abstract5.Ten Steps to Writing an Effective Introduction6.Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Results Section7.Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section8.Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Materials and Methods9.Twelve Steps to Developing Effective Tables and FIgures10.Developing an Effective Title11.Selecting a Journal12.Responding to Reviewers13.Eleven Reasons why Manuscripts are Rejected14.Journal Submission Checklist15.Promoting Your PublicationFocusing on your Central MessageSan Francisco EditThis is one of the most important parts of writing your paper, and one that is often overlooked. Think carefully about what it is that you want your readers to understand about your work. Remember, we are all busy and we need to absorb your message quickly and clearly. Try these exercises:1. Write down the three central points of your paper.2. Summarize your paper in one sentence.3. Describe your work to a colleague in one minute.These might sound easy, but try them and you'll find out they aren't!Don't rush this part of your planning. It is worth spending time getting it right. Once you have mastered these exercises you will feel more confident about the whole writing process that follows.A common problem with summarizing your work is that there are usually several major findings. This exercise is meant to focus your thinking on the central issues. It is not going to form the published abstract. So, if you really can't squeeze your key message into one sentence don't worry. Try to do it in two. If you can't do that then you need to take a careful look at the reasons. Remember, this is a very important part of the process for writing papers so work at it. Talk to your colleagues and see if between you it is possible to highlight the central message of your work.A number of studies have indicated that a badly written manuscript with poor use of English, even with good science, has less chance of being accepted and published.Eight Steps to Developing an Effective OutlineSan Francisco EditPreparing an outline is the most important step in the process of producing a manuscript for publication in a journal. The outline bears roughly the same relation to the final manuscript as an architectural blueprint does to a finished house.Its purpose of an outline is to divide the writing of the entire paper into a number of smaller tasks.A good outline will organize the various topics and arguments in logical form. By ordering the topics you will identify, before writing the manuscript, any gaps that might exist.There is no single best way to prepare a scientific manuscript, except as determined by the individual writer and the circumstances. You should know your own style of writing best. Whatever you decide to do, you should follow at least these steps before beginning to write your manuscript.Remember, at this stage, you are only constructing an outline. You are not writing; you just need to put down some notes to guide your thinking.1. Develop a central message of the manuscriptPrepare a central message sentence (20-25 words). If you were asked to summarize your paper in one sentence, what would you say? Everything in the manuscript will be written to support this central message.2. Define the materials and methodsBriefly state the population in which you worked, the sampling method you employed, the materials you used, and most importantly, the methods you used to carry out the study3. Summarize the question(s) and problem(s)What was known before you started the study? What answers were needed to address the problem(s)? List the key points pertaining to the question(s) and problem(s). What did you do to answer the question(s)?4. Define the principal findings and resultsYour central message sentence probably encapsulates the most important findings. There may be others that you feel ought to be included. List these in note form. Don't worry about the order or about how many you put down.5. Describe the conclusions and implicationsMake brief notes on each of the implications that arise from your study. What are the principal conclusions of your findings? What is new in your work and why does it matter? What are the limitations and the implications of your results? Are there any changes in practice, approaches or techniques that you would recommend?6. Organize and group related ideas togetherList each key point separately. Key points can be arranged chronologically, by order of importance or by some other pattern. The organizing scheme should be clear and well structured. You can use a cluster map, an issue tree, numbering, or some other organizational structure.Identify the important details, describe the principal findings, and provide your analysis and conclusions that contribute to each key point.7. Identify the references that pertain to each key point8. Develop the introductionBefore beginning on the introduction, read through the notes you have made so far in your outline. Read them through and see whether there is a coherent and cohesive story and a unifying theme that runs through the outline.Your introduction outline should start with the main message, describe what the purpose or objective of your study was, how you went about doing the study, what you found and what are the implications of what you found.Twelve Steps to Developing an Effective First Draft of your ManuscriptSan Francisco EditYou should now have detailed notes you can use to write your draft paper. If you don’t have one already, it may help to prepare an outline for each section which includes a number of major headings, sub-headings and paragraphs covering different points. If you need help in preparing an outline see our article Eight Steps to Developing an Effective Manuscript Outline at /newsletters.htm. At this point you will need to convert your notes and outline into narrative form.Some people recommend that you begin with the Introduction and continue in order through each section of the paper to help ensure flow. Others suggest that you begin with the easiest sections, which are usually the Methods and Results, followed by the Discussion, Conclusion, Introduction, References and Title, leaving the Abstract until the end. The main thing is to begin writing and begin filling up the blank screen or piece of paper.1. Consolidate all the information. Ensure you have everything you need to write efficiently, i.e., all data, references, drafts of tables and figures, etc.2. Target a journal. Determine the journal to which you plan to submit your manuscript and write your manuscript according to the focus of the targeted journal. The focus may be clearly stated within the journal or may be determined by examining several recent issues of the targeted journal.3. Start writing. When writing the first draft, the goal is to put something down on paper, so it does not matter if sentences are incomplete and the grammar incorrect, provided that the main points and ideas have been captured. Write when your energy is high, not when you are tired. Try to find a time and place where you can think and write without distractions.4. Write quickly. Don't worry about words, spelling or punctuation at all at this stage, just ideas. Keep going. Leave gaps if necessary. Try to write quickly, to keep the flow going. Use abbreviations and leave space for words that do not come to mind immediately.5. Write in your own voice. Expressing yourself in your own way will help you to say what you mean more precisely. It will be easier for your reader if they can “hear” your voice.6. Write without editing. Don't try to get it right the first time. Resist the temptation to edit as you go. Otherwise, you will tend to get stuck and waste time. If you try to write and edit at the same time, you will do neither well.7. Keep to the plan of your outline. Use the headings from your outline to focus what you want to say. If you find yourself wandering from the point, stop and move on to the next topic in the outline.8. Write the paper in parts. Don't attempt to write the whole manuscript at once, instead, treat each section as a mini essay. Look at your notes, think about the goal of that particular section and what you want to accomplish and say.9. Put the first draft aside. Put aside your first draft for at least one day. The idea of waiting a day or more is to allow you to "be" another person. It is difficult to proofread and edit your own work; a day or more between creation and critique helps.10. Revise it. Revise it and be prepared to do this several times until you feel it is not possible to improve it further. The objective is to look at your work not as its author, but as a respectful but stern critic. Does each sentence make sense? In your longer sentences, can you keep track of the subject at hand? Do your longer paragraphs follow a single idea, or can they be broken into smaller paragraphs? These are some of the questions you should ask yourself.11. Revise for clarity and brevity. Revise sentences and paragraphs with special attention to clearness. For maximum readability, most sentences should be about 15-20 words. For a scientific article, paragraphs of about 150 words in length are considered optimal. Avoid using unnecessary words.12. Be consistent. Often a manuscript has more than one author and therefore the writing may be shared. However, the style needs to be consistent throughout. The first author must go through the entire manuscript and make any necessary editorial changes before submitting the manuscript to the journal.Ten Steps to Writing an Effective AbstractAn abstract is a condensed version of the manuscript, which highlights the major points covered, concisely describes its content and scope, and reviews its material in abbreviated form. It is usually the first section read and sets the tone of the paper for the reviewer. It must be concise and easy to read and must cover the important points of the paper.Many publications have a required style for abstracts; the "Guidelines for Authors" provided by the publisher will provide specific instructions. Stay within the publisher’s guidelines, or your manuscript might be rejected.Writing an abstract involves summarizing a whole manuscript and providing as much new information as possible. The best way to write an effective abstract is to start with a draft of the complete manuscript and follow these 10 steps:1.Identify the major objectives and conclusions.2.Identify phrases with keywords in the methods section.3.Identify the major results from the discussion or results section.4.Assemble the above information into a single paragraph.5.State your hypothesis or method used in the first sentence.6.Omit background information, literature review, and detailed description ofmethods.7.Remove extra words and phrases.8.Revise the paragraph so that the abstract conveys only the essentialinformation.9.Check to see if it meets the guidelines of the targeted journal.10.Give the abstract to a colleague (preferably one who is not familiar with yourwork) and ask him/her whether it makes sense.Writing an effective abstract will improve the chances of your manuscript being accepted, encourage people to read it, and increase its impact.A number of studies have indicated that a badly written manuscript with poor use of English, even with good science, has less chance of being accepted and published.Ten Steps to Writing an Effective IntroductionSan Francisco EditThe purpose of the Introduction is to stimulate the reader’s interest and to provide pertinent background information necessary to understand the rest of the paper. You must summarize the problem to be addressed, give background on the subject, discuss previous research on the topic, and explain exactly what the paper will address, why, and how. Besides motivating a reader to read your manuscript and to care about your results, the Introduction is useful also to the journal’s reviewers and editors in judging the importance of your manuscript.An Introduction is usually 300 to 500 words, but may be more, depending on the journal and the topic. Therefore, the Introduction needs to be very concise, well structured, and inclusive of all the information needed to follow the development of your findings.Some people recommend that the Introduction be the first section written when writing a manuscript. If you need help beginning, please read our article Twelve Steps in Developing an Effective First Draft at /newsletters.htm.Below are the steps in developing an effective Introduction. However, since every journal is different, it is important that you look at papers in your targeted journal to determine whether they use all of these steps. For example, some journals do not include conclusions in the Introduction.1. Begin the Introduction by providing a concise background account of the problemstudied.2. State the objective of the investigation. Your research objective is the mostimportant part of the introduction.3. Establish the significance of your work: Why was there a need to conduct the study?4. Introduce the reader to the pertinent literature. Do not give a full history of the topic.Only quote previous work having direct bearing on the present problem.5. Clearly state your hypothesis, the variables investigated, and concisely summarizethe methods used.6. Define any abbreviations or specialized terms.7. Provide a concise discussion of the results and findings of other studies so thereader understands the big picture.8. Describe some of the major findings presented in your manuscript and explain howthey contribute to the larger field of research.9. State the principal conclusions derived from your results.10. Identify any questions left unanswered and any new questions generated by yourstudy.Other points to consider when writing your Introduction:1. Be aware of who will be reading your manuscript and make sure the Introduction isdirected to that audience.2. Move from general to specific: from the problem in the real world to the literature toyour research.3. Write in the present tense except for what you did or found, which should be in thepast tense.4. Be concise.Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Results SectionSan Francisco EditThe purpose of a Results section is to present the key results of your research without interpreting their meaning. It cannot be combined with the Discussion section unless the journal combines the Results and Discussion into one section. The results should be presented in an orderly sequence, using an outline as a guide for writing and following the sequence of the Methods section upon which the results are based. For every result there must be a method in the Methods section. It is important to carefully plan the tables and figures to ensure that their sequencing tells a story. If you need help in preparing an outline see our article Eight Steps to Developing an Effective Manuscript Outline at /newsletters.htm.1. Determine which results to present by deciding which are relevant to the question(s) presented in the Introduction irrespective of whether or not the results support the hypothesis(es). The Results section does not need to include every result you obtained or observed.2. Organize the data in the Results section in either chronological order according to the Methods or in order of most to least important. Within each paragraph, the order of most to least important results should be followed.3. Determine whether the data are best presented in the form of text, figures, graphs, or tables.4. Summarize your findings and point the reader to the relevant data in the text, figures and/or tables. The text should complement the figures or tables, not repeat the same information.5. Describe the results and data of the controls and include observations not presented in a formal figure or table, if appropriate.6. Provide a clear description of the magnitude of a response or difference. If appropriate, use percentage of change rather than exact data.7. Make sure that the data are accurate and consistent throughout the manuscript.8. Summarize the statistical analysis and report actual P values for all primary analyses.9. Use the past tense when you refer to your results.10. Number figures and tables consecutively in the same sequence they are first mentioned in the text. Depending on the journal, they should be in order at the end of the report after the References, or located appropriately within the text of your results section.11. Provide a heading for each figure and table. Depending on the journal the table titles and figure legends should be listed separately or located above the table or below the figure. Each figure and table must be sufficiently complete that it could stand on its own, separate from the text.12. Write with accuracy, brevity and clarity.Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion SectionSan Francisco EditThe purpose of the Discussion is to state your interpretations and opinions, explain the implications of your findings, and make suggestions for future research. Its main function is to answer the questions posed in the Introduction, explain how the results support the answers and, how the answers fit in with existing knowledge on the topic. The Discussion is considered the heart of the paper and usually requires several writing attempts.The organization of the Discussion is important. Before beginning you should try to develop an outline to organize your thoughts in a logical form. You can use a cluster map, an issue tree, numbering, or some other organizational structure. The steps listed below are intended to help you organize your thoughts. If you need additional help see our articles Eight Steps to Developing an Effective Manuscript Outline and Twelve Steps to Developing an Effective First Draft of your Manuscript at/newsletters.htm.To make your message clear, the discussion should be kept as short as possible while clearly and fully stating, supporting, explaining, and defending your answers and discussing other important and directly relevant issues. Care must be taken to provide a commentary and not a reiteration of the results. Side issues should not be included, as these tend to obscure the message. No paper is perfect; the key is to help the reader determine what can be positively learned and what is more speculative.1. Organize the Discussion from the specific to the general: your findings to the literature, to theory, to practice.2. Use the same key terms, the same verb tense (present tense), and the same point of view that you used when posing the questions in the Introduction.3. Begin by re-stating the hypothesis you were testing and answering the questions posed in the introduction.4. Support the answers with the results. Explain how your results relate to expectations and to the literature, clearly stating why they are acceptable and how they are consistent or fit in with previously published knowledge on the topic.5. Address all the results relating to the questions, regardless of whether or not the findings were statistically significant.6. Describe the patterns, principles, and relationships shown by each majorfinding/result and put them in perspective. The sequencing of providing this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. If necessary, point the reader to a figure or table to enhance the “story”.7. Defend your answers, if necessary, by explaining both why your answer is satisfactory and why others are not. Only by giving both sides to the argument can you make your explanation convincing.8. Discuss and evaluate conflicting explanations of the results. This is the sign of a good discussion.9. Discuss any unexpected findings. When discussing an unexpected finding, begin the paragraph with the finding and then describe it.10. Identify potential limitations and weaknesses and comment on the relative importance of these to your interpretation of the results and how they may affect the validity of the findings. When identifying limitations and weaknesses, avoid using an apologetic tone.11. Summarize concisely the principal implications of the findings, regardless of statistical significance.12. Provide recommendations (no more than two) for further research. Do not offer suggestions which could have been easily addressed within the study, as this shows there has been inadequate examination and interpretation of the data.13. Explain how the results and conclusions of this study are important and how they influence our knowledge or understanding of the problem being examined.14. In your writing of the Discussion, discuss everything, but be concise, brief, and specific.Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Materials and MethodsSan Francisco EditIn the Materials and Methods section you explain clearly how you conducted your study in order to: (1) enable readers to evaluate the work performed and (2) permit others to replicate your study.You must describe exactly what you did: what and how experiments were run, what, how much, how often, where, when, and why equipment and materials were used. The main consideration is to ensure that enough detail is provided to verify your findings and to enable the replication of the study.You should maintain a balance between brevity (you cannot describe every technical issue) and completeness (you need to give adequate detail so that readers know what happened).This should be the easiest section to write. If you need help beginning, please read our article Twelve Steps in Developing an Effective First Draft at/newsletters.htm.Since each journal has different requirements, review the journal’s guidelines before beginning to write this section. The steps listed here are a general compilation of these requirements.1. Order your procedures chronologically or by type of procedure and then chronologically within type of procedure using sub-headings, where appropriate, to clarify what you did. It is up to you to decide what order of presentation will make the most sense to your reader.2. Use the past tense and the third person to describe what you did. For example: “The sample was incubated at 37ºC for 3 days.” - NOT: “I incubate the sample at 37ºC for 3 days.”3. Describe your experimental design clearly, including the hypotheses you tested, variables measured, how many replicates you had, controls, treatments, etc.4. Explain why each procedure was done. Reference may be made to a published paper as an alternative to describing a lengthy procedure.5. Identify the source of any specific type of equipment, a specific enzyme, organism, or a culture from a particular supplier, which is critical to the success of the experiment.6. Describe in detail any modifications to equipment or equipment constructed specifically for the study and, if pertinent, provide illustrations of the modifications.7. Precisely quantify measurements (all metric) and include errors of measurement.8. Describe the dates and the site where your field study was conducted including physical and biological characteristics of the site, if pertinent to the study’s objectives.9. Identify treatments using the variable or treatment name, rather than an ambiguous, generic name or number (e.g., use "healthy donors" rather than "group 1").10. If required by the journal, mention the approval for the study by the relevant ethics committee(s) and the informed consent of the subjects.11. Describe statistical tests and the comparisons made; ordinary statistical methods should be used without comment; advanced or unusual methods may require a literature citation.12. Show your Materials and Methods section to a colleague and ask whether they would have difficulty in repeating your study.Other points to consider when writing the Materials and Methods:1. Don't mix results with procedures.2. Omit all explanatory information and background - save it for the discussion.3. Don’t include information that is irrelevant to the reader, such as what color ice bucket you used, or which individual logged in the data.Twelve Steps to Developing Effective Tables and FiguresSan Francisco EditThe purpose of tables and figures is to report data too numerous or complicated to be described adequately in the text and/or to reveal trends or patterns in the data. Tables and figures are critical. If readers go beyond the abstract, they are likely to examine the tables and figures next.Before writing the first draft of your manuscript, it is important to organize the data you plan to present in the manuscript. By preparing the tables and figures, their titles and legends, and appropriate statistical analyses, you will be certain of your results before you need to interpret them. At this time you will also be able to determine if you have all the data you need. Before writing the first draft, it is important to plan which results answer the questions you posed in your research and which data can be left out.If you need help beginning, please read our article Twelve Steps in Developing an Effective First Draft at /newsletters.htm.1. Decide which results to present, paying attention to whether data are best presented within the text or as tables or figures.2. Limit the number of tables and figures to those that provide essential information that could not adequately be presented in the text.3. Include only results which are relevant to the question(s) posed in the introduction, irrespective of whether or not the results support the hypothesis(es).4. Design each table and figure to be understandable on its own, without reference to the text.5. Number each figure and table in the order in which they are referred to in the text (figures and tables are numbered separately).6. Organize the tables and figures in such an order that they tell a story.7. Check with the targeted journal, but typically tables and figures are located on separate pages that follow the Reference section.8. Make sure there is no page break in the middle of a table or figure, if the journal wants the tables and figures integrated into the text. Do not wrap text around tables and figures.9. Be sure all figures and tables are referenced in the text of the article.10. Obtain permission from the copyright holder (usually the publisher) and acknowledge the source, if you are including a table or figure that has already been published.11. Write the table titles and figure legends in the past tense.12. Provide information regarding what is presented in the table or figure in the table titles and figure legends, but not a summary or interpretation of the results.TablesTables are used to make an article more readable by removing numeric data from the text. Tables can also be used to synthesize existing literature, to explain variables, or to present the wording of survey questions.1. Create tables with the table function (pull down menu) in Microsoft Word. Do not use tabs.2. Use column headings and table notes accurately to simplify and clarify the table. In most cases, the meaning of each column should be apparent without reference to the text.3. Check with the journal, but most journals want the table title and table on the same page, with each table on a separate page in numerical order.FiguresFigures provide visual impact and therefore they are often the best way to communicate the primary finding. Figures are traditionally used to display trends and group results but can also be used effectively to communicate processes or to display detailed data simply.1. Label each axis including units of measurement and clearly identify the data you are displaying (e.g. label each line in a graph).2. Check with the journal, but most want the figure legends listed in numerical order ona separate page and each figure on a separate page in numerical order.。

SCI论文的结构和写作方法

Title: DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THERMOCHEMISTRY .2. THE EFFECT OF THE PERDEW-WANG GENERALIZED-GRADIENT CORRELATION CORRECTION SCI被引721次, Source: JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 97 (12): 9173-9177 DEC 15 1992 3、Author(s): BECKE, AD
题名采用了名词性词组的形式(Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode; Inositol Trisphosphate And Calcium Signaling ; positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homolog )
为了确保眉题的准确性，作者最好在投稿时提供一个合适的眉题
题名撰写可以省略的多余词
SCI论文题名中可以省略的多余的词： Analysis of, Development of, Evaluation of , Experimental, Investigation of (on), Observations on, On the, Regarding, Report of (on), Research on, Review of, Studies of (on), The preparation of, The synthesis of, The nature of, Treatment of, Use of, 等
SCI高被引论文题名分析——名词性词组的形式
题名通常由名词性短语构成，其中的动词多以分词或动名词形式出现

SCI论文写作方法(超实用)

SCI论文写作方法(超实用)SCI论文写作方法（超实用）SCI论文的写作对国内的同行来说似乎是一个拦路虎，让我们就这个话题发表一下自己的意见。

首先，我们要明确一个事实：国外的英语类杂志除了刚申办的之外都是SCI收录杂志，外国人发表的英语类论文都是SCI论文。

这说明了什么？关键在于语言。

语言是非英语国家论文的最大障碍。

因此，我们需要注意时态和语态的使用。

在前言和讨论中，描述该研究的过去历史和现状时，应使用相应的时态：过去时和现在时。

在材料与方法、结果中，写自己的研究过程时，应使用过去式。

在前言和讨论中引述别人的研究或话语时，应使用过去式或现在时。

最后的结论应使用现在时。

语态上要尽量使用被动语态，主动语态少用或不用。

谈到SCI论文，很多人似乎觉得这种文章很高深，不好写。

其实不然，有很多可写的。

除了实验研究之类的论文外，临床上做的很多都可以成文：个案报告（case report或者case report and literature review)，技术革新（techniqcal case report),临床报告（4-5个个案可以写成一篇clinical report），正式论文（论著或原著original），甚至对某篇论文的看法都可以写成文章与编辑交流登报。

技术革新可以包括你如何解决临床上的一个难题，比如导管导丝在某个位置进不去，你如何解决的，都可以成文。

在语态方面，我们应尽可能使用被动态。

比如要这样写：This study was carried out to XXX.这种被动态在论文中很常见，而如果您写成“We carried out this study to XXX”，这种主动态无论从语法上还是其他方面来说都正确，但不适用于科学论文中。

因为科学论文讲究的是科学性，往往从客观的角度去描述，而不是从个人角度去描述。

对于SCI论文来说，创新似乎是最重要的特质。

虽然并非所有的SCI论文都必须具有创新，但是至少要与其他文章有所不同。

SCI论文写作及投稿技巧

（一）我的第一篇SCI论文发表经历(开篇) 我是一位农林科技工作者，1992年就参加了工作，不过很遗憾，截止到2019年前，还没有发表过SCI文章。

并不是没有能力发表所谓的SCI，我们已经发表的论文也是可以发表到SCI杂志的，因为我们对SCI文章没有追求，也可能因为见识太少，目光短浅吧。

现在情况不同了，业绩需要SCI，考核指标需要SCI，提升成果水平需要SCI，成果报奖需要SCI，报人才需要SCI。

很多，看了SCI还是有很多益处的。

不过，我想SCI最大的益处是交流国际化，这也是我在弄第一篇SCI的时候逐渐认识到的。

因为在查找参考文献过程中，发现同行的国外专家发表了很多SCI文章，从中发现了自己工作中的不足，包括实验设计、研究方法等都可以借鉴。

可能说到这，会有很多人笑话我了。

做这么多年科研工作，怎么才有这样的想法或感悟呢？No problem！谁让我的科研工作的视野就这么小呢？井底之蛙，认为我们的工作参考一下国内同行的文献就ok了，但放眼世界，真是有不一样的收获。

如果你也想发表SCI，无论是要毕业的学生，还是有一定经历的研究工作者，跟着我看一看，怎样弄一篇自己的SCI文章。

我现在的感触是，SCI文章没那么难弄，但也不是轻而易举，一蹴而就的。

言归正传，我把我第一篇SCI的发表经历分享给大家，因为我在弄这篇SCI的时候想找到一些捷径，什么百度，付费的广告公司也好，都努力过了。

但还是得走自己的路，别的信息帮不到太多，也是这样的缘故，我把我的SCI经历分享给大家，希望真的能够帮到大家！关于写作，回过头看，真是走了很多弯路。

照猫画虎！刚开始，就是看到拟要发表的期刊，通过各种渠道下载或在线看到已经发表的文章，做参考，人家怎么写就怎么描，觉得别人能发表，自己描个差不多就OK了。

于是就开笔了，真没有想太多，甚至是把原来的中文直接通过翻译软件翻译成English，再简单的改一改其中的语病，选词，自我觉得尽量通顺。

实际上，SCI杂志的语言要求不是都一样的，我觉得英语国家的SCI语言要求是很高的。

撰写SCI论文写作技巧ppt课件

管理出成绩不是空话---严格的管理、经常性的检查与督促，
朋友式的帮助与交流。
12
SCI论文—我的体会
创新的思想（最最重要，哪怕很小，但要新）。精心的设计（很重要，要能够自成体系，说明你想说明
的问题）。
高水平的实验（很重要，被广为认可的方法、材料与设
备；重复的次数，良好的数据处理等）。
可接受的表达（较重，借用外力完成目标）。
4
研究生培养过程管理---阶段目标责任制
第三学年
第三学年
完成论文的后续研究内容；执行能力的培养；
完成投稿论文的修改与补充独立研究的能力；
实验；
撰写SCI论文的能力；
自主完成第2篇SCI论文；了解申请专利的基本过程。
学位论文撰写与答辩。
5
研究生培养过程管理---分类培养制
根据学生实际情况与课题性质
24
The abstract should not exceed 150 words.
Guide for Authors---Food Chemistry-Research paper
include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per
14
15
SCI论文
据美国科学基金会统计，一个科研人员花费在查找
和消化科技资料上的时间需占全部科研时间的51%，计划思考占8%，实验研究占32%，书面总结占9%。由上述统计数字可以看出，科研人员花费在科技出版物上的时间为全部科研时间的60%。
知己知彼，百战不殆！！
16
SCI论文的设计
思路比技术本身更重要。作研究最重要的是如何根据研究目

写SCI论文的技巧

写SCI论文的技巧写SCI论文的技巧随着科学研究的发展，SCI（Science Citation Index，科学引文索引）论文已经成为科研工作者评价学术成果的重要指标之一。

SCI论文不仅可以提升个人学术声誉，还能增加科研项目的资金支持和科研合作的机会。

然而，写SCI论文是一项需要技巧的任务。

下面将介绍一些写SCI论文的技巧，帮助科研人员更好地撰写SCI论文。

一、选择合适的研究课题选择合适的研究课题是写SCI论文的第一步。

优秀的SCI论文应该具有创新性、有实际应用价值，并能够引起同行的关注。

为了选择合适的研究课题，可以参考已有的SCI论文，了解当前研究领域的前沿问题和研究热点，也可以与导师或同行讨论，获取他们的意见和建议。

此外，还可以关注学术会议、期刊和数据库的最新发布内容，了解行业动态。

二、深入了解文献在进行SCI论文写作之前，需对所需领域的相关文献进行全面、深入的调研。

文献调研可以帮助科研人员了解当前领域已有的研究成果和进展，找到自己的研究切入点，并避免重复性工作。

在文献调研时，注意阅读高质量、高影响力的期刊论文，以获取有深度、有广度的研究背景，并能够更好地理解研究问题的本质。

三、合理组织论文结构SCI论文的结构要合理、清晰。

常见的SCI论文结构包括：摘要、引言、方法、结果、讨论和结论等部分。

在摘要部分中，要突出研究的创新性、重要性；在引言部分中，要对前人研究进行回顾，并阐明自己的研究目的和意义；在方法部分中，要详细描述实验设计、数据采集和数据处理的方法；在结果和讨论部分中，要准确呈现实验结果，并结合文献进行分析和解读；在结论部分中，则要简明地总结研究的主要发现和意义。

合理组织论文结构可以帮助读者更好地理解研究内容。

四、逻辑严密、条理清晰的论述SCI论文的论述要逻辑严密、条理清晰。

写作时要注意用简洁、明了的语言表达研究问题和研究方法。

另外，要注意论述的连贯性，避免使用模棱两可的措词和不必要的修饰。

七步写出高水平SCI论文

七步写出高水平SCI论文国内比较注重论文数量，一些研究生读博士的时候就能发表不少论文。

我在国内读博士的时候也发表不少论文，来新加坡国立大学后，发现他们的评价标准是他引次数除以论文数量，如果别人不引用，论文数越多平均他引次数反而更小，所以很少有人片面追求数量。

这里结合自己的一些经验，讲述一下写出高水平论文的一些建议，相信对正苦于如何发表SCI论文的博士们是有借鉴价值的。

1. 研究方向要在自己擅长的领域选择，或者有擅长该方向的人指导选择研究方向是个很头疼的事情，这对研究的成败起着决定性的作用。

你研究什么问题，在很大程度上就决定了你能发表怎样水平的文章、有没有人看、有没有人引用，所以这是个很严肃的问题。

研究的对象很大程度上决定着研究的成果，中国两千多年来以孔圣人为研究对象，没有开拓研究对象，所以一直固步自封直到落后挨打，所以研究对象必须对社会发展有重大意义、必须不断开拓新的研究对象。

研究生的研究对象和方向基本由导师决定，自己可选的余地不大，但要知道这个道理。

对于博士毕业后仍然从事科研的年轻人来说，一般来说应该以自己擅长的方法、技巧、领域为基础，逐渐扩展。

如果自己特别喜欢某一个领域，需要多向熟悉该领域的学者请教、学习，如果能跟着熟悉该领域的成功者干一段时间更好。

2. 循序渐进掌握英语写作，尽可能自己写，多和导师修改后的论文比较英语写作是发表SCI论文必须过的一关，因为国内的中文期刊一般最多EI收录，想发表SCI论文很难。

多读一些科技论文写作技巧的书是很有必要的，我当时读过《How to Write & Publish a Scientific Paper》和《How to Publish a Paper in the Top Journal》，这两本书都写得非常好，建议写英文论文有困难的研究生一读。

我读博士的时候，第一篇论文我只写了中文，英文完全是导师翻译，从第二篇论文起我自己翻译成英文，导师修改后发表。

SCI文章写作方法

一、写作框架和各部分要求Title: Be short, accurate, and unambiguous; Give your paper a distinct personality; Begin with the subject of the study.Introduction: What is known; What is unknown; Why we did this study?Methods: Participants, subjects; Measurements; Outcomes and explanatory variables; Statistical methods.Results: Sample characteristics; Univariate analyses; Bivariate analyses; Multivariate analyses.Tables and figures: No more than six tables or figures; Use Table 1 for sample characteristics (no P values); Put most important findings in a figure.Discussion: State what you found; Outline the strengths and limitations of the study; Discuss the relevance to current literature; Outline your implications with a clear “So what?” and “Where now?”References: All citations must be accurate; Include only the most important, most rigorous, and most recent literature; Quote only published journal articles or books; Never quote “second hand”; Ci te only 20-35 references. Formatting: Include the title, author, page numbers, etc. in headers and footers; Start each section on a new page; Format titles and subtitles consistently; Comply with “Instructions to authors”.二、英文写作的语言技巧1. Introduction：A. 如何指出当前研究的不足并有目的地引导出自己研究的重要性？在叙述前人成果之后，用However来引导不足，提出一种新方法或新方向。

如何写SCI文章总结[精选多篇]

如何写SCI文章总结[精选多篇]第一篇：如何写SCI文章总结如何写SCI文章总结王xx 机械工程1xxxxx03 通过几个星期的SCI写作培训，自己对写SCI文章有了一定的了解，自己之前认为SCI离自己太远，自己完全不可能写的出来，但是自己现在认为写SCI文章有一定的套路，只要按照这个套路来，写出一篇SCI文章来根本不是问题。

在写文章时，自己的时间分配和修改次数都要有一定的规划：30%的时间细心思考，70%的时间认真写作初稿；把写好的论文放一段时间；逐字逐句地阅读论文；请其他人帮助阅读和修改；在修改的时候，从别人的角度来审视论文（Reviewer / boss / colleagues / proof-reader）；仔细修改的次数 > 3；修改的总次数 > 5。

要点：自己读自己的论文很乏味，并且不易找到错误；为了论文的小的层次提升，要付出大量劳动。

SCI文章大概有五个部分组成，包括：摘要、介绍、方法、结果和总结，它们之间的写作顺序也有一定的说法。

1、写出3~4层的纲要反复修改多次。

2、从Introduction开写，回顾已有的工作。

3、要声明文章结构，不要直接进入细节。

4、声明工作的动机和基本原理，提出潜在的问题，自己进行回答。

5、讲明自己工作与前人的不同，说明自己的贡献及其实际应用前景。

6、最后写Summary和Abstract，反复斟酌后确定标题。

下面重点来介绍摘要、介绍、方法、结果和总结这五个部分该怎么写，改写哪些内容。

1.Introduction: 问题的提出；研究的现状及背景；以前工作基础；本工作的目的；思路（可提假说）；对象；方法；结果。

在… 模型上，观察… 指标，以探讨…（目的）。

2.M & M ⑴ 材料的写法和意义;伦理.⑵ 程序与指标。

操作程序：能序贯，可操作性；方法：多指标方法的排序；引出参照文献简述;改良之处；哪些详或简？⑶ 统计学处理3.Results ⑴指标归类描述，忌流水帐。

WPS软件编写SCI论文的十大技巧_论文格式_

WPS软件编写SCI论文的十大技巧撰写sci论文最常用到的编缉软件就是word或wps。

wps改版之后功能强大，体积又小，最主要是免费。

笔者在此以wps为准，教给大家一些强大而实用的功能，使您在sci论文写作的时候，不为调整格式而烦恼。

一篇sci论文应该包括两个层次的含义：内容与表现，内容是说作者表达自己思想的文字、图片、表格、公式及整个文章的章节段落结构等等，而表现则是说sci论文页面大小、边距、各种字体、字号等格式。

相同的内容可以有不同的表现，例如一篇文章在不同的出版社出版会有不同的表现;而不同的内容可以使用相同的表现，例如一个期刊上发表的所有文章的表现都是相同的。

这两者的关系不言自明。

笔者认为，sci论文“表现”的编辑，是一个非常费时费力的工作。

如果在写sci论文之前，做了各方面的准备，并按照一定的规律来编写和排列，会起到事半功倍的效果;否则，会给你带来无穷无尽的痛苦。

笔者根据自己写sci论文的体会，建议如下。

1、字体样式编写sci论文，一定要使用字体样式，除了wps原先所提供的主标题、与正文等样式外，还可以利用自定义样式。

如果你发现自己是用选中文字然后用格式工具栏来设定格式的，一定要注意，想想其他地方是否需要使用相同的文字格式，如果确定的话，最好就自定义一个样式。

对于相同排版表现的内容一定要坚持使用统一的样式，这样做能大大减少工作量和出错机会。

如果要对排版格式做调整，只需一次性修改，修改相关样式即可。

使用样式的另一个好处是可以由wps 自动生成各种目录和索引。

一般情况下，撰写sci论文杂志社或学位授予机构都会根据其具体要求，给sci论文撰写者一个清楚的格式要求。

比如，要求新宋体、四号字，行间距16磅等等。

这样，sci论文的撰写者就可以在撰写sci论文前对样式进行一番设定，这样就会很方便的编写sci论文了。

2、编号一定不要自己敲编号，推荐使用交叉引用，否则手动输入的编号极可能给你文章的修改带来无穷的后患。

医学SCI论文写作及技巧

如何发表医学SCI论文写作及技巧英文医学论文（medical papers）的定义医学论文是对整理和发表医学研究成果的一种特殊文本的总称，就其内容和文体特点而言科分为以下几种：1．医学科研论文（scientific papers）2．调查报告（survey）3．综述（review）4．学位论文（theses）5．医学科研论文（scientific papers）医学科研论文定义国际生物学编辑委员会对医学科研论文的定义为：必须是首次公布的应提供足够的资料，使同行们能够进行：①评价所观察到的结果；②评价其推理过程；③重复实验。

分为以下两种：①临床研究(clinical study)；②基础研究或实验研究（experimental study)医学科研论文的格式（1）标题（title）（2）摘要（abstract）（3）引言（introduction）（4）材料和方法（materials and methods）（5）结果（results）（6）讨论（discussion）（7）致谢（acknowledgement）（8）参考文献（references）一、标题（一）要求1．简明扼要（short and concise）（1）尽量控制在一行，但不是一个句子（2）不超过25个单词或120-140个字母（3）除DNA、RNA、CT等不用缩写2．信息丰富(informative)3．便于索引（indexing）4．较长标题可采用副标题（二）标题写作中常用词组和表达方式1．用…（方法／手段）对…进行研究／分析／观察／评价：Study(analysis/observation/evaluation/assessment) of (on) …(by) using 方法/with工具）2．A对B的作用Effort of A on BProtective effect of omeprazole on endothelin-induced gastric mucosal injury3．A与B的关系Correlation (relation/relationship) between A and BCorrelation of A with B and C常用修饰词：positively/negatively/significantly/insignificantly4．用…治疗…Use of …in the treatment of …(病）in …（生物）Use of omeprazole in the treatment of gastric ulcer in the elderly5．A是B A as B二、著录部分书写（一）姓名标准式：WANG aobang，HUANG aobang，GUO Xiao’an （二）地址800 Xiang Yin Road, Shanghai 200433, P.R.China（三）资助A project funded by the National “863” Program三、摘要的分类与格式摘要是作者要给读者的精华，分两大类：（一）指示性摘要（二）资料性摘要1．非结构式摘要缺点：段落不明，给编辑、审稿、阅读和计算机处理带来诸多不便2．全结构式摘要（8要素摘要）（1）目的（2）设计（3）地点（4）对象（5）处理（6）主要测定项目（7）结果（8）结论全结构式摘要的优点（1）观点更明确（2）信息量更大（3）差错更少（4）符合计算机数据库建立和使用的要求全结构式摘要的缺点：烦琐、重复、篇幅过长3．半结构式摘要（四要素摘要）（1）目的（objective/purpose/aim）（2）方法（methods）（3）结果（results）（4）结论（conclusion）目的：是作者想要介绍的关键问题一、目的格式（一）单表目的（二）背景＋目的二、目的常用时态（一）背景：现在时（一般现在时、完成时和进行时）（二）目的：一般现在时／现在完成时，或一般过去时举例：（1）To evaluate the effects on 24-hour intragastric pH levels of infusions with omeprazole and H2 receptor antagonists in bleeding duodenal ulcer patients.（2）The role of omeprazole in triple therapy and the impact of Helicobacter pylori resistance on treatment outcome are not established. This study investigated the role of omeprazole and influence of primary H. pylori resistance on eradication and development of secondary resistance.三、介绍目的常用句型主要用动词不定式to表达1．直接用to do短语表达举例：To determine if use of omeprazole protects against the gastric mucosal injury2．The purpose/aim/objective/goal(of present study is)was to举例：The aim of this study was to determine the protective function of omeprazole on gastric mucosal injury3．The present study is /was designed/devised/intended to举例：The present study was designed to establish whether there might be a genetic predisposition to an altered pattern of anti-inflammatory cytokine produced in patients with irritable bowel syndrome4．This study was performed/conducted/carried out/undertaken to举例：An experimental study was conducted using a canine mode toelucidate …5．We aimed/sought to/attempted to举例：We sought to assess whether there is an increased risk of tuberculosis among individuals who work in certain industries occupations.四、介绍目的常用动词1．研究：study, investigate, examine, observe, explore举例：Our objective in this report is to examine the clinical feature, pathology and treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer.2．评价：evaluate, validate举例：To evaluate sonography as a tool for initial diagnosis in emergency room patients with abdominal trauma.3．确定：determine, decide, confirm, support, define, characterize4．证实：prove, demonstrate, document, test, support, testify, verify5．阐明、搞清：explain, elucidate, clarify, illustrate, delineate, find out, contribute to the knowledge of6．介绍：describe, present, report7．建立：establish, develop, set out8．寻找：search for, look for, seek, find9．识别、区分：identify, differentiate, discriminate10．优选：optimize11．比较：compare12．回顾：review13．相关：correlate A with B方法部分（1）研究设计（2）研究对象的特性（3）干预或处理方法（4）测定或观察方法一、研究对象的选择、来源及标准1．纳入研究：were entered into/enrolled in/selected (randomly)举例：A total of 169 patients were included in the study, 83 of whom received……2．排除或退出研究：were excluded from participation，withdrew from the study due to/because to举例：……Patients with significant aortic valvular diseases were excluded.二、研究对象的分组1．……were divided into/classified/grouped into2．……were divided randomly/randomized into3．……were divided equally into举例：Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1……Patients (n = 539) with a history of duodenal ulcer and a positive H. pylori screening test result were randomized into 4 groups. OAC group received 20 mg omeprazole, ……三、年龄1．某一年龄举例：A 50-year-old patient. Patients (age 26±3 years).2．在某年龄范围内及平均年龄举例：Patients range in age from …to…, with a mean of (50 years).3．在某一年龄以上或以下举例：Patients more than 50 years. Patients under/less than 50 years.四、性别、时间1．性别twelve patients (7 male and 5 female )The male-to-female ratio was 1:42．时间Body weight was measured weekly, and liver biopsy was obtained at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. ……五、诊断与治疗1．诊断be diagnosed as having …be diagnosed as …by …/with …®be suspected as …2．治疗be treated with…(alone or in combination with …)be treated on outpatient/inpatient basis举例：（1）Patients (n = 539) with a history of duodenal ulcer and a positive H. pylori screening test result were randomized into 4groups. OAC group received 20 mg omeprazole,…（2）50 patients with active bleeding duodenal ulcer were randomly assigned to receive one of the four treatment regimens. …结果部分1．是文章结论的根据2．应记录真实的科研数据3．除指示性说明外，一般用过去时表示一、常用句型1．结果表明：The results showed / demonstrated / revealed / documented / indicated/suggested…that…®It was found that…举例：The results showed that high thigh cuff Doppler technique was 79 percent sensitive, 56 percent specific and 63 percent accurate.2．与…有关：A was related / correlated /associated with B. There was a relationship /correlation between A and B. There was a relation of A with B and C举例：Insulin sensitivity index was negatively with blood velocity (r=0.530,P<0.05), body mass index (r=o.563, P<0.01) and baseline insulinemia (r=0.489,P<0.05)3．增加或减少（1）表示数值增加的动词：increase, rise, elevate（2）表示数值增加的名词：increase, increment, elevation（3）表示数值减少的动词：decrease, reduce, fall, drop, decline, lower（4）表示数值减少的名词：decrease, decrement, reduction, fall, drop, decline, lowering（5）从…增加到…，平均增加…：increase from …to …, with a mean/average (increase) of …（6）从…增加到…，总的增加…：increase from …to …, with an overall increase of …（7）增加了10％：increase by (10%)4．倍数比较（1）增加或减少3倍：increase by 3 fold (times). a 3-fold increase（2）A 是B的3倍：A is 3 fold (times) as…as B. A is 3 fold (times) B5．结果的统计学意义（1）明显不同（significant difference）（2）很明显不同（very/highly significant difference）（3）区别不明显（insignificant difference）（4）无区别（nonsignificant difference/no difference）6．统计学意义常用句型（1）There was/is significant difference in…between A and B（2）The difference in …between A and B was/is significant（3）A was/is significant difference from B in …（4）No significant difference was found / observed / noted in …between A and B“in”表示区分的性质或内容举例：①There were no significant difference between treatment groups in symptoms and lung function (P>0.05).②Significant difference were not noted in the level of HDL cholesterol, and LDL peak particle diameter before and after treatment.结论部分：是作者发表观点和见解，给读者的精髓部分1．归纳性说明研究结果或发现2．结论性说明结果的可能原因、机理或意义3．前瞻性说明未解决的问题一、结论部分时态1．过去时（1）涉及本研究的内容（2）涉及他人研究过程的内容（3）作者认为只适用于本研究环境和条件的结论2．现在时（1）指示性说明（2）普遍接受的思想、理论或结论（3）作者认为本研究结论具有普遍意义（4）前瞻性说明举例：Our findings indicate that hepatitis C is a progressive disease [指示性说明-现在时]，but only a few died during the average 20.4 years after the initiation of injection drug use [本试验过程中发生的事-过去时］. Antiviral treatment to eradicate the virus and halt the progression of diseases is indicated in this group of patients [作者认为具有普遍意义的结论-现在时].二、结论部分常用句型1．结果提示…：These results suggest that…举例：These data confirm the presence of at least two major HCV genotypes in Nigeria.2．结果支持或反对某种观点：These results support the idea that…；These results fail to support the idea that…举例：These results do not support the idea that treatment to lower cholesterol concentration cause mood disturbance.3．表示观点的确定或不确定性：There is no evidence that…；It is likely/unlikely that …举例：There is no evidence that NIDDM produce any change in bone metabolism or mass.4．具有…意义：Be of great (some/little/no) clinical significance in…to …举例：The detection of p53 gene is of great clinical significance in tumor diagnosis.5．前瞻性说明：…remain to be further studied；It is remains to be proved that …举例：However, the relation of insulin resistance to hypertension remains to be further studied.6．插入语：This is the first case of pancreas divisum.举例：This is the first case, to our knowledge, of pancreas divisum.小结中文是关键符合英语习惯不用简单句注意词语的用法注意时态。

SCI论文写法攻略

SCI论文写法攻略第一部分 SCI论文全攻略之选题与创新一、先想先写最后做1. 做研究之前，必须想清楚：结果能不能发表？发表在哪里？2. 先把文章大框写好，空出数据，等做完实验填完空就可以发了；正所谓心中有沟壑！3. 在未搞清“写什么、发哪里、自己研究与同类研究有何出色之处”之前，就不要动手做！4. 继续去看文献，去想；想不清楚就做还不如不做！5. 要想这样做，就得先看文献！要知道如何把文章架起来、要知道别人是如何讨论的、要知道自己的数据是不是说明了与别人不同的事情或别人没有做过……这个过程就是阅读文献及思考的过程，这些搞清楚了，写就简单了！6. 要是先做事，做完发现别人做过，或无法用理论来解释，岂不是冤大头？二、如何科学选题1. 课题选择和国际接轨。

想在国际核心期刊发表文献，就必须了解国际研究动态，选择与国际学术研究合拍的课题。

由于多方面因素的影响，我国科学研究选题与国际先进水平还有一定距离。

我国一家权威科研机构不久前在国内挑选了许多前沿领域的研究课题，准备参与国际合作，但到美国后发现近三分之二的课题已经不属前沿，在美国很少有人研究。

在高校，一些教师治学严谨、基础扎实，但科研成果不突出，重要原因就是不重视有关领域学术动态，不能选得合适的课题。

2. 课题要有可发展性。

课题可发展性对高水平论文的持续产出具有极大作用。

中国科技大学范洪义另辟蹊径，发展了诺贝尔奖得主狄拉克(Dirac) 奠定的量子论的符号法，系统地建立了“有序算符内的积分理论”，1998年有24篇论文被SCI收录；他对自己论文高产的解释是，研究“具有开创性，突破一点以后就可以向纵深发展，使研究工作自成系列、成面成片”。

我院被SCI收录论文最多的杨新民老师从事凸性理论研究，该理论兴起于 20世纪70年代，90年代进入高峰。

作为新兴研究领域，该理论本身有许多尚待研究之处，同时该理论也可用来解决最优化方面的问题。

反之，有人由于所接触的问题已处于该研究分支的末端，即使在该点上有所突破，也难持续发展。

SCI论文写作技巧

SCI论文写作技巧
二写好论文的先决条件
1）为什么写论文
2）写论文忌讳什么：惰性 a) 只说不练； b) 坐不住； c) 三天打渔，两天晒网; d) 遇到问题一拖再拖或是依赖别人; e) 一心二用甚至几用。
3）如何言之有物，思如泉涌
态度决定一切! SCI论文写作技巧
三如何构思一篇论文
（一）论文的结构 Introduction： (最体现思路的地方) Methodology: 研究区域
❖ 参考前人的致谢句型，换上自己的项目号和要感谢的人和机构（2-3句话）。
❖ The funding of this research was provided by “Prestudy on air quality criteria for particulate matter.” (2007–2008 Special Environmental Research Fund for PublicWelfare, No. 200709048)
❖ 第三步：认真阅读挑选过的文献，结合自己数据和别人处理方法，完善图形和表格，并确定哪者更好；标注出别人的讨论句式，有用结论，别人引用他人的结论；再剔除部分意义不大的文献；
❖ 第四步：将标出的句式和自己的论文框架，图标分章节全部粘贴在word 文档中，附上参考文献；
❖ 第五步：整理粘贴的材料，写出前言。仔细观察图表，找出规律，从粘贴的材料中找出相同或不同的结论，找出原因（纵向对比），充分论证；
处理完数据预计能得出什么结论，和别人做的相比
有哪些不足，或是自己觉得应该进行哪些方面的改进(Conclusion)
SCI论文写作技巧
四如何进行论文写作四遍七步法
❖ 第一步：结合数据，搜索下载文献，粗略浏览题目、摘要和目录，初步定下论文题目和框架；

教你SCI如何写(超实用)

院士大牛们一年N篇7点以上SCI的诀窍院士大牛们一年N篇7点以上SCI的诀窍这是一个一年三篇IF大于7的牛人当我问道他怎么这么强的时候，他给我看的院士导师传授的发文章秘笈。

看了实在是心中有一种感觉，特奉献出来一、研究生必备四本俗话说好记性不如烂笔头，所以一定要首先养成做笔记的好习惯！作为研究生下面这几个本子是必不可少的1，实验记录本（包括试验准备本），这当然首当其冲必不可少，我就不多说了；2，Idea记录本，每次看文献对自己有用的东西先记下，由此产生的idea更不能放过，这可是做研究的本钱，好记性不如烂笔头，以后翻翻会更有想法的；3，专业概念以及理论进展记录本，每个人不可能对自己领域的概念都了如指掌，初入门者更是如此，这时候小小一个本子的作用就大了；4，讲座记录本，这本本子可能有些零杂，记录听到的内容，更要记录瞬间的灵感，以及不懂的地方，不可小视！这四本是你必不可少的，不过作为我们这些非英语专业的研究生来说，还有一个应该具备的本子就是英语好句记录本。

二、论文写作要点1、选题要小，开掘要深；不要题目很大，内容却很单薄。

2、写作前要读好书、翻阅大量资料、注意学术积累，在这个过程中，还要注重利用网络，特别是一些专业数据库3、“选题新、方法新、资料新”的三新原则（老板教导的）4、“新题新做”和“小题大做总之，一点之见即成文。

三、如何撰写实验研究论文（唐朝枢）论文发表意识：基础研究成果的表达方式；是否急于发表（创新与严谨的关系）；发表的论文与学位论文的区别（反映科学事实而不是反映作者水平）论文格式：原著、快报、简报、摘要。

不同于教科书、讲义，更不同于工作总结。

撰写前的准备工作：复习和准备好相关文献;再次审定实验目的(学术思想,Idea);实验资料完整并再次审核1.Introduction:问题的提出；研究的现状及背景；以前工作基础；本工作的目的；思路（可提假说）；对象；方法；结果。

在…模型上，观察…指标，以探讨…（目的）2. M & M⑴材料的写法和意义; 伦理.⑵程序与指标。