cp2010124q

合集下载

施耐德接触器选型样本

施耐德接触器选型样本
D 型保护继电器
b TeSys D 型 3 极热过载继电器 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/2 b 说明,特性. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/3 b 型号 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/5 b 附件 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/9 b 尺寸,安装,线路图 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/11
v 用于至 75 kW/400V 的电动机控制, AC-3 类别 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/12 v 用于至 15 kW/400V 的电动机控制, AC-3 类别 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/13 v 用于 25 至 200A 的电路控制, AC-1 类别 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/18 b 用于电动机控制的可逆接触器, AC-3 类别 v 75 kW/400V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/20 v 15 kW/400V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/21 b 电源转换接触器组,用于 AC-1 负载控制 v 20 至 200 A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/22 b 根据所需电气寿命选型 v AC-3 使用类别 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/24 v AC-2 或 AC-4 使用类别 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/27 v AC-1 使用类别 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/30 v DC-1 至 DC-5 使用类别 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/32 b 可逆接触器的装配元件. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/35 b 辅助模块与附件 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/38 b D 型接触器线圈 v 交流线圈 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/45 v 直流线圈 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/48 v 宽电压范围直流线圈 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/50 b 尺寸,安装与线路图 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eSys D 型控制继电器特性 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/2 b 用于控制电路:交流,直流或低功耗 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/6 b 辅助模块 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/8 b 附件和备件. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/9

PSL-646U线路保护测控装置(多合一)技术说明书_V3.00_印刷

PSL-646U线路保护测控装置(多合一)技术说明书_V3.00_印刷
* 本说明书可能会被修改,请注意核对实际产品与说明书的版本是否相符 * 2015 年 05 月 第 1 版 第 1 次印刷 * 国7.04 修改日期
目录
版本声明 1. 概述 ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
国电南自 DL/T 1075-2007
PSL-646U 线路保护测控装置(多合一)
技术说明书
国电南京自动化股份有限公司 GUODIAN NANJING AUTOMATION CO.,LTD
PSL-646U 线路保护测控装置
技术说明书 (多合一)
V 3.00 国电南京自动化股份有限公司
2015 年 3 月
版本声明
z 本说明书适用于 PSL-646U 线路保护测控装置(多合一)。保护的设计标准引用了国网公司 Q/GDW 766 -2014《10kV~110(66)kV 线路保护及辅助装置标准化设计规范》。
z 本说明书适用于 PSL-646U 线路保护测控装置(多合一)V3.00 及以上版本的保护软件。
1.1. 保护功能配置 ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. 测控功能配置 ..............................................

消防工程安装定额

消防工程安装定额

11297 C7-1-31 联动控制器安装 多线制(落地式) 100点以下
11298 C7-1-32 联动控制器安装 多线制(落地式) 100点以上
11299 C7-1-33 联动控制器安装 总线制(壁挂式) 100点以下
11300 C7-1-34 联动控制器安装 总线制(壁挂式) 200点以下
11301 C7-1-35 联动控制器安装 总线制(壁挂式) 500点以下
广东省安装工程综合定额2010
序号 定额编码
项目名称
11267 C7-1-1 点型探测器安装 多线制 感烟
11268 C7-1-2 点型探测器安装 多线制 感温
11269 C7-1-3 点型探测器安装 多线制 红外光束
11270 C7-1-4 点型探测器安装 多线制 火焰
11271 C7-1-5 点型探测器安装 多线制 可燃气体
90.44
78.77
68.92
60.34

584.46 57.21 236.81
162.07
141.15
123.5
108.13

738.79 94.74 401.17
204.87
178.42
156.11
136.68

892.25 190.59 697.22
247.42
215.48
188.53
165.07
11272 C7-1-6 点型探测器安装 总线制 感烟
11273 C7-1-7 点型探测器安装 总线制 感温
11274 C7-1-8 点型探测器安装 总线制 红外光束
11275 C7-1-9 点型探测器安装 总线制 火焰
11276 C7-1-10 点型探测器安装 总线制 可燃气体

北通游戏外设最新报价

北通游戏外设最新报价

北通游戏外设2010年报价型号图片颜色特点批发价包装方式BTP-C024小手柄黑色黑色1750个/大件
BTP-1126小手柄Ⅱ黑色黑色2050个/大件
BTP-C027小双打黑色USB
接口
3340个/大件
BTP-1129战弩黑色USB
接口
2350个/大件
BTP-C033振动3黑色USB
接口
4330个/大件
BTP-036白神鹰白色USB
接口
5020个/大件
BTP-C031野牛3黑色USB
接口
5520个/大件
BTP-2118战戟白色
红色USB
接口
7020个/大件
BTP-2165战戟Ⅱ橘红,
酒绿,
天蓝
USB
接口
7820个/大件
BTP-2008龙腾中国红
宝石蓝
钢琴黑
USB
接口
9530个/大件
BTP-2276特洛伊磨砂黑USB
13020/件
接口
18520/件BTP-2269球王2磨砂黑USB
接口
8812个/大件BTP-C318幻影黑色USB
接口
BTP-C332银狐银色USB
6212个/大件
接口
1158个/大件BTP-4119银爵铁灰USB
接口
BTP-C0130方130银黑USB
1354个/大件
接口
1804个/大件BTP-C0168方168银黑USB
接口
BTP-C4328天影红色USB
1508个/大件
接口
BTP-C0169169红,黑USB
2504个/大件
接口。

220kV变电站继电保护压板核对表1

220kV变电站继电保护压板核对表1
1#主变保护A柜PRS-778S压板(89P)
1#主变护B柜PRS-778S压板(90P)
1#主变C柜 PRS-761A 压板(91P)
110kV夺直线RCC-941A压板(108P)
1LP1




1LP2



1LP3





1LP4




1LP5


1LP6




1LP7




1LP8
220kV夺乃Ⅱ线保护I屏RCS-931GPMV压板(18P)
220kV夺乃Ⅱ线保护II屏RCS-931GPMV压板(19P)
220kV母线保护I屏BP-2CS压板(35P)
220kV母线保护II屏BP-2CS压板(36P)
220kV母联PRS-723S压板(40P)
110kV母联PRS-723S压板(119P)
220kV夺底变电站
继电保护压板核对表
(2011.08.07)
220kV夺曲线保护I屏RCS-931GPMV压板(33P)
220kV夺曲线保护II屏RCS-931GPMV压板(34P)
220kV夺乃Ⅰ线保护I屏RCS-931GPMV压板(20P)
220kV夺乃Ⅰ线保护II屏RCS-931GPMV压板(21P)零序Ⅲ源自段1LP9零



1LP11
不对
称故障速

1LP13
闭锁



1LP14




QJL J124007-2010 通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料

QJL J124007-2010 通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料

Q/JL浙江吉利控股集团有限公司企业标准Q/JL J124007-2010代替Q/JLY J711507-2008 通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料2010-10-10发布2010-10-30实施 浙江吉利控股集团有限公司发 布前言为对通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的设计提供依据,指导生产和检验,结合本企业的具体情况编制本标准。

本标准由浙江吉利控股集团有限公司提出。

本标准由浙江吉利汽车研究院有限公司NVH及材料工程部负责起草。

本标准主要起草人:杨豪,李萌。

本标准于2010年10月首次发布,并于2012年10月30日进行第一次修改。

本标准所代替标准的历次版本发布情况为:——Q/JLY J711507-2008。

通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料1 范围本标准规定了通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的性能要求和试验方法。

本标准适用于块状、片状和条状或切割成以上形状的通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料的性能检验。

2 规范性引用文件下列文件对于本文件的应用是必不可少的。

凡是注日期的引用文件,仅注日期的版本适用于本文件。

凡是不注日期的引用文件,其最新版本(包括所有的修改单)适用于本文件。

GB/T 6342-1996 泡沫塑料与橡胶 线性尺寸的测定GB/T 6344-2008 软质泡沫聚合物材料 拉伸强度和断裂伸长率的测定GB/T 6669-2008 软质泡沫聚合材料 压缩永久变形的测定GB/T 6670-2008 软质泡沫聚合材料 落球法回弹性能的测定GB/T 9640-2008 软质和硬质泡沫聚合材料 加速老化试验方法GB/T 10807-2006 软质泡沫聚合材料 硬度的测定(压陷法)GB/T 10808-2006 高聚物多孔弹性材料 撕裂强度的测定ISO 3385-1989 软质泡沫聚合材料 用恒定载荷冲击法测定疲劳性能Q/JLY J7110335A-2011 汽车非金属材料阻燃性限值要求及试验方法3 分类3.1 通用软质聚氨酯泡沫塑料按25%压陷硬度可分8个等级,为245N,196N,151N,120N,96N,67N,40N,22N。

PRS-753技术说明书V3.01南网版

PRS-753技术说明书V3.01南网版
4 辅助功能 .......................................................................................................28
4.1 信号系统 ..................................................................................................................28 4.2 事故分析与过程记录 ..............................................................................................28
1.1 应用范围 ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 保护配置 ....................................................................................................................1 1.3 主要性能特点 ............................................................................................................2
5 定值及整定说明 ...........................................................................................35

一种无极性低功耗直流电源接口[实用新型专利]

一种无极性低功耗直流电源接口[实用新型专利]

专利名称:一种无极性低功耗直流电源接口
专利类型:实用新型专利
发明人:王冠凌,王俊杰,凌海波,丁博宇,王丞浩,韦永强,凌云志,何思雨
申请号:CN201220655559.4
申请日:20121119
公开号:CN202940731U
公开日:
20130515
专利内容由知识产权出版社提供
摘要:一种无极性低功耗直流电源接口,主要电源电路采用了电子开关作为实现正负极可随意调换的关键环节,P1为电源输入端,U1为电子开关,P2为电源输出端。

P1有1号引脚P1-1和2号引脚P1-2,P2有1号引脚P2-1和2号引脚P2-2,U1可以理解为具有低导通电阻的双刀双掷开关。

图中U1为ADG884,具有10个引脚,除去VCC与GND引脚,剩下8个引脚分别为:1A、2A、1B、2B、
1C、2C、1S、2S,8个引脚组成了两组开关,其中C为逻辑控制端、A或B为源端、S为输出端,当C 为0时,S与A的连接断开,与B连接;当C为1时,S与B的连接断开,与A连接。

P1的1号引脚P1-1与电子开关的1B与2A接口电连接,P1的2号引脚P1-2与电子开关的1A、2B、1C、2C接口电连接;P2的1、2号引脚P2-1与P2-2分别和1S与2S接口电连接。

本实用新型具有正负极可随意对接、电源实用范围广等优点,尤其适合低压场合。

申请人:安徽工程大学
地址:241008 安徽省芜湖市高新区长江南路83号科创中心安徽工程大学技术转移中心
国籍:CN
更多信息请下载全文后查看。

十二烷基辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚(op-10)的比热容

十二烷基辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚(op-10)的比热容

十二烷基辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚(op-10)的比热容下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。

文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!本店铺为大家提供各种类型的实用资料,如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等,想了解不同资料格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you! In addition, this shop provides you with various types of practical materials, such as educational essays, diary appreciation, sentence excerpts, ancient poems, classic articles, topic composition, work summary, word parsing, copy excerpts, other materials and so on, want to know different data formats and writing methods, please pay attention!关于十二烷基辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚(op10)的比热容的演示文章如下:十二烷基辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚(op10)的比热容。

Y124低温柔度试验仪测量设备计量确认记录表

Y124低温柔度试验仪测量设备计量确认记录表

不满足
2
检查服务方提供的检定/校准证书信息是否充分
满足
不满足□
3
检定/校准过程中所使用的主要计量标准器具与技术依据是否有效可行
满足
不满足□
4
检定/校准项目、检定/校准点是否符合本实验室项目的要求
满足
不满足□
5
根据检定/校准数据和测量不确定度来确认该仪器的计量特性是否符合检测要求
满足
不满足□
实验室项目要求确认信息
30±0.1
19.98
30.08
满足
不满足
计量溯源结果确认结论及结果
确认结论:满足不满足□
结果处理:
口校准/检定结果满足要求。
口根据证书、报告数据、结果判定该设备能投入使用。
口根据证书、报告数据、结果判定该设备需降级使用。
口根据校准/检定,测试产生的修正因子/修正值要对设备进行修正使用。
确认员:复核员:
实验室项目要求的确认依据(技术文件名称及编号)
GB/T328.14-2007及仪器说明书
序号
实验室项目需确认的相关参数
证书信息
验证结果
验证项目
测量要求
检定/校准结 果
1
弯曲轴上升速度(mm/min)
360±40
362
满足
不满足
2
温度示值(℃)
-20±0.5
-19.8
满足
不满足
3
直径(mm)
20±0.1
测量设备计量确认记录记录编号:
设备信息
使用部门
设备编号
设备名称
低温柔度试验仪
型号规格
测量范围
-20℃±0.5℃
精度等级
出厂编号

CP工控类产品

CP工控类产品

2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品接触器 (交流线圈) - VB6, VB7 (三极)2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品接触器附件2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品热过载继电器2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品电动机起动器 - MS3252009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品电动机起动器 - MO3252009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品电动机起动器 - MS450电动机起动器 - MS451电动机起动器 - MS495电动机起动器 - MS496电动机起动器 - MS4972009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品2009年参考价目表 - 控制及自动化产品从:SDS-T-45以上,KM1的CAL5-11需由左侧换到右侧。

爱尔顿冲击保护设备XXCF12010-CP的安装说明书

爱尔顿冲击保护设备XXCF12010-CP的安装说明书

ContentsDescription Page 1.0 Setup ................................21.1 Before Installation .....................21.2 Installation ..........................21.3 Wiring ..............................21.3.1 Series Wiring Applications ...........31.3.2 Parallel Wiring Applications ..........31.4 Apply Power .........................31.5 Specifications ........................41.6 Warranty . (4)Surge Protective Device XXCF12010-CP2Instruction Manual IM01005028E Rev. 5Effective October 2018Installation Instructions for Eaton Surge Protective Device XXCF12010-CPEATON WARNINGHAZARDOUS VOLTAGES PRESENTIMPROPER INSTALLATION OR MISAPPLICATION OF THESE DEVICES MAY RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY TO INSTALLER AND/OR DAMAGE TO ELECTRI-CAL SYSTEM OR RELATED EQUIPMENT. READ AND UNDERSTAND ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE BEGINNING INSTALLATION. PROTECTIVE EYE-WEAR SHOULD BE WORN WHENEVER WORKING AROUND HAZARDOUS VOLTAGES.NOTICEALL INSTRUCTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS MUST BE COMPLETED BY A LICENSED/QUALIFIED ELECTRICIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE U.S. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, STATE AND LOCAL CODES OR OTHER APPLI-CABLE COUNTRY CODES. THE U.S. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS (OR OTHER APPLICABLE COUNTRY CODES) SUPERSEDE THIS INSTRUCTION.Catalog Number Voltage Range Mode VPR MCOV In SCCRPeak Surge Current PhaseXXCF12010-CP48 - 149 Vdc 100-127 VacL-N5001503kA10kA30kAL-G 600150N-G5001501.0 SetupVerify that system voltages do not exceed those listed in Section 1.5, Specifications.•All AC measurements should be completed with an RMS voltme-ter.• All DC measurements should be completed with a DC voltmeter. •DO NOT INSTALL FILTER IF MEASURED VOLTAGE EXCEEDS MAXIMUM OPERATION LIMITS.Choose location for filter installation so that maximum separation can be maintained between input leads, output leads and ground leads. Filter is intended to be used as an in-line secured device and has no built-in feature to permanently attach the device to a surface.1.1 Before InstallationREMOVE POWER FROM ELECTRICAL SYSTEM BEFORE MOUNTING FILTER.•Filter MUST be located within an enclosure to assure personnel safety from exposed terminals.IMPORTANT:FILTER SHOULD BE LOCATED SO THAT THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE CONDUC-TOR LENGTH MAY BE USED. FILTER SHOULD BE MOUNTED TO ALLOW MAXIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN INPUT AND OUTPUT WIRING.•Filter contains no position-oriented components and can be mounted upside down or sideways.•Filter should be placed in electrical circuit so that it is the last device in the circuit before equipment to be protected.•Suitable for use on a circuit capable of delivering not more than 5000 rms symmetrical Amperes when protected by a circuit breaker rated: 15A, 240V/415V, 10kA Min. AIC Rating.•Contains no serviceable parts.1.2 InstallationFILTER MUST BE CONNECTED TO ELECTRICAL SYSTEM WITH A CIRCUIT BREAKER:For AC Applications•1 – Single Pole / Single Throw 15A circuit breaker. TheInterrupting Rating of the Circuit Breaker Shall Not Be Less Than the Available Fault Current. Circuit Breaker Ratings of 15A, 240V/415V, 10kA Min. AIC Rating.Note: Pre-existing breakers of the rated load size may be utilized if provisions for multi-conductor connections are made according to NEC 110-14A.•If Neutral wire is to be utilized as L2, then a circuit breaker must be provided for that phase.For DC Applications•DC units to be installed after an overcurrent protective device that is rated not to exceed 100% of the current rating.REMOVE POWER FROM ELECTRICAL SYSTEM BEFORE INSTALLING FILTER.Mechanically orient the filter.•Filter should be oriented to allow maximum separation between input and output wiring.•Filter contains no position-oriented components and can be ori-ented upside down or sideways.•Filter should be placed in electrical circuit so that it is the last device in the circuit before equipment to be protected.1.3 WiringNOTICEAN INSULATED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR THAT IS IDENTICAL IN SIZE AND INSULATION MATERIAL AND THICKNESS TO THE GROUNDED AND UNGROUNDED CIRCUIT SUPPLY CONDUCTORS, EXCEPT THAT IT IS GREEN WITH OR WITHOUT ONE OR MORE YELLOW STRIPES, IS TO BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE CIRCUIT THAT SUPPLIES THE FILTER. SEE TABLE 250-122 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC) REGARDING THE APPROPRIATE SIZE OF THE GROUNDING CONDUCTOR.THE GROUNDING CONDUCTOR IS TO BE GROUNDED TO EARTH AT THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE BUILDING EARTH GROUND SUCH AS THE BUILDING FRAME IN THE CASE OF HIGH-RISE STEEL FRAME STRUCTURE.ANY ATTACHMENT-PLUG RECEPTACLES IN THE VICINITY OF THE FILTER ARE TO BE GROUNDING TYPE, AND THE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SERV-ING THESE RECEPTACLES ARE TO BE CONNECTED TO EARTH GROUND AT THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE BUILDING EARTH GROUND SUCH AS THE BUILDING FRAME IN THE CASE OF HIGH-RISE STEEL FRAME STRUCTURE.PRESSURE TERMINAL OR PRESSURE SPLICING CONNECTORS AND SOL-DERING LUGS USED IN THE INSTALLATION OF THE FILTER SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AS BEING SUITABLE FOR THE MATERIAL OF THE CONDUC-TORS. CONDUCTORS OF DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL NOT BE INTERMIXED IN A TERMINAL OR SPLICING CONNECTOR WHERE PHYSICAL CONTACT OCCURS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR CONDUCTORS UNLESS THE DEVICE IS IDENTIFIED FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONDITIONS OF USE.CONDUCTORS SHOULD BE TWISTED TOGETHER TO REDUCE IMPEDANCE FACTOR. EXCESSIVE WIRE LENGTH AND SHARP BENDS DEGRADE FIL-TER PERFORMANCE; THEREFORE, AVOID EXCESSIVE WIRE LENGTH AND SHARP BENDS.3Instruction Manual IM01005028E Rev. 5Effective October 2018Installation Instructions for EatonSurge Protective Device XXCF12010-CPEATON 1.3.1 Series Wiring Applications•Connect incoming system GROUND wire to terminal labeled GND on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).•Connect load side GROUND wire to terminal labeled GND on protected end (labeled as EQUIP ).For AC Applications•Connect incoming system NEUTRAL wire to terminal labeled NEU on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).•Connect load side NEUTRAL wire to terminal labeled as NEU on protected end (labeled as EQUIP ).•Connect incoming system HOT wire to terminal labeled L1 on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).•Connect load side HOT wire to terminal labeled as L1 on protected end (labeled as EQUIP ).For DC Applications•Connect incoming system NEGATIVE wire to terminal labeled NEU on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).•Connect load side NEGATIVE wire to terminal labeled as NEU on protected end (labeled as EQUIP ).•Connect incoming system POSITIVE wire to terminal labeled L1 on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).•Connect load side POSITIVE wire to terminal labeled as L1 on protected end (labeled as EQUIP ).1.3.2 Parallel Wiring ApplicationsIMPORTANTFILTER SHOULD BE LOCATED SO THAT THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE CON-DUCTOR LENGTH MAY BE USED. CONDUCTORS SHOULD BE TWISTED TOGETHER TO REDUCE IMPEDANCE FACTOR. EXCESSIVE WIRE LENGTH AND SHARP BENDS DEGRADE FILTER PERFORMANCE; THEREFORE, AVOID EXCESSIVE WIRE LENGTH AND SHARP BENDS.•Connect incoming system GROUND wire to terminal labeled GND on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).For AC Applications•Connect incoming system NEUTRAL wire to terminal labeled L2/NEU on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).•Connect incoming system HOT wire to terminal labeled L1 on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).For DC Applications•Connect incoming system NEGATIVE wire to terminal labeled NEU on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).•Connect incoming system POSITIVE wire to terminal labeled L1 on unprotected end (labeled as LINE ).ote:N For ungrounded or isolated control transformer secondary, DO NOT CONNECT Ground terminal on either LINE or EQUIP side.1.4 Apply PowerApply power to system. Indicator light should glow. If the light does not glow, remove power and contact supplier.Figure 4. Single Phase Parallel AC ApplicationFigure 5. Split Phase Parallel AC Application (Shown with Neutral Utilized as L2)Figure 6. Parallel DC ApplicationInstruction Manual IM01005028E Rev. 5 Effective October 2018Installation Instructions for Eaton Surge Protective Device XXCF12010-CPEatonElectrical Sector1000 Eaton Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44122United States877-ETN-CARE (877-386-2273) © 2018 EatonAll Rights ReservedPrinted in USAPublication No. IM01005028E / TBG000472 October 2018Eaton is a registered trademark.All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.1.5 SpecificationsDescription RatingsAgency Approvals UL1449 4th edition recognized component for theUS and Canada, UL 1283 (Type 2 SPDs only)Terminal Connections Wire clamping terminals, 10-18 AWG (UL), 10-22 AWG (CSA)Torque 12 in-lbSystem voltagesDC48 - 149 VdcAC100 - 127 VacOperating Temperatures-40F(-40C) to +140F(+60C)Circuit Breaker15A, 240V/415V, 10kA Min. AIC RatingAmps*30Input Power Frequency50/60 HzWarranty 5 Years, 10 Years if registered on /spd RoHS Compliant Yes* Amp rating is for series connection only. Parallel connection is not current dependent. Figure 7. XXCF12010-CP Product Dimensions 1.6 WarrantyEaton warrants these products for a period of 5 years from the date of delivery to the purchaser, 10 years if registered on/spd, to be free from defects in both workmanship and materials. Eaton assumes no risk or liability for results of the use of the products purchased from it, including but without limiting the generality of the foregoing; (1) The use in combination with any electrical or electronic components, circuits, systems, assemblies, or any other materials or substances; (2) Unsuitability of any product for use in any circuit or assembly.Purchaser’s right under the warranty shall consist solely of requiring Eaton to repair, or at Eaton’s sole discretion, replace, free of charge, F.O.B. factory, and defective items received at said factory or failure to give any advice or recommendations by Eaton shall not constitute any warranty by or impose any liability upon Eaton. The foregoing constitutes the sole and exclusive liability of Eaton AND IS IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY AS TO THE MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PURPOSE SOLD, DESCRIPTION, QUALITY, PRODUCTIVENESS OR ANY OTHER MATTER.In no event shall Eaton be liable for special or consequential dam-ages or for delay in performance of the warranty.This warranty does not apply if the product has been misused, abused, altered, tampered with, or used in applications other than specified on the nameplate. At the end of the warranty period, Eaton shall be under no further warranty obligation expressed or implied.The product covered by this warranty certificate can only be repaired or replaced by the factory. For help on troubleshooting the Critical Protection Product, or for warranty information, call 1-800-809-2772, Option 4, sub-option 2. Repair or replacement units will be returned collect. If Eaton finds the return to be a manufacturer’s defect, theproduct will be returned prepaid.。

wepr22010c电源模块说明书

wepr22010c电源模块说明书

wepr22010c电源模块说明书
wepr22010c电源模块是一款高效、可靠、稳定的直流电源模块。

该模块采用进口元器件,结构紧凑,体积小,可广泛应用于电子设备、通讯设备、工业自动化控制等领域。

主要参数:
1. 输入电压:AC 85-265V
2. 输出电压:DC 2-24V (可调节)
3. 输出电流:0-10A (可调节)
4. 输出功率:200W
5. 效率:≥ 90%
6. 工作温度:-40℃~+85℃
安全保护:
1. 过流保护
2. 过压保护
3. 短路保护
4. 过热保护
使用注意事项:
1. 输入电压必须在规定的范围内。

2. 请勿超过模块的电压或电流输出范围。

3. 请勿在潮湿、高温、高压等恶劣环境下使用。

4. 请勿自行打开模块进行维修,如需维修请联系厂家或专业人士。

希望以上信息能够帮到您,如还有其他问题请随时咨询。

基于Petri网的联锁软件测评仿真建模

基于Petri网的联锁软件测评仿真建模

基于Petri网的联锁软件测评仿真建模
宫杰;陈邦兴
【期刊名称】《计算机应用与软件》
【年(卷),期】2009(026)002
【摘要】车站联锁软件一直有着严格的测试要求,仿真模块是软件测试的重要组成部分,Petri网作为形式化语言的一种,有着准确与完备的特点,对于联锁软件这类安全苛求软件的测试尤为适合,提出了一种使用Petri网对联锁软件测试中仿真模块建模的方式,并分别给出了用基本Petri网和有色Petri网的2个建模实例.该模型有助于提高铁路联锁软件测试系统的安全性与精确性.
【总页数】4页(P11-13,52)
【作者】宫杰;陈邦兴
【作者单位】同济大学电子与信息工程学院信通系,上海,201804;同济大学电子与信息工程学院信通系,上海,201804
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】TP3
【相关文献】
1.联锁软件的Petri网模型化 [J], 杨扬;王晓明;何梅芳;肖蒙
2.基于Petri网的联锁软件测试用例动态生成 [J], 强生杰;任恩恩
3.联锁软件的统一建模语言和Petri网建模 [J], 杨晋辉;郦萌
4.基于UML和Petri网的铁路联锁软件建模 [J], 杨晋辉;郦萌
5.基于Petri网的联锁软件安全性测试的研究 [J], 魏臻;周霞;鲍红杰;韩进
因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。

电力系统改进时滞依赖型鲁棒稳定判据

电力系统改进时滞依赖型鲁棒稳定判据

电力系统改进时滞依赖型鲁棒稳定判据李晓萌;贾宏杰【期刊名称】《电力系统及其自动化学报》【年(卷),期】2018(030)004【摘要】广域量测系统在采集和传输电力信息过程中由于通信链路限制和传输距离太大会使信号产生延时.针对电力系统时滞问题,给出了一种改进的含不确定时滞环节的电力系统稳定性Lyapunov鲁棒稳定判据.首先根据状态轨迹定义将状态变量在相应积分区间上定义为线性函数与对线性部分的偏离函数之和,以使Lyapunov泛函导函数中的二次型积分项取得极大值.然后结合"时滞分割"的思想,推导出改进的单时滞系统渐近鲁棒稳定判据,并将该方法推广到多时滞系统.最后借助典型二阶系统、单机无穷大系统以及WSCC3机9节点系统,对含不确定性的时滞系统保持稳定时系统所能承受的最大时滞进行分析.结果显示,该方法在保证一定计算效率的前提下改善了稳定性判据的保守性.%Due to the limitation of communication links and the wide range of transportation,time delays arise from the collection and transmission of signals in a wide-area measurement system.In this paper,an improved Lyapunov robust stability criterion for the power system with uncertain time-delays is presented.First,according to the definition of state trajectory,state variables are defined as the sum of linear function and the error function with respect to the linear part in the corresponding integral interval,such that the maximum value of the quadratic integral term in the derivative of Lyapunov functional is obtained.Then,with the combination of the"delay-partitioning"theory,an asymptotic robust stability criterion for the power system with one single time-delay is derived,which is further extended to the power sys?tem with multiple time-delays.Finally,a typical second-order delay system,a single-generator infinite-bus system,and a WSCC 3-generator 9-node system are employed to analyze the maximum delay margin that the time-delay system with uncertainties can sustain.The results demonstrate that by using the proposed method,the conservation of stability crite?ria is improved with acceptable calculation efficiency.【总页数】7页(P114-120)【作者】李晓萌;贾宏杰【作者单位】天津大学智能电网教育部重点实验室,天津300072;天津大学智能电网教育部重点实验室,天津300072【正文语种】中文【中图分类】TM71【相关文献】1.带有混合时变时滞的不确定中立型系统的鲁棒稳定性判据 [J], 李奕彤;苏亚坤2.时变时滞电力系统鲁棒稳定性新判据 [J], 钟开成3.广域测量时变时滞电力系统鲁棒稳定性的新判据 [J], 王真;肖伸平4.时变时滞电力系统鲁棒稳定性新判据 [J], 钟开成[1]5.中立型不确定变时滞系统的一个时滞相关鲁棒稳定性判据 [J], 王岩青;钱承山;姜长生因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

QUESTIONNAIRE ON CONSULTATION PAPER ON REVIEW OF THE CODE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND ASSOCIATED LISTING RULESThe Exchange invites views on its Consultation Paper on Review of the Code on Corporate Governance Practices and Associated Listing Rules (Consultation Paper), downloadable from the HKEx website at: /eng/newsconsul/mktconsul/documents/cp2010124.pdf.This Questionnaire contains the Personal Information Collection and Privacy Policy Statement; Part A: General Information of the Respondent; and Part B: Consultation Questions.All responses should be made in writing by completing and returning to HKEx both Part A and Part B of this Questionnaire no later than18 March 2011 by one of the following methods:By mail or hand delivery to Corporate Communications DepartmentHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited12th Floor, One International Finance Centre1 Harbour View StreetCentralHong KongRe: Consultation Paper on Review of The Code on Corporate Governance Practices and Associated Listing RulesBy fax to (852) 2524-0149By e-mail to response@Please mark in the subject line:“Re: C P on CG Review”Our submission enquiry number is (852) 2840-3844.The names of persons who submit comments together with the whole or part of their submissions may be disclosed to members of the public. If you do not wish your na me to be published please indicate so in Part A.Personal Information Collection and Privacy Policy StatementProvision of Personal Data1.Your supply of Personal Data to HKEx is on a voluntary basis. “Personal Data” inthese statements has the same meaning as “personal data" in the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, Cap 486, which may include your name, identity card number, mailing address, telephone number, email address, login name and/or your opinion.Personal Information Collection Statement2.This Personal Information Collection Statement is made in accordance with theguidelines issued by the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data. It sets out the purposes for which your Personal Data will be used after collection, what you are agreeing to in respect of HKEx’s use, transfer and retention of your Personal Data, and your rights to request access to and correction of your Personal Data.Purpose of Collection3.HKEx may use your Personal Data provided in connection with this consultation paperfor purposes relating to this consultation and for one or more of the following purposes: ∙administration, processing and publication of the consultation paper and any responses received;∙performing or discharging HKEx’s functions and those of its subsidiar ies under the relevant laws, rules and regulations;∙research and statistical analysis; and∙any other purposes permitted or required by law or regulation.Transfer of Personal Data4.Your Personal Data may be disclosed or transferred by HKEx to its subsidiaries and/orregulator(s) for any of the above stated purposes.5.To ensure that the consultation is conducted in a fair, open and transparent manner, anyresponse together with your name may be published on an “as is” basis, in whole or in part, in document form, on the HKEx website or by other means. In general, HKEx will publish your name only and will not publish your other Personal Data unless specifically required to do so under any applicable law or regulation. If you do not wish your name to be published or your opinion to be published, please state so when responding to this paper.Access to and Correction of Data6.You have the right to request access to and/or correction of your Personal Data inaccordance with the provisions of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. HKEx has the right to charge a reasonable fee for processing any data access request. Any such request for access to and/or correction of your Personal Data should be addressed to the Personal Data Privacy Officer of HKEx in writing by either of the following means:By mail to: Personal Data Privacy OfficerHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited12th Floor, One International Finance Centre1 Harbour View StreetCentralHong KongRe: Consultation Paper on Review of the Code on CorporateGovernance Practices and Associated Listing Rules By email to: pdpo@Retention of Personal Data7.Your Personal Data will be retained for such period as may be necessary for thecarrying out of the above-stated purposes.Privacy Policy Statement8.HKEx is firmly committed to preserving your privacy in relation to the Personal Datasupplied to HKEx on a voluntary basis. Personal Data may include names, identity card numbers, telephone numbers, mailing addresses, e-mail addresses, login names, opinion, etc., which may be used for the stated purposes when your Personal Data are collected.The Personal Data will not be used for any other purposes without your consent unless such use is permitted or required by law or regulation.9.HKEx has security measures in place to protect against the loss, misuse and alterationof Personal Data supplied to HKEx. HKEx will strive to maintain Personal Data as accurately as reasonably possible and Personal Data will be retained for such period as may be necessary for the stated purposes and for the proper discharge of the functions of HKEx and those of its subsidiaries.Part A General Information of the RespondentAll fields are mandatory, except the fields with an asterisk (*) if you are an individual respondent.If you do not wish to disclose the above information to the public, please check the box here:I do not wish to disclose the information above.Part B Consultation QuestionsPlease indicate your preference by checking the appropriate boxes. Please reply to the questions below on the proposed change discussed in the Consultation Paper downloadable from the HKEx website at:/eng/newsconsul/mktconsul/documents/cp2010124.pdf.Where there is insufficient space provided for your comments, please attach additional pages. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTIONPlain Writing AmendmentsQuestion 1.Do you have any comments on the plainer writing amendments? Do you consider any part(s) of the plainer writing amendments will have unintendedconsequences?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.CHAPTER 2: PROPOSED SUBSTANTIVE AMENDMENTSPART I: DIRECTORS1.Directors’ Duties and Time CommitmentsQuestion 2.Do you agree with our proposed change to Rule 3.08 to clarify theresponsibilities the Exchange expects of directors?YesPlease give reasons for your views.Question 3. Do you agree with our proposed addition of the Note to Rule 3.08 referring to the guidance issued by the Companies Registry and HKIOD?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 4.Do you agree to include a new duty (CP A.5.2(e)) in the nominationcommittee’s written ter ms of reference that it should regularly review the time required from a director to perform his responsibilities to the issuer, and whether he is meeting that requirement?Yes NoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 5. Do you agree to include a new duty (CP A.5.2(f)) in the nomination committee’s written terms of reference that it should review NEDs’ annual confirmation that they have spent sufficient time on the issuer’s business ?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 6.Do you agree to include a disclosure requirement in the Corporate Governance Report (paragraph L(d)(ii) of Appendix 14) that NEDs have made annual confirmation to the nomination committee that they have spent sufficient time on the issuer’s business?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 7. Do you agree to expanding CP A.5.3(re-numbered CP A.6.3) to state that a director should limit his other professional commitments and acknowledge to the issuer that he will have sufficient time to meet his obligations?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 8.Do you agree to expanding CP A.5.3 (re-numbered CP A.6.3) to state that an NED should confirm annually to the nomination committee that he hasspent sufficient time on the issuer’s business? Yes NoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 9. Do you agree to upgrading RBP D.1.4 to a CP (re-numbered CP D.1.4) and amending it to state that an NED’s letter of appointment should set out the expected time commitment?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 10. Do you agree to upgrading RBP A.5.6 to a CP (re-numbered CP A.6.6) and toamending it to encourage timeliness of disclosure by a director to the issuer on any change to his significant commitments?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 11. Do you consider that there should be a limit on the number of INED positionsan individual may hold?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 12. If your answer to Question 11 is“yes”, what should be the number? Pleasegive reasons for your views.Question 13. If your answer to Question 11 is “yes”, do you think that it should be a Rule ora CP?RuleCPPlease give reasons for your views.2. Directors’ Training and Independent Non -executive DirectorsQuestion 14. Do you agree that we should upgrade RBP A.5.5 (requirement for continuousprofessional development) to a CP (re-numbered CP A.6.5)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 15. Do you agree that the minimum number of hours of directors training shouldbe eight?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 16. What training methods do you consider to be acceptable for the requirementsstated in the proposed CP (re-numbered RBP A.6.5)? Please give reasons for your views.Question 17. Do you agree that we should upgrade RBP A.3.2 (at least one-third of anissuer’s board should be INEDs) to a Rule (re-numbered Rule 3.10A)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 18. Do you agree that this Rule (at least one-third of an issuer’s board should beINEDs) be effective after a transitional period as described in paragraph 87 of the Consultation Paper?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 19. Do you agree that we should upgrade RBP A.4.3 (shareholder to vote onaseparate resolution for the further employment of an INED who has served more than nine years) to a CP (re-numbered CP A.4.3)?Yes NoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 20. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP A.4.8 (issuer should includeexplanation of its reasons for election and independence of an INED in acircular) to a CP (re-numbered CP A.5.5)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.3. Board CommitteesA. Remuneration CommitteeQuestion 21. Do you agree with ourproposal to move the requirement for issuers toestablish a remuneration committee with a majority of INED membersfromthe Code (CP B.1.1) to the Rules (Rule 3.25)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 22. Do you agree with our proposal that the remuneration committee must bechaired by an INED?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 23. Do you agree with our proposal to move the requirement for issuers to havewritten terms of reference for the remuneration committee from the Code (CPB.1.1) to the Rules (Rule 3.26)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 24. Do you agree with our proposal to add a new Rule (Rule 3.27) requiringanissuer to make an announcement if it fails to meet the requirements ofproposed Rules 3.25, 3.26 and 3.27?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 25. Do you agreewith our proposal that issuers that fail to meet Rules 3.25, 3.26and 3.27 should have three months to rectify this?YesNoQuestion 26. Do you agree that we should add “independent” to the professional advicemade available to a remuneration committee (CP B.1.2, re-numbered CPB.1.1)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 27. Do you agree that, in order to accommodate Model B, we should revise CPB.1.3 (re-numbered CP B.1.2) as described in paragraph 117 of theConsultation Paper?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 28. (i) Do you agree that where the board resolves to approve any remunerationwith which the remuneration committee disagrees, the board should disclosethe reasons for its resolution in its corporate governance report)? (ii) If youranswer is “yes”, do you agree that RBP B.1.8 should be revised and upgradedto a CP (re-numbered CP B.1.6).(i)Yes No(ii)Yes NoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 29. Do you agree that the term “performance -based” should be deleted fromCP B.1.2(c) (re-numbered CP B.1.2(b)) and revised as described in paragraph 118of the Consultation Paper?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.B. Nomination CommitteeQuestion 30. Do you agree that RBP A.4.4 (establishment and composition of a nominationcommittee, re-numbered CP A.5.1) should be upgraded to a CP?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 31. Do you agree that the proposed CP (currently RBP A.4.4) should state that thenomination committee’s chairman should be an INED?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 32. Do you agree that RBP A.4.5 (nomination committee’s terms of reference, re -numbered CP A.5.2) should be upgraded to a CP?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.the nomination committee ’s review of the structure, size and composition ofthe board should be performed at least once a year?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 34. Do you agree that the proposed CP (currently RBP A.4.5(a)) should state thatthe nomination committee’s review of the structure, size and composition ofthe board should implement the issuer’s corporate strategy?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 35. Do you agree that RBP A.4.6 (availability of nomination committee ’s terms ofreference) should be upgraded to a CP?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.A.5.3) should state that issuers should include their nomination committee’sterms of reference on the HKEx website?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 37. Do you agree that RBP A.4.7 (sufficient resources for the nominationcommittee, re-numbered CP A.5.4) should be upgraded to a CP?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 38. Doyou agree that the proposed CP (currently RBP A.4.7, re-numbered CPA.5.4) should clarify that a nomination committee should be able to seekindependent professional advice at the issuer’s expens e?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.C. Corporate Governance CommitteeQuestion 39. Do you agree with the proposed terms of reference listed in paragraph 141 ofthe Consultation Paper?YesNoPlease give reasons and alternative suggestions.Question 40. Do you consider that the committee(s) performing the proposed duties listed inparagraph 141 of the Consultation Paper should submit to the board a writtenreport on its work annually?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 41. Do you consider that this report (as describedin paragraph 140 of theConsultation Paper) should be published as part of the issuer’s corporategovernance report?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 42. Do you agree with introducing RBP D.3.3 stating that an issuer shouldestablish a corporate governance committee?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 43. Do you agree the duties of an existing committee or committees can beexpanded to include those of a corporate governance committee? YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 44.Do you agree with the addition of CP D.3.2 stating that the committeeperforming the proposed duties listed in paragraph 141 of the ConsultationPaper should comprise a majority of INEDs?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 45. Do you agree with the proposal to add a note to CP D.3.2 stating that thecommittee should include one member who is an executive director or non-executive director with sufficient knowledge of the issuer’s day -to-dayoperations?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.D. Audit committeeQuestion 46. Do you agree wit h our proposal to upgrade RBP C.3.7 (audit committee’sterms of reference should include arrangements for employees to raiseconcerns about improprieties in financial reporting) to a CP?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 47. Do you agree with our proposal to amend CP C.3.3(e)(i) to state that the auditcommittee should meet the external auditor at least twice a year?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 48. Do you agree that a new RBP should be introduced to encourage auditcommittees to establish a whistleblowing policy?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.4. Remuneration of Directors, CEO and Senior ManagementQuestion 49. Do you agree with our proposal that issuers should discloseseniormanagement remuneration by band (Appendix 16, new paragraph 25A)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 50. If your answer to Question 49 is yes, do you agree with our proposal thatsenior management remuneration disclosure should include sales commission?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 51. Do you agree with our proposal to amend Appendix 16 to require an issuer todisclose the CEO’s remuneration in its annual report and by name?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 52. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP B.1.6 to a CP (a significantproportion of executive directors’ remuneration should be structured so as tolink rewards to corporate and individual performance, re-numbered CP B.1.5)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.5. Board EvaluationQuestion 53. Do you agree with our proposal to add newRBP B.1.8 that issuers shouldconduct a regular evaluation of its own and individual directors’ performance?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.6.Board MeetingsA. Considering a matter where there is a conflict of interest by a physical board meetingrather than a written board resolutionQuestion 54. Do you agree that, except for plain language amendments, the wording of CPA.1.8 (re-numbered CP A.1.7) should be retained (issuers to hold a boardmeeting to discuss resolutions on a material matter where a substantialdirectors or a director has a conflict of interest)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 55. Do you agree with our proposals to add a note to CP A.1.8 (re-numbered CPA.1.7) stating that attendance at board meetings can be achieved by telephonicor video conferencing?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.B. Directors’ Attendance at Board MeetingsQuestion 56. Do you agree with our proposal to add the notes to paragraph I(c) of Appendix14 (on attendance at board meetings) as described in paragraph 195 of theConsultation Paper?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 57. Do you agree with our proposal to introduce a new requirement (paragraph I(d)to Appendix 14) that attendance by an alternate should not be counted asattendance by the director himself?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 58. Do you agree with our proposal that an issuer disclose, for each nameddirector, the number of board or committee meetings he attended andseparately the number of board or committee meetings attended by hisalternate?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.C. Removing Five Percent Threshold for V oting on a Resolution in which a Director hasan InterestQuestion 59. Do you agree with our proposal to revise Rule 13.44 to remove the exemptiondescribed in paragraph 199 (transactions where a director has an interest)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.7. Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerQuestion 60. Do you agree with our proposal to remove the words “at the board level” fromCode Principle A.2 to clarify the division between management of the boardand day-to-day management of an issuer’s business?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 61. Do you agree with our proposal to amend CP A.2.3 to add “accurate” and“clear” to describe the information that the chairman should ensure directorsreceive?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 62. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP A.2.4 to a CP to give greateremphasis to the chairman’s duty to provide leadership for the board, to ensurethat the board works effectively and discharges its responsibilities, etc.?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.state: “The chairman should take primary responsibility for ensuring that goodcorporate governance practices and procedures are established”?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 64. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP A.2.6 to a CP to emphasisethe chairman’s responsibility to encourage directorswith different views tovoice their concerns, allow sufficient time for discussion of issues and buildconsensus?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 65. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP A.2.7 to a CP and amend it tostate that the chairman should hold separate meetings with only INEDs andonly NEDs at least once a year?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.chairman’s role to ensure effective communication between the board andshareholders?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 67. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP A.2.9 to a CP to emphasisethe chairman’s role to enable NED contrib utions and constructive relationsbetween EDs and NEDs?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.8. Notifying directorship change and disclosure of directors’ informationQuestion 68. Do you agree that we should amendRule 13.51(2) to require issuers todisclose the retirement or removal of a director or supervisor?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 69. Do you agree that we should amend Rule 13.51(2) to apply to the appointment,resignation, re-designation, retirement or removal of a CEO (and not only to adirector or supervisor)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 70. Do you agree that we should amend Rule 13.51(2)(o) to cover all civiljudgments of fraud, breach of duty or other misconduct involving dishonesty?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 71.Do you agree that we should amend Rule 13.51B(3)(c) to clarify that thesanctions referred to in that Rule are those made against the issuer (and notthose of other issuers)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 72. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP A.3.3 to a CP to ensure thatdirectors’ information is published on an issuer’s website?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 73. Do you agree with our proposed amendment to the CP (RBP A.3.3 upgraded)that directors’ information should also be published on the HKEx website?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.9. Providing Management Accounts or Management Updates to the BoardQuestion 74. Do you agree that we should add CP C.1.2stating issuers should provideboard members with monthly updates as described in paragraph 240 of theConsultation Paper?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.10. Next Day Disclosure for a Director Exercising an Option in the Issuer or theIssuer’s SubsidiariesQuestion 75. Do you agree with the proposed amendment to Rule 13.25A(2)(a)(viii) and (ix)removing the need for issuers to publish a Next Day Disclosure Returnfollowing the exercise of options for shares in the issuer by a director of asubsidiary?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 76. Do you agree with the proposed amendment to Rule 13.25A(2)(b)(i) and (ii) torequire issuers to publish a Next Day Disclosure only if options for shares inthe issuer exercised by a director of its subsidiary or subsidiaries results in achange of 5% ormore (individually or when aggregated with other events) ofthe issuer’s share capital since its last Monthly Return?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.11. Disclosing Long Term Basis on which an Issuer Generates or Preserves BusinessValueQuestion 77. Do you agree that we should introduce the proposed CP (CP C.1.4) asdescribed in paragraph 250 of the Consultation Paper?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.12. Directors’ InsuranceQuestion 78. Do you agree with our proposal to upgrade RBP A.1.9 (issuers should arrangeappropriate insurance for directors) to a CP (re-numbered CP A.1.8)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 79. Do you agree with our proposal to add the words “adequate and general” toRBP A.1.9 (upgraded and re-numbered CP A.1.8)?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.PART II: SHAREHOLDERS1. Shareholders’ General MeetingsA. Notice of Meeting and Bundling of ResolutionsQuestion 80. Do you agree with our proposal to amend CP E.1.1 to state that issuers shouldavoid “bundling”of resolutions and where they are “bundled” explain thereasons and material implications in the notice of meeting?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.B. V oting by PollQuestion 81. Do you agree with our proposal to amend Rule 13.39(4) to allow a chairman ata general meeting to exempt procedural and administrative matters describedin paragraph 274 of the Consultation Paper from voting by poll?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 82. Do you agree with the examples of procedural and administrative resolutionsin paragraph 275 of the Consultation paper? Do you have any other examplesto add?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 83. Do you agree that our proposed amendments to Rule13.39(5) clarifydisclosure in poll results?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 84. Do you agree with our proposal to amend CP E.2.1 to remove the words "atthe commencement of the meeting” so that an issuer’s chairman can explainthe procedures for conducting a poll later during a general meeting?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.C. Shareholders’ Approval to Appoint and Remove an AuditorQuestion 85. Do you agree with our proposal to add new Rule 13.88 to require shareholderapproval to appoint the issuer’s auditor?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.Question 86. Do you agree with our proposal to add, in new Rule 13.88, a requirement forshareholder approval to remove the issuer’s auditor before the end of his termof office?YesNoPlease give reasons for your views.。

相关文档
最新文档