桥梁工程外文文献
连续梁桥文献综述范文模板
连续梁桥文献综述范文模板(中英文实用版)English:The continuous beam bridge has long been a popular choice for spans over water, highways, and railways due to its ability to distribute loads effectively and provide a smooth, uninterrupted surface for traffic.Over the years, numerous studies have been conducted to improve the design, construction, and maintenance of these bridges.This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research on continuous beam bridges.中文：连续梁桥因其能有效分配荷载并提供光滑无阻的行车表面，长期以来一直是水面、高速公路和铁路上的跨度选择。
多年来，许多研究已经进行了以改善这些桥梁的设计、建造和维护。
本文献综述旨在全面介绍关于连续梁桥现有研究的概述。
English:One of the earliest studies on continuous beam bridges was conducted by Castigliano in 1854, which focused on the calculation of deflections and stresses in simply supported beams.Since then, many researchers have contributed to the development of various theories and methods for the analysis of continuous beam bridges.Some of the key theories include the principles of superposition, moment distribution,and flexibility methods.中文：最早对连续梁桥的研究之一是由Castigliano在1854年进行的，它关注的是简支梁的挠度和应力计算。
外文翻译---桥梁工程和桥梁美学
附录3 外文文献翻译BRIDGE ENGINEERING AND AESTHETICS Evolvement of bridge Engineering,brief reviewAmong the early documented reviews of construction materials and structure types are the books of Marcus Vitruvios Pollio in the first century B.C.The basic principles of statics were developed by the Greeks , and were exemplified in works and applications by Leonardo da Vinci,Cardeno,and Galileo.In the fifteenth and sixteenth century, engineers seemed to be unaware of this record , and relied solely on experience and tradition for building bridges and aqueducts .The state of the art changed rapidly toward the end of the seventeenth century when Leibnitz, Newton, and Bernoulli introduced mathematical formulations. Published works by Lahire (1695)and Belidor (1792) about the theoretical analysis of structures provided the basis in the field of mechanics of materials .Kuzmanovic(1977) focuses on stone and wood as the first bridge-building materials. Iron was introduced during the transitional period from wood tosteel .According to recent records , concrete was used in France as early as 1840 for a bridge 39 feet (12 m) long to span the GaroyneCanal at Grisoles, but reinforced concrete was not introduced in bridge construction until the beginning of this century . Prestressed concrete was first used in 1927.Stone bridges of the arch type (integrated superstructure and substructure) were constructed in Rome and other European cities in the middle ages . These arches were half-circular , with flat arches beginning to dominate bridge work during the Renaissance period. This concept was markedly improved at the end of the eighteenth century and found structurally adequate to accommodate future railroad loads . In terms of analysis and use of materials , stone bridges have not changed much ,but the theoretical treatment was improved by introducing the pressure-line concept in the early 1670s(Lahire, 1695) . The arch theory was documented in model tests where typical failure modes were considered (Frezier,1739).Culmann(1851) introduced the elastic center method for fixed-end arches, and showed that three redundantparameters can be found by the use of three equations of coMPatibility.Wooden trusses were used in bridges during the sixteenth century when Palladio built triangular frames for bridge spans 10 feet long . This effort also focused on the three basic principles og bridge design : convenience(serviceability) ,appearance , and endurance(strength) . several timber truss bridges were constructed in western Europe beginning in the 1750s with spans up to 200 feet (61m) supported on stone substructures .Significant progress was possible in the United States and Russia during the nineteenth century ,prompted by the need to cross major rivers and by an abundance of suitable timber . Favorable economic considerations included initial low cost and fast construction .The transition from wooden bridges to steel types probably did not begin until about 1840 ,although the first documented use of iron in bridges was the chain bridge built in 1734 across the OderRiver in Prussia . The first truss completely made of iron was in 1840 in the United States , followed by England in 1845 , Germany in 1853 , and Russia in 1857 . In 1840 , the first iron arch truss bridge was built across the Erie Canal at Utica .The Impetus of AnalysisThe theory of structuresThe theory of structures ,developed mainly in the ninetheenth century,focused on truss analysis, with the first book on bridges written in 1811. The Warren triangular truss was introduced in 1846 , supplemented by a method for calculating the correcet forces .I-beams fabricated from plates became popular in England and were used in short-span bridges.In 1866, Culmann explained the principles of cantilever truss bridges, and one year later the first cantilever bridge was built across the MainRiver in Hassfurt, Germany, with a center span of 425 feet (130m) . The first cantilever bridge in the United States was built in 1875 across the Kentucky River.A most impressive railway cantilever bridge in the nineteenth century was the First of Forth bridge , built between 1883 and 1893 , with span magnitudes of 1711 feet (521.5m).At about the same time , structural steel was introduced as a prime material inbridge work , although its quality was often poor . Several early examples are the Eads bridge in St.Louis ; the Brooklyn bridge in New York ; and the Glasgow bridge in Missouri , all completed between 1874 and 1883.Among the analytical and design progress to be mentioned are the contributions of Maxwell , particularly for certain statically indeterminate trusses ; the books by Cremona (1872) on graphical statics; the force method redefined by Mohr; and the works by Clapeyron who introduced the three-moment equations.The Impetus of New MaterialsSince the beginning of the twentieth century , concrete has taken its place as one of the most useful and important structural materials . Because of the coMParative ease with which it can be molded into any desired shape , its structural uses are almost unlimited . Wherever Portland cement and suitable aggregates are available , it can replace other materials for certain types of structures, such as bridge substructure and foundation elements .In addition , the introduction of reinforced concrete in multispan frames at the beginning of this century imposed new analytical requirements . Structures of a high order of redundancy could not be analyzed with the classical methods of the nineteenth century .The importance of joint rotation was already demonstrated by Manderla (1880) and Bendixen (1914) , who developed relationships between joint moments and angular rotations from which the unknown moments can beobtained ,the so called slope-deflection method .More simplifications in frame analysis were made possible by the work of Calisev (1923) , who used successive approximations to reduce the system of equations to one simple expression for each iteration step . This approach was further refined and integrated by Cross (1930) in what is known as the method of moment distribution .One of the most import important recent developments in the area of analytical procedures is the extension of design to cover the elastic-plastic range , also known as load factor or ultimate design. Plastic analysis was introduced with some practical observations by Tresca (1846) ; and was formulated by Saint-Venant (1870) , The concept of plasticity attracted researchers and engineers after World War Ⅰ , mainly inGermany , with the center of activity shifting to England and the United States after World War Ⅱ.The probabilistic approach is a new design concept that is expected to replace the classical deterministic methodology.A main step forward was the 1969 addition of the Federal Highway Adiministration (FHWA)”Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Members “ that covers strength and serviceability at ultimate design . This was prepared for use in conjunction with the 1969 American Association of State Highway Offficials (AASHO) Standard Specification, and was presented in a format that is readily adaptable to the development of ultimate design specifications .According to this document , the proportioning of reinforced concrete members ( including columns ) may be limited by various stages of behavior : elastic , cracked , and ultimate . Design axial loads , or design shears . Structural capacity is the reaction phase , and all calculated modified strength values derived from theoretical strengths are the capacity values , such as moment capacity ,axial load capacity ,or shear capacity .At serviceability states , investigations may also be necessary for deflections , maximum crack width , and fatigue .Bridge TypesA notable bridge type is the suspension bridge , with the first example built in the United States in 1796. Problems of dynamic stability were investigated after the Tacoma bridge collapse , and this work led to significant theoretical contributions Steinman ( 1929 ) summarizes about 250 suspension bridges built throughout the world between 1741 and 1928 .With the introduction of the interstate system and the need to provide structures at grade separations , certain bridge types have taken a strong place in bridge practice. These include concrete superstructures (slab ,T-beams,concrete box girders ), steel beam and plate girders , steel box girders , composite construction , orthotropic plates , segmental construction , curved girders ,and cable-stayed bridges . Prefabricated members are given serious consideration , while interest in box sections remains strong .Bridge Appearance and AestheticsGrimm ( 1975 ) documents the first recorded legislative effort to control the appearance of the built environment . This occurred in 1647 when the Council of New Amsterdam appointed three officials . In 1954 , the Supreme Court of the United States held that it is within the power of the legislature to determine that communities should be attractive as well as healthy , spacious as well as clean , and balanced as well as patrolled . The Environmental Policy Act of 1969 directs all agencies of the federal government to identify and develop methods and procedures to ensure that presently unquantified environmental amentities and values are given appropriate consideration in decision making along with economic and technical aspects .Although in many civil engineering works aesthetics has been practiced almost intuitively , particularly in the past , bridge engineers have not ignored or neglected the aesthetic disciplines .Recent research on the subject appears to lead to a rationalized aesthetic design methodology (Grimm and Preiser , 1976 ) .Work has been done on the aesthetics of color ,light ,texture , shape , and proportions , as well as other perceptual modalities , and this direction is both theoretically and empirically oriented .Aesthetic control mechanisms are commonly integrated into the land-use regulations and design standards . In addition to concern for aesthetics at the state level , federal concern focuses also on the effects of man-constructed environment on human life , with guidelines and criteria directed toward improving quality and appearance in the design process . Good potential for the upgrading of aesthetic quality in bridge superstructures and substructures can be seen in the evaluation structure types aimed at improving overall appearance .LOADS AND LOADING GROUPSThe loads to be considered in the design of substructures and bridge foundations include loads and forces transmitted from the superstructure, and those acting directly on the substructure and foundation .AASHTO loads . Section 3 of AASHTO specifications summarizes the loads and forces to be considered in the design of bridges (superstructure and substructure ) .Briefly , these are dead load ,live load , iMPact or dynamic effect of live load , wind load , and other forces such as longitudinal forces , centrifugal force ,thermal forces , earth pressure , buoyancy , shrinkage and long term creep , rib shortening , erection stresses , ice and current pressure , collision force , and earthquake stresses .Besides these conventional loads that are generally quantified , AASHTO also recognizes indirect load effects such as friction at expansion bearings and stresses associated with differential settlement of bridge components .The LRFD specifications divide loads into two distinct categories : permanent and transient .Permanent loadsDead Load : this includes the weight DC of all bridge components , appurtenances and utilities, wearing surface DW and future overlays , and earth fill EV. Both AASHTO and LRFD specifications give tables summarizing the unit weights of materials commonly used in bridge work .Transient LoadsVehicular Live Load (LL)Vehicle loading for short-span bridges :considerable effort has been made in the United States and Canada to develop a live load model that can represent the highway loading more realistically than the H or the HS AASHTO models . The current AASHTO model is still the applicable loading.桥梁工程和桥梁美学桥梁工程的发展概况早在公元前1世纪，Marcus Vitrucios Pollio 的著作中就有关于建筑材料和结构类型的记载和评述。
道路路桥工程中英文对照外文翻译文献
道路路桥工程中英文对照外文翻译文献Asphalt Mixtures: ns。
Theory。
and Principles1.nsXXX industry。
XXX。
The most common n of asphalt is in the n of XXX "flexible" XXX them from those made with Portland cement。
XXX2.XXXXXX the use of aggregates。
XXX。
sand。
or gravel。
and a binder。
XXX for the pavement。
XXX。
The quality of the asphalt XXX to the performance of the pavement。
as it must be able to XXX。
3.PrinciplesXXX。
with each layer XXX layers typically include a subgrade。
a sub-base。
a base course。
and a surface course。
The subgrade is the natural soil or rock upon which the pavement is built。
while the sub-base and base courses provide nal support for the pavement。
The surface course is the layer that comes into direct contact with traffic and is XXX。
In n。
the use of XXX.The n of flexible pavement can be subdivided into high and low types。
桥梁工程毕业设计外文翻译(箱梁)
西南交通大学本科毕业设计(论文）外文资料翻译年级:学号：姓名：专业:指导老师:2013年 6 月外文资料原文：13Box girders13.1 GeneralThe box girder is the most flexible bridge deck form。
It can cover a range of spans from25 m up to the largest non—suspended concrete decks built, of the order of 300 m。
Single box girders may also carry decks up to 30 m wide。
For the longer span beams, beyond about 50 m，they are practically the only feasible deck section. For the shorter spans they are in competition with most of the other deck types discussed in this book.The advantages of the box form are principally its high structural efficiency （5.4），which minimises the prestress force required to resist a given bending moment，and its great torsional strength with the capacity this gives to re—centre eccentric live loads，minimising the prestress required to carry them。
The box form lends itself to many of the highly productive methods of bridge construction that have been progressively refined over the last 50 years，such as precast segmental construction with or without epoxy resin in the joints，balanced cantilever erection either cast in—situ or coupled with precast segmental construction, and incremental launching （Chapter 15)。
建筑土木工程外文翻译外文文献英文文献混凝土桥梁
建筑土木工程外文翻译外文文献英文文献混凝土桥梁Concrete BridgesConcrete is the most-used construction material for bridges in the United States, and indeed in the world. The application of prestressing to bridges has grown rapidly and steadily, beginning in 1949 with high-strength steel wires in the Walnut Lane Bridge in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. According to the Federal Highway Administration’s 1994 National Bridge Inventory data, from 1950 to the early 1990s, prestressed concrete bridges have gone from being virtually nonexistent to representing over 50 percent of all bridges built in the United States.Prestressing has also played an important role in extending the span capability of concrete bridges. By the late 1990s, spliced-girder spans reached a record 100 m (330 ft). Construction of segmental concrete bridges began in the United States in 1974.Curretly, close to 200 segmental concrete bridges have been built or are under construction, with spans up to 240 m (800 ft).Late in the 1970s, cable-stayed construction raised the bar for concrete bridges. By 1982, the Sunshine Skyway Bridge in Tampa, Florida, had set a new record for concrete bridges, with a main span of 365 m (1,200 ft). The next year, the Dames Point Bridge in Jacksonville, Florida, extended the record to 400 m (1,300 ft).HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONCRETECompressive StrengthFor many years the design of precast prestressed concrete girders was based on concrete compressive strengths of 34 to 41 MPa (5,000 to 6,000 psi). This strength level served the industrywell and provided the basis for establishing the prestressed concrete bridge industry in the United States. In the 1990s the industry began to utilize higher concrete compressive strengths in design, and at the start of the new millennium the industry is poised to accept the use of concrete compressive strengths up to 70 MPa (10,000 psi).For the future, the industry needs to seek ways to effectively utilize even higher concrete compressive strengths. The ready-mixed concrete industry has been producing concretes with compressive strengths in excess of 70 MPa for over 20 years. Several demonstration projects have illustrated that strengths above 70 MPa can be achieved for prestressed concrete girders. Barriers need to be removed to allow the greater use of these materials. At the same time, owners, designers, contractors, and fabricators need to be more receptive to the use of higher-compressive-strength concretes.DurabilityHigh-performance concrete (HPC) can be specified as high compressive strength (e.g., in prestressed girders) or as conventional compressive strength with improved durability (e.g., in cast-in-place bridge decks and substructures). There is a need to develop a better understanding of all the parameters that affect durability, such asresistance to chemical, electrochemical, and environmental mechanisms that attack the integrity of the material. Significant differences might occur in the long-term durability of adjacent twin structures constructed at the same time using identical materials. This reveals our lack of understanding and control of the parameters that affect durability. NEW MATERIALS Concrete design specifications have in the past focusedprimarily on the compressive strength. Concrete is slowly moving toward an engineered material whose direct performance can be altered by the designer. Material properties such as permeability, ductility, freeze-thaw resistance, durability, abrasion resistance, reactivity, and strength will be specified. The HPC initiative has gone a long way in promoting these specifications, but much more can be done. Additives, such a fibers or chemicals, can significantly alter the basic properties of concrete. Other new materials, such as fiber-reinforced polymer composites, nonmetallic reinforcement (glass fiber-reinforced and carbon fiber-reinforced plastic, etc.), new metallic reinforcements, or high-strength steel reinforcement can also be used to enhance the performance of what is considered to be a traditional material. Higher-strength reinforcement could be particularly useful when coupled with high-strength concrete. As our natural resources diminish, alternative aggregate sources (e.g., recycled aggregate) and further replacement of cementitious materials with recycled products are being examined. Highly reactive cements and reactive aggregates will be concerns of the past as new materials with long-term durability become commonplace.New materials will also find increasing demand in repair and retrofitting. As the bridge inventory continues to get older, increasing the usable life of structures will become critical. Some innovative materials, although not economical for complete bridges, will find their niche in retrofit and repair.OPTIMIZED SECTIONSIn early applications of prestressed concrete to bridges, designers developed their own ideas of the best girder sections. The result is that each contractor used slightly different girder shapes. It was too expensive to design custom girders for eachproject.As a result, representatives for the Bureau of Public Roads (now FHWA), the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) (now AASHTO), and the Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) began work to standardize bridge girder sections. The AASHTO-PCI standard girder sections Types I through IV were developed in the late 1950s and Types V and VI in the early 1960s. There is no doubt that standardization of girders has simplified design, has led to wider utilization of prestressed concrete for bridges, and, more importantly, has led to reduction in cost.With advancements in the technology of prestressed concrete design and construction, numerous states started to refine their designs and to develop their own standard sections. As a result, in the late 1970s, FHWA sponsored a study to evaluate existing standard girder sections and determine the most efficient girders. This study concluded that bulb-tees were the most efficient sections. These sections could lead to reduction in girder weights of up to 35 percent compared with the AASHTO Type VI and cost savings up to 17 percent compared with the AASHTO-PCI girders, for equal spancapability. On the basis of the FHWA study, PCI developed the PCI bulb-tee standard, which was endorsed by bridge engineers at the 1987 AASHTO annual meeting. Subsequently, the PCI bulb-tee cross section was adopted in several states. In addition, similar cross sections were developed and adopted in Florida, Nebraska, and the New England states. These cross sections are also cost-effective with high-strength concretes for span lengths up to about 60 m (200 ft).SPLICED GIRDERSSpliced concrete I-girder bridges are cost-effective for a spanrange of 35 to 90 m (120 to 300 ft). Other shapes besides I-girders include U, T, and rectangular girders, although the dominant shape in applications to date has been the I-girder, primarily because of its relatively low cost. A feature of spliced bridges is the flexibility they provide in selection of span length, number and locations of piers, segment lengths, and splice locations. Spliced girders have the ability to adapt to curved superstructure alignments by utilizing short segment lengths and accommodating the change in direction in the cast-in-place joints. Continuity in spliced girder bridges can be achieved through full-length posttensioning, conventional reinforcement in the deck, high-strength threaded bar splicing, or pretensioned strand splicing, although the great majority of applications utilize full-length posttensioning. The availability of concrete compressive strengths higher than the traditional 34 MPa (5,000 psi) significantly improves the economy of spliced girder designs, in which high flexural and shear stresses are concentrated near the piers. Development of standardized haunched girder pier segments is needed for efficiency in negative-moment zones. Currently, the segment shapes vary from a gradually thickening bottom flange to a curved haunch with constant-sized bottom flange and variable web depth.SEGMENTAL BRIDGESSegmental concrete bridges have become an established type of construction for highway and transit projects on constrained sites. Typical applications include transit systems over existing urban streets and highways, reconstruction of existing interchanges and bridges under traffic, or projects that cross environmentally sensitive sites. In addition, segmental construction has been proved to be appropriate for large-scale,repetitive bridges such as long waterway crossings or urban freeway viaducts or where the aesthetics of the project are particularly important.Current developments suggest that segmental construction will be used on a larger number of projects in the future. Standard cross sections have been developed to allow for wider application of this construction method to smaller-scale projects. Surveys of existing segmental bridges have demonstrated the durability of this structure type and suggest that additional increases in design life are possible with the use of HPC. Segmental bridges with concrete strengths of 55 MPa (8,000 psi) or more have been constructed over the past 5 years. Erection with overhead equipment has extended applications to more congested urban areas. Use of prestressed composite steel and concrete in bridges reduces the dead weight of the superstructure and offers increased span lengths.LOAD RATING OF EXISTING BRIDGESExisting bridges are currently evaluated by maintaining agencies using working stress, load factor, or load testing methods. Each method gives different results, for several reasons. In order to get national consistency, FHWA requests that all states report bridge ratings using the load factor method. However, the new AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) bridge design specifications are different from load factor method. A discrepancy exists, therefore, between bridge design and bridge rating.A draft of a manual on condition evaluation of bridges, currently under development for AASHTO, has specifications for load and resistance factor rating of bridges. These specifications represent a significant change from existing ones. States will beasked to compare current load ratings with the LRFD load ratings using a sampling of bridges over the next year, and adjustments will be proposed. The revised specifications and corresponding evaluation guidelines should complete the LRFD cycle of design, construction, and evaluation for the nation's bridges.LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSISThe goal of design and management of highway bridges is to determine and implement the best possible strategy that ensures an adequate level of reliability at the lowest possible life-cycle cost. Several recent regulatory requirements call for consideration of life-cycle cost analysis for bridge infrastructure investments. Thus far, however, the integration of life-cycle cost analysis with structural reliability analysis has been limited. There is no accepted methodology for developing criteria for life-cycle cost design and analysis of new and existing bridges. Issues such as target reliability level, whole-life performance assessment rules, and optimum inspection-repair-replacement strategies for bridges must be analyzed and resolved from a life-cycle cost perspective. T o achieve this design and management goal, state departments of transportation must begin to collect the data needed to determine bridge life-cycle costs in a systematic manner. The data must include inspection, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation expenditures and the timing of these expenditures. At present, selected state departments of transportation are considering life-cycle cost methodologies and software with the goal of developing a standard method for assessing the cost-effectiveness of concrete bridges. DECKS Cast-in-place (CIP) deck slabs are the predominant method of deck construction in the United States. Their main advantage is the ability to provide a smooth riding surface by field-adjustment of the roadway profile during concrete placement. In recent years automation of concrete placement and finishing has made this system cost-effective. However, CIP slabs have disadvantages that include excessive differential shrinkage with the supporting beams and slow construction. Recent innovations in bridge decks have focused on improvement to current practice with CIP decks and development of alternative systems that are cost-competitive, fast to construct, and durable. Focus has been on developing mixes and curing methods that produce performance characteristics such as freeze-thaw resistance, high abrasion resistance, low stiffness, and low shrinkage, rather than high strength. Full-depth precast panels have the advantages of significant reduction of shrinkage effects and increased construction speed and have been used in states with high traffic volumes for deck replacement projects. NCHRP Report 407 on rapid replacement of bridge decks has provided a proposed full-depth panel system with panels pretensioned in the transverse direction and posttensioned in the longitudinaldirection.Several states use stay-in-place (SIP) precast prestressed panels combined with CIP topping for new structures as well as for deck replacement. This system is cost-competitive with CIP decks. The SIP panels act as forms for the topping concrete and also as part of the structural depth of the deck. This system can significantly reduce construction time because field forming is only needed for the exterior girder overhangs. The SIP panel system suffers from reflective cracking, which commonly appears over the panel-to-panel joints. A modified SIP precast panel system has recently been developed in NCHRP Project 12-41.SUBSTRUCTURESContinuity has increasingly been used for precast concrete bridges. For bridges with total lengths less than 300 m (1,000 ft), integral bridge abutments and integral diaphragms at piers allow for simplicity in construction and eliminate the need for maintenance-prone expansion joints. Although the majority of bridge substructure components continue to be constructed from reinforced concrete, prestressing has been increasingly used. Prestressed bents allow for longer spans, improving durability and aesthetics and reducing conflicts with streets and utilities in urban areas. Prestressed concrete bents are also being used for structural steel bridges to reduce the overall structure depth and increase vertical clearance under bridges. Precast construction has been increasingly used for concrete bridge substructure components. Segmental hollow box piers and precast pier caps allow for rapid construction and reduced dead loads on the foundations. Precasting also enables the use of more complex forms and textures in substructure components, improving the aesthetics of bridges in urban and rural areas. RETAINING WALLSThe design of earth retaining structures has changed dramatically during the last century. Retaining wall design has evolved from short stone gravity sections to concrete structures integrating new materials such as geosynthetic soil reinforcements and high-strength tie-back soil anchors.The design of retaining structures has evolved into three distinct areas. The first is the traditional gravity design using the mass of the soil and the wall to resist sliding and overturning forces. The second is referred to as mechanically stabilized earth design. This method uses the backfill soil exclusively as the mass to resist the soil forces by engaging the soil using steel orpolymeric soil reinforcements. A third design method is the tie-back soil or rock anchor design, which uses discrete high-strength rods or cables that are drilled deep into the soil behind the wall to provide a dead anchorage to resist the soil forces.A major advancement in the evolution of earth retaining structures has been the proliferation of innovative proprietary retaining walls. Many companies have developed modular wall designs that are highly adaptable to many design scenarios. The innovative designs combined with the modular standard sections and panels have led to a significant decrease in the cost for retaining walls. Much research has been done to verify the structural integrity of these systems, and many states have embraced these technologies. RESEARCHThe primary objectives for concrete bridge research in the 21st century are to develop and test new materials that will enable lighter, longer, more economical, and more durable concrete bridge structures and to transfer this technology into the hands of the bridge designers for application. The HPCs developed toward the end of the 20th century would be enhanced by development of more durable reinforcement. In addition, higher-strength prestressing reinforcement could more effectively utilize the achievable higher concrete strengths. Lower-relaxation steel could benefit anchor zones. Also, posttensioning tendons and cable-stays could be better designed for eventual repair and replacement. As our natural resources diminish, the investigation of the use of recycled materials is as important as the research on new materials.The development of more efficient structural sections to better utilize the performance characteristics of new materials is important. In addition, more research is required in the areas ofdeck replacement panels, continuity regions of spliced girder sections, and safe,durable, cost-effective retaining wall structures.Research in the areas of design and evaluation will continue into the next millennium.The use of HPC will be facilitated by the removal of the implied strength limitation of 70 MPa (10.0 ksi) and other barriers in the LRFD bridge design specifications. As our nation’s infrastructure continues to age and as the vehicle loads continue to increase, it is important to better evaluate the capacity of existing structures and to develop effective retrofitting techniques. Improved quantification of bridge system reliability is expected through the calibration of system factors to assess the member capacities as a function of the level of redundancy. Data regarding inspection, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation expenditures and their timing must be systematically collected and evaluated to develop better methods of assessing cost-effectiveness of concrete bridges. Performance-based seismic design methods will require a higher level of computing and better analysis tools.In both new and existing structures, it is important to be able to monitor the “health” of these structures through the development of instrumentation (e.g., fiber optics) to determine the state of stresses and corrosion in the members.CONCLUSIONIntroduced into the United States in 1949, prestressed concrete bridges today represent over 50 percent of all bridges built. This increase has resulted from advancements in design and analysis procedures and the development of new bridge systems and improved materials.The year 2000 sets the stage for even greater advancements. An exciting future lies ahead for concrete bridges!混凝土桥梁在美国甚至在世界桥梁上，混凝土是最常用的建设材料。
道路与桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献
中英文对照外文翻译(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)Bridge research in EuropeA brief outline is given of the development of the European Union, together withthe research platform in Europe. The special case of post-tensioned bridges in the UK is discussed. In order to illustrate the type of European research being undertaken, an example is given from the University of Edinburgh portfolio: relating to the identification of voids in post-tensioned concrete bridges using digital impulse radar.IntroductionThe challenge in any research arena is to harness the findings of different research groups to identify a coherent mass of data, which enables research and practice to be better focused. A particular challenge exists with respect to Europe where language barriers are inevitably very significant. The European Community was formed in the 1960s based upon a political will within continental Europe to avoid the European civil wars, which developed into World War 2 from 1939 to 1945. The strong political motivation formed the original community of which Britain was not a member. Many of the continental countries saw Britain’s interest as being purelyeconomic. The 1970s saw Britain joining what was then the European Economic Community (EEC) and the 1990s has seen the widening of the community to a European Union, EU, with certain political goals together with the objective of a common European currency.Notwithstanding these financial and political developments, civil engineering and bridge engineering in particular have found great difficulty in forming any kind of common thread. Indeed the educational systems for University training are quite different between Britain and the European continental countries. The formation of the EU funding schemes —e.g. Socrates, Brite Euram and other programs have helped significantly. The Socrates scheme is based upon the exchange of students between Universities in different member states. The Brite Euram scheme has involved technical research grants given to consortia of academics and industrial partners within a number of the states—— a Brite Euram bid would normally be led by partners within a number of the statesan industrialist.In terms of dissemination of knowledge, two quite different strands appear to have emerged. The UK and the USA have concentrated primarily upon disseminating basic research in refereed journal publications: ASCE, ICE and other journals. Whereas the continental Europeans have frequently disseminated basic research at conferences where the circulation of the proceedings is restricted.Additionally, language barriers have proved to be very difficult to break down. In countries where English is a strong second language there has been enthusiastic participation in international conferences based within continental Europe —e.g. Germany, Italy, Belgium, The Netherlands and Switzerland. However, countries where English is not a strong second language have been hesitant participants }—e.g. France.European researchExamples of research relating to bridges in Europe can be divided into three types of structure:Masonry arch bridgesBritain has the largest stock of masonry arch bridges. In certain regions of the UK up to 60% of the road bridges are historic stone masonry arch bridges originally constructed for horse drawn traffic. This is less common in other parts of Europe as many of these bridges were destroyed during World War 2.Concrete bridgesA large stock of concrete bridges was constructed during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. At the time, these structures were seen as maintenance free. Europe also has a large number of post-tensioned concrete bridges with steel tendon ducts preventing radar inspection. This is a particular problem in France and the UK.Steel bridgesSteel bridges went out of fashion in the UK due to their need for maintenance as perceived in the 1960s and 1970s. However, they have been used for long span and rail bridges, and they are now returning to fashion for motorway widening schemes in the UK.Research activity in EuropeIt gives an indication certain areas of expertise and work being undertaken in Europe, but is by no means exhaustive.In order to illustrate the type of European research being undertaken, an example is given from the University of Edinburgh portfolio. The example relates to the identification of voids in post-tensioned concrete bridges, using digital impulse radar.Post-tensioned concrete rail bridge analysisOve Arup and Partners carried out an inspection and assessment of the superstructure of a 160 m long post-tensioned, segmental railway bridge in Manchester to determine its load-carrying capacity prior to a transfer of ownership, for use in the Metrolink light rail system..Particular attention was paid to the integrity of its post-tensioned steel elements.Physical inspection, non-destructive radar testing and other exploratory methods were used to investigate for possible weaknesses in the bridge.Since the sudden collapse of Ynys-y-Gwas Bridge in Wales, UK in 1985, there has been concern about the long-term integrity of segmental, post-tensioned concrete bridges which may b e prone to ‘brittle’ failure without warning. The corrosion protection of the post-tensioned steel cables, where they pass through joints between the segments, has been identified as a major factor affecting the long-term durability and consequent strength of this type of bridge. The identification of voids in grouted tendon ducts at vulnerable positions is recognized as an important step in the detection of such corrosion.Description of bridgeGeneral arrangementBesses o’ th’ Barn Bridge is a 160 m long, three span, segmental, post-tensionedconcrete railway bridge built in 1969. The main span of 90 m crosses over both the M62 motorway and A665 Bury to Prestwick Road. Minimum headroom is 5.18 m from the A665 and the M62 is cleared by approx 12.5 m.The superstructure consists of a central hollow trapezoidal concrete box section 6.7 m high and 4 m wide. The majority of the south and central spans are constructed using 1.27 m long pre-cast concrete trapezoidal box units, post-tensioned together. This box section supports the in site concrete transverse cantilever slabs at bottom flange level, which carry the rail tracks and ballast.The center and south span sections are of post-tensioned construction. These post-tensioned sections have five types of pre-stressing:1. Longitudinal tendons in grouted ducts within the top and bottom flanges.2. Longitudinal internal draped tendons located alongside the webs. These are deflected at internal diaphragm positions and are encased in in site concrete.3. Longitudinal macalloy bars in the transverse cantilever slabs in the central span .4. Vertical macalloy bars in the 229 mm wide webs to enhance shear capacity.5. Transverse macalloy bars through the bottom flange to support the transverse cantilever slabs.Segmental constructionThe pre-cast segmental system of construction used for the south and center span sections was an alternative method proposed by the contractor. Current thinkingire suggests that such a form of construction can lead to ‘brittle’ failure of the ententire structure without warning due to corrosion of tendons across a construction joint，The original design concept had been for in site concrete construction.Inspection and assessmentInspectionInspection work was undertaken in a number of phases and was linked with the testing required for the structure. The initial inspections recorded a number of visible problems including:Defective waterproofing on the exposed surface of the top flange.Water trapped in the internal space of the hollow box with depths up to 300 mm.Various drainage problems at joints and abutments.Longitudinal cracking of the exposed soffit of the central span.Longitudinal cracking on sides of the top flange of the pre-stressed sections.Widespread sapling on some in site concrete surfaces with exposed rusting reinforcement.AssessmentThe subject of an earlier paper, the objectives of the assessment were:Estimate the present load-carrying capacity.Identify any structural deficiencies in the original design.Determine reasons for existing problems identified by the inspection.Conclusion to the inspection and assessmentFollowing the inspection and the analytical assessment one major element of doubt still existed. This concerned the condition of the embedded pre-stressing wires, strands, cables or bars. For the purpose of structural analysis these elements、had been assumed to be sound. However, due to the very high forces involved,、a risk to the structure, caused by corrosion to these primary elements, was identified.The initial recommendations which completed the first phase of the assessment were:1. Carry out detailed material testing to determine the condition of hidden structural elements, in particularthe grouted post-tensioned steel cables.2. Conduct concrete durability tests.3. Undertake repairs to defective waterproofing and surface defects in concrete.Testing proceduresNon-destructi v e radar testingDuring the first phase investigation at a joint between pre-cast deck segments the observation of a void in a post-tensioned cable duct gave rise to serious concern about corrosion and the integrity of the pre-stress. However, the extent of this problem was extremely difficult to determine. The bridge contains 93 joints with an average of 24 cables passing through each joint, i.e. there were approx. 2200 positions where investigations could be carried out. A typical section through such a joint is that the 24 draped tendons within the spine did not give rise to concern because these were protected by in site concrete poured without joints after the cables had been stressed.As it was clearly impractical to consider physically exposing all tendon/joint intersections, radar was used to investigate a large numbers of tendons and hence locate duct voids within a modest timescale. It was fortunate that the corrugated steel ducts around the tendons were discontinuous through the joints which allowed theradar to detect the tendons and voids. The problem, however, was still highly complex due to the high density of other steel elements which could interfere with the radar signals and the fact that the area of interest was at most 102 mm wide and embedded between 150 mm and 800 mm deep in thick concrete slabs.Trial radar investigations.Three companies were invited to visit the bridge and conduct a trial investigation. One company decided not to proceed. The remaining two were given 2 weeks to mobilize, test and report. Their results were then compared with physical explorations.To make the comparisons, observation holes were drilled vertically downwards into the ducts at a selection of 10 locations which included several where voids were predicted and several where the ducts were predicted to be fully grouted. A 25-mm diameter hole was required in order to facilitate use of the chosen horoscope. The results from the University of Edinburgh yielded an accuracy of around 60%.Main radar sur v ey, horoscope verification of v oids.Having completed a radar survey of the total structure, a baroscopic was then used to investigate all predicted voids and in more than 60% of cases this gave a clear confirmation of the radar findings. In several other cases some evidence of honeycombing in the in site stitch concrete above the duct was found.When viewing voids through the baroscopic, however, it proved impossible to determine their actual size or how far they extended along the tendon ducts although they only appeared to occupy less than the top 25% of the duct diameter. Most of these voids, in fact, were smaller than the diameter of the flexible baroscopic being used (approximately 9 mm) and were seen between the horizontal top surface of the grout and the curved upper limit of the duct. In a very few cases the tops of the pre-stressing strands were visible above the grout but no sign of any trapped water was seen. It was not possible, using the baroscopic, to see whether those cables were corroded.Digital radar testingThe test method involved exciting the joints using radio frequency radar antenna: 1 GHz, 900 MHz and 500 MHz. The highest frequency gives the highest resolution but has shallow depth penetration in the concrete. The lowest frequency gives the greatest depth penetration but yields lower resolution.The data collected on the radar sweeps were recorded on a GSSI SIR System 10.This system involves radar pulsing and recording. The data from the antenna is transformed from an analogue signal to a digital signal using a 16-bit analogue digital converter giving a very high resolution for subsequent data processing. The data is displayed on site on a high-resolution color monitor. Following visual inspection it isthen stored digitally on a 2.3-gigabyte tape for subsequent analysis and signal processing. The tape first of all records a ‘header’ noting the digital radar settings together with the trace number prior to recording the actual data. When the data is played back, one is able to clearly identify all the relevant settings —making for accurate and reliable data reproduction.At particular locations along the traces, the trace was marked using a marker switch on the recording unit or the antenna.All the digital records were subsequently downloaded at the University’s NDT laboratory on to a micro-computer.（The raw data prior to processing consumed 35 megabytes of digital data.） Post-processing was undertaken using sophisticated signal processing software. Techniques available for the analysis include changing the color transform and changing the scales from linear to a skewed distribution in order to highlight、突出certain features. Also, the color transforms could be changed to highlight phase changes. In addition to these color transform facilities, sophisticated horizontal and vertical filtering procedures are available. Using a large screen monitor it is possible to display in split screens the raw data and the transformed processed data. Thus one is able to get an accurate indication of the processing which has taken place. The computer screen displays the time domain calibrations of the reflected signals on the vertical axis.A further facility of the software was the ability to display the individual radar pulses as time domain wiggle plots. This was a particularly valuable feature when looking at individual records in the vicinity of the tendons.Interpretation of findingsA full analysis of findings is given elsewhere, Essentially the digitized radar plots were transformed to color line scans and where double phase shifts were identified in the joints, then voiding was diagnosed.Conclusions1. An outline of the bridge research platform in Europe is given.2. The use of impulse radar has contributed considerably to the level of confidence in the assessment of the Besses o’ th’ Barn Rail Bridge.3. The radar investigations revealed extensive voiding within the post-tensioned cable ducts. However, no sign of corrosion on the stressing wires had been foundexcept for the very first investigation.欧洲桥梁研究欧洲联盟共同的研究平台诞生于欧洲联盟。
土木工程桥梁方向毕业设计外文及翻译
土木工程桥梁方向毕业设计外文及翻译(总13页)--本页仅作为文档封面，使用时请直接删除即可----内页可以根据需求调整合适字体及大小--学生姓名：学号：班级:专业：土木工程（桥梁方向）指导教师：2010 年 3 月What is traffic engineeringTraffic engineering is still a relatively new discipline within the overall bounds of civil engineering. it has nevertheless already been partially planning. the disciplines are not synonymous though. transportation planning is concerned with the planning, functional design, operation and management of facilities for any mode of transportation in order to provide for the safe, rapid, comfortable, convenient, economical and enviromenally-comparible movement of people and goods. within that broad scope, traffic engineering deals with those functions in respect of roads, road networks, terminal points , about lands and their relationships with other modes of transportation.Those definitions, based on the 1976 ones of the of transportation engineers are complete than, the British instituting of civil engineering which deals with traffic planning and design of roads, of frontage development and of parking facilities and with the control of traffic to provide safe, convenient and economical movement of vehicles and pedestrians.The definitions of the disicipline are becoming clearer: the methodology is developing continuously and becoming increasingly scientific. the early rule-of-thumb techniques are disappearing.Traffic problemThe discipline is young: the problem is large and still growing. in 1920 the total number of motor vehicles, licensed in great Britain was,650, year later the comparable figure was 14,950,000-a growth factor of 23 times. in recent years the rate of growth has slackened somewhat, but it is still considerable: 1955 6,466,0001960 9,439,0001965 12,938,0001970 14,950,0001974 17,247,000In order to see the problem in every day terms ,consider high street. anywhere. assuming that present trends continue, it is expected that within the next fifteen years of so the traffic on this road will increase by around forty to fifty persent. if this increased volume of traffic were to be accommodated at the same standard as today, the road might need to be widened by a similar forty to fifty percent-perhaps extra lane of traffic for the pedestrian to cross. In man cases, to accommodate the foreseeable future demand would destroy the character of the whole urban environment, and is clearly unacceptable.the traffic problem is of world-wide concern, but different countries are obviously at different stages in the traffic escalation-with America in the lead, while a county has few roads and a relatively low problem, as soon as the country is opened up by a road system, the standard of living and the demand for motor transport both rise, gathering momentum rapidly. eventually-and the stage at which this happens is open to considerable debate-the demand for cars, buses and lorries become satiated. the stage is known as saturation level.For comparison ,car ownership figures in different countries in 1970 were:India cars/personIsrael personJapan cars/personIreland cars/personNetherlands cars/personGreat Britain cars/personWest Germany cars/personAustralia cars/personUSA cars/personBut the growth in vehicle ownership is only part of the overall traffic problem. obviously,if a country has unlimited roads of extreme width, the traffic problem would not rise. no country in the world could meet this requirement: apart from anything else, it would not make economic for each vehicle using the roads. This figure is decreasing steadily.Three possible solutionsThe basic problem of traffic is therefore simple-an ever-increasing number of vehicles seeking to use too little roade space. the solution to the problem-is else a not-too-difficult choice from three possiblilities:build, sufficient roads of sufficient size to cope with the demand.Restrict the demand for roads by restricting the numbers of licensed vehicles.A compromise between (a) and (b) build some extra roads, using the and the existing road network to their full potential, and at the same time apply some restraint measures, limiting, the increase in demand as far as possible.With no visible end to the demand yet in sight, and 216 with modern road-making costs ranging around ￡1 million per kilometer cost of building roads in Britain to cope with an unrestricted demand would be far too great. added to this, such clossal use of space in a crowed island cannot be, seriously considered. in Los Angeles, a city built around the parking space for, the automobile. our citie are already largely built-and no one would consider ruining their character by pulling them down and rebuilding around the car, thus the first possible soluting is rule out.Even today,in an age of at least semi-affluence in most of the Western World, the car is still to some extent a status symbol, a symbol of family wants to own one, and takes steps saving or borrowing-to get one. as incomes and standards rise thesecond car becomes the target. any move to restrict the acquisition of the private car would be most unpopular-and politically unlikely.For many purpose the flexibility of the private car-conceptually affording door-to-door personal transport is ideal, and its use can be accommodate. for the mass, movement of people along specific corridors within a limited period of .. particularly the journey to work it may be less easily accommodated. other transport mode may be more efficient. some sort of compromise solution is the inevitable answer to the basic traffic problem .it is in the execution of the compromise solution that, traffic engineering comes into its own. traffic engineering ensures that any new facilities are not over-deigned and are correctly located to meet the demand. it ensures that the existing facilities are fully used, in the most efficient manner. the fulfillment of these duties may entail the selective throttling of demand: making the use of the car less attractive in the peak periods in order that the limited road space can be more efficiently used by public transport.Such restraint measures will often be accompanied by improvements in the public transport services, to accommodate the extra demand for them.Prestressed Concrete BridgesPrestressed concrete has been used extensively in . bridge construction since its first Introduction from Europe in the late 1940s. Literally thousands of highway bridges of both precast, prestressed concrete and cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete has been constructed in the United States. Railroad bridges utilizing prastressed concrete have become common as well. The use and evolution of prastressed concrete bridges is expected to continue in the years ahead.Short-span BridgesShort-span bridges will be assumed to have a maximum of 45 ft .It should be understood that this is an arbitrary figure, and there is no definite line of demarcation between short, moderate, and long spans in highway bridges. Short-span bridges are most efficiently made of precast ,prestressed-concrete hollow slabs, I-beams, solid slabs or cast-place solid slabs. and T-beams of relatively generous proportions.Precast solid slabs are most economical when used on very short spans. The slabs can be made in any convenient width,but widths of 3 or 4 ft to have been frequently are cast in the longitudinal sides of the precast units. After the slabs have been erected and the joints between the slabs have been filled with concrete, the keys transfer live load shear forces between the adjacent slabs.Precast hollow slabs used in short-span bridges may have round or square voids. They too are generally made in units 3 to 4 ft to m) wide with thicknesses from 18 to 27 in to . Precast hollow slabs can be made in any convenient width and depth, and frequently are used in bridges having spans from 20 to 50 ft to . Longitudinal shear keys are used in the joints between adjacent hollow slabs in the same way as with solid slabs. Hollow slabs may or may not be used with a composite, cast-in-place concrete topping an accecptable appearance and levelness.Transverse reinforcement normally is provided in precast concrete bridge superstructures for the purpose of tying the structure together in the transverse direction. Well-designed ties ensure that the individual longitudinal members forming the superstructure will act as a unit under the effects of the live load. In slab bridge construction, transverse ties most frequently consist of threaded steel bars placed through small holes formed transversely through the member during fabrication. Nuts frequently are used as fasteners at each end of the bars. In some instances, the transverse ties consist of post tensionedtendons placed, stressed, and grouted after the slabs have been erected. The transverse tie usually extends from one side of the bridge to the other.The shear forces imposed on the stringers in short-span bridges frequently are too large to be resisted by the concrete alone. Hence, shear reinforcement normally is required. The amount of shear reinforcement required may be relatively large if the webs of the stringers are relatively thin.Concrete diaphragms, reinforced with post-tensioned reinforcement or nonprestressed reinforcement, normally are provided transversely at the ends and at intermediate locations along the span in stringer-type bridges. The disaphragms ensure the lateral-distribution of the live load to the various stringers and prevent individual stringers from displacing or rotating significantly with respect to the adjacent stringers.No generalities will be made here about the relative cost of each of the above types of construction; construction costs are a function of many variables which prohibit meaningful generalizations. However, it should be noted that the stringer type of construction requires a considerably greater construction depth that is required for solid, hollow, or channel slab bridge superstructures. Stringer construction does not require a separate wearing surface, as do the precast slab types of construction, unless precast slabs are used to span between the stringers in lieu of the more commonly used cast-in-place reinforced concrete deck. Stringer construction frequently requires smaller quantities of superstructure materials than do slab bridges (unless the spans are very short). The construction time needed to complete a bridge after the precast members have been erected is greater with stringer framing than with the slab type of framing.Bridges Of Moderate SpanAgain for the purpose of this discussion only, moderate spans for bridges of prestressed concrete are defined as beingfrom 45 to 80 ft to . Prestressed concrete bridges in this span range generally can be divided into two types: stringer-type bridges and slab-type bridges. The majority of the precast prestressed concrete bridges constructed in the United States have been stringer bridges using I-shaped stringers, but a large number of precast prestressed concrete bridges have been constructed with precast hollow-box girders (sometimes also called stringers). Cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete has been used extensively in the construction of hollow-box girder bridges-a form of construction that can be considered to be a slab bridge.Stringer bridges, which employ a composite, cast-in-place deck slab, have been used in virtually all parts of the United States. These stringers normally are used at spacing s of about 5 to 6 ft to . The cast-in-place deck is generally from to in to in thickness. This type of framing is very much the same as that used on composite-stringer construction for short-span bridges.Diaphram details in moderate-span bridges are generally similar to those of the short spans, with the exception that two or three interior diaphragms sometime are used, rather than just one at midspan as in the short-span bridge.As in the case of short-span bridges, the minimum depth of construction in bridges of moderate span is obtained by using slab construction, which may be either solid – or hollow – box in cross section. Average construction depths are requires when stringers with large flanges are used in composite construction, and large construction depths are required when stringers with small bottom flanges are used. Composite construction may be developed through the use of cast-in-place concrete decks or with precast concrete decks. Lower quantities of materials normally are required with composite construction , and the dead weight of the superstructure normally is less for stringer construction than for slab construction.Long-Span BridgesPrestressed concrete bridges having spans of the order of 100ft are of the same general types of construction as structures having moderate span lengths, with the single exception that solid slabs are not used for long spans. The stringer spacings are frequently greater (with stringers at 7 to 9 ft) as the span lengths of bridges increase. Because of dead weight considerations, precast hollow-box construction generally is employed for spans of this length only when the depth of construction must be minimized. Cast-in-place post-tensioned hollow-box bridges with simple and continuous spans frequently are used for spans on the order of 100 ft and longer.Simple, precast, prestressed stringer construction would be economical in the United States in the spans up to 300 ft under some conditions. However, only limited use has been made of this type of construction on spans greater than 100 ft. For very long simple spans, the advantage of precasting frequently is nullified by the difficulties involved in handling, transporting, and erecing the girders, which may have depths as great as 10 ft and weigh over 200 tons. The exceptions to this occur on large projects where all of the spans are over water of sufficient depth and character that precast beams can be handled with floating equipment, when custom girder launchers can be used, and when segmental construction techniques can be used.The use of cast-in-place , post-tensioned, box-girder bridges has been extensive. Although structures of these types occasionally are used for spans less than 100ft, they more often are used for spans in excess of 100 ft and have been used in structuresHaving spans in excess of 300 ft. Structurally efficient in flexure, especially for continuous bridges, the box girder is torsionally stiff and hence an excellent type of structure for use on bridges that have horizontal curvature. Some governmental agencies use this form of construction almost exclusively in urban areas where appearance from underneath the superstructure,as well as from the side, is considered important.交通工程介绍什么是交通工程交通工程仍然是在土木工程的总的界限内的一种相对新的训练。
桥梁设计外文翻译文献
桥梁设计外文翻译文献桥梁设计外文翻译文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译) 原文：A Bridge For All CenturiesAn extremely long-and record setting-main span was designed for the second bridge to across the Panama Canal in order to meet the owner’s requirement that no piers be placed in the water.Because no disruption of canal traffic was permitted at any time,the cable-stayed bridge of cast-in-place cancrete was carefully constructed using the balanced-cantilever method.In 1962 ,the Bridge of Americas(Puente de las America) opened to traffic,serving as the only fixed link across the Panama Canal .The bridge was designed to carry 60,000 vehicles per day on four lanes, but it has beenoperating above its capacity for many years.Toalleviate bottlenecks on the route that the bridge carries over the canal-the Pan-AmericanHighway(Inter-American Highway)-and promotegrowth on the western side of Panama,the country’s Ministry of Public Works(Ministerio de Obras Publicas,or MOP )decided to build a new highway systerm linking the northern part of Panama City,on the eastern side of the canal, to the town of Arraijan,located on the western side of the canal.The Centennial Bridge –named to commemorate 100 years of Panamanian independence-has noe been constructed and, when opend, will carry six lanes of traffic. This cable-stayed bridge of cast-in-place cancrete features a main span of 420m,the longest such span for this type of bridge in the Western Hemisphere.In 200 the MOP invited international bridge design firms to compete for the design of the crossing, requesting a two-package proposal:one techinical, the other financial. A total of eight proposals were received by December 2000 from established bridge design firms all over the world. After short-listing three firms on the basis of the technical merits of their proposals, the MOP selected T.Y.Lin International, of San Francisco, to prepare the bridge design and provide field construction support based on the firm’s financial package.The Centennial Bridge desige process was unique and aggressive,incorporating concepts from the traditional design/build/bid method, the design/build method , and the sa-called fast-track design process.T o complete the construction on time-that is ,within just 27 months-the design of the bridge was carried out to a level of 30 percent before construction bidding began, in December 2001.The selected contractor-the Wiesbaden,Germany,office of Bilfinger Berger,AG-was brought on board immediately after being selected by the MOP ,just as would be the case in a fast-track approach. The desige of the bridge was then completed in conjunction with construction , a process that id similan to desige/build.The design selected by the client features two single-mast towers,each supporting two sets of stay cables that align in one vertical plane.Concrete was used to construct both the towers and the box girder deck,as well as the approach structures.The MOP , in conjunction with the Panama Canal Authority,established the following requirements for the bridge design :A 420m,the minimum length for the main span to accommodate the recently widened Gaillard Cut,a narrow portion of the canal crossing the Continental Divide that was straightened and widened to 275m in 2002;A navigational envelope consisting of 80m of vertical clearance and 70mof horizontal clearance to accommodate the safe passage of a crane of World War 11 vintage-a gift from the /doc/e5324711c381e53a580216fc700abb 68a982ad21.html ernment that is used by the Panama Canal Authority to maintain the canal gates and facilities;A roadway wide enough to carry six lanes of traffic, three in each direction;A deck able to accommodate a 1.5m wide pedestrian walkway;A design that would adhere to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official standard for a 100-year service life and offer HS-25 truck loading;A structure that could carry two 0.6m dianeter water lines;A construction method that would not cross the canal at any time or interrupt canal operationa in any way.Because of the bridge’s long main span and the potential for strong seismic activity in the area,no single building code covered all aspects of the project.Therefore the team from T.Y. Lin International determinded which portions of several standard bridge specifications were applicable and which were not.The following design codes were used in developing the design criteria for the bridge，it is standard specifications for highway bridge ,16th ed,1996It was paramount that the towers of the cable-stayed structucture be erected on land to avoid potential ship collision and the need to construct expensive deep foundation in water. However, geological maps and boring logs produced during the preliminary design phrase revealed that the east and west banksof the canal, where the towers were to be located, featured vastly different geologicaland soil conditions. On the east side of the canal, beneath shallow layers of overburden that rangs in consistency from soft to hard, lies a block of basalt ranging from medium hard to hard with very closely spaced joint.The engineers determined that the basalt would provide a competent platform for the construction of shallow foundation for tower, piers, and approach structures on this side of bridge.The west side, however,featured the infamous Cucaracha Formation, which is a heterogeneous conglomerate of clay shale with inclusions of sandstone, basalt,and ash that is prone to landslide. As a sudsurface stratum the Cucaracha Formation is quite stable,but it quickly erodes when exposed to the elements. The engineers determined that deep foundations would therefore be needed for the western approach structure,the west tower,and the western piers.Before a detailed design of the foundationa could be developed,a thorough analysis of the seismic hazards at the site was required,The design seismic load for the project was developed on the basis of a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment that considered the conditions at the site.Such an assessment establishes the return period for a given earthquake and the corresponding intensity of ground shaking in the horizontal directtion in terms of an acceleration response spectrum.The PSHA determined two dominant seismic sources: a subduction source zone associated with the North Panama Deformed Belt capable of producing a seimic event as strong as 7.7MW,and the Rio Gatun Fault, capable of producing an event as strong as 6.5MW.The 7.7MW NPDB event was used as the safety evluationearthquake,that is,the maximum earthquake that could strike without putting the bridge out of service.The damage to the bridge would be minor but would require some closures of the bridge.The 6.5MWRio Gatun Fault event was used as the foundational evaluation earthquake,a lower-level temblor that would cause minimal damage to the bridge and would not require closures.For the FEE load case,the SEE loading was scaled back by two-thirds.The FEE is assumed to have a peak acceleration of 0.21g and a return period of 500 years; the probability that it will be exceeded within 50 years is 10 pencent and within 100 years,18 persent.The SEE is assumed to have a peak acceleration of 1.33g and a return period of 2,500 years;the probability that it will be exceeded within 50 years is 2 pencent and within 100 years,4 persent.Because of uncertainty about the direction from which the seismic waves would approach the site, a single response spectrum-a curve showing the mathematically computed maximum response of a set of simple damped harmonic oscillators of different natural frequencies to a particular earthquake ground acceleration-was used to characterize mitions in two mutually orthogonal directions in the horizontal plane.To conduct a time-history analysis of the bridge’s multiple supports,a set of synthetic motions with three components-longitudinal,transverse,and vertical-was developd using an iterative technique.Recorded ground motions from an earthquake in Chile in 1985 were used as “seed”motions for the sythesis process.A time delay estimate-that is,an estimate of the time it would take for the motions generated by the SEEand FEE earthquakes to travel from one point to the next-was create using theassumed seismic wave velocity and the distance between the piers of the /doc/e5324711c381e53a580216fc700abb 68a982ad21.html ing an assumed was velocity of approximately 2.5km/s,a delay on the order of half a second to a secondis appropriate for a bridge 1 to 2km long.Soil-foundation interaction studies were performed to determine the stiffness of the soil and foundation as well as the seismic excitation measurement that would be used in the dynamic analyses.The studieswere conducted by means of soil-pile models using linear and nonlinear soil layera of varying depths.The equivalent pile lengths in the studies-that is, the lengths representing the portions of a given pile that would actually be affected by a given earthquake-induced ground motion-ranged from2to10m.In such a three-dimensional model,there are six ways in which the soil can resist the movement of the lpile because of its stiffness:throngh axial force in the three directions and through bending moments in three directions.Because the bridge site contains so many layers of varying soil types,each layer had to be represented by a different stiffness matrix and then analyzed.Once the above analyses were completed,the T.Y.Lin International engineers-taking into consideration the project requirements developedby the owener-evaluated several different concrete cable-stayed designs.A number of structural systems were investigated,the main variables,superstructure cross sections,and the varying support conditions described above.The requirement that the evevation of the deck be quite high strongly influenced the tower configuration.For the proposeddeck elevation of more than 80m,the most economical tower shapes included single-and dual-mast towers as well as “goa l post”towers-that is,a design in which the two masts would be linked to each other by crossbeams.Ultimately the engineers designd the bridge to be 34.3m wide with a 420mlong cable-stayd main span,two 200mlong side spans-one on each side of the main span-and approach structures at the ends of the side spans.On the east side there is one 46m long concrete approach structure,while on the west side there are three,measuring 60,60,and 66m,for a total bridge length of 1,052m.The side spans are supported by four piers,referred to,from west to east,as P1.P2,P3,and P4.The bridge deck is a continuous single-cell box girder from abutment to abutment; the expansion joints are located at the abutments only. Deck movements on the order of 400 mm are expected at these modular expansion joints Multidirectional pot bearings are used at the piers and at the abutments to accommodate these movements.The deck was fixed to the two towers to facilitate the balanced-cantilevermethod of construction and to provide torsional rigidity and lateral restraint to the deck.. Transverse live loads, seismic loads, and wind loads are proportionally distributed to the towers and the piers by the fixity of the deck to the towers and by reinforced-concrete shear keys located at the top of P1, P3, and P4. The deck is allowed to move longitudinally over the abutments and piers. The longitudinal, seismic, live, and temperature loads are absorbed by what is known as portal frame structural behavior, whereby the towers and the deck form a portal-much like the frame of a door in a building-that acts in proportion to therelative stiffness of the two towers.As previously mentioned, the presence of competent basalt on the east side of the site meant that shallow foundations could be used there; in particular, spread footings were designed for the east tower, the east approach structure, and the east abutment. The west tower, the west approach structure, and the western piers (P2 and P3), however, had to be founded deep within the Cucaracha Formation. A total of 48 cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) shafts with 2 m outer diameters and lengths ranging from 25 to 35 m were required. A moment curvature analysis was performed to determine the capacity of the shafts with different amounts of longitudinal steel rebar. The results were plotted against the demands, and on the basis of the results the amount of required longitudinal reinforcing steel was determined to be 1 percent of the amount of concrete used in the shafts. The distribution of the longitudinal reinforcing steel was established by following code requirements, with consideration also given to the limitations of constructing CIDH piles with the contractor’s preferred method, which is the water or slurry displacement method.A minimum amount of transverse steel had to be determined for use in the plastic regions of the shaft-that is, those at the top one-eighth of eighth of each shaft and within the shaft caps, which would absorb the highest seismic demands. Once this amount was determined, it was used as the minimum for areas of the shafts above their points of fixity where large lateral displacements were expected to occur. The locations of the transverse steel were then established by following code requirements and by considering the construction limitations of CIDH piles. The transverse steel was spiral shaped.Even though thief foundation designs differed, the towers themselves were designed to be identical. Each measures 185.5 m from the top of its pile cap and is designed as a hollow reinforced-concrete shaft with a truncated elliptical cross section (see figure opposite). Each tower’s width in plan varies along its height, narrowing uniformly from 9.5 m at the base of the tower to 6 m at the top. In the longitudinal direction, each pylon tapers from 9.5 m at the base to about 8 m right below the deck level, which is about 87 m above the tower base. Above the deck level the tower’s sections vary from 4.6 m just above the deck to 4.5 m at the top. Each tower was designed with a 2 by 4 m opening for pedestrian passage along the deck, a design challenge requiring careful detailing.The towers were designed in a accordance with the latest provisions of the ATC earthquake design manual mentioned previously (ATC-32). Owing to the portal frame action along the b ridge’s longitudinal axis, special seismic detailing was implemented in regions with the potential to develop plastic hinges in the event of seismic activity-specifically, just below the deck and above the footing. Special confining forces and alternating open stirrups-with 90 and 135 degree hooks-within the perimeter of the tower shaft.In the transverse direction, the tower behaves like a cantilever, requiring concrete-confining steel at its base. Special attention was needed at the joint between the tower and the deck because of the central-plane stay-cable arrangement, it was necessary to provide sufficient torsional stiffness and special detailing at the pier-to-deck intersection. This intersection is highly congested with vertical reinforcing steel, the closely spaced confining stirrups of the tower shaft, and the deck prestressing andreinforcement.The approach structures on either side of the main span are supported on hollow reinforced-concrete piers that measure 8.28 by 5 m in plan. The design and detailing of the piers are consistent with the latest versions of the ATC and AASHTO specifications for seismic design. Capacity design concepts were applied to the design of the piers. This approach required the use of seismic modeling with moment curvature elements to capture the inelastic behavior of elements during seismic excitation. Pushover analyses of the piers were performed to calculate the displacement capacity of the piers and to compare them with the deformations computed in the seismic time-history analyses. To ensure an adequate ductility of the piers-an essential feature of the capacity design approach-it was necessary to provide adequate concrete-confining steel at those locations within the pier bases where plastic hinges are expected to form.The deck of the cable-stayed main span is composed of single-cell box girders of cast-in-place concrete with internal, inclined steel struts and transverse posttensioned ribs, or stiffening beams, toward the tops. Each box girder segment is 4.5 m deep and 6 m long. To facilitate construction and enhance the bridge’s elegant design, similar sizes were used for the other bridge spans. An integral concrete overlay with a thickness of 350 mm was installed instead of an applied concrete overlay on the deck. In contrast to an applied overlay, the integral overlay was cast along with each segment during the deck erection. Diamond grinding equipment was used to obtain the desired surface profile and required smoothness. The minimum grinding depth was 5 mm.A total of 128 stay cables were used, the largest comprising83 monostrands. All cables with a length of more than 80 m were equipped at their lower ends with internal hydraulic dampers. Corrosion protection for the monostrands involved galvanization of the wires through hot dipping, a tight high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheath extruded onto each strand, and a special type of petroleum wax that fills all of the voids between the wires.The stays are spaecd every 6 m and are arranged in a fan pattern.They are designed to be stressed from the tower only and are anchored in line with a continuous stiffening beam at the centerline of the deck.The deck anchorage system is actually a composite steel frame that encapsulates two continous steel plates that anchor the stays and transfer the stay forces in a continuous and repetitive system-via shear studs-throuthout the extent of the cable-supported deck (see figure above).A steel frame was designed to transfer the stays’horizontal forces to the box girders through concrete-embedded longitudinal steel plates and to transfer the boxes’ vertical forces directly through the internal steel struts.This innovative and elegant load transfer system made rapid construction of the concrete deck segments-in cycles of three to five days-possible.In addition to the geotechnical and seismic analyses,several structural analyses were performed to accurately capture the behavior of this complex bridge.For the service-load analysis,which includes live,temperature,and wind loads,the engineers used SAP2000, a computer program created and maintained by Computers &Structrures,Inc.(CSI), of Berkeley, California.This program was selected for its ability to easily model the service loads and to account for tridimensional effects.For correct SAP2000 modeling,it was necessary to define a set of initial stresses on the cables, deck, and tower elements to capture the state of the structure at the end of construction.For the calculation of those initial stresses, a series of iterations on the basic model were performed to obtain the stay forces in the structure that balance both the bridges’s self-weight and the superimposed dead loads. Once the correct cable stiffness and stress distribution were obtained, all subsequent service-load analyses were performed to account for the geometric stiffness and P-deltaeffects, which consider the magnitude of an applied load (P) versus the displacement(delta).The seismic analysis of the structure was conducted using the SADSAP structural analysis program, also a CSI product, based on the differences in seismic motions that will be experienced at the different piers based on their distance from one another.This sophisticated program has the capability to model inelastic behavior in that flexural plastic hinges can readily be simulated.Plastic hinge elements were modeled at varous locations along the structure where the results from a preliminary response spectrum analysis in SAP2000 indicated that inelastic behavior might be expected.The time-history records pertaining to the site were used in conjunction with the SADSAP model to botain a performace-based design of the piers and towers and to verifh the design of several deck stctions.As previously mentioned,the construction contractor was brought on board earl y in the process;the company’s bid of $93 million was accepted and the project was awarded in March 2002.To guarantee unimpeded canal traffic,the bridge had to be constructed without the use of the canal waters.To accomplish this, the cast-in-place main-pain superstructure was erected using the balanced-cantilever method.Form travelers were usedto accomplish this, and they were designed in such a way that they could be used as an integral part of the pier tables’falsework.After assembly on the ground, two 380 Mg form travelers were raised independently into the pier table casting position and connected to each other.After an initial learning period, the contractor was able to achieve a four-day cycle for the casting of the cantilevered deck segments, an achievement that greatly enhanced the ability of the team to construct the project on time.Once the side-span and mai-span closures were cast, the travelers had to be removed from locations adjacent to the towers rather than over water so as to avoid any influence on canal traffic.To save time, the towers approach structure, and piers were built simultaneously.The approach viaducts were designed and built using the span-by-span erection method by means of an underslung suupport truss.The east viaduct span was built first and the support truss was then removed and transferred to the west side so that it could be used to build the three spans of the west viaduct, one span at a time.The bridge construction was completeed in Auguse 2004 at a cost of approximately $2,780 per square meter.Its opening awaits the completion of the rest of the highway it serves.跨越世纪之桥1962年，横跨巴拿马运河的美国大桥作为仅有的固定连接开放交通车。
桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献
桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)BRIDGE ENGINEERING AND AESTHETICSEvolvement of bridge Engineering,brief reviewAmong the early documented reviews of construction materials and structu re types are the books of Marcus Vitruvios Pollio in the first century B.C.The basic principles of statics were developed by the Greeks , and were exemplifi ed in works and applications by Leonardo da Vinci,Cardeno,and Galileo.In the fifteenth and sixteenth century, engineers seemed to be unaware of this record , and relied solely on experience and tradition for building bridges and aqueduc ts .The state of the art changed rapidly toward the end of the seventeenth cent ury when Leibnitz, Newton, and Bernoulli introduced mathematical formulatio ns. Published works by Lahire (1695)and Belidor (1792) about the theoretical a nalysis of structures provided the basis in the field of mechanics of materials .Kuzmanovic(1977) focuses on stone and wood as the first bridge-building materials. Iron was introduced during the transitional period from wood to steel .According to recent records , concrete was used in France as early as 1840 for a bridge 39 feet (12 m) long to span the Garoyne Canal at Grisoles, but r einforced concrete was not introduced in bridge construction until the beginnin g of this century . Prestressed concrete was first used in 1927.Stone bridges of the arch type (integrated superstructure and substructure) were constructed in Rome and other European cities in the middle ages . Thes e arches were half-circular , with flat arches beginning to dominate bridge wor k during the Renaissance period. This concept was markedly improved at the e nd of the eighteenth century and found structurally adequate to accommodate f uture railroad loads . In terms of analysis and use of materials , stone bridges have not changed much ,but the theoretical treatment was improved by introd ucing the pressure-line concept in the early 1670s(Lahire, 1695) . The arch the ory was documented in model tests where typical failure modes were considered (Frezier,1739).Culmann(1851) introduced the elastic center method for fixed-e nd arches, and showed that three redundant parameters can be found by the us e of three equations of coMPatibility.Wooden trusses were used in bridges during the sixteenth century when P alladio built triangular frames for bridge spans 10 feet long . This effort also f ocused on the three basic principles og bridge design : convenience(serviceabili ty) ,appearance , and endurance(strength) . several timber truss bridges were co nstructed in western Europe beginning in the 1750s with spans up to 200 feet (61m) supported on stone substructures .Significant progress was possible in t he United States and Russia during the nineteenth century ,prompted by the ne ed to cross major rivers and by an abundance of suitable timber . Favorable e conomic considerations included initial low cost and fast construction .The transition from wooden bridges to steel types probably did not begin until about 1840 ,although the first documented use of iron in bridges was the chain bridge built in 1734 across the Oder River in Prussia . The first truss completely made of iron was in 1840 in the United States , followed by Eng land in 1845 , Germany in 1853 , and Russia in 1857 . In 1840 , the first ir on arch truss bridge was built across the Erie Canal at Utica .The Impetus of AnalysisThe theory of structures ,developed mainly in the ninetheenth century,foc used on truss analysis, with the first book on bridges written in 1811. The Wa rren triangular truss was introduced in 1846 , supplemented by a method for c alculating the correcet forces .I-beams fabricated from plates became popular in England and were used in short-span bridges.In 1866, Culmann explained the principles of cantilever truss bridges, an d one year later the first cantilever bridge was built across the Main River in Hassfurt, Germany, with a center span of 425 feet (130m) . The first cantileve r bridge in the United States was built in 1875 across the Kentucky River.A most impressive railway cantilever bridge in the nineteenth century was the Fir st of Forth bridge , built between 1883 and 1893 , with span magnitudes of 1711 feet (521.5m).At about the same time , structural steel was introduced as a prime mater ial in bridge work , although its quality was often poor . Several early exampl es are the Eads bridge in St.Louis ; the Brooklyn bridge in New York ; and t he Glasgow bridge in Missouri , all completed between 1874 and 1883.Among the analytical and design progress to be mentioned are the contrib utions of Maxwell , particularly for certain statically indeterminate trusses ; the books by Cremona (1872) on graphical statics; the force method redefined by Mohr; and the works by Clapeyron who introduced the three-moment equation s.The Impetus of New MaterialsSince the beginning of the twentieth century , concrete has taken its place as one of the most useful and important structural materials . Because of the coMParative ease with which it can be molded into any desired shape , its st ructural uses are almost unlimited . Wherever Portland cement and suitable agg regates are available , it can replace other materials for certain types of structu res, such as bridge substructure and foundation elements .In addition , the introduction of reinforced concrete in multispan frames at the beginning of this century imposed new analytical requirements . Structures of a high order of redundancy could not be analyzed with the classical metho ds of the nineteenth century .The importance of joint rotation was already dem onstrated by Manderla (1880) and Bendixen (1914) , who developed relationshi ps between joint moments and angular rotations from which the unknown mom ents can be obtained ,the so called slope-deflection method .More simplification s in frame analysis were made possible by the work of Calisev (1923) , who used successive approximations to reduce the system of equations to one simpl e expression for each iteration step . This approach was further refined and int egrated by Cross (1930) in what is known as the method of moment distributi on .One of the most import important recent developments in the area of analytical procedures is the extension of design to cover the elastic-plastic range , also known as load factor or ultimate design. Plastic analysis was introduced with some practical observations by Tresca (1846) ; and was formulated by Sa int-Venant (1870) , The concept of plasticity attracted researchers and engineers after World War Ⅰ, mainly in Germany , with the center of activity shifting to England and the United States after World War Ⅱ.The probabilistic approa ch is a new design concept that is expected to replace the classical determinist ic methodology.A main step forward was the 1969 addition of the Federal Highway Adim inistration (F HWA)”Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Members “ that co vers strength and serviceability at ultimate design . This was prepared for use in conjunction with the 1969 American Association of State Highway Offficials (AASHO) Standard Specification, and was presented in a format that is readil y adaptable to the development of ultimate design specifications .According to this document , the proportioning of reinforced concrete members ( including c olumns ) may be limited by various stages of behavior : elastic , cracked , an d ultimate . Design axial loads , or design shears . Structural capacity is the r eaction phase , and all calculated modified strength values derived from theoret ical strengths are the capacity values , such as moment capacity ,axial load ca pacity ,or shear capacity .At serviceability states , investigations may also be n ecessary for deflections , maximum crack width , and fatigue .Bridge TypesA notable bridge type is the suspension bridge , with the first example bu ilt in the United States in 1796. Problems of dynamic stability were investigate d after the Tacoma bridge collapse , and this work led to significant theoretica l contributions Steinman ( 1929 ) summarizes about 250 suspension bridges bu ilt throughout the world between 1741 and 1928 .With the introduction of the interstate system and the need to provide stru ctures at grade separations , certain bridge types have taken a strong place in bridge practice. These include concrete superstructures (slab ,T-beams,concrete box girders ), steel beam and plate girders , steel box girders , composite const ruction , orthotropic plates , segmental construction , curved girders ,and cable-stayed bridges . Prefabricated members are given serious consideration , while interest in box sections remains strong .Bridge Appearance and AestheticsGrimm ( 1975 ) documents the first recorded legislative effort to control t he appearance of the built environment . This occurred in 1647 when the Cou ncil of New Amsterdam appointed three officials . In 1954 , the Supreme Cou rt of the United States held that it is within the power of the legislature to de termine that communities should be attractive as well as healthy , spacious as well as clean , and balanced as well as patrolled . The Environmental Policy Act of 1969 directs all agencies of the federal government to identify and dev elop methods and procedures to ensure that presently unquantified environmenta l amentities and values are given appropriate consideration in decision making along with economic and technical aspects .Although in many civil engineering works aesthetics has been practiced al most intuitively , particularly in the past , bridge engineers have not ignored o r neglected the aesthetic disciplines .Recent research on the subject appears to lead to a rationalized aesthetic design methodology (Grimm and Preiser , 1976 ) .Work has been done on the aesthetics of color ,light ,texture , shape , and proportions , as well as other perceptual modalities , and this direction is bot h theoretically and empirically oriented .Aesthetic control mechanisms are commonly integrated into the land-use re gulations and design standards . In addition to concern for aesthetics at the sta te level , federal concern focuses also on the effects of man-constructed enviro nment on human life , with guidelines and criteria directed toward improving quality and appearance in the design process . Good potential for the upgradin g of aesthetic quality in bridge superstructures and substructures can be seen in the evaluation structure types aimed at improving overall appearance .Lords and lording groupsThe loads to be considered in the design of substructures and bridge foun dations include loads and forces transmitted from the superstructure, and those acting directly on the substructure and foundation .AASHTO loads . Section 3 of AASHTO specifications summarizes the loa ds and forces to be considered in the design of bridges (superstructure and sub structure ) . Briefly , these are dead load ,live load , iMPact or dynamic effec t of live load , wind load , and other forces such as longitudinal forces , cent rifugal force ,thermal forces , earth pressure , buoyancy , shrinkage and long t erm creep , rib shortening , erection stresses , ice and current pressure , collisi on force , and earthquake stresses .Besides these conventional loads that are ge nerally quantified , AASHTO also recognizes indirect load effects such as fricti on at expansion bearings and stresses associated with differential settlement of bridge components .The LRFD specifications divide loads into two distinct cate gories : permanent and transient .Permanent loadsDead Load : this includes the weight DC of all bridge components , appu rtenances and utilities, wearing surface DW nd future overlays , and earth fill EV. Both AASHTO and LRFD specifications give tables summarizing the unit weights of materials commonly used in bridge work .Transient LoadsVehicular Live Load (LL) Vehicle loading for short-span bridges :considera ble effort has been made in the United States and Canada to develop a live lo ad model that can represent the highway loading more realistically than the H or the HS AASHTO models . The current AASHTO model is still the applica ble loading.桥梁工程和桥梁美学桥梁工程的发展概况早在公元前1世纪，Marcus Vitrucios Pollio 的著作中就有关于建筑材料和结构类型的记载和评述。
土木工程 桥梁 毕业设计 外文文献翻译 中英文
文献翻译Bridge Maintenance TechniquesEssential maintenance generally involves strengthening or replacement of bridge elements . Strengthening techniques include welding , plate bonding and external post-tensioning which increase the stiffness of bridge decks . Replacement of elements has been used for deck slabs and beams, piers and columns. The primary purpose of essential maintenance is to increase the load carrying capacity and the reason for the inadequate capacity is secondary . If the reason is simply increased loading the maintenance can be limited to increasing the capacity , but if the reason is deterioration then maintenance must also include repairs and preventative maintenance.The selection of the maintenance method for repairs prevention depends primarily on the cause of deterioration . For steel construction the main cause of deterioration is corrosion and regular maintenance painting should be carried out to prevent the steel from corroding . If corrosion does occur then the only repair option is to grit blast back to shiny metal before repainting . An assessment of load carrying capacity should be carried out if corrosion has resulted in a significant reduction of steel section .The selection of repair and prevention methods for concrete construction is more complex because there are numerous causes of concrete deterioration .The deterioration of reinforced concrete can be conveniently sub-divided into deterioration of the concrete and deterioration of the steel reinforcement . The main causes of concrete deterioration are sulphates , free-thaw cycles and alkali-silica reaction(ASR). Deterioration can also be related to poor mix design and construction process such as compaction and curing . These types of deterioration can only be prevented by actions taken at the time of construction ; there are no effective preventative actions that can be taken after construction. For example where the environment is known to contain significant quantities of sulphide it is sensible to consider the use of sulphate resisting Portland cement . In regions experiencing large numbers of freeze-thaw cycles frost damage to concrete can be prevented by adding air entraining agent to the concrete mix . Frost damage is worse in concrete that is saturated with salty water so techniques such as waterproofing membranes and silane treatments may be helpful . Alkali-silica reaction between aggregates and the alkali in cement can be prevented by avoiding the most reactive types of aggregate and by keeping the alkali content of the cement below the designated limit . To set up damaging stresses in concrete the ASR requires water so procedures to reduce the water content such as waterproofing membranes and silane treatments may help . If these forms of concrete deterioration take place the only viable repair method is concrete replacement which may be extensive especially for ASR where entire sections can be affected . Sulphate and freeze-thaw damage normally occur only in the coverzone of the concrete . It is important to note that deterioration of the concrete will increase the risk of corrosion to the reinforcement because steel depassivators , like chlorides and carbon dioxide , will be able to move more easily through the concrete to the reinforcement .Deterioration of the reinforcing steel is caused by corrosion and can be prevented by actions taken at the time of construction and for a period after construction . Preventative techniques that can be applied at construction include the use of epoxy coated mild steel , stainless steel of carbon or glass fibre reinforcement , inhibitors , cathodic protection , anti-carbonation coatings , silane treatments and waterproofing membranes . All of these techniques , except the last three , directly protect the reinforcement against corrosion and to date , have been used only occasionally largely on grounds of cost . Waterproofing membranes , silane treatments , and anti-carbonation coatings are applied to the concrete and are designed to slow down the ingress of carbon dioxide and chlorides into the concrete thereby increasing the age of the structure when the reinforcement begins to corrode . These techniques can be used after construction because they are applied to the concrete surface and they should be effective , providing corrosion of the reinforcement has not already begun . It is important not to overlook the importance of well compacted and cured, low water : cement ratio concrete in preventing reinforcement corrosion.When corrosion of the reinforcement occurs it result in a loss of steel section and/or cracking, spalling and delamination of concrete due to the stresses produced as a result of the low density of rust compared with density of the steel . Reinforcement corrosion repair methods have two main functions , to crete replacement ; cathodic protection ; desalination ; realkalization.Concrete replacement has to be used to repair the damage caused by corrosion regardless of which technique is used to stop corrosion . Concrete replacement can also be used to stop corrosion although this involves the removal of all the carbonated and chloride contaminated concrete even though it is physically sound . This often means that concrete repairs to stop corrosion are not economically viable . Cathodic protection can be applied at any time to stop corrosion caused by carbonation or chlorides . It functions by making the reinforcing steel cathodic with respect to an external anode system . Cathodic protection requires a permanent electrical installation . Desalination can be used to stop corrosion caused by chlorides and it works by migrating chloride ions towards an external anode and away from the reinforcing steel in an electric field ; this process takes about 6 weeks . Realkalization stops corrosion caused by carbonation and it works by migrating sodium ions from an external anolyte into the concrete where in combination with the hydroxyl ions generated on the reinforcing steel due to the electric field , the alkalinity is raised to a level where the steel re-passivates . Realkalization takes about 4 weeks . Desalination ,realkalization and concrete repair are not normally used in conjunction with a preventative treatment such as silane or an anti-carbonation coating to increase the life of the repair .Cathodic protection does not requireadditional preventative measures because it is a permanent installation , but the anodes do require periodic replacement.大桥维修技术大桥的基本的维修大体上包括加强和更换桥的基本元素。
桥梁建设外文翻译参考文献
桥梁建设外文翻译参考文献1. NCHRP Report 724: Guidelines for Vegetation Management on Low-Volume Roads- 作者：Graham, Melinda S.; Miller, Nathan W.- 出版年份：2012年- 主题：该研究报告提供了低交通量道路上植被管理的指导方针，以帮助道路管理者有效管理植被并确保道路安全。
2. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering: Long-Term Performance Monitoring of Bridges- 作者：Steen, Ryan R.; DeWolf, Ronald J.; Cerato, Amy B.- 出版年份：2018年- 主题：该期刊文章介绍了监测桥梁长期性能的方法和技术，以评估桥梁结构的强度和安全性，并提出了预防维护的建议。
3. TRB Special Report 233: Bridge and Infrastructure Financing- 作者：National Research Council- 出版年份：2018年- 主题：该专题报告讨论了桥梁和基础设施融资的问题，包括不同的融资模式、可持续融资策略以及政府和私有部门之间的合作机制。
4. Journal of Bridge Structures: Innovative Materials for Bridge Construction- 作者：Ozyildirim, Celal; Ilki, Alper- 出版年份：2015年- 主题：该期刊文章介绍了用于桥梁建设的创新材料，包括纤维增强复合材料、高性能混凝土和聚合物改性材料等，以提高桥梁的性能和耐久性。
5. FHWA Report FHWA-IF-12-052: Bridge Design for Service Life Beyond 100 Years- 作者：Federal Highway Administration- 出版年份：2012年- 主题：该报告提供了设计具有100年以上使用寿命的桥梁的指南和方法，包括结构耐久性、材料选用、预防性维护等方面的考虑。
桥梁工程 英文文献3
1 INTRODUCTIONChina has a long history of building arch bridges. According to the materials used in the main structure, arch bridges can be classified into masonry arch bridge, metal arch bridge, concrete arch bridge and composite arch bridge. Up to now, each of the four types has its own remarkable span record, for example, the New Danhe Bridge in Shanxi Province being a stone arch bridge with a span of 146m, the Chaotianmen Bridge of a steel arch bridge with a span of 552m, the Wanxian Yangze River Bridge of a reinforced concrete (RC) arch bridge with a span of 420m and the Wuxia Yangze River Bridge of a CFST arch bridge with span of 460m (Chen Baochun 2004, 2005; Chen Baochun and Ye Lin 2006).Compared with other three types of arch bridges, only few steel arch bridges have been built before 2000 in China. With the rapid development of economy and transportation, more and more steel arch bridges have being constructed since 2000, However, the number of steel arch bridges is still less than other three types . Actually, there are still many problems existing in the design of steel arch bridges, such as the design method of ultimate bearing capacity, local and integral buckling. Therefore, the construction of steel arch bridges in China should refer to the specifications from other countries, need perfect construction specifications and well-trained technicians (Gao Jing and Chen Baochu 2005).In this paper, based on collected mass information of steel arch bridges in China, the construction history of steel arch bridges has been reviewed at first. Then statistical analysis on these bridges is obtained focusing on their numbers, spans, structural styles, construction methods and so on, in order to provide reference to the further study and application of steel arch bridges.2 OVERVIEW OF STEEL ARCH BRIDGE DEVELOPMENTIn China, steel bridges have not been paid attention to for a long time, especially for highwayState-of-the-art of steel arch bridges in ChinaKangming Chen College of Civil Engineering, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, JapanQiu ZhaoCollege of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China Shozo Nakamura Nagasaki University, College of Civil Engineering, Nagasaki , Japan Baochun ChenCollege of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, ChinaABSTRACT: The history of steel arch bridge construction is reviewed briefly in this paper; then most of steel arch bridges in China are investigated and analyzed with respect to their numbers, spans, structure styles, rib types, construction methods, and development tendency. After the nation-wide survey, it is found that most of these bridges are half-through or through boxarch bridges spanning from 100m to 150m, the common arch axis of which have the line shape of parabola with the ratios of rise to span varying from 1/4 to 1/5. Furthermore, for those bridges with relatively larger spans, the cantilever erection method is mainly used while the others with medium or small span always take the bracing method.Kangming Chen, Qiu Zhao, Shozo Nakamura, etc. 99 bridges. And most steel bridges are railway bridges. Most of the existing steel bridges are plate girder and truss girder bridges. But RC arch bridges are generally more economical since there is no sufficient steel material supply in China. There are some earliest typical steel arch bridges in China:(1) the No.2 Panzhihua Brdige (the Dukou Bridge) finished in 1966 with the main span of 180m, the arch rib of which uses steel-box-shaped section;(2) the No.3 Panzhihua Brdige (the Midi Bridge) using steel trussed arch rib, finished in 1969;(3) the Jiujiang Yantze River Bridge finished in 1992 with a span of 216m, which is a continuous structure composed of rigid steel trussed beam and flexible steel arch.In recent three decades in China, more steel has been used in bridge engineering, such as the construction of some long span cable-stayed bridges and suspension bridges. In 2003, the steel arch bridge with the largest span in the world at that time, the Lupu Bridge in Shanghai was finished, whose main span is a half through steel tied arch bridge while each side span is a deck arch bridge having composite girders. The spans of the Lupu Bridge are 100+550+100m, and the arch rise is 100m with the rise to span ratio of 1/5.5.The construction of the Lupu Bridge turns people’s attraction into steel arch bridges again that several steel arch bridges have been constructed later in China. The Jianghai Bridge finished in 2006, lying in the Xingguang Expressway of Guangzhou City, is a steel trussed arch bridge with the main span of 428m. The Caiyuanba Yantze River Bridge finished in 2007 in Chongqing City is a steel box arch bridge with the main span of 420m,. The Chaotianmen Bridge located in Chongqing City has the largest span among the steel trussed arch bridges in the world, with a span length of 552m.3 QUANTITY AND SPAN LENGTHUp to July of 2010, 65 steel arch bridges in China have been investigated, and 52 of which have their spans longer than 100m and are selected as analysis bridges later. Table 1 lists 27 steel arch bridges having spans longer than 150m.Fig.1 shows steel arch bridges in China during different construction periods. It is found that the quantity or span lengths of them has been increasing rapidly since 2000.Fig.2 shows that among those steel arch bridges spanning longer than 100m, 50.0% of which (about 26 bridges) have spans varying from 100m to 149m; 19.2% (10 bridges) spanning from 150m to 199m; 11.5% (6 bridges) spanning from 200m to 249m; no bridges have the spans between 250m and 299m; 5.8% of which (3 bridges) spanning from 300m to 349m; only 1 bridge is spanning between 350m to 399m; 6 bridges have spans longer than 400m.The steel arch bridges spanning shorter than 100m are almost foot bridges or piping bridges constructed a long time ago, which are not modern bridges because, for bridges with small spans, plate or girder bridges can serve well at low cost and simple construction, while arch bridges need more materials to strengthen the structure to prevent buckling. And besides, the construction procedure is complex and cost expensive. At present, for large span bridges, arch bridges are not so attractive due to the development of cable-stayed bridges. For example, steel cable-stayed bridges use less steel material and can be built in a more convenient construction procedure with lower requestment of equiptments and devices than steel arch bridges when the spans range from 250m to 500m. Therefore seldom steel arch bridges with such a span length are constructed.For steel arch bridges spanning shorter than 250m, construction technology has been achieved to some degree with reasonable costs. When the span is between 250m and 400m, the construction might have difficulty which can be overcome. Thus such a span length for steel arch bridges is still competitive. When the span is longer than 500m, the construction obvious becomes very difficulty. Now in the world, there are only 5 steel arch bridges with spans longer than 500m, two of which are existing in China. Therefore the construction technology for steel arch bridge needs to be advanced if a span of longer than 500m is requested.100 ARCH’10 – 6th International Conference on Arch BridgesTable1: Steel arch bridges in China(span ≥150m)No. Bridge NameSpan (m)Type Completed YearConstruction Method1 Zhujiang Baishahe Bridge inGuangzhou150Half through arch 2008 — 2 Kanjing Bridge in Taiwan 150Though arch 2002 — 3 Jingde Bridge inTaiwan 155Though arch2001 — 4 Guandu Bridge in Taiwan 165Half through arch 1983 Scaffolding Method 5 Jilonghe Bridge166Double deck — — 6 No.1 Mengshuai Bridge in Taiwan 170Double deck 2001 — 7 Yaojiang Bridge in Ningbo (WantouBridge)180Through arch 2009 Scaffolding Method 8 No.2 Panzhihua Bridge(Dukou Bridge)180Deck 1966 — 9 No.3 Panzhihua Bridge (Midi Bridge)181Deck 1969—10 Baling Bridge in Taiwan 185Half through arch2005 — 11 Min River Bridge located in Fuxiarailway 198Half through arch2009 Scaffolding Method 12 Zhongzhaiwan Bridge in Xiamen 208Half through arch 2004 Scaffolding Method 13 Jiubao Bridge in Hangzhou 210Through arch Under constructionLaunching Method 14 No.2 Mengshuai Bridge in Taiwan 210Through arch 1996 — 15 Jiujiang Yantze River Bridge 216Double deck 1992 Cantilever Method16 Rongjiang Railway Bridge in Shantou 220Half through archUnder construction — 17 Dongpingshuidao Railway Bridge inGuangdong242Half through arch2009 Cantilever Method 18 Nanning Bridge in Guangxi 300Half through arch2009Cantilever Method 19 Dongping Bridge in Foshan 300Half through arch2006 Swing Method 20 Da-sheng-guan Yangtze River Bridgein Nanjing336Half through arch2009 Cantilever Method 21 Wangzhou Yangtze River RailwayBridge in Chongqing 360Half through arch 2005 Cantilever Method 22 Da-ning-he Bridge in Chongqing 400Deck 2010 Cantilever Method 23 Caiyuanba Yangtze River Bridge inChongqing 420Half through arch2007 Cantilever Method 24 Xin-guang Bridge in Guangzhou 428Half through arch2006 Cable Hoisting Method 25 Mingzhou Bridge in Ningbo 450Half through archUnder construction Cantilever Method 26 Lupu Bridge in Shanghai 550Half through arch2003 Cantilever Method 27Chao-tian-men Bridge in Chongqing552Half through arch2007Cantilever MethodKangming Chen, Qiu Zhao, Shozo Nakamura, etc. 101A m o u n t o f S t e e l A r c hB r i d g eSpan/mFigure 1 : span and finished year of steel arch bridge Figure 2 : span arrangement4 STRUCTURE STYLESimilar to other arch bridges, steel arch bridges can be classified into 4 types: fixed (hingeless) arches, arches with single hinges, two-hinge arches and three-hinge arches according to the bearing types of arches. The information shows that most steel arch bridges use fixed arches while few of them use single-hinge, two-hinge or three-hinge arches in China.According to their structure systems, steel arch bridges can be classified into simple systems, composite structure of arch and girder. It can be also classified into arches having thrust or no thrust. When considering the deck location, steel arch bridges have 4 types, i.e.,deck arch bridge: half through arch bridge, through arch bridge and double decked arch bridge. Besides, it can be classified into parallel arches and basket-shaped arches according to the lateral arrangement of arch ribs.A deck arch bridge consists of an arch ring (rib) and a spandrel structure. In steel arch bridges, spandrel structures often use steel material, while deck systems sometimes adopt composite structures of steel and concrete. The arch is named as simple system arch when the deck is only under local loads. For large-span steel arch bridges, continuous girders are always used in the deck system as the main part, which behaves with the integral structure such that the bridge becomes a composite system of arches and girders.As shown in Table 2, among the collected bridges, 3 bridges are deck arch bridges with the percentage of 6.5%, 28 bridges take half through arches and 12 bridges are through arches, both of which with the percentage of 87.0%, while there are 3 double decked arch bridges with the percentage of 6.5%. In other words, half through and through arch bridges constitute most of Chinese steel arch bridges, similar to CFST arch bridges. But most RC arch bridges are deck arch bridges.Table 2 : Structure styles of steel arch bridgesstructure Amount of bridges Percentage structure Amount of bridges percentage deck 3 6.5 through 12 26.1 Half through 28 60.9 Double deck 3 6.55 ARCH ANALYSIS 5.1 Ratio of rise to spanRatio of rise to span is an important factor for steel arch bridges, which has influence on the inner forces and steel cost of an arch. A unreasonable ratio will require more steel in construction and affect the harmony between a bridge and its surroundings. A smaller value brings larger additional stress and shearing forces due to the deflection. On the other hand, large value will influence the lateral stability of arches and induces additional stress due to arch lateral displacements. Generally, deck steel arch bridges usually locate in mountain areas and take relatively large ratios of rise to span for a beautiful scene. While the through steel arch bridges are often found in plane areas using relatively small ratios of rise to span considering102 ARCH’10 – 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges the harmony between the bridge and the environment. Besides, the selection of suitable construction methods is related to this ratio in steel arch bridge (Chen Baochun 2007).From the collected steel arch bridges, it is found that the usual ratios of rise to span for Chinese steel arch bridges are between 1/2-1/8, 1/4-1/5 of which is often taken, as given in Fig. 3. The value between 1/5-1/6.5 has little effect on saving the construction materials. Sometimes, small values such as 1/2.5 are taken considering the engineering specialty. Fig. 4 shows that there is no direct relationship between ratios of rise to span and span lengths.246810121/81/6-1/81/61/5-1/61/51/4-1/51/41/21/2-1/3A m o u n t o f S t e e l A r c h B r i d g eRise to Span ratioFigure 3 : Ratio of rise to span arrangement1/21/31/81/71/61/5r a t i o o f r i s e t o s p a nspan/m1/4Figure 4 : relationship between ratio of rise to span and spanIn China, the usual ratios of rise to span for RC arch bridge are between 1/5-1/8, and 1/6 is most often used. For CFST arch bridges, this value always varies from 1/4 to 1/5, and 1/5 is popular. Therefore, the ratios of rise to span for RC arch bridges are generally less than those of CFST arch bridges in China, and both of them are included in the value range of steel arch bridges. 5.2 Arch axisArch axis is generally expected to be close to the pressure lines of dead loads in order to extract more compressive resistance of arches. For RC or CFST arch bridges, catenary or parabola is mainly used in the design of arch axis, and very few bridges use circular shaped axis or other curves. It is similar case in steel arch bridge, parabola is the most common axis line due to dead loads are nearly uniformly distributed, as can be seen in Table 3. Only 24 steel arch bridges are known of their arch axis in this investigation, from 45 bridges with their spans longer than 100m. It is shown that, 6 bridges use catenary arch axes with the percentage of 25.0%, and 14 bridges use parabola as the axes with the percentage of 58.3, and only 4 bridges take other types of arch axes with the percentage of 16.7%.Kangming Chen, Qiu Zhao, Shozo Nakamura, etc. 103Table 3 : Arch axis of steel arch bridgeArch axis shape parabola catenary otherAmount of bridges14 6 416.7percentage 58.3 25.05.3 Section of archesThe section with box or truss shape is mainly applied in the steel arch bridges of China, instead of “H”, “I”or circular shaped sections which are usually filled with concrete to be CFST structures. CFST arch bridges in China have been constructed so successfully that steel tubular is used in CFST arch bridges, instead of steel arch bridges.Arch ribs with box-shaped sections have many advantages, such as large torsion resistance, integral behaviours of structure, economical construction, and convenient erection. Most box steel arch bridges use rectangular sections, only few adopt irregular one. As an example, the No.2 Chanba River Bridge in Xi’an takes octangular section, and the Changjiang Bridge in Zhongshan as well as the Liuwu Bridge in Lasha uses oval section. The arch ribs with two connected boxes appear, in which one is upon the other in order to make the arch bridge behave well when the span is large, such as the Lupu Bridge and the Yongjiang Bridge.Rigid arch bridges with steel trussed ribs belong to a traditional type of bridge, which presents the beauty of bridge structures for a composite system of stiff truss arches and slender suspenders. In the ribs of steel arch bridges, the upper and lower chords have the sections of steel boxes, shaped steel or steel tube, which can also be used in the web members. Recently, box chords are popularly applied to this type of bridges with relatively large spans in China. The web members are bolted to the chords, and the chords can be bolted or sealed to each other in the factory or bolted in the erection site. Compared to solid ribs, trussed ribs can be produced, moved and fixed conveniently for the smaller members. Furthermore, the deflection of a bridge with trussed ribs under live loads is less than that of a bridge with solid ribs. And trussed ribs are often adopted in highway steel arch bridges under heavy loads or railway bridges under heavy live loads when spans are relatively small.In this paper, 39 steel arch bridges spanning longer than 100m are classified into two types, according to the sections of arch ribs (Table4). It is found that there are 25 box arch bridges and 14 trussed arch bridges. Box shaped sections are mainly used in the steel arch bridges in China because these bridges usually have midium or small spans. For example, steel arch bridges with spans ranging from 100m to 150m occupy 50.0% of all bridges. RC arch bridges always adopt double-parabolic arches, separated ribs or ribs with the box sections (Chen Baochun and Ye Lin 2006). Most CFST arch bridges take trussed sections for arch ribs, followed by dumbbell shapes (Chen Baochun and Yang Yalin 2005).Table 4 : Arch rib sections of steel arch bridgessection Box shape Truss shapeAmount of bridges 25 14percentage 64.1 35.96 CONSTRUCTION METHODConstruction methods of arch bridges can be classified into four ways. In the first way, there are also two types: self-erection and non self-erection, considering if the finished part of a bridge works as the support of the left structure. Self-erection methods can be further classified into cantilever and stiffened scaffolding methods. And non self-erection methods can be classified into scaffolding method, swing method, cableway method and cable-hoisting method. In the second way, construction method of arch bridge includes scaffolding method and unscaffolding method. In the third way considering hoisting device, construction method can be classified into cable-hoisting method, floating method and crane method. In the last way, methods of cast-in-site and prefabrication can be obtained (Chen Baochun 2007).104 ARCH’10 – 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges For RC arch bridge, construction method commonly used are cantilever erection method, stiffened scaffolding method, scaffolding method and main method of swing erection (Chen Baochun and Ye Lin 2006, Leonardo Fernández Troyano). For CFST arch bridge, swing method and scaffolding method are often taken, but cantilever erection method is the most common one (Xu Wei 2006, Chen Baochun 1997). The construction of steel arch bridge in China always uses cantilever method, scafolding method, launching method, cable-hoisting method and swing method. The construction of steel arch bridge is superior to other types of arch bridges, especially when spans are large.Cantilever method is the most popular for steel arch bridge construction. According to the bearing structure composed by temporary members and arch ribs or rings, cantilever method can be further divided into cable-stayed cantilever method, free cantilever method, and cantilever truss method. Free cantilever method is often employed in the construction because steel members are prefabricated and not heavy. In China, cable-stayed cantilever method is the most popular when the bridge span is relatively large. In this kind of method, pylon and cable are used to hold the cantilever arch advanced from spring to crown. Temperate pylon can be built on piers or at abutments. Stayed cables hold the cantilever arch with rear stays anchored to the ground or approach bridges. Before the bridge arches are closed, the arches are not efficient bearing structures, and auxiliary members or structures are necessary during the construction. Scaffolding method is usually used in railway steel arch bridges with stiffened girders and flexible arches. During the construction, arch ribs are erected through scaffolds on decks which are finished using the method as that of common girder bridges. For some steel arch bridges with small spans, when the river is shallow with allowable navigation requirement, temporary studded scaffolding method is sometimes used (Lai Wuzhao et al. 1999).Swing method, global launching method and cable-hoisting method are used in a few steel arch bridges. The Dongping Bridge in Foshan adopted the swing method, the Jiubao Bridge in Hangzhou did the global launching method, and the Xinguang Bridge in Guanghzou used the cable-hoisting method in which the trussed ribs above the deck were divided into three segments lifted by two scaffolds in the water.According to the construction methods mentioned above, the collected steel arch bridges can be classified as listed in Table 5. It shows that the main construction methods: cantilever method and scaffolding method have the percentage of 87.1%, and other methods occupy only 12.9%. Fig. 5 shows the relationship between construction method and span, from which it is found that cantilever method can be used in steel arch bridge with different span lengths, while scaffolding method is mainly applied in composite structures of arches and girders with small spans.Table 5 : Construction methods of steel arch bridgesConstruction method cantilevermethodScaffoldingmethodswingmethodlaunchingmethodcable hoistingmethodbridges14 13 2 1 1percentage 45.2 41.9 6.5 3.2 3.2It is known that construction method has large influence on the bridge technology for arch bridges. Steel arch bridge’s construction method, towards less-scaffolding or non-scaffolding, is related to bridge location, construction cost and project duration.7 FIGURE PURSUING AND STRUCTURE DISSIMILATINGArch, favoured by many bridge designers, especially architects, is a structure with aesthetics, which can be integrated with the nature well while it services as a structure, just like that T.Y.Lin said, “Many arch bridges are selected due to their values in aesthetics”. At the same time, aesthetics pursuing causes the change and development of bridge figures and dissimilation of structures (Chen Baochun 2007).Kangming Chen, Qiu Zhao, Shozo Nakamura, etc. 105span/mFigure 5 : relationship between construction method and spanThe transverse stability of arches should be alarmed during the bridge design. Generally, the style of two or more arch ribs connected through transverse systems of braces, or of basket shapes is selected to increase the transverse stability of arch bridges. However, a very different butterfly-shaped arch style, with two ribs outwards each other and no transverse bracing between them, is adopted in the Nanning Bridge in Guangxi Province and the Changjiang Bridge in Zhongshan City. Obviously, such kind of structure is unreasonable in its bearing system, which requires a high cost of construction.Besides, in some steel arch bridges, the ribs have different span lengths in the same bridge, such as the Fenghua Bridges and the Dagu Bridge in Tianjin, or the arch axis are dissimilated, such as the Bengbu Bridge in Tianjin and the Jiubao Bridge in Hangzhou, or the ribs have different rises. There are so many dissimilation styles, some of which are realized and some are just assumptions.8 CONCLUSIONSFew steel arch bridges have been built before 2000. However, the quantity as well as span lengths of this type of bridge increases at a high speed in the last decade. As mentioned above, steel arch bridges have many advantages, which are needed in the massive traffic infrastructure construction in China. Thus, it is important and necessary to conduct further study on the design theory, structure style topology, construction method and so on. Based on the information collected for steel arch bridges in China, their present situation is presented in this paper, and the author wish the analysis results on some parameters could provide references for the design and construction as well research of this type of bridge in the future.REFERENCESChen Baochun, 2005. State-of-the-art of the development of arch bridges in China, The 4th International Conference on New Dimensions of Bridge, Proce, p.13-24.Chen Baochun, 2004. Attainment and prospect of arch bridge technique. The second science and technology innovation forum of China Highway, Proc, p.121-125.Chen Baochun, Gao Jing, Wu Qingxiong, 2006. An overview of steel arch bridg, Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 30(supplement), p.22-30.Chen Baochun, 1997. A Summarized Account of Developments in Concrete Filled Steel Tube Arch Bridge, Bridge Construction, p.8-13.Chen Baochun and Ye Lin, 2006. Analysis on present situation and development tendency of CFST arch bridges in China, Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 28(2), p.89-96.Chen Baochun and Yang Yalin, 2005. Analysis on the application of CFST arch bridges, The National Conference on Bridge Engineering, Proce, p.219-226.Chen Baochun, 2007. Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Arch Bridges(Edition2), China Communications Press.Gao Jing and Chen Baochu, 2005. A summarize of steel arch bridge, The National Conference on Bridge106 ARCH’10 – 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges Engineering, Proce, p.211-219.Lai Wuzhao, Zhang Diwei and Zeng Rongchuan, 1999. The Design and Research of Double-Decker Steel Arch Bridge, Journal of Fuzhou University 34(4): p.83-87.Leonardo Fernández Troyano. Procedures For The Construction Of Large Concrete Arches. Arch Bridge IV, p.53-63.Xu Wei, 2006. Design of Steel Truss Rigid Arch Bridge, Bridge Construction (supplement 1), p.1-3.。
桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献
桥梁工程中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)BRIDGE ENGINEERING AND AESTHETICSEvolvement of bridge Engineering,brief reviewAmong the early documented reviews of construction materials and structu re types are the books of Marcus Vitruvios Pollio in the first century B.C.The basic principles of statics were developed by the Greeks , and were exemplifi ed in works and applications by Leonardo da Vinci,Cardeno,and Galileo.In the fifteenth and sixteenth century, engineers seemed to be unaware of this record , and relied solely on experience and tradition for building bridges and aqueduc ts .The state of the art changed rapidly toward the end of the seventeenth cent ury when Leibnitz, Newton, and Bernoulli introduced mathematical formulatio ns. Published works by Lahire (1695)and Belidor (1792) about the theoretical a nalysis of structures provided the basis in the field of mechanics of materials .Kuzmanovic(1977) focuses on stone and wood as the first bridge-building materials. Iron was introduced during the transitional period from wood to steel .According to recent records , concrete was used in France as early as 1840 for a bridge 39 feet (12 m) long to span the Garoyne Canal at Grisoles, but r einforced concrete was not introduced in bridge construction until the beginnin g of this century . Prestressed concrete was first used in 1927.Stone bridges of the arch type (integrated superstructure and substructure) were constructed in Rome and other European cities in the middle ages . Thes e arches were half-circular , with flat arches beginning to dominate bridge wor k during the Renaissance period. This concept was markedly improved at the e nd of the eighteenth century and found structurally adequate to accommodate f uture railroad loads . In terms of analysis and use of materials , stone bridges have not changed much ,but the theoretical treatment was improved by introd ucing the pressure-line concept in the early 1670s(Lahire, 1695) . The arch the ory was documented in model tests where typical failure modes were considered (Frezier,1739).Culmann(1851) introduced the elastic center method for fixed-e nd arches, and showed that three redundant parameters can be found by the us e of three equations of coMPatibility.Wooden trusses were used in bridges during the sixteenth century when P alladio built triangular frames for bridge spans 10 feet long . This effort also f ocused on the three basic principles og bridge design : convenience(serviceabili ty) ,appearance , and endurance(strength) . several timber truss bridges were co nstructed in western Europe beginning in the 1750s with spans up to 200 feet (61m) supported on stone substructures .Significant progress was possible in t he United States and Russia during the nineteenth century ,prompted by the ne ed to cross major rivers and by an abundance of suitable timber . Favorable e conomic considerations included initial low cost and fast construction .The transition from wooden bridges to steel types probably did not begin until about 1840 ,although the first documented use of iron in bridges was the chain bridge built in 1734 across the Oder River in Prussia . The first truss completely made of iron was in 1840 in the United States , followed by Eng land in 1845 , Germany in 1853 , and Russia in 1857 . In 1840 , the first ir on arch truss bridge was built across the Erie Canal at Utica .The Impetus of AnalysisThe theory of structures ,developed mainly in the ninetheenth century,foc used on truss analysis, with the first book on bridges written in 1811. The Wa rren triangular truss was introduced in 1846 , supplemented by a method for c alculating the correcet forces .I-beams fabricated from plates became popular in England and were used in short-span bridges.In 1866, Culmann explained the principles of cantilever truss bridges, an d one year later the first cantilever bridge was built across the Main River in Hassfurt, Germany, with a center span of 425 feet (130m) . The first cantileve r bridge in the United States was built in 1875 across the Kentucky River.A most impressive railway cantilever bridge in the nineteenth century was the Fir st of Forth bridge , built between 1883 and 1893 , with span magnitudes of 1711 feet (521.5m).At about the same time , structural steel was introduced as a prime mater ial in bridge work , although its quality was often poor . Several early exampl es are the Eads bridge in St.Louis ; the Brooklyn bridge in New York ; and t he Glasgow bridge in Missouri , all completed between 1874 and 1883.Among the analytical and design progress to be mentioned are the contrib utions of Maxwell , particularly for certain statically indeterminate trusses ; the books by Cremona (1872) on graphical statics; the force method redefined by Mohr; and the works by Clapeyron who introduced the three-moment equation s.The Impetus of New MaterialsSince the beginning of the twentieth century , concrete has taken its place as one of the most useful and important structural materials . Because of the coMParative ease with which it can be molded into any desired shape , its st ructural uses are almost unlimited . Wherever Portland cement and suitable agg regates are available , it can replace other materials for certain types of structu res, such as bridge substructure and foundation elements .In addition , the introduction of reinforced concrete in multispan frames at the beginning of this century imposed new analytical requirements . Structures of a high order of redundancy could not be analyzed with the classical metho ds of the nineteenth century .The importance of joint rotation was already dem onstrated by Manderla (1880) and Bendixen (1914) , who developed relationshi ps between joint moments and angular rotations from which the unknown mom ents can be obtained ,the so called slope-deflection method .More simplification s in frame analysis were made possible by the work of Calisev (1923) , who used successive approximations to reduce the system of equations to one simpl e expression for each iteration step . This approach was further refined and int egrated by Cross (1930) in what is known as the method of moment distributi on .One of the most import important recent developments in the area of analytical procedures is the extension of design to cover the elastic-plastic range , also known as load factor or ultimate design. Plastic analysis was introduced with some practical observations by Tresca (1846) ; and was formulated by Sa int-Venant (1870) , The concept of plasticity attracted researchers and engineers after World War Ⅰ, mainly in Germany , with the center of activity shifting to England and the United States after World War Ⅱ.The probabilistic approa ch is a new design concept that is expected to replace the classical determinist ic methodology.A main step forward was the 1969 addition of the Federal Highway Adim inistration (F HWA)”Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Members “ that co vers strength and serviceability at ultimate design . This was prepared for use in conjunction with the 1969 American Association of State Highway Offficials (AASHO) Standard Specification, and was presented in a format that is readil y adaptable to the development of ultimate design specifications .According to this document , the proportioning of reinforced concrete members ( including c olumns ) may be limited by various stages of behavior : elastic , cracked , an d ultimate . Design axial loads , or design shears . Structural capacity is the r eaction phase , and all calculated modified strength values derived from theoret ical strengths are the capacity values , such as moment capacity ,axial load ca pacity ,or shear capacity .At serviceability states , investigations may also be n ecessary for deflections , maximum crack width , and fatigue .Bridge TypesA notable bridge type is the suspension bridge , with the first example bu ilt in the United States in 1796. Problems of dynamic stability were investigate d after the Tacoma bridge collapse , and this work led to significant theoretica l contributions Steinman ( 1929 ) summarizes about 250 suspension bridges bu ilt throughout the world between 1741 and 1928 .With the introduction of the interstate system and the need to provide stru ctures at grade separations , certain bridge types have taken a strong place in bridge practice. These include concrete superstructures (slab ,T-beams,concrete box girders ), steel beam and plate girders , steel box girders , composite const ruction , orthotropic plates , segmental construction , curved girders ,and cable-stayed bridges . Prefabricated members are given serious consideration , while interest in box sections remains strong .Bridge Appearance and AestheticsGrimm ( 1975 ) documents the first recorded legislative effort to control t he appearance of the built environment . This occurred in 1647 when the Cou ncil of New Amsterdam appointed three officials . In 1954 , the Supreme Cou rt of the United States held that it is within the power of the legislature to de termine that communities should be attractive as well as healthy , spacious as well as clean , and balanced as well as patrolled . The Environmental Policy Act of 1969 directs all agencies of the federal government to identify and dev elop methods and procedures to ensure that presently unquantified environmenta l amentities and values are given appropriate consideration in decision making along with economic and technical aspects .Although in many civil engineering works aesthetics has been practiced al most intuitively , particularly in the past , bridge engineers have not ignored o r neglected the aesthetic disciplines .Recent research on the subject appears to lead to a rationalized aesthetic design methodology (Grimm and Preiser , 1976 ) .Work has been done on the aesthetics of color ,light ,texture , shape , and proportions , as well as other perceptual modalities , and this direction is bot h theoretically and empirically oriented .Aesthetic control mechanisms are commonly integrated into the land-use re gulations and design standards . In addition to concern for aesthetics at the sta te level , federal concern focuses also on the effects of man-constructed enviro nment on human life , with guidelines and criteria directed toward improving quality and appearance in the design process . Good potential for the upgradin g of aesthetic quality in bridge superstructures and substructures can be seen in the evaluation structure types aimed at improving overall appearance .Lords and lording groupsThe loads to be considered in the design of substructures and bridge foun dations include loads and forces transmitted from the superstructure, and those acting directly on the substructure and foundation .AASHTO loads . Section 3 of AASHTO specifications summarizes the loa ds and forces to be considered in the design of bridges (superstructure and sub structure ) . Briefly , these are dead load ,live load , iMPact or dynamic effec t of live load , wind load , and other forces such as longitudinal forces , cent rifugal force ,thermal forces , earth pressure , buoyancy , shrinkage and long t erm creep , rib shortening , erection stresses , ice and current pressure , collisi on force , and earthquake stresses .Besides these conventional loads that are ge nerally quantified , AASHTO also recognizes indirect load effects such as fricti on at expansion bearings and stresses associated with differential settlement of bridge components .The LRFD specifications divide loads into two distinct cate gories : permanent and transient .Permanent loadsDead Load : this includes the weight DC of all bridge components , appu rtenances and utilities, wearing surface DW nd future overlays , and earth fill EV. Both AASHTO and LRFD specifications give tables summarizing the unit weights of materials commonly used in bridge work .Transient LoadsVehicular Live Load (LL) Vehicle loading for short-span bridges :considera ble effort has been made in the United States and Canada to develop a live lo ad model that can represent the highway loading more realistically than the H or the HS AASHTO models . The current AASHTO model is still the applica ble loading.桥梁工程和桥梁美学桥梁工程的发展概况早在公元前1世纪，Marcus Vitrucios Pollio 的著作中就有关于建筑材料和结构类型的记载和评述。
桥梁工程外文
omoramadan@yahoo.ca Osman Ramadan, born 1961, received his Ph.D. in Civil Engrg. from Univ. of Western Ontario, Canada. He is currently Dean of Fac. of Eng., Beni-Suef Univ. & Professor at Cairo University. His research interests include static and dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete structures and soil-structure interaction analysis.
2. Introduction
The economy of the bridges depends on having useful guide lines for improving the cost effectiveness of the main parameters such as span to depth ratios, top and bottom slab thicknesses. These guidelines are usually based on previous experience. Optimizing these guidelines can result in significant savings in the total bridge cost as well as saving time consumed in the trials to find the optimal value. Many bridges worldwide have box-section prestressed decks, and Menn (1990) estimated that the prestressing steel cost is about 30% of the cost of the superstructure material. Hence, optimizing the prestressing steel can lead to significant savings. This paper focuses on finding guide lines for cost reduction of prestressed concrete bridges through obtaining optimum layout for the prestressing tendon.
桥梁工程英文参考文献(精选118个最新)
桥梁工程指桥梁勘测、设计、施工、养护和检定等的工作过程，以及研究这一过程的科学和工程技术，它是土木工程的一个分支。
桥梁工程学的发展主要取决于交通运输对它的需要。
以下是搜索整理的关于桥梁工程英文参考文献，欢迎借鉴参考。
桥梁工程英文参考文献一：[1]Liam J. Butler,Weiwei Lin,Jinlong Xu,Niamh Gibbons,Mohammed Z. E. B. Elshafie,Campbell R. Middleton. Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of a Self-Sensing Railway Bridge during Construction[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2018,23(10).[2]Reza Akbari. Accelerated Construction of Short Span Railroad Bridges in Iran[J]. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction,2019,24(1).[3]John C. Cleary,Bret M. Webb,Scott L. Douglass,Thomas Buhring,Eric J. Steward. Assessment of Engineering Adaptations to Extreme Events and Climate Change for a Simply Supported Interstate Bridge over a Shallow Estuary: Case Study[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2018,23(12).[4]Keke Peng. Risk Evaluation for Bridge Engineering Based on Cloud-Clustering Group Decision Method[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2019,33(1).[5]Y. M. Zhang,H. Wang,J. X. Mao,F. Q. Wang,S. T. Hu,X. X. Zhao. Monitoring-Based Assessment of the Construction Influence of Benoto Pile on Adjacent High-Speed Railway Bridge: Case Study[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2019,33(1).[6]Deshan Shan,Y. H. Chai,Xiaohang Zhou,Inamullah Khan. Tension Identification of Suspenders with Supplemental Dampers for Through and Half-Through Arch Bridges under Construction[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2019,145(3).[7]Haofeng Xing,Liangliang Liu,Yong Luo. Effects of Construction Technology on Bearing Behaviors of Rock-Socketed Bored Piles as Bridge Foundations[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(4).[8]Xiaoming Wang,Pengbo Fei,You Dong,Chengshu Wang. Accelerated Construction of Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Using Novel Tower-Girder Anchorage Technique[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(5).[9]Sattar Dorafshan,Kristopher R. Johnson,Marc Maguire,Marvin W. Halling,Paul J. Barr,Michael Culmo. Friction Coefficients for Slide-In Bridge Construction Using PTFE and Steel Sliding Bearings[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(6).[10]Mustafa Mashal,Alessandro Palermo. Low-Damage Seismic Design for Accelerated Bridge Construction[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(7).[11]Yeo Hoon Yoon,Sam Ataya,Mark Mahan,Amir Malek,M. Saiid Saiidi,Toorak Zokaie. Probabilistic Damage Control Application: Implementation of Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering in Seismic Design of Highway Bridge Columns[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(7).[12]Sherif M. Daghash,Qindan Huang,Osman E. Ozbulut. Tensile Behavior and Cost-Efficiency Evaluation of ASTM A1010 Steel for Bridge Construction[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(8).[13]Dongzhou Huang,Wei-zhen Chen. Cable Structures in Bridge Engineering[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(8).[14]Fuyou Xu,Haiyan Yu,Mingjie Zhang. Aerodynamic Response of a Bridge Girder Segment during Lifting Construction Stage[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(8).[15]Elmira Shoushtari,M. Saiid Saiidi,Ahmad Itani,Mohamed A. Moustafa. Design, Construction, and Shake Table Testing of a Steel Girder Bridge System with ABC Connections[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(9).[16]Upul Attanayake,Haluk Aktan. Procedures and Guidelines for Design of Lateral Bridge Slide Activities[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(9).[17]Nathan T. Davis,Ehssan Hoomaan,Anil K. Agrawal,Masoud Sanayei,Farrokh “Frank” Jalinoos. Foundation Reuse in Accelerated Bridge Construction[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2019,24(10).[18]Cheng Wen,Hong-xian Zhang. Influence of Material Time-Dependent Performance on the Cantilever Construction of PSC Box Girder Bridge[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development (English Edition),2019,13(2).[19]Hosein Naderpour,Ali Kheyroddin,Seyedmehdi Mortazavi. Risk Assessment in Bridge Construction Projects in Iran Using Monte Carlo Simulation Technique[J]. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction,2019,24(4).[20]Carlos M. Zuluaga,Alex Albert. Preventing falls: Choosing compatible Fall Protection Supplementary Devices (FPSD) for bridge maintenance work using virtual prototyping[J]. Safety Science,2018,108.[21]Zhe Wang,Kai-wei Zhang,Gang Wei,Bin Li,Qiang Li,Wang-jing Yao. Field measurement analysis of the influence of double shield tunnel construction onreinforced bridge[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research,2018,81.[22]Michele Fabio Granata,Giuseppe Longo,Antonino Recupero,Marcello Arici. Construction sequence analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridges[J]. Engineering Structures,2018,174.[23]Mi Zhou,Wei Lu,Jianwei Song,George C. Lee. Application of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in bridge engineering[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2018,186.[24]Erxiang Song,Peng Li,Ming Lin,Xiaodong Liu. The rationality of semi-rigid immersed tunnel element structure scheme and its first application in Hong Kong Zhuhai Macao bridge project[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research,2018,82.[25]Di Zhao,Yixuan Ku. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex bridges bilateral primary somatosensory cortices during cross-modal working memory[J]. Behavioural Brain Research,2018,350.[26]Jia-Rui Lin,Jian-Ping Zhang,Xiao-Yang Zhang,Zhen-Zhong Hu. Automating closed-loop structural safety management for bridge construction through multisource data integration[J]. Advances in Engineering Software,2019,128.[27]Cunming Ma,Qingsong Duan,Qiusheng Li,Haili Liao,Qi Tao. Aerodynamic characteristics of a long-span cable-stayed bridge under construction[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,184.[28]Wenqin Deng,Duo Liu,Yingqian Xiong,Jiandong Zhang. Experimental study on asynchronous construction for composite bridges with corrugated steel webs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2019,157.[29]Li Hui,Faress Hraib,Brandon Gillis,Miguel Vicente,Riyadh Hindi. A Simplified method to minimize exterior girder rotation of steel bridges during deck construction[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,183.[30]Faress Hraib,Li Hui,Miguel Vicente,Riyadh Hindi. Evaluation of bridge exterior girder rotation during construction[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,187.桥梁工程英文参考文献二：[31]Yaojun Ge,Yong Yuan. State-of-the-Art Technology in the Construction of Sea-Crossing Fixed Links with a Bridge, Island, and Tunnel Combination[J]. Engineering,2019,5(1).[32]Mingjie Zhang,Fuyou Xu,Zhanbiao Zhang,Xuyong Ying. Energy budget analysis and engineering modeling of post-flutter limit cycle oscillation of a bridge deck[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics,2019,188.[33]Alberto Leva. PID control education for computer engineering students: A step to bridge a cultural gap[J]. IFAC Journal of Systems and Control,2019,8.[34]Mustafa Mashal,Alessandro Palermo. Emulative seismic resistant technology for Accelerated Bridge Construction[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2019,124.[35]. Science - Geoscience; Studies from Presidency University Provide New Data on Geoscience (Bridge construction and river channel morphology-A comprehensive study of flow behavior and sediment size alteration of the River Chel, India)[J]. Science Letter,2018.[36]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Studies from Tongji University Update Current Data on Wind Engineering (Flutter performance and improvement for a suspension bridge with central-slotted box girder during erection)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2018.[37]. FirstEnergy Corp.; Mon Power Relocates Transmission Line for Construction of Corridor H Bridge in Tucker County[J]. Energy Weekly News,2018.[38]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Recent Findings by A. Benidir and Colleagues in Wind Engineering Provides New Insights (The impact of circularity defects on bridge stay cable dry galloping stability)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2018.[39]Ron Stang. Gordie Howe bridge officials announce cost, 74-month construction schedule[J]. Daily Commercial News,2018,91(192).[40]. Biomedical Engineering - Tissue Engineering; Investigators at Skane University Hospital Report Findings in Tissue Engineering (Electrospun nerve guide conduits have the potential to bridge peripheral nerve injuries in vivo)[J]. Biotech Week,2018.[41]. Information Technology - Data Delivery; Researchers from Chung Ang University Provide Details of New Studies and Findings in the Area of Data Delivery (Three-Dimensional Information Delivery for Design and Construction of Prefabricated Bridge Piers)[J]. Computers, Networks & Communications,2018.[42]Anonymous. Construction begins on U.S. side of Presidio International Rail Bridge[J]. Railway Track & Structures,2018,114(11).[43]. Engineering - Structural Engineering; Beijing Jiaotong University Details Findings in Structural Engineering (Scour Risk Analysis of Existing Bridge Pier Based on Inversion Theory)[J]. Computers, Networks & Communications,2018.[44]. Notice of Availability of a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the New U.S. Land Port of Entry in Madawaska, Maine and Madawaska-Edmundston International Bridge Project[J]. The Federal Register / FIND,2018,83(232).[45]. Regulated Navigation Area and Safety Zone: Tappan Zee Bridge Construction Project, Hudson River; South Nyack and Tarrytown, NY[J]. The Federal Register / FIND,2018,83(245).[46]Anonymous. Bronte Construction is awarded $ 5M bridge job[J]. Daily Commercial News,2018,91(242).[47]. Kanazawa University; Proposed engineering method could help make buildings and bridges safer[J]. NewsRx Health & Science,2019.[48]. Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Construction of Railroad Bridges Across Sand Creek and Lake Pend Oreille at Sandpoint, Bonner County, Idaho.[J]. The Federal Register / FIND,2019,84(025).[49]Anonymous. Bridge installation moves СТА95th/Dan Ryan Terminal Improvement Project forward[J]. Railway Track & Structures,2018,114(12).[50]Anonymous. Investments made in Hay River fish plant and bridge projects[J]. Daily Commercial News,2019,92(10).[51]. Reclamation work starts on $248m Bahrain bridge[J]. Gulf Construction,2019.[52]. Extension of Comment Period for the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Construction of Railroad Bridges Across Sand Creek and Lake Pend Oreille at Sandpoint, Bonner County, Idaho[J]. The Federal Register / FIND,2019,84(062).[53]. Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on the Frank J. Wood Bridge Project in Maine[J]. The Federal Register / FIND,2019,84(071).[54]. Energy - Electric Power; Study Results from Electrical Engineering Department Update Understanding of Electric Power (Development of Dynamic Phasor Based Higher Index Model for Performance Enhancement of Dual Active Bridge)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[55]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Findings from Southwest Jiaotong University Provides New Data on Wind Engineering (Wind Characteristics Along a Bridge Catwalk In a Deep-cutting Gorge From Field Measurements)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[56]. Work starts on Qatar bridge[J]. Gulf Construction,2019.[57]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Data from Southeast University Provide New Insights into Wind Engineering (Non-stationary Turbulent Wind Field Simulation of Bridge Deck Using Non-negative Matrix Factorization)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[58]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Findings from University of Stavanger Update Understanding of Wind Engineering (Aerodynamic Performance of a Grooved Cylinder In Flow Conditions Encountered By Bridge Stay Cables In Service)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[59]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Study Findings from Hong Kong Polytechnic University Broaden Understanding of Wind Engineering (Buffeting-induced Stress Analysis of Long-span Twin-box-beck Bridges Based On Pod Pressure Modes)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[60]. Engineering - Software Engineering; Researchers' Work from Polytechnic University of Valencia Focuses on Software Engineering (Valencia Bridge Fire Tests: Validation of Simplified and Advanced Numerical Approaches To Model Bridge Fire Scenarios)[J]. Computers, Networks & Communications,2019.桥梁工程英文参考文献三：[61]. Hood River-White Salmon Bridge Replacement Project; Notice of Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement[J]. The Federal Register / FIND,2019,84(100).[62]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Recent Studies from Southwest Jiaotong University Add New Data to Wind Engineering (Integrated Transfer Function for Buffeting Response Evaluation of Long-span Bridges)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[63]. Engineering - Pipeline Systems Engineering; Recent Findings from W.J. Wang and Co-Authors Provide New Insights into Pipeline Systems Engineering (Wind Tunnel Test Study On Pipeline Suspension Bridge Via Aeroelastic Model With Pi Connection)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[64]Dan O’Reilly. Baudette/ Rainy River International Bridge a construction collaboration at every crossing[J]. Daily Commercial News,2019,92(105).[65]. Archaeology; New Findings on Archaeology Reported by C.P. Dappert-Coonrod et al (Walking In Their Shoes: a Late Victorian Shoe Assemblage From the New Mississippi River Bridge Project In East St. Louis)[J]. Science Letter,2019.[66]Ron Stang. First signs of Gordie Howe bridge construction[J]. Daily Commercial News,2019,92(119).[67]Li Chuntong,Wang Deyu. Knowledge-Based Engineering–based method for containership lashing bridge optimization design and structural improvement with functionally graded thickness plates[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,2019,233(3).[68]Ashley Delaney,Kari Jurgenson. Building Bridges: Connecting science and engineering with literacy and mathematics[J]. Science and Children,2019,57(1).[69]. Hydrodynamics; Investigators from School of Civil Engineering Report New Data on Hydrodynamics (Effects of Air Relief Openings On the Mitigation of Solitary Wave Forces On Bridge Decks)[J]. Science Letter,2019.[70]. Engineering - Wind Engineering; Reports Summarize Wind Engineering Study Results from Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) (Ale-vms Methods for Wind-resistant Design of Long-span Bridges)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019.[71]. Engineering - Engineering Informatics; Reports Summarize Engineering Informatics Study Results from Seoul National University (Xgboost Application On Bridge Management Systems for Proactive Damage Estimation)[J]. Computers, Networks & Communications,2019.[72]. Microscopy; Recent Findings in Microscopy Described by Researchers from Chongqing Jiaotong University (Application of Long-distance Microscope In Crack Detection In Bridge Construction)[J]. Science Letter,2019.[73]Ghosh Soumadwip,Bierig Tobias,Lee Sangbae,Jana Suvamay,L?hle Adelheid,Schnapp Gisela,Tautermann Christofer S,Vaidehi Nagarajan. Engineering Salt Bridge Networks between Transmembrane Helices Confers Thermostability in G-Protein-Coupled Receptors.[J]. Journal of chemical theory and computation,2018.[74]Yainoy Sakda,Phuadraksa Thanawat,Wichit Sineewanlaya,Sompoppokakul Maprang,Songtawee Napat,Prachayasittikul Virapong,Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya Chartchalerm. Production and Characterization of Recombinant Wild Type Uricase from Indonesian Coelacanth ( L. menadoensis ) and Improvement of Its Thermostability by In Silico Rational Design and Disulphide Bridges Engineering.[J]. International journal of molecular sciences,2019,20(6).[75]Johnson Audrey M,Howell Dana M. Mobility bridges a gap in care: Findings from an early mobilisation quality improvement project in acute care.[J]. Journal of clinical nursing,2019.[76]Brzyski Przemys?aw,Grudzińska Magdalena,Majerek Dariusz. Analysis of the Occurrence of Thermal Bridges in Several Variants of Connections of the Wall and the Ground Floor in Construction Technology with the Use of a Hemp-lime Composite.[J]. Materials (Basel, Switzerland),2019,12(15).[77]Hager Keri,Kading Margarette,O'Donnell Carolyn,Yapel Ann,MacDonald Danielle,Albee Jennifer Nelson,Nash Cynthia,Renier Colleen,Dean Katherine,Schneiderhan Mark. Bridging Community Mental Health and Primary Care to Improve Medication Monitoring and Outcomes for Patients With Mental Illness Taking Second-Generation Antipsychotics-HDC/DFMC Bridge Project, Phase 1: Group Concept Mapping.[J]. The primary care companion for CNS disorders,2019,21(4).[78]Mardewi Jamal,M. Jazir Alkas,Supriyadi Yusuf. Study of Pre-Stressed Concrete Girders Planning on Flyover Project Overpass Bridges Mahakam IV Samarinda City[P]. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Materials Engineering and Management - Engineering Section (ICMEMe 2018),2019.[79]Aimin Zhang,Huijun Wu. Analysis of Internal Force in Construction of Asymmetric Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge[P]. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Forum on Environment, Materials and Energy (IFEME 2019),2019.[80]Jiang Wei,Sun Litong,Zhang Xiwen. Research on achievement assessment method for course objectives of bridge engineering based on OBE[P]. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2019),2019.[81]Welf Zimmermann,Stefan Kuss. New Composite Construction Method with STEEL/UHPFRC Constructing Railway Bridges[J]. Solid State Phenomena,2019,4809.[82]Michail M. Kozhevnikov,Sofia T. Kozhevnikova,Alexander V. Ginzburg,VitaliyA. Gladkikh. Improving the Efficiency of the Bridges Construction Organization on the Basis of Information Modeling[J]. Materials Science Forum,2018,4717.[83]Xiangmin Yu,Dewei Chen. Innovative Method for the Construction of Cable-Stayed Bridges by Cable Crane[J]. Structural Engineering International,2018,28(4).[84]Chuntong Li,Deyu Wang. Multi-objective optimisation of a container ship lashing bridge using knowledge-based engineering[J]. Ships and Offshore Structures,2019,14(1).[85]Hurley,Taiwo. Critical social work and competency practice: a proposal to bridge theory and practice in the classroom[J]. Social Work Education,2019,38(2).[86]Jamey Barbas,Matthew Paradis. Scalable, Modularized Solutions in the Design and Construction of the Governor Mario M. Cuomo Bridge[J]. Structural Engineering International,2019,29(1).[87]. The 2nd Bridge Engineering Workshop Mexico 2019[J]. Structural Engineering International,2019,29(3).[88]Wei Duan,Guojun Cai,Songyu Liu,Yu Du,Liuwen Zhu,Anand J. Puppala. SPT–CPTU Correlations and Liquefaction Evaluation for the Island and Tunnel Project of the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering,2018,16(10).[89]Seungjun Kim,Deokhee Won,Young-Jong Kang. Ultimate Behavior of Steel Cable-Stayed Bridges During Construction[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures,2019,19(3).[90]Shangqu Sun,Shucai Li,Liping Li,Shaoshuai Shi,Jing Wang,Jie Hu,Cong Hu. Slope stability analysis and protection measures in bridge and tunnel engineering: a practical case study from Southwestern China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2019,78(5).桥梁工程英文参考文献四：[91]Czes?aw Machelski. Effects of Surrounding Earth on Shell During the Construction of Flexible Bridge Structures[J]. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica,2019,41(2).[92]Fan Dingqiang,Tian Wenjing,Feng Dandian,Cheng Jiahao,Yang Rui,Zhang Kaiquan. Development and Applications of Ultra-high Performance Concrete in Bridge Engineering[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2018,189(2).[93]Xiaoyi Ma,Hailin Yang. The important role of civilized construction - a case study of flood control measures in a bridge construction of Gansu province, China[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2018,189(2).[94]Ruixin Huang,Keke Peng,Wen Zhou. Study on Risk Assessment of Bridge Construction Based on AHP-GST Method[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2018,189(4).[95]HanLin Zhou. Research on Bridge Construction Control Technology Based onMobile Formwork[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2018,189(2).[96]Jasson Tan,Yen Lei Voo. Working Example on 70m Long Ultra High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) Composite Bridge[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,2018,431(4).[97]N R Setiati. The feasibility study of bridge construction plan in Digoel River Province of Papua[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,235(1).[98]Junhua Xiao,Miao Liu,Tieyi Zhong,Guangzhi Fu. Seismic performance analysis of concrete-filled steel tubular single pylon cable-stayed bridge with swivel construction[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,218(1).[99]Zhengwei Feng,Longbin Lin. Discussion on manufacturing technology of steel box girder of cross-line bridge engineering in Xiamen Hele road[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,233(3).[100]Jiann Tsair Chang,Ho Chieh Hsiao. Analytic Hierarchy Process for Evaluation Weights on Occupational Safety and Hygiene Items in the Bridge Construction Site[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,233(3).[101]Yilong Huang,Xilin Yan,Jianying Wu,Guangqiang Peng. Cooperation research between electrode line transversal differential protection and bridge differential protection in HVDC project[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,227(4).[102]Li He,Wenwei Zhu,Shiqiang Mei,Xinji Xie. Checking Calculation Analysis for Construction of Long-span Steel Box Girder Bridges[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2019,1176(5).[103]Norhidayu Kasim,Mohd Rozaiman Sulaiman,Kamarudin Abu Taib. Utilization of ultra - high performance concrete for bridge construction – a case study of Kg. Seberang Manong to Pekan Manong bridge[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,2019,512(1).[104]Mairizal,Edrizal,Mohammad Ismail,Rosli Mohamad Zin. Identifying occurrences of accident at work place in terms of occupational safety on roads and bridges infrastructure in Indonesia[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,2019,513(1).[105]S T Noor,M S Islam,M Mumtarin,N Chakraborty. Dynamic load test of full-scalepile for the construction and rehabilitation of bridges[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,2019,513(1).[106]P G Kossakowski. Recent Advances in Bridge Engineering – Application of Steel Sheet Piles as Durable Structural Elements in Integral Bridges[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,2019,507(1).[107]R Vrayudha,M Iqbal,M Foralisa. Role Analysis and Mandor Functions on Bridge and Building Construction Projects in District Ogan Komering Ulu[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2019,1198(8).[108]Fawen Zhu,Jianfeng Zhou,Tianyi Zhu,Baofeng Li. Construction and structure analysis of Yongshun Bridge in Lichuan[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,267(5).[109]Qin Wang,Qiuxin Liu. Study of Mountainous Long Span Prestressed Concrete Box-Girder Bridge Cantilever Construction Safety Monitoring System Based on Multi-Agent System[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,283(1).[110]Jiang Ziqi,Liu Bingwei. Stability analysis of double x-shape arch bridge during construction[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,267(5).[111]Tiedong Qi,Yantao Du,Bo Peng. Sensitivity Analysis of Cantilever Construction Process of Long-Span Continuous V-Structure Composite Bridge[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2019,267(5).[112]Jie Su,Qian Fang,Dingli Zhang,Xiaokai Niu,Xiang Liu,Yunming Jie,Pier Paolo Rossi. Bridge Responses Induced by Adjacent Subway Station Construction Using Shallow Tunneling Method[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering,2018,2018.[113]Ting-Yu Chen,Lucia Valentina Gambuzza. An Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Compromise Approach with Correlation-Based Closeness Indices for Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis of Bridge Construction Methods[J]. Complexity,2018,2018.[114]Benjamin Kromoser,Thomas Pachner,Chengcheng Tang,Johann Kollegger,Helmut Pottmann,Melina Bosco. Form Finding of Shell Bridges Using the Pneumatic Forming of Hardened Concrete Construction Principle[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering,2018,2018.[115]Lei Yan,Gang Wang,Min Chen,Kefeng Yue,Qingning Li,Belén González-Fonteboa. Experimental and Application Study on Underpinning Engineering of Bridge PileFoundation[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering,2018,2018.[116]Zhifang Lu,Chaofan Wei,Muyu Liu,Xiaoguang Deng,Moacir Kripka. Risk Assessment Method for Cable System Construction of Long-Span Suspension Bridge Based on Cloud Model[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering,2019,2019.[117]Dilendra Maharjan,Elijah Wyckoff,Marlon Agüero,Selene Martinez,Lucas Zhou,Fernando Moreu. Monitoring induced floor vibrations: dance performance and bridge engineering[P]. Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring,2019.[118]Tianshu Li,Devin Harris. Automated construction of bridge condition inventory using natural language processing and historical inspection reports[P]. Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring,2019.以上就是关于桥梁工程英文参考文献的分享，希望对你有所帮助。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
West Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV 26506.
Note. This manuscript was submitted on February 2, 2012; approved on
deformation-induced structural damage and psychological user discomfort from excess bridge vibration. Previous research has shown that de-
flection criterion alone is insufficient in controlling excess bridge vibrations and structural deterioration of the concrete deck. Previous research
bridge, vehicle speed, and surface roughness.
1975; and DeWolf and Kou 1997) investigated bridge vibration
behavior. Human response to vibrations and the effects that vibration
has on the cracking of the concrete deck were examined. The con-
Improved Serviceability Criteria for Steel Girder Bridges
Michael G. Barker, Ph.D., and Karl E. Barth, Ph.D.2
A~bstract: Current AASHTO ,LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Service I deflection limits are in place with the purpose to prevent
was found (Barth et al. 2002).
The AASHTO LRFD Specifications (2012) details general de-
sign principles. Article 2.5.2.6 advises that the maximum defor-
able deflection for pedestrian bridges is that pedestrians are more
1professor, Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming,
Laramie, WY 82070 (corresponding author). E-mail: Barker@
trols the acting flexural strain in the concrete deck to control deformation-induced structural damage. The proposed serviceability criteria are
applied to a database of 185 steel girder bridges. Both the as-built behavior and the design optimized behavior are examined and compared with
vestigated the relationship between service defolxnations and deck
deterioration. These studies did not find any significant correlation.
A collection of studies (Walker and Wright 1971; Aramraks
truck design loading for determining deflections.
Live-Load Deflection Studies
A collection of previous studies (Fountain and Thunman 1987;
Goodpasture and Goodwin 1971; Nevels and Hixon 1973) in-
clusions of these studies were that live-load deflections alone are
insufficient in controlling excessive bridge vibration, and that bridge
vibration behavior is influenced more by the natural frequency of the
were an attempt to limit bridge vibrations. The 1905 American
Railroad Association limited the span-to-depth ratio as an indirect
method of limiting deflections. In the 1930s, the U.S. Bureau of
shows that natural frequency criteria better controls excess vibration than deflection criteria alone. In addition, previous research shows no sig-
nificant correlation between deflection and structrete deck slab. To better control excess bridge vibrations and
plank decks with a superstructure of pony and pin connected trusses
and simple beam bridges. There were no composite beams and few
continuous spans. Ifthe building material was steel, ASTM A7 steel
April 18, 2012; published online on April 20, 2012. Discussion period open
until December 1, 2013; separate discussions must be submitted for in-
dividual papers. This paper is part of the Journa7 of Bridge Engineering,
mation of the bridge should not exceed the (span length)/800 for
general vehicular bridges and the (span length)/l,000 for vehicular
bridges with pedestrian traffic. The reason for the smaller allow-
was the typical grade. The American Association of State Highway
Officials (AASHO) deflection limits first appeared in 1941, partially
because of the results of the Burean of Public Roads Study (Fountain
Author kevwords: Bridge deflections; Bridge vibrations; Bridge serviceability.
Introduction
Deflection limits have their origin from the raih'oad industry and
deformation-induced structural deterioration, two new separate criteria formulations are proposed. The first formulation consists of a natural
frequency criteria transformed into deflection-type terms familiar to the typical bridge engineer. The second proposed formulation directly con-
Vol. 18, No. 7, July t, 2013. ~ASCE, ISSN 1084-0702/2013/7-673-677/
$25.00.
sensitive to bridge vibrations than vehicular passengers. AASHTO
suggests that the service live load does not exceed the AASHTO
and Thunman 1987).
The ASCE (1958) investigated the origins for these service load