APQP流程文件

28-Feb-2013
23-Jun-2011
APQP Elements
Subactivities
M i l e s t o n e s
VPD
AA
PPC
PC
PV
IR
CR
PE Action Plan Description Owner / Responsible Target Close Date Remarks / Comments
05-Apr-2012
2011-11-10
Project / Product Name:
##
Oxygen 2 I P D
Supplier name:
ZUHAI ACTION PLAN / COUNTER MEASURE
APQP Review Date:
10-Nov-2011
19-May-2011
03-May-2012
23-Sep-2010
29-Sep-2011
0) General
Does the supplier have a valid SEAT / UAT 534 certification, GPA and evidence of compliance to Philips Sustainability requirements? List team members from Philips and the supplier with their contact details and indicate their attendance and agree on the APQP review frequency and roles & responsibilities per APQP Element Jointly review VoC analysis and NPS data. Ensure VoC is translated to CTQ requirements. Discuss and agree the design / functional performance / system requirements. If applicable, discuss and agree the aestethic/craftmanship targets Discuss and agree the KPIs including quality targets (ppm or Cpk) including internal/external FOR and the reliability targets (e.g. MTBF, FiT or FCR/PFQ) Review and agree program timing dates (including gateways and milestones) Review and agree ramp-up plan and ensure the volume & mix forecasts are achievable. Review and agree safety and approbation requirements (eg IEC60065) Verify Philips RoHS, REACH & Regulated Substances requirements (Declaration, test reports, inspection plan) are fulfilled. Ensure previous lessons learned are included/considered. Jointly review every function of the product and ensure every function is included / considered. Define & list the failure modes in technical and measurable terms and first assess the severity(S) of all failure modes, then the occurence(O) and finally the current controls(D).
2011-11-10
Project / Product Name:
##
Oxygen 2 I P D
Supplier name:
ZUHAI ACTION PLAN / COUNTER MEASURE
APQP Review Date:
10-Nov-2011
19-May-2011
03-May-2012
17-May-2012
Printed @ 2014-7-28 16:20 CLSB - 1413 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V. 2010 All rights are reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the written consent of the copyright owner
1) Customer Input Requirements
Jointly assess the impacts of failure effects by considering the outcome on the product, next higher assembly, system, customer wants and government regulations. Verify the potential causes and/or mechanisms of failure are 2) DFMEA identified for all failure modes. Ensure corrective actions, responsibilities and completion dates are assigned to high Severity, high Criticality (S x O) and high RPN (S x O x D) failure modes. Verify the corrective actions being implemented before RPNs are revised Use DFMEA to identify and review potential CTQ characteristics Translate and transfer the high Severity, high Criticality (S x O) and high RPN failure modes which cannot be reduced by design to the PFMEA. (The outcome of DFMEA is fed into PFMEA.) Ensure DFMEA will be updated when there is design and/or process change. Organise regular technical design reviews (at design owner) at appropriate intervals with appropriate team members Ensure the most promising concept selected and prove the technical feasibility 3) Design Review(s) Ensure the material selection is done according to agreed reliability targets (where applicable) Assess & agree capability of agreed critical requirements for components or sub modules to relevant CTQ's against targets with prototypes and/or FOS Ensure there is clear identification and agreement on; * all applicable tests (including design verification, product verification, SET, reliability, HALT, MEOST, lifetime quality tests tests) * methods, * equipment, * acceptance criteria, * sample sizes and sample allocation plan, * design level, 4) Design * timing and Verification / * the ownership (supplier or Philips) Product Ensure the tests that address the effects of the internal /external Validation Plan & environment including customer usage are considered. Review Ensure variable data is used where possible. Ensure the design verification tests are performed on representative prototype (made by prototype technologies and/or FOS) to verify potential CTQ-Sep-2010
29-Sep-2011
Ensure the product validation tests are performed on the products produced during the product trial run (running at R @R) to verify CTQ's. Ensure the DV / PV tests are successfully completed inline with the project timing. Agree on the frequency of reporting and confirm the contact details of related personnel for lifetime tests. Issue Bill-of-Materials (includes components/modules related to safety and CTQs) with sub-suppliers identified Identify potential critical sub suppliers, assess the risks and verify there is an action plan to minimise the risk (where required) on the 5) Sub supplier project Verify potential key/critical subsuppliers with direct contract to Philips Risk are ISO 9000 certified, compliant to Philips Sustainability Declaration Management and Restricted Substances Declaration requirements and have a robust plan to achieve ISO14001 in one year from the date of sourcing (or ISO14401 compliant) Verify sub-suppliers are capable of supporting the program requirements including quality targets, timing and volume Verify the timing of appropriate resources to ensure they are available and in place ontime to design, develop and implement the project and meet the targets. Provide the project team with the sufficient information to estimate/calculate investments for facilities, tools and gauges