双语名人演讲稿巴菲特在哥伦比亚大学的讲稿(双语)
慢慢变富的罗宾逊:巴菲特1998年佛罗里达大学商学院经典演讲
慢慢变富的罗宾逊:巴菲特1998年佛罗里达大学商学院经典演讲Question: The Asian Crisis and how it affects a company like Coke that recently announced their earnings would be lower in the fourth quarter.Buffett: Well, basically I love it, but because the market for Coca-Cola products will grow far faster over the next twenty years internationally than it will in the United States. It will grow in the U.S. on a per capita basis. The fact that it will be a tough period for who knows—three months or three years—but it wont be tough for twenty years. People will still be going to be working productively around the world and they are going to find this is a bargain product in terms of a portion of their working day that they have to give up in order to have one of these, better yet, five of them a day like I do.This is a product that in 1936 when I first bought 6 of those for a quarter and sold them for a nickel each. It was in a 6.5 oz bottle and you paid a two cents deposit on the bottle. That was a 6.5 oz. bottle for a nickel at that time; it is now a 12 oz. can which if you buy it on Weekends or if you buy it in bigger quantities, so much money doesnt go to packaging—you essentially can buy the 12 ozs. for not much more than 20 cents. So you are paying not much more than twice the per oz. price of 1936. This is a product that has gotten cheaper and cheaper relative to peoples earning power over the years. And which people love. And in 200 countries, you have the per capita consumption use going up every year for a product that is over 100 years old that dominates the market. That is unbelievable.One thing that people dont understand is one thing thatmakes this product worth 10s and 10s of billions of dollars is one simple fact about really all colas, but we will call it Coca-Cola for the moment. It happens to be a name that I like. Cola has no taste memory. You can drink one of these at 9 Oclock, 10 Oclock, 1 Oclock and 5 Oclock. The one at 5 oclock will taste as good to you as the one you drank early in the morning, you cant do that with Cream Soda, Root Beer, Orange, Grape. All of those things accumulate on you. Most foods and beverages accumulate; you get sick of them after a while. And if you eat Sees Candy—we get these people who go to work for us at Sees Candy and the first day they go crazy, but after a week they are eating the same amount as if they were buying it, because chocolate accumulates on you. There is no taste memory to Cola and that means you get people around the world who will be heavy users—who will drink five a day, or for Diet Coke, 7 or even 8 a day. They will never do that with other products. So you get this incredible per capita consumption. The average person in this part of the world or maybe a little north of here drinks 64 ozs. of liquid a day. You can have 64 ozs. of that be Coke and you will not get fed up with Coke if you like it to start with in the least. But if you do that with anything else; if you eat just one product all day, you will get a little sick of it after a while.It is a huge factor. So today over 1 billion of Coca-Cola product servings will be sold in the world and that will grow year by year. It will grow in every country virtually, and it will grow on a per capita basis. And twenty years from now it will grow a lot faster internationally than in the U.S., so I really like that market better, because there is more growth there over time. But it will hurt them in the short term right now, but that doesnt mean anything. Coca-Cola went public in 1919; the stock sold for $40per share. The Chandler family bought the whole business for $2,000 back in the late 1880s. So now he goes public in 1919, $40 per share. One year later it is selling for $19 per share. It has gone down 50% in one year. You might think it is some kind of disaster and you might think sugar prices increased and the bottlers were rebellious. And a whole bunch of things. You can always find reasons that weren't the ideal moment to buy it. Years later you would have seen the Great Depression, WW II and sugar rationing and thermonuclear weapons and the whole thing—there is always a reason.But in the end if you had bought one share at $40 per share and reinvested the dividends, it would be worth $5 million now ($40 compounding at 14.63% for 86 years!). That factor so overrides anything else. If you are right about the business you will make a lot of money. The timing part of it is very tricky thing so I dont worry about any given event if I got a wonderful business what it does next year or something of the sort. Price controls have been in this country at various times and that has fouled up even the best of businesses. I wouldnt be able to raise prices Dec31st on Sees Candy. But that doesnt make it a lousy business if that happens to happen, because you are not going to have price controls forever. We had price controls in the early 70s.The wonderful business—you can figure what will happen, you cant figure out when it will happen. You dont want to focus too much on when but you want to focus on what. If you are right about what, you dont have to worry about when very much.Question: What about your business mistakes?Buffett: How much time do you have? The interesting thing about investments for me and my partner, Charlie Munger, thebiggest mistakes have not been mistakes of commission, but of omission. They are where we knew enough about the business to do something and where, for one reason or another, sat they're sucking out thumbs instead of doing something. And so we have passed up things where we could have made billions and billions of dollars from things we understood, forget about things we dont understand. The fact I could have made billions of dollars from Microsoft doesnt mean anything because I never could understand Microsoft. But if I can make billions out of healthcare stocks, then I should make it. And I didnt when the Clinton health care program was proposed and they all went in the tank. We should have made a ton of money out of that because I could understand it. And didnt make it.I should have made a ton of money out of Fannie Mae back the mid-1980s, but I didnt do it. Those are billion dollar mistakes or multi-billion dollar mistakes that generally accepted accounting principles dont pick up.The mistakes you see. I made a mistake when I bought US Air Preferred some years ago. I had a lot of money around. I make mistakes when I get cash. Charlie tells me to go to a bar instead. Dont hang around the office. But I hang around the office and I have money in my pocket, I do something dumb. It happens every time. So I bought this thing. Nobody made me buy it. I now have an 800 number I call every time I think about buying a stock in an airline. I say,I am Warren and I am an air-aholic.They try to talk me down,Keep talking dont do anything rash.Finally I got over it. But I bought it. And it looked like we would lose all our money in it. And we came very close to losing all our money in it. You can say we deserved to lose our money it.We bought it because it was an attractive security. But it was not in an attractive industry. I did the same thing in Salomon. Ibought an attractive security in a business I wouldnt have bought the equity in. So you could say that is one form of mistake. Buying something because you like the terms, but you dont like the business that well. I have done that in the past and will probably do that again.The bigger mistakes are the ones of omission. Back when I had $10,000 I put $2,000 of it into a Sinclair Service Station which I lost, so the opportunity cost on that money is about $6 billion right now--fairly big mistakes. It makes me feel good when my Berkshire goes down, because the cost of my Sinclair Station goes down too. My 20% opportunity cost. I will say this, it is better to learn from other peoples mistakes as much as possible. But we dont spend any time looking back at Berkshire. I have a partner, Charlie Munger; we have been pals for forty years—never had an argument. We disagree on things a lot but we dont have arguments about it.We never look back. We just figure there is so much to look forward to that there is no sense thinking of what we might have done. It just doesnt make any difference. You can only live life forward. You can learn something perhaps from the mistakes, but the big thing to do is to stick with the businesses you understand. So if there is a generic mistake outside your circle of competence like buying something that somebody tips you on or something of the sort. In an area you know nothing about, you should learn something from that which is to stay with what you can figure out yourself. You really want your decision making to be by looking in the mirror. Saying to yourself,I am buying 100 shares of General Motors at $55 because........It is your responsibility if you are buying it. Theres gotta be a reason and if you cant state the reason, you shouldnt buy it. If it is because someone told youabout it at a cocktail party, not good enough. It cant be because of the volume or a reason like the chart looks good. It has to be a reason to buy the business. That we stick to pretty carefully. That is one of the things Ben Graham taught me.Question: The current tenuous economic situation and interest rates? Where are we going?Buffett: I dont think about the macro stuff. What you really want to in investments is figure out what is important and knowable. If it is unimportant and unknowable, you forget about it. What you talk about is important but, in my view, it is not knowable. Understanding Coca-Cola is knowable or Wrigleys or Eastman Kodak. You can understand those businesses that are knowable. Whether it turns out to be important depends where your valuation leads you and the firms price and all that. But we have never not bought or bought a business because of any Macro feeling of any kind because it doesnt make any difference. Lets say in 1972 when we bought Sees Candy, I think Nixon put on the price controls a little bit later, but so what! We would have missed a chance to buy something for $25 million that is producing $60 million pre-tax now. We dont want to pass up the chance to do something intelligent because of some prediction about something we are no good on anyway. So we dont read or listen to in relation to macro factors at all. The typical investment counselor organization goes out and they bring out their economist and they trot him out and he gives you this big macro picture. And they start working from there on down. In our view that is nonsense.If Alan Greenspan was on the one side of me and Robert Rubin on the other side and they both were whispering in my ear exactly what they were going to do the next twelve months, itwouldnt make any difference to me what I would pay for Executive Jet or General Re or anything else I do.Question: What is the benefit of being an out-of-towner as opposed to being on Wall Street?Buffett: I worked on Wall Street for a couple of years and I have my best friends on both coasts. I like seeing them. I get ideas when I go there. But the best way to think about investments is to be in a room with no one else and just think. And if that doesnt work, nothing else is going to work. The disadvantage of being in any type of market environment like Wall Street in the extreme is that you get over-stimulated. You think you have to do something every day. The Chandler family paid $2,000 for this company (Coke). You dont have to do much else if you pick one of those. And the trick then is not to do anything else. Even not to sell at 1919, which the family did later on. So what you are looking for is some way to get one good idea a year.And then ride it to its full potential and that is very hard to do in an environment where people are shouting prices back and forth every five minutes and shoving reports in front of your nose and all that. Wall Street makes its money on activity. You make your money on inactivity.If everyone in this room trades their portfolio around every day with every other person, you will all end up broke. And the intermediary will end up with all the money. If you all own stock in a group of average businesses and just sit here for the next 50 years, you will end up with a fair amount of money and your broker will be broke. He is like the Doctor who gets paid on how often to get you to change pills. If he gave you one pill that cures you the rest of your life, he would make one sale, one transaction and that is it. But if he can convince you that changing pills everyday is the way to great health, it will be great for him and the prescriptionists. You wont be any healthier and you will be a lot worse off financially. You want to stay away from any environment that stimulates activity. And Wall Street would have the effective of doing that.When I went back to Omaha, I would go back with a whole list of companies I wanted to check out and I would get my moneys worth out of those trips, but then I would go back to Omaha and think about it.Question: How to evaluate Berkshire or MSFT if it does not pay dividends?Buffett: It wont pay any dividends either. That is a promise I can keep. All you get with Berkshire, you stick it in your safe deposit box and then every year you go down and fondle it. You take it out and then you put it back. There is enormous psychic reward in that. Dont underestimate it.The real question is if we can retain dollar bills and turn them into more than a dollar at a decent rate. That is what we try to do. And Charlie Munger and I have all our money in it to do that. That is all we will get paid for doing. We wont take any options or we wont take any salaries to speak of. But that is what we are trying to do. It gets harder all the time. The more money we manage the harder it is to do that. We would do way better percentage wise with Berkshire if it was 1/100th the present size. It is run for its owners, but it isnt run to give them dividends because so far every dollar that we earned or could have paid out, we have turned into more than a dollar. It is worth more than a dollar to keep it. Therefore, it would be silly to pay it out. Even if everyone was tax-free that owned it. It would have been a mistake to pay dividends at Berkshire. Because so far the dollarbills retained have turned into more than a dollar. But there is no guarantee that happens in the future. At some point the game runs out on that. That is what the business is about. Nothing else about the business do we judge ourselves by. We dont judge it by the size of its home office building or anything the like the number of people working there. We have 12 people working at headquarters and 45,000 employees at Berkshire, 12 people at HQ and 3,500 sq ft. and we wont change it.But we will judge ourselves by the performance of the company and that is the only way we will get paid. But believe me, it is a lot harder than it used to be.。
巴菲特在哥伦比亚大学的演讲(英汉双语版)
1984年在庆祝格雷罕姆与多德合著的《证券分析》发⾏50周年⼤会上,巴菲特-这位格雷厄姆在哥伦⽐亚⼤学的投资课上给了“A+”的秀的学⽣进⾏了⼀次题为“格雷厄姆-多德都市的超级投资者们” (The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville)“的演讲,在他演讲中回顾了50年来格雷厄姆的追随者们采⽤价值投资策略持续战胜市场的⽆可争议的事实,总结归纳出价值投资策略的精髓,在投资界具有⾮常⼤的影响⼒。
THE SUPERINVESTORS OF GRAHAM-AND-DODDSVILLE Tilsonfunds EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is an edited transcript of a talk given at Columbia University in 1984 commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of Security Analysis , written by Benjamin Graham and David L. Dodd. This specialized volume first introduced the ideas later popularized in The Intelligent Investor . Buffett's essay offers a fascinating study of how Graham's disciples have used Graham's value investing approach to realize phenomenal success in the stock market. Is the Graham and Dodd “look for values with a significant margin of safety relative to prices” approach to security analysis out of date? Many of the professors who write textbooks today say yes. They argue that the stock market is efficient; that is, that stock prices reflect everything that is known about a company's prospects and about the state of the economy. There are no undervalued stocks, these theorists argue, because there are smart security analysts who utilize all available information to ensure unfailingly appropriate prices. Investors who seem to beat the market year after year are just lucky. “If prices fully reflect available information, this sort of investment adeptness is ruled out,” writes one of today's textbook authors. 格雷厄姆与多德追求“价值远超过价格的安全保障”,这种证券分析⽅法是否已经过时?⽬前许多撰写教科书的教授认为如此。
巴菲特的一次精彩演讲
巴菲特的一次精彩演讲(1):序言经济学家或者投资大师的演讲总是充满了智慧,最近在网络中看到了一篇文章,与大家共享。
在演讲里,巴菲特谈投资,谈做人,我觉得译者非常辛苦,让我受益匪浅。
翻译者翻译的不是一篇文章,是一次一个半小时的演讲,是一个Video。
确切的说,是Warrent Buffet(巴菲特)在University of Florida商学院的一次演讲。
翻出来着实要费些功夫。
我在此对翻译者的精彩翻译表示由衷的赞赏和感谢。
巴菲特前言我想先讲几分钟的套话,然后我就主要来接受你们的提问。
我想谈的是你们的所思所想。
我鼓励你们给我出难题,畅所欲言,言无不尽。
(原文:我希望你们扔些高难度的球,如果你们的投球带些速度的话,我回答起来会更有兴致)你们几乎可以问任何问题,除了上个礼拜的TexasA&M的大学橄榄球赛,那超出我所能接受的极限了。
我们这里来了几个SunTrust(译者注:美国一家大型商业银行)的人。
我刚刚参加完Coca Cola的股东大会(译者注:Warren Buffet的投资公司是CocaCola的长期大股东之一),我坐在吉米●威廉姆斯边上。
吉米领导了SunTrust多年。
吉米一定让我穿上这件SunTrust的T恤到这来。
我一直试着让老年高尔夫联盟给我赞助,但是都无功而返。
没想到我在SunTrust这,却做的不错。
吉米说,基于SunTrust存款的增长,我会得到一定比例的酬劳。
所以我为SunTrust鼓劲。
(译者注:巴菲特在开玩笑)关于你们走出校门后的前程,我在这里只想讲一分钟。
你们在这里已经学了很多关于投资方面的知识,你们学会如何做好事情,你们有足够的IQ能做好,你们也有动力和精力来做好,否则你们就不会在这里了。
你们中的许多人都将最终实现你们的理想。
但是在智能和能量之外,还有更多的东西来决定你是否成功,我想谈谈那些东西。
实际上,在我们Omaha(译者注:Berkshire Hathaway公司的总部所在地)有一位先生说,当他雇人时,他会看三个方面:诚信,智能,和精力。
巴菲特的演讲(Buffett's speech)
巴菲特的演讲(Buffett's speech)Buffett's speech at the University of Florida Business SchoolAuthor: Warren Buffet | translator: easy Xiaolan translator:The translation here is not an article, but a Video. To be exact, Warrent Buffet (Buffett) at University ofA speech at the Florida business school. In his speech, Buffett talked about investing and talking about life, which made translators benefit a lot. Turn it out here to attract readers.It was a 1.5 hour speech and it really took a lot of work to turn it out. It is hard to do it overnight, but I'm afraid I'll have to serialize it here. Forgive me.(I)I want to talk about a few minutes and then I mainly to cliches, take your questions. What I want to talk about is what you think.I encourage you to give me a problem, you can speak freely. I want you to throw up some difficult balls, and if you give me a bit of speed, I'll be more interested. You can ask almost any questions, except for last week's TexasA&M's college football game, that's beyond my limit. We've got a few SunTrust here. I just finished CocaCola's stockholders' meeting: Warren Buffet's investment firm is CocaOne of Cola's long-term major shareholders, I sat on Jimmy Williams Ben. Jimmy led SunTrust for many years. Jimmy must let me put on this SunTrust T shirt and come here. I always try to make the old Golf Federation to my sponsors, but failed. I didn't think I was in SunTrust, but I did a good job. Jimmy said, "based on the growth of SunTrust deposits, I will get a certain percentage of the reward.". So I was up SunTrust. (Buffett is joking.)I just want to talk to the students for a minute about your future after you leave school. You have learned a lot of knowledge of the investment here, you learn how to do things, you have enough IQ to do, you have the power and energy to do, otherwise you wouldn't be here. Many of you will finally realize your ideals. But beyond intelligence and energy, there's more to decide if you're successful, and I want to talk about those things. Actually, in our Omaha, BerkshireHathaway company headquarters) a gentleman said that when he hired people, he would look at three aspects: integrity, intelligence, and energy. Hiring a man with intelligence and energy without integrity will ruin the hired man. A man without integrity, you can only hope that he is stupid and lazy, not smart and energetic. I want to talk about the first point, because I know you both have the last two points.In considering this question, please join me in this game. You are now in MBA for second years, so you should know all about your classmates. Now I give you one to buy 10% of one of your classmates right until the end of his life. You can't choose those who have rich fathers. Everyone's efforts depend on hisown efforts. I'll give you an hour to think about this question, which student would you like to buy for 10% of the rest of your life?. Would you give them an IQ test and pick the one with the highest IQ value? I suspect it! Will you pick the best one? I doubt it, too. You don't necessarily choose the most energetic one, because you're already motivated. You might be looking for quality factors, because everyone here has a lot of brainsAfter an hour of thinking, when you bet, you may choose the person you most identify with, the person with the most leadership ability, the one who realizes the benefit of others, the generosity, the honesty,Even his own ideas will give credit to others. All these qualities, you can write down the qualities you admire. (whom would you choose) the person you admire most?.Then, I am here to give you a Ban. When you buy 10% of your classmates, you have to sell another 10%. Isn't that interesting? Who do you think I'm selling? You might still not find IQLowest. You may choose the classmate that annoys you, and the qualities that make you dislike it. The one you don't want to deal with, and someone else who doesn't want to deal with it. What qualities have led to that? You can think of a bunch of things, such as dishonesty, love, petty, and so on. You can write them down in the right column of the paper. When you look at the left and right columns of the paper, you'll find something interesting.Whether the football thrown 60 yards is not important, whether it can run 100 yards in 9 seconds in 3 days is not important, it is the best looking person in the class. What really matters is the quality of those on the left column of the paper. You can have all those qualities if you want. The qualities of action, temper, and character are all possible. They are not beyond the reach of each of us present. Look at all those qualities you hate in the right column. None of them is what you have to ask for.You can get rid of it if you have one. At your age, it's much easier to change than at my age, because most of these behaviors are gradually fixed. It is said that the chains of habit are so light that they cannot be felt. Once you feel it, it is too heavy to be removed. I think it's quite right. I've seen a lot of my age, or 10 younger than mePeople 20 years of age have self destructive habits and are unable to extricate themselves. They hate people wherever they go. They don't need that, but they're hopeless.However, at your age, any habit and mode of conduct can be, and as long as you wish, it is only a matter of choice. Like Benjamin Gram (a famous financier mid last century), when he was a teenager, he looks at those respectable, he wanted me to be a respected person, why I don't like those people do? He found it impossible to do that. He rejected the unpleasant qualities in the opposite way. So I said, if you put those qualities all down, ponder, follow, you will be the one you want to buy 10% people! Better yet, you own 100% of yourself. That's what I'm going to talk about today.Now let's start by talking about what you're interested in. We can start with hands raised from here or there.(two)Question: what do you think of Japan?Buffett: I'm not too macro. Now, 10 years of interest on loans in Japan is only 1%. I said to myself, 45 years ago, I went to Benjamin. Gram's course, then I have been diligent, hard work, maybe I should earn more than 1%? It doesn't seem impossible.I don't want to be involved in any risk of currency fluctuations, so I would choose assets based on yen, such as real estate or business, that must be domestic. The only thing I need to do is to make more than 1%, because that's the cost of my money. But until now, I haven't found a business that I can invest in.It's really interesting. Japanese companies have very low asset returns. They have a few businesses that will have 4%, 5%, or 6% returns. If Japanese companies do not make much money themselves, then their asset investors can hardly get good returns. Of course, some people make money, too.I have a friend who worked for Benjamin Gram for the same period. That was the first time I bought stocks, looking for companies that had a lower stock price than liquid capital, a very cheap but a little quality company.I call it the "cigar butt" approach to investing. You areeverywhere to seek the cigar, finally you find a wet, a hate cigarette smoke pot can look. That one is free. You pick it up, take the last bite, then throw it, and then find the next one. It doesn't sound elegant at all, but if you're looking for a free cigar, it's worth it.Don't make the low rate of return business. Time is a friend in business, but enemy in bad business. If you get stuck in a bad business for too long, your results will be bad, even if your buying price is very cheap.If you're in a good business, even if you start paying a little extra cost, if you do it long enough, your returns will be considerable. I don't find any good business from Japan now. It is also possible that Japanese culture will make some changes, for example, their management may be more responsible for the company's stock, so that the return rate will be higher. But now, all I see is some of the low rate of return, even when the high-speed development of the Japanese economy. It's also surprising, because a big, perfect market in Japan doesn't produce good, high returns. Japan's excellence is only in the aggregate economy, not in the quality of the company. This problem has caused trouble for japan. We haven't had much interest in Japan so far. As long as the interest rate is 1%, we will continue to take a wait-and-see attitude.Question: rumor has it that you have become a buyer of the long term fund management fund? What did you do there? What opportunities did you see?Buffett: in a recent article on Fortune magazine (cover ReubenMurdoch), it tells the whole story. I little interesting。
巴菲特一生最经典的演讲(收藏版)
巴菲特⼀⽣最经典的演讲(收藏版)巴菲特⼀⽣最经典的演讲⽂:巴菲特编:kuang你们毕业之后未来会怎样?在这所⼤学能学到⼤量关于投资的知识,你们将拥有成功所需的知识。
既然各位能坐在这⾥,你们也拥有成功所需的智商,你们还有成功所需的拼劲。
你们⼤多数⼈都会成功地实现⾃⼰的理想。
但是最后你到底能否成功,不只取决于你的头脑和勤奋。
▌品⾏决定命运假设现在你可以选⼀个同学,买⼊他今后⼀⽣之内 10% 的收⼊。
你不能选富⼆代,只能选靠⾃⼰奋⽃的⼈。
请各位仔细想⼀下,你会选班⾥的哪位同学,买⼊他今后⼀⽣之内 10% 的收⼊。
你会给所有同学做个智商测试,选智商最⾼的吗?未必。
你会选考试成绩最⾼的吗?未必。
你会选最有拼劲的吗?不⼀定。
因为⼤家都很聪明,也都很努⼒。
我觉得你会主要考虑定性⽅⾯的因素。
也许你会选你最有认同感的那个⼈,那个拥有领导能⼒,能把别⼈组织起来的⼈。
这样的⼈应该是慷慨⼤⽅的、诚实正直的,他们⾃⼰做了贡献,却说是别⼈的功劳。
我觉得让你做出决定的应该是这样的品质。
找到了你最钦佩的这位同学之后,想⼀想他⾝上有哪些优秀品质,拿⼀张纸,把这些品质写在纸的左边。
为了拥有这位同学今后⼀⽣ 10% 的收⼊,你还要同时做空另⼀位同学今后⼀⽣ 10% 的收⼊,想想你会做空谁?你会想到那些招⼈烦的⼈,不但你烦他们,别⼈也烦他们。
为什么有⼈会招⼈烦?原因很多,这样的⼈可能⾃私⾃利、贪得⽆厌、投机取巧或者弄虚作假。
类似这样的品质,请把它们写在刚才那张纸的右边。
左边的品质不是把橄榄球扔出 60 ⽶,不是 10 秒钟跑完 100 ⽶,不是相貌在全班最出众。
左边的这些品质,你真想拥有的话,你可以有。
这些是关于⾏为、脾⽓和性格的品质,是能培养出来的。
再看⼀下右边的那些品质,那些令⼈⽣厌的品质,你⾝上要是有,想改的话,可以改掉。
常⾔道,习惯的枷锁,开始的时候轻的难以察觉,到后来却重的⽆法摆脱。
⼤多数⾏为都是习惯成⾃然,想摆脱恶习,你们年轻⼈做起来更容易。
巴菲特三大经典演讲稿原文
巴菲特三大经典演讲稿原文
尊敬的各位领导、各位来宾,大家好:
我很高兴能够在这里和大家分享一些我的投资心得和经验。
我相信,这些经验
不仅仅适用于投资领域,也可以在生活中发挥重要作用。
首先,我想谈谈关于投资的第一点,那就是要有长远的眼光。
在投资的过程中,我们不能只看眼前的利益,而是要考虑到长期的收益。
这就好比是种树,虽然种下去可能需要很长时间才能看到成果,但只有坚持不懈地投入,才能最终收获硕果。
其次,我认为投资需要有足够的耐心。
市场波动时常存在,但我们不能因为短
期的波动而盲目行动。
耐心等待,耐心观察,才能找到真正的投资机会。
正如我曾经说过的一句话,“当别人贪婪时,我恐惧;当别人恐惧时,我贪婪。
”这就是要求我们在市场波动时保持冷静,不要被情绪左右。
最后,我要强调的是要对自己有足够的信心。
在投资的过程中,我们需要不断
学习,不断提升自己的能力。
只有不断地积累知识和经验,才能更好地应对市场的变化。
同时,我们也要相信自己的判断和决策,不要被外界的声音左右,坚定自己的投资理念。
总的来说,投资是一门需要长期积累和不断学习的艺术。
我们需要有长远的眼光,耐心等待,同时对自己有足够的信心。
只有这样,我们才能在投资的道路上走得更远,取得更大的成功。
谢谢大家!。
巴菲特在哥伦比亚大学的演讲(英汉)
Is the Graham and Dodd “look for values with a significant margin of safety relative to prices” approach to security analysis out of date? Many of the professors who write textbooks today say yes. They argue that the stock market is efficient; that is, that stock prices reflect everything that is known about a company's prospects and about the state of the economy. There are no undervalued stocks, these theorists argue, because there are smart security analysts who utilize all available information to ensure unfailingly appropriate prices. Investors who seem to beat the market year after year are just lucky. “If prices fully reflect available information, this sort of investment adeptness is ruled out,” writes one of today's textbook authors.
巴菲特在哥伦比亚大学的演讲(英汉双语版)
巴菲特大学演讲稿
巴菲特大学演讲稿篇一:演讲稿巴菲特经管学院工商管理 083104 钟瑶前言有这样一个人他从5岁开始就会摆地摊兜售口香糖聚揽财富11岁买入生平第一只股票13岁开始他的实业投资16岁时他已经积聚了6000美元的财富,这个年轻人赚的钱比他的老师的薪水还要多高中毕业前就已经拥有多达40英亩的农场1956年,年仅25岁的他只出资100美元便伙同他人创办了自己生平的第一个公司,时隔6年,公司资产达到720万美元1964年他个人就拥有了400万美元的财富,3年后,他个人拥有的财富已高达2500万美元1994年,他已经拥有了一个价值230亿的财富王国XX年,他的资产已达到360亿美元......他的名字就叫沃伦·巴菲特他被人们称为“股神”“奥马哈圣贤”“投资奇才”最近巴菲特的午餐被炒得沸沸扬扬。
巴菲特午餐,是和股神巴菲特在纽约知名的牛排馆共进午餐的活动。
XX年起每年拍卖一次,所得善款全部捐给美国慈善机构。
XX年度巴菲特午餐价最终落槌在262万零6311美元。
XX年6月初,巴菲特午餐再破纪录,午餐价格提高到了2626411美元。
我们的生活总会与经济息息相关。
所以今天我们就通过《听巴菲特讲投资之道》这本书来走进巴菲特和他的投资世界内容简介巴菲特是一名极具传奇色彩的股市投资奇才。
他曾创造了39年投资盈利2595倍,100美元起家获利440亿美元财富的投资神话,才30几年就变成了一家封闭式基金公司,接着又成为了一家股权公司。
1965至XX年的42年间,伯克希尔公司净资产的年均增长率达%,累计增长361156%。
他曾投资伯克希尔、可口可乐、索罗门、通用再保险公司、内布拉斯加家具城、《华盛顿邮报》、美国运通、市政府雇员保险公司等多家美国龙头企业,取得卓越的成就。
这本书主要讲的是巴菲特在其辉煌的投资生涯中人生经历,思想感悟,市场原则以及平常生活中的巴菲特。
这本书除了告诉你有关巴菲特正确的投资方法,还将告诉你他是如何正确地坚持自己的方法的。
巴菲特演讲稿
泡沫:1999年网络投资热的最顶峰背景:自1980年代以来,美国知名投资银行家赫伯特·艾伦在爱达荷州的太阳谷(Sun valley)举行的媒体顶峰会,就已成为媒体、科技和投资大亨界的一大盛事。
巴菲特把为期一周的太阳谷峰会当作自己真正放松和家庭聚会的一个好契机。
除偶然打一下高尔夫和桥牌,和少数的社交活动,峰会的大多数时刻他都会把自己关在房间里看商业新闻。
但在1999年的太阳谷峰会,巴菲特却决定受邀为峰会做闭幕演讲。
在峰会之前4个月,随着科技股正在取代“老经济”,道琼斯工业指数冲破了一度看起来遥不可及的1万点,在近3年半的时刻内翻了一倍。
在很多人看来,宣称不碰科技股的巴菲特在那个热潮中落伍了。
事实上,为了这场闭幕演讲巴菲特已经准备了数周。
他以为人们在股票市场里的交易并不是像在赌场那样简单拿筹码下注,股市里的筹码代表着商业。
他想到了全数筹码到底价值几何。
接下来他开始翻检历史。
这已经不是第一次一种新科技来把股票市场弄得翻天覆地了——铁路、电报、、汽车、飞机、电视:所有把事物更快联接在一路的革命性方式——可是有多少让投资者赚得盆满钵满呢?这是巴菲特在演讲里要讲述的。
这是他30年来第一次对股票市场做出公开预测。
“我现在要讲股票价值分析,我不准备谈论如何预测下个月或明年的股市走势,价值分析并不等同于预测。
”巴菲特如此开头,“短时间来看,股票市场是投票机,但长期看来它更像是称重机。
最终,称重机会胜出,但短时间内会是由投票的筹码左右。
不过,其投票机制却超级不民主。
不幸的是,正如你们所知,它并没有对投票资格进行认证。
”“在1964年到1981年的17年间,我们的经济体扩张了5倍,财富500强企业的销售额也增长了5倍,可是股票市场却几乎没有增长。
”“当你在投资时,是在推迟消费,把钱拿出来以期在以后收回。
关于此只有两个问题:一是能够取得多少回报;二是何时取得。
”巴菲特继续。
“寓言作者伊索看起来是不精通财务,因为他说‘二鸟在林,不如一鸟在手’,可是他并没有说在‘何时’情况应如此。
1984年巴菲在哥伦比亚大学的演讲《格雷厄姆-多德都市的超级投资者们》
格雷厄姆-多德都市的超级投资者们1984年巴菲特在哥伦比亚大学的演讲格雷厄姆与多德追求“价值远超过价格的安全保障”,这种证券分析方法是否已经过时?目前许多撰写教科书的教授认为如此。
他们认为,股票市场是有效率的市场;换言之,股票价格已经充分反应了公司一切己知的事实以及整体经济情况:这些理论家认为,市场上没有价格偏低的股票,因为聪明的证券分析师将运用全部的既有资讯,以确保适当的价格。
投资者能经年累月地击败市场,纯粹是运气使然。
“如果价格完全反应既有的资讯,则这类的投资技巧将不存在。
”一位现今教科书的作者如此与写道。
或许如此!但是,我要提供一组投资者的绩效供各位参考,他们长期的表现总是超越史坦普500种股价指数。
他们的绩效即使纯属巧合,这项假说至少也值得我们加以审查。
审查的关键事实是,我早就熟识这些赢家,而且长年以来便视他们为超级投资者,最近的认知也有十五年之久。
缺少这项条件——换言之,如果我最近才从成千上万的记录中挑选几个名字,并且在今天早上提供给各位——我建议各位立即停止阅读本文。
我必须说明,所有的这些记录都经过稽核。
我必须再说明,我认识许多上述经理人的客户,他们长年以来所收取的支票确实符合既有的记录。
在进行审查之前,我要各位设想—场全国性的掷铜板大赛。
让我们假定,全美国2.25亿的人口在明天早晨起床时都掷出一枚一美元的铜板。
早晨太阳升起时,他们都走到门外掷铜板,并猜铜板出现的正面或反面。
如果猜对了,他们将从猜错者的手中赢得一美元。
每天都有输家遭到淘汰,奖金则不断地累积。
经过十个早晨的十次投掷之后,全美国约有2.2万人连续十次猜对掷铜板的结果。
每人所赢得的资金约超过1000美元。
现在,这群人可能会开始炫耀自己的战绩,此乃人的天性使然。
他们可能保持谦虚的态度,但在鸡尾酒宴会中,他们偶尔会以此技巧吸引异性的注意,并炫耀其投掷铜板的奇异洞察力。
假定赢家都可以从输家手中得到适当的奖金,再经过十天,约有215个人连续二十次猜对掷铜板的结果,每个人并赢得大约100万美元的奖金。
巴菲特励志演讲稿
尊敬的各位来宾、亲爱的同学们:大家好!今天,我非常荣幸能够站在这里,与大家分享一些关于梦想、努力和成功的思考。
我的名字是沃伦·巴菲特,一个普通的美国人,一个从小镇走向世界的企业家。
今天,我想用我的经历来告诉大家,只要有梦想,有坚持,每个人都可以成为自己生命中的巴菲特。
一、梦想的力量在我很小的时候,我就有一个梦想:成为一名成功的投资者。
这个梦想像一盏明灯,照亮了我的人生道路。
我相信,每个人都有自己的梦想,这个梦想可能微小,也可能宏大,但正是这些梦想,驱使我们不断前行。
我记得,在我刚开始学习投资的时候,我并没有多少资金,但我有梦想。
我每天都会阅读大量的书籍,研究市场,寻找那些被低估的公司。
正是这份对梦想的执着,让我在投资的道路上越走越远。
我想告诉大家,梦想是成功的起点。
无论你的梦想是什么,只要你勇敢地去追求,就一定能够实现。
二、努力的价值成功不是偶然的,它来自于不懈的努力。
在我的投资生涯中,我遇到了无数的困难和挑战,但我从未放弃过。
我相信,只要付出足够的努力,就没有什么是不可能的。
记得有一次,我投资了一家公司的股票,结果这家公司陷入了困境。
当时,很多人都在嘲笑我,但我没有放弃。
我深入研究了这家公司的业务,发现它只是遇到了暂时的困难,而不是根本的问题。
最终,我坚持了下来,这家公司也重新崛起,我的投资也获得了巨大的回报。
我想告诉大家,努力是成功的基石。
只有通过不断的努力,我们才能够克服困难,实现梦想。
三、坚持的力量在我的投资生涯中,我最宝贵的财富就是坚持。
我相信,只有坚持,才能够看到成功的曙光。
有一次,我投资了一家房地产公司。
当时,房地产市场非常低迷,很多人都认为我疯了。
但我没有动摇,我坚信房地产市场终将回暖。
果然,几年后,房地产市场开始复苏,我的投资也获得了巨大的成功。
我想告诉大家,坚持是成功的保障。
在人生的道路上,我们会遇到各种各样的困难和挑战,但只要我们坚持下去,就一定能够迎来胜利的曙光。
巴菲特一生最精彩的演讲
巴菲特一生最精彩的演讲我先简单说几句,把大部分时间留下来回答大家的问题。
我想聊聊大家关心的话题。
请各位提问的时候一定要刁钻。
你们问的问题越难,才越好玩。
什么都可以问,就是不能问上个月我交了多少税,这个问题我无可奉告。
各位同学,你们毕业之后未来会怎样?我简单说说我的想法。
各位在这所大学能学到大量关于投资的知识,你们将拥有成功所需的知识。
既然各位能坐在这里,你们也拥有成功所需的智商,你们还有成功所需的拼劲。
你们大多数人都会成功地实现自己的理想。
但是最后你到底能否成功,不只取决于你的头脑和勤奋。
我简单讲一下这个道理。
奥马哈有个叫彼得•基威特的人,他说他招人的时候看三点:品行、头脑和勤奋。
他说一个人要是头脑聪明、勤奋努力,但品行不好,肯定是个祸害。
品行不端的人,最好又懒又蠢。
我知道各位都头脑聪明、勤奋努力,所以我今天只讲品行。
为了更好地思考这个问题,我们不妨一起做个游戏。
各位都是MBA 二年级的学生,应该很了解自己周围的同学了。
假设现在你可以选一个同学,买入他今后一生之内10% 的收入。
你不能选富二代,只能选靠自己奋斗的人。
请各位仔细想一下,你会选班里的哪位同学,买入他今后一生之内10% 的收入。
你会给所有同学做个智商测试,选智商最高的吗?未必。
你会选考试成绩最高的吗?未必。
你会选最有拼劲的吗?不一定。
因为大家都很聪明,也都很努力,我觉得你会主要考虑定性方面的因素。
好好想想,你会把赌注压在谁的身上?也许你会选你最有认同感的那个人,那个拥有领导能力,能把别人组织起来的人。
这样的人应该是慷慨大方的、诚实正直的,他们自己做了贡献,却说是别人的功劳。
我觉得让你做出决定的应该是这样的品质。
找到了你最钦佩的这位同学之后,想一想他身上有哪些优秀品质,拿一张纸,把这些品质写在纸的左边。
下面我要加大难度了。
为了拥有这位同学今后一生10% 的收入,你还要同时做空另一位同学今后一生10% 的收入,这个更好玩。
想想你会做空谁?你不会选智商最低的。
巴菲特发言稿
巴菲特发言稿尊敬的各位领导、嘉宾和朋友们:大家好!我很荣幸能够在这里与大家分享我的一些想法。
今天,我想谈论的是投资和成功的一些关键要素。
首先,我想谈论的是价值投资。
作为一个成功的投资者,选股是非常重要的。
相比于追求短期利益的投机行为,巴菲特一直主张选择那些具有长期增值潜力和合理估值的股票。
一个好的投资机会必须具备优质的公司基本面、良好的管理团队以及持续稳定的盈利能力。
值得强调的是,巴菲特热衷于深入研究和充分了解所投资公司的情况,不仅仅是看几个财务指标,更是要了解公司的商业模式、行业前景和竞争优势等。
其次,我要谈谈风险管理。
投资并非一帆风顺,风险无处不在。
巴菲特对风险的管理非常重视,他强调了市场的不确定性和风险的存在。
在投资过程中,他注重规避大幅亏损,减少错误决策的后果。
他的投资策略是选择一些抗跌性强、具备竞争优势和有一定安全边际的股票进行配置,以分散风险。
此外,他注重持有股票的时间,相对长期的持有期能够帮助抵御市场短期波动,降低交易频率带来的手续费和税费。
第三,我想谈论的是长期视角。
在投资中,巴菲特一直秉持着这样一种理念:“购买的是企业,而不是股票。
”他买入那些他认为具有长期持续增长能力的企业,并将其作为长期投资。
他认为,投资者应该把眼光投向未来,关注公司的发展前景和持续增值的能力,而不是过分关注短期价格波动。
最后,我想说的是,投资成功离不开不断学习和积累知识的过程。
巴菲特是一个知识渊博的投资者,他博览群书,不断学习各个领域的知识。
他认为投资是一个持续学习的过程,只有不断积累知识,才能更好地洞察市场,抓住投资机会。
尊敬的各位领导、嘉宾和朋友们,投资并不是一个简单的任务,不过在巴菲特身上,我们看到了一位成功的投资者的影子。
他的价值投资理念、风险管理、长期视角以及不断学习的态度,为我们提供了宝贵的启示。
我相信,只要我们秉持着正确的投资理念,合理管理风险,持有长远的投资目标,并且不断学习和谦虚的心态,我们也能够在投资中取得成功。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
1984年在庆祝格雷罕姆与多德合著的《证券分析》发行50周年大会上,巴菲特-这位格雷厄姆在哥伦比亚大学的投资课上唯一给了“A+”的最优秀的学生进行了一次题为“格雷厄姆-多德都市的超级投资者们” (The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville)“的演讲,在他演讲中回顾了50年来格雷厄姆的追随者们采用价值投资策略持续战胜市场的无可争议的事实,总结归纳出价值投资策略的精髓,在投资界具有非常大的影响力。
格雷厄姆与多德追求“价值远超过价格的安全保障”,这种证券分析方法是否已经过时?目前许多撰写教科书的教授认为如此。他们认为,股票市场是有效率的市场;换言之,股票价格已经充分反应了公司一切己知的事实以及整体经济情况:这些理论家认为,市场上没有价格偏低的股票,因为聪明的证券分析师将运用全部的既有资讯,以确保适当的价格。投资者能经年累月地击败市场,纯粹是运气使然。“如果价格完全反应既有的资讯,则这类的投资技巧将不存在。”一位现今教科书的作者如此与写道。
或许如此!但是,我要提供一组投资者的绩效供各位参考,他们长期的表现总是超越史坦普500种股价指数。他们的绩效即使纯属巧合,这项假说至少也值得我们加以审查。审查的关键事实是,我早就熟识这些赢家,而且长年以来便视他们为超级投资者,最近的认知也有十五年之久。缺少这项条件——换言之,如果我最近才从成千上万的记录中挑选几个名字,并且在今天早上提供给各位——我建议各位立即停止阅读本文。我必须说明,所有的这些记录都经过稽核。我必须再说明,我认识许多上述经理人的客户,他们长年以来所收取的支票确实符合既有的记录。
现在,这群人可能会开始炫耀自己的战绩,此乃人的天性使然。他们可能保持谦虚的态度,但在鸡尾酒宴会中,他们偶尔会以此技巧吸引异性的注意,并炫耀其投掷铜板的奇异洞察力。
Assuming that the winners are getting the appropriate rewards from the losers, in another ten days we will have 215 people who have successfully called their coin flips 20 times in a row and who, by this exercise, each have turned one dollar into a little over $1 million. $225 million would have been lost, $225 million would have been won.
Well, maybe. But I want to present to you a group of investors who have, year in and year out, beaten the Standard & Poor's 500 stock index. The hypothesis that they do this by pure chance is at least worth examining. Crucial to this examination is the fact that these winners were all well known to me and pre-identified as superior investors, the most recent identification occurring over fifteen years ago. Absent this condition - that is, if I had just recently searched among thousands of records to select a few names for you this morning —— I would advise you to stop reading right here. I should add that all of these records have been audited. And I should further add that I have known many of those who have invested with these managers, and the checks received by those participants over the years have matched the stated records.
在进行审查之前,我要各位设想 —场全国性的掷铜板大赛。让我们假定,全美国2.25亿的人口在明天早晨起床时都掷出一枚一美元的铜板。早晨太阳升起时,他们都走到门外掷铜板,并猜铜板出现的正面或反面。如果猜对了,他们将从猜错者的手中赢得一美元。每大都有输家遭到淘汰,奖金则不断地累积。经过十个早晨的十次投掷之后,全美国约有2. 2万人连续十次猜对掷铜板的结果。每人所赢得的资金约超过1000美元。
假定赢家都可以从输家手中得到适当的奖金,再经过十天,约有215个人连续二十次猜对掷铜板的结果,每个人并赢得大约100万美元的奖金。输家总共付出2.25亿美元,赢家则得到2.25亿美元。
By then, this group will really lose their heads. They will probably write books on “How I turned a Dollar into a Million in Twenty Days Working Thirty Seconds a Morning.” Worse yet, they'll probably start jetting around the country attending seminars on efficient coin-flipping and tackling skeptical professors with, “ If it can't be done, why are therand Dodd “look for values with a significant margin of safety relative to prices” approach to security analysis out of date? Many of the professors who write textbooks today say yes. They argue that the stock market is efficient; that is, that stock prices reflect everything that is known about a company's prospects and about the state of the economy. There are no undervalued stocks, these theorists argue, because there are smart security analysts who utilize all available information to ensure unfailingly appropriate prices. Investors who seem to beat the market year after year are just lucky. “If prices fully reflect available information, this sort of investment adeptness is ruled out,” writes one of today's textbook authors.
Now this group will probably start getting a little puffed up about this, human nature being what it is. They may try to be modest, but at cocktail parties they will occasionally admit to attractive members of the opposite sex what their technique is, and what marvelous insights they bring to the field of flipping.
THE SUPERINVESTORS OF GRAHAM-AND-DODDSVILLE
Tilsonfunds EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is an edited transcript of a talk given at Columbia University in 1984 commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of Security Analysis , written by Benjamin Graham and David L. Dodd. This specialized volume first introduced the ideas later popularized in The Intelligent Investor . Buffett's essay offers a fascinating study of how Graham's disciples have used Graham's value investing approach to realize phenomenal success in the stock market.
这时候,这群人可能完全沉迷在自己的成就中:他们可能开始著书立说:“我如何每天早晨工作30 秒,而在二十天之内将—美元变成100万美元。”更糟的是,他们会在全国各地参加讲习会,宣扬如何有效地投掷铜板,并且反驳持怀疑态度的教授说,“如果这是不可能的事,为什么会有我们这215个人呢?”