内部控制审计【外文翻译】
审计英语内部控制审计
审计英语内部控制审计一、考情分析根据本章内容特点，专业阶段考试以简答题的形式进行考查的可能性非常大，应当重点关注的知识点包括：内部控制审计基准日、内部控制缺陷评价、内部控制审计报告二、专业词汇内部控制：internal control基准日：base date内部控制有效性：internal control validity内部控制缺陷：internal control defects否定意见：adverse opinion无保留意见： unqualified audit opinion自上而下的方法: top-to-bottom method三、重点、难点讲解I.内部控制审计基准日I.Base date of internal control audit内部控制审计基准日，是指注册会计师评价内部控制在某一时日是否有效所涉及的基准日，也是被审计单位评价基准日，即最近一个会计期间截止日。
The base date of internal control audit refers to the base date involved when CPAs evaluate whether the internal control at a certain date is valid, and is the appraisal base date of auditee, that is the deadline of a latest accounting period.注册会计师对特定基准日内部控制的有效性发表意见，并不意味着注册会计师只测试基准日这一天的内部控制，而是需要考察足够长一段时间内部控制设计和运行的情况。
CPAs issuing opinion about the validity of internal control of specific base date, does not mean that CPAs only test internal control of base date, while need to study for a long enough time to design and operate internal control.在整合审计中，控制测试所涵盖的期间应当尽量与财务报表审计中拟信赖内部控制的期间保持一致。
审计学内部控制中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文翻译内部控制爆炸①摘要：Power的1997版书以审计社会为主题的探讨使得审计活动在联合王国（英国）和北美得到扩散。
由审计爆炸一同带动的是内部控制制度的兴起。
审计已经从审计结果转向审计制度和内部控制，它已然成为公众对公司治理和审计监管政策的辩论主题。
Power表示对什么是有效的内部控制各方说法不一。
本人对内部控制研究方面有一个合理的解释。
内部控制对非常不同概念的各个领域的会计进行探究，并研究如何控制不同水平的组织。
因此，内部控制研究的各类之间的交叉影响是有限的，而且，许多内部会计控制是研究是再更宽广的公司治理问题的背景下进行的。
所以，许多有关内部控制制度对公司治理的价值观点扔需要进行研究。
关键词：机构理论；公司治理；外部审计；内部审计；内部控制制度；管理控制1 概述Power的1997版书以审计社会为主题的探讨使得审计活动在联合王国（英国）和北美得到扩散。
由审计爆炸一同带动的是内部控制制度的兴起。
审计已经从审计结果转向审①Maastricht Accounting and Auditing Research and Education Center (MARC), Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Universiteit Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands s.maijoor@marc.unimaas.nl Fax: 31-43-3884876 Tel: 31-43-3883783计制度和内部控制，它已然成为公众对公司治理和审计监管政策的辩论主题。
例如，在最近的对于欧洲联盟内外部审计服务的内部市场形成的辩论中，监管建议建立关于内部控制和内部审计制度。
虽然对有关内部控制的价值期望高，但Power表示对什么是有效的内部控制各方说法不一。
本人对内部控制研究方面有一个合理的解释。
本科毕业论文内部控制外文文献翻译完整版中英对照
A Clear Look at Internal Controls: Theory and ConceptsHammed Arad (Philae)Department of accounting, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, IranBarak Jamshedy-NavidFaculty Member of Islamic Azad University, Kerman-shah, IranAbstract: internal control is an accounting procedure or system designed to promote efficiency or assure the implementation of a policy or safeguard assets or avoid fraud and error. Internal Control is a major part of managing an organization. It comprises the plans, methods, and procedures used to meet missions, goals, and objectives and, in doing so, support performance-based management. Internal Control which is equal with management control helps managers achieve desired results through effective stewardship of resources. Internal controls should reduce the risks associated with undetected errors or irregularities, but designing and establishing effective internal controls is not a simple task and cannot be accomplished through a short set of quick fixes. In this paper the concepts of internal controls and different aspects of internal controls are discussed. Keywords: Internal Control, management controls, Control Environment, Control Activities, Monitoring1. IntroductionThe necessity of control in new variable business environment is not latent for any person and management as a response factor for stockholders and another should implement a great control over his/her organization. Control is the activity of managing or exerting control over something. he emergence and development of systematic thoughts in recent decade required a new attention to business resource and control over this wealth. One of the hot topic a bout controls over business resource is analyzing the cost-benefit of each control.Internal Controls serve as the first line of defense in safeguarding assets and preventing and detecting errors and fraud. We can say Internal control is a whole system of controls financial and otherwise, established by the management for the smooth running of business; it includes internal cheek, internal audit and other forms of controls.COSO describe Internal Control as follow. Internal controls are the methods employed to help ensure the achievement of an objective. In accounting and organizational theory, Internal control is defined as a process effected by an organization's structure, work and authority flows, people and management information systems, designed to help the organization accomplish specific goals or objectives. It is a means by which an organization's resources are directed, monitored, and measured. It plays an important role in preventing and detecting fraud and protecting the organization's resources, both physical (e.g., machinery and property) and intangible (e.g., reputation or intellectual property such as trademarks). At the organizational level, internal control objectives relate to the reliability of financial reporting, timely feedback on the achievement of operational or strategic goals, and compliance with laws and regulations. At the specific transaction level, internal control refers to the actions taken to achieve a specific objective (e.g., how to ensure the organization's payments to third parties are for valid services rendered.) Internal controlprocedures reduce process variation, leading to more predictable outcomes. Internal controls within business entities are called also business controls. They are tools used by manager's everyday.* Writing procedures to encourage compliance, locking your office to discourage theft, and reviewing your monthly statement of account to verify transactions are common internal controls employed to achieve specific objectives.All managers use internal controls to help assure that their units operate according to plan, and the methods they use--policies, procedures, organizational design, and physical barriers-constitute. Internal control is a combination of the following：1. Financial controls, and2. Other controlsAccording to the institute of chartered accountants of India internal control is the plan of organization and all the methods and procedures adopted by the management of an entity to assist in achieving management objective of ensuring as far as possible the orderly and efficient conduct of its business including adherence to management policies, the safe guarding of assets prevention and detection of frauds and error the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records and timely preparation of reliable financial information, the system of internal control extends beyond those matters which relate to the function of accounting system. In other words internal control system of controls lay down by the management for the smooth running of the business for the accomplishment of its objects. These controls can be divided in two parts i.e. financial control and other controls.Financial controls:- Controls for recording accounting transactions properly.- Controls for proper safe guarding company assets like cash stock bank debtor etc- Early detection and prevention of errors and frauds.- Properly and timely preparation of financial records I e balance sheet and profit and loss account.- To maximize profit and minimize cost.Other controls: Other controls include the following:Quality controls.Control over raw materials.Control over finished products.Marketing control, etc6. Parties responsible for and affected by internal controlWhile all of an organization's people are an integral part of internal control, certain parties merit special mention. These include management, the board of directors (including the audit commit tee), internal auditors, and external auditors.The primary responsibility for the development and maintenance of internal control rests with an organization's management. With increased significance placed on the control environment, the focus of internal control has changed from policies and procedures to an overriding philosophy and operating style within the organization. Emphasis on these intangible aspects highlights the importance of top management's involvement in the internal control system. If internal control is not a priority for management, then it will not be one for people within the organization either.As an indication of management's responsibility, top management at a publicly owned organization will include in the organization's annual financial report to the shareholders a statement indicating that management has established a system of internal control that management believes is effective. The statement may also provide specific details about the organization's internal control system.Internal control must be evaluated in order to provide management with some assurance regarding its effectiveness. Internal control evaluation involves everything management does to control the organization in the effort to achieve its objectives. Internal control would be judged as effective if its components are present and function effectively for operations, financial reporting, and compliance. he boards of directors and its audit committee have responsibility for making sure the internal control system within the organization is adequate. This responsibility includes determining the extent to which internal controls are evaluated. Two parties involved in the evaluation of internal control are the organization's internal auditors and their external auditors.Internal auditors' responsibilities typically include ensuring the adequacy of the system of internal control, the reliability of data, and the efficient use of the organization's resources. Internal auditors identify control problems and develop solutions for improving and strengthening internal controls. Internal auditors are concerned with the entire range of an organization's internal controls, including operational, financial, and compliance controls.Internal control will also be evaluated by the external auditors. External auditors assess the effectiveness of internal control within an organization to plan the financial statement audit. In contrast to internal auditors, external auditors focus primarily on controls that affect financial reporting. External auditors have a responsibility to report internal control weaknesses (as well as reportable conditions about internal control) to the audit committee of the board of directors.8. Limitations of an Entity's Internal ControlInternal control, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity's control objectives. The likelihood of achievement is affected by limitations inherent to internal control. These include the realities that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes. For example, errors may occur in designing,Maintaining, or monitoring automated controls. If an entity’s IT personnel do not completely understand how an order entry system processes sales transactions, they may erroneously design changes to the system to process sales for a new line of products. On the other hand, such changes may be correctly designed but misunderstood by individuals who translate the design into program code. Errors also may occur in the use of information produced by IT. For example, automated controls may be designed to report transactions over a specified dollar limit for management review, but individuals responsible for conducting the review may not understand the purpose of such reports and, accordingly, may fail to review them or investigate unusual items.Additionally, controls, whether manual or automated, can be circumvented by the collusion of two or more people or inappropriate management override of internal control. For example, management may enter into side agreements with customers that alter the terms and conditions of the entity’s standard sales con tract in ways that would preclude revenuerecognition. Also, edit routines in a software program that are designed to identify and report transactions that exceed specified credit limits may be overridden or disabled.Internal control is influenced by the quantitative and qualitative estimates and judgments made by management in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of an entity’s internal control. The cost of an entity's internal control should not exceed the benefits that are expected to be derived. Although the cost-benefit relationship is a primary criterion that should be considered in designing internal control, the precise measurement of costs and benefits usually is not possible.Custom, culture, and the corporate governance system may inhibit fraud, but they are not absolute deterrents. An effective control environment, too, may help reduce the risk of fraud. For example, an effective board of directors, audit committee, and internal audit function may constrain improper conduct by management. Alternatively, the control environment may reduce the effectiveness of other components. For example, when the nature of management incentives increases the risk of material misstatement of financial statements, the effectiveness of control activities may be reduced.9. Balancing Risk and ControlRisk is the probability that an event or action will adversely affect the organization. The primary categories of risk are errors, omissions, delay and fraud In order to achieve goals and objectives, management needs to effectively balance risks and controls. Therefore, control procedures need to be developed so that they decrease risk to a level where management can accept the exposure to that risk. By performing this balancing act "reasonable assurance” can be attained. As it relates to financial and compliance goals, being out of balance can causebe proactive, value-added, and cost-effective and address exposure to risk.11. ConclusionThe concept of internal control and its aspects in any organization is so important, therefore understanding the components and standards of internal controls should be attend by management. Internal Control is a major part of managing an organization. Internal control is an accounting procedure or system designed to promote efficiency or assure the implementation of a policy or safeguard assets or avoid fraud and error. According to custom definition, Internal Control is a process affected by an entity's board of directors, management and other personnel designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories namely. The major factors of internal control are Control environment, Risk assessment, Control activities, Information and communication, Monitoring. This article reviews the main standards and principles of internal control and described the relevant concepts of internal control for all type of company.内部控制透视：理论与概念哈米德阿拉德（Philae）会计系，伊斯兰阿扎德大学，哈马丹，伊朗巴克Joshed -纳维德哈尼学院会员伊斯兰阿扎德大学，克尔曼伊朗国王，伊朗摘要：内部控制是会计程序或控制系统，旨在促进效率或保证一个执行政策或保护资产或避免欺诈和错误。
内部控制外文文献及翻译
LNTU---Acc附录A关于内部控制的意见如果要证明功能扩展到包含内部控制的有效性，那么报告准则则必须制定，若干基本问题必须被解决。
随着日益频繁增长，审计员听取了他们应该发表的一个效力于客户的内部控制制度建议的意见。
这一证明功能扩展的主张者迅速指出，目前已经有了实例如独立审计师的报告公开他们的客户的内部控制制度和一些政府机构的成效，包括一些空置中的美国证券和交易委员会，都需要一个报告。
这些证实类型的反对者公布了任何关于内部控制的有效性，他们认为，目前有显着性差异监管机构的报告要求和提出意见的内部控制将会误导公众。
现状报告虽然审计员的报告中的一些情况提及了内部控制的性质，但作出的本质陈述还有很大不同的效应。
大型银行。
关于对内部控制的观点事实上出现在一些大型银行和看法发行的年度报告中。
有时这些意见是被董事会要求的。
例如，下面的主张出现在1969年年度报告的一个大型纽约银行中，作为第3款的独立会计师的标准短形式的报告：我们的审核工作包括评价有效性，大块的内部会计控制，其中还包括内部审计。
我们认为，在于程序的影响下，再加上银行内部审计工作人员所进行的审核，这些构成一个有效的系统的内部会计控制。
意见被提供给几个其他银行，但它们基本上引用的意见是一样的。
美国证券交易委员会的规定。
美国证券交易委员会表格X-17A-5，要求独立审计师作出某些有关的内部控制陈述，并必须在每年的大多数成员国家与每一个证券经纪或注册的交易商根据1934年证券交易法第15条进行交流时。
此外，美国证券交易委员会的第17a-5(g)规定要求独立的核数师的报告要包含“一份如，是否会计师审查了程序，要安全措施保障客户的证券的声明中”此外，许多股票交易所要求该报告要表明审查已取得的“会计制度，内部会计控制和程序，是为维护证券，包括适当的测试它们对以后的期间，检验日期前”，很显然，美国证券交易委员会的工作人员更倾向于考虑，会计师包括了语言相似，所要求的所有报告的交流提交给证券交易委员会。
审计英语内部控制审计
审计英语内部控制审计一、考情分析根据本章内容特点，专业阶段考试以简答题的形式进行考查的可能性非常大，应当重点关注的知识点包括：内部控制审计基准日、内部控制缺陷评价、内部控制审计报告二、专业词汇内部控制：internal control基准日：base date内部控制有效性：internal control validity内部控制缺陷：internal control defects否定意见：adverse opinion无保留意见： unqualified audit opinion自上而下的方法: top-to-bottom method三、重点、难点讲解I.内部控制审计基准日I.Base date of internal control audit内部控制审计基准日，是指注册会计师评价内部控制在某一时日是否有效所涉及的基准日，也是被审计单位评价基准日，即最近一个会计期间截止日。
The base date of internal control audit refers to the base date involved when CPAs evaluate whether the internal control at a certain date is valid, and is the appraisal base date of auditee, that is the deadline of a latest accounting period.注册会计师对特定基准日内部控制的有效性发表意见，并不意味着注册会计师只测试基准日这一天的内部控制，而是需要考察足够长一段时间内部控制设计和运行的情况。
CPAs issuing opinion about the validity of internal control of specific base date, does not mean that CPAs only test internal control of base date, while need to study for a long enough time to design and operate internal control.在整合审计中，控制测试所涵盖的期间应当尽量与财务报表审计中拟信赖内部控制的期间保持一致。
内部控制外文文献及翻译
中文4500字本科生毕业设计（论文）外文原文及译文所在系管理系学生姓名郭淼专业会计学班级学号指导教师2013年6月外文文献原文及译文Internal ControlEmergence and development of the theory of the evolution of the internal controlInternal control in Western countries have a long history of development, according to the internal control characteristics at different stages of development, the development of internal control can be divided into four stages, namely the internal containment phase, the internal control system phase, the internal control structure phase, overall internal control framework stage.Internal check stages: infancy internal controlBefore the 1940s, people used to use the concept of internal check. This is the embryonic stage of internal control. "Keshi Accounting Dictionary" definition of internal check is "to provide effective organization and mode of operation, business process design errors and prevent illegal activities occur. Whose main characteristic is any individual or department alone can not control any part of one or the right way to conduct business on the division of responsibility for the organization, each business through the normal functioning of other individuals or departments for cross-examination or cross-control. designing effective internal check to ensure that all businesses can complete correctly after a specified handler in the process of these provisions, the internal containment function is always an integral part. "The late 1940s, the internal containment theory become important management methods and concepts. Internal check on a "troubleshooting a variety of measures" for the purpose of separation of duties and account reconciliation as a means to money and accounting matters and accounts as the main control object primary control measures. Its characteristics are account reconciliation and segregation of duties as the main content and thus cross-examination or cross-control. In general, the implementation of internal check function can be roughly divided into the following four categories: physical containment; mechanical containment; institutional containment; bookkeeping contain. The basic idea is to contain the internal "security is the result of checks and balances," which is based on two assumptions: First: two or more persons1西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）or departments making the same mistake unconsciously chance is very small; Second: Two or more the possibility of a person or department consciously partnership possibility of fraud is much lower than a single person or department fraud. Practice has proved that these assumptions are reasonable, internal check mechanism for organizations to control, segregation of duties control is the foundation of the modern theory of internal control.Internal control system phases:generating of internal controlThe late1940s to the early1970s, based on the idea of internal check, resulting in the concept of the internal control system, which is the stage in the modern sense of internal control generated. Industrial Revolution has greatly promoted the major change relations of production, joint-stock company has gradually become the main form of business organization of Western countries, in order to meet the requirements of prevailing socio-economic relations,to protect the economic interests of investors and creditors, the Western countries have legal requirements in the form of strengthen the corporate financial and accounting information as well as internal management of this economic activity.In 1934, the "securities and exchange act" issued by the U.S. government for the first time puts forward the concept of "internal accounting control", the implementation of general and special authorization book records, trading records, and compared different remedial measures such as transaction assets. In 1949, the American institute of certified public accountants (AICPA) belongs to the audit procedures of the committee (CPA) in the essential element of internal control: the system coordination, and its importance to management department and the independence of certified public accountants' report, the first official put forward the definition of internal control: "the design of the internal control includes the organization and enterprise to take all of the methods and measures to coordinate with each other. All of these methods and measures used to protect the property of the enterprise, to check the accuracy of accounting information, improve the efficiency of management, promote enterprise stick to established management guidelines." The definition from the formulation and perfecting the inner control of the organization, plan, method and measures such as rules and regulations to implement internal control, break through the limitation of control related to the financial and accounting department directly, the four objectives of internal control, namely the enterprise in commercial2外文文献原文及译文activities to protect assets, check the veracity and reliability of financial data, improve the work efficiency, and promote to management regulations. The definition of positive significance is to help management authorities to strengthen its management, but the scope of limitation is too broad. In 1958, the commission issued no. 29 audit procedures bulletin "independent auditors evaluate the scope of internal control", according to the requirements of the audit responsibility, internal control can be divided into two aspects, namely, the internal accounting control and internal management control. The former is mainly related to the first two of the internal control goal, the latter mainly relates to the internal control after two goals. This is the origin of the internal control system of "dichotomy". Because the concept of management control is vague and fuzzy, in the actual business line between internal control and internal accounting control is difficult to draw. In order to clear the relations between the two, in 1972 the American institute of certified public accountants in the auditing standards announcement no. 1, this paper expounds the internal management control and internal accounting control: the definition of "internal management control including, but not limited to organization plan, and the administrative department of the authorized approval of economic business decision-making steps on the relevant procedures and records. This authorization of items approved activities is the responsibility of management, it is directly related to the management department to perform the organization's business objectives, is the starting point of the economic business accounting control." At the same time, the important content of internal accounting control degree and protect assets, to ensure that the financial records credibility related institutions plans, procedures and records. After a series of changes and redefine the meaning of the internal control is more clear than before and the specification, increasingly broad scope, and introduces the concept of internal audit, has received recognition around the world and references, the internal control system is made.The internal control structure stage: development of the internal controlTheory of internal control structure formed in the 90 s to the 1980 s, this phase of western accounting audit of internal control research focus gradually from the general meaning to specific content to deepen. During this period, the system management theory has become the new management idea, it says: no physical objects in the world are composed of elements of3西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）system, due to the factors, there exists a complicated nonlinear relationship between system must have elements do not have new features, therefore, should be based on the whole the relationship between elements. System management theory will enterprise as a organic system composed of subsystems on management, pay attention to the coordination between the subsystems and the interaction with the environment. In the modern company system and system management theory, under the concept of early already cannot satisfy the need of internal control systems. In 1988, the American institute of certified public accountants issued "auditing standards announcement no. 55", in the announcement, for the first time with the word "internal control structure" to replace the original "internal control", and points out that: "the enterprise's internal control structure including provide for specific target reasonable assurance of the company set up all kinds of policies and procedures". The announcement that the internal control structure consists of control environment, accounting system (accounting system), the control program "three components, the internal control as a organic whole composed of these three elements, raised to the attention of the internal control environment.The control environment, reflecting the board of directors, managers, owners, and other personnel to control the attitude and behavior. Specific include: management philosophy and operating style, organizational structure, the function of the board of directors and the audit committee, personnel policies and procedures, the way to determine the authority and responsibility, managers control method used in the monitoring and inspection work, including business planning, budgeting, forecasting, profit plans, responsibility accounting and internal audit, etc.Accounting systems, regulations of various economic business confirmation, the collection, classification, analysis, registration and preparing method. An effective accounting system includes the following content: identification and registration of all legitimate economic business; Classifying the various economic business appropriate, as the basis of preparation of statements; Measuring the value of economic business to make its currency's value can be recorded in the financial statements; Determine the economic business events, to ensure that it recorded in the proper accounting period; Describe properly in the financial statements of4外文文献原文及译文economic business and related content.The control program, refers to the management policies and procedures, to ensure to achieve certain purpose. It includes economic business and activity approval; Clear division of the responsibility of each employee; Adequate vouchers and bills setting and records; The contact of assets and records control; The business of independent audit, etc. Internal structure of control system management theory as the main control thought, attaches great importance to the environmental factors as an important part of internal control, the control environment, accounting system and control program three elements into the category of internal control; No longer distinguish between accounting control and management control, and uniform in elements describe the internal control, think the two are inseparable and contact each other.Overall internal control framework stages: stage of internal controlAfter entering the 1990 s, the study of internal control into a new stage. With the improvement of the corporate governance institutions, the development of electronic information technology, in order to adapt to the new economic and organizational form, using the new management thinking, "internal control structure" for the development of "internal control to control the overall framework". In 1992, the famous research institutions internal control "by organization committee" (COSO) issued a landmark project - "internal control - the whole framework", also known as the COSO report, made the unification of the internal control system framework. In 1994, the report on the supplement, the international community and various professional bodies widely acknowledged, has wide applicability. The COSO report is a historical breakthrough in the research of internal control theory, it will first put forward the concept of internal control system of the internal control by the original planar structure for the development of space frame model, represents the highest level of the studies on the internal control in the world.The COSO report defines internal control as: "designed by enterprise management, to achieve the effect and efficiency of the business, reliable financial reporting and legal compliance goals to provide reasonable assurance, by the board of directors, managers and other staff to5西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）implement a process." By defining it can be seen that the COSO report that internal control is a process, will be affected by different personnel; At the same time, the internal control is a in order to achieve business objectives the group provides reasonable guarantee the design and implementation of the program. The COSO report put forward three goals and the five elements of internal control. The three major target is a target business objectives, information and compliance. Among them, the management goal is to ensure business efficiency and effectiveness of the internal control; Information goal is refers to the internal control to ensure the reliability of the enterprise financial report; Compliance goal refers to the internal controls should abide by corresponding laws and regulations and the rules and regulations of the enterprise.COSO report that internal control consists of five elements contact each other and form an integral system, which is composed of five elements: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, monitoring and review.Control Environment: It refers to the control staff to fulfill its obligation to carry out business activities in which the atmosphere. Including staff of honesty and ethics, staff competence, board of directors or audit committee, management philosophy and management style, organizational structure, rights and responsibilities granted to the way human resources policies and implementation.Risk assessment: It refers to the management to identify and take appropriate action to manage operations, financial reporting, internal or external risks affecting compliance objectives, including risk identification and risk analysis. Risk identification including external factors (such as technological development, competition, changes in the economy) and internal factors (such as the quality of the staff, the company nature of activities, information systems handling characteristics) to be checked. Risk analysis involves a significant degree of risk estimates to assess the likelihood of the risk occurring, consider how to manage risk.Control activities: it refers to companies to develop and implement policies and procedures, and 6外文文献原文及译文to take the necessary measures against the risks identified in order to ensure the unit's objectives are achieved. In practice, control activities in various forms, usually following categories: performance evaluation, information processing, physical controls, segregation of duties.Information and communication: it refers to enable staff to perform their duties, to provide staff with the exchange and dissemination of information as well as information required in the implementation, management and control operations process, companies must identify, capture, exchange of external and internal information. External information, including market share, regulatory requirements and customer complaints and other information. The method of internal information including accounting system that records created by the regulatory authorities and reporting of business and economic matters, maintenance of assets, liabilities and owners' equity and recorded. Communication is so that employees understand their responsibilities to maintain control over financial reporting. There are ways to communicate policy manuals, financial reporting manuals, reference books, as well as examples such as verbal communication or management.Monitoring: It refers to the evaluation of internal controls operation of the quality of the process, namely the reform of internal control, operation and improvement activities evaluated. Including internal and external audits, external exchanges.Five elements of internal control system is actually wide-ranging, interrelated influence each other. Control environment is the basis for the implementation of other control elements; control activities must be based on the risks faced by companies may have a detailed understanding and assessment basis; while risk assessment and control activities within the enterprise must use effective communication of information; Finally, effective monitoring the implementation of internal control is a means to protect the quality. Three goals and five elements for the formation and development of the internal control system theory laid the foundation, which fully reflects the guiding ideology of the modern enterprise management idea that security is the result of systems management. COSO report emphasizes the integration framework and internal control system composed of five elements, the framework for the7西安交通大学城市学院本科毕业设计（论文）establishment of an internal control system, operation and maintenance of the foundation.In summary,because of social, economic and environmental change management, internal control functions along with the changes, in order to guide the evolution of the internal control theory. As can be seen from the history of the development of internal control theory, often derived from the internal control organizational change management requirements, from an agricultural economy to an industrial economy, innovation management methods and tools for the development of the power to bring internal controls.From the internal containment center,controlled by the internal organization of the mutual relations between the internal control of various subsystems and went to COSO as the representative to the prevention and management loopholes to prevent the goal, through the organization of control and information systems,to achieve the overall system optimization of modern internal sense of control theory, from Admiral time, corresponding to the two economic revolution.Therefore, in the analysis of foreign internal control theory and Its Evolution, requires a combination of prevailing socio-economic environment and business organization and management requirements, so as to understand the nature of a deeper internal control theory of development.8外文文献原文及译文译文：内部控制Ge.McVay一、内部控制理论的产生与发展演进内部控制在西方国家已经有比较长的发展历史，根据内部控制在不同发展阶段的特征，可以将内部控制的发展分为四个阶段，即内部牵制阶段、内部控制制度阶段、内部控制结构阶段、内部控制整体框架阶段。
内部控制【外文翻译】
外文文献翻译译文一、外文原文原文：Internal controlIntroductionThe system of internal control over financial reporting in Japan under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) was implemented as of the fiscal year starting on April 1 2008.Under this system, executive officers of listed companies are obligated to evaluate their company's internal control over financial reporting and to file the results of such evaluation in the form of an internal audit report with the Financial Services Agency (FSA). In this report, executive officers should state material weakness if they judge any material weakness exists in the company's internal control over financial reporting. The report should also be audited by outside accounting auditors before being filed with the FSA. Since most Japanese companies have a fiscal year that ends in March, June 2009 will be the first time most companies file such a report.When the internal control system was introduced, it made reference to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of the US. Under the Japanese system, clear standards were set regarding the set-up of internal controls over financial reporting in an effort to prevent the creation of excessive documentation and to control costs, two issues which had occurred in the US. However, even with such standards, some uncertainty exists. In particular, uncertainty arises regarding the connection between this system under the FIEA and the rules of the Companies Act.Failure to submit the internal audit report or submission of false statements can lead to liabilities and criminal penalties under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). However, if there is a material weakness in the company's internal controls over financial reporting and executive officers disclose such material weakness in theinternal audit report, no sanctions will be imposed under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, nor will it directly lead to the director's liabilities under the Companies Act. Rather, disclosure of such material weakness is thought to be desirable, because by disclosing such material weakness, a company can improve the quality of its internal control over financial reporting, which will enable the company to submit more accurate financial reports in the future.Internal control is a process-effected by an entity's board of directors, management, and other personnel--designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Internal control consists of the following five interrelated components.1、Control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure.2、Risk assessment is the entity's identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of its objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed.3、Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure that management directives are carried out.4、Information and communication are the identification, capture, and exchange of information in a form and time frame that enable people to carry out their responsibilities.5、Monitoring is a process that assesses the quality of internal control performance over time.The interlaced audit issue is as follows: under the internal control system of the Companies Act, company auditors must audit the method and the results of the accounting audit conducted by outside accounting auditors. On the other hand, the internal control system of the FIEA requires the outside accounting auditors to auditthe company auditors' monitoring of internal financial controls. Therefore, company auditors that audit outside accounting auditors under the Companies Act are audited by the same outside accounting auditors under the FIEA. This interlaced audit however is expected to make each audit more effective because the company auditor and the outside accounting auditor will each monitor the audit of the other.The time lag issue is expected to arise due to the timing of the submissions of the various audit reports required under the FIEA and the Companies Act. Company auditors will need to prepare and submit audit reports regarding the execution of duties by directors for the fiscal year as required by the Companies Act. However, it is expected that these audit reports will be submitted before the internal audit report required under the FIEA is submitted and audited by the outside accounting auditors. Thus, if the internal audit report points out a material weakness that was not referred to in the audit reports prepared by the company auditor, the company auditor will be placed in a difficult position and will need to decide whether to amend and make changes to the audit reports as such audit reports should also disclose such weaknesses. However, if the directors, the company auditors, and the accounting auditors are cooperating properly, this issue would not arise.It is expected that the system of internal control over financial reporting will prompt companies to build better control systems through cooperation between the directors, company auditors and outside accounting auditors.Connection between the two internal control systemsOn the internal financial controls and internal accounting control the similarities and differences.A difference between monitoring and control objectives.Reason for the difference between the two, simply because of financial supervision and control of the target company's material flow and cash flow, and accounting internal control object is the information flow. Understanding of Marx's words, “the production and the production of bookkeeping records are two different things after all, just to ship the same loading and shipping order are two differentthings.” Corporate material production process is based on the currency as the leading material movement, production and operation of the currency as the beginning and the end result, is achieving its goal of expanding the value of value. And accounting control is passed that have occurred in the material flow, capital flow formed by the flow of information to be the recognition, measurement, reporting. The former to productivity gains, the latter objective, the real target. However, operation of the accounting value of enterprise assets, after all, subordinate to the overall objective, we should also ask for the overall objective of internal control should also be an asset value of its end. Why is this request? This is because the production activities of financial decisions and accounting need to subordinate corporate financial activities, accounting control objectives are to be subject to financial control target.Internal accounting control system is now setting goals, still remain in traditional accounting supervision and legal, reasonable levels, while ignoring the principles of economic efficiency, not subordinated to the overall goal of corporate finance. We know that even if the security integrity of corporate assets and personnel compliance. However, poor economic efficiency of enterprises can not continue to exist, then such an accounting internal control system, despite the integrity of the specification how beneficial for them? Accounting supervision, internal accounting controls, is the business management of the important part, if not for the continued survival and development of enterprises play a useful role, it is indeed sad . Although the internal financial control and internal accounting control objectives differ, but the overall goal should always be consistent. Accounting control objectives should always be subject to financial supervision and corporate goals. Accounting internal controls for business expenses from their own legitimacy and rationality to make judgments, give expenditure or expenditure not to start. This is the person in charge of the accounting organization's powers. The specific operation is completed by the cashier. Economic business is completed, signed by the person in charge, after verification of the accounting charge, the decision to grant or not to grant reimbursement claims. Practices through review of the original certificate and found areas of doubt or vulnerability. In acheck, be controlled when reimbursement. Another major accounting internal control task is to ensure that the accounting information provided by an objective, true, complete and timely.Financial internal control is based on the financial accounts of enterprises as the main target of supervision, to consider the legality of the decision-making costs, reasonable, and consistent with the principles of economic interests. The right balance of enterprises in the enterprise legal person units, in determining the expenditure, the accounting bodies and accounting personnel to provide business only the amount of funds available for expenditure obligations, and no decision-making rights. Usually the meeting was the participation by the general accountant, accounting bodies and accounting personnel did not participate in conference events. Therefore, the financial supervision to monitor the main orientation is very necessary. Financial supervision should be in advance of supervision as well, so that you can not burn in prevention. Matter of course, need supervision in order to promptly correct the error.From a doctrinal perspective the Catholic Church is highly centralized under the authority of the pope and his bishops. However, from an administrative perspective the church is quite decentralized with each diocese and each parish within the diocese having a fair amount of autonomy. Dioceses have virtually no external or regulatory oversight of their financial statements. Unlike corporations which provide quarterly financial statements to the SEC and hold quarterly conference calls with outside analysts, the church is subject to almost no recurring outside financial scrutiny. Many dioceses voluntarily post their audited annual financial statements on their website at the conclusion of the year-end audit. Additionally, many dioceses provide parishioners with an annual financial and administrative newsletter which provides a highly summarized view of the cash flows for the year and the results of social and spiritual programs offered by the diocese. But many other dioceses do neither. Since they are not required by law to be transparent and accountable in their finances, they choose to keep their finances private.Corporate Financial ControlsRecent scandals, such as the Enron and Tyco scandals, contributed to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. This has resulted in U.S. corporations undergoing intensive review, analysis, and testing of their internal control structures.The primary focus of the Sarbanes-Oxley bill is on fraudulent financial reporting. In a number of high-profile cases, management aggressively recognized revenue or manipulated (deferred) expenses to purposely make the company look better than it really was. This financial reporting chicanery had the impact of inflating the stock price which greatly benefited top management, holders of large blocks of the companies’ stock and stock options.Fraudulent financial reporting is much less of a concern for the dioceses and other not-for-profit entities. Safeguarding an entity’s assets is a bigger concern for not-for-profit entities. Revelations of embezzlements in not-for-profit entities are routinely reported in the media. Occasionally, those embezzlements occur at the highest levels of the organization. For example, the Orthodox Church of America recently fired its chancellor and began an audit. The chancellor is at the center of allegations brought by the former church treasurer of missing money, diverted cash, and un-audited accounts totaling millions of dollars. A pastor in the Bridgeport, Connecticut Catholic diocese was investigated on charges that he misspent $1.4 million of parish donations. Four purchasing agents for the archdiocese of New York allegedly extorted over two million dollars in a kickback scheme over eight years from various food vendors to maintain lavish lifestyles. The church lost over one million dollars by having to pay higher prices for the food being purchased for schools and parishes.There have been a number of studies that have documented the importance of and the general inadequacy of internal financial controls in churches. Others have focused on the relationship between the spiritual aspects of a church and its accounting practices.The objectives of the internal financial control structure of an entity are:1. Provide reliable financial statements and accounting records2. Safeguard the entity’s assets3. Promote operational efficiency and effectiveness4. Promote adherence to management’s policies and proceduresAn effective internal control structure consists of three levels:1. Control environment2. Accounting system3. Control proceduresRegardless of whether the entity is a Fortune 500 company or a diocese of the Catholic Church, the objectives of the internal control structure remain the same.They have difficulty separating duties and employees often have little supervision by a qualified financial manager. A fundamental tenet of internal accounting control is to keep the financial recordkeeping duties separate from those individuals that have access to assets, especially cash.Source: Jean C. Bedard, 2009 “Internal control”. T he Accounting Rreview.V ol.84,No.3.pp.839-867.二、翻译文章译文：内部控制介绍内部控制下的财务报告在日本的金融商品交易法（FIEA）下系统实施是从2008年4月1日开始的。
内控审计 英语
内控审计英语Internal Control AuditInternal control is a crucial aspect of any organization's operations, as it ensures the effectiveness and efficiency of its activities, the reliability of its financial reporting, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The internal control audit is a systematic process that evaluates the design and implementation of an organization's internal control system, identifying any weaknesses or deficiencies, and providing recommendations for improvement. This paper will explore the significance of internal control audits, the key components of the audit process, and the benefits of a well-designed internal control system.The primary objective of an internal control audit is to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of an organization's internal control system. This includes evaluating the control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. The control environment sets the tone of the organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. Risk assessment involves the identification and analysis of relevant risks that could prevent the achievement of organizational objectives.Control activities are the policies and procedures implemented to mitigate identified risks. Information and communication refer to the quality and timeliness of information used for decision-making and the channels of communication within the organization. Monitoring activities ensure the ongoing evaluation of the internal control system's performance and the timely implementation of corrective actions.The internal control audit process typically involves several key steps. The first step is to understand the organization's operations, its business objectives, and the risks it faces. This includes reviewing relevant policies, procedures, and documentation, as well as conducting interviews with key personnel. The next step is to evaluate the design of the internal control system, assessing whether the controls in place are appropriate and adequate to address the identified risks. This may involve testing the effectiveness of controls through sample-based testing, observations, and analytical procedures.The third step in the internal control audit process is to assess the implementation of the internal control system. This involves verifying whether the controls are being consistently applied and functioning as intended. The auditor may also evaluate the competence and training of the personnel responsible for implementing the controls. The final step is to communicate the audit findings andrecommendations to the organization's management and those charged with governance. This includes identifying any control deficiencies, their potential impact, and suggesting corrective actions to enhance the overall effectiveness of the internal control system.The benefits of a well-designed and effectively implemented internal control system are numerous. First and foremost, it helps to ensure the reliability and accuracy of financial reporting, reducing the risk of errors, fraud, and financial misstatements. This, in turn, enhances the organization's credibility and trust with stakeholders, such as investors, regulators, and the general public. Additionally, a strong internal control system can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of operations by streamlining processes, reducing waste, and ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations.Furthermore, an internal control audit can provide valuable insights into the organization's risk management practices, helping to identify and address potential vulnerabilities before they become significant issues. This proactive approach can lead to improved decision-making, better resource allocation, and enhanced overall organizational performance.In conclusion, the internal control audit is a crucial component of an organization's governance and risk management framework. By evaluating the design and implementation of the internal controlsystem, the audit process helps to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, the efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The benefits of a well-designed internal control system are far-reaching, contributing to the overall success and sustainability of the organization. As such, regular internal control audits should be a priority for any organization committed to maintaining a robust and effective internal control environment.。
乌克兰的内部审计和内部控制系统研究外文翻译(可编辑)
乌克兰的内部审计和内部控制系统研究外文翻译（可编辑）乌克兰的内部审计和内部控制系统研究外文翻译外文翻译Ukraine internal audit and internal control studyMaterial Source: Documents & Reports Author: International Finance Corporation Of the 67 companies surveyed, 48 percent of the companies responded that they had an internal audit departmentOnly 9 percent of the respondents planned to create an internal audit in the future. The rest of companies indicated that they do “some checks” and, in 15 percentof the respondents, some internal audit functions are performed by the external auditorsTypically, where “some checks ” are performed, theywould be done in connection with a special situation and/or problem and not as an on-going control measure.Only companies having an internal audit department answered the questions about the operation and structure of the internal audit function. Out of 67 surveyed, 32 companies with an internal audit department provided answers.44 percent of respondents indicated that the internal audit department is not managed as a separate corporate function with its own budget and organizational structureThe absence of a separate budget and organization for the internal audit department appears inconsistentwith the independence standard for an effective internal audit function.In more than half of the companies surveyed, the internal audit department hasexisted for one to five years. In another quarter of those surveyed, the function has been operating for more than five years. The rest of companies have had an internal audit function for less than one year.Almost half of the companies with internal audit departments 45 percent spend less than $50,000 annually to maintain the internal audit functionThat cost seems quite low and may be distorted by those companies responding negatively to the above question about an independent budget unit. 46 percent of the companies spend between $50,000 and $300,000 which appears a more reasonable range to maintain an effective internal audit function.Subordination and ReportingEmployees of the internal audit department are subordinated and accountable to executive management in 56 percent of surveyed companies, which is, again, inconsistent with the independence standard. In only a minority of the companies 35 percent there are the internal auditors reporting to Supervisory Board or Audit CommitteeSince multiple answers were possible to this survey question, overlap likely exists between members of the various groups listed.The issue of independence is again highlighted in the response tothe question below where, in more than 40 percent of the companies, representatives of top management are involved in issues of internal audit.Use of Audit ResultsThe profile of those who utilize the internal audit department reports again, multiple answers were possible is what would be expectedInformation in the internal auditors ' report may well require corrective action at various levels within an organization and management would bedelegating such action in a majority of casesHowever, the low level of involvement by the Risk Management/Internal Control Department 16 percent may indicate the absence of such a department in most surveyed companies.The internal audit department of a company does not provide information to state regulatory bodies in 94 percent of cases. The exception occurs when providing information to the State Commission for Securities and Capital Markets.Priority Ranking of Internal Audit ActivityWhen asked to rank the possible roles of internal audit, all activities listed, with the exception of support for environmental and social responsibility, were exceeded 3.5 on a scale of one to fiveIt is encouraging to note that those activities with the highest ranking included control over preservation of assets 4.6, independent evaluationof internal control 4.5, and risk management 4.1.StaffThe internal audit departments of the surveyed companies have a total of 172 staff membersFor almost 70 percent of respondents the number of internal auditors was five or lessThis result would be consistent with the relatively small maintenance costs reported above and indicates the limited resources devoted to internal auditThe professional qualities of the internal audit department employees, based on a one to five grade scale, were ranked strongSeveral key skills were ranked above fourThe exception to the overall strong rankings was expertise in risk management which was ranked 3.4This latter ranking may indicate a lack of understanding about the role of internal audit in risk management or a lack ofexpertise in risk management in the market.Only one-fourth of the internal audit department employees in the surveyed companies have professional certifications. Of that percentage, only 2 percent of employees hold a certificate from the International Institute of Internal Auditors CIAThis could indicate that the professional practice of internal auditing and the overall professional standing of the internal auditor are not well developed in Ukraine.Audit Methodology and ProcessThe role and importance of the internal audit department in the majority of respondents 69 percent are defined by the charter on the internal audit department. In one-fourth of those surveyed, the role of the internal audit department is specified in the charter on internal control.The majority of respondents said that the main document that regulates the activity of the internal audit department was the charter on the internal audit department and 41 percent of the surveyed companies mentioned that procedures of the internal audit department regulated the activity of the department multiple answers were possible. A somewhat surprising percentage 19 percent of respondents did not have documentation for the internal audit department.In almost all companies where there is an internal audit department, components of the process include the analysis of business processes and operations and development of recommendations for improvement of internal controlAssessment of the effectiveness of controls and risk management are also components in a majority of the companiesThese represent important internal audit functions so it is encouraging that they are present in most of the companiesresponding.The major types of audit that the internal audit department conducts represent a broad spectrum of internal audit activity multiple answers were requested and the priority assigned to each activity by the respondent was not established in the survey resultsHowever, it is interesting to note that IT system audits are performed in only 34 percent of the companiesThe lack of focus on IT audit and controls is noted in other parts of the survey and indicates a possible deficiency in the attention given to this key control component.It was encouraging that 75 percent of the surveyed companies create an annual plan program for the internal audit department.Unfortunately, the basis for the development of the annual internal audit plan multiple answers requested appeared flawedTop management recommendations should not be considered the primary criterionMost notably, only 63 percent of the companies responded that an assessment of business risks was one factor consideredThis percentage should be higher in recognition of the importance ofrisk-based audit planning Involving External AuditorsMore than 90 percent of surveyed companies have used external auditors. In particular, almost 60 percent of companies involve external auditors periodically once a year and almost 30 percent involve external auditors several times a year.Application of Ukrainian and International Audit Standards in Department Activities The majority of respondents 71 percent stated that there was no guidance or were unsure of the existence of official Ukrainian recommendations for internal audit in companiesOnly 19 percent of respondents are sure that such recommendations exist and, in fact, usethese in their company. Nevertheless, the persons interviewed as part of the survey process were not able to concretely name the guidance, explaining that such recommendations are dispersed in various regulations, standards, decisions, and lawsThis response would indicate that there are no laws or regulations in Ukraine that specifically address the internal audit requirements and/or practices for companies.As to recognized international audit standards, one-third of surveyed companies use standards from the International Federation of Accountants IFAC and 12 percent of respondents use official recommendations from the Institute of Internal AuditorsIt should be noted that the IFAC standards apply primarily to the external auditor. Therefore, as previously mentioned, the professional practice of internal auditing does not appear widely understood in UkraineCompliance of Ukrainian Official Standards with International Standards As the previous responses indicate, the overwhelming majority 76 percent of surveyed companies were not able to evaluate whether Ukrainian internal audit recommendations complied with accepted international standards.Perspectives for Development of Internal Audit in Companies 44 percent of the respondents believe that the presence of an efficient internal audit function improves the company 's ability to attractexternal financing. However, almost half of the respondents are not sure if it does and a small minority 9 percent believes that an efficient internal audit function does not improve opportunities for attracting external financing. Accordingly, there is no widespread consensus that making an investment in an internal audit function would ultimately enhance the company 's ability to attractfinancing.Many sound factors determining internal audit development were identified by the respondents, including initial public offerings IPOs and the need for investment multiple responses were requestedSomewhat surprisingly, however, 41 percent thought that the transition to International Accounting Standards IAS determined the development of internal auditThe internal auditors do not typically play a major role in the IAS transition process although they could be involved in some aspects of the related financial reporting complianceOnce again, only 16 percent of the companies listed the factor related to IT systemsMore than half of the respondents chose “ increasing efficiencyand effectiveness, ” “improv ing the qualifications of internalauditors, ” and “improvement of the internal audit methodology and expansion of its coverage ” as key issues concerning the organizationand functioning of the internal audit department. Almost 38 percent of respondents indicated that the information provided by internal auditors is used for decision making. A third of respondents also mentioned obtaining knowledge of IAS as a key factor, which is not normally a key component of the internal auditor 's role.Reasons for Absence of the Internal Audit Function in Companies For those companies that did not have an internal audit department 52 percent of surveyed companies, approximately 40 percent of respondents indicated that the reason for this was that the company was too small or that the business processes of the company were too simple. Another 20 percent responded that it was either difficult to provide a reason or that the owners did not think it was necessary.译文乌克兰的内部审计和内部控制系统研究资料来源:文件和报告作者: 国际财经合作在接受调查的67个公司中, 有百分之四十八的公司拥有自己的内部审计部门。
内部控制【外文翻译】
内部控制【外文翻译】外文文献翻译译文一、外文原文原文：Internal controlIntroductionThe system of internal control over financial reporting in Japan under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) was implemented as of the fiscal year starting on April 1 2008.Under this system, executive officers of listed companies are obligated to evaluate their company's internal control over financial reporting and to file the results of such evaluation in the form of an internal audit report with the Financial Services Agency (FSA). In this report, executive officers should state material weakness if they judge any material weakness exists in the company's internal control over financial reporting. The report should also be audited by outside accounting auditors before being filed with the FSA. Since most Japanese companies have a fiscal year that ends in March, June 2009 will be the first time most companies file such a report.When the internal control system was introduced, it made reference to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of the US. Under the Japanese system, clear standards were set regarding the set-up of internal controls over financial reporting in an effort to prevent the creation of excessive documentation and to control costs, two issues which had occurred in the US. However, even with such standards, some uncertainty exists. In particular, uncertainty arises regarding the connection between this system under the FIEA and the rules of the Companies Act.Failure to submit the internal audit report or submission of false statements can lead to liabilities and criminal penalties under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA). However, if there is a material weakness in the company's internal controls over financial reporting and executive officers disclose such material weakness in theinternal audit report, no sanctions will be imposed under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, nor will it directly lead to the director's liabilities under the Companies Act. Rather, disclosure of such material weakness is thought to be desirable, because by disclosing such material weakness, a company can improve the quality of its internal control over financial reporting, which will enable the company to submit more accurate financial reports in the future.Internal control is a process-effected by an entity's board of directors, management, and other personnel--designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: reliability of financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Internal control consists of the following five interrelated components.1、Control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure.2、Risk assessment is the entity's identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of its objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed.3、Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure that management directives are carried out.4、Information and communication are the identification, capture, and exchange of information in a form and time frame that enable people to carry out their responsibilities.5、Monitoring is a process that assesses the quality of internal control performance over time.The interlaced audit issue is as follows: under the internal control system of the Companies Act, company auditors must audit the method and the results of the accounting audit conducted by outside accounting auditors. On the other hand, the internal control system of the FIEA requires the outside accounting auditors to auditthe company auditors' monitoring of internal financial controls. Therefore, company auditors that audit outside accounting auditors under the Companies Act are audited by the same outside accounting auditors under the FIEA. This interlaced audit however is expected to make each audit more effective because the company auditor and the outside accounting auditor will each monitor the audit of the other.The time lag issue is expected to arise due to the timing of the submissions of the various audit reports required under the FIEA and the Companies Act. Company auditors will need to prepare and submit audit reports regarding the execution of duties by directors for the fiscal year as required by the Companies Act. However, it is expected that these audit reports will be submitted before the internal audit report required under the FIEA is submitted and audited by the outside accounting auditors. Thus, if the internal audit report points out a material weakness that was not referred to in the audit reports prepared by the company auditor, the company auditor will be placed in a difficult position and will need to decide whether to amend andmake changes to the audit reports as such audit reports should also disclose such weaknesses. However, if the directors, the company auditors, and the accounting auditors are cooperating properly, this issue would not arise.It is expected that the system of internal control over financial reporting will prompt companies to build better control systems through cooperation between the directors, company auditors and outside accounting auditors.Connection between the two internal control systemsOn the internal financial controls and internal accounting control the similarities and differences.A difference between monitoring and control objectives.Reason for the difference between the two, simply because of financial supervision and control of the target company's material flow and cash flow, and accounting internal control object is the information flow. Understanding of Marx's words, “the production and the production of bookkeeping records are two different things after all, just to ship the same loading and shipping order are two differentthings.” Corporate material production process is based on the currency as the leading material movement, production and operation of the currency as the beginning and the end result, is achieving its goal of expanding the value of value. And accounting control is passed that have occurred in the material flow, capital flow formed by the flow of information to be the recognition, measurement, reporting. The former to productivity gains, the latter objective, the real target. However, operation of the accounting value of enterprise assets, after all, subordinate to the overall objective, we should also ask for the overall objective of internal control should also be an asset value of its end. Whyis this request? This is because the production activities of financial decisions and accounting need to subordinate corporate financial activities, accounting control objectives are to be subject to financial control target.Internal accounting control system is now setting goals, still remain in traditional accounting supervision and legal, reasonable levels, while ignoring the principles of economic efficiency, not subordinated to the overall goal of corporate finance. We know that even if the security integrity of corporate assets and personnel compliance. However, poor economic efficiency of enterprises can not continue to exist, then such an accounting internal control system, despite the integrity of the specification how beneficial for them? Accounting supervision, internal accounting controls, is the business management of the important part, if not for the continued survival and development of enterprises play a useful role, it is indeed sad . Although the internal financial control and internal accounting control objectives differ, but the overall goal should always be consistent. Accounting control objectives should always be subject to financial supervision and corporate goals. Accounting internal controls for business expenses from their own legitimacy and rationality to make judgments, give expenditure or expenditure not to start. This is the person in charge of the accounting organization's powers. The specific operation is completed by the cashier. Economic business is completed, signed by the person in charge, after verification of the accounting charge, the decision to grant or not to grant reimbursement claims. Practices through review of the original certificate and found areas of doubt or vulnerability. In acheck, be controlled when reimbursement. Another majoraccounting internal control task is to ensure that the accounting information provided by an objective, true, complete and timely.Financial internal control is based on the financial accounts of enterprises as the main target of supervision, to consider the legality of the decision-making costs, reasonable, and consistent with the principles of economic interests. The right balance of enterprises in the enterprise legal person units, in determining the expenditure, the accounting bodies and accounting personnel to provide business only the amount of funds available for expenditure obligations, and no decision-making rights. Usually the meeting was the participation by the general accountant, accounting bodies and accounting personnel did not participate in conference events. Therefore, the financial supervision to monitor the main orientation is very necessary. Financial supervision should be in advance of supervision as well, so that you can not burn in prevention. Matter of course, need supervision in order to promptly correct the error.From a doctrinal perspective the Catholic Church is highly centralized under the authority of the pope and his bishops. However, from an administrative perspective the church is quite decentralized with each diocese and each parish within the diocese having a fair amount of autonomy. Dioceses have virtually no external or regulatory oversight of their financial statements. Unlike corporations which provide quarterly financial statements to the SEC and hold quarterly conference calls with outside analysts, the church is subject to almost no recurring outside financial scrutiny. Many dioceses voluntarily post their audited annual financial statements on their website at the conclusion of the year-end audit. Additionally, many dioceses provide parishioners with an annual financial and administrativenewsletter which provides a highly summarized view of the cash flows for the year and the results of social and spiritual programs offered by the diocese. But many other dioceses do neither. Since they are not required by law to be transparent and accountable in their finances, they choose to keep their finances private.Corporate Financial Controls。
审计和内控英语
1.audit 审计2.attestation 鉴证3.credibility 可信赖程度4.audit of financial statements 财务报表审计5.agreed-upon procedures 执行商定程序6.high levels of assurance 高水平保证pilation 编制8.reliability 可靠性9.relevance 相关性10.professional skepticism 职业谨慎11.objectivity 客观性12. professional competence 专业胜任能力13.Senior/CPA-in-charge 项目经理14.audit engagement letter 业务约定书15.recurring audit 连续审计16.the client 委托人17.change CPA更换注册会计师18.the existing CPA 现任注册会计师19.the successor CPA 后任注册会计师20.the preceding CPA前任注册会计师21.issue the audit report 出具审计报告22.expert 专家23.the board of directors 董事会24.knowledge of the entity‘ s business 了解被审计单位情况25.assess material misstatement risks评估重大错报风险26.detemine the nature，timing and extent of the audit procedures 确定审计程序的性质、时间和范围27.a general knowledge of 初步了解―――的情况28.a more knowledge of 进一步了解的情况29.the prior year‘s working papers 以前年度工作底稿30.minutes of meeting 会议纪要31.business risks 经营风险32.appropriateness适当性33.accounting estimate 会计估计34.management representations 管理层声明35.going concern assumption 持续经营假设36.audit plan 审计计划37.significant audit areas 重点审计领域38.error 错误39.fraud舞弊40.modified or additional procedures 修改或追加审计程序41.misappropriation of assets 侵占资产42.transactions without substance 虚假交易43.unusual pressures 异常压力44.the suspected noncompliance 涉嫌存在违法行为45.materialiy 重要性46.exceed the materiality level 超过重要性水平47.approach the materiality level 接近重要性水平48.an acceptably low level 可接受水平49.the overall financial statement level and in related account balances and transaction levels 财务报表层和相关账户、交易层50.misstatements or omissions 错报或漏报51.aggregate 总计52.subsequent events 期后事项53.adjust the financial statements 调整财务报表54.perform additional audit procedures 实施追加的审计程序55.audit risk 审计风险56.detection risk 检查风险57.inappropriate audit opinion 不适当的审计意见58.material misstatement 重大的错报59.tolerable misstatement 可容忍错报60.the acceptable level of detection risk 可接受的检查风险61.assessed levelof material misstatement risk 重大错报风险的评估水平62.simallbusiness 小规模企业63.accountingsystem 会计系统64.testof control 控制测试65.walk-throughtest 穿行测试munication沟通67.flowchart 流程图68.reperformanceof internal control 重新执行69.auditevidence 审计证据70.substantiveprocedures 实质性程序71.assertions认定72.esistence存在73.occurrence发生pleteness完整性75.rightsand obligations 权利和义务76.valuationand allocation 计价和分摊77.cutoff截止78.accuracy准确性79.classification分类80.inspection检查81.supervisionof counting 监盘82.observation观察83.confirmation函证putation计算85.analyticalprocedures 分析程序86.vouch核对87.trace追查88.auditsampling 审计抽样89.error误差90.expectederror 预期误差91.population总体92.samplingrisk 抽样风险93.non-sampling risk 非抽样风险94.samplingunit 抽样单位95.statisticalsampling 统计抽样96.tolerableerror 可容忍误差97.therisk of under reliance 信赖不足风险98.therisk of over reliance 信赖过度风险99.therisk of incorrect rejection 误拒风险100.the risk of incorrect acceptance 误受风险101.workingtrial balance 试算平衡表102.indexand cross-referencing 索引和交叉索引103.cashreceipt 现金收入104.cashdisbursement现金支出105.bankstatement 银行对账单106.bankreconciliation 银行存款余额调节表107.balancesheet date 资产负债表日realizable value 可变现净值109.storeroom仓库110.saleinvoice 销售发票111.pricelist 价目表112.positiveconfirmation request 积极式询证函113.negativeconfirmation request消极式询证函114.purchaserequisition 请购单115.receivingreport 验收报告116.grossmargin 毛利117.manufacturingoverhead 制造费用118.materialrequisition 领料单119.inventory-taking存货盘点120.bondcertificate 债券121.stockcertificate 股票122.auditreport 审计报告123.entity被审计单位124.addresseeof the audit report 审计报告的收件人125.unqualifiedopinion 无保留意见126.qualifiedopinion 保留意见127.disclaimerof opinion 无法表示意见128.adverseopinion否定意见129 financial statement assertions 财政报告宣称130 financial 财务131 finished goods 产成品132 flowcharts 流程图133 fraud and error 舞弊134 fraud 欺诈135 fundamental principles 基本原理136 general CIS controls 一般的 CIS 控制137 general reports to mangement 对（牛犬等的）疥癣的一般报告138 going concern assumption 持续经营假设139 going concern 持续经营140 goods on sale or return 货物准许退货买卖141 goodwill 商誉142 governance 统治143 greenbury committee greenbury 委员会144 guidance for internal auditors 指导为内部审计员145 hampel committee hampel 委员会146 haphazard selection 随意选择147 hospitality 款待148 human resources 人力资源149 IAPS 1000 inter-bank confirmationprocedures IAPS 1000 在中间- 银行查证程序过程150 IAPS 1001 CIS environments-stand-alone microcomputers IAPS 1001 CIS 环境-单机微型计算器151 IAPS 1002 CIS environments-on-line computer systems IAPS 1002 CIS 环境-（与主机）联机计算器系统152 IAPS 1003 CIS environments-database systems IAPS 1003 CIS 环境- 数据库系统153 IAPS 1005 the special considerations in the audit of small entities 在小的个体审计中的 IAPS 1005 特别的考虑154 IAS 2 inventories 信息家电 2 库存155 IAS 10 events after the balance sheet date 在平衡 sheeet 日期後面的信息家电 10 事件156 IFACs code of ethics for professionalaccountants IFACs 道德准则为职业会计师157 income tax 所得税158 incoming auditors 收入审计（查帐）员159 independent estimate 独立的估计160 ineligible for appointment 无被选资格的为任命161 information technology 信息技术162 inherent risk 固有风险163 initial communication 签署通讯164 insurance 保险165 intangibles 无形166 integrity 完整性167 interim audit 中期审计168 internal auditing 内部审计169 internal auditors 内部审计师170 internal control evaluation questionnaires （ICEQs）内部控制评价调查表171 internal control questionnaires （ICQs）内部控制调查表172 internal control system 内部控制系统173 internal review assignment 内部的评论转让174 international audit and assurance standards board （IAASB）国际的审计和保证标准登船（IAASB）175 international auditing practice statements （IAPSs）国际的审计实务声明（IAPSs）176 international federation of accountants（IFAC）国际会计师联合会（IFAC）177 inventory system 盘存制度178 inventory valuation 存货估价179 ISA 230 documentation 文件编制180 ISA 240 fraud and error 国际砂糖协定 240 欺诈和错误181 ISA 250 consideration of law and regulations 法和规则的国际砂糖协定 250 考虑182 Isa 260 communications of audit matters with those charge governance 审计物质的国际砂糖协定 260 通讯由于那些索价统治183 isa 300 planning isa 300 计划编制184 isa 310 knowledge of the business 企业的 isa 310 知识185 isa 320 audit materiality 审计重要性186 isa 400 accounting and internal control isa 400会计和内部控制187 isa 402 audit considerations relating to entities using service organisations 与正在使用的个体有关的 isa 402个审计考虑服务组织188 isa 500 audit evidence 审计证据189 isa 501 audit evidence-additional considerations for specific items isa 501个审计证据- 补偿为特殊条款190 isa 510 external confirmations isa 510个外部的查证191 isa 520 analytical procedures 分析性程序192 isa 530 audit sampling 审计抽样193 isa 540 audit of accounting estimates 解释估计的 isa 540 审计194 isa 560 subsequent events 期后事项195 isa 580 management representations 管理当局声明书196 isa 610 considering the work of internalauditing isa 610 以内部审计的工作看来197 isa 620 using the work of an expert isa 620 使用专家的工作198 isa 700 auditors report on financialstatements 财务报表上的 isa 700 审计（查帐）员的报告199 isa 710 comparatives isa 710个比较的200 isa 720 other information in documents containing audited financial statements isa 720 证券包含 audited 财务报表的其他信息201 isa 910 engagement to review financialstatements isa 910 债务复阅财务报表202 isas and rss isas 和 rss203 joint monitoring unit 连接检验单位204 knowledge of the entitys business 个体的企业知识205 law and regulations 法和规则206 legal and regulations 法定权利和规则207 legal obligation 法定义务,法定责任208 levels of assurance 保险程度,保障水平209 liability 负债210 limitation on scope 审计范围限制211 limitation of audit 审计的提起诉讼的限期212 limitations of controls system 控制系统的提起诉讼的限期213 litigation and claims 诉讼和赔偿214 litigation 诉讼215 loans 借款,贷款216 long term liabilities 长期负债217 lowballing lowballing218 management 管理219 management integrity 经营完整220 management representation letter 管理当局声明书221 marketing 推销,营销,市场学222 material inconsistency 决定性的前后矛盾223 material misstatements of fact 重大误报224 materiality 重要性225 measurement 计量226 microcomputers 微型计算器227 modified reports 变更报告228 narrative notes 叙述证券229 nature 性质230 negative assurance 消极保证231 net realizable value 可实现净值232 non-current asset register 非本期的财产登记233 non-executive directors 非执行董事234 non-sampling risk 非抽样风险235 non-statutory audits 目标236 objectivity 客观性237 obligating event 负有责任事件238 obligatory disclosure 有拘束的揭示239 obtaining work 获得工作240 occurrence 出现241 on-line computer systems （与主机）联机计算器系统242 opening balances 期初余额243 operational audits 经营审计,作业审计244 operational work plans 操作上的工作计划245 opinion shopping 意见购物246 other information 其他的信息247 outsourcing internal audit 支援外包的内部核数248 overall review of financial statements 财务报表的包括一切的评论249 overdue fees 超储未付费250 overhead absorption 管理费用分配251 periodic plan 定期的计划252 permanent audit files 永久审计档案253 personal relationships 个人的亲属关系254 planning 计划编制255 population 抽样总体256 precision 精密257 preface to ISAs and RSs 国际砂糖协定的序文和债券附卖回交易258 preliminary assessment of control risk 控制风险的预备评定259 prepayments 预付款项260 presentation and disclosure 提示和揭示261 problems of accounting treatment 会计处理的问题262 procedural approach 程序上的靠近263 procedures 程序264 procedures after accepting nomination 程序过程在接受提名之后265 procurement 采购266 professional duty of confidentiality 保密的职业责任267 projection of errors 错误的规划268 provision 备抵,准备269 public duty 公共职责270 public interest 公众利益271 publicity 宣传272 purchase ledger 购货分类账273 purchases and expenses system 买和费用系统274 purchases cut-off 买截止275 put on enquiry 询价上的期货买卖276 qualified opinion 保留意见277 qualifying disclosure 合格揭示278 qualitative aspects of errors 错误的性质上的方面279 random selection 随机选择280 reasonable assurance 合理保证281 reassessing sampling risk 再评价抽样风险282 reliability 可靠性283 remuneration 报酬284 report to management 对经营的报告285 reporting 报告286 research and development costs 研究和开发成本287 reservation of title 保留288 reserves 准备,储备289 revenue and capital expenditure 岁入和资本支出290 review 评论291 review and capital expenditure 评论和资本支出292 review 评论293 review engagement 复阅债务294 rights 认股权295 rights and obligations 认股权和待付款296 rights to information 对信息的认股权297 risk and materiality 风险和重要性298 risk-based approach 以风险为基础的方式299 romalpa case romalpa 个案300 rotation of auditor appointments 审计（查帐）员任命的循环301 rules of professional conduct 职业道德守则302 sales cut-off 销售截止303 sales system 销售（货）制度304 sales tax 销售税,营业税305 sales 销售,销货306 sample size 样本量307 sampling risk 抽样风险308 sampling units 抽样单位309 schedule of unadjusted errors 未调整的错误表310 scope and objectives of internal audit 内部核数的范围和目标311 segregation of duties 职责划分312 service organization 服务组织313 significant fluctuations or unexpected relationships 可重视的（市价）波动或不能预料的亲属关系314 small entity 小的个体315 smaller entities 比较小的个体316 sole traders 个体营业者317 sources of knowledge 知识的根源318 specimen letter on internal control 内部控制上的样本证书319 stakeholders 赌款保存人320 standardised working papers 标准化工作文件321 statement 1:integrity,objectivity and independence 声明 1: 完整，客观性和独立322 statement 2:the professional duty ofconfidence 声明 2: 信任的职业责任323 statement 3: advertising ,publicity and obtaining professional work 声明 3: 广告法（学），宣传和获得专业性工作324 statement 5:changes in professionalappointment 声明 5: 在职业上的任命中的改变325 statistical sampling 统计抽样326 statutory audit 法定审计327 statutory books 法定卷册328 statutory duty 法定责任329 stewardship 总管的职务330 strategic plan 战略性计划331 stratification 分层332 subsequent events 期后事项333 substantive procedures 实词程序过程334 substantive tests 实质性测试335 sufficient appropriate audit evidence 充分的适当审计证据336 summarising errors summarising 错误337 sundry accruals 杂的应计项目338 supervision 监督339 supervisory and monitoring roles 监督的和检验角色340 suppliers statements 供应商的声明341 system and internal controls 系统和内部的控制342 systematic selection 系统选择法343 systems-based approach 以系统为基础的方式344 tangible non-current assets 有形的非流动资产345 tendering 投标,清偿346 terms of the engagement 债务的条件347 tests of control 控制的证人348 the AGM 周年大会349 the board 委员会350 three Es 三 Es351 timing 定时352 tolerable error 可容忍误差353 trade accounts payable and purchases 贸易应付帐款和买354 trade accounts payable listing 贸易应付帐款挂牌355 training 培训356 treasury 国库,库房357 TRUE 真实358 turnbull committee turnbull 委员会359 ultra vires 越权360 uncertainty 不确定性361 undue dependence 未到（支付）期的未决362 unqualified audit report 无条件的审计报告363 unqualified report 无条件的报告364 using the knowledge 使用知识365 using the work of an expert 使用专家的工作366 valuation 计价，估价367 value for money 现金（交易）价格368 voluntary disclosure 自愿披露369 wages and salaries 工资，薪金370 wages system 工资系统371 work in progress 在产品372 working papers 工作底稿分享0收藏0支持0反对0大家帮助大家！逛大家论坛是一种享受……。
内部控制外文翻译资料
Internal management, establish a sound internal control system, enterprises and the needs for enterprises to face market risks and challenges. Only in accordance with the actual situation of their own, developed to meet the needs of internal management control system, and strictly follow the implementation can be sustained, steady and healthy development.内部管理，建立健全内部控制制度，企业和企业面临的市场风险和挑战的需要。
只有按照自己的实际情况，开发出满足内部管理控制系统的需求，并严格遵照执行能够持续，稳定和健康的发展。
The so-called internal control, the means by the enterprises board of directors, managers and other staff implementation, in order to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, operating efficiency and effectiveness of existing laws and regulations to follow, and so provide reasonable assurance that the purpose of the course. Internal controls related to enterprise production and management of the control environment, risk assessment, supervision and decision-making, information and transfer and self-examination, from a business perspective on the whole in all aspects of production. Their effective implementation will undoubtedly promote enterprise production and management to a new level, to promote the rationalization of business processes and standardization.所谓内部控制，董事会的企业董事会，经理和其他员工实施的，为保证财务报告的可靠性，现有的法律法规，经营的效率和效果跟踪，并提供合理的保证，本课程的教学目的。
内部控制 内部控制与审计风险英 精品
内部控制与审计风险（英）Chapter 1 General provisionsArticle 1This standard is prepared in accordance with the General Independent Auditing Standard to establish standards for Certified Public Accountants (“CPAs”) on the study and evaluation of an entity's internal controls in the audit of financial statements， to assess audit risk， to improve audit efficiency and to ensure a high standard of professional work.Article 2The term “internal controls” in this standard refers to the policies and procedures formulated and implemented by an entity with a view to ensuring the efficient conduct of the business activities， safeguarding assets， preventing， detecting and correcting error and fraud， and ensuring the truthfulness， legitimacy and pleteness of accounting information.Internal controls include the control environment， accounting systems and control procedures.Article 3The term “audit risk” in this standard refers to the possibility of the CPA expressing an inappropriate audit opinion after performing an audit， when the financial statements contain material misstatements or omissions. Audit risk includes inherent risk， control risk and detection risk.Article 4Unless otherwise specified， CPAs should refer to this standard in performing audit work other than the audit of financial statements.Chapter 2 General principlesArticle 5When preparing the audit plan， the CPA should study and evaluate the entity's internal controls.Article 6The CPA should perform pliance tests on any internal controls， which are intended to be relied upon， to determine the impact on the nature， timing and extent of the substantive tests.Article 7The CPA should maintain professional scepticism， apply professional judgement reasonably to assess the audit risk and to design and perform relevant audit procedures in order to reduce the audit risk to an acceptable level.Article 8The CPA should document the work carried out and the results of the study and evaluation of the internal controls and the assessment of the audit risk in the audit working papers.Chapter 3 Internal controlsArticle 9It is the accounting responsibility of the entity's management to establish sound internal controls. The relevant internal controls should generally：(1) ensure that business activities are conducted in accordance with appropriate authorization;(2) ensure that all transactions and events are promptly recorded at the correct amount， in the appropriate accounts and in the proper accounting period， to enable preparation of financial statements in accordance with the relevant requirements of the accounting standards;(3) ensure that access to and handling of assets and records are permitted only in accordance with appropriate authorization; and(4) ensure that assets recorded are reconciled with the physical assets at regular intervals.Article 10When determining the reliability of internal controls， the CPA should maintain professional scepticism and pay adequate attention to the following inherent limitations of internal controls：(1) The design and implementation of internal controls are restricted by the principle of cost and benefit;(2) Internal controls tend to be directed at routine business activities;(3) Even perfectly designed internal controls may not operate effectively due to human carelessness， distraction， mis-judgement and the misunderstanding of instructions;(4) Internal controls may be circumvented through the collusion by relevant persons with parties inside or outside the entity;(5) Internal controls may be circumvented when a person responsible for exercising an internal control abuses that responsibility or submits to external pressure; and(6) Internal controls may deteriorate or bee ineffective due to changes in the operating environment and the nature of the business.Article 11When preparing the audit plan， the CPA should understand the design and operating conditions of the entity's internal controls.When determining the nature， timing and extent of the audit procedures which should be performed to understand the internal controls， the CPA should mainly consider the following factors：(1) the size and business plexity of the entity;(2) the type and plexity of the entity's data processing system;(3) audit materiality;(4) the type of relevant internal controls;(5) the documentation of relevant internal controls; and(6) the result of the assessment of inherent risk.Article 12In understanding the internal controls， the CPA should make reasonable use of previous audit experience. With regard to significant internal controls， generally the CPA may also perform the following procedures：(1) make enquiries of the entity's relevant persons and inspect the relevant internal control documentation;(2) inspect the documents and records generated by the internal controls;(3) observe the entity's business activities and the operating conditions of the internal controls; and(4) choose certain typical transactions and events and perform walkthrough tests on them.Article 13The CPA should obtain and understanding of the control environment sufficient to assess the attitudes， awareness and actions of the entity's management regarding internal controls and their importance.Major factors affecting the control environment include：(1) philosophy， methods and style of management;(2) organisational structure and methods of assigning authority and responsibility; and(3) the control system.Article 14The CPA should obtain an understanding of the accounting system sufficient to identify and understand：(1) the major classes of transactions and activities of the entity;(2) how major classes of transactions and activities are initiated;(3) significant supporting documents， accounting records and items in the financial statements; and(4) the accounting and financial reporting process for significant transactions and events.Article 15The CPA should obtain an understanding of the following major control procedures sufficient to determine the relevant audit procedures reasonably：(1) the authorisation of transactions;(2) the assignment of responsibility;(3) the control of supporting documents and records;(4) access to assets and use of records; and(5) any independent checking.Article 16Internal audit is an important ponent of the entity's control system. The CPA should consider the following factors when studying and evaluating the quality of the internal audit work to determine whether to rely on the results of the internal audit work：(1) the independence of the internal auditors;(2) the experience and petence of the internal auditors;(3) the nature， timing and extent of the internal audit procedures;(4) the sufficiency and appropriateness of the audit evidence obtained by the internal auditors; and(5) the merit placed on the internal audit work by the management.Article 17The CPA may use various methods such as narrative descriptions， questionnaires， check lists， flow charts etc. to understand and evaluate internal controls and should include them in the audit working papers.Article 18The CPA should inform the entity's management of material internal control weaknesses identified during the audit. If necessary， a management letter may be issued.Chapter 4 Audit riskArticle 19In developing the overall audit plan， the CPA should assess inherent risk at the financial statement level. Inherent risk refers to the susceptibility of an account balance， or class of transactions， to material misstatements or omissions， either individually or when aggregated with misstatements or omissions in other account balances or classes of transactions， assuming that there were no relevant internal controls.Article 20In developing the detailed audit plan， the CPA should consider the impact of the assessment of inherent risk on the material account balances or classes of transactions at the assertion level， or directly assume that inherent risk is high for the assertion.Article 21The CPA should exercise professional judgement reasonably and consider the following factors when assessing inherent risk：(1) the integrity and petence of management;(2) any changes in management， especially the financial staff;(3) any unusual pressures on management;(4) the nature of business;(5) the circumstances and factors affecting the industry in which the entity operates;(6) financial statement items likely to be susceptible to misstatements;(7) the plexity of important transactions and events which might require using the work of an expert;(8) the degree of estimation and judgement involved in determining account balances;(9) the susceptibility of assets to loss or misappropriation;(10) the occurrence of unusual or plex transactions during the accounting period，particularly near the accounting period end; and(11) the susceptibility of transactions and events to omissions in the routine accounting process.Article 22After understanding the internal controls and assessing inherent risk， the CPA should make a preliminary assessment of control risk， at the assertion level， for each material account balance or class of transactions. Control risk refers to the possibility that a misstatement or omission that could occur in an account balance or class of transactions，either individually or when aggregated with misstatements or omissions in other account balances or classes of transactions， will not be prevented， detected or corrected by the internal controls.Article 23The CPA should assess the control risk of material account balances or classes of transactions at a high level， for some or all assertions， when one or more of the following situations occurs：(1) the entity's internal controls are not effective;(2) it is difficult for the CPA to assess the effectiveness of internal controls; or(3) the CPA does not plan to perform pliance tests.Article 24When making a preliminary assessment of control risk for a financial statement assertion， the CPA should not assess the control risk at a high level when：(1) relevant internal controls are likely to prevent， detect or correct material misstatements or omissions; and(2) the CPA plans to perform pliance tests.Article 25if the CPA plans to rely on the internal controls， he should perform pliance procedures to assess the control risk. The lower the preliminary assessment of control risk， the more evidence the CPA should obtain to show that internal controls are suitably designed and operating effectively.Article 26The CPA may perform the following pliance procedures：(1) inspection of documents supporting transactions and events;(2) enquiries about， and observation of， internal control operations which leave no audit trail; and(3) reperformance of relevant internal control procedures.Article 27When one or more of the following situations occurs， the CPA may directly perform substantive procedures without performing pliance tests：(1) the relevant internal controls do not exist;(2) even though the relevant internal controls exist， the CPA， through preliminary study， discovers that the internal controls do not operate effectively; or(3) pliance tests require more work than the reduction of substantive tests that would have been achieved by performing pliance tests.Article 28Based on the results of the pliance tests， the CPA should assess whether the design and operation of the internal controls are in line with the conclusion drawn from the preliminary assessment of control risk. If there are discrepancies， the assessed level of control risk should be revised and the nature， timing and extent of substantive procedures should be modified accordingly.Article 29In a continuing engagement， the CPA may make use of the information relating to the study and evaluation of internal controls obtained in prior periods， but will need to update it.Article 30The CPA should understand whether the internal controls were applied consistently throughout the accounting period being audited. If there were obvious changes， the CPA should consider testing them separately.Article 31If pliance tests have been performed in the interim audit， the CPA， before deciding to rely entirely on their results， should consider the following factors to obtain further audit evidence for the period between interim period end and final period end：(1) the conclusion drawn from the pliance tests in the interim audit;(2) the length of the remaining period after the interim audit;(3) any changes in internal controls after the interim audit;(4) the nature and amount of the transactions and activities which occurred after the interim audit; and(5) the substantive procedures to be performed.Before concluding the audit， the CPA should， based on the results of substantive tests and other audit evidence， make a final assessment of the control risk and check whether it is in line with the conclusion drawn from the preliminary assessment of the risk. If not， the CPA should consider whether additional relevant audit procedures should be performed.Article 33As control risk and inherent risk are related， the CPA should make an overall assessment of inherent risk and control risk， and use the result as the basis for the assessment of detection risk.Detection risk refers to the possibility that substantive tests will not detect a misstatement or omission that exists in an account balance or class of transactions that could be material， either individually or when aggregated with misstatements or omissions in other account balances or classes of transactions.The assessment of inherent risk and control risk has a direct impact on the assessment of detection risk. For higher levels of inherent risk and control risk， the CPA should perform more detailed substantive procedures and should also consider their nature， timing and extent to reduce the detection risk to an acceptable level.Regardless of the result of the assessment of inherent risk and control risk， the CPA should perform substantive tests on all material account balances or classes of transactions.Article 35If， after performing relevant audit procedures， the CPA still believes that detection risk regarding an assertion for a material account balance or class of transactions cannot be reduced to an acceptable level， the CPA should express a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.Article 36The internal controls in small businesses are usually weaker， resulting in higher inherent risk and control risk. The CPA should heavily or entirely rely on substantive procedures to obtain audit evidence in order to reduce the detection risk to an acceptable level.Chapter 5 Supplementary provisionsArticle 37The Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants is responsible for the interpretation of this standard.Article 38This standard takes effect from 1 January 1997.。
内部控制审计【外文翻译】
外文翻译原文Audits of Internal ControlMaterial Source:/cpajournal/2005/505/essentials/p22.htmAuthor: Jack W. PaulMAY 2005 - The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires public accounting firms that audit public companies to register with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and to adhere to professional standards established by the board for audits of public companies. The PCAOB’s pronouncement, Auditing Standard 2, An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements, requires auditors to issue an opinion on the effectiveness of their public company clients’ internal control.On June 5, 2003, the SEC issued Release 33-8238 to implement section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA), which requires management to include in the annual report to shareholders its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control. The company’s external auditors must attest to and report on management’s assessment for fiscal years beginning on or after January 15, 2006, for accelerated filers, and on or after July 15, 2006, for no accelerated filers. Standard 2 imposes many new responsibilities on public companies’ auditors and, by extension, on the public companies themselves. In it over 200 pages, Standard 2 delineates the PCAOB’s expectations for an internal control audit.Auditor’s responsibilities. Standard 2 requires the auditor to do the following: •Understand and evaluate management’s process for assessing the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.•Plan and conduct an audit of the company’s internal control.•Based on this audit, provide an opinion on management’s written assessment about the effectiveness of the company’s internal control.This opinion incorporates the auditor’s opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.These responsibilities augment those required for the financial statement audit. Included EntitiesIn general, the scope of the audit of internal control includes all entities over which management has the ability to affect internal control:•Entities acquired on or before the date of management’s assessment as of the end of the fiscal year, including consolidated entities or those proportionately consolidated; and•Those accounted for as discontinued operations at the end of the fiscal year.In some situations, such as when management does not have the ability to affect the controls of an equity method investee, the auditor’s s cope includes only the controls related to the investor’s financial reporting of its interest in the investee, rather than the controls in place at the investee. The applicable controls are those designed to ensure proper application of the equity method in reporting the company’s proportion of investee income or loss, the investment balance, adjustments, and disclosures. Variable interest entities (VIE), defined in FASB Interpretation 46, are treated in a similar fashion when management is not the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the VIE. Importantly, the auditor must evaluate the reasonableness of management’s claims regarding its inability to affect controls at such entities.Whereas design effectiveness pertains to whether a control is properly crafted, operating effectiveness deals with use of a properly designed control to prevent, detect, or correct misstatements or irregularities on a timely basis. For example, a daily reconciliation of cash receipts is not effectively designed when the cashier performs the reconciliation. But if an independent person is designated to perform the reconciliation and the other procedures are properly documented, the control is effectively designed. The control is not operating effectively when the independent reconciler either fails to perform the reconciliation daily or does so in a perfunctory manner. Design effectiveness of this control could be tested by reviewing documentation to ensure that the procedures are satisfactory. Operating effectiveness could b e tested by examining the reconciler’s initials on the daily reconciliation sheet.A striking difference between a financial statement and an internal control audit relates to the opportunity to correct deficiencies. Whereas a company can correct material misstatements detected during a financial statement audit by accepting the auditor’s proposed adjustments, if the auditor detects a material control weakness, itmay not be possible to fix it in time. Because the auditor’s opinion is “as of” the balance sheet date, the auditor must issue an adverse opinion on internal control when material weaknesses exist, even when the company receives an unqualified opinion on the financial statements.Take as a whole. The auditor exercises judgment to ascertain those accounts considered “significant” or more than material. The auditor also considers qualitative characteristics. For example, investment balances not material to the overall financial statements may obscure the true nature of the relationship, especially when the investment is in partially consolidated entities or involves debt guarantees. And certain accounts that are liquid or incorporate significant estimates are riskier than others. Examples include cash, marketable securities, and warranty liabilities.Point in time. Internal control procedures can relate to either transaction flows or account balances, sometimes referred to as “stocks.” Examples of controls relating to transaction flows include approving cash disbursements; prelisting cash receipts; approving credit sales; and matching purchase orders, vendor invoices, and receiving reports when booking accounts payable. Controls over balances (stocks) include periodic reconciliation of bank accounts; reconciliation of subsidiary ledgers with control accounts; procedures for physical inventory counts; and controls governing the periodic preparation of financial statements. Overarching controls include the factors comprising the control environment. Overarching controls and those pertaining to flows operate continuously throughout the fiscal period; controls relating to balances typically operate less frequently. Thus bank accounts are reconciled monthly, whereas controls over cash flows are continuous.Timing considerations. Controls must operate for a long enough period, which need not be an entire fiscal year, to provide sufficient confidence in the auditor’s control tests. Accordingly, the auditor must make several observations of controls that operate only at a point in time. Controls that operate infrequently should be tested closer to the “as of” date. These include controls over: the periodic preparation of financial statements; individual account balances; and no routine transactions. Consider a calendar-year company that begins the procedure of reconciling the accounts-receivable subsidiary ledger to the control account only at the end of December. The auditor might conclude that one observation is not sufficient to evaluate this control’s operating effectiveness.These considerations suggest that an unqualified opinion on internal control should state: “The controls were effective for a sufficient period of time during the fiscal year to be able to support the conclusion that they were still effective at the end of the period.” Nevertheless, Standard 2 calls for expressing an opinion as of a point in time, the end of the fiscal year.PCAOB Standard 2 requires the auditor to obtain evidence of the effectiveness of controls pertaining to all relevant assertions for all significant accounts each year; each year must stand on its own. It also calls for the auditor to vary the nature, extent, and timing of testing from year to year to introduce unpredictability and to respond to changing circumstances. Examples of variations include changing the number of tests performed and adjusting the combination of testing procedures.Audit ReportsStandard 2 specifies the content of the report on internal control. Auditors should be aware of several factors:•An auditor may provide either separate or combined reports on the financial statements and internal control.•Whereas the opinion on the financial statements typically addresses multiple periods, the opinion on internal control covers only the most recent fiscal year.•When an auditor issues separate reports, the annual report must contain both.•The reports should have the same date, normally the last day of fieldwork.•An auditor’s report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting includes an opinion on the company’s internal control.When the auditor issues an unqualified opinion on the financial statements but an adverse opinion on internal control, due to one or more material weaknesses, the report should indicate that the conduct of the financial statement audit took those material weaknesses into account. This information helps readers of the financial statements understand why the auditor gave an unqualified opinion on the financial statements. The auditor should include similar language when the adverse opinion on internal control affects the opinion on the financial statements.Most Likely Reasons for Opinion ModificationsAs a practical matter, opinion modifications are likely to arise from three circumstances:•Material misstatements detected by the auditor were not identified by the company. This situation could result in an adverse opinion.•Inadequate documentation. This situation is a control deficiency that may constitute a material weakness if extensive. In this case, the auditor renders an adverse opinion.•Inadequate management assessment creates a scope limitation requiring a disclaimer, a qualified opinion on internal control, or withdrawal from the engagement.Because it requires the auditor to go well beyond the review and evaluation of controls that was the norm for reporting on financial statements, Standard 2 promises to fundamentally alter the control systems in public companies and auditors’ assessment of them, thereby providing additional assurance to u sers.译文内部控制审计资料来源:http:// /cpajournal/2005/505/essentials/p22.htm作者：杰克·保罗2005年5月的萨班斯-奥克斯利法案, PCAOB发布了其第2号审计标准：“与财务报表审计相关的针对财务报告的内部控制的审计”，该标准关注对财务报告的内部控制的审计工作，以及这项工作与财务报表审计的关系问题。
审计 内控 英语
1 ability to perform the work 能力履行工作2 acceptance procedures 承兑程序过程3 accountability 经管责任,问责性4 accounting estimate 会计估计5 accounts receivable listing 应收帐款挂牌6 accounts receivable 应收账款7 accruals listing 应计项目挂牌8 accruals 应计项目9 accuracy 准确性10 adverse opinion 否定意见11 aged analysis 年老的分析（法,学）研究12 agents 代理人13 agreed-upon procedures 约定审查业务14 analysis of errors 错误的分析（法,学）研究15 anomalous error 反常的错误16 appointment ethics 任命伦理学17 appointment 任命18 associated firms 联合的坚挺19 association of chartered certified accounts（ACCA）特计的证（经执业的结社（ACCA）20 assurance engagement 保证债务21 assurance 保证22 audit 审计,审核,核数23 audit acceptance 审计承兑24 audit approach 审计靠近25 audit committee 审计委员会,审计小组26 ahudit engagement 审计业务约定书27 audit evaluation 审计评价28 audit evidence 审计证据29 audit plan 审计计划30 audit program 审计程序31 audit report as a means of communication 审计报告如一个通讯方法32 audit report 审计报告33 audit risk 审计风险34 audit sampling 审计抽样35 audit staffing 审计工作人员36 audit timing 审计定时37 audit trail 审计线索38 auditing standards 审计准则39 auditors duty of care 审计（查帐）员的抚养责任40 auditors report 审计报告41 authority attached to ISAs 代理权附上到国际砂糖协定42 automated working papers 自动化了工作文件43 bad debts 坏账44 bank 银行45 bank reconciliation 银行对账单,余额调节表46 beneficial interests 受益权47 best value 最好的价值48 business risk 经营风险49 cadbury committee cadbury 委员会50 cash count 现金盘点51 cash system 兑现系统52 changes in nature of engagement 改变债务的性质上53 charges and commitments 费用和评论54 charities 宽大55 tom walls tom 墙壁56 chronology of an audit 一审计的年代表57 CIS application controls CIS 申请控制58 CIS environments stand-alone microcomputers CIS 环境单机微型计算器59 client screening 委托人甄别60 closely connected 接近地连接61 clubs 俱乐部62 communications between auditors and management 通讯在审计（查帐）员和经营之间63 communications on internal control 内部控制上的通讯64 companies act 公司法65 comparative financial statements 比较财务报表66 comparatives 比较的67 competence 能力68 compilation engagement 编辑债务69 completeness 完整性70 completion of the audit 审计的结束71 compliance with accounting regulations 符合～的作法会计规则72 computers assisted audit techniques （CAATs）计算器援助的审计技术（CAATs）73 confidence 信任74 confidentiality 保密性75 confirmation of accounts receivable 应收帐款的查证76 conflict of interest 利益冲突77 constructive obligation 建设的待付款78 contingent asset 或有资产79 contingent liability 或有负债80 control environment 控制环境81 control procedures 控制程序82 control risk 控制风险83 controversy 论战84 corporate governance 公司治理,公司管制85 corresponding figures 相应的计算86 cost of conversion 转换成本,加工成本87 cost 成本88 courtesy 优待89 creditors 债权人90 current audit files 本期审计档案91 database management system （DBMS）数据库管理制度（数据管理系统）92 date of report 报告的日期93 depreciation 折旧,贬值94 design of the sample 样品的设计95 detection risk 检查风险96 direct verification approach 直接核查法97 directional testing 方向的抽查98 directors emoluments 董事酬金99 directors serve contracts 董事服务合约100 disagreement with management 与经营的不一致101 disclaimer of opinion 拒绝表示意见102 distributions 分销,分派103 documentation of understanding and assessment of control risk 控制风险的协商和评定的文件编集 104 documenting the audit process 证明审计程序105 due care 应有关注106 due skill and care 到期的技能和谨慎107 economy 经济108 education 教育109 effectiveness 效用,效果110 efficiency 效益,效率111 eligibility / ineligibility 合格 / 无被选资格112 emphasis of matter 物质的强调113 engagement economics 债务经济学114 engagement letter 业务约定书115 error 差错116 evaluating of results of audit procedures 审计手序的结果评估117 examinations 检查118 existence 存在性119 expectations 期望差距120 expected error 预期的错误121 experience 经验122 expert 专家123 external audit 独立审计124 external review reports 外部的评论报告125 fair 公正126 fee negotiation 费谈判127 final assessment of control risk 控制风险的确定评定128 final audit 期末审计129 financial statement assertions 财政报告宣称130 financial 财务131 finished goods 产成品132 flowcharts 流程图133 fraud and error 舞弊134 fraud 欺诈135 fundamental principles 基本原理136 general CIS controls 一般的 CIS 控制137 general reports to mangement 对（牛犬等的）疥癣的一般报告138 going concern assumption 持续经营假设139 going concern 持续经营140 goods on sale or return 货物准许退货买卖141 goodwill 商誉142 governance 统治143 greenbury committee greenbury 委员会144 guidance for internal auditors 指导为内部审计员145 hampel committee hampel 委员会146 haphazard selection 随意选择147 hospitality 款待148 human resources 人力资源149 IAPS 1000 inter-bank confirmation procedures IAPS 1000 在中间- 银行查证程序过程150 IAPS 1001 CIS environments-stand-alone microcomputers IAPS 1001 CIS 环境-单机微型计算器151 IAPS 1002 CIS environments-on-line computer systems IAPS 1002 CIS 环境-（与主机）联机计算器系统152 IAPS 1003 CIS environments-database systems IAPS 1003 CIS 环境- 数据库系统153 IAPS 1005 the special considerations in the audit of small entities 在小的个体审计中的 IAPS 1005 特别的考虑154 IAS 2 inventories 信息家电 2 库存155 IAS 10 events after the balance sheet date 在平衡 sheeet 日期後面的信息家电 10 事件156 IFACs code of ethics for professional accountants IFACs 道德准则为职业会计师157 income tax 所得税158 incoming auditors 收入审计（查帐）员159 independent estimate 独立的估计160 ineligible for appointment 无被选资格的为任命161 information technology 信息技术162 inherent risk 固有风险163 initial communication 签署通讯164 insurance 保险165 intangibles 无形166 integrity 完整性167 interim audit 中期审计168 internal auditing 内部审计169 internal auditors 内部审计师170 internal control evaluation questionnaires （ICEQs）内部控制评价调查表171 internal control questionnaires （ICQs）内部控制调查表172 internal control system 内部控制系统173 internal review assignment 内部的评论转让174 international audit and assurance standards board （IAASB）国际的审计和保证标准登船（IAASB）175 international auditing practice statements （IAPSs）国际的审计实务声明（IAPSs）176 international federation of accountants （IFAC）国际会计师联合会（IFAC）177 inventory system 盘存制度178 inventory valuation 存货估价179 ISA 230 documentation 文件编制180 ISA 240 fraud and error 国际砂糖协定 240 欺诈和错误181 ISA 250 consideration of law and regulations 法和规则的国际砂糖协定 250 考虑182 Isa 260 communications of audit matters with those charge governance 审计物质的国际砂糖协定 260 通讯由于那些索价统治183 isa 300 planning isa 300 计划编制184 isa 310 knowledge of the business 企业的 isa 310 知识185 isa 320 audit materiality 审计重要性186 isa 400 accounting and internal control isa 400 会计和内部控制187 isa 402 audit considerations relating to entities using service organisations 与正在使用的个体有关的 isa 402个审计考虑服务组织188 isa 500 audit evidence 审计证据189 isa 501 audit evidence-additional considerations for specific items isa 501个审计证据- 补偿为特殊条款190 isa 510 external confirmations isa 510个外部的查证191 isa 520 analytical procedures 分析性程序192 isa 530 audit sampling 审计抽样193 isa 540 audit of accounting estimates 解释估计的 isa 540 审计194 isa 560 subsequent events 期后事项195 isa 580 management representations 管理当局声明书196 isa 610 considering the work of internal auditing isa 610 以内部审计的工作看来197 isa 620 using the work of an expert isa 620 使用专家的工作198 isa 700 auditors report on financial statements 财务报表上的 isa 700 审计（查帐）员的报告199 isa 710 comparatives isa 710个比较的200 isa 720 other information in documents containing audited financial statements isa 720 证券包含audited 财务报表的其他信息201 isa 910 engagement to review financial statements isa 910 债务复阅财务报表202 isas and rss isas 和 rss203 joint monitoring unit 连接检验单位204 knowledge of the entitys business 个体的企业知识205 law and regulations 法和规则206 legal and regulations 法定权利和规则207 legal obligation 法定义务,法定责任208 levels of assurance 保险程度,保障水平209 liability 负债210 limitation on scope 审计范围限制211 limitation of audit 审计的提起诉讼的限期212 limitations of controls system 控制系统的提起诉讼的限期213 litigation and claims 诉讼和赔偿214 litigation 诉讼215 loans 借款,贷款216 long term liabilities 长期负债217 lowballing lowballing218 management 管理219 management integrity 经营完整220 management representation letter 管理当局声明书221 marketing 推销,营销,市场学222 material inconsistency 决定性的前后矛盾223 material misstatements of fact 重大误报224 materiality 重要性225 measurement 计量226 microcomputers 微型计算器227 modified reports 变更报告228 narrative notes 叙述证券229 nature 性质230 negative assurance 消极保证231 net realizable value 可实现净值232 non-current asset register 非本期的财产登记233 non-executive directors 非执行董事234 non-sampling risk 非抽样风险235 non-statutory audits 目标236 objectivity 客观性237 obligating event 负有责任事件238 obligatory disclosure 有拘束的揭示239 obtaining work 获得工作240 occurrence 出现241 on-line computer systems （与主机）联机计算器系统242 opening balances 期初余额243 operational audits 经营审计,作业审计244 operational work plans 操作上的工作计划245 opinion shopping 意见购物246 other information 其他的信息247 outsourcing internal audit 支援外包的内部核数248 overall review of financial statements 财务报表的包括一切的评论 249 overdue fees 超储未付费250 overhead absorption 管理费用分配251 periodic plan 定期的计划252 permanent audit files 永久审计档案253 personal relationships 个人的亲属关系254 planning 计划编制255 population 抽样总体256 precision 精密257 preface to ISAs and RSs 国际砂糖协定的序文和债券附卖回交易 258 preliminary assessment of control risk 控制风险的预备评定259 prepayments 预付款项260 presentation and disclosure 提示和揭示261 problems of accounting treatment 会计处理的问题262 procedural approach 程序上的靠近263 procedures 程序264 procedures after accepting nomination 程序过程在接受提名之后265 procurement 采购266 professional duty of confidentiality 保密的职业责任267 projection of errors 错误的规划268 provision 备抵,准备269 public duty 公共职责270 public interest 公众利益271 publicity 宣传272 purchase ledger 购货分类账273 purchases and expenses system 买和费用系统274 purchases cut-off 买截止275 put on enquiry 询价上的期货买卖276 qualified opinion 保留意见277 qualifying disclosure 合格揭示278 qualitative aspects of errors 错误的性质上的方面279 random selection 随机选择280 reasonable assurance 合理保证281 reassessing sampling risk 再评价抽样风险282 reliability 可靠性283 remuneration 报酬284 report to management 对经营的报告285 reporting 报告286 research and development costs 研究和开发成本287 reservation of title 保留288 reserves 准备,储备289 revenue and capital expenditure 岁入和资本支出290 review 评论291 review and capital expenditure 评论和资本支出292 review 评论293 review engagement 复阅债务294 rights 认股权295 rights and obligations 认股权和待付款296 rights to information 对信息的认股权297 risk and materiality 风险和重要性298 risk-based approach 以风险为基础的方式299 romalpa case romalpa 个案300 rotation of auditor appointments 审计（查帐）员任命的循环301 rules of professional conduct 职业道德守则302 sales cut-off 销售截止303 sales system 销售（货）制度304 sales tax 销售税,营业税305 sales 销售,销货306 sample size 样本量307 sampling risk 抽样风险308 sampling units 抽样单位309 schedule of unadjusted errors 未调整的错误表310 scope and objectives of internal audit 内部核数的范围和目标311 segregation of duties 职责划分312 service organization 服务组织313 significant fluctuations or unexpected relationships 可重视的（市价）波动或不能预料的亲属关系314 small entity 小的个体315 smaller entities 比较小的个体316 sole traders 个体营业者317 sources of knowledge 知识的根源318 specimen letter on internal control 内部控制上的样本证书319 stakeholders 赌款保存人320 standardised working papers 标准化工作文件321 statement 1:integrity,objectivity and independence 声明 1: 完整，客观性和独立322 statement 2:the professional duty of confidence 声明 2: 信任的职业责任323 statement 3: advertising ,publicity and obtaining professional work 声明 3: 广告法（学），宣传和获得专业性工作324 statement 5:changes in professional appointment 声明 5: 在职业上的任命中的改变325 statistical sampling 统计抽样326 statutory audit 法定审计327 statutory books 法定卷册328 statutory duty 法定责任329 stewardship 总管的职务330 strategic plan 战略性计划331 stratification 分层332 subsequent events 期后事项333 substantive procedures 实词程序过程334 substantive tests 实质性测试335 sufficient appropriate audit evidence 充分的适当审计证据336 summarising errors summarising 错误337 sundry accruals 杂的应计项目338 supervision 监督339 supervisory and monitoring roles 监督的和检验角色340 suppliers statements 供应商的声明341 system and internal controls 系统和内部的控制342 systematic selection 系统选择法343 systems-based approach 以系统为基础的方式344 tangible non-current assets 有形的非流动资产345 tendering 投标,清偿346 terms of the engagement 债务的条件347 tests of control 控制的证人348 the AGM 周年大会349 the board 委员会350 three Es 三 Es351 timing 定时352 tolerable error 可容忍误差353 trade accounts payable and purchases 贸易应付帐款和买354 trade accounts payable listing 贸易应付帐款挂牌355 training 培训356 treasury 国库,库房357 TRUE 真实358 turnbull committee turnbull 委员会359 ultra vires 越权360 uncertainty 不确定性361 undue dependence 未到（支付）期的未决362 unqualified audit report 无条件的审计报告363 unqualified report 无条件的报告364 using the knowledge 使用知识365 using the work of an expert 使用专家的工作366 valuation 计价，估价367 value for money 现金（交易）价格 368 voluntary disclosure 自愿披露369 wages and salaries 工资，薪金370 wages system 工资系统371 work in progress 在产品372 working papers 工作底稿。
乌克兰的内部审计和内部控制系统研究【外文翻译】
外文翻译Ukraine internal audit and internal control studyMaterial Source: Documents & ReportsAuthor: International Finance CorporationOf the 67 companies surveyed, 48 percent of the companies responded that they had an internal audit department. Only 9 percent of the respondents planned to create an internal audit in the future. The rest of companies indicated that they do “some checks” and, in 15 percent of the respondents, some internal audit functions are performed by the e xternal auditors. Typically, where “some checks” are performed, they would be done in connection with a special situation and/or problem and not as an on-going control measure.Only companies having an internal audit department answered the questions about the operation and structure of the internal audit function. Out of 67 surveyed, 32 companies with an internal audit department provided answers.44 percent of respondents indicated that the internal audit department is not managed as a separate corporate function with its own budget and organizational structure. The absence of a separate budget and organization for the internal audit department appears inconsistent with the independence standard for an effective internal audit function.In more than half of the companies surveyed, the internal audit department has existed for one to five years. In another quarter of those surveyed, the function has been operating for more than five years. The rest of companies have had an internal audit function for less than one year.Almost half of the companies with internal audit departments (45 percent) spend less than $50,000 annually to maintain the internal audit function. That cost seems quite low and may be distorted by those companies responding negatively to the above question about an independent budget unit. 46 percent of the companies spend between $50,000 and $300,000 which appears a more reasonable range to maintain an effective internal audit function.Subordination and ReportingEmployees of the internal audit department are subordinated and accountable to executive management in 56 percent of surveyed companies, which is, again, inconsistent with the independence standard. In only a minority of the companies(35 percent) there are the internal auditors reporting to Supervisory Board or Audit Committee. Since multiple answers were possible to this survey question, overlap likely exists between members of the various groups listed.The issue of independence is again highlighted in the response to the question below where, in more than 40 percent of the companies, representatives of top management are involved in issues of internal audit.Use of Audit ResultsThe profile of those who utilize the internal audit department reports (again, multiple answers were possible) is what would be expected. Information in the internal auditors’ report may well require corrective action at various levels within an organization and management would be delegating such action in a majority of cases. However, the low level of involvement by the Risk Management/Internal Control Department (16 percent) may indicate the absence of such a department in most surveyed companies.The internal audit department of a company does not provide information to state regulatory bodies in 94 percent of cases. The exception occurs when providing information to the State Commission for Securities and Capital Markets.Priority Ranking of Internal Audit ActivityWhen asked to rank the possible roles of internal audit, all activities listed, with the exception of support for environmental and social responsibility, were exceeded 3.5 on a scale of one to five. It is encouraging to note that those activities with the highest ranking included control over preservation of assets (4.6), independent evaluation of internal control (4.5), and risk management (4.1).StaffThe internal audit departments of the surveyed companies have a total of 172 staff members. For almost 70 percent of respondents the number of internal auditors was five or less. This result would be consistent with the relatively small maintenance costs reported above and indicates the limited resources devoted to internal audit.The professional qualities of the internal audit department employees, based on a one to five grade scale, were ranked strong. Several key skills were ranked above four. The exception to the overall strong rankings was expertise in risk management which was ranked 3.4. This latter ranking may indicate a lack of understanding about the role of internal audit in risk management or a lack of expertise in risk management in the market.Only one-fourth of the internal audit department employees in the surveyed companies have professional certifications. Of that percentage, only 2 percent of employees hold a certificate from the International Institute of Internal Auditors (CIA). This could indicate that the professional practice of internal auditing and the overall professional standing of the internal auditor are not well developed in Ukraine.Audit Methodology and ProcessThe role and importance of the internal audit department in the majority of respondents (69 percent) are defined by the charter on the internal audit department. In one-fourth of those surveyed, the role of the internal audit department is specified in the charter on internal control.The majority of respondents said that the main document that regulates the activity of the internal audit department was the charter on the internal audit department and 41 percent of the surveyed companies mentioned that procedures of the internal audit department regulated the activity of the department (multiple answers were possible). A somewhat surprising percentage (19 percent) of respondents did not have documentation for the internal audit department.In almost all companies where there is an internal audit department, components of the process include the analysis of business processes and operations and development of recommendations for improvement of internal control. Assessment of the effectiveness of controls and risk management are also components in a majority of the companies. These represent important internal audit functions so it is encouraging that they are present in most of the companies responding.The major types of audit that the internal audit department conducts represent a broad spectrum of internal audit activity (multiple answers were requested) and the priority assigned to each activity by the respondent was not established in the survey results. However, it is interesting to note that IT system audits are performed in only 34 percent of the companies. The lack of focus on IT audit and controls is noted in other parts of the survey and indicates a possible deficiency in the attention given to this key control component.It was encouraging that 75 percent of the surveyed companies create an annual plan (program) for the internal audit department.Unfortunately, the basis for the development of the annual internal audit plan (multiple answers requested) appeared flawed. Top management recommendationsshould not be considered the primary criterion. Most notably, only 63 percent of the companies responded that an assessment of business risks was one factor considered. This percentage should be higher in recognition of the importance of risk-based audit planning.Involving External AuditorsMore than 90 percent of surveyed companies have used external auditors. In particular, almost 60 percent of companies involve external auditors periodically once a year and almost 30 percent involve external auditors several times a year.Application of Ukrainian and International Audit Standards in Department Activities The majority of respondents (71 percent) stated that there was no guidance or were unsure of the existence of official Ukrainian recommendations for internal audit in companies. Only 19 percent of respondents are sure that such recommendations exist and, in fact, use these in their company. Nevertheless, the persons interviewed as part of the survey process were not able to concretely name the guidance, explaining that such recommendations are dispersed in various regulations, standards, decisions, and laws. This response would indicate that there are no laws or regulations in Ukraine that specifically address the internal audit requirements and/or practices for companies.As to recognized international audit standards, one-third of surveyed companies use standards from the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and 12 percent of respondents use official recommendations from the Institute of Internal Auditors. It should be noted that the IFAC standards apply primarily to the external auditor. Therefore, as previously mentioned, the professional practice of internal auditing does not appear widely understood in Ukraine.Compliance of Ukrainian Official Standards with International Standards As the previous responses indicate, the overwhelming majority (76 percent) of surveyed companies were not able to evaluate whether Ukrainian internal audit recommendations complied with accepted international standards.Perspectives for Development of Internal Audit in Companies 44 percent of the respondents believe that the presence of an efficient internal audit function improves the company’s ability to attract external financing. However,almost half of the respondents are not sure if it does and a small minority (9 percent) believes that an efficient internal audit function does not improve opportunities for attracting external financing. Accordingly, there is no widespread consensus that making an investment in an internal audit function would ultimately enhance the company’sability to attract financing.Many sound factors determining internal audit development were identified by the respondents, including initial public offerings (IPOs) and the need for investment (multiple responses were requested). Somewhat surprisingly, however, 41 percent thought that the transition to International Accounting Standards (IAS) determined the development of internal audit. The internal auditors do not typically play a major role in the IAS transition process although they could be involved in some aspects of the related financial reporting compliance. Once again, only 16 percent of the companies listed the factor related to IT systems.More than h alf of the respondents chose “increasing efficiency and effectiveness,” “improving the qualifications of internal auditors,” and “improvement of the internal audit methodology and expansion of its coverage” as key issues concerning the organization and functioning of the internal audit department. Almost 38 percent of respondents indicated that the information provided by internal auditors is used for decision making. A third of respondents also mentioned obtaining knowledge of IAS as a key factor, which is not normally a key component of the internal auditor’s role.Reasons for Absence of the Internal Audit Function in Companies For those companies that did not have an internal audit department (52 percent of surveyed companies), approximately 40 percent of respondents indicated that the reason for this was that the company was too small or that the business processes of the company were too simple. Another 20 percent responded that it was either difficult to provide a reason or that the owners did not think it was necessary.译文乌克兰的内部审计和内部控制系统研究资料来源:文件和报告作者：国际财经合作在接受调查的67个公司中，有百分之四十八的公司拥有自己的内部审计部门。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
外文翻译原文Audits of Internal ControlMaterial Source:/cpajournal/2005/505/essentials/p22.htmAuthor: Jack W. PaulMAY 2005 - The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires public accounting firms that audit public companies to register with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and to adhere to professional standards established by the board for audits of public companies. The PCAOB’s pronouncement, Auditing Standard 2, An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements, requires auditors to issue an opinion on the effectiveness of their public company clients’ internal control.On June 5, 2003, the SEC issued Release 33-8238 to implement section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA), which requires management to include in the annual report to shareholders its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control. The company’s external auditors must attest to and report on management’s assessment for fiscal years beginning on or after January 15, 2006, for accelerated filers, and on or after July 15, 2006, for no accelerated filers. Standard 2 imposes many new responsibilities on public companies’ auditors and, by extension, on the public companies themselves. In it over 200 pages, Standard 2 delineates the PCAOB’s expectations for an internal control audit.Auditor’s responsibilities. Standard 2 requires the auditor to do the following: •Understand and evaluate management’s process for assessing the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.•Plan and conduct an audit of the company’s internal control.•Based on this audit, provide an opinion on management’s written assessment about the effectiveness of the company’s internal control.This opinion incorporates the auditor’s opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.These responsibilities augment those required for the financial statement audit. Included EntitiesIn general, the scope of the audit of internal control includes all entities over which management has the ability to affect internal control:•Entities acquired on or before the date of management’s assessment as of the end of the fiscal year, including consolidated entities or those proportionately consolidated; and•Those accounted for as discontinued operations at the end of the fiscal year.In some situations, such as when management does not have the ability to affect the controls of an equity method investee, the auditor’s s cope includes only the controls related to the investor’s financial reporting of its interest in the investee, rather than the controls in place at the investee. The applicable controls are those designed to ensure proper application of the equity method in reporting the company’s proportion of investee income or loss, the investment balance, adjustments, and disclosures. Variable interest entities (VIE), defined in FASB Interpretation 46, are treated in a similar fashion when management is not the primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the VIE. Importantly, the auditor must evaluate the reasonableness of management’s claims regarding its inability to affect controls at such entities.Whereas design effectiveness pertains to whether a control is properly crafted, operating effectiveness deals with use of a properly designed control to prevent, detect, or correct misstatements or irregularities on a timely basis. For example, a daily reconciliation of cash receipts is not effectively designed when the cashier performs the reconciliation. But if an independent person is designated to perform the reconciliation and the other procedures are properly documented, the control is effectively designed. The control is not operating effectively when the independent reconciler either fails to perform the reconciliation daily or does so in a perfunctory manner. Design effectiveness of this control could be tested by reviewing documentation to ensure that the procedures are satisfactory. Operating effectiveness could b e tested by examining the reconciler’s initials on the daily reconciliation sheet.A striking difference between a financial statement and an internal control audit relates to the opportunity to correct deficiencies. Whereas a company can correct material misstatements detected during a financial statement audit by accepting the auditor’s proposed adjustments, if the auditor detects a material control weakness, itmay not be possible to fix it in time. Because the auditor’s opinion is “as of” the balance sheet date, the auditor must issue an adverse opinion on internal control when material weaknesses exist, even when the company receives an unqualified opinion on the financial statements.Take as a whole. The auditor exercises judgment to ascertain those accounts considered “significant” or more than material. The auditor also considers qualitative characteristics. For example, investment balances not material to the overall financial statements may obscure the true nature of the relationship, especially when the investment is in partially consolidated entities or involves debt guarantees. And certain accounts that are liquid or incorporate significant estimates are riskier than others. Examples include cash, marketable securities, and warranty liabilities.Point in time. Internal control procedures can relate to either transaction flows or account balances, sometimes referred to as “stocks.” Examples of controls relating to transaction flows include approving cash disbursements; prelisting cash receipts; approving credit sales; and matching purchase orders, vendor invoices, and receiving reports when booking accounts payable. Controls over balances (stocks) include periodic reconciliation of bank accounts; reconciliation of subsidiary ledgers with control accounts; procedures for physical inventory counts; and controls governing the periodic preparation of financial statements. Overarching controls include the factors comprising the control environment. Overarching controls and those pertaining to flows operate continuously throughout the fiscal period; controls relating to balances typically operate less frequently. Thus bank accounts are reconciled monthly, whereas controls over cash flows are continuous.Timing considerations. Controls must operate for a long enough period, which need not be an entire fiscal year, to provide sufficient confidence in the auditor’s control tests. Accordingly, the auditor must make several observations of controls that operate only at a point in time. Controls that operate infrequently should be tested closer to the “as of” date. These include controls over: the periodic preparation of financial statements; individual account balances; and no routine transactions. Consider a calendar-year company that begins the procedure of reconciling the accounts-receivable subsidiary ledger to the control account only at the end of December. The auditor might conclude that one observation is not sufficient to evaluate this control’s operating effectiveness.These considerations suggest that an unqualified opinion on internal control should state: “The controls were effective for a sufficient period of time during the fiscal year to be able to support the conclusion that they were still effective at the end of the period.” Nevertheless, Standard 2 calls for expressing an opinion as of a point in time, the end of the fiscal year.PCAOB Standard 2 requires the auditor to obtain evidence of the effectiveness of controls pertaining to all relevant assertions for all significant accounts each year; each year must stand on its own. It also calls for the auditor to vary the nature, extent, and timing of testing from year to year to introduce unpredictability and to respond to changing circumstances. Examples of variations include changing the number of tests performed and adjusting the combination of testing procedures.Audit ReportsStandard 2 specifies the content of the report on internal control. Auditors should be aware of several factors:•An auditor may provide either separate or combined reports on the financial statements and internal control.•Whereas the opinion on the financial statements typically addresses multiple periods, the opinion on internal control covers only the most recent fiscal year.•When an auditor issues separate reports, the annual report must contain both.•The reports should have the same date, normally the last day of fieldwork.•An auditor’s report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting includes an opinion on the company’s internal control.When the auditor issues an unqualified opinion on the financial statements but an adverse opinion on internal control, due to one or more material weaknesses, the report should indicate that the conduct of the financial statement audit took those material weaknesses into account. This information helps readers of the financial statements understand why the auditor gave an unqualified opinion on the financial statements. The auditor should include similar language when the adverse opinion on internal control affects the opinion on the financial statements.Most Likely Reasons for Opinion ModificationsAs a practical matter, opinion modifications are likely to arise from three circumstances:•Material misstatements detected by the auditor were not identified by the company. This situation could result in an adverse opinion.•Inadequate documentation. This situation is a control deficiency that may constitute a material weakness if extensive. In this case, the auditor renders an adverse opinion.•Inadequate management assessment creates a scope limitation requiring a disclaimer, a qualified opinion on internal control, or withdrawal from the engagement.Because it requires the auditor to go well beyond the review and evaluation of controls that was the norm for reporting on financial statements, Standard 2 promises to fundamentally alter the control systems in public companies and auditors’ assessment of them, thereby providing additional assurance to u sers.译文内部控制审计资料来源:http:// /cpajournal/2005/505/essentials/p22.htm作者：杰克·保罗2005年5月的萨班斯-奥克斯利法案, PCAOB发布了其第2号审计标准：“与财务报表审计相关的针对财务报告的内部控制的审计”，该标准关注对财务报告的内部控制的审计工作，以及这项工作与财务报表审计的关系问题。