【英语】高考英语阅读理解(科普环保)技巧(很有用)及练习题

合集下载
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

【英语】高考英语阅读理解(科普环保)技巧(很有用)及练习题

一、高中英语阅读理解科普环保类

1.犇犇阅读理解

Kaitlin Woolley and Ayelet Fishbach report in Psychological Science that a meal taken "family-style" from a central plate can greatly improve the outcome of later negotiations.

Having conducted previous research in 2017 revealing that eating similar foods led to people feeling emotionally closer to one another, Dr Woolley and Dr Fishbach wondered whether the way in which food was served also had a psychological effect. They theorized that, on the one hand, sharing food with other people might indicate food scarcity(短缺)and increase a feeling of competition. However, they also reasoned that it could instead lead people to become more aware of others' needs and drive cooperative behavior as a result. Curious to find out, they did a series of experiments.

For the first test they recruited 100 pairs of participants from a local cafe, none of whom knew each other. The participants were seated at a table and fed tortilla chips with salsa. Half the pairs were given their own basket of 20 grams of chips and a bowl of 25 grams of salsa, and half were given 40 grams of chips and 50 grams of salsa to share. As a cover for the experiment, all participants were told this snack was to be consumed before the game began.

The game asked the participants to negotiate an hourly wage rate during a fictional strike. Each person was randomly assigned to represent the union or management and follow a set of rules. The researchers measured cooperation by noting the number of rounds it took to reach an agreement, and found that those who shared food resolved the strike significantly faster(in 8. 7rounds)than those who did not(13.2 rounds). A similar experiment was conducted with 104

participants and Goldfish crackers(饼干), this time negotiating an airline's route prices. The results were much the same, with the food-sharers negotiating successfully 63. 3%of the time and those who did not share doing so 42. 9%of the time.

(1)What does the "family-style" meal in the report refer to?

A. A meal taken at home.

B. A meal shared with others.

C. A meal consumed by oneself.

D. A meal taken in a family atmosphere.

(2)For what purpose did the researchers carry out the present experiments?

A. To show the way food is served.

B. To prove sharing food increases competition.

C. To confirm sharing food can promote cooperation.

D. To find out whether sharing food can get people close emotionally.

(3)Why were participants asked to eat up the snack before the game?

A. To add to their energy.

B. To reward them for their participation.

C. To hide the intention of the experiment.

D. To avoid the distraction during the game.

【答案】(1)B

(2)C

(3)C

相关文档
最新文档