双语：为什么人文学科不应被摒弃
人文学科并没有过时英语作文
人文学科并没有过时英语作文The Relevance of Humanities in Modern TimesIn an era dominated by technology and scientific advancements, the significance of humanities often goes unnoticed. However, the humanities remain as relevant as ever in understanding the complexities of human existence and society.Firstly, the humanities provide a deeper understanding of human behavior and culture. By studying history, literature, philosophy, and other humanities subjects, we can gain insights into the values, beliefs, and traditions that shape human society. This understanding is crucial in navigating the diverse and often conflicting cultures of the modern world.Secondly, the humanities foster critical thinking and analytical skills. In a world where information is constantly bombarding us, the ability to critically evaluate and interpret this information is invaluable. The humanities train us to question assumptions, challenge authority, and seek truth through rigorous argumentation.Moreover, the humanities contribute to ethical decision-making. As technology and science progress, ethical challenges are becoming increasingly complex. The humanities, particularly ethics and philosophy, provide frameworks and perspectives for addressing these challenges, ensuring that technological advancements are used responsibly and ethically.In conclusion, while technology and science play a pivotal role in modern society, the humanities remain essential in providing a balanced, nuanced understanding of human existence and society. They foster critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and cultural understanding, making them indispensable in our quest for a more enlightened and harmonious world.人文学科在现代社会的重要性在科技和科学进步为主导的时代，人文学科的重要性往往被忽视。
儿童教育双语不用教了
儿童教育双语不用教了在当今社会，越来越多的家长意识到双语教育的重要性。
他们明白，给孩子提供一个双语环境能够带来无穷的好处，从提高语言能力到培养跨文化的认知能力。
然而，一种新的教育方法正在崭露头角，那就是“双语不用教”。
本文将探讨这一教育方法的优势以及如何有效地实施。
“双语不用教”是一种以母语为主的教育方法，认为通过日常生活交流中的自然语言环境，儿童可以潜移默化地学会第二语言。
这种方法强调的是语言的实际运用，而不是靠机械地学习课本上的知识。
首先，双语不用教的方法可以提高孩子的语言能力。
在封闭的教室环境中，孩子们可能只能在有限的时间里接触到第二语言，而真实的语言环境有助于他们更快地掌握第二语言的听说读写能力。
此外，通过与母语者自由沟通和交流，孩子们可以更好地理解和应用所学语言，从而提高语言表达能力。
其次，双语不用教的方法有助于培养儿童的跨文化意识与认知能力。
在与不同文化背景的人交往中，孩子们会对其他文化产生兴趣，并逐渐摒弃任何隔阂和歧视。
他们可以更好地理解和尊重其他文化的差异，培养跨文化交流的能力，这对他们未来的人际关系和国际交往是至关重要的。
但是，尽管双语不用教的方法有许多优势，也需要家长和学校共同努力来实施。
首先，家长应该创造一个双语环境，给予孩子足够的语言输入。
这可以通过与孩子进行常规的日常对话，观看双语电视节目或播放双语故事等方式实现。
此外，家长还可以和其他有双语背景的家庭联系，组织孩子进行双语交流和玩耍，以加强他们的第二语言能力。
其次，学校也扮演着重要的角色。
学校应该提供一个支持双语不用教的教育环境，鼓励学生自由表达和思考。
教师可以创造各种语言学习场景，如小组讨论、角色扮演和实地考察等，以帮助学生更好地运用第二语言。
最后，需要注意的是，并不是所有的学生都适合双语不用教的方法。
对于一些学习困难或有特殊需求的学生，可能需要额外的支持和指导。
学校和家长应该根据孩子的实际情况，制定相应的教学计划，确保他们能够顺利地适应双语学习。
不应该取消文科课程的理由
不应该取消文科课程的理由1. 文科课程的重要性文科课程是培养学生综合人文素质和思维能力的重要途径，具有以下几个方面的重要性：1.1 培养人文素养文科课程涵盖了语言、文学、历史、哲学等领域的知识，能够培养学生对人文社会的理解和思考能力。
通过学习文科课程，学生可以了解人类的历史、文化和价值观，培养自己的人文素养和社会责任感。
“文以载道”，文科课程能够引导学生形成正确的世界观、人生观和价值观。
1.2 培养综合能力文科课程注重培养学生的综合能力，包括逻辑思维、分析问题和解决问题的能力。
文科课程要求学生阅读、理解和分析大量的信息和文本，培养学生批判性思维和创新思维能力。
这些能力在学生的日常生活和职业发展中都是非常重要的。
1.3 提供全面教育文科课程能够提供学生全面的教育，不仅仅是专注于特定的技能和知识。
学生在学习文科课程中可以接触到不同学科的知识，拓宽自己的眼界。
这种综合性的教育有助于培养学生的跨学科思维和综合解决问题的能力。
2. 培养全面发展的人才文科课程的存在对培养全面发展的人才至关重要。
取消文科课程可能会导致以下几个问题：2.1 学科单一化取消文科课程将导致学科的单一化，将教育变得过于功利化和灌输式。
学生只注重于某些特定的学科和技能，而忽视了其他领域的重要性。
这种单一化的教育会限制学生的综合能力和发展潜力。
2.2 缺乏人文关怀文科课程能够培养学生的人文关怀能力，使他们成为具有同理心和社会责任感的人才。
取消文科课程可能导致学生对于社会和人类命运的关注度降低，丧失了对人文精神的尊重和理解。
2.3 缺乏综合解决问题的能力文科课程注重培养学生的综合思考和解决问题的能力。
取消文科课程将限制学生的思维发展，使他们在面对复杂问题时缺乏综合的解决方案。
这样的人才无法适应社会的发展和变化，也无法在竞争中脱颖而出。
3. 文科课程的现实意义文科课程对个人和社会的现实意义不可忽视。
以下几个方面说明了文科课程的现实价值：3.1 培养人的全面发展文科课程能够培养学生的道德情感、审美情趣和创造力。
大学取消人文学科是不利的英语作文
大学取消人文学科是不利的英语作文Without the humanities there would be little value in human life, and man would become a true animal. But the humanities should not be overemphasized, or even substituted for science, for humanity would live forever in a state of ignorance.Since the 2008 global financial crisis, "crisis" has become a fashion word with high frequency in the media. However, people may not know that the so-called "humanities crisis" has long existed in British and American universities. The American scholar Harold Bloom, in the elegiac epilogue, the last chapter of his book The Western Canon, predicts so gloomily: "I have little faith that literature will survive its present illness." Princeton university published in 1997 a collection of essays called What's Wrong with the Humanities? In this paper, the sociological data survey method is used to explore the chronic humanism. Edward Said lamented in the spring of 1999 that "literature itself is disappearing from university curricula" and being replaced by "fragmented, jargon-filled" supposedly emerging disciplines. In November the same year,the magazine of the New York review of books published durban's article "the decline and fall of literature", the title adopting the's book "the decline and fall of the Roman empire" "The end of literature is near," hillis Miller, a professor at the University of California, declares alarmingly in the opening sentence of His treatise, though he immediately adds a self-contradictory statement: "Although its end is not far, literature is eternal and universal."In British and American universities, the Department of English is increasingly in trouble, which is facing a reduction in administrative funding, a sharp drop in students, graduate employment and other fatal injuries. All this has left the once "high and dry" English department as the only marginalized and ridiculed department on campus. A visiting British university professor recently told me that the government's decision to base funding on the actual social benefits of the humanities had left liberal arts departments so financially strapped that they had to treble university tuition fees, prompting an outcry from students.Is the crisis in the humanities a phenomenon of the last decade or so, or has it already existed? What are the causes?In fact, the humanities have long been in crisis. As far back as Plato's Republic, Socrates advocated the expulsion of poets from his imagined republic lest they stir up vile desires in the guardians of the city. Plato claimed through Socrates: "We will not accept him in a city that expects good manners and good governance, because he awakens and nurtures the base part of the soul, makes it strong, and kills the rational part... We may say that the poet, who practises simulation, has thrust a bad regime into every individual's own soul, to please the unwise part of the soul..." Augustine, in his Confessions, accuses himself of neglecting spiritual cultivation by indulging in theatre. The English Renaissance poet Sidney defended his poetry against various Puritan attacks in his Poem Debate, and Shelley spared no effort to find the reason for the existence of poetry in the utilitarian and pragmatic era in his long essay of the same name... The "soft" humanities, which have been in retreat ever since "hard" subjects such as science were established in universities in the 19th century, seem to have no retreat from the more fashionable disciplines such as economics and management. They need to do some soul-searching to figure out their raison d 'etre and theirfuture direction.All of which suggests that the humanities are in a hostile environment all the time, or at least that they are regarded as dispensable cultural trimmings. Capitalism, in Eagleton's words, pays a little homage to culture by touching its brim.There are two main schools of accusation against the humanities. One is the moral charge, as Plato and later Christian defenders (Tolstoy is prominent among them). The second is the utilitarian charge, represented by the Four Ages of Poetry written by Peacock in the 19th century. In modern times, moral criticism of literature has given way to apathetic attitudes, driven by a cosmopolitan secularization and a relativism of moral principles, as Shakespeare loses out to Adam Smith in the ruthlessly pragmatic job market.As an independent subject in universities, English has a history of just over a century. In Britain, until the end of the 19th century, humanities education in universities was based on the transmission of ancient Greek, Roman and other classical language documents. It was not until the turn of the 20th century that the old, conservativeuniversities in Britain opened English departments and opened their own languages and literature. According to Eagleton, the English discipline served several purposes: to find a more time-consuming and labor-intensive way for the working class to receive an education, to provide more accessible subjects for the women who had recently crowded into universities, and to create a sense of national identity and export imperial cultural identity to British subjects. Readers will guess why Matthew Arnold, Oxford's first professor of poetry, delivered his inaugural address in English, not in the traditional Latin.One of the important reasons for the crisis of English discipline is its unclear orientation. As early as the end of 1950s, Canadian critic Frye pointed out the dilemma of literary criticism in his famous book Anatomy of Criticism: criticism relies on history on one side and philosophy on the other. Critics borrow events from history and ideas from philosophy. This dilemma of criticism is also a true portrayal of literature. Because in college English departments, the interpretation of a literary text must rely on the framework of a critical theory, rather than on personal taste and subjectiveimpression (which is typical of critics at the end of the 19th century) to deal with a work. Thanks to the advances in the natural sciences since the end of the 19th century, the humanities by contrast remain in the shadow of old ideas, as can be seen from how many years British and American critics have been talking about Plato's imitation and Aristotle's catharsis. In view of this, the modernist master T. S. Eliot advocated the "non-individuation" of art in his article Tradition and Individual Talent, and put forward the anti-romantic slogan: "The progress of an artist is a kind of continuous self-sacrifice, a kind of constant elimination of individuality". He believes that only in this kind of deindividuation can art approach the status of science. From Russian formalism to T. S. Eliot to F. Fry and later the "New Criticism," literary researchers have long dreamed of creating a science of the humanities that would rival the precise methods of the natural sciences. But since the 1960s and 1970s, this dream of establishing the humanities has been shattered by a barrage of political, feminist, and minority criticism, leaving the humanities in a "tower of Babel" chaos.Another important reason for the decline of English is theruthless pragmatism of Anglo-American capitalism. Russell devoted his book ode to Leisure to "useless knowledge". "In the last 150 years," he wrote, "the value of 'useless' knowledge has been increasingly debated, and the belief has grown that the only knowledge worth having is that which can be applied to some area of socio-economic life." Under the influence of this dominant ideology, the humanities are dwarfed by subjects with direct economic benefits such as marketing, and applicants' pure academic interests are swayed by the baton of employment, choosing only those subjects with better job prospects. In the era of market economy, celebrities have become invisible masses of consumers, and according to the cultural elite, the masses are "collective mediocrity."In recent decades, literary education in British and American universities has experienced the controversy of breaking the "Canon". There was no doubt in the minds of former educators what a Canon was. Eliot considered the Canon to be Greco-Latin literature, and for him the common measure of excellence in literature written in European languages was the classics. Schopenhauer wasobsessed with the classics and wrote: "Nothing refreshes us so much as reading the old classics... Read even half an hour... The spirit is purified, sublimated and strengthened. It feels like drinking from a mountain stream." In the Western Canon, Bloom relentlessly rebukes attempts by various contemporary schools of fashion criticism to open up the Canon and affirms the centrality of Shakespeare and Dante. Confusingly, however, over the past two or three decades English departments at British and American universities have courted fashion, offering a variety of courses that have nothing to do with Canon texts, and even calling for "cultural studies" to replace traditional literary studies. On the other hand, advocates of "political correctness" and feminism attacked the Canon as a product of WASP (i.e., white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant) ideology, reflecting the dark motives of the ruling class to maintain its position. The writers in the Canon are almost all dead white men, rejecting female literary representation. It is not hard to imagine how a discipline can survive an existential crisis when even its core Canon is questioned.Since the 1960s, the theoretical wind blowing from continentalEurope has dealt a fatal blow to the English discipline. These theories are hard to understand, and the result is that college students spend too much time nibbling on them to read core literature. This situation is well illustrated by David Jeffrey, a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, in Literary Studies in a Post-Theoretical Context: "Many of these critics... Worried about the decline of the literary discipline they had helped to precipitate, about the flight from literary works to the tenets of literary theory... These doctrines have become sectioned and have marginalised the discipline of literature in universities."In short, the predicament of humanities (English) discipline is caused by both internal and external factors. If we want to save the dying humanities, we must face up to these factors and try to find out the way to get rid of difficulties and revitalize humanities.。
大学应该取消人文学科吗 英语作文
大学应该取消人文学科吗英语作文The debate on whether universities should abolish humanities has been a contentious issue for quite some time. This discussion has gained momentum in recent years, as some argue that humanities are no longer relevant intoday's fast-paced and technology-driven world. Others, however, strongly oppose this view, arguing that humanities are crucial for fostering critical thinking, cultural understanding, and ethical values.On one hand, those advocating for the abolition of humanities argue that they are expensive and time-consuming, offering little practical value to students. In today's job market, employers often prefer candidates with skills in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields, which are considered more marketable and useful. Furthermore, with the advent of technology, some argue that humanities courses can be replaced by online resources and self-study, making them redundant in a university setting.On the other hand, those opposing the abolition of humanities argue that these courses are integral to a complete education. Humanities courses, such as history,literature, philosophy, and languages, foster critical thinking and analytical skills that are invaluable in any field. They help students understand different cultures and perspectives, fostering a sense of empathy and cultural awareness. Additionally, humanities courses instill ethical values and moral principles that are crucial for responsible citizenship.Moreover, humanities courses contribute to the development of a student's personal growth and identity. By studying humanities, students gain a deeper understanding of their own values, beliefs, and identities. This self-awareness is crucial for making informed decisions and leading meaningful lives.Furthermore, the argument that humanities are not marketable is shortsighted. While STEM fields may offer more immediate job opportunities, humanities graduates often find themselves in positions of leadership and influence. They are able to communicate effectively, think critically, and solve problems innovatively, skills that are invaluable in any field.In conclusion, while the debate on whether universities should abolish humanities is complex and multifaceted, itis clear that these courses play a crucial role in a complete education. Humanities courses foster critical thinking, cultural understanding, ethical values, and personal growth, skills that are invaluable in today's world. While technology and online resources may have changed the way we learn, they cannot replace the value ofa humanities education. Universities should continue tooffer a balance of STEM and humanities courses, ensuringthat students receive a well-rounded education thatprepares them for success in all aspects of life.**大学应该取消人文学科吗？**关于大学是否应该取消人文学科的辩论已经持续了一段时间。
传统文化在大学英语教学的缺失.docx
传统文化在大学英语教学的缺失一、注重中国传统文化的重要性中国传统文化在中国的历史长河里是具有非常重要的作用。
因为，它是历史文化先人经过长期的探索和反复的实践而得来的重要文化。
对于中国传统文化，我们可以取其精华，去其糟粕。
对于优秀的好的文化，我们可以传承和学习。
要把中国的传统文化继承发扬并学习，因为，它有着非常重要的意义。
对于优秀的传统文化，是可以渗透于文化教学中的。
因为，它也是经过历史名人不断探索而得来的结果。
具有非常源远流长的教育文化知识。
因此，作为中国传统文化在大学英语中的教学我们是必须要注重其本土化的教育，再注重国外的教学发展。
两者结合，才会使得英语教学有很好的发展。
我们要注重中国传统文化内在的渗透作用。
因为，对于英语教学来说，毕竟中国的学生不是外国人，在英语学习中还是有很大的学习缺陷的。
因此，这就需要我们要融合中国的传统文化进行教学。
二、中国传统文化在大学英语教学中的缺失1.过分的学习西方文化如今，在如此发达的经济发展中，中国人越来越多的喜欢去西方玩和学习，过分的学习和崇洋媚外有时候会出现反作用的。
因为，在如此日新月异的文化发展中，每天都在不断地更新。
慢慢的学生会忽视中国传统文化的存在，转而注重外来文化学习。
面对过分的学习西方文化是不正确的，我们要适当的学习，而不是过分的学习，而忽视我们中国传统的优秀文化。
2.对大学英语学习的片面化在大学英语教学中，有的学生对英语的学习认识是非常片面化的。
他们不能理解传统文化对国人的重要性。
而忽视了中国传统文化的认识。
在长久的学习中，学生只看见了英语对于走出国门的重要性。
认为英语是走出去的首要条件。
而对中国传统文化的不够重视，这样往往就会忽视了很多重要的东西。
我们在大学英语教学或学习上都应该以同等重要的态度，去重视[1]。
而不是只单纯的看见英语教学的片面化。
学习外来文化本身是一个非常好的一个学习过程，但是我们不可只关注外来的文化，而忽视了中国的传统文化的学习。
翻译在英语教学中的作用
翻译在英语教学中的作用随着现代语言教学中偏重口语交际技巧和提倡更“自然”的第二语言，外语习得方法的方法和方法的发展，要求在课堂上进行翻译的方法被回避。
通过检查学生在解决问题任务中的表现，旨在证明ELT中“教学翻译”的有效性，特别是在本科阶段，它是人文学科英语阅读课程不可或缺的一部分。
国外的古典语言教学将翻译置于教学学习过程的中心位置。
随着欧洲及其他地区现代语言教学方法和方法的发展，从19世纪开始，人们开始重视口语交际技巧，并提倡更“自然”的第二语言外语学习方法，要求在课堂上进行翻译的方法论被回避。
尽管如此，翻译作为一种资源，旨在帮助学生通过阅读理解练习、对比分析和对书面文本的反思来提高他或她的外语知识，这种持续的实践导致翻译逐渐在语言教学中重新站稳脚跟，其他学科的创新有助于我们理解翻译并影响我们的教学实践，行为和电生理学数据表明，母语激活是第二语言理解的无意识关联，因此，翻译是外语理解中无意识和不可避免的元素，如果是这样的话，那么很明显，翻译从来没有完全离开过语言课堂，尽管有人对在语言教学中使用翻译提出了人为的指责，但近年来有重要的呼吁是“恢复”。
此外，自从中世纪经院哲学和备受诟病的19世纪语法翻译方法论时代以来，翻译作为外语课堂中的一种语言学习活动就被赋予了许多名称，例如“学校翻译”、“教学翻译”和“学术翻译”到当前后交际认知范式中的较新术语，例如“翻译行为”，英语教学中的翻译（ELT）通过融入新技术不断更新，从纸质和电子手持资源和专业软件到在线平台和虚拟论坛，所有这些都可以用来促进“翻译行为”在教学学习过程中。
随着21世纪新技术的使用，通过检查大学生在解决问题任务中的表现，使用过程研究方法并借鉴发展学习理论，本章旨在证明“教学翻译”的有效性和相关性”在ELT中，尤其是在本科阶段，它是许多人文学科学习课程中英语阅读课程不可或缺的一部分。
在文学和语言学系，翻译本身并没有明确地作为目的来教授，而是作为完善外语阅读技能的一种手段。
双语教育在中国是否应该被鼓励？
双语教育在中国是否应该被鼓励？国外有关双语教育的界定不下几十种，但可以把它划分为广义的双语教育和狭义的双语教育两种：广义的双语教育指的是学校中使用两种语言的教育。
狭义的双语教育指的是学校中使用第二语言或外语传授学科内容的教育。
而目前在中国，我们大部分学校的双语教育都是使用第二语言或外语传授学科内容的。
双语教育有利有弊但总的来说是利大于弊的。
这里我们主要从两个方面来分析。
一、双语教学的有利之处(一)迎合了提高综合国力和国际竞争力的需要不可否认，世界科学、技术、经济和文化的重心在美国和欧洲。
科学、技术、经济和文化的传播方式从来就是从中心向边缘地带扩散。
中国是发展中国家，处于边缘地带。
在相当长的时期内，我们必须加强外语学习，才能够较快地学习和掌握发达国家的先进科学知识和科学技术。
只有紧跟时代前进的步伐我们才不会犯从前闭关锁国时的错，而紧跟时代前进的步伐的前提是我们精通外语。
(二)满足社会和时代的需求必要性因此，对我国学子进行英语教学不仅仅是社会的需求，更是时代的需求。
如今的社会不断地朝全球化进军，到处急需高素质、高知识水平的人才。
面对这样的趋势，我们只能把希望寄托于我们的新时代青年。
他们是未来世界的全部希望，所以，今天双语的教育不仅是为培养高水平人才而进行的，也是为了提高我们的全民素质水平。
而且，双语教育是一种积极的益智活动，对学生的语言、认知发展起到一定的促进作用。
(三)满足了学生未来发展的需要科研工作、获取信息、出国深造都离不开高超的英语水平。
过去人们常说“学会数理化，走遍天下都不怕”，现在人们常说“掌握英语和计算机,走遍天下都不怕。
”尽管这种说法过于偏激，但是精通英语已经成为学生未来发展的重要素质。
(四)双语学习对幼儿的发展具有极大的影响1.双语学习能促进幼儿语言的发展第二语言的学习向幼儿展示了另一套与母语完全不同的语言符号系统，可以促进幼儿语言能力的发展。
第二语言的学习可以使幼儿逐渐产生对两种语言之间差异的敏感性和对语言符号本身结构的敏感性，其直接结果是幼儿开始将语言看作他们头脑中已经拥有的诸多系统中的一一个特殊系统，从而提高了他们的语言操作能力和交往能力，使幼儿学到地道、纯正的第二语言。
26659309_双语教育的价值所在
双语教育的价值所在杜秀花中国人不需要学外语了吗？随着我国综合国力的增强，一些人觉得国人不需要再学外语了，让外国人学中文就可以了。
这种观点作为一种小期许来自我安慰是可以的，显然不能当真。
一方面，我国仍然是发展中国家，正走在实现中华民族伟大复兴的道路上，需要向世界发达国家学习先进科学技术，等等；另一方面，为了使中华民族复兴梦在世界范围内被广泛接受和理解，必须有效讲述中国故事。
要讲好中国故事，就需要在语言表达上使用海外听众乐于接受的语言组织形式和思维方式。
怎样学习外语最有效？双语教育产生的直接原因就是为了解决外语学习高耗、低效的难题，其最基本的原理是通过用外语教和学数学、科学、历史等非语言学科来拓展学生学习和使用外语的时空，来提高学生的外语水平。
事实证明，双语教育是提高外语教与学的质量的有效途径和必由之路。
双语教育为什么那么难开展？第一，相对于单语教育，双语教育对参与其过程的人与物的要求更高，面对的关联更错综复杂。
如双语数学课是用外语讲授数学知识、培养数学能力，要求双语数学教师不但要具有专业的数学素养，还要具有很高的外语素养；相对于单纯的数学课或外语课，双语数学课承担着数学学科和外语语言双重教学任务，面临双重甚至多重压力。
第二，双语教育需要更加和谐的语言交往环境、更加宽松的社会心理环境。
根据加德纳的社会—教育模式、斯波尔斯基的双语教育评价模式等双语教育理论及耶基斯·多德森定律等可以推理出和谐的语言交往环境、宽松的社会心理环境等隐性环境对双语教育这种高难度教育更加重要，而隐性环境的建设难度远远大于显性环境，尤其是在双语教育价值尚未被普遍认识的当下的中国。
第三，双语教育基本上属于小众教育，满足的是人们追求高品质、高效率、个性化的教育需求，与短、平、快的教育需求不匹配。
综上所述，双语教育是外语教育的有效途径，是高效率学习外语的必由之路，只要学习外语的必要性存在，双语教育就会存在。
双语教育的春天将会伴随人们对高品质、高效率、个性化教育的渴望而到来！注：作者系江苏理工学院教育学院教授，江苏理工学院双语教育研究所所长。
人文学科过时了吗英语四六级英语作文
人文学科过时了吗英语四六级英语作文## English Answer: ##。
In the contemporary era, the relevance of humanitieshas sparked a heated debate. Some argue that the humanities, a traditional field centered around the study of human culture, history, and philosophy, have become obsolete dueto technological advancements and the rise of STEM disciplines. Others, however, contend that the humanities remain indispensable in fostering critical thinking, creativity, and ethical decision-making in a rapidly changing world.Proponents of the obsolescence argument highlight the perceived lack of immediate practical applications for humanities knowledge in today's job market. They contendthat STEM fields offer more concrete skills and career prospects, aligning better with the demands of the modern economy. This perspective prioritizes vocational training and emphasizes the need for individuals to acquiretechnical expertise to succeed.However, proponents of the enduring relevance of humanities counter that such arguments overlook the broader and more fundamental role of humanities in shaping human understanding and values. Humanities scholars argue that the study of history, literature, philosophy, and the arts provides essential insights into human nature, society, and the complexities of the human experience. These insights are crucial for navigating the challenges of the 21st century, which include grappling with issues of inequality, climate change, and technological disruption.Humanities cultivate critical thinking skills that enable individuals to analyze complex information, identify biases, and formulate well-reasoned arguments. They foster creativity and imagination, which are essential for innovation and problem-solving in diverse fields. Moreover, humanities promote ethical decision-making by exposing students to diverse perspectives, moral dilemmas, and the history of human rights.In an increasingly interconnected globalized world, where information is readily available but often fragmented and manipulated, the humanities provide the tools todiscern truth from falsehood, to understand different cultures, and to make informed decisions. They equip individuals with the critical thinking skills, creativity, and ethical values necessary to navigate a complex and challenging world.## 中文回答， ##。
真正的素质教育必须同时淡化语文和外语科目在高考中的地位
真正的素质教育必须淡化语文和外语科目在高考中的地位高考改革，英语减分也好，语文升分也罢，都是语言学家们玩的跷跷板游戏，都是以自身的利益为出发点发表的观点，是一些高位者为自己的私欲为设计的，都不是从国家和民族的长远大计考虑问题的，强化这些学科，势必会走入另一个极端，整天把学生束缚在文字狱中，学习和研究一些文字游戏。
为什么这样说呢？首先我们分析一下英语和语文的功能。
英语和语文都属于语言范畴，担负的主要使命就是完成信息的传递，而不是语言本身的研究和欣赏。
它们的职责是基础性的和服务性的，不应该在中学教学中唱主角，否则就是本末颠倒。
中国不缺会吹牛的，现在会吹的是人满为患，缺的是创新人才，能让科技取得较大突破的人才。
最近几年来国家教育为什么走滑坡路？我们为什么培养不出相当数量的诺贝尔奖获得者，这恐怕是一个较为重要的因素。
不是我们的学生不努力，也不是教师不认真，而是导向、指挥棒都是错的。
语文、英语考试的难度和比重，让许多学生花费了大量的时间和精力在上面，更让一些中国的“乔布斯”式的理工学科特别优秀的人才被高考排斥在优秀大学的大门之外。
高考指挥棒的错，因为高考中语文和英语占的分值太大了。
你可以问一下学生，为什么学英语啊？为了考学、为了考级。
为什么学语文啊？为了考学。
别昧着良心说一些不靠谱的大话，实际调查一下吧！事实就是这样！哪所学校语文开的课少啊？哪所学校英语开的课少啊？但语文和英语又给人们带来了哪些好处呢？写作文手机网上搜，考试手机网上找，可悲啊！我不是说语文和英语不重要，而应该还原它们的真面目，让学生知道为什么重要，学好它们有什么用途。
为考试而学习未免有点走极端！为使用而学习才是硬道理。
现在高考导致学生在这两门学科上几乎花费了一半的学习时间，使其它学科出现严重消化不良。
基本历史常识不知道，错了不说是错，叫搞笑，叫穿越，可悲至极啊！学生社会责任心越来越少，政治思想太淡化了。
有些文科学生甚至连起码的理化常识都不懂，难道这就是素质教育吗？要想真正提高学生的综合素质，必须提高高考中理化生和政史地的分值，否则一切的改革都是徒劳。
人文学科永不过时英语作文
人文学科永不过时英语作文The Humanities Never Go Out of StyleIn a world that is constantly evolving and changing, the value of the humanities remains as important as ever. The study of the humanities, which includes disciplines such as history, literature, philosophy, and art, offers unique insights into the human experience and provides a deeper understanding of our world. While science and technology may dominate the headlines, the humanities continue to offer timeless wisdom and perspective that are essential for navigating the complexities of the modern world.One of the key reasons why the humanities are so important is that they help us to understand ourselves and others better. By studying history, we can learn from the mistakes and triumphs of the past, gaining valuable insights into the human experience and the forces that shape our society. Literature allows us to explore the complexities of human emotions and relationships, while philosophy challenges us to think critically about the fundamental questions of existence. And art, in all its forms, offers a unique window into the human soul, allowing us to connect with the beauty and creativity that define our shared humanity.Moreover, the humanities play a crucial role in fostering empathy and understanding among people from different cultures and backgrounds. In a world that is increasingly interconnected, the ability to appreciate and respect diverse perspectives is more important than ever. The study of the humanities encourages us to engage with ideas and experiences that are different from our own, challenging us to step outside of our comfort zones and see the world through the eyes of others. This broader perspective not only enriches our own lives but also enables us to build bridges of understanding and compassion across cultural divides.Furthermore, the humanities provide us with the critical thinking, communication, and analytical skills that are essential for success in the modern world. The ability to analyze complex information, think creatively, and communicate effectively are all skills that are honed through the study of the humanities. These skills are not only valuable in academic and professional settings but also in everyday life, helping us to make informed decisions, engage in meaningful conversations, and navigate the complexities of the world around us.In a society that is increasingly focused on instant gratification and material success, the humanities remind us ofthe deeper, more enduring values that define our humanity. They encourage us to ask the big questions, to ponder the mysteries of existence, and to seek meaning and purpose in our lives. In a world that is often characterized by division and conflict, the humanities offer a beacon of hope, showing us that despite our differences, we are all connected by our common humanity.In conclusion, the humanities are an essential part of the human experience, offering timeless wisdom and insight that are as relevant today as they have ever been. By studying history, literature, philosophy, and art, we can gain a deeper understanding of ourselves and our world, foster empathy and understanding among diverse cultures, and develop the critical thinking and communication skills that are essential for success in the modern world. In an age of rapid change and uncertainty, the humanities provide us with a foundation of knowledge and wisdom that will never go out of style.。
关于人文学科过时了吗的英语作文
关于人文学科过时了吗的英语作文英文回答：The humanities, encompassing disciplines such as history, literature, philosophy, and art, have been the cornerstone of academic inquiry for centuries. However, as the world rapidly progresses and becomes increasingly technology-driven, questions have arisen regarding the relevance and necessity of the humanities in contemporary society.Proponents of the humanities argue that they provide essential skills and knowledge that are indispensable in a rapidly changing world. The humanities cultivate critical thinking, analytical abilities, and effective communication skills, all of which are highly valued in the modern workforce. By engaging with diverse perspectives, students of the humanities develop empathy, resilience, and a deep understanding of human nature. These qualities are crucial for navigating the complexities of a globalized andinterconnected society.Furthermore, the humanities offer a unique perspective on the human condition and the complexities of human experience. They delve into the motivations, desires, and fears that drive individuals and societies. By examining the past, the humanities provide invaluable insights into the present and help us to anticipate future challenges. In an era of fake news and conflicting narratives, thecritical analysis skills fostered by the humanities are more important than ever.Opponents of the humanities contend that they are outdated and impractical in the face of technological advancements. They argue that the skills acquired in humanities courses are not easily translated into tangible career outcomes and that the focus should shift towards fields that provide more direct pathways to employment. Additionally, they point to the increasing cost of higher education and question the return on investment for a humanities degree.However, it is important to recognize that the value of the humanities extends beyond immediate career benefits. The humanities provide a foundation for lifelong learning, critical engagement, and personal fulfillment. They cultivate a deep appreciation for the human experience, fostering a sense of curiosity, wonder, and connection with the world around us.In conclusion, while the humanities may not offer the same immediate job prospects as certain technical fields, their intrinsic worth remains undeniable. The skills, knowledge, and perspectives gained from humanities education are indispensable for navigating the challenges of the 21st century and cultivating a well-rounded and engaged citizenry.中文回答：人文学科是否过时？人文学科包括历史、文学、哲学、艺术等学科，几个世纪以来一直是学术研究的基石。
人文学科还没有过时的英语作文
人文学科还没有过时的英语作文英文回答：The Humanities Are Far From Obsolete.The humanities, encompassing disciplines such as philosophy, history, literature, and art, are often perceived as antiquated relics in the face of technological advancements. However, this perception is profoundly misguided. The humanities remain indispensable to human understanding and progress.Cultivating Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving.The humanities challenge students to engage in critical thinking and discourse. Through close reading, analysis, and debate, they develop the ability to discern truth from falsehood, understand multiple perspectives, and construct sound arguments. These skills are essential not only in academia but also in all aspects of life, from professionalenvironments to personal decision-making.Fostering Empathy and Cultural Understanding.Literature, history, and art offer windows intodifferent cultures and historical periods. By exploring the experiences, perspectives, and values of others, students develop empathy and gain a deeper understanding of human nature. This fosters tolerance, compassion, and a respectfor diversity, fostering a more harmonious and just society.Sparking Creativity and Innovation.Contrary to popular belief, the humanities stimulate creativity and innovation. The open-ended nature of humanities questions encourages students to think outsidethe box, explore new ideas, and develop original solutions. The arts, in particular, nurture imagination and provide a platform for self-expression, fostering artistic and scientific advancements.Preserving Cultural Heritage and Identity.The humanities are the guardians of human history, culture, and values. They preserve and document the past, offering insights into our present and guiding us toward a better future. By understanding our roots, we canappreciate our cultural heritage and foster a sense of identity and belonging.Addressing Contemporary Global Challenges.The humanities are not divorced from the challenges facing humanity today. They provide frameworks for understanding complex social issues, such as inequality, conflict, and environmental degradation. By examining historical precedents, analyzing cultural perspectives, and engaging in thought experiments, the humanities empower usto devise innovative solutions to pressing problems.Therefore, the idea that the humanities have become obsolete is not only inaccurate but also profoundly harmful. In an increasingly complex and interconnected world, the humanities are more vital than ever. They cultivatecritical thinkers, foster empathy, spark creativity, preserve cultural heritage, and provide insights into addressing contemporary global challenges.中文回答：人文科学绝未过时。
大学应该取消人文学科吗 英语作文
大学应该取消人文学科吗英语作文English:Universities should not cancel humanities disciplines. While it is true that STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields have become increasingly important in our technology-driven world, humanities subjects play an equally crucial role in educating well-rounded individuals. Humanities disciplines provide students with valuable skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and effective communication, which are transferable to various career paths. Moreover, studying humanities fosters empathy and understanding of different cultures, histories, and perspectives, enhancing social cohesion and global awareness. Humanities subjects also enable individuals to appreciate art, literature, philosophy, and ethics, contributing to personal growth and a deeper understanding of humanity. By eliminating humanities disciplines, universities would deprive students of these invaluable opportunities for intellectual and personal development.中文翻译:大学不应该取消人文学科。
辩论辩题是否应该限制使用外语
辩论辩题是否应该限制使用外语正方辩手：首先，我认为应该限制使用外语。
使用外语可能会导致语言障碍，使得沟通变得困难。
如果每个人都使用自己的母语，那么沟通将更加顺畅，能够更好地理解对方的意思。
此外，限制使用外语也可以促进本国语言的传承和发展，保护本国语言不被边缘化。
毕竟，语言是一个国家的文化和传统的重要组成部分，应该得到尊重和保护。
名人名句方面，美国前总统约翰·肯尼迪曾经说过，“不要问国家能为你做什么，而要问你能为国家做什么。
”这句话可以引申为不要问别人能用什么语言来与你沟通，而要问你能用什么语言来更好地融入对方的世界。
限制使用外语可以促进人们更好地融入本国社会，增进国家的凝聚力和文化认同感。
经典案例方面，可以引用加拿大的法语和英语之争。
加拿大是一个双语国家，法语和英语都是官方语言。
然而，长期以来，法语在加拿大的地位一直不如英语稳固。
如果加拿大限制使用外语，特别是英语，可能会更好地保护和发展法语，促进加拿大的双语文化。
综上所述，限制使用外语是有必要的，可以促进沟通顺畅，保护本国语言和文化，增进国家的凝聚力和文化认同感。
反方辩手：我认为不应该限制使用外语。
首先，随着全球化的发展，人们之间的交流变得更加频繁和紧密。
限制使用外语会给国际交流带来不便，影响国家与国家之间的合作和交流。
其次，使用外语可以拓宽人们的视野，增加对不同文化的了解和尊重，有利于促进世界和平与发展。
名人名句方面，尼尔·波兹曼曾说过，“语言是文化的载体，多一种语言就多一种世界。
”这句话强调了语言对于文化的重要性，限制使用外语可能会限制人们对不同文化的了解和交流，从而影响世界的多元发展。
经典案例方面，可以引用欧洲联盟的多语言政策。
欧盟拥有24种官方语言，这种多语言政策为欧盟成员国之间的交流和合作提供了便利，有利于欧盟的统一和发展。
综上所述，不应该限制使用外语，使用外语有利于国际交流和文化交融，有利于促进世界的和平与发展。
我呼吁不要取消文科课程英语作文
我呼吁不要取消文科课程英语作文Title: Why I Advocate Against Cancelling Humanities CoursesAs the debate over the importance of humanities courses, particularly English, in education continues to gain attention, I feel compelled to speak out against any proposed cancellations. In this essay, I will outline the reasons why I believe these courses are essential for students' development and overall education.Firstly, studying humanities subjects such as English provides students with valuable skills that are transferable to many aspects of their lives. The ability to critically analyze and interpret texts, to communicate effectively, and to think creatively are all crucial skills that are cultivated through the study of humanities. By canceling these courses, we would be depriving students of the opportunity to develop these skills, which are not only important in academic settings but also in the world beyond the classroom.Secondly, studying humanities subjects allows students to gain a deeper understanding of human experiences, societies, and cultures. Through the study of literature, history, philosophy, and other humanities disciplines, students can broaden their perspectives, develop empathy, and learn to appreciate diversity.In a world that is becoming increasingly globalized, it is more important than ever for students to have a well-rounded understanding of different cultures and societies.Furthermore, humanities courses help students develop their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. By engaging with complex ideas and texts, students learn to question assumptions, analyze evidence, and formulate well-supported arguments. These skills are essential for navigating the complexities of the modern world and for making informed decisions in both personal and professional contexts.In addition, studying humanities subjects fosters a sense of curiosity and a love of learning. The study of literature, art, history, and other humanities disciplines can be intellectually stimulating and emotionally enriching, sparking students' interest and passion for the world around them. By canceling humanities courses, we risk stifling students' natural curiosity and depriving them of the opportunity to explore diverse ideas and perspectives.Lastly, humanities courses play a crucial role in promoting the values of democracy and social justice. Through the study of literature, history, and philosophy, students learn about the struggles and triumphs of individuals and communitiesthroughout history, gaining insights into the challenges and opportunities that shape our societies. By canceling humanities courses, we risk erasing important voices and narratives from our collective memory, undermining our efforts to create a more just and inclusive society.In conclusion, I strongly believe that humanities courses, particularly English, are essential for students' development and overall education. These courses provide students with valuable skills, cultivate empathy and cultural understanding, develop critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, spark curiosity and a love of learning, and promote democratic values and social justice. Rather than canceling humanities courses, we should recognize their importance and value, and invest in creating a well-rounded and enriching educational experience for all students.。
人文学科是否过时的英语作文
人文学科是否过时的英语作文英文回答：The humanities have been an integral part of education for centuries, providing students with a well-rounded understanding of the human experience and the world around them. However, in recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether the humanities are still relevant in today's society. Some argue that they are outdated and no longer provide the skills and knowledge that students need to succeed in the modern world. Others maintain that the humanities are more important than ever, as they help students develop critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills that are essential for success in any field.There are several reasons why some people believe that the humanities are outdated. First, they argue that the humanities focus on the past, which is not as relevant to students who are preparing for the future. Second, theycontend that the humanities are too theoretical and do not provide students with the practical skills they need to get a job. Finally, they argue that the humanities are biased and do not reflect the diverse perspectives of society.However, there are also several reasons why the humanities are still relevant in today's society. First, the humanities help students develop critical thinking skills. By studying history, literature, and philosophy, students learn how to analyze information, identify bias, and form their own opinions. These skills are essential for success in any field, as they allow students to make informed decisions and solve problems effectively.Second, the humanities help students develop problem-solving skills. By studying the human experience, students learn about the challenges that people have faced throughout history and the ways in which they have overcome them. This knowledge can help students to develop their own problem-solving skills and to approach challenges with creativity and resilience.Third, the humanities help students develop communication skills. By studying literature, writing, and art, students learn how to express themselves clearly and effectively. These skills are essential for success in any field, as they allow students to communicate their ideas effectively and to build relationships with others.Finally, the humanities help students understand the world around them. By studying history, geography, and culture, students learn about the different ways in which people live and interact with each other. This knowledge can help students to develop empathy for others and to understand the global challenges that we face.In conclusion, the humanities are still relevant in today's society. They provide students with the critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and global understanding skills that are essential for success in any field. While the humanities may not always be directly applicable to a specific job, they provide students with the foundational skills that they need to succeed in any career.中文回答：人文学科几百年来一直是教育中不可或缺的一部分，为学生提供了对人类经验和周围世界的全面理解。
学术与语言告别文人角色
学术与语言告别文人角色随着现代社会知识经济的快速发展，学术和语言也越来越多地保持在现代社会舞台上的重要地位。
传统上，学术和语言的发展一直与文人角色密切相关，文人作为高度文化的象征，经常作为学术和语言的代表。
不过，随着时代变化和偏见和歧视的逐渐淡化，学术和语言逐渐告别了文人角色。
本文将探讨学术和语言告别文人角色的原因，以及这场变革对知识和文化的影响。
学术和文人角色的分手，可以追朔到20世纪初。
在这一时期，欧洲和美国的学术研究开始追求更加专业的知识，强调学者的专业化训练和实证研究，而不是抽象思考和人文学科的追求。
这种转变主要受到现代科学和工业的影响，学术研究与现代技术密切相关，要求学者具有严格的专业和实证方法。
这种转变使学术研究摆脱了传统的文人色彩，成为专业的、富有实践和经验的领域，使学者不再是单纯的思想家。
同时，语言的改变也预示着文人角色的逐渐消失。
现代科技使人们享有了更加方便、快捷、准确地表达和交流的方式，尤其是随着信息技术的快速发展，社交网络和移动通讯的普及，彻底改变了语言的沟通方式和习惯。
传统的文学、诗歌、小说和散文等文学形式还存在，但它们的观众有限，而现代文化形式更加具有多样性和广泛性。
语言的变化迫使人们重新审视和调整文化传播的方式，重新思考文化是如何被人们理解和传递的。
今天，我们已经看到学术和语言告别文人角色的明显结果。
学术越来越关注实证研究和专业知识，在严格的学术研究和实证方法的基础上，强调研究结果的应用和实践价值。
对于语言，技术和人类的发展正在将它转变为更方便、更快捷和更多元的通信工具，语言的演进和掌握不再是文人角色的专属领域。
虽然这种变革给知识和文化带来了新的发展方向，但它也带来了新的挑战和问题。
在学术领域，实证研究和专业知识的重要性可能会导致一些领域的研究过于狭隘，缺乏跨学科的交流和创新。
此外，虽然技术正在改变人类的语言和沟通方式，但随之而来的是一些新的语言和文化问题，例如语言和文化的交流，语言习惯的改变以及语言的意义和表现力等等。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
“We are drowning in information, while starving for wisdom.”“世人被知识压死，智慧却少得很。
”That epigram from E.O. Wilson captures the dilemma of our era. Yet the solution of some folks is to disdain wisdom. E·O·威尔逊( E.O. Wilson)一语道破了我们这个时代的困境。
但一些人给出的应对之道竟是鄙弃智慧。
“Is it a vital interest of the state to have more anthropologists?” Rick Scott, the Florida governor, once asked. A leader of a prominent Internet company once toldme that the firm regards admission to Harvard as a useful heuristic of talent, but a college education itself as useless. “拥有更多人类学家是本州的关键利益所在吗？”佛罗里达州州长里克·斯科特(Rick Scott)曾经这样问道。
某著名互联网公司的负责人曾经告诉我，该公司把哈佛大学的录取通知书当成一个人是否有才的具有启发性的有用依据，但并不认为大学教育本身有什么参考价值。
Parents and students themselves are acting on these principles, retreating from the humanities. Among college graduates in 1971, there were about two business majors for each English major. Now there are seven times as many. (I was a political science major; if I were doing it over, I’d be an economics major with a foot in the humanities.) 学生和家长们正按照这类准则行事，纷纷摒弃人文学科。
1971年，商科本科毕业生和英语系本科毕业生的比例是2：1。
现在，两者的比例是7：1。
（我学的是政治学专业；如果可以重来一次，我会去学经济学，同时选修人文学科。
）I’ve been thinking about this after reading Fareed Zakaria’s smart new book,“In Defense of a Liberal Education.” Like Zakaria, I think that the liberal arts teach critical thinking (not to mention nifty words like “heuristic”). 自从读了法里德·扎卡里亚(Fareed Zakaria)颇有见地的新书《捍卫人文教育》(In Defense of a Liberal Education)之后，我一直在思考这一现象。
和扎卡里亚一样，我认为人文教育有助于培养学生的批判性思维（具有“启发性”等漂亮话就更不用说了）。
So, to answer the skeptics, here are my three reasons the humanities enrich our souls and sometimes even our pocketbooks as well. 人文学科可以丰富我们的精神生活，有时甚至可以充实我们的钱袋子。
为了回应怀疑论者，我在此给出三点理由。
First, liberal arts equip students with communications and interpersonal skills that are valuable and genuinely rewarded in the labor force, especially when accompanied by technical abilities. 首先，人文教育有助于提高学生的沟通和人际交往能力，在职场上，这种能力可以给人带来巨大的回报，尤其是在跟技术能力共同起作用的时候。
“A broad liberal arts education is a key pathway to success in the 21st-century economy,” says Lawrence Katz, a labor economist at Harvard. Katz says that the economic return to pure technical skills has flattened, and the highest return now goes to those who combine soft skills — excellence at communicating and workingwith people — with technical skills. “在21世纪的经济体系中，宽泛的人文教育是通往成功的重要途径，”哈佛大学的劳动经济学家劳伦斯·卡茨(Lawrence Katz)说。
卡茨称，纯技术能力的经济回报已经趋平，既具有软能力——善于与他人交流和协同工作——又具有技术能力的人获得的回报是最高的。
“So I think a humanities major who also did a lot of computer science, economics, psychology, or other sciences can be quite valuable and have great career flexibility,” Katz said. “But you need both, in my view, to maximize your potential. And an economics major or computer science major or biology or engineering or physics major who takes serious courses in the humanities and history also will be a much more valuable scientist, financial professional, economist, or entrepreneur.”“因此我认为，一个人文专业的学生，如果对计算机科学、经济学、心理学或者其他学科也颇有研究，就会很有价值，在职场是会有很大的灵活性的。
”卡茨说，“但在我看来，你必须‘脚踏两只船’，才能最大限度地挖掘自己的潜能。
一个经济学专业的学生，或者是计算机专业、生物学专业、工程学专业、物理学专业的学生，如果正经八百地修过人文和历史课程，也会成为一个更有价值的科学家、金融专业人士、经济学家或者企业家。
”My second reason: We need people conversant with the humanities to help reach wise public policy decisions, even about the sciences. Technology companies must constantly weigh ethical decisions: Where should Facebook set its privacy defaults, and should it tolerate glimpses of nudity? Should Twitter close accounts that seem sympathetic to terrorists? How should Google handle sex and violence, or defamatory articles? 我的第二个理由：我们需要通晓人文学科的人来帮忙做出明智的公共政策决策——甚至是和科学有关的决策。
科技公司必须不断对伦理决策进行权衡：Facebook的默认隐私设置应该是什么样的，该容忍些许裸体影像的存在吗？Twitter该关停似乎对恐怖分子颇为同情的账号吗？谷歌(Google)该如何处理关于性与暴力的内容以及诽谤性文章？In the policy realm, one of the most important decisions we humans will have to make is whether to allow germline gene modification. This might eliminate certain diseases, ease suffering, make our offspring smarter and more beautiful. But it would also change our species. It would enable the wealthy to concoct superchildren. It’s exhilarating and terrifying. 在政策领域，我们人类必须做出的一个最为重要的决定：是否允许修正人类生殖细胞基因。
人类生殖细胞基因修正或许可以消灭特定种类的疾病，减少痛苦，让我们的后代更聪明、更美丽。
但它同时也会改变我们这个物种，会让富人有机会炮制出犹如超人的子女。
这真是既令人振奋，又透着恐怖。
To weigh these issues, regulators should be informed by first-rate science, but alsoby first-rate humanism. After all, Homer addressed similar issues three millenniums ago. 要权衡这类问题，监管者不仅要具有一流的科学素质，还要具有一流的人文素质。
毕竟，早在3000年前，荷马(Homer)就提出过类似的问题。