特朗普在美国自由大学的演讲(2012年9月24日) 要想成为赢家,你必须像赢家一样思考

合集下载

特朗普的“政治正确”：美国利益就是一切

特朗普的“政治正确”：美国利益就是一切作者：徐海娜来源：《当代世界》2017年第05期近来，美国总统特朗普的内政外交表现与其竞选阶段及上台之初的主张大相径庭，舆论对特朗普外交政策诸多评论莫衷一是，总体上认为特朗普从其赖以起家的“政治不正确”走向了“政治正确”。

“政治正确”在美国有狭义和广义之分，狭义“政治正确”的过度发展在一定程度上损害了美国的言论自由和政治生态，由此形成了巨大的政治分裂。

所谓“政治正确”把美国捆绑死了，而特朗普恰恰能够跳出“政治正确”，把“美国优先”作为新的政治信条。

特朗普绝不是只会锱铢必较的商人，他正在用其特殊的方式实现政治理想。

近日来，美国总统特朗普的内政外交表现与其竞选阶段及上台之初的主张大相径庭：他在竞选时声称上任第一天就要把中国列为“汇率操纵国”，近日却明确表示不会把中国认定为“汇率操纵国”，其后美国财政部报告又加以确认；他在竞选时声称要“解散北约”，现在又正式收回“北约过时论”；他在竞选阶段“离奇地钦佩”[1]普京，如今却改口说“我一点也不熟悉他”，并且对习近平赞赏有加，从“亲俄贬华”迅疾改为“抗俄和华”；他一改先前对叙利亚问题的超脱姿态，对俄罗斯力挺的叙利亚政府空军基地进行军事打击，等等。

面对近期特朗普的种种外交行动，国际舆论认为他开始从其赖以起家的“政治不正确”走向了“政治正确”。

2017年4月18日，特朗普在接受福克斯电视台采访时针对其对华态度转变做出回应，“我没有改变立场”。

其实，特朗普说了一句真心话。

“政治正确”和“政治不正确”这些标签都框不住他。

特朗普没有什么特别固定的意识形态立场，“没有永远的敌人，没有永远的朋友，只有永远的国家利益”这一经典的外交圭臬在他身上得以体现。

没竞选总统之前，特朗普是“商业利益至上”；竞选期间，特朗普是“选民利益至上”；入主白宫之后，特朗普的“政治正确”归结为“美国利益至上”。

“政治正确”的双刃剑当前，美国的“政治正确”说，指由美国政界（自由派政治家）、学术界和媒体于20世纪70年代所共同缔造的话语体系，其出发点旨在避免冒犯弱势群体（少数族裔、女性、同性恋者、跨性别人士、有不同宗教信仰或持不同政见者）并保护其权益。

特朗普葛底斯堡演讲内容

特朗普葛底斯堡演讲内容来到葛底斯堡，我感到非常荣幸。

在这片神圣的土地上，伟大的革命前辈们为了自由而战，献出了自己的一生。

林肯总统在任时的美国，也曾处于极度分裂状态。

如今，我们的国家已是四分五裂，我希望我们能借鉴前人的经验，解决我们现在的分裂问题。

我不是一名政客，过去，我也从未想过要从政，请相信我。

但如今国难当头，我无法袖手旁观。

祖国待我恩重如山，我也深深爱着我的祖国，我知道我应该开始行动了。

很多年来，我曾以局内人的身份见证这个政治系统的内幕。

我知道华盛顿和华尔街是怎样运作的，我也知道他们是如何作威作福，蹂躏美国人民，践踏美国法制。

处于高收入年龄阶段(25-54岁)的美国人，近四分之一没有工作。

美国有五分之一的家庭，无人工作养家。

4500万美国人吃不起饭，4700万美国人生活于贫困之中。

旧城区已被抛弃，许多非裔和拉丁裔美国人一直过着非常穷苦的生活。

我们被卷入海外军事冲突，陷入了永无止境的战争。

这是赢不了的战争，因为这些战争的发起者对战争根本一无所知，在我们国家，许多伟大的退伍老兵相继病逝，只因得不到及时的医疗救助。

我们的政治系统已经溃烂了。

想要改变美国，我们只能打破腐朽的政治系统。

华盛顿建制派们如此处心积虑的阻止我们，进一步印证了我们的竞选运动已是美国人民最后的机会。

我们的政治系统早已腐败不堪第一个问题就是投票作弊。

根据皮尤研究中心的报告，这届美国大选，2400万张选票要么无效要么造假，选票造假到这种程度，简直难以置信。

竟有180万死人登记投票，死人都爬起来投票了，我很想知道这是如何办到的。

(哈哈哈哈哈我忍不住了这里太好笑了我在一边看川普演讲一边翻笑死我了)还有280万人在不同州重复刷票。

堂堂美国大选，竟然有14%的选票来自于非美国公民。

本次大选还有一个黑幕，希拉里本不应该被允许竞选美国总统，谁知FBI竟联合司法部门包庇了希拉里的犯罪行为。

希拉里多次向FBI和国会撒谎，其中，她分别在不同的场合向FBI撒谎39次，说自己什么都不记得。

美国特朗普的发言稿

美国特朗普的发言稿尊敬的各位美国同胞：大家好！首先，我要感谢你们对我的支持和信任，让我有机会在这个伟大的国家里领导，并为你们的利益而奋斗。

今天，我很荣幸向你们发表这个重要的讲话，在这里，我将回顾过去四年来的成就和挑战，分享我的愿景和承诺，也将解释为什么我应该再次当选为美国总统。

这是一次告别，也是一次新的起点。

过去四年对于我们来说是充满了困难和挑战的时刻，但我们成功地克服了这些困难，并为美国带来了巨大的变革。

当我上任时，我们面临着经济的衰退、就业率的下降、犯罪率的上升等重大问题。

然而，我们通过鼓励创新和投资，实施了一系列的经济政策，使我们的经济重新焕发活力。

我们取消了许多繁重的监管，为企业创造了更好的发展环境，帮助他们提高竞争力和创造就业机会。

我们还通过降低税收和优化税收政策，让中产阶级和小企业受益，推动了经济增长。

我们还加大了对于国家安全和边境控制的投入。

我们实施了严格的移民政策，保护了我们的国土和公民的利益。

我们加强了与盟友的合作，打击了国际恐怖主义组织，维护了国家的安全和尊严。

我们加强了军队和警察力量的建设，使他们能够更好地履行自己的使命。

我们推动了国内外的和平与发展，努力实现国际秩序的改革和改善。

此外，我们也承认并积极应对了许多其他重要问题，例如医保改革、教育改革、环境保护等。

我们致力于保护和提升美国人民的生活水平，使每个人都能够享受到更好的医疗服务、更高的教育水平和更干净的环境。

我们大力发展可再生能源，减少对化石燃料的依赖，并参与国际合作，共同应对气候变化等全球性的挑战。

虽然我们取得了许多重大的成就，但我们也面临着许多挑战和困难。

目前全球疫情肆虐，给我们的生活和经济带来了巨大的冲击。

我要向那些受到疫情影响而失去亲人或工作的人们表示我的哀悼和慰问。

我们采取了一系列的措施应对疫情，例如实施了旅行禁令、加强了医疗资源的投入、推动了疫苗研发和分发等。

我相信，只要我们全国上下团结一心，共同努力，我们一定能够战胜这个疫情，恢复经济和社会的正常运转。

白宫赢得大选发言稿高中

白宫赢得大选发言稿高中尊敬的美国人民、各位贵宾、媒体朋友们：大家好！今天，我站在这里，非常荣幸地宣布，我已经赢得了白宫大选的胜利！首先，我要向所有投票支持我的选民表示最衷心的感谢，没有你们的支持和信任，我无法取得这样的成绩。

同时，我也要感谢我的竞选团队、志愿者们和所有支持者们，你们的努力和付出是我能够成功的最大动力。

作为美国的下一任总统，我深知自己肩负着重任。

我将会为全体美国人民谋福祉，努力让美国更加繁荣、更加和谐、更加强大，在我的领导下，我相信美国的未来将会更加美好！首先，我将努力解决当前的经济问题。

在全球经济竞争日益激烈的今天，美国必须要更加自信地站在世界舞台上，我将推动政府与企业合作，加大对实体经济的支持力度，鼓励创新，促进产业升级，加快经济发展的步伐。

我也会采取更加积极的政策措施，降低企业税率，促进就业增长，为每个家庭创造更多的经济机会和发展空间。

其次，我将着力改善医疗保健体系。

现代医疗保健已经成为许多家庭的沉重负担，我将致力于推动医疗改革，保障每个美国人都能够获得基本的医疗服务，让医疗保健系统更加公平、更加普惠，让每一个美国人都能够享受到高质量的医疗保健。

再次，我将重视教育事业的发展。

教育是国家的未来，我将加大对教育的投入，建设更多的优质教育资源，改善教育环境，提高教育质量，让每个孩子都能够接受到优质的教育，为他们的未来打下坚实的基础。

同时，我也将重视职业教育，培养更多的技术人才，满足社会对各种专业人才的需求。

此外，我还将努力推动环保事业。

环境保护是人类共同的责任，我将坚定不移地推动环保事业的发展，加大对清洁能源的支持力度，减少对环境的破坏，保护我们共同的家园。

最后，我将致力于改善社会治安和促进民族团结。

在强大的国家背后，是每个人民群众的安宁和和谐。

我将加强社会治安力度，净化社会风气，保障人民的人身安全和财产安全。

同时，我也将加大对少数民族和弱势群体的关爱力度，消除种族歧视，促进民族团结，让每一个美国人都能够享受到平等的权利和待遇。

美国总统拉票竞选演讲稿

大家好！今天，我站在这里，怀着无比激动的心情，向全国人民发表竞选演讲。

在此，我要感谢大家的信任与支持，是你们让我有了站在这里的机会，让我有机会为美国的未来奋斗。

首先，我要向大家介绍一下我自己。

我叫约翰·史密斯，是一名来自美国中西部的普通公民。

我热爱我的祖国，热爱我的家人，更热爱这片美丽的土地。

在过去的日子里，我始终关注着国家的发展，关心着人民的福祉。

今天，我站在这里，是带着一颗赤子之心，为了美国的繁荣昌盛，为了人民的幸福生活。

同胞们，我们正处在历史的十字路口。

过去几年，美国经历了很多挑战，无论是经济、政治还是社会问题，都让我们的国家面临着巨大的压力。

在这样的背景下，我们需要一个有担当、有远见的领导者，带领我们走出困境，走向繁荣。

下面，我将向大家阐述我的竞选理念和未来政策。

一、重振美国经济经济是国家的基石，是人民幸福生活的保障。

我将把发展经济作为首要任务，采取以下措施：1. 减税降费，激发市场活力。

我将积极推动减税政策，减轻企业负担，提高人民收入水平。

2. 加大基础设施投资，提升国家竞争力。

我将投资修建公路、铁路、机场等基础设施，提高运输效率，降低物流成本。

3. 支持科技创新，培育新兴产业。

我将加大科技创新投入，鼓励企业加大研发力度，培育新兴产业，推动产业结构优化升级。

4. 拓展国际市场，扩大出口。

我将积极推动自由贸易，拓展国际市场，扩大出口，增加外汇收入。

二、加强国家安全国家安全是国家的生命线，是人民幸福生活的保障。

我将把国家安全放在首位，采取以下措施：1. 提高军事实力，确保国家安全。

我将加大国防投入，提升军队现代化水平，确保国家领土完整和主权。

2. 加强边境管理，打击非法移民。

我将加强边境管理，打击非法移民，维护国家安全和社会稳定。

3. 严厉打击恐怖主义，确保人民生命财产安全。

我将加强国际合作，共同打击恐怖主义，确保人民生命财产安全。

4. 加强网络安全，维护国家利益。

我将加强网络安全建设，保护国家关键信息基础设施，维护国家利益。

伊万卡特朗普演讲稿

伊万卡特朗普演讲稿尊敬的各位来宾，大家好！我很荣幸能够在这里发表一篇关于未来的演讲。

作为特朗普总统的女儿和白宫高级顾问，我对美国未来的发展充满信心。

首先，我想强调的是，我们需要坚定不移地支持创新和创造力。

创新是我们国家成功的关键，我们必须继续在各行各业鼓励创新，为创业者提供更多的机会和资源。

为此，我们在去年推出了“科技治国”的计划，该计划旨在帮助创业者们将创新成果应用到实际的生产领域。

我们已经看到很多公司利用这些工具取得巨大成功，我相信这种趋势将在未来继续发展。

其次，我们需要继续投资教育和技能培训。

我们的未来成功依赖于新一代的才华和智慧。

我们需要确保他们接受到高质量的教育和培训，以便在未来的工作中取得更好的成就。

因此，我们必须继续增加教育和技能培训的资金，确保我们的学生和工人获得全面发展，并取得他们所期望的成功。

此外，我们需要注重促进全球贸易和外交关系，这对我们的经济增长和全球安全至关重要。

我们必须与世界各国建立良好的关系，通过合作解决共同关切。

只有这样，我们才能使全球各国的经济实现繁荣与共赢，并确保我们的未来更加光明。

最后，我想指出的是，我们需要重视家庭和社区的价值。

家庭是社会发展的基本单位，它们是我们未来的支柱。

我们需要努力寻求提高家庭生活的质量，给予父母和孩子们更多的支持和资源。

同时，我们应该更加重视社区的发展，鼓励社区成员之间的合作，共同为社区的繁荣做出贡献。

在总结时，我希望能够强调，这是一个繁荣、充满机遇和希望的时代。

我们必须更加积极地应对我们的挑战，推进我们的发展，使我们的未来更加光明。

最后，我想再次感谢所有嘉宾的到来，并祝愿你们在未来的日子里一切顺利。

谢谢！。

11月9日特朗普发言稿

11月9日特朗普发言稿尊敬的美国公民们、各国领导人、媒体朋友们：大家好！首先，我要感谢各位在今天来到这里，聆听我的发言。

我十分荣幸能够再次站在这个重要的讲台上，向全世界发表我的讲话。

今天，我想与大家分享一些重要的议题，包括美国的发展、国际关系、全球化、贸易、环境等方面的问题。

我希望通过这次发言，向世界展示美国的立场、原则和政策。

首先，我要说，美国是一个伟大的国家。

我有幸成为美国的总统，我为能够为这个伟大的国家服务而感到自豪。

在过去的四年里，我们在经济、军事、外交等方面取得了许多重要的成就。

我们成功推动了税改、就业增长、减少了监管，使美国经济呈现出强劲的复苏势头。

我们坚决捍卫国家安全，击败了伊斯兰国等恐怖组织，为世界带来了和平与稳定。

我们与世界各国建立了更强大的伙伴关系，推动了自由贸易和国际合作。

我可以毫不谦虚地说，我们为美国和全球做出了重要的贡献。

然而，我们所面临的挑战也是不可忽视的。

正如我在竞选期间所强调的，我们需要解决一些关键的问题，以便持续推动美国的发展。

其中之一就是贸易问题。

贸易是国家繁荣与发展的关键之一。

然而，历年来，美国在贸易中一直存在不平衡的问题。

我们的市场开放，但其他一些国家的市场却相对封闭。

这导致了美国的制造业衰退、就业岗位减少等问题。

为了保护美国的产业和就业，我采取了一系列贸易措施，其中包括对一些国家征收关税。

这并不是对某个国家的敌意，而是为了维护美国的利益和正常的贸易秩序。

我要强调的是，我们愿意与各国进行平等和公平的贸易，但如果其他国家对美国采取不公平的贸易行为，我们将采取必要的措施进行回应。

与此同时，全球化也是我们所面临的挑战之一。

全球化为各国带来了许多机会，但也带来了一些问题。

一些国家利用全球化发展自己的经济，却忽视了对环境的保护和劳工权益的重视。

作为一个负责任的国家，我们呼吁各国共同努力，建立起一个公平、开放、透明和可持续发展的全球经济体系。

我们将加强与其他国家的合作，共同应对全球变化和挑战。

特朗普问鼎总统之道

诺的话。他集中火力攻击技术和全球化其同造成的脱位：制造业就业不仅被墨西哥等国夺走，而且还被机器人夺走。非对称战争不
是冈美困软弱而是因社交媒体成为可能。越来越多的人活得越来越长引发了退休和医保问题定时炸弹，而更长寿一定程度上因计算机力量阐明疾病机制而成为可能。特朗普利用了脱位造成的痛苦，但他怪错了对象。美国领导人未能解决这些令人震惊的
业和企业变革更加频繁和剧织前副总裁朱民，全国人大常出，在当今竞争环境日益开放主要从事自有品牌男装的设计、
烈。当前，企业的三个最重要委、财政经济委员会副主任委化和数字化的背景下，银行仍生产与销售的阿蓝尔股份有限公
问题帮助特朗普当选，但现在他成了领导人，轮到他为这些问题一筹莫展了。
业界动态
Ｏ１０月２６日ＩｎＳＰＵｒＷＯｒｌｄ策服务。２０１６）ｔ￣潮技术与应用峰会— — ” 数字化转型成就智慧企业 ” 科技的新趋势和新热点。板 ”企业于ｌ１月１８日在北京全
参议员和第一夫人．连输三场辩论（据民调），不被大约６０％的美国人认可。十几位女性指控他性侵。他自诩一年挣数千万美

特朗普团队竞选发言稿

特朗普团队竞选发言稿尊敬的选民们，大家好！我很荣幸能够站在这里，代表特朗普团队，向大家发表竞选演讲。

在过去的四年里，特朗普总统带领我们国家取得了一系列重要的成就，这些成就不仅改变了美国，也改变了全世界。

今天，我将向大家展示特朗普总统及其团队在未来四年将为我们国家带来的改变。

首先，我要说的是经济。

特朗普总统上任以来，我们的经济发展出现了巨大的变化。

我们实施了减税政策，鼓励了企业的发展，为美国人创造了大量的就业机会。

我们的失业率历史性地下降，同时我们的GDP增长率也一直保持在较高水平。

特朗普总统的经济政策带来的是实实在在的成果，我们的人民享受到了更高的生活水平和更多的福利。

在未来四年，我们将继续坚持这一政策，为美国经济带来更多的增长和进步。

其次，我要说的是外交政策。

特朗普总统在国际舞台上的表现堪称出色。

我们拒绝了过去的一些不公平贸易协议，重新谈判了一系列对美国人民有利的协议。

我们坚定支持我们的盟友，同时我们也对那些不尊重我们的对手表现出了坚决的立场。

我们不希望美国成为世界的警察，但我们也不想看到我们的利益受到侵害。

在未来四年，我们将继续坚持我们的外交政策，保护美国的利益，维护国际和平。

第三，我要说的是移民问题。

移民一直是美国面临的一个重大挑战，我们需要找到一个既能保护我们的国界安全，又能保护移民权益的解决方案。

特朗普总统一直强调国界安全的重要性，他推出了一系列严格的移民政策，确保我们的国界安全。

同时，特朗普总统也不忘关心那些合法移民的权益，他提倡合法移民，并承诺为他们创造更好的生活条件。

在未来四年，我们将继续推进我们的移民政策，找到一个既能保证国界安全，又能保护移民权益的平衡点。

最后，我要说的是医疗保健。

特朗普总统一直致力于改革医疗保健体系，他推出了一系列政策，降低了医疗保健成本，提高了医疗保健质量。

我们要把更多的决策权交还给个人和家庭，让他们能够自主选择适合自己的医疗保健方案。

在未来四年，我们将继续改革医疗保健体系，为美国人民提供更好的医疗保健服务。

伊万卡特朗普演讲稿【全文】

伊万卡特朗普演讲稿【全文】伊万卡演讲的语言得体，并富有超强的感染力，听完以后直接想给川普投一票!同时她对自己父亲的描述也非常适合作为人物描述的口语参考范例，转起学习~在我的一生中，我见证了他对他人的同情和慷慨，尤其是对那些陷入困境的人。

这就是他在你有困难时支持你的方式。

我父亲不仅具有成为下一任总统所需的魄力和能力，也具有善良和同情心，使其能成为这个国家所需要的领导人。

——伊万卡·川普以下是特朗普父女（伊恩卡·特朗普）对公众的演讲。

它总共有3100个单词，阅读大约需要8分钟。

“晚上好!一年前，当他宣布参选，我介绍过我的父亲。

作为一个局外人，他以自己的方式，通过自己纯粹的意志力为进入政治领域做出了巨大的牺牲，战胜了16位才华横溢的竞争对手。

一年多来，唐纳德川普一直是人民的冠军。

今晚，他是人民的总统提名人。

和我这个年龄的许多千禧一代一样，我不把自己归类为共和党人或民主党人。

我超越党派偏见，为我的家庭和国家的利益投票。

有时候，这是一个艰难的选择。

然而，事实并非如此。

作为你们总统候选人的女儿，我自豪地告诉你们，唐纳德·特朗普是能够让美国再次伟大的人。

真正的变化——我们几十年未见的那种——只会来自于系统外部，来自于把整个生命用来做别人认为不可能做的事情的人。

我的父亲是一名斗士。

当初选艰难的时候——当对手强悍时!——他做了伟大领导人所做的事：他深耕细作、勤奋努力，渐入佳境、越战越勇。

我见过他为家庭、员工和公司而战。

现在我看到他为我们的国家而战！这是他一生的故事，也是他最近竞选的精神所在。

这也是党乃至国家再次想要尝到胜利的滋味并实现团结所有人的目标的前奏。

特朗普女儿伊万卡的演讲稿全文+视频我父亲很有名，但他不出名。

这就是养育我的父亲。

在我们现在一起工作的办公室里，我记得在父亲办公桌旁的地板上玩耍，用乐高积木和建筑积木建造微型建筑，用混凝土、钢和玻璃建造他的建筑。

我父亲教导我们的兄弟姐妹要有积极的价值观和强烈的道德取向，这非常重要。

奥巴马就特朗普胜选

奥巴马就特朗普胜选演讲❶不论你支持的竞选人获胜与否，太阳依旧会照常升起。

Yesterday, before votes were tallied, I shot a video that some of you may have seen in which I said to the American people: Regardless of which side you were on in the election, regardless of whether your candidate won or lost, the sun would come up in the morning.你们可能也看到了，昨天在开票前，我录过一段视频。

在视频里，我对美国人民说，“不论你们支持谁，不论你支持的竞选人获胜与否，太阳依旧会照常升起”。

And that is one bit of prognosticating that actually came true. The sun is up. 那个小小的预言变成了现实，太阳照常升起了。

❷是的，特朗普和我差异很大。

Now, it is no secret that the President-elect and I have some pretty significant differences. But remember, eight years ago, President Bush and I had some pretty significant differences.现在，当选总统和我有相当大的差异，这已经不是什么秘密了。

但别忘了，八年前，小布什总统和我也有相当大的差异。

So I have instructed my team to follow the example that President Bush’s team set eight years ago, and work as hard as we can to make sure that this is a successful transition for the President-elect -- because we are now all rooting for his success in uniting and leading the country.我已经指示我的团队，像八年前布什总统的团队那样，尽全力确保与当选总统成功交接。

特朗普关于乌克兰发言稿

特朗普关于乌克兰发言稿尊敬的各位听众：大家好！感谢各位能够出席今天的新闻发布会。

我今天想和大家谈谈乌克兰问题，这是一个十分重要的国际议题，也是我们当前外交政策的焦点之一。

首先，我要明确地表达一点：美国对于乌克兰的承诺是坚定的。

我们将继续支持乌克兰的主权和领土完整，支援乌克兰人民的追求独立和自由的权利。

乌克兰是欧洲的一个重要国家，它的稳定和发展符合美国的利益，也符合地区的和平与繁荣。

我希望乌克兰能够保持内外稳定，通过改革与发展实现国家的繁荣。

我们愿意成为乌克兰成功的伙伴。

当前，乌克兰面临着一些严峻的挑战，包括地区冲突和经济困境。

乌克兰东部地区的不稳定局势仍旧威胁着该国的和平与稳定。

我呼吁所有各方能够通过对话与谈判的方式解决矛盾，避免使用武力解决争端。

我们鼓励乌克兰政府与东部地区的民众和解，恢复国家的统一。

同时，我们也敦促俄罗斯和乌克兰之间加强对话和合作，通过和平手段解决问题。

经济发展是乌克兰的另一个重要挑战。

乌克兰的经济一直处于困难中，面临着贫困、失业和腐败等问题。

我希望乌克兰政府能够采取有效的措施，改善投资环境，吸引外资，推动经济转型和创新发展。

美国将提供相应的支持和援助，协助乌克兰实现经济的稳定增长。

除了地缘政治和经济问题，乌克兰还需要应对一系列内部挑战，包括民主制度的巩固和反腐败斗争。

我们期待着乌克兰政府能够加强法治建设，保障公民的基本权利和自由。

我们希望乌克兰政府能够加大反腐败力度，建立透明的政府机构和有效的监管机制。

反腐败是乌克兰稳定和国家建设的关键所在，我们期待乌克兰政府能够取得更进一步的成果。

最后，我想谈谈乌克兰与美国的关系。

乌克兰是美国的战略伙伴，我们希望通过加强双边合作，进一步深化两国关系。

我们将继续支持乌克兰的欧洲和北约一体化进程，维护乌克兰的主权和领土完整。

我们还将继续提供相应的援助和支持，帮助乌克兰实现经济和民主改革。

在结束我演讲之前，我要再次强调，乌克兰是一个重要的国际议题，美国将继续关注并参与其中。

特朗普谈大选后的发言稿

特朗普谈大选后的发言稿尊敬的美国国民，首先，我要向每一位支持我的选民表示衷心的感谢和崇高的敬意。

是你们让我有机会成为这个伟大国家的第45任总统。

在整个竞选过程中，我从未忘记自己所承诺的“使美国再次伟大”。

现在，大选已经结束，我想和你们分享一些关于我们未来美国方向的思考。

首先，我要为我们的选民制度感到骄傲。

我一直坚信，只有一个公平、透明的选举过程才能真正代表人民的意愿。

虽然这次选举中存在一些争议和质疑，但我相信我们的法律和制度将帮助我们最终找到真相，并确保选举结果的公正性。

我支持对选举结果的调查，以便将任何不当行为置于法律的制裁之下。

我的竞选口号是“使美国再次伟大”，这不仅仅是一个口号，而是对我对这个国家的承诺。

我深知，我们面临诸多问题和挑战，但我相信我们有能力克服它们。

我们要重振经济，创造就业机会，改善医疗体系，并确保每个美国人都能过上富足和安逸的生活。

在接下来的四年里，我将聚焦于以下几个方面的工作：第一，重振经济。

新冠疫情给我们的经济带来了巨大打击，失业率的增加、企业的倒闭给人们带来了巨大的不安和挑战。

我将推动一系列的经济刺激措施，减税降费，为中小企业提供更多的支持和鼓励，促进经济复苏和增长。

第二，改善医疗体系。

新冠疫情再次暴露出我们医疗体系的漏洞和不足。

我将致力于推动医疗体系的改革，降低医疗费用，提高医疗服务的质量和可及性，确保每个美国人都能获得合理的医疗保健。

第三，加大对教育的投入。

教育是国家的未来，我们要确保每个孩子都能获得优质的教育资源和机会。

我将推动加大对教育的投入，改善学校设施，提高教育质量，为每个孩子提供平等的教育机会。

第四，加强国内安全。

我将继续加大对边境安全的投入，推动边境墙的修建，控制非法移民的流入，并加强打击恐怖主义行为的力度。

第五，推动科技创新。

科技创新是我们国家未来发展的关键。

我将加大对科技创新的投资，支持科研机构和创新企业，提供更多的研发经费和支持，促进科技创新的发展，推动美国在全球科技领域的领先地位。

拜登竞选成功演讲稿

今天，我们聚集在这里，共同见证一个历史性的时刻。

经过漫长而艰苦的竞选征程，我，乔·拜登，有幸成为美国总统的候选人。

在此，我怀着无比激动和谦逊的心情，向你们发表这篇演讲。

首先，我要感谢所有支持我、信任我、陪伴我走过这段历程的同胞们。

是你们的热情和信念，让我有勇气站在这个舞台上，为我们的国家献出自己的一份力量。

同时，我也要感谢那些与我竞争的对手，是你们让我更加坚定地认识到，我们肩负着共同的责任，那就是为了美国的繁荣和民主，不懈努力。

同胞们，过去的四年，我们的国家经历了太多。

从经济衰退到疫情肆虐，从种族矛盾到社会分裂，我们面临着前所未有的挑战。

然而，在这艰难时刻，我们并没有放弃，而是团结一心，共同面对困难。

正是因为有了你们的付出和努力，我们才有了今天这个机会，为了更美好的未来而努力。

今天，我站在这里，不仅是为了我自己，更是为了你们，为了我们的孩子们，为了我们伟大的美国。

在此，我要向大家承诺，如果我当选美国总统，我将全力以赴，为实现以下目标而努力：一、团结美国，消除分裂同胞们，分裂是我们最大的敌人。

在过去四年里，我们看到了太多的仇恨和偏见。

我要告诉大家，我们的国家是多元化的，我们要尊重每个人的权利和信仰。

作为总统，我将努力消除种族歧视，促进社会和谐，让每个美国人都能感受到公平和正义。

二、振兴经济，创造就业经济是国家发展的基石。

面对当前的经济困境，我将采取一系列措施，包括加大基础设施投资、扶持中小企业、推动科技创新等，以促进经济增长，创造更多就业机会。

同时，我将积极推动贸易自由化，扩大出口，为美国经济注入新的活力。

三、抗击疫情，保障人民健康疫情是当前最紧迫的问题。

作为总统，我将全力以赴，确保疫苗研发和接种工作顺利进行，让每个美国人都能接种疫苗，战胜疫情。

同时，我将加强公共卫生体系建设，提高医疗服务水平，保障人民健康。

四、应对气候变化，保护地球家园气候变化是我们面临的另一个严峻挑战。

作为总统，我将坚定支持可再生能源发展，推动绿色能源转型，减少碳排放。

特朗普发言稿

特朗普发言稿尊敬的各位国家领导人、尊敬的现场嘉宾们：大家好！非常荣幸能够站在这里，与诸位共同见证历史。

首先，我要感谢主办方为这次盛会所付出的努力和辛勤工作。

作为美国总统，我要向全世界发出一个明确的讯息：美国与全球的合作是我们最重要的使命。

我们愿意与所有国家携手合作，共同解决全球面临的挑战和问题。

我要告诉大家，美国正在走上一条全新的发展之路。

我们正以激动人心的步伐推动经济发展、创造就业机会，并致力于提高人民的生活水平。

在过去的几年里，我们采取了一系列改革措施，包括减税、削减监管等，创造了有利于企业和个人的良好发展环境。

我们也将保护我们的国家安全。

美国决不允许任何国家威胁我们的安全利益。

我们正加大国防力量建设，加强军事合作，确保我们的军队能够有效履行职责，保卫我们的家园和人民。

同时，我要强调，我们拥抱世界、推崇多边主义。

美国将继续坚定支持联合国的工作，并积极参与国际合作事务。

我们将全力推动全球经济的繁荣和稳定，开展平等互利的贸易合作，为人民创造更多的就业机会和福利。

我们还将大力推动环境保护和可持续发展。

我们深知环境问题的紧迫性，美国作为全球最大的碳排放国，将承担起应有的责任，推动减缓气候变化的国际合作。

我们也将加大投资，推动可再生能源的研发和应用，实现经济的绿色转型。

无论是在国内还是国际事务中，美国都将始终遵循公平、正义、平等、合作的原则，坚持共赢的合作方式。

我们将尊重他国的主权和独立，尊重各种文化和社会制度的多样性。

同时，我们希望其他国家也能以同样的方式对待我们，共同构建和谐稳定的国际秩序。

最后，我相信，只要我们携起手来，共同努力，我们能够创造一个更加美好的世界。

让我们携手共进，为人类的和平、进步和繁荣而努力奋斗！感谢大家！。

早期美国总统竞选演讲稿

大家好！今天，我站在这里，满怀激情地向大家宣布，我愿意为美国的未来，为我们的自由、民主和繁荣，竞选美国总统。

我是托马斯·杰斐逊，一个热爱这片土地，关心人民福祉的美国人。

首先，我要感谢各位同胞们对我的信任和支持。

在这漫长的竞选路上，我深知责任重大，但我坚信，只要我们团结一心，共同努力，就一定能够战胜一切困难，实现我们的梦想。

回顾美国的历史，我们有过辉煌，也有过挫折。

从独立战争到南北战争，从经济大萧条到二战胜利，我们一路走来，付出了巨大的代价，但也积累了宝贵的经验。

如今，我们正站在一个新的历史起点上，面临着前所未有的挑战。

为了我们的子孙后代，为了美国的未来，我们必须勇敢地面对这些挑战，坚定地走下去。

在此，我想向大家阐述一下我的竞选纲领，以及我为美国制定的未来蓝图。

一、振兴经济，改善民生经济是国家发展的基石，民生是国家的根本。

近年来，我国经济取得了长足的发展，但同时也暴露出一些问题，如贫富差距扩大、环境污染严重等。

为了解决这些问题，我将采取以下措施：1. 加大对教育的投入，提高全民素质，培养更多优秀人才。

2. 优化产业结构，推动科技创新，提高我国经济的核心竞争力。

3. 实施积极的财政政策和稳健的货币政策，稳定经济增长。

4. 加强社会保障体系建设，提高低收入群体的生活水平。

5. 强化环境保护，实施绿色发展战略，建设美丽中国。

二、捍卫自由，维护民主自由和民主是美国的核心价值观，也是我们为之奋斗的目标。

为了捍卫这些价值观，我将：1. 严格执法，维护社会公平正义，保障公民的合法权益。

2. 加强法治建设，推进司法改革，提高司法公信力。

3. 保障言论自由，尊重媒体监督，促进社会舆论健康发展。

4. 坚决反对任何形式的腐败，保持政府廉洁高效。

三、强化国防，维护国家安全国家安全是国家的生命线，我们要始终保持高度警惕。

为此，我将：1. 加强军队建设，提高军队战斗力，确保国家主权和领土完整。

2. 坚决维护国家利益，积极参与国际事务，维护世界和平。

美国特朗普的发言稿英文

美国特朗普的发言稿英文Ladies and gentlemen,It is an honor to stand before you today and address the great people of the United States. As your President, I am committed to making America strong, prosperous, and secure.First and foremost, let me assure you that we are taking bold steps to revitalize our economy. Through tax cuts, deregulation, and renegotiating trade deals, we are unleashing the power of American innovation and entrepreneurship. Our economy is booming, with record-low unemployment and soaring stock markets. We are putting America first and creating jobs for our hardworking citizens.Additionally, we are prioritizing the security of our Nation. We have made significant investments in our military, ensuring that our armed forces are the strongest in the world. We are providing them with the resources they need to protect our borders, combat terrorism, and defend our interests abroad. Furthermore, we are working tirelessly to secure our southern border to curb illegal immigration and protect American jobs.Furthermore, our administration is committed to ensuring that every American has access to quality healthcare. We are working towards dismantling the Affordable Care Act, which has proved to be burdensome and unaffordable for Americans. We are dedicated to providing better alternatives that empower individuals and allow for more choice and affordability.In addition to these domestic issues, we are actively engaging in the global arena. We are renegotiating trade agreements to ensure fair and reciprocal trade with our partners. We are also holding our allies accountable for their contributions to our collective security. America will no longer be taken advantage of, as we stand strong and defend our interests on the world stage.Under our leadership, we have made significant strides towards peace and stability. We have successfully brokered historic agreements in the Middle East, bringing nations together and promoting peaceful coexistence. We will continue to prioritize diplomacy and work towards resolving conflicts worldwide.In conclusion, the United States under my administration is experiencing a renaissance. We are restoring American greatness and building a brighter future for all. Together, we will make America even greater than ever before. Thank you, and may God bless the United States of America.。

美国总统大选辩论原文之欧阳育创编

2012年美国总统大选电视辩论原文__BY crazyboyJIM LEHRER: Good evening from the Magness Arena at the University of Denver in Denver, Colorado. I'm Jim Lehrer of the PBS NewsHour, and I welcome you to the first of the 2012 presidential debates between President Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee.This debate and the next three —two presidential, one vice- presidential —are sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.Tonight's 90 minutes will be about domestic issues, and will follow a format designed by the commission. There will be six roughly 15-minute segments, with two-minute answers for the first question, then open discussion for the remainder of each segment.Thousands of people offered suggestions on segment subjects of questions via the Internet and other means, but I made the final selections, and for the record, they were notsubmitted for approval to the commission or the candidates. The segments, as I announced in advance, will be three on the economy and one each on health care, the role of government, and governing, with an emphasis throughout on differences, specifics and choices. Both candidates will also have two-minute closing statements.The audience here in the hall has promised to remain silent. No cheers, applause, boos, hisses —among other noisy distracting things — so we may all concentrate on what the candidates have to say. There is a noise exception right now, though, as we welcome President Obama and Governor Romney. (Cheers, applause.)Gentlemen, welcome to you both.Let's start the economy, segment one. And let's begin with jobs. What are the major differences between the two of you about how you would go about creating new jobs? You have two minutes — each of you have two minutes to start. The coin toss has determined, Mr. President, you go first. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Well, thank you very much, Jim, for this opportunity. I want to thank Governor Romney and the University of Denver for your hospitality.There are a lot of points that I want to make tonight, but themost important one is that 20 years ago I became the luckiest man on earth because Michelle Obama agreed to marry me. (Laughter.) And so I just want to wish, Sweetie, you happy anniversary and let you know that a year from now, we will not be celebrating it in front of 40 million people. (Laughter.)You know, four years ago we went through the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Millions of jobs were lost. The auto industry was on the brink of collapse. The financial system had frozen up. And because of the resilience and the determination of the American people, we've begun to fight our way back.Over the last 30 months, we've seen 5 million jobs in the private sector created. The auto industry has come roaring back and housing has begun to rise. But we all know that we've still got a lot of work to do. And so the question here tonight is not where we've been but where we're going. Governor Romney has a perspective that says if we cut taxes, skewed towards the wealthy, and roll back regulations that we'll be better off.I've got a different view. I think we've got to invest in education and training. I think it's important for us todevelop new sources of energy here in America, that we change our tax code to make sure that we're helping small businesses and companies that are investing here in the United States, that we take some of the money that we're saving as we wind down two wars to rebuild America and that we reduce our deficit in a balanced way that allows us to make these critical investments.Now, it ultimately is going to be up to the voters, to you, which path we should take. Are we going to double down on the top-down economic policies that helped to get us into this mess, or do we embrace a new economic patriotism that says, America does best when the middle class does best? And I'm looking forward to having that debate.MR. LEHRER: Governor Romney, two minutes.MR. ROMNEY: Thank you, Jim. It's an honor to be here with you, and I appreciate the chance to be with the president. I am pleased to be at the University of Denver, appreciate their welcome and also the presidential commission on these debates.And congratulations to you, Mr. President, on your anniversary. I'm sure this was the most romantic place youcould imagine here —here with me, so I —(laughter) —congratulations.This is obviously a very tender topic. I've had the occasion over the last couple of years of meeting people across the country. I was in Dayton, Ohio, and a woman grabbed my arm, and she said, I've been out of work since May. Can you help me?Ann yesterday was a rally in Denver, and a woman came up to her with a baby in her arms and said, Ann, my husband has had four jobs in three years, part-time jobs. He's lost his most recent job, and we've now just lost our home. Can you help us?And the answer is yes, we can help, but it's going to take a different path, not the one we've been on, not the one the president describes as a top-down, cut taxes for the rich. That's not what I'm going to do.My plan has five basic parts. One, get us energy independent, North American energy independent. That creates about four million jobs. Number two, open up more trade, particularly in Latin America; crack down on China if and when they cheat. Number three, make sure our people have the skills they need to succeed and the best schools inthe world. We're far away from that now. Number four, get us to a balanced budget. Number five, champion small business.It's small business that creates the jobs in America. And over the last four years small-business people have decided that America may not be the place to open a new business, because new business startups are down to a 30-year low. I know what it takes to get small business growing again, to hire people.Now, I'm concerned that the path that we're on has just been unsuccessful. The president has a view very similar to the view he had when he ran four years ago, that a bigger government, spending more, taxing more, regulating more — if you will, trickle-down government would work. That's not the right answer for America. I'll restore the vitality that gets America working again.Thank you.MR. LEHRER: Mr. President, please respond directly to what the governor just said about trickle-down —his trickle-down approach. He's — as he said yours is.PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, let me talk specifically about what I think we need to do.First, we've got to improve our education system. And we've made enormous progress drawing on ideas both from Democrats and Republicans that are already starting to show gains in some of the toughest-to- deal-with schools. We've got a program called Race to the Top that has prompted reforms in 46 states around the country, raising standards, improving how we train teachers. So now I want to hire another hundred thousand new math and science teachers and create 2 million more slots in our community colleges so that people can get trained for the jobs that are out there right now. And I want to make sure that we keep tuition low for our young people.When it comes to our tax code, Governor Romney and I both agree that our corporate tax rate is too high. So I want to lower it, particularly for manufacturing, taking it down to 25 percent. But I also want to close those loopholes that are giving incentives for companies that are shipping jobs overseas. I want to provide tax breaks for companies that are investing here in the United States.On energy, Governor Romney and I, we both agree that we've got to boost American energy production.And oil and natural gas production are higher than they'vebeen in years. But I also believe that we've got to look at the energy source of the future, like wind and solar and biofuels, and make those investments.So, all of this is possible. Now, in order for us to do it, we do have to close our deficit, and one of the things I'm sure we'll be discussing tonight is, how do we deal with our tax code, and how do we make sure that we are reducing spending in a responsible way, but also how do we have enough revenue to make those investments? And this is where there's a difference because Governor Romney's central economic plan calls for a $5 trillion tax cut, on top of the extension of the Bush tax cuts, so that's another $2 trillion, and $2 trillion in additional military spending that the military hasn't asked for. That's $8 trillion. How we pay for that, reduce the deficit and make the investments that we need to make without dumping those costs on the middle-class Americans I think is one of the central questions of this campaign.MR. LEHRER: Both of you have spoken about a lot of different things, and we're going to try to get through them in as specific a way as we possibly can.But first, Governor Romney, do you have a question thatyou'd like to ask the president directly about something he just said?MR. ROMNEY: Well, sure. I'd like to clear up the record and go through it piece by piece. First of all, I don't have a $5 trillion tax cut. I don't have a tax cut of a scale that you're talking about. My view is that we ought to provide tax relief to people in the middle class. But I'm not going to reduce the share of taxes paid by high- income people. High-income people are doing just fine in this economy. They'll do fine whether you're president or I am.The people who are having the hard time right now are middle- income Americans. Under the president's policies, middle-income Americans have been buried. They're —they're just being crushed. Middle-income Americans have seen their income come down by $4,300. This is a — this is a tax in and of itself. I'll call it the economy tax. It's been crushing. The same time, gasoline prices have doubled under the president, electric rates are up, food prices are up, health care costs have gone up by $2,500 a family.Middle-income families are being crushed. And so the question is how to get them going again, and I've described it. It's energy and trade, the right kind of training programs,balancing our budget and helping small business. Those are the — the cornerstones of my plan.But the president mentioned a couple of other ideas, and I'll just note: first, education. I agree, education is key, particularly the future of our economy. But our training programs right now, we got 47 of them housed in the federal government, reporting to eight different agencies. Overhead is overwhelming. We got to get those dollars back to the states and go to the workers so they can create their own pathways to getting the training they need for jobs that will really help them.The second area: taxation. We agree; we ought to bring the tax rates down, and I do, both for corporations and for individuals. But in order for us not to lose revenue, have the government run out of money, I also lower deductions and credits and exemptions so that we keep taking in the same money when you also account for growth.The third area: energy. Energy is critical, and the president pointed out correctly that production of oil and gas in the U.S. is up. But not due to his policies. In spite of his policies. Mr. President, all of the increase in natural gas and oil has happened on private land, not on government land. Ongovernment land, your administration has cut the number of permits and license in half. If I'm president, I'll double them. And also get the — the oil from offshore and Alaska. And I'll bring that pipeline in from Canada.And by the way, I like coal. I'm going to make sure we continue to burn clean coal. People in the coal industry feel like it's getting crushed by your policies. I want to get America and North America energy independent, so we can create those jobs.And finally, with regards to that tax cut, look, I'm not looking to cut massive taxes and to reduce the —the revenues going to the government. My — my number one principle is there'll be no tax cut that adds to the deficit.I want to underline that — no tax cut that adds to the deficit. But I do want to reduce the burden being paid by middle-income Americans. And I — and to do that that also means that I cannot reduce the burden paid by high-income Americans. So any — any language to the contrary is simply not accurate.MR. LEHRER: Mr. President.PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, I think —let's talk about taxes because I think it's instructive. Now, four years ago when Istood on this stage I said that I would cut taxes for middle-class families. And that's exactly what I did. We cut taxes for middle-class families by about $3,600. And the reason is because I believe we do best when the middle class is doing well.And by giving them those tax cuts, they had a little more money in their pocket and so maybe they can buy a new car. They are certainly in a better position to weather the extraordinary recession that we went through. They can buy a computer for their kid who's going off to college, which means they're spending more money, businesses have more customers, businesses make more profits and then hire more workers.Now, Governor Romney's proposal that he has been promoting for 18 months calls for a $5 trillion tax cut on top of $2 trillion of additional spending for our military. And he is saying that he is going to pay for it by closing loopholes and deductions. The problem is that he's been asked a —over a hundred times how you would close those deductions and loopholes and he hasn't been able to identify them.But I'm going to make an important point here, Jim.MR. LEHRER: All right.PRESIDENT OBAMA: When you add up all the loopholes and deductions that upper income individuals can —are currently taking advantage of — if you take those all away — you don't come close to paying for $5 trillion in tax cuts and $2 trillion in additional military spending. And that's why independent studies looking at this said the only way to meet Governor Romney's pledge of not reducing the deficit — or — or — or not adding to the deficit, is by burdening middle-class families.The average middle-class family with children would pay about $2,000 more. Now, that's not my analysis; that's the analysis of economists who have looked at this. And — and that kind of top — top-down economics, where folks at the top are doing well so the average person making 3 million bucks is getting a $250,000 tax break while middle- class families are burdened further, that's not what I believe is a recipe for economic growth.MR. LEHRER: All right. What is the difference?MR. ROMNEY: Well —MR. LEHRER: Let's just stay on taxes for —MR. ROMNEY: But I — but I — right, right.MR. LEHRER: OK. Yeah, just — let's just stay on taxes for a moment.MR. ROMNEY: Yeah. Well, but — but —MR. LEHRER: What is the difference?MR. ROMNEY: —virtually every —virtually everything he just said about my tax plan is inaccurate.MR. LEHRER: All right, go —MR. ROMNEY: So —so if —if the tax plan he described were a tax plan I was asked to support, I'd say absolutely not. I'm not looking for a $5 trillion tax cut. What I've said is I won't put in place a tax cut that adds to the deficit. That's part one. So there's no economist can say Mitt Romney's tax plan adds 5 trillion (dollars) if I say I will not add to the deficit with my tax plan.Number two, I will not reduce the share paid by high-income individuals. I —I know that you and your running mate keep saying that, and I know it's a popular things to say with a lot of people, but it's just not the case. Look, I got five boys. I'm used to people saying something that's not always true, but just keep on repeating it and ultimately hoping I'll believe it —(scattered laughter) —but that —that is not the case, all right? I will not reduce the taxes paidby high-income Americans.And number three, I will not, under any circumstances, raise taxes on middle-income families. I will lower taxes on middle-income families. Now, you cite a study. There are six other studies that looked at the study you describe and say it's completely wrong. I saw a study that came out today that said you're going to raise taxes by 3(,000 dollars) to $4,000 on — on middle-income families. There are all these studies out there.But let's get to the bottom line. That is, I want to bring down rates. I want to bring down the rates down, at the same time lower deductions and exemptions and credits and so forth so we keep getting the revenue we need.And you think, well, then why lower the rates? And the reason is because small business pays that individual rate. Fifty-four percent of America's workers work in businesses that are taxed not at the corporate tax rate but at the individual tax rate. And if we lower that rate, they will be able to hire more people.For me, this is about jobs.MR. LEHRER: All right. That's where we started.MR. ROMNEY: This is about getting jobs for the Americanpeople.MR. LEHRER: Yeah.Do you challenge what the governor just said about his own plan?PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, for 18 months he's been running on this tax plan. And now, five weeks before the election, he's saying that his big, bold idea is "never mind." And the fact is that if you are lowering the rates the way you describe, Governor, then it is not possible to come up with enough deductions and loopholes that only affect high-income individuals to avoid either raising the deficit or burdening the middle class. It's — it's math. It's arithmetic. Now, Governor Romney and I do share a deep interest in encouraging small-business growth. So at the same time that my tax plan has already lowered taxes for 98 percent of families, I also lowered taxes for small businesses 18 times. And what I want to do is continue the tax rates — the tax cuts that we put into place for small businesses and families. But I have said that for incomes over $250,000 a year that we should go back to the rates that we had when Bill Clinton was president, when we created 23 million new jobs, went from deficit to surplus and created a whole lot ofmillionaires to boot.And the reason this is important is because by doing that, we can not only reduce the deficit, we can not only encourage job growth through small businesses, but we're also able to make the investments that are necessary in education or in energy.And we do have a difference, though, when it comes to definitions of small business. Now, under — under my plan, 97 percent of small businesses would not see their income taxes go up. Governor Romney says, well, those top 3 percent, they're the job creators. They'd be burdened.But under Governor Romney's definition, there are a whole bunch of millionaires and billionaires who are small businesses. Donald Trump is a small business. And I know Donald Trump doesn't like to think of himself as small anything, but — but that's how you define small businesses if you're getting business income. And that kind of approach, I believe, will not grow our economy because the only way to pay for it without either burdening the middle class or blowing up our deficit is to make drastic cuts in things like education, making sure that we are continuing to invest in basic science and research, all the things that are helpingAmerica grow. And I think that would be a mistake.MR. LEHRER: All right.MR. ROMNEY: Jim, let me just come back on that — on that point.MR. LEHRER: Just for the — just for the record —MR. ROMNEY: These small businesses we're talking about —MR. LEHRER: Excuse me. Just so everybody understands —MR. ROMNEY: Yeah.MR. LEHRER: — we're way over our first 15 minutes.MR. ROMNEY: It's fun, isn't it?MR. LEHRER: It's OK. It's great.PRESIDENT OBAMA: That's OK.MR. LEHRER: No problem. No, you don't have — you don't have a problem, I don't have a problem, because we're still on the economy, but we're going to come back to taxes and we're going to move on to the deficit and a lot of other things, too.OK, but go ahead, sir.MR. ROMNEY: You bet.Well, President, you're —Mr. President, you're absolutely right, which is that with regards to 97 percent of the businesses are not — not taxed at the 35 percent tax rate,they're taxed at a lower rate. But those businesses that are in the last 3 percent of businesses happen to employ half —half —of all of the people who work in small business. Those are the businesses that employ one quarter of all the workers in America. And your plan is take their tax rate from 35 percent to 40 percent.Now, I talked to a guy who has a very small business. He's in the electronics business in —in St. Louis. He has four employees.He said he and his son calculated how much they pay in taxes. Federal income tax, federal payroll tax, state income tax, state sales tax, state property tax, gasoline tax —it added up to well over 50 percent of what they earned.And your plan is to take the tax rate on successful small businesses from 35 percent to 40 percent. The National Federation of Independent Businesses has said that will cost 700,000 jobs. I don't want to cost jobs. My priority is jobs. And so what I do is I bring down the tax rates, lower deductions and exemptions —the same idea behind Bowles-Simpson, by the way. Get the rates down, lower deductions and exemptions to create more jobs, because there's nothing better for getting us to a balanced budgetthan having more people working, earning more money, paying —(chuckles) —more taxes. That's by far the most effective and efficient way to get this budget balanced. PRESIDENT OBAMA: Jim, I — you may want to move on to another topic, but I would just say this to the American people. If you believe that we can cut taxes by $5 trillion and add $2 trillion in additional spending that the military is not asking for —$7 trillion, just to give you a sense, over 10 years that's more than our entire defense budget —and you think that by closing loopholes and deductions for the well-to-do, somehow you will not end up picking up the tab, then Governor Romney's plan may work for you.But I think math, common sense and our history shows us that's not a recipe for job growth.Look, we've tried this —we've tried both approaches. The approach that Governor Romney's talking about is the same sales pitch that was made in 2001 and 2003. And we ended up with the slowest job growth in 50 years. We ended up moving from surplus to deficits. And it all culminated in the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.Bill Clinton tried the approach that I'm talking about. We created 23 million new jobs. We went from deficit to surplus,and businesses did very well.So in some ways, we've got some data on which approach is more likely to create jobs and opportunity for Americans, and I believe that the economy works best when middle-class families are getting tax breaks so that they've got some money in their pockets and those of us who have done extraordinarily well because of this magnificent country that we live in, that we can afford to do a little bit more to make sure we're not blowing up the deficit.MR. LEHRER: OK. (Inaudible) —MR. ROMNEY: Jim, the president began this segment, so I think I get the last word, so I'm going to take it. All right? (Chuckles.)MR. LEHRER: Well, you're going to get the first word in the next segment.MR. ROMNEY: Well, but — but he gets the first word of that segment. I get the last word of that segment, I hope. Let me just make this comment.PRESIDENT OBAMA: (Chuckles.) He can — you can have it. He can —MR. ROMNEY: First of all —MR. LEHRER: That's not how it works.MR. ROMNEY: Let me —let me repeat —let me repeat what I said — (inaudible). I'm not in favor of a $5 trillion tax cut. That's not my plan. My plan is not to put in place any tax cut that will add to the deficit. That's point one. So you may keep referring to it as a $5 trillion tax cut, but that's not my plan.PRESIDENT OBAMA: OK.MR. ROMNEY: Number two, let's look at history. My plan is not like anything that's been tried before. My plan is to bring down rates but also bring down deductions and exemptions and credits at the same time so the revenue stays in, but that we bring down rates to get more people working. My priority is putting people back to work in America. They're suffering in this country. And we talk about evidence — look at the evidence of the last four years. It's absolutely extraordinary. We've got 23 million people out of work or stop looking for work in this country.MR. LEHRER: All right.MR. ROMNEY: It's just —it's —we've got —we got —when the president took office, 32 million people on food stamps; 47 million on food stamps today. Economic growth this year slower than last year, and last year slower than theyear before. Going forward with the status quo is not going to cut it for the American people who are struggling today. MR. LEHRER: All right. Let's talk —we're still on the economy. This is, theoretically now, a second segment still on the economy, and specifically on what do about the federal deficit, the federal debt. And the question —you each have two minutes on this —and, Governor Romney you go first because the president went first on segment one. And the question is this: What are the differences between the two of you as to how you would go about tackling the deficit problem in this country?MR. ROMNEY: Well, good. I'm glad you raised that. And it's a — it's a critical issue. I think it's not just an economic issue.I think it's a moral issue. I think it's, frankly, not moral for my generation to keep spending massively more than we take in, knowing those burdens are going to be passed on to the next generation. And they're going to be paying the interest and the principle all their lives. And the amount of debt we're adding, at a trillion a year, is simply not moral.So how do we deal with it? Well, mathematically there are — there are three ways that you can cut a deficit. One, of course, is to raise taxes. Number two is to cut spending. Andnumber three is to grow the economy because if more people work in a growing economy they're paying taxes and you can get the job done that way.The presidents would —president would prefer raising taxes. I understand. The problem with raising taxes is that it slows down the rate of growth and you could never quite get the job done. I want to lower spending and encourage economic growth at the same time.What things would I cut from spending? Well, first of all, I will eliminate all programs by this test — if they don't pass it: Is the program so critical it's worth borrowing money from China to pay for it? And if not, I'll get rid of it. "Obamacare" is on my list. I apologize, Mr. President. I use that term with all respect.PRESIDENT OBAMA: I like it.MR. ROMNEY: Good. OK, good. (Laughter.) So I'll get rid of that. I'm sorry, Jim. I'm going to stop the subsidy to PBS. I'm going to stop other things. I like PBS. I love Big Bird. I actually like you too. But I'm not going to — I'm not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for it. That's number one.Number two, I'll take programs that are currently good。