论义和团运动的性质与扶清灭洋口号.
合集下载
相关主题
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
Should the Qing government be held responsible for the Boxer Catastrophe?
1.History of the Boxer Movement
Where and when the BoxerБайду номын сангаасMovement take place, grow and develop into a catastrophe? How was its development related to the Qing policy?
4.Basic Nature of the Boxers and the Qing government
If the relationship between a heterodox anti-dynastic sect (the Boxers) and a legitimate government (the Qing Court) is like cat and mouse, why could the “collaboration” happen? What part did the government play in this collaboration?
5.Indirect Relationship
Given the Boxer Movement was an anti-foreignmovement, who should be held responsible for provoking this feeling and sentiment? Who allowed it to grow and foster? Who was toblame?
3.Existence of the Boxers
Did the Qing Government really want to subdue the Boxers? Was it able to do so? If the answer is affirmative, why were the Boxers spared?
St. Bonaventure College & High School
Asian History (China)
Topic Eighteen: The Nature of the Boxer Movement
Readings:
Victor PurcellThe Boxer Uprising Ch. 8, 9, 10 and 12
S. WehrleBritain, China and the Anti-missionary riots, Ch. 8 and Conclusion
Chester C. TanThe Boxer Catastrophe, Ch. 1, 2, 3 and 12
李時岳論義和團運動的性質與扶清滅洋口號
廖一中論清政府與義和團的關係
What role did the Chinese masses play in the Boxer Movement? Why did they, mostly and for long being submissiveand apathetic, “suddenly” rise up first against the government and later against the foreigners?
2.Policy of the Qing Government towards the Boxers (see Appendix 1)
What were the basic policyof the Qing Government towards the Boxers? Was the policy changeable? What factors threw weight on the decision? In case of disputes between the Boxers and the others, what did the government do? What would be the consequences?
張玉田庚子那拉氏對外宣戰原因的探討
廖一中等義和團運動史
李德征、丁鳳麟論義和團時期的圍攻使館
Major Points to cover:
The Boxer Catastrophe was usually associated with Cixi and the Qing Court. They were regarded responsible for it. This apparently proved to be valid as far as the nature of the Boxer movement and the policy of the Qing Court were concerned. However, there were other issues to be considered: Why were the common people so “crazy” to give support to the Boxers? Did they incite the Boxer Movement, or the other way round? What were the attitudes and policies of the Powers? What would be the motives of sending so many troops to North China, which seemed unnecessary? Did these three forces, viz. the collaboration between the Boxers and the Qing Court, the Chinese masses and the foreign powers act and/or interact with each other to bring about the Boxer Catastrophe?
1.History of the Boxer Movement
Where and when the BoxerБайду номын сангаасMovement take place, grow and develop into a catastrophe? How was its development related to the Qing policy?
4.Basic Nature of the Boxers and the Qing government
If the relationship between a heterodox anti-dynastic sect (the Boxers) and a legitimate government (the Qing Court) is like cat and mouse, why could the “collaboration” happen? What part did the government play in this collaboration?
5.Indirect Relationship
Given the Boxer Movement was an anti-foreignmovement, who should be held responsible for provoking this feeling and sentiment? Who allowed it to grow and foster? Who was toblame?
3.Existence of the Boxers
Did the Qing Government really want to subdue the Boxers? Was it able to do so? If the answer is affirmative, why were the Boxers spared?
St. Bonaventure College & High School
Asian History (China)
Topic Eighteen: The Nature of the Boxer Movement
Readings:
Victor PurcellThe Boxer Uprising Ch. 8, 9, 10 and 12
S. WehrleBritain, China and the Anti-missionary riots, Ch. 8 and Conclusion
Chester C. TanThe Boxer Catastrophe, Ch. 1, 2, 3 and 12
李時岳論義和團運動的性質與扶清滅洋口號
廖一中論清政府與義和團的關係
What role did the Chinese masses play in the Boxer Movement? Why did they, mostly and for long being submissiveand apathetic, “suddenly” rise up first against the government and later against the foreigners?
2.Policy of the Qing Government towards the Boxers (see Appendix 1)
What were the basic policyof the Qing Government towards the Boxers? Was the policy changeable? What factors threw weight on the decision? In case of disputes between the Boxers and the others, what did the government do? What would be the consequences?
張玉田庚子那拉氏對外宣戰原因的探討
廖一中等義和團運動史
李德征、丁鳳麟論義和團時期的圍攻使館
Major Points to cover:
The Boxer Catastrophe was usually associated with Cixi and the Qing Court. They were regarded responsible for it. This apparently proved to be valid as far as the nature of the Boxer movement and the policy of the Qing Court were concerned. However, there were other issues to be considered: Why were the common people so “crazy” to give support to the Boxers? Did they incite the Boxer Movement, or the other way round? What were the attitudes and policies of the Powers? What would be the motives of sending so many troops to North China, which seemed unnecessary? Did these three forces, viz. the collaboration between the Boxers and the Qing Court, the Chinese masses and the foreign powers act and/or interact with each other to bring about the Boxer Catastrophe?