本科毕业生论文外文文献翻译-当代西方建筑美学新思维毕业论文外文翻译-中英文对照论文翻译

第一部部分外文文献原文部分

中文2000字

New thinking of contemporary western architectural

aesthetics

One of the most striking features of aesthetics of contemporary western architecture, is the change of aesthetic thinking. It is a rich epoch-making revolutionary change. As we know, the aesthetic thought of modern architecture, basically confined to the overall

thinking, linear thinking, rational thinking this fixed,

and even can be said to be rigid frame, it is difficult to

break through the shackles of functionalism, rationalism. However, at present, in and promote the dual influence of

western contemporary philosophical and scientific thought, had the historical transformation of aesthetic thinking of contemporary architecture. It is completely out of the

general, linear and rational thinking inertia, towards a

new thinking for a more contemporary nature's way.

Non overall thinking

Modern architectural geometry hegemony and pure aesthetics basically is a kind of in a flagrant way

"oppressive totalisation" (his words) to control and guide the construction of aesthetic trend. When V enturi, Philip? Johnson et al to challenge the "oppressive totalisation", when the modern movement has become thriving in the construction field, modern unified pattern was quickly

broken, overall tanked. Unfortunately, when the postmodern architecture emerge in large numbers, the architects soon felt, they are likely to be as Jaspers said, "from a situation into another kind of situation", from an overall fall into another kind of overall. This replaces the aesthetic revolution another tyranny in a dictatorship, is a contemporary architects and scientists do not want to see, most cannot accept, therefore, all sorts of new architectural concepts since the anti-modernist movement

until the emergence of resistance, all to the overall,

pursuit diversity as a preventive and expel any form of

aesthetic autocracy charm monster banner.

Adorno (Theodor W ? Adoeno, German philosopher) said, "the liberation of mankind does not mean to become a general". In order to carry out the communication and understanding between different races of human, really

need a standard of value, common ideals andcommon feelings,

however, this does not mean that, human's political institutions, customs should follow the same general. On

the aesthetic, specifically, on art and architecture, the general can only is an inert strength, even can say, it is the most terrible enemy of creativity.

Terrible place overall is, it has a periodic attack

morbid inertial forces. When a art of totality was a fatal blow when, often is another kind of overall quietly out of. So Adorno thinks, if art is always a radical, it is always conservative. The strengthening phase separation and the dominant spirit of the illusion, "which in practice is

invalid and complicit did not reduce disaster is apparently painful". It was in one direction, and lost in the other

direction; if art to bypass the disgraced historical logic, then it will have to pay a high price for this free, one

of which is difficult to meet the reproduction of historical logic. Adorno to escape from the overall has

been holding a contradiction, suspicion and even pessimistic attitude. He said, we can ignore the totality, but overall did not ignore us. As if the general is a kind

of come a nd go like a shadow, as the shadow follows the form, unable to get rid of stuff. In his view, fled the totality