罗子雄ted演讲 ppt课件

合集下载

精选高中Unit3Word power公开PPT课件

Let’s fill in the form together.
Part flash disk keyboard printer
function a small piece of disk for storing information a series of keys for typing a machine that puts the words and pictures onto paper
Use computers and Internet properly!
Thank you!
凡事都是多棱镜，不同的角度会看到不同的结果。若能把一些事看淡了，就会有个好心境，若把很多事看开了，就会有个好心情。让聚散离合犹如月缺月圆那样寻常，
Computers & the Internet
• Today almost everyone knows computers and the Internet．they have been an indispensable(不可或缺的）part of our life.
Words related to computer and internet
revision: data software CPU
download hardware
e-mail surf
Words related to computer and internet
hard drive
monitor
CD-ROM/DVDROM drive
keyboard
mouse
Words related to computer and internet

演讲与表达技巧 (PPTminimizer)

演练：赞美身边每一个人
2020/3/20
38
第二单元
演讲内容设计与组织
2020/3/20
39
具有吸引力的材料准备
• 新——要有新人、新事、新成果、新情况，反映新面貌，讲出新道理；
• 实——就是具体、实在，使听众能感觉到，而不是空洞抽象的说教；
• 趣——就是要有趣味。既有动人的情节，能引起悬念，又活泼风趣，具有幽默感；
2020/3/20
33
2020/3/20
“爱”与“感谢”本是宇宙存在与人际关系的基本原则，美好的情感与心念会对世界产生有益的影响，所以，我们更应该多一些“爱与感谢”。这也回答了“世界为什么需要赞美”的疑问。
34
先处理心情，再处理事情
• 人的天性是不讲道理的，受情绪影响 • 成功的人：处理别人的心情，完成自己的事情 • 失败的人：处理自己的心情，帮别人做事情
2020/3/20
8
演讲者的态度
真诚用心地表达生命的感动与学习的分享。
2020/3/20
9
演讲者的情绪与感觉
自信
自然
2020/3/20
感兴趣
真诚
坚信
10
优秀演讲者的特性
• 灵活
• 开放
• 诚实
• 幽默
• 思维敏捷
• 善于把握机会
• 临场把握与驾御能力
• 临场解决问题与组织能力
2020/3/20
2020/3/20
26
天然水：南极水（左）、日本泉水（右）
只要是天然水，结晶都异常美丽
2020/3/20
27
看到“爱与感谢”，水结晶接近完美
骂它“混蛋”，水结晶则支离破碎

成功的演讲与表达技巧培训ppt课件

确保主题与听众的兴趣和需求相关，以提高听众的参与度和兴趣。
主题创新性
尝试选择新颖、独特的主题，以吸引听众的注意力。
了解听众背景
了解听众需求
了解听众的职业、兴趣和需求，以便更好地调整演讲内容和风格。
了解听众文化背景
了解听众的文化背景和价值观，以避免文化冲突或误解。
了解听众认知水平
根据听众的知识水平和理解能力，选择适当的技术和语言。
内容逻辑
1 2
主题明确
确保演讲内容与主题紧密相关，避免偏离主题。
逻辑连贯
使用过渡句和段落来连接不同部分，使内容连贯。
3
重点突出
强调关键信息，使用强调符号或改变语调来突出重点。
案例分析
选择恰当案例
选择与演讲主题相关的案例，能够支持论点。
分析案例细节
深入分析案例的背景、过程和结果，与演讲内容相结合。
使用生动、形象的语言，增强演讲的吸引力和感染力。
语言流畅
保持语言的流畅性，避免停顿、重复和无意义的词语。
肢体语言
姿势自然
保持自然的然
保持自然的表情，不要过于紧张或过于夸张。
手势适度
使用适度、自然的手势，增强演讲的表达效果。
声音控制
音量适中
根据演讲场合和听众规模调整音量大小，确保听众听清。
详细描述
在观众反馈的基础上，培训师会给出具体的改进建议。学员需要遵循这些建议，不断调整和完善自己的演讲技巧，提高演讲质量。
CHAPTER 05
演讲后的总结与反思
回顾演讲过程
演讲主题
确认演讲的主题和目的，回顾是否准确传达了信息。
演讲内容
回顾演讲的内容，检查是否有遗漏或错误的信息。

TED演讲(亚历杭德罗)

The Power of Synthesis-------Alejandro Aravena If there’s any power in design, that’s power of synthesis. The more complex the problem, the more the need for simplicity. So allow me to share three cases where we tried to apply design’s power of synthesis.Let’s start with the global challenge of urbanization. It’s a fact that people are moving towards cities, and even if counterintuitive, it’s good news. Evidence shows that people are better off in cities. But there’s a problem that I would call the “3S” menace: The scale, speed, scarcity of means with which we will have to respond to this phenomenon has no precedence in history. For you to have an idea, out of the three billion people living in cities today, one billion are under the line of poverty. By 2030, out of five billion people that will be living in cities, two billion are going to be under the line of poverty. That means that we will have to build a one million-people city per week, with 10,000 dollars per family during the next 15 years. A one million-people city per week, with 10,000 dollars per family, If we don’t solve this equation, it is not that people will stop coming to cities. They will come anyhow, but they will live in slums, favelas and informal settlements. So what to do? Well, an answer may come from favelas and slums themselves. A clue could be in this question we were asked 10 years ago. We were asked to accommodate 100 families that had been occupying illegally half a hectare in the center of the city of Iquique in the north of Chile using a $10,000 subsidy with which we had to buy the land, provide the infrastructure, and build the houses that, in the best of the cases, would be of around 40 square meters. And by the way, they said, the cost of the land, because it’s in the center of the city, is three times more than what social housing can normally afford. Due to the difficulty of the question, we decide to include the families in the process of understanding the constraints, and we started a participatory design process, and testing what was available there in the market. Detached houses, 30 families could be accommodated.Row houses ,60 families. The only way toaccommodated all of them was by building in height,and they threatened us to go on a hunger strike if we even dared to offer this as a solution,because they could not make the tiny apartments expand.So the conclusion with the families and this is important,not our conclusion with the families,was that we had a problem.We had to innovate.So what did we do? Well,a middle-class family lives reasonably well in around 80 square meters,but when there’s no money,what the market does is to reduce the size of the house to 40 square meters.What we said was,what if ,instead of thinking of 40 square meters as a small house,why don’t we consider it half of a good one? When you rephrase the problem as half of a good house instead of a small one,the key question is,which half do we do?And we thought we had to do with public money the half that families won’t be able to do individually.We identified five design condition that belonged to the hard half of a house,and we went back the families to do two things join forces and split tasks.Our design was something in between a building and a house.As a building,it could pay for expensive ,well-located land,and as a house, it could expand.If, in the process of not being expelled to the periphery while getting a house,families kept their network and their jobs,we knew that the expansion would begin right away.So we went from this initial social housing to a middle-class unit achieved by families themselves within a couple of weeks.This was our first project in Iquique 10 years ago.This is our last project in Chile.Different designs,same principle:You provide the frame,and from then on,families take over.So the purpose of design,trying to understanding and trying to give an answer to the “3S” menace,scale,speed and scarcity is to channel people’s own building capacity.We won’t solve the one million people per week equation unless we use people’s own power for building.So with the right design,slums and favelas may not be the problem but actually the only possible solution.The second case is how design can contribute to sustainability.In 2012,we entered the competition for the Angelini Innovation Center,andthe aim was to build the right environment for knowledge creation.It is accepted that for such an aim,knowledge creation,interaction among people ,face-to-face contact,it’s important,and we agreed on that.But for us, the question of the right environment was a very literal question.We wanted to have a working space with the right light ,with the right temperature,with the right air.So we asked ourselves:Does the typical office building help us in that sense?Well,how dose that building look,typically?It’s a collection of floors,one on top of each other,with a core in the center with elevators,stairs,pipes,wires,everything,and then a glass skin on the outside,that, due to direct sun radiation,creates a huge greenhouse effect inside.In addition to that,Let’s say a guy working on the seventh floor goes every single day through the third floor,but has no idea what the guy on that floor is working on.So we thought,well,maybe we have to turn this scheme inside out.And what we did was,let’s have an open atrium,a hollowed core,the same collection of floors,but have the walls and the mass in the perimeter, so that when the sun hits,it’s not impacting directly glass, but a wall.When you have an open atrium inside, you are able to see what others are doing from within the building, and you have a better way to control light,and when you place the mass and the walls in the perimeters,then you are preventing direct sun radiation.You may also open those windows and get cross-ventilation.We just made those openings of such a scale that they could work as elevated squares,outdoor spaces throughout the entire height the building. None of this is rocket science.You don’t require sophisticated programming.It’s not about technology.This is just archaic,primitive common sense,and by using common sense,we went from 120 kilowatts per square meter per year,which is the typical energy consumption for cooling a glass power,to 40 kilowatts per square meter per year.So with the right design,sustainability is noting but the rigorous use of common sense.Last case I would like to share is how design can provide more comprehensive answers against natural disasters.You may know thatChile,in 2010,was hit by an 8.8 Richter scale earthquake and tsunami,and we were called to work in the reconstruction of the Constitucion in the southern part of the country.We were given 100 days,three months,to design almost everything, from public buildings to public space,street grid,transportation,housing,and mainly how to protect the city against future tsunamis.This was new in Chilean urban design,and there were in the air a couple of alternatives.First one:Forbid installation on ground zero.Thirty million dollars spent mainly in land expropriation.This is exactly what’s being discussed in Japan nowadays,and if you have a disciplined population like the Japanese,this may work,but we know that in Chile,this land is going to be occupied illegally anyhow,so this alternative was unrealistic and undesirable.Second alternative；build a big wall,heavy infrastructure to resist the energy of the waves.This alternative was conveniently lobbied by big building companies,because it meant 42 million dollars in contracts,and was also politically preferred,because it required no land expropriation.But Japan proved that trying to resist the force of nature is useless.So this alternative was irresponsible.As in the housing process,we had to include the community in the way of finding a solution for this,and we started a participatory design process.【采访】I don’t know if you were able to read the subtitles,but you can tell from the body language that participatory design is not a hippie,romantic,let’s-all-dream-together-about-the-future-of-the-city, kind of thing.It is actually not even with the families trying to find the right answer.It is mainly trying to identify with the precision what is the right question.There is nothing worse than answering well the wrong question.So it was pretty obvious after this process,that,well,we chicken out here and go away because it’s too tense,or we go even further in asking,what else is bothering you?What other problems do you have and you want us to take care of now that the city will have to be rethought from scratch?And what they said was,look,fine to protect the city against future tsunamis,we really appreciate,but the next one is going to comein,what, 20 years?But every single year,we have problems of flooding due to rain.In addition,we are in the middle of the forest region of the country,and our public space sucks.It’s poor and it’s scarce.And the origin of the city,our identity,is not really connected to the building that fell,it is connected to the river,but the river cannot be accessed publicly,because its shores are privately owned.So we thought that we had to produce a third alternative,and our approach was against geographical threats,have geographical answers.What if,in between the city and the sea,we have a forest,a forest that doesn’t try to resist the energy of nature,but dissipates it by introducing friction?A forest that may be able to laminate the water and prevent the flooding?That may pay the historical debt of public space,and that may provide ,finally,democratic access to the river. So as a conclusion of the participatory design,the alternative was validated politically and socially,but there was still the problem of the cost:48 million dollars.So what we did was a survey in the public investment system,and found out that there were three ministries with three projects in the exact same place,not knowing of the existence of the other projects.The sum of them:52 million dollars.So design’s power of the synthesis is trying to make a more efficient use of the scarcest resource in cities,which is not money,but coordination.By doing so,we were able to save four million dollars,and that is why the forest is today under construction.So be it the force of self construction,the force of common sense,or the force of nature,all these forces need to be translated into form,and what that form is modeling and shaping is not cement,bricks,or wood.It is life itself. Design’s power of synthesis is just an attempt to put at the innermost core of architecture the force of life.Thank you so much.整合的力量-----亚历杭德罗·阿拉维纳如果说设计有什么力量的话，那就是整合的力量。

自信的演讲PPT课件讲解学习

Before you tell a story, decide what the ending will be.
Jack E Rossin
Tell Us a Story
2 minutes long Take 10 to prepare
Jack E Rossin
Critique
Name a spokesperson
Jack E Rossin
Techniques that make you appear confident...
Speaking more slowly Storytelling Experience presenting Listening Skills Preparation/rehearsal
Jack E Rossin
Warning
Major “Opening” exercise coming up!
Jack E Rossin
Building the Presentation
Open
Middle
Close
Jack E Rossin
Focus on the Open
Audiences are most attentive in the beginning
Jack E Rossin
Techniques that make you Appear confident...
Speaking more slowly Storytelling Experience presenting Listening Skills Preparation/rehearsal
Jack E Rossin
Eye Contact
Eye contact wins people to your side One thought, one person Don’t talk without eye contact Straight shooters make eye contact

ted演讲稿PPT

适当的留白
利用空白区域突出关键信息，引导观众关注重点。
图片和视频素材选用
高质量图片
选用与演讲内容相关的高质量图片，增强信息的视觉冲击力。
短视频辅助
适当插入短视频，有助于观众更直观地理解演讲内容。
素材授权
确保使用的图片和视频素材已获得合法授权，避免侵权纠纷。
07 演讲实战应对策略
面对紧张情绪的处理方法
力。
互动环节设计
提问环节
预留观众提问时间，鼓励观众参与讨论，增强演讲互动性。
调查或小游戏
通过现场调查或小游戏，让观众更直观地了解演讲主题。
故事或案例分享
分享与主题相关的故事或案例，激发观众兴趣，增强演讲说服力。
邀请观众参与
邀请观众上台参与演示或分享经验，让观众更深入地了解演
讲内容。
06 幻灯片制作要点
主题亮点
提炼演讲中的亮点和创新点，激发听众对演讲的兴趣。
演讲者背景
演讲者简介
简要介绍演讲者的基本信息，包括姓名、职业、成就等。
演讲者经历
分享与演讲主题相关的个人经历或故事，增强演讲者的可信度。
演讲者专长
强调演讲者在相关领域的专业知识和技能，提高听众对演讲的期待值。
演讲目的
传递信息
ted演讲稿
目录
• 引言 • 演讲核心内容 • 支撑材料 • 演讲结构安排 • 语言表达技巧 • 幻灯片制作要点 • 演讲实战应对策略 • 总结与展望
01 引言
主题介绍
01
02
03
演讲核心主题
明确阐述演讲的核心主题，使听众对演讲内容有初步了解。
主题背景
介绍主题的历史背景、现实意义以及社会关注度，增强听众对主题的认知。

教育培训演讲教师课件课程展示PPT-Pitcho Widescreen - Blue Orange Light

Simple and regular than that of the individual languages. The new common language will be more simple
Introduction Section
01
About Our Company
02
Meet The Team
To achieve this, it would be necessary to have uniform grammar, pronunciation and more common words
The Modern Work World Requires Flexibility
Services One Title
17,874
Current Selling Value
8,028
Product Distributed
What We Are Doing
If several languages coalesce, the grammar of the resulting language is more simple and regular than that of the individual languages. The new common language will grammar of the resulting language is
Ideas Are Commodity Execution Of Is Not
Acquainted With The Value
To achieve this, it would be necessary to have uniform grammar, pronunciation and more common words. If several languages coalesce, the grammar of the resulting language is more simple and regular than that of the individual languages. The new common language will be more simple and regular than the existing