love is a fallacy 总结
love is a fallacy 详细讲解,复习
Introduction to the text:1. This text is a piece of narrative writing, a story.2. The narrator of the story, Dobie Gillis, a freshman in a law school, is the hero or protagonist(主角，正派角色）. He struggles against two antagonists（反派角色）: Petey Burch, his roommate whose girlfriend he plans to steal; and Polly Espy, the girl he intends to marry after suitable re-education.3. The climax（高潮）of the story is reached in paragraphs147 to150 when Polly refuses to go steady with the narrator because she had already promised to go steady with Petey Burch.4. The denouement（结局）follows rapidly and ends on a very ironic tone.About the Title---The title of the story is humorous and well-chosen. It has two meanings:1. When “fallacy”is taken in its ordinary sense, the title means:There is a deceptive（虚伪的，欺诈的）or delusive（欺瞒的，迷惑的）quality about love.2. When “fallacy”is taken as a specific term in logic, the title means:Love cannot be deduced（推理）from a set of given premises.Perhaps Max Shulman wants the reader, after reading the story, to conclude that “love”is an error, a deception and an emotion that does not follow the principles of logic. But the writer, through this story has succeeded perhaps unwittingly(无意地) in revealing what love may sometimes mean in the affluent society（物质社会）. Girls do not want brilliant, gifted or educated husbands, but want husbands who are rich and wealthy enough to provide all the things necessary in life—home, clothes, cars, etc..Pay attention to his change of emotions:1. favoring her with a smile2. chuckled with amusement3. chuckled with somewhat less amusement4. forcing a smile/ ground my teeth5. croaked, dashed perspireDetailed study of the textenterprising: ad. having or showing enterprise 有事业心的；有胆量的；富于创业精神的It’s very enterprising of them to try and start up a business like that.as…as: a correlative construction used to indicate the equality or sameness of two things. He is as strong as an ox.month of Sundays: (colloquial口语体的) long timeunfettered: ad. (fml. or lit.) free from control; not tied by several rulesThe new city developed quickly, unfettered by the usual planning regulations.limp: ad. drooping; lacking firmness 无力的；易弯的I like lettuce to be crisp, not limp and soggy.我喜欢莴苣是脆的，不喜欢软而湿乎乎的。
love is a falacy详解
hollow-eyed: ad. having deep-set eyes or dark areas under the eyes, as from sickness, mental suffering or fatigue hulk: n. a heavy, awkward person 笨重的东西/人； 庞然大物 say that you will go steady with me: Promise to be my sweetheart. Promise to go out with me only and no other. I will wander…hulk: Hyperbole. Worn, wearied and dragging my feet, I’ll roam disconsolately all over the world like a hollow-eyed wreck.
The dear child…lessons well: This selfconceited and arrogant freshman adopts a very patronizing attitude towards Polly. This dear little girl has learnt very well what I taught her. patting…manner: His patronizing not only in speech and tone but also in action. He patted her hand in such a way as to show that he was trying to put up with something he did not especially like.
LoveisaFallacy解读
爱情就是谬误马克斯舒尔曼查尔斯．兰姆是一个世所罕见的性情欢快、富有进取心的人，他那笔下的散文《古瓷器》和《梦中的孩子》无拘无束、自由奔放。
实在令人难忘。
下面这篇文章比兰姆的作品更加自由奔放。
实际上，用“自由奔放”的字眼来形容这篇文章并不十分确切，或许用“柔软”、“轻松”或“轻软而富有弹性”更为恰如其分。
尽管很难说清这篇文章是属于哪一类，但可以肯定它是一篇散文小品文。
它提出了论点。
引用了许多例证，并得出了结论。
卡菜尔能写得更好吗?罗斯金呢?这篇文章意在论证逻辑学非但不枯燥乏味而且活泼、清新、富于关感和激情，并给人以启迪。
诸位不妨一读。
——作者注我这个人头脑冷静，逻辑思维能力强。
敏锐、慎重、聪慧、深刻、机智一一这些就是我的特点。
我的大脑像发电机一样发达，孳化学家的天平一样精确，像手术刀一样锋利。
一一你知道吗?我才十八岁呀。
年纪这么轻而智力又如此非凡的人并不常有。
就拿在明尼苏达大学跟我同住一个房间的皮蒂·伯奇来说吧，他跟我年龄相哆’经历一样，可他笨得像头驴。
小伙子长得年轻漂亮，可惜脑子里却空空如也。
他易于激动，情绪反复无常，容易受别人的影响。
最糟的是他爱赶时髦。
我认为，赶时髦就是最缺乏理智的表现。
见到一 q9种新鲜的东西就跟着学，以为别人都在那么干，自己也就卷进去傻干——这在我看来，简直愚蠢至极，但皮蒂却不以为然。
一天下午我看见皮蒂躺在床上，脸上显露出一种痛苦不堪的表情，我立刻断定他是得了阑尾炎。
“别动，”我说，“别吃泻药，我就请医生来。
”“浣熊，”他咕哝着说。
“浣熊?”我停下来问道。
“我要一件浣熊皮大衣，”他痛苦地哭叫着。
我明白了，他不是身体不舒服，而是精神上不太正常。
“你为什么要浣熊皮大衣?”“我本早该知道，”他哭叫着，用拳头捶打着太阳穴，“我早该知道查尔斯登舞再度流行时，浣熊皮大衣也会时兴起来的。
我真傻，钱都买了课本，可现在不能买浣熊皮大衣了。
”我带着怀疑的眼神问道：“你是说人们真的又要穿浣熊皮大衣吗?”“校园里有身分的人哪个不穿?你刚从哪儿来?”“图书馆，”我说了一个有身分的人不常去的地方。
love is a fallacy爱情观
love is a fallacy爱情观“Love is a fallacy”这句话指的是“爱情是谬论”，定义了一些人对爱情的看法。
这种观点引出了一些对爱情的讨论，相信很多人会对这个话题状态很感兴趣。
在这篇文章中，我将逐步分析这个论点并阐述我的观点。
第一步，解释“谬论”的意思。
谬论是指无法证明却被人们普遍固守的信念。
关于爱情和婚姻的看法，往往是因为被文化和传统的束缚而产生的。
很多人会相信，爱情是存在的一种特殊的感情，它经常伴随着人们的幸福，让他们感到完美和满足。
但是这种看法并没有被科学证明，也没有任何证据能够表明，它是真的。
第二步，列举对于论点的支持或是反驳的证据。
对于这个问题，很多人会有不同的看法。
有些人会认为，爱情是存在的，只需要找到对的人，并付出真诚的感情，就能得到相应的回报。
不过，也有一些人不相信爱情的存在，他们认为情感只是瞬间的感性冲动，而且情绪的波动是容易变化的，所以爱情只是短暂的和虚无的。
第三步，提出个人的看法并解释其原因。
在我的观点中，我认为爱情是存在的。
尽管这是一种难以解释的情感，但是我相信在有些人身上，爱情的感觉是很真实的。
当你找到一个你想在一起，能够彼此了解并在一起共度一生的伴侣时，爱情就会存在。
当然，这个观点也有一些限制，比如在关于感情的自由、相互尊重和信任等方面也可以帮助更好地维持关系的稳定。
总结起来，爱情是一个充满争议的话题。
尽管有些人认为它是一种谬论，没有被证实，但是我相信爱情是存在的，并能够实现和持久。
当然，每个人的看法和经历都是不同的，人们应该随着自己的感受和信仰，去寻找属于自己的爱情观。
love is a fallacy一文中修辞手段的应用
love is a fallacy一文中修辞手段的应用美国著名的幽默作家Max Shu man的精彩之作Love is aFallcy;语句幽默,运用了多种修辞方法,充满讽刺意味,达到了很好的语言表现效果。
明喻：一种最常见的修辞方法,就是将具有某种共同特征的两种不同事物加以对比,用另一种事物比方所要说明的事物，使语言形象生动0Charles Lamb, as merry and enterprising a fellowv as you wa month of Sundaysmcet h ypineo sous ie poerhlas a dgnmo as prcie as a chenefs scales as penetrating as a scalpel 暗喻：隐喻要靠读者自己去意会的比喻。
隐喻没有指明两个不同事物共同点而是用一个具有形象意义的词来直接称谓代替)某个事物。
这情,更具表that logic, far fion being a dry pedantic discipline, is a living breath inth ing fill of beauty passion, and traumaMaybe somewhere in the extinct crater of her m ind a fwembers still smolded Maybe samehow I cou ld fan them into flamt借代：文章时不直接说出所要表达的人或事物,而是借用与它有密切相关的人或事物来代替,这种修辞方法叫借代。
恰当地运用代可以突出事物的本质特征,增强语言的形象性,而且可以使文笔简洁精炼,语言富于变化和幽默感移就：又称词语移用,就是有意识的把描写甲事物的词语移用来描写乙事物，是在特殊语言环境中改变词语搭配关系的一种临时迁用。
从语言逻辑上看,好像不合规范,也不合情理,但在具体的语言环境中,它却能赋予个词语以新的意义,增强语言的表达效0I said with mysterious wink and closed my bag and left” pa40Amyseriouswink 就是一个典型的移就的例子。
最新Love Is a Fallacy总结
2. The use of clipped vulgar forms
Such forms as “delish”, “marvy” “sensaysh” “terrif”, and “magnif” are chosen to create the image of the simple-mindedness and stupidity of the girl.
3. The use of ultra learned terms
Many such terms as “Dicto Simpliciter”, “Post Hoc”, “Ad Misericordiam” showing boasting of the narrator contrasts sharply with the simple - mindedness of the girl.
6. The use of colloquial words
For example: “dumb” “pin - up ”,“kid”, “go steady” “date” “Holy Toledo” “casual” “kick” laugh”, “terrif” ,“magnif”, “yummy”, “fire away” and “darn” , to add realism to the story.
7. The use of slangs
Here are some examples: “nothing upstairs” “keen” “deal” “nut” “knock one out” “dreamy” “how cute” “well -heeled” “rat ” “knot-head” “jitterbug” “guy” “fracture” and many others.
爱情与逻辑谬误的故事总结
爱情与逻辑谬误的故事总结[摘要]故事《爱情就是谬误》用轻松欢快的笔调讲述了三个普通美国大学生的校园爱情故事，充满了趣味和幽默。
通过具体例证，分析《爱情就是谬误》中幽默的具体表现形式，指出修辞手法是实现幽默效果的有效手段，幽默也可来源于反讽与诡辩。
幽默是不和谐的产物，幽默的感知依赖于语言接受者结合具体语境所作的认知努力。
[关键词]《爱情就是谬误》；幽默；修辞；反讽；诡辩；语境“Love is a Fallacy”（《爱情就是谬误》）出自美国幽默大师马克斯?舒尔曼（1919-1988）的Dobie Gillis（1951）一书。
作者用轻松欢快的笔调讲述了三个普通美国大学生的校园爱情故事，调侃了他们的人生态度，尤其是对待爱情的态度。
整个故事充满了趣味和幽默，探讨的却是一个永恒的话题：爱情到底是什么？《朗文当代高级英语词典》将humor定义为“the quality in something that makes it funny”。
一般而言，有趣或可笑而又意味深长的话语可视为幽默。
其表达方式很多，双关、夸张、反语等均可传递幽默含义。
幽默是一种语用策略，是语言使用者自觉或不自觉地根据语境和交际目的所进行的语言策略的选择。
目前国内关于英语幽默研究的理论方法主要有合作原则、关联理论等，相关研究文献比较丰富，但鲜有关于一个文本的幽默表现形式的多角度分析研究。
幽默在故事《爱情就是谬误》中的具体表现形式多样，不一而足。
本文拟以《爱情就是谬误》为例，多角度分析其中英语幽默的具体表现形式，旨在帮助英语学习者更好地理解和赏析英语幽默。
一、修辞与幽默修辞广泛地应用于幽默之中，因为修辞是一种能使语言产生会话含义的有效手段。
充分利用修辞手段来实现幽默的语言效果，是《爱情就是谬误》的一大特色。
例：Cool was I and logical.Keen,calculating, perspicacious, acute and astute ―I was all of these.My brain was as powerful as a dynamo, as precise as a chemist’s scales,as penetrating as a scalpel.And ―think of it! ―I was only eighteen.It is not often that one so young has such a giant intellect.Take, for example, Petey Burch,my roommate at the University of Minnesota.Same age,same background,but dumb as an ox.A nice enough young fellow,you understand, but nothing upstairs.Emotional type. Unstable.Impressionable.Worst of all,a faddist.Fads,I submit,are the very negation of reason.To be swept up in every new craze that comes along, to surrender yourself to idiocy just because everybody else is doing it this,to me,is the acme of mindlessness.Not,however, to Petey.（张汉熙，1995：67-68）这是故事开头的两段，引入了两个重要人物：Dobie Gillis（男主人公兼第一人称叙事者）和Petey Burch（与Dobie住同一房间的同学兼情敌），也为后来故事的发展作了铺垫，与故事的结尾构成了强烈的反差。
love is fallacy这篇文章的结构
love is fallacy这篇文章的结构《Love is Fallacy》这篇文章由6部分组成。
全文通过一个幽默的故事，讲述了一个错误的逻辑，即“爱情真理学”。
下面将详细解析每个部分的内容。
第一部分（引子）介绍了主人公Sheldon和他的朋友Petey。
他们是大学的室友，Sheldon自视甚高，自称是天才。
这一部分主要描绘了Sheldon和Petey的关系以及Sheldon对于Petey相貌平平而自己智商高于他的看法。
第二部分（主体）中，Sheldon在故事中提出“爱情真理学”的观点。
他的观点基于一种错误的逻辑：“智商与美貌是人们选择伴侣的最重要因素”。
他试图以此来证明自己很聪明，而且知道如何赢得美丽的女孩Polly的心。
第三部分（例子一）中，Sheldon给Petey举了一个例子来支持他的论点。
他提到了一个看似荒谬的故事，即Petey成功地将一只漂亮的狗交换成了一个笨重的但有一张漂亮面孔的金鱼。
Sheldon将此看作是一个有力的例证，用来证明他的观点。
这个故事笑料百出，使得阅读者在故事逻辑之外发现乐趣。
第四部分（例子二）中，Sheldon再次给Petey举例来证明他的理论。
这次，他提到了一个更加荒谬的故事，即他成功地用他的“爱情真理学”策略赢得了另一个漂亮女孩的芳心。
他将这个故事描述得更加夸张和荒诞，以增强故事的幽默感。
第五部分（转折）是这篇文章的转折点。
Polly看到Sheldon和另一个女孩子在一起，开始怀疑Sheldon对她的真实感情。
她和Sheldon 进行了一次对话，表达了自己对于他的做法的不满和质疑。
这个转折点揭示了Sheldon错误的逻辑和自私的动机，使故事的结构变得更加复杂和有趣。
第六部分（结尾）中，Sheldon意识到他无法通过逻辑和“爱情真理学”来控制和征服感情。
他预示着自己将重新考虑自己的观点，并承认了Petey的智慧。
这篇文章的整体结构非常巧妙。
首先，引子部分提供了背景信息，为接下来的故事奠定了基础。
LoveIsaFallacy总结
6. The use of colloquial words
For example: “dumb” “pin - up ”,“kid”, “go steady” “date” “Holy Toledo” “casual” “kick” laugh”, “terrif” ,“magnif”, “yummy”, “fire away” and “darn” ,
These lexical devices together help to contribute to the vividness and aesthetic beauty of the essay.
Rhetorical devices
• 1. Simile “My brain was as powerful as a dynamo, as precise as a
made in sharp contrast with the dumb Petey Burch.
5. The use of derogatory terms
Many derogatory terms to describe Petey Burch ,who is “dumb”, “nothing upstairs “ emotional” “unstable”“ impressionable” and “Worst of all ,a faddist . ”The dumbness of Petey Burch is vividly portrayed
Lexical devices
The lexical spectrum is colorful. This mix adds to the
realism of the story. One would expect a freshman to
love is a fallacy 总结.doc
love is a fallacy 总结.docLove is a Fallacy, or “爱是一种谬论”，是Max Shulman创作的一篇小故事。
故事主要围绕着主人公利奥，一位自认为聪明的年轻学生，试图通过授课的方式来让他的搭档波莉爱上他，从而成为他的女友。
故事有趣而幽默，传达了一些有关逻辑和相爱关系的值得思考的信息。
故事颠覆了传统对“爱情”的看法。
它认为爱情是错误的、没有逻辑的想法，是一种“谬论”。
作者通过利奥的学习，启示了人们的思维方式应该是逻辑的、理性的，而非凭借感性来做出决定。
虽然，作者在文中批判了爱情的表现形式、展示了许多荒谬的判断行为，却并不否认真正的爱情的存在。
故事通过利奥的授课过程完整地展现了很多逻辑学的重要元素，如演绎法和陈述法等。
它让读者们认识到，逻辑思维是人们需要在生活中并行不懈的修炼和提升的能力。
并不仅仅存在于学术研究和数学推导中。
故事让读者们认识到，谷类对逻辑的运用可以存在于生活中，并能够帮助人们做出理性的判断。
故事的主角是一对青年男女，这些人都在学习阶段。
这透露了在如今这个知识经济时代，教育和理性能力的重要性。
故事描述了青年的困惑、爱情的盲目、无视利用逻辑思维的情感等问题。
这些问题是大多数年轻人都会遇到的。
也让人们意识到，爱情是一种复杂而又美丽的情感，而利用逻辑思维的方式谈恋爱，或许是一个值得探讨的方式。
总之，“爱是一种谬论”是一篇优秀的短篇小说，它让读者们思考逻辑思维的重要性，以及理性思考和维护人际关系之间的平衡。
故事有趣而深刻，让读者们去思考爱情、性别、逻辑思维和文化值等方面的问题。
LoveisaFallacy谬论
在面对爱情中的挑战时，我们需要积极应对。通过勇于面对现实和接 受现实，我们可以更好地克服挑战，从而让爱情理解和认识
爱情并非永恒
爱情是一种情感，受到许多因素的影响，包括个人价值观、生活经历和外部环境等。因此，爱情并非永恒不变，而是 随着时间和情境的变化而变化。
Love is a Fallacy谬论
• 引言 • 爱情与理性的关系 • 爱情中的谬误类型 • 爱情中的谬误实例 • 克服爱情中的谬误 • 结论
01
引言
主题简介
爱情是一种普遍的情感体验，被视为人类最美好的情感之一 。然而，爱情是否真的存在，是否是一种谬论，是本篇论文 探讨的主题。
爱情被视为一种非理性、冲动的情感，与逻辑和理性相悖。 因此，本篇论文将通过分析爱情的本质和特点，探讨爱情是 否真的存在，是否只是一种谬论。
保持合理的期望有助于我们避免过度理想化爱情。我们应 该根据实际情况来设定期望，而不是盲目追求完美。
勇于面对现实和接受现实
勇于面对问题
在爱情中，我们不可避免地会遇到各种各样的问题和挑战。为了克 服这些问题，我们需要勇于面对现实，并采取积极的措施来解决问 题。
接受现实的不完美
爱情并不总是完美的，我们需要接受现实的不完美。通过接受现实， 我们可以更好地应对问题，并找到解决问题的方法。
家庭和朋友。
认为爱情可以解决一切问题，忽 略了现实生活中存在的困难和挑
战。
将爱情视为一种纯粹的感情，忽 略了理性思考和责任的重要性。
05
克服爱情中的谬误
提高理性思考能力
理性思考
在面对爱情时，我们需要保持冷 静和理性，不要被情感冲昏头脑。 通过提高理性思考能力，我们可 以更好地分析问题，不被谬误所 迷惑。
loveisafallay读后感
About Love Is a FallacyMax Shuman’s excellent story “Love Is a Fallacy”is attractive and impressed me deeply. I think it is the most interesting article I have learnt in English classes. From my point of view, plot plays a significant role in a successful novel. Undoubtedly, the emergence of eight logic fallacies creates the dramatic effort of discovery and suspense in the novel, makes the original dull story become unpredictable.It is a satire that the girl turned down Dobie’s request of being his girlfriend with the logical statement Dobie taught her. And it is also a satire that Polly finally received Petey’s love just because he had a raccoon coat.It seems that the author wrote a love triangle, actually the love relationship between the three characters in a fallacy. Dobie thought himself a keen, calculating,perspicacious, acute person, and he deserved a beautiful, gracious, intelligent wife. After his hard work to perfect Polly to have a logic thinking, Petey thought he lost his lover when he accept Dobie’s raccoon coat. Dramatically, he was the last one who went steady with Polly, since he had a raccoon coat. All the three got the result they hadn’t expected at first.The whole story is a piece of light, humorous satire.After World War Ⅰ, many people feel stressed and anxious. Under such circumstance, Max Shulman wrote The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis, this story is one of it, it gained popularity because of its humorous and light style. At the beginning, Petey said like a fool he has spent all of his money fortextbooks, and now he couldn’t get a raccoon coat. Generally, it is necessary that students should buy textbooks, here expresses humor, as well as Petey’scharacteristic---a faddist. Dobie thought it I easier to make a beautiful dumb girl smart than to make an ugly smart girl beautiful. However, I think it is wrong now, for that one can be more beautiful by plastic surgery and makeup. On the contrast, smarten someone will take great ter come to the climax of the novel, Dobie teaches her how to recognize the common fallacies of logic, he succeeds too well because the whole thing backfires on him when Polly refutes all his arguments as logical fallacies before finally rejecting him.In the meanwhile, I found this story very instructive. The author teaches us eight logical fallacies and then reviews by Polly, so readers can take a course in logic automatically. On the other hand, their views on love let us think of our own. Dobie wants to find a perfect woman, though he didn’t love her; Petey wants the raccoon coat and can give up the girl; Polly goes steady with Petey just because he has the coat. All of them have wrong views on love.However, I am quite confused that why Dobie gave the coat to Petey as Polly hadn’t went stead with anyone, they can compete justly. In addition, if the raccoon coat represents rich life, and Polly favored money, obviously Dobie is richer than Petey, so why she didn’t chose him? Maybe she is a faddist or just playing a game with him.。
Love-Is-a-Fallacy总结
5. The use of derogatory terms
Many derogatory terms to describe Petey Burch ,who is “dumb”, “nothing upstairs “ emotional” “unstable”“ impressionable” and “Worst of all ,a faddist . ”The dumbness of Petey Burch is vividly portrayed
to add realism to the story.
7. The use of slangs
Here are some examples: “nothing upstairs” “keen” “deal” “nut” “knock one out” “dreamy” “how cute” “well -heeled” “rat ” “knot-head” “jitterbug” “guy” “fracture” and many others.
Syntactic devices
• The use of simple sentences They shed. They smell bad. They weigh too much. They’re unsightly.
• The use of sentence fragments “Same age , same background , but dumb as an ox. ” “Worst of all ,a faddist .”
• The use of elliptical sentences “Emotional type. Unstable. Impressionable. ”
love is a fallacy段落划分
love is a fallacy段落划分Love is a Fallacy，是由美国作家Max Shulman所创作的一篇幽默的短篇小说。
这篇小说被广泛地阐述学习逻辑思维的方法和思路，并通过一个生动的故事向读者介绍了逻辑思维的基础原理。
下面，本文将这篇小说按照题目要求进行段落划分，以帮助读者更好地理解故事的主要内容。
第一段：简介Love is a Fallacy这篇小说最初发表于1951年，讲述了一个男子通过教女友思考逻辑来争取追求她的过程。
这篇小说除了富有幽默感和喜剧元素，还蕴含着深刻的意义。
第二段：主人公主角的名字叫做“爱登堡”。
在小说中，爱登堡是一个非常聪明的年轻人，是个博学多才的人。
他通过自己的智慧，锐利的思维和逻辑推理能力，赢得了众人的青睐。
第三段：女主角女主角的名字叫做“波莉霍普”。
波莉霍普是一个平凡而普通的女孩，没有什么特别的天赋和才智。
但是她很美丽，这是她吸引男人的主要资本。
第四段：男主角的计划爱登堡喜欢波莉霍普，但她只喜欢外表阳光幽默的男人。
得知这一点之后，爱登堡开始分析并学习外表阳光幽默的特质。
同时，他还教波莉霍普学习逻辑，希望能够改变她的看法。
第五段：逻辑的学习爱登堡和波莉霍普开始了逻辑学习之旅，教材是学校里的一本逻辑书。
逻辑学习开始后，爱登堡以逻辑的形式向波莉霍普说明逻辑的各个概念，并用生活实例加以解释。
第六段：爱登堡的计划成功了吗？逻辑学习的同时，爱登堡还不断地将自己变成外表阳光幽默的人。
之后，在他恰到好处的时候向波莉霍普表白，并告诉她，他正是她所需要的人。
波莉霍普终于被他的机智、才智和外表感动，并接受了他的告白。
第七段：结语Love is a Fallacy 这个故事教我们：学习逻辑思维可以让我们更加理性地认识和看待世界。
同时，对于恋爱中的人们来说，爱情固然重要，但机智与智慧同样不可或缺。
总之，Love is a Fallacy 是一个让我们在笑声中学习逻辑思维的有趣故事。
love-is-a-fallacy主题分析
love-is-a-fallacy主题分析“Love is a fallacy”is a pun that can be understood of two meanings. Love is not only an error, a deception, but also an emotion that does not follow the principle of logic.Love is fallacious, deceptive, or misleading. Love makes the narrator stupid. When “fallacy” refers to the quality of being deceptive, the title means “there is a deceptive or delusive quality about love”.Love is an illusion.Dobie exchanged his raccoon coat for Petey’s girlfriend. When people regard love as a deal, it could be a fallacy. Petey thought a raccoon coat was more important than his girlfriend, so the love between Petey and Polly was a fallacy, too.Polly loves Petey is a fallacy. Polly chooses Petey, because Petey is able to wander around the campus like those big men in his new fashionable raccoon coat.she can’t be intelligent enough to understand what is temporary and what is enduring, what is illusory and what is practical.Love is illogical. The narrator has a logical mind, but he fails to win the girl’s love, which does not follow the rules of logic. When taken as a specific term in logic, the title means “love can not be deduced from a set of given premises”.Love is unpredictable, unreasonable.Love can not be predicted. We can’t decide our couple.Dobie’s love to Polly is a fallacy. Dobie believes he can change Polly into a smart woman, and then they two become a pair of enviable perfect couple.This is truly a “false- analogy”fallacy. Dobie taught Polly several logic theory during whole dating time in order to make an intellectual wife. Love is a fallacy when the two people have other purpose or just love part of the person.Polly proves the narrator’s love to her a fallacy. When he shows his love to Polly after that, Polly refutes all his arguments as illogical based on exactly the same fallacies he teaches her. That means his love to Polly is just a fallacy. The failure made Dobie realize that love is not follow the traditional routine. Love is a fallacy that have an unexpected ending.Neither the narrator nor Polly loves each other, and they don’t know what is love at all. The narrator gets on Polly to make her his wife, and Polly gets onPetey for raccoon. Both are not for love, but for other purposes. That’s why we find that love is a fallacy in the text. Welcome To Download欢迎您的下载，资料仅供参考！。
LoveIsaFallacy总结
• introduction • The irrationality of love • The Defects and Problems of Love • Rational Thinking on Love • Summary and suggestions
01
Background
With the development of modern society, people's expectations for love are increasing, but in reality, love relationships often face various challenges and difficulties. Therefore, in-depth thinking and exploration of love have important practical significance.
04
Rational Thinking on Love
Love is not everything in life
Love is only a part of life: although love occupies an important position in human life, it is not the entirety of life. People also need to pay attention to other aspects, such as career, family, friendship, and self actualization.
The Multifacedness of Love
Love is not a single concept, but encompasses multiple emotions and experiences, including romance, intimacy, commitment, etc.
love is a fallacy主旨大意
love is a fallacy主旨大意Love is a Fallacy: A Critique of Romantic IdealismIntroduction:Love is a Fallacy is a thought-provoking and satirical short story written by Max Shulman in the early 1950s. The story revolves around the central character, a young man named Dobie Gillis, who attempts to use logic and reasoning to win the affection of his love interest, a beautiful girl named Polly Espy. However, the main thesis of Love is a Fallacy challenges the idea of love as an emotion based on rationality, arguing that it is ultimately a fallacy that cannot be fully explained by logic. This paper aims to critically analyze the main points and underlying themes of the story, exploring the fallacies surrounding love and the limitations of purely rational thinking in matters of the heart.Summary of Love is a Fallacy:The narrative is set in a college campus, where Dobie Gillis encounters Polly Espy, a desirableyoung woman known for her beauty but not her intellect. Dobie, who prides himself on his logical thinking and rationality, becomes infatuated with Polly and sees her as a prize to be won. He devises a plan to educate Polly to be more intellectually astute, believing that a relationship requires shared intelligence.Dobie acquires the help of a roommate and uses logical reasoning to "trade" Polly for her raccoon coat, a valuable item he believes will enhance his social status. His plan goes smoothly until Polly unexpectedly falls in love with the roommate, despite his less-than-adequate logical abilities. This turn of events challenges Dobie's belief that love can be won through intellectual superiority.Main Themes and Analysis:1. Love as an Emotional Fallacy: The primary theme of the story is the fallacy of equating love with logical reasoning. Dobie's attempts to educate Polly are based on the assumption that a successful romantic relationship requires shared intellectual compatibility. However, the outcome reveals thatlove cannot be reduced to mere logic or acquired through teaching someone to be intellectually astute. Love is depicted as an irrational and unpredictable emotion that transcends rationality.2. The Limitations of Rational Thinking:Dobie's character embodies the limitations of rational thinking when it comes to matters of the heart. His confidence in logical reasoning blinds him to the possibility that love is more complex and irrational. This highlights how his rigid adherence to logic prevents him from understanding the intricacies and nuances of human emotions.3. The Failure of Stereotypes: Polly Espy's character challenges gender stereotypes by defying Dobie's expectations and falling for the roommate despite his lack of logical prowess. This subversion of gender and intellectual stereotypes implies that love cannot be confined or predicted by societal norms and preconceived notions.4. Satire and Social Commentary: While the story is primarily focused on love and rationality, it also serves as a satire on societal values andeducation systems. Dobie's attempts to teach Polly are reminiscent of the authoritarian methods of educating imparted by formal educational institutions. It satirizes the idea of molding individuals to fit a specific ideal or intellectual standard.Conclusion:"Love is a Fallacy" offers a witty critique of the fallacies surrounding love and the limitations of pure rationality. The story challenges thebelief that love can be obtained through logical reasoning or by conforming to societal expectations. Instead, it suggests that love is an unpredictable and emotional experience that defies logic. Max Shulman's narrative serves as a reminder that love cannot be neatly categorized or controlled, urging readers to embrace the complexities and irrationality of human emotions.。
Love-Is-a-Fallacy总结
“Emotional type. Unstable. Impressionable. ”
• The use of dashes and short dialogues to maintain a fast pace
Examples see para.139-150.
Hecuba to him or he to Hecuba that he should weep for her ?”from Shakespeare’s Hamlet
Discourse cohesion devices
• The words “raccoon coat” appear 18 times in all and there are 12 pronouns for “raccoon coat”. The last 3 words of the essay are also “a raccoon coat”. In all ,the words “raccoon coat” appear 31 times in the essay.
– 2. the author’s note
• “spongy”, “limp”, “flaccid” are specific characteristics of his essay. He is joking, which indicates that the whole story is humorous.
the constellations of outer space.”
• 6. Rhetorical question “Could Carlyle do more ? Could Ruskin ?” “Who knew ?”
love is a fallacy 总结
①绝对判断Dicto simpliciterAn argument based on an unqualified generalizationEg：1.exercise is good . There everybody should exercise。
(who have heart disease）2。
meat will make people fat。
(吃肉会长胖）②草率结论Hasty generalizationEg：1。
you can`t speak french. I can`t speak french。
Petey can`t speak french. So nobody at the university of minnesota can speak french。
2.齐国晏子楚国君王橘生淮南则为橘，生于淮北则为枳,叶徒相似，其实味不同.所以然者何？水土异也.今民生长于齐不盗，入楚则盗，得无楚之水土使民善盗耶？”③牵强附会Post hocA faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence Eg：1.let`s not take Bill on our picnic。
Evert time we take him out with us ，it rains.2。
Bill purchases a new Power Mac and it works fine for months. He then buys and installs a new piece of software. The next time he starts up his Mac, it freezes。
Bill concludes that the software must be the cause of the freeze。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
①绝对判断
Dicto simpliciter
An argument based on an unqualified generalization
Eg:1.exercise is good . There everybody should exercise.(who have heart disease)
2.meat will make people fat. (吃肉会长胖)
②草率结论
Hasty generalization
Eg:1.you can`t speak french. I can`t speak french. Petey can`t speak french. So nobody at the university of minnesota can speak french.
2.齐国晏子楚国君王橘生淮南则为橘，生于淮北则为枳，叶徒相似，其实味不同。
所以然者何？水土异也。
今民生长于齐不盗，入楚则盗，得无楚之水土使民善盗耶？”
③牵强附会
Post hoc
A faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence Eg:1.let`s not take Bill on our picnic. Evert time we take him out with us ,it rains.
2.Bill purchases a new Power Mac and it works fine for months. He then buys and installs a new piece of software. The next time he starts up his Mac, it freezes. Bill concludes that the software must be the cause of the freeze.
④前提矛盾
Contradictory premises
An argument that draws conclusion from inconsistent or incompatible
Essentially a proposition is contradictory when it asserts and denies the same thing
Eg:1. if god can do anything,can he make a stone so heavy that he won`t be able to lift it?
2.
⑤文不对题
Ad misericordiam
Eg:1.a man applies for a job. Instead he appeals to the boss`s sympathy.
2.We hope you'll accept our recommendations. We spent the last three months working extra time on it.
⑥错误类比
False analogy
Eg:1.students should be allowed to look at their textbooks during examinations. After all, surgeons have x-rays to guide them during an operation ,lawyers have briefs to guide them during a trial.
2.
⑦与事实相反的假设
Hypothesis contrary to fact
Eg:1.if madame curie had not happened to leave a photographic plate in a drawer with a chunk of pitchblende ,the world today would not know about radium.
2.If I had studied hard, I would definitely have passed the test.
⑧井里投毒
Poisoning the well
Eg:1.my opponent is a notorious liar. You can`t believe a word that he is going to say....
2. You may argue that God doesn't exist, but you are just following a fad.。