托福阅读否定事实信息题合集之TPO31-2-智课教育旗下智课教育
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
智 课 网 托 福 备 考 资 料
托福阅读否定事实信息题合集之TPO31-2-智课教育旗
下智课教育
本文和大家分享的是托福阅读否定事实信息题合集之TPO31-2,正在准备托福阅读的学生可以一起来看看这份tpo阅读否定事实信息题的集合,希望能给大家的托福考试准备带来帮助。
托福阅读否定事实信息题是阅读考试十大题型之一,通常每篇阅读中都会出现;tpo是托福阅读 备考最权威的材料,所以托福小编综合二者,为大家集中整理了tpo阅读中考察的否定事实信息题及其对应的解析,供大家参考使用。
本文带来的是TPO31-2的否定事实信息题,一起来看看吧。
TPO31-2 Early Children Education
Paragraph 3:
【3】Whether Head Start is seen as successful ornot depends on the lens through which one is looking. If, for instance, theprogram is expected to provide long-term increases in IQ (intelligencequotient) scores, it is a disappointment. Although graduates of Head Startprograms tend to show immediate IQ gains, these increases do lot last. On theother hand, it is clear that Head Start is meeting its goal of gettingpreschoolers ready for school. Preschoolers who participate in Head Start arebetter prepared for future schooling than those who do not. Furthermore,graduates of Head Start programs have better future school grade. Finally, someresearch suggests that ultimately Head Start graduates show higher academicperformance at the end of high school, although the gains are modest.
5.Accordingto paragraph 3, the Head Start program had NOT been successful at which of thefollowing?
A.Helping children adjust to school.
B.Providing long-term increase in IQ scores.
C.Improving school performance throughout high school.
D.Preventing children from being placed in special-education classes.
解答:只有B不对应,其他的几个选项根据后文中的内容都是正确的。
段落翻译:
【3】“Head Start”的成功与否取决于人们看待的角度。
比如说,如果人们希望它可以带来智商的长期増长,那它终将是令人失望。
因为,尽管“Head Start”可以使智力迅速地提高,但这种増长并不会持续太久。
另一方面,很显然,“Head Start”的目标是让学龄前儿童做好上学的准备。
相对那些没参与过“Head Start”计划的孩子们而言,参加了这个项目的孩子们对学业有着更充分的准备。
而且,“Head Sta rt”的毕业生今后的学习成绩会更好。
最后,调査表明,虽然收获一般,但最终“Head
Start”的毕业生在高中结束时会取得更高的学术成就。
Paragraph 5:
【5】The most recent comprehensive evaluation ofearly intervention programs suggests that, taken as a group, preschool programscan provide significant benefits, and that government funds invested early inlife may ultimately lead to a reduction in future costs. For instance, comparedwith children who did not participate in early intervention programs,participants in various programs showed gains in emotional or cognitivedevelopment, better educational outcomes, increased economic
self-sufficiency,reduced levels of criminal activity, and improved health-related behaviors. Ofcourse, not every program produced all these benefits, and not every childbenefited to the same extent. Furthermore, some researchers argue thatless-expensive programs are just as good as relatively expensive ones, such asHead Start. Still, the results of the evaluation were promising, suggestingthat the potential benefits of early intervention can be substantial.
9.Paragraph5 mentions that participants in early intervention programs have been shown todo all of the following better than
nonparticipants EXCEPT
A.Take care of there health.
B.Support themselves financially.
C.Take care of their own children.
D.Have increased emotional development.
解答:根据关键词定位至For
instance开始的内容,其中不包括C。
段落翻译:
【5】最近关于早期介入项目的综合评估表明,总的来说,学前项目可以带来巨大的收益,政府在早期投入的资金最终会减少未来的花销。
比如说,与没有参与早期介入项目的孩子相比, 参加了各种项目的孩子在情感和认知能力上得到了提高,改善了教育成果,提高了经济的自足性,减少了犯罪行为的发生,健康行为得到了改进。
当然,不是所有的项目都能产生这样的收益,也不是每个孩子都能得到同等程度的提高。
此外,一些调査者称那些相对便宜的项目和昂贵项目结果一样好。
评估的结果仍然很乐观,它认为早期介入的潜在好处是不可估量的。
以上就是托福阅读TPO31-2中的否定事实信息题及其解析,大家可以在备考的时候参考复习,希望能够帮助大家的考前准备。
最后智课教育祝大家都能取得理想的托福考试 成绩。