GM 1927-05 Open Issues
GM-1927-17---GP5---Severity-IpB-train解析只是分享
– 供应商目标=500*50%+1000*25%+15000*25%=3875
质量等级对Bidlist的影响
新bidlist计算方式和老bidlist计算方式的区别
S-Ipb模拟实例
• 当前计算方式：
– 少量的不良品数比上交付数（PPM低于CT目标时不扣分） – 登陆的PRR数不用来计算 – 1个项目管理PRR扣分5分 bidlist分数为95分 bidlist仍为绿色 （Bidlist大于等于80分为绿色小于80分为红色）
多重等级D的不符 合，总共 返工时间 少于20分 钟 或者 贴错标签 （不需要 返工或关 线）
等级BCDE重复发 生
G1没有被等级D和 等级E包 括的非致 命不符合
G2致命不符合
等级G1重复发生
等级G2重复发生
没有影响到装配/ 动力系统 /部件工 厂 缺陷没有 进入生产 过程 缺陷不会 被排到生 产线
增强型供应商测量严重程度—Ipb (incident per billion)
• 目的： – 当处理由于供应商制造不良时应用来自PSA最新的方 法 • 更好的按照对GM和最终客户真实的影响对bidlist进 行排序 – PRR反应在测量和动力系统的影响 – 动态的PRR数目代替静态的PPM数目 • 减少PRR的数目（600+ 到 36） • 简化进入GQTS方式
– 不同的bidlist输入都来自直接的材料/CCA/或者售后
增强型供应商测量严重程度—Ipb (incident per billion)
• 事件/PRR
供应商引起的一个动力系统或者装配问题
基于对车辆和动力系统的影响，这个事件将被 分为8个不同等级编辑到PRR中
GM1927全球供应商质量手册(中文)
GM1927-01(全球APQP项目计划)
初始技术评审
初步 R@R 计划
产能分析
R@R GM1960 (实施)
17
经验教训
Initial-TR 初始技术评审
经验教训概述
经验教训评审
September 24, 2008 May 8, 2009
GM1927-1 GM1927-1(SGM)
概念整车工 程释放 (CVER) 产品释放 -110
结构整车工 程释放 (SVER) 产品释放 -98
集成整车工 程释放 (IVER) 产品释放 -83
BIW MRD CVER / -54 /
SVER / IVER -48 / -45
SORP 0
M1 GA MRD -42
M2 & PPV GA MRD -32
定点前 Pre-Sourcing
Pre-Sourcing 定点前
阶段评审
阶段评审 关键交付物
阶段评审 1 -启动会议 定点后30天内 APQP 供应商状态工作表GM1927-34(SGM) 启动会议检查清单 GM1927-14(SGM)
售后数据/下降计划
阶段评审 2 (最终期限 - 78)
阶段评审 3 (最终期限 -52)
全球APQP项目计划(整车项目)
GM GVDP 5.0 33/20 全球APQP任务 -16re-Sourcing 定点前
= Repeat previous activity
PPV BIW MRD -39 MVBns BIW MRD -25 MVBs BIW MRD -15
流程图
针对设计更改的 DRBFM
流程图更新
初始技术评审
初始DFMEA评审 KCDS进度表和& KCDS GMW15049 研讨会
GM 1927-16a 标签过程审核
20
21
Ref. GM1927.参照GM1927
Audit Owner: Tom Lopiccola
Change History
Date 2009-6-2 Version Initial Release Change Summary
3 of 3
GM Specific Process Audit 通用特殊过程审核
Auditor: Supplier: Duns:
Specific Process Audit: Labels 特殊过程审核：标签 Version: Intial Release 版本：最初发放 Issue Date: June 2, 2009 问题日期：09年6月2日 Date: 审核员 日期 Location: 供应商 地址 Part Name: 编号 产品名称
Requirements and Guidance要求和指导
Objective Evidence客观证据：
N/A Satisfactory
10
Check for documentation. Look for evidence of management layered audit.检查文件。寻找管理层次审计证据。
Assessment评估 Not Needs Immediate Satisfactory Action
Question Number问
Question问题
Requirements and Guidance要求和指导
Objective Evidence客观证据：
N/A Satisfactory
19
Do you have partial containers of parts in the area where labeling occurs?在贴标签地区，有部 Review areas and practices.审核区域和做法。 分产品包装箱么？ Are labels verified after being applied to containers? By whom?标签是在贴上包装箱后验证的吗？由 Does the supplier understand and use "Drill Deep" and "Read Across".供应商是否了解和使 用“钻深”和“交叉阅读”方法 Check work instructions. Look for evidence of management layered audit.检查工作的指示。寻找管理层次的审计证据。
GMAPQP手册
通用汽车公司GM 全球性APQP产品质量先期策划全球性采购2000年11月第一版序言本参考手册详述/阐述了致力于开发GM(通用汽车公司)APQP(产品质量先期策划)统一的流程之全球GM团队的共同努力。
在此之前，通用汽车公司的供应商质量系统均采用各自的部门或区域性之一套具体的办法使得APQP流程更为简捷从而便于实施。
全球性团队使得各部门和区域间的APQP流程更为和谐统一而又标准从而制定了本GM APQP手册（GM1927）。
本手册制定了通用汽车公司开发并实施一系列的产品或服务的APQP流程所必需的一致统一的环球产品质量策划要求。
旨在将其作为一个标准将一个统一的格式提供给供应商的质量工程师以及供应商。
通过统一的形式来进行APQP的所有步骤。
本文件是第一修订版，首次发行并已经过更新以反映由通用汽车公司为所有的全球供应商设定的最新标准。
作为修订的部分，即在模块组装的支持业务的基础上重又增加了一部分。
很多的工作也已经更新，包括模块部件和系统的特殊业务。
很多模块的APQP业务都用一个特殊的上标M来表示以突出任务。
参加《产品质量先期策划》的审核（人员）如下：K. Williams R. Gasper W. Kraatz全球采购动力列车北美卡车经营部供应商质量供应商质量供应商质量J. Graff M. Morretti M. Aldea北美轿车经营部拉丁美洲经营部亚太经营部供应商质量供应商质量供应商质量M. Schoenleber欧洲经营部供应商质量目录目录手册内容说明APQP过程模式流程图监控的用户及供应商矩阵图APQP任务定义任务1：主要股本持有人会议任务2：技术评审任务3：风险评估及其起源任务4：供应商程序评审任务5：进度表以及公开项目任务6：可制造性评估函任务7：流程图任务8：DFMEA—设计失效模式和后果分析任务9：设计评审任务10：量具、工具以及设备评审任务11：GP—11预制模型和原形材料任务12：PFMEA—设计过程的分析开发任务13：控制方案/计划任务14：GP—12早期生产范围/规模任务15：PPAP—生产部件审核过程/流程任务16：运行@速率（GP—9）任务17：所汲取的教训附件：附件1—GM区域性文件要求模型以及GM1927文件GM1927-1 APQP项目计划/安排GM1927-2 APQP进度表GM1927-3 供应商质量要求表（SOR）GM1927-4 所要求的质量情况函GM1927-5 APQP公开项目表GM1927-6 主要股本持有人会议检查清单GM1927-7 早期风险评估GM1927-8 进度安排及可行性表格GM1927-9 系列工具及检验设备检查清单GM1927-10 所学课程流程总览GM1927-11 所学课程及实施流程图GM1927-12 所学课程规范检查清单GM1927-13 技术评审检查清单GM1927-14 APQP启动（试生产）会议检查清单GM1927-15 APQP启动会议说明GM1927-16 过程控制计划审计工作单GM1927-17 GM以及供应商程序联系单GM1927-18 典型的股本持有人会议时间安排GM1927-19 可制造性信函GM1927-20 随时间而变的过程能力GM1927-21 RPN削减小结模块供应商的专用文件MGM1927—22M 程序管理RASICGM1927—23M 直接购买检查清单GM1927—24M 供应商程序审查GM1927—25M 转包的程序状态矩阵图GM1927—26M 转包的详细状态矩阵图附件2：M模块APQP补充及定义附件3：术语—名词解释手册内容说明每一部分都用任务号注明有出处，包括下属内容：? 任务名称? 任务所有人? 任务完成时间（大约）? 任务说明? 根据具体任务完成情况移交? 具体的可交付物品的用户? 完成具体任务，包括每一投入资源的必要投入? 资源明细---包括从事完成这一任务的组织人员? 一套办法---需要采取措施的简要说明? 参考（资料）以及附加信息附件附件中包括所有GM（通用汽车公司）贯穿于履行APQP流程的APQP（先期产品质量策划）所使用的专有表格和文件。
GM1927-03 Supplier_Quality_Statement_of_Requirements
Supplier to assume the gage construction orientates the part in vehicle position unless Supplier Quality approves a deviation. All customer monitored APQP parts shall have gage designs in line with GM - AVTOVAZ gage design and approved by the Supplier Quality Engineer or the appropriate customer gage approval group prior to the start of fixture construction (for your regional requirements, contact your supplier quality engineer). Gage designs shall incorporate approved GD&T datum schemes and gages/fixtures must be capable to dimensionally evaluate parts. Supplier shall have hand apply fixtures for sub-datum KPC’s and openings where assembly plant or sequencer/subassembler will install something that impacts a final vehicle specification (e.g. trim plates, extension panel, grilles, glove box door, etc.). Supplier shall have the ability to check a completed assembly. Sub-contractors shall also have the ability to check component parts. Any cubing or build fixture shall have the ability to demonstrate fit to adjoining parts and attachments. Appropriate functional testing and final inspection to ensure product performs as designed under actual vehicle conditions. Supplier shall ensure that fixtures are procured in a timely manner to meet major program benchmarks (i.e. first shots, GP-11 events, Functional evaluations, and PPAP.) Supplier shall, at a minimum, have a CMM (coordinate measurement machine) holding fixture available for the inspection of first parts off prototype and production tooling (unless otherwise agreed with the customer).
GM 1927-14(SGM) Kick-Off Mtg Checklist 090323
Prior to the Kick Off Meeting supplier should ensure full understanding of the APQP Project Plan (SGM1927-1) and all related procedures. Any issue requiring clarification needs to be addressed to SGM SQE.在启动会议之前，供应商应理解APQP项目策划(SGM1927-1)及所有相关流程。
任何需了解的问题都应咨询SGM SQE.Section 1. Customer Requirements - All unresolved items must be added to Open Issues List 第一部分.顾客要求－所有未解决事项都应列入问题清单1.Does the supplier have and understand the latest information about program timing (e.g. Design release, Tooling Order,Prototype, Matching, PPV, MVBns, MVBs, SORP)? Is the supplier familiar with the quality requirements by build level?供应商是否有并理解项目进度的最新信息(如：设计释放，模具订单，样件，匹配，PPV, MVBns, MVBs, SORP)?供应商是否了解造车阶段时的质量要求？Yes 是No否Explain:解释2.Does the supplier have a clear understanding which SGM receiving plant(s) he will supply? Are there any requirements forsupplier support at a SGM location other than the receiving location? E.g. remote Pilot Line.供应商明确了解将供货的SGM接收工厂吗？是否要求供应商支持除SGM接收工厂外的其他地点？如远处的试装线。
GM APQP 供应商质量管理培训教材-SQE必备
•
GM-1927 协调和标准化了多区域和部门的 APQP 手册
– Aligns with the 5 phase within the AIAG APQP manual and provides the detail required to implement and APQP plan – 配合AIAG APQP手册的5个阶段，并提供执行APQP计划所需的细节 – Align with GM’s 4 phase program timing and deliverables – 配合GM 项目时间表的4 阶段，及可交付的资料
Global APQP for SQEs
Global APQP
GM
GM-1927 全球供应商质量 手册
是通用汽车共用的全球 Global APQP 手册
ቤተ መጻሕፍቲ ባይዱ
General Motors Corporation
GM 发展和执行 APQP计划的共用 的指导方针
下载 ： GMSupplyPower
Advanced Product Quality Planning
客户监督意味着SQE负更多的责任 Supplier monitoring means more responsibility for the supplier 供应商监督意味着供应商负更多的责任
GM 1927-34(SGM) GM Global APQP Supplier Status workbook 090521
Supplier Name: Supplier Phone:供应商名称电话Mfg. DUNS: Plant Location & Country:DUNS 号工厂地址及国家 Supplier Contact: Part Name:供应商联系人零件名称 Program: Part Numbers:项目零件号Auditor: (SQE) Auditor Phone:评审人员（SQE)评审人员电话 Auditor: E-Mail: GM Division:评审人员 E-MailGM 分部APQP Gate Review 1APQP Gate Review 2APQP Gate Review 3APQP Gate Review 4PPAP Review Run @ Rate ReviewAssessmentAssessment Assessment Assessment AssessmentAssessmentNOT ASSESSEDNot Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed #REF!Not AssessedNot AssessedNot AssessedNOT ASSESSEDNOT ASSESSEDNot Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not AssessedNot Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed #REF!Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not AssessedNot Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed NOT ASSESSEDNot Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not AssessedNot Assessed Not AssessedNot AssessedTier II Management Not Assessed NOT ASSESSEDNot Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed#REF!Not Assessed #REF!NOT ASSESSEDNOT ASSESSEDNot Assessed Not AssessedNOT ASSESSED Not AssessedNot AssessedNot Assessed NOT ASSESSEDNOT ASSESSEDNot Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not Assessed Not AssessedNot AssessedNot AssessedNot Assessed#REF!Not Assessed #REF!#REF!Not Assessed Not AssessedHighlighted box indicates Deep Dive task突出显示单元格表示的是深挖任务Grey box indicates task not reviewed as adeliverable at this Gate 灰色单元格表示此阶段无需审核该交付物Gate Review Decision阶段审核结论APQP Task:APQP 任务：DFMEADimensionals and Matching 尺寸和匹配Gage 量检具Tooling 工装模具Timing Charts 进度表Open Issues List 问题清单Quality System Basics 质量体系基础Flow Chart 流程图Capital Equipment PFMEAControl Plan 控制计划GP-12Customer Feedback 顾客反馈PPAPADVP&RRun@RateLessons Learned 经验教训GM Global APQP Supplier Status Summary GM 全球APQP 供应商状态汇总September 23,2008May 21, 2009GM1927-34GM1927-34(SGM)。
GM 1927-33(SGM) GM Global GP-12 Audit 090313
15. Are boundary samples available and
0
used? 操作人员是否有合格的边界样品并正确使
用?
18. Is there a reaction plan established
0
and documented for each defect found? 针对发现的每个缺陷是否建立相关的行动
Auditor Phone: 审核员电话
SGM Division: SGM 区域
Technical Information Availability/技术信息
0
2. Approved Drawing 批准图纸
Potential总分 8
0%
Quality System Documentation/质量系统文件
RED RED RED RED
RED
Pts Element Scoring 要素评分
0
Element is not in place and no evidence of plans to implement 公司现在没有该要求项并且没有证据表明公司有实施计划
1
Element is not in place but a plan to implement is documented 公司现在没有该要求项，但公司已经制定了实施计划
所有பைடு நூலகம்量具都制订了适当的操作指导书？
14. Have operators been trained effectively to follow Standardized Work? 0 操作工经过了有效培训去执行标准化操 作？
17. Are Error Proofed operations checked in GP-12 to verify error proofing 0 effectiveness? GP-12中是否对防错操作进行检查，以验 证防错的有效性？
GM 1927-16b Aluminum High Pressure Die Casting Process Audit 铝压铸中英文
16
17
18
Using auto spray? Auto spray with manual Auto spray with manual assist is usually the best assist? Manual spray by itself? combination. Observe at machine. 是否使用自动喷涂？手自动联合使用？纯手工喷 手自动联合喷涂通常是最好的结合？ 涂？ Are computer programs or mechanical limits protected from non-authorized changed? 电脑程序或机械极限的改变受保护的？ Mandatory. Look for enclosed and locked cabinets for computer programs 强制性的，电脑程序是封闭式的和上锁的柜子。
Mandatory. Review records. 强制性的，评审记录。
8
Mandatory. Observe in factory. 强制性的，到现场确认。
9
Is the specific gravity controlled within 0.10 of the theoretical maximum? 比重是否控制在0.10以内？
Die Design 模具设计 1 Are production tools(dies) made from premium Mandatory. Question supplier.强制性的，询问供应 grade H13 tool steel?生产工具（模具）是否使 商。 用优质的H13钢材？ 2 Is solidification software being used before tooling is built? Which software Any Casting? Magma? Other?是否有凝固软件被用于模具设 计？什么软件用于任何压铸？Magma，还是其 他的？ Do all dies have at least one chill vent?所有模 具是否至少有一个通风孔？ Are the raw casting datum locators all on one insert?原料铸造基准定位器都在同一个基准插 入？ Mandatory to optimize simulations before building dies. Ask to see the simulation movies and the successful simulation evidence.强制优化模拟在模具 设计前，请求观看模拟视频和成功模拟证据。 Strongly recommended. Look at the die. 极力推荐.观察模具 Mandatory. Look at die. 强制性的。观察模具
GM1927-13TechReviewChecklist090630(最新整理)
研发
满足信息传递的计划
Testing performed in-house or by third party accredited
List of directed buys
laboratory
直接采购清单
由公司实验室或由有资质的第三方实验室完成试验
Facilities Plan
设备计划
Examples of prior experience with complex assemblies.
Section
Change
Continuous Improvement
Added Warranty Reduction Plans
Revision History- September 24, 2008 Changes
Section Prior to Technical Review Meeting GP11
复杂总成/分总成的详细材料清单
September 24, 2008
2 of 3
GM1927-13
Global Purchasing 全球采购
Technical Review Checklist Guidelines 技术评审检查清单指南
Revision History- January 1, 2004 Changes
记录结果
快速开发工具（铅平版印刷术，EDM 等）
Ongoing
Types of gaging; CMM holding fixture,
正在进行
Variable/Attribute, how many gages
Uses data drivers (PPM, Downtime, Warranty, etc)
GM_APQP-Gate-Reviw
Supplier Program Reviews
Subcontractor Status Update GM 1927-25 Available Process Capability Data GM1927-20 Tiered Supplier Management Plan Review Tiered-Components inf o GM1927-23 / 26 GM1927-2 Update GM1927-5 Update QSB or Greenf ield Facility implementation Follow Up
I
I A I I I A I I
Gage, Tooling and Equipment Reviews 检具、工装与设备评审 GP-11 Pre-prototype & Prototype 预样件和样件 PFMEA Development Control Plan 控制计划 EPC(Early Production Containment,GP-12) 早期生产遏制GP12 PPAP 生产件批准 Run @ Rate (GP-9) 按节拍生产 Lessons Learned 经验教训
Gate Re vie w 1 - Kick -Off M e e ting Within 30 days of nomination
APQP Supplie r Status Work book GM 1927-34 Kick -off Che ck lis t GM 1927-14 Warranty Data / Reduction Plan GM & Supplier Program Contacts GM1927-17 Tiered Supplier Management Plan draf t Tiered-Components inf o GM1927-23 / 25 Tim ing Plan GM 1927-2 Open Issues List GM1927-5
Open-Issues问题清单
Supplier/Mfg Duns Number / 邓白氏号:
Supplier Contact / 供应商联系人: SQE :
* Type Key类 S型=: DesignSGFu==pFpDlaieecsriliig/tin供e-s吉应/ 利设商 me)
责任人
* Type 类型
Part Number(s) / 零件号: Program(s) / 项目:
Part Name / 零件名:
RK==PParcokdaugcitniognECnogninteroelr/in生g 包M装= 工程 Manufacturing/Process /
Issue No. 序号
Issue Date 发布日期
T = Tooling / 模具 C = Capacity / 产能 L = Late Release / 发放滞后
A= Appearance
外观 O = Other
/
其他
P = Purchasing /
采购 Person
IssuesDescription and/or Sketch Responsible
1/4 Find Root Cause 找到问题根本原因
May,2008 June29,2009
2/4 Short Term Action Plan Proposed and start to Implement 确定短期措施，并开始实施
3/4 Long Term Action Plan Proposed and start to Implement 确定长期措施，并开始实施
4/4 Issue Resolved 问题已解决
以往缺陷清单
C= Capacity 产能
L = Late Release 发放滞后
XXX压铸有限公司
APQP Open Issues APQP 问题清单
Part Numb
er(s) 零件
号: Progr am(s) 项目:
Part Name
零件 名:
M= Manufacturing/P rocess制造/工艺
O = Other其他 :
*Type Key类 型:
Supplier/Mf g Location
供应商:
Duns Number邓
白氏号:
Supplier Contact供 应商联系人:
SGM SQE Contact
SGM SQE:
T= S = Design-Supplier供应商设计 Tooling
工装
G = Design-GM GM设计 F = Facilities设备
Issue Issue No. Date
Severity
IssuesDescription and/or Sketch
GPM1e9r2s7o-5n Responsible
* Type
Action Plan&Progress to Plan
ForPeagceas5t of 19 Completion Status
P = Purchasing 采购
R= Product ion Control 生产控 制
Issue Issue No. Date
Severity
IssuesDescription and/or Sketch
GPM1e9r2s7o-5n Responsible
* Type
Action Plan&Progress to Plan
APQP问题清单
严重度 Severity
措施及现状 Action Plan & Progress to Plan
预计完成日期 Forecast
Completion Date
状态 Status
GM1927-5
Page 1 of 2
序号 Issue
No.
问题来源 Issue From?
发布日期 Issue Date
APQP 问题清单/APQP Open Issues
GM1927-5
Page 2 of 2
预计完成日期 Forecast
Completion Date
状态 Status
注： 严重度/Severity定义：A级---需要分管副总支持；B级---需要部门经理支持；C级---项目负责人自己协调解决。 状态Status定义：绿色为目标任务按期完成或提前完成；黄色为预测目标任务不能按期完成需要报警；红色为目标任务到期但未完成，需要采取强制措施。
序号 Issue
No.
问题来源 Issue From?
发布日期 Issue pen Issues
问题描述或插图描述 IssuesDescription and/or Sketch
更新日期/Updating Date：201?-??-?? 编制/Editor：
责任人 Person Responsible (Name)
问题描述或插图描述 IssuesDescription and/or Sketch
更新日期/Updating Date：201?-??-?? 编制/Editor：
责任人 Person Responsible (Name)
严重度 Severity
措施及现状 Action Plan & Progress to Plan
GM 1927-03_SQ_SOR质量要求
1. Supplier Quality Base Requirements: 供应商质量基本要求•This document is intended to be used in conjunction with and is in addition to the GM General Standard Terms and Conditions.该文件被视为GM的一般标准条款，以及标准条款的额外补充。
•All suppliers are expected to supply parts to General Motors with zero defects. Parts shall meet all engineering specifications and function with no abnormalities according to intent。
所有供应商的供货应当是零缺陷的。
零件必需符合工程以及性能要求。
•Funding is to be identified in the initial quote and subsequent quotes to reflect error occurrence detection (poka yoke, error proofing devices, etc) and defect outflow prevention to customers. Controls implemented at a later date are the financial responsibility of the supplier.为了阻止缺陷外流给客户或因需要防错而产生了额外费用，该费用应当在最开始的报价或之后的几轮报价中反映出来。
后续控制所产生的费用应当由供应商自己承担。
2. ISO/TS 16949 - Quality System Requirements:质量体系要求：•All providers of a) production materials, b) production or service parts, or c) heat treating, plating, painting or other finishing services directly to General Motors must be certified to ISO/TS 16949 by a Certification Body (CB) recognized by the International Automotive Task Force (IATF) and have a current certificate availabledemonstrating compliance to GM supplements.所有与GM有关的原料，配件以及热熔焊，电镀，喷漆或其他加工服务，必须获得认证机构所颁发的TS16949认证并在有效期内。
GM 1927-14 Kick-Off_Mtg_Checklist_November_2006
APQP Kick-Off ChecklistThe purpose of this meeting is to develop a common understanding concerning the total requirements of the part/material by assuring that proper communication and buy-in occurs between GM and the supplier. This form encompasses questions from the AIAG Advanced Product Quality Planning and GM APQP Manual GM-1927 manuals. Its intent is to ensure advanced product quality planning activities occur at the appropriate time and establish customer requirements for part qualification, part availability, quality, packaging, scheduling, and tooling information. Current revisions of all GM documents listed can be found in the GM Supply Power web site.This document should be completed by the supplier and provided to the SQE prior to the meeting date.DATE: PROJECT/PROGRAM:SUPPLIER:PART NO:MANUFACTURINGLOCATION:PART DESCRIPTION:SECTION 1. CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS1. Does the supplier understand all the applications and intended end uses of the parts/materials for all customers?Yes No Explain:2.Does the supplier have the latest information about program timing (example: Drawing release, Prototype, Matching, Pilots/MVB,SOP)?Yes No Explain:3.Does the supplier have and understand the QS-9000 or TS 16949 Manual, FMEA Manual, SPC Manual, Measurement SystemsAnalysis Manual, Quality System Analysis Manual, PPAP Manual and the Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) and Control Plan Manual?Yes No Explain:4.Has the supplier provided all information listed in the Required Quality Information letter GM 1927-4 as outlined in the RFQpackage?Yes No Explain:5. Does the supplier have and understand all the requirements listed in the Supplier Quality Statement of RequirementsGM 1927-3?No Explain:DoesYesSECTION 1. CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS continued6. Are returnable containers required?Yes No Explain:7. Are there any packaging issues to be resolved?Yes No Explain:8. Does supplier agree to provide product in clean dunnage/containers?Yes No Explain:SECTION 2. Product Design / Development9. Does the supplier have and understand ALL of the latest drawings and specifications (SOR, SSTS, CTS, STD)?Yes No Explain plans to obtain:10. Has an Analysis Development Validation (ADV) plan been provided if specified in the SOR?Yes No Specify planned date:11. If communication link for math data exchange is needed have appropriate contacts been taken?Yes No Explain:12. If GM is design responsible, has a Design-FMEA review been done between supplier and the GM Engineer?Yes No Specify planned date:13. If Supplier is design responsible, has a Design-FMEA been done? Are actions in place to reduce high RPNs? Has a review withthe GM engineer been completed?Yes No Specify planned dates:14. If supplier is responsible for system, has a system FMEA been completed and been reviewed?Yes No Specify planned dates:15. Has a design review been done by the supplier and reviewed with the GM product engineer?Yes No If No, explain:Yes No If No, specify plans16. Have KPCs and Product Quality Characteristics (PQCs) been identified and included in drawings/specifications? Is the supplieraware of the KPCs and PQ Cs? Is the supplier’s intended process able to meet the capability requirements of the KPCs and PQCs?Yes No Explain:17. Does the supplier understand the critical nature of dimensions that interface with the customer’s application of their ma ting parts?Yes No List all knowninterfaces:18. Are there any Pre-Prototype/Prototype requirements?Yes No List them in the space below:SECTION 2. Product Design / Development continued19. Does the supplier understand the requirements of GP-11 procedure?Yes No Explain:20. Will the appropriate control plan be developed for use during each build i.e. Prototype, Pre-Launch, and Production?Yes No Explain:21. Are controls for KPCs, PQCs and KCCs clearly identified?Yes No Explain:If no explain the process to control Critical Features (KPCs, PQCs and KCCs)22. Per the SOR, what amount of design and/or test is required by supplier?SECTION 3. PROCESS DESIGN/DEVELOPMENTKey Activities from the APQP Project Plan GM 1927-1 and Timing Chart GM 1927-223. Does the supplier understand ALL items listed on the APQP Project Plan?Yes No Explain:24. Has the supplier filled in the APQP Timing Chart for these parts?Yes No Explain:25. GM Global APQP requires 4 Supplier Gate Reviews. In addition to these 4 reviews, specify your planned reporting frequency:_26. Have the following preliminary documents been completed?Process Flow Chart If No:Yes No Specify completion date:Process FMEAYes No Specify completion dateControl PlanYes No Specify completion date27. Has error proofing been considered during PFMEA creation and included in quoted price?Yes No If No, explain plans to achieve quality requirements28. Is any new equipment, tooling, gages, special fixtures or test equipment needed to produce this part?Yes No CommentReview the tooling and gage breakdown .as submitted in the RFQ.29. General Motors minimum required acceptance criteria for the PPAP initial study is a Cpk or Ppk of 1.67 (ref. AIAG PPAP manual). Are any print, material specifications or process control plan changes needed to meet these requirements?Yes No Explain:30. Has the supplier confirmed that their subcontractors, including directed buy subcontractors, will do the following:. APQPYes No Explain:. PPAPYes No Explain:. Run @ RateYes No Explain:SECTION 4.0 PPAP (Production Part Approval Process)31. Lead-time for tooling: ____________________________________________________________________32. After tool completion, (first parts off tools), what is the lead-time for PPAP submission? _______________________________33. Is additional lead time required after PPAP approval to meet the QTC?Yes No Explain:34. Does the supplier understand the requirements for Full PPAP?Yes No Explain:35. Does the supplier know where to obtain the required forms for PPAP?Yes No Explain:36. Define the number of samples to be submitted along with PPAP documentation.Total # of Samples: ________Samples per Cavity: ________Total # of Cavities: ________37. Name the GM person that you will send PPAP documentation and samples to: _38. Will Pilot/MVB (and pre-pilot, if applicable) parts be produced from 100% production tools?Yes No Explain:39. Does the supplier understand the GP-12 procedure?Yes No Explain:40. Does the supplier understand the GP-12 exit criteria?Yes No Explain:Run @ Rate & Capacity Related41. Fill in the following capacity information:A. What is the Daily Contracted Capacity _________________________________B. Number of tool sets required _________________________________C. Number of machines/lines/cells required _________________________________D. Capacity per tool set _________________________________E. Number of work hours per day _________________________________F. Number of shifts per day _________________________________G. Number of days per week _________________________________42. Run @ Rate GP-9 – Normally 8 Weeks Prior to SOPDoes the supplier understand the requirements for Run @ Rate?Yes No Explain:43. Does the supplier have all of the documentation needed to perform the Run @ Rate?Yes No Explain:44. Will a staged Run @ Rate be planned?Yes No Explain:45. State length of time the Run @ Rate must be performed: ________________________________________________46. Does the supplier understand the procedures that apply when problems occur at a GM plant?(GP-5, ControlledShipping level 1 & 2, New Business Hold, Global Sourcing)Yes No Explain:SECTION 5.0 – SUPPLIER QUALITY PERFORMANCE47. What is supplier’s PPM rating? _____________________________________________________________________________48. Does supplier have any parts currently in controlled shipping environment? _________________________________________Yes No Explain:49. Does supplier have any PR/R’s that are not resolved? ___________________________________________________________Yes No Explain:SECTION 6.0 – Warranty50. Does the supplier have a warranty sufficiency/action plan? Are they on target to meet theirgoals?_____________________________________________________________________________________ Yes No Explain:Explain:52. Has the supplier performed any benchmarking activities related to warranty performance of their specific commodity?________Yes No Explain:Explain:54. What has the supplier done with existing warranty data to improve this new product/process? Provide specific examples.Explain:method for operations.Explain:Date:GM Attendees: Supplier Attendees:Product/Design Release Engineer (DRE) Program ManagerAP Buyer: Manufacturing EngineerProduction Buyer Quality EngineerPPM/Asst.Materials Rep.SPO/After Sales Rep.Manufacturing EngineerRevision History – January 1, 2004 ChangesRevision History – November 30, 2006 Changes。
APQP产品质量计划概述
(GM1927-21)
第二十三页，共84页。
方法:
供 应 商 项 目 审 核 #1 (PR#1)
• 在定点决定后进行：
-- GM SQE 协 调 并 主 持 首 次 评 审 -- 供 应 商 的 责 任 和 提 交 的 结 果 将 进 行 评 审
第十七页，共84页。
任务号:3 任务名称:风险评估和定点
任务所有人:采购员
任务进度:
定 点 前 进 行 初 始 评 审。 样 件 / Gamma / 整 车 验 证 时 间段内进行第二次评审
第十八页，共84页。
任务描述:
风 险 评 估 是 一 种 工 具，用 以 评 估 车 辆 在 早期(zǎoqī) 开 发 过 程 中 存 在 的 潜 在 问 题 ，并 确 定 通 用 汽 车 应 对 哪 些 零 部 件 和／或 供 应 商 给 予 更 多 的 关 注。 它 意在评价所有新零件/供应商。一个供应商的选 择是通过所有关键利益各方同意的质量保证采购 来决定的。
第六页，共84页。
APQP 项 目 计 划
(Gamma)
(Manufacturing Validity)
u 公司策划确定时间框架
u VLET 确 定 关 键 节 点 日 期
8 Part A
第七页，共84页。
具体保密注释
•供应商的所有信息都是保密的。 这
些内容包括：
-过 程 FMEA -项 目 时 间 进 度
第十九页，共84页。
SQE的职责(zhízé)：
•参与最后的风险(fēngxiǎn)评价(含TA) •选定候选供应商 •决议APQP和GP9的主导方式