雅思A类大作文真题范文：政府是否应在在艺术品方面加大投入

合集下载

雅思政府-艺术类作文高分范文

雅思政府-艺术类作文高分范文艺术品代表着文化、遗产和历史，政府是否应该冲财政上支援艺术家们?下面是店铺整理的作文范文，欢迎阅读!雅思作文题目：Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.雅思作文范文【1】People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas thework of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.雅思作文范文【2】To be of assistance or not, it indeed is debatable if artists deserve and require funding by the government. Firstly, I acknowledge that the benefits from artists and poets can enrich our everyday lives in so many different ways; otherwise our life would have been a lot drabber without them.Any genuine artist most certainly deserves some form of aid and there can not be any doubt about that, however, whether they require government assistance is another issue altogether. Contrary to popular belief it seems to be that not all artists and literary personalities are wealthy, and most renowned personalities are deservedly rich and famous.While the other large group of artists is neither rich nor famous, they do continue to produce the art works as for the passion and often the passion is what drives them. It would be ridiculous to think that any kind of financial incentives could power their creativity. However, not many of them are able to take up their passion on a full time basis because they cannot afford to. It is import to note that most creative artists are made, and were not born so. It is the vagaries of life & struggles that they have to face which fuels their creativity, in the process they need to mature into renowned to be an artist or a writer. When they do and when their work is recognized, there will not be anydearth of money or fame.In my opinion, it would be criminal to take away this very drive and shun their creativity. Having said that, I do believe that they need to have some kind of incentives, it can be in the way of appreciation and opportunity to present their talent to the rest of the world. This could be done in various ways, for instance, giving tax incentives to amateur artists and writers or financial rebates in government owned auditoriums to stage their presentations.In talking about artists in Australia, which has a concrete social security system in place to take care of all kinds of basic needs, any kind of added financial incentives are not only an added burden on the taxpayer. It would be an issue to find out worthy beneficiaries and there will be enough crooks who will misuse any well intended government assistance schemes. Every human being craves for recognition and money happens to be one of the means towards this end, however, as I mentioned in the beginning it is more important to acknowledge their work than provide financial assistance.On the other hand, as a Chinese, my perception of the government’s assistance is more questionable. Firstly, we need to give artists a definition and how do you classify a person who is an artist. In essence, calligraphy, poetry, music and art they all can be extended to a person who writes well, paints well in his/her Blog. To extend this artist sense further, can we say a singer is an artist? Well, there are many pop song and folk music singers in China. In the same way, a dancer, a talk show’s talent, a movie star, the director, the photographer they can all be artists. And this number of artists would add up to whole population of Australia. How could the Chinese government provide anyassistance without any discrimination to those artists in every classification? I personally do not believe our government has enough financial ability to accommodate this wide ganging number of artists.As a Chinese I can see that in my country, there is still a big gap between the poor and the rich, I would rather government’s financial assistance be directed toward the poor, this does not mean that I would think to provide assistance to artists is a waste of money. My point is that while we can give a true definition of artists, government should use our taxes in a way to be more accountable for.。

政府和艺术相关的雅思英语作文

政府和艺术相关的雅思英语作文你认为政府应该资助音乐家、艺术家、演员和戏剧公司吗?为什么?下面有店铺整理的关于政府对于艺术工作者的补贴的英语作文，大家可以参考参考。

Traditional arts civilized a nation. Do you think government should subsidize musicians, artists, actors or drama companies? What should a government do?Traditional arts, as valuable cultural relics of a nation, are disappearing far away from the modern society. China, as one of the highly-civilized countries in the world, abound in various forms of traditional arts, such as painting, calligraphy, music, architecture and dramas, which are not only our national cultural treasures, but also a rich fortune of the world. (58 words) As essence of a local culture, traditional arts reflect a nation’s artistic talents and traditions. For example, water-color painting depicts a harmony between people and nature. Architecture illustrates a nation’s aesthetic value and religious belief. Cathedrals, highlighted by Gothic style in the Medieval, represent Christianity. Pagodas, totally different from cathedrals stylistically, are a symbol of Buddhism. Peking Opera describes the history of our country. (65 words)However, traditional arts are leaving contemporary people further and further away, one of the main reasons for which is that the authorities concerned and some institutes lack funds and professionals, which are quite essential to the research and promotion of traditional culture. Another radical reason should be attributed to the impact of western cultures on traditions. Young people, especially youngsters, are addicted to western music like rock and roll, without any knowledge about traditionalmusical instruments. With the economic globalization, traditional culture and arts will be in the danger of assimilation. How to maintain and develop traditional arts becomes the biggest concern of a government. (105 words)Firstly, the government should lay a fund for the research and promotion of traditional arts. Secondly, the research institutes and universities should work out a long-term developing scheme, organizing systematic research on traditional arts. Arts belong to a nation and the whole world as well. The prosperity of traditional arts will diversify the culture of the world. (57 words)参考翻译：传统的艺术,作为国家的珍贵文物,远离现代社会消失。

政府投资艺术雅思作文

政府投资艺术雅思作文Title: Government Investment in the Arts.Government investment in the arts plays a crucial role in promoting cultural development and enriching society as a whole. The arts, including visual arts, performing arts, literature, and music, are an integral part of our cultural heritage and identity. Therefore, it is essential for the government to allocate funds and resources to support the arts.First and foremost, government investment in the arts helps to preserve and promote cultural heritage. By funding museums, galleries, theaters, and cultural institutions, the government can ensure that our cultural treasures are preserved for future generations to appreciate and learn from. Additionally, government support for the arts can help to foster creativity and innovation, as artists are able to explore new ideas and push boundaries with financial backing.Furthermore, government investment in the arts can have significant economic benefits. The arts industry creates jobs, stimulates tourism, and contributes tothe overall economic growth of a region. By investing in the arts, the government can not only support artists and cultural institutions but also boost the local economy and attract visitors from around the world.In conclusion, government investment in the arts is essential for preserving cultural heritage, fostering creativity, and stimulating economic growth. It is important for governments to recognize the value of the arts and provide the necessary funding and support to ensure that the arts continue to thrive and enrich our society.标题：政府对艺术的投资。

雅思高分作文：政府投资艺术家

雅思高分作文：政府投资艺术家雅思大作文题目：You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters, musicians, poets. However, other people think that is a waste of money.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words.【话题分类】政府类【题目解析】题目大意：有些人认为政府应该资助各种类型的艺术家，其他人认为这是浪费金钱。

讨论两种观点并且提出你自己的想法。

题型特点：明确表明对观点的态度并提出切题的原因。

本文论文推进：开头段引入讨论，表明立场。

让步段先说明有人认为政府资助艺术家无法带来实质性的回报，而后立论段强调政府资助有利于满足大众艺术追求，也同时能够推动艺术产业的发展进步。

结尾重申观点。

【写作思路】开头段：政府预算分配一直是大众关心的话题。

有些人认为政府应该提供财政援助给艺术家，也有人认为这是一种浪费。

我认为前者更加合理。

让步段：诚然，政府资助艺术家被普遍认为是浪费金钱，因为大众很难因此获得实质回报。

对比于其他基础性的重要领域，比如教育医疗等，政府对于艺术家的经济支持很难实质性地解决民生问题。

考虑到政府财政有限，提供给艺术家经济援助，而不投入足够资金到其他重要领域，不可避免地会引发大众不满。

雅思大作文范文：艺术投资

政府投资：1. Some people argue that the government should spend money on publicservices and facilities, but not on the arts. Do you agree or disagree? [Sample]:The role of arts in modern life is unique, providing people with entertainment and yielding various psychological rewards, such as relief from stress. Despite these benefits, the arts have been taken as luxury goods in many cases. It is suggested that public money of a city should be concentrated in projects like public facilities, which are more likely to bring immediate benefits to the public, rather than the arts. There are a number of facts indicating that this position is right.Public facilities, widely accepted as one of the main precursors to a city’s development, should be one of the highest priorities. Those underdeveloped cities in particular, should direct sufficient funding toward public facilities. While municipal office buildings, courthouses and post offices are essential components of public services, libraries, hospitals, parks, playing fields, gymnasiums and swimming pools are available to the public for social, educational, athletic and cultural activities. By boosting spending on public facilities, cities are more capable to satisfy the needs of citizens and improve their standard of living.In addition to social benefits, there are economic merits that public facilities can offer to communities. An integrated transport network (maritime, land and inland waterways transport and civil aviation), for example, promises the smooth and speedy movement of goods and people in a city. Industrial products, as well as agricultural produce of a city, can be delivered to other cities in exchange for steady income. Of equal importance are public Internet facilities. It is no exaggeration to say that entrepreneurs, either from home or abroad, will first examine the infrastructure of a city before deciding whether to pursue business opportunities there.The arts, by comparison, although enabling people to see the world and the human condition differently and to see a truth one might ignore before, do not merit government spending. The first reason is that the arts –referring to music, film and literature altogether – are more likely to attract the investment of the private sector than public facilities. Business people continue to invest in the arts in the expectation of earning lump sum income and the arts in return, continue to flourish without the government spending. Meanwhile, the arts are a key component of a culture and naturally passed down from one generation to another. Unlike public facilities, they require no money to survive.It is therefore clear that construction of public facilities should be given theforemost consideration. The concern about the well-being of individual citizens and that of a city is more acute than the apprehension about the survival and prospects of the arts, something that business have a stake in与…利害攸关.。

雅思写作大作文范文雅思写作同意与否政府在艺术上浪费钱wasting money on the arts.doc

雅思写作大作文范文雅思写作同意与否政府在艺术上浪费钱wasting money on the arts今天我们雅思写作大作文范文的文章来研究下政府子艺术上浪费钱的问题。

不少人认为艺术对于提升人们的生活没有什么直接的用处。

与其在这上面花费大量的资金进行扶持和资助，还不如将这笔钱用于其他更能提升人们生活水平和促进国家经济发展的方面。

不知道大家是否同意这种看法。

小编搜集了一篇相关的高分范文，以供大家参考。

雅思写作政府与社会类话题思路总结，了解更多切入点和论述方式雅思写作大作文题目Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?一些人认为政府在艺术上浪费钱。

这些资金可能被更好地用于其他地方。

你在多大程度上同意或者不同意？雅思写作大作文范文Arts sometimes reflect the heritage of a country and depict the creativity of an individual. While many believe that financing in arts is a wastage of money, I am of the opposite view as I believe that financing in arts is a good idea for the government.艺术有时候反映了一个国家的遗产，并描绘了个人的创造性。

虽然许多人认为资助艺术是在浪费金钱，我持相反的观点，因为我认为资助艺术对于政府而言是个很好的想法。

Supporters of the idea put forth that diverting funds towards arts hamper the national well-being. For example, this article is from Laokaoya website, available monetary resources could be put to use in building more hospitals, roads, infrastructure, and schools. This means increasing care of the sick and improved transportation to previously inaccessible areas. For children, it caters for increased literacy rates. This group of people believes that art is a luxury and many governments cannot afford this extravagance. According to them, other important sectors require more money and hence a government should stop spending money on arts and invest in more critical areas.这一观点的支持者提出分散资金用于艺术方面会有害一个国家的健康。

雅思写作模板：政府是否应限制艺术家发表艺术见解的自由

雅思⼤作⽂政府类和社会类交叉的话题，⼜和艺术沾边，话题⽐较抽象，所以写起来有⼀定难度。

下⾯是为⼤家整理的该话题模板范⽂，供⼤家参考借鉴。

请⼤家不要盲⽬背诵，可参考其写作结构，以及精彩的词句，多多练习摹写，这样才能真正把英语写作提⾼，取得雅思作⽂⾼分。

Creative artists should be given freedom to express their ideas (words, pictures, music and films. However some people think government should take some restriction with them. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give your reasons with own knowledge and give examples. The responsibility of an artist is to create artworks to cater for people’s needs for aesthesis and enjoyment. Some masterpieces by the world-renowned artists like Shakespeare, the greatest poet in British literature; Vinci, the most famous Italian painter, architect and sculptor impress the people around the world deeply. From my point of view, the government should not give restrictions to artists. On the contrary, their creativity and innovation should be encouraged. (71 words) Creativity is the source of arts. The development of literature is a very vivid illustration. From Classicism to Romanticism, from Renaissances to Realism, from Humanity to Post-modernism, (从古典主义到浪漫主义，从⽂艺复兴到现实主义，从⼈⽂主义到后现代主义) all the styles of literature reflect people’s thinking and have epoch-making significance. Suppose there were only one style of literature, people would not appreciate so abundant poetry and novels and our world would become so monotonous. Furthermore, restrictions on creativity will arouse tragedies, one of which is “Burn books and bury the literati in pits” (焚书坑儒) in Chinese history launched by Emperor Qin Shihuang, who buried the Confucian scholars alive and prohibited the dissemination of Confucian. Another tragedy was started by Emperor Yongzheng in the Qing Dynasty, who killed many creative artists and intellectuals, undermining the literal development and distorting the development of humanity. History proves that only when a government encourages people to express their own idea and thought freely, can its country make progress and prosper. Finally, I will quote a classic sentence from a famous article entitled “Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death” by Patrick Henry, the greatest writer in American history, “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” (不⾃由，勿宁死!)本⽂为孙肇春(Tony)⽼师原创。

雅思大作文范文：政府应该注重投资基础设施还是娱乐设施

Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement?These days, the government spends a large part of its budget not only on public services, but also the arts. Although I agree that it is important to spend money on public services, I do not think spending on the arts is a waste of money.如今，政府的大部分预算不仅花在公共服务上，也花在艺术上。

虽然我同意在公共服务上花钱很重要，但我不认为在艺术上花钱是浪费钱。

There are several reasons for spending a significant amount of the government budget on public services. First and foremost, public services are the things such as hospitals, roads and schools, and these things determine the quality of life that most of us will have. For example, if the government does not spend enough money on hospitals, the health of our society may decline. Similarly, if not enough money is spent on schools, our children may not be properly educated. Also, it will be the poor in our society that will be affected more if we do not spend enough on these things because they are the ones more dependent on such services.将大量的政府预算用于公共服务有几个原因。

政府应不应该资助艺术产业发展英语作文

Government Funding for the Arts: ANecessary InvestmentIn the realm of cultural development, the arts play a pivotal role in enriching society, promoting creativity,and fostering a sense of community. However, the questionof whether governments should fund the arts industry often sparks debate. This essay aims to delve into this discussion, exploring the reasons why government supportfor the arts is not only beneficial but also crucial for sustainable cultural growth.Firstly, government funding for the arts serves as a catalyst for innovation and creativity. Artists, being visionaries and dreamers, often require financial supportto pursue their craft. Without such support, many promising projects may never see the light of day. Government funding, therefore, acts as a launchpad for innovative ideas and projects, enabling artists to experiment and push the boundaries of their creativity.Secondly, the arts contribute significantly to anation's soft power and cultural identity. Cultural exports, such as films, music, and visual arts, are powerful toolsfor promoting a country's values and heritage. By investing in the arts, governments are effectively investing in their country's image and influence on the global stage. This is particularly important in today's interconnected world, where cultural diplomacy plays a crucial role in international relations.Moreover, the arts industry generates significant economic activity and employment opportunities. From ticket sales to merchandise, the arts contribute significantly to a country's GDP. Additionally, the arts sector employs a diverse workforce, including artists, designers, producers, and marketers, among others. By funding the arts, governments are supporting not just the artists but also the larger economic ecosystem that depends on them.However, it is important to note that government funding for the arts should not be a monolithic approach. Instead, it should be targeted, transparent, and accountable. Governments should prioritize funding for projects that align with their cultural policies and objectives, while also encouraging private sector involvement and partnerships. Transparency in fundingallocation is crucial to ensure that funds are used effectively and efficiently. Accountability mechanisms should also be established to monitor the impact and outcomes of government funding.In conclusion, government funding for the arts is a necessary investment that yields rich dividends for society. It fosters innovation, promotes cultural identity, and generates economic activity. While the approach to funding should be targeted, transparent, and accountable, theoverall benefits of supporting the arts industry far outweigh the costs. Governments, therefore, have a responsibility to prioritize funding for the arts as a critical component of their cultural and economic development strategies.**政府资助艺术产业发展：一项必要的投资**在文化发展领域，艺术对于丰富社会、促进创新和培养社区意识起着至关重要的作用。

雅思写作｜真题解析：政府不应该投资艺术吗？

雅思写作｜真题解析：政府不应该投资艺术吗？烤鸭们，最新一期雅思写作真题解析和高分范文，读起！雅思写作题目Some people think that arts(such as painting and music)do not directly improve people's life,so government should spend money on other areas.Do you agree or disagree?解析&审题本周作文是2012年7月28日的雅思原题再现，同时2013年5月25日的雅思真题也与本次作文高度相仿。

本题的核心在于：政府到底该不该在艺术方面投资？仔细审题，我们会发现题目的前半部分说的是“艺术不能直接改善人们的生活”，也就是说，这个题目已经预设了一个原因，即艺术不直接改善人们的生活。

因此，这个题目完整的审题应该是这样的：政府该不该因为艺术不能直接改善人们的生活而不支持艺术？那么，就这个问题，我们就可以展开讨论。

如果认为这个说法很正确，考生就需要论证：（1）艺术的确不能直接改善人们的生活（甚至可能让人们的生活恶化）；（2）政府的资金应该投向那些直接改善人们生活的领域（比如科技、教育、医疗等）。

反过来，如果不同意这个说法，考生就需要论证：（1）艺术可以直接改善人们的生活（比如艺术可以给国家带来收入）；（2）即使艺术不直接改善人们的生活，但艺术可以有其他很多功能（比如丰富人们精神生活，在危机时刻甚至可以将一个国家的所有人团结起来）。

这样，这个题目其实就变成了讨论艺术的作用。

[批判思维提示]本题的题目结构是“原因+结果”型，考生在论证时如果同意题目观点，需要同时对原因和结果表示支持并进行论证；如果不同意题目观点，则可以承认原因，但不承认结果（比如可以承认艺术的确不能直接改善人们的生活，但并不能因此就认为政府不该投资艺术，因为艺术还有其他很多重要的功能），也可以对原因进行否定（比如认为艺术实际上可以直接改善人们生活），然后对艺术的其他功能也进行论证。

托福写作范文(13)政府应该花更多钱资助艺术而不是体育？

（13）Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than on athletics?开头：不同意政府花更多的钱在资助艺术上而不是体育。

（话题引入+他人观点+明确立场+过渡句）Arts and athletics both play indispensable roles in people’s life, for arts nurture people’s minds while athletics help to build a healthy and strong body. Thus, there has recently been a heated debate on which one deserves more financial aid from the government. As far as I am concerned, the government should give priority to athletics. I am going to elaborate my point of view in the following paragraphs.中间段1：现代人缺乏锻炼意识，多数处于亚健康状态。

（主题句+说理论证+细节例子）Firstly, the physical quality of modern people is not as good as in the past, which calls for more exercises. Along with the high-speed development of society, people, especially youth, are confronted with unprecedented competition. They need to work very hard to guarantee a decent life, which causes most of them be in the state of sub-health. Therefore, it is high time that the government took some measures to reinforce citizens’ health condition. For example, the government should build easily accessible sports facilities in the neighborhoods and make known to the public the benefits of doing exercises through mass media.中间段2：体育强是国家实力的体现，能增强人们的自豪感和凝聚力。

英语考试作文-关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解

英语考试作文关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解雅思写作高分范文能够让考生有效学习遣词造句的技巧，还能扩展词汇量。

对于基础薄弱的考生而言，背诵高分范文也是一个不错的选择。

除了能够快速提高语法的运用能力之外，还能积累大量的好词好句。

今天小站君为大家带来关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文。

希望能够帮助到大家。

雅思写作题目：Many people think that arts (painting and music) do not directly improve people’s life, so the government should spend money on other important areas. Do you agree or disagree?雅思写作题目讲解：第一段：引入话题，艺术是否该获得政府资金支持。

第二段：社会服务当然可以明显地提高人民的生活水平，如教育，医疗，环境或基础建设。

但是这些并不会增加人民的幸福感受。

第三段：人民需要艺术，因为：艺术相关人们的情感和价值观，这是人们行为的核心部分。

艺术培养人的创造和创新能力;艺术是娱乐休闲方式，艺术是感情和精力释放的安全方式，艺术促进不同文化和民族间的理解。

第四段：政府应该既投资社会基础服务，也投资艺术。

这样才能创造一个健康有生机的社会。

雅思写作范文：While the economy is booming in many countries, the funding for arts has been decreasing. The main reason is that some people overly emphasize social services such as medical care and education, but underestimate the intangible role of the arts as they find it difficult to quantify their benefits.在大多数国家经济繁荣的时候，艺术经费也会随之减少。

政府应不应该资助艺术产业发展英语作文

政府应不应该资助艺术产业发展英语作文-概述说明以及解释英文回答:Government should definitely fund the development of the arts industry. The arts play a significant role in enriching our society and promoting cultural exchange. By providing financial support, the government can ensure that artists have the necessary resources to create and showcase their work.Firstly, funding the arts industry can have a positive impact on the economy. The arts sector creates jobs and generates revenue through ticket sales, exhibitions, and cultural events. By investing in this industry, the government can stimulate economic growth and create a vibrant arts scene.Secondly, the arts have intrinsic value in society. They provide a platform for self-expression, creativity, and innovation. Artistic endeavors can challenge societal norms, provoke thought, and inspire change. By supporting the arts, the government fosters a culture of creativity and encourages individuals to explore their artistic talents.Furthermore, funding the arts industry promotes cultural diversity and understanding. The arts have the power to transcend language barriers and connect people from different backgrounds. By supporting diverse artistic expressions, the government can promote inclusivity and bridge cultural divides.However, it is important for the government to ensure that funding is distributed fairly and transparently. It should support both established artists and emerging talents, and consider the needs of different art forms, such as visual arts, performing arts, and literature.In conclusion, government funding for the arts industry is essential for its growth and development. The arts contribute to the economy, enrich society, and promote cultural exchange. By investing in the arts, the government can create a thriving artistic landscape and foster a more vibrant and inclusive society.中文回答:政府应该资助艺术产业的发展。

雅思作文分析是否应投资博物馆等事业

雅思作文分析:是否应投资博物馆等事业Currently a growing number of governments are investing some money in museums. Some people believe this will benefit the whole society while others maintain that the government should tighten its budget and spend the money on more important things. To my mind, the former view does make sense.We can hardly lose sight of the fact that every country prides itself on the glory of its own history. Undoubtedly, the museum, which usually boasts a collection of objects of artistic and historical value, plays a vital role in recording a country's history. By visiting museums, we can not only learn about our history and civilization, but gradually cultivate a sense of social responsibility, which normally stems from a clear understanding of mankind's history. For instance, if young people come to know what their ancestors have contributed to the development of their country, they will be inspired to dedicate themselves to the economic well-being of society. Moreover, in the museum, they will also learn something that can not be acquired from books. In addition, revelling innostalgic memories is likely to be a sort of great enjoyment and relaxation. Therefore, it will be beneficial to the whole society if the government takes the lead in funding museums.However, we have to admit that some countries, especially poor ones, may have difficulty spending a large sum of money in this respect, but they are able to organize fundraising activities so that wealthy members of society can donate money to public facilities such as museums. As far as I know, this is common practice in many countries.In the final analysis, it is quite clear that museums are treasure troves of mankind. The government, as well as the individuals, should endeavour to provide enough funds for them to be on the right track.【备注说明，非正文，实际使用可删除如下部分。

雅思大作文范文-社会发展和其他

The government should spend more money on public facilities rather than on artists or artistic projects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Government sponsorship for arts is a controversial issue, especially when the state is confronted with budget problems. Those who object to public funds for arts believe that money should be diverted to the construction of public facilities. I am of the opinion that the government should take citizens’ benefits into consideration and adjust the spending on art or infrastructures accordingly.It is first important to realize that art is an essential component of cultural legacy, so the protection and development of art has important implications to cultural diversity. In terms of painting, for example, styles, genres, tool and materials differ from culture to culture. An art form is likely to disappear, if it is not well protected. Besides, some works of art such as graffiti, spark people’s imagination and provide them with a novel perspective to view the world. Art can develop a culture in which people pursue it as a hobby. Furthermore, public art boosts the appeal of the built environment, which is reflected in the diversity of architecture and landscaping.Despite the importance of art, public facilities deserve more of government spending than art. Citizens are more interested in the availability of public facilities, as water and electricity supply, schools, libraries and roads, which have a direct impact on their daily lives. By contrast, for most people, sculptures, paintings or operas are luxury items, which cannot bring any tangible benefit to them. Another reason is that the art can sometimes yield high returns andarts include music, movies, operas and creative arts. Therefore, it is pointless to support the use of public funds for this purpose, if basic facilities are underfunded.In the light of the facts outlined above, government investment in the arts is essential to cultural diversity, the development of personal hobbies and the visual appeal of the built environment. However, in those countries whose infrastructure is inadequate, government funding for the arts may have to be reduced.Instead of asking the government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves. Do you agree or disagree?The government has long been the major funds of university education. Those people who support government spending on education think that some students do not enroll because of learning costs. My view is that students’ personal situations should be considered, before the government decides whether to offer free education.It is worth noting that university education is the key to closing/bridging the income gap. There are numerous students, especially those from low income families, who cannot affordyears in the university, making university education an expensive option to them. Because of financial constraints, people of low socio-economic status are at a disadvantage in terms of educational opportunities and career development. By contrast, children of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to advance their education and find well-paid jobs eventually. As a consequence, the widening income gap may add uncertainty to social stability.Higher participation rates in tertiary education are also vital to economic and social development, because productivity will be improved and citizens’ morals will be strengthened. Even though government sponsorship can inspire people to receive tertiary education, it can also cause the waste of public resources. Free education may be a reason why many students are reluctant to complete their courses and enter the workforce at the earliest date. It not only adds/imposes a burden on the country but also affects state funding for other sectors, such as primary and secondary education.Let alone students’ contribution allows universities to upgrade facilities and recruit well-qualified lecturers, both important to students’ academic achievement.To summarize, the government should provide financial support according to students’ needs to ensure that they have access to education. However, tuition fees are applicable to most students, especially those from middle to high income families, as it helps maintain the quality of tertiary education.Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country, while some people think that there are other factors. What other factors should be considered? Among these factors, do you think that any factor is more important than the others?The rapid growth of emerging economies has fuelled controversy over how to define successful countries. Regarding the distinguishing features of successful countries, people might have some shared opinions but they do not reach any agreement. I think that besides economic development, other factors should be taken into consideration.Firstly, social welfare is a significant factor, which has relevance to people’s satisfaction with life. There is ample evidence that in many developing countries, poor people do not benefit from economic growth, which is reflected in the widening gap between haves and have-nots. National wealth is not distributed evenly, as the health care service and the education system are underfunded. Among other problems, the ever-increasing cost of living and the escalating class conflict are particularly pronounced. It is also important to realize that the economic development of some countries is achieved at environment’s expenses. This has a destructive effect on the natural environment and causes the spread of different diseases.Considering these factors, economic growth should not be regarded as the main criterion for measuring a country’s success. There is a growing recognition that a successful country can ensure the fair distribution of wealth so citizens’ needs can be satisfied. People are able to acquire necessities such as food, housing, education, medical care and so forth at affordableaccess to clean water, waste disposal, sewage management and transport infrastructure. In addition, we must take into account the issue of whether or not the economic development is sustainable, namely, whether the country can provide adequate resources to feed future generations.In brief, it is premature to equate wealth with success. Living standards and sustainable development are among those factors that can be taken into consideration when a country’s success is evaluated.It is argued that we are living in a throw-away society: people throw away what they use in daily life, instead of recycling or reusing them. Why has this happened and how to address this issue?The past decade has seen a marked increase in the public’s awareness of environmental issue. The environmental impact of the use and disposal of consumer goods has become a cause for concern. It is important to focus on how this problem has happened and how to solve this problem.The main reason behind the increased consumption of products lies in the fact that people have higher income. The improvement of productivity, as well as technological innovation, hashousehold products, are increasingly affordable. Moreover, people’s fast pace of life accounts for their dependence on disposable products. The lifespan of durable products (such as mobile phones and computers) has been shortened, in large part due to the fact that these products are renewed rapidly. Furthermore, consumers are indifferent to the consequences of their behavior. The continuously growing demand for products results in enormous energy consumption as well as a substantial increase in waste and pollution.As the overconsumption of products is pervasive, it is important to take some measures to mitigate pollution. One main strategy is the use of bio-degraded materials, which can reduce the damage caused by plastic bags, packages and metals to the environment. In addition, emphasis should be placed on people’s environmental awareness, as it changes the ways in which people use and dispose of products. For example, people should be encouraged to keep old products, as long as these products function appropriately. Environmental groups should disseminate the knowledge of how to recycle disposable goods and household appliances.In conclusion, people’s attitude toward consumption and the increase in disposable income are main reasons behind excessive consumption of disposable items. To address this problem successfully, the top priority is to raise people’s awareness of environmental protection, which can lead to a change to their lifestyles.Volunteer work organized by middle schools brings more benefits than problems. To whatextent do you agree or disagree?Volunteer work has widely been promoted in many schools and even recognized as a requirement for a graduation. Despite the fact that volunteer work has its downside, it is beneficial for participants and the community as a whole. It is clear that students can improve their skills and enrich their social experience by participating in community service.When providing community service, students will encounter numerous problemsand challenges which are rare at school, such as how to introduce community service to the elderly and how to assist children in schooling. Volunteer work enables students to boost their confidence and improve problem-solving abilities, although they are sometimes not aware of this benefit. A second benefit is that students can integrate their academic experience with their practical experience. It comes as no surprise that many employers now express strong interest in those graduates with volunteer experience. The increase in the number of young volunteers is also of benefit to the community. Some services, such as those that aim to help the homeless, often have financial problems, which can be solved if young volunteers are involved. It can also raise the awareness of some social problems (such as environmental issues and animal rights) among people, especially young people. In a society where people are willing to help each other, people have a sense of belonging, which is crucial to community cohesion.The value of volunteer work is sometimes discounted by its deficiencies. We cannot rule outvolunteers’ time and energy. Another problem is the lack of flexibility, which makes volunteer work tedious and strenuous rather than stimulating and educational. Volunteers are not devoted to the service, possibly because the value of their labour is not explicit.The discussion of these factors leads to the conclusion that we should recognize the importance of volunteer work for students’ abilities, career prospects and social development. In order to rally support for volunteer work, volunteer service organizations should tailor these services to meet vounterrs’ needs.News has a remarkable influence on people’s opinions and ideas, do you think it is a positive or negative change?We are bombarded with the information presented by the news media, including newspaper, radio, television and the Internet. There is a growing recognition that news is important in forming and affecting public opinion. From a personal point of view, the undue influence of the news media is a challenge to society.More often than not, news magnifies the effect of some events, spreading anxiety throughout society. It is customary for the news media to exaggerate the magnitude of some crises or threats (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters, serial murders and financial crises) in anoverreaction and mood swings as they will tend to believe that they are under threat constantly. Their feelings will be strong if these events occur in the vicinity. Not only does it affect their wellbeing but it also erodes their confidence in interpersonal relationships.News can also cultivate and affect one’s attitudes towards some people or events but fail to offer an insight into the truth in all cases. In choosing newsworthy events, news agencies show a preference for those events that live up to viewer s’ expectations and support their notions. For example, media coverage of crime will reinforce stereotypes about some social groups, such as minority ethnic groups, because news reports increase these people’s representation intentionally. Many news agencies obtain financial sponsorship from political parties or for-profit organizations, so they present some biased information to affect people’s opinions. There are numerous examples that illustrate this point. Some drug companies describe their products as major breakthroughs in the news media, in an effort to convince people that their products are safe rather than hazardous. It is fair to say that news causes people to form misconceptions and make unwise decisions.My concluding remark is that it is not a boon if news permeates our lives. Apart from our understanding of the world, news can have a profound impact on our behavior.A longer prison term as a way of punishing those who break the law is not as good as other methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Imposing sentences is considered as a method to punish those who commit a serious offence and sometimes as a correctional method. However, we sometimes note that the crime rate is soaring, despite the fact that the number of prisons is growing. In the discussion of pros and cons of imprisonment, we need to consider the severity of the offense, the age of the offender and the impact on the public.The supporters of stiff sentences believe that this kind of punishment has a deterrent effect on both prospective offenders and habitual offenders. The logic behind this idea is that imprisonment means a loss of freedom, a consequence that no rational person is willing to take. This is particularly true when it has an impact on their lives, including their career. For habitual criminals or those who commit serious crimes, a harsh sentence is also reasonable, because it can protect social order. It is difficult to convince people that a serial killer poses no threat to the public. When we oppose imprisonment, we。

政府应不应该限制艺术发展雅思作文

政府应不应该限制艺术发展雅思作文The question of whether governments should impose restrictions on artistic development is a complex one, fraught with debates on freedom of expression and societal responsibility. On one hand, art is the cornerstone of human creativity and imagination, offering a window into diverse perspectives and emotions. Limiting its development would stifle innovation and suppress vital societal conversations.Art serves as a mirror, reflecting societal issues and challenging norms. It has the power to evoke empathy, inspire change, and even effect political transformations. By restricting artistic expression, governments risk silencing voices that may be critical of their policies or actions.However, it's also true that some forms of art can be controversial or even harmful, particularly when they promote violence, hate speech, or the degradation ofcertain groups. In these cases, governments have a duty to protect citizens from such content, ensuring a safe and inclusive environment for all.Ultimately, the balance lies in fostering anenvironment where artistic freedom thrives while also upholding societal values and safeguarding citizens' rights. Governments should encourage and support artists, recognizing their crucial role in shaping culture and society, while also implementing regulations that ensure art remains a force for good.。

雅思写作范文：政府应该为艺术买单吗？

【题⽬】Some people think the government should spend more money on public services rather than wasting money on art.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?这题要讨论的是：政府应该为艺术发展买单，还是应该专注民⽣，完善公共服务。

那像这类题⽬，双⽅都很难完全否定，因此“⼀边倒”的写法并不容易。

范⽂采取的是更容易下⼿的双⾯写法，即“双⽅都肯定，重点讨论有争议的⼀⽅”。

【范⽂】(1) With the development of modern society, governments are allocating more funds to building art galleries, theatres or supporting the life and work of artists. Some people disapprove the governments’ decisions and insist that the money should be spent on public services to improve people’s living standard in a more direct way. In my view, however, although funding public services is essential to social development, art is also an indispensable part of the society that should be valued. (2) It is true that establishing public services is the top priority of the government. It provides for basic human needs and guarantees the stability of the society. In China, people have been relying on public services since the day of birth. They receive education in schools founded and supported by the government. When they are sick, the government helps paying for the medical care. Besides, everybody enjoys the public facilities like highways, parks, libraries and so forth which all come from government investments.(3) However, this does not mean that the government spending money on art is unnecessary. Although people do not feed on art, it is still their natural instinct to pursue beauty. Once the survival needs are met, people start seeking spiritual fulfillments by creating and appreciating art, which helps them to calm down and relax after long hours of labor. Naturally, apart from bread and milk, the government should also take care of the spiritual life of common people.(4) Admittedly, with successful commercialised operation, many art groups perform well and do not need the financial support from the government. Yet, there are still ones that depend on government funding. For example, Peking Opera, which is a valuable cultural inheritance of China, might not have survived and thrived without the promotion by the government. It is the same with many other art forms of art all over the world.(5) In conclusion, it is the government’s duty to facilitate public services that provide for the basic needs of citizens. Nevertheless, art is also an important part of human life and deserves equal attention and support from the government.【解析】这篇⽂章中，Eileen采⽤了经典的“五段式”。

雅思范文：政府是否应该投资在艺术领域

最权威的国际教育服务平台资料来源：教育优选 /雅思范文：政府是否应该投资在艺术领域There has been an on-going heated debate on whether government shouldsubsidy various forms of arts, such as music and painting. Some see thetaxpayers’ money spent on arts as a worthwhile investment to facilitate thehealthy development of arts, which is regarded as the scream of nationalculture. Reasonable may it sounds, it can beIdontknowlly misleading.In fact, government and arts make nothing more than a noxious brew. It cannever be something of surprise after you have accepted th e truth that thegovernment’s subsidy always carries with it a danger of government interferenceand distortion. That is to say, there exists a risk of the arts to be harnessedas a political tool. Subsidized art, which is concerned with reflecting thepolitical views of the government officials who fund it, will no longer be arevelation of social temper and the general state of mind of the majority. Thus, it can be safe to conclude that the best government promotes a freesociety. Keeping the government out of the business of patronizing arts ensuresthat allparties-individuals are not forced to advance causes against theirbeliefs, while the artists are not compelled to conform to government standardsthat are prone to change with the wind of politics and popular thought.What’s more, it may seem thoroughly ridiculous for the government to splasha large sum of money on the arts, which is nothing short of a luxury for most ofthe taxpayers, while apparently we have more pressing needs, such as health careand social secure.In a nutshell, it will be a win-win policy to get the government out of theart business, with better art and more rational allocation of taxpayers’money 。

雅思A类大作文真题范文：政府是否应在在艺术品方面加大投入

雅思政府-艺术类作文高分范文

政府和艺术相关的雅思英语作文

政府投资艺术雅思作文

雅思高分作文：政府投资艺术家

雅思大作文范文：艺术投资

雅思写作大作文范文 雅思写作同意与否 政府在艺术上浪费钱wasting money on the arts.doc

雅思写作模板：政府是否应限制艺术家发表艺术见解的自由

雅思大作文范文：政府应该注重投资基础设施还是娱乐设施

政府应不应该资助艺术产业发展英语作文

雅思写作｜真题解析：政府不应该投资艺术吗？

托福写作范文(13)政府应该花更多钱资助艺术而不是体育？

英语考试作文-关于政府类的雅思写作高分范文详解

政府应不应该资助艺术产业发展英语作文

雅思作文分析是否应投资博物馆等事业

雅思大作文范文-社会发展和其他

政府应不应该限制艺术发展雅思作文

雅思写作范文：政府应该为艺术买单吗？

雅思范文：政府是否应该投资在艺术领域

雅思写作大作文范文雅思写作同意与否政府在艺术上浪费钱wasting money on the arts.doc